Dan Snow's History Hit - The Clinton Body Count to the QAnon Shaman: Conspiracy Theories in American Politics
Episode Date: November 6, 2024From the Clinton 'crime family' to businessman JP Morgan sinking the Titanic to kill off his rivals, conspiracy theories are rife on the internet. Dan Snow teams up with BBC journalist Gabriel Gatehou...se, creator of hit The Coming Storm podcast, to unravel the journey of conspiracy theories from whispered suspicions to narratives that have shaped modern American politics. Beginning with the mysterious death of Vince Foster and Clinton-era controversies in the 1990s, this episode explores how conspiracy beliefs have embedded themselves in American culture, the psychological forces that drive people toward misinformation, and the deeper reasons these stories hold such power.Gabriel's new book is called The Coming Storm.Produced by James Hickmann and edited by Dougal PatmoreEnjoy unlimited access to award-winning original documentaries that are released weekly and AD-FREE podcasts. Sign up HERE for 50% off for 3 months using code ‘DANSNOW’.We'd love to hear from you - what do you want to hear an episode on? You can email the podcast at ds.hh@historyhit.com.You can take part in our listener survey here.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hi everybody, welcome to Dan Snow's History Hit.
We are living in the age of conspiracy theories.
Whether it's the moon landings, the death of Jeffrey Epstein,
Covid, Trump and the various assassination attempts made against him,
Pizzagate, P. Diddy, the Cambridges, you name it.
People have just lost trust in the media,
traditional institutions of education,
the government, experts, and yes, even podcasts. In 2023, there was a YouGov poll, and it showed
that a staggering 41% of Americans agreed that there is, quote, a single group of people who
secretly control events and rule the world together. Frankly, folks, I wish
that was true. I think we'd be a lot less likely to stumble into nuclear oblivion or climate breakdown
if that was in fact true. We should be so lucky to have a single group of people ruling the world
together. Anyway, conspiracy theories have thrived in the post-internet environment. And we're all familiar with things like QAnon
and the role that conspiracy theories are playing
in the build-up to the American election.
One of the reasons we're so familiar with it
is because of the wonderful Gabriel Gatehouse.
He is a BBC journalist.
He is responsible for the smash hit podcast series, The Coming Storm.
He's got a new series of that out now.
He's got a book out of the same name.
He is the man we need to help us navigate through this new world that we find ourselves living in. There is no one better to
chronicle this era, this era of conspiracy theorizing that we live in now. Enjoy.
T-minus 10. Atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. God save the king. No black-white unity till
there is first and black unity.
Never to go to war with one another again.
And lift off, and the shuttle has cleared the tower.
Gabriel Gatehouse, welcome to the podcast.
I'm very excited to be here. Thank you, Dan.
I think, unfortunately, for people, even though you and I are in the prime of
life, we do have to accept the 1990s is kind of history. So it is worth talking about in this
podcast. I'm fascinated by the 90s, not just because I was young and my knees didn't hurt then,
but because different versions of the future seemed, well, one version of the future seemed
like the one we were heading to. But in retrospect, things started to diverge in the 90s didn't they they diverged
and they diverged beneath the surface because yeah we all thought i didn't notice yeah we all
thought it was the triumph of liberalism it was the end of history it was it was the decade where
nothing happened but everything happened and the internet would be this great sort of the only
interesting thing going on was the internet.
That seems useful.
And it will be this gigantic engine of democracy
and enlightenment for people.
Right.
The great leveller.
And everyone would have all information at their fingertips.
And what we discovered was that they did have all information
at their fingertips, but very little understanding or knowledge.
It's like information has exploded,
but knowledge has diminished. That's a nice way of looking at it. And what do you identify,
what should we be looking at in the 90s? So as part of this book and podcast, The Coming Storm,
I started to dig into the craziness that is current American politics, which we saw on January the 6th, 2021,
we saw a mob storm the Capitol, who were at least in part motivated by this idea that American power
had been captured by a cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles. And now, if anything, things have
gone even crazier. And something like 41% of Americans believe that the people who are
supposedly in charge of their
government are not really in charge and behind the scenes, shadowy figures are pulling the string.
So I started trying to dig into this and trying to find, if you like, a ground zero moment,
where did this come from? And I alighted on this one character in the 90s, 1993,
a guy called Vince Foster, Vincent J. Foster.
He's a lawyer from Arkansas.
He's an old friend of Bill Clinton's.
He and Bill went to the same kindergarten.
They went to, I have to get the name right, they went to Marie Perkins' school for little
folks in Hope, Arkansas.
And in fact, Bill Clinton's later chief of staff in the White House,
Mac McLarty, also went to the same kindergarten. So it's probably the most powerful kindergarten
in all of American history. The Eton of America.
Exactly. And so he's an Arkansas lawyer. And when Bill Clinton goes to the White House in 1993,
Bill takes a bunch of his old Arkansas buddies with him, and Vince Foster
is one of them. Now, Vince has been working with the Clintons for decades. He, in fact,
worked with Hillary Clinton at the Rose Law Firm in Arkansas, which was this big
institution in Little Rock. So he's kind of woven into the fabric of the Clintons.
And in the summer of 1993, so midway through the first year of Bill Clinton's term, everything is rosy.
History has come to an end.
The triumph of liberalism at this new administration, Vince Foster's body is found dead in a park just outside Washington, D.C.
Inside the administration, you know, it's a big blow.
It's a painful moment for the Clintons,
for Bill and Hillary. He's a personal friend. Nobody can understand it. Nobody saw it coming,
as so often with suicides, and nobody can quite understand why he did it. But it's ruled a suicide
and people move on. That's on the surface. Beneath the surface, these conspiracy theories
start germinating. People start talking about how Vince Foster
was seen in this place or that place, how he was actually killed in a safe house belonging
to Hillary Clinton somewhere in Virginia, rolled up in a carpet and dumped in the park.
The investigators, to be fair to them, there's all sorts of inconsistencies in the accounts.
Either he was found with a gun or he wasn't found with a gun. There are things to go up,
but these conspiracy theories germinate and they really take hold. It's the beginning of what, if you spend any time on the
sort of more conspiratorial end of the American political spectrum, you will inevitably hear
mention of something called the Clinton body count. It's this theory that the Clintons,
Bill and Hillary, in their meteoric and unstoppable rise to power, have climbed over a mountain of dead bodies.
And Vince Foster's not chronologically the first, but he's kind of the most important.
And you point out in the book and the podcast that actually there have been several investigations.
And they have all, including the independent counsel, Kenneth Starr, who we might come to later on, but they all have ruled that it was suicide. You're not suggesting foul play, was it?
Yeah. I'm not suggesting for one minute. I mean, there are all sorts of inconsistencies
in the investigation, but there is no evidence that anyone killed him, right? The most likely
explanation for these inconsistencies are that the people who first investigated it were the
parks police because he was found in a national park. They're not really used to investigating
murders or dead bodies, let alone those belonging to high-powered White House lawyers. So, you know,
maybe they touched the body, moved it before the people with the cameras could arrive, and then
they tried to, oh, they realized they'd messed up and they tried to. So that's the most likely
explanation for these inconsistencies. There is no evidence that he was murdered.
Why the Clintons?
Was there something particular about them
that just got the hackles up of their political opponents?
Or were they just in power after the Cold War?
People in America were looking for a fight.
Consensus was breaking down.
The generation of largely men who'd served alongside each other
on the battlefields of World War II were sort of leaving politics. Younger, hungrier people coming in, the internet
was starting to land. What is going on and why this kind of frenzy about the Clintons?
I mean, I think in a way those two things are the same, right? They were in the right place at the
right time. They were there at this turning point in history. Hillary Clinton was this strong,
powerful woman. When she moves into the White House, she's definitely not content with picking
out new curtains for the East Wing. She makes herself an office in the West Wing, the political
heart of the White House. And she is there to make policy. She starts getting involved in
healthcare policy, remembering this kind of disastrous effort to try to sort out American healthcare. And so
immediately, she starts making enemies. And it's quite clear from early on that actually a lot of
the focus of the ire of the discombobulation of the conspiracies is Hillary, not Bill.
And is the world of broadcast changing? I mean, we've got sort of the precursor to the internet,
if you like, is sort of radio. Talk radio is huge. Yeah. Is there now a platform for these ideas to spread?
Right. So you've got talk radio and you've got figures like Rush Limbaugh and people like that
who were instrumental in spreading the Vince Foster conspiracy theory. But at the same time,
you have got the actual internet. Remember that 1993, it's literally
just beginning. By about 1995, you've got chat rooms. And all of this is, I spoke to a guy who
worked in the White House at this time, and he said there were only about half a dozen computers
in the whole of the White House complex, which is massive, that were actually connected to the
World Wide Web. And he had this suspicion that
there was something going on there, something he couldn't see. He recalls going one Saturday
afternoon into the old executive office building, which is part of the White House administration,
but not actually in that building. And he goes up to this tiny little windowless room,
like a broom cupboard, more or less, where there's a handful of computers that are plugged
into this thing called the World Wide Web. And he descends into this kind of labyrinthine rabbit warren
of chat rooms where they're discussing the Clinton body count, these alleged murders.
It's not just Vince Foster now. There are stories about some young boys who were found dead on the
railway tracks in the 80s in Arkansas, and how this proved that
Bill Clinton was involved in drug running to Central America, and wrapped up in Iran-Contra,
and everything just spreads, right? Everything is connected. And he comes out of this room into the
kind of sunlight of a Washington Saturday afternoon, and he's blinking and he realizes
everything is changing, right? This whole
kind of top-down method of communication that we've had, the White House press call where
briefings will be given and information will be disseminated. It will then be printed in
the New York Times and the Washington Post, and that is coming to an end. And in a way,
the people out there beneath the surface who've been talking about all this stuff and listening to talk radio they are taking control of the means of production of story
right they can start creating their own stories this is the whirlwind we're all in today
this is the start of that whirlwind funny if i had a similar experience my first experience of
using chat rooms i had the same thing i suddenly it was sort of hit by this tidal wave of, I sort of typed in Napoleon or something,
and I was suddenly, this door opened at a crack and then I closed it and went to the pub, I think.
Where did you get it? Because you could probably quite quickly end up in like Napoleon,
Nietzsche, and end up in some kind of pretty radical far-right spaces, I would imagine.
Yes, it was definitely about the great man, the superman,
in his role in bending history with his will.
And people either will have heard of this through your brilliant pods
or they may have heard Donald Trump refer to this in 2016, 2017 as well.
So this is something that in that ecosystem,
that conspiracy theory is still of great relevance.
Yes, yes, Donald Trump referenced it in 2016. I mean, he didn't go all
out, but it was certainly all over the internet. It was sort of seemed like the origin story. If
you think, how is it that there is this crazy narrative that has taken hold of America that
Hillary Clinton is at the head of a cabal of satanic pedophiles that is secretly ruling America. And in that narrative,
the Vince Foster story was kind of like Ground Zero, was the origin story of how you get to
this idea that the Clintons are criminals, that they're violent. And of course, everything with
Bill Clinton certainly was very deeply connected to sex because of the very well publicized sex scandals that took hold later in his administration.
Most famously, of course, Monica Lewinsky, which whatever you say about the Monica Lewinsky story was on both counts a consensual sexual affair. But there were other stories which Bill Clinton has always denied, but which
nevertheless are out there in the ether of sexual harassment. Paula Jones, who accused him of sexual
harassment, he settled that for $800,000 without admitting liability. And then, of course, there's
Juanita Broderick, who accused him of raping her in an Arkansas hotel room in 1978, didn't want to tell her story,
but was forced to by the Kenneth Starr inquiry. And then that story was kind of buried because
it didn't fit the narrative. As Juanita told me, this is during the impeachment at the end of the
Clinton presidency, and Ken Starr was looking for obstruction of justice. Had Bill Clinton lied or offered anyone else
any kind of inducement to lie on his behalf
over the Lewinsky affair?
And Juanita said, no, they didn't.
So her story kind of got buried.
But this idea of kind of sexual violence
attached itself to the Clintons in the 90s.
And then tell me about making a documentary,
a so-called documentary about this and Cliff Jackson,
because this link is so fascinating, I find.
So while I was out in Arkansas,
people kept telling me,
you've got to go and find this guy, Cliff Jackson.
It was a small town, personal injury attorney.
I tried calling him on the number that was listed on Google. It just kept going
to answer phone. I drove to the address that was given online. It was a sort of
shuttered lawyer's office on the outskirts of Hot Springs, Arkansas, on the shores of Lake
Catherine or Lake Hamilton. Anyway, you can picture it, this sort of hot, steamy southern
place, a sort of a
holiday resort, but in Arkansas.
Somebody once described Arkansas to me as, it's the South, but without the charm.
So I go there and I finally find Cliff Jackson.
He really doesn't want to talk because he's known as Bill Clinton's best friend who stabbed
him in the back.
Anyway, I twist his arm.
I say, I've come all the way from England to talk to you.
And I twist his arm and we end up in this rib joint on a strip mall on the outskirts
of town.
And he tells me this story about how he and Bill Clinton met at Oxford in 1968, right?
So the height of the Vietnam War, they're both scholarship boys.
They love playing basketball and they love politics.
Bill's a Democrat. Cliff is a Republican, but it doesn't matter. There they are in England at this very heightened political time and they bond. And at this time, Bill Clinton
gets a draft notice for the Vietnam War. And of course, he doesn't want to serve Israel against
the Vietnam War, but also he's got his life to live. And so Cliff Jackson helps him get around
it in a legal way. Hundreds of thousands of American men got around the draft
through various connections or schemes or whatever. Anyway, Cliff helps him to avoid it.
And then when Bill is running for the presidency, he is asked about this draft notice. And Cliff
sees his friend Bill saying, oh, I never got the draft. I never got a draft notice. And Cliff sees his friend Bill saying, oh, I never got the draft.
I never got a draft notice.
And Cliff's like, hold on.
That's not quite right.
I remember you got the draft.
I helped you.
I wrote letters to a family friend who was in the military in Arkansas.
And we kind of figured it out for you.
I got the sense there was definitely a sort of an element of jealousy and rivalry going
here.
You know, here's a guy who's been relatively successful as a lawyer, but his friend is running for the president of the United States,
and he's only in his 40s still. So there's an imbalance of power there.
And Cliff, he called it crossing the Rubicon. He said, I had to decide whether or not I was
going to betray my friend Bill Clinton and go public with what I knew. He had letters.
And he said he knew he would be
crossing the Rubicon, just like Julius Caesar, and that there would be no going back. So he
sleeps on it. And the next morning he wakes up and he decides to tell his story. So he tells
his story about how Bill Clinton actually did get the draft and avoided it. And it's a minor thing,
and it doesn't affect Bill's campaign. Bill gets elected and it's all fine. But from that moment on, Cliff Jackson
becomes the go-to guy for all of the Clintons' enemies who want to find dirt on him in Arkansas.
And what neither Bill nor Cliff know at the time is that there is a project going on at the time,
well-funded by Clinton's enemies, by this heir, Richard Mellon Scaife, who's a sort of heir to an oil and banking
fortune.
And he's funding something called the Arkansas Project.
And it is basically a project specifically dedicated to digging up dirt on Bill Clinton,
sending reporters into Arkansas and digging up stories, true or false, doesn't really
matter, and putting them out into this new media ecosystem, the talk radio stations,
the internet, wherever it'll stick to the wall. And so Cliff Jackson becomes the guy who introduces
reporters to some Arkansas state troopers who tell all of these kind of very lurid tales about
Bill Clinton's sexual adventures. And eventually, these stories start getting
wrapped in. Some of these stories, they're not fantasies, right? They're true. Bill Clinton was
up to all sorts of sexual shenanigans, but they get mixed in through Cliff, who's kind of purveying
these stories to journalists. They get mixed in with the wild conspiracy theories about the
murders, about Vince Foster, about the boys on
the train track, about the drugs running through an airport in Mena, Arkansas. And by about the
mid-90s, 95, 96, there's a VHS tape doing the rounds in the country. It's almost like this
documentary that has smushed all of these stories together into this kind of crazy conspiracy theory story
about how the Clintons are this crime family, leaving a trail of dead bodies in their wake,
high on power and sex and corruption. This videotape is doing the rounds,
and people are copying it, and it's going from VHS player to VHS player.
And this narrative is implanting itself beneath the
surface of America. This is all pretty much invisible to the people in Washington on the
coast, the people who read the New York Times or the Washington Post or the LA Times and get those
delivered to their door every morning. Nobody knows about this. But in between, this narrative
is doing the rounds and it really takes hold. It sort of sits there beneath the surface and festers and then explodes back up into the open again when Hillary Clinton starts running for president in 2016.
Listen to Dan Snow's history. We're talking about conspiracy theories. More coming up.
conspiracy theories more coming up. And you've traveled across america you've looked into these conspiracy theories you've hunted down the people at the center why are we so happy to believe them sorry to keep coming back to
technology but is it because our brains are so naive i've watched members of my family indeed
i've had this experience myself if you're trained to sort of see a well-printed and formatted piece of paper
and a book that's come from a publishing house or a newspaper, you're tempted to believe what it
says. It carries authority. Did the internet and the ability of just anyone who is anybody to sort
of format and make things and give them grand titles like Breaking News Daily, were our brains
naive to it? Or is
there something deeper here that we are just drawn to conspiracy? Because we like to think that the
world is... I sometimes think it's because the unbearable truth is that if no one's in charge
and everyone's just sort of chaotically hurtling around the sun on this bit of dust, that it's
rather more scary than Rupert Murdoch being in charge. Absolutely. Absolutely. I think both of those things are
true, right? Especially for the boomer generation, maybe the generation that's one generation older
than us, Dan. These are people who grew up, as you say, if something was published, then it had
the imprimatur of authority, right? And suddenly, all kinds of nonsense is being published on the
internet. You know, I've noticed this with my parents sometimes.
During COVID, they'd be like, but there's this doctor.
I found him on Facebook.
He says that X, Y, and Z.
And it's like, what's he a doctor of?
And so our generation and above are naturally inclined to believe things, as you say, that
are published.
I think the young generation, Dan, and this should give us hope, are frankly a lot more
savvy about this stuff.
young generation, Dan, and this should give us hope, are frankly a lot more savvy about this stuff. But I think the wider thing that you point out and that you allude to is definitely true.
We seek to understand the world around us. And especially in confusing and chaotic and uncertain
times, we seek even more to understand it. Because if we can understand why things are happening,
it gives us a sense of agency. And sometimes, frankly, things are just not explicable, right? We don't know why things
are happening. I mean, this was definitely the case with Vince Foster, right? I broke my head
on that story, because I did want to give them the time of day. So there's this conspiracy theory,
he was murdered. Okay, let me look into it, right? And you start looking, and there are so many
contradictory things that
if you were that way inclined you would be inclined to believe that there was some kind of
dodgy shenanigans because you want an explanation right and so you have to be careful not to grasp
on things for which there is no evidence in order to try to make things make sense
listen to that kids from your mouth from your lips to God's ears or whatever the expression is.
But it's the confidence in a way, isn't it? It's sort of knowing the inside.
That's right.
And then making other people feel a bit naive in some ways.
Knowledge is power. Knowledge is power and knowledge is control. And you can control
your life in uncertain times. I spoke to this old, grizzled, gray-haired, long-in-the-tooth FBI agent who'd
investigated the satanic panic back in the 80s, which was this narrative that swept America,
that satanic ritual abuse was going on everywhere, especially in daycare centers.
And he had figured out from just looking at a lot of these cases, he said that there is a tendency to grasp for explanations
when your life feels out of control. And he had this phrase, I'll never forget it. He said,
the greater the need, the greater the tendency. And there is a great need right now, and so a
great tendency. You extraordinarily met the, we can come on to QAnon, and is a great need right now, and so a great tendency.
You extraordinarily met the, we can come on to QAnon, and the QAnon shaman who you met.
Tell me all about him.
People remember him as being one of the most visible icons of the January the 6th insurrection,
storming of the Capitol.
You actually met him before and after. I met him before.
Sadly, he didn't want to meet with me after.
He was the inciting incident for this whole journey that I've been on.
So this was a couple of days after the 2020 presidential election.
I was in Phoenix, Arizona, outside the counting center.
The voting was done, but they hadn't called it yet.
They were still counting the votes.
It was complicated.
It was tense.
It was close. And there They were still counting the votes. It was complicated. It was tense. It was close.
And there were these protests across the country,
but in Arizona, particularly acute.
And I sort of go to this protest.
I'm reporting for Newsnight.
I'm a news reporter, a TV news reporter.
So it's all about the pictures.
And it's very colorful, as America usually is.
You know, you've got colorful people
with great stories to tell,
who are good at telling them and not shy about it.
I love America.
I absolutely love it.
And I'm there outside the counting house, and there's this guy with horns on his head and furs draped around his shoulders and kind of tattooed chest and stars and stripes painted on his face.
And I think, this guy looks great.
I go over and talk to him.
So I have a chat with him.
This guy looks great. I go over and talk to him. So I have a chat with him. And it quite quickly becomes clear that he has basically, it felt like he'd eaten an encyclopedia of conspiracy
theories for breakfast and was regurgitating them in a random order at around brunch time.
So there was everything there, but somewhere in the mix was this story about how Hillary Clinton
and her cabal of satanic pedophiles had taken over
America and were trying to steal the election, which it turned out was QAnon, which I didn't
really know much about. And he had this spear with him with a sign on it that on one side read,
hold the line, patriots. And then he flipped it around and it said, Q sent me. I didn't really
know what this QAnon stuff was. And I remember saying to my cameraman, look, this guy looks
fantastic. He's going to make great telly, to my cameraman, look, this guy looks fantastic.
He's going to make great telly, but it's irresponsible to stick this guy on TV. He's
obviously a fringe character. His views are fringe. It wouldn't be responsible. It wouldn't
be right to put this guy on Newsnight, right? We're a serious news organization here. So I
didn't film an interview with him. Two months later, I'm back in London watching this incredible world-changing event
as a mob storms the Capitol trying to overturn a democratic election in the United States.
And I see him. There he is, the same guy with the same horns, the same furs, the same spear.
He's in the Capitol. He's in the Senate chamber. He's got himself behind the desk that was until
minutes earlier occupied by the vice president who's just fled in fear of his life. And he's
writing a note on it. And it says, it's only a matter of time. Justice is coming.
Right? So this guy, I'd completely underestimated the extent to which this guy's narrative, the narrative that had
captured his mind, had also captured the rest of America. And in a sense, this whole book,
The Coming Storm, this whole podcast was an attempt to make up for that incredible journalistic fail.
What took him there? Having deconstructed that, why was he there wearing that, writing that,
on that day? I would like to just make a quick detour. This guy, his name is Jacob Chansley,
Jake Angeli, Jake Chansley. He was actually a really nice guy. He went to the Capitol on
January the 6th. He wasn't violent. He didn't hit anyone. In fact, there's video of him telling
other insurrectionists
or members of the mob or whatever you want to call them not to steal a congressional muffin
from a kitchenette, you know. So he's like, he's a law and order guy. He's a gentle guy. He's
obviously got a lot of kind of strange ideas, but he's not a bad man. And he went to jail for like
two and a half years. So that's like one thing to say is that, you know, in this narrative in
America that's taken hold now where these Jan Sixers, quote unquote, are political prisoners, quote unquote, part of the DC gulag, which if you spend any time in MAGA world, you'll hear that narrative a lot.
This is the kind of thing they're talking about.
People like Jake Chansley, the QAnon shaman, who went to jail for quite a long time for not being violent and actually doing something that
their president had told them to do, right? Their commander in chief, Donald Trump had said,
it's been stolen. We're going to walk to the Capitol and we're going to fight like hell,
you know? So in a way I kind of, I sympathize, obviously there were some people who planned this
and were violent and there are some people who, you know, really didn't do very much.
And I kind of feel like some of them did get a bit of a bad rap. These people are often known as truth seekers, and they
spend time on the internet, quote unquote, doing their research. You'll be able to find all kinds,
you can go down the rabbit hole. And if you're naturally inclined to mistrust authority,
as Jacob Chansley was, the Q Shaman, as for example, Bobby Kennedy Jr. is. If you look at Bobby Kennedy Jr., who was, for want of a better word,
the conspiracy theory candidate in this upcoming presidential election,
here's a guy who saw his uncle murdered in murky circumstances in 1963 when he was nine,
his father murdered in murky circumstances in 1968 when he was 14,
and rightly believes that the government
isn't telling him the whole truth about it so here's another person who has good reason to believe
that everything is being told is a lie right so you can psychologically understand where
these people are coming from you listen to dan snow's history at more after this
You'll listen to Dan Snow's history at More After This.
I'm Matt Lewis.
And I'm Dr. Eleanor Yonaga.
And in Gone Medieval, we get into the greatest mysteries.
The gobsmacking details and latest groundbreaking research.
From the greatest millennium in human history.
We're talking Vikings.
Normans.
Kings and popes.
Who were rarely the best of friends.
Murder.
Rebellions.
And crusades.
Find out who we really were.
By subscribing to Gone Medieval from History Hit.
Wherever you get your podcasts. where are we going with all this as used to the younger generation are more savvy
is this just the gigantic convulsions of the boomers and gen x's who were given this the
most powerful communication tool in the history of the universe and it's been a few little bumps in the road are things going to smooth out or is this our future i am deeply pessimistic great but i'm also wary of imposing
my deep pessimism on everybody else because i have spent so much time in this kind of weird
world of conspiracy theories that it's quite hard for me to feel sunny about the future because I feel like this stuff
has taken hold. It's not a blip. It's getting deeper and it's getting more entrenched now.
And I don't think it is just the boomers and the Gen Xers. I think lots of young people
at a Bobby Kennedy rally, for example, this past May, I got speaking to a guy who said, oh, you do know about the Titanic, don't you? I was like,
what now? And he told me that the Titanic was sunk by, I think he said it was JP Morgan.
This is his story, right? JP Morgan was supposed to be on the Titanic, but cancelled at the last
minute. It was his own ship. He had sunk his own ship because three people who were against the
establishment of the federal reserve which he wanted established were on that boat so he sunk
his ship this is a young guy youngish couple ah yes killing um aster and guggenheim and right
exactly yeah okay yeah i have come across that have you come i'd never come across this before
i was like my jaw was on the floor.
I was like, this is a brilliant theory.
Well, listen, if you ever want to do a podcast series
on the various conspiracies around the Titanic,
there's some absolute bangers out there.
There's an idea there.
Maybe I'll do that.
Anyway, my feeling is that if you boil down QAnon
to its basic components,
like if you take it literally,
a cabal of satanic pedophiles led
by Hillary Clinton is running America, secretly running America. It's obviously nonsense, right?
But if you boil it down to its sort of essential elements, what people who believe in QAnon are
essentially saying is that the people who really run the world, the people with the real power,
are possibly not the ones that I vote for every
four or five years. There might be people whose names aren't that familiar to us. Maybe they are
familiar. Maybe they're like Elon Musk, but maybe they're like people who are very powerful in the
financial system and run the world, but we don't know who they are and we certainly can't vote for
them or elect them, right? So this narrative has really, really taken hold now, now that QAnon
is sort of receding into the distance. This is basically the narrative that is taking hold,
that it's a cabal of politicians from both sides of the aisle, Democrats and Republicans colluding
with people in big business, finance, and big tech to basically run the world and screw the
little people. And, you know, in a way, they're kind of
right. And hence this idea that all is not as it seems, which is what the second series of the
coming storm is really digging into. So I think this is getting deeper and more entrenched.
And I think there are genuinely a bunch of people, some of them in big tech, who are on record as saying that they don't
think democracy is a very good system, and that we could get a lot more done if we just scrap
democracy. And so this is true. There's this character called Peter Thiel, who founded PayPal
with Elon Musk, set up Palantir, this kind of big data surveillance organization, first person to
invest in Facebook. He's on record as saying the great thing about technology is that when it's done well, technology is anti-democratic. You don't have to sit around waiting for somebody
to give you permission to change the world. You could just go and change it. And that's what these
Silicon Valley guys really want to do. Some of them. So I think this is where we're heading,
but maybe I'm down my own rabbit hole, Dan. I don't know. Pull me out.
What's it like being constantly, or constantly swimming in those waters?
I have two kids. I have a six-year-old and a two-year-old who pull me out of the rabbit hole
at regular moments of the day when they need feeding and bathing and just general attention.
So Julia Donaldson books is what keeps you pointing to true north.
Exactly. I turn away from vince foster and get onto
a.a milne i mean that pulls me into the real world um my mental health is fine i am genuinely
fascinated by this and i'm genuinely interested in speaking to all these people and i would just
like to say again that the people who often are the conveyors of these conspiracy theories
often genuinely believe in themselves,
right? Some of them are total troublemakers, right? And I think some of the people who
pushed QAnon and created it were real troublemakers. And they were trying to do what
they call meme warfare. But a lot of the people who believe it, they are genuine and decent and
good people. Well, listen, we have them in our family and our extended networks.
Exactly. And we've got to be careful not to get sucked into the culture wars around this. You
know, since COVID, there's been so much kind of judgmentalism about people who don't believe the
same things as we do. And I think, you know, we need to be a bit careful about that and a bit
understanding about people and also recognise the fallibility of our own assumptions. I think
that's always very important i like to
sometimes project myself 500 years into the future and wonder which of the certainties that i live
with now that i base my life on are going to turn out to be total nonsense yeah that is the strange
area in which we find ourselves what you mentioned that expression, do your own research. That's become,
well, it's become a sort of a slur. And yet in the 90s, that's what we all told ourselves was so great about the internet. It would allow us all to do our own research, to learn as if we
were all undergraduates or studying arts and humanities for the rest of our lives. And there
is something in that that is important. You don't want to take your political opinions from the
editorial page of a tabloid or
a paper, and yet it's also going to metastasize into something else. It's so difficult.
The common touchstones of our information ecosystem have become so diversified 20,
30 years ago. As you said, the common touchstones of our information ecosystem were either what we
could see in our daily lives, so the experience of ourselves and our friends, or the editorials of the newspaper, or whatever was on
the BBC News at 10, and these people who decided what the national conversation was. That's all
out the window. It's been broken open for good and for ill. Yeah. Well, that is where we have
to leave it, for good and for ill. The pieces are still flying through the air. Who knows when and
if they'll assemble themselves in a different pattern a different shape Gabriel Gales thank
you very much everyone knows what your brilliant podcast call but tell everyone what the pod is
called and the book and all that kind of thing so the pod and the book are called the same thing
and it's called the coming storm it's still coming they're both out basically yeah you can read them
you can listen to them and enjoy them immerse yourself in it if
you dare you know what i hope in 15 years time you're still flogging at the coming storm franchise
because then i can say to you well when is that storm coming the storm won't have come right and
we'll all still be here well i know but i can say well maybe gabriel k house maybe we can surmise
the storm isn't coming we can just calm the hell down maybe i was wrong wouldn't that be great
well no i think so far,
most of what you've been saying has come to pass.
That's for sure.
Thank you very much for all the amazing work you do
and the humour and the insight with which you executed.
It's wonderful.
It's been a delight.
Thanks, Dan. you