Knowledge Fight - #900: February 16, 2024

Episode Date: February 19, 2024

In this installment, Dan and Jordan attempt to figure out Alex's response to the cascade of news stories that have broken since they last recorded.  Unfortunately, Alex was out of studio Thursday and... Friday, so they're left to sort through some special reports to get the lay of the land.

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys saying we are the bad guys. Knowledge fight. Dan and George, knowledge fight. I need money. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Stop it. Andy and Kansas.
Starting point is 00:00:44 Andy and Kansas. It's time Kansas, andy and Kansas, andy and Kansas, andy and Kansas, andy and Kansas, it's time to pray. Andy and Kansas, you're on the air, thanks for holding. Hello, Alex, I'm a Christian Colony, I'm a huge fan, I love your work. Knowledge Fight. No, no, no, no, no, knowledgefight.com.
Starting point is 00:00:58 I love you. Hey everybody, welcome back to Knowledge Fight, I'm Dan. I'm Jordan. We're a couple dudes, like to sit around, worship with the altar of Selene, and talk a little bit about Alex Jones. Oh, indeed we are another Try Down Dad. I'm Jordan. We're a couple dudes. Sit around, worship with the author of Celine and talk a little bit about Alex Jones. Oh, indeed we are, Dan.
Starting point is 00:01:08 Jordan. Dan! Jordan. I have a quick question for you today. What's your bright spot? My bright spot today, I guess Jordan, it's that we're back in the saddle, recording in person again.
Starting point is 00:01:17 It feels, I mean, it hasn't been that long. No, but it feels like forever. It feels like fucking ever. We did an episode remotely and then it had to get this root canal. So realistically, it's been a week since we recorded in person. It just, I don't know, it feels like a long time. I know.
Starting point is 00:01:35 It is uniquely us because other shows are like that is the correct amount of time to see each other per week. Whereas we're like, have we considered eight more hours? Right. Yeah. Yeah. And it's, uh, yeah, it's not, it's maybe not a positive sign. Uh, I don't know. It's pretty great. It's fun. Worked out so far in enough ways for us to continue eating. I guess that's as good as it gets. I guess so. Yeah. Um, so speaking of eating, I got that root canal on last Thursday. Four hours under the drill.
Starting point is 00:02:08 Jesus. And in there, it's a real exciting thing to show up to the dentist. And then have him say, this is going to be one of the most complicated root canals you can do. I'm sorry, who, what? Oh boy. Hold on.
Starting point is 00:02:21 I didn't even know that there were. I'm not a smart man. Right. I didn't think it wasn't much more complicated than going shh and then we cleaned it out. Definitely what it feels like. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I haven't seen it from above, so I'm not sure. But yeah, it's always a daunting experience
Starting point is 00:02:37 to go into the dentist period. And then for him to really brag about what he's about to do, it's upsetting. That's nice. But yeah, we did end up not having a Friday episode. I did see a fair amount of feedback that everyone thought it was because I was on drugs. Right. And I got no painkillers. No, none. No, no, no, no. I'm a huge painkiller guy. What do you mean by that? I mean, I mean, where I take some Tylenol here and there. I was gonna say, I think in my in our
Starting point is 00:03:06 experiences together where many people would go, oh, I just take some of you go, I can handle the pain. Maybe maybe I have a decent pain threshold. Or whatever. But I had all my wisdom teeth taken out when I was much younger, and I didn't need the pain meds. Although back at that point in my life, I definitely took them for fun. I was gonna say, yeah that was a more fun now. Now I don't think I think the dangers of that are far outweigh the desire and seem to be going too well. I don't know. I just didn't really. It's so weird. It didn't really hurt that much. Well, it's strange
Starting point is 00:03:39 because I know a lot of people have the opposite experience and I empathize with them. But yeah, but yeah, for me it was just kind of like, I haven't, yeah, I haven't gone to, I won't say real dentist. I have a, how would I- Sounds like you've been to a fake dentist. What would I say? I would say that I, my dentist is a woman in a little Vietnam
Starting point is 00:03:59 who does have, who has an office that would be more like where you would find a centipede of the human variety. Like a mob dentist kind of off the books. It's very cheap. Alright Bob, dentistry is dentistry right? That's what I'm saying. She doesn't speak much English so there's not much...
Starting point is 00:04:24 No judgment. There's not much talking. There's not like, oh, have you done this? She doesn't even know. She could never tell you it's the most complicated root canal that you can do. She really could. So it's your bright spot. My bright spot is I will say that I don't know how much detail
Starting point is 00:04:39 I can give. But my wife has been bullied professionally at her school for a long time by some people. And over the last week, she stood up to those bullies in such spectacular and stirring fashion. It was, truly, it has been an impressive stretch of her fighting in just people with a... It's been quite a while Yeah, and she she stood up and she just fucking took it and then I mean I she just took it to this guy Oh, it was so good. That's so good I'm so proud of her and I'm like pumped and I'm jealous because I haven't I haven't been in a situation where I can like really
Starting point is 00:05:22 Tell somebody off. Mm-hmm, you know in a while. Well, I mean, I guess that's kind of a can like really tell somebody off, you know, in a while. Well, I mean, I guess that's kind of a lucky thing for you. Right. You know. Absolutely. You're a little jealous of getting to have the triumphant moment, but then at the same time, it's like, thank God, you don't have to. It's a good thing I don't have that year, two years of abuse to have to over-dump. To justify that moment.
Starting point is 00:05:39 Yeah, yeah, yeah, but man, it's good. Well, proud of her on your behalf as well. That's great. Yep. Secondary good stuff. Proud of her on your behalf as well. That's great. Secondary bright spot. Yes. We announced on our last episode that we are doing these shows. That's right. That's right.
Starting point is 00:05:50 We forgot to talk about it. They have all sold out. And so we ended up being able to add more tickets in Boston. So as we're recording this, there are tickets still available for Boston because we extended the room. But sorry about all the other ones. They're all sold out.
Starting point is 00:06:06 Yeah, I believe all of the seats are sold out in Baltimore, but I think there might be the general balcony. You didn't tell me there was a fucking balcony. Why wouldn't there be a balcony? That's not fair for us. We should be in a tiny black box theater, not in a place with a balcony. Oh man. What is this? Yeah, I went by bad. My wife she reminded me of the very first one we did at the playground theater
Starting point is 00:06:33 where there's like 13 people there was 13 people and we were carrying two 32 packs of beer and in the middle of the show someone was hey, can I have one of the beers? Yeah, sure. Yep. And we gave them one. Yep. That playground theater show, Spicious. I think what's terrible about that show, right, is that it is almost like in retrospect, we set it up and did it just so now would look more impressive.
Starting point is 00:07:03 You know, like, that's a very obvious. We could have just done nothing, You know, like that's a very obvious, we could have just done nothing, you know, but that's a very like, oh, I was there for their first show kind of show. Well, the instinct was to do nothing. Right. If I remember correctly, I don't know why we did that. Honestly.
Starting point is 00:07:19 Oh, that's a good question. I think it was because it was early on enough that we still had like a real stand-up tradition of like You want to do live live shit? You want to be in front of a crowd? Mm-hmm? And who tried to translate it to this and there was just no interest no Good times I believe that was the episode about Andrew Breitbart dying. Yes, that was wow good times cocaine So Jordan today we have an episode to go over. Uh-huh. It's a mess. Yep I don't know how cocaine I don't know how else to describe it to you. There's just a weird
Starting point is 00:07:53 Scatter shot nonsense here. Okay, but we'll get into exactly why and what's going on After we say hello to some new walks. That's great. I did the first Uncle John from GD radio dot net celebrating 20 years of streaming grateful dead and more in 2024 thank you so much. You're now policy wonk. I'm a policy one Thank you very much. I realized halfway through I should probably be doing that in a sales evo Radio announcer voice. Yeah, I like that next social media terror Jim Britt. Thank you so much. You're now policy wonk I'm a policy wonk. Thank you very much. Thank you next shout out to Alice and M the raptor princesses. Thank you so much You're an out policy wonk. I'm a policy wonk. Thank you very much. Thank you next the Welsh word for beard is barf Thank you so much. You're an out policy wonk. I'm a policy wonk. Thank you very much
Starting point is 00:08:36 I trimmed my barf. Yeah, you did and me and my pooser little kitty babies. Thank you so much. You're an out policy wonk I'm a policy wonk. Thank you very much. And we got a technocrat in the mix. Or so thank you so much to the one and only badass thing Alex Jones has ever done and will do in his life was announcing Henry Kissinger's death over Pantera's cemetery gates. Thank you so much. You're an out technocrat. I'm a policy. Walk. I don't like to hype things, but people are designed to hype. I am going to paint once a week on air and I'm gonna let callers call in we'll also take emails and request what you want to see me paint. One, two, three, Matt Damon!
Starting point is 00:09:13 Matt Damon! There you go! Party time! I'm gonna get in your guts and the Nazis in my view were thugs that shook people down to a lot of really bad things. But they did good things too we're gonna stop dissing the Nazis all the time. Okay. I'm thinking about doing some shows too where I run the whole thing myself, just hit record, and sit in the dark with just a few candles and candlelight, and talk about the nature of the world universe. I mean, you know, a big old juicy ribeye, folks, is as good as, you know, sex with your
Starting point is 00:09:41 wife. I mean, let's just get down to reality here. I'm going to go Donkey Kong, King Kong crazy in about 45 days America sucks for all races it's over doesn't mean I want to go live say in some places in Asia where you could off the plane over there folks they karate chop you thank you so much thank you very much so man I think since our last episode, a million things have happened. Yeah, it's been busy. Mm-hmm.
Starting point is 00:10:08 We had Putin killed Navalny. Yep. That happened. Yep. Yep. Putin said that Tucker's interview was weak. Yeah, man, he's had a week. Mm-hmm.
Starting point is 00:10:17 Uh-huh. Tucker was shopping in Russia and got blown away by things at the Russian supermarket. I don't... No, okay. I'm not I don't, no, okay. I'm not saying that this is entirely my fault. All right, but I will say that I directly told Putin that he was a loser who was weak for having a bad interview and then he went and murdered a guy.
Starting point is 00:10:39 So I do feel like I bear a little responsibility for that. If maybe spiritually, but to imagine he was doing it at you, is a little that you might be losing your career. I think he was threatening me. So Huma Abedin is dating Alexander Soros? I'm sorry, what? Yeah. What is happening?
Starting point is 00:10:57 Why does anybody do anything now? This is mad lips. Yep. Also the witness who was the basis for the whole Biden Ukraine money laundering conspiracy got arrested for making it all up. That's hilarious. Yeah. Why not? Sure.
Starting point is 00:11:12 Trump was fined about $354 million in his fraud case, which also included him being barred from doing business in New York for three years. Sure. Not being able to take any loans. I like I like a good, uh, you your barred from doing business here as though that's it like that's almost a quaint old-timey like we won't see in this town anymore run you out of time absolutely yeah yeah so there's there's just a lot there's a lot and to me and the Fulton County DA is fucking around so that whole
Starting point is 00:11:43 case is gone that's true well no that case isn't gone sure sure but you know what I mean there's just there's a lot but like so I was kind of dreading doing the show honestly because like there's so much yeah but then Alex was out of studio and Owen hosted the show on Thursday and Friday nothing to do not at all no business no business I'm not to go through a whole show with Owen hosting is that ding dong is boring. So in order to try and figure out what the Alex lying on some of this stuff was, I had to go over to band.video to see what kind of reports Alex was putting out. Yeah. I managed to find a couple. The Trump fraud judgment didn't break until Friday afternoon
Starting point is 00:12:20 and Alex wasn't at studio. So there's no coverage of that sure on band odd video as far as I can tell there's no videos of the Biden witness being arrested which isn't surprised yeah not not topping the coverage hilarious though I was shocked however to click on some of these videos and see the very low level of engagement they have it's absolute shit like a lot of the comments are spam and if a video has a hundred to two hundred thousand views there's gonna be like a hundred likes on it and that's only for Alex's show if you go to the war room their shows are generally under thirty thousand views and the American Journal is luckily lucky to be over ten Paul Joseph Watson hasn't posted on their since last May the reports of Tucker Carlson interviews and they just
Starting point is 00:12:59 repost them they aren't getting the kind of numbers they want. Roger Stone is posting Stone Zone videos there, but they typically get view counts in the hundreds. It is a grim picture. Wow. Yeah. Stone is doing worse than some open Mike comics. I know. I think that's because he primarily has the videos on the like Frank speech or whatever. Sure. Sure. The truth is his core following is elsewhere. Elsewhere. Yeah. Mike Lindell. Yeah. I think this is just like, you know, post it there. See who see what we can get out of it. But it's still only like, you know, it's it's pretty low. That's sad. So I went over there to get some news to break down for everybody and I was shocked to learn that the February 15th video, the episode from that day was Owen, he's hosting show, along with Chase Geyser and Harrison Smith
Starting point is 00:13:47 in what they called the Infowars Roundtable. No, no, no. They were the Knights. Do not tell me that the three of them teamed up to be shitty at their jobs together. Then they were the Knights of the Infowars Roundtable. Oh my God. So a little while into the show, Alex barges in and-
Starting point is 00:14:02 We need to stop this, this is terrible. These three are talentless and garbage. Everybody please never let me do this again. He had a different take. Okay. So here's here's him explaining what he's what's going on. So here's a wait entering the chat entering the chat ring the bell. It's now official the Knights of the Info Wars round table Arthur the power has just Room and Alex Jones is now in the studio Yeah, I'm having to deal with a bunch of the bankruptcy crap
Starting point is 00:14:33 I'd rather be on air and listen to you guys, but I'm actually up here at the office getting some stuff done I'll be back for part of the show tomorrow and I'll be up here this weekend. Obviously. They have a lot of court crap I have to deal with obviously they have a lot of court crap have to deal with. I love it. I have to be on Cy for a deal with. This is a voice mail. They do stuff like sell off everything I own, which is fine because I don't care about selling
Starting point is 00:14:51 every trinket or every knife or every gun or every book or everything I ever had. Because truth and justice are on the air is what matters. And these people don't understand that. But I've been following the Russia situation and I know exactly what's going on with space nukes so I'm going to shoot a special report right now uh that'll be ready for you guys and if I was you guys on spaces I would actually make it some about the big Russia threat because uh Mario nefal at three o'clock will be popping on him he's doing his own spaces on this
Starting point is 00:15:22 I don't know what you guys chose to your spaces spaces on, but I'm going to have the inside baseball for you guys. A little five minute report you can air during that spaces. I'll have it ready for you. I heard about 40 minutes or so. Okay. Copy that. I'm an expert on this. Okay. So you can learn two important things from that clip. One, Alex is dealing with bankruptcy related issues that are impacting him enough that he's had to take two days off his show. And two, he's becoming completely obsessed lot of electricity to it, it's just kind of a bummer. Posting something on there is not going to hit the dopamine button. But now that Alex is back on Twitter, he has access to what is essentially a dopamine factory. There's so many scammers and bots and so much inauthentic traffic on there that every
Starting point is 00:16:20 time he posts, it's gotta feel like a million bucks worth of attention. And to add to that the distinct possibility that if you have a Twitter space going, there's a chance you may end up having access to one of the richest people in the world and you have a combination that's irresistible for someone like Alex. I would expect that he'll fail to learn from his past mistakes and put as many eggs as he can into that basket to the point where his show starts catering to an audience carve-out that engages most with his Twitter. We're already seeing him dabbling and using Twitter spaces instead of phone calls which I honestly think is a double-edged sword where both edges are bad. You're taking
Starting point is 00:16:52 the appearance of professionalism away from the show and at the same time because Alex has that like space open on camera, he runs the risk of doxing all of his callers. But Alex brought up the Russian space laser so that's as good a place as any to start. I like that. I mean, could there be a more like, oh, you have no boss moment than just wandering on to somebody else's show and just being like, hey, I'm going to give you an update on my bankruptcy stuff,
Starting point is 00:17:21 despite the fact that that has nothing to do. Like that's. Hey, I'm going to do something on Twitter later incredibly unprofessional behavior well I mean it is his own show just something else is hosting exactly and it also wanders off and then comes back I mean yeah almost immediately after to talk more about Twitter's faces yeah seriously this I mean I get that it's his own show but there would be a part of me that is like come on man let's make this a show show if you're going to have me host get get lost yeah yeah you do it I got I came here I got my friend Harrison Smith and my buddy chase geyser up here
Starting point is 00:17:58 to the three of us come to terms with how lack of talent can lead to whatever we do now Hmm, and then you show up. Yeah, what are we supposed to do? Well, that's why he's King Arthur that shit so we We go now to the special report that Alex shot about the space laser It's apparently he was promoting on his interruption of Owen hosting the show he was promoting on his interruption of Owen hosting the show. Right, right, right. So here's a, here's just a real good sting to open. Are the globals preparing a nuclear triggered EMP false flag to be blamed on Russia?
Starting point is 00:18:34 You bet your ass they are. Okay. We remove the mystery. Yeah. Sure. Are they doing this? Yes. You know, that is like, I mean, it's easy to make fun of,
Starting point is 00:18:49 but every time the local news has done that, like, are kids eating too much cereal? We'll see you next time. If they just said, yeah. No, no, no, no, no, they do not say, see you next time. They say, we'll talk about it after the break. And they do it to make you watch commercials. Right, right, right.
Starting point is 00:19:03 That's not what Alex is doing. No, no, no, he's doing the Alex is doing. No, no, no. He's doing the opposite of that. He's going like, are your children in too much cereal? Yeah, end of show. Well, in theory, after this music, he'll tell the implication is he's going to talk more about it, like the local news.
Starting point is 00:19:17 But there isn't an ad there. I mean, Alex. The ad is at the end of the video. I'm just saying you can press stop at that moment, because he's already said it. We could. Yeah. But we're here anyway so let's hear what else Alex has to say.
Starting point is 00:19:29 Okay. Is Russia developing nuclear powered lasers? Are they deploying them in space? And the answer is undoubtedly yes. But guess who was doing this even back in the 1970s and it perfected it by the 1980s and 90s, the United States United States and as usual everybody's running around with an entry knee across. Do you think Reagan did a good job at Star Wars? Acting like they don't know what's going on to scare the public when there's a very
Starting point is 00:19:53 clear history of exactly what's going on with the United States, Russia, China and other governments. So I'm about to break down what's really happening in space straight ahead. Oh, what? Another another? Wow. Okay. So there's a secondary introduction that goes to more music. All right. Okay. So yeah, Alex, I mean, you just nailed. He's talking about stuff. Yeah, those plans were about creating some kind of a weapon that could shoot down missiles from space and they famously didn't work. Right. Conversely, what's being alleged about Russia is that they're developing an anti-satellite
Starting point is 00:20:27 weapon which would be a very severe violation of the non-armament of space treaties that were signed in the 60s. Sure. I have no idea what Russia is up to or isn't up to and I don't want to jump to hysterics over some vague government announcements but if what they're saying is correct that Russia is planning a nuclear armed anti-satellite weapon, that would be a huge provocation and unlike anything the US or other countries have done. Alex is being very strange about this equivocation. I mean, I'll just say as far as that goes, right? Here's the problem with all of that.
Starting point is 00:21:01 It doesn't make any sense. Any defensive defensive weapon or offensive weapon when it comes to mutually assured destruction They're all the same You know a protection from destruction is an offensive weapon because the entire basis is that we will all die together Right, so if you were trying to protect yourself from which is part of why Star Wars was was bad was not because it could have worked Or not because it didn't work, but because if it did work it would necessitate an immediate retaliation. True, before it got put in place. Exactly. Before there was never an opportunity again.
Starting point is 00:21:33 Because anything that alters mutually assured destruction in any direction requires an instant response in order to return back to the status quo. Well. In order to return back to the status quo well So if there is a big news alert to me about this that says to me somebody somewhere wants more money And it is not going to fucking protect anybody Well, you probably I mean look it's hard to parse. Yeah, it's hard to parse because on the one hand I do believe that there is a probably a strong likelihood that Russia is exploring these avenues and maybe is closer to developing something like this than you might think.
Starting point is 00:22:10 Sure. You might want to think. Sure. There could be a legitimate threat. At the same time, it's obviously people want more funding. Yeah. I don't know. I don't know what to make of.
Starting point is 00:22:22 I don't know what to make of the real world, but I do know what to make of what Alex is saying. Yeah. Yeah. So Alex talks a little bit more about this. He talks about how there were powerful lasers. Oh, actually, actually, that's a good question. Have we talked about this? Does Alex think that secretly Star Wars did work? I think he must. I think that's because I think that's where we, I think that's where I mess up all the time is because I think, I think he must I think that's because I think that's where we I think that's where I mess up all the time is because I think I think He thinks that mm-hmm, but I forget that it you know what I mean, right? But if he did then the whole possibility of like nuclear attacks from Russia shouldn't scare him
Starting point is 00:22:56 Right, we secretly have in destructibility essentially right, but then again The globalists would want those nuclear strikes to end up happening so they wouldn't use the star wars system that does exist right right right I think we're trapped I think that is the problem with this path yeah so it this all goes back man it's it goes back so far okay by the 1970s it's declassified the United States have powerful lasers mounted in space some of them what are called X-ray lasers that are powered by a nuclear power plant. Earth-based nuclear-powered X-ray lasers
Starting point is 00:23:33 fire at their radioactive rays. In many cases, they would actually detonate a small atomic or hydrogen bomb that then fires through the X-ray laser arrays and just fries everything in a massive radius around it. This would also cause major electromagnetic disturbances in the atmosphere. That's why the Pentagon back in the 1960s did Operation Fishbowl where they tried to detonate the upper atmosphere with high-powered hydrogen bombs just to test and see if it was safe
Starting point is 00:24:05 So this was all what Alex is talking about is the fruit of the research in a program called project Excalibur And it did look at options like having a power reactor for the lasers or having nuclear explosions used as a power source Sure, but these weren't things that were put into force by the United States research Right, it was it was done done, they explored it and Operation Fish Bowl happened in 1962, many years before Excalibur was going. So this is his timelines a little bit weird and all over the place. The dynamic that's important to understand here is that Alex wants to excuse Russia's actions and ideally make it more likely for them to use this capability against the United States. You can kind of tell based on his
Starting point is 00:24:43 tone and considering the possible ways that this could play out, you can see which ones are advantageous to him. There's the outcome where Russia doesn't use this technology, which is kind of neutral. Alex can get a little excitement out of talking about it for now and creating narratives about what could happen, but if it doesn't get used, it's all pretty much just static. I believe that Alex would much prefer the tech being used to take out US satellites primarily because he's been crafting conspiracies for years about someone pulling off a false flag cyber attack, which would then get blamed on the Russians. But it wouldn't be blamed on Russia for its own sake. They would only get the blame as a way of attacking
Starting point is 00:25:17 Putin's supporting crowds in the United States like Alex and all his friends. Alex has made constantly wrong predictions about this for quite a while now, so if this was used and the US satellites were hit, it would be perfect for a fake Alex Jones was right type moment, and he's pretty addicted to those, especially with Twitter. Alex needs to rush to get out ahead of things like this because the alternative is really dangerous for him. If there was an attack on satellites like what people are talking about, and it was Russia that did it, that runs the risk of actually uniting people in the country around a common fight, and that would be uniting under the umbrella of the United States federal government,
Starting point is 00:25:53 who is Alex's real enemy. In order to limit the ability for people to galvanize and unite around shared trauma, Alex has a very strong incentive preemptively to tell these stories as false flags, so they lose their unifying power. This is one of the ways that false flag narratives are used on info wars. One major strategy is using the fear of incoming false flags as a way to do advanced damage control when you're pretty concerned that someone from your world may carry out violence, but this is another. The whole thing about false flag attacks on the power grid is actually an interesting
Starting point is 00:26:22 example of a case where both strategies are being used simultaneously. This narrative framework makes excuses in advance in case any right-wing extremists attack the power grid. And if Russia attacks these satellites, this narrative framework will hinder cohesion around a shared threat and make it so everyone will just be, ah, blame the government for this. Yeah. Yeah, you know, something that's interesting to me about this, uh, because it is, it's something that like we've always, we've all grown up with as being a totally normal part of life to like just know about, oh, the some, the rushers or, you know, that kind of thing, you know, but it really makes no sense to me from a, from a distant standpoint,
Starting point is 00:27:02 because for that to be a problem for me personally so many things would have to go wrong that it wouldn't really matter like I would already be in such dire straits at that point you know what I'm saying like I don't need to know if there's a threat to the satellite system because if they goes down, oh no. Until then, there's nothing I can do to affect it one way or the other. Well, that's true. And you know, this only happened because that one,
Starting point is 00:27:34 like Congressperson came out and said something. So who's to know if like, it was even really something that merited the public's attention in a meaningful way or if this is just something that should be discussed in the chambers where it's relevant. Right. Or someone can do something about it, as opposed to you worrying about it.
Starting point is 00:27:53 And like most of Congress is, you know, I would say they're professional, but a lot of Congress is also capable of saying weird random nonsense for no reason, and everybody just does it. That is true, especially when weird cryptic yeah oh they're coming what you can't say that you're in Congress yeah hmm so Alex believes that this is meant to ratchet up a new cold war sure why is the Pentagon and the White House all
Starting point is 00:28:18 mysteriously oh we're not gonna say if they have a weapon or or what it is but it's probably nukes in space and nukes that power lasers. It's probably nukes in space because they're ratcheting up a new cold and probably hot war with Russia. The EU, the NATO leaders are saying it's going to be a 20, 30 year long term war. They're going to bring back national conscription in Europe and the UK. They're setting their entire political future while they make us eat bugs and oh nothing. Nothing to be happy on using the outside threat of Russia as the pretext for domestic crackdowns and control here at home.
Starting point is 00:28:56 Yeah, I feel like you don't need the we eat the bugs thrown in here. It does seem superfluous. Yeah. Yeah. Like they're gonna bring back the natural draft in Europe. Yeah. While they make us eat bugs like that. We don't need that. We're already bad. The national draft part is that's the bad part. Well I imagine it probably be here too. Well Alex has been crowing about the draft for for fucking ever. It's always a specter that looms in the background that the globalists are trying to put into place but seemingly never pull off. I like the idea that we could avoid a draft out of like nationalism, you know, like, oh,
Starting point is 00:29:34 well the Europeans are doing it so you know it's a stupid idea, you know. Well, the only way that you're going to avoid this draft is like Russia do whatever they want. Yeah, pretty much. Well, I mean, if you didn't want want to fight then you should have given everything away so we come to the end of Alex's report on the laser and Man, you can't just have a lazy. That's the thing. All right. If you throw up could be a space laser Then it is Alex's job to make it a
Starting point is 00:30:03 bombastic space laser that can like no can target people from all over Can't because it's Russia doing it exactly That's what he should be doing. He's doing that but in reverse He's with the United States already has the bombastic Sensationalized version of it and whatever Russia is doing is fine. It's disappointing. That's why it's a little bit Finally you've gotten a brief history of these weapons systems We've explained the fact that these are existing technologies that any advanced government or corporation could deploy don't worry Be afraid but don't just hyping all this up for war hysteria with Russia
Starting point is 00:30:40 Yes, like we saw don't be scared and Trump and all the rest of it The most important point of all these incredibly important points is this. The globalists have been hyping for three years that Russia is going to launch an EMP and knock out the power grid in America, or they're going to work with, quote, Trump's supporters and knock out the power grid ahead of the 2024 election. Now who really believes that? But now we're being told of this magic power up in the sky.
Starting point is 00:31:06 So you should be afraid. They could do all these incredibly bad things and it's all classified so they can't tell us. Ladies and gentlemen, big things are already happening, even bigger things are coming and we have been predicting that they might pull something like this and false flag Russia. So we need to expose this right now and all of you need to research the claims I've made in this video find out it's true. Yeah it's hard to imagine what Putin could do that Alex wouldn't defend or pretend to secretly globalist false flag at this point. And for what it's worth we didn't get a history lesson in this video.
Starting point is 00:31:36 Alex just repeatedly said that there have been nuclear armed US weapons in space since the 70s and the only thing he's even presented as evidence or is passing as evidence as vague references to Project Excalibur which famously didn't work it was the basis of the Star Wars system. So not quite a history lesson but it is it is like okay here's the deal I'm an expert on this shit. Sure. The tried to false flag Russia. Right. Great. Thank you. Okay. Okay. I do. I do appreciate there's a I want to I wonder if there's some some somebody's probably researched this but like there's got to be something about when people try and replace an emotion with the
Starting point is 00:32:17 same emotion. If that makes sense to you like hey hey hey no you shouldn't be afraid of that you should be afraid of this you know like if you're trying to replace fear with different fear, that's something that you shouldn't trust. You know, if somebody, if somebody's caring for you, they're trying to replace fear with a positive emotion, right?
Starting point is 00:32:36 Not replace it with the same emotion in a different direction. Right. Especially when there is kind of an incentive Yeah. around the other emotion. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Like a caring person does not look at a human being in fear and go, ah, here's what you should do. Continue being afraid but the way I want you to. Right. Kids afraid of monsters under the bed and you're like, no, no, no, no, no, don't
Starting point is 00:33:01 worry about it. It's me you should be afraid of. Or spiders or something like that. Yeah, yeah, yeah. It's not the most sensible instinct. Right. Yeah it is strange. Yeah. So anyway I think that gave us not much contribution to the information space. Oh what a shock. Alex says something is gonna be a false flag to blame Russia. Great, we already knew it. So since we're on the Russia topic, let's see. He had a special report about Navalny. Let's write it out. The murder of Putin's deliberate specific and purposeful murder of his largest critic. Maybe. Okay. The news broke this morning that Alexei Navalny, Russia's biggest political dissident, died in a Siberian work camp. Was he murdered by the Russian state?
Starting point is 00:33:47 And the answer is we don't know. But we do know that- That's your answer. You info fucking wars. killed about half the people of the two years. Tomorrow's as news today. It's a slow death penalty. So in the final equation, Putin definitely wanted this guy to go away. Let's just state the facts here. Now that that's out, let's look at motive. Why would Putin, when he's
Starting point is 00:34:11 just basically won the Ukraine war, had this huge Tucker Carlson interview, is in pole position to win by 80 plus points in the upcoming presidential elections, why would he kill somebody who's already in a work camp in prison? Why does he have a motive so that Biden and NATO and the whole world could come out against him? Why would he do that now? They don't have the motive. And Russia is similar to the United States
Starting point is 00:34:36 in that it's full of globalist, full of different operatives. How do we know somebody wasn't paid off to poison him so they could use this as a false flag. They made a movie about it. To try to get the stalled funding. The guy who did it. He reignited it. He wore it through.
Starting point is 00:34:51 And that's what Biden said in his speech today. He said, we've got to pass this funding now in memory of Alexei. Yep. So Navalny's death may be a false flag too. What a shock. How about that? Yeah. Wow. It's, um, I mean,
Starting point is 00:35:07 I think that, uh, as it exists now and maybe the information will never be fully available in terms of the precise cause of his death. Sure. Um, but I think you can spiritually say that you tried to poison him and then sent him to a Siberian Worth camp. Yeah, and that's murder. Yeah. Yeah You end up dying at the end of that you were I feel like people have kind of Mistaken the the the fit for me personally like I would prefer the being murdered part to the Siberian Death camp part because you die either way, but one takes a long time. Right. They're both murder. Murder me right away. Just I'm gone. Fine.
Starting point is 00:35:52 You you lack some of the Vim and the will to live that other people things are great and I'm on the edge as it is. Sure. You know, take it down a notch and that's already too bad. Yeah, I find this to be the not surprisingist thing ever. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. The coverage of this is led with maybe maybe a globalist. And yeah, you can't. If anybody, I mean, yeah, let's put it this way. The fact that Info Wars has been reduced to saying, did Putin murder the guy he most obviously murdered?
Starting point is 00:36:31 You never know. Of ever. Right. Of anyone. Of all the people ever to ever murder a guy, the most murdered a guy has ever been is right now. Hey, we gotta really get all the facts on this one before we make any assessments.
Starting point is 00:36:45 You know what, Alex is the kind of guy who's slow to judge me. That's something that you really say about him that is an admirable quality. They are so bad at it too that Navalny called the guy who poisoned him for a movie. And the guy who poisoned him was like, yeah, we poisoned you, that was fucking great. And then he's gone. Do you know who else is murdered? The guy who admitted who poisoned him was like yeah, we poisoned you that was fucking great. Yeah, and then he's gone Do you know who else is murdered? Oh the guy who admitted he poisoned him? Well, it's a quiz. It's probably a global It's very murder. Putin doesn't have a motive Probably a globalist probably a secret global could you possibly say we don't know right?
Starting point is 00:37:20 Look the um though, right they want an investigation Why would they why They want an investigation. Why would they, why? They want an investigation. Stop it. But now let's look at all the hypocrisy. The UN has come out and said we want an investigation. Anytime somebody dies in state custody in prison, there should be an investigation.
Starting point is 00:37:38 So did the UN call for an investigation of the mysterious death of Jeffrey Epstein, where the coroner said it was obviously murder? Can is that a thing they do neck was broken in three places? No I think there's a few differences between these situations I think probably the reason that the UN didn't wade into calling for an investigation into Epstein's death is there was already an investigation started immediately Also Epstein wasn't the only high-profile political opponent to a dictator who that dictator had previously tried to poison and then sent to a Siberian work camp. So I think there's a few distinctions between these two things. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:38:13 But what Alex is doing here is equivocating because he supports Putin killing Navalny. Deep down, he knows that's what happened, but it seems like his primary function these days is to make Putin look good. So it's important that he plays games with this. Yeah. You don't want your audience to realize that Putin straight up kills his political opposition and jails critical journalists so you gloss over this stuff. You suggest that Navalny's death might have been a false flag, then move on to whining about unrelated hypocrisy points about the UN. In a matter of minutes, Alex has managed to hand wave Navalny's death and then pivot into distraction so the audience doesn't start thinking this Putin character is bad news.
Starting point is 00:38:47 It's weird. It's not weird, but it is weird. You know what I mean? It is, yeah. I think what's almost weirder is that I expect it. That's the weirdest thing about it. Like if you go back at any point in time and you're just like, oh yeah,
Starting point is 00:39:01 you would totally expect the right wing in the United States to be like, Putin doesn't murder people, you're crazy. That totally makes sense, that's crazy. You start to ask yourself, is there a point at which Alex would be like, Putin has gone too far? I mean, right? I can't really imagine it now, I guess maybe nuking a city,
Starting point is 00:39:20 but he wouldn't do that, it would be the globalist. Yeah, I mean, actually, that's, see, but that's the type of thing that's almost like less likely for Alex to draw a line in there because the bigger it is the easier it is to be like, oh that was somebody else, you know, whereas something like this that is so clearly personal. Did, was he murdered by the state? What are you fucking talking about? How dare you say the state when you know that you mean
Starting point is 00:39:45 Putin? You're saying the state because you don't want people to think you mean Putin, even though you mean Putin, which is why you're saying the state. Right. And it is unfortunate timing for Alex, you know, with Tucker's interview and all that, to have to try and... But that's why he did it. It didn't go well. He's a fucking whiny, pathetic loser. So to get his rocks off, he killed a guy. Well, that's how do we not know this? That's the story that you're telling. And I don't think I mean, obviously, you can't prove that. That is that is the narrative thread that you've put together.
Starting point is 00:40:15 Sure, sure. Who knows if there's any actual connection between those things. Sure. But you have deduced the psychology of the individual is as Gives. I mean, listen, I'm just saying that... And people can correct me if I'm wrong. This is not our first maniacal dictator overlord. They have an MO.
Starting point is 00:40:37 Generally speaking, they make very similar mistakes. And often are assuaged with very similar solutions. So in this case, historically, I've seen a lot of guys murder a guy to feel better. So, um, Alex, for what it's worth, does not support sending people to Siberia. He is not a fan. He is a courageous stance to take in 2024. Now there's some other things he doesn't like. Oh, I don't defend Putin's sending some of his political
Starting point is 00:41:07 and now about to defend Siberian work camps. That's that's Russia. I don't agree with it. That's not the American way. But Putin doesn't have the motive and our same media and our same government that made jokes about Gonzalo Lyra and could care less. In fact, before he was killed, he begged for help from the state department to get out of the country and they wouldn't even return his phone calls or emails. Well, in a moment, show his final statement here before he was grabbed and then basically starved to death. So that's
Starting point is 00:41:32 we're going to show you his final statement is the fact that just because rush has issues and is corrupt, doesn't mean that it's okay for our government to persecute its political enemies. So that's definitely that he's talking about is relevant to the point. That's all a complete distraction smoke screen from the matter at hand. Now he's deploying this stuff because he supports Putin and he doesn't want to talk about the actual facts of the matter in this case. You're gonna get great. You don't support sending people to Siberia and then your next immediate thought is, but also America sucks. Yeah. It seems like, it seems like a strange path of thought. It feels, it feels like you should at least have to try harder than that. Like shouldn't you have to be like, okay, well we're gonna give you Navalny's words
Starting point is 00:42:14 and then immediately after that to kind of wash that out of your mouth. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, not fair. No, you can't that's just changing the subject No, you can't because the point of this isn't actually about Navalny's death. It's about America being bad, right? That's basically what the whole thrust is sure So that's the reality here is you can say okay Russia's got these your county in situations going on and I opposed that tough talk But now we're just going to accept those Sharon America I And I opposed that tough talk, but now we're just going to accept those Yeah, it's bad things here in America. I put out a video about 10 minutes before the ruling came out with the headline New York judge finds Trump guilty of real estate fraud.
Starting point is 00:42:55 And then sure enough, 10 minutes later, they came out with the ruling. It was imminent. How did I know that would happen? Because the judge last year phone call already found Trump guilty and they had his own trial with no jury to find out how guilty. They think we're stupid, ladies and gentlemen. So Putin's not dissolving our borders. Putin's not shipping in Fentanyl. Putin's not starting all these wars like the United States has started.
Starting point is 00:43:19 So this is a video that's supposed to be about covering the news that Putin's primary opposition, whom he had tried to poison and then sent to a Siberian work camp Died at said word camp instead of having any real discussion of that It seems like this whole video is meant to be about how bad America is and how because of that we can't really judge Putin That's weird particularly for the number one super America loving patriot guy Also, Alex could post that headline ahead of time because he does sloppy work and he doesn't care about verifying information. He constantly posts headlines that are completely full of shit based on whims and hunches, so this is nothing new.
Starting point is 00:43:51 He was a pretty educated guess that Trump would be fine to shit though, so good on you. Judge Engeron hadn't found Trump guilty a year ago and then now he was doing this trial to find out how guilty he was. That's Alex's talking point about his own Sandy Hook cases and he's trying to superimpose that onto Trump so it appears like the globalists are attacking them with the same power. Which is a wise move. Alex is misrepresenting that the case had seven different causes of action. The first one is a very simple one that only required that it be proven that Trump and his
Starting point is 00:44:19 co-defendants had made false statements in business. That was super easy to prove and the court granted them summary judgment on that back in September. Yeah, that shouldn't even have been, like that should have already have happened 30 years ago. Yeah, probably, yeah, that kind of thing. The other six causes of action required that they prove that there was intention
Starting point is 00:44:36 to violate laws behind the false statements, which was then litigated at this trial. Alex is just lying about this because if he dealt with reality, he would really highlight how much of a con man Trump is and how none of the audience should trust him, and how much Alex was an idiot to trust him. He just doesn't want to open that can of worms.
Starting point is 00:44:51 Yeah. Instead of taking this as a moment where they could realize that the guy that they cast as their strongman political savior is actually a fraud, Alex is lying about the circumstances of the case in order to make it seem like political oppression. That political oppression is then being used to deflect from accusations that Putin killed Navalny.
Starting point is 00:45:07 That's pretty over the top, even by infowar standards. This is a heroic level of deflection. Yeah. Like, here's what I feel like. All right, let me try and like, wait into something safe, okay? I think the justice system can work. But like, here's the problem.
Starting point is 00:45:27 It doesn't work for the edgiest of edge, the extremes, because realistically, it is insane for any of us to walk into a courtroom and then be like, we need to prove motive behind whether or not Trump intended to defraud people. That should literally just be you walk in and everybody goes, come on! Like it's too late for that, you know what I'm saying?
Starting point is 00:45:52 And that's, but that's the thing, right? We can't have a justice system where that happens at all. It can never have a one. You want the protection of not being subject to the come on. Totally. Legal justice system and therefore people who deserve a little come on. It's unfortunate. Yeah, they don't, they are not subject to the command totally legal justice system and therefore people who deserve a little command It's unfortunate. Yeah, they don't they are not subject to the come on rules
Starting point is 00:46:09 Right, right, right, and that's why we have superheroes because we think that there's that difference You know we think that makes sense, but then who watches the watchman and there we go, right? You know we've we've we've come full circle the I don't know any more references but still further yeah all right let's go one step further back mm-hmm if you don't think Putin murdered Navalny this is the most come on you know that's why it's hard to read about in newspapers and shit where it's like allegedly murder come on it's very it's
Starting point is 00:46:41 very strange you know like the reason that people generally say allegedly yeah because of worrying about being sued Yeah, it's funny. It's fucking put what are you doing? Oh, we won't get an interview with Putin anymore. Yeah, surprise Yeah, yeah, so look this is a rush issue man. That's that's that's really that's really what's going on The truth is Putin runs Russia. That's Russia's issue, but in America we've got tyrants that make Russia, that's Russia's issue. But in America, we've got tyrants that make Vladimir Putin, even if you believe he's the devil, look like an amateur and that is the reality. So remember Gonzalo Lyra, remember Julian Assange, remember the hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of
Starting point is 00:47:19 peaceful January 6 activists that were waved into the capital that are serving years in prison and others that shook the fence like Joe Biggs spending decades in prison and Understand that when the left points their finger at Russia and says look they're totalitarian They should be looking right back in the mirror because they're cheerleading all this garbage. Putin denies. He does all this The left is everywhere calling for all of our imprisonment. They openly support this so they are guilty as hell. So this is all just going to be deflection. That's basically all this is. Right.
Starting point is 00:47:53 So I think the thing that's really fascinating here is Alex's take at the beginning where it's just a Russia issue. Does he think he doesn't comment on and get really worked up about domestic politics in other countries? Like an entire chapter of his great reset book was about how tyrannical Justin Trudeau was because of the Canadian trucker protests. Sure. Alex is very hands off when it's a leader that he likes doing something that he can't possibly support. But if it's a leader he doesn't like, it's open season. Alex has to be a little delicate here because his world operates in black and white.
Starting point is 00:48:22 There's a literal devil who runs the enemy's side, so you have to be pretty allergic to nuance. Alex needs to maintain Putin as a heroic figure because he represents a lot of the societal bigotry that Alex wants to make normal here in the United States, so it's critically important to not do anything that's going to push him onto the enemy's side. They can theoretically be launching space nukes, killing political opponents, jailing journalists, and Alex's response has to be to pretend that these things are false flags. And even if they're not, the United States is worse because if he doesn't, he runs the risk of, uh-oh, Putin's working for the devil. Yeah. And then you lose a lot of the, the, the branding and the imagery around him as like, he wants to raise the birth rates. Yeah. He wants to make
Starting point is 00:49:04 religion central, the traditional family, all this stuff like is, is raise the birth rates, he wants to make religion central, the traditional family, all this stuff like is so valuable to him that he can't really deal with it in real terms. Yeah, yeah, that, I mean, it's so damaging just as a frame, a point of reference, like that idea of like, because if you've condensed things down so clearly to just one or the other, then any conversation is either you're trying to hurt or help me, you know? And if you're saying, oh, well, this person on my team
Starting point is 00:49:35 is bad, you're hurting me because you're hurting the team. Right now is not the time to go after this guy who's on our team. Right now is the time to go after Ultimate Evil. Right, which is the US government. Now it seems- Well, it's the people who are hijacked the US government. Now, it seems strange that this has been going on
Starting point is 00:49:54 for your entire life and the lives of the people before you and the people before you and the people before them and so on and so forth. It does. With no change in any conversation. Well, it is. But this time, it's gonna work The lesser of two evils is the right way to go
Starting point is 00:50:09 We simultaneously always and never have the chance to conquer the devil and that is great. Yeah, so look man He's not a Putin apologist. No, no, no My job is not being an apologist for Putin or for Russia. I'm just saying the timing of this is very very suspicious Oh Putin or for Russia. I'm just saying the timing of this is very very suspicious. Oh Also, he could have had a heart attack and really died for real could have tended. I think that's the case Oh, we was fought play but again tender We don't know any of that, but if you go to X impossible to know really national news Oh, Putin did it for sure. Ladies and gentlemen, why would Putin kill somebody who's unpopular? who's unpopular, who's
Starting point is 00:50:45 in prison and then give the Western establishment a big win? Okay, so look, I understand Alex does caveat some stuff with like, there's a speculation and shit, but like, your speculation is there's no reason that this could be Putin. If it's foul play, it's a fucking globalist who's trying to false flag Putin. And at least he at least he talks himself he you know talks himself down He's like could be a normal heart attack. I don't think so. I Mean, it's fun to be like I'm not an apologist for Putin and then literally Sorry for Putin. I think everything he does is great and I think well if you believe that he's wrong you're wrong
Starting point is 00:51:19 It's very strange Man why you know? That's that's a question for a deep question that I think requires a serious amount of time to get to the bottom of. Why? Why did you pull it back? You could say it.
Starting point is 00:51:36 We don't know why. I mean, you could say we don't know why. But not even he could say that without going, I tend to think that's not the case. Like, why? Well, because there's a level of without going, I tend to think that's not the case. Like, why? Well, because there's a level of like, I'm embarrassed. Right? How is that the level, you know?
Starting point is 00:51:54 What's your past a certain point? Like, why even have a level at all? I don't disagree with you, but, you know, as the kids say, some people are built different. Hey, could have been anybody out there. Yeah. So, um, the special reports, uh, we're not that fertile of, uh, ground to tail soil. Um, but there was something about Cheerios, uh, uh, make, there's chemicals in the Cheerios that are making nutrients. Okay. Um, so that's fun. I decided to ignore that report. Yeah. Let's get that one out of here. And so I was like, all right, well, Alex, he on Friday
Starting point is 00:52:30 on the 16th, he did show up. I didn't really show up. He did a little bit of time at the beginning on the phone or maybe pre recorded. And so we'll listen to that a little bit. Sure, sure, sure, sure. So here's the beginning of the show. No more Agatha Christie murder mystery of Navalny. No, no, no, no. Does not really come up on Friday's show. Do you know who did it, Dan?
Starting point is 00:52:55 All of us. It was Colonel Mustard. It was all of us who killed him. Oh, so it was an Orient Express situation. Yeah, it was an Orient Express situation. Shit. Well, here's where we are on Friday. OK.
Starting point is 00:53:04 It's Friday, February 16th, 2024, I'm your host, Alex Jones, and the wheels are coming off the New World Order. The entire system is being revealed to the world. There are open announcements by publications like the Wall Street Journal that, hey, inflation is your fault, and you should just skip meals.
Starting point is 00:53:24 We're gonna be breaking that down next segment. Oh, very exciting. So the Wall Street Journal did have a headline, quote, to save money, maybe you should skip breakfast. But the body of the article doesn't really match the tone of that headline. This was a bit of a clickbait situation where the actual body of the text is just about price increases in many of the categories of foods that generally make up breakfast, how these prices are rising. Right. At least they were back when this article was published in February 2023.
Starting point is 00:53:49 Oh my God. It's over a year old. It's over a year old. But Alex doesn't realize that since he's not covering this article itself. He's covering a zero hedge article that uses the Wall Street Journal as a prop in the middle of the article. The Wall Street Journal article is a year plus old, a little over a year old. That zero-headge article itself doesn't even seem to realize that. It seems to think that this is a current article. Who are these people? I don't know. How does this happen?
Starting point is 00:54:15 I took from the tone of the zero-headge article that it simultaneously believed it to be in the past and current. I don't know. A powerful ability to manipulate time. Yeah. It's worth noting also that the underlying article itself never says that inflation is your fault. There was never the argument that was being made. Sure. That was from the zero hedge article, not the Wall Street Journal one. Right. And outside of the headline, the actual article doesn't say you should skip meals. It's just trash work both from Alex, zero hedge and whoever wrote that Wall Street Journal headline. That was a clickbaity kind of business.
Starting point is 00:54:49 Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I don't know if, I don't know if people know, like, if you're, if you're editor or somebody who's doing the headline is like, yeah, I'm going to make it seem like your article's different. That's not good. That's not good. It's not, but a lot of times you have no power over that kind of thing. I know, I know, I wouldn't feel good about it.
Starting point is 00:55:11 No, it'd be tough. So Alex has another topic to talk about, although he does spend a fair amount of time on this Wall Street Journal article. Sure. Top news kind of thing. Yeah, should you be skipping breakfast? The other article or the other
Starting point is 00:55:25 news piece that he has is about the case in Fulton County and Fanny Willis. Yeah, yeah, yeah. The first thing I wanted to get into is Fanny Willis and the incredible testimony yesterday and I guess more of what's coming up today and we'll be covering it live. I mean here is this corrupt prosecutor that hired her boyfriend, lied about it and then got caught giving him hundreds and hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars much of it in cash that he would then go pay for trips in her name. So clear money laundering.
Starting point is 00:55:57 So just because I'm sure this is confusing with all the cases that Trump is facing, this has to do with the Fulton County, Georgia criminal case against Trump for trying to overturn the 2020 election. The district attorney in that case is Fannie Willis and she at one time was in a romantic relationship with a man named Nathan Wade, who she appointed to be the special prosecutor over the case. Wade received $650,000 in his role and he paid for some trips with Willis, which is being characterized by Trump's side as a corrupt arrangement where Willis sought to enrich herself through the case using Wade as an intermediary.
Starting point is 00:56:30 This argument entirely falls apart upon any examination, and Trump's lawyers wanted to put Willis on the stand as some form of a fishing expedition. That backfired in terms of establishing any legal issues for Willis, but it provided a lot of flashy type meme moments. Yes, yeah, yeah, yeah. It's been a while since I've seen an event where the exact same information was being experienced in two polar opposite ways.
Starting point is 00:56:53 The same clips of Willis testifying are being shared by people on the left and right with each clamoring about how the context of the clip is that they're right. You know, celebrating her on one side and the other people being like, this is complete proof of corruption on the other. I think we're all insane. I think we're all insane if that's the way people are engaging
Starting point is 00:57:11 with this information. It's weird. It's insane. This is very disorienting, but I think at the end of the day, this is more or less nothing too important. A woman had an unadvisable and possibly inappropriate work relationship. They probably shouldn't have done that, and there's no evidence that the relationship involved any professional wrongdoing. And this is the best Trump side could do to try and invalidate what is likely to be a very tough case for them to win. Also, Alex just has basic facts here wrong. Alex said that she hired her boyfriend. And as we have seen so far, that is not true. Right. Willis and Wade had known each other since 2019 and he was hired as the
Starting point is 00:57:45 special prosecutor in 2021, but their personal relationship would not start until after that point in 2022. There's no romantic relationship as we've been able to establish at the time of her hiring him. Alex also said she lied about the hiring, which is not true. Willis did not respond to a lot of salacious accusations until recently, but there's not a specific thing that Alex is accusing or lying about that she has in fact lied about. Alex says that she gave him quote hundreds and hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars much of it in cash that is not true. He was paid six hundred fifty thousand dollars for his work as a special prosecutor. This was not giving him money and it wasn't transferred in
Starting point is 00:58:21 cash. To the extent that there wasn't any cash. It was Willis repaying Wade for things like a trip to Aruba that he paid for and then she re re re upped him for right. Alex is severely mischaracterizing this. Alex has pretty much all of the basic details of this story wrong because the goal isn't to discuss things as they are. The goal is to fudge details so they fit the conclusion that he's going to report no matter what, namely that this is a clear case of money laundering Yeah, and it's it's
Starting point is 00:58:49 It's strange to watch I Don't I think it's hilarious I mean, I'm sorry, but it's one of the funnier things that I've ever I It made me like when I started reading about it and then and then her fucking dad was called to test I don't understand why I fucking when I was reading about it. And then, and then her fucking dad was called to test. I don't understand why I fucking when I was reading about it. I was like, why did I stop doing stand up? There's so many fucking like one, this dude's dick has got to be the greatest in history. That guy, if not, it doesn't matter because it may alter the course of history
Starting point is 00:59:21 so much. And then also from everything, it everything I gotta be hot as shit to be working on a case against the fucking former president sure that's fucking hot yeah why not let's do it well okay well I'm starting to see why you don't do stand up anymore these bits are good thanks that was that was me having worked on it for a month said it felt like you had maybe hit an open mark. Trying to work some of this out. Hey, y'all ever been working on a case against the president? If?
Starting point is 00:59:53 It's hot. If? If I was doing more than giving premises? Man, I would quit. The issue is I don't think from everything I can tell that this is going to really alter anything I don't think that she's going to be Taken off the case it doesn't feel like that from the tenor of how things are going And they do think that while it is an incredibly surreal thing to be witnessing it has
Starting point is 01:00:18 Layers of racism and misogyny that are mixed into it that make it very you know know, while there's a surreality to it, there's a, what is happening in a troubling way also. But yeah, it's, I don't know, I don't know, man. I mean, like, okay, on the one hand, sure. You can say, if you are part of prosecuting the former president of the United States who attempted to overthrow said country, maybe, maybe, take it super seriously.
Starting point is 01:00:57 I think there's cause. To an almost absurd degree. I think there's cause to be like, very by the book. Sure, sure. Sure. On the other hand, fucking, it's not affecting anything. So who fucking cares? Yeah.
Starting point is 01:01:09 It's not in my business. At least everything that has been brought up has not indicated that there is any reason to think that it's caused any kind of change to have things around. And we watch movies about this kind of scenario. This is a romcom scenario. They're actually becoming even better lawyers
Starting point is 01:01:25 together. There was probably some friction at the beginning. There's even like, yeah, if you read Willis is filing to the court, do you even points out that people on Trump's side are dating each other? Yeah, it's fine. Yeah, there isn't, there isn't inherent conflict of interest or anything inherently wrong here. It's just a desperate attempt to try and paint some reason why this, this trial needs to be derailed. And it doesn't appear to be working, but it is working in as much as, you know,
Starting point is 01:01:59 creating a lot of bullshit for people like Alex to talk about. Right. And that's probably what the goal is ultimately. Totally, totally. And the problem, of course, the problem is that you, you know, again, there is, they did nothing wrong. There's no problems there. You know, everything you do is fine. But in this very specific situation, unfortunately, I am in the position of saying it is reasonable for people to maybe overreact a little bit, you know? Because, again, this is the guy who tried to overthrow the United States of America. Yeah, I'm an observer. Totally. I don't, this to me does not feel like, it doesn't feel
Starting point is 01:02:40 sensible. No, no, no, no. So instead of going too far into this, Alex goes back to the Wall Street Journal article. Sure. Friday, February 16th, 2024. And I want to kick the broadcast off with this headline in your face from the Wall Street Journal. To save money, maybe you should skip breakfast. And the Atlantic says you should eat beans instead of meat. Ladies and gentlemen, they are building a giant dystopic system in our faces and tell us what we're doing. We're about to break it down right now. This is a great reset. This is the post-industrial
Starting point is 01:03:21 world. This is the depopulation system in our face. Alex doesn't seem to understand this. This is a year old Wall Street Journal article with information that is no longer current about commodity prices. That Atlantic article is even older. That's from August 2017. Jesus Christ.
Starting point is 01:03:37 Tip of the spear work being done here. This is what he wants to lead the show off with. We don't know who killed Navalny. Probably a false flag. There's no way of knowing. I do appreciate. Here's the problem I have with Alex is not the way he's you know these are this is awful terribly. Of course. But that Alex is engaging with this in any way other than like I could not need a newspaper to tell me to skip breakfast if I'm broke more. I have skipped so many meals.
Starting point is 01:04:07 I didn't need to read anything to tell me that I cannot afford to eat right now. That was free information. That's true. I didn't have to spend a dollar 50, I didn't have, X-tree, X-tree, you can't afford this paper. Well, but again, it is such a complicated dynamic because the article doesn't say that the headline says that oh weird. Yeah. And it's so weird. And the article even like if
Starting point is 01:04:33 the article is not very long, it is just a discussion of some prices that have gone up. Yeah. But there's also some prices that they listed have gone down. Oh my God. Like whole bean coffee. What are we coffee category that had gone down It's just I don't know it feels like there's a better use of time Can I get a slice and a pop for 350? That's really ultimately at the end of the day in my mind That is like survival remember the dollar dollar man. That's what I'm saying, you know mm-hmm. Yep used to come back from My college classes broke his know. I used to come back from my college classes, broke the shit. I used to live with a Taco Bell in between my classes and home. I lived just off campus.
Starting point is 01:05:13 I would get a bean burrito especial because it was a dollar nine or something like that. And then if there's a corner store right there where I'd get a pack of camel lights, paying change. Ooh, those are the days. Those change days. Mm-hmm, mm-hmm. So we get a little more coverage of the Wall Street Journal article.
Starting point is 01:05:33 Okay. And this is just disconnected from reality. I don't really know what else to say. The Wall Street Journal tells readers, to save money, maybe you should skip breakfast. Now remember, cutting off much of the fertilizer, shutting down many of the farms around the world, this is all good to save the earth from climate change
Starting point is 01:05:55 because particularly organic farming is bad, factory farming is good. That's the Ewan and Lundin Guardian and many other establishment mouthpieces openly saying that of course this all flies in the face of common sense and reality. Then separately the UN comes out and says oh hundreds of millions are going to starve to death, UNICEF means billions and billions of dollars more because the virus caused a breakdown in food production, no, the lockdowns that went on for all these years did that and now all these years and when it comes to farms What and food production around the world in fact the controls incrementally shutting down that key infrastructure
Starting point is 01:06:36 Have only intensified so imagine the globalist party the WFUN trillionaire club and party, the WFUN Trillionaire Club. And their slogan is, you will eat the bucks. You will owe nothing, you will like it. And you say, that's so dystopic, they'll never get away with that. But they are, to some extent, because the public is so incredibly ignorant about the nature of just how evil this plan is, because even though they're saying we've broken the social contract, even though they're saying we're shutting down the normal infrastructure and killing oil drilling and gas production, even though they're shutting off the coal, even though they're saying the West isn't open for business but it sure is in China and India
Starting point is 01:07:18 where their investments are, the public still hasn't wrapped their mind around the fact that this is administrative Deindustrialization which will lead to poverty crime and death Especially in the third world. So here's the amazing headline Wall Street Journal tells readers who save money Maybe you should skip breakfast. That's how you save money. So what's going on that that sounds not okay? That's crazy because it's not what it says no first of all I mean and Alex is laundering his source and this isn't even about a Wall Street Journal article This is about a zero-hedge article that's covering the Wall Street Journal article which he does clarify later But it's he's acting like this year-old article is what he's basing all this stuff on the information and it isn't current It's not accurate anymore all this stuff on. The information in it isn't current. It's not accurate anymore. All this stuff is nonsense.
Starting point is 01:08:07 Yeah. The globalists or whatever aren't in favor of factory farming. I mean, any of this shit. There's no lockdowns that have existed for these all these four years. What is this to to to go to to give me the fertilizer, give me that whole thing to give me that whole fertilizer. And thing to give me that whole lot fertilizer And then to be like and here's how you know this headline Should you save money by skipping breakfast? Mm-hmm like if that's that's unfortunate
Starting point is 01:08:35 It's I just was listening that I'm like this is just a barrage of things that are disconnected from from anything Yeah, yeah, and it's it's a it's like It's like a bad improv show where the suggestion is this Wall Street Journal headline. I'm going to ask, actually I was going to ask you a very, like, dark question. At what point won't we be able to tell if it's Alex or if Alex is created in the AI Alex that just allows it?
Starting point is 01:09:02 Because it's like, oh. You can't create the weirdness in AI that Alex embodies from time to time. Yeah, there is something about it. Yeah, AI would never throw hatchets on Christmas Eve. No, there's that kind of stuff. Yeah. AI would never say that you get off the airplane
Starting point is 01:09:20 and the karate chop you. For all the artifacts and all the insanities, there's a very specific type that just can't be recreate but unfortunately I do think that 70% of the time Alex might as well be a yeah yeah I mean that other times it that does not need yeah that AI and AI could have like word salad at that even seems bored. Yeah, totally. Yes, that's what I mean. Yeah. Yeah. Now, here's a little weirdness. What's going on?
Starting point is 01:09:45 Just sit back and think about for a moment. Cogitate, meditate. Set it straight. The air of the corporate diamond. The most of these cats is featherweight. Mastacage. Articles in Cosmopolitan about have a baby go to a Satanic temple abortion clinic and they will sacrifice it with you. They actually have satanic sponsored abortion clinics now where women go to say it's a sacrifice. Okay. All these groups are pushing us and you're like that's just completely over the top. They're trolling us. No, they're getting ready for a post-industrial world and training you to not stand together and training you to be nihilistic and satanic like they are. So there was a Cosmo article from November 2023 and this is a part trolling, it's one
Starting point is 01:10:34 part trolling and one part a real clinic. It's a telemedicine operation in New Mexico that prescribes things like abortion pills, not a place where you can go and have an abortion as a satanic ritual. It has to have a religious thing though for first amendment reasons Well, we'll get to that in a second. Gotcha But before I tell you that I should tell you that the name of the clinic is Samuel Alito's mom's satanic abortion clinic right? So they are trying to fuck with people like Alex very clear That's very clear and so this article that Alex is citing also literally says quote Satanists don't actually worship the devil
Starting point is 01:11:02 There are no ritual sacrifices or quests for supernatural powers at the Satanic temple. Although ironically, when you think about it, there are sort of rituals and a quest for supernatural powers in Alex's world. Yeah, that is definitely real for him. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So not all reproductive health care advocates agree with this whole thing,
Starting point is 01:11:21 but the idea is to get around state bans on providing this kind of care by pretending it's a religious ritual. Right. They'll prescribe an abortion pill and advise you to do a ritual where you look at a mirror and say things like quote one's body is inviolable, subject to one's own will alone. Right, right, right. Alex gets really worked up about the satanic temple because they're using the inverse of a lot of his beliefs. He believes that he's allowed to use his religious beliefs to deprive people of access to things like reproductive care or human rights, and the satanic temple is using the same argument to try to provide these things or defend them. This is tough for Alex because he can't really argue against their actual point without
Starting point is 01:11:56 devastating his own, so the only path that he has available to him is to create a straw man of them to attack and pretend that they're actually hanging around with that guy with horns. Yeah. So good stuff. Yeah. It is interesting that they exist because they are a glaring like, this is all stupid, beacon. They're a beacon of this is all a waste of everybody's time and life and energy.
Starting point is 01:12:23 A glowing like giant sign to the sky that says everything you believe, look at it. Look at it in the way that you don't want to. That's us. Everything you should ask yourself a lot of questions. Really, right now, you should be asking yourself questions. That it doesn't make people do that is kind of amazing. It's truly kind of an incredible thing. Well, I mean, you don't have to ask questions if you just create, like, their demons. Totally, totally. I mean, just like in the abstract, like the idea of just being able to sit down with somebody in the quiet and to know that everything that you are saying is also applicable.
Starting point is 01:13:02 Like to just sit there with that information and then to still move forward and say, don't care. That is incredible. That's truly a power. I don't have it. So Alex talks a little bit more about the Fulton County situation and he talks about another character in that case that he's really, really writing an interesting story about. We're now into day two of the hearing where a judge is determining whether Fannie Willis has to step down from a political prosecution of President Trump there in Atlanta, Georgia. This is a complete meltdown. We've got clips for meltdowns coming up here in a moment. But that was on day one. Right now we are in day two and a gentleman named Terrence Bradley that worked with Fannie Willis' boyfriend, Nathan Wade, had signed an affidavit that indeed they did
Starting point is 01:13:55 have a relationship with Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade. Now he's had the lawyers threaten him and claims that he'll be disbarred and lose his law license if he doesn't claim all activity that he's ever had the last what four, five, six, seven years with Mr. Nathan Wade is now attorney-client privilege and so he can't comment on the affidavit. That's not how that works. You know that right. That relationship which they've now been trying to deny. So Terrence Bradley was expected to provide testimony that Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade had been dating already in 2022. Yeah, like prior to that. That was what the
Starting point is 01:14:34 expectation was on Trump's side. Sure. He was called to the stand and asked about the timeline of Willis and Wade's relationship because he was in contact with Trump's side's lawyer while she was trying to confirm some of these rumors about the relationship. When Bradley took the stand, he couldn't answer most of the questions because of attorney client privilege. That's because he was Nathan Wade's lawyer in his divorce. So the judge decided eventually that he would, that speak in private about this.
Starting point is 01:15:00 He wasn't threatened with disbarment if he didn't change some testimony and he didn't sign an affidavit. Just rules of how we do things. Yeah, Wade and Will has signed affidavits that their relationship started in 2022, which Trump side was sure that Bradley was going to refute. Right. Bradley did say that he was concerned that he could be disbarred, but not because of anyone threatening him. His fear was that that was what could happen if he violated attorney client privilege by answering Some of the questions he was being asked by Trump side
Starting point is 01:15:29 Right and his lawyers did advise him that this is this might be protected Right, and whether or not Wade and Willis had a relationship is not what's that issue Alex is pretending. That's an issue Yeah, it's whether the relationship started before or after she hired him as a special prosecutor Alex seemingly has no grasp on what the actual details of this case are, and that's because he's not interested then, past the point where they're useful as a way to make excuses for Trump's crimes. That's the end the beginning of this. I think what I find so funny and ironic about all of it is that in no way is any of this that in no way is any of this at all about the quality of the case against Trump. No. It is entirely about whether or not they can convince people that she is trying to get
Starting point is 01:16:14 rich off of the trial against Trump. Right. And more importantly, can we somehow wiggle out of this on a technicality? Which? wiggle out of this on a technicality. Which, for people who have just been hit with half a billion dollars worth of go fuck yourself for the type of shit that you are blaming other people. And if you read the judges ruling on that, it's staggering. It's staggering. It is absurd for them to at all think like, oh well this is bad, like fuck you. All of you can go fuck yourselves yeah it's a little rich yeah pun intended nice so we have one last clip
Starting point is 01:16:50 here and that's because Owen hosts for a bit and then we come back to a pre recorded interview that Alex did with one Lou Dobbs and it is so boring. And now, Alex Jones, the Alex Jones I might add. Alex, it is great to see you. It's been a long while in coming, but we're delighted to have you here and to have a chance to have a little talk. What are your thoughts today on America?
Starting point is 01:17:25 Well, I'm glad you raised that up front because you sent me a few questions, but you didn't add that one, and that's what I was gonna say. What is it like when you add the top show in the English-speaking world? We're not trying to be first place here, but a bigger show than Tucker had on Fox.
Starting point is 01:17:42 When you were on CNN reaching 10 million people a day conservatively predicting the one years ago, I mean, 18 years ago, everything that's happened. So our job is much easier as patriots that are anti globalist. I mean, you pioneered on mainstream media. The first person ever break all this. So I was going to ask you when you asked me questions, what is it like now to now be here when Elon Musk and Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson all sound just like you did 20 something years ago? Well, it sounds like music to me
Starting point is 01:18:15 because I didn't hear any like voices like minds. Well, I would reserve that. You were amazing throughout your amazing. Go fucking yourself. It is an establishment and you know, my hands off to you. I mean, you're but I was not the wilderness. I mean, I was out in the wilderness. I was a bush lager when I was doing it. You charged right on and it showed that freedom is popular. It's just the two of them talking about how great each other are too late Too goddamn. I always knew that Lou Dobbs was a bit of a weirdo
Starting point is 01:18:50 So but I didn't know that he was this far like he's pretty he's pretty much just yelling about the Marxist Dems and shit Like ooh, okay. Yeah talking about how great Alex is it's either obliviousness or like he's really pretty nuts. Yeah, pretty nuts. He's pretty nuts. But I mean, yeah, I'm just more on Alex's team. Like in my, in my estimation, if Lou Dobbs is telling me this now, it's too late, too late, man, you should have said something when you could have made a difference. Now go fuck yourself, Lou Dobbs. I don't know. Fuck yourself. No, because I know from listening to this Alex has always had like a positive
Starting point is 01:19:29 relationship with Lou Dobbs sure maybe it wasn't the two-way street necessarily I don't think this is the first time they've talked I'm just saying definitely I'm just saying that Lou Dobbs could be saying a lot of fun nice stuff about Alex on CNN and that's CNN CNN but he didn't he didn't maybe he did in code see it's just a boring fucking interview yeah and that's that's that's the end of it an argument could be made that we should have covered an episode that happened where Alex interviewed Brett
Starting point is 01:20:05 Weinstein. Brett Weinstein made his way to Info Wars. Oh, didn't he? He was on. He was on the Rogan show. He's making the tour around doing some HIV denialism. Sure. Sure. Now's the time for it. Well, sure. And one of the things that I was like, I'm very, I'm very bored by Brett Weinstein as a person. I find him difficult to listen to. Yeah. And one of the reasons that I ended up not covering that is because that's about, you know, the sensational headline that there is HIV denialism and shit is ascendant among these ding dongs, but that's not different for
Starting point is 01:20:41 info wars. No, him being on info wars, Saying this stuff is kind of like yeah Alex had John Rappaport on as an expert for years and probably he still shows up in the fourth hour every now and again If he's not dead, I have no idea Yeah, but like John Rappaport is one of the big figures in HIV denialism and he's a guy who hypnotized Alex with his His neuro linguistic programming and made Alex cry a bunch hypnotized Alex with his neuro linguistic programming and made Alex cry a bunch. So like this, it's not that shocking in the context of in for is it shocking that Brett Weinstein is engaging in it. But I'm not, I don't care about Brett Weinstein. Yeah, I think he sucks.
Starting point is 01:21:16 Yeah, I mean, I feel like we're, I think, I think what exists a lot is the, the like, you can't have certain beliefs all a cart, if that makes sense, you know, the like, you can't have certain beliefs a la carte, if that makes sense, you know? So like, for people who are surprised when this stuff happens, I get why you're surprised, but what we should realize is you can't have some beliefs a la carte. So this comes along with other stuff, you know?
Starting point is 01:21:39 Well it does, and certainly believing some things and cultivating certain audiences make you more likely to Totally. Take on these positions. Absolutely. But then also when you have like a position that is almost entirely about being a social contrarian and all this shit, eventually you're going to need to up the stakes. Yeah.
Starting point is 01:22:02 And that is unfortunately kind of the exercise you're seeing. Now, like, I think one of the big reasons also that I've just like, I don't feel like it's essential to cover. I'm happy to bring it up and be like, this happened. But like, I don't find, he's not that important. Like, if like. I still forget his name. You know, if Tucker comes on, then, you know,
Starting point is 01:22:23 if they're just doing info wars shit, it becomes more relevant. I mean, it's... Bray Weinstein's Bray Weinstein. He's just so low on my list of terrible Weinsteins, right? He's the only reason that we know about him is he got mad that they were being mean to him as a white guy at Evergreen University. That's the only...
Starting point is 01:22:41 Yeah, that's him. Yes, that's the only reason... I keep forgetting that that's the guy that is origin story is fucking nothing because his brother works for Peter Teal. That's well yeah I mean his origin story is fucking weak sauce yeah you're nothing to me yeah it I understand he's cultivated something of an audience and what have you but I just don't I wasn't drawn to it. I can't I get you know there's a lot of audiences that I just can't understand and it's not you know, it's not it's not wine scene I understand wine scene. I don't understand why you would be attracted to him. It does seem straight
Starting point is 01:23:14 That doesn't make sense to me. No, no, he's not he's not like like with Alex It even makes a little bit more sense to be drawn to him, you know No, that's what we have it emotionally resonant and visceral performance and a lot of things. He says, granted, I guess you could be drawn to the certainty with which some like Brett Weinstein talks, but I don't know. He's don't ask me. He's dull. Anyway, Alex swears to be back in studio on Sunday, which has been recording.
Starting point is 01:23:43 So, you know, maybe we won't have which has been recording. So, you know, maybe we won't have any O.N. for, you know, coming up the works for a bit. It'd be nice. But we'll see. We'll be back. Another episode. Maybe Alex will expand on his ideas about the false flag and the falling the killing. Has there any been, has there been any movement on Owen having gone to jail heroically? Or is it just never happened? I was looking. Well, I don't I haven't watched his shows. Sure. Sure. Sure. But like I was looking through the, you know, the war room and their numbers and there's a giant spike when he gets out of
Starting point is 01:24:13 prison. Right. It lasts a very short time before it goes back to sort of normal numbers. And now we're on the subject. Alex was like Owen's about to be on Tucker. I know that happened. I? I know. Ha ha ha ha ha. Yeah, I don't think so. You have got to have zero talent to not be able to keep at least a little bit of that. From going to jail, fucking Johnny Cash went to jail. Right.
Starting point is 01:24:38 Never looked back. Mm hmm. Mm hmm. Mm hmm. So I don't know. But we'll see what happens in the future. Owen should he should brag about like he should have gotten like a teardrop tattoo. Yeah, yeah, something should have some kind of new prison mentality or some sort of some
Starting point is 01:24:56 signifier that he's he's he's been through it. Yeah. Yeah. It's here's the problem. All right. They know it's a show. They know they're doing a show and they know they're not real. Hmm, but they refuse to act like showman Well, sometimes and that just makes me so mad. I think because I don't know I think part of the reason is because it might be bad for the brand, you know, too, but at the same time You know you have this I was a political prisoner It fits within your character. It shows growth. It is a literal timestamp,
Starting point is 01:25:28 so it allows you to know that things have passed. It's a great move all across the board. Maybe he is doing it, and we just don't know because we don't watch a show. So that's another. Maybe it's just so bad we don't even notice. Anyway, we'll see him on Tucker soon.
Starting point is 01:25:41 But we'll be back until then, Jordan, we have a website. Indeed we do. It's KnowledgeRite.com. Yep, we're also on Blue Sky. We are on Blue Sky. It's KnowledgeRite. Yep, we'll be back until then Jordan we do it's knowledge right.com where's on blue sky we are on blue sky is knowledge right. Yeah, we'll be back but until then I'm the old easy X car. And now here comes the sex robot Andy and Kansas you're on the air. Thanks for holding. So Alex, I'm a first time color. I'm a huge fan. I love your work. I love you.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.