Instant Genius - The biggest unsolved mysteries in cosmology
Episode Date: August 1, 2025For thousands of years humans have looked out into the night sky and pondered on the mysteries of the vast cosmos that we find ourselves part of. From Copernicus’ discovery that the Earth revolves a...round the Sun to Einstein’s revelation that gravity is the result of the curvature of spacetime, we’ve learned much about how the universe operates. But we’re still only scratching the surface. In this episode, we speak to Marcus Chown, an award-winning science writer and broadcaster and long-time contributor to BBC Science Focus. He explains why pinning down the nature of dark matter and dark energy has eluded us for so long, why we can’t get gravity to agree with the three other forces of nature, and discusses the possibility of the existence of multiple universes. To get the exclusive gift box from Shokz, order via this link: https://bit.ly/4kFt10l Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
No one goes to Hank's for his spreadsheets.
They go for a darn good pizza.
Lately, though, the shop's been quiet.
So Hank decides to bring back the $1 slice.
He asks Copilot in Microsoft Excel to look at his sales and costs
to help him see if he can afford it.
Co-pilot shows Hank where the money's going
and which little extras make the dollar slice work.
Now, Hank has a line out the door.
Hank makes the pizza.
Co-Pilot handles the spreadsheets.
Learn more at M365Copilot.com slash work.
When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use Indeed
sponsored jobs. It gives your job posts the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people
with the right skills, certifications, and more. Spend less time searching and more time actually
interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a $75-sponsored
job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast. That's Indeed.com slash podcast. Terms and conditions apply.
Need a hiring hero? This is a job for Indeed sponsored jobs.
Introducing the new Best Skin Ever Ultra Slim Precision Concealer from Sephora Collection.
It's full coverage with a matte finish and perfect for any look,
whether you're building it up for a full glam moment or targeting correction for a more natural vibe.
At only $12, it's great for affordable touch-ups on the go.
Get this new must-have concealer at Sephora or at Sephora.com today.
This podcast is sponsored by name, audio and focal.
Streaming has made music more accessible than ever,
but true listening is about more than ease.
It's about quality.
British audio experts name audio,
alongside French acoustic specialist focal,
combine handcrafted tradition with cutting-edge innovation
and high-end materials,
delivering digital precision with analogue warmth.
So you can experience exceptional sound at home.
Music just as the artist intended.
Visit name audio.
to learn more.
Hello and welcome to Instant Genius, a bite-sized master class in podcast form.
Every Monday and Friday you'll hear world-leading scientists and experts
talking about the most fascinating ideas in science and technology today.
I'm Jason Goodyear, commissioning editor, BBC Science Focus.
For thousands of years, humans have looked into the night sky
and pondered on the mysteries of the vast cosmos that we find ourselves part of.
From Copernicus' discovery that the Earth revolves around the sun, to Einstein's revelation that gravity is the result of the curvature of space-time.
We've learned much about how the universe operates.
But we're still only just scratching the surface.
In this episode, we speak to Marcus Chown, an award-winning science writer and broadcaster and long-time contributor to BBC science focus.
He explains why pinning down the nature of dark matter and dark energy has alluded us for so long,
why we can't get gravity to agree with the three other forces of nature
and discusses the possibility of the existence of multiple universes.
So Marcus Chown, welcome to the podcast.
Thanks for inviting me.
Thanks so much for joining us.
So today we're talking about the mysteries of cosmology.
So why there's no question that over the years we've developed a pretty impressive picture of the universe.
But as always in science, there's always lots to learn.
So I thought the best place to start then, we've established that the Big Bang was the start of the universe.
But what does that mean and how did we figure that out?
Well, I want to tell you that physicists or astronomers have been dragged kicking and screaming to that idea.
Because obviously once you know that the universe had a beginning, then everyone says what happened before.
So most people were wedded or before the Big Bang idea was proved.
most physicists were wedded to the idea that the universe had existed forever.
But basically, the building blocks of the universe are galaxies,
two trillion of them,
of which our Milky Way where we live is just one of them.
And they're all flying apart,
like pieces of cosmic shrapnel in the aftermath of some Titanic explosion.
And if we run that expansion backwards, you know, in our minds,
like a movie in reverse,
we come to a time 13.82 billion years ago when everything was compressed into a small space.
And when you compress anything, it gets very hot, as anyone who squeezed the air in a bicycle pump knows.
So the Big Bang, this explosion, was a hot Big Bang.
And the evidence of that is in the room where we are now.
Because the afterglow of the Big Bang, the afterglow of the fireball of the Big Bang, is all around us.
So incredibly, 99.9% of all the photons,
those are particles of light in the universe,
are tied up in the afterglow of the Big Bang,
and only 0.1% come from the stars and galaxies.
That fireable light has been degraded by the expansion of the universe
to lower energies, and it appears at microwave wavelengths,
you know, the wavelengths used by your phone, by a microwave oven,
that kind of thing.
So that's why we can't actually see it.
But if we were to be out in space,
and we were to have glasses, magic glasses,
that could see microwaves rather than visible light,
we would see the entire universe glowing white,
not black at all, everything would be white.
It would be like being inside a giant light bulb.
And that afterglow of the Big Bang,
which is the final proof that it happened,
is the most striking feature of the universe.
And that's still something that astronomers study now,
isn't it, with special instruments?
Yeah, I mean, it turns out that imprinted on this afterglow
is basically the universe beginning to go from a uniform state in the Big Bang to a clumpy state.
So today it's in a very clumpy state, you know, with galaxies and big gaps in between.
But in the beginning, it wasn't like that.
So we can actually see the seeds of structures,
the seeds of great clusters of galaxies impressed on this afterglow.
So when I said, you look at the sky and it appears white all over,
there were slight fluctuations in that whiteness.
And those fluctuations are due to matter being slightly clumped.
So we can see the beginning of the structures in the universe forming.
So after that time, anywhere that was slightly denser than average,
pulled in, had slightly stronger gravity and pulled in material slightly faster.
And in a process which is kind of like the rich getting ever richer,
the galaxies like our Milky Way formed.
Yeah, so I think the obvious question that someone as a curious scientist is going to
obviously that took a lot of really clever people a long time to figure out.
You're going to think, well, what happened before the Big Bang?
Exactly.
And as I said, this is why nobody, nobody wanted to believe in the Big Bang.
You know, I mean, they really, the prevailing idea, the competing idea,
which you probably all heard, the steady state theory,
which would have been promoted by the British physicist Fred Hoyle.
This said that the universe has basically existed forever.
and you know
if that's the case
you don't have to worry about the beginning
but of course once we began to be able
to look a long way across space
so when light actually
is incredibly fast
but on cosmic distances
it kind of crawls like a snail
towards us you know so when we look at very distant
objects billions of light years away
we're seeing them as they were billions of years ago
and the studies they predicted that the universal
should look exactly the same
back then as it does now
but it doesn't
there are things for instance
called quasars which were discovered in
1963
these are basically
super luminous
galaxies which are pumping out
hundreds of times more energy than a typical galaxy
we now know they're powered by supermassive black
holes and they
existed in the past but they don't exist today
so they were the proof that the universe
has actually changed and it's evolved
so how about this idea
of inflation
it looks sort of
eternal inflation as it's called.
Yeah, well, okay, so we have this basic Big Bang that we know is true, right?
We know that the universe began in a hot, dense phase and has been expanding and cooling
and the galaxy is congealing out of that cooling debris.
We know that's true.
We know that's true because of the existence of the fireball radiation, what we call
a cosmic background radiation, which is everywhere.
So we've got the evidence of that.
But the Big Bang theory conflicts with our observations.
in three major ways.
So you just mentioned one of them,
but I'll just quickly say that we need an awful lot
of what's called dark matter, invisible stuff,
that has, you know, we can feel it's gravity,
but we can't see it.
And we also need another thing called dark energy,
which we often cover in science focus,
stuff with repulsive gravity
that fills a lot of the universe.
And the third thing you have to,
so basically you have this Big Bang model,
which is hot dense phase,
you know, universe expanding and cool,
we have to bolt on dark matter, dark energy, and as you say, inflation.
And the reason for inflation is, so I say, inflation was a kind of super fast expansion
that happened before the Big Bang.
So if you imagine, like, the explosion of a nuclear bomb compared to a stick of dynamite,
the nuclear bomb would be inflation, and the explosion of the dynamite would be the sedate expansion
that's taken over since.
The reason we need this is because when we look at this after go of the Big Bang,
you know, the whole sky appearing white,
there are correlations between bits of the sky,
which are 180 degrees apart.
But if we run the expansion of the universe back
to the time when that radiation was formed,
about 380,000 years after the moment of creation,
we find those regions could not possibly have been in contact,
There was no way that any signal could have gone between them.
So how do they know to be at the same brightness, the same temperature?
So what we've realized is there had to be in a super fast expansion very early on.
And so that would mean that these regions would have been in contact when we don't think they were.
And this is inflation.
So inflation, if you want the real description, it's a really unusual state of the vacuum.
Okay.
So the vacuum we think of is empty, but in quantum theory,
the vacuum is not empty.
But this is a weird state of the vacuum
with actually repulsive gravity.
And this repulsive gravity causes this vacuum to expand.
So in the beginning, there was literally nothing
but this vacuum.
It's called the false vacuum or the inflationary vacuum.
But it expanded because it had this repulsive gravity,
and it created more of itself.
So it's like the ultimate free lunch.
You've got some banknotes between your hands.
You move them apart.
You get more banknotes.
So basically inflation creates more and more of this vacuum for free.
But as it expands, it's what we call a quantum thing.
And quantum things are unpredictable.
And so all over the ever expanding, faster expanding nothingness,
the little tiny bits decay into normal vacuum.
So the vacuum that's all around us today.
And all the energy of this higher inflationary vacuum has to go somewhere
and it goes into creating matter in these tiny little bubbles forming everywhere.
And that matter is heated to millions of degrees.
Those are the big bangs.
So in this picture, the Big Bang is not a one-off.
There are Big Bangs going off all over this inflationary vacuum,
like kind of like fireworks just going off all over the place.
And we just happen to be in one of these Big Bang universes.
And that's sort of one of the ideas of the multiverse,
which is known as the bubble universe.
Is that right?
Exactly right.
So if we're in one of these bubbles,
it turns out that the vacuum between us and the next bubble
is basically expanding so fast that we can never ever
have contact with that. So in effect that's another universe, you know?
And this inflation, unfortunately, goes on forever
because if you imagine these little bubbles are forming.
Imagine it's like a moth-eaten coat, right?
So the moths, and the coat is expanding.
the moths can't eat the coat fast enough.
As fast as they eat the coat, more of it expands.
So this inflation goes on forever
and creates all of these disconnected bubble universes,
Big Bang universes.
Yeah, so it does actually bals on us the idea of the multiverse.
And that is a real downer
because the idea of inflation
was that it was going to give us a theory of everything,
not that we're going to, you know,
one universe, one explanation,
not we were going to have this infinity of you.
the verses. So let's go on to, you mentioned there, dark matter. Yeah. So this is another thing that's
just been a mystery for decades now, isn't it? So how did we first come across it and, you know,
where are we now? I think you can actually say a century because the first person who realized that
there had to be a lot of hidden stuff was Fritz Wickey, a Swiss American physicist in California.
But, but yeah, so everywhere we see evidence,
of the visible stuff being pulled or pulled by the gravity of something invisible.
But the main reason for dark matter is that without it, we couldn't possibly be here.
The Big Bang predicts that we shouldn't be here.
So I told you that there were these slight density enhancements in the Big Bang fireball,
and because they were slightly enhanced, they had slightly stronger gravity,
they dragged the material faster, as I say, the rich getting richer, that kind of process.
If you think of that process, it would take 10 times the current age of the universe to make our Milky Way.
Okay, so we cannot possibly exist unless there is an enormous amount of other stuff
whose gravity speeded up that process of gathering matter together.
So it's roughly the dark matter, the invisible stuff, outweighs the visible stuff by about a factor of six.
Yeah, and we still haven't figured out what this is, have we?
There's been dozens of theories, wimps, you know, tiny black holes, all sorts of things.
So what do you think the current top contenders are?
It's just really hard to know.
I mean, there have literally been hundreds of proposals, you know.
This staff, which is clearly in this room with us now, but we can't, it doesn't interact with ordinary matter.
it could be just give out very little light
or it could give out no light
and as you just alluded to
many theories of particle physics do predict
the existence of stuff
there's a theory called supersymmetry
that predicts a whole load of new particles
but all searches
at a large hadron collider in Geneva
in laboratories stuck down mines all over the world
have failed to find absolutely anything
basically you've got to wait
until some bit of dark matter bumps into something
that you're, you know, your detector
and note the vibration or something like that.
That's what you've got to do.
But since we've got no idea what the dark matter is,
you know, there's a very difficult to look for it.
And as you say, all earthbound experiments
have completely drawn a blank.
So we don't really have much of a handle on it.
But interestingly, you mentioned black holes there,
and they're very interesting thing about black holes.
is of all these hypothetical things, we know they exist.
So in my mind, they're the least outrageous possibility for the dark matter.
But we've done these searches called macho searches.
There's a process called gravitational lensing.
So when the light of a distant galaxy goes past a mass, it's kind of bent and focused.
And we can see this effect.
And we've used this effect to search for these things.
massive compact halo objects, you know, could the dark matter be made of?
Asteroids, dead stars, black holes, and the searches have actually drawn a blank.
So there is still a possibility that black holes could be the dark matter,
but there's a very small window of mass range where they could possibly exist.
Peak pollination season, and my business is scaling fast.
To keep the nectar flowing, I need a phone plan with top priority.
data speeds. That's why I chose GoogleFi wireless. My connections stay strong even when the
hive is buzzing. Plus, unlimited plans started $35 a month. Now that's a deal that doesn't stay.
Explore Google Fi Wireless plans today. Plus taxes and government fees. Google Fi Wireless is not
subject to data traffic deprioritization during times of high network usage.
You said this place was steps from the water. We just haven't found the steps yet.
How much did we save?
Enough to get lost.
Or you could book a stay with Hilton.
Welcome to your oceanfront room.
Just steps from the water.
The Hilton sale is on now.
Book on Hilton.com or the Hilton app
and save up to 20% to get the stay you expected.
When you want savings, not surprises.
It matters where you stay.
Hilton, for the stay.
This podcast is sponsored by name, audio, and trocal.
With over 100 years of combined
expertise, Name and Focal have been bringing music to listeners just as the artist intended.
Since day one, this mantra has shaped every innovation in hi-fi design, technology and acoustic engineering,
balancing craftsmanship and tradition with pioneering thinking.
Name Audio pushes cutting-edge technology to ensure digital precision whilst sustaining Pratt,
pace, rhythm and timing.
the elusive quality that makes music feel alive and gives it emotional texture.
Today, in partnership with French acoustic specialist focal,
name audio creates systems that deliver exceptional sound,
and unforgettable listening experiences at home.
Try it for yourself at a focal powered by name boutique.
Visit focal powered by name.com for more information.
So let's go on to Black holes then, another really fascinating topic.
So as you said, a bit back, the event horizon telescope actually made an image of a black hole.
So, you know, we know that they're out there.
So what is a black hole?
Well, I mean, a black hole is a region of space where gravity is so strong that nothing not even light can escape.
So incredibly, at the height of the First World War, Einstein presented his new theory of gravity in Berlin
in a series of four lectures in November 1915.
And I should tell you that he realized that gravity is the curvature of space.
We can't see it because it's the curvature of four-dimensional space-time
and we have three-dimensional beings, we can't see it.
So that's why it took the genius of Einstein to realize it.
So you think the earth is held, going around the sun on an invisible tether
between the sun and the earth, you know, gravity.
but in fact the sun makes a depression or a valley in the space time around it
and the earth goes around the outer regions of this valley like a roulette ball in a roulette world
and i just should tell you that Einstein replaced the one formula that newton had to describe gravity with 10
so finding the curvature of space which is gravity for any any realistic mass he considered impossible
But within a few weeks, a man working on the Western Front, on the Alsace front, at a place called Molehouse, found a solution, found a description for the space time around a compact mass.
This name was Carl Schwarchtild, and he wrote this letter to Einstein, and Einstein was amazed to get that from the Western Front, and even more amazed to find that this thing that he thought was impossible was, you know, was possible.
But Schwarzschild hadn't finished, the beginning of 1960.
and he wrote to Einstein, he said, if this, if the mass became ever more concentrated,
the valley of space time would become steeper and steeper and steeper until it became a bottomless
pit from which nothing not even light could escape.
And that's a black hole.
So Schwarzen, is the person who discovered that they, but then there follows an entire century
where pretty much everyone thought these things cannot possibly exist.
I mean, they are just too ridiculous.
Einstein never believed in black holes because if there's nothing to stop, once the mass
starts shrinking under its own gravity, there's nothing to stop it.
And it will shrink down to a point.
It becomes infinitely dense.
This is called a singularity.
And when you get a singularity in any theory, it tells you your theory is broken.
You can't say anything sensible.
So that's why Einstein hated this black hole solution because he spent 10 years of blood
and sweat developing his new theory of gravity.
He didn't want to know within a few weeks that there was a flaw in it, you know.
But, you know, nature has, despite the fact that we thought you can't possibly exist these things,
we have actually confirmed that they do.
The actual definitive evidence was the signal on the 14th of September 2015
when gravitational wave detectors in America,
so these detect ripples in the fabric of spacetime,
detected gravitational waves from the merger of two black holes.
And the signal that they got was the definitive signal.
But as you say, in 2019, an event horizon telescope, which is eight radio dishes spread over the planet.
There was one in Antarctica, one in Mexico, all over the place.
They jointly observed the same object, which was a galaxy called M87, and which we believe had a 6.5 billion solar mass black hole in the centre.
And the signals from all these telescopes are all identical, were flown together,
to supercomputers in Hastack in Massachusetts and Bonn in Germany.
And on a computer, we were able to get the image we would have had had we had a telescope
the size of the Earth.
And bigger the telescope, the finer, the detail you can see.
And we got that amazing image of this donut, this glowing orange donut of material swirling down
onto this black void, which was the black hole.
Yeah, in the office, we call it the eye of sauron.
It is like the eye of sauron, yeah.
But it took three more years to actually image the black hole at the center of our galaxy,
which is called Sagittarius A Star that was discovered in 51 years ago.
And bizarrely, it's a thousand times smaller than the one in M87,
but it's a thousand times nearer.
So the two objects look exactly the same size on the sky.
But the reason it took so long is because it's so much smaller,
stuff whirls around it much, much faster.
So it's kind of like very easy to photograph an elderly Labrador sleeping on your lawn because it doesn't move much.
But try photographing a puppy that's flying about.
The puppy's kind of Sagittarius A star and the Labrador is M87.
So you mentioned there that a black hole not even light can escape from.
So the big question then is what's going on inside it?
Well, I mean, this is one of my bug bears because in 1963, Roy Kerr, who he's still alive, he's 91, he's a New Zealander, he's still publishing papers, and he did something that everyone thought was impossible.
He found the shape of the curvature of space around a spinning black hole, so a realistic black hole.
And it was the first solution to Einstein's equation for 47 years.
and he then thought to myself,
I need to find out what's the curvature of space
inside the black hole, and he gave up, it's impossible.
So it's not been possible for anyone
to use Einstein's theory to predict what's inside a black hole.
So everything you hear, you know, oh my God, you know,
if you go into the central of the black hole,
you're appearing another time, you're hearing another universe,
this is all complete speculation.
We have no idea.
I mean, the theory predicts that there is a singularity
which is a point of infinite density
and for a spinning black hole
that's actually a circular thing
is actually a circularity
but we know that singularities are impossible
so we're waiting for what's called
a quantum theory of gravity
because we think that that iron time theory breaks down
and we need a better theory
but we haven't made much progress there
but that will tell us what's actually
at the center of a black hole
I should tell you that
outside a black hole
space and time are highly distorted
So as you get near the black hole, in strong gravity, time slows down.
So if you were to see someone falling into a black hole,
they would be moved more and more in slow motion
as they got closer to the point of no return,
which is called the event horizon, you know.
That person, they would cross the event horizon into the black hole quite quickly.
But from your point of view, outside, it would take forever.
and bizarrely this distortion of space and time
becomes even more ridiculous when you cross the horizon
because the direction of space and time switch.
So the direction to the centre of the black hole
is no longer a distance in space
is a distance in time.
So you can't avoid the singularity
for the same reason you can't avoid tomorrow
because you can't.
It's in the future.
So let's have a look at gravity then.
And you mentioned there this idea of quantum gravity.
And we've got the standard model, particle physics, the three forces that that explains,
the strong force, the weak force, the electromagnetic force.
And they all have a particle associated with them.
We found those.
There are several in the weak force, for example, aren't there?
But when it comes to gravity, we haven't been able to find its associated particle.
So what's the idea behind that and why is that so tough?
The reason for that is that gravity is unbelievably weak.
You know, it's one followed by 40 zeros weaker
than the electric force that is holding together the atoms in your body.
It is so weak that I can hold my arm out
and the entire mass of the earth, with all of its gravity,
cannot pull my arm down.
I mean, that's how weak gravity is.
So in terms of
You're talking about the other forces
They have a quantum explanation
So we imagine that the forces arise
Because of an exchange of what we call force-carrying particles
So as you say
With the electromagnetic force that glues together
The atoms in the bodies
It's this change of photons
And with gravity
And it's weakness
Is associated with infrequency of interaction
So it means that
Because it's so weak
Gravitons hardly ever interact
And when you do a calculation, Freeman Dyson, the British physicist who lived in America most of his career, he did a calculation and I think he realized that you would need a detector the size of Jupiter operating for more than the age of the universe to expect one graviton to interact with it.
So I don't think we're going to, I mean, there is a lot of interest now in, incredibly, in maybe tabletop experiments that might be able to yield evidence of gravitons.
But we have every reason to believe that the gravitational force, just like the other three, has a quantum explanation in terms of the exchange of gravitons.
It's just weird that uniquely gravity can be described as yours.
geometry, okay? So because everything falls at the same rate, you can imagine it's all falling, you know, in the same curve space type. You can't do that for electromagnetic force because the force that's experienced by a mass depends on its charge. So that's a different geometry for every charge. But in the particular case of gravity, which is a universal force, that affects every single mass the same, there is this geometrical explanation. But there is this geometrical explanation. But
That doesn't necessarily mean that there isn't a quantum explanation as well.
So, another big mystery that physical physicists and cosmologists have been trying to figure out
is the fact that where is all the antimatter?
Because the theories say that it should be essentially equal parts of matter and antimatter.
But there's way more matter than antimatter.
Yeah.
Well, first of all, we ought to say that one of the really,
really shocking aspects of modern science is that only 5% the universe have we seen.
So the majority of the 95% is this dark matter and dark energy,
we don't actually know what it is at all.
And the 5% is made of atoms.
So we really haven't really seen much of the universe.
But as you just said, that 5% should come in two types.
Because every single experiment we do with particles,
when we generate a particle of matter, we automatically generate a particle of antimatter.
So the electron has a partner called the positron, which has particular significance to Bristol
where science focus is based, because Paul Dirac, the Bristol physicist, is the person who predicted
dark matter in 19, not dark matter, antimatter in about 1928.
But yeah, so there is a clue to where the antimatter is,
and that is there are 10 billion photons in the universe,
particles of light, for every particle matter.
Okay, so that tells you that,
because when matter and electrons and positrons meet,
they annihilate and end up as photons.
So that tells you that in the beginning,
for every 10 billion particles of antipsy,
matter, there were 10 billion and 1 particles of matter.
And then there was this orgy of destruction and all and pretty much all of it,
turned it in the photons, leaving this just one particle per 10 billion of matter.
So there's a tiny, tiny asymmetry in the laws of physics,
which must have resulted in all the antimatter vanishing.
And really, when you think about it, that has to exist.
because if it didn't exist, there would be no universe
because all matter would have been destroyed and annihilated
if it was equal amounts of antimatter and antimatter.
So the person who actually really discovered
what has to be part of the solution
is a woman called Chen Xingwu
who was scandalously overlooked for the Nobel Prize in 1957.
She did this tremendous experiment
which everyone thought was impossible
and she found that there was
a skewness to the laws of physics
that the weak
weak interaction, the weak
nuclear, one of the three, one of the four forces
called the weak force.
The weak force
behaves differently
when it pulls on
particles which are spinning one way
to the other way. Okay, and it's called
parity violation
and there were great
physicists of the day like Wolfgang Power
bet their house that it couldn't possibly exist and she proved it was correct but the two
theorists who predicted it won the Nobel Prize and she didn't get a share but somehow the solution
has to involve that so either there was a process in the big bang that produced a surplus of
matter over antimatter or there was a process that destroyed antimatter preferentially but we haven't
found it yet. So let's finish up with a classic sci-fi favourite then. The search for alien life,
particularly intelligent life. So a lot of people say, well, if it exists, surely at least
if we haven't found it, it would have found us. So what's the idea there? Well, it is a puzzle,
isn't it? You know, why we haven't seen anything, but it's a big universe. If you look at life on earth,
you see that it got stuck at the single cell stage for a long time,
about 3 billion years, something like that.
And only in the last about 800 million years or 500 million years has it become complex.
And that kind of implies that the step from single cell life to complex life like us is a difficult one.
So it could be, and this is a problem that we're arguing from one instance, which is very difficult.
it could be that there was a lot of life in the universe, but it's very simple.
You know, it's only single, if it's like chaos, it's single cell organisms.
And there may not be much intelligent life.
So we haven't seen any sign.
But I mean, I just remember that one of the great books that got me interested in physics,
and that was Carl Sagan's The Cosmic Connection.
And I remember him saying that there were tribes in New Guinea who lived in separate valleys.
and they spent their lives in these separate valleys
and they communicated with big drums
and he said if you'd ask them
how would you communicate with an advanced civilization
a few valleys away
they say use a bigger drum
and we are using radio waves
which we've only been using for a century
almost certainly
other forms of communication
might be used by extraterrestrials
and you know
we are just thinking, well, we'll just get a bigger radio telescope, you know, and try and pick it up.
So it could be that the extraterrestrial communication is whizzing through us at this very moment,
and we don't know.
But another thing, an interesting idea is from Stephen Waltham.
Stephen Woffrom is a physicist from London.
He's a billionaire because he invented a computer language called Mathematica.
And one of the questions is, you know, where are?
are they? And he he thinks that if you look at our communications, they become more and more chaotic.
Okay, so to squeeze more and more information into our radio communication, we make them more,
there's less and less pattern. And so our signals, if you look at our phone communications
and whatever, they're looking more and more like natural sources like the sun. So, you know,
we're looking for the instillular equivalent of Radio 1.
You know, we're looking for a single carrier frequency that's modulated,
but that may not be the way anyone is communicated.
So there's lots of possible explanations,
but I'm pretty certain that there will, well,
I'm pretty certain we'll find evidence of life in our solar system.
I'm pretty certain of that because of the simple fact that
there are meteorites that arrive on Earth from Mars,
you know, something's hit Mars,
a meteorite has been, you know, ejected into space, circled around for a few million years and fallen on Earth, and it's possible for simple organismic bacteria to survive inside this.
And Mars, for instance, was a habitable place, about a billion years before the Earth or half a billion years before the Earth.
We see evidence on the surface of rivers and seas.
So it could be that life arose there first and came here, that we're all Martians, but certainly interplanetary.
pan-spermia, the idea that simple life could spread between the planets and is quite likely.
And we can see quite a few places in the solar system where life could arise.
In particular, the subsea oceans of the Jupiter's moons, Ganymede, Europa, Callisto, maybe.
And then, of course, Saturn's Moon, Titan, or an uranus.
There's quite a few places in the solar system.
where we could find life.
Thank you for listening to this episode of Instant Genius,
brought to you from the team behind BBC Science Focus.
That was Marcus Chow.
To discover more about the topics we just discussed,
check out his book, A Crack in Everything.
If you liked what you just heard,
then please do consider subscribing to Instant Genius
on your preferred podcast platform.
If you'd like to see our guests and hosts in person,
then also check out our YouTube channel, Matt, Science Focus.
The current issue of BBC's science.
Science Focus magazine is out now.
Pick up a copy wherever you buy your favourite magazines
or download us on your app store of choice.
You can also find us on Apple News or online at sciencefocus.com.
This podcast is sponsored by Name, Audio and Focal.
The texture and emotional depth of music
can be lost through digital sources or poor signal.
Name Audio believes you can have digital precision
with analogue warmth.
Alongside French acoustic specialist focal,
Name creates high-end audio systems, combining innovation with craftsmanship,
so you can listen to music, just as the artist intended.
Discover more at name audio.com.
Ambition comes in all shapes and sizes.
At First Citizens Bank, we roll with your goals because we're built for what you're building.
Fit for your ambition for Citizens Bank.
Relax and let Ralph's delivery handle your grocery shopping this week.
We start with only the freshest items, then review your list and carefully choose each one.
Then we pack it all up and deliver it in as little as 30 minutes, so you can feel confident it's what you ordered.
Fresh groceries, your way, with Ralph's delivery and pickup.
And right now, you can save $20 on your first delivery or pickup order.
Ralph's, fresh for everyone.
