Feel Better, Live More with Dr Rangan Chatterjee - BITESIZE | How Smartphones Are Rewiring Our Brains | Jonathan Haidt #554
Episode Date: May 8, 2025A topic that I’m truly passionate about is the introduction of social media and smartphones into all aspects of our lives – and what impact this is having on us individually, collectively and, per...haps most urgently, what impact this is having on our children. Feel Better Live More Bitesize is my weekly podcast for your mind, body, and heart. Each week I’ll be featuring inspirational stories and practical tips from some of my former guests. Today’s clip is from episode 456 of the podcast with world-renowned psychologist and author of the best-selling book ‘The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness’, Jonathan Haidt. In this clip, Jonathan shares some eye-opening insights and we delve into practical strategies for parents. Thanks to our sponsor https://www.drinkag1.com/livemore Show notes and the full podcast are available at drchatterjee.com/456 Support the podcast and enjoy Ad-Free episodes. Try FREE for 7 days on Apple Podcasts https://apple.co/feelbetterlivemore For other podcast platforms go to https://fblm.supercast.com. DISCLAIMER: The content in the podcast and on this webpage is not intended to constitute or be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your doctor or other qualified health care provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have heard on the podcast or on my website.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Today's Bite Size episode is sponsored by AG1, one of the most nutrient dense whole
food supplements that I've come across, and I myself have been drinking it regularly for
over six years.
AG1 makes it simple to be the best version of you.
Over 70 ingredients, one scoop once a day for less than a cup of coffee.
It's a science-driven, daily health drink which supports your energy, focus and immune
system.
It also helps support your gut's health.
For example, it contains calcium which contributes to the normal function of digestive enzymes
and biotin to maintain your own intestinal mucus membrane. Subscribe now and get a free bottle of Vitamin D and five free AG1 travel packs with your
first subscription.
See all details at www.drinkag1.com forward slash live more.
Welcome to Feel Better, Live More Byte Size, your weekly dose of positivity and optimism
to get you ready for the weekend.
Today's clip is from episode 456 of the podcast with Jonathan Haidt, world renowned psychologist
and author of the bestselling book, The Anxious Generation.
Now a topic that I'm truly passionate about is the
introduction of social media and smartphones into all aspects of our
lives and what impact this is having on us individually, collectively and perhaps
most urgently what impact this is having on our children. In this clip, Jonathan shares some eye-opening insights and shares
some practical advice for parents.
I think a lot of us can understand why social media in particular can be toxic. So why in
your view do you think we should try our best to avoid giving our children smartphones
until the age of 16?
When I started writing the book, I thought the main story was going to be about social
media and girls, because that's where the evidence is clearest.
But pretty soon in, I realized, no, it's the phone-based childhood.
It's when the phone moves to the center of your child's life, it blocks out everything
else.
In fact, I call phones experience blockers
because they will reduce the degree to which your child
has every other kind of experience.
They won't read as many books,
they're not likely to have hobbies,
they're not gonna sleep as much.
And that's even true if they're not on social media
because the phone has so many fun things to do.
So look at the way kids behave now.
At the beginning of class, it's silent.
You know, most students are there a little bit early.
It's silent because it's a little awkward
to start a conversation with someone
who isn't your best friend.
And everyone else is on their phone.
And so you pull out your phone.
Even if you don't have social media,
you've got something to do there.
Or maybe you get into an elevator.
And you know, it's a little awkward in an elevator
with some people that you sort of know. Do you make small it's a little awkward in an elevator with some people
that you sort of know, do you make small talk?
No, you just pull out your phone.
That's what everyone else is doing.
There's no need for small talk.
And so the technology is amazing at making our lives easier.
And that's why we adults are hooked on it.
It's not necessarily bad.
I love my iPhone.
It does all kinds of amazing things for me.
It's very, very helpful.
But I guess the key idea I wanna get for parents here
is the last thing you wanna do for your child
is make everything easy.
The last thing you wanna do is say,
all the things that are difficult in life,
here, here's a phone.
It will take care of things for you.
That's a way to guarantee that they will not grow.
And so even if your daughter, let's say,
gets a smartphone or your son has a smartphone
and you say no Instagram, no Snapchat, no TikTok. There's still a lot of stuff to do there and they will still use it as
a crutch socially. It feels that we are literally changing our experience of the world. Having
immediate access to everything all the time, I think actually is a problem. It makes us lazy.
Exactly. That's right.
Kids need to strive and struggle for things
thousands of times.
And if we make it easy for them, they don't learn.
But your point about how this feels different,
this time is different,
almost all of us, no matter who you talk to,
our technology is a mixed blessing.
We all see the value in it for our work,
but we're overwhelmed just the number of emails
and texts and distractions, the things we have to do.
And then once we appreciate how hard it is for us,
now transfer this to nine-year-olds,
to children who are just about to begin puberty.
What does it do as the brain is rapidly rewiring?
Puberty is this incredibly important period
of brain development. What does this crazy, insane, inhuman kind of overwhelming life do to our
kids?
Yeah, you touched on something really important, I think, which is we all know how difficult
it is for us to manage our own relationship. And we have fully developed prefrontal cortexes,
right? We have fully developed brains.
So what is it doing to our kids?
Yeah.
So let's start by talking about childhood,
because human childhood is unique among all other animals.
You know, childhood in other animals
is this temporary period between, you know,
when you're a neonate and a tiny little thing,
and then you have to quickly get to the adult form
to be reproductive.
But humans have this weird S-shaped curve
where we grow quickly the first couple of years,
and then we grow very slowly from age four, five, six,
all the way in that period,
what Freud called the latency period,
up to 11, 12, 13, whenever the growth spurt starts.
And in that period, the brain isn't really growing either,
but it's rewiring itself up.
And it's wiring itself up based on experience.
And if you're a young mammal,
you have a relatively large brain
compared to other taxa of animals.
And you are programmed to play.
All young mammals play.
And there's a biological purpose for that play,
which is they try out motor patterns at first.
Just can I run, can I walk, can I climb?
And then they try out social patterns.
Can I tease, can I take teasing?
And this takes many, many years, 10, 15 years,
to do this, to wire up the brain.
So what happens, what happens if we give our kids,
and in the UK, I heard this horrible statistic,
in the UK, Ofcom reported that 24% of your five
to seven year olds have their own smartphone.
Parents give them a hand me down, whatever,
here kid, watch this, I'm busy, I'm cooking,
I'm doing email, here's a phone.
A quarter of five to seven year olds have a smartphone.
A smartphone is an experience blocker.
Once a kid has it, it's so enticing,
they're just not gonna have many of those experiences
that they need to wire up their brains properly.
So when all this stuff was coming in, you know,
we thought, well, sure, they're having social interactions
on social media, it's very social.
And, you know, the boys are talking to each other
on video games or they're, it's exciting.
So we, you know, we thought, well,
maybe these virtual interactions will be just as good. So we thought, well, maybe these virtual interactions
will be just as good.
I even thought, I remember when I first saw Twitter
and kids were like tweeting about a hamburger
that they had or something, I was thinking,
well, it's kind of weird, it's trivial,
but maybe it's super social.
Maybe, you know, maybe they're like,
if you have 500 contacts with other kids during the day
rather than just 50 or whatever I had
when I was in grade school, maybe that'll be good.
But it's not.
A real world interaction is one that involves our bodies.
Like even right now, I'm moving my hands, you and I,
there are all kinds of rules.
Like you're listening to me, so you look at me.
I just make temporary eye contact.
It'd be weird if I just stared at you.
So this is a subtle thing about human social interaction
that I can put into words, but I didn't know this
until I like read it in a book that this is what we do.
So you and I are both practiced at this
because we've had millions and millions
of face-to-face interactions.
But in a virtual interaction, there's no body.
You're just interacting.
I mean, you're just interacting mostly through typing,
through words, and the person on the other end
doesn't even have to be a person, it can be an AI.
So the body is really important.
We use our heads, our head position,
we use all kinds of things.
So nonverbal communication is crucial.
And that's just the first feature.
The next feature is synchronous versus asynchronous.
So, right, see, you just said,
yeah, like we both know exactly when to put
in that little sound.
Too earlier, you'd be interrupting me.
Too late, and we'd trip over each other.
So it's this really tight dance
that we all know how to do with each other.
But on social media, on virtual interactions,
I post something and then I check
and you didn't comment on it and why not?
But you commented on someone else, like what's going on?
So asynchronous interaction is much more prone
to misunderstanding, stress, a lack of feedback.
And so if kids are doing that rather than joking around
with each other and wrestling and putting their arms
around each other and playing,
they're missing out on what they need.
It's as though they were being kept flat on their back
instead of learning to walk.
And it has to be in real time, right?
Real time, exactly.
So beginning in infancy,
there's a real emphasis on the back and forth,
almost like a tennis game.
One person, you tickle the kid and then she laughs,
and then you laugh and then she laughs.
So we get this dyadic interaction going.
And then when kids are older,
they like to be with a small group,
two or three other kids hanging around.
So that you're truly interacting.
And when you interact, when you take turns, that bonds you.
You trust more when you've done that turn-taking.
You're not performing for your friends.
You're playing with them.
But when you put kids on, so let's say texting, okay?
So texting the way the millennials did it
on their flip phones, you text one other person
and you might joke around.
That's okay.
I'm not against joking around on text, but it's one-to-one.
Now what kids on Snapchat and just regular texts are doing,
a lot of group texts. I mean, you have 30 people on a group text, you have a whole large group.
Now it's performative.
You're not bonding, you're performing.
It will change the nature of what you say just because so many people are looking at
it.
Exactly.
It's performative rather than playful.
Kids need a lot of play.
They don't need much performance at all.
Something that I read in, I think it was Sherry Turkle's book,
Reclaiming Conversation.
That's a great book.
It's a wonderful book.
And she shared how adolescents now
would rather communicate,
or some of them would rather communicate on text message
because they can edit.
Yes.
It's not real time.
Right, you're growing up on camera.
You're always on camera. You don't want to screw up. I found that remarkable. It's not real time. Right, you're growing up on camera.
You're always on camera.
You don't want to screw up.
I found that remarkable.
It's so sad.
And then if we think about what you're talking about
throughout the book and what you've already said,
if we are not developing the skill of real time interaction,
we're going to struggle massively when we're adults.
That's right. That's right.
You make this case right at the start of your book that we have overprotected
children offline in the real world and underprotected them online.
It is remarkable how many children, young children now have a smartphone.
I didn't know actually it was that much in the UK.
That's quite, well, for anyone who's read your book or read your book, I think that
statistic becomes even more alarming.
But I think we have to acknowledge that a lot of parents are trying to do their best.
They probably don't know the impact that that is having on their kids.
That's right. So I think the way to understand it, because in my book, I don't blame parents
at all. If parents all over the world are failing in the same way, then it can't be
the parents fault. There's something about the system, the product. So I don't blame
parents.
Kids and social media, kids and screens are something that I brought up on many occasions
on this podcast over the previous years.
It's something I'm very passionate about.
Now, there's some pretty compelling graphs in the book.
Can you explain what exactly happened in 2010?
You've already touched on it, but if we're really trying to understand the causative
link between social media use and mental health problems, particularly in girls, maybe explain
some of that data for me, please.
Anxiousgeneration.com is the website for the book. And so we now have a fantastic research
page there. Just go to anxiousgeneration.com, you'll see that you click on the research tab, you'll see all these graphs.
And the basic pattern is this,
the, when you trace out levels of depression and anxiety,
and you always need to do it separated by sex,
never trust graphs that merge all kids together.
Always look at just girls separately,
and look at boys separately, because they're very different.
And what you find is that for the girls,
everything was very stable from the late 90s
or wherever the data goes back to, generally in the 90s
and all the way through the early 2000s, up to 2010,
there's no real pattern.
We're talking now about the millennials.
When the millennials were teenagers,
their mental health was very stable.
When were you born, if you're a millennial?
1981 to 1995.
And so their mental health is very stable.
But then when Gen Z enters these data sets,
Gen Z is 1996 and later.
When Gen Z enters, the numbers go up very, very suddenly
around 2012.
And it's not just because Gen Z has arrived,
it's because this is the great rewiring period,
2010 to 2015.
And if you're a millennial,
you were mostly done with puberty by the time this happened.
So if you didn't get your first Instagram account
until you were 17 or 18, or maybe you were in university,
you're probably fine.
It was distracting, it wasted time,
but it didn't rewire your brain
because you were mostly done with puberty.
Early puberty is the most sensitive,
easily disrupted open period, roughly 11 to 13 for girls,
maybe 12 or 13 to 14, 15 for boys. That is the most important period for us to be careful about,
about what's going into their eyes and ears. And so this is, I believe, what caused Gen Z to exist,
rather than just being more millennials, is it's those kids around 2012 who got their
first smartphone, Instagram account, front-facing camera, high-speed data, all of it comes in
just in a few years.
So kid is 11 or 12 when they get all this stuff.
Now their most sensitive period of brain rewiring is governed by like millions of little things
flashing past with a status report.
This got this many likes,
this person has this many followers,
everything's quantified, everything that you're on camera.
So if you were in early puberty
during the great rewiring period, you became Gen Z
and you have more than a double the risk of anxiety,
depression, self-harm and suicide, if you're a girl.
For boys, the interesting thing is
that the percentage increases are often similar,
but boys start from lower levels of depression and anxiety.
Puberty girls have always had their levels
of depression and anxiety,
what we call internalizing disorders, go up.
So boys and girls are both going up,
but the difference is that for the girls,
it's a hockey stick.
It's almost always a hockey stick graph.
That is it's flat, you get to 2012 and then boom,
it goes up, up, up.
The boys, it's not usually a hockey stick.
The boys, it's more of a slow curve.
And for the boys, it begins a couple of years earlier.
And I think, I can't prove this part,
but I think it's because the boys were getting
onto the multiplayer video games around 2007, eight, nine.
The boys are getting onto multiplayer video games, which are great fun,
but there's so much fun that they don't see each other in person much anymore.
So the problem for boys starts a little earlier.
It doesn't have an elbow in it that's as sharp.
And that's, that was one of the clues that the boy stories is different from
the girl's story. Yeah. It's really powerful.
I have seen this in practice.
I have seen at least three kids where I can directly
See a link between their social media use and their mental health and I've also seen how quickly
It can change if you help them reset their relationship
Yeah, you've mentioned that it's different for girls than it is for boys.
This is incredibly fascinating, Jonathan.
Can you walk us through that please?
Why is social media particularly harmful for girls?
Yeah.
The big difference between boys and girls, men and women is not in their abilities.
It's in what they enjoy.
When you look at what boys and girls choose to do,
when they are left alone playing however they want,
the boys tend to go for, they'll form into groups
and then they will compete.
They just enjoy that.
The boys will work more with things.
They'll build things.
So boys are more oriented towards things,
girls are more oriented towards people.
Just on average, these are just differences on average.
So when you let kids play,
the girls will tend to spend more time in pairs
or small groups talking,
and especially talking about other people.
Girls are really interested.
They have a much more sophisticated mental map
of social space.
So this is no judgment on either sex.
This is just what we find.
So what happens when everybody gets devices all day long?
The boys get their phones and their video controllers
and they say, wow, rather than like going out
and it's raining and we're gonna,
we wanna play basketball or football,
rather than that, how about we all just,
let's play video games, it's more exciting anyway.
What's happened once we got high speed internet,
the games became more and more amazing,
multiplayer distributed games.
So now if a boy wants to play with his friends,
he has to go home alone.
He can't go over to a friend's house
because he needs his own headset,
his own controller, his own screen.
And then he can play with his buddies
and a bunch of strangers,
Fortnite or whatever war game they wanna play.
But he's not really with them.
Exactly, that's right.
Now it is synchronous.
So video games are better than social media
because video games, at least they're synchronous.
The boys, you know, my son, like during COVID,
we finally relented and got him an Xbox
and he played Fortnite with his buddies
and they'd be laughing their heads off.
So there are some good things about these video games.
But when those video games displace time together,
they're really losing out.
So that's the boy story.
Video games and porn are at the heart
of what's blocking the boy's development.
But social media takes that natural girl interest
in the social map and exploits it and says,
do you wanna know what someone just said about someone else?
Here it is.
What do you think about that?
Do you wanna know what someone else just said about you?
Here it is.
So social media is really targeted at girls insecurities.
And we know this from some of the documents
that Frances Haugen brought out of Facebook,
the Facebook whistleblower.
There's one, I mentioned it in the book, where they have a little seminar within Facebook, now Metta.
They have a little seminar on brain development,
and they show slides about how the prefrontal cortex
is the last part to myelinate,
the last part to lock down,
how the emotion centers are very powerful
in a 12, 13, 14-year-old kid,
but the ability to regulate impulse control
and say no is much weaker.
I mean, they knew exactly what they were targeting in their battle to keep girls, especially to keep
them on their platform and not let them go to other platforms. Yeah. It's so powerful to hear
the difference between boys and girls because as you say, boys are getting harmed by this new tech world, but just in a different way to girls.
And so I appreciate it's difficult in every family, everyone's got unique challenges.
At the same time, we're not blaming parents.
You're very clear in the book to not blame parents.
This is a collective action problem.
But whilst we are waiting for this collective
action problem to get solved, I think there are some things that we can do.
Absolutely. In fact, yeah, let's not put it as while we're waiting for it to get solved.
Let's put it as we all have to get going today to improve the habits and exposure of our kids.
You don't want to keep your kid away from the internet entirely.
To have a desktop computer, a big computer
with a big screen out in the living room or the kitchen
or some place where it's somewhat public
is probably a good idea.
I mean, there are many times when you want your kid
to do something on the internet.
The problems, from what I hear, and here I'm drawing on,
there's a woman named Melanie Hempe
who runs Screen Strong, an organization in the US
She says the really bad stuff happens when they can take a device into their bedroom at night
And they're not monitored and that's when they're talking to strangers and that's when a lot of the really horrible stuff happens
So don't think you have to keep your kid away from the internet
What you have to do is you have to delay as long as you can
the day at which your child has unlimited immersion
in the internet on demand.
And that's what a smartphone gives them,
unless as in your case, when they come home,
they have to put aside the smartphone.
That's what we do too.
For my daughter, she comes in,
she has to put on the kitchen counter.
It's supposed to stay there.
It doesn't always stay there.
But at least there's a framework there.
Even if it doesn't always stay there, you're't always stay there. But at least there's a framework there. Even if it doesn't always stay there, you're setting expectations, right?
There's a framework for how to live and how to use this device.
Even if it doesn't get followed 100% of the time, your daughter was still growing up knowing
that I shouldn't be on this thing the whole time because mom and dad are prioritizing
this.
That's right. And in the solutions,
I really focus on solving
what we call collective action problems.
This is the key to the whole thing.
Collective action problem is one in which
if one person does something, it might be very difficult,
but if several of us do it at the same time,
it becomes much easier.
And so if you're the only parent who says to your son,
no, you're not getting a smartphone.
And he says, but everyone else has one, I'm left out.
They're all on various platforms, they're doing things
and I don't even know what's going on.
It's very painful for the kid and it's painful for you.
So if you are the first one to do
what you thought was the right thing,
you are imposing a cost on your child.
But what if you can team up with a few of your child's friends' parents so that when
your kids reach eight or nine or 10 or whatever it is that you're thinking of giving them
a smartphone, you all say, you know what?
The five of us, the five families, we're all going to do the same thing.
We're going to keep you on flip phones or brick phones, whatever you call them here.
Until, you know, in the US, I would say 14 high school,
here 16 end of secondary school.
We're gonna keep you on those, but guess what?
We're gonna give you a fun childhood.
The families of your best friends.
We're all gonna give you an enormous amount of freedom.
You can hang out at any of our houses.
You can go between them without supervision.
And if you're talking like eight,
nine, 10 year olds, this is incredibly healthy.
We're gonna, you know, we'll pay for you to take trips
to an amusement park or to, you know,
something that you can do fun without supervision.
That's the way we can give our kids back a healthy childhood.
And if the school is on board,
then you have, you break the collective action problem
instantly because now you have the whole community is saying,
let's delay smartphones.
Let's give our kids more independence
and free play without smartphones.
What about parents who are less staying, who go,
okay, I don't know what to do.
And the practical area is brilliant, by the way,
for people, get the book,
because actually it's so clear,
you've set it out for different ages, what to do, right? It's really, really clear. But what about for someone who might feel that,
I don't know, the ship has sailed, like they've got a 15 year old who already is hooked on
their smartphone. This is very challenging, isn't it?
It is.
Do you have any advice for that parents?
Sure. You know, I hear this a lot, you know, the trains left the station, the ship has
sailed, so we can't call it back, you know, but if a
train left the station carrying a hundred kids and it was headed for a
bridge that was out and we knew they were gonna fall into a ravine, we'd call
it back, like we do something. And so I think, you know, I think we can do it
here, but it's very, very hard if you just call your kid back and nobody else does.
That's really painful for your kid. You don't want your kid,
once your kid has all these social relationships
through technology, it's very hard to rip them out
and say, no, those relationships are gone
because now you're condemning your kid to social death.
So the first thing is team up with a few other families.
If it's a few families doing it together,
it's much easier, much less painful.
That's the first thing.
Second thing is once you're aware,
once you have the concept of a phone-based childhood
versus a play-based childhood,
now you can think again with other families
and perhaps the whole school,
how do we give our kids more of a play-based childhood
rather than a phone-based childhood?
Because don't think about this just as,
we've got to rip the phones out of their hands.
We've got to get them off screens, period.
What are they gonna do all day if you take them off screens?
You have to give them back a human childhood where there's a lot of time with other kids unsupervised
So the more you think about it as giving your kid a play-based childhood
Instead of just taking away the phone based childhood the easier it's gonna be. Yeah, I love that
Hope you enjoyed that Bytesize clip.
Hope you have a wonderful weekend.
And I'll be back next week with my long-form conversational Wednesday
and the latest episode of Bytesize next Friday.