Dr. Mario Alonso Puig - ¿Pensamientos Negativos?

Episode Date: January 11, 2024

De las formas mas prácticas y útiles para evitar los pensamientos negativos es aprender a mantenerse en el PRESENTE: No permitiendo que la mente nos arrastre al pasado para lamentarnos de lo que hicimos o dejamos de hacer y no permitiendo que la mente nos arrastre al futuro para preocuparnos.No deberíamos morder ese cebo que encierra un tremendo anzuelo…Es en el presente donde se activa la red neuronal ejecutiva central lo que provoca que el cerebro funciona de manera más eficiente, que nuestro cuerpo funcione mejor, incluso, que nuestro sistema inmune funcione mejor. Entrenar la ATENCIÓN para estar en el aquí y en el ahora es una de las prácticas mas efectivas para evitar esos pensamientos.Ojalá este podcast te haya gustado y pueda convertirse en una inspiración a la hora de despertar y florecer tu verdadero potencial.Página Web:  https://marioalonsopuig.com/ Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/marioalonsopuig/Youtube:https://www.youtube.com/@MarioAlonsoPuigOficialFacebook:https://www.facebook.com/MarioAlonsoPuigOficial

to learn to maintain in the present. Not permit that the mind no is arraughts to last or the future.

Not mordered that cebo that in fieler a tremendous anthewel. This is a podcast

for all those people that want in great, and living in

great. I'm the doctor Mary Alonso Puch, I'm to live with

this adventure of this Maybe I'd get before, but together we'll get us much more less lejos. Bien-veni.

When I think in a visagra, I think in a door that you get from a place to another. I open the door and me to another stance. Normally, me get to a stancy that I know- this experience that we're

taking, I think, no, it's, a place that's that's so easy to predecide. It's, it's a a a, a, a, a, a, a, a world different, with some things of the anterior

and others that we know what's going to be. So, if it's a, a period of transit, of a world known or a world disconocid,

not simply of a world very known to one relatively known, but I think there is a more profound. I think we're at a reality structurally different. Sule to say, this is something

very known, not as a as a world in change, but as a change, but I think that's so. Deja, weas that are difficult to borrow? Yes, what we're living

is a situation in grand measure traumatic. It's a thing, from the point of of view of the peridies traumatic for

to be a new, with congestion of hospitals, persons young, if not young,

very very and for the other things that for the human has a

important the thing economic and the thing of the thing of the things,

that of your people, to not to go to come to to

eat to and the time or the the form in the

that you you saw you, you're a thing that's a lot of a lot of

and there is a lot of it's been impactant the perception of our fragility,

the perception of the fragility of the world, of how a virus diminut

is capable to produce semehant disruption a level global. And this

in our schemes mental is that we want to control all, that we

want to that we want to dominate all, produces an desequilibrium very profound. Ante this, there are two

ways that can take. The first is the way of a person that, that is an

situation so in unesperable, that bruska, is repliega over she seems small,

she's insignificant, and this can induce a process of stress post-traumatic.

There are other persons that, against this situation, that also that's a lot, they're

how they're the form to maintain to flot, the form to grow, they're and then

they're in those people what's called the thing, the is the problem.

So, no there's no a level major of sophistication. The part anterior of the Cerebrose

the Cerebr executive. The Cerebro executive is the encargated to learn things new, take good decisions and even with

little information, be more creative, to be more, relationarse with more more

more than other people, negotiate more. In a new environment,

like the actual, we need these capacities plenament active. The capacities of the

Cerebro executive are enormously influidated for other part of the brain that is a system

limbicic or Cerebr emotional. It's when the cerebral emotional is a fencing, is a

fencing, is a fencing of passion, the Cerebro executive is a much more

active and then then can detect to a form much more more

where it seems that there. Now, well, when the system lindbic, the Cerebro Emotional, the type of sentiments, the type of affectors that generate are, the tristence, the sensation of impotency,

the desperance, et cetera, et cetera, that same system limbical with different structures is capable of blocker the

Cerebro-Eecutive. What occurs with a person that constantly is not only having pensions negative that

his mind active this part dysfunctional of the system limbical

and and get to get to lamented for what he he's

or for what he he he's to to be to

automatically automatically reduce the function of the brain

of the capacity to adaptate to It's radically. For that,

being a person positive in the life. Not means not to have a problem. It's not

to say, it's not when you when you're when you look as a form active

the opportunity, evitas that this part of the cerebral emotional that's

ceba in the negative is so that is a way your capacity

to adaptate, to take good decisions, of learning things new

we have to learn things new, we need to negotiate better, to make an important today of the

day of the cooperation, it's disparate. For that's so important be being positive in

these moments in those we are going to the penumbra, the obscurity, the uncertainty,

the difficulty. For me, one of the neuroscientifices more the world, is the

professor Antonio Damasio of the University of South of Califel And he has demonstrated much,

with his woman, Anna Damasio, that is a spectacular neuro-radiologist, have demonstrated that it's impossible to make good decisions without the concurrence

between reason and emotion. Me explain. The reason, what we're we call us, is very good at the hour to take decisions

in the aula, in an entorn virtual. The emotions are exceptionally good, leading claves subtiles of the entornes reales. Ambous, reason, and emotion confluen in one part of the cerebrose that's called the area ventromedial. Well, what we know?

We know that if we're almost totally frios, that in reality, not we don't, not not we should learn claves inconscientes that one

part of the Cerebr is a time of the world emotional. It's this

sensation that a intuition of my my my head me said this

but now now it's certain that if we

we're we not for certain emotions it the

part rational then what is the proposal? The proposal is

If you're inunded by emotions is that you're going to take good decisions or modules

those emotions that you think that that's refer to or you're you're to

you're to you're your not your reason not not you're

not you're not you think only with the reason you're

to find you're fiatte too of that point, that is the intuition, that is the world

that's being read at a level emotional, but as far the reason, the reason says, this is not

the reason. It has much sense. Of the actually, they've done experiments, has done

experiences, where this is impressive and registros with electroencephalography to

see, registering the activity cerebral. and an electrocardiogramma, also with studies of coherency cardiac, viewing the response of the heart. So, they were they put mazzos of cards,

and, according eligiered, of one macko or other, they were going to win or to earn or lose money. There was a tricker that they had to discover of what mazo no they had to take cards, because at final, was the mazo of cartes,

truced, for that they'd money. When when they'd discover the

secret and they start the the first change, not was

not about in the brain. The heart the first the

true the true, and he's the thing in

form of intuition. This ago this is a don't this is

so this is a the heart has a the heart And the world affective is

capturing information of the exterior. Not we know exactly how it's, but is it happening information of the students. I would say, the reason, always, living only, empuged by the emotions is very very dangerous.

But to try the friality, I want to eliminate the emotions, no, it's a good decisions. My, my, my propost is the next. First, all we are the same

front of spejows. It's a is that we're not in based to how we're not to come others,

and we're we're seeing how others we're. The fact, Dr. Rosenthal, Cateratic of Psychology

at the University at Harvard, this he most the applicating what's called the

effect Pygmalion. When the professors crean that their students were

they were they had said that were very list, the form that they were in the form in that they interactuad on them, lograva that those alumni, although traditionally in other colleges, had been seen bad students, and they'd have been very good students. Mientras that,

that traditionally are very good, although the new professors, not know they'd, but that they had said to these professors in this experiment that were mal those, the form of mirroles, the form of in relation to them, had a lot of impact

that, that's quite historically were very good students, they're going to be very bad the students.

It's a see, we're seeing, we're seeing we're doing the self-estimed of a person,

only we have to do a few things. I don't say, it's very, this

function. First, there, have to care to the person, not you can't

elevate the self- the self- the person, He wants. Second, there is

to create in that person for on the person is that expressing. There's to value it.

We know when we know they they're to ask it. Because that that you

recognize that has a potential that not has expressed so, so

for that you you're to you're to be and you to accompany

and then then it's to make to autoestimely, independently the age. What does pass? We're

that many times not we don't know we're not we're not we're not we're not we're not we

we're we're we're we're we're we're we're we're

we're sometimes not us so the autoestim as as a general and for

it's much important to make front a I'm a question, because one, the first that consult is, is I'm able to

do you? What can't do my things? This question was done after 5,000 years, and

it's perfectly the explanation in the text most antivocal that's the Mahabata and in its

Nucle the vagabat Gita. What is what we have to do? There is

what our contrary to what our mind what our does our mind. Our mind not wants to be in the present,

only want to be in the past or in the future. For what is going to the past? Parliamentarse, for what he did or he went to do? For what?

To be the future, to preoccupation? So, of the forms more practical, utiles, to do you do what you

do you know, is to learn, to maintain in the present. not permit that the mind

not to the mind that's arraughts that's a cebo that's in the present

where is a red neuronal that's the network the general

when that the red is the the the the

world function the more more efficient even the system

immune the that is the the virus, it's it's just is entrener the attention

to start in the here and the hour. Oh, this podcast you have liked and could be

a new inspiration at the hour to display and make flowering your your potential.