Knowledge Fight - #268: December 17-18, 2012
Episode Date: February 25, 2019Today, Dan and Jordan continue looking into how Alex Jones covered the tragedy that occurred at Sandy Hook in the days immediately following. In this installment, the gents see a solidifying of Alex's... "this is all about my guns" mentality, but also the beginning of a troubling drift toward finding ways to sensationalize things that everyone knows will not end well.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Andy and Chanzos, you're on the air. Thanks for holding.
Hello, Alex. I'm a first-time caller. I'm a huge fan. I love your work.
I love you.
Hey, everybody. Welcome back to Knowledge Fight. I'm Dan.
I'm Jordan.
We're couple dudes like to sit around, drink novelty beverages,
and talk a little bit about Alex Jordan.
Oh, indeed we are, Dan.
Jordan.
Dan.
Jordan.
What type of bird would you be if you were, if you had to be a bird?
I feel like it would be wrong of me to say anything other than cardinal,
seeing as I'm from Missouri.
I love our baseball there. You know, all my friends are big red birds fans.
Yeah.
So I should probably say cardinal.
You should probably say cardinal.
But then I could piss everybody off in Missouri by saying Oriole or Blue J.
Do people in Missouri care about Baltimore and Toronto?
I'm not sure they do. I just think of other baseball teams that are birds.
I don't know. I mean, I just, I don't want to be a bird.
So I choose a cardinal just because that seems like there's an other consideration.
You don't want to be a bird.
Fuck no.
You've never wanted to fly.
No, birds are dumb, flying to windows all the time and stuff.
It seems like you're not a very fun life.
See now we've learned a lot about you.
Well, it just, I also don't like seeds all that much.
Like sunflower seeds don't charm me.
It's like whatever they eat and like suet looks gross.
You are not focusing on the positives of being a bird.
You can fly, fine, whoopty shit.
Come on, the skies are yours.
Yeah, but you got to eat seeds.
And the flying is clearly too much of a risk.
You run into things all the time.
You got to take risks to live a rich full life dad.
Okay, fair enough.
When I used to work at the Walgreens over on Western.
Yeah.
It was some of the worst times of my life here in Chicago.
I had just moved to town.
Everything was going bad.
No, standup was not going well.
The job sucked.
I was miserable, but I couldn't leave it because I needed, you know, to pay rent and stuff.
And so one day I'm out on a smoke break and I'm in front of the, the, the store smoking a cigarette
and a bird falls out of the sky in front of me dead.
It was at that moment.
I realized I did not want to be a bird.
I don't want to work at Walgreens anymore.
That is, that is exactly when, when Bernie was given that big speech and the bird landed on the podium
and just kind of hung out there and everyone was like, oh my God, if a bird had just suddenly fallen
and died, we all would be like, no, this birdie guy isn't for us.
It really was like a, it was like someone was writing a story.
Yeah.
I'm depressed.
I'm having a real bad time for even birds are dying when they get around how sad your life is.
No good.
So I don't want to be a bird.
Okay.
All right.
But I do want to know more about Alex Jones as I mean, I already know quite a bit.
Yeah.
And I only know what you tell me.
So I need you to learn more in order for me to learn more.
And that's what this show is about.
Jordan, we got an interesting episode to go over today.
But before we get to that, I need to give a shout out to a couple of new people who have signed up
and are supporting the show.
So first of all, like you say, thank you to Conner.
You are now a policy.
Wonk.
I'm a policy.
00:02:53,500 --> 00:02:54,100
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
Gartner, Lieutenant Conner could be next month.
Thank you so much.
You are now policy.
Wonk.
I'm a policy.
Wonk.
Thank you so much next well, thank you.
You're now a policy walk.
I'm a policy one.
Thank you.
Well, you will next, Michael.
Thank you so much.
You're now policy.
Very much.
Next, piss tape granddad.
You are now a policy.
Wonk.
I'm a policy.
Wonk.
Thank you.
Piss tape granddad.
I'm sure we've met many a time at conventions.
Sure.
Yeah.
And finally, I'd like to say thank you to somebody who joined up on a little bit of an elevated level.
We appreciate it.
Oh, so very much.
So, Sherry, thank you so much.
You are now a technocrat.
I'm a policy.
Wonk.
Four stars.
Don't honk your mother and tell her you're brilliant.
Someone, someone, Sodomite sent me a bucket of poop.
Daddy shark.
Bom, bom, bom, bom, bom, bom.
Jar Jar Binks has a Caribbean black accent.
He's a loser little, little titty baby.
I don't want to hate black people.
I don't want Jesus Christ.
Thank you so much, Sherry.
Thank you very much, Sherry.
If you're listening out there and you're thinking, hey, I like what these guys do.
I'd like to support their efforts.
You can do that by going to our website.
It's knowledgefight.com.
There's a button on there that says support the show and we would appreciate it.
Indeed we would.
So Jordan, today what we're doing is we are staying in 2012.
Oh man.
We are continuing the investigation into what happened in Alex Jones's coverage
after Sandy Hook.
And I know that this is three episodes in a row.
We haven't done three episodes in the same year in a row in a year.
Yeah, it's a little wild.
But one of the reasons it has been three episodes in a row is
we're getting into the investigation.
I think it's important for us to find our feet.
You know, find our base before we have breaks in between the episodes
where we're developing the themes and we're learning more.
We need to get our, you know, groundstone in place.
Currently all our base belong to them.
Right.
Now that is not to say that we will only be doing, you know,
it's not like the next five, ten episodes are all going to be Sandy Hook
investigation episodes.
But for now, it, you know, I don't know what I'm trying to say, but you know,
it's three in a row.
Three in a row.
Is that what, that was all you were trying to say, isn't it?
Three in a row.
I guess there was a lot more to go on.
Felt like I had a point and then they started talking and I didn't.
That's what happened.
Happened sometimes.
That does happen sometimes.
So today, Jordan, we're going to be going over December 17th and 18th.
Last we left off, we covered the Sunday show on the 16th and Alex was,
it seemed like he had found his moral center and that was defending guns.
Right.
And now we have the Monday show.
So it's back to the regular week and you wonder if that's going to change
anything, if that's going to have a different feel than his Sunday show.
And I'll say a lot of it is still just about defending guns.
Yeah, I, I'm not surprised by that.
I'm not surprised that anytime there's a threat to guns, he's going to spend
the next week being like, oh, it's every, people get killed all the time by knives
and shit, man.
But there are some interesting developments that go along the way, some
interesting pieces of his rhetoric that enter the conversation that haven't so
much in the past.
And it's interesting because it, this gave me an opportunity to look into
them a little bit more.
And his first clip is actually a great example of that.
Alex trying to reinforce his insinuation that the government probably
did Sandy Hook without full throatedly saying it.
Okay.
It, as we've heard so far, he's compared it to all these other things
that he believes are fake, whether it's the Aurora shooting, whether
it's Kaczynski, that sort of stuff.
And now he pulls up an interesting piece of history to bring it to the
conversation.
There are some government operations where they've been caught red-handed
staging mass shootings, especially in Europe, where our own government
staged them via Operation Gladio and the NATO option.
That has been declassified.
That program went on from the 50s into the 1980s, including mass shootings
at schools, train stations, blowing up school buses, shooting up school
buses, and was used to take guns all over Europe.
And it has been declassified partially by the US, completely by the
Italians, that it was staged to take the liberties and disarm the people.
It sounds like an episode of hate.
So this could be an Operation Gladio op.
Could have been.
Operation Ajax was mass shootings to take the guns in Iran.
In 1953, our government with the British shot up a bunch of Mosque
and then paid the Muslim leadership to call for gun confiscation.
So there's been a lot of different things that have happened.
This Fitch thing, the MO of it, you have a mass guy come in, shoot the
people, they exfiltrate, and then of course you have the drugged up
Patsy, you shoot in the head.
So you can kind of get the sense of what he's trying to insinuate with
this talk of Operation Gladio and Operation Ajax.
Nobody ever brings up Operation Sejak though, because it's very random.
It is.
Yeah, you just go around the wheel.
You never know.
Never know.
You never know bankrupt playing that operation.
Absolutely.
So whenever Alex wants to suggest something, some kind of tragedy is fake
and he needs to prove that what he's saying isn't ludicrous.
There's, if you just want to like not have any real defensibility,
he can point to his Aurora shooting narrative and stuff like that.
And that's good enough for most of the time.
But when he needs to appear like he's not being crazy, he'll
inevitably bring up Operation Gladio and with less regularity, Operation Ajax.
Both of these were ops that were clandestine operations that the government
was involved in to an extent.
They're both fucked up pieces of our history, but if you take a closer
look at them, you'll see that neither of them really help reinforce the
point that he's trying to make, namely that the United States government
is perfectly fine with killing their own civilians in order to take Alex's
guns.
Operation Gladio refers to the stay behind networks that were put in
place in countries throughout Europe after World War two.
The reasoning for creating these secret units was obviously that
they were worried about the Soviet Union and their Warsaw packed
allies invading and having people in place in the country to countries
involved to deal with that possibility was deemed preferable to having large
standing armies or doing what they were doing previous to like in World
War two, having these people who were allied with the cause of fighting
against the Soviet Union, but it was so disorganized that they would
rely on like late night supply drops and fractured communication.
Okay.
Among people.
Yeah.
So they deemed that setting up these cells of people right in secret
operation were the best way to do it.
I don't know.
So was was this also part of Operation Dumbo drop?
It's similar, but without elephants different.
Okay.
I'm intentionally not going to take a stance on their choice, neither
for or against it because I'm not really sure that I can say that I'm
an expert on the factors that led to these countries choosing that path
and to pretend that I am would be dishonest to you and to our listeners.
Right.
That being said, there are a lot of claims about Operation Gladio that
are accepted and repeated in conspiracy circles that are not reflective
of established fact, but based solely on assumptions.
One of these is that the CIA was involved in Gladio.
Another is that the stay behind networks in these countries committed
false flag terror events in order to achieve their political goals.
The basic idea here is that these groups were created to fight back
against the threat of the invasion from the Soviet Union that never
came to exist.
So in order to proceed with the agenda that they were created to push
the appearance of that threat needed to be created.
And thus these groups began fake terror attacks to blame their political
enemies to so to create the perception of Soviet infiltration or whatever.
They would commit these acts that they would blame on Soviet forces or
communists.
Right.
Right.
So the stay behind networks did in fact do that.
That is what the conspiracy world believes.
But we do not know for a fact they did that.
No, a lot of this interpretation comes from a 2004 book by Daniel
Ganser called NATO secret armies, Operation Gladio and terrorism in
Western Europe.
I'm almost certain that this is where Alex is getting his ideas about
Gladio from because his version of it and the one espoused in the book
match almost perfectly.
The bad news about Ganser's book is that it isn't really so much a book
that contains documented history as much as it is a book full of
misused true information mixed up with unfounded assumptions and rumor.
Olav Rist of the Norwegian Institute for Defense Studies was a
researcher on the topic of Norway during the Cold War and he dug up
some information about the actions of stay behind networks in his home
country.
His information is used in Ganser's book and even cited in the bibliography.
Olav found that his primary research was being completely misrepresented
by Ganser saying quote a detailed refutation of the many unfounded
allegations that Ganser accepts as historical findings would fill an
entire book.
Other reviews of his book followed similar patterns.
Hayden Peek an expert who's frequently published in journals
regarding intelligence and operations took a little bit of a stronger
tone than Olav quote proof is a problem for Ganser.
He complains that the outset he was unable to find any official sources
to support his charges of the CIA's or any Western European governments
involvement with Gladio.
Nevertheless, his book devotes 14 chapters to the quote secret war in
various Western nations on his list.
Ganser fails to document his thesis you say 14 14 chapter.
He doesn't know any.
There's zero information 14 chapter but he wrote 14 war that that he had
zero information on zero documented factual information.
Man, that is that is really ringing blood out of a stone then man.
This guy is killing it is good at stretching.
Yeah.
Um, so to finish his quote quote Ganser fails to document his thesis
that the CIA MI six and NATO and its friends turned Gladio into a
terrorist organization, right?
Which is the fundamental assumption and charge that's being made
and the belief that Alex has and a large part of the conspiracy
world has conspiracy theory.
Yeah.
It was the A team who did that.
Could have been all of them.
Could have been face.
Everybody everybody got hired.
They were their mercenaries.
That's why it doesn't matter what country they're in and if you
need a job done right, you got to call the A team.
That's that's true.
They have a good batting average.
Yeah.
So Ganser wrote these things but he didn't prove them but Alex
takes that book or at least the ideas espoused in it as proof
when he really shouldn't especially considering that in 2005 it was
revealed that a lot of Ganser's narrative relies on a historical
forgery that he took to be authentic.
This is what's known as supplement B to the U.S.
Army's field manual 30-31 which purports to be a classified
section of the very real field manual 30-31 but is in fact a forgery
put out in the 1970s by Soviet disinformation teams.
The forge document contains exactly what Alex Jones thinks quote.
There may be times when host country governments show passivity
or indecision in the face of communist or communist inspired
subversion and react with inadequate vigor to intelligence
estimates transmitted by U.S.
agencies such situations are particularly likely to arise
when the insurgency seeks to achieve tactical advantage by
temporarily refraining from violence thus lulling host
country authorities into a state of false security in such cases
U.S.
Army intelligence must have the means of launching special
operations which will convince the host country governments
and public opinion of the reality of the insurgent danger
and of the necessity of counteraction to this end U.S.
Army intelligence should seek to penetrate the insurgency by
means of agents on special assignment with the tasks of
forming special action groups among the more radical elements
of the insurgency when the kind of situation in visit in
visaged above arises these groups acting under U.S.
Army intelligence controls should be used to launch violent
or nonviolent actions according to the nature of the case.
So this is basically the protocols of the writers of the
field manual.
Yeah and well it's Russian propaganda that they are good
man. Right. That sounds great. Right. He should have known
it was a forgery when he saw that it was written in crayon
though. It's all that is a big red flag. Another big red flag
is it's almost too good. You know it's it's kind of exactly
what you would need to prove exactly that everything is fake
right or whatever and it it's not if you exclude this document
that serious scholars and formal investigations have ruled to
be a forgery then the evidence that the stay behind networks
that were part of operation gladio actually committed any
false flag terrorism completely falls apart in the interest
of fairness there have been some indications that old weapons
caches from gladio style stay behind networks very may well
have been used in later terrorist attacks and even if
that's true that's a far cry from proving that the CIA or MI
6 converted these groups into terrorist groups. There's a
hundred other explanations that could account for that.
So I don't take that to be like a good piece of evidence of
from Alex's like it doesn't sound great. No, no, it falls
apart. Yeah, when you look at it. So operation gladio for me is
kind of out the window. I'm still bummed about the 14 chapters.
You know, I have a hard time. I have a hard time writing that
much when I do have all the information. That's that's too
many words. Yeah, but if you think you're like breaking
something that'll change the world, some sort of news that
will change the world. I imagine it gets those. So he's
writing like Jack Kerouac is what you're saying. He's got
the spirit flowing. He's got the he's got the scroll going
down. Gotcha. And as for operation Ajax, Jordan, that
one is more real, but Alex isn't really using it correctly.
That operation refers to the CIA is 1953 overthrow of Muhammad
Mossadak and the reinstallation of the Shah into his dictatorship
over Iran. While this is a great example of the CIA doing
something underhanded and what you could easily call evil.
It doesn't really work to help Alex's point about the
globalists doing false flags in the United States for one
pretty big reason and that is motive. Operation Ajax happened
because Mossadak was leading a massively popular drive to
nationalize the oil assets of the British company in charge
of their oil, the Anglo Iranian oil company, which was a huge
threat to a lot of people's profits. The CIA rationalized
overthrowing Mossadak by appealing to the idea that if
they allowed him to take over Iran, all the oil would be in
the hands of communists and that would be a real problem.
Yeah, self determination for sovereign states is ah, we can't
have that. It was 1953 after that sort of mentality was quite
widespread. It's so good that we're done overthrowing people.
Riots were manufactured and the Shah swept in and removed
Mossadak from power with the full support of the U.S.
government at MI6 because they knew he would be easier to
play ball with. Of course, that is the choice that was made.
That is kind of how we do things. I know history is more
complicated than that brief summation of it. But the thing
that sticks out to me is that Alex is way out of line using
this as a piece of evidence to support his worldview. All of
his narratives are built on the backs of people who existed
solely to demonize communism. He loves the John Birch
society and all the most virulent anti communist weasels
you can find. He excuses all sorts of evil in the name of
saying at least it's not communism. And guess what?
That's exactly the reasoning the CIA used his propaganda to
justify reinstalling the Shah who would go out to be a go on
to be the dictator of Iran for quite a while afterwards.
Yeah, yeah, the people that he has as spiritual mentors and
what guides his whole sort of philosophy and worldview is
exactly the same thing that the CIA used to justify their
actions.
Yeah, that's ironic. It is a little bit. It's a little
ironic. We move along here. Sorry, that was a lot up top.
But that's alright. You know, it's just how the clip you got
you got you got through it. So in this next clip, Alex
discusses the actual shooting and where he stands on December
17th. So this could be a staged event. What we do know is
staged is the crocodile tears. Ridiculous behavior of Obama
milking this for every disgusting ounce he can get.
So Obama has given his speech where he cries and Alex is
dead certain that he was fake crying, which is also deeply
ironic. Yeah, man, and the fact that he's saying that there
are that it's like he's milking this for everything it's worth
and it's like, dude, what are you doing? Yeah, you are milking
this for everything. It's worse. Yeah, right wing propaganda
machine is milking this and it gets worse as we go along.
But Barack Obama is just like, Hey, can we not have kids die
all the time anymore? That's nice. Yeah. And you know, sort
of relating as a human and a parent and right the idea of
getting emotional is not like that. I don't know. I think I
think that certainly was more authentic than the many times
we've heard Alex fake cry. Yeah, absolutely. But I think it's
interesting because that's the first instance of two major
instances on this episode that I think Alex is projecting on
to Obama what he would do in these circumstances. Of course.
So the first one here is fake cry. He sees Obama crying on
television. He's like that. He's like every time I cry, it's
fake. So it must be fake with this guy. Yeah, any any outpouring
or expression of emotion that shows non masculinity in Alex's
definition, I guess must be performative. Yeah. And so he's
like Obama, your fake crying. I know because I do it all the
time. Exactly. That's how I hear that. Listen up. It takes
one to know one asshole. Yeah. But I think you wouldn't do you
know, you wouldn't be saying that if he wasn't just so
suspicious about this shooting. So suspicious. But you know
what? He's not the only one who's suspicious, at least not
in still occupied Texas at this point. All I'm doing is saying
their war drums are going full blast. Get ready. Everyone I've
talked to now says their spidey sense is off the chart. Not
only over these 20 dead kids, I told my wife that night and
that morning that I felt physically ill. And she said
what's going on? I said they're coming. They're coming for
everything. I've talked to everybody around the office.
They've had the same feelings. I know you're having it. That's
your gut instinct God gave you. But intellectually you can see
what they're doing politically. I mean that folks that we're
entering the prime zone as I said a month ago of mass shootings
federal buildings being blown up. They're going to blame it
on the preppers and the Patriots stay with us. So because
you guys do it all the time. It does seem like stop doing it
and then we'll stop blaming it on you. You know, if the right
wing terrorists weren't right wearing terror ring all the
time and it's all just fake. Why is it that so much more has
happened when there's a Republican president in office? It
would encourage is it? Yeah, and it would stand a reason that
more of it would be happening during Obama's presidency. If
it was false flags. Whereas if it were a real right wing
terror because that arguments that's an impossible or a boros
argument because Alex would just say no because the globalists
are now panicked because of how powerful and popular Trump is
that they're going into overdrive. But that's insane. Of
course it is. It's all insane. No, I know it's no matter what
no matter what happens the argument fits and that's why
it's a bad argument, right? But it's an even worse argument
because it's a bad idea. Yep, like it's why is it disagree with
that? Why is it that all of his conspiracy theories about
these globalists are them coming up with utterly silly and
stupid plans that he thinks he's going to take down mainly
because they're so stupid. It wouldn't be hard to take down
those plans. No, which plans the if you're gonna if you're
gonna come up with this whole like, oh, the globalists are
panicking more now. So they're doing more right wing terror
attacks. That's going to backfire miserably. It's only going
to inspire more right wing terror or desensitize people to
the effects of right wing terror. So that doesn't make any
fucking sense. Well, because it doesn't seem like in the
instances that these things have happened in the past,
anything against the right wing has actually been done. Exactly.
So yeah, it does seem like it would be a even when they would
be the globalists fishing in a dry well. Yeah, even when the
globalists put out this massive document terror, calling all
of us terrorists or patriots, they just got rid of it in like
two seconds because you guys bitched the whole time. Yeah,
it shows a little bit of a yeah, kind of as a counter example
to the globalists for being bad at their jobs. That's what
I'm really mad at these hypothetical imaginary people
are bad at their imaginary jobs. Exactly. Yeah, frustrating.
So Alex thinks that like he's being blamed for this because
he always does. He always feels personally blamed for
things because he doesn't understand what's going on in
the world and stuff like that. He doesn't only reads headlines
who doesn't understand what people are actually saying.
And this next clip is a great example of that. I've got daily
mail, foreign affairs, Washington Post, you've seen it CNN,
CBS, all saying preppers did this. There's one of the
headlines right here. New Town in the doomsday preppers,
foreign affairs, a division of the Washington Post, foreign
policy.com. I mean, this is absolutely incredible that all
of this is going on. It is incredible. It is very incredible,
especially because Alex is referring to an article in foreign
policy, not foreign affairs, but it seems like the way he's
talking about it doesn't realize those are two different
publications. No, it doesn't sound like which does not inspire
confidence. No, that's not a good sign. Beyond that he clearly
didn't read this article. He just read the headline. The body
of the text discusses how a lot of preppers are acting out of
rational concerns about being ready for a disaster and the
people who mock them often change their tune real fast when
a hurricane comes right or something like that. The article
is about early indications that Adam Land's mom was a bit of
a survivalist prepper. But if Alex had read the article, it
says toward the end quote, the extremity of Adam Land's crime
has created a desperate desire for explanations and dismissing
him as a crazy survivalist or the son of a crazy survivalist
will likely prove irresistible for many people trying to make
sense of a senseless act. But the ultimate truth of his motive
is not likely to be so simplistic. Additional information
will emerge over the coming days, but we may never know really
why Landza killed his mother and so many innocent teachers
and children understanding the context of his actions may
provide useful insights that could prevent future incidents,
but gross oversimplifications will only stand in the way. The
article is literally a voice of caution warning people that
labeling Landza as a prepper and using that to explain his act
is somehow or it is something that will stand in the way of
future understanding of the tragedy. That's literally the
opposite of what Alex is saying. But I don't think Alex
could ever actually like disregarding the fact that Alex
can't read. Even if he could read those sentences are would
like just short circuit his brain like he would white out and
it would just be on the floor and he'd be like I'm going to
pretend those didn't exist compared to what he pretends to
read or what he claims to read. Those are simple fucking
sense. Exactly. But what they mean is so hurtful to him.
It's not. It's supportive of his worldview. Exactly. He's
defending the worst thing that could happen with this article.
Yeah, but he can't be them. He can't be. He can't allow them
to be supporting his articles or his his ideas. He needs to be
the victim. I got bad news. He fucking needs to because he's
reporting on this stuff in the wake of a giant mass shooting
of at an elementary school. He can't play fast and loose with
this stuff. These really he is. Why is he going to get sued?
Well, I hope a couple years later. It's that it's that you
know the oversimplifications only stand in the way. Alex is
embodying the last sentence of this article. Right. Exactly.
That's what I'm saying. That's what I'm saying. If it doesn't
even matter what they say, when you hear the words when Alex
reads the words over simplification, he's like,
No, that's what I do. Stop it. Don't don't tell me not to
oversimplify. That's the only thing I know how to do. Stop
it, which might be why I mean it's but it's probably best if
he just reads headlines then because then he can sort of
feign ignorance or something like that. Right. That's true.
If he just came out with it and said, I don't care much for
articles. I like to just read headlines. I'm he could pull
off like his I'm a Gerald Salenti style trends forecaster.
All you need is the headlines to get the trend. Right. All I'm
doing is expressing the vibe I'm getting. Yeah, or whatever.
But then he wouldn't be able to pretend he's really smart and
research. Exactly. So it's kind of can't really have both.
I mean, he has read over 100 books on World War two, I guess
that's so that's fine read the title. Yeah, 200 books. Yeah.
So at this point, we are still seeing him sort of wanting to
say it's fake, relating the event to other things that he
thinks are fake. And that sort of thing. And in this next
clip, there's another implication that he thinks this
was fake.
You see, the government has lost the trust of the people
and they know that. So they're basically saying anyone that
doesn't trust us and doesn't want to be robbed by the
government is a terrorist. And I'm telling you, they're getting
ready to stage more mass shootings and events. Stay with
us. Okay, so it's clear from the language there when he says
they're getting ready to plan and stage more fake shootings
and stuff like that. It's not really clear if he's saying
that is like Sandy Hook was one and there will be more or if
it's the other ones that he talks about. So I'm presenting
that as a little bit of like, this is shrubbery around the
the house that's being built of our investigation. Okay, it's
just more it's more evidence that he just thinks everything's
fake. Yeah, frankly. Yeah, I don't I don't like the I mean,
it stands to reason if you are saying immediately following a
mass shooting, they are planning to stage more mass
shootings. It follows that you think that mass shooting was
staged and it's inescapable that people listening to it would
take that. Yeah, and it wouldn't be crazy of them to take that
understanding. It's the only thing that makes sense. And if
it's not, you're doing a bad job talking. So stop it. So that's
just sort of to give you a little bit of the flavor of things
here. And it gets back to talking about gun grabbing. And
these gun grabbers that are going around, they want to grab
your guns. But he also that's not the best way to do it either.
Like I wouldn't this is another problem with the globalist
plans. Don't grab guns. Ask people politely to give them to
you. It's way better. People with guns don't respond well to
polite request. They don't respond well to grabs. Nope. Don't
respond well to anything. No, it turns out. So let's just move
on to this next clip. Okay, where he talks about how the
systems at war with him. And then he says something else that
in the same way as that clip a couple ones back. It's sort of
unclear if he's referring to Sandy Hook when he says something
about shootings being fake, but in exactly the same way you
brought up, it's only reasonable to assume that the one that
is most recent and he has been talking about is what he's
referring to. Right. It's very complicated. The system is panicking.
It's run by foreign banks that have looted Europe and are now
looting us engaged in all sorts of crime in front of us, arming
to the teeth against us with armored vehicles and tanks,
being cash in every town and city. Marshall law being
incrementally turned on TSA on the streets. All of this being
done in the name of al Qaeda, then they flip the script and
say no, no, no, it's for preppers. It's for conservatives. Now
the rollout starts and they create the simulation 20 dead kids
from some person under psychiatric care undoubtedly on drugs
video game head. So the simulation. Yeah, that's tough. Because
I actually introduced that poorly. I forgot that he literally
said the 20 dead kids. Yeah. Yeah. That one said that one says
this is fake. Yeah. That one says this is fake. Yeah. But
it but the way he's saying a simulation, it's it's too vague
to really nail in like what version like what does he mean
by that? Right. Does he mean that they created that simulation
before? Because if they created that simulation before, then
it would only make sense for them to then have followed through
with it. It's hard to say at this point or it is a simulation
by them pretending that it happened currently, right? Or
they're simulating the fallout from what no, there's no way
that means that means he says it's staged. Well, I can see one
version of it that isn't that what that is that the shooting
itself happened whether or not the government staged it or
not whatever it happened. Yeah. And then the simulation that
he's referring to is the way it's being framed by the media
or something like that. Yeah, I could see that being a position
he could defend. It's thin. No, it's thin. No, it's thin. No
chance. I look, I have to extend all the possibilities. That
is one version of it. I could see it's unlikely how much
nuance is involved in that a lot. Then it didn't exist. It's
probably not real. It's not real. It doesn't if there's
nuance involved. Alex doesn't understand it. Aggressive doubt
benefited. That is too much. That is too much. It might be
but I'm not going to give him any of that shit. He just said
that Sandy Hook was stage but short any other like the sort
of corroborating pieces. I'm not willing to accept that as like
a full throated. Everything was fake or anything like that.
I'm gonna go with an indication of where his head is. Yeah.
And how he's speaking. Well, one of the things that I feel
like needs to be pointed out is he is absolutely certain
it's real. And I will tell you my my reasoning for that is he
is coming up with more and more supervillains in this story
and different angles of attack for them to be making towards
gun people. Sure. So he's coming up with. All right. Now
it's these foreign bankers. All right. Now it's the the
government itself who's trying to come take your guns. All
right. Now it's Obama's rogue at leftist elements of the
government trying to take your guns. Every he's trying to get
everybody everybody involved in this or to try and on shoes
see which one fits. Yeah, figure out which which is the
you think he could walk around right. He's throwing shit at
the wall to find out who people are going to react with the
most. Yeah, that's that's a very likely possibility. So earlier
he was saying that Obama was fake crying which I think is a
huge projection on his part and here is the second clip where
I think he is projecting a little bit. Again, the system
needs to be relevant. It needs to be able to grandstand and
make you watch it. The mainstream media needs this because
no one watches them unless there's a big mass shooting and
then Obama whose normal White House videos get about 10,000
views. If you go to White House official channel on YouTube
gets about 10,000 views shit his videos. Oh, he gets to have
four or five million now on his videos when this wow see
fucking wow. Alex seems to be implying that Obama either
staged this shooting or is behaving in response to the
shooting the way he is to get more traffic to his YouTube.
Yeah, I think that I think what he's trying to say is that
Obama staged the shooting for ads. So for views for views for
ad revenue and that is exactly what Alex is wishing he could
do right now 100% if Alex could get away with staging something
like that like some giant publicity event like I don't
know it's like starting some sort of fight with some famous
podcaster. Oh, if he could stage any number of different
events that are not true and are not based on anything real
in order to get views then of course the president would
kill kids. Yeah, he's so he's so nuts that like the only way
he can really understand other people's actions and reactions
to things is how he would react right and the way he would
react to this if he had to give a speech in Newtown is to fake
cry because he needs to you know, bring the emotions or
whatever because on a cognitive level he knows that
that's the response people have I need to be I need to mirror
humans right. Yeah, he's like an alien. And so he accuses Obama
of fake crying and he knows that he would use something like
this in order to get more publicity and traffic. Of
course. So he accuses Obama of his videos being manipulative
or or whatever if that and that's the most generous version
because Obama killed kids for views. Right. Yeah. Yeah.
That is another interpretation of that clip which is just
fucked up. Wow. Yeah, it's as brain works. So that's how his
brain works but his gut is a slightly different matter and
in this next clip he says what his gut feels. We knew this
was coming and you know my gut tells me because of what we
know about other shooters and that being swept under the rug
and report of a guy in a mask and then reports of other
shooters and then who this guy's dad was high level GE exec
we're getting some intel right now. It looks bad. They
probably had some globalist grease mommy get him wound up
drugged out get him in there shoot him because this has been
done before then have your real group that did it exit but
even if that's not the case it's cultural mind control the
television the shooter video games designed by the Pentagon
to make you kill instinctively and uncaringly in a program
trained fashion. This is so weak man. This is this is
absolutely weak because he's suggesting exactly what he wants
to report as his angle which is that right they greased mom
and then drugged up the kid. Yeah, we got it. We got another
angle of attack for these different villain globalists
but he's not ready to do that for whatever reason and so
he's couching that with like even if that's not the case it's
all social brainwashing. Yeah. Cool. I don't say anything.
You don't have to do any of this. He could defend guns without
this. This stuff is completely superfluous. That's not as a
good point. It's wild. He could point. He's just getting
himself in trouble because well because he needs more clicks
right. The same thing he's accusing Obama of is what is
going to I'm more convinced than ever what is going to lead him
to make the unforced errors. Yeah. That he makes as we go
through this. Yeah. It's just so stupid. Oh man. Here's what
he could have said. This is a tragedy. Mm hmm. That's it.
Well and even if you could have just stopped that you could
also say this is a tragedy but we have you know we have to keep
moving forward as a country. I firmly believe that the Second
Amendment is one of the most important things. We cannot
allow our emotions to override our political principles and
while we honor and mourn the loss of life and extend
condolences to the families we also will not bend on our
convictions or whatever. There is a way. Damn can you imagine
him saying that. No fuck no. No I know but I mean like just
no I mean just like reading those words. No. You know like
saying like because of course he couldn't come up off the top
freestyle. Yeah. You just freestyled a very kind thing.
Still felt dirty. It's awful. Yeah. No it's miserable but can
you imagine him like just reading those words hearing his
voice say those words. I can't imagine like even if he was
doing voice over for a Jim Jarmusch movie you'd still be
like. Condolence. I'm just saying I'm just saying that I
think that there's a way that he could achieve all of the
political goals he thinks he's achieving or trying to achieve
yeah without doing any of the stuff that's bad. No this is
all bad. Yeah. So in that last clip he said that his gut was
telling him all these things about how the globalists took
him in there and did all the blah blah blah and then you
know hey that's just his gut. Right. Unfortunately my guts
telling me he's shooting himself in the dick. That's just me.
Well he does explain in this next clip that whenever he
trusts his feelings he's always right. My whole life I haven't
gone off my feelings and every time I don't follow my feelings
it's bad. Every time I follow my feelings it's right and man
I've told you used to I was getting chills like maybe twice
a year when I saw something happening then I started getting
chills every week that every day now it's just one big chill
and something bad's about to happen. Correction something bad
did happen. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And also I
would say everything that we're seeing in this snapshot so far
of this end of 2012 period is a condemnation of his gut. It is
like we know. Oh yeah. We know that this is a prime example
of him his gut leading him down a horrible road. So no you
should not listen to your gut Alex your gut is unhealthy.
That is that is so. Wow. The idea that he would say my gut
tells me something bad is about to happen. It's wild. Yeah.
After that phrase a massive school shooting. Yeah. Yeah.
But he's like man that's fucked up. Well he's trying to
minimize it to a lot in the in the sense of like everyone's
demonizing mass shootings and stuff like that but more people
are killed by deer every year and stuff like that. And it's
like hey sure I mean if you want to go based on numbers fine
but if you want to extend that metaphor even further what you
should then be like the analog is putting up signs in places
where there's lots of deer that's a that's sort of a government
action that tries to limit the damage of deer on highways
and stuff like that. Well Chicago has one of the strictest
deer control laws in the country but we get all of our deer
just coming in from Indiana. Right. Like it's brutal. Right.
You know what I'm saying. Like they're federal deer control
laws. There aren't like he would be the one if if he was like
super passionate about like if the Second Amendment was about
deer like he would be the one saying like deer or free to
roam. You can't put up a sign here. Yeah. That's demonizing
the deer. Yeah. That's the equivalent of what he's doing
about guns. So yes people do hit a lot about a lot of damage
demonizing the deer. Don't demonize deer. You know what I'm
saying. Yeah. I do know what you're saying. So I don't know
in his conception whatever he thinks is coming is worse than
the shooting. Yeah. In as much as he thinks that they're going
to take the guns and then there's going to be a civil war.
Yeah. So do you know it's way worse than a lot of children
being murdered and nothing being done about it. And so more
and more children are murdered. The idea that he wouldn't be
allowed to have assault rifles. But it's the worst thing.
It's less that I promise you it's less that although that is
a big piece of it then that he foresees a civil war coming
because of the gun grabbers. Right. So if you look at if you
think about the loss of life that would come from an all out
civil war you could say that that might be worse than a
school shooting. I don't think it would be a civil war more
like it would be like the entire country going like holy
shit guys you are fucking crazy. And then the one percent of
the country that owns all of our guns would be like I guess
we're going out in a blaze of glory. That's they're they're
all living the remember the alibi they would kill so many
innocent I know I'm not I'm not saying that I'm just saying
it's not a civil war. It would be a massacre. I'm saying the
scale of that is what he's saying is worse than a school
shooting. Right. Not just the abstract idea of him losing a
gun. Right. I know it's an unnecessary defense but I just
don't want to be sitting here being like all he cares about
is keeping his gun. He is still I mean it's ludicrous for him
to even like suggest that it's a likely outcome of things but
at least what he's talking about isn't just that you know it
isn't just his I guess I'll give you that one. I think you
have to because it is different. I get it. I just don't buy
his whole civil war bullshit. No of course not. It's absurd.
Yeah. But it's where his head is. All right. You got to meet
him halfway. All right. So all this is going on getting
harder and harder to meet him halfway. It's true. So he's
terrified. There's a lot of bad stuff going on. It's all a mess
and you might be asking yourself is it time to pray. Do you
think it's time to pray. No it hasn't been time to pray since
early 2017. Let's see if it's time to pray. I just commit
myself in the hands of God. That's all I can say and and and
I want to say this. I keep meaning to say a prayer on air
but I don't feel worthy to say a prayer on air. I feel humble.
I think God would be kind of pissed about it. He said he
didn't like that shit. I just love my children so much and I
love my children so much in their innocence. I love other
people's children. I know what everybody's thinking and saying
who's got children. That's why the globalists use the murder
of children to control us and it makes me so mad at the
Democrats who are just murdering children everywhere with
wanton abandon. So I hate him so much when he goes on to talk
about how like they're you know kids are killed in foreign
countries as a byproduct of our foreign policy and yeah fair
point. Yeah doesn't doesn't help here all that much but
when he says the like they they're using the deaths of these
children in order to push you know that stuff it does imply
there's a fakeness but it also still could be just in the
use of the story in the media afterwards. God this is just
edging just edging and this isn't going to help because it
has to do with prophetic dreams. Of course and one of our
reporters I didn't ask permission and I don't know if he
wants me to tell the story but I'll I won't I won't tell it
was he wants to tell it. He said you know I talked to my wife
she had a horrible nightmare that night of men repelling down
into a school. He just proceeds to tell the story. He says
that he's not going to tell. Yeah that's wild. Yeah that's so
rude. No and shooting little kids and his wife's a teacher
and it was one of those dreams that upset her so bad she called
her friends about it. See I've had dreams that actually come
true before that I've told people about and then they come
through six months later. And as I walked around the corner
and this guy tried to mug me. I had a sick feeling walk around
the corner going I've been here before and it was the dream
and the guy and the shirt and everything. But but again I'm
not getting off into mumbo jumbo here the point is is that I
told everybody I'm physically sick that whole week I said I
something bad and it's not just the murder of these three
little precious children. It's that they're launching this is
the bugles sounding the charge is on they're coming they're
coming. So somebody knows that a prophetic dream about this
and then he relates it to a time that he had a literal prophetic
dream which does seem to imply that this person who's like
info wars employees spouse did have a prophetic dream which
doesn't tend to imply that what happened evidenced by this
prophetic dream is people repelling into the school and
shooting kits. It is amazing. I have not seen too many media
organizations who have hired so many mediums. Yeah. And
psychics and there's a lot of real people. Yeah. Yeah.
Organization. Yeah. It's it's like the info wars men the info
wars X men like that's what he's he's established. Alex's
school for gifted children. Yeah. Perhaps. Yeah. It is weird.
You'd think that if the guy running the place was a psychic
statistically actually. Yeah. He would hire more psychics than
other probably hire all psychics. Yeah. Yeah. Maybe the
problem is he's not hiring enough psychics. That could be.
Yeah. That could be maybe because he's a psychic that goes on
his gut. Yeah. His gut isn't psychic. His gut is definitely
not psychic. Neither is his brain. That clip was really weird.
I found that to have no place in a show in the week after
safety hook. No. Relying on sort of you know paranoia
paranormal type ideas and then be like I'm not into mumbo
jumbo like you are you are literally doing that right now.
You just said you were a psychic. Yeah. Yeah. So Alex is
psychic. He's got a team of psychics working for him. Yeah.
They still can't predict shit. But in this next clip Alex
talks about how frustrated he is at how how awake he is about
the globalists and all of that. He's so it's so frustrating
to be so right all the time. Being this awake is exhausting.
I mean I'll just tell you right now because and it's
frustrating to know how wicked these Democratic Party
operatives are how bad they are how evil they are how
duplicitous how murderous. And you know I try to hold back
my gut tells me the White House people controlling the
governments were involved in this. That's what my gut tells
me. Okay. All right. All right. All right. All right. Well
there it is. We've turned the corner false flag. Yep. There
it is. That's pretty over but again it's still the super
like unsatisfying thing where he's saying it's still like
this is what my gut tells me it is. Yeah but he says his gut
is always 100% right. And he's psychic. Sure. I get that.
I'm not giving you this one. No I know this is 100% he's
saying that it's staged. If you if you include the premise
my gut is never wrong. Yes. That is what he's saying. But
it's taking his red. I think it is. Yeah. But if you're
some are giving way too much better than the doubt on this
one because I'm trying to look at this from like a structural
perspective. I'm trying to look at this like as if I were an
entirely unbiased observer who's like all of his bullshit
talk about his gut. Just throw that out the window. I still
think he's couching his language and maybe that's the more
important piece. He's couching his language and not saying
guys this was fake. The White House was involved. Right.
Something like that. Right. He's still relying on that
secondary premise in order to fill in the gaps in his
listeners mind. I guess as opposed to overtly making the
statement. Right. Right. Right. And the overtness is the
point I'm far more interested in or at least I think that's
you know where the the conversation changes although
that is fucking over. Yeah. That is really that is pretty
crazily over. I think I think you're over correcting for
your unbiased listener because even an unbiased listener
were they to listen to like this in succession like all of
these clips in a row they'd be like yeah yeah yeah that's
happening. If it was one of those if it was any one of the
clips that you have put together an unbiased observer
would be like that's not one hundred percent proof. But
when you got six in a row yeah they're like come on man.
I am over correcting if only because I want to it's it's
tough when you cover a conspiracy theorist and someone
like Alex it is it is the sort of thing where you almost
find yourself making leaps of logic that aren't appropriate
by virtue of him doing it all the time. Right. And so I try
to keep as mindful presence of that in my head when I'm
looking at this stuff that I have to adhere to a pretty strict
this means this this means this yeah kind of last I give into
the temptation to play the games he does right even if it's
I see I see what you're saying because there is a
subconscious desire to play the fun all the new games that he
does yeah he's clearly having a lot of fun. Yeah which is
really disgusting. I don't get to say that I'm a psychic. No
you don't that's fun. No I know it is. Give yourself super
powers to kids. I'm sorry. What would your superpower be being
a fucking Cardinal. That's what it would be. The ability to
transform into any bird I want bad superpower. So earlier you
were asking sort of the idea was like is he implying that the
government and all of them knew in advance and in that last
clip I think he is heavily implying yeah yeah but now he
actually instead of just saying my gut tells me this in this
next clip from December 17th he says something that if he
believes and he's reporting this as a thing that he's like
it's actual a story a news story if he believes this to be
true there is no way that he cannot think that it was planned
ahead of time. Did you know five nights in a row in the build
up. Well the first four nights Monday Tuesday Wednesday
Thursday and then of course Friday the four nights leading
up to the shooting last Friday as those are the days I went
I heard about this from listeners I went and looked it up it
was true CNN and MSNBC both for the four nights leading up
we're doing gun control we've got to ban the semi autos I mean
how much more obvious does this get. Okay come on so come on
he's he's saying come on CNN and MSNBC in preparation for the
shooting yeah had been running pre like preparatory stories
they were priming people to hate guns so whenever a mass
shooting happened that they knew was going to happen or at
least their handlers or whatever yeah higher levels
dictated their propaganda stories sure yeah so that that
come on that's no that one is tough to get around I'm not
sure I can make a good argument for that one get around that
one I don't think I can no that's the first instance I think
of like okay you're now committing to this road you're
beer you're bringing in stuff that listeners have told you
about and you're pretending that you've confirmed yeah and
they are their narratives that only serve to provide some
sort of a structural integrity to your idea that it was fake
yeah that is intent and action encapsulated and even ended
it with saying how much more obvious could this be true
which is which is like if you're saying it's so obvious
that you're saying that it happened the way you're saying
and it obviously did it obviously did yeah and so I think
that this is probably the point at which we can make a
reasonable and fair statement that he believes it's fake yes
yes in in some manner or not or another and it seems pretty
clear that at this point it is that Ethan Hunt came in from
the ceiling and shot the kids yes or whatever so yeah secret
agent within the globalist structure went in there and set
up Adam Lanza right it seems like that is where his head is
he said that the white his gut tells him to the White House
or the people in charge and running things in the White
House were involved I'm almost certain that this is the departure
point absolutely for that he's saying that the government hired
the A team and it will only get worse from there yeah I think
because we know that he never sees the light until no until
much much later in terms of saying till there's a lawsuit
right yeah so I don't I don't know I think it's gonna I think
it's just gonna spiral out of control but he's afraid that
they're gonna take the guns right and one of the things
that he's he's already made the argument and he said a couple
of times that they're ramping up martial law stuff because of
the Sandy Hook shooting I he doesn't use a lot of specifics
right I I'm I just can't get this thought out of my head real
quick I'm we're at a week after Sandy Hook right less than
four days after something like that four days after and three
days three days three days after and it took zero time for him
to then say that it's all the lefts fault oh yeah he is
saying Democrats instead of globalists are interchangeable
at this point yeah exactly does scream a bunch about how the
Republicans are just there to help you the Patriots right
bend over for the Democrats who are the ones who are really
running the ball down the field right for the globalists
right so let's just put this juxtaposition together all
right and maybe this is why we lose Dan we have heard eight
million clips in a row basically saying I think it was fake but
with little different languages and and you're like we're
gonna give you the benefit of the doubt we're gonna give you
the benefit of the doubt I'm gonna try and give you the
benefit of the doubt and it took three days after one of the
worst mass shooting in America at the time for him to say that
it's all Democrats fault I'm just saying Jordan this is why
we lose I feel you on that they don't give a fuck I feel you
on that but I would also stipulate that I wouldn't
respond this way if we were listening to this in 2012 I am
responding the way I am in part because we're listening to this
years later and that's not to say there isn't any stakes
involved in us covering this but it's certainly not the same
as if it was happening in real time in front of us right
if I was listening to these episodes and we were doing
this podcast in 2012 I would probably have responded to the
day of him saying it was fake like with alarms going off
you're like yeah yeah Alex is suggesting this is fake guys
right you know it would have been much more a big deal and I
think one of the reasons I'm giving so many benefits of the
doubt is because I know it's going to get really bad and
it'll be so much worse for him if we're fair yeah that's true
because I don't I don't I'm just I'm just saying that's that's
something that I cannot get out of my head that just like this
is a lesson to learn this is a lesson to learn somewhat I
think I think I think the applying that lesson is on a
case by case basis and you got to be careful with it but
there is that there is a overarching lesson to learn
and the others a lot of times the other side doesn't care as
much as you care and that can be a hindrance but I don't know
I don't I don't know how to I don't know how to apply that
across the board effectively because all it does if it if
you do that across the board then you paint with a broad brush
of all of your perceived enemies and you give yourself
carte blanche to never listen to anybody who might be not a
horrible person I don't think it's so much that's I don't
think that's what that's not what I'm trying to express
there I understand well I understand fully I'm just saying
yeah I'm saying that the lesson is good and the lesson is
often very applicable but if you universalize it it's bad
that's all I'm saying yeah I get what you're saying okay so
let's let's let's let's jump back okay here because I got
some fun stuff here okay so on this show Alex is not done a
lot of news necessarily it's complained about Sandy Hook a
bit and speculated that it's fake but I don't call that news
necessarily now he had that one headline about the prepper
thing which is bogus as hell right as we've discussed and
now he gets into how he thinks that in response to Sandy Hook
they're bringing in martial law he brings up a headline and
it's real whack Paragold Arkansas Mayor Mike Gaskell and
the party don't still will announced a December 14th
town hall meeting the beginning of the 2013 streets of their
city we're going to be patrol by police officers or in SWAT
gear and AR 15s if you're out walking we're going to stop you
ask you why you're out walking and check your ID well that's
called martial law right there but the borders wide open and
the police are ordered to let illegal aliens drunk drive and
do whatever they want cops admit it because it's all a joke
it's about making sure you know you're a slave we've got the
newscast link to it's like the news is like it's great they're
keeping it safe and so we already I mean we got that nice
juxtaposition between you the slave and illegal immigrants
and yeah so at least that's I mean that's pretty consistent
there should have been there should have been a bell that
went off where he was like the mayor of Parasol Arkansas and
the bell goes off and you're like don't care nobody cares nobody
cares Paragold nobody fucking cares about what the mayor of
Paragold the good people don't care don't care we have a lot
of listeners in Paragold care we're big are we insulting our
Paragold people I'm not insulting them I'm just saying as far
as news go I want them to live in martial law as far as news
goes if you bring up Paragold Arkansas I shut down I don't
care I can understand that but conversely I turn on because
that is a specific I can check I find that news story right
it's obviously easy to track down of course so Alex has an
interesting take on the situation out of Paragold Arkansas
he sees a story about police dressed up in SWAT gear patrolling
the streets and he instantly reports on it is somehow being
related to the aftermath of Sandy Hook when it in reality
has nothing to do with that well reporting in the Arkansas
Times reveals that Todd Stovall the Paragold police chief
announced his plans for police and SWAT gear patrolling
citizens in high crime areas in a town hall meeting on December
13th the day before Sandy Hook happened in that clip we just
listened to Alex misreports the date of the meeting as being
December 14th because the way he wants to tell the story is
that this happened as a result of the shooting and as an
example of the globalists using the shooting to bring in
martial law but that story doesn't fly if the meeting happened
the day before yeah anybody else that might be excused as a
slip of the tongue or getting a detail wrong in some sort of
benign way but in this circumstance with this dude that
seems very likely to me to be a straight up lie yeah in order
to serve the narrative especially because it would probably
better serve as narrative if he did say that it was the day
before because then that's the globalist soft launching their
martial law yeah and they're then going to because they're
picking Paragold Arkansas you know where the globalist want
to try out all their new plans right as they say as Paragold
goes so goes the country it's it's a really interesting line
because yes if you could say that they were pushed this the
day before saying to hook in the same way he's saying that
CNN reported these anti gun stories exactly but that doesn't
work if the premise is that this police chiefs actions are
motivated by Sandy Hook he can't have both of those things
right so that's true it has to be after because the
justification has to be Sandy Hook to rationalize martial law
right so that's why he has to lie about the date okay new
theory all right the police chief does this town hall and
does not get a positive reaction oh he doesn't he doesn't
know he doesn't know he doesn't not everybody that clips as
the media is all like oh it's great they were not he everybody
hates it right real bad but he really wants to do this what
does he do goes all the way up Sandy Hook and that's what he
does and then he comes back and he's like see my plan is a
great plan it's time to take over Paragold but even after
saying to hook no one thought it was a good plan so Alex is
also lying about the media and everyone else saying that they
were excited about this idea there was quite a bit of backlash
to Stovell's plans and it's clearly you know it's an
unnecessary move and it would almost certainly be used in a
pretty racist way that's the police their definition of
high crime stop and frisk type behaviors in Arkansas can you
imagine traditionally that's you know it's not been not done
well not not a not the progressive bastion of Paragold
huh no but there's one piece of this whole thing that Alex
isn't talking about and it's not a coincidence that he's not
talking about it you know who's leading the charge against
Stovell's plan of what Alex calls martial law I don't it was
Rita Sklar the executive director of ACLU Arkansas who said
that Stovell had quote zero understanding of constitutional
rights period hmm so the ACLU Alex's sworn enemy and somebody
who he thinks is an arm of the globalist was the one organization
on the ground that was organizing and acting against
this guy's plan to foment martial law in Paragold right
so I can see why the Sklar brothers don't take her with
them on tour but I don't know seems pretty great at what
she there's a good sense of humor in that article that isn't
bad that I mean just saying he has no understanding of
constitutional rights period there's a little bit of that
in there but then her response to one of his comments was just
you could just type out ha
all right get her on tour guys come on you Sklar
oh you're just twins fuck off you could use a sister yeah
so that story Alex is totally wrong about and now in service
of building up his other narrative that he talked a bit
more about on the last episode which was the idea that he's
on Prozac the at these pros and yeah stuff like that and
that's what causes this he brings up another headline and
it's always a problem when he brings up headlines.
Prozac faces ban over suicide fear boom Daily Mail boom got a
level and he says boom.
Is there anything that's going to be dunked on more than any
sentence he says and ends with boom boom any time he's like
see knock it down that one's in my column it is the most
dunkable is the John Madden of yeah of propaganda so it's
clear that Alex didn't read this article either and he only
knows the headline because he's if he presented the contents
of the article it would go a long way to undermining
undermining the essential narrative that he's trying to
present.
Before I get into the article it's important to remember that
he's presenting the idea that the globalists are trying to
get everyone on Prozac because it'll make a certain percentage
of the population kill themselves or kill others and the
globalists can that use those killings as an excuse to carry
out their nefarious plans he's not just a concerned citizen
who thinks a certain medication is dangerous he believes that
evil globalists are giving it to you and the public to fuck
them up now in this article you immediately find some red
flags this Daily Mail article the first is this passage quote
teenagers could be barred from being prescribed Prozac in
other antidepressants amid fears that they may increase the
risk of suicide using antidepressants increase suicide
related behavior in children and adolescents said the London
based European medicine medicines agency the agency did not
find any evidence of deaths caused by the drugs so clearly
the first problem is even the organization that's lobbying to
get Prozac banned admits that they have zero actual cases
where Prozac caused someone's death.
That's a problem for Alex's argument but I'm sure wouldn't
be too hard for him to wiggle out of it by saying they reclassified
death. Yeah sure sure sure sure the bigger problem and the
one he can't wiggle out of is that this band was being
promoted and pushed by the European medicines agency.
Why is that a problem?
Because the EMA was specifically created in 1995 by funding
from the European Union God damn it exclusively to exist as
a body within the EU their website is EMA dot Europa dot
EU and while they used to be based in London they've since
had to relocate to Amsterdam after Brexit because they're
EU body. This is entirely anathema to Alex's narrative.
He's literally saying that the globalists want to give you
Prozac to kill you and at the same time the medical arm of the
EU the world's largest globalist entity is actively
campaigning to ban Prozac in the world of this man who's just
swims in contradictions. This one is still pretty impressive.
Everything he's saying is upside down world.
It's well it's bananas it's not it's an indication that he
doesn't know any of these things right you can just take
it seems like you would you could just say European medicines
agency and kind of guess right like even if it's based in
London this is also pre-Brexit.
Yeah well pre-Brexit when Britain is still in the EU yeah
but it's literally called the European medicines agency.
Yep like it's probably part of the EU.
Yep but that's that to me is evidence that he either didn't
read the article or doesn't give a fuck now he doesn't give a
fuck it well I could also see him not reading the article
because the headline is the sort of thing that leads him to
say boom right so why read the article if the headline it
already delivered it's the perceived slam dunk yeah that's
true it's the equivalent of the slam dunk where you hit the
back of the rim and the ball bounces back like all the way
to half court but you think that you dunked and so you like
flex when you get down to the ground and like.
Wizards era Jordan in the All-Star game you're really
clowning on somebody that you didn't dunk on you know that
sort of thing oh that's kind of the feeling that I have here
but it'd be like if it'd be like if Steph Curry took one of
those threes where he shoots it and it looks so pretty and
he turns around before he even.
Before even before it even goes in he doesn't even need to
watch it go in and it just misses by a mile and nobody tells
everybody just moves on like it didn't happen.
I might have done that once in back when I used to play
basketball yeah and like junior high or something like that
just really got cocky about how good a ball felt coming off
my hands completely missed yeah that's real embarrassing got
a real embarrassing you should probably be the best shooter
in the history of the sport before you start playing around
with those moves well it was you know 13 or whatever and
thought I was hot shit so all this is to say that like it is
this weird line of like.
I think that you have a responsibility to do better
like no matter what no matter what kind of place we're going
to land in terms of his like what version of of Sandy Hook
is fake is he espousing that stuff he has a moral obligation
to do a better job than this and it's evidenced by how bad
these stories that he's using right the things that if you
just read the story it says the opposite of what he says it
is but he uses the headline to reinforce whatever terrible
road he's going down this is the act of a completely
irresponsible person and it's a bad actor it's someone who
has something that they want to work towards as opposed to
find out more about I think we can agree no matter what where
we land on any of that stuff that this next clip is deeply
immoral now this isn't good and for the first time probably
in the you know what this when we're done with this episode
it'll be four days worth of episodes after Sandy Hook
that I've heard of Alex's this is the first time that I sort
of shuttered a little bit thankfully it's not really
about the shooting itself he's trying to make fun of Obama
and his response to the shooting he plays some of Obama's
speech and the way he's acting I find so deeply reprehensible
that I don't know we'll see on the other side how you feel
I bet you'll agree with me.
I know there's not a parent in America who doesn't feel the
same overwhelming grief that I do.
His only grief is that majority of those who died today were
children.
Oh, little kids between the ages of five and 10 years old
well you have grief that the vaccine didn't like kill them
slowly or what.
Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh my gosh, oh my gosh
they're lower mandibles they had their entire lives ahead of
them and I couldn't start their days graduations weddings kids
of their own taxes to pay me in the foreign banks chemotherapy
then he cries out the other among the following were also
teachers and women who devoted their lives to helping our
children there in the victim shooting center.
So our hearts are broken today.
Okay, that's enough.
Yeah, our hearts are broken.
So let me now demonize the second amendment the country
was founded on.
I mean, these are total opportunists.
It's just gross.
It's just it's an inhuman response.
The idea of seeing this person and then be like, oh, well,
you just you just said he couldn't kill him slowly with
vaccines.
He's just mad that they didn't grow up to pay him taxes.
Yeah, this is Westboro Baptist Church heckling at a funeral
kind of thing.
Yeah, it's it's it's bad like it's his response is very very
bad.
Fuck and take an hour off just take an hour off and let that
speech be what it is and then move on.
Don't do that.
That's fucking disgusting.
Yeah, it's pretty bad.
He also accuses Obama of using neuro linguistic programming.
I just didn't I just didn't even include that clip because
it's clear from his words.
He doesn't really understand what that is.
No, and I don't care to get into it.
No, I think what he thinks is he's talking well.
I think Obama is using neuro linguistic programming or oratory.
I think he's implying that he has like he's able to put people
into a trance or something like that.
Yeah, he's using magic words.
Well, that's why he can't allow that he could never ever.
I don't know why he played that speech other than to like I
suppose it's a preemptive defense against empathy because if
he were to have played that speech in its entirety even on
his show, there's no way that his listeners are going to
heckle the same way.
Some of them I'm sure would but there are.
There have to be plenty of his listeners.
There's no way that all of his listeners are psychopaths.
No, and if they were to if you listen to that fucking speech
at the very least, you recognize humanity.
Even if you hate everything Obama stands for, right?
Even if you think he's the worst president in history,
if you just listen to that entire speech uninterrupted,
you're like.
I feel you.
Yeah, but that's yeah, but that's exactly has to heckle.
He has to build up a this this display of like a real emotion
and a real human response to this must be fake.
Lest I be compared to it.
Exactly or something along those lines.
Yeah, I think there's probably a piece of that in there.
So I'm going to skip this next clip because it doesn't really
matter and he says very similar things, but he's just trying
to make the argument that when people get killed with cars,
you know, like blame auto manufacturers and stuff like that.
Sometimes you do.
Well, when there's when they do it stuff like that.
Yeah, sure.
But but he's saying that like when people get killed with guns,
you blame gun organizations and stuff like that.
And one of the reasons for that is because those groups like
the NRA, they lobby against these sort of regulations that
the automobile industry is subject to.
Exactly.
So the conversation isn't you should blame the manufacturer
for making the thing that's used to hurt people.
It's these organizations actively disallow people to take care
of the problems that their products create.
So anyway, I don't really care.
Whatever is next clip.
Alex talks about how he sees more false terrorism coming.
He says that part isn't new, but then he says something at
the end of this that's real, real wild.
It's going to be hammered down folks.
They're going to stage terror attacks and blame it on us.
They're going to just it's going to be battle.
They'll probably release a bio weapon.
Who knows how bad it'll be.
It's just get pray to God is all I can say because let me
tell you something I would not be up here on air.
I would be high tailing it to Ireland or Switzerland.
Not that they're perfect, but I would be, you know, doing
the show every day from from from a studio in Europe only
because I'm a target here.
If I wasn't trusting in God right now, folks, I would be
evacuating right now gone.
Boom.
I mean, this is a real tyranny.
This is an evil illegitimate government that's built
reeducation camps and bought 1.6 billion bullets.
Okay.
Okay.
So I think, you know, why would you want to go to Europe?
Why?
What's what?
They have stronger First Amendment protections there.
Wait, no, they don't.
He hates that they don't have a constitution with them with
the Bill of Rights at all.
He hates the EU.
Why would he flee to you?
Why would he do it?
They get a studio in Europe if he's going to be.
I genuinely think he doesn't think Ireland is part of the
EU.
I genuinely think he's like, it's an island.
It can't be part of the EU.
I think he just, uh, I don't know, but I don't even think
he says that he's Irish generally.
Always talks about his well-shared it.
Yeah.
Switzerland.
I guess I get that the impartiality historically and stuff
like that and Nazi's hiding stuff in the banks.
Lex tax laws.
Yeah, I guess.
I don't know.
It that's just really weird to me, but a lot of those pieces
are, are things that are just super consistent over years
and years.
He was saying that they're going to release a bio weapon.
We fucking heard him say that in 2009.
Yeah.
Says that all the time.
The reeducation camps.
That's just FEMA camp nonsense.
All this is just the same stuff that he's now using to fit the
immediacy of this crisis that he has in front of him.
And that's and even the talking about the fleeing.
That is all he does that all the time.
Well, not, not necessarily all the time, but it's still in
service of this being an immediate thing.
Right.
Which is also a method, uh, not neuro linguistic programming
necessarily, but a way of height, uh, like sort of hacking into
people's brains to make whatever argument you're trying to make
more, um, uh, important, more severe than, uh, it would be heard
otherwise.
If you're, I mean, every, every argument that he's making usually
comes down to an, uh, an adrenal, uh, an appeal to adrenaline,
I suppose, because everything is always, we need to fight this
or we need to run away from this.
Sure.
Like that kind of thing.
It's always fight or flight with that's the dichotomy in that
clip.
Exactly.
I want to, uh, flee, but I'm staying to fight because I trust
God or whatever.
Yeah.
So at this point, we have a new logical fallacy.
I don't know if it's new, but appeal to adrenal.
I'm sure that there is a technical term for that, but, um, at
this point, Alex goes out to break like this, uh, this next
clip and it, it, it made me have a realization that I don't think
I've ever had before and I really should have.
I should have realized this earlier.
Get, get locks in.
We're coming back straight ahead in defense of the Republic.
I'm Alex Jones, your host, transmitting worldwide.
It is to 29 and 36 seconds deep in the heart of former Texas
FEMA Regents, new order occupied territory.
The transmission continues from occupied zone six.
Stay with us.
So the realization that I had is Alex Jones is basically
a militia dork.
He's really, you know, like the way he's like reveling in
talking about like, we're in occupied.
Yeah.
FEMA region six, like all that stuff is like he is like part
of it is this, uh, this sort of spy novel that he's cast himself
in.
Right.
But the other part is, is he's a nerd.
He is a fucking nerd, but without any of the, like intellectual
aspects of it.
Yeah.
He's just the annoying parts of nerds.
Yeah.
He's a civil war reenactor, but on the radio.
Yeah, exactly.
That's, that's a good point.
He would be like the town crier in a civil war reenactment.
Yeah.
If you just lied about stuff.
Yeah.
It's just, it, I don't hear you hear you.
Everything is fine.
I don't know why it stuck out so much to me, but I'm like so
much of his behavior is so dorky.
It is just, it is absurd.
But listening to that clip for some reason, I was like, man,
what are this?
Yeah, especially with a, and of course you don't recognize that
because he comes off posturing is so masculine as this jock.
Yeah.
And then at the, at the heart of it though, he's just like a
little geeky, like, man, wouldn't it be cool if I was in a militia?
Like he's that dude.
Yeah.
And I would assume any real militia person would probably be
able to smell that.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I don't know.
He would get his ass kicked.
It seems like it.
Yeah.
Although every story he tells goes the other way, which is
exactly what a dork would do.
Hey, everybody, Dan here.
Just wanted to take a little break in the episode to call
myself out about something.
So at this point in the episode, Alex has a guest on who I've
never heard on before and has the unfortunately very generic
name, Matt Williams.
He's on to talk to Alex just about how he loves guns.
He's a guy who teaches concealed carry classes and he's just,
you know, it's just fear mongering and paranoia peddling
about the gun grabbers.
Why have you very standard interview?
Not really a whole ton worth going into, but I believed in
the lead up to this episode and my preparation.
I thought I'd figured out who Matt Williams was.
And so a lot of the conversation that Jordan and I had about
the interview, even though the interview itself quite bland
and unnotable, dealt with who I thought he was.
And it turns out that after we had recorded and when I started
editing up the episode, I challenged some of my own
assumptions and wanted to make sure that I was correct about
the me thinking that I figured out who this guy was.
And after giving it another look once over, I'm not confident
that I know who this guy is.
So I removed all of this stuff where we talk about him, which
is why I needed to give you all this little bumper and mostly
also because in this next clip, Alex is going to be talking
to Matt Williams and Matt is going to say something that I
think is really great and I didn't want to cut out of the
episode because I think it's an important piece of the you
know what the episode, but I had to remove the stuff where I
just can't stand behind it got to be on the open up about
this.
So yeah, I guess that's that's that's the situation.
So anyway, back to the episode.
So earlier in the episode, Alex talked to Jesse Ventura.
He had him on and I was very interested to hear what Jesse
Ventura's take on this whole thing was.
It was fine.
There's that's why there's no clips of it. His response to
it is it's a tragedy. Alex. It's as like fine as it can be,
but at the same time he is on the side of arming teachers
and stuff like that. Right.
So that's not great, but it's not really helpful to any of
our investigative purposes. Yeah, it's just like, Oh, you
have that dumb idea. Okay. I was really interested to hear
if he came down on Alex's side on this or anything, but he
he doesn't really just gave a nothing. But he does say that
you should arm the teachers and actually one of his perspective
ideas was take people who are, you know, soldiers in foreign
countries, bring them back, give them jobs at the school
where they're secretly commandos like, oh, no, have them be
the janitor at the school, but they're not the predator.
This is not the predator. This is Jesse Ventura. No, this
is a plot, but that is not a good plan. So that's just one
of your shitty movies, Jesse. Stop it. Yeah. So that's his
idea. And Alex mirrors that at least in terms of like arming
the teachers and that sort of thing. And so he tries to
bring this up to Matt Williams at the end of this this episode.
And Matt accidentally completely destroys the argument that
having teachers be armed is worth a damn.
But I mean, they know right now have the share of train and
deputize whoever wants to be in the school. And then that's
the end of it.
That would be logical to actually implement a deputy officer.
I went to a really bad high school. So we actually had a
substation in our high school. Didn't stop shootings and didn't
stop savings and didn't stop drug activity. So you were in
what was it? Miami or South Miami, Southridge Senior High.
It was a it was back in the 80s in South Florida. So it had
its problems all together.
E Howard Hunt always called it Miami. So that's why I call it
my grandma called it that and she's from Texas.
Miami Miami.
Why do you pronounce it Miami because of E Howard Hunt?
Why wouldn't you?
Alex, why is E Howard Hunt a linguistic reference point for
you? Weird.
That is weird.
And then second, the argument that Alex is making is armed
the teachers have an officer in the school and Matt Williams
responses like yeah, that makes sense. We had a substation in
our school and it didn't do shit. Yeah.
So hey, guess what from the anecdotal evidence that your
gun loving guest is bringing to the table. It doesn't work.
Right.
So you probably abandoned that argument. Alex, what I think
we should do that that veered into silence of the lambs
territory. That one that one didn't that didn't go well.
Buffalo Ventura.
Yeah.
So that brings us to the end of the 17th and we'll jump into
the 18th and there's much less to talk about on the 18th.
The 18th is so much of the same. So much just defending guns.
No real nothing really to speak of necessarily at least big
picture about the like is it fake? Is it not? It's still is
his position is still pretty similar and most of the stuff
in the episode is just not interesting at all. He has an
interview with Larry Pratt, who's the guy who runs the more
extreme NRA group. Great. And it's what you expect. They're
just like, Hey, we love guns. Yeah, who cares? Yeah. It's not
doesn't really help anything. We've already established that
firmly. We love guns in the end word. Don't worry about it.
And they don't like they're not talking about Sandy Hook in
any meaningful way outside of we're afraid that people are
going to use it to take our guns. Right. So that said, there
are a couple things that are important. And the first thing
that's important is at the beginning of this episode, we
get a special report from Mike Adams. Oh, no, not the health
Ranger, the health Ranger. God damn it. Why does the health
Ranger involved? Well, because he loves guns to for a weird I
don't understand why exactly, but they're very healthy, very
healthy. He has one with a salad every morning. He is on and
he's doing this this piece about basically the idea that, Hey,
guns don't kill people people kill people. That sort of thing.
And so what he's doing is he's the video of it is him like
looking at a gun and like trying to make it go off without
his own. Fuck, it's pretty bad. It's much longer than the clip
I'm going to play. But this clip should give you a sense of
where he's at. And guess what it took to actually make it shoot?
It took a human being touching the trigger, making a decision
to pull the trigger in a safe direction. By the way, there's a
backstop over that way. Are you jerking off right now? And
actually having a conscious being do that. The gun didn't kill
anything all by itself. Now I know what you're thinking. Maybe
maybe handguns don't automatically kill people, but
maybe shotguns do. Take our Benelli M4 tactical shotgun. I'm
thinking I want to make sure the camera is on your head on
just about any ranch. It's also great for home defense anywhere.
Let's see if we can make this shoot by itself.
Shoot, shoot, shoot. The right to really take an overcomer.
They're so funny.
What a pathetic shotgun. I know the safety's on.
There we go. God, I want him to hurt himself so bad right now
it'll kill something. I want him to shoot himself in the foot
so bad.
What if he did that? Please blow your own foot off. So Mike
Adams is out here doing a pathetic comedy piece about how
guns don't kill people trying to stress that his gun doesn't
fire by itself and that a person has to do that part. On the
one hand, it's kind of an example of missing the point of
what people are complaining about when they say that guns
kill people. But more importantly, it's just wrong. In
2000, the year 2000, Barbara Barbara accidentally shot her
nine year old son Gus with a Remington model 700. I say
accidentally because she didn't even touch the trigger. The
gun just went off and her son was killed. She decided to take
legal action and it turned out that she wasn't the first person
to experience this from Remington. A class action lawsuit
and a CNBC investigation revealed that as many as 7.5
million guns sold by Remington could be susceptible to a
design flaw where the gun could accidentally fire without the
trigger being pulled. They alleged that at least 100 injuries
and 24 deaths were attributable to this happening. Guns going
off all by themselves without being touched. The very thing
that Mike Adams is mocking the idea of in this field piece.
And the Remington case isn't even close to the only one. In 2013
I was I was sheriff's deputy Chris Carter sued a gun
manufacturer named for Haas Torres after his PT 140 Millennium
Pro pistol spontaneously discharged after it fell out of
his holster. In the suit, it was discovered that nine different
guns Torres produced could potentially fire if they were
quote bumped or dropped or when the safety is on and the trigger
is pulled. That's not good.
You know, that's the type of thing where if you were a car
manufacturer and you made a car that killed people, they would
sue you and then regulations would be passed.
Oh, but all these all these people who have definitely not
received money from the NRA consistently vote against the
idea that you're able to sue gun manufacturers crazy. Yeah.
This problem was estimated as potentially affecting
approximately 956,000 guns in the U.S. alone. The idea that
you had the safety on you pull the trigger could still shoot.
This case was settled in 2016 with Torres offering to repair
or buy back affected guns. But here's where the evil aspect
of this comes in. They weren't required to recall the guns
and as such they didn't have to warn people about the danger
that those almost one million guns posed to law-abiding
completely responsible gun owners.
That is fucking insane.
It's not what yeah, what and the story what the fuck and the
story that brought this to light was a family whose son who
was a responsible shooter ended up shooting himself because
of this malfunction in a tourist gun and they were furious
about the idea that like no one sent out any kind of warning
that you should get your gun checked if you have one of these
guns. Nobody that that God that can't be real. It's real that
can't be part of the fucking crazy. It's so crazy. Part of the
problem is that unlike pretty much every other product that's
sold on the market. There is no governmental body that can
recall a broke ass gun. The gun lobby and people like Alex
have made sure that any attempt in that direction can never go
anywhere. Specifically the NRA had a close relationship with
tourists which explains why they presumably a gun safety
organization didn't warn their members about the danger that
these defective guns posed. All this is to say that Mike Adams
is a fucking idiot. Gun manufacturers rely on people like
him to muddy the water and make sure that people think all
criticisms of their actions are actually veiled attempts to
take everyone's guns when often the criticisms are really as
simple as something like your product is defective and cause
me to kill my own child and you shouldn't be able to sell a
product so severely defective. That's not an attack on the
Second Amendment at all. This is a conversation that like you
you can't have a conversation about reasonable gun ownership
responsible gun rights until you have the same oversight that's
applied to everything else applied to guns as evidence by
these at least and Alex would minimize the spirit of what
24 people were killed by those Remington guns that were
defective. Yes. Yes. 24 people were killed.
I God damn it. God fucking damn it. And that's only that's
only the ones that could be definitively traced back to
this fucking crazy. That is genuinely fucking crazy. That
makes that evil. That's literally evil. It is that is the
definition of literal that. Oh my fucking God.
Yep. And they and the NRA is the NRA didn't even give a fuck
if its members got murdered by these guns or their children
or a specifically went out of their way because they fucking
knew about it. So if you even if you are a gun owner, you
think that you're protected by the NRA's lobbying, they're
actively killing you or at least not caring as you kill your
children or yourself. Yeah, they don't care about the idea
that they it's presented as a gun safety organization when
issues of gun safety like this are ignored. That is disqualifying
as you like you being able to call yourself that if you are a
gun safety organization, then one major thing is you should be
on the side of recalling defective guns because they will
kill people. Yeah, it's not like I don't know maybe a defective
toaster could kill somebody. It could you could get electrocuted
or something like that. But that's why they would get fucking
sued and they would have to recall them. That's why they get
yeah, that's why things are in place fucking lettuce gets
recalled. Right. And lettuce is designed as food not as
specifically put bullets in living things guns big lettuce
that's unreal. Yep. Yep. Because because it's only there's
only two ways to go. There's only two ways to go if you're
the NRA. If you're the NRA you say we need to have these
recalled because this reflects poorly on gun owners. You
would hope that's the direction they'd go right or the other
direction is lobby so fucking hard you immunize every gun
manufacturer to this level to this extent of just you can
kill. Yeah, you can kill go for it. And articles I was reading
to about that specific manufacturer tourists like their
history is super messed up their parent company operates out
of Brazil. And they had bought up a competitor so they
provided like 90% of the guns that were sold and produced in
Brazil. And the Brazilian government has a law in place
where law enforcement has to buy Brazilian made guns. Yeah.
And so they're basically the sole supplier of the military
and police's guns and nine of their models were completely
defective, or at least potentially had the very
serious risk of being completely defective. Well, in in their
defense in future guns, they did market as the unsafety as
opposed to the safety. So I did watch a video two of the guy
who the lawyer who was running that case, like demonstrating
how the defect works, like with an unloaded gun. Yeah, it's
crazy. Because it is like you you watch him very meticulously
turn on the safety, and then pull the trigger. And it's like,
this would have fired. Yeah, it does the exact same thing
through all the safety on. Yeah. And the dude if you read
interviews with him is like, while I filed my briefs and my
lawsuit, one of the things that I put very specifically into
the language was that this has nothing to do with Second
Amendment rights. Yeah, people's rights to have guns. This is
very clearly a product quality. Yeah, exactly. And still
everyone's against it. Yeah, this is just like, Hey, we are
selling this Pinto. We think it's a great idea. We love it. And
it turns out the car lobbies have made it so if your car
explodes, we don't even have to tell anybody. That's unreal.
Keep it on the low. Unreal. Yep. messed up. Wow. So there's
how did that lawyer not just like, rip his hair out, become a
fucking monk. He didn't seem happy. Yeah. So there's breaking
news that has developed on the 18th. And that is that a local
Thai restaurant in Austin. I'm sorry, opened a new branch in
Parigold, Arkansas did not know it's the owner of this Thai
restaurant apparently said in a sense deleted Facebook post.
And when I mean sense, I mean, by the time Alex is reporting on
it, that he fails to give a shit about the kids who died at
Sandy Hook. In as much as I don't care that white children
are being killed. Something along those lines. shitty. Yeah,
not good. Not great. Not a good response. Not great. Pretty
bad. I would say quite bad. So Alex dispatches David Knight
and Jacarie Jackson, right? We got to get the dream team
together to fucking really get to the bottom of this shit and
politely harassed the owner of this Thai restaurant. I will
give you the bad news first. What's that? The show wasn't
there. The show ends before they get back with any report.
Of course. So we have no idea how that went. We might find out
next episode. I'm not entirely sure. But Alex in talking about
this Thai restaurant makes this statement. And he's really
angry about the racism of like I don't care about these white
kids being shot. Yeah, of course he is. And then he says,
this proclamation about what if I did that about other groups
their pad Thai isn't even that good. I'll guarantee you folks
if I got on air when there was say a gangland shooting in
Chicago where a couple of black kids got killed. And if I
said, who cares? They're just, you know, right now. Stop
you know, paraphrase quote. I don't think that I'm not saying
it. They'll cut it out of context. I would be destroyed in
a matter of weeks. I would be off all my affiliates. It would
be over. I mean, so at least 20 times throughout the 17th
and 18th, Alex has said, hey, with these mass shooting
statistics, most of them are just gangs killing each other.
So he has minimized that whole thing. Yep. In listening to
it. I didn't cut those clips on my way through. And I didn't
have an easy way to go back and find all of them to prove
my case. And I was really worried about the idea like Alex
is saying, if I minimize these gang shootings, I would be in
so much trouble. I'd be off the air in a week. I was like, I
really want to demonstrate my point, but I can't go back and
listen to four hours over again and find the clips. Luckily
about five minutes later, he says Jesus fucking Christ. 88
dead and mass shootings. Half of those are more gang related.
It's gangs killing each other and they call it a mass shooting.
That's him minimizing that. And you know what he's saying.
Wow. You know how his code works. Wow. Yep. It's black people
killing each other. And you know how that that's fine. That's
what he's saying. Fucking wow. That's pretty crazy. He's so
mad at this Thai restaurant owner. If I behave that way, I'd
be off the air. Doot, doot, doot, doot. I'm behaving that
way. Here's the problem. Here's the problem. I don't like
siding with the guy who said he doesn't care of white children
get killed. We're not. But I see where he's coming from when
Alex does this shit. I'm not siding with that guy at all.
I'm siding with fine with white people. I'm siding with Alex
being wrong. That's all the side I'm on. Oh, no, I'm just
saying like, if you want to justify a post, look, this is
this is again, the the people who are so afraid of white
genocide are the people who go out of their way to give reasons
for white genocide being a good idea. Perhaps like it's it's
everybody else is fucking like, no, no, no, that's crazy.
That's a terrible idea, except for the people who are afraid of
it, who are like, what if we just colonized a country? Let's
just do that. Like fuck you.
So Alex has had Larry Pratt on earlier on this episode. Like
I said, we're not gonna talk anything about him because the
interviews pointless. It's just I love guns, blah, blah, blah.
But at towards the end of the show, Alex has another guest
on who's a member of Congress. And that's interesting, because
it always blows my mind when anybody from Congress shows up
on Alex's show. It's weird.
I think there's a I think we often forget that there are
465 members of Congress.
Yeah, I mean, this guy is in the house. There's a lot more of
them. Yeah, still you would think it's a position where it
would be unbecoming to go on info war away. There's so many of
those guys who are fucking nuts. I understand that it's still
surprising. Okay, still somehow so unpalatable to me. I mean,
like house like state houses or states and people. Yeah, that's
more understandable. And that's not to impugn the state houses
or state Senate or anything like that. They're just more able
to fly under the radar. Exactly. There you go. That's a huge
part. Yeah. But that is also another huge part of it is we're
coming into it with that sort of present day awareness of Alex
that maybe didn't exist so much in 2012, where there wasn't the
stigma of showing up on here. And maybe this guy wouldn't get
any, you know, bad feedback from it. Yeah, still weird, always
weird. Congressperson on and this is strange. It is, it is a
little bit of like, I have the ability to write federal
legislation means you should not be on info wars. It seems like
yeah.
Ladies and gentlemen, we are joined by Representative Walter B
Jones. And he joins us from his seat there in the Carolinas
north. And he is probably one of the best lawmakers we have in
Congress. And certainly the best out of North Carolina.
He's the best out of North Carolina. Hold on to that thought
for a moment. Walter B Jones was a member of the House of
Representatives from North Carolina serving from 1995 to
February 2019. Actually about 15 days ago from when we're
recording now, when he passed away while in office. So he did
die very recently. Rest in peace. His career in Congress is
one that's particularly difficult to discuss in very simple
terms. For instance, from 1982 to 1992, he was a member of
the North Carolina State House of Representatives, where he'd
been elected as a Democrat. His father Walter Jones senior
had been a member of the US House from 1966 to 1992 when he
also died in office. Walter Jr decided that he wanted to run
for his father's open seat, but failed running as a Democrat.
So he tried again in 1994, this time running as a Republican.
He used this strong anti Bill Clinton sentiment as a weapon
against his opponent, Martin Lancaster, who'd been photographed
jogging with the president. And Jones wrote a wave of midterm
Republican Obama's an opportunist. It's all the Democrats.
They're all opportunists. He wrote that energy and came along
with the 1994 takeover of the House that the Republicans
did. This sort of thing seems to run through his career as a
politician. The changing ideas, I mean, not giving a fuck.
He was initially a firm supporter of invading Iraq, but
later became a harsh critic. He's a member of the Liberty
Caucus and claimed to have libertarian values, but still
cosponsored legislation to ban online gambling. Jones was
the one who in March 2003 furious that France didn't support
the US going to war in Iraq demanded that the Congressional
cafeteria renamed French toast and French fries, freedom toast
and freedom fries. Great. He was that guy. He was that guy.
That's the guy. A 2005 article in The Guardian points out that
the quote, the name change still in force made headlines
around the world, both for what it said about the US French
relations and its pettiness. Yeah, get him that not a surprise
that guy winds up on info wars by that point in 2005, Walter
Jones had already soured on the Iraq war. So when asked about
renaming foods, that whole thing, he said, quote, I wish it
had never happened, which is a strange way to say, quote, I
wish I hadn't done that. Taking responsibility away from
you. No, no, no, he doesn't. It's something that happened. It
happened. It happened. It happened. I was a bystander. It
also should be noted that among the list of his top donors,
you'll find that he's received $53,500 from Northrop Grumman,
$52,500 from Lockheed Martin and $48,200 from the NRA. The
Center for Responsive Politics lists Jones as the largest
recipient of NRA money among North Carolina House members
with the total he received, including expenditures that
they made on his behalf coming in at over $56,000. So it
probably shouldn't surprise anyone that he has an A rating
from the NRA and consistently votes against any common sense
regulations about gun safety. In 2007, Jones voted to ban
gun registration in Washington DC and repeal the law that did
exist on the books about needing to lock up guns. He voted in
2009 to make all state concealed carry permits valid in every
other state, which seems to run counter to the state's rights
ideas that these people profess to have. But I don't know.
Is that it? Is that what we really need to do? Like with
this guy, it's just like, if, if anti gun groups have donated
$48,000 or whatever, would he be anti gun? Is that really all
it is?
I don't think so.
Because it seems like it.
I think it's a huge part of it.
It seems like this guy just doesn't give a fuck.
You'd also need to replace the other 50,000s that are coming
from defense contractors and shit like that.
All right.
Fine.
Is that is that what it is?
Is it just a bidding war for Republican votes?
I think if a lot of that money were to disappear, a lot of
people's impetus to behave the way they do would disappear.
Seems like it.
I think and certainly not all of them, but a lot of them.
Also in 2010, Walter Jones signed a house resolution that
would encourage schools and community organizations to use
the Eddie Eagle gun safe program and encouraged supporting
funding for the program being used in schools.
The Eddie Eagle gun safe program was developed by and run
entirely by the NRA.
That is a super slimy move, right?
And it's just as slimy as Alex Jones having Walter Jones on
his show to spread fear about how the man is coming for your
guns without disclosing that he has accepted money from and
tried to funnel government funds to the NRA, an organization
that exists almost exclusively to disallow the possibility of
having a real conversation about guns in this country.
Whatever else we can say about how Alex responded to Sandy
Hook, these few days that we've heard so far clearly indicate
that his number one priority was to round the wagons and pack
his show with pro gun propagandists.
Unreal.
Yeah, dude.
On fucking real.
Yeah.
Eddie Eagle.
It's is is there is there less evil?
Is there a less evil than they could be doing?
Is there some way we could distract them with keys or something?
You'd hope like just jangle them over the other side and be
like, ah, socialism, we're going to bring it.
And then all the while like sneakily take their guns away
because this is fucking unreal.
It's it's pretty wild.
I don't know.
I don't want to take their guns and no one really actually ever
did, but they sure didn't save one more clip here.
And that is at the end of the show on December 18th.
Alex gets a call from somebody who lives in in Newtown and
someone who their kids went to Sandy Hook.
They don't go there anymore, but they went to the school and
I'm going to play this clip because this clip is firmly
demonstrative that if like Alex can't ever in good conscience
believe that the people at that school were actors.
This clip firmly proves that he has to think that everything
was real and we were involved.
My I was very involved with the school.
I ran the Cub Scouts.
The third and fourth grade out of Sandy Hook Elementary.
I live like a mile down the street.
My wife used to do the Sandy Hook Elementary School clothing
lunch.
We used to sell it.
You know, they do stuff for Christmas and Halloween and you
know, all the holidays they try to represent, you know, by
having some gathering or, you know, parties at the school
at night.
So, you know, we're pretty involved.
We knew a lot of his teachers and I want to thank you first
of all, you know, before I forget to do it, I want to thank
you for everything you do and I want to thank you for putting
up Victoria Soto's picture because she was actually my son
after school tutor, you know, kids who are having problems
with like math or whatever.
She she was a tutor for him for like the last three years.
He was in Sandy Hook Elementary.
So I had conversation with her twice a week.
And folks that don't know who she is, tell them about her.
Well, she was she was a young girl who did she was like a
teacher's assistant and she did like with my son.
He was having trouble with math.
So she would work with the kids after school for an hour,
hour and a half, you know, giving them, you know, extra
tutoring, you know, bringing them up to, you know, the skills
they needed to get through their class and really good girl,
very smart, you know, and my son loved working with her.
You know, he didn't mind being there at all.
And for folks that don't know, she saved a lot of people.
Wow.
And and so he's exasperated there at the end.
He posted a photo of her memorializing her on info wars.com.
He has this guy who's calling in thanking him for that whose
kids went to the school and don't go there anymore because
they're they've aged out.
He's talking about years in the past that they went to
Sandy Hook Elementary School in order for Alex to pivot
his narrative into believing that people were actors and this
was staged, which we do know is an eventual endpoint.
He gets to he has to then believe that they were actors
planted in that school for years.
This guy has experience with these the people who she died.
Yep.
Victoria Soto died at that school and this guy knows that.
He knows her.
I don't I don't I just it's important to it's important to
nail some of those things down in terms of his like how far
it must fall because that is in a vacuum a human response
that he had to that caller.
Yep.
In a vacuum that is okay that saying that she saved children's
lives absolutely.
Amen.
You know giving a respectful hearing to this guy who again
you know Alex Jones's callers are always going to come with
a grain of skepticism but I listened to his entire call.
I don't see any red flags.
He has a lot of details and seems as a very natural way of
speaking about his experiences.
Yeah, I don't he doesn't strike me in the same way as a lot
of Alex's bullshit callers do so I'm ready to accept whatever
he's saying and so is Alex Alex accepts this this is the
reality the reality is tragedy whatever he wants to make on
top of that tragedy in order to defend his guns and his admitted
Lee fucked up fears about a civil war that may come from
the taking of the guns whatever the case is.
Here's what here's the way I want to say this better.
The recognition that you see in that clip is what he exploits
if that makes sense the fact that we know and we can see that
he knows that this is real and this 27 year old teacher at
that school was murdered and he knows he knows that that is
that is a building block of his lies and that makes it so much
worse to me and that's why you have to be fair to him that's
why you have to be fair to him because it makes it so much
worse the same thing we know that we go we go over a lot we
talk about a lot is the like the lies that people tell about
Alex Jones are often spiritually true but they lack
certain amounts of accuracy and the nuance and the accuracy
make it worse than the broad you know Alex Alex lied about
Sandy Hook yeah spiritually true yeah when you dig into the
muck a little bit you you see the ways that he lied about it
and you see the awareness that he had to have known he's lying
about it it it's just it make it goes from opportunistic to
inhuman yeah it's just really really fucking gross it's hard
to like like no matter how many times you're confronted with
the reality of trafficking women you're you're every time
you're just blown away by how cruel and stupid and pointless
human beings can treat other human beings sure you know and
and it's the same way with Alex in this situation where you
just you're just looking at that going like how could a human
being do that what rationalizations do you have to
go through every single night to make it okay for you to wake
up in the next the next day you know like it's it it's so
impossible to to really enter the mind of somebody who is
willing to watch more children die well and not willing to
but actively making it so more children will die well I think
the only explanation for it and it comes back to what I was
saying earlier is that he has to convince himself or he has to
have convinced himself that they are trying to do this to get
guns which will lead to a civil war which will lead to way more
kids being killed or whatever and a greater risk to my
children so if you frame it that way there is an empathic
argument or something you know like there is like an argument
from the saving lives perspective that you could talk
yourself into that the problem with that and the reason I
have a problem with that is that it's such an extreme this will
lead to that it's an extraordinary claim that requires
extraordinary evidence and backing yeah and I can't imagine
being able to convince yourself that that was the reality
without reading all of these things when you are also
somebody who only reads headlines and then reports as if
you understand all and everything about all this stuff
how do you convince yourself that a civil war is coming and
that's what I'm fighting against like how do you how do you
not have like well I'm not sure about how do you not have the
humility or the sort of presence to just be like this is
what I think I might I might be way off on this it the most
gross part about this I think is that we're talking about Alex
Jones this is what you would expect from Alex Jones you know
like we've got to about where what you'd expect to see is
happening exactly not finally it's only been a few no but
but the the and this is part of what makes it so difficult
now is even in 2012 Alex Jones you expect to minimize the
depths of children you expect Alex Jones to do all of these
awful things because he's Alex Jones that's where he's
supposed to exist that was the exact same time every theoretically
reasonable Republican was doing the exact same shit that Alex
Jones was doing dissembling to try and protect guns in any
possible way they could this was not Alex Jones being Alex
Jones this was Alex Jones reflecting mainstream Republican
thought probably being a little ahead of the curve yeah
honestly but yeah still there yeah this is not this is not
some dude out on the fringes no but that also might be a part
of why he has to go further because he is still himself
and maybe that right maybe that's a factor of this that we'll
we'll see as we move along is realizing like I'm not getting
the same adrenaline shot that I usually get from being crazy
from right just defending guns because everyone else is yeah
I'm not supposed to set myself apart from the pack but they're
all crisis actors or whatever yeah it's got to be something
so I think we've seen I think I think first of all this isn't
a hundred percent an investigation to find out when he says
people are actors or anything like that right because I think
that that is a common misconception that that's the only
negative about his coverage I think we've all I think we've
already seen a lot of real negatives and infinite amount
of negative and I think that we you see on the first couple
episodes of this him trying to find his footing and then
finding it a little bit on Sunday but the evolution that
it's taken on Monday and Tuesday here with this like he's
being much more overt about thinking it was fake and that
the government did it he's bringing in he's introducing
new narratives about CNN reporting days before about gun
stuff as a priming the pump kind of thing and then having
these paid gun people on in order to help reinforce his
narratives I think you're seeing a pivoting towards like him
and knowing what he's doing more and I think that's interesting
I think that's a great point I think that that's really
interesting and I think that you could make a demarcation
line on just on the 17th or 18th I'm willing to sort of say
it's vague between you about when like things really the wheels
fell off the wagon there was still a chance he could have
righted the ship based on just his his rank speculation on the
day of right he probably could have found his center and then
on Sunday he's even saying I kind of think that the official
story is right right that sort of thing right so all the way
to the next day and the day after he's just yep and I think
yeah so I'm I'm interested to see how quickly it deteriorates
further but for now it's not good disgusting disgusting so
what's not disgusting is our website nicely all right it is
all right it's at knowledge fight dot com indeed it is what
about our Twitter page it's knowledge underscore fight
what about Facebook we are there we have a group called go home
and tell your mother you're brilliant how about itunes
we're there yep you can subscribe rate review all that
wonderful belly who here's the biggest problem so far with our
Sandy Hook investigation not a lot of people who haven't killed
me not a lot of people who haven't killed a guy I bet that
Walter Jones didn't kill anybody do you yeah I mean he was a
North Carolina House State House member for years and that's
how you get initiated into the state house you gotta get like
jumping someone have you not seen what's going on in North
Carolina right now I don't know about this in North Carolina
why don't you regale me with a story well now North Carolina
did every year since 1874 that was the first state House
election where they all decided that the only way that the
North Carolina State House was going to work is if everybody
agreed to kill a guy so they all got together so you get
they were hoots between each other they they were these big
robes and they just fucking man I don't know I'm so sad
I'm so sad this is so miserable Rita Sklar the executive
director of the ECLU in Arkansas killed anybody I guarantee
she has not killed anybody no and she actually should be
someone Alex looks up to because of her behavior in trying to
fight back against SWAT teams mirroring martial law that Alex
is so afraid of she's never killed anybody but one guy
technically probably has and that's Alex Jones and Ian
Kansas you're on the air thanks for holding so Alex I'm a
first-time color I'm a huge fan I love your work I love you