Life Kit - From Family Planning To Recycling: Your Climate Questions Answered
Episode Date: October 30, 2021Ahead of the U.N. climate talks in Glasgow this weekend, we're sharing this episode from our friends at It's Been A Minute with Sam Sanders.In this episode, Sam chats with climate experts Ayana Elizab...eth Johnson, marine biologist and writer, and Kendra Pierre-Louis, senior climate reporter with the podcast 'How to Save a Planet.' Together, they answer listener questions about everything from how to talk to your kids about global warming... to how to deal with all of this existential dread.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey, LifeKit listeners. If you're like me, you have a lot of questions about what it means to
live during climate change. It can be a lot. So in an effort to make sense of all of it,
our friends at It's Been a Minute sat down with a scientist and a climate change reporter
to sift through all of it. Here's the episode.
Hey, y'all. This is Sam's Aunt Betty, this week,
answering your questions about climate change.
All right, let's start the show.
Hey, y'all, you're listening to It's Been a Minute from NPR. I'm Sam Sanders. Beginning
this weekend, the UN will hold a conference on climate change in Glasgow. And as you've
heard by now, more than ever, scientists have said it is very critical for us to start making some really big changes to avoid the most catastrophic effects of global warming.
Happy Halloween, everybody.
The scares are coming from inside the house.
Climate change is here.
You know, climate change is such a big problem for everyone that I sometimes find it very difficult to even talk about, both in my personal life and frankly on this show.
But all that aside, I am still kind of hopeful because I think that hope is something we should have, something we have to have for this kind of thing, right?
I mean, that's what the posters tell me.
That is the thing that keeps people going in sad movies and TV shows.
Hope.
Are y'all hopeful?
Do you ever feel the defeatist streak of it?
No.
No.
Okay.
Tell me.
Tell me.
I don't like that word.
Okay.
We are an anti-hope establishment.
Okay.
This is Kendra Pierre-Lewis and Ayanna Elizabeth Johnson.
My name is Kendra Pierre-Lewis and Ayanna Elizabeth Johnson. My name is Kendra Pierre-Lewis.
I'm a senior climate reporter with the Gimlet Spotify podcast, How to Save a Planet.
I'm Ayanna Elizabeth Johnson.
I'm a marine biologist and a writer, formerly co-host of How to Save a Planet, co-creator of that show, and co-founder of a think tank called Urban Ocean Lab.
I'm going to own the fact that I grew up extremely Catholic. And so for me,
the thing that I feel like gets lost in all of this is like morality, right? Like,
and I think that's why I don't like hope because hope has this expectation that's tied to an
outcome. So if you don't think that you're going to achieve this outcome, then what's the use in trying, right?
Whereas I'm very much shaped in the idea that there's a right thing to do and a wrong thing to do.
And so, like, why would I do the wrong thing just because doing the right thing may not get the outcome that I'm looking for?
Also, can we just preface this whole conversation by saying that going to Mars is probably not the answer.
Like, it is absolutely bananas to me that somehow we think we can colonize Mars, which it doesn't have.
You know, like there are just many, you know, it doesn't have a breathable atmosphere.
It doesn't have the water or anything that we got down here, you know, and it's like, really, guys?
Anyway, we invited Kendra and Ayanna on the show this week to answer some questions from listeners and myself about climate change.
From where we should live to how to talk to your kids about it to what we could do that might actually help.
Spoiler alert, your compostable straws not really doing that much.
Let's get to our questions from our listeners.
Both of you answer at will as you feel it.
This one comes from Elizabeth. She wrote, quote, I've moved around the country a fair amount for school, for work,
but it seems like almost everywhere is plagued by some element of the climate crisis,
fire season in California, dwindling water in the Southwest, hurricanes along the East Coast.
As I try to decide where to put down roots, everywhere feels
precarious. My question is, how are other people dealing with this? How do you decide? Am I freaking
out because I'm an older millennial and this is our thing? I have a solution as to where she should
live, though. Oh, say it. No, I mean, it's half a joke, but Duluth, Minnesota. I did a story years ago where these researchers sort of crunched the numbers about like where would be the better places in the United States to live in a warming world.
And a lot of the sort of northeastern Finger Lakes or not Finger Lakes, Great Lakes regions sort of hit that sweet spot.
But it's really tongue in cheek.
She's right.
There's no place on the earth that is untouched by climate change.
And she is not wrong to be thinking through sort of where does she want to live.
It absolutely drives me bananas when I see things like I like looking through like Redfin, you know, and I see these beautiful homes that were built in a floodplain two years ago.
And that makes me absolute bananas.
But it's not like an absolute, with very few exceptions. If you're talking about the United States, there are very few places where you absolutely cannot live and you absolutely should not live, right?
Like there's a saying in disaster research that there's no such thing as a natural disaster.
There's a natural hazards or a tornado, a wildfire, a hurricane.
But a disaster is when that natural hazard meets a human population. And so when you talk to researchers about climate change, they don't just talk about mitigation, which is, you know, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, stopping the worst effects of climate change.
They also talk about adaptation.
Climate change is here and it's with us and we need to learn to live with it.
Yeah.
Well, also, you know, I think what I hear in this question, because I hear people ask it a lot, where can I live to avoid climate change?
What they're also asking sometimes is where can I go live to not have to change my way of life whatsoever?
Where can I go where I still get the same big house with the big yard and grass that I water every day and an SUV that guzzles gas,
steak every week and never having to think about
climate change. And the question perhaps is not just where should I live, but also in what way
should I change how I live wherever I am? I think we can still have a nice quality of life
in the future. I think we just need to shift our expectation of what that looks like,
especially around consumption. And so I think, yes, if the thing that brings you joy is like
huge bonfires and Hummers and traveling everywhere by airplane and eating nothing but factory farmed beef three times a day
like it would be great if you stopped doing those things but also like i think it's been such a
distraction and honestly like a failing of the environmental movement in some aspect to allow
this whole question to be framed as one primarily of individual choice,
as opposed to how do we change building codes? How do we change our agricultural policy? How do
we change our transit options and what fossil fuel companies have done expertly with billions of dollars of investing in marketing
is to convince us to all obsess over our own carbon footprints, over our own waste,
over our own individual impact. Instead of saying, yo, it's not my fault that every time I turn on
the lights, it comes from coal. Like, can y'all please fix that? Can we just stop with that?
I think it's also important to think about whether we should rebuild in some places at all, right?
It becomes this thing where it's like— I think this about New Orleans all the time, and I feel bad even thinking it.
I think it about a lot of coastal places, and it's like this concept of managed retreat. And so figuring out what managed retreat looks like in a way that is respectful of communities and cultures that doesn't just displace low-income people is really hard.
But I think the sooner that we start talking about that kind of thing, the better, because we're talking about huge investments after every storm. And
every storm is an opportunity to think not just about how we rebuild, but about where we do that.
And it's not just water. Remember, it's also like wildfires are another huge issue.
Or if you're in Southern California, it's both.
Coming up, we answer more of your questions including
how to deal with all of this existential dread there is a way i promise
i know that we talked about collective uh versus individual action already but because we got so
many questions like this from our listeners i feel like I have to ask it at least once. This one comes from Amy. She wrote, quote, What's the easiest change I can make to mitigate climate change? By easiest, I mean something a fairly ordinary middle-aged mom can do and stick with. And like, I know it should be about the collective, larger structural, but people still want to know, what can I do right now?
Drive less.
Okay.
I hear that.
I could do that.
What else?
Or give up your car altogether.
No, no, no, no.
I don't know about that.
That's not easy, Kendra.
I mean, I think the hard answer is like, there isn't that much easy stuff that's going to make a big difference.
The bigger a difference you want to make, the more you have to actually do, right?
I mean, quantitatively, in terms of carbon emissions, the biggest thing you can do is often just not make more humans.
And no one wants to hear that, of course.
So I think the option that I often push people to as politics. Like, make sure you are pushing to elect representatives at all levels
of government and voting in every single election to ensure that we have people in power who actually
get that climate change is happening and are willing to make laws to address it.
Yeah. Yeah, I was piggybacking on that. There are a lot of, because she said she was a mom,
this is the only reason I'm saying this, there are a lot of mom climate groups. So she can find one and she can join them. And because they are mom climate groups, like, I don't know how old her kids are, but like, they're generally kid friendly, right? Like, it's not a thing where they will need to find childcare or any, you know, like, they will work around you as a mom. And so that may be an entryway into it because I know that saying, you know, get involved in politics is like, well, how?
Well, that's an easy, like finding a group of people who are already doing it and there are a number of them in your area is an easy sort of way of figuring out how to get involved.
I have a follow-up question in terms of like what things can people do individually?
And that is what stuff should I stop caring about when it comes to individual
action? Like over the course of the pandemic, just being at home a lot more, I've started to think a
lot about how much food I'm wasting. And it's like, to the extent you can eat all the food you buy,
because it takes a lot of water and energy to make all that food. And I feel like doing that and
taking that seriously has been good for the planet.
But there are other things
that just increasingly feel nonsensical
and not worth the ugh.
Like, what is the deal with the straws?
Do I have to have a pasta straw?
Do I have to have a compostable straw
that breaks down in two minutes?
Do you need a straw at all?
That's, there you go.
There you go.
But there's this obsession with that stuff.
Yes.
You may not need any sort of straw.
The funny thing about the straw though is that we obsess over the straw and we don't
obsess over the, like the thing that we're putting the straw in, you know?
Oh my God.
I saw this dude walking down the street in Brooklyn carrying like a plastic to go ice
coffee cup with a metal straw in it.
And I was like, like bro you got completely missed
the point there's so much plastic that you're about to throw away just miss me with this virtue
signaling that's the thing the virtue signaling that kind of goes back to the systems things
which a lot of it is baked into like how we structure everything in this country and it's
structured to go and a friend of mine brought in one of those
like reusable cups she like went to all the effort she loved iced coffee would carry her cup around
and and she went to i'm not going to name the chain but she went to the chain and they literally
took a plastic cup and tucked it into her reusable cup lord
and so like there's again a limit to how much you can expect an individual to do.
It takes so many of us acting in math.
You know, so, like, I know in California there are anti-plastic legislation bills.
Like, that is where the change happens, right?
It doesn't happen because you're a good person and you don't use a straw or whatever.
It happens when we change it so that, like, it's not an option for most people.
And it's bizarre that it isn't like, you know. And also, I bet that place that you're ordering
delivery from, you could probably walk down the street and go pick it up maybe. Like I've been
trying to do that more. I wanted to get my little bougie artisanal sandwich today for lunch and I
walked to go get it. Get out of here. Listen, felt nice. Took the
dog too. All right. Next question comes from Ellen. She wrote, quote, what can I tell my 15-year-old
when she is scared about her future because of climate change? Tell her to get to work. Yeah.
Channel that fear, that anxiety into action. I mean, the only reason I'm not constantly having a panic attack is because I'm doing my part, right?
Like, I'm trying to figure out how to be useful every day.
And the way that I recommend that people think about that is think about this Venn diagram of, like, what are you good at in one circle?
Another circle being, like, what part of this, like, huge challenge of addressing the climate crisis do good at in one circle? Another circle being like, what part of this
like huge challenge of addressing the climate crisis do you want to work on? Is it bike lanes
or composting or energy efficient buildings or whatever? Pick your part. And then the third
circle of the overlapping Venn diagram would be what brings you joy? What gets you out of bed in
the morning? And figuring out where those three things overlap
for you, your skills, which part of the problem you want to work on and what brings you joy.
That's the way to deal, I think, with the sort of emotional overwhelm and joining something.
Do not try to save the entire planet by yourself. It is literally impossible.
So think about what group or
initiative you can be a part of. Yeah. You know, I have a follow-up just for me.
I'm hearing you, I want to say composting a lot, but not say recycling. And I'm bringing this up
because I have increasingly read reports and stories and heard podcast episodes that kind of
speculate or say that like
a lot of recycling that we think is being recycled is not being recycled can i get some expert
feedback on that yeah only about nine percent of the things we toss in that bin only get
actually get recycled nine percent plastic okay so, metal, you're golden. Plastic is the problem.
Oh, that's good to know because I was at this point where I'm just like, I don't even know if I should do it.
So you should absolutely feel like shit about your takeout containers that are all plastic.
Yes.
But you can recycle other stuff pretty successfully.
Aluminum cans, newspapers.
Yeah.
Okay.
Okay.
I like that.
Wine bottles.
I mean, that's better than nothing.
Yeah.
But the other thing is, we always focus on recycling, but we forget the first two R's, which are reduce, reuse, right?
Come on.
We go straight to, like—
Repair, repurpose.
There's plenty of other R's before we should get to recycle.
Stay with us.
Coming up, how movies like The Day After Tomorrow can actually make a difference.
The team and I noticed with all the questions that we got from listeners, whether on Twitter or in our inbox, there was just this tone of defeat and nihilism and what can I do? It's all the worst and it will never, ever get better. And I think some of that,
if not a lot of that, comes from the way that my industry, our industry, covers climate change.
This is not to cast dispersions on those out there in the trenches covering the story of our time.
They are doing the work that needs to be done in many respects. But I, as a news consumer,
often feel like the way that American news media covers climate change just isn't quite right.
Yep.
And it's not helping.
Yep.
But I want to ask you two, who are really in this work, am I right to feel that way?
Yes.
And if so, what should change?
Okay, let's start with fire. Because you live in California, one of the biggest issues with the way
national media in particular reports from wildfire is that they treat fire as uniformly bad. And
that's a problem because we know that the thing that we need to reduce fire risk out west is we
need to burn more fires. But it's hard to get people on board with that messaging
if the only thing that they've ever learned is that fire is bad.
So that's just like one concrete example.
The other is kind of hinting at more broadly,
which is journalism will tell you the problem,
but it very rarely centers the solution.
Often I think because national media overall
is a little bit actually uncomfortable with climate change because it really challenges journalistic structures of objectivity.
Because I joke all the time that I have a pro-Earth bias, but that doesn't mean I have a technology bias, right?
Like that doesn't mean that I'm like this technology is a solution and that isn't the solution.
And that's where I think objectivity comes in.
We all want a habitable planet and it's dumb for me to pretend that I don't.
Right?
Yeah.
And so because the solutions are telling people to get civically engaged, it brushes up against this idea of activism.
And often where I think we draw the line as a podcast is we kind of think of it as a buffet.
So we're going to give you as many solutions as possible, and you can choose how you're going to enter into acting
on climate based on the number of solutions that we highlight that are out in the world.
Often, climate reporting doesn't even tell you the name of a bill that's on the docket. They
often don't tell you when public comment periods are open so people can engage in that way.
They often don't tell you. They bury what a political candidate's climate affiliation is.
Even now, when we're talking about Joe Manchin,
very little of the coverage is focused on
what is the impact of climate change in West Virginia, right?
Like he's making a decision for his state,
but what is that decision going to do to impact his constituents?
We're not getting that.
Very vulnerable populations there in terms of flooding and other impacts.
Landslides.
There's a huge risk for landslides.
West Virginia has very little climate coverage, actually.
And so on both sides, right?
Like both Manchin is not acting in the long-term interest of his own constituents, but also
his constituents are underserved because many of them, based on the reporting that I find,
don't clearly understand what their climate risks are.
Yeah.
And so the reporting that we do have is disaster reporting often, which then doesn't
say like, how could we have avoided this? What could we do differently in the future? Which is
not biased. It's just practical, right? It's solutions journalism, which we're starting to
see more of, but not nearly enough. Yeah. Well, and also what I hear you saying when like,
I could see a whole lot of old school news editors pushing back against the very idea of solution-based journalism.
Cause I,
I know some folks that have been in the field for decades who would say a
journalist job is not to solve a problem,
but to explain it to you.
But I kind of feel like,
all right,
if the whole world is damn near on fire,
how about y'all do give me some solution journalism too? I want that, right? And that
requires a certain shift. Profile the people who are working on the solutions, right? Exactly.
Profile the case studies of people trying to implement things and do what Kendra was saying
about really dissecting what is working, what isn't, and why. That doesn't mean you have a bias. It
means you're reporting on the world's attempt to deal with this problem. And I guess I would just
add that when it comes to media and climate, it's not just the news, right? What we need is climate
to be a part of every story. I mean, Michaela Cole, I loved your interview with her, and I loved
I May Destroy You because there were these moments where she talks about climate anxiety, right? story um i mean michaela cole i loved your interview with her and i loved i may destroy
you because there were this moments where she talks about climate anxiety right she acknowledges
that this is the context of the world that we live in it should be something that comes up in every
sitcom every romantic comedy every drama every you know genre of music should have this as the
context within which our lives are now unfolding,
because that is the truth. And when we look at culture and we don't see in art and music and TV
and film any evidence of the fact that we are in a global, devastating, terrifying, already
unfolding crisis, then it's very easy to pretend that this is an isolated problem.
And so what I would say is in addition to needing much better news reporting, we also need
media writ large and culture more broadly to be including discussion of climate, not as
necessarily the theme. I'm not saying we need more documentaries that no one's going to watch
on Netflix, even though we all put them in our queue, right? Like that's not. I'm not saying we need more documentaries that no one's going to watch on Netflix, even though
we all put them in our queue, right?
That's not what I'm advocating for, but
let's just acknowledge that this is the context
within which every other decision we make
unfold. I interviewed the director
of The Day After Tomorrow, Roland Emmerich,
and that movie
did more to move the needle on climate change
than, what's that, Al Gore
documentary?
The frog boiling documentary that Al Gore documentary? An Ingrid Engintree.
The frog boiling documentary from Al Gore.
Yeah.
People who watch The Day After Tomorrow bought hybrid vehicles because it was like 2004.
They started pushing their elected officials to do things on climate change.
It made it real and palpable to them in a way that nothing prior to it had.
And I rewatched it before our interview.
And there's a scene in the movie where there are all of these Americans
crossing the Rio Grande into Mexico to get away from the effects of climate change.
And obviously, the reality is that the reverse is happening.
A lot of people in Central America are being impacted by climate change,
and that's why they're migrating north.
But it was really interesting to see that he was predicting these migrations,
you know, 15, 17 years ago.
Wow. Wow.
So Sam, when you talk about migration, when you talk about justice,
when you talk about TV shows, all these amazing guests you have,
I'm sure there's a way to bring climate into the conversation.
Yes, there is.
My first question will be to any guest,
all guests from now on,
tell me your thoughts on pasta straws.
Let's start there.
I'm kidding, I'm kidding.
I know, I know.
Big thanks again to Ayanna Elizabeth Johnson.
She's a marine biologist,
a writer and the co-founder of the Urban Ocean Lab.
And thanks as well to Kendra Pierre-Lewis.
She's a senior climate reporter with the podcast How to Save a Planet.
And of course, thanks to all the listeners who wrote in with their questions.
All right, this week's episode was produced by Janae West, Anjali Sastry, Liam McBain, and Audrey Nguyen.
Our intern is Nathan Pugh.
We had engineering support from Daniel Shukin, and our fearless editor is Jordana
Hochman. Our big boss is NPR's Senior VP of Programming, Anya Grunman. All right, listeners,
till next time, be good to yourselves. I'm Sam Sanders. We'll talk soon.
Thank y'all so much. I rarely have a talk about climate change that leaves me feeling
a bit better, but this one did that. You just like our jokes. We're saying the same scary facts,
just with more jokes.
The comedic timing makes it all different.