Dr. Mario Alonso Puig - ¿Por qué nos cuesta ser felices?

Episode Date: November 12, 2024

La razón por la que nos somos felices a nivel profundo es solo una; creemos que no merecemos ser felices. Ojalá este podcast te ayude y pueda convertirse en una inspiración a la hora de despertar y florecer tu verdadero potencial. Página Web:  https://marioalonsopuig.com/  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/marioalonsopuig/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@MarioAlonsoPuigOficial Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MarioAlonsoPuigOficial

At the level of the ser, all are we all the same. What happens? What happens? There is a respect, there's a certainia, there's a turnour. The people most

that I've seen are people are tremendously amables. At the level of the ser, those are all as well as. This is a podcast for all those

those people that want to think in great, sentire in great and living in great. I'm the doctor Mario Alonso Puch.

I invite to be with me this adventure of this adventure of discovery and Creciment personal. Only, maybe I get before, but we'll get us much more

lejos. Bien-been. The reason for that we not are a level profound is one, only one.

Cremes that no, we'recees are felices. For that auto-boicoteam the felicity.

Let's let's Let's see us We're seeing To see if they're Connected with what I'm saying You're going to say You're going to You're going to

You're going to You're going to You're especially content And then you're You're going to This can't be Nothing good They're

They're going to They're going to Get to the things Good Uff This And you

You're to start We're We're to get We're We're We're not being. Because, because for

reasons very profound, that I don't that's the moment of commentarles, in a moment of terminated, we've accused of something, we've accused of something, we've judged, we've declared culpable, and we've established

or we've established for us ourselves, a pen. The pen is, not are felices because is this

because we're erroneously tragically that in our essence we're men

men a me fascina Shakespeare I know he's marvellously

the alma and there there's a moment in that has produced

a assinato and the assesino in his works that has

that has the same in the man because he he said no the water

of the ocean could be not these hands we have

the we a level ontological is a metaphysical and not

for so so without implications very profound in

our we have a man that not the

water of the ocean would be capable of lavar, she'll have to to live, we're going to be

as a lotchewishers. No, so it's auto-boicot. Ceres, and for so, not we don't mercees a correction of our errors, we dece us,

we deceptive. And this, a level ontological, has implications very profound. Why? Because we're constantly

boycote-none that. In the moment in the moment in that we know we we're as

as beings, that inerent We are not only-officed We are not-eastern, we are We are youngs of the Stars of the Universe Hives, I-i-as-of-the-your-of-the- In the moment in that

we know that grandness and that perfection profound, in that moment, the Mancha disappears and what we is be felices as, as a

like one being a child, a child, the universe, not be a we have to understand. that that mancha is a fiction and

if i'm me see i'm so i'm i'm going to be a lot encountering rationales yes or no mercedor of no i don't know i'm not i'm not i'm not not ever be merceded of things lindas is is a level

profound a level metaphysical the problem of why weicotteamos So, for that for me, the title of the conference is more grand, of what you're saying, what you want to express is that, that's true, that we're doing tonteries, clear that we're

we commites errors, that we're, that we're things that are incorrect, but that's not define who we're who knows. I can't have a fealda. I can't imagine, imagine, a oruega, that,

according the criteria actual, is a one or a or a more more more small or more more a

thing that that's a really a person a it's a it's a I'm

a I'm a not a I'm can't I can't

have a kind of a that that no me

can be a because if I put all

my life front I I see that there

act of there is true, also, there are act of valentia. And in that moment, and that's balance, I'd say, ah, for that what I'm not that I'm reflected

not by that act of co-barredia, and by that act of valentia. I'm so I'm a different. This has implications very great because in the moment in which you recognize that you are more than what you are more than what you

think, in that you can't in that moment, can re-scribrived your own story. And how I present I to someone. I'm, for example, and you're, and you're, and you're, who you're?

It's very good question. And the response is that that is a response that each one has to discover. I, in a moment determined, it was a process of

meditation of a profundity extraordinary, and I, and I took to superar what's called the angustia ontica. The angustia

ontica is the If you ask me, Mario, what are you? Are you? To me, I mean, I'm a medical. You say, no, Mario, that's your profession. Well, I'm, well, I'm sorry, your nationality.

Well, I'm, so you're your gender. I'm a father, no, that's a condition family. I'm a husband, a condition family. And I get a moment in that I'm that I'm a called angustia ontica. The angustia, the ontology is the

science as a ser. Why? Because I'm I'm quite, and the vacill, and in that vacue is when you discover who is in reality. So, you have the paper of the father, is the paper of the spouse, this case, the gender that you have, you know, the nationality,

where you've been, etc., you know, you know, you know, things that are very valiosas, and nobody no negate, but no define what you're. The same way, that the person has much money or a little money, no implica the grandeza of that person. No, someone for having more

money is more grand than that someone who has more altitude, or, someone for having more altitude, no is more grand in the sense that we're talking, that someone that has less altitude, or someone that is of the Argentina, no is

more, or less, than someone that is in Spain. At the level of being, all are always. At the level of having, we're, we're, we're having more beaugh, obviously, like you, others, less than I, more juvenu like you, less like I,

but at the level of the ser, we're almost equal. What occurs? When at the level of the ser, we're going to be as equal, there's a respect, there's a certainia, there's a turnura, because I'm not putting, and I'm not taking anything in the world of the term. Nothing, no, no, that's, for you know, nothing. For sure,

the people most marvellousas I've encountered I in the life. Some, premiums Nobel, other people that have gotten all the type of of triumphs deportives.

The people most grandes that I've seen were people tremendously amables, cercanas. They were

to all the world with a careno, with a affability independently of who were.

If it were a person with a person of a an enterprise of a nation. A level of the ser, those be in all as equal. What is what is in

reality? Oh, I hope this podcast you had liked and could convert into an inspiration at the hour of to display and make flower your your real potential.