Football Daily - Monday Night Club: Transfer Deadline Day
Episode Date: September 1, 2025All of the reaction to a very busy transfer deadline day with the Monday Night Club team. BBC Sport’s Sami Mokbel joins Mark Chapman, Joe Hart, Chris Sutton and Rory Smith to unpick all of the big d...eals from the last day of the window. Chris and Joe disagree about how Isak conducted himself during the window, and they look at how he’ll fit in at Liverpool. They also give their thoughts on Sunday’s top of the table clash between Liverpool and Arsenal – and Mikel Arteta’s approach to the match. And after a record spend throughout the summer transfer window, how have clubs’ approach to PSR rules changed? Has that affected Aston Villa’s approach to the final day of the window? BBC Sport’s Nick Mashiter drops by to explain why – and what might happen next for Emi Martinez. Plus – Joe gives his thoughts on Manchester United’s new keeper – and the goalkeeper situation at his former club, Manchester City.TIME CODES01:00 – Joe’s transfer deadline day move 02:55 – Changing approach to PSR? 15:35 – Where does Alexander Isak fit at Liverpool? 19:40 – Liverpool v Arsenal reaction 23:05 – Has there been an overreaction to Arsenal losing? 34:10 – Life after Isak for Newcastle 47:55 – Aston Villa 59:20 – Manchester City’s goalkeepers
Transcript
Discussion (0)
BBC Sounds, music, radio, podcasts.
This is the Monday Nightclub with Mark Chapman.
On the Football Daily podcast.
Welcome to the Monday night club at the end of a very busy transfer deadline day.
Joe Hart, Chris Sutton and Rory Smith are with us alongside BBC Sports Sammy Mockball.
Some of the day's big headlines, Alexander Isak has joined Liverpool for a British record fee of £125 million.
Mark Gay to Liverpool is off, though.
Newcastle have signed Johann Whistair from Brentford.
Victor Lindelhoff and Jaden Sancho and Harvey Elliott have joined Aston Villa.
Rasmus Hoyland has gone on loan from Manchester United to Napoli.
Anthony has gone to Rail Bettis.
Randall Kolo Muani has joined Tottenham on a season long loan.
You can get all the latest from Transfer Deadline Day on the BBC Sport website and app.
Did you ever move on Deadline Day?
I should have found this out there, but I've been too busy doing a last-minute dash for school uniform.
Have you?
No, I can't remember.
I don't think so.
I can only ask you, because
Deadline Day didn't exist when Chris played.
It did, chappas.
That's not true.
It existed at the end of March.
I actually don't know.
No, I don't think so.
Pretty sure.
Right.
Okay.
I've just, I've forgotten about all.
Oh, no, you're just your eyes lit up at the deal sheet.
That was all.
No, I was wondering whether you...
It's just laughable, isn't it?
Like, you just presume things need to be done by seven, and then, oh, seven comes.
Well, I'm like, I don't worry about it.
Seven in England, 11 in Scotland.
Important to point that out, isn't it, Chris?
Well, it is important, Mark.
Yeah, we cover Scotland as well, which is very good.
Why is that different?
I don't know.
Well, for Rory's favourite...
You should know, well, you should know stuff like that, really.
For Rory's favourite football market, Turkey, it's mid-September.
Ah, the last resort of the damned, 30.
I think, Chris, that it's been brought forward.
Sammy might know more about this than me,
and it sounds a little bit like a conspiracy theory.
I wonder if they've brought it forward because of the deal sheets,
that they've sort of figured out that the transfer window is not like written in the Bible or anything.
It's just a thing we made up.
So they can do it at whatever time they're like.
They could shut it at like 10.30 in the morning if they wanted.
And I wonder if some of the executives have got around together
and thought, hang on, why are we sending these deal sheets around at half-past one in the morning?
Why don't we do it during the day?
They want to get back.
That's why.
They don't want to work, do they?
Work shy.
Yeah, don't know.
Do all things to do, Sammy.
Well, it also keeps the coverage going for a lot longer during the evening.
Why do we not know?
I'm a guest, by the way.
You know, I don't know.
You should be giving this to the nation explaining why the deal sheet matters.
There will be a reason.
Yeah, unfortunately.
I'm not done my job properly.
Not you.
Chappers, this is all chappers.
You're a guest, are you?
Rather than just part of it.
You're just a humble guest.
You actually did move to Torino on Deadline Day in 2016.
No, I didn't.
You did I?
Yeah.
Well, there you go.
Rory, as well as being across everything that Sammy has done today,
I dipped into Sky Sports News earlier and Christian Perslow was on Sky Sports News.
He made a really interesting point, I thought,
which he gets a feeling that within football, PSR, squad cost, whatever it is,
the mood may have turned against it,
but from fans as well in a sense of this is not allowing clubs that do have money,
wherever that money has come from from the owners
to flex their muscle
and therefore you are seeing
the same old, same old and maybe
not new blood coming through. So he thinks
that mood music has changed
and therefore coming
down the line at some point
might be a change in financial
rules and therefore
and this is what he was saying
Liverpool may have gone big
this summer in case
new rules come in in a couple of years
and they've beaten it.
doing things exactly right by exploiting their, you know, their advantage that they have at the
moment. There's definitely something that's changed this summer because I think they will just
about have tipped three billion in a single summer, which has never happened before. I think
the previous best was two and a half billion in the summer of 2023. That's 500 million quid.
That's quite a lot of footballers. I think there's a few kind of things around little bits of
circumstantial stuff that maybe helped to explain it. I think the fact that all three
promoted clubs have come up and
had a go, that makes a difference
to that overall spend.
I think the fact that all of the big six
or the traditional big six, don't want to upset anybody,
they've all gone out
and said, you know, United have done
200 million on strikers.
Arsenal, I think until Isaac, have got a higher
net spend than Liverpool.
City did all their business early.
Chelsea, obviously, just continually buying
people. Spurs of events
they've done quite a lot as well.
They've all spent heavily, all the
big kind of traditional powers.
But Liverpool in particular, to go over 400 million pounds.
It's astonishing, but, so Christine Persolone may well be right that they are gambling
or guessing that something might change down the line.
They had the PSR headroom from the previous years because, as Joe said, they didn't sign
anyone last, they spent 14 million quid last summer, I think, out most.
And I also think that the way Liverpool operate, it might suggest to me that next summer
will A, be a lot quieter and might see a big outgoing.
Liverpool will balance the books.
They're not going to be throwing money at it without thinking how, you know,
they'll have an owl.
So I think that, yeah, it might be that it signals some sort of change.
I think broader than that, I think clubs have learned how PSR works.
There's a lot of Chelsea and their methods in this transfer market.
I think a lot of people have worked out that if you keep money rolling out,
if you keep churning the players, you can spend a lot more money.
as long as you've got the Liverpool have sold 200 million towards a worth of players that's that's a lot of money and the other thing that I think is significant is that all of that top six especially Arsenal have worked out you need a massive squad so they're prepared to commit to it yeah now they haven't just worked that hour have they no but they Arsenal now have to play as to Liverpool two players two players in every single position of that in a way they didn't before I think the era of coaches saying I kind of want 20 players 20 senior players and maybe maybe not in
including goalkeepers, I think they're gone
and teams are doing what else you've done.
Although 20 senior players
excluding goalkeepers is two players for every
position. No, but well, that's a fair
point, yeah, all right. Yeah, take that.
You know what I mean, chappas, you're just being difficult.
Don't let Chris get into your head, like this.
Aston, Liverpool, particularly, are running
at greater depth than they have previously.
I've never seen Chris look so happy.
You like that, didn't you?
I enjoyed that. Just do your mess, Rory.
I don't know which school you went to.
can I just make a point
Rory's point on selling
to buy is spot on
is like Chelsea sign players
and then flip them the next year
for profit. That's the key
and I'm not saying they're going to do this
but you can 100% see
they've obviously signed Liam Dilap
this summer. You can 100% see them
I think it was for 35, 30 million
quid, release clause. You can see them
flipping him next season, next summer
or the summer after
for 60 or 70 million quid
and they'll do it
and that's how they continue to buy
in consecutive windows
but I guess what the problem for that is
for a manager is I don't know how you
how you can build continuity
in your squad with that
I think just on that
I think Sammy's totally right
but I think on that
what Chelsea doing
and they're the only ones who do it
as far as I can tell
they have players who are not there
to play for Chelsea
there is no question
the two most baffling deals of this window
and I think they're both loans Sammy
Buon and Otten and Cesar
there is a group of players
players who Chelsea have, and you look at Georgia Petrovich, the Bournemouth keeper, who played 20, 25 games for Chelsea last season, I think, or two seasons ago, and it's clearly a very good goalkeeper. It looks excellent for Bournemouth in his first games. I think he was brought in, but as Chelsea, you relatively cheap, 12, 15 million quid, something like that. You then raise them up, you give him European or lead down football at Strasbourg for a year, double his price. And the way PSR works is that all of the profit from the sale is booked this year.
the fee that you pay is spread out over six, over five,
and the book profit that you're working with
is the difference in those two figures,
which means Chelsea are recording huge sums.
Chelsea, I think, are in profit for transfers this season
in terms of the accountancy.
That's the key.
So is this an era then?
Are we now in an era, Chris, do you think?
And look, you could pick clubs at all sorts of different levels here.
You could go Liverpool spending over 400 million.
you could talk about
Arsel bringing in
8. I think David Moyes said
the start is Transylinda
he wanted to bring in 8 to 10
and I think he's not far off
that. You could look at the promoter clubs
who are certainly Sunderland and Leeds
are in double figures with the players
they've brought in
and do you know what? You could probably go down
lower leagues. I know Rexham might not be
the best example of a regular
championship club because of how they fund
but they've gone berserk
in a good way, I suppose, in the players that they brought in.
They've done it again today.
This is I'm Ben Sheaf, the Coventry captain for six and a half million.
Are we in an era now of clubs will flip eight to ten players in a transfer window in a summer?
Yeah, well, the key thing is making sure that the players, like, you know, which come into the club,
that, you know, they can sell on for a profit.
And Chelsea seemed to be the masters of that.
I think for the, you know, certainly for the promoted club,
this season. It's sort of encouraging, in a way, for the last, you know, couple of seasons,
the promoted clubs who have come up to the Premier League have gone straight back down.
You see Sunderland, the moves that they're making. I've absolutely astonished by their
spending. But, blimey, you know, they've given themselves, you know, an opportunity of
staying up. I think we've said before on here, the likes of Nottingham Forest and Ashton Villa
spent big and ended up staying up. And that's the justification of spending big.
shaking that gamble, but it does, it does seem to be, or has seemed to be a little bit different
in terms of the numbers of clubs going big this summer.
Yeah, I hear what everyone's saying.
And we're discussing it.
I just can't work out what the issue is.
If they're the rules and Chelsea are doing it, I'm not saying you've got an issue.
But like we're trying to get our heads around it.
Chelsea have got their heads around it.
They're obviously very good businessmen.
Football's great and we play the game and it's sporting and we shake hands.
But it's a massive business.
And if they've worked out, you know, they've got some.
of the best lawyers, some of the best people that money can buy.
I'm looking at it more now of saying to you, okay, so we know what they're doing and how
they're doing.
From a player's point of view, okay, there are eight to ten different players coming
in in the summer.
We've come from previous times and Rory taught, you know, Guadiole wants to work with
18 in his squad or it's about keeping the core of the squad together, but maybe just
adding two or three.
That appears to a good.
So from a player's point of view now,
and I said it on size it,
it's a bit like, you know,
you have to introduce yourself
to someone every week for the first few weeks.
Yeah, but to be a top player
for a long period of time,
you have to adapt.
You have to adjust.
It changes all the time.
If it means that you're going to have
your best mate sat next to you
for six, seven years,
and you're going to share your memories
and your children and grow up together,
great.
But if it means that you're going to meet someone
every transso window sat next year,
get used to doing,
making a good first impression.
That's just football.
You just have to be really good
at whatever's going on.
And if you don't,
You'll get left behind.
You will get left behind.
Is it a bit like a big family do
where you just sometimes don't bother learning everyone's name?
Well, you have to, yeah, to an extent.
Before you could get, you probably had to learn
because you know you're going to have to be put in the room with them
for the next 20 years.
Now you're thinking, you've got nothing to the table.
I'll call you, mate, and we'll get on with it.
Yeah, you'll be gone, mate.
Not a problem.
Have you ever been to a first session of pre-season training wear
someone's had to wear a name badge?
I actually thought that should happen.
Towards the end of my career.
because it just avoids any awkwardness
the first three weeks
I think name badges
of what people want to be called
and staff especially
do you know the turnover of staff now
oh my goodness me
that's the worst
Joe do you have to have like a cheeky
little Wikipedia of the players
just to work out where you
you signed from me
have you did you did well there
I think the top Premier League teams
maybe not but anywhere lower down
yeah you make the lad across the room
you're trying to work out who he is
so you can Google him and say
have something in common with him
Yeah, that's factual, that's happening.
I don't know whether this is a good example to sort of throw in
about how this transfer window appears to have worked,
but Arsenal it feels at the very last minute
made a move for Hincapier by Levikuzan,
but that then allows them to move Kivior out to...
He'll go to Porto.
So that's Portugal.
So he's gone to Portugal.
But to all intents and purposes,
you're moving out a sort of left-sided defender
who can fill a couple of roles
and bringing in a left side of defender with a couple of roles,
even though they may have slightly different games.
Yeah, look, that's recruitment nowadays.
It's not a case of, oh, we want this player.
You know, that's slap down this bid for that one.
Sporting directors nowadays need to be just as good at accounting
than they are at spotting players.
That's just the name of the game now.
That's why they're not called Chief Scouts.
They call sporting directors because they need to be across the finances.
They need to be across sort of the talent,
identification and they also need to be across the sort of the selling element of of um of what the
club need to do in each in each transfer window and you know as as i alluded to earlier i guess it
doesn't it doesn't lend itself to building such a great camaraderie i guess if that you know
if if if squads are being unsettled and disrupted every summer and every january but kind
of is what it is that's just you know as as as joe said you've just got to adapt to to the to your
around it
The structures
of the deal
chap is just
quickly
the structures
of the deals
are getting
more and more
complicated
than Sammy
would have seen
this
a lot
that my
favourite
new
development
this summer
has been
the
conditional
obligation
I like that
one
because it
makes
just in terms
of
grammar
it makes
no sense
so that's
yeah
so you have
I think
I think Hoyland
is on
a conditional
obligation
at Napoli
isn't they
have to
pay 44
million euros
to Man
United
if they
qualify
for the
Champions League
and there's
a few
deals like that. And I think Sammy's right, that you see that they are, they're thinking their
way around these problems much more. I do wonder whether the one of the kind of after effects
of PSR that we hadn't thought about is that it gives clubs a target. You know exactly what your
headroom is. You know how much you can spend. And most people in football won't be looking
at that and saying, well, we better not get near that. They'll be looking right. We'll spend all
of that and then we'll see what the problem is. So Kivior, yeah, for Hincapier seems like a roughly
straightstop, I think Hintapier is an upgrade, but it means that Arsler can book all that money.
Hintapier's loan with an obligation, or maybe even loan with an option, and they get all that
extra PSR whittle room. They're using it as a game, effectively. The money has become a game
to them. Can you only have a conditional obligation, but not a conditional option?
I think all options are inherently conditional. I think that might be the way that options work.
Rory writes for the observer in case you were under it.
now. Let's do this tactically with
Isaac, shall we? Because you
watch Liverpool Arsenal yesterday for
a match of the day.
How does that Liverpool
forward line work
with him? Does it actually not
matter because it could be horses for courses
depending on their opponent? Do they
slightly change their structure
in how they operate? They've got to
get him in the building. They've got to train with him.
They've got the people who are going to
run the game. They've got to work out
how he gels with them.
So how does he gel with Florian Verz?
How does he deal with the fact that Mo Salah's going to play,
regardless of his quality in the game?
And that's not me knocking him.
He plays, you know, he was basic yesterday, weren't he?
Some of the touches that he took.
But we all knew at some point he was probably going to settle the game.
He didn't, but he still has that.
So he's going to play.
And he's actually used to someone on that right-hand side.
I think he had a great relationship with a Jacob Murphy,
a workhorse who's just willing to put it on a plate for him.
How does he adapt?
He's a top player.
and Anish Flot will have all these ideas
but in answer to your question
will they change tactically
it's really hard to say because he won't know
he won't know where he's at he won't know how that will flow
we don't know if Newcastle used all of his talents
he might have some other ways of playing that didn't necessarily suit
Eddie Howe that might work with Liverpool
it probably won't be instant you know with the lack of fitness
and what's gone on and the stuff surrounded him
it would take someone in a certain headspace to just walk in
and carry on like nothing's happened it will weigh on him
a tiny bit, but ultimately you'll have that Liverpool jersey on and the Liverpool fans will get
behind him like they do. And he probably just needs to score those first couple of goals for
everyone to just leave him alone and he can get on with business. How does it work for you, Chris,
do you think? Yeah, I think Joe's right. I don't think that they will rush Alexander
ESAC into the team. I think that that would be Darfur for Liverpool to do that. I think it will
take time for him to get up to speed. I don't see there being sort of a mark change in
in sort of how Liverpool play because of him.
We know that Isak is versatile, you know, is versatile,
can score goals in different ways.
He's tremendous in the air.
And with Eckertique, I think it just gives Liverpool
that extra strength, that extra option up front.
And, you know, they're extremely strong in that forward line.
So it's a, you know, it's a piece of business in truth
where you think ESAC going in,
Liverpool now are strong favourites for the title without him
and maybe there'd been an injury to, you know, Salah or Rekatiki
or whatever you think, have they got enough strength in depth?
But with him in the building now, you're thinking,
blimey, you know, once he gets up to speed,
then I think he'll fit in just fine.
Although that signing doesn't alter what you said before the game yesterday
that they're too defensively vulnerable.
I think if you looked at Liverpool in the first two games against Bournemouth,
there was a sort of criticism about Liverpool being vulnerable to Bournemus counter-attacks
and then Newcastle just out-muscled, just out-worked Liverpool with their 10 men.
I think yesterday, the way that Liverpool defended,
if you watch Canate in the first two games of the season,
you'd think it barely played football before and he was a trial list.
But yesterday he was absolutely phenomenal.
They could go in so many different directions, couldn't they?
Now, there's an article on the BBC Sport website, actually.
real tactical dive into how different players can be used in different roles.
Even highlighting that Ekateke, when he was at Iron Track Frankfurt,
actually worked as a two with Marmouch at times,
and they sort of played 4-2-2-2.
Now, that would then alter a role for Sala or Gapot or Virtz,
but I'm just highlighting that as an option of how Ekitke played at Frankfurt.
No role will get altered for Sala.
No.
He tactically sits out there and plays his game,
because what's the point in signing and keep it?
him. He's proven what he does and how the
team works around him. They've almost
got to just, like I said, yesterday, sometimes he's going to have those days
where the ball bounces off him and he doesn't score, but ultimately
most of the time he's going to affect the game. So I can't see any role
where do you want Verts to be playing having watched yesterday
because he was deep, wasn't he? He was, he seemed to pick
the ball up quite deep yesterday.
Yeah, he was hard to keep it. He just didn't really feature, did he?
But I'm not going to hold that against him. I've seen so
much of him. I've played against him
probably four years ago when he was really
young and he's just a top player.
He's coming in to a Liverpool team
into a Premier League that's really, really difficult
and he's just having a little bit of time
to find his route. And what I talked about with
ESAC coming in, Liverpool have got to work out.
He doesn't necessarily just walk through
the door and dictate the game.
He's walking into a very good team, very
good system and he's having to learn it himself
and he needs those moments. He's going to
need those, not even one game, he's going to
need two or three games where he starts. It all
starts to tick through him. Everyone trusts him. Gravenberts trusts him. Van Dyke's pumping
balls through the lines to him. He's getting it on the half turn. Isak or Eckertike's working out how
he likes to feed them and put them in. That all takes a little bit of time. So at the moment, I wouldn't
know where he is. Probably going deep yesterday was him searching for the ball because he's a confident
player. He's a brilliant player and he wants to be on the ball. And that's what he's being
important to do. But at the moment, he's just struggling to find where he fits. I think he was much
better in the second half yesterday. And you've got to bear in mind that that is Arsenal. And
they, Arsenal are brilliant defensively.
The Arsenal are really good at stopping teams playing.
I was at that first game of the season against Bormouth,
when for 20 minutes in the second half,
Bournemouth just had Liverpool on the ropes.
And Iriola said afterwards that the thing with Liverpool
is they've got so much individual quality
that even when their system's not really working,
they can still settle games just by kind of a moment of magic.
And obviously we saw that from Sober's like yesterday.
And I wonder whether, as they go through those teething problems
that Joe's talking about,
As they work out, you know, do Ikeke and Isak kind of interchange, one sort of theoretically on the left, one through the middle, maybe you swap around, maybe that makes them harder to pick up.
Sala, I think, probably just stands on the right like you always does.
That's what Mosella does.
You need Virtz to be a little bit further forward.
That maybe means Gravenberts and McAllister have to play a bit further forward.
But maybe the gamble is that while they're working all that stuff out, they've got so much talent on the pitch that games are decided anyway.
I'd agree with that.
I think Vertz will be fine.
It's just a bedding in period.
I think that I think because of how much Liverpool spent on him,
we just suddenly expect a switch to be flicked and him to be incredible.
I think in the early games it's certainly about developing understanding
and relationships and combinations with other midfielders and forwards
and understanding their movements.
What isn't in doubt is his awareness to see a pass and slide a pass?
I think that will come.
I think maybe the sort of physicality aspect
getting up to speed with the Premier League,
maybe something, but I don't see him, you know,
fitting in as a big issue.
Diverts score against you in that game.
You can't even remember when you moved.
Yeah.
Whether you remember.
No idea.
I think we got pumped, so highly likely, yeah.
That bit of analysis last night.
I was just speaking about the energy for the Premier League
of Sir Bosla's.
200-yard sprint there and back was
And he wasn't even breathing
He was appealing for the goal kick
And he just got on with it
He was unbelievable yesterday
What a top player
Just as regards yesterday's game
Has there been an overreaction
To Arsenal losing it, Chris?
Yes, but I think it is a bit of a theme
Because remember when Artetta
Went to the Etty had
and put up a defensive display.
And they just missed out, didn't they, on the title?
So I think people have maybe gone early with that.
It was a brilliant free kick, which decided the game.
That's the bottom line.
You know, who's to say if Declan Rice would have, you know,
had a, I think he did have a free kick,
but banged a free kick in from 30-odd yards.
You know, it would have been,
we'd be talking about Arsenal in glowing terms
and saying, Artetta, that was an absolute masterclass from him.
But it is, there is something there,
which I think will be looked
out how Arsenal approach certain away games this season against the bigger team,
because if Arsenal want to get over the line, I think it's fair to say,
then the way that Liverpool performed defensively in the opening two games,
there's the theory that Arsenal should have gone for the jugular more.
So I certainly get that, but it was such a tight game,
could have gone either way, and Liverpool found a way.
I suppose the reason I threw it in there is the overreaction,
Joe is the two players that people could have argued
start instead of how they lined up yesterday
would have been Oedegard and Eza
but Oedegar's coming back from an injury
and I follow your train of thought on Isak
it's not like you just walk through the door and immediately take to it
and there you go even if you've been in the Premier League already
say the same thing about EZE so it may have been
slightly cautionary when it comes to tactics but also probably
cautionary towards the individuals as well
Yeah, I think Michel Artetta, if he's proved anything, he's a thinker, isn't he?
And he would have made all those decisions.
But he wants his team to do exactly what he wants them to do.
And obviously that goes without saying.
But I mean, there's no room for real kind of flamboyancy or going off the cup.
Individuality.
That's the one.
That's the one.
Sorry, I haven't got that guardian degree.
I was struggling there.
Thank you.
Individuality.
So to bring Eze in, who's a top player, no doubt he's a top player.
but the conversations would have been minimal getting him through the door.
Martinelli, for everything that he frustrates people with,
he knows exactly what Mikhail wants him to do.
And he did it.
Is Ezzer an upgrade?
I mean, where with Odegaard he's sort of nursing his way back in
and you sort of understand that.
His form, you know, hasn't been exceptional.
Maybe there's a slightly different argument with Ezra simply,
sort of head-to-head, who would you pick?
Who's the better player?
Who's more creative?
I think that that's a legitimate argument.
with that
but it's
you know
it's
I'm not saying
it's an easy call
to make
between Martinelli
and Eze
Chris you're saying
yeah
yeah yeah
no it's a
I think it's a valid
question
I think there are two
different players
knowing
sort of knowing a little bit
about how
Arsenal recruited
or why they
recruited Eze
I think they
they primarily see
Eze as a 10
as a number 10
and they
when they wanted to
sign him or when they first made the approach this was sort of much earlier in the summer he was
with a view to him being playing in that in that ten role as the summer panned out they kind of
worked out that well Ethan when he was signing a new contract there was some doubt that he was
going to go we've got martin odigard can we really do we really need another 10 so from there
obviously kai havers got hindered they needed another attacking body through the door and because
they had this long-term interest in him,
they went and done the deal.
But I don't necessarily think
that Michel Artetta sees
Ebertche Eze as an
out-and-out left-sider.
I think he will, if he can,
and it's difficult, obviously, but you've got over-guards.
That's quite straight, you know, to suggest
he cannot play there.
I think he can operate over there,
out there.
But I think that's why they signed in
Hinkapi, another left-back,
because I think what they will see,
what you might see when Eze plays
is that he will drift in
and I think they just want more of an out-and-out
defender in Hinkapi
just to protect that left side a bit more
That therefore means, doesn't it?
That they've got quite a lot of players
who they view in very similar roles
Because he's very clear in what he wants
And I'm just thinking about Eze
Had he been fully fit and available
Maybe he would have fitted in in the 10
But would he have fitted in the left-hand side
When they go into Anfield
and he wants kind of that structure
and that burst of pace
on the left-hand side
but willing to get back in
would he have picked Martinelli
any?
I think it's very,
he plans a 38 game season
does Mikhail Artetta
and again that sounds simple
but I'm saying he's gone to Liverpool
and gone,
I think there's three potential results here
there's the nil-nil
I think we could win one-nil
and we could lose one-nil
in a very close game
and I'm okay with that
I'm not saying we lose to a
Joe, three potential results.
I'm going to win one.
with tight games was my point, mate.
Tight gains was my point.
With his kind of chess piece and how he structures it
and how he wants his team to set up.
I don't think he's ever going to go to Liverpool
and go, you know what, this is a chance
of us to really stick our mark on the Premier League.
I'm going to show them what we've got
and I think we can pump them two, three
because they struggled against Bournemouth,
who by the way, battered Totman.
So to use Bournemouth
as an example getting at Liverpool's defence,
the Premier League's unbelievable, a top top
league and a top top teams and every old has proven that. But what I'm saying is, would he have
changed it and been more attacking if he had everyone and Eze had been through the door? I don't think
he would. I really don't. I think he believes in a Martinelli playing on that left-hand side and that's
why he played him. Because then that becomes the interesting discussion, doesn't it, Rory? Why don't
you go to Anfield and go at Liverpool like Bournemouth went at Liverpool? But then the reverse
of that is, well, they went at Liverpool, but they lost four two. But that's never going to happen.
So there's no point in that being a conversation whilst Mikhail Artetta is the manager.
No, okay.
It's not though, is it?
I move on to my next.
Do you think that's going to happen?
No, no, no, but I don't think that is going to happen.
But I do think there is a conversation from maybe some asshole fans going,
oh my God, we've done the business that we've done.
We've seen that they look vulnerable.
Let's go at them.
But I agree, they're not going to do that.
That's for our fans I have, but you've got to be bulletproof.
I'm fully believing what you're doing, which he does.
And, you know, it's not working at the moment because they're not winning.
I understand totally what you're saying,
but as Mark says,
if Arsenal don't get over the line this season,
that will be another legitimate criticism of Mikhail Artetta,
because it, you know, it wasn't just at Liverpool this season.
It's happened, you know, before at Manchester City, as I've said before.
And if Arsenal come up short again,
they'll say, well, Mikhail Artetta,
it hasn't been, hasn't learned his lessons of the past, really.
You know, he should have gone for the jocular.
And with the, with the sort of Martinelli as a thing, I'm sorry, you know, I'm sorry, I know you're saying, well, Artetta likes to have players who play in a certain position.
I take everything which Sammy says on board.
But people can't tell me that Martinelli is a more creative player than Ezra.
And Ezra can't play off the left-hand side and wouldn't be a greater threat.
Ezra is a better footballer, full stop.
He could do it.
He's not stupid.
He would understand how to track back, how to run back, how to do all those hard yards.
he's been a brilliant player
a consistent player for Crystal Palace
over five years
scored a barrel load of goals
got a load of assists
so I think you know
at times it's a straight
you know it's a straight pick
who's the better player
you pick your better creator
you're more likely goal scorer
you do that if you were the coach
and you were the manager
and you were making those decisions
but what I'm saying is I'm not saying
Mikhail Oetta's right
I'm not here to judge him
and tell him who's right or wrong
I'm telling you from what I know
and the personality that I've got used to
as the Arsenal manager, the one that they continually back, they continually back because they've
had opportunities to get rid of him before and they've said, no, we believe in what he's doing,
for him to just flip a 180 and go, you know what, I'm probably going to get a load of stick of this
doesn't work out. I'm going to start flinging it when I go to the Etiad, when I go to Amfield.
He's proven that he doesn't care. He is so hell-bent on what he's doing and what he thinks is right.
And I'm not saying he's right, Chris, I'm not saying that Eze isn't a better player than Martinelli.
I'm just saying I'm not surprised when those decisions are made.
Like, it's not a conversation.
You talk about Arsenal fans being frustrated.
Of course they would be.
Because they're not being paid to make those massive decisions
and put it on the line and go toe to toe with Liverpool.
No, although they are paying to watch the results of those massive decisions.
I said they're not getting paid.
No, and I'm saying, but they are paying to watch the results of that.
And I say they're allowed an opinion.
Of course they are.
And I hear it.
And like those conversations, I'm just bad when it comes to things like this
because I'm like, well, what's the point in us having a chat about it?
change.
Yeah.
We need to work
on how this show works.
Probably ruining
the show, yeah.
Joe,
yeah, yeah.
So, to me,
the idea that Arsenal
didn't try and win
yesterday's ridiculous.
Arsenal did try and win.
They just tried to win
in a specific way.
You can try and win a game
by saying,
this is going to be fine margins.
Both teams look really wary
of each other.
Like, they both looked very much
like they knew just how much
the other team could hurt them.
I think a lot of the frustration
for Arsenal fans would be
that certainly in the first half,
Arsenal looked like
they had maybe more control than Liverpool did, and they never, they didn't really create a chance,
certainly from open play throughout the game. And I think that's, that would be the short-term
frustration. I think the risk for Artetta is that if you're playing winning football,
if you're playing football, there is kind of fine margins, quite cautious, all the stuff
that you're describing, you have to win. Because if you don't win after a while, people start
saying, well, this isn't great to watch. That's the risk he's taking.
just to be clear, I'm not on here to protect
Mikel Artetta. I'm not
here. I'm not here to appease the Arsenal fans.
I'm just telling you what I knew would happen
and how it would play it and like it didn't
surprise me, that's all I'm saying.
I've missed work with you.
Yeah, cheers, man. I feel like I've worked
with you for a few months.
Get closer to the action
with live commentary from the world's
greatest sporting events on BBC
Sounds. It is all over.
Bulls, all edge,
put behind, including cricket,
Super League, Women's Euro's
2025, Wimbledon,
Formula One, and much more.
It's all right to the lights,
adding foot to the floor.
Oh, what a done it!
Drop shots! Winner!
On five sports extra,
sports extra two and sports extra three.
Listen, only on BBC Sounds.
This is the Monday nightclub with Matt Chapman.
On the Football Daily podcast.
Alex, a Newcast.
sent us an email, MNC at bbc.co.uk.
I do think this is interesting, Chris.
He's a Newcastle fan.
He says, I'm not happy with the Wistler Transfer.
He's shown the same disrespect to the fans of Brentford
that Isak showed at Newcastle.
We don't live in their multi-million pound bubbles.
Contracts don't seem to matter anymore.
If players can refuse to play,
knowing their value is far more than their contract is worth.
Is that a fair point?
Absolutely fair.
I agree with that.
100%. I mean, players sign contracts. You know, people in everyday life sign contracts,
you adhere to those contracts. Now, if Isak and VISA had buyout clauses in their particular
contracts, that's absolutely fine. It's up to them to tell their agents to get those
clauses into their contracts. But, you know, in respect to the way that they have behaved
an actor, they've got what they want, but it's absolutely
despicable what they've, you know, what they've done.
They may well be happy tonight, but it's a disgraceful
way to behave. It really is. And, you know, I mean,
Eddie Howe, you know, with Isak and his career,
Isaac owes Eddie Howe a hell of a lot.
But he's just treated him with total disrespect.
But having said that, Newcastle have signed Wiss who's done
the, who's done, you know, exactly the same thing as
as ESAC has.
If they end up with Wiesa and Volta Mada to replace ESAC,
is that decent business, Rory?
And actually, Volta Mata and Wissa together
will have cost roughly the same as they'll get for ESAC.
Yeah, I think Newcastle have had a good window
other than the shadow cast across it
by the whole ESAC situation.
If you look at the signings they've made,
they've strengthened every area of their team.
Ramsdale's come in as competition to post.
Malik Tjure from Milan gives them defensive strength in depth.
I think Jacob Bramses has had injury issues,
but I think he's a brilliant footballer,
and he could be a great signing.
Ilanga hit the ground running.
Volta Mada, really, really promising.
Bayan tried really hard to sign him this summer,
and I think got caught out by their own hubris,
as much as anything else.
They just assumed Stuttgart would buckle.
What's hubris mean?
Kind of tempting fate.
Thank you.
Sort of arrogance.
I think Bayern basically assumed
that Stuttgart would buckle because they're by Munich
and Stuttgart sort of went
No, don't really want to do that, thanks
But he's a great
sort of up and coming star of German football
He's got all the physical and technical attributes
to do really well from the little that I've seen of him
Wisser is proven in the Premier League
They have Champions League football to think about this year
which was a problem for them two years ago in terms of depth
They should have solved that problem
I don't want to claim any knowledge
that I don't have or say that I can do anything
I could do anything that I couldn't.
I've got to admit, if I was running Newcastle,
if someone had been foolish enough to say
you can do this transfer window for us,
I think the one thing I maybe would have thought
is Whister is obviously overpriced for his age.
Maybe you sit on that money
and you wait until January or next summer
and see if there's someone you really like.
You still got Willa Sula,
Jillinson can play up front.
Anthony Gordon can play through there.
But just hang on from there.
Look at it from Eddie Howe's perspective.
Okay.
I mean, yeah, and what he's done.
And, you know, Joe Lyndon, Newcastle tried him up front.
Asula, Eddie Howe didn't even mention Asula.
But, you know, so that, that's a pretty, I know, you know, came on and scored against Liverpool.
That's pretty damning for him.
And Anthony Gordon, as, you know, as a makeshift, that that's not ideal.
So they also have to have to please Eddie Howe in some way, shape or form.
Don't they have the Newcastle hierarchy by electing that through?
Yeah, absolutely, and they've clearly prioritised that.
And I can see the logic in that, Chris.
I don't think it's a ridiculous thing to do.
I think Wissett is, I mean, their first bid for him was 25 million quid,
and they've ended up paying towards 60, which is that is a,
it's not a bad, you know, that's pretty good negotiating from Brentford.
I just wonder if, like, the best practice of, again, just my opinion,
I am not qualified to run a football team.
I wonder if it's worth paying.
You didn't have to clarify that.
But it's a relief.
I wonder if it's maybe in hindsight,
you could say sometimes the deal that you don't do is valuable.
If you say, look, there might be a player out there
who will cost 70, 80 million quid,
who Newcastle could have waited a year for,
and then you have Voltaimada and one other.
60 million pounds seems a lot to pay
for the player that basically Newcastle have been saying
all summer is the replacement for Callan Wilson.
It would have been a lot cheaper just to keep Callum Wilson.
who's been injured for however long barely played a game
so the alternative for that for Eddie Howe is
don't get a striker in
finish 12th in the Premier League and get the sack
because they didn't get a strikeer in
they will finish 12th in the Premier League
because I think their squad is much stronger
but there is that expectation at Newcastle
and Newcastle owe it to Eddie Howe in some way, shape or form
and I think he said ESAC or words to that effect
that ESAC if they got two in
which they have got to in now,
then ESAC could go.
So, you know, it is what it is.
But to say that they, you know,
that they should have waited,
you know, this was always going to be the case
where they were going to pay an overinflated price
for whichever send a forward.
It is, especially this late on in the day.
It would have been a hell of a risk, wouldn't it,
just to go in, as promising as Volta Mada is,
by all accounts, to just go with him
and back off Wissau.
if they were asking for 55 million.
That would have been a heck of a risk.
Yeah, I think it would have been.
And I think that they got in their head
and got into their plans
that they were going to get Visser in.
So he pushed and pushed, as Chris said,
and Eddie Howes probably said,
look, if this is going to happen,
which we all knew it was going to happen,
in terms of the ESAC and the money coming in,
we need to use it on VISA,
because that's who I planned for
and that's who I think can make work this season.
You know, they're not an established Champions League team.
They're very much in that battle
to get into it, and they've got into it now,
and they need to stay in it.
So if FISA means they've got to play it over-priced to him with money that they've got,
then I think they've just said that that's the risk that they're willing to take.
As a supplementary question, and this is a sincere one,
if you're Willa Sula and your manager's saying,
we don't have a recognised centre forward, do you get offended by that?
You can choose to if you want, but you're going to make any difference.
Or you can go in and bang a few goals in training and get in his face.
They're your options.
You can get offended.
It is not going to change Eddie Howe, what he thinks.
You know, as sorry as everyone's feeling for him, he's ruthless as well.
That's a ruthless comment.
Don't feel sorry for him.
He's the gaffer, and he doesn't think he's good enough to play up front.
So he's gone out and bought someone else.
But he's probably not feeling too good about himself.
I don't think it's a compliment, is it?
No, not really.
If you're Mark Gaye now, how difficult has today been?
Takes all different personalities, right?
And I think if it was any of the other two players who forced their moves,
I think there'd be some serious problems.
from Mark, I don't know him
but for the impression that I get
and the way that he conducts himself
I think he wanted to go to Liverpool
and he said to Crystal Palace
if you can make it happen
that'll be great
I'll go up and I'll shake hands
and if it doesn't happen so be it
you've got to be okay with these things
especially if you're going to take his stance
you know we're talking about the stances
that people have taken
he very much will have known
that it was Oliver Glasner
would have been clear with him they're having
definitely having open conversations
and Mark Gehie's going and saying
look I would like to go
what you, and he's going, I'd love you. He's probably said, I'd love you to go. You probably
deserve to go. I'd love to see you playing for Liverpool, but I'm the Crystal Palace
manager. We've got a huge year coming up. You're so influential here. If we can do the
business, I'll let you go, mate. But if we can't, you'll stay. And by the sounds of it,
I think Mark Gahey will just kind of shrug his shoulders and say, look, well, my bag's
packed, give me the nod, let me know what I'm playing for, and then I'll give my own.
It's a respect thing, Mark, isn't it? It's a respect thing to, you know, to Oliver
Glast, but also his teammates. I'll go back.
You know, when you sign a contract, players are happy to sign contracts for, you know, tens of thousands of pounds a week.
Players are happy to put their name to that, sign it, take all the money.
But the contract has to mean something.
So, you know, to be fair to Mark Gay, the contract has meant something.
Yeah, and that's my whole, and that's the point which, you know, which I'm making.
And from Pallas's point of view, who have been brilliant under Oliver Glastner,
Oliver Glasner, you know, saying, well, if we can't get replacements in, then help me out.
And he is doing so.
So, you know, I'm sure, as Joe said, Oliver Glasner would have loved Mark Gehue to go.
What a way to go.
Brilliant goal, which he scored against Haston Villa.
And Crystal Palace fans would have all understood that if they have replacements in.
But he is under contracts.
Contracts have to mean something.
But, you know, if he goes back to Palace and gets his head down and plays,
as I'm sure he will, then fair play to him.
Well, he still get criticised for leaving on a free
for running his contract down.
Chris Wilder on Saturday said to you, Chappas,
that the thing he dislikes the most
is when players run their contract down
because it's leaving the club in church.
It'd be a bit harsh to criticise him now.
Well, I mean, it wouldn't be the first...
He was going up there and then sort of wham him
after going back and, you know,
if he's going to go back and fit in,
and then baseball back, then when he does go on a free at the end of the season,
he'd gone back to do him a favour.
But can we just be clear?
I don't think Marguéhy cares
whether he gets criticised or not.
He's just got his way that he wants to do things.
Who cares if you get criticised?
I know it's not nice what's happened to how Alexander Isaac has conducted himself.
But trust me, if Newcastle wanted it to go the other way,
they'd have stomped all over him.
They'd have stomped all over.
And I've seen it so many times in football.
If football was fair, he acted unacceptably.
If everyone honoured their contracts, clubs included,
this is how we're going to do it.
You're going to get your equal opportunity.
Play while you continue to play.
Everyone shakes hands.
Great. That's a great way to look at football, but everyone knows it doesn't work like that.
We've all been stomped on when it's suited someone else.
But that's got nothing to do with anything, Joe.
What do you mean? What do you mean it's got nothing to do with anything?
Well, it's wrong with Alexander Isaac standing his ground and saying, I want to go to Liverpool.
It's all about the contract because he's under contract.
Well, it's obviously not because he's gone.
The contract means nothing. You can say you can want the contract to mean something, but it doesn't because he's gone to Liverpool.
Yeah, I know he's gone and that, but he's getting slow.
for going, and he's got his own way, but he
cares if he's getting slammed though, Chris.
I'm sure Alexander Isak cares
what any of us think right now.
Well, obviously he doesn't.
And why should he?
He's selfish. He's selfish, no,
and he's disrespectful to his teammates.
He's doing it for himself and his family.
Oh, teammates are teammates.
Joe, don't sign the contract then.
If you don't want to sign a car,
or get your agent to put the claws in, Joe.
I honestly don't know what you're talking about.
Chris, you're ruthless.
You're ruthless, so I don't know
Why are you having this kind of lardy-dard opinion?
Who's the ruthless one here?
I'm ruthless.
By backing Alexander Reesack.
Did you hear me back him?
Did you hear me back him?
Did you hear me back him?
You just said he did the right thing.
No, I didn't say that.
I said I understood why he did it.
And I'm saying, why would he kick?
I mean, you talk about Mark.
What's wrong with me understanding?
I'm allowed to understand him.
No, it's not.
That's okay.
Well, do you understand selfish behavior?
That's fine.
What's it back?
Why is he being selfish to?
You?
Because you're getting a bit upset?
No, I'm not just
Who's he being selfish to?
Contracts have to mean something, Joe.
But they don't.
But they don't.
Contracts don't have to mean anything.
No, I'm not saying that they do or don't.
I'm just telling you they don't.
And when it doesn't suit, when it doesn't suit the club,
the contract means nothing.
Go and sit in that dressing room.
Don't train when we come in.
All those sorts of things happen.
So why, when it's the other way around,
do we all of a sudden have to adhere to the contract
and respect everything that's going on?
I want it to be that way.
Trust me, I want it to be that way.
I loved respecting my contract.
I really did.
And I love playing for the clubs that I played for
and I love respecting the fans.
But I'm also well aware,
and I've been in the game,
that I'd love it to be that way.
I really would.
And I love football.
I love football fans.
I love playing for a team.
I love representing.
I love all those decisions.
My family being a part of it.
But I've seen way too many things
go on in football
where that's not the case.
I've seen way too many things in football
where they don't care how you feel.
They don't care how your family feels.
They don't care if you've just moved everyone
and everyone around you has come up
to a certain point in the world
and you've dropped your bags
and just because you've had a bad game or two
they're now looking to get rid of you
because it suits the PSR.
That's what I'm saying.
I agree with that
but that's sort of separate
but you still can't justify
the actions of Alexander Easek.
I'm not justifying.
I'm not saying he's right.
I'm saying I understand.
Yeah.
By understanding.
Is it what really the same thing?
No, okay.
Can I?
I enjoyed how in the middle of that chap
has just sat back
like with the
self-suffice
someone who just started
a really nice fire
I actually nearly put my feet
on the table next to me
just to relax
and listen to it
can I just check
your you're contracted
for nine or ten
Monday night clubs this season
I like honouring my contract
yeah that's just me
Chris your contract lasts for how long
I don't know
indefinitely
until I say something
really stupid
Joe Hart, Rory Smith and Chris Sutton are with us
We had an email from Stephen in Belfast saying
We're going to talk Villa now
He says Villa don't seem to have got over the last day of last season yet
A real sliding doors moment
A decision that was a hundred million pound swing to Newcastle from Villa
Of course we will never know what would have happened
If Roger's goal was not disallowed
United may still have won
Newcastle may have drawn all one
Yes no doubt Chris or Rory will probably say
that's one decision across an entire season.
Martinez was sent off in that game.
A decision going against you in the seventh game of the season,
though, is a lot different than one going against you
in the last 50 minutes of the season.
Fair, Rory?
I mean, logically, no, that's not true, but yes, it is fair.
It does feel as though there's been like an emotional toll on Villa
that they haven't really recovered from this summer.
Someone told me today that they've been quite frantic Villa
in trying to find reinforcement.
over the last couple of days that they're not maybe acting in the way that has that I don't know I guess the precision that you would look for to try and strengthen their squad it does feel as though there's an erraticness to the way that they've kind of recruited a little bit that I think is not is not ideal the players they've got in Harvey Elliott's a really really good signing I think he'll do extremely well for them and they've got him on a brilliant deal for them alone with an obligation not a conditional obligation just an obligation to buy for for 35 money in quid which in the current market
is, is extraordinarily low for the captain of England's under 21s.
Sancho, I think, could be a brilliant signing for them.
Probably won't be.
Might be.
Never know.
They've still got the core of that side from last season.
But they're seeing, I don't know, there feels like there's a sense at Villa that they,
I don't know, almost that everything's kind of arranged against them.
It feels like a club that's down on its look for reasons that I don't really understand.
Yeah.
So the Elliot, Elliot's a low move with the obligation to buy.
for 35 million pounds. Sancho is a loan.
The United sources involve, say 80% of his wages will be covered by Villa.
There are bonuses in that that would take the total up to 100% of his wages, apparently.
Victor Lindelhoff has signed down a two-year deal.
That's on a free, and it looks obviously like Eminem Martinez is staying put
because Manchester United have gone for a different goalkeeper.
Nick Masheter is with us, being BC Sports Senior Football News Reporter,
but has spent a lot of time focusing on Villa.
is erratic a fair comment?
I think they've just got to have been very, very careful this summer.
We all know the PSR concerns that they've had.
They can't just go out and spend the money they want to.
I mean, Villa voted against the PSR when it came in.
They felt that it was going to restrict investment
and stop owners from wanting to invest.
And they've kind of kind of seen,
had a quite a good bit of foresight there
because for them and Newcastle, that has been the case.
So they've had to been really picky
of what they can get
because they can't go out
and get essentially what they want
they didn't want to sell Jacob Ramsey to Newcastle
they had to go and do that
that was needed to ensure they
they complied with PSR
again I agree with Roy though
Harvey Elliott regardless of whether you get him
on the first day of the window or the last day of the window
it's a sensational bit of business
he's a great player 22 years old
two European championships
with England Premier League
trophies with Liverpool
for somebody of his age has got an incredible
amount of experience
Is keeping Martinez surprised
Villa hierarchy, Villa fans?
I think if you look at his reaction,
I mean Martin's reaction at the end of last season
in his last game at Villa Park
it probably surprises him
because from what he looked like
he was going to leave.
Where did, sorry to interrupt,
where did he think he was going?
Because for him to behave like that
and set it up this summer,
he looked like he had one,
if not three options,
ready to just feature during the summer
and then get himself in.
I think we have to look at Manchester United
all the way through.
Yeah.
And the fact that he is still there,
I mean, he's been a wonderful goalkeeper,
Ville, he's been part of their trajectory
over the last few years,
has been a core part of that.
They need to make sure that they have a happy goalkeeper
because they can't have him sitting around
as one of the top earners,
and experienced plays won the World Cup.
They can't have an unhappy Emmy Martinez at the,
the club. They need to make sure that he's in the right mindset to go forward with Villa at least
until January. Did Unai Emory want him out then? That's one you're going to have to ask
Unai at the minute. Unai just repeats Marco Bezo's name, doesn't he? If you ask him about
Emmy Martinez. So any club like Aston Villa where they are at the minute would want, would
need an Emmy Martinus. He's a fantastic goalkeeper. With the Turkish window being open until
mid-September and
looking like Edison's going to Fenabachi
having been linked with Galatasaray
would there be anything in
potentially Martinez going there
have they kind of just
giving up the fact that he's an Astin Villa player
or is it always being that you find someone
in this window and if you don't you come back in you'll be
our number one well it's just got to work for everybody hasn't it
yeah it's got to work for Villa Martinez
and whether it's Galatasaray
or whoever else I mean you can't
can't necessarily force him to go somewhere
he doesn't want to go of course not
And I don't want to go back over the, you know, who'd you upset?
Are you bothered by criticism, whatever?
Are you stirring a scrap here?
No, I'm not.
I'm definitely not here.
But I was looking at various sort of on the text commentary on the website and message boards and whatever.
It feels very split from the villa fans towards Martinez.
As in he's been great for them and he's a World Cup winner and they have adored him.
But actually they're not impressed with how he's behaved this summer.
Now, Alexander Isak or Yoan Wisser doesn't have to worry about that
because they've gone to a different fan base now
where they will probably be adored.
Martinez would have to worry about that a bit more.
Do you have any indication of how Villa fans would welcome him back?
He's a rascal on the pitch, isn't he?
I think we've seen what he's done with Argentina previously,
but he's been their rascal.
He's one that they've taken into their hearts,
and they adore him.
They have really, really taken.
to him because of what he gives on the pitch and what he potentially gives to the other team
and whether we want to come a wind-up merchant or not. We've seen that. It's all down now to
how he behaves going forward. Because if proverbial toys come out the pram or if he comes
out with any statements on social media or in the press, then the fans are going to jump on that.
We've seen what's happened with Alexander Ezek, of course. So going forward, that,
That's the crucial thing.
You've kind of got to forget about what's gone in the summer
because if he's staying, Aston Villa, he's there for the next few months.
You know, you talk about his antics, and you can love him for that.
And, you know, I don't love all that personally, but he is some goalkeeper.
He makes massive saves.
And he would have been a really good sign for Manchester United, but he's not.
So I honestly think that Villa just take him back in and he plays the next game
and they get on with it.
Nick, thank you. Nick Mashner with us, BBC Sports Senior Football News reporter.
Are you surprised, and this isn't necessarily criticism of either the goalkeeping,
of either players' goalkeeping abilities here or a comment on them,
but are you surprised that Manchester United have gone down the route of a 23-year-old from Antwerp
rather than Martinez?
I'm not surprised only because of finances and the Andreanana deal and what they put into it
and, you know, they didn't get obviously any money when they lost De Hea.
So it was just all spend
and they put all their eggs in his basket
and they're already in quite a difficult position
and I know that that Martinez
would have been a brilliant, brilliant signing
had we not be living in the world
that we're living in right now
and I think they've just had to make
an educated decision
and that's what they've gone with.
They believe in this goalkeeper.
I have not seen in play
so I can't comment on him
but I believe that a lot of teams
have been tracking him
and they probably will believe in him
but as I talked about
is he the person
hopefully he is for Manchester United
but is he the person who just walks in and plugs that gap of complete uncertainty when it comes to the goalkeeping?
Joe, I have a feeling you'll tell me that noise from the outside doesn't make any difference to anyone in football.
It makes difference. It does make difference. No one's bulletproof.
But do you think that for goalkeepers, and maybe especially at a place like United where there is so much like relentless focus on everything,
do you think that it plays a more pronounced role? Because goalkeeping is to an extent, obviously it's about reflexes,
and reading of the game,
and I'm sure I heard someone talk about 2020 vision the other day.
Do you think that the ability to kind of be numb to criticism from the outside
is kind of the defining thing about being a goalkeeper for Manchester United?
The thing is that as soon as anyone makes a mistake in Gold for Man United,
it's a massive thing.
And after a while, it feels like it becomes like a self-repeating prophecy.
I get asked a lot, you know, being a former goalkeeper and played to a level.
Young mothers and fathers and friends of children that want to go and go,
what's your biggest bit of advice?
and the only thing I can say is you go in goal
because you want to be in goal
so all those things that you've talked about
the mood changing when you make a mistake
will people be worried about you in goal
like none of that is in your mindset
none of that was in my thought process
when I signed for anyone when I walked out
I walked out because I wanted to be in goal
people say oh I feel sorry for your last line of the defence
you make you know you make a mistake it goes in
it costs you it cost the team
that is what I signed up for that is exactly who I am
I don't care because I'm going to put myself
in the best possible position, I'm going to make it
as hard as I possibly can to beat
for you to beat me. I'm going to try and win
the game for my team and that's how you've got to be
when you're a professional goalkeeper,
it's your livelihood. We all go through
we suffer little bits of crisis
of confidence, that's just the human side of it.
But if you really want to play for Manchester
United, all those things that you listed are not
what you think about. You know what?
Can I be that guy? I grew up watching
probably Lamins will be. I grew up watching
Dehaya or I saw a little bit
of Van Dasar. He wouldn't care about
the other people that he's seen
that haven't gone so well
he wouldn't care what's happened
to Andre or Nana
he's seen the Pete Shemichael's
and he's going to go
I'm going to put that shirt on
and that's going to be me
at the Stretford end
when everyone feels cool and calm
when I put a man your night's shirt on
you can't think
and he will not be thinking
like all those things
that you just listed there
because to be a top goalie
that can't be in your mindset
and it won't be in your mindset
would you just going back
to the just becoming a goalkeeper
I mean two of my boys
were terrible outfield
that's why they're
goalkeepers. That's why a lot of goalkeepers
ended up as goalkeepers.
Look, if I could have been a striker
scoring goal, if I could have had your career,
I'd have taken it all day every day. I'd love
to score a goal, but ultimately I ended up
in that position and
it just became apparent. It's
weird. I can go way too deep
about it because I think to be a goalkeeper
it's in every decision you make
and how you behave and how you want to
protect and be a last line and
be solid and be okay with things going
wrong. So again,
Way too deep, but I just think you've got to live it.
And the things that Rory's listed, coming into Manchester United,
you don't see it as that, you just see it as an opportunity.
I want to stand there.
I want the number one on my back.
I want to show people that I can make people feel safe and I can win things.
Are you surprised Manchester City have gone for Donoruma, Chris?
No, not at all.
Okay, I'll move on.
No, no, no, I am surprised.
Yeah, why aren't you surprised?
Do I think Doneruma is a better goalkeeper than James Trafford?
Absolutely.
And the other thing about Doneruma, which I keep hearing,
Dona Ruma can't use his feet.
Well, I'm afraid he can use his feet, and he has used his feet.
You know, he's certainly not incapable.
He's just maybe not at the level of other goalkeepers.
But do you know what?
He's a brilliant goalkeeper, you know, one of the best, if not the best, out there.
So why on earth would Manchester City not want to sign him?
Because, Chris, and I don't know if anyone here has first-hand experience of this,
Pep Guardiola has always made quite a big thing
about his goalkeeper playing line-breaking passes
and he has in the past
perhaps moved on
perfectly good international goalkeepers
perfectly good. I'll take perfectly good if it is me.
That's all I'm having. I'm not doing any further than perfectly good.
Pepi Gradiola isn't allowed to change his mind.
He's not allowed to change his mind, is he?
He is absolutely. And look, I agree with you about Donnerum
is like having a bear in goal. Why would you not want to have a bear in goal?
but do you not think it's surprising
he does he looks like a bear
don't know I think it's surprising
that after what
eight nine years since he
replaced Joe with Claudio Bravo
that pepsed on or actually do you know
all that stuff doesn't matter as much
because that guy's massive and can
and can produce these
these incredible saves it feels like a
it is a significant shift
from Guardiola it is I would say
just a significant a tactical shift
as when he put a massive number
number nine in his team having spent
X number of years, basically saying strikers are old-fashioned.
Yeah, well, unfortunately, I fell foul of his shift.
But I'm not going to, I'm not going to judge him for that.
And I think, like Chris has said, I actually think Donaruma, I know how you feel,
Jan Luigi, mate, because he's capable with his feet.
He's more than capable.
I've watched him play under pressure.
I've watched him play for Italy.
I've watched him the whole way up from 16 years old.
There's a man who could, well, a boy at the time who could hold his nerves.
for AC Milan all the way through
and then gone into PSG
and won them their first Champions League trophy
look I'm a big James Trafford fan
I'm really pleased for how he's done
and him coming back to Manchester City
I think it's a really positive move
but why would you not sign Dona Ruma
and have him as part of your
part of your system and someone who can win you games
he's absolutely humongous as you say in goal
making top top saves at the top level
and when it comes to James Trafford
I think they're in such a zone right now
Pepo Gwale is in such a zone
where maybe he thought that
the Premier League would just continue winning it
and maybe he'd win last year and move out.
I think he's ruthless now and he wants someone
in there who he knows his world class.
James Stratford has potential.
I think they will nurse that and I think
they will respect that but he might not get what
he wanted out of this season if they
do sign Dona Ruma but I still
think he'll have a Manchester City career for sure.
Do you think it's you could easily
nowadays have two different styles
of goalkeepers?
In the same way, you might have two central strikers or two different right-backed.
Yeah, and I can't see them.
I don't think it will just be cups.
I think it will be games and it will be momentum and it will be a 60-game season
that they'll plan and they'll play quite flippantly.
If both of them are performing and he feels comfortable,
I think he will pick and choose who he can rest and how he can work it.
And constantly looking to develop James Trafford.
Of course, they'll look to develop Donna Ruma as well
in how he wants him to play because he'll want him to be on the ball.
but I didn't watch PSG last year in that Lewis Enrique team
and think, oh God, they're just having to shell it
because Dona Room is in gold.
No, no, they played through the system, not a problem,
and hardly anyone caught them,
proving why they literally won everything.
Just to clarify a little earlier, Joe said
he had to deal with Guardiola's shift.
There was an F.
There was an air.
Oh, yeah.
Thank you, just to clarify that.
Was there?
Joe, thank you.
Thank you.
Rory, Chris, as well.
He scored goals, lifted trophies and broken records along the way.
There it is!
It's a day to remember the Wayne Rooney!
And now he's got a podcast.
Welcome to The Wayne Rooney Show.
Twice a week, Wayne Rooney, Kay Kerrude and me, Kelly Summers,
break down the biggest stories in the Premier League and beyond.
As much as you'd like to say it, loyalty in football and hours is no existence,
whether that's fun players or managers.
Plus, we'll hear the funniest, wildest and most outrageous stories from Wayne's career.
The Wayne Rooney Show.
Everybody's talking about it.
Listen on BBC Sounds.