Good Life Project - Jodi Picoult: Why Every Villain is the Hero of Their Own Story
Episode Date: September 14, 2026Every villain is the hero of their own story. That line opens part two of Jodi Picoult's thirtieth novel, and she'll tell you it's also how most of us get through any given day, or life.Picoult is the... number one New York Times bestselling author of thirty novels, including My Sister's Keeper, Small Great Things, and Wish You Were Here. Her new one, Hollow Bones, arrives right around the 25th anniversary of 9/11 and centers on a woman whose entire career is built on preparing for catastrophe, who gets blindsided anyway. For three decades, Picoult has done her research by climbing all the way inside other people's lives, including people whose beliefs she can barely stand to sit across from, and a good part of this conversation is about how and why she does that, how it impacts her own life, beliefs, and approach to storytelling. We explore:What thirty years of living inside other people's heads has actually cost her, including the nightly ritual one narrator forced on her before she could face her own familyThe moment in an interview when she had to leave the room, splash water on her face, and decide which version of herself was walking back inOne finding from her research on lying that explains why a small untruth gets harder to take back the longer you hold onto itWhy one of her books landed on the most banned book in America list last year, and how she respondedWhere the line actually sits between sugarcoating your own life and bending the truth to protect someone you love, and what tends to happen to people who never find itIf you have ever told a gentler version of the truth to protect somebody you love, this conversation will sit with you for a while.You can find Jodi at: Website | Instagram | Episode TranscriptNext week, it's just me, and I want to talk about something that's been on my mind: the moments in our lives that end without us ever knowing they were the last ones. Be sure to follow Good Life Project wherever you get your podcasts so you don't miss that or any upcoming episodes!Midlife Design Lab: I'm opening up an intimate retreat with me and a small, curated group in Boulder, CO (Oct 24-25, 2026), followed by 3 months of virtual group coaching. A few weeks back, I shared something I'd been building for myself, and the response blew me away, so spots are limited and I expect them to fill fast. If this calls to you, apply here.Check out our sponsors and resources: Visit Our Sponsor Page Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
So question for you, when is the right time, if any, to return to a trauma that so many people still carry in their bodies and their memories?
That's one of the questions I explore in this deep, provocative conversation with iconic author Jodi Pico.
So Jody and I, we both lived through 9-11 in New York City, and this conversation takes us into her new book, Hollow Bones, which is cast around that event, what those days felt like, what came after, and how.
shared grief can briefly unite people in a way that's both heartbreaking and strangely beautiful.
We also talk about the pandemic because once again,
she's writing right into the center of collective disruption
and the stories we tell ourselves to survive moments like that.
What I love about Jody's work is that she doesn't hand you easy answers.
She writes in the gray area.
She wants you to see every side of a question,
including the ones that make you really uncomfortable,
and then decide for yourself what you believe.
In this conversation, that shows up pretty much everywhere.
In the research behind hollow bones and her approach to that research,
in the psychology of lying and self-protection while telling yourself
that you're actually doing it to save someone you love pain.
We also wind around to the topic of book banning, gender discrimination, and publishing,
and her enduring belief that empathy is at the heartbeat of not only the work, but of this
human life. And we also get into what turning 60 has felt like for her, what it means to keep
making art after three decades in the public eye, and why she recently got her first tattoo as a
declaration that she is not done yet. So excited to share this conversation with you. I'm Jonathan
Fields, and this is Good Life Project. And we'll jump right in after this short break.
The new book lands, I think right around September 15th, which is pretty close to the 25th.
the anniversary of 9-11. I was in New York City, as were so many people that I knew in New York City,
I knew people who went to work that day and did not come home. What made you feel like now
was sort of like the right time to drop into territory that arguably has also been
really explored from almost every angle? I think that when you're talking about a disaster of that
magnitude, you almost have to let it settle a while before people are ready to read about it or
revisit it in some way. You know, I specifically timed Hollow Bones with the 25th anniversary.
I knew that I wanted it to come out this particular year. And, you know, it's one of those things
that everybody has a story about, right? Everybody knows where they were the minute that the
planes crashed into the Twin Towers. And, you know, I think that for me, one of the most interesting
things about writing is choosing topics where your readers bring their own stories into the one that
you've written as well. So there's not anyone who's going to be able to read this book and not be
able to relate to it on that level, you know, if they were alive back then, obviously, who wasn't born
yet. That's a different story. You know, so it felt to me like the right time. It wasn't too soon.
And it also wasn't, it was, it was coming at a time when I think we're going to see a very natural return to discussions about 9-11, you know, now that we have a very big milestone coming up.
Yeah, I mean, that lands really strongly for me. You know, I was, I'm in Boulder, Colorado right now, but we were 30-year New York City lifers before that and we were a pandemic move.
you know so I was there that was my home for decades before and as horrifying as it was to be in the city in that moment and you're right like I can tell you the couch that I was on the color of the fabric and exactly like that moment will be seared in me forever and I found myself actually volunteering unexpectedly about 30 feet from what they were calling at that moment the pile two days later.
later. And so all of that is deep. It's like in my DNA at this point. I am not claiming in any way
shape or form to be one of like the heroic people who did all the incredible work. It was a complete
chance that I was there. But but you're right. There's a story that I will bring to it that every
other person will bring to it. But the story that that really I haven't seen told,
I'm curious how this land with you is what happened in New York in the six months that followed,
which was the sense of sisterhood and fellowship. Yes.
That I never felt before and I haven't felt since.
Yeah, there was, I mean, I think it actually bled outside of New York.
I lived in New Hampshire then.
And I just remember the goodwill from the world, the fact that we're all grieving with you, that it was a unification.
It was a terrible event that brought everyone together.
And, you know, especially right now when I think we're a very fractured country, it's very hard to remember what that felt like.
But yeah, there was what I remember about.
New York was I wasn't living there, but I remember a few months later, well, I remember first of all, I was, I was not one of the authors on book tour. Because I remember many authors who were like, now what do we do? And how do we get home? There are no planes. And I remember authors like carpooling and driving across the country. I wound up flying, I think, three days after 9-11. Oh, wow. So you were like one of the first planes in the air after. I remember going into the air. The air.
airport and I remember getting on the plane, it was like a giant plane, it was like a jumbo
jet, and there were three people. Wow. And we all sat down and we looked at each other like,
do I trust you? Do I trust you? And everything was fine, but I remember thinking that was a very
strange feeling. Yeah, it's, I do think too, though, that like there's so much collective trauma
left still in New York. You know, I remember months later being in New York and,
every day was another funeral for a fallen first responder.
And you would see like the fire engines going down 8th Avenue and the police cars, you know, in a big sort of line of a very solemn parade.
I mean, it just felt like it didn't end ever.
Yeah, no, that lands so true.
As you're describing that, what's coming to me is the only other time I felt the sensation anywhere remotely similar to the way we came together was actually the pandemic in the city.
that like smack in the middle of that.
You know, like we lived on the Upper West Side, actually,
a couple of blocks from Biansoni,
which you've written about in prior books.
You heard of their pots and pants out the windows?
Yeah.
I have, you know, at 7 o'clock every night,
it was a ghost town when you looked outside,
but like millions of windows got thrown open
and were banging and banging.
I recorded a bunch of those nights,
and I cannot listen to those, like, you know,
60 seconds of audio
without just completely being broken.
brought to tears. It's like it's because of what it symbolized, you know, and it's like it was
just more of this place. As awful as this moment is, more of that. Yeah. You know, it's, it's funny
because you talk, your first question was about how do you know it's time? And it's not time yet
for the pandemic. I mean, I wrote a novel about it, actually. And it was for a different reason.
It wasn't to memorialize that it was really to chronicle it because I think we're going to
forget a lot of what it was like back then. And our grandkids are going to be like,
oh my gosh, you were alive back then?
What was that like?
You know, so, but I also,
one of the projects that I did during the pandemic
was write a musical
with my co-librettist,
who I work with on other musical projects,
and as many songwriting teams and directors
as we could possibly bring together
because the entire theater industry closed.
Yeah, right.
And we were trying to employ people, basically.
And so we wrote something that was a bunch of linked vignettes.
And, you know, we filmed it in an empty theater, and we streamed it because you couldn't go to the theater.
And that, I think a lot about that musical.
And I think about how in about 15 years post-pandemic, we'll be ready to really sit down and see that again.
Yeah.
I feel like you're right.
You know, that we need time to really let it sit and understand it better.
It brings up one of the, called a theme or question, really, that I felt was really centered in this new book in Holo Bones.
You talk about somebody who has literally prepared her whole life, and I'm going to do my best not to give away any spoilers.
I know.
It's hard, right?
Yeah.
Yeah.
You know, like, centered in this is a woman who has prepared for, you know, like 25 years for catastrophe.
Right.
Yet she is the one who like can get everything figured out when all the awful stuff hits.
Yeah.
Yet the way the story unfolds, the one thing that, you know, absolutely derails everything is something she could never have seen or prepared for.
Exactly.
And I feel like in telling that, you're capturing so much of what so many of us have felt.
so many years. Yeah. You know, I don't think it's giving too much away to say that the character
you're talking about is Molly. We meet her when she's 25, but on 9-11, she was two months old,
and her mom goes to a doctor's appointment and never comes home. And, you know, even that two-month-old,
her whole life is sort of formed around having this very public tragedy, you know, and it was very
different for the people who lost someone, you know, in the towers that day or in the planes,
very, very different than all of us who still were grieving and watching it unfold on TV.
And in speaking with the survivors from family members of people who died that day,
they really grew up feeling like they were in a fishbowl a little bit because of all these
retrospectives, like, oh, what are the children of the people who died in 9-11 like?
and, you know, and it felt to me very organic that someone who grew up thinking about that all the time
would wind up in a career where she tried to keep other people from feeling what she felt.
Right.
You know, and so there are, I did shadow this woman, an amazing woman who runs the Department of Emergency Preparedness for the state of Rhode Island,
and that is literally her job.
Her job is to try to mitigate disaster.
But the problem is that catastrophes happen no matter how hard you try for them not to.
Yeah.
I mean, that's the whole concept behind the Black Swan, right?
It's like these big, wildly disruptive things.
And you can plan and plan and plan.
But they are by definition the things that you could never have dreamed would come into your orbit.
Right.
Exactly.
Yeah.
So as you just described, you went and found this like the real life person who does this job.
your approach to writing has been repeatedly to kind of largely dissolve yourself and live inside
someone else's interior life from the inside.
And you do immense research.
Some of it is academic, some of the study, but also often it's experiential.
Like let me go and sometimes not just interview and really be with the person, but actually
like, can I live their experience?
You've been doing this for 30 years.
not just writing, but that level of let me go and inhabit somebody else's into your experience.
Yeah.
What does that do to you over 30 years just as a human being?
I actually see it as a real privilege, you know, because I never lose myself in the moment.
I never forget who I am.
And even when I'm writing the person and kind of channeling that voice, I know who I am.
I can separate that out.
But to me, you know, not many people get to try on other lives for size.
And I do it every year.
I get to go wherever I want to go.
And it's allowed me to become a lifelong student.
You know, I was the kid who loved learning.
I was the academic.
And I guess the alternative would have been to, you know, become a professor or a postdoc or something.
But even that would have been just one topic.
And with this, I get to learn every time I start a new book and not just learn the facts and the figures, but how it affects real people in the middle of all of it.
Because that ultimately is why I think it's why I write and I think it's why people pick up novels.
It's to be whisked away, sure, but it's also to find what resonates with you and this fictional character.
Have you ever found yourself?
You hear about actors, especially method actors in particular, right?
Yeah.
Who will, they will literally, they won't break character ever.
Like, talk about inhabiting another person.
Like, they'll walk through their days and their lives and they go to the bodega and they're in character.
Right.
So that's not you.
But you do oftentimes go really, really deep into these people.
Yeah.
And it does affect you.
Like, when I were all great things, it was in three narrative.
voices. One was a white woman who was a public defender. One was a black woman who was a nurse that
was accused of murdering an infant. And one was the infant's father who was a skinhead. And I did very,
very deep research in all of those fields, including talking to people who were former skinheads.
And every time I sat down to write Turk's point of view, I felt like there were ants crawling all
over you know and I knew it wasn't me again I knew this was a persona I was trying on but it's the only
time I've ever written a narrator and every time I finished one of his sections I had to go downstairs
and take a shower and something that really doesn't wash off all that easily I don't want to be
with this guy I don't want him in my head you know it was it was really hard to inhabit that space
and yet I I feel really duty bound to do that because I tend to write about pretty controversial
things. I, of course, have opinions on all of these, but I don't think it's my job to tell you what to
think. I think it's my job to show you every facet of a situation, even the ones I don't agree with,
and let you decide what you believe. But I will ask you to revisit your beliefs, because I think
many of us form our opinions, kind of when we're very young, you know, from our parents, our friends,
our religious leaders, and we don't really ever think about it. We just kind of hold that opinion.
And I think what's nice about my books or what I hope is helpful about my books is that it invites you to look at everything laid down very neatly for you so that you can reevaluate what you believe.
No, I think they do that beautifully.
I mean, I'm curious, when you do that also, and again, you've been doing this pretty much every year for 30 years now.
This is book 30 that's come out, right?
Is there a cost to that just personally for you?
Have you felt that at any point where like this is actually, like, as much as it's opening doors inside of me of empathy and understanding that there's a cost that it's actually, I wasn't anticipating paying.
No, if anything, I think it's very, I think it's enriching, honestly, because it, I feel like it allows me to tick something off my list.
Because the things that I write about are the things I worry about, right?
So if I can process them in a book, then I'm like, okay, great, don't have to worry about that anymore.
Of course, that's not true.
It's just my superstitious nature.
But something about being able to explore something that deeply, an issue that deeply, makes me feel like I've, you know, check that one off.
That's a notch in the belt.
Another, you know, I can move on now.
It's really at the end of the day, right?
It is about, I was going to say it's about empathy.
but like part of what you're doing is you're basically saying like here's a question that probably
a lot of us struggle with even when we're not consciously aware of the fact that we're struggling
with it we're sitting with it you know and we're probably getting one side of the story
based on the bubble that we choose to surround ourselves with um i'm going to i'm going to position
front and center more sides for you and then it's your job to figure out what to do with that exactly
Yeah. I mean, my favorite books are the ones where I write about something like abortion rates in America, right? And I have people come up to me on book tour and say, I couldn't figure out whether you're pro-life or pro-choice. And I mean, I'm happy to tell them and I'm quite pro-choice, but I'm thrilled that they don't know that, you know, from the book. Because then it feels very balanced and even.
Yeah. Because for you, that's not what it's about. Well, it's almost like you choose an issue that you know.
is polarizing, but also something that you really want people to revisit and understand
different points of view. But rather than saying, this is my point of view. You're like,
we're going to create a story around it that shares all points of views and you can figure out
where you land with this. Hullabones is a really good example of that because, you know,
there's nothing political really about 9-11. It happened. There's something we can change that,
right? But the after effects of COVID, for example, are, you know,
are very deeply explored through Molly's professional life.
Because one of the things that this woman in Rhode Island made very clear to me
is that, first of all, the state of Rhode Island used to get all their funding for emergency
preparedness from the federal government.
They get nothing now, absolutely nothing.
So they have to find a way to find money in a state budget for that.
They also said that after the after effects of COVID where there were questions about
do masks work, should we vaccinate, vaccines aren't good.
for you. All of that anti-science rhetoric that has sprung up in the wake of the pandemic,
she said, will make it absolutely impossible for her to do her job if another massive global
catastrophe like that happens because people have lost faith in public health officials.
And, you know, it was really important to me to make sure that I said all that too.
When you go into issues like that, there's a really big risk that you, in telling a fictional story, you're presenting things as fact that people will assume are fat, but get them wrong.
I imagine you're very aware of that and you research fiercely to try and make sure that those specific things are dialed in.
I do. And I mean, I wouldn't be able to do the work I do if I didn't have.
people who are willing to, like you said, let me shadow them, walk through their lives, have
interviews with them. And it doesn't end there. I mean, when I finish a manuscript, they get the
manuscript and their job is to take a red pen to it to make sure I've gotten it right. You know,
I don't want to assume that what I heard was the right thing. You know, that said, sometimes you do
get the facts right, and people don't want to believe them. Yeah. Have there been times when you
did get it wrong and it was important and it landed with you where you're like, oh, what
I do about this. Yeah. And there are actually times where something was in error, because,
honestly, because someone who is helping me with research got it wrong, even in their own field.
And when possible, I will try to make a correction for future printing.
And we'll be right back after a word from our sponsors.
One of the things that is definitely present in this book. And also, it's sort of like a common
theme is, in fact, this is actually, if I remember correctly, the opening line in part two of the new book,
It's this idea that every villain is the hero of their own story.
Take me into this.
Yeah, you know what?
I had that line in my head, and I wanted to use it so badly.
And it felt like the moment.
You're like, I need the right book for this.
Yeah, totally.
And this was it, because the character who is our narrator in part two
make some very questionable choices.
And you can look at her and see her as a villain,
or you can look at her and see her as a hero.
She is not talking about herself, mind you,
when she says that line.
Yeah.
And that's all I can say, because I can't give anything else.
I know.
But I guess more generally, just the notion of, you know,
we do love to see ourselves in a particular light.
Even if the world sees us radically differently.
Right. No one sits down and says, you know, oh, today I'm going to be, I'm going to be the evil villain. It's everyone thinks that they're justified in their thoughts and their opinions and their actions. You know, and sometimes that's true and sometimes it's really not.
Yeah. When you sit down with somebody who the world perceives as a villain. Oh, I got this one. Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
A, how do you handle that?
And how do you get inside their head?
Well, I'll give you a story.
When I was writing a book called Sing You Home, which was about gay rights, I had started
the book, and then my eldest son was writing his college application essays at the time,
and he came out in his essay.
And he gave me the essay to read, and I read it.
And I said, well, did you want to talk about, like,
the content or the grammar. And he said, both. And, you know, I gave him a big hug. And I said,
Kyle, I could not love you anymore if you were not gay. And I do not love you any less because
you are gay. This was not a big surprise to me or my husband. I think it was more of a surprise
to Kyle. But all of a sudden, this book which I had been writing theoretically about gay rights
and gay parenting and what makes a family was very, very personal. And part of my research
for that book involved going to talk to people from Focus on the Family. And at the time, they were
running a seminar called Love, Love Wins Out, or Love One Out. And it was basically a seminar where you could go
and be told that you were not gay, you were gay identifying, and that just like a dieter can
avoid chocolate cake, you can avoid these gay impulses. And lots of stuff that I personally do
not believe at all. And anyway, I went and I talked to the public information officer for this
organization at the time. And it was this woman who had actually been a lesbian and was born again,
Christian, and decided that this was not the path she wouldn't follow and, you know, was now
apparently attracted to men and so on. And I was talking to her and we, I mean, I was trying to be
as, I guess as non-contentious as possible so that I could, you know, have a conversation rather than
be lectured to. We talked about Bible quotes. And when she gave me Bible quotes, I would say to her,
okay, are you aware that this word, you know, which is translated as homosexual in the Bible,
is from the Greek Arsena Kotoy. And actually, nobody really knows what it means. And it wasn't
actually in the Bible as the word homosexual until 1950.
But most Greek scholars think it means somebody who was married who paid for a male prostitute.
And I can say things like that because I had done my homework.
And she, of course, had some kind of comeback.
And then we kept talking and, you know, we're going around in circles.
She's discounting all the science that shows that there's a genetic component to being gay.
And finally, I said to her, do you ever worry that some of the rhetoric you use at your conference
is going to lead to hate crimes against gay people.
And she looked at me straight in the eye,
and she said, well, thank goodness that has never happened.
And I lost it.
I said, will you excuse me?
I ran to the bathroom, and I'm splashing water on my face.
And I was like, I was having such a hard time in that moment,
not being the mom of a gay kid,
but instead just being an interviewer.
And I got myself under control,
and I went back there and I said, I'm sorry, but have you ever heard the name Matthew Shepard?
And she looked at me and said, who? And you know, you just have to hold it together in that moment.
I will tell you that not long after I interviewed her, she wound up leaving the organization.
And from what I could figure out, she wound up in a relationship with a woman.
So there you go. But, you know, that's a great example of how even when you don't agree,
You know, even when you're talking to a skinhead, if you want the information, you have to listen to them and you have to understand that this is their point of view.
You will have a chance to give your point of view, but you have to let them talk.
You can't talk about it.
I mean, what I'm curious about in that scenario, too, because this is not the typical way that you would go into an interview, like having just had your son, Julie, come out to you as you and then having this conversation, like, literally all sort of like unfolding in real time, right?
And as you shared, you have this commitment to sort of, I'm going to go out and going to talk to people often who I may just personally, fiercely disagree with their point of view.
But I still want to bring the representation of them or that point of view into this particular story that I'm writing in a way where somebody can see the different sides of the argument and make up their own mind.
How do you do that in that particular scenario?
You just honestly, you have to fight.
your inner instincts.
Yeah.
You know, it's like, the way I always think about that moment is swapping out a hat,
taking off the mom hat and putting on the researcher hat.
And really, you know, subsuming that part of me that just wanted to reach across the desk and shake her.
You know, because that was not my job at that moment.
I was not there to advocate for my son.
I was there to get information from her about what focused on the family believes about homosexuality.
No. When you sat down with her to do that interview, was there anything in you that was also thinking part of my job in this moment is to try and persuade her to a different point of view?
Absolutely. It's like, how could you not?
Yeah, that's why I had all those great Bible quotes and the studies that have been done that, you know, prove this genetic component to homosexuality.
So, I mean, I went in there armed, fully armed.
But, you know, but I, there is, there was a wall and I found this.
I've, I've written about evangelicals multiple times in my books, including in hollow bones.
And I have found that when discussing anything sometimes with evangelicals that one might consider a fraught topic, there is always a point that I call the Jesus wall where the answer is just because that's how it is.
You know, and they won't go past that.
Yeah. And I think you could also extend that to, in a lot of ways, orthodoxy in almost any philosophy.
Absolutely. Yeah. You know, it's basically just this idea that there is a doctrine. There's one translation of it. Like, and this is what has been taught to me as the way things are. It just is. Like, no matter where it comes from. Yeah. Right. It's orthogonal to the way I write, which is saying that there are multiple sides. Right. And we have to figure out with all the information that we have.
We need to make a Bayesian rational decision about what is actually morally right and what is morally wrong.
Yeah.
I mean, do you feel like part of what you're doing in your writing is people love to have to not make choices,
but they love to know what to decide?
Like they love to know the rules.
Yeah.
I think so.
And I actually would say I really like gray areas.
That's the most fun to walk around in, right?
Because there's room.
and there's nuance.
And you're never going to see me write a character that is 100% good or 100% bad.
Everyone's got some flaws in them.
Otherwise, it's a very boring book.
But I think that most people actually want to be told what to think.
There are a couple of books of mine that have really ended on a cliff.
And I cannot tell you how many readers are like, but what happened?
But what did you do?
You can just tell me, right?
You know.
It's just us, just the two of us.
Come on.
Yeah, I so agree.
So when you write something where it's like, look, here's a scenario.
Here's a big question that we're building a story around.
Here are the different ways to look at this.
And now you're handing it over to them sort of like figure it out.
Like where do you land?
Right.
On the one hand, it's got to be incredibly eye-opening,
but it's also probably really jarring for a lot of readers because they're left in the gray.
And they just want to go back into a world of black and white so they can move on and not sit with it anymore.
Look, I have many, many theories about this and they're all political.
It has to do with, like, rational thinking and teaching kids how to think instead of teaching them, you know, what to do, basically.
I think we've lost the ability to critically think right now.
You know, I actually have a master's degree in education.
And a million years ago when I was teaching, you know, that was kind of the catchword.
The catchphrase was critical thinking and had a sort of enhance critical thought in sort of.
students. And I don't, I think that teachers still care about that, but I think that we're not
seeing a lot of it. You know, with the rise of AI, you're going to see even less of it.
And we'll be right back after a word from our sponsors.
That another thing that tends to show up really commonly, and again, it's centered in,
in hollow bones, is this idea that we are unwitting and unreliable narrators of our own lives.
You know, we're all kind of editing a version of our lives and ourselves, just our identities in real time, often becoming these wildly unreliable narrators.
In the name of making it more kind of inhabitable, more smoothed over and make us feel better about maybe the world or about how we personally are showing up.
And there's a lot of revisionist history that we're doing in our own lives, like almost on a minute-by-minute basis.
Absolutely.
And I feel like some of that actually, there's an argument that says that some of that can be a good thing,
especially if you've gone through major trauma.
Yeah.
Yeah.
You've got to figure out how to tell a different story about what happened to you.
Right.
But there's a counter argument to that too.
Yeah.
I mean, it goes back to the everyone, every villain's a hero in their own life, right?
You know, you are going to cast yourself in the starring role of your own life.
And you're going to somehow create your narrative in a way that's palatable to you.
there are a lot of bad actors, bad faith actors that I can think of right now who are in positions
of power who manage to do that every single day. And worse, they're trying to convince other people
of that. I would argue, though, that there is a difference between that, sugar-coating
your own life to make it more palatable, and twisting the truth to protect the people you love.
Take me into that more.
I think that's what you see in hollow bones.
Choices that are made that might seem suspect are not necessarily selfish choices, but selfless ones.
Yeah.
We can't really go deeper into it without revealing like a major spoiler.
I'm like, ah, let's really go that one more step.
Six months after it comes out, I know.
I know.
No, but I think that is I get that, especially as a parent.
Right.
I get that, you know, because you're constantly trying to figure out what is in the best interest of the people who I care most about and who I feel responsible to protect in this world.
Exactly.
More than anything.
Right.
And the way that we tell our own story or even their story is going to be teller to that, even if we're fully aware of the fact that it's not truth.
I get asked all the time, you know, which character of yours are you most like?
And I usually say none of them because they live terrible lives. Thank you very much.
But the one who I'm really most like is actually Nina from Perfect Match, who finds out that her son has been sexually abused by a priest.
And she decides she's a prosecutor. And she knows what the system's like. And she takes matters into her own hands and kills the guy who she thinks did it only to find out she killed the wrong guy.
And everyone's like, what? That's who you are? And I'm like, no, I haven't killed anyone yet.
But, you know, I could see myself, that's my mama bear instinct.
If you do something to my family, I'm coming after you.
Yeah.
I mean, that's, you often hear stories about a parent who's done something horrific, supposedly, in like the name of something that they believe strongly.
And you think, oh, how could they ever do that?
And then, but, but, you know, if you're really a second later, you also might think, there but for God's grace, go I.
Absolutely.
And I would argue that is very much a hallmark of hollow bones as well.
No, I agree.
So if we're kind of all walking around revising our stories, sometimes mercilessly all day every day,
is there a cost to that?
Like, what would it cost somebody to revise a story they told about themselves?
Because if you're making it more palatable or more protected for somebody else,
and you feel good, you've got the nach of, like, you know, yes, I'm being good to them.
But there's got to be a cost to you, too.
Yeah, you know, it actually does make me think of hollow bones because one of the characters in there, Jesse, who is Molly's husband, who returns from my sister's keeper.
He's all grown up now. And he is a cop who basically is an expert in lie detection. And there's a lot of information in this book about lying.
And one of the facts about lying that I learned in my research is that the more you lie, the more fluid you get, the easier it gets.
to convince yourself and others.
You start to believe your own lies.
So, you know, you tell a mistruth often enough, and it becomes the truth.
So to answer your question, I don't know that the cost to you would be so great if you started
believing it.
But your own life is tangled with so many other people's lives.
And so to erase whatever connections or damage.
you did to somebody else, I think that could be very dangerous.
Yeah.
But I mean, erasing, you know, the connection or the damage you or someone else, I think is one thing, but also you're intentionally leaving a part of your own identity, your experience, your history out of the story that you're bringing forward.
Yeah.
You know, and I've got to just think that there is a suffering that is attached to that, even if you don't, if it's not service level.
like there's a seed that gets planted that says, like, I am not whole in the life that I'm inhabiting.
You know, it's interesting.
I'm only thinking about this because I've been doing this whole retrospective of 30 books recently.
Yeah, I know.
And so when I wrote the book of two ways and I was doing research with death professionals in the death industry,
death doulas and hospice, chaplains and stuff, I got to spend a lot of time at the bedside of people who are dying.
And one of the things that happens is people who are utter strangers just tell you things when they don't have a lot of time left.
So I heard someone say, you know, that they had their son wasn't their husbands.
I heard someone say they had, they confessed to a murder.
I mean, like crazy stuff.
I had met this person 10 minutes before.
But, you know, it sort of goes to your point that if you are aware that you've rewritten the narrative of your life and you've buried something,
thing and you've you've spackled over a very big hole. I wonder if at the end of your life
start to realize that that maybe the infrastructure is not so great without spackling,
that there's still up there. And if like what, what then happens if the, the seemingly true
story that you've told those like who rely on the honesty of that, like, you know,
there's a devastating effect. Yeah. When, when decades later that person finds out what the true
story is. Like there's a grappling and a reckoning that happens that everything you were trying
to save that person from, it may have landed in a compounded way. Right. Absolutely. You use the
word erase a couple of minutes ago also. And that makes me curious actually about your prior book
by any other name. This was a book about two women separated by about 400 years whose words were
introduced to the public under a man's name.
one of them historically real, from what I understand from all of your research.
Yeah.
Why was this topic?
Why was this so important for you to explore?
I feel like I have been talking about this topic my whole life.
I have talked about gender discrimination in publishing since I was a baby writer.
Because even when it's not entirely visible, it is glaring.
You know, whether you're talking about the fact that, yes, there are a lot of,
of female editors in this industry, but very few female CEOs of publishing companies.
Or whether you talk about the fact that when a man like George R.R.R. Martin writes about dragons
and sex, it is high fantasy. And when Rebecca Yaros does it, it's very smut. Right? So there's
always something that demeans women's voices in some way or women in this industry in some way.
And I feel like I've circled that over and over again, just even in conversation and interviews.
And when I stumbled across this story, thanks to an incredible article in The Atlantic by Elizabeth Winkler, which questioned the authorship of Shakespeare and pointed out that, you know, although that, that's been an open secret for ever since I was an English major, you know, years ago.
But most of the candidates who have been suggested are men.
And Elizabeth posed this.
Candidates for being the real writers behind.
The real writer of the plays, yeah.
And so she suggested someone I'd never heard of, who was Amelia Bissano.
And I did this deep dive into her.
And the more I learned about this woman, not only did she seamlessly fill in all the gaps in Shakespeare's life that academics have spent 400 years trying to explain away.
but she also was on her own merits an accomplished writer.
She is the first published female poet ever in England.
Like we should all know her name because of that,
and nobody knows who she is.
And, you know, it felt like the right story to tell.
It's also, I paired it with a modern day story
about her fictional descendant,
who is a young female playwright in New York City
and writes basically the story of her ancestors' life
and can't get any traction
because she's a female playwright,
and there's a lot of gender discrimination in the theater industry.
And that's something I experienced firsthand
with my own theater experience as a writer.
And everything that happens to that character
is something that happened to me or that was said to me.
And, you know, I really wanted to write this book
because I told you I have nothing in common
with my characters, right? These are the first characters who I'm literally living their lives
every day. And, you know, here we are. It's 2026. And where's the men's fiction? Why is there
women's fiction, but no men's fiction? What's up with that? There's just still so many tiny ways
that female writers and voices are discriminated against and elided from, you know, the overarching
narrative of time, really, that that's kind of what I wanted to address. And the research that I did
on Amelia, I think a lot of connections that I made were things that people had never made before,
because they weren't looking in the same patterns I was. And I, if you ask me, I am 100% convinced
that she is one of the people who wrote some of Shakespeare's plays. I don't think she wrote
all of them. But I do think that she worked with a bunch of other writers, including the Earl of
Oxford, to create those plays. Yeah. And there's an author's,
it's more than an author's note at the end of that book,
where you basically say, like, let me,
because right, as I was reading it,
I was like, wow, if this is all true,
this is really compelling.
And then you jump in at the end,
and you're like, okay, so let me tell you what the real research showed.
Yeah.
And my mind was like, wait, what?
I know.
I mean, that's it.
I'm writing it as fiction,
but when you realize how much of it is true,
again, it's very hard to discount when you see that,
when you see the parallels in her life
and the gaps in Shakespeare's.
Right. And it's like the only way that she could actually have her work meet the public at most times was through the voice and the guys and the facade of a man.
Exactly.
And what you're sharing is a lot has changed and a lot hasn't changed.
I say that all the time. A lot's changed in 400 years, but a lot left to go.
Yeah. I mean, it's interesting, right, because somebody could look at you and your career, you know, like 30 astonishing years of writing huge, huge books that have sold, you know, like six.
70 million copies and all this acclaim and say, well, but you don't have to deal with this.
But if they zoom the lens out more, there's a bigger story here.
Oh, yeah, totally.
And just because I don't deal with it, you know, in terms of sales, does it mean that you shouldn't open your voice and speak up for someone else?
Yeah, absolutely.
But in my opinion, I am still dealing with it.
I mean, I cannot tell you how many people will call my books Chicklet.
And Chicklet is actually, it is a genre, and it's great.
If that's what you want to read, that's awesome.
My books are the worst chicklet because they're supposed to be funny and bubbly and happy.
And if you take one of mine on the beach to just whisk yourself away and have a good time, I hate to tell you this.
You're going to be crying at some point.
You're crying, yeah.
So, you know, there's this, when people call something chicklet or when they say it's women's fiction,
What they really mean is it was written by a woman.
Yeah.
And they're sort of like loading that up with all sorts of assumptions without actually stating them overtly.
Absolutely.
And the number of women who read both men and women, as opposed to the number of men who read both men and women, is very different.
You have confronted the potential for Eurasia in the form of bending.
You know, that has been something that has present.
Because you, as we've talked about, like, you look at an issue.
You're like, this is a big, thorny, complicated, polarizing issue.
And for you, you run to it rather than away from it.
And so you have these deep, rich, complex stories built around it, which for a lot of people, clearly they want to engage.
But then for a lot of people, it also, it really scares them.
They don't want that in the conversation.
So that ends up leading them to sort of like say, like, how can we remove this and by default, you from the conversation?
Yeah.
I mean, book banning is out of control in America. It has increased over 1,100 percent since 2020. Over, I believe, Penn America has said that over 23,000 individual titles have been banned. It's mostly being done at the school library level, but that has bled out into public libraries as well. Challenges to public libraries have increased by 92% since 2020. Most of the books that were being pulled off shelves were being pulled off shelves were being pulled.
pulled off and not being read, the people who were challenging them admitted they had not read them,
but they were written by BIPAC or LGBTQ authors. Then they started pulling what they called mature
content. And I put air quotes around that. That's where mine fall in. 19 Minutes was the most
banned book in America in 2024. I'm currently the fourth most banned author in the country.
And the reason 19 Minutes is banned, as well as more than 20 of my other books, is 19 minutes
has the word erection on page 313.
Now, they don't care that this is a book about a school shooting.
They don't care about the violence.
They care about the word erection because apparently in a high school school library,
high school students don't know what one of those is.
So I don't know.
The other really amazing fact, which we knew, which was just documented.
documented by the American Library Association is that the vast majority of book banners are not
individual parents who are concerned about their own child reading something and deciding
them that no one's children should read it. They are actually, these bans are coming from
organized groups that are political advocacy groups that are trying to get books removed
at a grassroots level across as many states as possible. Very similar to the way that
that conservatives sort of rolled out changes at local levels to abortion before it was overturned
federally so that in a lot of the red states, they chipped away at protections until even, say,
in Mississippi, the only surviving abortion clinic couldn't perform abortions anymore.
And of course, we saw then Dobbs overturned federally the constitutional right to an abortion.
Well, just like that, we now currently have a bill in front of Congress that is going to try
to create book bans at a federal level, meaning that if schools decide they should not,
they don't want to take these books off a shelf, they will not receive federal funding.
So now is the time for anyone listening to this podcast to get involved. And I get asked all
the time, well, what do we do? How can I make a difference? Even if it's not happening in your town
yet, there's a very good chance that it will eventually. I say that what you need to do,
first of all, is talk about it. When people tell you, oh, a school book band is in a band. You can still
buy it on Amazon. It is still a ban. As long as that book is removed from a school library shelf,
it's a ban, because there are a lot of kids who cannot access Amazon or can't get to a public
library. That's the reason there is school libraries. That's why they exist. If you can start a
banned book club, put ban books in your little free library, but most importantly, get involved
politically. Run for school board. We need voices that oppose banning that are just as loud as
the ones that are telling people to ban books.
I mean, when you look at some of the most banned books also, many of them fall into what a lot of people would consider some of the greatest literary works of, like, generations.
Beloved it, Michael Morrison, right?
Yeah, right.
So it is, yeah, it's suspect, it's upsetting.
Well, and we know why it's happening, because as we were talking about, it's all about critical thinking.
It's all about allowing kids to learn for themselves instead of believing what you tell them.
And there are a certain subset of people in this country that are terrified of the thought that books might allow kids to broaden their minds, to find empathy, to find themselves represented in between pages.
All of those things are so critically important to kids in a very complex world.
We're giving them tools with books to learn how to deal with it.
And when you pull those books off a shelf, it just gets hard.
harder. Nobody is protecting children by banning books. So you just use the E word empathy. Yeah.
I feel like that is the heartbeat of so much of your work. Is that true? I think so. Yeah, but I mean,
I wouldn't say it, but it's nice to hear you say. Yeah, it is. It's really nice. I think it is.
It's always about recognizing the things that we have in common rather than the things that separate us.
As we're having this conversation, it is both the eve of this new book, Meeting the World.
It's also not too long after you had your 60th birthday, something, which I had a couple
months before that.
As we were talking about before we came on there, we're also both Long Island kids.
60 for me has been interesting.
50 didn't really do anything.
I was like, whatever.
Same, yeah.
60?
I'm like, oh, this is landing differently.
I'm curious how it's landing for you.
Same exact thing.
I didn't care when I turned 40, didn't care when I turned 50.
I started coming up and I was like, what fresh hell is this?
I did not want to turn 60.
And it really, really upset me.
Like, I was just, like, you know, you can't stop time, but there was something that just
really rattled me about it.
And I think, I mean, I've unpacked this in therapy.
I've done everything I can, you know, but.
I think it's, I think it's multiple things.
I think it's that with 50, you can still labor under the delusion that you, you've only lived half a life, right?
You still have the other half left.
60, the numbers aren't working out for you anymore, right?
So you know you're not going to live another 60 years.
I've tried to tell myself that that's actually not true, but it really doesn't land.
You know, and I think, too, that there is, there's a sense that what's coming, what is, what is yet to come is not going to be great.
There's a lot of stuff that's going to be painful and hard that nobody wants to face, you know, whether it's the physical breakdown of your body or losing people that you love.
My parents are still alive and mentally, incredibly there.
and I know they're not going to live forever, you know, so I'm thinking about that too.
Yes, am I having grandchildren at an alarming rate?
Yes, which is great.
And I love that.
But there's still going to be a lot of loss coming.
And that's something that you kind of have to sit with when you turn 60.
I think also it's different for a woman than a man.
Tell me what.
Because there is, I know, like I feel very healthy and strong right now.
and I'm very happy with the way I look.
And there is this belief that, you know, when you hit 60 as a woman, you need to be shelved.
You need to be archived.
You are not supposed to be attractive.
You are not really supposed to talk about being attracted to anyone.
And I think society tries to really make women of a certain age invisible.
You know, I would argue that now in America, where we're only really apparently useful to produce children,
post menopause, what am I here for?
Right?
I mean, there's nothing left for me.
I'm a husk.
So I think that there's also the sense that I am done and I'm not done, you know?
So one, here's what I did to combat it.
I don't know what you did.
But, and please don't tell my mother, hopefully she won't watch the podcast.
But I went out and I got my first tattoo.
I'm so close to doing that, by the way.
So I don't know if you can see it.
I can see it, yeah.
It is the Pilcro sign, which is the paragraph symbol.
And what is a paragraph symbol?
It means same story, fresh start.
I love that.
Right.
And so it's like, I am not done yet.
And this to me is the physical representation of that.
And every time I see it, and I see it a lot because it's on my left hand and I'm left hand off.
And, you know, I remember I am still here and I'm still vital.
Is what you're exploring now going to end up in a book?
I don't know.
it's a great question. You know, I just started this podcast by telling you things need to settle. So maybe I'll write it when I'm night.
Right, right.
You know, I don't know. I think I'm always amazed when I read a book these days and I'm like, the character is middle age or older because I'm so used to reading about like 30, 40 years old, nothing older than that.
I can't say. Maybe one day, you know, we'll see. Yeah. And like similar things. I mean, obviously, you know, like,
I'm in a man's body, so it's a different experience for me also.
But, you know, people call me sir.
Yeah, right.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
You know, like, I don't have hair, which I haven't had for a long time.
But there's just something that has landed differently.
And maybe it's what you were describing is this, like, there's no way that I can sort of, like, make the math work that says, like, I'm like, you know, I'm like smack in the middle anymore.
And there's an awareness.
And I think also I'm a lot closer to a lot closer to a lot.
time in my life where there are people that I have known who are no longer here. And increasingly
people are grappling with things that are really challenging. And so it makes you meet your
mortality on a much more regular basis. And I feel like it's created a sense of urgency in me.
Yeah. But also urgency bundled with possibility. I'm not defeatist or fatalist. I'm weirdly
wired to just constantly see what is possible. But there's an urgency that I think has really
touched down sort of like as I enter my 60s. That feels different. Time is different. Time just
feels different. Yeah. It feels a little more compressed, I think, a little more frenetic because
you don't know how much you've got. Yeah, 100%. One of the ways, really, that showed up for me.
I've been a writer for a long time, and it's always shown up as writing nonfiction books.
I'm working on novel.
Hey, there you go.
Because I'm kind of like, hmm.
Why not?
If not now, then when.
But yeah, it's been a whole completely,
that's a whole different conversation we won't sort of like even get into.
You're at this moment also where 30-year retrospective,
I've heard you describe, you know, like you,
this book tour is not just a tour for this new book.
It is your quote era's tour for like each one of the 30 different books.
And workshopping the chapters tour.
Right, right. I like chapter store. Like, that works for me. As you think about sort of like moving around and having this conversation, that's not just about, hey, like there's this new book out there, but I want to share moments of the last three decades of work. Why is it important to you?
One of the other things I've noticed about turning 60 in my industry is that in a very nice way, when I meet young writers,
They're like, oh, my God, you're Jodi Pico?
You know, there's this, this is icon feeling.
I mean, that sounds very, I don't know, but I don't want to sound egotistical,
but they do treat you differently.
They treat you like you've been around forever.
You know, you have a status they don't have just out of longevity, you know,
much less sales.
And there's this weird, there's this weird threshold there, too, right?
Because, you know, nobody submits you for, you know, like the kind of life, a lifetime achievement award until you reach a certain age, right?
You're not getting it at 25.
And there's a part of me that feels a little sad at that, at being treated like someone on a pedestal instead of someone in the thick of it.
And I think for me, part of part of the joy.
of revisiting all the work I've done over the past 30 years is to see how much of the landscape
I was able to leave marks on.
Yeah.
It's powerful.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, it's like, yeah, it's counting the tattoos I left on readers, I guess.
Yeah.
And in their hearts and minds.
Yeah.
It feels like good place for us to come full circle in our conversation as well.
So in this container of Good Life Project, if I offer up the phrase to live a good life, what comes up?
Be kind, be honest, and be strong.
Thank you.
One of the things I keep turning over from this conversation is just how easily we let ourselves off the hook.
Jody says nobody actually thinks of themselves as the villain, that everyone believes they're justified in what they do.
and once you start listening for that in your own head, you hear it constantly.
She also pointed out something that stuck with me since we recorded,
that the more you repeat a version of events, even a small one, the more fluid it gets,
until you start believing it yourself.
And the distinction that she draws between sugar-coating your own life to make it easier to live with
and twisting the truth to protect somebody you love, that's not the same thing.
And she's right that most of us, often unwittingly, we blur them together.
So this week, if there's a story that you've been telling about something,
maybe just ask yourself honestly, which one of these things is actually real,
which one is true, and which one is helpful.
And hey, before you leave, next week, it's just me.
I want to talk about something that's on my mind.
The moments in our lives that end without us ever knowing they were the last ones.
Be sure to follow a Good Life Project wherever you get your podcast.
so you don't miss that or any upcoming episode.
And do me a quick favor, share this conversation with just one person
who you know needs to hear what we talked about today,
or maybe just a Jody fan, and she's got millions of them,
and leave us a review wherever you get your podcast.
It helps us get discovered,
and it brings more people into important conversations like these.
This episode of Good Life Project was produced by executive producers,
Lindsay Fox and me, Jonathan Fields.
editing help by Troy Young, Alejandro Ramirez, Christopher Carter wrote our theme music.
And of course, if you haven't already, go ahead and follow us wherever you get your podcast,
so you never miss a conversation.
Until next time, I'm Jonathan Fields, signing off for Good Life Project.
