Feel Better, Live More with Dr Rangan Chatterjee - BITESIZE | How To Exercise With Less Effort And Get Fitter | Professor Stephen Seiler #532
Episode Date: March 7, 2025What if you could achieve a lot more by doing a little less? “The logical assumptions that emerge from ‘no pain, no gain’ are not valid, they’re not true” Professor Stephen Seiler Today�...�s clip is from episode 422 of the podcast with world-renowned sports scientist Professor Stephen Seiler. Whether your fitness goal is completing an Ironman race, jogging a 5K, or simply tackling the stairs without getting out of breath, in this clip Stephen shares some surprising news on how you can get there quicker, by putting in less effort. Thanks to our sponsor https://www.drinkag1.com/livemore Support the podcast and enjoy Ad-Free episodes. Try FREE for 7 days on Apple Podcasts https://apple.co/feelbetterlivemore For other podcast platforms go to https://fblm.supercast.com. Show notes and the full podcast are available at drchatterjee.com/422 DISCLAIMER: The content in the podcast and on this webpage is not intended to constitute or be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your doctor or other qualified health care provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have heard on the podcast or on my website.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Today's Bite Size episode is sponsored by AG1, one of the most nutrient dense whole
food supplements that I've come across.
And I myself have been drinking it regularly for over five years.
It contains vitamins, minerals, probiotics, prebiotics, digestive enzymes, and so much
more and can help with energy, focus, gut health, digestion, and support a healthy immune
system.
If you go to www.drinkag1.com forward slash live more, they are giving my listeners a
very special offer, a free one year supply of vitamin D and five free AG1 travel packs
with your first order.
See all details at www.drinkag1.com forward slash live more.
Welcome to Feel Better, Live More Byte Size, your weekly dose of positivity and optimism
to get you ready for the weekend.
Today's clip is from episode 422 of the podcast with world renowned sports scientist, Professor Stephen
Seiler.
Whether your fitness goal is completing an Ironman, jogging a 5k, or simply tackling
the stairs without getting out of breath, in this clip Stephen shares some surprising
news on how you can get there quicker by putting in less effort.
No pain, no gain suggests that the only way I can make a gain is if there's a lot of pain,
which suggests that every day has to be really hard.
The logical assumptions that emerge from no pain, no gain are not valid. They're not true. And that's
what we have to get away from. What we all are trying to do is how do we develop a sustainable
lifestyle where exercise is part of it, eating is part of it, sleep is part of it, our work
is part of it, but it's sustainable.
I want to ask you about high intensity or HIIT training, because over the past few years,
HIIT training has become all the rage.
And so what I have seen in clinical practice over the years is people who are super stressed
at work, have a lot of stress in their home life, a lot of responsibilities,
and they hear how good HIIT training is for mitochondrial function, for the aging process,
for metabolic health, whatever it might be.
They go, right, I don't have much time, so when I have 20 minutes, I'm going to go hard
for those 20 minutes.
Let's say they train three times a week.
I've seen patients over the years who will literally do all of their three sessions super,
super hard.
And I see them getting sick.
I see them breaking down.
I see them getting injured.
And I also see them struggling to lose weight because they don't realize the impact that
chronic unmanaged stress has on their ability to lose weight because they don't realize the impact that chronic unmanaged
stress has on their ability to lose weight.
So I wonder if you have any comments on that, whether you think that's a problem.
We could go all day on this, but, and I'm part of the problem in the sense that I am
a sports scientist and interval training is more fun to do as a research project
than saying, well, come on in and you're going to train
for two hours, low steady state,
and we're going to measure what's happening.
So we have contributed to the problem in the sense
that interval training is more popular to do research on,
it's easier to get published, you know?
And so we've created this little industry
of comparing little details
of what's the perfect interval training session.
So there's a bias almost built into the system. So it's more fun to do research on high intensity.
It's more likely to get published. Therefore, the media are more likely to pick up and disseminate this information.
And so we are seeing a small fraction of the work, but thinking that this is what we have
to do.
That's the whole thing.
Right.
So we're seeing the part of the big iceberg that's visible.
It's got to be sustainable.
And if we do too much hard, high intensity, the recovery times get longer, the risk of
injury gets higher, and on average, it doesn't pay off.
So yeah, there are some sessions that are hard and they feel rewarding to achieve, but
they are achievable because of the sustainable process.
Well, let's talk about this 80-20 rule, 80% low intensity, right?
Because if you're not familiar with this research, if you haven't been following your work or
Inigo Sanmilan's work or other researchers in this field, you may assume that if you
want to be really fast at running, let's say, that you need to practice being fast at running.
Running really fast.
Yeah.
So every time you go out, you need to be running fast because that's how you get faster.
But I think what your research is showing is that that's absolutely not necessarily
the case.
And I also very much appreciate that you say that you didn't create this.
No, no.
Right?
You coined the term maybe, but you didn't create this.
You simply observed what the very best were doing.
That's right.
When you have a very clear outcome that you have to achieve,
run faster for 10,000 meters, that gives you a quite clear outcome.
And you say, all right, if I train more high intensity, does that help?
If I train longer duration, does that tend to help?
So the 80-20 has evolved in the crucible
of having very clear performance outcomes
that you have to achieve.
So they have these clear outcomes
and it's a kind of a Darwinian process.
They can try more intervals, they can try more volume,
they can try training three times a day,
and then they're slowly, their coaches,
and through experience,
they're going to settle in on a methodology.
And what we saw was is that, hmm, interesting.
The rowers and the runners and the cyclists
who really don't talk to each other,
they've all landed on basically the same distribution.
And in my mind, that suggested, okay, there must be some universality here, some universal
truth, a self-organizing process.
And that's what got me really excited about it.
Now, I think your message of 80-20, at its core, it should be really empowering for people
because I can think of so many patients right now who over the years have been put off by
movement because they think it has to be sweaty, it has to hurt, it has to be painful.
And actually this 80-20 approach is saying, guys, you got it
wrong. You don't need to. 80% of it actually will be quite enjoyable. You won't be sweating.
You'll be able to have a conversation. Do you know what I mean? I think that's a very
important message.
And when you do the 80%, I got excited, sorry. When you do the 80%, the 20% also feels better, it's challenging, but you're able to do it.
So it's a virtuous relationship.
Why does the 20% then feel easier or enjoyable?
It's not easier, but in the sense that you are working hard,
but you have now built machinery
that allows you to actually mobilize
your capacity more completely.
You're actually able to use your heart up to close
to heart rate max because you have the capacity
in your legs that can be supported.
So it's an interesting, building up that basic endurance.
That's why we see that it also improves maximum capacity
in elite athletes.
They have to have the volume.
They have to train quite a bit of low intensity to really pull out the maximum capacity also.
One thing I've realized, let's say I'm on my indoor bike for an hour at a low heart
rate.
It feels easy, pretty easy. I'm like, yeah, I could
keep going longer. Right. And when I finished, I often feel I haven't done that much. Right.
Not only that, Steven, my recovery is super quick. And I find that when you do low intensity work, you could do more.
You sometimes don't feel you've actually done that much compared to the high intensity stuff.
You might even forget you did the workout.
Yeah. So let's go back to this 80% then at low intensity. What does low intensity mean?
Yeah. In layman's terms, if someone says, well, where do I need to be in this so-called low intensity,
which I often, I use colors,
green, yellow, red is what I've tended to say.
Why?
So green zone training, if they take off running,
and it takes a few minutes to kind of come up to speed,
your body warms up literally,
but from about 15 minutes into that run,
that's gonna last say an hour,
the heart rate should stabilize.
It shouldn't just keep drifting up, up, up.
It should flatten out.
And they should come into a routine where they're just like,
they're able to think about other stuff.
They're able to be distracted by the flowers and the trees
and the bees around them.
They're not having to concentrate
to maintain that intensity.
They should also find that they can talk.
You can share sentences with somebody running beside you
and say, did you see the game last night and so forth.
So that's another working person's kind of measure.
And when they're finished with that one hour of running,
they kind of just, let's go eat.
Is dinner ready?
So they're still hungry.
They're ready to go straight to the dinner table, usually.
And you say, well, what in the heck
does that have to do with anything?
Well, it's an indirect indicator
of whether or not they've turned on what we call
that sympathetic stress response.
Because in that classic fight or flight stress response,
what happens when we have to run from the tiger,
our body says, send blood to the muscles,
take it away from the stomach, right?
We've got to shift our reserves.
So appetite and things like that are reduced for a period
after a high stress workout.
You can't even look at food for the first hour
after a really tough interval session, right?
You can go straight to the dinner table
because you haven't turned on that big stress response.
That's a nice indicator, but it's one.
So flat heart rate rate can talk together
and can go straight to the dinner table after. You mentioned flat heart rates. Not everyone,
of course, measures their heart rates when they're training. So, in terms of something
that's really practical for people, you're saying a lot of this low intensity work
is being done so that whilst you're doing it,
if you were with someone else,
you could have a conversation with them.
Yeah.
Yeah, so I think some people call that the talk test maybe.
The talk test, now the talk test's not perfect,
but it's often no one tool, no one measure is perfect.
But when we put it together,
there are some people that will manage to be able to talk
when they're working too hard
because they're just good at it, you know?
And others don't wanna talk at all.
So, but that is a nice test that we can add.
And so you don't have to measure heart rate,
but it can be nice to do sometimes.
That green zone is what we call steady state.
Things are pretty flat.
But when you're in that yellow zone,
it's slowly feeling harder and harder.
The body's having to mobilize more and more
because you're running out of glycogen,
muscle fibers are getting fatigued and so forth.
So it's a non-sustainable intensity in the long run.
But it's a very, we need to do some of it.
I'm not saying we don't, but number one,
it will turn on some stress responses.
It'll take longer to recover from.
And particularly when we also go into that third zone,
that really high intensity where now heart rate
is above 90%, often we you know, really breathing.
We're counting minutes.
Minutes.
Yeah, we're down.
I mean, this is the other interesting thing
is when you're in that green zone,
you can kind of forget the time.
You say, oh wow, I've already done four years.
Right?
Because it feels quite sustainable.
Then you get into that yellow zone, the brain,
the mind kind of starts to zero in.
You start to scan your body as you're working.
You have to be more purposeful.
You have to be more focused.
Where in the green zone, you can be talking with your pals.
You can be thinking about other things and so forth.
The brain can kind of go on autopilot.
But there's this inward focusing that starts to happen
in that threshold, that yellow zone.
That yellow zone.
And becomes particularly,
you really have to focus in the red zone.
That's the typical pace
where we will break things up into pieces.
We'll break the pie up into what we call intervals.
That's when this interval training comes in.
And so then the coach or the fitness center will say,
okay, today we're gonna do six times three minutes.
So they're saying that you're gonna do little bouts of work
for three minutes, they're gonna be quite hard,
but then you're gonna get a short recovery period.
You won't fully recover, but you'll recover some.
And so it will allow you six times three minutes.
What's that add up to? 18.
But if I told you today you're gonna do 18 minutes at that exact same pace, you wouldn't
be able to do it.
So you have to rest.
Yeah.
So you're now in an intensity that by breaking it up into smaller pieces, you can accumulate
more time.
Now I think it's important to understand that staying in the green zone for 80% of your work will also help you get faster and perform better. One of the core messages coming out
of your work is that we need to spend most of our time in this green zone. And if we
do that, we'll get all kinds of performance benefits, metabolic health benefits, you know, just
health and wellbeing benefits, frankly, full stop because it's a low stress zone as well.
So we're not generating cortisol and adrenaline. And I think that also speaks to the stress
load of training. Like if you're training at a low heart rate in that green zone, actually, you know, it's having less of a stressor effect
on you. And in many ways, does that make sense to you?
It's exactly what we're, what we're basically trying to manage. I say that for me, training
intensity distribution, after doing research on it for over 20 years, is all about managing the relationship
between signal, adaptive signal,
that I'm trying to create signals
for more mitochondria and capillaries,
and stress, which is a systemic phenomenon.
So the local adaptations, they're happening in the cells,
the muscles and the capillaries,
but the stress response is more of a systemic wide response.
So I'm trying to manage.
Now I can't, I don't want to get rid of all of this,
but I want to get that ratio in my favor.
And green zone training gives us a high adaptive response
at very low stress.
We're trying to stay under the stress radar,
most of our workouts.
But then some of our workouts, then we say,
yeah, today's high stress, it's good, but I built it in
and I have a plan because tomorrow I'll go easy
and the day after that I'll still go easy
because I'm building in some recovery.
I'll tell you this last story maybe.
What got me started doing research
on this intensity distribution,
one of the key moments in my scientific life
was I'm out jogging in one of the local forest trails
in Norway and I see a young woman,
she's jogging in front of me
and then she comes to a fairly steep hill
and she starts walking up that hill.
And then she gets to the top and starts running again.
And the reason that was jarring for me
was because I knew I had tested her.
I knew she had a VO2 max that was quite high,
meaning she was a very good endurance athlete.
Her sister was an Olympic silver medalist.
And I was like, why are you not running up that hill?
Even I can run up that hill.
But then I learned, well, no,
because that day was a green zone day for her.
Hmm.
And she was exhibiting intensity discipline.
And that was this moment of truth for me,
is I realized, okay, I got to rethink this.
What I thought I understood about training, because there's knowledge here that I need
to understand.
I love that.
It's a beautiful story.
Very, very inspiring.
There's almost a conflict, which is we know that physical inactivity is one of the leading causes of death globally.
We know that a lot of the population are not meeting basic government guidelines of physical
activity, right?
And we're now saying, yeah, be active, but be careful when you're active.
Can you just help people understand that?
Our great, great grandparents would have,
they would have had jobs that were quite physically
demanding as a rule.
They worked on farms, they worked physically.
And so they were getting a lot of green zone training,
but they never called it training.
It was just work.
It was like putting food on the table, right?
But we've almost eradicated jobs that require us
to use our bodies in a physical way.
The famous study from the double-decker buses,
this was some of the start of epidemiology research
and physical activity.
The bus driver wasn't getting physical activity.
The conductor, the person who was taking tickets
or whatever, you know, up and down the two double-decker bus
was more protected from heart disease.
Wow.
Right?
So we've seen this in these basic things
in normal work have disappeared.
We push buttons, even the farmers,
even the traditional factory workers, you know,
they're no longer doing heavy labor.
They're not getting the big heart rate.
They're not lifting anything.
So it's all gone.
And that means we have to somehow synthetically,
artificially bring it back into our lives
because our genetics needs it.
We're still built for movement.
If you're getting out the door,
three or four days a week,
then good things are gonna happen.
So yes, we've been on the sofa a lot,
we're out of shape, but lucky for us,
our genes are there still waiting
for us to offer the right stimuli.
And there is so much, what should we say, unexploited capacity
that we can tap into if we just make it sustainable.
For that individual who fancies themselves as a bit of a weekend warrior. You know, they
work hard in the week, they've got kids, but they like to push themselves. They like to
do the park run. They like to do 10 K's every few Sundays when there's a local event on. I know many people
like this, but they're feeling tired. They're not getting faster. They wish they could run faster or
be injured less. What would your words of advice be for that individual? I would say to them, just put a little bit of trust in me for six weeks and follow this
guidance that we're going to reduce the number of hard sessions.
If you're doing two or three times a week, probably three times a week, they're going
pretty hard.
I'm going to say, can you let me have two of those?
You keep one really hard, give me two,
and I want them to go into this green,
and we'll stretch them a little bit.
Give me six weeks of your time, as an experiment.
And let's see where you're at in six weeks.
And what do you want them to assess?
Is it sleep, energy, performance,
all of these things I'm guessing.
And they may, it happens surprisingly often.
They may say to me in an email, you know what?
I haven't run this fast in 10 years.
And I'm being totally honest with you.
I get so many emails that say,
because it surprises them so much.
I'm running slower in training and I'm faster in the 10k.
I don't get this.
But it's true.
So just give it a six week try.
Okay.
Great advice for them.
And then they could also forget about a seven day cycle and go, okay, I train three times a week,
but one in every five sessions is going to be intensity.
So therefore you, you know, cause we have this seven day model in our head, but we don't
have to train to a seven day model.
Do we?
And I've talked a lot about this, even my own daughter, who I coached as a runner.
That's what we did is we changed the the seven-day cycle to a 10-day cycle.
Her personal records, you know, ran a 116 half marathon, you know, it got better.
She said, she said, Papa, now I feel flow in my training.
I still remember that.
She used that term.
Now the training is flowing.
Hope you enjoyed that bite-sized clip.
Hope you have that Bytesize clip.
Hope you have a wonderful weekend.
And I'll be back next week with my long-form conversational Wednesday
and the latest episode of Bytesize next Friday.