Dr. Mario Alonso Puig - Cómo afrontar CONVERSACIONES DIFÍCILES
Episode Date: March 14, 2025Las conversaciones difíciles son inevitables en la vida. Ya sea para expresar una preocupación, resolver un conflicto o comunicar algo delicado, el miedo a la reacción del otro y la incertidumbre s...obre el impacto de nuestras palabras pueden hacer que las evitemos. Pero, ¿qué pasaría si aprendiéramos a abordarlas con calma, claridad y empatía?En esta conversación con mi amigo Alberto Herrera en COPE, exploramos cómo prepararnos antes de un diálogo complicado, gestionar las emociones y transformar la comunicación en una herramienta de conexión en lugar de confrontación.Espero que estas claves te ayuden a afrontar con mayor seguridad esas conversaciones que has estado evitando.Ojalá este episodio te acompañe y pueda convertirse en una inspiración a la hora de despertar y florecer tu verdadero potencial.Página Web: https://marioalonsopuig.com/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/marioalonsopuig/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@MarioAlonsoPuigOficial Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MarioAlonsoPuigOficial Entradas a la nueva conferencia 2025: https://marioalonsopuig.com/gira-2025/
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Before
that you
understand,
you'll
understand.
How many
conversations
difficult
are in
conversations
amables,
conversations
constructives and
creative.
If really
we
would be
interested
what the
other
person
and needs
and
not just
what he
doesn't
what he
and he
and needs.
This is
a podcast
for
those
those
people
that
They want to think in great,
Sentire in great, and
living in great.
I'm the doctor
Mario Alonso Puch,
I'm invite to
to be with me
this adventure
of discovery and
the
development.
Solo,
maybe I
might get
before, but
we're
much more
much more
very much.
Mario,
good days.
Good days,
dear,
how are you?
Very well.
Oh, yeah,
to you
have been
said that we
have to
have been
to
that we
have been
I've said and I've
I've said you.
I've done
that's done
a pause
and valorative
I'm
sure,
sure,
sure,
I'm not
I'm
said,
I'm
what I'm
let's go
let's go
part,
conversations
is difficult,
I'm
I'm a
medical,
as
now have
you have
to
have to
have
many
many
many
bad,
when you
you have
you have
to
when you
you're
to come
to make
a
problem
how you
how you
affrontable
that
that
the
people,
is that, effectively,
you know, you have
commented very
well,
we can't
make a
public to do you
do you
know,
a certain
end up
this is a
thing, it's a
question
statistically
about.
Well,
a percentage
is a
cure, a
percentage
not a
etc.
What we
don't want
to do
never the
people
in any
situation is
a
verdict.
Because it
is totally
different.
It's
We know we have been situations very difficult to explain
from the pure science,
the ones have been
there have been remedies that have remitied
in a form that we're medically,
with the science,
we don't know we can't explain.
So, in second,
there's a second place,
not to do you know,
not so you can't give an information
in the middle of a passillo.
There is to look a city a little more
amable and the
the truth
without compassion is crueled
is to say,
all,
that's what you can't
say,
oh yeah, this is that
is the situation
that we've got to
make you know,
because if it's
so,
you have to
describe it
when you
when you're
with the family
after the
intervention
chirurgic
you have to
do with
a sensibility
with an
amability
with an affect
that the quite and a yearro
a situation
that's
quite difficult.
But that's
I know
is extrapolable
to any
conversation
difficult.
But all we
have conversations
difficult,
we know,
we're
things difficult
to tell,
to transmit,
and to receive.
And,
I think,
we'll
we'll
we'll
let's get
a possible
conversation
difficult.
It's
and how
not
that
predisposition
negative
at the
time of
a time?
Well,
we'll
be,
we'd
we'd
we'd
a conversation
difficult
like
a
that is associated
to the
MEDA
the MEDA
the
consequences
if we
have to
offer a
vulnerability
that can
go to
that's
associated to
a certain
a certain
inquietude
in the
fact of
that when
we'll
we'll
we'll
be a
form
that not
that's
that's
that's
that
can't be
aira
that generate
a
some
that
The conversations difficult
are in these two polarities.
The ira or the
the fear, the fear
to what can be
the question,
the fear of the
consequences
that can't
have to be
for the
other part,
the inquietude
that is a
enfabed in me
that generate
a down
in the other
person and that
still do you
more the
relation.
So how
I have
to prepare
to be the
receptor
to be the
receiver or
the emissor
in this
case of a
I'm a message,
difficult.
Well,
look,
the most
important,
although
it's
altering the
perception
that I'm
of the
situation.
For example,
if I
go to
a person
with a
time,
because he
has done a
that has
been offensive
or me has
perjudicado,
although
it is
a very
to say,
not going to
be a
just just
the
words that
that are
that's not
my form
to look
my
tone in the
voice
is that
we're
we're
we're
those
those
discovered in the
university
parma in
1996
the
equipment of
Ritsolati
Fogatza
called
Neuronas
Spejo
that are
capable
to
capture
that's
so at
the
level
inconsient
but at
the
not
mean
that
not
not
not
they're
can't
they
can't
the
sentiment
real,
the
person,
is to say,
if I'd
say,
I'd
like to
know how
you're
but I'm
doing
a lot of
a
lot of
these
neurons are
to be
able to
get to
and the
person,
in the
person,
in the
person,
I'm
interested
legitimately
for how
it's,
will
be to
to be
a
tension,
will
a
fact
to be
a factor
in
that
conversation.
For that's...
It's the most...
It's the word of those
those words we have to
have to be said
well-ditche or not,
because you know
because we're associable
something
to do not.
Yes.
So,
especially,
from where
we say,
if I'm
saying, if I
say we're going
to talk
and so I
don't know
an tone
imperative, no, it's, you know, it's, you know, I'm, in afto, and
it's a fact that.
transmit us here, because when a person
is put in a situation of defense,
because it's in danger,
in that moment, there are changes
very important in the riego of the
brain, and the cerebrough
decapting a information fundamental.
The cerebrough
put in march a patrones automatic
of defense that robin part
of the riego sanguineo,
that would have to go to the part
of the corteza prefrontal,
the part more evolutioned in our
Cerebro, that is precisely the
that we can't connectar, the that
us permit empathize, the that we can't
understand what the other person
us wants, and it's
position in a
in a situation in
that we activate other mechanisms
where we're constantly
filtering the reality
in a time that the only
that we're preoccupied is that what in that
in that moment we're perceivism
that we're going to, and that's what does is to
augment the distance. For so there are
that the
good intentions
for resolve
something in
a communication,
if that communication,
that conversation
not is prepared,
generate a
more distance.
What I know
is if they're
because,
even with good
communication,
not you have
to get to
a state
in the
that you
get to
someone to
get to
there are occasions
that is
not, but
there are
some of
some
there's
there
problem
that's
when we
only
we're
communication in moments of crisis, in moments of urgency, and not
we don't have communication habitual.
So, if you want to enter a process of communication or
you want to establishes that conversation, when no has
been encounters previous, when only you connectas
with that person in moments of crisis, in a moment of
difficulty, well, it's like the person that
not has
trained
in certain
things
and of
the
and the
need to be
the level
of the
situation
more
difficult.
I mean,
I did
a program
very interesting
in
Boston
about the
thing about
the
negotiation.
It's
the
program
more
sophisticated
that
is the
one of the
things that
they were
that they
were
that they
had been
that
many
people
that were
to
processes of
a process
to
a process of
negotiation very complicated.
They didn't even
them
they're in
they're in a
form automatic
would be a
creativity and
then it's
all the contrary
if you don't
you prepare
the things
what's all
is the creativity
what is the
activation of
patrones
reactivos
and
of pure
automatisms.
This is
what you say
and again
that's
that you're
saying you're
going to
you're going
you're
you're going
to have
you're going to
you're
to say
much things
And when you get you to your
house and say,
me caching the masala,
that no I've
said I'm in the
head to the
because at the
whole for the
impulse,
no?
Well,
we know we
we're not
we're trying
is in a
period of
resolve what
has been
stropeing
during much
time.
We have
to have
an objective
clear in
that conversation.
We have
to understand
what is
what we
really
we're really
things.
For example,
we're
we're
to understand what a person
is the relationship
to a a determined
that has been,
to some way,
affect to our,
a, a,
a, a, a,
a, a, a,
our objective is
to know what
that someone
really needs.
Our objective
could be
that someone
entienda
how we
know,
how we're
respect to
or that
we can
that we're
that we're
not being
being covered.
What the
most part of the
most part of the
other
times
surprisingly
our
conversation
not
is a
focused
to the
really
we're
to be
to get
to put
our
other
person or to
defend
us
the point
of the
other
person
that's
that's
express
us
not
that's
expression
that
that's
not
that's
we're
we're
we're
a predispos
tremendous
so
that's
that you
take
an idea
I
one of a one
I'm a,
a supertom
in,
in,
in,
he said
something, he
said,
he said,
no me
never, and
has to
have
a
benefit for
both
parts.
If I
think the
other part
is my
enemy,
you know the
phrase,
the enemy
and then
what's
what I'm
that I'm
that's
that person
never more
never more
to be
to make
that I
have used
that he
has been
that
I've
got
I've
got to
it.
It's
a lot
something
something
something
in the
conversations.
In the
conversations
many
times
we're
to
point of
view.
To
readchazz
the
point of
the
other
person,
not we
don't
not we
know
what the
other person
and needs
and he
need to
Steve
Covey
who was
a great
man
said
he said
before
that you
understand
you
understand
how
conversations
difficult
many
are
conversations
amables
conversations
construct
and
creative
if
really
I
really
not, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, not to interest
know what the other person, sheented and needs, no, not just
what he thinks or he has to, but, no, no, no, not?
Not to have them, is much better than to have, no?
I mean, to say, evite that conversation, difficult, and comersetelo to
you know, so, yeah, for one, for a, for a reason, very, very, very curious.
The mind, um, has been, um, um, um, is it has been, um, um, um, um, you know, it has been,
Descrited and discovered
Has been
many years
And that
Error is
in the
base
of all
the
suffering
that we
experimented
So the
mind
needs
information
and if
no
has information
she
it
inventa
if I
have
a
conversation
and
in that
conversation
really
I
look
as
an
explorer
interesting
and
curious
and
to
understand
what
the
other
person
live
experiment
or
Sient, I'm
receiving
an information
and,
for a
time,
not have
to invent
another
information.
But if
I don't
have that
conversation,
the
mind has
to inventors
an information
and assume
that is
real,
although
it's a
pure
spegism
and a
pure
invention.
The
curious is
that here
is where
the
error of
the
mind.
The error
of the
mind,
what
is that
is that
information
that
is a
information
that
support, solidific
potency,
my point of
view, and not
the buskedom
of the
fact.
The information
always has
more power than
the opinion.
The information
to get to
the
know of the
world,
while the
elucubration,
what you
get to
the
ignorance.
Totally.
That interesting
this
you have
said.
There is
a issue
about
that I
want to
I
want to
I
think that's
something
something.
Sure, being
not is the
not the same
is a very much
of being
there's an
authentic sincericida
for there
is what I
said you
before before
information
not something
or something
or something
or something
or something
or something
you
the truth
the
right
right
you
you
when a
person
is sincere
is
saying
something
something
something
that
for that
is relevant
what
not
implica is
that
have to
have to
tell
to
tell you
all
your
life.
That's
no,
no,
no,
no,
it's
saying,
you
you
you can
you
can't
you
know,
but
not
you
don't
say
that
you
can
reserve
certain
you
know
what you
do
say,
you
totally.
Another
other
other
other
is that
you know,
you
say,
you know,
you
know,
you're
that's very
frequent
and
create
something,
you're
,
you're
giving
support
and solidize
something,
that in the
fond of
you know,
you know,
you know,
you know,
so it's
what you're
saying,
then it's
a fact
a exercise
of reflection,
of much
authenticity,
of much
honesty,
to be
to make
that with
what frequency
we're
so
and so
how much
the problem,
the problem,
the difficulty,
the
error in the
other person
and the
difficult
to recognize
it in
one.
But that
has
to
have to
have
an
application
scientific, Mario, because it's
involuntary, and it's
involuntary, and he's a lot.
Sure.
It's, for sure,
everything, for
the whole,
it's a,
one, a,
explanation
scientific.
I mean, the
explanation is
very simple,
and at the
way has
his Aquel,
no?
The
explanation is
that the
most of
the
cases,
who is
having the
conversation with
the other
person,
no,
you,
no,
is our
ego,
and our
ego,
has to
be sure
of that we're
in the ceguera
that the reality
that we're
the only reality
is the only reality
and it's
indisputable
for that
surge
soberbiah
in that conversation
I have
so you're
so much
then you
start one
to get a
little to
do that
a piece
and it's
because the
ego is
because the
ego is a
structure
mental
very
very danina
with that
we know
we're
we're
and when
that ego
is he sent
eried
what he
is
to understand to the other person,
what you look is to
deliver the offence,
buska,
then it's,
car, we,
we know,
we're a tremendous
ceguera.
For that
that capacity
to park
the ego,
is fundamental.
There,
in Denver,
in Colorado,
there was a
gynasia of
Aikido,
that had
a,
a,
a,
a,
a,
a special,
the,
that put
before,
before,
or no,
I said,
"'Juntal with
"'tas
"'withes
"'withing the tatami,
"'not can't enter with
"'withes
"'dehack here
"'t your ego.
"'C.,
"'not enter
"'in the tatami
"'with,
"'because then
"'vac,
"'you're going
"'a
"'of a series
"'of,
"'of,
"'that are
"'to be
"'that you
"'gannes
"'and the other
"'Pierda.
"'Con,
"'you can't
"'a'
"'No,
"'to be a
connection, you're going to
to lose what is the
spirit of the Aikido in this case.
So, then it's
what's the same.
When you enter
in a conversation,
deja your ego
in the door.
And what is
to have the ego
in the
door?
It's to
judge-to-
and to
leave the
pasto
out.
Because if you
have
a person
and the
etiquette
always is
on the
past,
or it
comes to
you,
you're
to make
that person
that person
is a
little you
not you
to make, in
your form of
You're even
You're not
You're
He's
You're
You're start
The etiquette
That's
You're
You're
You're
You're
I'm going to
Like I'm
Like I'm
Bruce
Lee in an
Annuncelio
No
I said
Ver the
things
Like for
first
Libera
the
person of the
etiquetta
And veras
Al
human
But for
That's
I can
To get
the
Ego
in the
Puer
I'm
I'm
I've
seen
Converses
are
People
are
tremendously
sabies
because
are
very
humildes and
they're
something that's
they're
they're in
they're in
they're in
the disposition
that's about
that's a
person who
he's about
and know all
what you know
what you
good
good advice
oh yeah
these conversations
are very
sincere but very
sinceres
I think
they're
they're
they're
well
we're
we're
we're
we're
we're actually
we're
we're
we're
that much
of the
suffering
that the
human
experimented
It has to be with the relations.
The same that's
that the element
clave in the felicity
are the relations.
The element
fundamental in the
infelicidad
also are the relations
when you don't
have good relations,
when not you
see accepted,
not you feel accepted
as well as
you know,
you're constantly
judgeed,
criticated,
etc.
And for that's
so important
to give us
the relations
and naturally
to the
conversation.
I love. I enjoy much. Mario, a minute. A minute. A minute.
A great.
A bravo.
Oh, jala, this podcast you have liked and could
convert into an inspiration at the hour
to display and make flourer your
a very potential.
