Knowledge Fight - #709: 2 Dan's 2 War

Episode Date: July 31, 2022

Today, Dan and Jordan wrap up their coverage of Alex's documentary by discussing the Q&A that Glenn Greenwald hosted after the film's premier.  It's not good....

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys saying we are the bad guys knowledge fight. Dan and George, knowledge fight. I need money. Andy and Kansas, stop it. Andy and Kansas, just time to pray. Andy and Kansas, you're on the air, thanks for holding me. Hello Alex, I'm a Christian color, I'm a huge fan, I love your work. Knowledge fight. I love you. Hey everybody, welcome back knowledge, right? I'm Jordan, a couple dudes like to sit around, worship at the altar of Celine from afar in this hotel room and talk a little bit about Alex Jones. Indeed, we are Dan Jordan, Jordan, quick question for you. What's your bright spot today, buddy? My bright spot, Jordan is that I went to the 7 11 walking down the
Starting point is 00:01:21 aisle, always been a big fan of Swedish fish. Really? Yeah, I like they disgust me. Oh wow. Yeah, okay. I think it's probably something to do with my dad, like growing up fair. Some of the things that he really liked stuck fish. Yeah, and it was Swedish. I like Swedish fish. My dad liked Swedish fish, but also he was a big fan of like Marzipan and that one didn't carry over. I don't like Marzipan. Gotcha. But Swedish fish are fine. Anyway, my bright spot is that I saw a bag of Swedish fish and friends. I was excited to make friends. The fish has made friends. We've been awake too long. Yeah. There are new flavors. Actually, they're new flavors. They're not good. Oh, well, that makes sense. There's a strawberry dolphin and a watermelon turtle. Honestly,
Starting point is 00:02:10 the nationality are they? Oh, that's a great question. I think they're all Swedish. That's, that's kind of offensive to me. I really am. Yeah, I mean, it's a rainbow world now. Norwegian turtle. Happy? Yes, I am. What's your bright spot? My bright spot is that boy, it's Saturday. I'm not, I don't have to live between a trial today. My bright spot. Yeah, that is true. It is. You got the day off from your new gig. No, it's not my fault. No, it's just, I type a lot. It's really hard. It hurts your fingers. I don't know how you do it. It's a lot. Yeah, I wrote, I think 20,000 words yesterday. It's a book. That's fucked up. That is fucked up. So yeah, it is nice. Yeah, to free up those fingers. I haven't felt they're just soft and gentle all day. You got to play piano,
Starting point is 00:03:04 put lotion on them. Oh, I'm trying. Yeah, I'm trying. I'm going to learn. Well, I'm happy for you. And you'll have to be back on that. You know, you got to do finger pushups. Get ready for Monday, the Bruce Lee to finger push. I get it. Yeah, you're right. You're right. I got to step up my game. So Jordan today. Yes, we are doing the thing that we have to do. And that is the follow up to Alex's war. Yes, coverage of that. After the premiere of that film, they did a little Q&A where Glenn Greenwald interviewed Alex Jones and Alex Lee Moyer, the documentarian who directed this film. They did not have their mics really working and the sound was really terrible for the portion where Moyer was interviewed. So we're not going to talk about any of that. I wonder if she's
Starting point is 00:03:56 mad at the crew. I would be maybe not. Actually, maybe it's best to not know exactly how that interview went. Right. So we've just got Alex's chunk. And honestly, it's like 40 something minutes of an interview. And I mean, it sucks. But it's going to take more than 40 minutes to talk about. I'm surprising. Fairly certain. So what are your feelings going into this? What are your expectations? Um, I my my feeling is that it's going to be Glenn Greenwald doing the soft balliest of interview, like not even softball questions, not T ball questions. Like he's swinging the bat for Alex to try and get that ball across the fucking plate. That's what I feel like. Interesting. We'll see if that lives up to your expectations. Okay. So before we get into the
Starting point is 00:04:46 actual interview, I have a few things I want to say. I have some comments. Jordan, you're getting very excited. So I've been tracking some reactions to this new documentary about Alex. And I have to say that I have just been seeing more and more shit takes. It's sincerely unbelievable to me that anyone could watch this film and come away accepting the argument that the producers and director just showed Alex as he is. That's such an offensive and gaslighting farce that I feel the need to address this again, and really sharpen the point that I'm making. On the day before the film was released, Matt Taiiby published a fawning interview with director Alex Lee Moyer on his sub stack. In his introduction to the interview, Taiiby says quote, she takes characters reduced
Starting point is 00:05:30 in panicked media treatments to two dimensional to two dimensional monsters and renders a non judgmental, tautly edited Herzogian treatment of who they of who they are and how they came to be that way. This is absolute nonsense. And if I were Herzog, I would not take kindly to this kind of a suggestion. But I want to ask what exactly is meant by non judgmental here. That seems like a really important concept to nail down, because it seems like this is something Moyer and the film's defenders are really proud of being. I would guess that from the other things I've read, non judgmental to these folks means that they don't include critical voices in their film to provide any other input. And then they pat themselves on the back, a whole bunch for having
Starting point is 00:06:17 the courage to let the audience decide what to think about the subject of the film. I guess it's fine to not include critical voices in a film. But I really don't think that you're going to be able to say that you even tried to portray your subject as they are. You're just portraying your subject how they want you to see them. For example, Alex lies constantly and contradicts himself about biographical information in this film. But you aren't introduced to somebody expressing that point in the film. So you have no reason to suspect that Alex is being anything but honest. The audience is being allowed to make up their own mind, I guess. But their options are believing Alex or choosing not to, which they'd have no reason to do based on the film they're watching.
Starting point is 00:07:01 Another important point is that you're editing the film according to the whim of your subject, which makes it nearly impossible for an uninformed viewer to make up their mind for themselves. If you're watching this film, nothing about it would give you any reason to distrust Alex's assertion that the only reason anyone was mad at him about Sandy Hook was because he liked Trump and they needed something to smear him with. There's no reason at all from the material in this film to not conclude that the Sandy Hook parents like Neil Heslin or Scarlett Lewis, who we've been in the courtroom with this week, are just tools of an overzealous democratic machine that wanted desperately to punish Alex for supporting Trump. That assertion, that narrative
Starting point is 00:07:45 that Alex tells is not presented as just what this guy is saying. The film is structured around defending that narrative. The only outcome of accepting lawyer's claim that this is just non-judgmental in presenting Alex how he is would be to conclude that she either believes Alex's version of this story or she edited her film in a way to strengthen the story fully aware that it was full of shit and is now bragging about how great she is for not indicating that the audience maybe shouldn't trust this claim at all. It's weird. Yeah, odd. We've done this fucking stupid dance all over like over and over again with idiots like Rogan who want to have their cake and eat it too but then they also want pie. They want to talk to and platform dangerous lunatics and
Starting point is 00:08:29 whitewash their images but they don't want to be criticized for it. And not only that, they want to be treated like the real heroes for having the courage to do what they do. And much like with Rogan, I don't buy that shit from Moyer. If you're doing a documentary about a liar or a con man and you don't include any content critical of that liar or con man in your film, you aren't doing a documentary. The con man is using you as a medium to spread their message to an audience they wouldn't have access to otherwise. You do have a responsibility in that circumstance whether you choose to accept it or not. To be totally clear, here is Moyer in her own words on how she approaches her filmmaking. This is from that interview with Tayebi.
Starting point is 00:09:13 Quote, this is what I'm going to do with all of the documentaries that I make by the way, including the one I just made about Alex Jones. It's not meant to confirm your biases. It's meant to actually show you what these people are actually like and then you can make an informed decision based off watching the film. It used to be called journalism. This was said in response to her telling a story about how she had investors not want to support her first film because she wouldn't include the voices of people who had been harmed by misogynists and school shooters, which is meant to connect to her choice to not have critical voices of Alex in this film. In a very real sense, she's kind of engaging in censorship here because guess what
Starting point is 00:09:55 ding dong? A huge part of who Alex actually is and what he's actually like is that he knows that he's caused people an enormous amount of pain and he doesn't give a shit. By not giving voice to that and not exploring that side of him, you're kind of covering up that aspect of his psyche because it's inconvenient and probably too difficult of a subject for you to pull off in this soft ball documentary. Now, let me focus in on my point about Moyer's approach by applying it to a different situation. Now, let's imagine that Alex's war actually could be called a fair portrait and that it provided the audience with enough information to make an informed decision. I totally don't believe that, but that's going to be the standard that will apply to another situation
Starting point is 00:10:42 and see how it feels. So they're really going to wish they hadn't said that. I'm going to throw that out at you right now. I don't think it's going to go well for them. I just don't think they're going to stand up to it. That's just me. So what would Moyer say about someone who made a documentary like hers about Jim Jones in like, I don't know, 1974, right when he was forming Jonestown in Guiana? What if that person just let Jim Jones tell his own story lying the whole time with no pushback from the director or anyone in the film at all? You'd think that Jim Jones would be able to spin a pretty good yarn and be able to make the idea of heading to his compound and his commune sound like a pretty decent idea. People were having a great time and he was spreading
Starting point is 00:11:23 a real message of love and unity. It's the word of God is coming through. Now, let's imagine further that this hypothetical documentarian knew that there were former members of the people's temple who had left and alleged that Jim Jones had abused them both physically and sexually, that people had come forward and alleged that Jim Jones would punish dissenters by starving them and ostracizing them from socializing with the rest of the community. This documentarian knew those things, but decided not to include any of them in the film because of a commitment to just showing Jim Jones as he really is. Well, and everybody knows that when that happened, all of those people who left, they were just hired by Carter to smear Jim Jones. Everybody knew that.
Starting point is 00:12:07 Now, let's imagine that this hypothetical filmmaker edited together their documentary in such a way that swelling music played over hero shots of Jim Jones and almost religious soundscape served as the background for him talking about his religious awakening. Now, let's imagine that this hypothetical filmmaker allowed Jim Jones's framing of his life to inform the structure of their documentary and how the story was told. So, like you were touching on, in this documentary, they do end up mentioning the allegations of abuse of his followers, but it's not brought up as a negative thing about him. Instead, it's only mentioned as something that Jim brushes off to the side as an attack from the power structure who were afraid of the religious revolution that he was
Starting point is 00:12:48 involved in and his commune in Guyana and the possibilities that it posed. I should have made a more extreme joke. That was too obviously just what would have happened. Well, that's the parallel to this documentary. The mass murder that ended Jonestown hadn't happened yet, so maybe some edgy assholes of the day would say that this documentary filmmaker was just giving a non-judgmental view of this public figure who's somewhat polarizing. And if I were somebody who studied Jim Jones back then, as I am somebody who studies Alex Jones right now, I would say that's complete bullshit. Portraying Jim Jones in exactly the way he wants to be portrayed with no context and no countervailing information is very likely to lead viewers to adopt a more positive view of him,
Starting point is 00:13:32 and that would be a dangerous thing to be involved in. Yeah. Dan, I want to run through a brick wall for you right now. I want to bounce my fucking head against the like, let's stop recording shit. Let's go fight Jim Jones. I don't even know what's happening right now. I'm sure that the rebuttal to this would be that Alex Jones is no Jim Jones, and sure, he doesn't have a Jonestown, but you're delusional if you think that Alex doesn't pose as much potential danger as Jim Jones did. By adopting the lawyer's approach, you're essentially legitimizing the figure you're covering and making people more likely to follow them. And as we've seen over the course of doing the show, Alex is a completely unhinged child unable to control his emotional outbursts who
Starting point is 00:14:19 constantly tells his audience to keep a list of globalists in their town so they'll know who to kill when the time comes. He's told his audience that it might be time to consider if you could kill your family members if they support vaccination. He extols the message that psych meds are mind control weapons, which could have the effect of making people not seek mental health care or even worse, just stop taking medications that they're prescribed. Ask the people of Boston if Alex's actions have real world consequences. Ask the people of the Sandy Hook Victims family members. Ask the families of Igor Soldo, Alan Beck and Joseph Wilcox, the three people who were murdered by Jared and Amanda Miller in 2014, murders that were inspired by their anti-government views and
Starting point is 00:15:03 which Jared had discussed beforehand on the Infowars forums. Ask the family of tragically deceased Marcel Fontaine. These are stories that we know and they're just the tip of the iceberg of the lives that have been changed permanently by Alex's behaviors and Alex doesn't give a shit. He continues acting in the exact same ways that he did that led to these people's grief because it's profitable and these voices are ignored and disrespected in this documentary because actually covering Alex as he really is would be way too hard and I suspect that it wouldn't have resulted in the kind of movie that Moyer wanted to make. It would have resulted in 710 episodes of some sort of, I think that might have been, that might be what would have happened.
Starting point is 00:15:51 It definitely wouldn't have resulted in the sort of movie that she was looking for, considering that at least two of the producers of this film were also producers of the Trump propaganda nonsense film, The Plot Against the President. Alex Lee Moyer made a stupid and inaccurate film, one that willfully omits information that calls into question the subject self-delivered image of himself. It's a bad movie and it will hurt people, but it's her right to make it. I hope the money that she made doing it is worth it, but please spare me the sanctimonious bullshit about how people can't handle that you do journalism. You're a cut-rate editor producing semi-slick character studies, not of Alex Jones, but of the person Alex Jones wants you to think
Starting point is 00:16:32 he is. Basically, you're the mark if you think what this documentary shows is Alex as he really is. Also, before we get into this Q&A, I need to make one more point crystal clear, which is that the framing that Moyer has about her own work, that isn't even real. She isn't interested in seeing these subjects as they are, and that just is some sort of purity to it, and the most obvious tell is that she interviews Owen Shroyer, Rob Dew, and Mike Hansen in the documentary. They don't provide a glimpse into Alex as he really is. Interviewing them doesn't just show Alex as he is and lets the audience decide for themselves. They're included because they're sycophantic voices that'll echo the self-aggrandizing narrative that Alex is telling
Starting point is 00:17:15 about himself, which is the story that Moyer wants to tell. Including interviews with people who glorify Alex as counter to her pretend ethos, and kind of makes a joke of her insistence of not interviewing critical voices in the name of some pretense of journalistic purity. That's a condescending mask she's wearing so she can elevate her puff piece, brand rehabilitation project into some kind of act of reporting that's so brave that we can't even understand it. I reject that shit entirely, and it's really sad to see people with actual media careers falling for this kind of an act. And I can't stress this enough. Even if Moyer thinks that she's some kind of an uncritical observer just dispassionately relaying the story of Alex,
Starting point is 00:17:58 she's deluded. She's a creator, and she's creating. Some of her input and biases are impossible not to have an impact. For instance, in a piece about the movie's premiere in the New York magazine, these lines made me think maybe she's not so impartial of a documentarian as she's pretending. Oh yeah? What might that be? Quote, she watched the X-Files, researched serial killers and conspiracies, and generally respected misfits. Distain for authority was normalized back then, she says, whereas now people worship power and believe in towing the line for the state. Liberal outlets, she thinks, have unwittingly lent credibility to figures like Jones thanks to their credulousness about official narratives. Quote, the things they're calling conspiracy
Starting point is 00:18:41 theories are just going to be news items six months from now, she says. There were WMDs, COVID came from a bat. This is just her saying Alex's catchphrase in a less succinct manner. Infowars, tomorrow's news today. Last bit of business. Glenn Greenwald has a penchant for run on sentences, so in order to present this Q&A in as fair of a light as possible, I've attempted to preserve as much of that as possible. God damn it. It's going to lead to some clips that are longer than I would like in rambling meandering questions, but I would rather risk annoying you fair, fair, being sensorious. Listen, just because I am not a very important person doesn't mean that I shouldn't be okay with you treating me like this. So anyway, I have some
Starting point is 00:19:27 thoughts. How are you feeling? I mean, it's just, it's just sad. It's so sad. She sucks, like just on a level of like quality, like she just sucks. She played shitty music. Like it's not like she had good choices. She didn't have Radiohead or anything on there. That might have boosted up the documentary for somebody. She would have had trouble with that one. I get clearing that might have been an issue. Yeah, definitely. But like just having Owen Schreuer on there, a man who's literally a puppet, a self admitted puppet. Yeah. Of the subject of the documentary. What are you going to get? Wait a second. Wait a second. Like what is Jeff Dunham's hand up a puppet's ass going to say in a documentary about him is, Oh, Jeff Dunham. Well, I mean, he would say mean things,
Starting point is 00:20:13 but that's not the point of what I'm trying to say. Yeah. Owen Schreuer is going to say anything meaningful in the documentary. It's like, well, I'm essentially unemployable in any other media situation. I'm stuck here. I'm saddled with this. Absolutely. So I'm going to say shitty things about my boss. Totally. Totally. Yeah. Cool. While Alex's hand is right all the way up my ass controlling my mouth, I'm going to be like, I think he might go too far sometimes. Like what are you doing? This nonsense idea of that, like I'm just showing him as he is. It's so torpedoed by the fact that you sought out Mike Hansen. Yeah. Alex, like his current employees or at the time current employees also a dubious move. Yeah. But Mike Hansen's inclusion in there is like, get off your fucking
Starting point is 00:20:58 high horse pretending that like, what input is Mike Hansen giving that shows Alex as he actually is right? Nothing. No, it's giving Mike Hansen's impression of Alex, right, which is a positive one. You exclude all negative impressions of Alex because you're not up to the task of telling that fucking story. Yeah. I think what it's it is tying together with what I'm learning during this whole fucking experience down here is that all of these people are fucking cowards who are afraid of anybody challenging them. And because they have a rabid fan base that will attack people who do challenge them, a lot of people don't discover that they're cowards. They have this little group of people who protect them and keep them from ever having to realize that they're a bunch of
Starting point is 00:21:47 fucking cowardly babies who have no competence or quality at anything. They mean like Alex's 90 bodyguards. Yeah. Oh my God. Jesus Christ. There were his 90 bodyguards for nobody showing up to court at all. You missed it. You missed the best one. Whenever I left court the other day, he went out, he went across the street to go get a hero or something, right? And his 10 bodyguards were surrounding him and they were doing the funniest like mission impossible ass maneuvers. Like people are checking the corner and like I got your six like it was hilarious. There is no one there. They're doing these mission impossible ass organizational moves. It is fucking sad. They have like really long meetings before they go public about like, all right, we got to keep an
Starting point is 00:22:33 eye out for milkshakes. Totally. Totally. Can't let Alex get milkshaked and no offense at all. But one of his bodyguards is five foot three. I'm not joking. I'm not joking. May or may not have a false mustache. Yes, I did see the guy that was still up in the air, whether or not you'll never know. You'll never know. Kind of looks like somebody from that Beastie Boys video. He grew a mustache. The size of Mike Dick's forehead is what I would like to describe it as yeah. So without further ado, Jordan, let's let's jump in on this Q&A. All right. This is not going to not be frustrating for you. Anyway, it starts with some compliments. Alex already frustrating for me. Alex is not yet on stage. So this is just Greenwald and Moyer. Okay. Yeah. You know,
Starting point is 00:23:16 I just say this week I had to spend time explaining what I thought was never necessary to explain, which is you can, if you're a journalist, for example, go and speak to someone without making clear whether you love that person or hate that person, but simply to try and understand them is kind of fundamental to what journalists are supposed to do. And I think that's the same for filmmakers and artists and documentarians. And the fact that you even have to explain yourself, the fact that it's unusual to watch a film without constantly being bombarded with the filmmakers' moral perspective, I think is a testament to just how repressed of the society has become. And I really want to congratulate you for resisting that and for kind of restoring what
Starting point is 00:23:56 I think is the purpose of art and journalism in film and documentary and documentaries, which is to show the public information that they ought to have and let them decide what they think about it as opposed to shoving that conclusion down their face. And life is a lot easier for you, as I said, if you had chosen a different route. But I think it takes a lot of courage for you to do that. And I think it's important. So I want to congratulate you for that. Thanks, Glenn. I feel like one of the defining characteristics of people you really shouldn't listen to are people who have a mindless need to be in opposition. For instance, I think you're delusional if you don't think that Glenn's belief that this documentary shows a fair portrait of Alex is
Starting point is 00:24:39 in some way informed by the fact that all of the media voices he doesn't like are saying it's not. I think if you've watched this film and you see that this is Glenn's take, he's just a loser. This film isn't providing the information that people need to make an informed decision. It's not just a dispassionate exercise in journalism that people are just mad at because it doesn't include the requisite performance of outrage. That's the line these ding-dongs tell themselves so they can feel morally superior to everyone else while they trot out their exploitative vanity projects. Let's look at this idea of an informed decision. I would argue that in order to make an informed decision, you need to have all the relevant information about a subject.
Starting point is 00:25:22 For instance, it would be inappropriate for a pill to market itself by exclusively talking about the positive things it can do while completely neglecting the potential side effects it can have. Similarly, it wouldn't serve a person at all if the coverage of a pill focused entirely on the potential side effects and ignored the thing that it's effective in treating. Either of these would give the person a lot of information about the pill in question, but neither would give them what they needed to make an informed choice. It might give them the feeling that they had that informed choice, but that feeling is an illusion. This documentary does not give the viewers the information they need to make any kind of an informed decision about Alex. In order for this film to actually
Starting point is 00:26:04 be something that the viewer can watch and make up their own mind about, the viewer would need to already enter the film knowing that Alex is a liar and nothing he says can really be taken as sincere. You already need to know that there's a reason not to trust him before you watch, and that's an absurd expectation to have for most viewers who are randomly coming into this film. I talk to people periodically and they're like, what do you do? I do a podcast about Alex Jones. Who's that? He's not somebody who everyone knows about. There's a lot of people who have an unformed opinion about him, and you go into this documentary and all the information that it provides is incomplete. Glenn thinks he knows who Alex is, and he's been told that
Starting point is 00:26:49 this documentary provides a fair portrait, and people he doesn't like don't like the movie, so he's gung-ho about patting himself on the back and congratulating Moyer on her active and lightened filmmaking. They're just basking in their own fucking delusion and illustrating how little they know about the subject that they're actually talking about. Yeah, I mean, it's disgusting. I can't imagine what our next film, Mussolini, a profile in courage is going to be about, but I think I've heard that it shows a balanced view of Mussolini right up until 1941. Just that he's a great guy. No, I think she'll need misunderstood. I think she'll need to overcorrect and do some film about something that'll make the right wing angry or something.
Starting point is 00:27:30 If she overcorrected, she would jump off a bridge. That's the wrong kind of overcorrect. That's maybe a little too overcorrecting there. I mean, artistically overcorrect. That's the smart one. I don't know. A puff piece about an eco terrorist or something like that. I don't know. Bill Ayers. Isn't he the best? Well, that would be an interesting film. That would be an interesting film. Anyway, Alex comes out and here we are. All right. So do you want to end the weirdness of talking about Alex Jones right in front of him if he's not here and bring him up on stage? All right. Get up here, AJ. Come on, Alex. Does he have a mic? Yeah, he should have a mic.
Starting point is 00:28:17 We can share. We can share. No, I mean, I haven't asked anything. Alex, do you want to talk? Silent Raiders attacks. No, no, no. Listen, I got into an access TV when I was 21 years old. Dames. But I meant everything in purity. I made a lot of mistakes. I've done a lot of bad stuff. It wasn't on purpose. So it's great to be here with Gwyn Greenwald. It's great to be here with Alex Moyer. And the thing is, I didn't lie on purpose. I made a lot of mistakes, but I'm not some person getting orders and lying to people. And we're probably like 90% accurate, 10% wrong, and I want to get better. And so that's just where I'm at. And it's great to be here. And I'm glad you made a film that just kind of shows what we've done because I look at it as kind of horrifying
Starting point is 00:29:02 obnoxious I am. And then parts of it are good. But I mean, I did this from a peer place. And that's at the end of the day, like I did not lie to people on purpose. I didn't make mistakes on purpose. And I'm just glad you guys made this film. So Alex, let me actually begin by asking you a little bit about that in terms of your intentions. So this is a good indication of how stilted this Q&A is. Any decent interviewer might hear that opening statement that Alex made and first say, are you okay? And after clearing that up, you'd probably point out that unprompted. Alex just said that they that he didn't ever intentionally lie three times in about a minute. That kind of feels like somebody who lies intentionally,
Starting point is 00:29:47 really trying to stress that they don't do that. And if your instinct isn't to follow up on that, I guess you're just a better journalist than I can ever imagine being. Also, weird not to latch onto that weird 90% accurate claim seems like that's something that could stand to be explored. Like how do you quantify that? Does that actually mean anything? Or is that just an evasive catchphrase that you use to try to dodge responsibility for the horrible things you say and do all the fucking time? Sure. I mean, you're forgetting Shakespeare's immortal line, you know, me thinks you can't possibly protest too much. Me thinks you can't protest at all. Why would you? Yeah, you're too right all the time. Yeah, me thinks what is
Starting point is 00:30:27 protesting? Are you on the stand? So Glenn, Glenn started into a question there. And here's where he goes. And if you're expecting it to be like, Hey, let me ask you about that. You say you don't lie. What do you mean? That's not it. So Alex, let me actually begin by asking you a little bit about that in terms of your intentions and the like, because I when I remember when I watched the film, it was just so striking this early footage of you. And I remember when the internet first discovered some of the early pictures of you from your public access days in Austin, I remember liberals being almost horrified, like with this cognitive dissonance, like we're supposed to look at him as a screaming, spitting monster. And yet these these pictures are disturbing the
Starting point is 00:31:09 handsome. And there's like very extreme monster, you are now you, that's the beginning how to kind of charisma, a natural charisma. You were so handsome. And now you're ugly, even said from the first time they saw you. And so when you combine your soul attributes that you had when you were young, this is a great question. Clearly had you been somebody who was willing to affirm rather than question establishment, Heidi's could have ended up as like a meteorologist on like Good Morning America or like some Anderson Cooper type. And I'm wondering if you were aware of that potential and purposely chose to reject it for a different path, this kind of path. That's your question. It's an outcast that we're surrounded by delightfully. And it's whether it was just so
Starting point is 00:31:52 natural to your personality that you never even considered trying to pursue that kind of mainstream acceptability. What I was thinking about driving her today. So that's where Glenn goes. That's his first question. After Alex says three times in a minute that he doesn't lie on purpose and that right 90% of the time Glenn decides to open with a question predicated on how Alex was a handsome young man. This is this is just pathetic because track this question. It's basically asking, did you make a conscious decision to not be as rich and famous as your talents would make you deserving of being because you were too invested in questioning the power structure or is it just your instinctual nature to be a rebel who questions the power structure.
Starting point is 00:32:38 So the decision to not be super rich and famous wasn't even a decision. It's basically like, are you so awesome by choice or by nature? I mean, you you almost went too long for me. I would have gone with why is your dick so big? How did it get so big? That is the biggest dick I've ever seen. That's another reading of it. Yeah, this shit is embarrassing, partially because it's basically answered in the film, but also because it kind of ignores the reality that if Alex has ever tried to get a job where he'd have a boss or advertisers that weren't a shady gold salesman and a book about where to hide guns, he wouldn't have lasted more than a month. He is talented, but he's not that talented to the point where an employer would look past his extreme oppositional
Starting point is 00:33:23 defiance because he's got the goods. Yeah. He's no Howard Stern, let's say. No, no, no, no. This question is predicated on a false construct of what Alex could and could not have done as a younger man. Yes, he was handsome. Yes, he was talented. But he was also Alex Jones that whole time. If you take his story in the documentary at all seriously, you shouldn't have to ask this question. Alex talks about how he got fired from a radio station because he wouldn't stop talking about Waco. Alex took the path he did because it was the only path available to him that allowed him to satisfy his need for attention and for nobody to ever be able to tell him what to do. It's quite something really. This Q and A was never going to be hard hitting, but
Starting point is 00:34:08 I didn't predict it would open this flaccid. I mean, yeah, that one's tough. Pretty bad. Here's a good, no, no, no. Here, if you want to do that Beatles like, hey, listen, man, you had that moment where there were two paths becoming a rock god or working at a grocery store, you know, what was it that really turned that and I would have been like, hey, Alex, you could have been a father of at least 10. Why didn't you become that? Alex Glenn doesn't know any of that stuff. You could have been, you could have been in jail for murder. Why did you become an info wars hose? Hey, excuse me. Have you ever heard your own story about your childhood? Why didn't you put it in this fucking movie? I'm going to guess that Glenn's awareness of Alex starts and ends with things that are in
Starting point is 00:34:49 this documentary and the fact that everybody doesn't like him. Yeah. And then he gets more money for it. Yeah. Yeah. And what a piece of shit and maybe a few of the like really broad things that people know like he was against the Iraq war. He's glad that he hates the establishment which Glenn Greenwald should be against him for Glenn was for the Iraq war. So is his buddy Tucker, right? Weird. Yeah. Anyway, here's Alex's answer to that question of well, essentially how big that dick. Yeah, or whether it was just so natural to your personality that you never even considered trying to pursue that kind of mainstream acceptability. Glenn, I was thinking about driving her today, what I wanted to say and I forgot it. Thank God you brought that up. No, no, no, seriously. No,
Starting point is 00:35:35 it's really intuitive. My enemies say I'm this Lex Luthor mastermind and we don't say that. You're a moron. None of that. I had no I could study the ball and politics and read like books by was speaking to Brazilian like these were scary things. But I had no training, no idea, no plan. And the this idea that like, I'm this mastermind, it's in these opposite. I mean, I can't balance my check that, you know, and so and I'm not trying to put myself down. It's just like, they literally think I'm like this evil mastermind. And I literally can't balance my checkbook. And they're just like attacking me constantly like where's the secret? Where's the Russians? Where's the who's giving the immersors? Who's giving the orders? I'm like, I was just covering the news. I was just
Starting point is 00:36:22 giving my opinion on something. And so no, I had no idea what I was doing. I just was America and like, kind of a libertarian and like, didn't like Republicans didn't like Democrats. And I was just watching all this happen. I said, God, I don't access TV. So I tried to go to college and tried to get an RTF job. And they're like, Oh, take it five years, even be doing anything in radio. So I was like, well, I'll do access TV. So that was it was basically, I have my own political beliefs, nor just pro freedom. And then I got involved. It was immediately successful. And then I was like, trying to like figure out as I went and I'm trying to be truthful made a lot of mistakes along the way. But none of it was with malice. Crazy. None of it was matured anybody. Yeah, we're
Starting point is 00:37:02 going to talk about the mistakes for sure. And in a few minutes, it wouldn't be a complete discussion without that. But before we get to that, I just why, why wouldn't it be a complete discussion? Anyway, this isn't really an answer to Glenn's question, but Glenn doesn't give a shit. In fairness, I guess it's like a half answer with an answer to a completely different question mixed in. Also, you might notice that Alex ended that ramble by again, saying that he never meant to lie. And if you're Greenwald, it's a conscious choice to ignore that happening so much. A neutral observer would look at that behavior and say, Hmm, this person really seems to be going out of his way to say that he doesn't lie on purpose. And yet no one here has accused
Starting point is 00:37:42 him of that at all. That seems like something he's being super defensive about. And maybe if I want to have a full discussion, I should check in on that glaring dynamic that's playing out right in front of me. I guess you could just ignore it and power through to your next softball question, though. That's certainly another option. I mean, I'm so fucking furious at Glenn already, you know, like it's like this is a dude who will go out of his way to try and destroy a young journalist's career, who will fucking sick his sycophantic bullshit people on other people to destroy their lives. Then he'll go and fucking say, Alex, you've got the biggest dick in the world. How do you walk with a dick this big? It's so huge. But he won't even fucking
Starting point is 00:38:24 talk to me. He won't even block me on Twitter. Do you know why? Because I don't have any fucking restraints that young journalist. She could lose her job if she called him a giant shitball fucker. But instead, we are. We are untethered from the. Exactly. You can't. What are you? Who's going to get mad at me? He doesn't have anything to gain. It is interesting. And I do think there's a really funny thing in that you're mad that he won't block. I want him to because this means that he knows and he's just a coward. He doesn't even have the guts to acknowledge it. If you block me, you told me I didn't see this, but you told me that somebody who tweeted at him who had like under 10 followers immediately blocked when they said that he should listen to our show.
Starting point is 00:39:06 So, so believe me, you know, you know, that's a little suspicious. Yeah. So, um, Glenn, here is his next question here. And I think that there's a little kernel of something in here, actually. Yeah, we're going to talk about the mistakes for sure in a few minutes because it wouldn't be a complete discussion without that. But before we get to that, I just, you know, the question of your politics, I think it's so interesting. And this is what was striking me watching the film is there's a, the idea, there's this idea, you know, if you ask somebody with what political faction or ideology is Alex Jones associated, they would instantly say, oh, the far right. And I'm watching you. I wonder why well before most people thought
Starting point is 00:39:43 about doing it, spreading huge amounts of skepticism and doubt about the CIA, the US state, you're confronting the FBI well before Trump began spreading that kind of skepticism and Republican circles that question before Alex even gets a chance to the NSA before 9 11, you're warning about the dangers of exaggerating the threats of bin Laden and al Qaeda in order to kind of bring into a sort of authority, authoritarian imbalance giant. Lots of things that people very associated with the left have been saying for a long time, kind of opposing these institutions of authoritarianism, warning about how they exploit people's perceptions to put the population in fear. How have you seen yourself ideologically and politically on years? Exactly. So that's
Starting point is 00:40:31 a dumb question, but there's a little bit of truth in it. Alex was skeptical of all these organizations like the FBI and the CIA early on, but there's also a context that's missing from all of this. And it's not something you're going to get from Glenn or from Alex himself, and certainly not from this film. Alex hated these groups, not because of some kind of a principled opposition to things like spying, the way Glenn is framing the question. Alex hated these groups because of Waco, Ruby Ridge, and the Oklahoma City bombing. He distrusted them because after OKC, the issue of right wing militia violence was a high priority for law enforcement and to put a serious halt to the momentum that the extreme right was seeing in terms of organizing.
Starting point is 00:41:08 It wasn't an opposition to the idea of spying or the FBI. It was that Alex felt that they were focused on people who were too much like himself. Similarly, his opposition to overhyping the threat of bin Laden was also really just about his fears about the government cracking down on far right militias. He didn't oppose spying on like suspected Muslim terrorists for its own sake. He just thought it was a smokescreen to eventually spy on Christian nationalistic extremists. Yeah, I mean, they might as well. Here's a better way of framing that question. Alex, you opposed the FBI because they're not solely out to get non white people. How long has that been going on for? But Glenn would have no way to know any of that stuff because he didn't prepare
Starting point is 00:41:50 for this interview at all. I really don't know anything except for I am tired of hearing that as an excuse. It's not excuse. It makes it worse. Exactly. It's a willful ignorance of the subject you're covering or you do know some things and you're just pretending not to know that because it would be inconvenient for the interview. It would be a terrible idea to know those things. Yeah, it's fine to give it up to Alex that on paper a lot of his positions about things like the NSA are good, but to pretend that they're based in some kind of a principled belief is a little bit much. Taking Alex seriously on this issue is honestly kind of funny because he's the last person I would accuse of being a serious opponent of authoritarian leadership. For one thing, he
Starting point is 00:42:31 made cartoonish accusations about how like Obama was going to become a tyrant, like he was going to dissolve the government so he could turn the country into part of a one world caliphate that he ruled the caliphate. Yeah. Engaging with the notion of tyranny like this indicates a lack of seriousness about the subject and not somebody who you should ask their thoughts on because they're not going to, there's not going to be a point. Or you could look at how he behaved with Trump. He was cheering on Trump's authoritarian leanings at every turn and yelling that Trump needed to go further. He wanted Trump to imprison his political enemies, take over the media, militarize the border and outlaw the Democratic Party. If this is someone you're taking it all seriously on the
Starting point is 00:43:09 subject of authoritarianism, the joke is on you. Also, Alex's politics are really simple. He's a John Birch Society styled anti-communist reactionary who wants to install a white Christian heterosexual dominated state. Yeah. Yep. I mean, it's just, it's, but he's not going to tell you that. I mean, yeah, it's like, I just don't know, Glenn. Glenn, you don't have a place in Alex's world just in case you were wondering. At the end of the day, Glenn, good luck to you. Yeah. You want to fawn over the guy who wants you dead? Weird. Oh my God. Hey, no, no, no. He's only going after trans people right now. I'm sure whenever he's done with that, he's going to stop. That's how it works, right? Once you go after LGBTQ, you, you stop after one of the letters.
Starting point is 00:43:56 You don't go after all of them. Yeah. Makes sense. Yeah. Glenn, Glenn may learn a hard lesson that Dave Rubin is learning currently at some point. Yeah. Which I don't enjoy. There's no shodden Freud in that. It's fucked up. Yeah. It's awful. It's tragic. And why? Yeah. It's fucked. Anyway, Alex responds to this question that you very readily pointed out. Glenn was basically answering in the delivery. Yes. Yeah. Yeah. And because I think maybe partially because of that, Alex just, I don't know what the fuck even this answer is. Okay. How have you seen yourself ideologically and politically on years? Exactly. Exactly. Starting out like 95, 96. First articles were like communist Alex Jones, anti-American. That was against wars and surveillance. Because that
Starting point is 00:44:44 just seemed like, well, Bill Wright says, you don't do this real quick. 94 and 95. Alex Jones is a communist. No way. How old was he? Well, first of all, like that's the great when he's beginning his career. No one really gave a shit. Nope. And he was opposed to Bill Clinton at the time. Yeah. He was attacking from the right. He's trying to pretend that he was called a communist because he opposed Bush. And that's not accurate at all. It's better for his mythology to have that in his background than to be a right-wing shipbag from the start. For sure. Yeah. So this is bad. And I would just follow the Constitution really hand fistedly. And I was like, well, I see all this news about the Constitution. And so I wasn't even being right-wing or left-wing. I was simply
Starting point is 00:45:23 thinking, I want to promote freedom. That's a fun thing to do. And so that's really where it came from. And then that's why like Martin Sheen 18 years ago or so said, I want to fly you out here to California. And we want you to, you know, Milo Estevez's son. We really love what you're doing. So I get their house and it's like, I'm sitting there and they're putting movies on like, so you're really a good liberal, right? You're against these wars. And you're against George Bush. I'm like, yeah, I'm against George Bush. And they didn't care that I was pro-gun or any of this stuff. It was like, I'm sitting there like, oh, Anthony Hopkins is going for dinner. Let's have dinner right now. So like, we're talking like 18 years ago, I'm sitting with Anthony Hopkins eating roast beef.
Starting point is 00:46:03 And like, like Martin Sheen's house in Malibu. And I'm like, what's this place? Because I had no idea, like private jet land, slides back to California. They're like, you're a very important young filmmaker. You're, you're exposing the evil right-wingers. I'm like, I just don't want to have a war. I don't want to support what these people are doing. And so there was that. And then as soon as Obama got in, this is astonishing. They're like, boy, this is Obama. And I'm like, I don't like what Obama's continuing the same stuff. So to me, I literally just went on access TV at like 21 years old, got a local radio show at 22, got a syndicated at 23, totally self-taught, made a ton of mistakes, but I did it for a place of truth, what experience like Hollywood and what
Starting point is 00:46:45 it does. And then just I had this great experience over 28 years on air of like seeing all the weird underbellies of all the stuff because I didn't come into it from the establishment. I literally came out of access TV in Austin, Texas. And so because I wasn't part of any of the power structures, I got to see stuff nobody else is seeing. So let me, let me ask you the, the, a similar question that the one asked Alex for cheese. I don't think that was an answer to Glenn's question, but whatever. There's no reason to ask a follow up to the original question because Glenn didn't really care that much about it to begin with. It was really just a launching pad for Alex to go off on some rambling diatribe that it's eventually going to include him saying that he doesn't lie on purpose
Starting point is 00:47:29 at some point. It's very defensive about that. It does seem like that almost like he's about to go on trial. Sure. But he's not on trial here and he's super defensive. You know what I find really interesting though? Like Alex has all these stories with these left wing folks like Martin Sheen mistakenly thinking that he's on the left because he hated Bush, but you never really hear any stories about right wingers who invited Alex in and only to realize that he isn't right wing after all. Sure. He had like that time when Ann Coulter was on his show and she laughed at him for being so far right that he sounded like Lyndon LaRouche, but I don't think anyone on the right would talk to Alex and come away disappointed thinking like, oh, he's not on our side. Man, he's a rhino. That's
Starting point is 00:48:10 what Alex is. He's a rhino, buddy. Yeah. Anyway, Glenn has another question for Alex that is really just like hype man shit. So let me ask you a similar question that the one asked Alex, which is you know, it is so striking when I began writing about politics in 2005. Let me ask you this. How does Anthony Hopkins like his roast beef? That is a good question. Liberals hated more than anybody, George Bush, the architects of the Iraq war. I began writing an opposition to rendition and the torture regime and Guantanamo and due process free imprisonment. And it's just so striking that people back then who were implementing it were advocating it are completely acceptable. In fact, be loved in mainstream liberal circles. Liberals watch
Starting point is 00:48:57 media outlets and consume media outlets that employ those people. As I was saying, I could interview all of them and I would be applauded by liberals and yet you who back in 2004 were saying, don't trust George W. Bush. His father was the CIA director, the Iraq wars based on lies, all things that auto appeal to that sensibility of liberals. You are uniquely castigated and kind of cast out of good company to the point where you're one of the very few people that even journalists are told they can't speak to. Why is that? Why have you been identified as such a threat in a way that other people who actually have blood on their hands and wars on their legacy aren't even remotely cast as? Well, I mean, that's a great question. And I again only learned this
Starting point is 00:49:41 Glenn through organic experience of it. But I think I think Glenn should take up his concern with himself and his good buddy Tucker, who was a huge supporter of the war back in his bow tie days. Hey, you'd think this is an interesting point, although one that Alex has nothing interesting to say on the subject. There have been some attempts to rehabilitate the images of people like George W. Bush, and that's been a distasteful thing to say to see. That said, I don't think it's been as successful as Glenn is pretending. And I don't know how many fawning pieces we're seeing about like Dick Cheney or Carl Rove these days. To his larger point, though, all of the mainstream media outlets have Trump people on their rosters of talking heads. Like Kellyanne Conway
Starting point is 00:50:21 was just on CBS today, and she was the person that really? Yeah, she's the person the Trump hired to lie to the media for him. It does suck. But media outlets do feature some shitty people. But there are people who fall within a certain spectrum of shittiness. And most right thinking people understand that Alex is outside that range. It does feel like all networks have a worm farm somewhere. I suspect that a giant part of Alex is not being allowed in is I think it's less about what Alex believes or would say and more about how he would act. He's already shown himself through countless appearances to be unable to stop himself from just yelling and self promoting instead of actually doing an interview like with Piers Morgan, Andrew Neil in the UK,
Starting point is 00:51:04 or the time that he was on the view. If I were a TV Booker, I'd be pretty aware that Alex isn't going to be a guest that participates in any discussion you might be trying to have, but he's just going to steamroll everything and yell info wars.com. He's a shitty guest as further evidence by his appearances on the podcasts like flagrant to and Rogan. He just gets wasted yells nonsense at the only reason you'd want him around as if you're looking for a spectacle. Most TV shows wouldn't consider the spectacle to be worth the hassle of having Alex on. But the math is different for desperate people and charlatans. So thus here we are. Yep. That explains the situation. Yeah. Yeah. Glenn's questions so far are living more than up to my standard. In
Starting point is 00:51:47 fact, I did not expect that he would be asking Alex something along the lines of Alex, your virtues are so great. We are knighting you a paladin of truth tomorrow. Tell me more about how you came by them. This question in particular, I think I would translate as like, why won't anyone let you come on their show? Is it because you're too right about things? Also, isn't it really awesome that I'm not scared to interview you like all those other media outlets? I'm pretty awesome too. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's nice that we doing it's nice that two of two of the biggest dicked people in the world get to share a stage together for one moment. You know, it's just rare to see this happen. So here's Alex's answer to whatever question that was. Okay. I mean,
Starting point is 00:52:30 that's a great question. And again, only great question through organic experience of it. But if I lied about WMDs, if I kill billions of people, I'm part of the establishment, but they're not scared of Alex Jones. They're scared of populist movements. And the fact that I wasn't left wing or right wing, the fact that I was just pro America and pro freedom, they they really wasn't me. They just saw me as like the American people and like, okay, this is what the American people produced. This is organic because they went and checked out who I was who I wasn't controlled. They're like, well, this guy just came out of the dirt. And so this is this is the enemy. And so it's their hatred of the general public, their hatred of the organic
Starting point is 00:53:15 grassroots. It's not me. It's their hatred of just good, decent classical liberal Americans that want peace and want justice and want unity and want justice and want everybody living peace. We don't want to hurt anybody. We're not judging anybody. We just want our freedom. And so that's what freaked them out like, well, this guy could get this popular and he's just some idiot on access TV. What are we gonna do? So I'm a symbol of their insecurity. I'm not that strong. They're weak. And and that's mascara. So, you know, it is it is it is interesting that the thing they hate most are people who develop influence and a significant audience without being captive to their structures and their influence. Wow. Talk to me, Glenn. Hey, listen, look at it. Look at what's happening now.
Starting point is 00:54:04 I'm developing an influence independent of all this bullshit. How about that? Glenn seems like Glenn's not into that either. It seems weird. Yeah. Ha. Ha. Also, I mean, it's all good and well to talk about Alex not being beholden to CNN or news core, but you got 8 million in Bitcoin from somebody. So crazy. He's so unbeholden. Yeah. And he spent most of his career hawking gold for a weirdo. Oh, so unbeholden to constantly doing the earth is going to fall apart. So you better buy gold ads. Yeah. Weirdly in the documentary and this interview, Ted Anderson doesn't come up once. Oh, that's so crazy. So strange. So how about that? Fuck it. I mean, we we're mad. I think you're madder. I was madder when I was true, true. You're writing your anger is pushed
Starting point is 00:54:56 into the document. Now you're free. Yeah. Yes. Yes. I'm still reliving it for the first time or living it for the first time. Yes. So here isn't the next question. And I actually think that this is Glenn's best question. Okay. It doesn't shorter. It doesn't go anywhere. And I might be misinterpreting it. Okay. It is interesting that the thing they hate most are people who develop influence and a significant audience without being captive to their structures and their influence. And that is something that defines what you've done. I think more than anything, you came out of public access TV, which was tolerated because it's supposed to be a joke that no one watches. And yet you develop this gigantic audience. And clearly part of why is because you
Starting point is 00:55:35 have a kind of showman charisma, kind of, you know, entertainment component to you that made people want to watch. And one of the things that struck me was, you know, you were talking early on in this funny episode about how when you were 12, you would see these preachers with Royce's and gigantic houses doing coke off hooker's breasts and whatever. And now you do that and have those they had this similar kind of showmanship, they were able to get people to watch. And by the end of the film, we're watching you talking about praying for President Bush and satanic influences in a way that I'm just wondering, no, let's be honest, I became the abyss. Okay. But but why is there a, what do you notice that kind of similarity? I became what I saw, but for a good
Starting point is 00:56:18 cause that wasn't on purpose. Only at 48 can I now see it. No, I was like, damn, that's a hot slut that preachers bang on his back porch. That rolls Royce was pretty. I mean, I wasn't doing that consciously. But yeah, there's, there's definitely, I mean, I'm not gonna lie. Yeah, it's true. I'm a preacher. And so only now at like 48, last year, I'm like, whoa, what have I been doing? I've kind of like, you know, the things you get old, you go, damn, what I just do. You're like, like, damn, I did all that. Like, God, I'm a freaking horrible person. But then I didn't do it consciously. The establishment is lying. According to formulas, I didn't ever do stuff on purpose. So this could actually be interpreted as a pretty scathing question, which may be why
Starting point is 00:57:01 Alex dodged the real meaning behind it by turning on that charisma and talking about titties. The point of the preachers thing that, you know, that Alex saw as a kid, it wasn't that they were preachers, that they were hypocrites. They were pious as an act to make money. And then in their real lives, they did coke off sex workers on boats. If taken as it appears to be asked, Glenn's question would seem to be asking about a possible dynamic where Alex has become the same kind of hypocrite, ranting about the devil on air to make money, but living a discordant life. Right. I'm not sure if that's what Glenn was getting at, but that's the most generous interpretation I can come up with. So I'm going to imagine his point as good as possible. Do your best. In response,
Starting point is 00:57:43 Alex puts on this little show and pretends to wrestle with the idea that he's a preacher and that he's done bad stuff in the past or whatever. Great. Not that he's a preacher on air and a millionaire off air. If nothing else, Alex does have good instincts on when to distract from dangerous points. Also, he brought back up that whole I don't lie on purpose thing again, which is really starting to become more and more suspicious that Glenn is not calling it out. I mean the number of times that he is essentially saying, because I didn't do bad on purpose, do not hold me accountable for doing bad. As though the only crime in the world is first degree murder. All other crimes are legal. As long as it's not premeditated murder, you're golden,
Starting point is 00:58:27 baby. Right. Just apologize. Say you're sorry and then cash another check. It's like it's like the reverse of the John Stuart mill. The only thing that is good is the only thing that is truly good is a good will. Yes. And no, the only thing that's bad is a bad will. All right. That is why John Stuart mill wasn't idiot. I think Alex would agree with you until you explain. Anyway, so this next clip, they're talking about January 6th and Alex says some stuff that I think is really fucking stupid. And if Glenn had any awareness of Alex's career and what he does on air, he would be able to recognize that he was being lied to. Oh, if I had it all to do again, I would have just stepped back and said, Biden, just sink the ship and see what happens. Because
Starting point is 00:59:16 man, I'm not a revolutionary leader in like war. I'm not trying to lead troops. I don't have some weird thing in my head. Like I need to be a military GI Joe guy. But when you get a million people in DC, it doesn't matter. Even if they're being manipulated, you steal your responsibility. So I have a lot of guilt over January 6th, because it could have gone really bad. If the federal provocateurs had their way, they would have the Q people would have actually kidnapped Mike Pence and Pelosi and put them in handcuffs. We'd be in martial law. That would have been nice, because that would have been us capturing the Capitol. That would have been the country going down the tube. So we came in January 6th and closing was a dud. It was meant to provocateur us
Starting point is 00:59:58 into a violent event that was meant to get out of control. Thank God it failed. And so I feel like I've been brought to the edge of death. And so January 6th to me is very serious. Let me ask you about the underlying cause of January 6th. So this is such bullshit. Like it was taken as gospel fact on info wars that if Biden got into office, the literal Christian devil would take his place as the head of the country aligned with communist China. And it would be all over for the Patriots. As soon as Biden got into office, folks like Alex would be rounded up and sent to camps as the orderly depopulation of the planet took off. Now in hindsight, since that didn't happen, it's so fun for Alex to say, if I could do it all over, I'd just let Biden get into office and fail,
Starting point is 01:00:43 because it, you know, to take responsibility for the rhetoric he was using before the election would just be embarrassing now. And Glenn doesn't know or doesn't care about what Alex says on his show. All he knows is what he saw in this dumb documentary. So he's going to let this bullshit stand on questioned. I would call that the mark of an unprepared interviewer. This is not good. When you have something like this, there is a very clear next follow up question that is, okay, if you you're saying that if you could do this all over again, you would just let Biden get into office and then we, you know, see whatever we're seeing now. Sure. Are you lying to me now or were you lying to your audience about the devil ascending to the throne and aligning with communist
Starting point is 01:01:27 China and everything being over the day Biden comes into office, right? Were you lying to your audience or lying to me? I am lying to both of you. Right. So I got into there at the end of Alex's talk, the idea that there was an underlying cause of January 6th. And that, of course, is the election fraud story line. I assume Glenn doesn't follow up with like, okay, so you think it was, if it went gone wrong, you know, you think it gone wrong. And if it had gone right, it would have been bad. Why do you think it would have been bad if it had gone right? Wouldn't you be the fucking White House press correspondent? Also, didn't your employee who was hosting your show for you say the capital has fallen and the Patriots are now in charge? Doesn't he think that the Patriots
Starting point is 01:02:16 being in charge is a good thing? Certainly one of your employees was celebrating it as it was happening. Seems odd. Crazy. Weird. Anyways. Anyway, what about that election fraud stuff? How about it? In this case where you were saying there was widespread fraud, did you actually conduct what you feel like is kind of a meticulous, a forensic analysis of the voting patterns and conclude that there was fraud in the state sufficient to have swung the election? Or was this kind of an ethos, like a way of saying that the establishment was so against Trump from the beginning in illegitimate ways that I'm going to kind of endorse this cause, not because it's necessarily true in its particulars, but more as kind of a thematic way of protesting? No, I mean, I'll be
Starting point is 01:02:56 honest, which the establishment doesn't do, I'll be honest. It was a, yeah, no, it was a pre-baked deal that obviously- What? More votes than Trump. And we saw all the weird, you know, anomalies and like Democrats blocking the windows and people like feeding machines full of things. And so we saw some evidence, but we were expecting it. And so yeah, you can say it's kind of a foregone conclusion and we all went through a rose-colored dark lease, but I think it's kind of 50-50. And then outside with 2,000 mules all the time it's coming out. I mean, I think that obviously I don't think Biden got more votes than Trump. But in a sick way, it's better that Biden's in so we now get to see what the establishment's really about. But yeah, I mean, we expected election fraud right away.
Starting point is 01:03:39 And so kind of when you're a hammer, everything's a nail. I mean, I think we distorted our views, obviously. And they'll say, Jones admits he distorted views. Now there was evidence of the fraud and it got covered up and it got suppressed, but I'm not going to lie and say we didn't, I didn't distort my views and hindsight to what was happening. What? Yeah, you know, I think one of the things I think about a lot is the established media, its function is to spread disinformation. They lie constantly in ways far worse than what you just kind of- Exactly. I admit I'm what you just said. I don't want to be a liar like them on purpose. Wow. So once again, really driving home that point that Alex insists he doesn't lie on purpose,
Starting point is 01:04:19 which kind of should make anyone listening suspicious that he feels guilty about how much he lies on purpose. I mean, it is a fucking lot, man. Yeah. He's saying that a lot too much. Yeah. Also, listening to this, Glenn should really be picking up on what Alex is saying. Alex is essentially saying that his entire coverage of the question of election fraud of the 2020 election was a predetermined narrative he decided he'd report on before the election, before anything ever happened. Yep. Alex insists there was evidence of fraud, but any half decent interviewer might want to point out that this evidence that Alex is bringing up like the 2000 mules thing, it's all bullshit. And what Alex is describing is confirmation bias.
Starting point is 01:05:01 He'd made up his mind and then anything he saw could be used to justify the conclusion he already had in mind. It was already, you know, like anything that affirmed that was automatically considered bombshell proof of election fraud because he desperately needed to justify the narrative he was going to sell his audience no matter what. This seems to fly directly in the face of the hundred times Alex says that he doesn't lie on purpose. And the only way to really square this circle is to suggest that maybe Alex doesn't even really know the difference between lying and telling the truth. Yeah. I mean, if you're saying that I've never lied on purpose, you don't understand what a lie is. A lie is purposeful. You can't lie not on purpose.
Starting point is 01:05:39 That is true. You can be wrong. You can't lie unless you know the answer that you are obfuscated in. That's not how it works. Now, the other thing that a competent interviewer could tease out of this, if they understood what Alex was saying and knew anything about his career is that you could take this glaring, shocking admission on Alex's part that they decided that they were going to just say election fraud no matter what. There wasn't any evidence. It was a pre gone conclusion. I feel like me screaming what every second made perfect sense and any reasonable interviewer would be like, stop at some point. Right. And then what you could do from there is bring up how that's all he does. When you have the situation with his coverage of the Uvaldi shooting,
Starting point is 01:06:27 he was doing that. He had a foregone conclusion that he wanted to bring up. And so pieces of evidence that were bullshit were unchecked, unconfirmed in any way were treated as gospel if they upheld the narrative he wanted to tell. Right. Same thing with the Boston Bombings. Same thing with Sandy Hook. Same thing with every single thing in his career. He comes up with a conclusion and then the evidence is stuff he's figured out out of confirmation bias to justify the conclusion he was always going to reach. Yep. And Glenn doesn't even take a step towards that when it's right there in front of me. I know it's a choice. It's astonishing. It is astonishing that a man it's it's it is crazy because because Glenn is trying to do a softball interview
Starting point is 01:07:21 and Alex is trying to force him to do a hardball interview by being so admitting to crimes. Glenn Glenn is it's crazy. Glenn is doing this softball interview and Alex is almost like too soft. Yeah. I mean it's really that it's really is that Alex is trying to give. Hey buddy this is too soft. Let's mix it up a little bit. I know like what are we doing? Hey Glenn you're going to lose the audience. Glenn please in some way challenge something. Right. Right. Pathetic. Come on man. Glenn you're weak even for Alex. That's bad. Hey Glenn I just teed you up to ask if I intentionally lied about stuff in order to overthrow the government. You want to take a swing at this. Hey Glenn did you realize that Joe Rogan's a better journalist than you now.
Starting point is 01:08:06 You want to take a bite off that apple or that instead do you want to just talk about how bad the other media is and how I'm not as bad as them. Man you're so sex great. Great. Let's keep going. Great. Yep. Jesus. This world is sad. Hey Glenn the check's knocking clear. It turns out Bitcoin dropped dramatically. So that is now four million dollars of Bitcoin my friend. So here's Glenn's next question. Yeah. When you are somebody who's standing against kind of establishment authority and establishment institutions you know that one of the things they're going to do is seize on any mistake that you make. So is is is and this is what I kind of try and counsel people all the time who are trying to be dissidents which is you need to be a thousand
Starting point is 01:08:48 times more careful because they can lie all the time and no one's going to call them out on it because they're on the side of the people with the more powerful megaphones. Do you feel like one point eight million dollars on some occasions have paid insufficient attention to the need not to hand your enemies really easy and cheap weapons for them to take and bash you over the head with. 100% Glenn. Wow. One like that's just an amazing spin. Glenn is giving out. Oh boy. Almost like something you know like you said a ball on a tee to make it easier for Alex to hit. Alex defamed grieving parents. He intentionally lied about election fraud in a way that led to an attempted overthrow of our government. He's undoubtedly killed vast numbers of his
Starting point is 01:09:32 fans through his vaccine bullshit. These aren't instances of Alex just not being careful enough and giving his opponents easy wins. Wins that they only need because he's an anti-establishment dissident voice that must be destroyed. The framing of these questions is pathetic. Do you realize that you said Alex defamed grieving families. Yeah. You did not say Alex allegedly defamed because Alex is guilty of defaming them legally. You don't even get to say he's he kind of defamed them or he a little defamed them or he made a mistake. He committed a fucking crime. And as to that. Yeah. Here is Glenn's question about Sandy Hook. Sure. Let's hear how great and insightful this fucking question is going to fucking be. Mike down for this. Yeah. Good call.
Starting point is 01:10:20 Yeah. So you know I mentioned before I want to ask you a little bit about Sandy Hook. I know the expectation is I'm supposed to come here and bash you over the head about. Go ahead. I know I have no interest in doing that. I don't give a shit what the expectations are. It would bore me if I tried. You've talked about it extensively for people who are interested in it. You've been deposed about it. You've talked for hours about it. People interested in the particulars can go watch that if they want. I'm not going to jump through hoops in order to like appease people anger that I'm here. I do don't want to ask you about a question that I'm actually interested in myself which is you know you have just you just said that that you have made mistakes. Obviously
Starting point is 01:10:56 one of those is the stuff you said about Sandy Hook. We watched you in the film come very clean about the fact that you made statements that turned out to be untrue. You've obviously spent a lot of kind of reflective time. It's like the soulful Alex Jones we got to see in the last part of the the film. What is it that you think caused you to do that? I mean you you reference some things I you know and I just identify with it myself that when you know people who lie for a living are telling you that you're a liar when people who are whose job it is to spread this information are accusing you of doing that you kind of want to dig in a little bit and and not give an inch to people who you know aren't criticizing you in good faith but what is it about kind of how social
Starting point is 01:11:36 media works about how kind of groups function? Have you thought about some of the psychological and cultural dynamics that that led you to to make some of those mistakes in Sandy Hook? Well sure think of this like a thousand page book. So Glenn is essentially starting this question off by apologizing for asking it and saying that everyone expects him to ask about Sandy Hook. It's almost like a meta conversation that Glenn is having with himself about how aggrieved he is about how people view him for agreeing to do this documentary Q&A. It's legitimately insane. Yeah this is nut-baggery of the highest caliber. Yeah but then this question is trash. First off Glenn says that if people want to know the particulars they can watch Alex talk about Sandy
Starting point is 01:12:19 Hook. They can watch the depositions etc. That's all good and well but I'm fairly certain that Glenn hasn't done any of that himself. He's not interested in the reality of what Alex did about Sandy Hook like he just assumes based on what this shallow ass documentary is presented that Alex got some things wrong and then he apologized for it. Now everyone's just using these errors against him because he's a dissonant voice that needed to be destroyed because he supported Trump. That's the foundation of this bad question and to make the question worse Glenn builds an excuse into the question as he's asking it. Do you think the media was so unfairly mean to you that you had to defame grieving parents? It totally makes sense that you'd say that people's dead kids
Starting point is 01:12:59 weren't real because the media is so bad and sometimes you just get too caught up in your noble fight against them right? Fuck off. I mean this is this is a fucked up thing to I'm very struggling. I'm struggling with this one. I started making all kinds of weird movements. Yeah you did. This is not good. You've been doing breathing exercises periodically. I have. You have. Your pits are sweating. My intense extreme fury sweat is going crazy right now. This is not good. Nope. So here's Alex's answer to that question. Let's hear this. It goes about as you'd expect. I don't care about the Sandy Hook families. Alex please continue to cause problems for them in front of me right now. Well Alex has an interesting take on it
Starting point is 01:13:52 that I think won't surprise anybody who listens to our show at all. Well sure think of this like a thousand page book and Sandy Hook in my life is like a quarter page and then not putting down the kids that died or you know that stuff it's just like. Yeah you wouldn't want to put them down. I used to. You don't want to call them overweight. Go with take calls. This would be a call different show. It still is but like 10 years ago it was like almost all calls for like four hours a day. So the callers all call and say we don't believe this. Look at this. Well let's look at this. Let's look at that. They kind of take pieces of that out of context and so here's a way to describe it. Fast forward to Jesse Smollett. I do a Sunday show and I guess it was a Saturday night or
Starting point is 01:14:30 wherever it was. Maybe it was a Monday show I forget but they say he's at 2 30 in the morning and guys don't bleach on him and put a noose over his head and say it's a maggot country and I already been sued for Sandy Hook and I said I don't care if I get sued this doesn't sound real and of course it wasn't real or or or or or that NASCAR driver Bubba whatever Bubba Wallace they had nooses hanging in my thing it's like like you just know that's BS so a lot of it's just I'm a talk show host so I don't go I'm journalistic and I have the witnesses and I have the proof and you know uh uh Jesse Smollett's full of crap but I still went on air and I said the day after it happened I said Jesse Smollett's full of crap there's not dudes at 23 below zero running around
Starting point is 01:15:14 at 2 30 in the morning dumping bleach on black people get your ass kicked I mean like you go attack black people building on Chicago you're gonna die I mean like run around 2 30 in the morning that ain't going on so so to me it's not like out of your mouth the internet doesn't buy anything it's told him more because they've been lied to so much I mean take take take you vaulting I didn't say anything about you vaulting the head of state police said everything we've been told to lie we don't know what happened I mean project what you want on lies and incompetence in the 77 minutes stand down the police are putting hand sanitizer so I'm Glenn I'm sorry it's a long answer uh is it an answer hey he's forgotten what the question was but like uh he did say a ton of
Starting point is 01:15:55 shit about you Valde it's just that no one really remembers and he gets to pretend he didn't yeah so even with all this softball features that are built into this question and with Glenn doing everything he can to make Alex seem justified and heroic Alex can't handle answering this question directly without getting lost in his talking points about how everything is fake also it might be a good idea for Glenn to ask a follow-up about how it's suspicious that the only two examples that Alex can come up with from modern history of times he's called things fake and he feels confident about still saying that are times when he denied an alleged hate crime with small it fair enough Alex was right on that but he was right for the wrong reasons with Bubba Wallace Alex
Starting point is 01:16:37 doesn't even understand the basic facts of that situation and I would dare to say that essentially no one in that audience even remembers that case totally this is pretty grim stuff and if I were Glenn and I hadn't already this is about the time where I would realize that I'm interviewing a deceitful idiot yeah and he's not even keeping track of what question he's answering no I mean I either either Glenn is like playing a fucking cartoon in his head while Alex talks and I mean yeah it has to be because there's no if you are legitimately listening to this human being speak if you the next words you say are the ones Glenn Green has said the whole time you're an insane person yeah the the way that it's just like a question answer oh wow next question just not
Starting point is 01:17:23 even not even a conception of a response that acknowledges the answer none Glenn almost none no Glenn is asking a question answering the question the way Alex should answer it and then allowing it Alex to say a bunch of stuff and then pretending that Alex didn't say anything right this is a frustrating experience for me it's not it's not pleasant and here is Glenn refocusing the question re-asking the question Alex another bite at the apple as it were yeah doesn't doesn't here we go doesn't do a good job well I'm sorry it's a long answer what was the question no no what what do you think led you into these kind of errors that you've been describing that was the question keep going with great question it was just being on air four
Starting point is 01:18:07 five hours a day you're very cavalier and so you you're not putting a journalistic filter on things when I write an article I would do that or make a film I was like getting a piece together those were no you have to know you wouldn't know they're pretty accurate but they weren't on air cavalier and like drinking vodka and smoking cigarettes and like you know that's unacceptable and you're like you're like yeah I hear it's a bunch of fake BS man and like you're sued for it oh god so so wait wait wait wait so your excuses you were drunk I was drunk it doesn't count Dan Dan I stole the car but I was drunk look man I was just free associated I was just drunk as shit on air it's all right maybe I said that these kids didn't actually exist okay so this
Starting point is 01:18:51 motorcyclist is now part of that tree over there but in my defense I was drunk I love I love the way that Alex will be on air and it'd be like I spent 20 hours a day studying this stuff totally I eat breathe and sleep the globalist I know nothing but their plans backwards and forwards I dream about them even when I'm not working right and then here being like I have to explain himself you're on air you're just you know free ball and here's smoking a cigarette drinking vodka like fuck you man listen I why doesn't people why don't people understand that the defense is excellent and unimpeachable defense is because we have to fill time it's okay for us to defame parents and make money well if you're gonna make an omelet sometimes you're gonna defame parents that's
Starting point is 01:19:40 happen that's how it's how that's how it happens unreal unreal yeah um so Alex complains about this trial uh whatever I'm probably gonna probably boycott the trial or something because that's not a trial where if I was a guy caught again with 20 dead bodies in my basement I could get up they're like mr jones we have the dead bodies and we we have them in your basement I'm still innocent your honor a judge has never said you can't say you're innocent that is in a court order starting next wednesday that I cannot say I'm innocent so I'm not even feeling sorry for myself I'm like whoa this is the end of the country and so whatever things I did weren't on purpose and I had 10 points to beg on your question it's a really big question no I mean I think you know
Starting point is 01:20:31 it's interesting and I've identified this with myself and I think yeah no shit you identify no fucking shit you fucking coward pretty remarkable to allow Alex to say these kinds of things about his his case and like not ask clarifying questions like oh why can't you say your innocent is it because that's not a relevant question of the phase that we're in this case he's making it seem like it's a case to determine his ill his innocence or guilt totally um and it's not no no such bullshit listen listen listen this is how you know that Glenn Greenwald knows full well what he's doing yeah okay because if you're going to say that out loud to what is supposedly a journalist right they have to then ask well if you are guilty before this happened
Starting point is 01:21:22 why why are you not allowed to say you're innocent tell me why explain the judge because if what you're saying is true then the entire justice system has fallen apart this is the biggest news in the world that Glenn Greenwald is the first person to discover that Alex Jones has had his free rights his forced amendment rights to say that he is innocent had taken away from him and this is a constitutional fight he knows that the person he's talking to is full of shit because he just moves on yep like yeah exactly just if it's embarrassing if that was true you like I mean honestly if Alex truly on his first try to go to trial for this crime right was instantly disallowed from saying he's innocent you and I would be talking about it yeah I think that would
Starting point is 01:22:08 be a problem we would be furious you do not get to at least have a trial yeah the reason we didn't have a trial is because of all this shit yeah if Alex had cooperated with the discovery process and everything and it had gotten to the point where it was going to trial uh actually on the merits yeah the original question totally and he was not allowed to say he was innocent we would we would be like that's unacceptable that's unacceptable and it never would happen no so um you know Glenn identifies with Alex like he said there at the end and uh here's here's a little more I hope he will when he's broke interesting and I've identified this with myself and I think if you start off as kind of this outside or you start off as like on access tv you start growing
Starting point is 01:22:49 a little bit of influence growing a little bit of influence and suddenly you you become I think one of the most influential people in the country with one of the largest audiences it's hard I think sometimes to remind yourself I'm not that guy on access tv and awesome anymore because it wasn't all that long ago when you weren't getting so much scrutiny and then suddenly you're subjected to more scrutiny than anybody and I think it's hard to try and you know kind of adapt with that because it's kind of a slow and incremental that's why you're a great right great journal that's exactly what I meant to say because he's because they go back they can't finish the work they go back and they go back 10 years five years you're like oh I didn't drink a bottle of vodka that day Jesus I
Starting point is 01:23:28 said that you know I mean I'm gonna be honest about I'm like a lot of people you know so it's yeah exactly so let me see this because I you know obviously do a lot of work on on internet censorship hey here's my on alcoholism girl the fuck up like I do think that it's a gradual process to adjust to rising levels of notoriety and that as your influence rises you have a greater responsibility with your messaging it's also the case that you're responsible for understanding that and to not understand it is you neglecting your responsibility it isn't an acceptable excuse to say that alex jones in 2013 or onward wasn't aware of his reach and his responsibility he wasn't some guy on public access he had multiple employees and reporters working under him he would brag on
Starting point is 01:24:13 air all the time about how many viewers he got on the website if he didn't understand what responsibility he had to the audience about delivering information that was a conscious choice that he was making to ignore that responsibility because it would make his job harder and less fun for example he wouldn't be able to drink that bottle of vodka and get on air make up a bunch of shit that gets people hurt and then do it again the next day he would know that he was responsible to not do that right what a load of shit and to hear glenn lap this up and not ask any follow-up questions it's really disappointing but honestly it makes total sense he needs access to alex in order to interview alex and if he doesn't do exactly what he is doing
Starting point is 01:24:51 and if he treats alex with any critical focus he knows that he's gonna lose that access conversely i think glenn probably fully understands that the most likely result of pushing back on alex at all is that this interview is going to become a fight it's happened in pretty much all of alex's other high-profile interviews and that's not what glenn wants this is supposed to be a promotional event for this image rehabilitating documentary so it would be counterproductive for the end result of this q&a to be everyone walking away thinking yeah maybe you can't really interview alex maybe there's a reason he doesn't give many invitations because he's an asshole and they just end up in fights yeah it's essential to glenn and alex lee moyer's grift for alex to be treated seriously and
Starting point is 01:25:33 not like a cartoon and in order for that to be able to happen you need to treat him with kid gloves and it's pathetic i mean and it's not even it doesn't even work alex is a cartoon they're just acting like he's not it is gaslighting of the highest order for you to talk to what is the words coming out of his mouth to respond with what glenn is saying is gaslighting can you imagine what kind of restraint you would need to employ to not ask a follow-up question if alex said i was drunk i drank a bottle of vodka when i defamed families amazing amazing who had i i mean people die that they loved on sandy hook it meant so little to me that i was just drunk on air it was just a shit face just threw it away why are you why are you mad at me i made a mistake when
Starting point is 01:26:19 i was drunk that's his argument that's what he's allowed to say to glenn fucking greenwald no about a fucking propaganda movie about how great hitler is no curiosity on glenn's part none none nope so anyway there's a great journalist and a great writer though yeah but you know what he's not good at what booking because apparently they had trouble finding a venue oh no you know i was when i got picked up at the airport i was told that there was some difficulty for a while getting a venue here in austin for to do this event that when they found out um that you were involved uh they said you know what on second thought we're not really interested in in your money and i thought about it for a minute and at first i said okay yeah that's of course that's
Starting point is 01:27:00 the case and then i realized that shouldn't be so comforting like normal to hear that should be chilling and alarming i should be what do you mean we're in the united states why is it difficult to get a venue to show a film about somebody who has a lot and we've been so conditioned we're getting too comfortable yeah i mean i think there were there's a kind of repression that has emerged that we've been trained for so long to think takes place in other places that were we have a very hard time recognizing that we're actually subject to that level of repression here have you had problems with with the film like this film getting god distribution and another kind of publicity for it that you didn't have with the first film have you noticed greater
Starting point is 01:27:43 difficulty there's a bear shit in the woods that wasn't a question for alex that was familiar yep um but like okay who cares like i they're basically just trying to say cancel culture without saying cancel culture as a tireless advocate for free speech as someone who demands that everyone be given the choices to do what they desire when a venue refuses money based on some sort of political opinion how dare they how dare they stand up for that not a first amendment right they have to deny me giving whatever i want does he think that like if you paid for it a theater should be forced to let you screen song of the south or triumph of the will clearly like why well because they didn't let him do it that's cancel culture i'm a whiny baby is
Starting point is 01:28:33 what he said and also isn't free association like one of the main pillars of alex's ideology this question and alex's reaction to it in essence reveal that alex's libertarian leanings and those bedrock ideas are it's just lip service he fully supports the right of a business to not serve someone because they're black or because they're gay but he'll cry bloody murder if a theater doesn't want to air his stupid documentary also again this question is basically just teeing alex or alex up to complain about how everyone's been so mean to them because they were brave enough to make this film and that jordan is good journalism i'm gonna tell you this right now i'm gonna tell you this right now people have not been anywhere near mean enough to them yeah i'm doing my best
Starting point is 01:29:16 and i'm not being mean yeah i'm trying i'm we're fighting so hard to be mean to these people and it's not they don't know what mean is man and it's not meanness born out of bad faith or ill will or some kind of a hostility towards them it's righteous fury well it's a this is unjust it's a reaction to the thing that they made or did exactly and they on the merits they should be treated way harsher based on how bad that the shit they're doing is disgusting so anyway moyer comes in to answer this question about finding a venue have you had problems with with the film like this film getting distribution and another kind of publicity for it that you didn't have with the first film have you noticed greater difficulty there's a bear shit in the woods well sort of but
Starting point is 01:30:06 also we read the tea leaves after what happened with our last film and we took matters in our own hands and thanks to play nice hi we you know we started basically talking to people outside of hollywood and i'm not i mean i don't i'm a free agent i'm not playing ice but we're a team on this movie for sure and there are people that are interested in seeing authentic content you know in one amdc and i'm going to really ask and vouch for that too so play nice is the company that distributed the film and it's run by that guy who used to be in charge of sinna family until he got forced out because of rampant sexual harassment complaints against him and then the theater went out of business incidentally play nice was founded partially with the investment from peter teal
Starting point is 01:30:58 i'm sure that's a totally benign thing and not at all suspicious you know it's crazy alex's next film is about how he's not guilty of any of those sexual assaults that he committed do you know why he was drunk dan also i'm not sure how much stock i'd put into a mandemillius vouching for moyer's free agency considering that milley is produced and directed the plot against the president the trump propaganda film that two of the producers of that film are producers of alex's war unbeholden it was smart of milley is to shorten the title of that movie from the title of the book that it's based on which is quote the plot against the president the true story of how congressman devin newness uncovered the biggest political scandal in u.s history that title probably
Starting point is 01:31:40 wouldn't have aged quite as well as the shortened version could have been it could have really hurt could have really hurt later on the plot against the president the true story of how congressman devin newness tried to sue a twitter account the capital is falling and that's a good thing uh-oh nope where should we head in the well boy so here's uh what is essentially the last question of uh of this interview do you mean the first seem to be somebody who from the very beginning you know we're saying things that in your community and in in your politics and and in the media we're your love that we're gonna cause you to be cast aside as a crazy person or as a conspiracy theorist going back to the nineties with waco and and and the fbi and those sorts of things why did that
Starting point is 01:32:25 happen why why did you end up on this path that uh caused you to just constantly be so skeptical of what you're told by authority you know my my uncle uh william farce hamlin was uh a worldwide helicopter pilot vietnam and then he worked in iran contra and he wouldn't tell me all the secret stuff but he he said where i was like a teenager and i was like i'm like where's lumbar he goes the rub luck goes to control the democrats are controlled and it's all it was down there visiting for like two weeks in san Antonio and he just he said let me just take you back on the back porch and let's sit down you know eat a sandwich talk about this and he said he told me about a lot of the stuff he saw in vietnam and how he did these things he was told to do and then he got worse and
Starting point is 01:33:07 worse and worse so the moment he said no and it was narcotics trafficking in vietnam and then it was everything you know with the iran contra it met a point where they were they were smuggling kids out of orphanages you know where they were going and he said at that point he was done and so he told me about all that and then i had other family uh you know they were involved in black operations back when it was all human intelligence and like the russians were actually here and they were actually in wars so my dad's cousin was involved in a bunch of stuff and so i grew up kind of like sit around dinner table like here and these people talk about this stuff and so i kind of knew what was going on what other people didn't and i was just growing up around that and so i kind of heard that
Starting point is 01:33:48 and then my dad was heavily involved in geopolitics and research and all these books around the house and so i kind of grew up around that and these were like pro-american people but they were saying the government's bad government did a lot of bad stuff there's a bad group taking over yeah but they weren't telling me this the you know there's a bumper sticker if you want your children to listen whisper they weren't telling me this stuff this was me hide around the corner like listen what they were talking about and so that that's why i had a leg up on it all was because of a bunch of family stuff well i wonder if glenn would ask a follow-up if alex was clear about what he's talking about and it's all the john birch society shit yeah like i wonder if glenn would debase himself
Starting point is 01:34:29 enough to be like yeah the jbs they were on to something right yeah maybe listen i one i get all of my greatest wisdom from bumper stickers and two uh my parents didn't tell me a lot about the john birch society they just told me that uh black people were part of a communist plot to take over america and that we need to fight against the russians as well as civil rights with everything that we've ever got they didn't tell me that they just yelled about it to their friends all the time and had a house uh full of books about the topic yeah picture books it's the only things i could read exactly yeah so also this question that glenn is asking is framed on a lie like he's like pretending that what alex did was bold like his shit wasn't unpopular in the community he was in
Starting point is 01:35:11 and the politics that he had in conspiracy theory anti-government militia anti-communist worlds everything alex was saying was popular and basically the standard doctrine it was pandering yes glenn's acting like alex had a job at cnn hosting a nightly show and then he did what he did like he took a brave stand it wasn't brave to be a conspiracy theorist in a community of conspiracy theorists maybe it would be if you were expected to not be insane but that was never the expectation for alex he was in an insane world the person they're really talking about here is david eich that guy sucks and is wrong about everything but what he did took a lot of nerve he was already a big mainstream celebrity and he essentially threw that all the way to go
Starting point is 01:35:55 down a crazy conspiracy path alex was just born on that path and followed along doing the things that got him positive reinforcement until we're we're here until he wound up saying that david eich was right all along right the turd in the punch bowl turd in the punch ball is a delicious turd but like yeah that they're pretending that alex did that like david eich went on tv and said that like he's jesus i'm just i'm just so mad i'm tired of people being allowed to gas like me yeah this bad it's pretty rough just be like hey man i think that mcdonald's nuggets are good fine you're gaslighting me but that's fine you know nuggets are fine see i'm sick you're not good but they're fine yes exactly so uh greenwald uh starts talking about like what life would be if
Starting point is 01:36:43 you'd made a different choice sure and mic down for this because there's a there's a slip of the tongue and i want to make sure you catch okay so i was uh before i came here was thinking about where i would be instead of here if i had made different choices to pursue the kind of mainstream accountability acceptability that i was interested in in wondering why you had rejected that's meaningful there were two paths there were accountability and acceptability that is a really good point accountability is really what he's rejecting like you want to pretend that you're a rebel shunning acceptability but that's a farce you just don't want to be held accountable for the things you do and alex is basically the avatar of that shit i have lost so much accessibility
Starting point is 01:37:24 with my 1.8 million followers what i have is accountability with my ability to harass people with less of an audience than i do and receive no consequences for it yeah yeah whoops oh no fun slip of the tongue yeah so anyway here we go this is the last uh clip we have this is just sort of a wrap up and uh you know after this there's not really anything just glenn saying goodbye to the audience so i was uh before i came here was thinking about what where i would be instead of here if i had made different choices to pursue the kind of mainstream accountability acceptability that i was interested in in wondering why you had rejected and i was thinking i'd probably be in like the cnn building with wolf blitzer and chris haze and like anemone clobber chart and ancy polosi
Starting point is 01:38:09 wanting to kill myself out of boredom and disgust and you know i referred to this crowd as like a kind of crowd of misfits and outcasts and and it is and and i'm so happy um so much happier to be around people like this who place themselves on the outside and and decide that they're not going to pay that price of kind of god you know i'm embracing things they don't believe for whatever rewards they offer and you've been doing this for decades and taking all kinds of slings and arrows and you yourself recognize you made a lot of mistakes um but i'm really glad you've been doing what you're doing well then i appreciate you coming i appreciate alex old thing and thanks absolutely just to close on that thanks alex thanks alex
Starting point is 01:38:51 go ahead go ahead you say something no i was just thinking you no no but thank you being in the movie and you know i never really thank you for well you guys are being too nice but but but the difference is i didn't make mistakes on purpose oh my god we all get better we all fix them and but but the larger issue is we have a lot of go ahead right i was gonna ask you did you make mistakes on purpose or did you do them intentionally so you know what i said a five times yeah you're right see it's funny the crowd hilarious the crowd laughs and claps at glenn finally acknowledging that alex keeps saying that you know that he doesn't lie on purpose it's cathartic it's a tension breaker because the joke is that they all know that alex absolutely
Starting point is 01:39:36 lies on purpose and has been for the past 40 minutes or whatever he's been on stage yeah that's the price of admission you want the attention and outside or credibility that you can gain from associating with alex then you better stick to kayfabe and present alex how he wants to be seen glenn understands that which is why he didn't acknowledge the constant insistences that alex doesn't lie on purpose to do so would be to call out that very notion and call it into question whereas it needs just to be taken as a given it's a it's just a fundamental fact yeah the audience laughs because they're in on the joke they know that alex lies on purpose but their ability to use him as an avatar of their hatred of the mainstream press and the establishment
Starting point is 01:40:17 it requires that they maintain the same kayfabe that glenn is bound by there's nothing challenging or brave about this content and the congratulations these idiots give themselves for engaging in it is hollow and meaningless what would actually be challenging it's putting alex in an uncomfortable position where he has to wrestle with the idea that his evasions and lies and self contradictions aren't gonna fly and see how he reacts there's nothing challenging about filming a lie or lie and then interviewing about his lies as if they're truth but you don't act like this because you know alex doesn't actually need you he wants the press of the movie but he's fine without you you need him and if you don't make yourself a good little soldier in alex's imaginary war he's not gonna play
Starting point is 01:41:02 ball and you don't get him yep so fuck you i mean here's the you know we were we our last episode which we recorded so long ago uh about stand-up comedy reminds me of something uh important for this uh when i was coming up uh there was one joke that i that i told that really worked well uh and then as i kept telling it i realized that i didn't know i didn't understand why it worked i didn't understand what the people were laughing at i didn't know what i was really saying that made them release that tension which is what the laughter really is and it was a fucked up thing to say i thought i was being very satirical and smart and doing all of that but the reason that they were laughing is because they were thinking i was saying it literally that that can happen you know
Starting point is 01:41:52 and then i stopped doing the joke because if you understand why people are laughing then you understand what it is you're actually saying and what it is they are understanding you to say that laugh became because that unacknowledgment had been in the air the entire fucking show yes and it came and it came as a laugh because when he released the tension what the tension release was was it's fine yeah it's fine it's fine to imagine that it doesn't matter that alex lies intentionally yep who cares that's what the joke is the joke is we don't even have to bother and the joke is imagining glenn ever even asking that question to begin with 100 because this is silly yeah it's ridiculous yeah everybody has participated in a farce and then glenn greenwald gets to pop the balloon at the end
Starting point is 01:42:38 because it's over and everybody gets to go home and pretend that they weren't part of this farce in the fucking first place well honestly he has to pop the balloon sure because the audience laughed when alex said it the last time yeah that's true he has to address the fact that they laughed so he has to just break the tension whatever yeah and make the very idea of asking that question the joke itself and yeah yeah it's nonsense it's awareness and it's bullshit it's fucking bullshit yeah it is pathetic and that is a sad sad sad sad sad man yeah i mean if you're sucking the boot of alex jones and really trying to get the whole thing in your mouth as much of that boot as you can you're not doing good that paycheck better have been huge it better be big
Starting point is 01:43:20 man wolf whoo nally i can't believe that so i think this was one of the i mean it was way worse than i think i expected it to be i was well i i really am blindsided truly and honestly i knew your expectations were low my expectations are so low i mean i'm fine with glenn asking insanely long questions because that's just how the moron talks you know yeah but this is bad yep this is bad yeah i mean there's it's almost i think those questions could have been asked by a broom yeah yeah absolutely more concisely and better they weren't thoughtful there weren't follow-ups anyway um i i find i find all of this uh just so annoying distasteful so i mean this brings us to the end of our arc i guess with alex's war sure and that documentary is bad yeah it's
Starting point is 01:44:18 dangerous because it lends itself towards um mainstreaming alex uh it foists alex upon an unsuspecting population who if you if you if you go into that documentary without an awareness of who he is which many people probably will just like i've heard this name sure let's let's see this documentary about him or something or they know him as just the gay frogs guy right yep you could stand to um very seriously uh endanger somebody by making them more likely to buy into his shit well what you're saying to the people who know him or don't know who know him as the gay frog guy or don't know him at all is yes look at this man he's the gay frog guy but he's more than that he's a human who makes mistakes and he's a man with principled political stances and it's fucking
Starting point is 01:45:11 bullshit it's all a lie it's all bullshit and she sucks i think humanizing alex is totally fine and i do i do think that one or two dimensional caricatures of him are counterproductive i 100 percent agree with that i just don't think that that's what this is now i think that this is a an attempt to humanize the version of alex that he wants people to see and that is not what a documentary is you're not showing the accurate picture you're showing the the the mask that alex wears and not really giving any indication that it's a mask you're not giving like it's just you're fucking over your audience if you do this yeah and glenn is too and it's uh whatever i don't know yeah you have every right to do it but like any kind of pretense of like this is
Starting point is 01:46:01 somehow a challenging piece of work that we're doing no no it's not you're playing the recorder and pretending it's a tuba yeah or whatever you've you've created a golem of alex jones in order to allow the real alex jones to avoid consequences for his behavior that's what it is yep and let us not forget quite sincerely this q and a and this premiere of this documentary was set to happen just before the trial was to begin glenn rick greenwald came to austin to engage in a promotional event with alex doing these softball bullshit questions after this puff piece as shallow documentary in the context of the same city right around the same time that alex is trying to avoid
Starting point is 01:47:02 responsibility for his actions vis-a-vis sandy hook yep and glenn is essentially a media outlet cheerleader for him in those efforts yep willingly unwittingly willingly who knows it doesn't matter if you lie on purpose or not i guess that's really what it comes down to that's what it comes down to glenn is saying to alex it's a good thing that you keep saying you don't lie on purpose so i don't have to say i don't lie on purpose yeah jesus so anyway we serve each other we'll be back um but until then we have a website we do have a website it's knowledgefight.com yep we're also on twitter we are on twitter it's at knowledge underscore fight net go to bed jordan yeah we'll be back but until then i'm neo i'm leo i'm dzx clark i'm uh alex's empty bottle of vodka
Starting point is 01:47:52 before he got on air and now here comes the sex robots andy and chanzas you're on the air thanks for holding so alex i'm a first-name caller i'm a huge fan i love your work i love you

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.