Knowledge Fight - #1053: June 15, 2025
Episode Date: July 7, 2025In this installment, Dan and Jordan witness Alex continuing to cover the Minnesota lawmaker shootings, where he pulls out some of his old tricks, like calling grieving people actors....
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Music It's time to pray. I have great respect for knowledge fight. Knowledge fight.
I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys saying we are the bad guys.
Knowledge fight.
Dan and Jordan.
Knowledge fight.
I need, I need money.
Andy and Kansas.
Andy and, Andy and, stop it.
Andy and, Andy and Kansas.
Andy and, Andy and, it's time to pray.
Andy and Kansas, you're on the air, thanks for holding.
Hello, Alex.
I'm Andy and I'm a fan of Andy and Kansas.
Andy and Kansas.
Andy and Kansas.
Andy and Kansas.
Andy and Kansas.
Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas, Andy and, Andy and, stop it! Andy and Kans, Andy and Kansas, Andy and, Andy and,
it's time to pray.
Andy and Kansas, you're on the air, thanks for holding.
Hello, Alex, the Mr. Spin Color, I'm a huge fan.
I love your work.
Knowledge Fight. N-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n- Welcome back knowledge right I'm Dan. I'm Jordan wear couple dudes like sit around Worship at the altar of Celine and talk a little bit about Alex Jones. Oh indeed we are Dan Jordan
Yeah, Jordan quick question for you. What's up? Which bright spot today, buddy? Okay?
I got a bright spot, and I got a dark spot all right
I'm gonna leave it up to you what you want to hear first okay?
Oh, I mean clothes on a bright spot. Let's start with the dark spot. Okay. I got I got popped by the
recycling police
So in my building, in the recycling, you're supposed to break down the boxes when you
put them into the recycling.
Of course.
A lot of people do not do this.
It's just kind of like a thing where sometimes you do, sometimes you don't.
It is what it is.
Right?
I was taking down a big box of recycling.
And so I had a bunch of stuff in a box right and everything inside the box was broken down
But the box that was containing the broken down things were not how do you want me to bring it if not within a container?
Mm-hmm. I can't break down the container that holds the broken down
I guess I could have once I dumped it into the recycling or something, but I didn't do that
Bananas get out of here. It was something that had my address on it. Oh, so I get an email that I'm getting a fine for this
Motherfuckers are doing what is happening?
Happening crazy Jesus Christ. Yeah, so that's that's the downside
I mean, I guess you know I only put half effort into breaking down the boxes and it
unacceptable. I refuse to believe this. This is bullshit. No, no individual action you can take
could have a measurable impact on the climate crisis ever, let alone rip cutting down a box.
How dare they find you? Well, I think it's more about like just considerate-ness and like,
because if you don't break down boxes, it fills up more space in there.
I understand.
You know, like it's less about the actual environment.
Oh, it's reasonable.
Yeah, so when I got that email, I was like, fine.
But I also was furious.
Of course.
So I've seen so many boxes that were broken down.
This is selective enforcement.
I'm gonna take it all the way to the top.
I agree with you, I agree with you.
But at the same time, you can't enforce anything
if it doesn't have teeth.
It's a problem.
And you'd rather find than like they'd knock on your door and drag you out one night.
Yeah, I guess.
I guess.
Anyway, that's annoying that there's recycling snitches.
All right.
What's your bright spot?
Okay.
So I was at the grocery store that shan't be named.
Right.
And I was wearing my pinky ring.
Okay.
Incidental to this story.
But just in the background.
Yes.
Yeah. so I went
through the checkout line uh-huh and the guy who was ringing me up forgot to ring up the
last item all right so I pay and I was like oh that's also mine no and he's like it's
on the house nice nicely done it into my basket hell yeah now here's here's what this revealed
to me okay that. That's possible.
Yeah. That's crazy. How did you not realize that was possible? Because it's a supermarket.
Right. It seemed like the person who's checking you out doesn't have the authority to be like
it's on the house buddy. Totally do. Everything's free. Yeah. It turns out. Absolutely. Yeah.
If somebody can just do that, I forgot to
Ring this through just go ahead and take it. Yeah, that means that everything is open for that kind of treatment
Yeah, and they should be giving away all that food. Oh man. You better believe it
Yeah, I mean hey listen
I just not to reveal my business at all
But if I'm grocery shopping and I'm always going through the checkout
and I'm not always paying for everything.
Talk about the self checkout.
I would say that I am always not paying for everything.
You call it ringing up everything as bananas.
I'm ringing everything up or at least it's-
Shout out to David Drake.
It looks like it.
It looks like I've rung things up.
Oh man, so many bananas.
So anyway, I got a free item.
What's your bright spot? My bright spot spot is got some new tattoo action up here
Oh shit. Yeah. Yeah. I got a nice little
Nice little piece on the top of my back right around
I was just trying to show you if you to hear my voice
That was what it sounds like if I'm digging into my chest with my honk if you're horny it says on your shoulder blades
It's a great one
No, it's a it's the first simulated image of a black hole
in dot form, and it was really great.
Okay, I can only see the top of it,
but it looks neat.
Yeah, but because it was dot, it was a dot format,
it was really one of the more enjoyable
tattoo experiences that I've ever had.
I feel like it was similar to acupuncture.
What's the difference? Some people may not... Some people, I mean me, I don't know the difference.
Oh, no. Well, like with your tattoo, there's that filling in thing and so you'll have the
giant fill in needle that'll go like that. Whereas this one is every single thing is
a dot. So it's just a constant poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke,
poke, like that, like a sewing machine.
It's like a Monet.
It is a little bit like a Monet, but I
think you're thinking of George Seurat, actually.
Probably.
Yeah.
I don't know my artist.
So it is just like point, point, point, point, point, point.
So it was surprising.
Yeah, it's weird how much of the
Pain is like oh, that's a scratch
Whereas just the the poking is like oh, this is kind of nice That's strange to me because I was under the impression that all of the tattoos were just a lot of points
But like really fast
Yes, yeah, yeah, I mean yes. Yeah, you're like yeah
You're talking about your tattoo is a little slower
It's a little bit of it was a slower tattoo. Okay. Yeah. Yeah, you got a slow-cooked tattoo. Yes, exactly
Well, that's fun. Yeah, I'm happy for you and I am still intending to go get my next one I meant to do it while I was in Colombia
Yeah
That would've been I didn't have time and I wasn't sure if the tattoo shop that like everyone used to go
to back then, like I don't know if they take walk-ins.
Yeah.
So I didn't want to risk it and I was too busy, but I did...
It's close.
It's close.
Would have been nice.
Yep.
Yep.
So something that's not nice Jordan is our episode that we have to do today.
Fair enough. We got it in front of us, so we're gonna do it. Okay. We're gonna be talking about the 15th of June 2025
All right
America's in a civil war Alex has killed Gene Hackman yep
The Minnesota lawmakers have been assassinated
Whoo Nellie yeah a lot of stuff's going on who won the Super Bowl this year? Was it just Kendrick? Yes. Yeah. Yeah
Tell you who lost
Drake. Yeah, but we will get down to business on what Alex is up to on this show. But
First let's say hello to some new ones. That's a great idea
So first Luke Cretia wants to shout out dr
Paris because she's amazing and awesome and we bonded over KF and I know she would get a kick out of it
Thank you so much. You're now policy wonk. I'm a policy wonk. Thank you very much Shout out Dr. Paris because she's amazing and awesome and we bonded over KF and I know she would get a kick out of it.
Thank you so much.
You're now a policy wonk.
I'm a policy wonk.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Next, it's the eye of the geyser.
He's a shill for the right sucking up to a red faced racist liar.
Thank you so much.
You're now a policy wonk.
I'm a policy wonk.
Thank you very much.
And well done.
I could tell.
I don't know how I could tell.
Immediately that was the...
You felt it in your heart. Yeah. And Alex Jones' pa pauses are so pregnant chase will insist he carry them to term. Thank you so much
You're now policy walk. I'm a policy walk. Thank you very much. Thank you
Next we had tech right in the door. So thank you so much to Dane
Pronounced like a large dog or failed comedian would like Zack
Redacted last name to protect the innocent to reach out so we can talk about the up to this date
Completion of the knowledge fight compendium thank you
so much you are now a technocrat I'm a policy wonk someone someone sonomite
sent me a bucket of poop daddy shark Jar Jar Binks has a Caribbean black action
he's a loser little little kitty baby I don't want to hate black people. I renounce Jesus Christ
Thank you so much. Thank you very much. But also I would say that Dane Cook is not a failed comedian
Hmm, I think he has a troubled legacy sure
I think that maybe he's not someone who we're gonna look at as a
Carlin or a prior sure sure sure. But I think he was wildly successful.
I am a failed comedian.
I am beyond a failed comedian.
I think Dane Cook did all right for himself.
Yeah, he got the super finger going.
He was in a bunch of movies, right?
He was, yeah.
How?
Mr. D. No, not Mr. D. It's Mr. Brooks.
Yeah, it can't be... Listen, it can't be more of a success
than to be Dane Cook and then wind up in movies
Yeah, that's successful. He was in that one movie where everyone showed each other their balls
He was in that Ryan Reynolds where he was in the store. Mm-hmm. Yep. Might have been the same one might have been the same one
Waiting no, he was in wait. Oh, you're right. He wasn't waiting. Yeah, he was the Seth Rogen
Roll the Seth Rogen and 40 year old virgin role in The Waiting.
Yeah.
How's that, that wasn't bad.
It was terrible.
Yeah, fair enough.
So, the Minnesota shooting has happened, as we discussed on the last episode.
And Alex has made his attempts to pin this on Tim Walls and create a wonderful conspiracy
out of it.
And he starts this episode off on the 15th thinking,
something stinks here.
Something's not right.
Something's rotten in Denmark.
We have the Minnesota Tim Walz appointee
and No King's organizer,
who they say is the suspect,
or police say they saw run out of the house and shoot at police and they go in and there's the
dead state senator her husband he critically wounded in a state rep and the other spouse
and then they caught the wife and a bunch of other people with guns and passports
fleeing but detained her but then didn't arrest her and then he runs a security intelligence company. He's wearing a plastic mask. You believe it's him. This thing smells
of some type of
sophisticated operation. I don't know exactly what's going on. But the first
thing I did yesterday morning when the news broke and I said, Let me see you.
These two Democrat lawmakers are that got shot. Both of them were bucking the party.
Both of them were voting against illegal aliens getting health care and other
goodies. We're being demonized and we're scared. And what did they know? What were
they about to release on Tim Walz? Oh man, so this is a good illustration of Alex using one of his standard little tricks.
He technically said that he doesn't know what's going on with the case of this shooting,
so whatever shit he talks isn't something you can really hold him responsible for.
He's making very clear insinuations, and the storyline he wants the audience to follow
is not ambiguous, but all he wants to own up to is saying that this situation is suspicious.
That it smells.
But that's not the point he's making.
The point he's making is that these two Minnesota lawmakers were unique in the fact that they
were fighting against the Democratic Party line, particularly in terms of undocumented
immigrants having access to Minnesota care benefits.
They were scared, and the alleged shooter has deep connections to Tim Walz.
The story is very clear that Tim Walz sent the guy to kill them for their refusal to
join the team on these votes, but Alex doesn't want to just come out and say that, probably
because he knows how stupid it sounds when you spell it out in plain language.
When you keep things in the territory of suggestion and heavy insinuation, it's possible to lead
people to conclusions that they would reject if you were more blunt about what you're saying.
Yeah.
And that's what Alex is doing.
Yeah.
It's the just asking questions method.
Yeah. Yeah. You know, it brings up to mind, people in general, I think a lot of people are
surprised by people's actions, but I think in general people do
things because they work and they only know that they work because they've done them in
the past.
So I would say that it would be surprising for Governor Tim Walz to intentionally assassinate
lawmakers without also having a trail of intentional assassinations behind him.
Wow.
It's not unusual to just have the first assassination be...
Pretty big.
Yeah, I mean it'd be a big one for your first.
Yeah.
That's all I'm saying.
Well, I mean, you know, I think that a lot of people in Alex's world have ideas about
the Clinton body count and stuff, so I think they could find random people who have met
Tim Walls who are now dead, that they could say he killed.
Fair enough. We could do this. You want him? We I don't want to. I don't want to do it. But what if
dude, yeah, it wasn't just Tim Walls. Like I understand what you're saying. This would
be big for his first right. Go at it. Are you saying that this goes all the way to the
top? Yes. Oh shit of China. What did they know? What were they about to release on Tim the How do we know now that you know they heard gunshots today his car the stolen police car was found in by some woods.
I'm sure they'll find his dead body soon.
So Alex is deep in insinuating that Tim Walls was behind the shooting and now I guess the
idea is that the shooter might have been an agent of the Chinese government who's killing
these people to stop them from releasing some information about walls being employed by
China. That's really dumb.
And if it's true, then the Chinese government assassins are fucking sloppy. One of the targets
and his wife survived, so whatever intel they were going to be killed to keep secret isn't
going to stay secret now, so mission not accomplished. I like this kind of game though,
because Alex is operating off zero information and just throwing out fun what-if scenarios like he's a watch to the watcher yeah just like I
don't know what if this guy under the mask was a Chinese government spy agent
guy let's make it a Christmas episode I think this happened because of the Lord
our Jesus Christ's birth why not make sense yeah I whenever your standard of
suggesting something is how do we know this isn't true?
Yeah. I think you're on shaky ground.
You know, it's easy for us to walk over because we are who we are and we live where we live in
this present day, but it cannot be understated how insane it is, right? That a guy who was materially, partially at the very least,
responsible for these murders, who shouldn't have been on the air anyways, who could have very easily
been off the air for a long time prior to this, who is being given a platform by any number of
people currently, like all of this could have been stopped. No, I disagree. I think Alex's
Engagement in it probably could have been stopped. Sure, but I don't think that like I think that if you know
I don't know about the the the whole yeah the whole everything could have been stopped. There is there is
Definite disruptions that could have been made in this information economy
Yeah
And things like that like if Alex had suffered the consequences that he should have, let's say from the Sandy
Hook trials, and he was no longer able to produce his show, or maybe was in jail or
something.
Whatever you like.
All of this stuff that the shooter was ingesting, he would have found somewhere else.
For sure.
Like he would have found it on Twitter, just like Alex finds all of his content on Twitter.
No, I understand that aspect. I just wanted to make clear that I...
No, no, no. I'm with you. I meant less like all of this could have been stopped and more
Alex's participation in this it could have been stopped and yet we are listening to him
run interference for the thing that could have been stopped. Yeah. You know what I'm
saying? Yeah. Like that is happening. And I think that a larger understanding of how this misinformation economy and ecosystem
works, I think if people more broadly and largely understood it, then it could help
limit the number of people who are like this shooter who go down this path because of the
information exploitation that people like Alex carry out.
You would think.
You'd hope.
But we're not there.
Nope.
Now listen, Alex.
Oh.
Okay, well if you're not going to listen, I'm done.
No, no, no, I'm out.
Okay.
Alex is saying that maybe it's a Chinese agent who put on a rubber mask and we've all just
got a patsy going.
Could have been.
Would you describe that as conspiracy?
Theory, I think it would have to be a conspiracy by definition, but is that a conspiracy theory that Alex is pitching?
I mean, it's a theory about a conspiracy so it is demonstrably a conspiracy theory. So you're saying yes. Yes
Well, you're wrong. Oh fair enough Alex is not a conspiracy guy enough. So how do we know a And again, I'm not the conspiracy theory guy.
99% of what I cover is what's going on analysis inside information sources.
But when it comes to something like this, it does not add up information sources, dreams,
weird feelings.
This raises this raises a very important linguistic question. Yeah, all right now
In this particular situation is it possible for this to not have been a conspiracy?
Because she has unilateral authority
Is it possible for him to have just ordered the death of these people and no one else have any input whatsoever on it?
Would that not be a conspiracy?
Unless she was in the mask, then there's probably people who are conspiring.
That's what I'm saying, right?
It would have to be a straight line of nobody question anything because the moment somebody
is like, well, what if we then it's a conspiracy?
Right.
If other people take actions in furtherance of the plot, we have a conspiracy on our hands has to be right now
That's a linguistic
concern, but
Coalily when we talk about conspiracy theories we talk about exactly what Alex does all the fucking time
Yes, that is what we're doing there. Yeah seems to be a little defensive about it doesn't feel like he was being nitpicky about language
No, I think he's just like don't make me Don't make me feel stupid to be blunt
This is really dumb
But I think that it reveals an interesting little reality that Alex doesn't want to be seen as the conspiracy guy
Even when he's engaging in embarrassing levels of conspiracy theories
He wishes he was someone who people took seriously
But unfortunately the only people who could ever take him seriously aren't serious
people. It's ironic that one of the wonks referenced Dane Cook because it's a vicious cycle.
Yeah.
You know?
Yeah.
Alex wants to be respected and the only way he knows how is to pretend to be something that stupid
people respect.
Yeah. I mean, it is a strange kind of torture to create the box that you try and escape from
And then keep yourself in it, but wild but ironically
Inside the box you're safe inside the box you're fed inside the box
You're happy you're exactly where you're supposed to be right Alex
But you just want to be out of that fucking box that society tells
you you want but what you really want man is for the truth to be out there or you know
to be the most popular thing on the planet cool so the not a conspiracy okay Alex isn't
a conspiracy not a conspiracy now in theory now if the Chinese government knew that these two lawmakers had dirt on
walls and so Walls was involved with getting this guy that he put on a board in order to
kill them or maybe just use him as a patsy, this is elaborate.
And I honestly think that you would have to suspect that the local police would be in on it. They would have to be right? Yeah. Well Alex
wants you to know he's not saying that. Okay. And I'm not saying local police
departments in on it but they within you know an hour of the
shootout with the guy in the rubber mask who they caught in the act and they went
in and then one of the victims one one was dead when one died as the ambulance the guy who was on the run. They had a rubber mask. Who
they caught in the act and they
went in and then the. One of
the victims one one was dead
when one died as the ambulance
got there. I'm sure they have
Intel that releasing at how
they believe it's this guy.
Who's on the run, and he's
supposedly sending text
messages to his friends and family. You know that he
did something like this. And
then we see videos by the
groups reading the tax and.
All of it and the wife caught
fleeing. With passports and
guns with other people. There
she is on screen. This. This. There's the state senator on screen.
This does not smell good.
So I think Alex has to be suggesting that the local police are in on this.
Yeah, I don't think there's any way this works otherwise.
So they'd identified Vance Bolter as a suspect pretty quickly because of two things.
One, his roommate called the police after he got some texts that were a thinly veiled confession that he'd committed some serious crimes.
Two, Bolter abandoned an SUV at the scene of the Hortmans' home where the police had
intercepted him and he managed to escape on foot. The plotting and carrying out of this
attack was fairly intricate, but it wasn't really a whodunit after it was done and had
been interrupted. The clues were all there.
Pretty obvious.
Alex wants to make it suspicious that there was a suspect fairly quickly, but it doesn't
really seem weird at all.
There were strong leads, and a person who just killed two people and attempted to kill
two others at two separate locations was presumably armed and on the loose.
The police would get that information to the public fast because it's a matter of public
safety that you find this person before he kills another person.
He's going to kill more people.
There's no reason not to kill people.
He very clearly, in the SUV that he abandoned, there's indications of intent to kill more.
So Bolter's wife was pulled over and stopped by the police.
She was briefly questioned and consented to a search of her vehicle.
She was driving with her four kids, their passports, $10,000 in cash and two guns.
Alex said that she was, quote, fleeing with other people, but seems uninterested in the
fact that they were her kids.
Yeah, that is, that is, that does change things a little bit as far as calculus.
Yeah.
And in your point of view on that.
I think he's making, he's using language to make that a little bit shadier than it was. Yeah, yeah, and in your point of view on that. I think he's making he's using language to make that a little bit
Shadier than it was yeah
Yeah, so the reason that she was in this situation is likely that she'd received a text from her husband saying quote words
They're not gonna explain how sorry I am for this situation
There's gonna be some people coming to the house armed and trigger happy and I don't want you guys around
The couple were preppers and they had a bug out plan
So it seems like she might have been following that plan when her path intersected with the police.
Yeah.
As it stands now, there's no indication that the wife was involved with the murders.
And all of these things that Alex is pointing out as suspicious,
they're only suspicious if you want them to be.
Yeah.
If you want to create suspicion around not looking at information, not looking at details.
This, you know, there are a lot of things we can take away from this.
But I think the big thing for me is that bug out bags aren't as useful as I thought they were going to be.
I thought bug out bags were going to be more important, but it feels like if you can be intercepted that quickly, bug outbacks aren't as big a deal as you think. But I'm not sure, I'm not sure, like I see conflicting information a little bit about
how much she was willing to be intercepted.
She has said that the police contacted her and she pulled over in order to like meet
with them.
Oh so she was like on the phone with them.
Maybe.
Or whatever.
She has said something like that.
The police in their affidavit said they
located her and pulled her over. So you think her heart wasn't in the bug out? Probably
not. Okay. No. And especially if you're in the car with your kids. I mean, what are you
doing with kids and a bug out? But here's the thing. You need a sensible bug out. Sure.
Sure. I mean, yeah, but we're not talking sensible. We're not talking about sensible
here. We're well past that. Yeah
well, I think the indications that I would take away from this or the like little bits of
You know sort of context seemed to be that he
Was looking for a shooting war. Yep, and maybe she was less committed to the the violent going out in a blaze of glory
Kind of like so I I don't know
because you did have two guns which I like shouldn't have a problem with sure
but those could be for when you get to the homestead or whatever you know for
kids is so many kids to have two more than two and also want to have a lot of
guns to fight the government with yeah, those things go hand in hand a little bit though. So
anyway, this story stinks.
It I mean, it really does. Yeah. Yeah.
And again, I don't know what's going on. I just know what we're
being told doesn't add up. And everybody's pointing that out.
How do they know a guy in a stolen police car?
They said it was looked like their police car, their police car.
They're not been clear yet,
but indistinguishable from their police car,
who's the head of an intelligence company,
intelligence security company,
who's got all these big appointments in the state government and a no Kings
organizer. who's got all these big appointments in the state government and a no-kings organizer,
how does he, how do they know it's him? And then I said yesterday, oh, we're gonna find his dead
body somewhere. And then, oh, there's a manhunt. Oh, and he had a manifesto of 70 names he wanted to kill.
Maga maniac.
Click that.
Let's see what the Democratic Party, Drudge, is saying.
Click that.
Drudge is the Democratic Party.
Drudge is the Democratic Party.
What are they saying?
So all of the details that Alex is adding to this story to make the official version
not make sense are things that he's wrong about or intentionally misrepresenting.
The police never said that the shooter's car was a stolen police vehicle.
They said it was made to look like a real police vehicle by the addition of lights and
stuff like that.
Alex's just decided that maybe it was a stolen cop car because that makes things look more
suspicious.
Yeah.
Boulder doesn't have an intelligence and security company.
He had worked a bit in food service and traveled to the Democratic Republic of the Congo as
a missionary, but he had a fantasy of running a security company.
He founded a company called Praetorian Guard Security Services, which failed to attract
customers.
Alex is embellishing the status of that company in order to make it look like this guy had
connections to the FBI, the CIA, the intelligence community.
Bolter didn't have, quote, all these big appointments in the state government.
He was appointed to the governor's workforce development board in 2016, an unpaid position that has approximately 60 members.
It's a single low level position he held, which Alex is exaggerating out into a series of high
level posts, because that makes this picture more suspicious. Yeah.
Bolter wasn't a no Kings organizer. He had a bunch of no Kings flyers in his car, but that doesn't
really prove anything.
They could have been there because he came across them at a shop and he took them to
try and limit the amount of other people who could take these flyers and in the process
limit the promotional spread.
There's a number of possible explanations for why those flyers were in his car, but
Alex has decided that he was a No Kings protest organizer because that's the option that makes it look the most suspicious.
This is a typical strategy that Alex employs when the reality of a story is threatening
to him.
He just creates a fake story and then points out all the weird anomalies that don't make
sense in his fake story.
If you go through his career, you see this behavior again and again, generally when he's
worried about the real version of a story.
In this case, he's probably worried that it's going to come out that the shooter was a fan of
his and that people are going to start asking questions about how Alex had openly declared a
civil war had started on his show and how he said the next wave of the patriot movement launched with
the no kings protest. All of it doesn't look good. Yeah. but in other cases like with the Sandy Hook shooting Alex knew that if people took that event seriously
We would need to re-examine gun laws and that was deeply threatening to him in cases like these
Alex cannot deal with reality
So he creates a second reality to engage with to make sure that people are too busy with his fake bullshit
To ever deal with the real issue at hand and the way he does that is by just asking questions.
The story stinks.
I don't know what's going on, but it's fishy.
The official story that we're being told doesn't make sense and the official story is a fake
version of an official story that he's selling to his audience.
Specifically so it won't make sense.
Yeah.
He's a real piece of shit.
Yeah. Yep. Yep
it's
Hmm, how would I describe like?
It's why we have judges in sports like a line judge in tennis because sometimes
Maybe the guys fucking not telling the truth and then you have a person who just goes no you're done you know move on move on you're done we move on it's very hard to
make this make sense in real life yeah yeah this is he should have struck out a
long time ago long time ago and people just keep going yeah I don't I don't
know tennis terms but you know you should have been he should have been thrown out
of the game. Yeah
Brummer so he's got some of his old employees who are still around people like a John Bowne
And he plays a little report that John Bowne has made about the shooting and I will say that a lot of it is just
John Bowne Rehashing things that Alex has said sure we're gonna be looking at all of this. Sean bounce, follow the report on it. Minnesota shooting reveals Democrat domestic terror.
Here it is. the the
quiet suburbs of Minneapolis were shattered early this morning by a cold calculated act of political terror. State Representative Melissa Hortman, a Democratic powerhouse and former house speaker, along with her husband Mark, were gunned down in their Brooklyn park home by a suspect the state's health insurance program. The state's health
insurance program. The state's
low income health insurance
program. This 68 to 65 vote
with a total of 168.5% of
Republicans in the state
voted for Minnesota care. The
state's low income health
insurance program. The state's
low income health insurance
program. This state's low income health Minnesota care, the state's low income
health insurance program.
This 68 to 65 vote with Hortman as the decisive crossover marked a stunning departure from
her party's progressive rhetoric.
The Democrats decried Hortman's vote as cruel and immoral with Representative Maria Issa
Perez Vega
chanting, this ain't one Minnesota in protest.
Days before her murder, Hortman, physically shaking,
defended her vote as a necessary compromise
to secure a state budget in a tied 67-67 House.
I know that people will be hurt by that vote.
And I'm, we worked very hard to try to get a budget deal that
wouldn't include that provision.
Yet this single act of pragmatism may have sealed her fate as whispers of retribution
swirl in the wake of her assassination.
This is absolute shit. What did John say the vote was on this bill? It was 68-65, right?
So if Hortman had abstained from voting, it would have been 67-65.
Or if she'd voted against it, it would have been 67-66.
It seems like whatever she did, the bill would have passed and that her vote was more of
a symbolic act meant to ensure cooperation from the Republicans on other parts of the
state budget. Because where he cuts off her that thing from the news report saying that we wanted to find
a way to do this without this in the budget, but the GOP will not.
They made it clear they weren't going to give an inch and that they were willing to shut
down the government if they didn't get their way.
The Minnesota House is a complete mess, even before this shooting.
In the 2024 election, the House ended up being a 67-67 split between the GOP and the DFL,
or the Democratic Farmer Labor Party. The GOP challenged the winner of the District 40B race,
Curtis Johnson, and they were successful in stopping him from being seated by arguments
that he didn't live in his district. A special election was scheduled, but for the time being the GOP had a majority of 67-66,
with the 40B seat being vacant.
It was very clear that the DFL would win that seat and it would end up in a tie, but while
they had a temporary advantage, the GOP tried to push through all of their agenda.
In response, the DFL members boycotted the House, refusing to show up so the GOP wouldn't have the required number of representatives present to make a quorum.
In February of this year, the two parties reached a power sharing agreement, which sort
of resolved things, but also clearly didn't. Melissa Hortman was part of that negotiation
for the power sharing agreement, since she was the former Speaker of the Minnesota House
and the leader of the DFL party. When they came to this compromise, she was part of the negotiations to form a state budget,
part of which was this unshakable GOP position that undocumented adults were to be stripped
of eligibility for Minnesota care.
I'm not defending her choice in making that compromise, but I'm trying to illustrate
that her vote is not as suspicious as Alex and John Bound want to make it out to be.
The entire narrative of this vote being part of the motivation for the shooting falls apart
when you add in the other victim, Senator John Hoffman.
He voted against the bill, which wasn't as close in the Senate and had 15 Democratic
votes in favor of it.
So if there was a means of like killing these people to punish them for going against
the Democrats, there's 15 senators in the Minnesota Senate that should have been targets
before Hoffman. John Bowne says that Hortman's pragmatic vote may have sealed her fate and
that whispers of retribution are in the air, but he's the one who's doing the whispering.
They're creating this like, oh, streets are talking.
And then pretending that they're just neutral observers covering this story.
It's horseshit.
Yeah.
Yeah, I wouldn't be Jon Bowne near me.
Like listening to that, I threw my hockey gloves to the ground.
That shit was done.
Yeah.
Time to have a hockey fight.
I don't know how else
to describe what just happened there. I'm the sensible information person here. Clubs
off, clubs down. Let's go. Now you know what you're doing here, Dick. You know exactly
what you're doing. You are doing it on purpose. I know it. Now it's got to be resolved one
way or the other. So Alex continues playing this John Bowne report.
And I honestly think that it's just repackaging Alex's stuff with a different person's voice.
No official motive has been confirmed, but the no Kings flyers found in Bolter's vehicle
tie him directly to the raucous anti-Trump rallies planned across Minnesota and the rest
of the country. We don't have any raucous anti-Trump rallies planned across Minnesota and the rest of the country.
We don't have any raucous. Go fuck yourself. There were some flyers that said no kings. And the plot thickens as Bolter has been identified as a 2019 appointee to the
governor's workforce development board by Minnesota governor Tim Walz.
My good friend and colleague, Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband mark
Were shot and killed early this morning in what appears to be a politically motivated assassination
And as Trump's military parade marking the US Army's 250th anniversary begins to roll out the left's refusal to cancel these rallies
reeks of hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance, preaching peace while aggressively rallying
against kings, exposes the fractured ideology that Hortman's vote and her death have laid
bare.
There's a shocking and disgusting irony to that.
The dissonance of the left doing protests, the dissonance of this, this kind of packaging,
this kind of reporting, as a means of running cover
for a political assassin is dark.
You know, I'm trying to invert things, right?
Like, I'm not screaming at you,
because we're
in this room together. Right. And that makes me want to scream
very, very loudly. Yeah, yeah, yeah. For a long period of time.
I know. I can feel it. And I'm not doing it to you because
doing it to you wouldn't help. And yet you do that a lot.
Well, I didn't say I was succeeding. Right. I said I was trying. Sure. Cuz man that boy you
It's gaslighting. Oh
Boy, yeah, oh man. It's um, it's unfair. No Kings. How mmm?
How dare you buddy if there's one thing that the United States is supposed to be like a one thing
That's above the whole like oh, I'm on the left or I'm on the right or anything like that It's no Kings. No Kings the whole thing is about how there's no Kings, right?
But the fact that it's called that means that it's not really about that cuz it's soros and all that shit
So that that's fine. Yeah, also, okay fine. Then here's what I'll pull back
I can't do anything about that. Mm-hmm. What I do think that we can do is
Make put words behind an achievement wall can't do anything about that. What I do think that we can do is make,
put words behind an achievement wall.
You know how when you're playing a video game,
you can unlock characters if you do a well enough job
at this thing or complete this challenge.
I've played a little vampire survivors,
I'm aware of this dynamic.
This is good.
We need to put words behind these kinds of challenges.
He should not be allowed to use the word raucous. He shouldn't. You know what? He shouldn't be allowed. This is good. We need to put words behind these kinds of challenges.
He should not be allowed to use the word raucous.
You shouldn't.
You know what?
He shouldn't be allowed.
I don't know about not allowing people, but what you're describing is essentially education.
You should learn about things before you discuss them.
Yes, I am.
I am describing education.
It seems important to realize that I'm describing that because it did not seem to take.
No, certainly not. So education is about learning things. And one of one of the arguments that
I think has been central to our show is that Alex does not learn lessons. That's true.
He will not learn. He is incapable of engaging with people trying to, in good faith or even
in dicey faith, trying to explain to him why the things that he does are wrong and they
hurt people.
No matter how many times you read it in a newspaper, Alex did not change his mind.
No.
Yeah.
And I think that as I was listening to the unfolding of his coverage around this, I felt like there's a lot of fucking Sandy Hook parallel.
Yeah. Oh, yeah.
A lot of the like the official story stinks.
I just don't know.
I'm asking questions.
There's anomalies.
I'm feeling it. Yeah.
And this next clip made me disgusted.
Now, yesterday, I saw the roommate of the supposed shooter.
Who were all being told did it. Vance Bolter. the now yesterday I saw the roommate of the supposed
shooter. We're all being told
did it. Vance Bolter. And now
there's a manhunt and people
heard gunshots in the woods
and his vehicles been found. I
think we'll find his dead
body. And somebody shows up in
a mask, a rubber mask. You're
told it's him. Then I saw the video
And I thought, man, that's really suspicious, but I didn't really say anything yesterday about it. I just he's a big guy. He does all the police. But some guy in a
rubber mask and a police car
was there doing it. Had a
shootout with police and
escaped. That he is a huge
Trump supporter. Yeah and
there he is. We'll play that
next. But first I want to play
the corporate media out front
his house. And oh, he says that this appointee by walls with all the no kings fliers
in the car that the police found, the police car, he's a Trump supporter.
And he had 70 targets.
So were they planning to hit more people, whoever this group is, and then blame Trump,
blame us?
What did I say is coming? The false flag. This is the exact same behavior that Alex engaged in with Sandy Hook.
The parallels are pretty direct, which is why part of holding Alex accountable for what
he did in that case involves not letting him be a public figure that can be taken seriously
again.
He will just do this over and over because he doesn't care about the people that he
might hurt in the process.
Someone connected to the shooting said something that's inconvenient for him politically,
so Alex has just decided to heavily suggest that he's an actor and he must be in on the whole thing,
planted there to say that the Patsy was a Trump supporter.
That's really all Alex is responding to.
There's nothing bigger behind this than the fact that the roommate said
that the shooter was a Trump supporter,
and that's threatening to Alex.
So Alex has to invalidate it.
That's it.
If he'd said that the shooter was a big Harris fan,
do you think that he would come off
as such a theater kid to Alex,
or would it, conveniently, his vibes be a little bit different?
Crazy.
Alex cannot control himself,
because there's no reason to. There are some strong
indications that the shooter in this case was a fan of his content, which carries zero
consequences in reality. In order to deflect any potential association between the shooter
and Trump, Alex is engaging in the same behaviors that led to his Sandy Hook lawsuit because
he hasn't really faced that many consequences there. He's still super rich, and the vilification that came from that suit
has made people like Tucker Carlson
think that he's some kind of counter-cultural figure
that they should prop up.
You know, he's learned, in essence,
nothing wrong with doing this.
Yep, I'm gonna do this.
Who cares?
I'm gonna do the same thing.
Yeah.
Yeah, I mean, it is one of those things where, to me, looking at the present, it feels like
what we're living in is not the consequences of malicious behavior so much as the consequences
of not punishing failure.
If you fail the way that the legal system has failed, the consequences are not
on the legal system. They're on us. The consequences are then fed directly to us. And all of the
people who have failed get to go on about their day as though, hey, listen, win or lose,
it's just a thing. Right? And it can't be like that. Like it can't be like Well, it's the it's the same thing with like failing to
regulate pollution makes us all pay for it. Yep. You know,
instead of making the companies that are polluting pay for it,
but then not holding Alex responsible in a way that
addresses the issue within the legal system makes all but
certain other people are going to be subject to the same
things. Yep.
He's going to, when convenient, when profitable, when easy, he's going to do the same things
in the same way that if allowed, companies are going to pollute.
Yep.
And we all are going to bear the social burden of that.
Yep.
The sales pitch on that system is that the consequences can be less corrupt and can be safer and can be all
of those things. But if you fail, then then what? You know, there's no recourse and there's
no acceptance of responsibility. There's no there's no like, Hey, we failed you, America,
the world. I'm not sure I'm not sure what the answer is either. I don't think that vigilantism or trying to hurt Alex is an answer or a legitimate way
of enforcing those consequences.
I don't know what it is.
I think the answer might be he's going to have to get sued again.
I don't know if this dude wants to sue him, but there's certainly a path for this
dude to sue him.
At what point does, you know, you start to get into criminal consequences for, like the
civil courts very clearly seem to have not provided the consequences that Alex would
respond to, but maybe some sort of criminal court would.
I don't know.
It's depressing honestly honestly
it would go a long way for people to apologize for failing and admit that they failed it
would go a long way I think it would go a long way for people who are listening to just
hear like judges and people go like sorry we fucked up this one failed we failed this
one and then that's what we got to do, but we're gonna pick up and move on I don't failure happens
I don't know if that's the universal perception that all of them would have and then exactly I don't foolish
Yeah, and that's fine. Yeah, but and I don't know I don't know how you communicate that message, but
It's a bummer yep, so, Alex has decided that he's going
to start attacking this roommate guy as an actor.
But here is David Carlson. And this is my opinion. You can make your own decision about
it. This came out within a few hours this happening yesterday. And to me, this looks extremely ungenuine and scripted.
Oh, you heard the reporter. It's
Vance Bolter. See, it's his last words. Oh, text
messaged a guy in a rubber mask supposedly does this tries to
kill the police, shoots four people found dead. And then we're told, Oh, people heard shots in the woods. They police
found the car a few hours ago.
Dead men tell no tales. Oh,
here's the police. We're
going to be dead. We're going
to be dead. We're going to be
dead. We're going to be dead.
We're going to be dead. We're
going to be dead. We're going
to be dead. We're going to be
dead. We're going to be dead.
We're going to be dead. We're
going to be dead. We're going
to be dead. We're going to be
dead. We're going to be dead.
We're going to be dead. We're
going to be dead. We're going
to be dead. We're going to be
dead. We're going to be dead.
We're going to be dead. We're
going to be dead. We're going
to be dead. We're going to be dead. We're going to be dead. We're going to be dead. We're going to be dead. We're going to be dead. We're going to be dead. We're going to be dead. We're going to be dead. We're going to be dead. We're going to be dead. We're going to be It's probably a good thing that Alex doesn't really matter as much as he did in 2013, or
else this could incite a really bad harassment campaign against the guy.
He may still be the subject of some dumb conspiracies and harassment, but Alex is an unnecessary
part of that process in 2025.
It's just a Twitter recap show, so it would probably be a lot harder to argue that he
was a critical part of spreading theories about David Carlson compared to the past.
But it's interesting how Alex is wrong about everything in that clip.
All of his predictions about how things are going to play out are wrong.
Bolter wasn't found dead, he was arrested.
Alex is wrong in making shit up, but there's another aspect of this that's important.
He's saying that Bolter is going to be found dead, which is part of his argument that this
has set up written all over it.
Alex doesn't realize it and it's not important to anyone, but this is a conditional if-then
statement.
If Bolter is found dead, then this has set up written all over it.
His final texts to Carlson and his wife can't be fraudulently pinned on
him if he survives and says that he sent them. The shootings can't be falsely ascribed to
him if he lives and said that he did it. All of this patsy crafting that Alex is doing
relies on the assumption that he's going to be found dead and then everyone will just
say that he did it. Because Bolter was taken alive, Alex should have to reassess a lot
of this stuff, but he doesn't have to and part of the reason is that no one cares, including Alex. This is all a game to him.
Yep. None of this is the conveying of sincere belief or information.
Yeah. Yeah. I mean, it is like the effect of Alex in 2013 that everybody else is handling it without
him.
You know, like, oh yeah, we've already got the conspiracies.
We've already got the Patsy.
We've already got the fake actors.
We've already got it all down.
You have educated us in such a way that this is how it is done.
This is how we do it.
Yeah.
It had such a erosive effect on people's engaging with breaking stories, breaking information. He
made so much money off it. There's such a profit incentive in these kinds of games that
people just can't resist.
He might as well have written the handbook on like, oh, take step, step, step, step,
step profit.
His show essentially is that if you wanted it to be, I guess you could train yourself
to abuse information pretty well.
So he's just wrong about how he thinks things are going to play out.
Sure.
What did I tell you in the last six months?
False flag shootings on lawmakers, on homes, on Ely Laly demonstrations, on black churches,
that's what they've been pre-programming.
They always tell you beforehand, getting their story ready, getting it in your mind.
And then I said, they find a dead body of a MAGA supporter so that they can't defend themselves.
And here we are. He's a huge Trump supporter.
Says his best buddy.
And look, we got the text messages. They didn't say someone claiming to be
Vance Bolter. No Vance Bolter's last text messages. What could be his last
words? All foreshadowing. They find the dead body. I'll be very surprised if
they catch him in the manhunt now. so shockingly wrong on such a regular basis.
Makes you wonder how stats work.
So Alex says all this foreshadows them finding Bolter dead because he's treating all this
like a dramatic story someone else is telling, and he's trying to predict the plot based on the writers clues. The problem is
that he doesn't actually think like that. If he did he would have killed a bunch
of people by now and probably himself. What he's exhibiting is a very distorted
manner of viewing the world but if he really saw things that way and acted
upon it he'd be unable to function. He couldn't run a fake pill company. He couldn't shift all of this stuff over from the Alex Jones store to the
Alex Jones dot net network or whatever. He wouldn't be able to do all that stuff if he
truly was caught up in reading all the clues that the man is secretly giving him. And this,
I believe, is part of what makes him such an interesting figure is that he is kind of fucked up, right in
this way, right? There is some part of that that he's drawn by,
right. But part of it is also very fake. And part of it is a
performance that encourages that kind of thinking in the audience.
And that that like, is this real, is this fake? That kayfabe or whatever, it's the most blurry with him than it is with anybody
in his media bubble. Do you remember the Tony Hawk games? Very well. Right. And do you remember
like later on, I remember them having so many stats like, you know
Like oh, this is how good they are. Ali, you know, like it would just be line after line of stat things that you can slightly adjust
You know, even the first ones had a fair amount. Yeah
Yeah
To me anything higher than like your standard Dungeons and Dragons six stat kind of thing is awful high
It feels like the amount of characteristics, the stat characteristics have to be tuned
to such a very specific level at every single one of them to get Alex.
Yeah.
You know?
It's true.
What is his version, what's a skater's version of charisma?
Is that manual?
That is a good question.
What would that be? Photogenic, photogenicness. Okay. that is a good question what would that be
photogenic photogenic miss okay that's a great step good job Jordan yep yep
yep yep well see here's here's the thing yeah some of the earlier games you
didn't have things like the manual wasn't in the first game I think the
grind stat that's what that's the most charisma charismatic thing to do is to
grind going down the
The issue that I have with this stat thing with Alex is that like
There are certain things that like in a D&D build sure there are certain stats that preclude other stats
Sure, like if you have a giant bulking super strong person
They can't also have super high agility.
It's more interesting.
You can't have both of those things together,
or else you then have to have no charisma,
no, you can't talk.
But you could move around a lot and you're beefy.
With Alex, he's able to navigate bullshit
the way that he does on his show.
And I think that you could
believe that he is just as crazy as he presents himself to be sure but he has
really good handlers around him like his dad right you know right you could see
like once the cameras are off he is a raving lunatic and his dad has to stop
him from doing all of the killing and
shit that he would do on his own.
But so he's like a horse.
He's put inside of a thing and driven from place to place and then allowed out to do
the show.
Well, I'm saying that someone could suggest right, right, right.
But he's such a defiant, like oppositional character and his personality relies so much
on like, no one is telling me what to do.
No one can tell me what to do. No one can tell me what to do
Yeah, that I don't think that I don't think that those traits are compatible
Like he can't be being handled by his dad true and be the oppositional defiant
Weirdo that right he is right. None of it makes sense. The stats don't add up together, right?
And that's what makes him interesting. I agree.
And I think the places where it's confusing is mostly lies.
Yeah.
I think mostly it's...
The incongruity can be resolved using Occam's razor, which is he's a big fat liar.
But he's also somebody who's always right when he theorizes about stuff.
Makes sense.
But it looks like whatever they had planned didn't go as big as they want it I don't know but you know
usually when I am forced to theorize look at the different pieces I have more
often than not I'm dead on what do you think we'll post this clip from a live
show at X later do you want to know more you can give me your intel in your the
think we'll post this clip
from the live show at X later.
Do you want to know more? You
can give me your intel in your
angles, which I really need
with your human intelligence.
You're human. We'll figure this
out. We're going to stay on
this. I'm going to come back
and play this guy. In my
opinion. Fake fake crying. I mean, this is just really bad acting. This guy get his acting training in a strip mall.
So I think that the way that that clip plays out gives you a
little bit of you know, some indications this like, I'm
fishing for attention on Twitter, you know, please sound
off with your comments and your few met. But he also needs other people to create some of this shit talk that then he can repeat
That lets him a little bit off the hook. I'm just covering what people are saying right the morning to evening Fox News
Pipeline kind of thing yeah, he's trying to incite other people to come up with
shit
Be his wolfgang Halbig.
People are saying, I'm reading now,
that people are saying that he wasn't real
in the first place.
I'm just reporting that there's-
I'm just interviewing this guy
who has an interesting thought on it.
Exactly.
This is a very prestigious, credible person
who's Professor Ding Dong, or whatever the fuck, on Twitter.
Yep.
The thing I hate most
about shit like that is whenever it's so directly parallel you know it's like at
the very least give me give me a new version of this how can we allow the
exact same words to be said again you know yeah I think he's I think he's a
bad actor should be like even you should not say that.
You should be like, well, I'll come up with something better than he's a bad actor.
Yeah.
If I were Alex and I was just a gigantic piece of shit and I had been through what I had
been through with the Sandy Hook cases, I would have PTSD around the idea of saying
this about somebody again.
I would not be able to do it because I would be like,
well, at least on a muscle memory level,
I remember that this is trouble.
Yeah, but no.
Absolutely.
No, doesn't matter.
Nothing.
So Alex pledges that he's gonna follow this story.
He's gonna get to the bottom of this.
I doubt it.
All right, we're gonna follow this story
because it stinks to high heaven like a rotten fish or like a sewage line. But here's what we know.
You have a high level appointee to the board of labor of Minnesota
the the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the the Democrat, and then his best buddy reads messages crying for the news that it's him, and here
he is saying all this.
And then the best buddy says, oh yeah, he's a huge Trump supporter.
And so the huge Trump supporter in a rubber mask with a stolen police car. We're told that a man with a stolen
police car. Those attacks the
state Senator State reps
house. Kills to critically
wounds to others. Kills the
senator husband critically
wounds the state rep and their
spouse. And then we're told
it's going to be found dead.
And now we're looking for the
dead body. They heard shots.
There's a car found in the woods. Show the the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the of things. So when you're a big Trump supporter, you go kill the Democrats that are defecting
from the party, which is their main fear, which is happening everywhere. None of it
adds up.
So I'm thrilled that he's going to keep on following the story. And I think that Bolter's
roommate could sue him. I think the grounds are pretty clear there. Everything Alex is
saying in that clip that's meant to add to the suspiciousness of this
story is false or wildly exaggerated.
The version that Alex is telling is very suspicious, but only because of the stuff that he's making
up.
If he addressed this story based on the information that was available, it wouldn't be all that
suspicious, but he can't do that, because if he did, it would make him feel bad.
One thing that's particularly wrong here is that the people who the shooter targeted were
Democrats who voted against extending Minnesota care to immigrants.
Melissa Hortman voted with the GOP on that, but John Hoffman didn't, so this theory of
a motive doesn't work.
A further complication is that Tim Walz was supportive of the compromise that the lawmakers
reached in order to pass a state budget.
He was obviously opposed to this piece of it, but he was part of reaching the larger agreement.
He literally appeared with Hortman and the new Speaker of the House, GOP Representative Lisa DeMuth,
at a press conference announcing that compromise back in May.
Voting for this piece of the budget wasn't going against Tim Walz. In fact, it could be argued that Hortman made a very difficult decision that was exactly
what Walz needed her to do in order to get the rest of the budget passed.
Alex needs to lie and add shit to this story to make it suspicious, because if he didn't,
he wouldn't really be able to argue against the shooter's actions.
Democrats are fucking demonic child abusers who can't get enough human trafficking. On what grounds could Alex actually stand against assassinating democratic leaders?
If anything that he preaches is meant to be taken seriously,
Bolter's actions should be reported on Infowars as noble and just, which is why this has to be
a false flag and why he desperately has to go out of his way in order to create this dumb bullshit.
He desperately has to go out of his way to create this dumb bullshit
Yeah, we're not at the point where it's useful and
advantageous to propagandize these people as heroes I
Imagine we'll get there. I would say no, but I've been so wrong about
Tough tough to tough to hold up here the track record well, and I think that you know the way that you know he's made sort of tragic
heroes out of people who like cops who have killed black people sure like a Derek Chauvin
sure type figure that one kid from Milwaukee or whatever his fucking name is I think we're not
that far off from him being able to do that. Now whether or not he has the nerve
to...
I'll say that in some circles he already is being hailed as a hero.
Yes, but I mean Alex. I mean does Alex have the nerve?
For sure. That's a good question.
I don't know if he thinks that his brand could survive doing that, but I think a time may
come when he...
I mean time may come when it's the only way he feels like his brand can survive is to go full on.
Yep, it might be well.
So Alex like you know he knows when things are fake when he sees them.
Sure.
Yeah.
Again, how do you walk into someplace you see a bowl of fruit and from 20 feet away
you go that's fake.
It looks real but you just your mind knows because you know it's the look. the out here. I love you guys. I made some choices and you guys don't know anything about this,
but I'm going to be gone for a while. So like he says he knows when things are fake, but
his track record about like knowing fake things is pretty shit
In a sense, but the biggest problems he's had in his career or times when he's called things fake that he was totally wrong
About right. So in a sense, all right
if you
Think about it this way
All right
If you know all of the things that are wrong. Every single thing that is wrong. You in a sense also know what is right because that is defined as the only thing that is
not.
Do you know what I mean?
Yeah.
By virtue of this.
So in a way, yes.
If he calls it fake, you know it's real.
And if he calls it real, you probably know it's fake.
Therefore, he kind of does know when things are fake.
It's an, that's an unreliable metric. Yeah, that is, it's very therefore he kind of does know when things are fake. It's an honor. That's an unreliable
Metric yeah, that is it's very
Alex call something fake doesn't mean it's real, but him saying something that is fake means nothing yeah, and his track record is shit, right?
So he plays this clip of David Carlson
speaking to reporters and
Reading these text messages, and he did not, I watched the larger video,
he didn't seem to want to read these text messages.
The reporters were kind of like,
could you give us some information?
What did they say?
No, I think it's a little bit uncomfortable,
but also I understand why reporters are doing
what they're doing in that context.
But Alex has decided this all just looks very fake.
Obviously.
And, uh, man.
But I love you guys, and I'm sorry for all the trouble this has caused.
So...
It looks like he reads us for the first time with the news cameras,
and he chokes up.
He does the huffing and puffing and I just feel like I'm in a middle school play of Peter Pan here don't you?
Your cops watching that you know bullcrap when you see it right? But you're
not supposed to ask questions that's why I'm such a bad man. I know that Alex is
being facetious here about this being why he's a bad man, but he's actually
spot on. This is a huge part of why he's a horrible person. Alex is saying the exact
same things he did about Robbie Parker's press conference after the Sandy Hook shooting,
and Alex has every reason to know how much that hurt him. Alex knows precisely what he's
doing and he does not care. This couldn't be a clearer example that he hasn't learned anything from that entire lawsuit
and he's doing the exact same thing to another person because the truth is too difficult
for him to spin.
If he actually dealt with reality on reality's term, it'd be tough.
I mean, or he's learned one thing from the lawsuit, which is he can do whatever he wants.
Right.
And I think that those are the same thing in terms of like learning your lesson
and learning that I don't have to learn lessons.
There are no consequences for me.
So David Carlson's a private citizen
and Alex is accusing him of being an actor,
which would have to mean that he's part of an elaborate plan
to kill Minnesota state lawmakers
and a willing participant in a Psy-Off
meant to overthrow Trump.
Who hired him?
Who hired that person? Under whose direction?
How many people did they... Was it an open casting call? Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Yeah. Until Alex faces real consequences that make him understand the gravity of the things that he does to people,
this behavior isn't gonna change.
And I don't know what those consequences are, but I think he probably...
There should probably be some way that he could go to jail like I feel like that might do it. Maybe
But maybe not I mean, I don't know
from jail It is like it is like I wonder how much of Alex's protection is really just cast-off
Protection from the legal systems inability to hold any rich person accountable?
I think that's a large part of it
And then I think a lot of these issues are really really touchy things that a lot of people don't want to deal with like
Speech sure I think that
the
The retreat and the mask of free speech is something that people you know you worry about
What's the precedent something is going to set?
Or, you know, I think that especially in the U.S., we're pretty bad with those kinds of
issues.
We don't really deal with them in a way that's compatible with, you know, real life.
Well, at least not dealing with them has clearly served us well so far, I feel like we're doing great no no notes no notes so look man this guy he didn't
do it maybe maybe he was a Chinese agent who knows I feel like it's very easy to
know but there was a rubber mask right fair enough so now they can just frame anyone. So they can put a mask on.
And go out and kill whoever they want and frame MTG, Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Matt Gaetz, Roger Stone.
And then they got your phone,
they just sent out the messages and voila.
And it's how quick they had it out.
It's how it was how quick they had it
out. It's how it was already.
How it was all prepared. You
see the preparation of walls
and his statement yesterday.
All of it. I know scripting
when I see it. And so do you.
I don't know what's going on.
But I'm saying I believe this is a big lie. And I believe that's what we have to manifest up. They won't show us 70. He
wanted to go. And then you got
the wife in a carload of people
with all their passports, guns
and ammo caught in other
county. And that story went off
the radar. And then you got the
wife in a carload of people with all their passports, guns, and ammo caught in another county. And that story went off the radar.
Meanwhile, you've got Jamie Raskin at the No Kings event in DC. No American flags
to be seen, but Palestinian flags are there. And then you've got North
Carolina state rep, Waves Trump, the cap it had at no Kings protest some cuts may be necessary
Let us try to hype somebody to go out into the violence. That's yeah somebody already shot at him
Hey, that's already been done that that that feels silly that bridge has already been crossed if he gets shot
It's because people are already shooting at him.
Yeah.
So you might notice that no one's put on a rubber mask and framed Alex, Roger, MTG, because it wouldn't be as easy as Alex is imagining it.
It would be almost absurd.
Yeah. So also that story from the No Kings protest is misreporting.
North Carolina representative Julie Von Hafen posted an image of a protester's sign on social media,
which Alex is reporting as her waving around a severed head at the protest.
Sounds about right.
He doesn't know what the actual story is, and Von Hafen immediately apologized.
Seems kind of stupid, though, to whine about how this is all going to lead to violence
while simultaneously trying to run defense for a guy who just assassinated a state rep.
But Alex is kind of stupid that way.
And the dissonance of this is not going to
make the listeners think like,
oh wait, hold on a second.
People were just murdered.
People weren't murdered after the No Kings protests.
Mm-hmm.
Strange.
Very strange.
protests. Mm-hmm.
Strange.
Very strange.
I wonder if there's some sort of way to go back and look, because I feel like there's
a death spiral that begins when enough people are successfully convinced that competence
is suspicious.
You know what I mean?
Like when somebody like,
oh my God, they did it. They did it too well. Like, Jesus Christ, be happy that somebody
did their fucking job well for once. Sure. Right? Like, oh, see how fast the vaccine
came out? That's no way you're way off. That's an amazing achievement. Do you see the pyramids?
It's an amazing achievement. Yeah. You know you know yeah human effort when directed and ushered well can have shocking results
it's good yeah things can be good or it's all a plot and you should be end of
society I think that yeah I mean I don't think that explains everything but
there's something to that,
that competence being suspicious is not a sustainable...
Yeah, there's just no way to come back from it, right? Once doing a good job is like,
oh, you can't trust him, then why would you ever do a good... How could you do a good
job?
It certainly de-incentivizes that. So I thought, well, Alex is really doing some shit on this show.
And then halfway through, he just decides to leave.
Oh, all right, we're gonna go to break start the next hour.
Masses of news clips, analysis on so many stories, so many friends.
Chase Geyser was downtown last night during the no Kings.
Bedlam.
He's got all this footage coming up.
Stay with us.
He'll be in the studio. But look at the boomers.
I posted that today.
You go to the No Kings thing, it's 99% white.
That's old white leftists that wanna be the ruling class
trying to control society.
Now, we got a sale that ends today,
and your funding of this operation is critical,
but you want the products, only sell stuff that works.
We have ultra-methylene blue capsules
with vitamin C to supercharge it.
Amazing.
So we, I thought from listening to that, that like, okay, Chase is gonna come in and do some reports on the protest.
Alex is gonna host and Chase is gonna guest. Chase just takes over. So Alex leaves.
Alright.
And that thing, a look at the boomers, is in reference to Chase's big revelation that he has that is like all right so these protests
Yeah, when you go to them. Oh
At the beginning it's all old people. It's all these old boomers
Sure, and then when the lights go down
When the sun set when the protest start to get real fuck face
That's when the show up right. Right, right, right.
And all of these protests are really just meant
to make it look normal to protest
when later the kids are gonna show up
and set things on fire.
Okay.
Yeah.
All right.
I don't know.
That's an interesting theory, Chase.
I also think it's pretty amazing.
Alex is saying he's bedlam at these protests.
And Chase's coverage of it is quite boring
It's he was not able to capture on on tape any kind of bedlam
Yeah, mostly people doing some chanting and say fuck Trump and that kind of stuff. Yeah, but
It's I mean, I guess I guess
From where I'm sitting
It would be very hard
from where I'm sitting, it would be very hard if I'm on the right going like, wow, can you see the lack of decorum as my main criticism of the protests?
I feel like that would not be...
Well, I mean, that's what Alex has tried to do about Alex Padilla,
you know, like the senator who got handcuffed at the Kristi Noem event.
Not polite enough.
Not polite enough. should have been kinder
Yeah, we could all stand to be a little bit more kind now. Let me auction off this bullhorn. Yeah
So I'm I'm
somewhat flabbergasted by this and I wanted this episode to stand alone a little bit
Yeah, I think it's such a clear illustration of Alex doing the Sandy Hook tricks again.
And I think that it's a mistake to think of them as Sandy Hook tricks.
They're his tricks.
They're the things that he does.
It's just that the most famous example that got him in the most trouble had to do with
the Sandy Hook shooting.
To bring it full circle, as I was saying, this is a moment because you couldn't go back
and look at Alex's career before Sandy Hook and see him doing the same thing over and
over and over again because it works.
Yeah, yeah.
And some of it, I think, certainly escalated a lot more.
For sure.
But yeah, the Aurora shooting was before Sandy Hook and Alex called a lot of the people who
were their actors
These were things that were already starting to take hold in
Conspiracy circles the crisis actor narratives and stuff like that. So it's not unique to that
It's what he knows can work
It's a pattern of behavior and I think that the reason that it's interesting to see it deployed here is that for a long time, I don't think he's felt comfortable
doing that. Yeah. Because of the courts, because of the danger that some of this represents.
And there's a back on my bullshit kind of feel about him doing this to the shooter's
roommate. There were plenty of times that we've talked about in the intervening years, Back on my bullshit kind of feel about him doing this to the shooters roommate
There were plenty of times that we've talked about in the intervening years, which is great to say those words
years
wherein he's like
You know what? Maybe I'll hold back a little bit because of you know all of that stuff
he's insinuated that he is holding back due to
you know, consequences. But it's until a pattern
of behavior is stopped, you know, like a diverted until the inertia of that is moved away, especially
if it's monetarily rewarded, people are just going to keep doing it.
I'm, I'm, I'm afraid so, you know, and I think that in the past we've seen or intervening years as you say
We've seen a lot of examples of him getting fairly close to doing stuff like this
Yep, but I don't know how I don't feel like I've seen him go full on
This guy is a fucking actor. Where do you learn a strip mall? Like that kind of stuff. Saying that these tears are fake.
All this shit.
I don't think that I've seen that in a while.
It represents a shift.
I don't think it's a meaningful shift.
Except for that obviously he doesn't think that this can get him in trouble anymore.
Right.
Right.
Like in the past what we've seen is him trying to do the same thing using words that won't
get him in trouble.
Yeah, damage avoidance.
Right, right, right.
And so with his words, if you connect a bunch of clauses and put everything together, you
can see he's saying the exact same thing about Sandy Hook that he was before.
He's just doing it in a different way, whereas now it feels like he's saying it exactly the
same.
This has a smoke him if you got him.
Absolutely.
100%.
And that to me I think is meaningful, if anything.
So we'll see what happens.
He has not yet commented at this point on the shooter being an Infowars fan.
Unsurprisingly.
But I'm sure that will escalate the actor aspects because that information does come
from the roommate
who Alex is already working to discredit.
So that'll be fun.
I hope he stays on this story forever.
Great.
Anyway, we'll be back.
Indeed we will.
But until then, we have a website.
Indeed we do.
It's knowledgeright.com.
Yep.
We'll be back.
But until then, I'm Leo.
I'm Leo.
I'm GZX Clark.
I am the mysterious professor.
Woo! Yeah! Woo yeah woo yeah woo!
And now here comes the sex robots.
Andy in Kansas, you're on the air, thanks for holding.
Hello Alex, I'm a first time caller, I'm a huge fan, I love your work.
I love you.