Knowledge Fight - #1037: May 12, 2025
Episode Date: May 14, 2025In this installment, Dan and Jordan check in to see what Alex thinks about Trump's recent actions on prescription drugs, Chinese tariffs, and jets from Qatar....
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Music It's time to pray I have great respect for knowledge fight knowledge I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys saying we are the bad guys knowledge
Knowledge fight
Pray Hey everybody, welcome back to Knowledge Fight, I'm Dan. I'm Jordan.
We're a couple dudes that like to sit around, worship with the altar of Selene, and talk a little bit about Alex Jones. Oh, indeed we are, Dan. I'm Dan. I'm Jordan. We're a couple dudes like to sit around worship at the altar of selene and talk a little
bit about Alex Jones. Oh indeed we are Dan. Jordan. Dan. Jordan. Quick question for you. What's up?
What's your bright spot today buddy? You go first. My bright spot is Expedition 33. Oh, okay. This video game is amazing
Yeah, you were telling me a little before the before we started recording. Love it. You like the French? Ah, man
It's just great. Yeah, I do And I do like the French angle to it. I think that's fun.
The French angle. That game is deeply French.
It is deeply French.
It is so fucking French.
Yeah, which is fun.
It's just like video games in my head from,
because where we grew up in this world has been like,
it is so heavily influenced by Japan.
Sure.
Especially RPGs.
You know, like the JRPG is such a massive part of growing up like it is so heavily influenced by Japan. Sure. Especially RPGs.
You know, like the JRPG is such a massive part
of growing up that the language in and of itself
is a whole thing.
Yeah.
And then to just suddenly be hit with some French,
like, ooh, look at that guy's mustache.
At times, do you not think it's too French?
Absolutely not.
Okay.
I mean, nobody has yet gone, ho ho ho ho.
No? So it is possible that I will get to him. I mean nobody has yet gone, ho ho ho ho. No?
So it is possible that I will get to him.
I thought there was one character who just speaks in ho ho ho's.
There was a guy.
Have you reached a point in the game yet where you find an unlockable weapon that is a baguette?
No, not yet.
That would be too French.
I assume that a baguette is coming.
That's too French.
Two days old. Two days old is the baguette time for murder. Crusty bread baguette is coming. That's too French two days old
Two days old is the baguette time for murder. Yeah, everybody knows that. Yeah, I'm glad you're enjoying that
I tried to play it and it wasn't my cup of tea or a cup of vann. Yeah nice
But yeah, I'm glad I'm glad you're enjoying it. Yeah, that's great. What what's your favorite character so far?
Um, mael is a world destroyer. Sure. She is
I've got I think right now early on part of the struggle for me is that I've got this like
Three-person combo setup. So it's boom boom boom boom boom and then the fights over and mail is
Just at the end of that. She is the she is the day new ma
So I enjoy her immensely okay. Yeah awesome. Did you did you have fun with anybody?
I had no strong feelings about anybody that I encountered
Except for they were fucking friend. You stop
Gustav fucking Lumiere or Gaston or some shit.
No, I thought it was a great game,
but it just wasn't for me.
I can't do those timing things.
Like, it's very, very hard for me,
and I just can't get good at it.
Totally get it.
So I set it down.
I may get back to it one day,
because it is gorgeous.
It's beautiful.
And the narrative of it is very gripping. Yeah, so like I would like the story
I'd like to know more of the story. Yeah, it's it's fantastic so far nice. What's your bright spot?
My bright spot is
Jordan
Your usual suspects think me but like your verbal kinting.
You're looking at the walls like, uh, uh, Kobayashi!
Where's Kobayashi, god damn it!
Um, no.
So my bright spot is not a bright spot.
It's a... it is a negative spot.
It is a boo spot.
Okay, okay, okay.
And that is, I went to the grocery store that we shan't name no no plugs
Mm-hmm, I was wearing the pinky ring sure so this was a pinky ring experience, okay?
And I think it was partially. I think the pinky ring played into it a little bit, okay?
because I saw a
cheesecake mm-hmm a mocha cheesecake
for sale and I had seen it before and I'd
said no okay and I was I was there this time with pinky ring with the pinky
ring so you believe that the pinky ring influenced you towards the cake I think
it might have given me a little bit of a devil may care attitude okay and I bought
the mocha cheesecake okay and it trash. I ask you this question
Do you think that over time if we were to like really?
Map out your behaviors there would be a trend towards a riskier set of behaviors with pinky ring as opposed to without I wonder
I would don't we all I?
Think yes, I I bet there is mm-hmm, but I also I don't know how risky quantitatively
You know like listen that's fair. I mean, it's a mocha cheesecake though, so you you never know what you're gonna get there
Yeah, I mean depending on how we set the variables and everything
I think you would find that but I bet it would be like a very incremental tiny little bit of added risk
Yeah, but that's what happens when you're cool. I mean, yeah, absolutely
You get a cheesecake. It sucked. I didn't enjoy it
I like the idea that you were eating the cheesecake and then you took the ring off and then you were like
I hate this cheesecake
I don't want to I don't want to speak bad while I'm wearing the ring as soon as I took the ring off
I realized it was a bad purchase bad purchase
I've made a mistake, but I guess it could still be a bright spot because I felt the freedom to buy this cheese
Yeah, absolutely. I guess negative experiences are positive experiences over time. Sure. Make sense. You learn the things you don't want exactly
Like more mocha cheesecake makes perfect sense. So Jordan today we got an episode to go over. All right
We're gonna be talking about May 12th, 2025. Alex was out of studio for Friday and then Sunday.
Sure. And so now he's back on on Monday. All right. And yeah, I think that he's a sad man.
He's a sad, sad man. Sure. And we'll talk about it. But first, let's take a little moment to say
hello to some new walks. That's a great idea. So first, Nick, you're a loser little tidbit, baby. Thank you so much. You're now a policy wonk.
I'm a policy wonk.
Thank you very much!
Thank you! From Kerry, Phoenix, I love you more than anything in the whole wide monster hunter world.
See you in startling city. Thank you so much. You're now a policy wonk.
I'm a policy wonk.
Thank you very much!
And I removed an Info Wars bumper sticker off a utility box two hours south of the Arctic fuck you Alex
Thank you so much. You're now policy wonk. I'm a policy wonk. Thank you very much
Thank you, and we got a technical credit the mix Jordan
So thank you so much to you
I want my mom to know that I made something of myself and I am now a policy wonk correction
You're now a technocrat. I'm a policy wonk
Someone someone sodomite sent me a bucket of poop.
Daddy shark.
Bomp, bomp, bomp, bomp, bomp.
Jar Jar Binks has a Caribbean black accent.
He's a loser little, little kitty baby.
I don't wanna hate black people.
I renounce Jesus Christ.
Thank you.
Yes, thank you very much.
So I felt like this episode is a grim picture of Alex.
I think it's a very, like as much as everything about him sucks, like a lot of the political
beliefs and you know, all that, the fact that he's a huge old liar, all that sucks.
But man, this just felt weak.
And I think you'll understand why as we get
through it, it's just you never want to live long enough to become this if you're someone
like Alex. So we start off with him covering the some news about China and tariffs and
trade. Okay. Now the stock market's up what 6% right now. But that's not the real indicator of the economy.
That's what they just try to use to manipulate people.
China completely capitulated,
and the corporate media is,
Oh, my God, Trump backed off his tariffs.
Trump totally surrendered.
No, China did what Trump asked them to do eight years ago and tried to do. Trump's trade policy, but the
Chinese and Switzerland. Told
the Treasury secretary, and
he's on record now. We have the
clip coming up. They said,
Listen, we already did the deal
and you didn't enforce it. So
now there's this 90 days to
implement all of these policies
and all of these policies are
being implemented. And they
are being implemented. And they're being implemented. And they're being implemented. And they're being implemented. And they're being implemented. And secretary and he's on record now we have the clip coming up they said listen we already did the deal and you didn't enforce it so now there's this 90 days
to implement all the finer pieces of it but it will go through because China is
on the verge of total collapse you are not gonna see the corporate media tell
you that you would think Trump is the biggest moron on earth.
So there was a major breakthrough in the trade negotiations between the United States and
China, but it's kind of silly to say that China capitulated.
In the past months, Trump has imposed and stalled and then imposed giant tariffs on
Chinese imports into the United States.
In response, China has put retaliatory tariffs in place and then has had the effect of basically
creating an unofficial embargo between these two giant trading partners.
It was very dumb and unnecessary.
And then in April, China had added export restrictions on rare earth minerals and they'd
done a bunch of other adjustments to their relation to the United States, not necessarily
just involving trade or tariffs.
This agreement that they struck involved dropping those pointless tariffs that Trump had initiated,
and as part of the deal, China's going to drop all the other stuff that they were doing
in response to those tariffs.
We're essentially back where we started, but also clearly worse off.
In terms of international relations, I think that this whole affair paints China as a much
more reliable and trustworthy trading partner, and it also kind of reveals that they have
a bit more leverage than Trump and Alex want to admit.
They can clearly move the needle.
No, it makes sense.
Anyway, this agreement is just to lower the tariffs for 90 days, so we'll see what happens
in the meantime, and when that clock runs out. I would predict more chaos and stupidity.
Yeah.
But, you know.
Yeah, there's a part of me that feels like we shouldn't be, nobody should be getting
any updates on any of this because God knows what's happening.
I don't think they know what's happening.
I think us knowing anything only makes things more confusing.
Yeah.
I think Alex having any bits of things to hang on to is bad.
You know, like we should all just wait because fucking I don't know what's going on.
Yeah.
And I think that Trump and his administration have such a lack of credibility that like
them coming out and saying like, Oh man, we worked out a great deal here.
Makes me feel like, um, I don't think, I don't think you did.
Yeah, there's no way it doesn't look like it and this whole like well
90 days
That I don't I don't I don't like that as a media strategy
Yeah
Because I think that this has happened a bit where it's like 30-day pause on this stuff, right?
And that just kicks the can down the road and people's attention will be gone by the time this this this time runs out. Yep. Oh
well. Yeah that's the problem with getting the wrong kind of news. Would you say though that that
is kind of the art of the deal? Oh I let me I'll just throw this out at you okay now I don't know
what's going on. I'm not sure about negotiations and I'm not an economist so I don't know what's going on. I'm not sure about negotiations and I'm not an economist so I don't know what
levers push what and make what happen. But I will say that as far as negotiations go,
in history, from what I understand, if you are in a weak position, you are probably going to have to
give up more in the negotiations than you will receive. So you want to be in a stronger position within those negotiations.
Now perhaps putting all of your political capital on suddenly being an asshole might
be a weak position in a trade negotiation.
Yeah, or it could be a way to artificially create the appearance of strength.
Exactly.
Which indicates weakness.
In reality, when you're negotiating
with China, you will find yourself in a weak position, but you look like you're the big
guy with your big shoulders all up all over everywhere. It does. I do get that vibe, but
it could be just the art of the deal. You know, I haven't read that book. No. So China
has agreed to get rid of all of its non-monetary tariffs, all the little hidden ones. And this the out with a moderate tariff. If they don't agree, boom, it gets bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger, which is weaponization because they've
been weaponized against us. And then when they back off, he comes back to what he first
said. I mean, that's just simple art of the deal stuff that he didn't invent that, by
the way. Men, it's like your kids. First time you tell them, don't do that. Next time you go, Hey, I'm warning you. Third time, I'm going to whip your ass. And you know, if you're 16 and keep
not doing what they say, they just say, Hey, get your ass out of the house. Go.
So this is the guy who's like all about the sacredness of the family and how the left
is trying to destroy the family unit. But he's also someone who believes that violent
threats and kicking your kid out of the house in their sophomore year of high school is
good parenting.
Sure.
Seems like an asshole.
What Alex is describing as the art of the deal and also parenting is just bullying.
This is a cornerstone of Alex and Trump's worldview and it shows a little bit of the
path of how you need to respond to it.
This is just bullying.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, the problem is it's not like they're doing it because it hasn't worked for them.
You know?
Like it is so much like, of course bullying works up until it doesn't.
That's the risk reward strategy of bullying.
Sooner or later, somebody's going to be like, no more bullying.
And then it turns out you're a piece of shit. That's how it works.
So Alex is gonna get to the news. But before he does, there's something that is a little
bit more important.
All right, let me get into this. Historic events that are happening all around you right
now and the incredible victories humanity in America is having. But I want to say something
out of the gates because it's very instructive and informative
and important.
I notice a massive continued talking point on X
that I'm not even looking for.
I just see it cause I love reading comments
and love seeing clips and articles and memes
that people post in response to what I post,
what others post.
I just love it, addicted to it.
Spent hours a day on it, I can't stand it.
I mean, I can't stand it to not be able
to not constantly be looking at it. I'm obsessed. And I see this talking point. Jones used to be anti government. Now he works for the government. Jones used to be anti establishment. Now he is the establishment. Yep.
Ah, not yet.
But that's the stated goal. Populism, we the people, right?
Read the Declaration of Independence.
That'd be like when George Washington and our four bears won.
And the public going, my God, we can't have our new government of the people.
I mean, we're the rebels.
Well, I mean, now George Washington's King George.
We can't, what?
So apparently talking about what random people
are saying on Twitter is more important
than getting to the news.
This dude has a serious problem with social media.
It's taking over his life.
I can understand how this criticism
that is being waged against Alex kind of stings him a bit
because it does directly
indict his entire career.
So this is a natural part of the challenge that his type of career presents.
The relationship with power is always something that he needs to manage or else he is going
to become seduced by it.
Someone in his position isn't a watchdog about corruption or any of that other shit,
but in order to play that role, he needs to have a healthy distance, and unfortunately that means never
really being associated with the actual power structure.
It's important for him to champion idealistic losers like Ron Paul, who have no shot of
actually getting elected, because maintaining that support is easy.
If only Ron Paul had got elected, it wouldn't be in this mess.
That's a simple refrain that he can pull out any time a Democrat or Republican president
does something bad.
Maintaining this connection to power always allows you to be playing forward-thinking
and optimistic games.
You're striving for a state of affairs that will never come to pass, but man if they did,
things would be great.
When your guy fucks around and gets elected, you have to make excuses and justify
why things aren't as good as they should be or you said they were gonna be. You become someone
playing a defensive and backward thinking game, and that's not the natural position for a media
figure like Alex Jones to be embodying. The criticisms of Alex aren't about him being close
to power, but it's a byproduct of how what he does doesn't work in this state of affairs.
He's made a career off talking about how the media didn't lie to prop up the globalist
leaders, but now anyone paying any attention can see that all he does is lie to prop up
Trump.
He's become the dinosaur media that he's used to attack, which probably sucks for him,
and I can understand how he doesn't want to see that on Twitter, but it's unfortunate.
It's the reality of where you are.
Yeah. Yeah, I think in his world, I think he, like, his job functions a lot like a parasite.
You know, like, as long as you're on the right host and you don't get too big or too small,
you can just kind of have a nice run.
You're doing great.
I'm, yeah, fucking, I'm a big fan of Rand Paul.
Nobody's ever gonna take me too seriously.
I'm never gonna get big, but I can suck juices out of Rand Paul.
If he gets too big, then you've gotta be dealt with.
People have to look at this gigantic tick and go,
ah, we gotta get this shit out of here.
I think that's part of it
And then I think it's also like you know the Green Lantern
Can't exist in red oh whatever you know like sure sure sure sure weak against red
Yellow I believe is fine. Whatever. I don't know. I don't know I saw that Ryan Reynolds movie
That's the most I know don't remember it But like, it's it's he's the character is weak to this thing. And that thing is exactly what's
happening now, which is having to tow the line and carry water
for the power establishment. It's should know better. Yeah,
just don't go in this proximity.
It's it's I mean, if seduction weren't seductive we wouldn't have a word for it
That's the problem. You know of course
You got a week. He's right. He's weak to social media of course. He's weak to shit tons of money, right?
Yeah, I think that if Alex were smart
Yeah, he would agree to have Roger Stone on the show that
first time, but only if he was tied to a mask.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Absolutely.
Unable to respond in any of the ways that...
Hannibal Lecter mask.
So anyway, Alex is like, hey man, all you people on Twitter talking shit, you're wrong.
I'm cool. I've never been anti-government.
When the corporate media would call me that in the ADLs, I'd probably lost Senate Democrats.
I would say I'm pro-constitutional government, limited government, the American system, and
I'm anti-occupment when it's limited and constitutional.
In fact, I defend it because it's of the people.
It is our country.
And I am anti-illegitimate government,
and will fight it with every ounce of energy
and every drop of blood, sweat and tears,
clawing with my
fingernails to the last breath in my lungs and the last beat of my heart against them.
I understand what Alex is trying to say, but this just doesn't work with the rest of his
career.
His career has been based on a very strong position of states' rights over everything
that wasn't specified as a power that the federal government was given in the Constitution.
That's what so many of his positions have been theoretically based on over the years.
What he's saying in that clip is basically, I'm not opposed to all government, I'm just
opposed to government I don't like, which is a meaningless statement.
It's fine to believe this, and I don't actually have a problem with someone saying something
like that because it's kind of a fine position.
You would be saying that government itself is value neutral, and when it's used for
good it's good, and when it's not it's bad.
But that's not what Alex believes.
He's intellectualized his feelings about government, and he's got a long-standing position that
the federal government has to be weakened as much as possible, and that states have
all the powers that aren't given to the federal government specifically in the constitution.
He's always been a critic of executive power, and the issue people have is that he's completely
abandoned this essential piece of his philosophy.
Anyone paying even a little bit of attention can tell that he's fundamentally altered his
beliefs about civics, and it makes sense that he's sensitive about being called out about
this.
Like, he was part of the popularization of the idea of democide, like government murdering
people.
He is opposed to government in a sense. Yeah.
I guess the question for him is like, this is frustrating for him because I do think
that this is inaccurate criticism.
Because the accurate criticism would be to say, Alex has been lying to us this whole
time, right?
Not like Alex has changed his beliefs about blank, but Alex was lying to us from the jump.
Yeah. If you're going to put intention into it, if you take intention out of it, it is
your relationship with what the government's power is has changed.
Yeah.
If you just want to give it descriptively and give it the most benefit of the doubt. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Because in a way, if you want to provide some depth to the idea of states' rights as an
actual philosophy that you could say was real, then it would be less states' rights and more,
here are all of the tools that we have with the constitution propaganda wise, reality
wise, courts wise, all of this to protect against a centralized form of government that
I don't like.
And then here are all the tools that the constitution and propaganda and all this stuff has to enforce
a executive government that I do like.
I am willing to lie, cheat or steal to get power is the is the
actual criticism that is Alex, you know, not like you were cool, man. I was never cool. Not once.
I was lying to you. You idiots. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. There's a, the, the, it's a flawed criticism. And
then even if you take it, um it at its most generous, it's a
misarticulated criticism.
But these people are responding to something that is real.
Exactly.
And that is that Alex's tune has changed.
And he doesn't like that.
He doesn't like the idea that like, oh, yeah, in order to maintain the position that I have
now and the relationship with power that I have now, I have to give up on what is my stated philosophy and what I pretended
to believe all this time.
Yeah.
Yeah, and I think that you're right that the real criticism is you were a liar.
You weren't, you didn't believe any of this shit.
It was just what was convenient for you at the time because you knew that there was no chance of
Executive power being something that would go in your what your direction, right?
right
and you've you've internalized this criticism as being so bad not because of
The content of it, but because you've been lying to yourself as well
Probably you've been trying to tell yourself you are also still the powerful truth teller while
at the same time being the bootlicking toady.
Yeah.
And I think that the criticism and the fact that it's happening on Twitter where he is
obsessively scrolling around looking for dopamine hits.
Right, right, right.
I think the reason it's so palpable for him is that it does start to chip away at that facade
of the character that he is.
And that's threatening.
Yeah, you know what's great about social media is that if you're somebody with a propensity
for repetitive thoughts, you want to have those externalized and then shot at you through
a gun.
That's the way you want social media to do things.
Yeah. So anyway, people are a little too mean to Alex on social media. And I think he gets lost
ranting about the Patriot is a scarce man. hated, feared, scorned. But in time, when his
But in time, when his cause succeeds, the timid join him, because then it cost nothing to be a patriot.
When his cause succeeds, when his cause succeeds, when his cause succeeds, the timid join then because it costs nothing
to be a patriot.
And what did the timid and the John income latley's do now that we're winning?
Oh, he sold out to the government.
He's with the system now. We have not taken the government
back yet, but we've taken large pieces over it and we've turned the tide. And humans are
not God, and so we will always have problems, and I'm not promising some utopia here. What
I'm saying is, we're going back to the American system and we're going
to have a victory or we're going to have death. As
Colonel Travis wrote in his final letter to my ancestors in Gonzales with instructions to take care
of his son.
And that's what this is, ladies and gentlemen.
This is about victory, or this is about death.
And we're going to get plenty of death if these people continue on as you've seen with the poison shots the GMO
the chemtrails the fentanyl and all the autism and all this garbage
Because the wages of sin is death
Mixing mixing metaphor. So my answer the tyrant says victory or death
Okay So my answer to the tyrant says victory or death Okay
Was that policy wise
like progressive taxes victory or
Death with three lines under it all right, okay
three little commitment and
When you commit to something worthy and good it is not a weight it is everything
it is your greatest strength it becomes your soul keep in mind this is a guy who's just mad about
some things people said on twitter like he's god's appointed soldier to kill the devil but he also
has to spend long chunks of time on air whining about how people don't respect him enough.
Also, I was thinking about that, like, I'm not promising a utopia thing, and that's
sometimes not true.
Alex does get into utopian visions periodically, but I'm going to pretend that he doesn't.
If you just accept his premise that he doesn't promise the listeners a utopia, I still think
that he sells his shit by promising utopia.
One version of utopia is the creation of an ideal state, but another is the avoidance
of a totally evil one.
Alex doesn't promise a positive vision of a utopia, but he does promise the audience
that if he wins, they'll be spared from the dystopia that he spends so much time on air
describing.
In effect, he's created a hell for them to fear
and offered a path to salvation from it.
This is really no different than promising someone
a utopia if you follow them.
It's just playing on their fear instead of optimism
for a better tomorrow.
Sure.
It's like great, yeah, you don't promise a utopia,
you promise avoiding hell.
Ultimately, in both cases, all you're really promising is safety from pain
Mm-hmm one is a positive vision and the other is a
Absence of a negative one. Yeah, great. Yeah, well really
Fun fun to stumble upon them being fundamentally the same. That's an interesting thing. That's fun to get to
But ultimately yeah, no, he doesn't understand anything now, but he's did you know Twitter gets dumb?
That's that sucks
That's it
I don't I don't empathize or I don't feel for him
but of all the things that I would want to be tortured by, I really think
social media being addicted to it and at the same time being okay. Being a person who talks
to the TV because the TV keeps calling me a piece of shit, but also the TV keeps calling
me a piece of shit. You know, like it's really calling me a piece of shit.
Yeah.
That's terrifying.
It is.
Yeah.
And the fact that Alex has worked himself into this situation where in order for this
business model to continue working, he has to keep getting called a piece of shit by
the TV.
Yeah.
It is a Twilight Zone episode.
It is fucked up to exist in his world.
Yeah. episode it is fucked up to exist in his world yeah so we get back to the news
that's not Twitter based and has to do with the prescription drugs that the
Trump has he's just he's solved it oh well that's nice
humanity has awoken and it's getting more intense every day. The level of the awakening is getting stronger.
So let's get into the big developments. You know on average the people of the United States pay triple what anybody else pays on average for drugs.
Roughly double what people pay in Europe for the very same companies. And that's because everything's been set up to screw the American consumer.
He just cut an executive order, take a few months to phase in the cost of prescription
drugs.
So the reason that prescription drug prices are lower in other countries is because other
countries have regulations in place that limit those prices.
Sure.
Places like England have nationalized health care that drives down the prices and essentially
those countries don't allow pharmaceutical companies to set their own prices and run
the game however they want.
That seems crazy.
On the flip side, the US doesn't have these types of protections for the consumers and
big pharma and insurance companies can fleece us for medications at huge markups.
Trump signed an executive order that said that they were going to ask drug companies
to voluntarily drop the prices of drugs, but there's no mechanism for enforcing anything
and this will do jack shit to solve the problem that Americans face with healthcare.
According to NPR, the EO also quote, directs the US trade representative and Department
of Commerce to take action against unreasonable and discriminatory policies that lower drug prices abroad.
The reason that drug prices are lower abroad is because of government-subsidized healthcare
systems that set prices that drug companies are allowed to charge.
It's pretty clear that Trump's goal here is to put pressure on these countries to raise
their drug prices on the premise that if everyone else were paying more for these drugs, the Americans would pay less.
Just from a purely law-based standpoint, Trump did nothing with this executive order, but
it's clearly signaling a direction that involves US consumers paying the same amount for drugs,
but it's trying to do that by forcing Europeans to pay more which doesn't help anybody except for the drug companies
Yeah, this is populism, baby. Yeah. Yeah, we're trapped in we're trapped in accurate falsehood territory
You know where it's like it doesn't matter what you're reading. It doesn't matter how reputable the news source is
They're reporting on something probably accurately
Probably defensively that also might not
be true tomorrow.
It might just not exist tomorrow.
So they might have lied to you today, but they're accurate today, but tomorrow it might
not exist.
Well, I mean, these things that are like, hey, we're doing a 30-day pause on this, that
makes that so much more likely.
What's true today might not be true tomorrow, next week.
Exactly.
You have accurately reported on something that does not exist in time
Which is a wild circumstance?
It says weird state of affairs to exist in mm-hmm like I understand that what you're telling me is true right now
Check tomorrow. I can't trust anything. You know do you mean Alex's description of the prescription drug executive order is true today I mean no just like no no I read a thing which was
like president signs executive order to drop prescription drug prices by 30 to
50 percent or something like that well that's yeah that's yeah on his he
assumes it'll drop it right right You are telling me something accurate and yet at the same time in no way is any of that
information true.
Well, the head, yeah, I think the articles that I've read maybe have had something along
those lines in headlines, but then once you get into the body of the articles, they'll
be like, this has nothing, this does nothing.
Right?
Yeah.
So the accurate thing to say is Trump does nothing right the sure but
But that's also not accurate because he did do something exactly yeah, but what's real?
The body of the article lays out more of what's real, but unfortunately people's attention are drawn
You know everyone's addicted to Twitter right exactly you got those headlines. Yeah
so yeah the this prescription drug thing
is not a meaningful change that Trump is going for.
And honestly, I think if you look at it from most angles,
the only real party that stands to gain is drug companies.
Yeah, that sounds right.
And the people who stand to lose the most
are European consumers.
Yeah, that sounds right. Yep, that sounds right. So that's who stand to lose the most are European consumers. Yeah, that sounds right.
Yep, that sounds right.
So that's one story of a big Trump win.
Great.
And then we get back to the China tariffs thing.
Another huge win.
Breaking.
US and China agree to cut tariffs for 90 days while they negotiate and get the finer points
done. Major breakthrough. the while retaining the remaining ad valorem rate of 10% from that announcement. According to a joint statement, China agreed to the same stipulations,
adding that will adopt all necessary administrative measures to suspend or
remove the non tariff countermeasures taken against the United States.
Since April 2nd, the announcement stated under the deal, reciprocal trade
for both countries would be reduced by 150%. The U. S US will temporary lower its tariffs on Chinese
goods from 145 to 30 and China will reduce its levels on American products
from 125 to 10 now 145 to 30 to 125 to 10 who's got a higher
tariff we did is 30 bigger than 10 who just won that okay what team wins by 30
to 10 that is not how it works
so we're lowering to 30 they're lowering to 10 who won that
interaction this is this is a good representation of why people would say that Alex is just working for the
government now. He's dumbing this issue down to a point where it's meaningless in order
to present it as a win for Trump because everything is a win for Trump. These numbers really don't
tell the whole story. For most of Biden's presidency, the US had a 19% tariff on Chinese
exports and China had a 21% tariff on ours.
However, there was a disproportionate application of Trump's tariffs.
For example, almost 67% of Chinese exports were subjected to US tariffs before, whereas
only 58% of US exports to China were tariffed.
What Trump has done is raise these tariffs to a ridiculously high rate and subject 100%
of Chinese exports to that tariff.
In response, China raised their ratio of tariffed exports from the US to 100% as well, so we
were actually disproportionately affected by that retaliatory jump.
This also fails to take into account that we have a sizable trade imbalance between
our countries.
We import way more stuff from China than China imports from us, so on a consumer level, the
US is going to feel these impacts way more than Chinese citizens do.
Alex is so invested in spinning everything as a positive for Trump that it ends up creating
surface-level coverage that even some passive idiots in his audience are probably starting
to sense that.
30-10!
He better hope that he gets some of that Elon money soon, and some of these people aren't
going to follow him on to his next fake company.
I think the quality is slipped.
The idea...
Listen, I don't know.
I genuinely don't know.
I have no idea I can't I can't fucking fathom the difficulty of understanding international finance agreements
No fucking clue sure what I can do is tell you that if you say
30% tariff beats 10% tariff obviously we win
You're a fucking idiot. It's it's very obvious that you're not accounting for a ton of variables.
And you're willing to like, this is the story that I'm going to tell you my audience.
And it just makes clear that you're not interested in information.
You're not interested in the news.
This is propaganda.
Yeah, absolutely.
And here's the other thing.
I genuinely don't know if anybody knows what
long term any of this is going to do.
No. And I think a lot of the articles that you end up reading from experts reflect that.
They say things like that. We have no idea what this is going to do.
This could go any direction.
Yes.
Like maybe, no, and here's the thing. Maybe we could somehow whatever win quote unquote
is, I don't know what that means, but over long term, maybe something happens.
But I don't even know what that would mean.
Would that mean that we pay less for stuff and they pay more for stuff?
Is that what winning is?
I'm not sure.
But I think that most of what I've read is, you know, there is a lot of that who knows,
who knows what the fuck's going to happen.
Sure.
A lot of it is like odds are it's not good. It's in a territory of not who knows. Who knows what the fuck's gonna happen. But a lot of it is like, oh, it's not good.
It's in a territory of not good for the consumer.
Right, but that's the question is like,
what are we doing when we're talking about this?
Am I going to pay less for stuff?
Is that important?
Or is somebody getting paid more to make it?
Here's my problem.
I don't think anybody is actually keeping the money but rich people some
Somehow at the end of all this shit
I don't think anybody's getting paid more in China if they charge us more here, right? I think your instincts might be on. Yeah
Yeah, so Alex has a big show big show lined up, you know all these great Trump wins
But you know
Top FBI whistleblower Kyle seraphine to cover the waterfront in
studio the third and fourth hour today. He's already here with all these documents, articles,
clips, info. We're going to cover dozens of key topics with him. And remember he broke
here months ago, the 14 terabytes of Epstein raping kids and horrible stuff. And now that's all over the news last week.
So he'll have more coming up
and his review of so far the administration
and what's going on and so it's gonna be critical.
That's good to get those perspectives coming up
in the third and fourth hour, deep dive today.
We should also open the phones up some in the
second hour when he's on with us in the fourth hour, second hour of the interview.
You can ask your questions. I'm sure you'll bring up some better topics. You'll always do. I'm
serious when I say that. I'm not patronizing you when I say that. That's why I love taking calls
with great guests because you bring up angles I wouldn't think of. I love that uncensored people
power of populism. All right.
I want to get into the so-called trade deal. It's a lot bigger than that.
The prescription drug executive order and more
than I'm gonna get into all the other news here.
And there's a lot of it.
And it's important.
But today is the last day at thealexjonesstore.com
that when you get two bottles of ultramethylene blue, already discounted, you get the Alex Jones store.com. When you get two bottles of ultra-methylene
blue already discounted, you get the third bottle free.
That's an amazing deal. Whoa, that deal is crazy. Yeah, that deal is literally crazy. So good. At
those prices, I can't afford not to buy it. Right. So Kyle Seraphine is this, he's the guy Alex doesn't
have on this whistleblower. He worked with the FBI until 2022 when he was suspended indefinitely for refusing to get vaccinated, at which point he became a right wing media celebrity by
spreading J6 conspiracies and all this other shit. He's cool.
I, okay. Here's the, like, I'm against him. Bad guy. All that stuff. But if I'm working
for the FBI and I'm not seeing anybody else take the obvious
job position of former FBI guy who's spreading conspiracy theories
I'm thinking about it. It's gotta be one better than working for the FBI. Yeah
There's more money in it nature abhors a vacuum absolutely and someone is going to fill that was going to do it
Yeah, yeah, whoever can get a hold of James O'Keefe the quickest has a new career Absolutely and someone is going to fill that slot. Somebody was going to do it. Yeah.
Whoever can get a hold of James O'Keefe the quickest has a new career.
I genuinely think if I'm an FBI agent, I'm going to my boss like, I'm going to want to
raise otherwise I have this opportunity to lie about you for money.
It's somewhere between blackmail and job negotiation.
Exactly.
It's somewhere in blackmail and job negotiation. Exactly, it's somewhere in there.
But you know, the intelligence services are, there's some corrupt dealings.
Maybe that would be a good way to do it.
So that might be a little bit of blackmail.
Sure.
But what is blackmail but just sophisticated negotiation?
I think that's a good point.
Right?
Yeah, that's expanded negotiations.
Yeah, so Alex discusses that a little bit here. Great. Let's get back into Trump and this
Big victory with China big victory with India
The list goes on and on I mean it's over a hundred countries now that have signed deals are in the process of signing deals
India was the big one UK last, and they're doing everything Trump wants
because it's all one-sided and now Carney's having to say okay he's gonna
work with Trump but you can't take over Canada. See he's like I want your country.
Or can you?
You'll be the governor.
He's like well you can't do that but we'll do everything else you said.
Whereas he had all that other rhetoric before that Trump's a tyrant, Americans Americans want to steal our country. Trump asked for way, way, way, way, way
more than he knows he's going to get show that when they do everything else
he really wanted, well, they feel like they did. Okay. That is a basic tactic
of negotiation. So we're going from not having any negotiations are being
totally sold out by the globalist
middlemen to the complete opposite, an incredible negotiator with an incredible economic team.
I mean, what Alex is describing is basically a stick up.
Like, that's not a negotiation.
Nope.
That's a, we're going to take over your country.
Yep.
All right, fine.
We can do some trade.
Yep.
Like, that's a shakedown. By hook or
by crook, we will have your things. Or you could negotiate
what you choose. What a masterful negotiator. What a
bully. He's a bully. It is a I mean, it's a long term strategy
that's always worked out. I can think of no massive resentment
that could be built up over time
You know makes perfect sense to me. Yeah
Yeah, I got a gun pointed at you and now I think that we're gonna you know, you're gonna sell me some stuff
Okay, you're to sell me for some stuff for the price that I think is pretty ridiculous
But I suggested at first which you balked at until I had this gun in your face
It seems strange that the gun is involved.
Yeah, well, hey, I have it.
Now that I'm hearing your actual pitch, it feels very important to your pitch, in fact.
Well, you know, I think that you'll see my original terms as quite reasonable compared
to this gun.
That gun does make things different.
Yep.
Cool.
The art of the deal.
Negotiation master.
Yeah, yeah, that's good stuff. What a dick.
When you think about it, guns do make negotiations easier. I don't know if better or more longer
lasting. Or seriously suggesting I'm gonna take over
your country. You could become a governor instead of the president prime minister.
I feel like this is... Actually, here's what I'm doing.
Alright, if I'm Canada, I'm going, yeah, take us over.
We'll become a state.
How many fucking Electoral College votes are we gonna toss into your bullshit?
Y'all don't even...
You're not even ready for Canada to be a state.
Don't even think about that shit.
Because they could take over, man.
Sure.
Yeah, I mean, I'm looking at a map.
It's big. We're on a 50-50. Oh, Democrat, Republican. Cause they could take over man. Sure. Yeah. I mean I'm looking at a map.
It's big.
We're on a 50-50, oh Democrat, Republican, now we gotta throw in Canadian in there?
Anything could happen.
Also it's really funny that it would be conceivably one state.
Yeah I mean right?
Nonsense.
Are we doing provinces or are we just Canada?
51st state?
Yeah.
Twice the size of all other states combined. Yeah, it's it's it's it's
it's it's this is negotiation. It's it's simple. I find this to be fucking stupid. Yeah. And
the idea of Alex suggest like acting like this is is counter to what he's supposed to
be. Yeah. Yeah. But when I told you the beginning, this episode is sad. Yeah, it's because of this right this next clip is I
Feel like it's a new low. Oh
Boeing can't even build in a decade a new Air Force one
And
So Trump gets given one and they go oh, it's a bribe
No, it's a bribe if it's not declared
And you could, oh, it's a bribe. No, it's a bribe if it's not declared. And you could say, oh, well, the point is,
is that that, of course, Boeing can make a jumbo jet
for somebody else, but when they know
it's a government contract, just like these fighter jets,
they keep milking it and scamming it.
And what they've already,
they're gonna be like eight million for it,
and Trump negotiated it
six, seven years ago down to 1.4 billion and they can't even deliver one. Alex's numbers are a little off, but this is really funny. The idea that Alex Jones, the champion against corruption,
is having to bend over backwards to justify Trump being personally given a jumbo jet worth $400
million by Qatar.
This is so comically corrupt that Alex should really just ignore it.
Like I don't believe that like, you know, people talk about Illuminati humiliation rituals.
I don't believe in any of that stuff, but this has the feeling of a public humiliation
ritual.
Yeah.
Alex having to go out on air and defend Trump getting a plane from Qatar.
So the thing is, as laid out by Politico, this isn't a gift to the US government.
It's a luxury plane that's a gift to Trump and an expense to the taxpayers.
From their article, quote, a private contractor would have to rip it apart and turn the jet
into a flying White House for the president with secure communications and classified upgrades, according to former
Air Force officials and lawmakers, an expensive and complicated prospect that could cost taxpayers
hundreds of millions of dollars."
So that's what Alex is defending.
Yeah, no, I mean, beyond any other conversation, which it is absolutely fucked up
but even then he can't take it because
If I'm cutter and I'm giving you personally a four hundred million dollar jet
I am loading that jet with all kinds of spying ass spy shit
That's ever been spied on for spies
You might and that's part of the giant expense of if you were to take this, you'd have to...
We have to hire somebody to unspy this shit.
And then we don't have a plane. We have to put the whole thing back together again.
Yeah. And then like every plane that you would have in your fleet, it requires upkeep.
I think it was that same Politico article quoted
someone is like, you might want to ask yourself why stars fine getting rid of this absolutely
very expensive to maintain this giant luxury plane. If if they're giving a plane like this,
then you have to blow it up. That's the only thing that makes sense for everybody involved.
They can't have it. You can't have it. Nobody can have it. If we take real world things out of it and
put those to the side and just look at this as an Alex moment. Yeah. This is
pathetic. Yeah. If you have the president of the United States being personally
gifted a plane by a foreign government and your take on it
is it's cool. It's not a bribe if you declare it. If you have to say it's not a bribe if
you are talking about a bribe. I mean even if it's not it's just a shady as shit. Like
I don't know that if I don't know there's a quid pro quo that's you know specific out
of it. Yeah it's it's not it's not what you'd want a general print quote quid
quo pro quo aty to it.
That is going to be an issue sooner or later.
Yeah. Yeah. So Alex lies a bit about this whole playing business because he's a
piece of shit.
Ridiculous.
There'd be like eight billion for it.
Trump negotiated it.
Six, seven years ago, down to one point four billion, and they can't even deliver the $1.4 billion. They negotiated
it. Six seven years ago down
to 1.4 billion, and they can't
even deliver one. And so a
Gulf state says here we're
donating it to the U. S
government. That's how
ridiculous this has gotten, and
they call that a bribe? Yes, it is a bribe. It's like Elon Musk donating Starlinks to the air traffic control systems when they
go down, or donating them during the fires, the palisades, or donating them during the
hurricane.
So Qatar did not offer to donate the plane to the US government.
It's a gift to Trump, and he's explicitly said that he would donate the plane to his
presidential library after his term ended.
This is a gift for a person, not the government, and Alex is directly lying about that to cover
up Trump's praise and corruption.
Also, Elon isn't just donating Starlink terminals because he's a great person and
he wants everyone to be online.
It's part of a business strategy where companies try to circumvent the government contract
or competition by offering their product for free. By insinuating yourself this way, you can provide a service that ends up becoming
essential to the point where your ability to remove that service gives you outsized
influence and the ability to demand a lot of money.
That'd be Windows.
This is what Elon is doing. He's provided Starlink terminals in places that need them,
so it becomes more costly to try and go with another vendor than just continue working with him.
He's the proverbial drug dealer who gives you that first hit for free just out of the
goodness of his heart.
It's crazy how all of the government computers were given Microsoft Windows early on for
free and now suddenly it costs a lot of money and they can't not use it.
Yeah.
It's crazy.
There was an article in ProPublica that was discussing how Elon's strategy in Microsoft It costs a lot of money and they can't not use it. Yeah. Yeah. It's crazy.
There was an article in ProPublica that was discussing how Elon's strategy and Microsoft
are like, it's very clear.
It's the smartest thing to do.
Yeah.
And we saw this even play out with the war in Ukraine.
When the war broke out, Musk donated 20,000 Starlink units to the country to provide networking
and communications that were based in satellites so they would still work, despite Russia taking out major pieces of Ukrainian infrastructure.
Then, in November 2022, Musk said that it was too expensive for him to continue offering
these units, telling the Pentagon that they would need to pay for it, saying it would
cost $120 million to finish out that year and $400 million for the next year.
Musk essentially put the government in a position where they would need to pay him a shitload
of money to continue enjoying the gift he supposedly gave them, or they would need to
come up with a replacement satellite communication system or leave Ukraine in the dark.
Naturally, in 2023, the Pentagon announced that they had awarded Musk and SpaceX a contract
to provide the Starlink service in Ukraine.
This isn't a gift or a donation,
it's a business model that is only a little bit different
from extortion.
Yeah.
Musk is far from the only person who engages
in these kinds of business practices
like we discussed with Microsoft.
Yeah.
But it comes off as very pathetic for Alex to get on air
and have to pretend that he doesn't understand this dynamic.
Like how fucking stupid do you have to be
to try and pretend like oh?
He's such a benevolent guy giving out these so low. Yeah, it's encroachment. It's a business strategy and when your
personal job is
Going to end before the consequences of a deal like this are going to fully mature
What do you really care at the end of the day?
Not least of which because at the end of your term,
you'll probably get a job with the people
who fleeced the people you were representing.
You know?
Well, but this time the term doesn't end.
Yeah, right.
So that's great.
Yeah.
Get rid of the revolving door by having a permanent dictator.
Let's just do dictator.
Let's come on, let's see where I'm done with it.
Yeah. Let's get out of here. We've been dipping our toes in for too dictator. Let's come on. Let's see where I'm done with it. Yeah, let's get out of here
We've been dipping our toes in for too long. Yeah, come on everybody move on wrap it up
so we talk here a little bit more about the
Major major breakthrough on prescription drugs. Hmm. Let's get in to what he did with the executive order on prescription drugs
That they've been talking about for decades. Why do we pay more? Why do we pay more?
Because we have a political establishment,
both Republican and Democrat,
that got together and screwed the people.
And then the drugs we get and that they push
are always the newest, dangerous ones
that are the highest cost
because they make the most money off of it
and it fits their agenda to kill us, to depopulate us.
So here's Trump signing that executive order.
But starting today, the United States
will no longer subsidize the health care of foreign countries,
which is what we were doing.
We're subsidizing others' health care.
The countries where they paid a small fraction of what
for the same drug that what we pay many, many times more for.
And we'll no longer tolerate profiteering and price gouging from Big Pharma.
But again, it was really the countries that forced Big Pharma to do things that frankly,
I'm not sure they really felt comfortable doing, but they've gotten away with it.
These countries, European Union has been brutal, brutal. To be clear, nothing that Trump is doing with that executive order will have any effect on
US consumer prices for prescription drugs. If you listen to what he's saying, he's complaining that
other countries have, you know, they've set prices that drug companies can't charge more than and
that's what's unfair. In the fantasy that he has there's a set amount that
these drug companies need to make. Let's say a hundred billion dollars a year.
They need to make this amount in order to keep making new drugs and curing
things so it's really important that they make that much. Europe has set a law
in place that these companies can only make 20 billion dollars from their
countries so in order to make the amount they need they charge the US consumers
80 billion. We're subsidizing their drugs! Makes perfect order to make the amount they need, they charge the US consumers $80
billion.
We're subsidizing their drugs!
Makes perfect sense to me.
Trump is trying to attack- 30 is bigger than 10!
Sure.
Trump is trying to attack the price controls that keep European drug prices low and pretending
that this will drop prices here.
Like if the European consumers have to pay $40 billion, all of a sudden our prices will
drop because the drug companies only have to make 60 billion from us.
It's almost like profit motives and capitalism aren't factors in this imaginary world.
In reality, Trump wants to pressure these other countries to drop their price controls
so that drug companies can charge them more, which won't make a difference with US consumer
drug prices.
The answer to this is sort of the opposite of what Trump is doing.
I feel like we should all know this.
Like this is, it's 2025.
We should all be here now.
If there is something that is good for you in regards to healthcare, then you will see
healthcare CEOs on TV all the time
telling you about how bad it is for you that this happens.
There is often going to be that dynamic.
Right? It's like, I've never not seen it be the case where somebody's caught on TV
and been like, actually, this thing that's going to save you money, that's terrible for you!
You want us to have the profits, otherwise we'll steal your legs!
That's what we do. We steal legs.
Yeah. I mean, if you asked somebody who was like, I don't know, running a check
cashing place or something like that, whether or not they provide a service,
they'd probably say yes.
Oh, of course. They were the best service. And those 50% loans are just great.
Yeah. So I think that Trump is in a little bit of hot water because of the whole plane thing.
Sure.
Man, that plane thing is fucked up.
It's pretty crazy.
It's fucking crazy.
And guess what?
We'll forget about it in a week.
Probably.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Good work on you.
But some of his base has turned against, eh, not turned against him, but they're critical.
Sure, sure, sure.
Of him about this. Yeah.
This, this means that unfortunately Drudge is now Democrats.
That'll happen.
Here's the corporate headlines out of a Drudge.
I mean, it's democratic party.
Qatar gives a jet to Trump.
Palace in the sky.
Is it a crime?
And no, the law is being followed.
He's been trying to get a new aircraft for
the last eight years. They admit the old one is two of us falling apart. Air Force One,
the main one in the backup. And so Qatar goes, okay, we'll donate this to the US government.
They're like, Oh my God, it's criminal. They're paying him off on. Look, I got no interest
in drugs, but I feel like I would be pissed if I were him. Yeah, like you Alex you have no career without me
Yeah, I'm the fucking corporate news and the Democrats you piece of shit. Yep, you ungrateful sack of garbage
How dare you?
I
You know, everyone is is a corporate Democrats once they're saying the thing you don't want them to. I mean, it's, yeah.
If you think about those, I don't know if you, there was a lot more of them, I think
in the like 60s, 70s and 80s.
But those Swami guru kind of things, where there would be the guru guy and then he would
have a lot of people
who got way into him too fast.
And then slowly the stories would start being like, look at all these people leaving in
droves because of the real things this guy is doing.
But there was always the core group left.
There was always the core group that no matter what you told them, they would look you in
the eyes and go, we're're pot-committed sure this guy's God that kind of thing
Do you think it's fun to be a monster who exploits those people like do you think Trump is watching Alex going like
Can you believe this shit like he's got popcorn like I wonder what else I can get this monster to agree with you know
I think I think it's probably stressful know I think I think it's probably stressful I think I think it's probably a man if I lose these these folks
I got nothing I think I think maybe I don't know maybe it's a glass half full half empty kind of thing
I mean isn't that isn't that the thing that keeps us from ever even considering it though is that it would be to us
It would be a horrifying thing to do to people. Right? So if
you are doing it you probably are fine with it right? Yeah it's I guess it would be hard to
judge the mental state of someone who's already monstrous. Yeah. You know. Yeah. No it's also
really weird to think about how like Alex is that inner core diehard group. He is the cult member who's like more, he's gonna go
down with the ship. I think that he thinks that he's not though. I think he is really
deluded about where he is in terms of, like if you are saying Trump is cool to have Qatar
give him a plane and that drudge is Democratic Party corporate media because
there's criticism of this flagrant corruption.
You are so deep.
You are never getting up for air.
Too far gone.
Yeah.
Yep.
And I think that there's some other figures in this world that have a little bit of a
more interesting maneuverability.
And one of them is unfortunately Laura Loomer.
God damn it.
But Laura Loomer slams Trump over a guitar jet, calls it staying on the presidency.
I'm so disappointed.
You know, I like Laura a lot, man, but she just doesn't sometimes get it.
And it just goes on and on and on.
So on our last episode, Alex was bragging about how Laura Loomer was critical of Trump's
choice for Surgeon General, which made Trump change his mind.
She was the shining example of constructive criticism, the part of the base that was holding
Trump's feet to the fire.
But now she doesn't get it.
Alex's world has a Loomer problem, because they've empowered her a little bit too much
and she isn't going to play ball.
She's a chaotic influence who isn't playing the same games as all of these people around
her.
All these assholes pretend that they were like Jewish people in the lead up to World
War II and they got kicked off Twitter.
They whined about how they were being put into digital ghettos because that helped them
inflame the feelings of persecution that animate the audience, which then helps them sell supplements. Meanwhile, Laura Loomer put a Star of David on and
handcuffed herself to the door of Twitter's headquarters. It was embarrassing, and she
forgot to handcuff herself to both doors so people just walked around her, but I think
that's representative of the different game that she's playing. She sucks and is wrong about almost
everything, but her actions also often have the subtext of, okay, what if we mean it? Whereas all of these other figures
in Alex's orbit, they know that what they're saying is bullshit and they don't take any
of it too seriously. Yeah. So now you have things like Trump saying that he's going to
accept an obviously illegal gift from the government of Qatar and Loomer is rightly
responding, hey, isn't this the opposite of what we're supposed to pretend to support?
Alex's response is exactly right.
Sometimes she doesn't get it.
Sometimes she doesn't get that their media space is weaponized propaganda, and you aren't
supposed to criticize your side for not following the rules you demand the other side follow.
She and Nick Fuentes are good examples of people that the right-wing media should have
done everything they could to sideline a long time ago.
They were too circumstantially profitable for the right-wing media to use, and they've gotten out of hand.
They have too much status and have built organic audiences of their own that aren't going to go away, and they're not going to play ball. It is comforting when you're anti-conspiracy theory-ing-ing to know that confidently no
one in charge of anything has a legitimate long-term plan for anything.
If you look back, it's like, you guys, it's fairly obvious that this was going to happen,
but you wanted it too bad because you're there.
Like, there's so much of that Alex addiction of like, yeah, but he's useful now.
He's useful now.
We got to use them now.
We got to use everything now.
You know, it's just, it's just that the immediacy of the need.
Yep.
Yeah.
And I was, I was like thinking over a lot of the things that Laura Loomer's done in in her career and a lot of it is
Like the actions of someone taking seriously something everybody else knows not to take seriously
Yeah, like she and Jacob Wall and Ali Alexander
They went to try and prove that Ilhan Omar was married to her brother. Yeah, it's like this is something
We're just smearing.
This is something for Twitter and shit. You don't need to go do an investigation into this.
You don't need to handcuff yourself to the door at Twitter. Come on.
The irony of what you're doing is you're proving why what we're doing works and what you're doing
doesn't work. Because it's not real. And unfortunately, if you do too much of that,
it is going to ruin our ability to do our thing.
Because it reveals that none of what we say is real.
Right.
Yeah.
So they should do something about her at some point,
because otherwise it's gonna blow up in their face.
Yeah, just as a comparison point for somebody
who actually believes something versus you.
Mm-hmm.
You know, like you don't want the
actually believe something person to exist if you don't
want to actually believe it.
And I want to be totally clear.
I don't want to go out on a limb and say that Laura Loomer actually believes any of the
stuff.
Sure, sure, sure, sure.
Her actions follow the path more frequently of what if we believe exactly.
Yeah.
How would we behave if we weren't just all talking shit?
Yeah.
Yeah. It's not about belief. It's't just all talking shit? Yeah. Yeah, it's not about
Belief it's about comparison between the two. Yeah. Yeah, so
We have one last clip here and it's cuz Alex interviews that FBI whistleblower sure he's got and I just decided to turn it off because
He tells this story. Okay, and
Let's see. Let's see how you feel about this. All right. All right
Let me give the bottom line up front
because that's the way I was taught to brief people.
If people look here on the overhead cam,
you probably can see it.
This is the notice I just got from Google.
So this is brand new.
This came in on Saturday evening at 1023.
By the way, it's funny, I sent you one of those on Friday
that my wife got to get your opinion
and the next day you get one.
Yeah, no, thanks for that.
I appreciate it. So it's an identical notice. So this is something that happens
So I used to be on the other end of this and that's what I guess the weirdest part for me
So I used to be able to serve process to people like Google or meta or your cell phone companies and so on and if we
Wanted them to preserve data and then we wanted to serve either a subpoena or what's called a national security letter
And that's a secret subpoena or a search warrant for content or information
Then we would do so and then eventually whenever we let the seal
lapse because we would go hey don't let the user be notified I don't want Alex
Jones to know that I'm in his emails so we would ask that to be under seal for a
period of time at some point time either the case would conclude or we would
bring out an indictment so you knew about it because you've been arrested
then we would go out and we would let this thing lapse and you would get this
email notifying you so I'm just gonna read it. It says, this is from
Google. It's on their official letterhead. It says, hello, Google received and responded
to a legal process issued by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, my ex-girlfriend, my former
employer, compelling the release related to your Google account. A court order previously
prohibited, that's the thing I just mentioned, Google from notifying you of the legal process.
We're now permitted to disclose the receipt of legal process. So if you have a legal process, you can go to the order previously
prohibited. That's the thing I
just mentioned Google from
notifying you of the legal
process. We're now permitted
to disclose the receipt of
legal process. The agency
reference number is as follows,
and there's a number there,
which is a grand jury subpoena
says. J G J. So that's what we
assume for that one. There's
some kind of a subpoena. There's
another piece in their
reference 2023 are number. I
don't know exactly what that
means, but the odds are that this was served in 2023. So the chaos that I feel when I look at this
is that my former agency,
and I made a note about what the STASI was,
so a lot of people probably are familiar with that term,
but it gets thrown around
and bandied around an awful lot.
They were the East German secret police,
and they operated for 40 years,
and they were responsible for three things in particular.
Domestic surveillance, that's what the FBI does.
Intelligence gathering, that's a post-911 FBI thing
in a very big way, and suppressing dissent,
which has been basically a post-Obama-era FBI mandate
going after dissent.
So we saw this stuff with the Twitter files.
We saw this stuff happening
under Trump's first administration,
where he was removed from social media.
Suppressing dissent means we now decide
whether or not you're allowed
to have all the information you want,
and we're gonna go after people that have
Contrary viewpoints and that's what they've been doing to me what you saw we have that document from the Trump administration
Under Obama national security investigation forever, right? And and so it's of course this is unrelated
I'm sure that I think it's from my bankruptcy. They wanted to see what was going on with my wife
I hid something. Of course. I didn't a I don't do stuff like that and be I'm not stupid
see what was going on with my wife. I hid something of course I didn't. A. I don't do stuff like that and B. I'm not stupid. And so obviously they probably had a grand jury
of both of those and then they didn't find it so it's been closed probably right?
In this case yeah and I'm sure in the same thing for your wife's case but here's the
problem. Well you saw I sent you my own wife's notice. So that would be closed. What did you
get from it? Same sort of thing as this. So this is the first thing that this guy is bringing to the table is this email
And how does that story grab you?
Um, I mean
If a former FBI agent is calling the FBI the Stasi mm-hmm, I I feel divorced somewhere
We did call them his ex-girlfriend
Yeah, I I feel divorced somewhere. We did call them his ex-girlfriend. You know? Yeah.
I hear these details of the story where Alex's wife got this email and then he sent it on to this guy
and then he got an email. I kind of think that maybe it's a phishing email. I think that maybe
you know, it's possible. Yeah. So I looked into it and I,
the sort of text of his email,
tried to find if this was a legitimate thing
that Google sends out.
And it turns out it is a form email that they do send out,
but there's a decent chance that scammers
have also copied it.
Yeah, obviously.
So I don't know if this is an authentic email or not.
But generally speaking, what this email is indicative of is that your phone was near
a crime.
And your phone got caught up in the geolocation data that the police were running when they
were trying to track the person's phone who committed this crime.
So generally, when you get an email like this, it is indicative not of they've been spying
on your email and everything that you've...
Whatever he's describing, like there's a grand jury and they're targeting you.
No, it's that your phone got caught up in a drag net. Yeah. Typically.
Right, right, right, right.
I'm not going to say that it's impossible that it can't be sent out in other cases,
but you're not, if you, if they're trying to weaponize the state against you, you're
not going to get a notification afterwards.
Like, Hey, we, we tried to find some dirt on you.
We fucked up.
It's a strangely.
Okay.
It's existence belies your lie about it, right?
Like the email, if it's the, the Stasi didn't email you,
they didn't like go around your house and be like,
hey, surprise, we tried to secret police you,
but you're so good.
But because they're using Google, Google has to do it.
No it don't.
The Stasi wouldn't, the Google does.
What?
Why?
Google's also part of your conspiracy about people who are in the globalist who don't
give a shit about laws.
Yeah, that is a difficult point to get around.
But my gut tells me that I think maybe it was not a...
I think it's a spam.
I think that's what's going on here
the fact that Alex asked about it like his wife got one sent it to him yeah and
then he got one that kind of leads me to believe that maybe it's like a fishing
thing oh my my initial vibe was he just made it up like if if Alex sends you
okay yeah you know if Alex sends you this there's kind of a bit of like hey
We need this is what we're going to talk about and what's a great way to
Throw that in there. I also got one your wife and I are close you and I are closer now
This is all we're all part of the same conspiracy kind of thing. That's very possible I was trying to come up with an explanation that involved all of the basic facts being true.
Now assuming that they aren't, that is a good explanation. I also thought of another explanation
is that like maybe, I don't know, were they at the same place? Right. Like if Alex, his
wife and this guy went to dinner or something, then it's entirely possible Alex didn't have
his phone on him or something. Both of's entirely possible Alex didn't have his phone on him or
something. Both of their phones were near where a crime was committed and they would get the same
geolocation alert. I would go so far as to say Alex himself is a crime and if you were around
Alex there's a fair chance that somebody might be looking at your phone. Yeah that's possible.
Fair chance that somebody might be looking at your phone. Yeah, that's possible.
Yep.
The explanation provided of the government was trying to investigate this guy and Alex's
wife.
It's nonsense.
Right?
Yeah.
No.
No.
So if this is the level of shit we're going with, then I think that this is a guy who,
like you were describing, rightly saw an opportunity for a career change, as opposed to,
is someone I'm gonna take seriously
as an FBI whistleblower?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So, fuck him.
Yeah, I mean, probably had to drive more than he wanted.
I bet his commute was long, and he was just like, man.
He can work from home as a bullshitter.
Absolutely.
I can do whatever I want from a phone.
Woo!
And no standards. None, and no standards none
None no bosses. Yeah, so shit sad around Infowars headquarters
Yeah, I think Alex is a real just sad image this
You gotta have a line man. Yeah, you gotta have a line at defending this plane thing is
have a line man yeah you gotta have a line at defending this plane thing is you just gotta ignore it there's no way for him to take on this story and not
come off like just a worm yeah you can't you can't cling mm-hmm like that's if
you're an Alex figure that's you that's got to be the hardest rule of all you
can't cling. If it feels
like you're losing your grip, you have to let go. Because if you try and cling, you're
just going to look pathetic.
Yeah. And I think I was trying to workshop like what could you do? And I think the only
way you can even talk about this story if you're Alex and come off with any dignity.
Yeah.
Is be like, I don't know all the details of this doesn't look good.
Moving on.
Like that's about all you can do is vain ignorance and be like, I don't know.
And then it'll blow over.
Yeah.
You don't have to, you don't have to touch every live ball, you know?
Like, yeah, no one's there's so much going on.
You could probably
gamble on enough people like just not even seeing it because it only happened
for a day yeah well the only problem is that drudge and loomer being critical
maybe forcing the issue in his head a little bit but he still could ignore it
yeah you're I mean at the end of the day you're fighting ghosts mm-hmm you're fighting there even drudge and loomer are fighting the day, you're fighting ghosts.
Even Drudge and Lumer are fighting their own ghosts.
You're acting like they're your ghosts.
Yeah, that's crazy.
They're all shadow boxing.
Yep, it's Pac-Man shit.
Yeah, it's crazy.
So, we'll check in, see how low he can go, but until then, we have a website.
Indeed we do.
It's knowledgefight.com.
Yep, we'll be back. But until then, I'm Neo. I'm Leo do. It's knowledgefight.com. Yep.
We'll be back.
But until then, I'm Leo.
I'm Leo.
I'm DZX Clark.
I am the mysterious professor.
Woo yeah woo yeah woo!
And now here comes the sex robots.
Andy in Kansas, you're on the air.
Thanks for holding.
Hello Alex.
I'm a first time caller.
I'm a huge fan.
I love your work.
I love you.