Dr. Mario Alonso Puig - Actuar ante los desafíos

Episode Date: March 12, 2024

Las crisis, los cambios, los desafíos, son llamadas a hacer cambios en nuestra forma de pensar, de vivir … y dependiendo de la manera en la que nosotros valoramos esos desafíos, vamos a obtener un resultado u otro. “Es la valoración del evento lo que genera la experiencia en la persona” Antes de juzgar, explora, pregunta, analiza, observa, indaga, busca y luego ya…. Sacarás una conclusión. No te aferres a lo primero que parece porque a lo mejor no es lo que es. Intentar conectar con lo que es y no con lo que parece que es.   Ojalá este podcast te haya gustado y pueda convertirse en una inspiración a la hora de despertar y florecer tu verdadero potencial.   Página Web:  https://marioalonsopuig.com/   Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/marioalonsopuig/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@MarioAlonsoPuigOficial Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MarioAlonsoPuigOficial

Before to judge, explore. Preguntar, analysis, observe, indaga, and then you'll

you'll make a conclusion. No, you're to farres to the first, because

at the most it's what it. This is a podcast for those

people that want in great, sentire in great and

live in great. I'm Dr. Marlonso Puch, I'm invite to

to live with me this adventure of discovery and the development and only, maybe I'll get it before

but we're we're much much more less lejos well well the being the person

simple the solutions simple the solutions simple and one is to say that something is possible

and other is to say that something when one one be a idea for that to be a vivance

has to be disposed to to pay the price, not there a possibility for that that's a

possibility to be a time to you. You have to act every day as if

that possibility were a reality. And that implic a long training and not

all the world is to put the dosis of

faith, the doses of determination, the doses of persistence,

the doses of the dosis of patience, and the That's so that. There are many people who are not are disposed to do this work.

They want the camino, and the transformation of the mind is a great possibility. No is a camino, so I just want to comment that the change, profound, not is a suit of erudition, it is a sumpo of motivation. Not all the world has the

that is necessary to have to do, and, then, then, we'll justifications, and we'll justices. Why we know that the people that have that has that ambr and that motivation and that garra for

doing it, because we can observe that there are many cases of persons that have created his dreams and has been a reality and not has been a lot of easy but have persisted, they've creed in the idea, they've been, they've seen, for that, well, from my point of view, the same that for

to learn an idiom new, for example, the English, first you have to see the necessity and the illusion, and then you need to sit a period very long, where you sometimes making ridicule, because not you

don't get when you're when you don't know when they they're in you, at not all the

whole of the whole is supposed to want to this tension that's that's then we're not we're

not we're the clavis that the person that's the better of the way, that you're not you're the

that's got to that you're that's going to think that all the system is the that the decision of all, that

person is putting in a situation of victim that will impede for complete to learn. The crisis, in the fund, is a a call to make a change fundamental in the form of thinking, in the form of living,

and in the form in that that society contemplates the what what occurs is that depending of the form in that we're that we we're going to obtain a result or other.

or another. For example, if a person, an situation of crisis, a situation of difficulty, a situation of inflection in his life, it's a situation of an opportunity to make a change fundamental in his form of comporta, in his form of to move, in what that moment, that crisis will help

to explore a new. If a person, ante a crisis, he's to valor it as a a disgrace, like a spanto, as a little the proper emotionality that

surge of that dialogue internal, he will impede to find possibilities even those it's the valouration of the event,

what it generates the experience in the person. We'd have to activate, Mario, the radar, antifrasas

negative, talking to one of one yes, we're going, I think no one one single

human, that has a very complete. For that, even if we don't think

things that not we're we're to have to that is a matter in

case of that's a real an incomplete. Or more it's, it's,

it's a absolute. But if me you're a lot, in some things,

I'm in some I'm sorry, I'm don't know good, I'm don't

be done well, as I have been a true, I've had been

a great, I'm there's there's there to the

top the you, you know, you're short, and in some

things, I'm quite, quite to learn, for certain apprentices, to me cost a rarity.

Other apprentices, let's go a good at a good like a never to not even

because no anybody that's access to the reality is infinite, and the truth is a reason

of the reason. We're we're our better approximation to the

fact, what can that many people, that's that's have created certain

things and the problem is that they don't they're they're they

generate they're they're they're in the inconscient the conditions for that

the prophecy auto-culted exactly, the process auto-cuh the process autopulipid so if

I think I'm sure that I'm in a form incocient I'm to make a

clear it because when a person has created these has generated these

and funci it's the mind to the system reticular active the

end of the structure cerebral, it's a start evidence to support that

Moment it's a minute that's going to say, let's see, let's see, let's see, let's see. Nobody. This person says something, is an opinion. I'm going to, I'm going to valor. And, point. But that's not going to be in my reality. The ego, we have to understand it not as a structure fission, but as a structure dynamic.

The ego is our identity. And the ego can't have two positionments. One is an ego completely stanko, or an ego porosome. The ego stanko has that I I feel completely separated from the rest I don't know

no point in connection only me preoccupy so I'm preoccupy just me preoccupy to use to my things this is tremendously

elisive because the cause of infelicity and a point of the end of the ego porosos is when I

recognize that I think a a group different that I have different to

see the reality that I that I like more a more a

I'm conscious that all the humans form us a unity. Why? Because we all we have illusions, todos of courseions, we have angustias, we all we have luchas and that I,

recognizing that I'm that I'm distinct of the other not me that's not distant. For that

the the base of all cataclysm is the egoism and the base of all prosperity is

the generosity. The base of total cataclyism, for the most, as I'm know, is

convertive in the center of the circle and the base of prosperity is the generation

of an ellipse. An elipse has two and you. Sure, this

generates a encounter, and where there a encounter, there

possibilities and where there is, there there's a state of

radically distinct. The The only manner in that the creativity aflora is when we top us top with a mur. Because when we top with a mur, and we we're pegs with the mur and the muro no is rompe,

only there's two options that we can't. The first is abandoner. And the second is, encounter a way. We know perfectly that the creativity is the disclige and the intelligence is able, precisely when we encounter the difficulty.

What the past is that, As we don't we like nothing to suffer, in when we start that that's notar to give us, it's the normal is that abandoning. How many people, because they've seen it, because they've created in their possibilities, have discovered that all the moor has a micro-fractures and that, for the micro-fractures, poco to gole-a-pocket. I think that you have to have much more ambris, much more ambition

that no avaricea for, to get to be it. own own own plenitude. I think we can't with much facility in the conformism.

In-quant we're doing a certain level of competition, we're not aspirational to the

maestria. Insegid us we're and we think that this hunger,

these of learn to progress, these of progressar, not we have

to lose people me invited a few years, the cociners of the Basque, to talk about creativity with

them, what thing? What's the thing? I'd have been to be I've been I've been

a lot of the people of the people of the people who are, one of a, with

a lot of much more to learnes to learn how I'm about, how I'm talking about.

This is an example. No me strange that have been given that have

converted, in the Silicon Valley of the Cucina at the world. No me strained. They're generous.

They're going to learn of and so however, you see, you know, you know,

you know, that's that you know, that's gonna tell me a little. Well, in fin,

well, the power focus or the power attention, the focus of

the attention is clave. We're very distraided for the life.

Quanto are the in the environment, more claras, you have to have your priorities. Quanto more difficult are the challenges, more enclared you have to be in your values. That's the focus. The focus is not to detraer for things that are irrelevant.

In surgeries, it's fundamental to have focus. In the life is fundamental, to have focus. To be a lot fundamental, and obviously for that is to say no to what is fundamental. When we're We're talking We're We're

We're We're A mental The mind has to make a Valoration And the

Valoration is of two types One, Tierra Incierta Tierra Dierre

Dierra Hostile If the Valoration The Mente is Tierra

Hostil only can put in March three Mechanism has

been for much time in the evolution of the

species One the agression another, the uida, and another, the blocker.

There are people that are in the agression. They're amazed by the life, they're

being amazes for the other, although the other not they're not them are

and that they're they're being very irritable tendan even to be

people violentas. It's a lot of that's what's what's

what's the difference between the stress good Mario. I think it's a great

question because the word stress has a lot of connotations negative. There is a lot of words, the significance of that word is given to the cajone emotional that abet us. The stress is a mechanism, sumamently

complex, that what he pretends is to help us in certain moments, in those which our capacity to affrontar the that we're in the we're not sufficiently adequate.

We have two mechanisms, the process, the stress, put in march two mechanisms. One is a mechanism

called of superviance, that only is active or it would be to activate when we're

when we're when we're a menace real. There's another mechanism that is the mechanism of adaptation.

In a mechanism adaptation, the clave is that the Cerever not percived a menace

if perceives uncertainty, if perceive change, comprehend that there can be dangers, comprehend that could have opportunities, and the systems that are

totally different of the mechanisms of supervency, because here, there's a change very interesting in the riego of the cerebral,

and we know much more more than what is going, our capacity to make decisions is more

asserted, our capacity to memorize, our capacity to maintain in the logic, a fear, a point of enthusiasm for what we can discover.

It's also active, it's put in march. The problem is when we're confunding those mechanisms, and the Cerebro interpreta a situation in the ideal would activate mechanism of adaptation with a situation in which we've been menaces. This is

we're seeing much today. No there's doubt that the situation that's economic, the situation economic that's currently in the world is very complex. What the past is that if we're that situation, activate mechanisms of supervivency, the only reactions that are to surging of the activation of this process

is attack, uida, or blocker, that we're seeing much. But, if we've seen that, the accord, is a term incert, the world has changed in a lot of aspects, and we're not to adapt to, we'll have to find the new patterns that operate,

of how to manage. The Eustres, the form positive of stress, is, or would it would be to signify the of the mechanism

correct to according to the stressor, of the reason the is when is when it

has activated a mechanism that is the correct. For example, if I live permanently

amazado, in a world in a world with a situation bellica, but it's like it

can be in a city with a city with the situation to be

permanently amazated even not be very intense but but if, prolonged in the time,

that pattern of alarm sustained in the time has a effect even a level molecular. You know, that affecta the genetic, affect a how the genes expression,

and this is very important that we know. Our emotions is a thing very testated scientifically. Our emotions affect them to the

genetics. There are that we think we're those who are and are and they're and they're

depending on our genome. It's a Yes, yes. The genes have, say, on or off, a gen is express or not is express, depending on these interruptors. And we know that,

both the entorners in the we've lived, the air that we're in the air that we're going to our state emotional affect a much to the expression of one and other genes.

Leo in your book, in Vivir is an issue urgent, Mario, this phrase says, for that a person human crepture and evolve, are

necessary, both episodes of stress and of recuperation. And, you say, the person need to

respect this type of oscillation. If we're we're permanently adaptathing us, to say if there's a change, immediately another change, then there's

another change, no there's a period of recuperation. You have to have to be a situation new, has to do a

movement, a transformation in all their metabolism, in all its generation of energy, that is tremendous,

it's like if, you'd be a person, you'd be a, that put a its wheels, a million

of revolutions per minute. This is a thing that obviously implic a desgaste and a necessity

of recuperation. Today we know that one of the problems that is that is that is that we're

that we're in this situation of tension, not we don't we take into the period of

the period of time. I want to we're not a time, that we're not we're going to

think the the period of descansus like the when a person no doorme in a media of seven hours diaries, we know of the form of clear that affects a system of defense, that affect the function of its tub digestive, that empeor the memory, that empeor

the efficiency. But many times, all this is that not the act, the do you live as a period of time. It's absolutely necessary that we looked spaces to the long of the day, simply it's four or five minutes

to make a little passage or hear a little of music, to close, recuperation is imprescindible. If a person not buska these periods of

recuperation, automatically the organism is resient. You're clearly the distinction between the

world real and the world mental. René DeKars said that question, where is

the truth? The reality, the real, in mayuclars is the

real, what is the real, no can be real, and it was

the thing was the the famous Colgitorbosun, I think, thensoll then, because for him, the thought that was what you'd have the ability. In fact, in neurociences, has

shown that this is a great error, logical in that era, we've been about more of 300 years, that the emotions, clear, that count, and we've done a point of the power that has the mind to distortioning

our perception of the reality. So, this has led to a concept that is, to go to the sense. What is going to the sense?

What is the world of the way of the question? That's not

not to have the criteria. Salisers of the judicial and explore the

reality. With your view, with your word, with your word,

with data, with to say, is to get to connect to the

world real and not with the world mental that many

many times us before to to judge, explore. Preguntar, analyze, observe, indaga,

busca, and then you'll make a conclusion. No, you doffers to the first, because at the

most of the thing. To me, to the reality, is to try to connect with

what it is, not with what it is. There are two types of interpretations, the interpretation

automatic and the interpretation reflexive. The interpretation automatic is when I, of form automatic,

without thinking, is a a resizue inconscient, I value something in base to a series of presuppostos, a series of creences previous. For example,

if I think that the world is scarce and I see that something is reducing, I go, clear, it's

normal, the world is scarce. The problem of these interpretations automatic is that the

only that is to find, confirm with a series of evidences tremendously sesgated, a series of presupposts initials that operate under the conscience and that can be absolutely false. The interpretation with the reflections, as, as you as, as with the data that I've explored,

how I've done a sense. So, the sense that's configure no has to be parecure in nothing to the the sense initial. What is that we do not only is that we like, we're not that we're just, we're very accommodated to the thought automatic, and very little to the

thought of the resistance. The theme of the resistance is one of the things that most me has important for many years. There are two types of resistance ante, and, there's the resistance intellectual. The resistance

intellectual is super with information. There are people who say, well, this is a disaster, this is an ammanace, and they're a manazement, and they're from, So those people, to to super,

transcender that resistance, what they have to do is informars. It's to say, to understand that to have a certain value, you have to have a minimum of information. Opinar, for opinion,

without, you can't think that that's, that you'll call the attention, that attracts to some, but not is an exercise that I

consider the convenient. So that resistance is superer with information. The more complex of resolve is the resistence emotional. The resistance

emotional is a resistance based in a fear that many times even is defined. Because if I, for example, I'm going to say, there's a door entering by the door, I'm sorry, I'm sorry,

but I know what I have to do, what I'm going is to the door, I'm going to other side. But if I'm put to gritty as a posseo, a toro, a toro, a toro, what I do? I'm blocker. because I don't see where there, there's something that is a lot of delimitation, this

fault of concretion is very typical, is very typical when we're we're going to elements disruptive. And there is where a person has to learn, for the most in the basic, to gestionate your world emotional. Because if not gestionate the world emotional,

although it's in the basic, enters in one of the phases pears in which can enter in a world is called Panicco. So when a person enter in panic, it's a person alocated and the the damage that can do is brutal. So, are two gestions different. It's more, when it's a

activation of the mechanism mental related to the panic, there's a lack of a functionality of those areas cerebral in the region prefrontal, that are claves to see the things with a little of perspective. For that is so important gestionate the two resistances of different and not think that a resistance

emotional is a resistance intellectual or that a resistance intellectual is a resistance emotional. Although you rationally you think that you're acting in a form absolutely objective, this is true.

It's tremendously matized by your tone emotional. For that, when one person understands this, knows that no can separate

Descartes Distingia the res Cogitans the intellect pure of the res extensate

in the including emotions et et cetera and for example Antonio Damacio

for me in neurociencia affective in human not in animal of human

the number one of the number one the obviously that not

exists that that there not exist that with the

rational but the emotional is tremendously in the

color in the color the color of the blue, the rational, the amarillo, would be the emotional. You in the red, no, you can't

distinguish the blue the blue, the person says, no, no, I've been rational, like if only had a color blue. No, no, there's color

amarillo also, even, even you think you think no, because you think you're not, because not you're

the enormous emotionality that there in your decisions apparently that's, automatically

you're you're seeing a color that not the real. But the impact that's

in the world real, is that the is that color not only blue, but that color is red. Why is red? Because it's very, because it's the entire texied the amarillo, that is the world emotional. I think one of the things

most beautiful that we're going to be, today in this time of our history, as a human, is the connection between different camps. The medicine, the neurociency in particular, all what is the functioning of the system nervous in its own, the psychology,

all what has to be with elements like the physics, the physics theoretical, themes that have been with the spirituality, understanding a in a sense of a sense of transcendence

to the human, that I don't know I can't be, no, I can't be, no person human, can be explained exclusively from the material.

That's saying, that the love that you can have, or that I can have for our our people that I'm clear that it implicate

centers nervouses that are neurotransmissory that are situations viscerals that can be

but not it can do do to get to a movement physical

there there is that that is that is that is investigating

much from a form very a problem a this is a

dimension subtle of the existence so I think

and every we're going how these these camps and there are to add one more, that is the

philosophy. Because, of course, philosophy means a more to the wisdom.

We're what we are we're being a sadious in the life. Ser sabio,

that is a person sabious, a person is a more a person

that is a person sabia, not only know how how you do

do it and can become a inspiration to the hour of display and to make flource your true potential.