Dan Snow's History Hit - Pompeii and the Eruption of Mount Vesuvius
Episode Date: November 28, 2020Pompeii is back in the news. An extraordinary new, touching discovery, found during the Great Pompeii Project of Professor Massimo Osanna and his team. Roughly 700 metres northwest of Pompeii, in the ...remains of a suburban Roman villa, archaeologists have unearthed the incredibly-preserved remains of two men, victims of the infamous eruption of Mount Vesuvius that occurred almost 2,000 years ago in 79 AD.So what do we know about the eruption? What do we know about this terrible event that has left Pompeii with this astonishing legacy? Daisy Dunn came back on the show for this special, emergency podcast to talk through what we know about the eruption and those who witnessed it.Daisy is the author of In The Shadow of Vesuvius: A Tale of Two Plinys. She has also appeared on the Ancients podcast earlier this year, talking about Rome’s most erotic poet Catullus.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hi everybody, welcome to Dan Snow's History Hit. We've got Daisy Dunn on the pod. Daisy
Dunn's been on this podcast before. She's an expert in Pliny, she's an expert in Pompeii,
she's a wonderful scholar who's making waves. This is an episode of our sibling podcast,
The Ancients. Once a week we hand over the channel to either The Ancients or the World
Wars podcast, two of the History Hit podcasts. This one is The Ancients. It's Daisy Dunn
talking about Pompeii. The reason we've done that is because i still noticed in the on the internet this week in the newspapers there've
been some pictures of excavations in pompeii people are talking about pompeii again it's a
story that never goes away so we've got daisy dunn on here on the ancients podcast talking all about
that remarkable place submerged by pumice and ash in the eruption of Vesuvius in 79 AD. Listeners to the podcast will
remember when I went there last year and crawled along some robotiles, some contemporary robotiles,
people that have been nicking stuff, as we speak and listen to this podcast. I was able to crawl
down there and we discovered some extraordinary human remains and fragments of frescoes that
have been chipped off by these robbers. And I would have been the first person, other than the robbers,
to see those in nearly 2,000 years.
Super exciting. Super exciting.
I'm a big Pompeii fan, everyone.
I'm a big Daisy Dunn fan as well, and Tristan, the Tristorian,
who presents this podcast.
So enjoy.
It is the Black Friday weekend at the moment, whatever that means.
The Black Friday weekend, that means that you go to our shop,
HistoryHit shop.
We're selling stuff.
You can buy stuff for all your friends and relatives on there who love history because i'm sure they all do you can get
a history hit dot tv use our best this is our best ever deal it's our best ever deal we only release
it this time of year you go to history hit dot tv you subscribe you get all of the best history
documentaries in the world all the back episodes the podcast all that kind of stuff and you if you
use the code black friday black friday one word, you get a month for free,
and then 80% off your first four months subscription. I mean, it's ridiculous,
really. That takes you through to spring next year. Autumn, if you're living in the Southern
Hemisphere, takes you through to one or other of those. All for just over a pound, a dollar,
a euro a month. It breaks my heart, actually, because it's so cheap.
But enjoy, enjoy, enjoy the Black Friday bonanza if you can.
Go to historyhit.tv, use the code BLACKFRIDAY.
In the meantime, here's the brilliant Tristan and Daisy Dunn.
Daisy Dunn, it's a pleasure to have you back on the show.
Thank you very much for having me.
In this case, Pompeii, it's just been in the news all of this week.
It has. It's one of those great things, Pompeii.
It's kind of forever rising from the dead and from destruction.
I think every other year it seems there's something fantastic being found.
And I think at the moment there's a lot because there's been a great excavation project taking place. There's been something called the Great Pompeii Project
which has been a sort of hugely well-funded project to sort of restore and excavate and
discover what else is under there. And yeah the last week we've had fantastic news of two more
humans being discovered at one of the sites. And do we know anything more about
these two humans at the moment? I know it's a brief. Do we have any real idea about them?
We have a fair idea. And so to put it into context, we found, not we, not me personally, I wish,
two humans have been discovered in an area called Quimita Juliana, which is about 700 metres northwest of Pompeii,
so just outside of the city proper. And it's two men, it's thought, looking at the build of them,
and they look slightly different from one another. So they were found in a little room
off a cryptoporticus, and a cryptoporticus is a long sort of covered walkway in rather a nice villa.
And they were sort of lying down on the ground. And one of them, they think, is probably aged 18
to 25. And people have looked at him and they think that some of his vertebrae in his spine
are quite compressed. And from that, they've said maybe he was involved in
some kind of manual labour. The other man is slightly taller. We're not talking tall here,
I'm thinking I think it's about 162 centimetres or something, which I'm not quite sure, I'm not
very good at my convergence, but I think that's about five foot three, five foot four.
Forgiven.
Yeah. And I think they said that he was slightly older, so aged between about 30 and 40,
And I think they said that he was slightly older, so aged between about 30 and 40, and had a sort of cloak on his body.
And one of the things that's really interesting is to see how the media has kind of reacted to this. And straight away, people have said in the papers, here we've got a man and his slave.
Because looking at these compressed vertebrae, it would be unexpected to find a man who was aged 18 to 25 with that kind of condition
of his body. But having said that, that's quite a conclusion to leap to, isn't it? It's difficult
to say that that's a slave. I mean, it's possible, like a considerable proportion of the population
of Pompeii were slaves, so it's possible. But on that evidence alone, it's very difficult to say
who he was in relation to the older man. And the
other interesting thing is they said, have a look at the older man, he's wearing a cloak, and that's
a piece of evidence of his status and his wealth. And that, again, is very, very sort of problematic
as evidence goes, because what we know, actually, looking at a lot of the bodies which have been
found in Pompeii is that they very often had wooden cloaks on them. If you think about it,
it's really kind of sensible.
You have all this sort of burning pumice falling down on you.
In the middle of an eruption,
you're going to put on your thickest layers and venture out.
You're not going to go out wearing something skimpy,
or you're going to be burned.
So that in itself is very, very difficult, again,
to sort of use as evidence of who this person was.
But the fact is we've got two people who were found there. Their skeletons were buried within the volcanic deposit.
And the archaeologists poured plaster into the deposit left behind by their bodies to preserve their final shapes.
And at least one of these men had his hand in this kind of, we call this pugilistic pose, a sort of boxer pose.
And that's evidence that he died of a result of the sort of
intense heat that was kind of when he was caught up in the pyroclastic flow which buried them
and that's kind of a very common cause of death of a lot of the victims of pompeii is a thermal shock
i find it absolutely astonishing what you're saying there i mean all these new discoveries
that seem to come out of pompeii is said like we see several times a year all these amazing
new discoveries they seem to be telling us so much more about the people and the eruption,
but at the same time, they're also creating all these new questions that we're considering at the
same time. I think this is the classic thing with Pompeii and the general area. You think as soon
as you find something, you think, fantastic, this is going to answer a load of these mysteries that we still have hanging over our sort of 2000 years later but actually almost every new piece
of evidence that comes to light actually just throws up a dozen more questions and sort of
complicates the picture even further but that's what I think what makes this area of history just
so interesting because you can never find the absolute answer there's always something that
leads you into another path and as a historian historian, that's what you love. You love these sort of
never-ending labyrinths that you can sort of enter into and kind of interpret in new ways
and kind of build up a bigger picture from what's coming to light all the time.
Absolutely, absolutely. And just sticking a bit longer on this new discovery before going on to
the eruption itself, we have this new discovery. And just to confirm, this isn't in Pompeii itself. It's nearby Pompeii.
It's nearby. So I think it's about 700 metres northwest of sort of central Pompeii. So there
was a lot of villas, larger villas in the surrounding area. And I think one thing,
when we're thinking about Pompeii, we think of it very much as sort of an urban centre,
but actually it was very, very heavily involved in agriculture.
Lots of people had orchards and farms, people were growing food.
So it was quite a rustic area in some ways.
I mean, we have sort of people with rustic outbuildings,
people with their own wine presses, all of this going on at the same time.
So it's not quite the sort of picture of this,
you know, very neat little city that you might have in mind. It's sort of a little bit more sprawling and spacious than that. Well, you mentioned wine culture, you mentioned agriculture,
and you mentioned all these villas surrounding Pompeii there. And let's then look at Pompeii
just before the eruption, because from what you're saying, and from what the archaeology
seems to suggest, this was a thriving centre for trade
for viticulture, for agricultural trade. Very much so, yes. People were sort of contributing to
the sort of trade and market by growing things such as figs. Figs were very popular in Pompeii
and Herculaneum. Cabbages were grown here. About a century before the eruption, Pompeii was a great centre for producing
sticky fish sauce. We might have heard of this garum, rather a foul thing, which they sort of
poured on everything, but like our ketchup today, sort of fermented fish, basically is what went
into it. And they sort of made this in these large vats. But what we know is that in Pompeii,
this was quite popular at the time, but then it was sort of superseded by industries elsewhere.
So particularly in Bilo Claudia in southern Spain, they had this vast processing plant for fermented fish products there.
So Pompeii's industry in that area kind of waned.
So by the time of the eruption, its focus was very, very much on viticulture.
And I think it's really interesting when you look at one of the really iconic wall paintings that's come out of Pompeii.
You have a picture of what's very probably Vesuvius
and you have the wine god Bacchus
and he's actually wearing this very sort of funky grape outfit
and he's sort of presiding over all these vineyards
and you can see all these vines growing all the way up Vesuvius.
And I think when you look at that picture, you think this is not the picture you have in mind.
You look at Vesuvius today, you think of it as being in this very, very virulent, quite frightening
place when you look at the volcano in itself. It's a real sort of force. But I think when you look at
that picture, you see it through the eyes of the people who were living in Pompeii at that time.
you see it through the eyes of the people who were living in Pompeii at that time.
We have a source, for example, describing it as a vineyard-covered mountain.
That was how it was seen. It was seen to be green.
It was a place of great abundance and fertility, and people were growing vines there.
This was very much the prime place where wine was being produced.
It was the main source of wine production for Rome, supplying Rome in this period, for example. And obviously the eruption devastated that, you know, that whole
sort of source of its prosperity really fell away with the eruption. So that was a really,
a real turning point in the history of Pompeii. And talking about it sort of being a place of
great prosperity, at the same time, I think it's really important to bear in mind that about 16, 17 years prior to the eruption, it suffered a really devastating earthquake.
So that's in the year AD 63. And so when we look at the remains of Pompeii today,
you're seeing lots of fantastic things left behind. You're also seeing evidence that the
city was sort of very much being rebuilt in the period. So when it was
destroyed finally by Vesuvius, there were still things which were unfinished and things which
were being recovered and sort of remade after this earlier devastation.
It's amazing, you said, from that wall painting and everything, to have an idea of what the Romans
thought of Vesuvius, what the Pompeians thought of Vesuvius before the eruption. Because from what
you're saying, it sounds like it had this association with wine growing. Did they know that it was a
dangerous volcano? Did they have any idea of this at all? I believe not, actually. I mean,
I'm going on particular, that description I just gave of it being a vineyard covered mountain,
that came from the natural history of Pliny the Elder, who was a great encyclopedist, who's also admiral of
the fleet nearby in the Bay of Naples at this time. And there's no evidence that I found anyway
in any of the ancient sources where anyone's describing this as a volcano. And what's really
interesting is the same figure, Pliny the Elder, he described lots of the volcanoes of the world
within this reference book that he wrote, The Natural History, and he did not include
Vesuvius in that volcano section at all. And what we now know, thanks to scientific analysis of the
area, is that Vesuvius had been dormant for about 700 years before it erupted in AD 79. So there's
absolutely no reason why anyone would have expected it to be anything other than
this wonderfully fertile green mountain. I guess this also explains why there seem to be so many
elaborate villas, perhaps in ancient Roman Beverly Hills, stretch all along the side of Vesuvius.
Yes, exactly. I mean, you'd think that if people were aware of it, they might have been slightly
more cautious. I say that, but then look at it today. Again, it's very, very closely, very, very built up again.
And I think, you know, there is that real sort of interesting fact
that people were and are prepared to live within a danger zone.
I think that's very much built into the Roman mindset as well.
I think it's interesting when you look at some of the decorations
of these villas, for example, you find in one of them at least a wonderful mosaic in the dining room of a skeleton.
He's holding two bottles of wine.
And it's very much this idea that people are living with an awareness that death can come at any time.
It's a real sort of carpe diem attitude and almost a sort of willingness just to sort of embrace that
and to accept that that is part of life, is this sort of realisation that death can come at any time.
So you wonder actually whether they, if they did know that it was an active volcano and could blow at any moment, whether they'd have done things any differently.
I'm not 100% sure that they would have done.
100%. Was it worth the risk as it were, as you said, if it hadn't been active for 700 years or so?
as you said, if it hadn't been active for 700 years or so. And Daisy, you mentioned just there the other main P word of this discussion, plinny, because for the eruption itself,
we've got this amazing archaeology, but we're also gifted with this brilliant contemporary
literary source of the eruption. Yes, we are incredibly lucky when it comes to the eruption of Vesuvius to have one or the two eyewitness accounts of the eruption itself.
And this is two letters which are written by Pliny the Younger, who was 17 years old when Vesuvius erupted.
So a mid boy, really.
And his uncle was Pliny the Elder who wrote the encyclopedia. And the uncle had a villa somewhere near Vesuvius, a place called Mycenaeum, which is about 30 kilometres away from the volcano.
And Pliny the Younger was staying with his uncle and his mother at this villa when the eruption began.
And I don't know if you want me to go into this whole story now.
Go on, absolutely. Don't worry. You can, we can.
So obviously, it's one of my favourite stories coming out of the ancient world, because it's true.
The elder pinny was alerted by his sister to this amazing cloud which was rising in the distance.
That's all they saw at the beginning, it was early afternoon.
And he wanted to go and have a closer look at it.
So he sort of got his shoes, had a look and thought,
I really, really want to go and inspect this at closer quarters bear in mind he's you know a natural scientist is writing this great
monumental encyclopedia he's a very curious man he wants to see what's going on and as he's also
admiral of the fleet he has this whole fleet at his disposal so he says to his nephew I'm going
to go and have a look would you like to come with me and the 17 year old boy says no I'd rather stay at home with with mum and get on with my my research my studies so he stays with
his books it's very unusual to unexpected choice maybe but um ultimately a sensible one so the
elder pliny goes off with the fleet and he sails across the Bay of Naples and as this happens this cloud starts to rain
pumice down upon him and this pumice flow gets gets heavier and heavier and ultimately the
pumice gets so thick that it actually forms kind of masses on the water so Plinio de Aldo can't
actually go to the place where he wanted to he'd actually received just before he left a message
from a friend of his who said, she was
just basically begging him for help. She said, we can't get out, you know, please bring help.
So Pliny the Elder doesn't seem to be able to reach her. So he continues and puts in where he
can, which is at Stabiae, which is about 16 kilometres from the volcano. And he meets up
with a friend there and he kind of lives out the rest of the
eruption at that site. And all of this information comes to us from these two letters, which were
written to the historian Tacitus by his nephew, who meanwhile is kind of witnessing the whole
thing, but from slightly further away at Mycenae. You mentioned the Pumice Storm just then. The
Pumice Storm, is this one of the first real visible indications that the eruption is starting?
Yes, it is. And it's immediately unclear to people and clearly to the two plinies what this is. It's
a cloud. The young plinie compares it to an umbrella pine tree in its shape. It's sort of
that kind of shape, that kind of trunk, and then the kind of branches coming out of the top and the pumice it starts off quite white it turns gradually more grey
and heavier I mean it went on for hours and hours and hours and this is kind of what becomes really
problematic when Pliny the Elder actually meets up with his friends where he where he is at Stabii
and their whole villa is actually being sort of rained
upon so heavily that they realize that if they don't leave that villa now they won't be able to
later because the pumice gets so high outside their doorway they're actually going to be sealed
into the villa so they have to escape that way and presumably other people were actually sort of you
know reined in entirely by by this pumice flow and you know, that's kind of followed by these pyroclastic
flows and surges and the layers build up and up and up.
Well, just keep on that for the moment. So as Pliny Ildi is travelling across the bay
towards Stabiae on his own quest, on his own journey, at the same time, the pumice cloud is,
I'm guessing it's also raining at this time down on pompeii
and for several hours it is yes suddenly when you look at different cities and towns in the area
they all seem to experience this slightly differently so the pumice for herculaneum for
example isn't heavy at all at pompeii it seems to get heavier into the next morning so it goes on
probably till about 7 a.am I think so it's something
that people haven't experienced before and it causes as it gets heavier buildings to to fall
down and you've got to bear in mind at the same time as this you've got earthquakes going on so
there's a whole sort of situation of various things happening at once and obviously causing
confusion and panic well confusion and panic it must have felt like the end of the world.
Do we have any evidence at this time that there seemed to be, with the people of Pompeii,
a mass exodus from the city as they see all this occurring around them, all this Armageddon?
We think that a lot of people did actually manage to escape in time. I mean, this is one of the
million dollar questions again for classists today is how many people died and how many people survived, how many people got away from the eruption.
And so far, it's been a question, again, an answer that's eluded us.
People still actually sort of dispute how many people lived in Pompeii at this time.
This is something which is hotly contested.
I'd say somewhere in the region of 10,000 to 15,000 of the number of bodies we found,
somewhere between 1,000 and 1,200. So that would suggest that the vast majority managed to get out.
But bear in mind that not all of Pompeii has been excavated yet. We've got two more found this week.
You've then got sort of areas of Pompeii where you found evidence of people actually trying to
escape. There's an area, for example, called,
I think it's called the Garden of the Fugitives. And this is kind of almost a vineyard type area.
And it has sort of 13 people were found there. And they seem to have been probably trying to
get towards one of the gates when they were overwhelmed by volcanic matter. So it's very,
very difficult to say who got away and who didn't. But I think, you know, there is good evidence that the people did manage to, in the early stages of the eruption, elude the worst that was to come. Whereas other people who maybe were more frail or more infirm or simply sort of reluctant to give up their property, you know, prefer to stay where they were and probably the two that have just been found, the fact that they were in a cryptoporticus in a kind of covered area suggests maybe they thought they were going to be safer
there sort of taking shelter under a building than sort of actually going out into the open
and being rained on by all of the pumice and by the ash and everything that followed.
So is that something that we're seeing in the archaeology over the years and including this
most recent find from Pompeii and the surrounding area that we're seeing a lot of the bodies of the people, the unfortunate victims of this natural disaster, they were trying to find
places of safety underground or in shelter as what they thought? I think very much so. I think
a case in point is that through much of our history, people thought that most people from
Herculaneum, for example, had managed to escape. And it was only in the 80s the early 80s that people realized they came across all these boat
stores near the shore where they found hundreds of skeletons where people had taken cover in these
kind of archways very very narrow archways and until that time people thought you know that not
many bodies had been found in Herculaneum and clearly everyone got out. But that was only 40 years ago.
It's not that long ago that they suddenly came across all these hundreds of human remains,
all crowded together, trying to obviously seek safety in a very covered, sheltered area.
It's just unfortunate that that kind of situation would not have saved them
from the absolutely catastrophic heat of the pyroclastic
flows and people would have died upon impact with the heat i think when you read the scientific
descriptions of how those people would have died it's it's incredibly grim yeah incredibly so and
you mentioned it there the pyroclastic flow we've got to really talk about that the end product of
this eruption as it were so after the pumice cloud this early morning this early morning it seems this must have been a morning like no other it
mustn't have felt like a morning it must have been completely dark yes i mean one of the fantastic
descriptions that plinny the younger left behind is he he likens it he says it's like night but
it's darker than any night it's he's it's like sitting in a study where someone's switched out
the lamp or blown out the lamp you know in a darkened room so to be in a situation it's been darker than any other
morning known to man i mean it defies belief you i mean that's such a kind of poignant description
i think you read that you think god and that really must have been terrifying and obviously
no electricity then very very limited light people were carrying torches to try and guide their way outside.
But it's frightening at the same time, Pliny the Younger, even though he's 30 kilometres away,
he's terrified of being trampled by the crowds who are trying to make their escape.
I mean, that seems a legitimate worry.
It's not let alone sort of all of the volcanic matter that's around.
It's the actual sort of force of the people that poses a risk to life.
Yeah, so what is Pliny witnessing at Mycenae at this time,
a bit further away from the volcano you mentioned?
So he's seeing all of these people making their way through the city?
He is. He's seeing huge crowds of panicking people.
I mean, he can only really imagine how bad it is that much closer to the volcano.
He doesn't know if his uncle is dead or alive.
In the course of his escape, he actually bumps into one of the friends of his uncle,
who says to him, his mother, why are you still here?
I mean, if your uncle was here, he'd be telling you to get away.
If he's dead, he'd want you to survive him.
So he kind of hastens them along, and they kind of begin on a sort of chariot ride through this,
and they realise they have to get sort of chariot ride through this and
they realize they have to get off and continue their journey by foot because it's the only way
they can do it but they're seeing absolutely incredible things I mean at one point the the
sea seems to be kind of sucked back into itself Pliny the Anger says and we're not quite sure
whether this is just in a further effect of the eruption or whether it's beginning of a tsunami
but he sees all this kind of like stranded sea life you know in its wake i mean the whole thing is beyond words in many ways i
mean reading these letters or you kind of get breathless like reading this and trying to imagine
what it was like in those really really desperate moments is that one of the things and yourself
being such an esteemed roman historian when you're trying to look at look at these works of figures
like catullus or Foplini,
when they're writing these amazing, amazing works,
trying to get into their minds, perhaps, or what they were seeing at that time,
but what they were thinking from our 21st century mindset,
it must be one of the most difficult things out there.
It is, it is. It's really difficult.
Because I think you forget there's a real kind of risk, I think, with this period in history
when you look at things like the casts which have just been produced of these two dead people
or any of the others which have been found to date.
And you see them and you think, oh, wow, isn't that amazing?
There's kind of this sort of slightly lurid aspect to it.
Or you look at them almost as works of art.
And you kind of forget that these are the remains of real people and what they've been
through and I think when you read the letters of the younger Pliny in conjunction with all the
sort of archaeological evidence you have to kind of appreciate that these people were going through
something which like none of them had ever anticipated before. And the kind of descriptions that Pranayama gives,
he says that people start to kind of elaborate what was happening.
People kind of magnify it.
People say, kind of paint a worse picture in some situations of the destruction
than is actually occurring.
And other people kind of trying to make sense of it,
that people will talk about giants trampling the landscapes.
There are descriptions by other historians of people in Rome, to make sense of it that people will talk about giants trampling the landscapes there are
descriptions by other historians of of people in rome and people you think in rome the sky was went
all dark people had no idea what was happening there either people were thinking that this was
the end of the world i mean what would you say if you're not in pompeii and we focus so much on
on pompeii and on the bay of Naples that's the epicenter of this
but to people that much further away the impact was still felt miles and miles and miles hundreds
of miles away even in in North Africa and Syria the dust from the volcano was said to have reached
these places as well I think you've got to try and put yourself in in the head of those people
as well where you've got no kind of information coming to you. You've just got these strange kind of happenings in the sky
above. What do you say to yourself? What do you imagine? I mean, I think the only explanation
you could give would be that this was the end of the world.
More from the ancients and Daisy Dunn after this. We uncover the epic stories that inspire Assassin's Creed. We're stepping into feudal Japan in our special series, Chasing Shadows,
where samurai warlords and shinobi spies teach us the tactics and skills needed
not only to survive, but to conquer.
Whether you're preparing for Assassin's Creed Shadows
or fascinated by history and great stories,
listen to Echoes of History, a Ubisoft podcast brought to you by History Hits.
There are new episodes every week.
Absolutely.
And then you can also, I guess, you think the sounds as well,
the completely unusual sounds that they would have heard, whether you're on Pompeii,
and then obviously you have no more chance after that, but if you were in Mycena or whatever.
And once again, it must really emphasise this idea that they could have thought that this was
the end of the world as they knew it. Yeah, you're completely right. I mean,
with the sounds as well, that's one thing that really comes, I think, across when you read
these Eyewitness accounts.
You get descriptions of people calling to their loved ones, the wailing of children, trying to sort of make out each other's voices in this kind of melee of people trying to escape.
And when I was writing about this, I was really struck by the parallel.
I was really struck by the parallel.
It just seems so similar in many ways, this description to when you read Aeneid,
the Aeneid by Virgil, where he describes what it's like in the underworld.
Essentially, he describes all these infants weeping at their mother's breasts and things like this.
And the description's really remarkably similar.
And it is almost like they've kind of entered this hell, as described by the poets.
We're talking about the Aeneid.
Keeping on that just quickly, because one of the things I found really interesting from your book,
The Plinies on this, was the parallel, as it were, between Pliny and his mother in Mycenaeum
and that of Aeneas and his own mother trying to escape Troy.
I mean, that's remarkable in itself.
Yeah, it's incredible.
I think this is one thing
that you really warm to this 17 year old boy um his mother says you must go on without me she said
I'll slow you down please escape and save yourself don't don't save me but the younger
pony says no no no and he he kind of takes her by the hand and ensures that they escape together
I mean this really evokes to a classist description in The Aeneid
where they're trying to escape from burning Troy
and Aeneas actually loses his mother
because just in the confusion of people leaving.
Again, you've got this whole sort of band of refugees desperate to escape
and he loses her and it's just a devastating thing.
You almost kind of see Pliny the Anger trying desperately just to stop you know stop himself from repeating the mistake
of Aeneas. And as Pliny and his mother are and Pliny's trying to make sure he doesn't repeat
the mistake of Aeneas as they're trying to flee from Mycenae in this same morning is this roughly
the same time that the devastating pyroclastic flow hits
the people of Pompeii who are still in that city? Yes. So we know, we think there are about six
pyroclastic surges and Pompeii experiences several of these, but I think there are two
which are very, very significant. The first of these seems to have kind of quite a limited effect
on the city, but it's the second one which seems to absolutely kind of quite a limited effect on the city.
But it's the second one which seems to absolutely devastate and kill anyone who's still remaining there.
And certainly the two people just found seem to have died.
They can tell this by looking in the nature of the kind of sediment.
These two people seem to have died in that second pyroclastic flow,
which was kind of just so much material just being deposited on top of the the city it's just monumental this that the whole effect of this
was beyond words it changed the whole kind of shoreline of of this part of the world it pushed
it out i think that's one of the confusing things when you visit pompeii and you visit herculaneum
you you forget that actually originally before this eruption they were a lot closer to the water especially
when you look at Herculaneum you see these boat arches where people were trying to take cover you
think these boat arches I mean it seems ages you know from from the water but it's just the whole
coastline is different it's changed as a result of this eruption I mean the effects of this are
just absolutely massive it's almost inconceivable today well let I mean, the effects of this are just absolutely massive.
It's almost inconceivable today.
Well, let's keep on the effects then for a bit.
You mentioned how the coastline seems to change with the eruption. It was one of the greatest and long-lasting effects
of the Vesuvius eruption.
The whole layout, shall we say, of Campania, the region of Campania.
Yeah, it changes.
It just has a different um feel to it
afterwards and I think when you rediscover the these great villas you have to bear in mind that
most of them have these wonderful sea views which again today you can't really appreciate necessarily
particularly I mean when you look at Herculaneum Herculaneum I think is absolutely fascinating
it should be visited just as much as Pompeii in in some ways it's easier to get a sense of it as an ancient bustling town
than it is Pompeii because it's that much smaller. I think its population was only probably about
five to six thousand, so probably about half the size of Pompeii. But it's a lot wealthier
in many ways. The villas which are found there are absolutely monumental. And one of them has
the oldest library surviving from the Graeco-Roman world and sort of the biggest collection of
statues found anywhere in Greece or Rome. And they were these great maritime villas,
and you just don't get that kind of sense of them today necessarily.
And you mentioned it right there herculaneum steviae
these other places that are affected by the eruption but daisy why is it when we think of
the vesuvius eruption why is it that pompeii is the town that we almost always think of why pompeii
rather than the herculaneum or any of the others i think a lot of it has to do with the fact that it's been so celebrated by writers and by artists.
I mean, everyone from Edward Ball Lytton
to Robert Harris has written of Pompeii
and sort of the last days there.
Fantastic books coming out of it.
And I think because it was well excavated quite early on,
sort of from, particularly sort of from the 18th century, but particularly in the 19th century, a lot of these bodies were found there.
So it seemed more human, and I think it has something to do with the human aspect of it.
Herculaneum actually began to be excavated slightly earlier than Pompeii.
But as I said, we didn't really have the discovery of human remains at that early stage in the same degree as we did in Pompeii.
I think with Pompeii, I mean, there's just so much to see there in terms of daily life that you're just immediately surprised by the fact that people had shops, for example, at the front of their villas, that people had a kind of laundrette, the philonica.
the front of their villas that people had a kind of laundrette the philonica um that you know there were about 30 bakeries or something there and it just you can really imagine it as a fully
functioning town and i think people like to almost draw that parallel between their own kind of town
and and pompeii uh and i think i mean i i personally say that there's you can just as well
do that with with herculeanium and with Stabion and with some of these other places.
But I just think that Pompeii, just because there's so much there,
it's so much bigger, I think, than you anticipate when you visit.
And it was subject, from what you're saying there,
to some remarkable archaeological excavations during the 19th century.
Particularly in the 19th century.
I think a lot happened in the 19th century.
I mean, initially it was discovered by accident and people sort of you know engineers trying to dig canals that
sort of thing but standard yeah standard sort of stuff um but in the 19th century it kind of came
into its own because uh that's when we got a sort of a new archaeologist came along called fiorelli
and he was the one who masterminded this whole technique of how to preserve the shapes of the ancient dead so he's the one who said oh look I've left a deposit we can pour plaster into the
cavity left in the in the kind of volcanic deposit and then preserve the shapes of of these ancient
people and that's where we get all these sort of casts from that we've seen before so that was kind
of an exciting time initially I have to say sort of a lot of the
early excavations looking sort of prior to that period in particular very very slapdash like
really really badly done people kind of going in and raiding and taking out the kind of wall
paintings cutting stuff out and actually causing more damage than than good I mean it's almost
comparable to Schliemann in in Troy it's really, really made a mess of the situation.
I think that's one of the situations,
one of the explanations really for why people often ask me today,
well, why aren't we excavating more of Pompeii and Herculaneum?
Because so much of both these places remains covered over.
But actually archaeologists today have to focus a lot
on trying to shore up and preserve what they have actually uncovered
because a lot of these places are very very fragile and part is as a result of tunnelling and stuff that's happened
you know for centuries earlier we've got evidence of people tunnelling even before that they either
of these places were officially excavated I mean this probably began in Roman times themselves I
mean what we know is that people actually returned to the site after the eruption
and people did kind of break into homes and steal treasures that were sort of remaining there.
I mean, this kind of began from the very beginning and it kind of continued through history.
So this whole kind of history of looting very much accompanies the history of Pompeii.
Wow. I didn't know anything about that whatsoever.
The picture in my mind was that this
was just so many layers of ash that no one would have been able to get through at all but from what
you're saying that there was looting throughout history of this site. Yeah it happened I think
certainly I think there's evidence from the 14th century even of people starting to tunnel through
some of this kind of concretized material obviously very very difficult and I think there
were probably areas of Pompeii and Herculean which were easier to access than others. Obviously, there were parts
which were completely covered under metres and metres and metres, which no one was going to get
to. But at the same time, people were dropping treasure and all kinds of things. We know,
looking at the cast, people kind of gathered up bags of money, bags of jewellery, people put on
as many rings and things as they could to try and escape. But obviously things were dropped in the process. All kinds of things were discovered as part of the excavation
process where you see people trying to make off of their livelihood as much as possible. But
this left the door open for other people to come in and try and make the most of.
And Daisy, the surviving art and architecture and the shape of the bodies themselves of those who unfortunately perished in this natural disaster almost 2,000 years ago, they must give us an invaluable insight into the people of Pompeii, their lifestyle, what they were doing, etc, etc.
They do, yes. I mean, I think this comes with a note of caution, which I think all historians have to give, which is whenever you look at these casts,
and there's been a great history of people looking at them thinking,
oh, look, that person looks like they're hugging their friend,
or look, are these two maidens?
And actually scientific analysis later, years later,
discovered that these are two men.
It's very difficult.
Some of the shapes actually preserved by this kind of process
of casting these people in plaster,
they've actually sort of incorporated other bits and bobs,
other kind of cloaks and all kinds of things
and given a kind of a false impression
of what's actually underneath them.
They can sometimes tell quite a kind of confusing story,
but other times you have quite a clear picture.
I mean, when you see people huddled together,
obviously trying to comfort each other
in their final moments,
you can't help but be touched by that.
And those stories, I I mean they don't really
need words they kind of speak for themselves you see them together you see children clearly much
smaller figures with their their parents being completely helpless and kind of just you know
absolutely knocked back by the force of of the eruption and it is devastating I mean I think I
you know I just try and sort of remind everyone who looks at these people that this isn't some, like, fantastic sight,
and I think it's a very sort of Victorian thing,
particularly it was popular in the Victorian period,
and a lot of people kind of played this up almost,
almost like a fairground effect.
You know, people looked at this almost as a sort of source of amusement
and entertainment, but it's really a very tragic human story
at the end of the day.
Land a Viking longship on island shores,
scramble over the dunes of ancient Egypt
and avoid the Poisoner's Cup in Renaissance Florence.
Each week on Echoes of History,
we uncover the epic stories that inspire Assassin's
Creed. We're stepping into feudal Japan in our special series, Chasing Shadows, where samurai
warlords and shinobi spies teach us the tactics and skills needed not only to survive, but to
conquer. Whether you're preparing for Assassin's Creed Shadows or fascinated by history and great
stories,
listen to Echoes of History, a Ubisoft podcast brought to you by History Hits.
There are new episodes every week.
Absolutely, absolutely. Well, talking about hotly debated topics and slightly confusing issues surrounding this whole period of ancient history, Daisy,
quite recent archaeology has made suggestions that the traditional date surrounding the eruption of Vesuvius in 79 AD may not be as accurate as we first thought.
No, this is another, we were talking earlier about this
sort of confusion that's caused by excavations thinking we hope this is going to answer our
questions but actually throws up a dozen more questions. The date has been another of those
big, big dilemmas and sort of question marks that hangs over the eruption. When did Vesuvius erupt in the year AD 79? The confusion really basically comes down to
the fact that these eyewitness accounts of Pliny the Younger are preserved in various manuscripts
and when scholars were reading them a long time ago they decided that they said that the eruption happened on the 24th of August 79 AD and this is one of many dates
preserved in the manuscript but kind of textually it looked the most secure so people went with that
for ages but then archaeologists started to look at the evidence and they said well hang on a minute
there's a lot of evidence here to suggest that the eruption happened far deeper into the year
than August. I mean for a
start you've got people in wooden cloaks but as I said that's not really evidence because people
are covering themselves up. Then there are evidence of pomegranates, people having harvested wine
already which isn't traditionally done by that date in August. There is evidence of all kinds
of things,
all these sort of fruits and vegetables which aren't necessarily sort of harvested
at that time of year,
all being around then.
So people say it must have happened
later into autumn.
And other things have come to light.
So at some stage,
someone found a coin,
a silver denarius, which was there.
And someone read it and thought,
this is very exciting
because this coin seems to say September.
So that would suggest that it happened post-September.
But then they reread this coin legend a couple of years ago
and discovered that the first person who read it actually read it wrong
and it couldn't be used as evidence after all.
It was probably minted in July or August, so no help to us whatsoever.
Then a few years ago, someone found an inscription.
It's part of the latest excavation very very
exciting he found an inscription in charcoal which mentions the date 17th of october and it's just
this sort of silly piece of graffiti talking about someone sort of eating too much or something i ate
too much on the 17th of october so that suggests that it happened after the 17th of october because
i mean and sort of fairly recently afterwards, because charcoal
doesn't really survive long. You'd have thought if it rained or anything else, it would have
disappeared. But at the same time, it doesn't give us a date at all. So now people are looking at
other pieces of evidence. So people look, for example, at the dispersal of the evidence,
and that seems to suggest that the wind was blowing in a southeasterly direction.
And that doesn't generally happen in
August. So I would say most evidence suggests it's into October, at least, in 79 AD. And it's not
that Pliny was necessarily wrong about this. I think it was to do with the manuscript tradition
of it being kind of the date, going with the wrong date, essentially going with the date in that
particular manuscript when they could have chosen one of these other dates. So I think October is probably a more probable
date for the eruption. But I think one thing that interests me, and one thing that I would say is,
this isn't a question of it happening in summer versus autumn. You've got to bear in mind,
Pliny the Elder, a great encyclopedist who died in the eruption, he said that autumn began on the 8th or the 11th of August.
So whichever way you look at it, this is an autumn event.
So, I mean, that's how I see it.
I just love what you're saying.
I just love how some of the smallest archaeological finds,
whether it be a coin or whether it be these fruits, these pomegranates,
I mean, that in itself is extraordinary organic material and how things as small as that can
completely alter what people have thought for decades or even centuries yeah yeah it can and
i think that's the thing the more that comes to light the more people are going to question it
and try and who knows maybe there will be another inscription at some point which will give us a more accurate date but it seems at this stage unlikely at least it's more
that we're getting building up a jigsaw as so often with this from looking at things like
pomegranates that that's what you know what we're working with at this stage talking about the
effects of the eruption in in sense 90 especially for the romans and we've talked about it earlier
that there seems to be a lot of people who perhaps were able to get out before the main eruption of the eruption in since 19, especially for the Romans. And we've talked about it earlier that
there seems to be a lot of people who perhaps were able to get out before the main eruption,
before the devastation really occurred. But do we know much? I mean, this seems really
extraordinary and amazing. But do we know much about the survivors of Vesuvius, as it were?
The survivor we know most about is the Younger Pliny, because he's our only sort of
person that we know the identity of, who wrote about the eruption. But we get sort of snippets
in other authors as well of what this meant, what the eruption meant for the people of Naples,
and even for people living further afield. I mean, one poet, for example, called Statius,
further afield. I mean, one poet, for example, called Statius, he comments on, he says, I mean,
will people ever believe what happened when these fields grow green again? Will people actually know what's buried beneath it? And what's really striking is that a lot of vegetation appears to
kind of recover and grow back within about 20 years of the eruption, which really isn't long
at all. And there's evidence of
people going back there and that the area kind of regained its reputation for fertility and
abundance and agriculture. I mean, so much so that the younger Pliny, his wife became quite unwell,
probably as a result of a miscarriage. And the one place she chose to go to to try and recover
was Campania. And you think actually she could have
gone anywhere and Pliny the Younger had loads of villas all over Italy. She could have gone to any
one of those but no she went to this area which had traditionally had this reputation for being
a place of great health benefits. And it's astonishing to me that within 20 years it had
regained that reputation. That said you get descriptions of sort of the more immediate aftermath where we hear of people
suffering terribly from this kind of pestilence which developed as a result of sort of the
the volcanic material and people getting ill as a result of maybe going back and maybe breathing in
a lot of the dust which had settled so it was quite unpleasant obviously as an area afterwards
it wasn't really habitable
to the kind of extent that it had been. Certainly, when we hear of the emperor at the time, Titus
actually rushes down there and tries to kind of put together a rescue attempt and try and salvage
what buildings he can. And so to make sure that the privy purse doesn't really benefit from this
natural disaster. And there's kind of, you know, some senators who try and put things back together
as much as he can. But obviously, that's not possible. The fact that we're still working on this today is testament to that, really.
But I think that's the most surprising thing for me is how quickly this area kind of recovered, at least in the popular imagination.
It is quite interesting to think, isn't it, if someone who was able to escape Pompeii, a citizen of Pompeii, managed to escape it when the eruption occurred,
who was able to escape Pompeii, a citizen of Pompeii, managed to escape it when the eruption occurred, could possibly go back 20 years or so later and see so much of it, well, the greenery
of the area back as it was before the eruption. It's astonishing, isn't it? And I think it's also
the bravery. It kind of goes back to what we were discussing earlier. And this doesn't seem to have
had a kind of, I mean, it's always really hard to say this with Roman sources, but I mean, Pliny the Younger doesn't seem to be mentally scarred by this. He's not worried,
especially for his wife going to this area in particular. He's not worrying there's going to
be another, you know, terrible disaster, which could happen at any time. This doesn't seem to be
a concern. It's more that people see that the benefits of the area outweigh the risks.
And I think that's really interesting.
It says something about the mindset.
And how does witnessing the eruption of Vesuvius affect Pliny,
apart from what you've just mentioned there, for the rest of his life?
I think, well, that is the other really surprising thing.
I mean, I don't get the impression that it does.
I don't think it, I mean, you'd think this would stay with you. You're 17 years old. Your uncle has died. He seems to have suffocated on the beach at Stabiai when he was there trying to escape. Pliny the Younger writes about these things probably 25 to 30 years after the events when Tacitus asks for a description of them.
asks for a description of them. And he seems incredibly level-headed in the way he describes them. And what we know with him is that within nine months of the eruption, he's actually embarked
upon his career. And we find him in Rome. He's joined this court and becomes a young junior
lawyer. I mean, that doesn't seem like the action of someone who is so kind of shaken up by the
disaster that he's not having
to sort of but that's again that's not a really roman thing is it's not a very sort of stoic way
of thinking about it i mean i think it's it's a very modern reading to assume that everyone would
have been you know in some ways of really really shaken by this and unable to live their lives
in the same way that they had before i mean obviously that must have happened to people
who lost loved ones, their lives could
not have been the same again. But we just we don't find that in the sources.
Do we have any other snippets from others? And you mentioned one earlier, but do we have any
other snippets from later Roman writers who are recalling the events of Vesuvius and Pompeii and
the aftermath? Or does Pliny, does he really stand out above the rest for the description?
He very much, I mean, he's alone really with that description. I mean, it's astonishing that we just
don't really have anything else. What we know is that he wrote these two letters to Tacitus because
Tacitus wanted to incorporate some of the information into what was probably his histories.
But that part of the book, unfortunately, so we might have had you know a whole
load more and it would have been really interesting to see what Tassius did with that information and
how he incorporated it into his own storytelling but we just don't find anything like it really
we find little bits and bobs here and there we find Cassius Dio for example talking about the
eruption happening he says it happens in late autumns again that's another indication of the timing but we just don't find this really you know detailed description of what was going on and
of the course of events the rest of the story is very much told to us by what's on the ground and
what's continuing to come out of the ground and you mentioned continuing to come out of the ground
now do you think this latest find really emphasizes and we said it right at the start of the chat how pompeii and the area surrounding pompeii it's just got all this
on one level horrible but on the other level extraordinary archaeology remaining to be
uncovered that can tell us so much about this period in ancient history exactly i think i mean
looking at something like this it's just so exciting especially when you think i think this is the same area where, I don't know if you remember, I think it was about three years ago, they found some horses with their harnesses still in place.
And that was all in the newspapers as well. And you just think this is a story which is still evolving.
And the fact that such sort of important finds are coming up with fair regularity is really significant. And, you know, I think it's
only right that they still continue to find their place in our media today, because they are
incredibly important events. And they're filling in a story, which we all think we know so well,
but in many ways, we don't. I think with everything that comes up, there's always
more questions to be asked. You get a sort of another perspective
on things. I mean, looking at the art, for example, as well, that's coming out the last few years,
a lot of the artwork is showing us sort of representations of myths, which we hadn't
really seen so much of before, you know, quite sort of risque pictures a lot of the time,
and just very surprising things which tell us as much about life really as they do about death.
It is absolutely extraordinary and there are those places in the Roman Empire like over 2,000 years
ago that really seem to strike out Pompeii being one of them my mind instantly starts to think of
the Vindolanda excavations as well with the tablets that they continue to reveal more about
the daily life of these people on the frontier, in Saint-Pompeii and elsewhere. It is extraordinary, these sites,
exactly from what you were saying there,
in showing how this might have occurred almost 2,000 years ago,
but we are still, every year, every half year,
uncovering so much more and learning so much more
about these ancient societies.
And long may that continue to happen.
I mean, I just get so excited every time I open the newspapers
and find this sort of thing all being spoken about with such interest
because I think it puts paid to that whole idea of when I,
certainly when I started studying classics,
people saying what a remote thing, what a remote subject to want to do,
how arcane, how very cut off from our world.
But I'm just so glad that this changed so much. I think in the last
10 years, certainly people seeing this is very much an interesting, evolving story, something
that has impact upon the way that we live now. And something that tells us something about
ourselves as well as about the remote past as we see it. Absolutely. Ancient history is very much
alive and kicking. It's where the cool kids of history stay. Daisy, last thing, your book on Vesuvius and the Plinies is called?
It's called In the Shadow of Vesuvius, A Life of Pliny.
It's essentially a biography of the two Plinies
that tells the story of the eruption
and how they lived their lives around it.
Fantastic.
Daisy, thank you so much for coming back on the show.
My pleasure. It would be great if you could do me a quick favour. Head over to wherever you get your podcasts and rate it five stars.
And then leave a nice glowing review.
It makes a huge difference for some reason to how these podcasts do.
Madness, I know, but them's the rules.
Then we go further up the charts, more people listen to us, and everything will be awesome.
So thank you so much.
Now sleep well. you