Knowledge Fight - #709: 2 Dan's 2 War
Episode Date: July 31, 2022Today, Dan and Jordan wrap up their coverage of Alex's documentary by discussing the Q&A that Glenn Greenwald hosted after the film's premier. It's not good....
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys saying we are the bad guys knowledge
fight. Dan and George, knowledge fight. I need money. Andy and Kansas, stop it. Andy and
Kansas, just time to pray. Andy and Kansas, you're on the air, thanks for holding me.
Hello Alex, I'm a Christian color, I'm a huge fan, I love your work. Knowledge fight.
I love you. Hey everybody, welcome back knowledge, right? I'm Jordan, a couple dudes like to sit
around, worship at the altar of Celine from afar in this hotel room and talk a little bit
about Alex Jones. Indeed, we are Dan Jordan, Jordan, quick question for you. What's your
bright spot today, buddy? My bright spot, Jordan is that I went to the 7 11 walking down the
aisle, always been a big fan of Swedish fish. Really? Yeah, I like they disgust me. Oh wow. Yeah,
okay. I think it's probably something to do with my dad, like growing up fair. Some of the things
that he really liked stuck fish. Yeah, and it was Swedish. I like Swedish fish. My dad
liked Swedish fish, but also he was a big fan of like Marzipan and that one didn't carry over.
I don't like Marzipan. Gotcha. But Swedish fish are fine. Anyway, my bright spot is that I saw a
bag of Swedish fish and friends. I was excited to make friends. The fish has made friends. We've
been awake too long. Yeah. There are new flavors. Actually, they're new flavors. They're not good. Oh,
well, that makes sense. There's a strawberry dolphin and a watermelon turtle. Honestly,
the nationality are they? Oh, that's a great question. I think they're all Swedish. That's,
that's kind of offensive to me. I really am. Yeah, I mean, it's a rainbow world now. Norwegian
turtle. Happy? Yes, I am. What's your bright spot? My bright spot is that boy, it's Saturday. I'm
not, I don't have to live between a trial today. My bright spot. Yeah, that is true. It is. You got
the day off from your new gig. No, it's not my fault. No, it's just, I type a lot. It's really
hard. It hurts your fingers. I don't know how you do it. It's a lot. Yeah, I wrote, I think 20,000
words yesterday. It's a book. That's fucked up. That is fucked up. So yeah, it is nice. Yeah, to
free up those fingers. I haven't felt they're just soft and gentle all day. You got to play piano,
put lotion on them. Oh, I'm trying. Yeah, I'm trying. I'm going to learn. Well, I'm happy for
you. And you'll have to be back on that. You know, you got to do finger pushups. Get ready for
Monday, the Bruce Lee to finger push. I get it. Yeah, you're right. You're right. I got to step up
my game. So Jordan today. Yes, we are doing the thing that we have to do. And that is the follow
up to Alex's war. Yes, coverage of that. After the premiere of that film, they did a little Q&A
where Glenn Greenwald interviewed Alex Jones and Alex Lee Moyer, the documentarian who directed
this film. They did not have their mics really working and the sound was really terrible for the
portion where Moyer was interviewed. So we're not going to talk about any of that. I wonder if she's
mad at the crew. I would be maybe not. Actually, maybe it's best to not know exactly how that
interview went. Right. So we've just got Alex's chunk. And honestly, it's like 40 something
minutes of an interview. And I mean, it sucks. But it's going to take more than 40 minutes to
talk about. I'm surprising. Fairly certain. So what are your feelings going into this? What are
your expectations? Um, I my my feeling is that it's going to be Glenn Greenwald doing the soft
balliest of interview, like not even softball questions, not T ball questions. Like he's swinging
the bat for Alex to try and get that ball across the fucking plate. That's what I feel like.
Interesting. We'll see if that lives up to your expectations. Okay. So before we get into the
actual interview, I have a few things I want to say. I have some comments. Jordan, you're getting
very excited. So I've been tracking some reactions to this new documentary about Alex. And I have
to say that I have just been seeing more and more shit takes. It's sincerely unbelievable to me
that anyone could watch this film and come away accepting the argument that the producers and
director just showed Alex as he is. That's such an offensive and gaslighting farce that I feel
the need to address this again, and really sharpen the point that I'm making. On the day before the
film was released, Matt Taiiby published a fawning interview with director Alex Lee Moyer on his
sub stack. In his introduction to the interview, Taiiby says quote, she takes characters reduced
in panicked media treatments to two dimensional to two dimensional monsters and renders a
non judgmental, tautly edited Herzogian treatment of who they of who they are and how they came to
be that way. This is absolute nonsense. And if I were Herzog, I would not take kindly to this kind
of a suggestion. But I want to ask what exactly is meant by non judgmental here. That seems like a
really important concept to nail down, because it seems like this is something Moyer and the
film's defenders are really proud of being. I would guess that from the other things I've read,
non judgmental to these folks means that they don't include critical voices in their film to
provide any other input. And then they pat themselves on the back, a whole bunch for having
the courage to let the audience decide what to think about the subject of the film. I guess it's
fine to not include critical voices in a film. But I really don't think that you're going to be
able to say that you even tried to portray your subject as they are. You're just portraying your
subject how they want you to see them. For example, Alex lies constantly and contradicts himself
about biographical information in this film. But you aren't introduced to somebody expressing that
point in the film. So you have no reason to suspect that Alex is being anything but honest.
The audience is being allowed to make up their own mind, I guess. But their options are believing
Alex or choosing not to, which they'd have no reason to do based on the film they're watching.
Another important point is that you're editing the film according to the whim of your subject,
which makes it nearly impossible for an uninformed viewer to make up their mind for themselves.
If you're watching this film, nothing about it would give you any reason to distrust Alex's
assertion that the only reason anyone was mad at him about Sandy Hook was because he liked Trump
and they needed something to smear him with. There's no reason at all from the material
in this film to not conclude that the Sandy Hook parents like Neil Heslin or Scarlett Lewis,
who we've been in the courtroom with this week, are just tools of an overzealous democratic machine
that wanted desperately to punish Alex for supporting Trump. That assertion, that narrative
that Alex tells is not presented as just what this guy is saying. The film is structured around
defending that narrative. The only outcome of accepting lawyer's claim that this is just
non-judgmental in presenting Alex how he is would be to conclude that she either believes Alex's
version of this story or she edited her film in a way to strengthen the story fully aware that it
was full of shit and is now bragging about how great she is for not indicating that the audience
maybe shouldn't trust this claim at all. It's weird. Yeah, odd. We've done this fucking stupid
dance all over like over and over again with idiots like Rogan who want to have their cake and
eat it too but then they also want pie. They want to talk to and platform dangerous lunatics and
whitewash their images but they don't want to be criticized for it. And not only that,
they want to be treated like the real heroes for having the courage to do what they do.
And much like with Rogan, I don't buy that shit from Moyer. If you're doing a documentary about
a liar or a con man and you don't include any content critical of that liar or con man in your
film, you aren't doing a documentary. The con man is using you as a medium to spread their message
to an audience they wouldn't have access to otherwise. You do have a responsibility in that
circumstance whether you choose to accept it or not. To be totally clear, here is Moyer in her
own words on how she approaches her filmmaking. This is from that interview with Tayebi.
Quote, this is what I'm going to do with all of the documentaries that I make by the way,
including the one I just made about Alex Jones. It's not meant to confirm your biases.
It's meant to actually show you what these people are actually like and then you can make
an informed decision based off watching the film. It used to be called journalism.
This was said in response to her telling a story about how she had investors not want to support
her first film because she wouldn't include the voices of people who had been harmed by misogynists
and school shooters, which is meant to connect to her choice to not have critical voices of Alex
in this film. In a very real sense, she's kind of engaging in censorship here because guess what
ding dong? A huge part of who Alex actually is and what he's actually like is that he knows that
he's caused people an enormous amount of pain and he doesn't give a shit. By not giving voice to that
and not exploring that side of him, you're kind of covering up that aspect of his psyche because
it's inconvenient and probably too difficult of a subject for you to pull off in this soft ball
documentary. Now, let me focus in on my point about Moyer's approach by applying it to a
different situation. Now, let's imagine that Alex's war actually could be called a fair portrait
and that it provided the audience with enough information to make an informed decision. I
totally don't believe that, but that's going to be the standard that will apply to another situation
and see how it feels. So they're really going to wish they hadn't said that. I'm going to throw
that out at you right now. I don't think it's going to go well for them. I just don't think
they're going to stand up to it. That's just me. So what would Moyer say about someone who made a
documentary like hers about Jim Jones in like, I don't know, 1974, right when he was forming
Jonestown in Guiana? What if that person just let Jim Jones tell his own story lying the whole
time with no pushback from the director or anyone in the film at all? You'd think that Jim Jones
would be able to spin a pretty good yarn and be able to make the idea of heading to his compound
and his commune sound like a pretty decent idea. People were having a great time and he was spreading
a real message of love and unity. It's the word of God is coming through. Now, let's imagine further
that this hypothetical documentarian knew that there were former members of the people's temple
who had left and alleged that Jim Jones had abused them both physically and sexually,
that people had come forward and alleged that Jim Jones would punish dissenters by starving them
and ostracizing them from socializing with the rest of the community. This documentarian knew
those things, but decided not to include any of them in the film because of a commitment to just
showing Jim Jones as he really is. Well, and everybody knows that when that happened, all of
those people who left, they were just hired by Carter to smear Jim Jones. Everybody knew that.
Now, let's imagine that this hypothetical filmmaker edited together their documentary in such a way
that swelling music played over hero shots of Jim Jones and almost religious soundscape served as
the background for him talking about his religious awakening. Now, let's imagine that this hypothetical
filmmaker allowed Jim Jones's framing of his life to inform the structure of their documentary
and how the story was told. So, like you were touching on, in this documentary, they do end
up mentioning the allegations of abuse of his followers, but it's not brought up as a negative
thing about him. Instead, it's only mentioned as something that Jim brushes off to the side
as an attack from the power structure who were afraid of the religious revolution that he was
involved in and his commune in Guyana and the possibilities that it posed. I should have made
a more extreme joke. That was too obviously just what would have happened. Well, that's the parallel
to this documentary. The mass murder that ended Jonestown hadn't happened yet, so maybe some
edgy assholes of the day would say that this documentary filmmaker was just giving a non-judgmental
view of this public figure who's somewhat polarizing. And if I were somebody who studied Jim Jones
back then, as I am somebody who studies Alex Jones right now, I would say that's complete
bullshit. Portraying Jim Jones in exactly the way he wants to be portrayed with no context and no
countervailing information is very likely to lead viewers to adopt a more positive view of him,
and that would be a dangerous thing to be involved in. Yeah. Dan, I want to run through a brick wall
for you right now. I want to bounce my fucking head against the like, let's stop recording shit.
Let's go fight Jim Jones. I don't even know what's happening right now. I'm sure that the
rebuttal to this would be that Alex Jones is no Jim Jones, and sure, he doesn't have a Jonestown,
but you're delusional if you think that Alex doesn't pose as much potential danger as Jim
Jones did. By adopting the lawyer's approach, you're essentially legitimizing the figure you're
covering and making people more likely to follow them. And as we've seen over the course of doing
the show, Alex is a completely unhinged child unable to control his emotional outbursts who
constantly tells his audience to keep a list of globalists in their town so they'll know who to
kill when the time comes. He's told his audience that it might be time to consider if you could kill
your family members if they support vaccination. He extols the message that psych meds are mind
control weapons, which could have the effect of making people not seek mental health care or even
worse, just stop taking medications that they're prescribed. Ask the people of Boston if Alex's
actions have real world consequences. Ask the people of the Sandy Hook Victims family members.
Ask the families of Igor Soldo, Alan Beck and Joseph Wilcox, the three people who were murdered
by Jared and Amanda Miller in 2014, murders that were inspired by their anti-government views and
which Jared had discussed beforehand on the Infowars forums. Ask the family of tragically
deceased Marcel Fontaine. These are stories that we know and they're just the tip of the
iceberg of the lives that have been changed permanently by Alex's behaviors and Alex doesn't
give a shit. He continues acting in the exact same ways that he did that led to these people's grief
because it's profitable and these voices are ignored and disrespected in this documentary
because actually covering Alex as he really is would be way too hard and I suspect that it
wouldn't have resulted in the kind of movie that Moyer wanted to make. It would have resulted in
710 episodes of some sort of, I think that might have been, that might be what would have happened.
It definitely wouldn't have resulted in the sort of movie that she was looking for,
considering that at least two of the producers of this film were also producers of the Trump
propaganda nonsense film, The Plot Against the President. Alex Lee Moyer made a stupid and inaccurate
film, one that willfully omits information that calls into question the subject self-delivered
image of himself. It's a bad movie and it will hurt people, but it's her right to make it.
I hope the money that she made doing it is worth it, but please spare me the sanctimonious bullshit
about how people can't handle that you do journalism. You're a cut-rate editor producing
semi-slick character studies, not of Alex Jones, but of the person Alex Jones wants you to think
he is. Basically, you're the mark if you think what this documentary shows is Alex as he really is.
Also, before we get into this Q&A, I need to make one more point crystal clear,
which is that the framing that Moyer has about her own work, that isn't even real.
She isn't interested in seeing these subjects as they are, and that just is some sort of purity
to it, and the most obvious tell is that she interviews Owen Shroyer, Rob Dew, and Mike Hansen
in the documentary. They don't provide a glimpse into Alex as he really is. Interviewing them
doesn't just show Alex as he is and lets the audience decide for themselves. They're included
because they're sycophantic voices that'll echo the self-aggrandizing narrative that Alex is telling
about himself, which is the story that Moyer wants to tell. Including interviews with people who
glorify Alex as counter to her pretend ethos, and kind of makes a joke of her insistence of not
interviewing critical voices in the name of some pretense of journalistic purity.
That's a condescending mask she's wearing so she can elevate her puff piece, brand rehabilitation
project into some kind of act of reporting that's so brave that we can't even understand it.
I reject that shit entirely, and it's really sad to see people with actual media careers
falling for this kind of an act. And I can't stress this enough. Even if Moyer thinks that
she's some kind of an uncritical observer just dispassionately relaying the story of Alex,
she's deluded. She's a creator, and she's creating. Some of her input and biases are
impossible not to have an impact. For instance, in a piece about the movie's premiere in the New
York magazine, these lines made me think maybe she's not so impartial of a documentarian as she's
pretending. Oh yeah? What might that be? Quote, she watched the X-Files, researched serial killers
and conspiracies, and generally respected misfits. Distain for authority was normalized back then,
she says, whereas now people worship power and believe in towing the line for the state.
Liberal outlets, she thinks, have unwittingly lent credibility to figures like Jones thanks
to their credulousness about official narratives. Quote, the things they're calling conspiracy
theories are just going to be news items six months from now, she says. There were WMDs,
COVID came from a bat. This is just her saying Alex's catchphrase in a less succinct manner.
Infowars, tomorrow's news today. Last bit of business. Glenn Greenwald has a penchant for
run on sentences, so in order to present this Q&A in as fair of a light as possible,
I've attempted to preserve as much of that as possible. God damn it. It's going to lead to
some clips that are longer than I would like in rambling meandering questions, but I would rather
risk annoying you fair, fair, being sensorious. Listen, just because I am not a very important
person doesn't mean that I shouldn't be okay with you treating me like this. So anyway, I have some
thoughts. How are you feeling? I mean, it's just, it's just sad. It's so sad. She sucks, like just
on a level of like quality, like she just sucks. She played shitty music. Like it's not like she
had good choices. She didn't have Radiohead or anything on there. That might have boosted up
the documentary for somebody. She would have had trouble with that one. I get clearing that might
have been an issue. Yeah, definitely. But like just having Owen Schreuer on there, a man who's
literally a puppet, a self admitted puppet. Yeah. Of the subject of the documentary. What are you
going to get? Wait a second. Wait a second. Like what is Jeff Dunham's hand up a puppet's ass going
to say in a documentary about him is, Oh, Jeff Dunham. Well, I mean, he would say mean things,
but that's not the point of what I'm trying to say. Yeah. Owen Schreuer is going to say anything
meaningful in the documentary. It's like, well, I'm essentially unemployable in any other media
situation. I'm stuck here. I'm saddled with this. Absolutely. So I'm going to say shitty things about
my boss. Totally. Totally. Yeah. Cool. While Alex's hand is right all the way up my ass controlling
my mouth, I'm going to be like, I think he might go too far sometimes. Like what are you doing?
This nonsense idea of that, like I'm just showing him as he is. It's so torpedoed by the fact that
you sought out Mike Hansen. Yeah. Alex, like his current employees or at the time current employees
also a dubious move. Yeah. But Mike Hansen's inclusion in there is like, get off your fucking
high horse pretending that like, what input is Mike Hansen giving that shows Alex as he actually
is right? Nothing. No, it's giving Mike Hansen's impression of Alex, right, which is a positive
one. You exclude all negative impressions of Alex because you're not up to the task of telling
that fucking story. Yeah. I think what it's it is tying together with what I'm learning during this
whole fucking experience down here is that all of these people are fucking cowards who are afraid
of anybody challenging them. And because they have a rabid fan base that will attack people who do
challenge them, a lot of people don't discover that they're cowards. They have this little group
of people who protect them and keep them from ever having to realize that they're a bunch of
fucking cowardly babies who have no competence or quality at anything. They mean like Alex's 90
bodyguards. Yeah. Oh my God. Jesus Christ. There were his 90 bodyguards for nobody showing up to
court at all. You missed it. You missed the best one. Whenever I left court the other day, he went
out, he went across the street to go get a hero or something, right? And his 10 bodyguards were
surrounding him and they were doing the funniest like mission impossible ass maneuvers. Like people
are checking the corner and like I got your six like it was hilarious. There is no one there.
They're doing these mission impossible ass organizational moves. It is fucking sad. They
have like really long meetings before they go public about like, all right, we got to keep an
eye out for milkshakes. Totally. Totally. Can't let Alex get milkshaked and no offense at all.
But one of his bodyguards is five foot three. I'm not joking. I'm not joking. May or may not have
a false mustache. Yes, I did see the guy that was still up in the air, whether or not you'll
never know. You'll never know. Kind of looks like somebody from that Beastie Boys video.
He grew a mustache. The size of Mike Dick's forehead is what I would like to describe it as
yeah. So without further ado, Jordan, let's let's jump in on this Q&A. All right. This is not going
to not be frustrating for you. Anyway, it starts with some compliments. Alex already frustrating
for me. Alex is not yet on stage. So this is just Greenwald and Moyer. Okay. Yeah. You know,
I just say this week I had to spend time explaining what I thought was never necessary to explain,
which is you can, if you're a journalist, for example, go and speak to someone without making
clear whether you love that person or hate that person, but simply to try and understand them is
kind of fundamental to what journalists are supposed to do. And I think that's the same for
filmmakers and artists and documentarians. And the fact that you even have to explain yourself,
the fact that it's unusual to watch a film without constantly being bombarded with the
filmmakers' moral perspective, I think is a testament to just how repressed of the society
has become. And I really want to congratulate you for resisting that and for kind of restoring what
I think is the purpose of art and journalism in film and documentary and documentaries,
which is to show the public information that they ought to have and let them decide what they think
about it as opposed to shoving that conclusion down their face. And life is a lot easier for you,
as I said, if you had chosen a different route. But I think it takes a lot of courage for you to
do that. And I think it's important. So I want to congratulate you for that. Thanks, Glenn.
I feel like one of the defining characteristics of people you really shouldn't listen to are people
who have a mindless need to be in opposition. For instance, I think you're delusional if you
don't think that Glenn's belief that this documentary shows a fair portrait of Alex is
in some way informed by the fact that all of the media voices he doesn't like are saying it's not.
I think if you've watched this film and you see that this is Glenn's take, he's just a loser.
This film isn't providing the information that people need to make an informed decision.
It's not just a dispassionate exercise in journalism that people are just mad at because
it doesn't include the requisite performance of outrage. That's the line these ding-dongs tell
themselves so they can feel morally superior to everyone else while they trot out their exploitative
vanity projects. Let's look at this idea of an informed decision. I would argue that in order
to make an informed decision, you need to have all the relevant information about a subject.
For instance, it would be inappropriate for a pill to market itself by exclusively talking about
the positive things it can do while completely neglecting the potential side effects it can have.
Similarly, it wouldn't serve a person at all if the coverage of a pill focused entirely on the
potential side effects and ignored the thing that it's effective in treating. Either of these would
give the person a lot of information about the pill in question, but neither would give them what
they needed to make an informed choice. It might give them the feeling that they had that informed
choice, but that feeling is an illusion. This documentary does not give the viewers the information
they need to make any kind of an informed decision about Alex. In order for this film to actually
be something that the viewer can watch and make up their own mind about, the viewer would need to
already enter the film knowing that Alex is a liar and nothing he says can really be taken as
sincere. You already need to know that there's a reason not to trust him before you watch,
and that's an absurd expectation to have for most viewers who are randomly coming into this
film. I talk to people periodically and they're like, what do you do? I do a podcast about Alex
Jones. Who's that? He's not somebody who everyone knows about. There's a lot of people who have
an unformed opinion about him, and you go into this documentary and all the information that
it provides is incomplete. Glenn thinks he knows who Alex is, and he's been told that
this documentary provides a fair portrait, and people he doesn't like don't like the movie,
so he's gung-ho about patting himself on the back and congratulating Moyer on her active and
lightened filmmaking. They're just basking in their own fucking delusion and illustrating
how little they know about the subject that they're actually talking about. Yeah, I mean,
it's disgusting. I can't imagine what our next film, Mussolini, a profile in courage is going to be
about, but I think I've heard that it shows a balanced view of Mussolini right up until 1941.
Just that he's a great guy. No, I think she'll need misunderstood. I think she'll need to
overcorrect and do some film about something that'll make the right wing angry or something.
If she overcorrected, she would jump off a bridge. That's the wrong kind of overcorrect.
That's maybe a little too overcorrecting there. I mean, artistically overcorrect. That's the
smart one. I don't know. A puff piece about an eco terrorist or something like that. I don't know.
Bill Ayers. Isn't he the best? Well, that would be an interesting film. That would be an interesting
film. Anyway, Alex comes out and here we are. All right. So do you want to end the weirdness
of talking about Alex Jones right in front of him if he's not here and bring him up on stage?
All right. Get up here, AJ. Come on, Alex.
Does he have a mic? Yeah, he should have a mic.
We can share. We can share. No, I mean, I haven't asked anything. Alex, do you want to talk?
Silent Raiders attacks. No, no, no. Listen, I got into an access TV when I was 21 years old.
Dames. But I meant everything in purity. I made a lot of mistakes. I've done a lot of bad stuff.
It wasn't on purpose. So it's great to be here with Gwyn Greenwald. It's great to be here with
Alex Moyer. And the thing is, I didn't lie on purpose. I made a lot of mistakes, but I'm not
some person getting orders and lying to people. And we're probably like 90% accurate, 10% wrong,
and I want to get better. And so that's just where I'm at. And it's great to be here. And I'm glad
you made a film that just kind of shows what we've done because I look at it as kind of horrifying
obnoxious I am. And then parts of it are good. But I mean, I did this from a peer place. And that's
at the end of the day, like I did not lie to people on purpose. I didn't make mistakes on purpose.
And I'm just glad you guys made this film.
So Alex, let me actually begin by asking you a little bit about that in terms of your intentions.
So this is a good indication of how stilted this Q&A is. Any decent interviewer might hear that
opening statement that Alex made and first say, are you okay? And after clearing that up, you'd
probably point out that unprompted. Alex just said that they that he didn't ever intentionally lie
three times in about a minute. That kind of feels like somebody who lies intentionally,
really trying to stress that they don't do that. And if your instinct isn't to follow up on that,
I guess you're just a better journalist than I can ever imagine being. Also,
weird not to latch onto that weird 90% accurate claim seems like that's something that could
stand to be explored. Like how do you quantify that? Does that actually mean anything? Or is
that just an evasive catchphrase that you use to try to dodge responsibility for the horrible
things you say and do all the fucking time? Sure. I mean, you're forgetting Shakespeare's
immortal line, you know, me thinks you can't possibly protest too much. Me thinks you can't
protest at all. Why would you? Yeah, you're too right all the time. Yeah, me thinks what is
protesting? Are you on the stand? So Glenn, Glenn started into a question there. And here's where
he goes. And if you're expecting it to be like, Hey, let me ask you about that. You say you don't
lie. What do you mean? That's not it. So Alex, let me actually begin by asking you a little bit
about that in terms of your intentions and the like, because I when I remember when I watched
the film, it was just so striking this early footage of you. And I remember when the internet
first discovered some of the early pictures of you from your public access days in Austin,
I remember liberals being almost horrified, like with this cognitive dissonance, like we're supposed
to look at him as a screaming, spitting monster. And yet these these pictures are disturbing the
handsome. And there's like very extreme monster, you are now you, that's the beginning how to kind
of charisma, a natural charisma. You were so handsome. And now you're ugly, even said from the
first time they saw you. And so when you combine your soul attributes that you had when you were
young, this is a great question. Clearly had you been somebody who was willing to affirm rather
than question establishment, Heidi's could have ended up as like a meteorologist on like Good
Morning America or like some Anderson Cooper type. And I'm wondering if you were aware of that
potential and purposely chose to reject it for a different path, this kind of path. That's your
question. It's an outcast that we're surrounded by delightfully. And it's whether it was just so
natural to your personality that you never even considered trying to pursue that kind of mainstream
acceptability. What I was thinking about driving her today. So that's where Glenn goes. That's his
first question. After Alex says three times in a minute that he doesn't lie on purpose and that
right 90% of the time Glenn decides to open with a question predicated on how Alex was
a handsome young man. This is this is just pathetic because track this question. It's
basically asking, did you make a conscious decision to not be as rich and famous as your
talents would make you deserving of being because you were too invested in questioning the power
structure or is it just your instinctual nature to be a rebel who questions the power structure.
So the decision to not be super rich and famous wasn't even a decision. It's basically like,
are you so awesome by choice or by nature? I mean, you you almost went too long for me. I would
have gone with why is your dick so big? How did it get so big? That is the biggest dick I've ever
seen. That's another reading of it. Yeah, this shit is embarrassing, partially because it's
basically answered in the film, but also because it kind of ignores the reality that if Alex has
ever tried to get a job where he'd have a boss or advertisers that weren't a shady gold salesman
and a book about where to hide guns, he wouldn't have lasted more than a month. He is talented,
but he's not that talented to the point where an employer would look past his extreme oppositional
defiance because he's got the goods. Yeah. He's no Howard Stern, let's say. No, no, no, no. This
question is predicated on a false construct of what Alex could and could not have done as a younger
man. Yes, he was handsome. Yes, he was talented. But he was also Alex Jones that whole time. If you
take his story in the documentary at all seriously, you shouldn't have to ask this question. Alex
talks about how he got fired from a radio station because he wouldn't stop talking about Waco.
Alex took the path he did because it was the only path available to him that allowed him to
satisfy his need for attention and for nobody to ever be able to tell him what to do. It's
quite something really. This Q and A was never going to be hard hitting, but
I didn't predict it would open this flaccid. I mean, yeah, that one's tough. Pretty bad. Here's
a good, no, no, no. Here, if you want to do that Beatles like, hey, listen, man, you had that moment
where there were two paths becoming a rock god or working at a grocery store, you know, what was it
that really turned that and I would have been like, hey, Alex, you could have been a father of at least
10. Why didn't you become that? Alex Glenn doesn't know any of that stuff. You could have been,
you could have been in jail for murder. Why did you become an info wars hose? Hey, excuse me.
Have you ever heard your own story about your childhood? Why didn't you put it in this fucking
movie? I'm going to guess that Glenn's awareness of Alex starts and ends with things that are in
this documentary and the fact that everybody doesn't like him. Yeah. And then he gets more money for
it. Yeah. Yeah. And what a piece of shit and maybe a few of the like really broad things that
people know like he was against the Iraq war. He's glad that he hates the establishment which Glenn
Greenwald should be against him for Glenn was for the Iraq war. So is his buddy Tucker, right?
Weird. Yeah. Anyway, here's Alex's answer to that question of well, essentially how big that dick.
Yeah, or whether it was just so natural to your personality that you never even considered trying
to pursue that kind of mainstream acceptability. Glenn, I was thinking about driving her today,
what I wanted to say and I forgot it. Thank God you brought that up. No, no, no, seriously. No,
it's really intuitive. My enemies say I'm this Lex Luthor mastermind and we don't say that.
You're a moron. None of that. I had no I could study the ball and politics and read like books by
was speaking to Brazilian like these were scary things. But I had no training, no idea, no plan.
And the this idea that like, I'm this mastermind, it's in these opposite. I mean, I can't balance
my check that, you know, and so and I'm not trying to put myself down. It's just like, they literally
think I'm like this evil mastermind. And I literally can't balance my checkbook. And they're just
like attacking me constantly like where's the secret? Where's the Russians? Where's the who's
giving the immersors? Who's giving the orders? I'm like, I was just covering the news. I was just
giving my opinion on something. And so no, I had no idea what I was doing. I just was America and
like, kind of a libertarian and like, didn't like Republicans didn't like Democrats. And I was just
watching all this happen. I said, God, I don't access TV. So I tried to go to college and tried
to get an RTF job. And they're like, Oh, take it five years, even be doing anything in radio.
So I was like, well, I'll do access TV. So that was it was basically, I have my own political
beliefs, nor just pro freedom. And then I got involved. It was immediately successful. And then
I was like, trying to like figure out as I went and I'm trying to be truthful made a lot of mistakes
along the way. But none of it was with malice. Crazy. None of it was matured anybody. Yeah, we're
going to talk about the mistakes for sure. And in a few minutes, it wouldn't be a complete discussion
without that. But before we get to that, I just why, why wouldn't it be a complete discussion?
Anyway, this isn't really an answer to Glenn's question, but Glenn doesn't give a
shit. In fairness, I guess it's like a half answer with an answer to a completely different
question mixed in. Also, you might notice that Alex ended that ramble by again, saying that he
never meant to lie. And if you're Greenwald, it's a conscious choice to ignore that happening so
much. A neutral observer would look at that behavior and say, Hmm, this person really seems
to be going out of his way to say that he doesn't lie on purpose. And yet no one here has accused
him of that at all. That seems like something he's being super defensive about. And maybe
if I want to have a full discussion, I should check in on that glaring dynamic that's playing
out right in front of me. I guess you could just ignore it and power through to your next
softball question, though. That's certainly another option. I mean, I'm so fucking furious
at Glenn already, you know, like it's like this is a dude who will go out of his way to try and
destroy a young journalist's career, who will fucking sick his sycophantic bullshit people
on other people to destroy their lives. Then he'll go and fucking say, Alex, you've got the biggest
dick in the world. How do you walk with a dick this big? It's so huge. But he won't even fucking
talk to me. He won't even block me on Twitter. Do you know why? Because I don't have any fucking
restraints that young journalist. She could lose her job if she called him a giant shitball fucker.
But instead, we are. We are untethered from the. Exactly. You can't. What are you? Who's going to
get mad at me? He doesn't have anything to gain. It is interesting. And I do think there's a really
funny thing in that you're mad that he won't block. I want him to because this means that he
knows and he's just a coward. He doesn't even have the guts to acknowledge it. If you block me,
you told me I didn't see this, but you told me that somebody who tweeted at him who had like
under 10 followers immediately blocked when they said that he should listen to our show.
So, so believe me, you know, you know, that's a little suspicious. Yeah.
So, um, Glenn, here is his next question here. And I think that there's a little
kernel of something in here, actually. Yeah, we're going to talk about the mistakes for
sure in a few minutes because it wouldn't be a complete discussion without that. But before
we get to that, I just, you know, the question of your politics, I think it's so interesting. And
this is what was striking me watching the film is there's a, the idea, there's this idea, you know,
if you ask somebody with what political faction or ideology is Alex Jones associated, they would
instantly say, oh, the far right. And I'm watching you. I wonder why well before most people thought
about doing it, spreading huge amounts of skepticism and doubt about the CIA, the US state,
you're confronting the FBI well before Trump began spreading that kind of skepticism and
Republican circles that question before Alex even gets a chance to the NSA before 9 11,
you're warning about the dangers of exaggerating the threats of bin Laden and al Qaeda in order to
kind of bring into a sort of authority, authoritarian imbalance giant. Lots of things that people
very associated with the left have been saying for a long time, kind of opposing these institutions
of authoritarianism, warning about how they exploit people's perceptions to put the population
in fear. How have you seen yourself ideologically and politically on years? Exactly. So that's
a dumb question, but there's a little bit of truth in it. Alex was skeptical of all these
organizations like the FBI and the CIA early on, but there's also a context that's missing from
all of this. And it's not something you're going to get from Glenn or from Alex himself,
and certainly not from this film. Alex hated these groups, not because of some kind of a
principled opposition to things like spying, the way Glenn is framing the question. Alex hated
these groups because of Waco, Ruby Ridge, and the Oklahoma City bombing. He distrusted them
because after OKC, the issue of right wing militia violence was a high priority for law enforcement
and to put a serious halt to the momentum that the extreme right was seeing in terms of organizing.
It wasn't an opposition to the idea of spying or the FBI. It was that Alex felt that they were
focused on people who were too much like himself. Similarly, his opposition to overhyping the threat
of bin Laden was also really just about his fears about the government cracking down on far
right militias. He didn't oppose spying on like suspected Muslim terrorists for its own sake.
He just thought it was a smokescreen to eventually spy on Christian nationalistic extremists.
Yeah, I mean, they might as well. Here's a better way of framing that question. Alex,
you opposed the FBI because they're not solely out to get non white people. How long has that
been going on for? But Glenn would have no way to know any of that stuff because he didn't prepare
for this interview at all. I really don't know anything except for I am tired of hearing that as
an excuse. It's not excuse. It makes it worse. Exactly. It's a willful ignorance of the subject
you're covering or you do know some things and you're just pretending not to know that because
it would be inconvenient for the interview. It would be a terrible idea to know those things.
Yeah, it's fine to give it up to Alex that on paper a lot of his positions about things like
the NSA are good, but to pretend that they're based in some kind of a principled belief is a little
bit much. Taking Alex seriously on this issue is honestly kind of funny because he's the last
person I would accuse of being a serious opponent of authoritarian leadership. For one thing, he
made cartoonish accusations about how like Obama was going to become a tyrant, like he was going
to dissolve the government so he could turn the country into part of a one world caliphate that
he ruled the caliphate. Yeah. Engaging with the notion of tyranny like this indicates a lack of
seriousness about the subject and not somebody who you should ask their thoughts on because they're
not going to, there's not going to be a point. Or you could look at how he behaved with Trump.
He was cheering on Trump's authoritarian leanings at every turn and yelling that Trump needed to
go further. He wanted Trump to imprison his political enemies, take over the media, militarize the
border and outlaw the Democratic Party. If this is someone you're taking it all seriously on the
subject of authoritarianism, the joke is on you. Also, Alex's politics are really simple.
He's a John Birch Society styled anti-communist reactionary who wants to install a white Christian
heterosexual dominated state. Yeah. Yep. I mean, it's just, it's, but he's not going to tell you
that. I mean, yeah, it's like, I just don't know, Glenn. Glenn, you don't have a place in Alex's
world just in case you were wondering. At the end of the day, Glenn, good luck to you. Yeah.
You want to fawn over the guy who wants you dead? Weird. Oh my God. Hey, no, no, no. He's only
going after trans people right now. I'm sure whenever he's done with that, he's going to stop.
That's how it works, right? Once you go after LGBTQ, you, you stop after one of the letters.
You don't go after all of them. Yeah. Makes sense. Yeah. Glenn, Glenn may learn a hard lesson that
Dave Rubin is learning currently at some point. Yeah. Which I don't enjoy. There's no shodden
Freud in that. It's fucked up. Yeah. It's awful. It's tragic. And why? Yeah. It's fucked. Anyway,
Alex responds to this question that you very readily pointed out. Glenn was basically answering
in the delivery. Yes. Yeah. Yeah. And because I think maybe partially because of that, Alex just,
I don't know what the fuck even this answer is. Okay. How have you seen yourself ideologically and
politically on years? Exactly. Exactly. Starting out like 95, 96. First articles were like
communist Alex Jones, anti-American. That was against wars and surveillance. Because that
just seemed like, well, Bill Wright says, you don't do this real quick. 94 and 95. Alex Jones is a
communist. No way. How old was he? Well, first of all, like that's the great when he's beginning
his career. No one really gave a shit. Nope. And he was opposed to Bill Clinton at the time. Yeah.
He was attacking from the right. He's trying to pretend that he was called a communist because
he opposed Bush. And that's not accurate at all. It's better for his mythology to have that in
his background than to be a right-wing shipbag from the start. For sure. Yeah. So this is bad.
And I would just follow the Constitution really hand fistedly. And I was like, well, I see all
this news about the Constitution. And so I wasn't even being right-wing or left-wing. I was simply
thinking, I want to promote freedom. That's a fun thing to do. And so that's really where it came
from. And then that's why like Martin Sheen 18 years ago or so said, I want to fly you out here
to California. And we want you to, you know, Milo Estevez's son. We really love what you're doing.
So I get their house and it's like, I'm sitting there and they're putting movies on like, so you're
really a good liberal, right? You're against these wars. And you're against George Bush. I'm like,
yeah, I'm against George Bush. And they didn't care that I was pro-gun or any of this stuff. It was like,
I'm sitting there like, oh, Anthony Hopkins is going for dinner. Let's have dinner right now.
So like, we're talking like 18 years ago, I'm sitting with Anthony Hopkins eating roast beef.
And like, like Martin Sheen's house in Malibu. And I'm like, what's this place? Because I had no
idea, like private jet land, slides back to California. They're like, you're a very important
young filmmaker. You're, you're exposing the evil right-wingers. I'm like, I just don't want to have
a war. I don't want to support what these people are doing. And so there was that. And then as soon
as Obama got in, this is astonishing. They're like, boy, this is Obama. And I'm like,
I don't like what Obama's continuing the same stuff. So to me, I literally just went on access TV
at like 21 years old, got a local radio show at 22, got a syndicated at 23, totally self-taught,
made a ton of mistakes, but I did it for a place of truth, what experience like Hollywood and what
it does. And then just I had this great experience over 28 years on air of like seeing all the weird
underbellies of all the stuff because I didn't come into it from the establishment. I literally came
out of access TV in Austin, Texas. And so because I wasn't part of any of the power structures,
I got to see stuff nobody else is seeing. So let me, let me ask you the, the, a similar question
that the one asked Alex for cheese. I don't think that was an answer to Glenn's question, but whatever.
There's no reason to ask a follow up to the original question because Glenn didn't really
care that much about it to begin with. It was really just a launching pad for Alex to go off on
some rambling diatribe that it's eventually going to include him saying that he doesn't lie on purpose
at some point. It's very defensive about that. It does seem like that almost like he's about to go
on trial. Sure. But he's not on trial here and he's super defensive. You know what I find really
interesting though? Like Alex has all these stories with these left wing folks like Martin Sheen
mistakenly thinking that he's on the left because he hated Bush, but you never really hear any
stories about right wingers who invited Alex in and only to realize that he isn't right wing after
all. Sure. He had like that time when Ann Coulter was on his show and she laughed at him for being
so far right that he sounded like Lyndon LaRouche, but I don't think anyone on the right would talk
to Alex and come away disappointed thinking like, oh, he's not on our side. Man, he's a rhino. That's
what Alex is. He's a rhino, buddy. Yeah. Anyway, Glenn has another question for Alex that is really
just like hype man shit. So let me ask you a similar question that the one asked Alex, which is
you know, it is so striking when I began writing about politics in 2005.
Let me ask you this. How does Anthony Hopkins like his roast beef? That is a good question.
Liberals hated more than anybody, George Bush, the architects of the Iraq war. I began writing an
opposition to rendition and the torture regime and Guantanamo and due process free imprisonment.
And it's just so striking that people back then who were implementing it were advocating it are
completely acceptable. In fact, be loved in mainstream liberal circles. Liberals watch
media outlets and consume media outlets that employ those people. As I was saying, I could
interview all of them and I would be applauded by liberals and yet you who back in 2004 were
saying, don't trust George W. Bush. His father was the CIA director, the Iraq wars based on lies,
all things that auto appeal to that sensibility of liberals. You are uniquely castigated and kind of
cast out of good company to the point where you're one of the very few people that even
journalists are told they can't speak to. Why is that? Why have you been identified as such a threat
in a way that other people who actually have blood on their hands and wars on their legacy
aren't even remotely cast as? Well, I mean, that's a great question. And I again only learned this
Glenn through organic experience of it. But I think I think Glenn should take up his concern
with himself and his good buddy Tucker, who was a huge supporter of the war back in his bow tie days.
Hey, you'd think this is an interesting point, although one that Alex has nothing interesting
to say on the subject. There have been some attempts to rehabilitate the images of people
like George W. Bush, and that's been a distasteful thing to say to see. That said, I don't think
it's been as successful as Glenn is pretending. And I don't know how many fawning pieces we're
seeing about like Dick Cheney or Carl Rove these days. To his larger point, though, all of the
mainstream media outlets have Trump people on their rosters of talking heads. Like Kellyanne Conway
was just on CBS today, and she was the person that really? Yeah, she's the person the Trump
hired to lie to the media for him. It does suck. But media outlets do feature some shitty people.
But there are people who fall within a certain spectrum of shittiness. And most right thinking
people understand that Alex is outside that range. It does feel like all networks have a worm
farm somewhere. I suspect that a giant part of Alex is not being allowed in is I think it's less
about what Alex believes or would say and more about how he would act. He's already shown himself
through countless appearances to be unable to stop himself from just yelling and self promoting
instead of actually doing an interview like with Piers Morgan, Andrew Neil in the UK,
or the time that he was on the view. If I were a TV Booker, I'd be pretty aware that Alex isn't
going to be a guest that participates in any discussion you might be trying to have, but
he's just going to steamroll everything and yell info wars.com. He's a shitty guest as further
evidence by his appearances on the podcasts like flagrant to and Rogan. He just gets wasted yells
nonsense at the only reason you'd want him around as if you're looking for a spectacle.
Most TV shows wouldn't consider the spectacle to be worth the hassle of having Alex on. But the
math is different for desperate people and charlatans. So thus here we are. Yep. That explains
the situation. Yeah. Yeah. Glenn's questions so far are living more than up to my standard. In
fact, I did not expect that he would be asking Alex something along the lines of Alex, your
virtues are so great. We are knighting you a paladin of truth tomorrow. Tell me more about
how you came by them. This question in particular, I think I would translate as like, why won't
anyone let you come on their show? Is it because you're too right about things? Also, isn't it
really awesome that I'm not scared to interview you like all those other media outlets? I'm pretty
awesome too. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's nice that we doing it's nice that two of two of the biggest
dicked people in the world get to share a stage together for one moment. You know, it's just
rare to see this happen. So here's Alex's answer to whatever question that was. Okay. I mean,
that's a great question. And again, only great question through organic experience of it. But
if I lied about WMDs, if I kill billions of people, I'm part of the establishment,
but they're not scared of Alex Jones. They're scared of populist movements. And the fact that I
wasn't left wing or right wing, the fact that I was just pro America and pro freedom, they
they really wasn't me. They just saw me as like the American people and like, okay,
this is what the American people produced. This is organic because they went and checked out who
I was who I wasn't controlled. They're like, well, this guy just came out of the dirt. And so this
is this is the enemy. And so it's their hatred of the general public, their hatred of the organic
grassroots. It's not me. It's their hatred of just good, decent classical liberal Americans
that want peace and want justice and want unity and want justice and want everybody living peace.
We don't want to hurt anybody. We're not judging anybody. We just want our freedom. And so that's
what freaked them out like, well, this guy could get this popular and he's just some idiot on access
TV. What are we gonna do? So I'm a symbol of their insecurity. I'm not that strong. They're weak. And
and that's mascara. So, you know, it is it is it is interesting that the thing they hate most
are people who develop influence and a significant audience without being captive to their structures
and their influence. Wow. Talk to me, Glenn. Hey, listen, look at it. Look at what's happening now.
I'm developing an influence independent of all this bullshit. How about that? Glenn seems like
Glenn's not into that either. It seems weird. Yeah. Ha. Ha. Also, I mean, it's all good and well
to talk about Alex not being beholden to CNN or news core, but you got 8 million in Bitcoin from
somebody. So crazy. He's so unbeholden. Yeah. And he spent most of his career hawking gold for a weirdo.
Oh, so unbeholden to constantly doing the earth is going to fall apart. So you better buy gold ads.
Yeah. Weirdly in the documentary and this interview, Ted Anderson doesn't come up once.
Oh, that's so crazy. So strange. So how about that? Fuck it. I mean, we we're mad.
I think you're madder. I was madder when I was true, true. You're writing your anger is pushed
into the document. Now you're free. Yeah. Yes. Yes. I'm still reliving it for the first time or
living it for the first time. Yes. So here isn't the next question. And I actually think that this
is Glenn's best question. Okay. It doesn't shorter. It doesn't go anywhere. And I might be
misinterpreting it. Okay. It is interesting that the thing they hate most are people who develop
influence and a significant audience without being captive to their structures and their
influence. And that is something that defines what you've done. I think more than anything,
you came out of public access TV, which was tolerated because it's supposed to be a joke that
no one watches. And yet you develop this gigantic audience. And clearly part of why is because you
have a kind of showman charisma, kind of, you know, entertainment component to you that made people
want to watch. And one of the things that struck me was, you know, you were talking early on in
this funny episode about how when you were 12, you would see these preachers with Royce's and
gigantic houses doing coke off hooker's breasts and whatever. And now you do that and have those
they had this similar kind of showmanship, they were able to get people to watch. And by the end
of the film, we're watching you talking about praying for President Bush and satanic influences
in a way that I'm just wondering, no, let's be honest, I became the abyss. Okay. But but why
is there a, what do you notice that kind of similarity? I became what I saw, but for a good
cause that wasn't on purpose. Only at 48 can I now see it. No, I was like, damn, that's a hot
slut that preachers bang on his back porch. That rolls Royce was pretty. I mean, I wasn't doing
that consciously. But yeah, there's, there's definitely, I mean, I'm not gonna lie. Yeah,
it's true. I'm a preacher. And so only now at like 48, last year, I'm like, whoa, what have I been
doing? I've kind of like, you know, the things you get old, you go, damn, what I just do. You're
like, like, damn, I did all that. Like, God, I'm a freaking horrible person. But then I didn't do
it consciously. The establishment is lying. According to formulas, I didn't ever do stuff on
purpose. So this could actually be interpreted as a pretty scathing question, which may be why
Alex dodged the real meaning behind it by turning on that charisma and talking about titties.
The point of the preachers thing that, you know, that Alex saw as a kid, it wasn't that they were
preachers, that they were hypocrites. They were pious as an act to make money. And then in their
real lives, they did coke off sex workers on boats. If taken as it appears to be asked, Glenn's
question would seem to be asking about a possible dynamic where Alex has become the same kind of
hypocrite, ranting about the devil on air to make money, but living a discordant life. Right. I'm
not sure if that's what Glenn was getting at, but that's the most generous interpretation I can
come up with. So I'm going to imagine his point as good as possible. Do your best. In response,
Alex puts on this little show and pretends to wrestle with the idea that he's a preacher
and that he's done bad stuff in the past or whatever. Great. Not that he's a preacher on
air and a millionaire off air. If nothing else, Alex does have good instincts on when to distract
from dangerous points. Also, he brought back up that whole I don't lie on purpose thing again,
which is really starting to become more and more suspicious that Glenn is not calling it out. I
mean the number of times that he is essentially saying, because I didn't do bad on purpose,
do not hold me accountable for doing bad. As though the only crime in the world is first degree
murder. All other crimes are legal. As long as it's not premeditated murder, you're golden,
baby. Right. Just apologize. Say you're sorry and then cash another check. It's like it's like
the reverse of the John Stuart mill. The only thing that is good is the only thing that is truly
good is a good will. Yes. And no, the only thing that's bad is a bad will. All right. That is why
John Stuart mill wasn't idiot. I think Alex would agree with you until you explain. Anyway,
so this next clip, they're talking about January 6th and Alex says some stuff that I think is
really fucking stupid. And if Glenn had any awareness of Alex's career and what he does on
air, he would be able to recognize that he was being lied to. Oh, if I had it all to do again,
I would have just stepped back and said, Biden, just sink the ship and see what happens. Because
man, I'm not a revolutionary leader in like war. I'm not trying to lead troops. I don't have some
weird thing in my head. Like I need to be a military GI Joe guy. But when you get a million people in
DC, it doesn't matter. Even if they're being manipulated, you steal your responsibility.
So I have a lot of guilt over January 6th, because it could have gone really bad. If the
federal provocateurs had their way, they would have the Q people would have actually kidnapped
Mike Pence and Pelosi and put them in handcuffs. We'd be in martial law. That would have been nice,
because that would have been us capturing the Capitol. That would have been the country going
down the tube. So we came in January 6th and closing was a dud. It was meant to provocateur us
into a violent event that was meant to get out of control. Thank God it failed. And so I feel
like I've been brought to the edge of death. And so January 6th to me is very serious. Let me ask
you about the underlying cause of January 6th. So this is such bullshit. Like it was taken as
gospel fact on info wars that if Biden got into office, the literal Christian devil would take
his place as the head of the country aligned with communist China. And it would be all over for the
Patriots. As soon as Biden got into office, folks like Alex would be rounded up and sent to camps
as the orderly depopulation of the planet took off. Now in hindsight, since that didn't happen,
it's so fun for Alex to say, if I could do it all over, I'd just let Biden get into office and fail,
because it, you know, to take responsibility for the rhetoric he was using before the election
would just be embarrassing now. And Glenn doesn't know or doesn't care about what Alex says on his
show. All he knows is what he saw in this dumb documentary. So he's going to let this bullshit
stand on questioned. I would call that the mark of an unprepared interviewer. This is not good.
When you have something like this, there is a very clear next follow up question that is, okay,
if you you're saying that if you could do this all over again, you would just let Biden get into
office and then we, you know, see whatever we're seeing now. Sure. Are you lying to me now or
were you lying to your audience about the devil ascending to the throne and aligning with communist
China and everything being over the day Biden comes into office, right? Were you lying to your
audience or lying to me? I am lying to both of you. Right. So I got into there at the end of Alex's
talk, the idea that there was an underlying cause of January 6th. And that, of course, is the
election fraud story line. I assume Glenn doesn't follow up with like, okay, so you think it was,
if it went gone wrong, you know, you think it gone wrong. And if it had gone right, it would have
been bad. Why do you think it would have been bad if it had gone right? Wouldn't you be the
fucking White House press correspondent? Also, didn't your employee who was hosting your show
for you say the capital has fallen and the Patriots are now in charge? Doesn't he think that the Patriots
being in charge is a good thing? Certainly one of your employees was celebrating it as it was
happening. Seems odd. Crazy. Weird. Anyways. Anyway, what about that election fraud stuff? How about it?
In this case where you were saying there was widespread fraud, did you actually conduct what
you feel like is kind of a meticulous, a forensic analysis of the voting patterns and conclude
that there was fraud in the state sufficient to have swung the election? Or was this kind of an
ethos, like a way of saying that the establishment was so against Trump from the beginning in
illegitimate ways that I'm going to kind of endorse this cause, not because it's necessarily
true in its particulars, but more as kind of a thematic way of protesting? No, I mean, I'll be
honest, which the establishment doesn't do, I'll be honest. It was a, yeah, no, it was a pre-baked deal
that obviously- What? More votes than Trump. And we saw all the weird, you know, anomalies and
like Democrats blocking the windows and people like feeding machines full of things. And so we saw
some evidence, but we were expecting it. And so yeah, you can say it's kind of a foregone conclusion
and we all went through a rose-colored dark lease, but I think it's kind of 50-50. And then outside
with 2,000 mules all the time it's coming out. I mean, I think that obviously I don't think Biden got
more votes than Trump. But in a sick way, it's better that Biden's in so we now get to see what
the establishment's really about. But yeah, I mean, we expected election fraud right away.
And so kind of when you're a hammer, everything's a nail. I mean, I think we distorted our views,
obviously. And they'll say, Jones admits he distorted views. Now there was evidence of the
fraud and it got covered up and it got suppressed, but I'm not going to lie and say we didn't,
I didn't distort my views and hindsight to what was happening.
What? Yeah, you know, I think one of the things I think about a lot is the established media,
its function is to spread disinformation. They lie constantly in ways far worse than what you just
kind of- Exactly. I admit I'm what you just said. I don't want to be a liar like them on purpose.
Wow. So once again, really driving home that point that Alex insists he doesn't lie on purpose,
which kind of should make anyone listening suspicious that he feels guilty about how
much he lies on purpose. I mean, it is a fucking lot, man. Yeah. He's saying that a lot too much.
Yeah. Also, listening to this, Glenn should really be picking up on what Alex is saying.
Alex is essentially saying that his entire coverage of the question of election fraud
of the 2020 election was a predetermined narrative he decided he'd report on before the election,
before anything ever happened. Yep. Alex insists there was evidence of fraud, but
any half decent interviewer might want to point out that this evidence that Alex is bringing
up like the 2000 mules thing, it's all bullshit. And what Alex is describing is confirmation bias.
He'd made up his mind and then anything he saw could be used to justify the conclusion he already
had in mind. It was already, you know, like anything that affirmed that was automatically
considered bombshell proof of election fraud because he desperately needed to justify the
narrative he was going to sell his audience no matter what. This seems to fly directly in
the face of the hundred times Alex says that he doesn't lie on purpose. And the only way to really
square this circle is to suggest that maybe Alex doesn't even really know the difference
between lying and telling the truth. Yeah. I mean, if you're saying that I've never lied on purpose,
you don't understand what a lie is. A lie is purposeful. You can't lie not on purpose.
That is true. You can be wrong. You can't lie unless you know the answer that you are obfuscated
in. That's not how it works. Now, the other thing that a competent interviewer could tease out of
this, if they understood what Alex was saying and knew anything about his career is that you could
take this glaring, shocking admission on Alex's part that they decided that they were going to
just say election fraud no matter what. There wasn't any evidence. It was a pre gone conclusion.
I feel like me screaming what every second made perfect sense and any reasonable interviewer
would be like, stop at some point. Right. And then what you could do from there is bring up
how that's all he does. When you have the situation with his coverage of the Uvaldi shooting,
he was doing that. He had a foregone conclusion that he wanted to bring up. And so pieces of
evidence that were bullshit were unchecked, unconfirmed in any way were treated as gospel
if they upheld the narrative he wanted to tell. Right. Same thing with the Boston Bombings. Same
thing with Sandy Hook. Same thing with every single thing in his career. He comes up with a
conclusion and then the evidence is stuff he's figured out out of confirmation bias to justify
the conclusion he was always going to reach. Yep. And Glenn doesn't even take a step towards that
when it's right there in front of me. I know it's a choice. It's astonishing. It is astonishing
that a man it's it's it is crazy because because Glenn is trying to do a softball interview
and Alex is trying to force him to do a hardball interview by being so admitting to
crimes. Glenn Glenn is it's crazy. Glenn is doing this softball interview and Alex is almost
like too soft. Yeah. I mean it's really that it's really is that Alex is trying to give. Hey buddy
this is too soft. Let's mix it up a little bit. I know like what are we doing? Hey Glenn you're
going to lose the audience. Glenn please in some way challenge something. Right. Right. Pathetic.
Come on man. Glenn you're weak even for Alex. That's bad. Hey Glenn I just teed you up to ask
if I intentionally lied about stuff in order to overthrow the government. You want to take a
swing at this. Hey Glenn did you realize that Joe Rogan's a better journalist than you now.
You want to take a bite off that apple or that instead do you want to just talk about how bad
the other media is and how I'm not as bad as them. Man you're so sex great. Great. Let's keep going.
Great. Yep. Jesus. This world is sad. Hey Glenn the check's knocking clear.
It turns out Bitcoin dropped dramatically. So that is now four million dollars of Bitcoin my
friend. So here's Glenn's next question. Yeah. When you are somebody who's standing against kind
of establishment authority and establishment institutions you know that one of the things
they're going to do is seize on any mistake that you make. So is is is and this is what I kind of
try and counsel people all the time who are trying to be dissidents which is you need to be a thousand
times more careful because they can lie all the time and no one's going to call them out on it
because they're on the side of the people with the more powerful megaphones. Do you feel like
one point eight million dollars on some occasions have paid insufficient attention to the need not
to hand your enemies really easy and cheap weapons for them to take and bash you over the head with.
100% Glenn. Wow. One like that's just an amazing spin. Glenn is giving out. Oh boy.
Almost like something you know like you said a ball on a tee to make it easier for Alex to hit.
Alex defamed grieving parents. He intentionally lied about election fraud in a way that led
to an attempted overthrow of our government. He's undoubtedly killed vast numbers of his
fans through his vaccine bullshit. These aren't instances of Alex just not being careful enough
and giving his opponents easy wins. Wins that they only need because he's an anti-establishment
dissident voice that must be destroyed. The framing of these questions is pathetic. Do you
realize that you said Alex defamed grieving families. Yeah. You did not say Alex allegedly
defamed because Alex is guilty of defaming them legally. You don't even get to say he's he kind
of defamed them or he a little defamed them or he made a mistake. He committed a fucking crime.
And as to that. Yeah. Here is Glenn's question about Sandy Hook. Sure. Let's hear how great
and insightful this fucking question is going to fucking be. Mike down for this. Yeah. Good call.
Yeah. So you know I mentioned before I want to ask you a little bit about Sandy Hook. I know the
expectation is I'm supposed to come here and bash you over the head about. Go ahead. I know
I have no interest in doing that. I don't give a shit what the expectations are. It would bore
me if I tried. You've talked about it extensively for people who are interested in it. You've been
deposed about it. You've talked for hours about it. People interested in the particulars can go
watch that if they want. I'm not going to jump through hoops in order to like appease people
anger that I'm here. I do don't want to ask you about a question that I'm actually interested
in myself which is you know you have just you just said that that you have made mistakes. Obviously
one of those is the stuff you said about Sandy Hook. We watched you in the film come very clean
about the fact that you made statements that turned out to be untrue. You've obviously spent a lot
of kind of reflective time. It's like the soulful Alex Jones we got to see in the last part of the
the film. What is it that you think caused you to do that? I mean you you reference some things I
you know and I just identify with it myself that when you know people who lie for a living
are telling you that you're a liar when people who are whose job it is to spread this information
are accusing you of doing that you kind of want to dig in a little bit and and not give an inch to
people who you know aren't criticizing you in good faith but what is it about kind of how social
media works about how kind of groups function? Have you thought about some of the psychological
and cultural dynamics that that led you to to make some of those mistakes in Sandy Hook?
Well sure think of this like a thousand page book. So Glenn is essentially starting this
question off by apologizing for asking it and saying that everyone expects him to ask about
Sandy Hook. It's almost like a meta conversation that Glenn is having with himself about how
aggrieved he is about how people view him for agreeing to do this documentary Q&A. It's legitimately
insane. Yeah this is nut-baggery of the highest caliber. Yeah but then this question is trash.
First off Glenn says that if people want to know the particulars they can watch Alex talk about Sandy
Hook. They can watch the depositions etc. That's all good and well but I'm fairly certain that Glenn
hasn't done any of that himself. He's not interested in the reality of what Alex did about Sandy
Hook like he just assumes based on what this shallow ass documentary is presented that Alex
got some things wrong and then he apologized for it. Now everyone's just using these errors against
him because he's a dissonant voice that needed to be destroyed because he supported Trump.
That's the foundation of this bad question and to make the question worse Glenn builds an excuse
into the question as he's asking it. Do you think the media was so unfairly mean to you that you
had to defame grieving parents? It totally makes sense that you'd say that people's dead kids
weren't real because the media is so bad and sometimes you just get too caught up in your
noble fight against them right? Fuck off. I mean this is this is a fucked up thing to I'm very
struggling. I'm struggling with this one. I started making all kinds of weird movements.
Yeah you did. This is not good. You've been doing breathing exercises periodically.
I have. You have. Your pits are sweating. My intense extreme fury sweat is going crazy right
now. This is not good. Nope. So here's Alex's answer to that question. Let's hear this.
It goes about as you'd expect. I don't care about the Sandy Hook families. Alex please continue
to cause problems for them in front of me right now. Well Alex has an interesting take on it
that I think won't surprise anybody who listens to our show at all. Well sure think of this like a
thousand page book and Sandy Hook in my life is like a quarter page and then not putting down the
kids that died or you know that stuff it's just like. Yeah you wouldn't want to put them down.
I used to. You don't want to call them overweight. Go with take calls. This would be a call different
show. It still is but like 10 years ago it was like almost all calls for like four hours a day.
So the callers all call and say we don't believe this. Look at this. Well let's look at this.
Let's look at that. They kind of take pieces of that out of context and so here's a way to describe
it. Fast forward to Jesse Smollett. I do a Sunday show and I guess it was a Saturday night or
wherever it was. Maybe it was a Monday show I forget but they say he's at 2 30 in the morning
and guys don't bleach on him and put a noose over his head and say it's a maggot country
and I already been sued for Sandy Hook and I said I don't care if I get sued this doesn't sound real
and of course it wasn't real or or or or or that NASCAR driver Bubba whatever Bubba Wallace
they had nooses hanging in my thing it's like like you just know that's BS so a lot of it's just
I'm a talk show host so I don't go I'm journalistic and I have the witnesses and I have the proof and
you know uh uh Jesse Smollett's full of crap but I still went on air and I said the day after
it happened I said Jesse Smollett's full of crap there's not dudes at 23 below zero running around
at 2 30 in the morning dumping bleach on black people get your ass kicked I mean like you go attack
black people building on Chicago you're gonna die I mean like run around 2 30 in the morning that
ain't going on so so to me it's not like out of your mouth the internet doesn't buy anything it's
told him more because they've been lied to so much I mean take take take you vaulting I didn't
say anything about you vaulting the head of state police said everything we've been told to lie we
don't know what happened I mean project what you want on lies and incompetence in the 77 minutes
stand down the police are putting hand sanitizer so I'm Glenn I'm sorry it's a long answer uh
is it an answer hey he's forgotten what the question was but like uh he did say a ton of
shit about you Valde it's just that no one really remembers and he gets to pretend he didn't yeah
so even with all this softball features that are built into this question and with Glenn doing
everything he can to make Alex seem justified and heroic Alex can't handle answering this question
directly without getting lost in his talking points about how everything is fake also it might
be a good idea for Glenn to ask a follow-up about how it's suspicious that the only two examples
that Alex can come up with from modern history of times he's called things fake and he feels
confident about still saying that are times when he denied an alleged hate crime with small it fair
enough Alex was right on that but he was right for the wrong reasons with Bubba Wallace Alex
doesn't even understand the basic facts of that situation and I would dare to say that essentially
no one in that audience even remembers that case totally this is pretty grim stuff and if I were
Glenn and I hadn't already this is about the time where I would realize that I'm interviewing a
deceitful idiot yeah and he's not even keeping track of what question he's answering no I mean
I either either Glenn is like playing a fucking cartoon in his head while Alex talks and I mean
yeah it has to be because there's no if you are legitimately listening to this human being speak
if you the next words you say are the ones Glenn Green has said the whole time you're an insane
person yeah the the way that it's just like a question answer oh wow next question just not
even not even a conception of a response that acknowledges the answer none Glenn almost none
no Glenn is asking a question answering the question the way Alex should answer it and
then allowing it Alex to say a bunch of stuff and then pretending that Alex didn't say anything
right this is a frustrating experience for me it's not it's not pleasant and here is Glenn
refocusing the question re-asking the question Alex another bite at the apple as it were yeah
doesn't doesn't here we go doesn't do a good job well I'm sorry it's a long answer
what was the question no no what what do you think led you into these kind of errors that you've
been describing that was the question keep going with great question it was just being on air four
five hours a day you're very cavalier and so you you're not putting a journalistic filter on
things when I write an article I would do that or make a film I was like getting a piece together
those were no you have to know you wouldn't know they're pretty accurate but they weren't on air
cavalier and like drinking vodka and smoking cigarettes and like you know that's unacceptable
and you're like you're like yeah I hear it's a bunch of fake BS man and like you're sued for it oh god
so so wait wait wait wait so your excuses you were drunk I was drunk it doesn't count
Dan Dan I stole the car but I was drunk look man I was just free associated I was just drunk as
shit on air it's all right maybe I said that these kids didn't actually exist okay so this
motorcyclist is now part of that tree over there but in my defense I was drunk I love I love the way
that Alex will be on air and it'd be like I spent 20 hours a day studying this stuff totally I eat
breathe and sleep the globalist I know nothing but their plans backwards and forwards I dream
about them even when I'm not working right and then here being like I have to explain himself
you're on air you're just you know free ball and here's smoking a cigarette drinking vodka like
fuck you man listen I why doesn't people why don't people understand that the defense is excellent
and unimpeachable defense is because we have to fill time it's okay for us to defame parents
and make money well if you're gonna make an omelet sometimes you're gonna defame parents that's
happen that's how it's how that's how it happens unreal unreal yeah um so Alex complains about
this trial uh whatever I'm probably gonna probably boycott the trial or something because
that's not a trial where if I was a guy caught again with 20 dead bodies in my basement I could
get up they're like mr jones we have the dead bodies and we we have them in your basement
I'm still innocent your honor a judge has never said you can't say you're innocent that is in a court
order starting next wednesday that I cannot say I'm innocent so I'm not even feeling sorry for
myself I'm like whoa this is the end of the country and so whatever things I did weren't on purpose
and I had 10 points to beg on your question it's a really big question no I mean I think you know
it's interesting and I've identified this with myself and I think yeah no shit you identify
no fucking shit you fucking coward pretty remarkable to allow Alex to say these kinds of
things about his his case and like not ask clarifying questions like oh why can't you say
your innocent is it because that's not a relevant question of the phase that we're in this case
he's making it seem like it's a case to determine his ill his innocence or guilt totally um and
it's not no no such bullshit listen listen listen this is how you know that Glenn Greenwald
knows full well what he's doing yeah okay because if you're going to say that out loud to what is
supposedly a journalist right they have to then ask well if you are guilty before this happened
why why are you not allowed to say you're innocent tell me why explain the judge because
if what you're saying is true then the entire justice system has fallen apart this is the biggest
news in the world that Glenn Greenwald is the first person to discover that Alex Jones has had his
free rights his forced amendment rights to say that he is innocent had taken away from him and
this is a constitutional fight he knows that the person he's talking to is full of shit because
he just moves on yep like yeah exactly just if it's embarrassing if that was true you like I mean
honestly if Alex truly on his first try to go to trial for this crime right was instantly
disallowed from saying he's innocent you and I would be talking about it yeah I think that would
be a problem we would be furious you do not get to at least have a trial yeah the reason we didn't
have a trial is because of all this shit yeah if Alex had cooperated with the discovery process
and everything and it had gotten to the point where it was going to trial uh actually on the
merits yeah the original question totally and he was not allowed to say he was innocent we would
we would be like that's unacceptable that's unacceptable and it never would happen no so um
you know Glenn identifies with Alex like he said there at the end and uh here's here's a little
more I hope he will when he's broke interesting and I've identified this with myself and I think
if you start off as kind of this outside or you start off as like on access tv you start growing
a little bit of influence growing a little bit of influence and suddenly you you become I think
one of the most influential people in the country with one of the largest audiences it's hard I think
sometimes to remind yourself I'm not that guy on access tv and awesome anymore because it wasn't
all that long ago when you weren't getting so much scrutiny and then suddenly you're subjected to
more scrutiny than anybody and I think it's hard to try and you know kind of adapt with that because
it's kind of a slow and incremental that's why you're a great right great journal that's exactly
what I meant to say because he's because they go back they can't finish the work they go back
and they go back 10 years five years you're like oh I didn't drink a bottle of vodka that day Jesus I
said that you know I mean I'm gonna be honest about I'm like a lot of people you know so it's yeah
exactly so let me see this because I you know obviously do a lot of work on on internet censorship
hey here's my on alcoholism girl the fuck up like I do think that it's a gradual process to adjust
to rising levels of notoriety and that as your influence rises you have a greater responsibility
with your messaging it's also the case that you're responsible for understanding that and
to not understand it is you neglecting your responsibility it isn't an acceptable excuse
to say that alex jones in 2013 or onward wasn't aware of his reach and his responsibility he wasn't
some guy on public access he had multiple employees and reporters working under him he would brag on
air all the time about how many viewers he got on the website if he didn't understand what
responsibility he had to the audience about delivering information that was a conscious
choice that he was making to ignore that responsibility because it would make his job
harder and less fun for example he wouldn't be able to drink that bottle of vodka and get on air
make up a bunch of shit that gets people hurt and then do it again the next day he would know
that he was responsible to not do that right what a load of shit and to hear glenn lap this up and
not ask any follow-up questions it's really disappointing but honestly it makes total sense
he needs access to alex in order to interview alex and if he doesn't do exactly what he is doing
and if he treats alex with any critical focus he knows that he's gonna lose that access conversely
i think glenn probably fully understands that the most likely result of pushing back on alex
at all is that this interview is going to become a fight it's happened in pretty much all of alex's
other high-profile interviews and that's not what glenn wants this is supposed to be a promotional
event for this image rehabilitating documentary so it would be counterproductive for the end result
of this q&a to be everyone walking away thinking yeah maybe you can't really interview alex maybe
there's a reason he doesn't give many invitations because he's an asshole and they just end up in
fights yeah it's essential to glenn and alex lee moyer's grift for alex to be treated seriously and
not like a cartoon and in order for that to be able to happen you need to treat him with
kid gloves and it's pathetic i mean and it's not even it doesn't even work alex is a cartoon
they're just acting like he's not it is gaslighting of the highest order for you to talk to what is
the words coming out of his mouth to respond with what glenn is saying is gaslighting can you imagine
what kind of restraint you would need to employ to not ask a follow-up question if alex said i was
drunk i drank a bottle of vodka when i defamed families amazing amazing who had i i mean people
die that they loved on sandy hook it meant so little to me that i was just drunk on air it
was just a shit face just threw it away why are you why are you mad at me i made a mistake when
i was drunk that's his argument that's what he's allowed to say to glenn fucking greenwald no about
a fucking propaganda movie about how great hitler is no curiosity on glenn's part none
none nope so anyway there's a great journalist and a great writer though yeah but you know what
he's not good at what booking because apparently they had trouble finding a venue oh no you know
i was when i got picked up at the airport i was told that there was some difficulty for a while
getting a venue here in austin for to do this event that when they found out um that you were
involved uh they said you know what on second thought we're not really interested in in your
money and i thought about it for a minute and at first i said okay yeah that's of course that's
the case and then i realized that shouldn't be so comforting like normal to hear that should be
chilling and alarming i should be what do you mean we're in the united states why is it difficult
to get a venue to show a film about somebody who has a lot and we've been so conditioned we're
getting too comfortable yeah i mean i think there were there's a kind of repression that has
emerged that we've been trained for so long to think takes place in other places that were we
have a very hard time recognizing that we're actually subject to that level of repression here
have you had problems with with the film like this film getting god distribution and another
kind of publicity for it that you didn't have with the first film have you noticed greater
difficulty there's a bear shit in the woods that wasn't a question for alex that was familiar
yep um but like okay who cares like i they're basically just trying to say cancel culture
without saying cancel culture as a tireless advocate for free speech as someone who demands
that everyone be given the choices to do what they desire when a venue refuses money based on
some sort of political opinion how dare they how dare they stand up for that not a first
amendment right they have to deny me giving whatever i want does he think that like if you
paid for it a theater should be forced to let you screen song of the south or triumph of the will
clearly like why well because they didn't let him do it that's cancel culture i'm a whiny baby is
what he said and also isn't free association like one of the main pillars of alex's ideology
this question and alex's reaction to it in essence reveal that alex's libertarian leanings
and those bedrock ideas are it's just lip service he fully supports the right of a business to not
serve someone because they're black or because they're gay but he'll cry bloody murder if a theater
doesn't want to air his stupid documentary also again this question is basically just teeing alex
or alex up to complain about how everyone's been so mean to them because they were brave enough to
make this film and that jordan is good journalism i'm gonna tell you this right now i'm gonna tell
you this right now people have not been anywhere near mean enough to them yeah i'm doing my best
and i'm not being mean yeah i'm trying i'm we're fighting so hard to be mean to these people and
it's not they don't know what mean is man and it's not meanness born out of bad faith or ill will
or some kind of a hostility towards them it's righteous fury well it's a this is unjust it's
a reaction to the thing that they made or did exactly and they on the merits they should be
treated way harsher based on how bad that the shit they're doing is disgusting so anyway moyer comes
in to answer this question about finding a venue have you had problems with with the film like this
film getting distribution and another kind of publicity for it that you didn't have with the
first film have you noticed greater difficulty there's a bear shit in the woods well sort of but
also we read the tea leaves after what happened with our last film and we took matters in our own
hands and thanks to play nice hi we you know we started basically talking to people outside of
hollywood and i'm not i mean i don't i'm a free agent i'm not playing ice but we're a team on this
movie for sure and there are people that are interested in seeing authentic content you know
in one amdc and i'm going to really ask and vouch for that too so play nice is the company that
distributed the film and it's run by that guy who used to be in charge of sinna family until he got
forced out because of rampant sexual harassment complaints against him and then the theater went
out of business incidentally play nice was founded partially with the investment from peter teal
i'm sure that's a totally benign thing and not at all suspicious you know it's crazy alex's next
film is about how he's not guilty of any of those sexual assaults that he committed do you know why
he was drunk dan also i'm not sure how much stock i'd put into a mandemillius vouching for
moyer's free agency considering that milley is produced and directed the plot against the president
the trump propaganda film that two of the producers of that film are producers of alex's war unbeholden
it was smart of milley is to shorten the title of that movie from the title of the book that it's
based on which is quote the plot against the president the true story of how congressman
devin newness uncovered the biggest political scandal in u.s history that title probably
wouldn't have aged quite as well as the shortened version could have been it could have really hurt
could have really hurt later on the plot against the president the true story of how congressman
devin newness tried to sue a twitter account the capital is falling and that's a good thing
uh-oh nope where should we head in the well boy so here's uh what is essentially the last question
of uh of this interview do you mean the first seem to be somebody who from the very beginning you
know we're saying things that in your community and in in your politics and and in the media we're
your love that we're gonna cause you to be cast aside as a crazy person or as a conspiracy theorist
going back to the nineties with waco and and and the fbi and those sorts of things why did that
happen why why did you end up on this path that uh caused you to just constantly be so skeptical
of what you're told by authority you know my my uncle uh william farce hamlin was uh a worldwide
helicopter pilot vietnam and then he worked in iran contra and he wouldn't tell me all the secret
stuff but he he said where i was like a teenager and i was like i'm like where's lumbar he goes
the rub luck goes to control the democrats are controlled and it's all it was down there visiting
for like two weeks in san Antonio and he just he said let me just take you back on the back porch
and let's sit down you know eat a sandwich talk about this and he said he told me about a lot of
the stuff he saw in vietnam and how he did these things he was told to do and then he got worse and
worse and worse so the moment he said no and it was narcotics trafficking in vietnam and then it was
everything you know with the iran contra it met a point where they were they were smuggling kids out
of orphanages you know where they were going and he said at that point he was done and so he told me
about all that and then i had other family uh you know they were involved in black operations
back when it was all human intelligence and like the russians were actually here and they were
actually in wars so my dad's cousin was involved in a bunch of stuff and so i grew up kind of like
sit around dinner table like here and these people talk about this stuff and so i kind of knew what was
going on what other people didn't and i was just growing up around that and so i kind of heard that
and then my dad was heavily involved in geopolitics and research and all these books around the house
and so i kind of grew up around that and these were like pro-american people but they were saying
the government's bad government did a lot of bad stuff there's a bad group taking over yeah but they
weren't telling me this the you know there's a bumper sticker if you want your children to listen
whisper they weren't telling me this stuff this was me hide around the corner like listen what
they were talking about and so that that's why i had a leg up on it all was because of a bunch of
family stuff well i wonder if glenn would ask a follow-up if alex was clear about what he's talking
about and it's all the john birch society shit yeah like i wonder if glenn would debase himself
enough to be like yeah the jbs they were on to something right yeah maybe listen i one i get all
of my greatest wisdom from bumper stickers and two uh my parents didn't tell me a lot about the
john birch society they just told me that uh black people were part of a communist plot to take over
america and that we need to fight against the russians as well as civil rights with everything
that we've ever got they didn't tell me that they just yelled about it to their friends all the time
and had a house uh full of books about the topic yeah picture books it's the only things i could
read exactly yeah so also this question that glenn is asking is framed on a lie like he's like
pretending that what alex did was bold like his shit wasn't unpopular in the community he was in
and the politics that he had in conspiracy theory anti-government militia anti-communist worlds
everything alex was saying was popular and basically the standard doctrine it was pandering
yes glenn's acting like alex had a job at cnn hosting a nightly show and then he did what he
did like he took a brave stand it wasn't brave to be a conspiracy theorist in a community of
conspiracy theorists maybe it would be if you were expected to not be insane but that was never
the expectation for alex he was in an insane world the person they're really talking about
here is david eich that guy sucks and is wrong about everything but what he did took a lot of
nerve he was already a big mainstream celebrity and he essentially threw that all the way to go
down a crazy conspiracy path alex was just born on that path and followed along doing the things
that got him positive reinforcement until we're we're here until he wound up saying that david
eich was right all along right the turd in the punch bowl turd in the punch ball is a delicious
turd but like yeah that they're pretending that alex did that like david eich went on tv and
said that like he's jesus i'm just i'm just so mad i'm tired of people being allowed to gas like me
yeah this bad it's pretty rough just be like hey man i think that mcdonald's nuggets are good
fine you're gaslighting me but that's fine you know nuggets are fine see i'm sick you're not good
but they're fine yes exactly so uh greenwald uh starts talking about like what life would be if
you'd made a different choice sure and mic down for this because there's a there's a slip of the
tongue and i want to make sure you catch okay so i was uh before i came here was thinking about
where i would be instead of here if i had made different choices to pursue the kind of mainstream
accountability acceptability that i was interested in in wondering why you had rejected that's
meaningful there were two paths there were accountability and acceptability that is a
really good point accountability is really what he's rejecting like you want to pretend that you're
a rebel shunning acceptability but that's a farce you just don't want to be held accountable for
the things you do and alex is basically the avatar of that shit i have lost so much accessibility
with my 1.8 million followers what i have is accountability with my ability to harass people
with less of an audience than i do and receive no consequences for it yeah yeah whoops oh no
fun slip of the tongue yeah so anyway here we go this is the last uh clip we have this is just sort
of a wrap up and uh you know after this there's not really anything just glenn saying goodbye to the
audience so i was uh before i came here was thinking about what where i would be instead of here if i
had made different choices to pursue the kind of mainstream accountability acceptability that i
was interested in in wondering why you had rejected and i was thinking i'd probably be in like the
cnn building with wolf blitzer and chris haze and like anemone clobber chart and ancy polosi
wanting to kill myself out of boredom and disgust and you know i referred to this crowd as like a
kind of crowd of misfits and outcasts and and it is and and i'm so happy um so much happier to be
around people like this who place themselves on the outside and and decide that they're not
going to pay that price of kind of god you know i'm embracing things they don't believe for whatever
rewards they offer and you've been doing this for decades and taking all kinds of slings and arrows
and you yourself recognize you made a lot of mistakes um but i'm really glad you've been doing
what you're doing well then i appreciate you coming i appreciate alex old thing and thanks
absolutely just to close on that thanks alex thanks alex
go ahead go ahead you say something no i was just thinking you no no but thank you being in the
movie and you know i never really thank you for well you guys are being too nice but but but the
difference is i didn't make mistakes on purpose oh my god we all get better we all fix them
and but but the larger issue is we have a lot of go ahead right i was gonna ask you did you
make mistakes on purpose or did you do them intentionally so you know what i said a five
times yeah you're right see it's funny the crowd hilarious the crowd laughs and claps at glenn
finally acknowledging that alex keeps saying that you know that he doesn't lie on purpose
it's cathartic it's a tension breaker because the joke is that they all know that alex absolutely
lies on purpose and has been for the past 40 minutes or whatever he's been on stage yeah
that's the price of admission you want the attention and outside or credibility that you
can gain from associating with alex then you better stick to kayfabe and present alex how he
wants to be seen glenn understands that which is why he didn't acknowledge the constant insistences
that alex doesn't lie on purpose to do so would be to call out that very notion and call it into
question whereas it needs just to be taken as a given it's a it's just a fundamental fact yeah
the audience laughs because they're in on the joke they know that alex lies on purpose but
their ability to use him as an avatar of their hatred of the mainstream press and the establishment
it requires that they maintain the same kayfabe that glenn is bound by there's nothing challenging
or brave about this content and the congratulations these idiots give themselves for engaging in it
is hollow and meaningless what would actually be challenging it's putting alex in an uncomfortable
position where he has to wrestle with the idea that his evasions and lies and self contradictions
aren't gonna fly and see how he reacts there's nothing challenging about filming a lie or lie
and then interviewing about his lies as if they're truth but you don't act like this because you know
alex doesn't actually need you he wants the press of the movie but he's fine without you you need
him and if you don't make yourself a good little soldier in alex's imaginary war he's not gonna play
ball and you don't get him yep so fuck you i mean here's the you know we were we our last episode
which we recorded so long ago uh about stand-up comedy reminds me of something uh important for
this uh when i was coming up uh there was one joke that i that i told that really worked well uh and
then as i kept telling it i realized that i didn't know i didn't understand why it worked i didn't
understand what the people were laughing at i didn't know what i was really saying that made them
release that tension which is what the laughter really is and it was a fucked up thing to say
i thought i was being very satirical and smart and doing all of that but the reason that they
were laughing is because they were thinking i was saying it literally that that can happen you know
and then i stopped doing the joke because if you understand why people are laughing then you understand
what it is you're actually saying and what it is they are understanding you to say that laugh became
because that unacknowledgment had been in the air the entire fucking show yes and it came and it came
as a laugh because when he released the tension what the tension release was was it's fine yeah
it's fine it's fine to imagine that it doesn't matter that alex lies intentionally yep who cares
that's what the joke is the joke is we don't even have to bother and the joke is imagining glenn
ever even asking that question to begin with 100 because this is silly yeah it's ridiculous yeah
everybody has participated in a farce and then glenn greenwald gets to pop the balloon at the end
because it's over and everybody gets to go home and pretend that they weren't part of this farce
in the fucking first place well honestly he has to pop the balloon sure because the audience
laughed when alex said it the last time yeah that's true he has to address the fact that they
laughed so he has to just break the tension whatever yeah and make the very idea of asking
that question the joke itself and yeah yeah it's nonsense it's awareness and it's bullshit it's
fucking bullshit yeah it is pathetic and that is a sad sad sad sad sad man yeah i mean if you're
sucking the boot of alex jones and really trying to get the whole thing in your mouth as much of
that boot as you can you're not doing good that paycheck better have been huge it better be big
man wolf whoo nally i can't believe that so i think this was one of the i mean it was way worse
than i think i expected it to be i was well i i really am blindsided truly and honestly i
knew your expectations were low my expectations are so low i mean i'm fine with glenn asking
insanely long questions because that's just how the moron talks you know yeah but this is bad
yep this is bad yeah i mean there's it's almost i think those questions could have been asked by
a broom yeah yeah absolutely more concisely and better they weren't thoughtful there weren't
follow-ups anyway um i i find i find all of this uh just so annoying distasteful so i mean this
brings us to the end of our arc i guess with alex's war sure and that documentary is bad yeah it's
dangerous because it lends itself towards um mainstreaming alex uh it foists alex upon an
unsuspecting population who if you if you if you go into that documentary without an awareness of
who he is which many people probably will just like i've heard this name sure let's let's see this
documentary about him or something or they know him as just the gay frogs guy right yep you could
stand to um very seriously uh endanger somebody by making them more likely to buy into his shit
well what you're saying to the people who know him or don't know who know him as the gay frog guy or
don't know him at all is yes look at this man he's the gay frog guy but he's more than that he's a
human who makes mistakes and he's a man with principled political stances and it's fucking
bullshit it's all a lie it's all bullshit and she sucks i think humanizing alex is totally fine
and i do i do think that one or two dimensional caricatures of him are counterproductive i 100
percent agree with that i just don't think that that's what this is now i think that this is a
an attempt to humanize the version of alex that he wants people to see and that is not
what a documentary is you're not showing the accurate picture you're showing the the the mask
that alex wears and not really giving any indication that it's a mask you're not giving like
it's just you're fucking over your audience if you do this yeah and glenn is too and it's uh whatever
i don't know yeah you have every right to do it but like any kind of pretense of like this is
somehow a challenging piece of work that we're doing no no it's not you're playing the recorder
and pretending it's a tuba yeah or whatever you've you've created a golem of alex jones
in order to allow the real alex jones to avoid consequences for his behavior that's what it is
yep and let us not forget quite sincerely
this q and a and this premiere of this documentary was set to happen just before the trial was to
begin glenn rick greenwald came to austin to engage in a promotional event with alex doing
these softball bullshit questions after this puff piece as shallow documentary
in the context of the same city right around the same time that alex is trying to avoid
responsibility for his actions vis-a-vis sandy hook yep and glenn is essentially a media outlet
cheerleader for him in those efforts yep willingly unwittingly willingly who knows it
doesn't matter if you lie on purpose or not i guess that's really what it comes down to that's
what it comes down to glenn is saying to alex it's a good thing that you keep saying you don't
lie on purpose so i don't have to say i don't lie on purpose yeah jesus so anyway we serve each other
we'll be back um but until then we have a website we do have a website it's knowledgefight.com
yep we're also on twitter we are on twitter it's at knowledge underscore fight net go to bed jordan
yeah we'll be back but until then i'm neo i'm leo i'm dzx clark i'm uh alex's empty bottle of vodka
before he got on air and now here comes the sex robots andy and chanzas you're on the air thanks
for holding so alex i'm a first-name caller i'm a huge fan i love your work i love you