Panic World - Is the ghost of Epstein breaking MAGA?
Episode Date: August 20, 2025We made it nearly a year without having to cover Epstein, but with Trump and his allies consistently committing own-goals and bringing him up, the day has come. Today we’re talking about the Epstein... files and what appears to be Trump’s most consequential weakness so far. Josie Duffy Rice joins us to talk about how and why Epstein became so central to the MAGA movement, and whether this could be the thing that finally cracks Trump’s base. Our guest Josie Duffy Rice is a journalist, writer, and law school graduate whose work you can follow on her website or @jduffyrice on Bluesky and Instagram. Want even more Panic World content? Like ad-free episodes, bonus episodes, and access to our Discord? Sign up for just five bucks a month at: https://www.patreon.com/PanicWorld. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You know, simple question, like, do you think Epsi killed himself?
I do.
Okay.
You know.
And I'd love to tell you why.
I would love to hear it.
And I think by the end of the episode, I will have a great idea of whether or not he did.
I oscillate back and forth.
I'll be honest.
A friend of mine in 2019 put Epsi didn't kill himself in his wedding speech, which I thought was a choice, a really interesting choice.
If I wasn't married, he wasn't married, that might be my kind of guy.
Yeah?
Because it's just crazy enough.
that I'm in the way.
That is not where I thought you were ahead with that.
That's fascinating.
The reason I started this episode was such a basic and easy question
is because that's what we're talking about today.
We're talking about the rhyming fervor around the Jeffrey Epstein conspiracy theories.
I'm Ryan Broderick with me, as always, is Grant Irving,
who definitely wasn't on Epstein's list.
Just bringing that up?
He was not.
Yeah, he was not.
I thought I'd get that out of the way now in case our audience was curious.
And Panic World is a show about how the internet warps our minds, our culture, and eventually reality.
And today, we are taking on a story that I have not wanted to touch with a 10-foot pole since we started this show.
But it's very clear that this story is never going to go away.
And it somehow is the most consequential weakness, at least so far, for Trump.
So we wanted to help show how and why this became so central to the Make America Green Again movement
and asked a question that feels, you know, kind of crazy to ask, which is, you know,
could this be the thing that brings down Trump and saves democracy?
Joining us today is Josie Duffy Rice, a journalist, a writer, the proud owner of a law degree.
Hello, welcome.
How are you?
Hi.
I'm as good as I can be given the world.
Uh-huh.
Good.
Have you been surprised by the resurgence of Jeffrey?
Epstein discourse this summer?
Is it shocking to you that it's come back so strong?
It's not shocking to me in the way that like nothing can really be shocking at this point
because there's no predictable logic to how certain things go, especially on right-wing
internet.
I guess I would say that generally I'm surprised at how long its legs have been, but I don't
know.
It does feel like a real own goal for the Trump administration to bring it up so consistently.
It would have remained a Q&ONF fixation, but even Q&N, the sort of right-wing conspiracy theory that underpins a lot of Trumpism, isn't really as powerful or as relevant as it was, you know, even a year ago.
So I agree that it's strange that this has come back so much.
And just as an example of, you know, where we are right now, the Wall Street Journal reports earlier this summer that Trump drew a doodle of a naked woman with his signature as the pubic hair for,
a birthday card for Jeffrey Epstein.
Roseanne Barr is even mad about it.
She tweeted in July, Mr. President, yes, we still care about Epstein.
Is there a time not to care about child sex trafficking?
Read the damn room.
And I think it is understandable for an average person by this point to be a little confused
about how we got here.
So we're going to look at why this means so much to the MAGA movement.
When did the Epstein scandal get on your radar?
Like going all the way back.
all the way back. That's a great question. I feel, I'm trying to think of like when I first heard
about Epstein, and I'm not sure I could put my finger on it. What I do remember is Alex Acosta,
a former prosecutor, federal prosecutor in Florida who had basically given Epstein the sweetheart
deal. I remember that whatever I knew about Epstein before, suddenly he became kind of the center
of this much bigger narrative about sex trafficking, about the federal government, about Trump. I mean,
has brought him up in the context of prosecutors
when Trump is like basically saying
that lots of prosecutors can't be trusted
because they prosecuted him
and then they gave Epstein a sweetheart deal.
I guess he was just not on my radar
until I started working in newsrooms.
And even then, I mean, and we're going to get into the timeline.
This would have been like the early 2000 tests.
Oh, okay. Yeah.
And just to actually start our timeline here,
Epstein receives his first criminal charge
related to child trafficking at Palm Beach.
in May 2006. So like I'm still in college and I'm like, I don't know, maybe I think a lot of reporters go through this or like you, you graduate out into the world and then you just realize like how little you know about anything. And I feel like the all of the Epstein charges and all the prosecution of Epstein was happening as I'm like sort of getting a sense of like, wow, like there sure is a lot of stories that I have not been following as a child. You know, right. Now I have to understand what's going on. But you know, I wanted to start with the sentence.
of child trafficking that Epstein received.
And from like your background with criminal justice, like is that a, is that a typical
sentence for something like this?
Like the initial one in 2006?
No, it's not.
He was prosecuted in federal court, which already is one step more serious than like someone
who's prosecuted example for like sexually assaulting a kid, like statutory rape or
something like that.
If it's someone you know and it happens in like in your state or in your district,
like you're going to be prosecuted by state authority.
So already the fact that he's prosecuted federally meant that, like, there was more to it.
Usually that means that something has crossed state lines, and that can often mean, like,
you're looking at child porn on the internet.
In his particular case, I think it meant he actually was crossing state lines with women or with girls who were underage.
So already the fact that it's in federal court usually means a bigger deal on something like this,
and it was surprising that he got the deal that he did.
Like, I think that's pretty unusual.
What's notable, most notable about it, right, was the part where he got to go to work every day and he just had to come back to jail to sleep, come to no person to sleep.
That was the deal.
That is crazy.
Of all of the crazy details around this story, that is still one that I can't really wrap my head.
Right.
It's nuts.
It is something that you would only get if you had money, right?
Like race matters here, et cetera, but like money matters.
Martha Stewart didn't even get that.
Yeah, exactly.
But again, like a lot of this has to do with how much attention is being paid on this, like to the case at any point, right?
And so in the case of Epstein, like, they would not have given him that deal if they could have seen what was coming because they just didn't know that he was going to become kind of the center of this whole narrative around child sex trafficking, etc.
Or that anybody was going to really care.
And nobody did really care for a good decade at any kind of like public, big public way about that.
The other thing I'll just say is that like people make crazy deals all.
the time in criminal cases.
Like, people will, you know, someone could get convicted of first review murder and get, you know,
10 years.
Someone else could get six life sentences.
Like, the circumstances matter, the politics matter.
The prosecutor matters.
So I'm always like a little hesitant to make it seem as if everything fell in category A and only
he fell in category B.
Like, I'm not saying it was singular, but I definitely think it was.
unusual. Fun little background fact about me. My first job in college, like professional job,
was writing depositions for a defense attorney. I really enjoyed it. Ooh, I love that. It made me want
to be a reporter because I drove around and interviewed people about how they got screwed over by the
cops. And then I like did research. And it was like, where can I do this as a job without going to law
school? And they're like, boy, do I have a job for you?
Yeah, yeah. To your point about how-
The defense attorney is still a job and media has kind of died.
So you might have made the wrong call.
I may.
Yeah, I'm hosting a podcast now instead of being a fancy lawyer.
So you might be right there.
Same.
And I went to law school.
So there you know.
To your point about how people weren't really paying attention, I think that is a really
interesting piece of this because from like 2008 until 2018 after the verdict, that's
when you start to see this wave of lawsuits.
you all almost from anonymized Jane Does.
And that's also when the flight logs and the little black book, you know,
enter the public consciousness.
That's when you start to hear about connections with Trump,
with the Clintons, Prince Andrew in the UK.
But it doesn't really feel like people can wrap their heads around it.
People not being able to wrap their heads around it continues to this day.
And instead they've kind of like filled in the blanks with their own.
Like there's a lot we don't know.
know, there's a ton that we will probably never have insight into.
And so that has just left this void that has allowed people to fill it in with, you know,
whatever they want.
Contentioned on their own kind of political readings and like how much time they spend on
Twitter.
I feel like that's part of its salience is the fact that like we know enough, but we don't
even know the beginning of what we could know, probably.
Well, let's talk about what we do know because we do we got a few things to sort of orient ourselves in this really weird world.
So between 2016 and 2017, Trump gets elected.
The Me Too movement starts looking at the timeline that we put together for this episode, it is actually interesting that a lot of the early Epstein legal strategy from his victims actually became like a wider strategy during the Me Too movement of like, okay, if the courts can't handle this in a quick enough time or a satisfactory way, like we'll do it with civil law.
We'll do it in any other way.
And I had not actually put that connection together until I looked at it like literally just today.
Yeah, that's interesting.
I hadn't thought about that either.
I wonder to like, again, I think it's so hard to kind of tell what's influencing which, right?
And the whole kind of legal systems approach to sexual assault or rape has shifted obviously drastically since the MeToo movement, I think.
I think it's a, I think it is in general a very different environment to bring a,
case like that. But I also think that there have always been kind of these people that the system
doesn't listen to, and they always have to had to rely on civil consequences to kind of get what they want.
Criminal consequences obviously have their own value to someone who might be victimized by a crime,
but the value is kind of internal. It's not external, right? And there is something about being like,
I was harmed and these are the damages I get for being harmed. It's not necessarily justice,
but it's something, right?
Yeah, I mean, we saw this with Alex Jones a few years ago
where it's like, this guy won't stop.
And so we're just going to sue him for defamation into the ground
because there's no other way to get this guy to stop.
In terms of like the Epstein storyline here,
the big first, I think, moment where I think people who haven't been following
this closely until now go like, whoa, what's going on here is 2018.
In November, there's a huge expose from the Miami Herald,
which brings Epstein's case basically into the national spotlight.
It singles out, as you said, Alex Acosta, who was the United States Secretary of Labor by that point.
It alleges that he was complicit in keeping Epstein out of jail.
All the information about Epstein's association with rich and famous men, that starts to come out.
It becomes tabloid fodder.
And now Trump is in the White House.
And I do think, you know, there's a lot of times where I want to be like a little fly on the wall in like Democratic strategy meeting.
just like out of pure like grim shot in Freud.
And this is one where I'm like, yeah, that would have been sick actually to watch
those people freak out to realize that like Epstein's pal is now the press.
Yeah.
Whoops.
Too late.
Right.
I like, I think it's very hopeful of you to think that there even are these strategy meetings
because I guess not, but I hear you.
This is also like an interesting year though because I would, you know, if I had to sort of throw a dart
at it, I'd say 2018 is the peak of the Me Too movement. And I come back to it here just because it feels
very linked to me. Epstein is, even though like Epstein is its own beast and its own monster, it does
feel very much like this giant global moment of going, okay, what do we do with very powerful men
who are all predators? You know, like, what do we do with this? And now possibly that includes the
president. It's like, something. It's like,
something out of a bad horror movie.
Right.
Do you have a sense, like, looking back on how both Epstein and the Me Too movement
have changed specifically criminal proceedings?
That's the world that I always wonder, like, did anything happen?
What is the legacy there for this?
Yeah.
I mean, I think that the Me Too movement has changed, from what I can tell,
it has made it more likely that people who want to pursue charges against,
those who have harmed them or like predators or people have sexually assaulted them have more of a chance of doing that.
The story I was just reading was about the woman who was sexually assaulted in college and then years told people and said all this stuff and then years later someone, he messaged her and said, so I raped you and I'll never do it again.
And then it took basically this has been like a 20 year thing for her of trying to get some kind of consequences.
and I think the Me Too movement made it possible for that to happen.
As someone who is like skeptical of the criminal justice system's ability,
skeptical is the kindest word I have,
to actually like impart accountability, right?
I think in many ways it hasn't changed much at all.
What we are seeing is kind of the same structure of accountability
that has existed in the past.
And I'm not sure how effective that is.
And by that I mean like, you know,
we talk about carcel feminism, right? And we talk about this idea that women who are obviously
much more likely to be victims of sexual assault or rape who have kind of exist under a patriarchal
structure in this country often are relying on one of the most unreliable systems to bring them
justice or to find some sense of closure or to hold someone accountable. And that that system
itself is replicating kind of the same harms that we that they're trying to address in the
first place. And so what what can the system really do for you? Right? I mean, along with the
Me Too movement you think about right now, like think about the end of abortion rights. You think
about like as we were talking about before we started, the increase in surveillance. Like my concern is
always that we rely on on a system that in its own way has it out for all of us to like bring
justice for women, and that to me seems like a pipe dream.
If you think of the criminal justice, quote-unquote, system as actually baseline punitive,
it doesn't actually work as a system for justice.
It's a system for punishment.
Exactly.
I understand that there is some kind of privilege and even being able to make that distinction,
because if you're a woman who's, like, being stalked or harmed by a man right now,
that, like, you're thinking, I need him away from me, I need him locked up, I need to be safe.
and that's a very different, it becomes less theoretical then, and I understand that,
because we don't really have any other ways of addressing harm other than the system, right?
And so, like, we use what we have.
Like, the movement has done a lot and nothing at the same time.
That's the way I would summarize what I'm trying to say.
Getting back to Epstein, it's hard to point to exactly how this has shaped culture,
but it has had an enormous impact.
And for Trump, it's been both an opportunity he's taken advantage of and potentially an existential problem.
he's hit with federal charges for sex trafficking and he's arrested.
And this happens in 2019.
By this point, Trump is well into the White House.
He says that he's quote unquote not a fan.
That's his quote there.
I love that.
Not a fan.
Not a fan of the guy.
Wait a talk about like a grilled cheese.
So a weird thing happens.
He's deflecting this connection, but it's also going to be Trump's advantage that this is happening.
And there was this group online of, you know, bored boomers who were happy to,
make Trump the hero of this story.
Of course, I'm talking about Q&N.
And we're going to get to them next.
But for those not in delusion land, you know, not in the weird filter bubble that all the
Trump supporters live in, this was always an issue with Trump.
The New York Times reports that at one point, Roger Stone was told that the swimming pool
at Marlauga was filled with young beautiful girls.
Sam Nunberg, a former campaign aide, Donald Trump.
said that he raised concerns by the candidate's involvement with Mr. Epstein before Mr.
Trump officially began his presidential campaign, but Mr. Trump assured Mr. Numburg that he had
barred Mr. Epstein from entering his clubs after Mr. Epstein had tried to recruit a woman who
worked at Marlago. And this was reported at the time. So this has been around for a while.
And then on August 10th, 2019, for Chan gets the scoop, actually, before any media on earth
that Epstein had killed himself, which is one of those crazy things.
of history that I think is actually so insane that like people don't want to think about it.
Yeah, there are prison guards on 4chan and there are a lot of them.
Yeah.
Which honestly, like, I'm going to guess that like a mass amount of 4chan users are prison guards,
but like probably started as like 4chan users and then became prison guards as adults.
I could go in either direction.
I mean, look, when you look at like the dredges of the internet, like the worst part of the
internet, it's a lot of cops and it's a lot of prison guards.
Like, yeah.
And I think it goes both ways that those are the kind of people who choose, in some ways,
those are the kind of people who choose jobs, but also those jobs are, make you a worse person,
just the day-to-day of those jobs, like tears at your moral and emotional integrity.
So I feel like, yeah, I would draw the same conclusion.
Like, definitely a prison guard told 4-chan.
For sure.
Trump at the time.
Did I was, do we already know about the list at this point?
Like, the list in that island and that.
What we know is we know about the flight logs and we know about the exact.
of the little black book.
I believe, and we're going to get further into sort of like how this has evolved sense,
but I believe the basis of the quote unquote list is the little black book.
Okay.
And the flight logs.
So like the idea would be like if you can figure out who was going on the Lolita Express,
like you could create a list of his clients and then, you know, that's the Epstein list.
I think the Epstein list, quote unquote, is like those is like one of those things like the,
the DNC servers where like the DNC leaked servers from the Clinton
hack are not servers. It's like an email list. You know, it's like what it just gets called in
popular culture. So Trump responds to Epstein's alleged suicide by retweeting a post immediately
that blames the Clintons for it. And that post included stuff like hashtag Clinton body count
and hashtag Clinton crime family. So it's not like any of this was subtle. And there's like
a ton of interest bipartisan, weirdly enough, to investigate the suicide. Epstein's
His lawyers argue he was murdered.
The jail guards are charged with negligence, not with posting on 4chan, weirdly enough.
And then the case gets shut down.
That is sort of the birth of all of this.
And by all accounts, this story should have ended here.
But because of the circumstances around his death, like, it also can't ever end.
It's like who shot JFK, kind of, but for the 21st century.
Yeah, totally.
Do you have a sense of how the, like, how.
average people think about this?
Like, like, this is like the Thanksgiving conversation for 2019 into 2020, which is insane.
Yeah.
Yeah, it's a good question.
I mean, I think the pandemic, and I'm only sort of realizing this as I'm talking to you guys,
like the timing of the pandemic contributed a lot to the narrative around this.
100% around this conspiracy, not just because like everybody was at home and forgetting
how to socialize and had like nothing to do and was just online, but also because,
there was all of this conspiracy
around the pandemic as well.
Yes.
You know, and so it contributed to this idea
that like everybody in government
is in it together and, you know,
they're doing all these things.
They're getting us sick. They're inventing diseases
for big pharma. You know, they're on
Epstein's Island and he has all their secrets.
So like, I feel like the pandemic
is when the social fabric,
even more than Trump's election, really started
to fray in a way that
I am continually surprised by
today. I think that
Epstein thing only contributed to that.
In terms of, like, what do regular people think?
It's like a good question.
I mean, I don't know that I know that many regular people on like a day-to-day basis.
Cool.
Like, you know, my kids are in school.
I meet like their parents.
But I'm like not like, we're not cool enough that Epstein would come up, right?
You know, like what are you doing for after school this year?
Hey, do you think Jeffrey Epstein kill himself, by the way?
Yeah, exactly.
Exactly.
What I do think is that, so I was recently in L.A.
visiting my, and Naus.
And my husband and I went to this party of a friend.
And I started talking to this girl.
She was like, what do you guys do?
And we're a journalist.
She was like, do you think Epstein killed himself?
And someone else grew up in was like, do you think I've seen killed himself?
These people like work in, I don't know, they don't know, I have no idea what they do.
But they're more well adjusted than us, right?
They don't work in media or government.
And so I do feel like it's not just an endgame thing.
most people genuinely do not think
Epstein kill himself. I think I'm in the minority.
Far, far, far minority.
I question it. Yeah.
Right.
I think that sounds right.
I mean, and your point about the pandemic is really sharp.
Culture freezes and it just sort of stops.
And everyone comes online because they're bored.
It's like people just speed running 20 years of like internet brain rot simultaneously.
And Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself as a man.
memes starts to spread at this exact period of time.
So you see it pop up when a Fox News guest references it on Jesse Waters' Fox News show.
Right.
Oh, I remember that.
Yeah.
A woman who sues Epstein wears it on a friendship bracelet in court.
John McAfee, the billionaire who may or may not have had sex with a whale and may or not have
killed himself, made a crypto token called Epstein didn't kill himself.
and then wrote, I never said Jeffrey Epstein.
That is the worst sentence I've ever heard in my entire life.
You're welcome.
It included billionaire.
It included sex with bail.
It included crypto.
Like it had all of it.
One, two, aside.
Like, everything that's awful.
I'm, I'm really.
I'm so impressed.
I'm really proud.
I'm really proud.
You should be.
Thank you.
I feel proud.
Just for clarification, McAfee later said,
I never said Jeffrey was murdered.
I said he didn't.
commit suicide, not the same.
Could be alive.
Could have never existed.
Maybe murder.
I don't know.
I don't know.
This is the guy who started the software.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And then yeah.
Yeah.
And then what nuts.
Yeah.
He finished writing.
I only know Jeffrey Epstein didn't commit suicide.
And then obviously.
He existed.
Honestly, I love that idea.
That like Jeffrey Epstein didn't exist.
And speaking of conspiracies, we're going to talk about what the
world of conspiracy theorists do with all of this after the break.
But first, a word from our sponsor, My Pillow.
I forgot about my pillow.
I sleep on one every night and I can't move my spine.
It's made of glass now.
I am literally made of glass.
You know, based on what we can see, the Q&on movement, you're familiar, right?
Like, just sort of basically, okay.
And I assume our listeners.
at this point are familiar with it as well.
Card carrying member of QAnon.
Yeah, do you have the mug?
I have the shirt.
Where we go, one we go all, guys.
So the Epsine stuff obviously been kicking around,
but it wasn't really mainstream
when Q&N started. Like Q&N was not a reaction to this,
is what I'm saying.
And this is actually from a Vox article
from before the Epstein story broke,
which reads,
accusations of pedophilia aimed at celebrities,
companies and politicians are a critical part of QAnon.
Roseanne Barr and others have tweeted
that the purportedly unprecedented increase in sex trafficking arrests taking place under the Trump
administration is the direct result of Trump working with Robert Mueller to arrest pedophiles nationwide.
For the record, there has not been an unprecedented increase in sex trafficking arrests.
Correct.
This was in the air during his election, but when he got to office and, you know, the world didn't
change.
There was an increased effort to believe he was working on exposing this massive big pedophile plot.
and intentionally or unintentionally, he gave them little bits for them to run while with
and turn into conspiracy theories online.
For instance, the QAnon tagline, the storm is coming, comes from a random press conference
that Trump does in his first term.
And this is how NBC News describes sort of the combination of these two worlds.
That disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein was injured in his Manhattan jail cell, has revived
a decades-old conspiracy theory that baselessly links Hillary Clinton to a number of
suspicious deaths. The conspiracy theory related to Clinton first emerged in 1993 through a
newsletter published by a former attorney in Indianapolis, Linda Thompson. In her letter titled
Coincidence or the Kiss of Death, Thompson posited that scores of people close to Bill and Hillary
Clinton had died under mysterious circumstances. At this point in our timeline, so like post-arrests
pre-death, like what is your sense of how right-wing conspiracy circles are processing this?
the interesting thing about some of this to me is I'm like,
these people are doing bad things like all day long,
but they make speeches about them.
Right?
They're like,
like all these people are responsible for many deaths.
They are like warhawks.
They are, you know,
they are elitists.
There's a lot, like there's so much you can criticize about them.
And then you kind of go to this extreme,
random,
obsolete, you know,
list of possibilities that it is the,
like, meaning of it that matters to them.
them like get rid of all the details like the point is that these people can have anybody that
killed it that they want that we would never know that oh well they covered it up well you
yeah it says they got in a car accident but they probably hired the person who drove the car
was this person well they were probably drug by this like it's just you can't unprove everything
all the time so I mean look I feel like this is about the time where like this pizza gate and
whatever I'm like I mean I feel like Laura Lumer I was thinking about a lot at this time like
who's this crazy one?
Yeah, this is right around when she got briefly banned from Twitter and like handcuffed herself
to the door of Twitter.
And I think I think she was like wearing a diaper or something.
She said she wasn't going to leave until they like let her in and then like three hours
hours later she was like a damn board.
Yeah, right wingers love wearing diapers.
It's like a thing that happens a lot weirdly.
Yeah, totally.
So I think at this time I, and this is the part of this entire story that I think I was just
totally wrong about.
like I was like, oh, these are just some extremist weirdos.
Like even related to MAGA, these people are not mainstream.
They're not normalized.
They're not like these are just some weirdos that will die out.
And I was wrong about that.
I thought the same thing.
I did not take Q&ON as a serious player in like the online ecosystem for a long time
because I just thought it was too stupid.
And now I will never make that mistake again.
But the thing that you're talking about here,
they're kind of like how these people fit into the larger Trump world,
The Atlantic takes a snapshot of this in 2019 that I think is really useful here.
So they write, the more we learn about the allegations against the reclusive billionaire Jeffrey Epstein,
the more he seems like a figment of the online fever swamps.
The wealthy financier arrested last week for underage sex trafficking is accused of operating
and international sexering that could implicate high-powered men across business politics in Hollywood.
I definitely see it as a moment of vindication, David Seaman,
a chief proponent of the so-called Pizza Gate theory told me,
I think this is a turning point.
Then this is just the beginning, said Liz Crocken, a prominent Q&on devotee in a video posted to YouTube.
The storm is officially here.
And then finally, I think I've been unnecessarily maligned, said Mike Sernovich, a right-man of social media personality, who has claimed that every A-list actor in Hollywood is a bad file.
This shows I'm doing real things, man.
Yeah, that's, yeah, sure.
You know what's so funny.
Cernovich being brought up, I feel like is really relevant because I used to read these blogs in the early, like, mid-2000s, right, about criminal justice.
But I remember him from the comments of like these blogs.
And I've gone back and looked at them since.
Sometimes what he says makes sense to me.
It was like more of a systemic analysis about the way that systems hold power and like the way we focus on, we create bad policy out of like one bad situation, et cetera.
Like I couldn't quote anything he said now, but I remember feeling like he was on, he was one of the people where I was.
I disagree with you a lot, but, like, there was something I could follow in his, like,
process of thinking that made sense to me.
It just shows you how fragile all of our brains are.
I'm one, I'm one two steps away.
If this podcast doesn't do it all enough in our first year, like, I'm going.
But I'll be, I'm, I'm, I'm be slow with it.
It's like boiling frogs.
The pivot to the right, you know, you got to go really slow.
It could be lucrative.
You're a white guy, so it's not going to be as lucrative for you because there are a
lot of those.
That's true.
Yeah, it's a crowded market.
Now, for me, I feel like I could do great.
You could do great.
Because Candice Owen is going to get sued into oblivion by a manual macular.
So, like, there's going to be a big opening.
All I have to do is be one step below saying that the First Lady of France is, like, lying
about her gender.
And I could like, you know, and you're good.
Yeah, and you're totally good.
Yeah.
The Cernivichers of the world, the QAnon people, they are cooking in this stuff.
leading up to the pandemic.
And all the energy has to go somewhere.
And as you've said, there's now this vacuum.
There's nothing actually happening with Epstein himself.
The Maxwell case is going on, but like it's not the satisfying conclusion that people need
because these Trump's awarders like desperately need catharsis because like the whole thing
is built around this grievance movement.
So of course that finally explodes on January 6th, 2021, where you get basically all of the Trump
supporters storming the capital, calling everything.
single person in the government, a pedophile, you know, connected to Epstein, what have you.
Ashley Babbitt, who was killed on January 6th, one of her last tweets in 2020 was,
no the fuck you will not, no masks, no you, no Biden, the kid raper, no vaccines, sit your
fraudulent ass down, we the people, bitch.
Beautiful, yeah.
And then a couple months after that, uh, John McAfee, your, your friend dies mysteriously as well.
And according to Business Insider of the time, word on the street, only time will tell if this report was true or not an account with 61,000 subscribers shared on Twitter.
Conspiracies alleging that McAfee had a dead man switch or a device that activates when its owner dies were also being shared online.
A 2019 tweet from the antivirus software moguls verified Twitter account appeared to be emboldening some of these claims with the quote, if I suicide myself, I didn't.
So he dies in prison.
There's a ton more conspiracy theories.
His crypto coin is soaring in value.
And in 2023, a couple years after that, we get a judge ordering that court documents in the Epstein trial are unsealed.
And this is the beginning of the client list.
Okay.
So it's a massive story.
There are betting pools.
There's about who's going to be in it.
And I think the assumption is like we're going to get the list.
And I guess from like a criminal justice point of view, like, how realistic was that idea that they were going to suddenly tell us the name of everyone that Epstein worked with?
Like, was that ever going to be a possibility here?
No, because I don't think, I don't think there's a list.
And I don't think there's a list.
I mean, I don't think there's like some.
Grant, you're in the clear.
Saying you're in the clear, Grant.
I checked it.
You're in the clear, man.
He didn't write any names down.
You're safe, buddy.
But also, you only put on the really rich people, so that could just mean, you guys are, you know, out of the pals, but not actually don't have enough money to make the list.
He didn't track the Jet 2 holiday tier of people who would take the Lolita Express.
Exactly.
And he flew commercial to Lolita, you know, Ireland, who did make money.
Yeah, the riot here.
There's a ready comments saying that you need to bully me less.
This is never going to go away.
No, I want to say it for everybody.
Grant is not on the list.
You grant us on the list.
Thank you.
Because there's no list.
So, I mean, look,
this is,
people watch a lot of TV,
and then they also feel,
like,
I think somewhat impotent in their,
like, lives right now,
and, like,
they don't have a purpose
and, like,
they're not important.
And what that turns into is the obscene conspiracy,
because there's no list.
There's no, like,
here are the,
you know,
200 people who went with
Epstein to his island and had sex with young girls there.
I guess my thing is, like, isn't it bad enough?
We know that this guy had sex with underage girls,
and we know that he had, like, a lot of friends who,
if they didn't know he was having sex with underage girls,
knew that he was like a creep.
And that, to me, feels really bad.
This need for it to be more.
The list is going to come out and then we're going to really be able to catch it.
It's like, you're right here.
There are people saying they're victimized right now,
and you guys are ignoring them at the,
so that you can uncover all these other names of the,
these people you don't like and therefore they must be pedophiles.
So to answer your question about, like, was it realistic for a list to ever come out?
That depends on how the case went, what they needed, what evidence they needed, what could be helpful.
I think it's like not likely that given the fervor to which this had reached at this point,
that it would have been irresponsible for prosecutors to like just be releasing documents willy-nilly
without proof or charges.
And that once you release them, then like you kind of are obligated to pursue these.
cases and a lot of times you don't have evidence or whatever. So there are a lot of kind of,
there are a lot of variables that would have gone into whether or not something like this
would have been released. It doesn't add up. It sounds, it would make sense in a two-hour
movie. But when you went home, you'd be like, well, that was kind of a plot hole, you know?
Like, it doesn't really make sense. It's more a reflection on this desire for justice.
And that desire is fascinatingly enough bipartisan. Yeah. An editor years ago who was like,
the invention of Instagram will lead to the invention of the new guillotine once people understand
what the lives of the rich and powerful actually look like and that we were not supposed to actually
know and that it'll be looked back on as this massive mistake of the 21st century to give people
access through what would have been hidden in Versailles 200 years ago right and when I think about
the Epstein list I think about it as this idea of a new guillotine the idea that like we can
finally have the pretext we need to arrest or in the case of Q&N execute on the front lawn
of the Capitol building the rich and powerful people that we hate for whatever reason we hate
them for.
Yeah.
And if you think about COVID as part of this story, like nothing has done more to accelerate
the feelings of like social inequality in America that are felt like on a ground level.
And so like the idea that like as people are home and consuming the internet as their main mode of reality and they're getting really angry about like how rich people are writing out the pandemic, you see this massive spike in this desire for a list, a pretext to throw every rich person you know in jail.
And that desire I think is easy to understand by most.
But then, you know, you put it through their media ecosystem and he becomes a story, you know, about Trump and how he's going to.
to save them all. That makes sense and that the other element of that is it's related to this feeling
that people have that like there's not that much to hope for. So yeah, for better, for worse,
people don't want to be politicians anymore. They don't want to run for office. Everybody,
like, nobody has any kind of respect for these positions of power and they think of them as pure
evil, which, look, I'm as critical as of like, does the next person of the Zuckerbergs and
the Clintons and all the people who like have it in an ordinance.
kind of influence on our lives.
Like, it's very comforting to think that the reason people have more than me is because they're
bad.
And the reason people have more than me is because they're connected and they had to sell their
soul to the sex trafficking Illuminati in order to have what they have.
And I would never do that.
And I'm because I'm good.
And that's also why I can't keep a job and I don't have any money and my kids won't
see me or talk to me.
Right.
They must be demons.
They must be like spirit cooking and child sex cabal.
and stuff.
Right.
And it's an impulse that Trump loves to play with.
Trump at his heart is like a tribal leader who wants to get you angry.
He wants to like, he wants to make you, you know, associate with his in-group, which is all tied
together by pushing conspiracy theories.
So even if he doesn't bring it up himself, he can't throw water on the Epstein thing.
In September of last year, Trump went on Lex Friedman's podcast and he said, I'll take a look at it.
And then J.D. Vons, a horrible combination of two very awful men.
J.D. Vance goes on Theo Vons podcast, and he says the same thing.
I find it really interesting that this was being asked of them.
And so no one really noticed the tricky position that, you know, you put them all in.
It's not something Trump or Vance wanted to bring up, but you can't have a base that you've spent, you know, the entire election telling them it was stolen and that,
all these elites hate them and that they're going to traffic their children and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, and then spin around and say, chill out, we're in power now. There's nothing more to see here. We don't know anything about this evil pedophile in his secret island.
And then The Guardian Rights in October of last year, a former model who says she met Donald Trump through the late sexual abuser Jeffrey Epstein, has accused the former president of groping and sexually touching her in an incident in Trump Tower in 1993, and what she believed was a twisted game between the two men.
Stacey Williams, who worked as a professional model in the 1990s, said she met Trump first in 1992 at a Christmas party after being introduced to him by Epstein.
It became very clear that he and Donald were really, really good friends and spent a lot of time together.
This, like, kind of disappeared, even though, like, Jimmy Kimmel was making jokes about it in his monologue.
For many reasons we've discussed on this show during the election, the Democrats have never figured out how to make.
any of their punches really land when it comes to this stuff.
Despite all the connections between Trump and Epstein, it really won't matter until Trump
owns himself in an interview and makes it a massive problem.
And so we're going to talk after the break, though, about what happens when it finally does
pop the bubble.
But first, a word from our sponsors, fluoride, coming to a water supply near you.
I mean, you've sort of touched on it throughout the episode, but what do you think would have happened if Trump had just never made this a part of his second presidential campaign?
I mean, I think what you're fundamentally asking is, like, what's more powerful, the obsession around Trump or the attraction of conspiracy?
I am asking that question almost every episode of the show.
Yeah. I am trying to figure that out.
And I don't know. I don't know the answer. I mean, do I think it would have faded someone in the background?
perhaps, but I do think
this idea that now that Trump's in charge
he can tell us everything, probably would not have gone away entirely.
But the early kind of promises,
the early kind of focus on like, we're going to figure this out,
knowing that he was going to put someone in DOJ
who was not going to probably be able to figure this out,
probably was a bad decision on the long run.
I think also I have a real question of like,
some of these people believe their own shit, man.
Trump maybe not,
Like, all of these other people who have like powerful positions, I'm not sure that they knew that there was no there there on the Epstein stuff or that they weren't going to be able.
I'm not.
I just don't know.
Yeah, that's a convoluted way of answering your question to say.
I don't know.
I'm there with you.
I don't know who's in on the bit and what they think the bit is.
That's my central confusion around all of Trump 2.0, which is like, I don't know who knows what and what they think about what.
Let's quickly talk here about, you know, how they, how they set up this bomb that is.
is now going off.
So in February of this year, you know, Trump is in the White House and they invite like a
bunch of hapless doofuses from Twitter to the White House and they give them binders titled
the Epstein Files Phase 1.
Phase one.
Like the Marvel universe.
Yeah.
It's a mess.
It's just full of like redacted Xerox copies of stuff that has been public knowledge since the
little black book and the flight logs were reported on, you know, a decade before.
Those pictures were so crazy.
Yeah, they were awesome.
I mean, those people are the dumbest people that have ever lived.
Ever.
I'm a little jealous.
Garbage Day or Panic World wasn't invited, you know, but maybe next time.
Yeah, maybe next time.
Yeah.
Start the right wing Pidna.
Yeah.
Starts, you know.
Yeah.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah.
But this is actually the same moment that right wing media starts to get a little grumpy with Trump.
The New York Post writes a piece titled, You should feel frustrated.
and it's about how all of the masseuses included on one of the documents were redacted, all their names.
They seem to be very angry at the idea that this thing that has never been confirmed to exist in their first place, the client list was not given to them.
So it's crazy to be upset that the names of the victims were not really, like.
Well, because they want to terrorize them.
Yeah, and they also want to help them.
But I'm like, they don't want your help.
Right.
Like, there's a, there's a much.
scarier. I mean, yeah, I think this is where we should bring this up. There's a much
scarier version of what happened this year where in February, the White House does unredacted
stuff and does accidentally leak out victims' names or something. And you get a version of what
happened during the Trump trial where the jurors are being targeted by Twitter and doxed.
Like there's there's a version of this where this conspiracy theory gets turned up to 11 because now, you know, right wing media and right wing influencers can figure out a way to make the the victims themselves look evil in some way, which has happened so many times before that I'm almost shocked it didn't happen this time.
I thank God it didn't happen this time.
But but why, sorry, this is probably a dumb question, but why would they have wanted to make them, they would have made their lives miserable, but why would they have gone after them?
They expose the victim.
The victim names a conservative.
There's a world where the cyber army is running defense and they go after the victims and try to make them part of the conspiracy, which has happened a million times before.
Right, right, right, right, right.
Okay.
So a couple days after that, the Trump Goon Squad seems, you know, not only out of their depth, but totally stunned by this.
Pam Bondi goes on Fox News and she says that she's shocked that there's no new information that was released.
Take a listen.
And I started asking for these documents right when I came into office.
So I'm going through it, and I kept saying there has to be more.
There has to be more.
I'm assured that's it.
I found out, you know, this week that a source told me New York, SD&Y, they're sitting on thousands of pages of documents regarding Epstein.
But the American people have a right to know.
And Donald Trump is the most transparent president in our nation's history.
So not only will America get the full Epstein files, they will get JFK.
Cash Patel and Dan Bongino, who now run the FBI together, I guess, or whatever,
they are mad and they say that Epstein killed himself.
They get attacked by their own followers.
And I'm just running through this really quick just so everybody knows.
So end of May, the MAGA base online, they get really pissed.
they're upset, a former White House correspondent for Newsmax.
She starts tweeting that Dan Bongino and Cash Patel know that they destroyed their credibility
by claiming that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself.
It's floating around, but then the most online person in the world takes it into overdrive.
Elon Musk has his little tiff, his little oral.
That was a good moment.
Great.
With Trump.
Early June, yeah.
Early June.
He brings it up.
He deletes it, but he does briefly accuse the president of,
of being a pedophile.
And every attempt to fix this just makes it worse.
As of last month, we have this like day by day drip drop that leads to ultimately nothing.
We get the new, the new Epstein tape that's missing a minute, but there reportedly is another tape that doesn't miss a minute, but it hasn't been released yet.
What I can't really like wrap my head around is why they keep going.
Like from the administration's point of view, like, why do you think they are still like self-flagellating themselves like this in public?
So it was so interesting that for a few days there, when Trump started saying, shut up about this, this isn't a big deal, why is everybody paying attention to this? Get over it. When he started really having kind of like an angry reaction, there was so much backlash from his own people, right? And that to me, I found like, I was like, oh, you're trapped now. Like, what can you do? Like, you've created this monster and now you're telling them, stop creating this monster. And they're like, no, we're close now. And we're close now. And we're, we're close now. And we're.
where you want to know what's up.
I have noticed that in the past few days,
and I don't have any kind of like,
I don't follow right-wing Twitter
in any sort of methodical way.
It's mostly just like,
because I hate myself.
And so sometimes I look at it,
but I wouldn't say I'm like, you know,
following it, like,
carefully or to any healthy end.
But like, it does feel like there is
a kind of less discussion about it right now.
I don't,
I think Pam Bondi is a great example
of someone who thought there was going to be more,
than there actually was.
She, like, was totally,
was, you know, drinking the Kool-A.
And so I think that she probably thought
she could get in there
and have some records to turn over.
And I genuinely think there's not that much to turn over.
I think that giving up on this
for the administration to say, like,
we were wrong, or not even we were wrong,
but we've given everything that there is.
We don't have any more.
If there's more, it's not in the hands of the government.
It was destroyed.
It was whatever.
would be giving up an opportunity
that they are going to want to wield later
against whoever they want to wield it against.
Yes. It would do two things, right?
It would, like, reduce the fervor of some of the supporters
who think that there's this big government conspiracy,
this big American elitist politician conspiracy
that Trump is, like, trying to destroy.
And it would probably increase the fervor
of another group of supporters who were, like, even, you know,
if he can't find it, what could they have done with it?
They must have.
You know, it would just, like,
People are going to affirm their priors no matter what.
In some ways, I think Trump is being proven right that he sort of thinks he can beat this.
And it seems to me like he might be able to.
I want to get there in just a second, because I have to make a bet on polymarket tonight about this.
So hold on.
But what you're sort of talking about is something that I believe came up in one of our episodes about Area 51, which is this idea that there's propaganda, there's misinformation, there's disinformation.
and it's spread from a central source.
So whether it's the CIA or it's, you know, the Soviet Union or whatever it is, right?
And then the problem is when you do that, when you surround yourself with propaganda, with misinformation, with disinformation, to try to get people to be distracted or confused or to attack your enemies, you run the risk of then hiring people who believe it.
And I think Pam Bondi and Dan Bonino are like prime examples of the.
kind of people you get in your inner circle who come in believing what they saw on the
propaganda channels.
And they end up embarrassing themselves.
And that's the best case scenario because the worst case scenario is they get inside the inner
orbit and they go, well, we have to make it real.
Correct.
But can I add something to that?
Because I think you're totally right.
A major part of this is January 6th, right?
Because once January 6th happened and Trump had isolated and pissed off a lot of kind of
of like mainstream Republicans.
And I don't even just mean like mainstream elected Republicans,
but I mean like just like regular people and also like the Federalist Society.
Yeah.
His first term was a lot about getting a lot of these people who had rejected him
to accept him as the head of the Republican Party.
His second term has basically been to reshape the Republican Party
in the image of what were formerly the extremists, right?
You don't have any other choice at this point.
You've, this is part and parcel of, like, who, who he has at this point.
Dan Bongino is at the fucking FBI.
It's insane.
It's insane.
Like, yeah.
It's crazy.
You know, like, a fitness influencer is, like, running the, running, like, the biggest police organization on the planet.
I would say there are several fitness influencers running important state organs in America right now.
Too much power.
Also, it's funny to watch Trump not even be able to keep all this straight because, look, I'm not going to go.
down the road of like, does he have diminished mental capacity because he's the demented old
man? You know, that's a whole other episode we could do. But he can't even hold this stuff
together because at the end of last month, you know, right as what, as you said, like, it's starting
to dip down again. He's on Air Force One and he's asked by a reporter, you know, what's going on
with the Epstein investigation? And he drops the totally unprovoked bombshell that one of his
underage spa girls was stolen by Jeffrey Epstein confirming a, an entire,
narrative being put, you know, put out there by a former Epstein victim, Virginia
Guffrey.
Right.
He didn't have to.
No.
He just.
No, but does it matter?
What price is he paying?
That's not rhetorical.
I'm asking.
No, so this is where I wanted to end today's episode, which is I have in certain
moments over the last, over this summer, thought to myself, okay, the Republicans have basically
stalled out and run out the clock and they won't let anyone back until September.
because they don't want,
they want this thing to blow over.
And now Fox News is pumping the airwaves
with stuff about Sidney Sweeney and her jeans.
They're just trying to shake the keys
in front of the baby to make everyone forget
that this is happening.
Is there a world where come September,
the Democrats grow a spine or I don't know what they do,
but this or...
Can already answer that.
Or, in my more fanciful ideas,
is there a world where like the,
J.D. Vance, Peter Thiel, contingent, I don't know, figure out a way to do knives out at Trump.
But does this end with Trump with a Trump impeachment? Like, if he can't shake this stuff.
No. Not a chance. Nope. Here's the thing. I think that there probably does not exist any evidence out there that Trump was having sex with underage girls.
I would be very surprised, in part because I think that Trump is an optics guy, not a, like, I don't think Trump likes to put his feature in anybody's hands.
And I think that's always been kind of the case, right?
And so, like, regardless of what he wants to do, my suspicion is that he is a control freak in a way that that, you know, some of these other people you can see doing, being sloppy because essentially that's what a lot of this is, sloppiness, right?
Sloppiness and depravity.
but like you have to be both in order to get yourself mixed up in this.
So that's my suspicion.
But nobody has the political power that Donald Trump has.
Like they don't have it.
He has people hypnotized.
Even at the beginning of this term, I would have said something,
I think I underestimated his power, right?
He has people hypnotized in a particular way,
which is that if it's between reality,
what people can see with their own two eyes and him,
they pick him every time.
he is a comfort to them in a way that like a cult leader is right like that is essentially what
we're working with i don't see a world where he's betrayed by his people and ends up impeach
i don't think this is going to be the thing that takes him down when i look over the past few years
i realize how comfortable people have had to get with their own kind of internal contradictions
in a way that previously i think they would have had to grapple with them and this is true of
everybody right you like believe yourself to be a good person
there's someone or something you have an investment in and care about and like.
You find out something bad about that something or someone.
You reject it because you believe yourself to be a good person.
So it's very hard for us to kind of like acknowledge that something that we're invested in
and that we want to continue to be invested in is bad, right?
It is so particularly true about Donald Trump and I felt like that, especially when the Wall Street Journal thing came out.
New York Times said, Pam Bondi told us he was in the files.
That makes a lot of sense.
It makes it make sense why he hasn't fired Pambondi.
It makes it make sense why he, like, has kind of avoided some of the stuff, you know.
And the response online, and I know Twitter isn't real life, but it's real enough for me, is that he, everybody knew he was on the list.
They used to be friends.
Trump told him to get out of Marlago.
Trump rejected him.
Trump wasn't part of that.
Like, I'm almost like, what could, would there have to be a video?
I don't know what would have to happen for people to be.
And if I think of there were a video, they would say the girl lied about her age.
It was AI.
Like, it was AI.
I just don't think we're in a world where it matters.
It matters in theory to these people because they want to fight to fight and they want to feel good and they want to feel like all the people who have more than them are pedophiles.
But they don't want to feel like any of the people that are on their side are pedophile.
Like, this has always been kind of illusory, right?
Yeah, all right.
None of this matters.
Thank you for coming on.
That was great.
All right.
No, I, I mean, I want to hear what you think.
Do you think it would matter?
The thing that I've been trying to.
trying to figure out since January is like how much of like the status quo pre-Trump 2.0
is still in play.
And I go back and forth on it every couple weeks where I'm like, we are in straight out.
We are in an authoritarian state.
The rule of law is gone.
And then some days I'm like, actually, it's probably a little overblown.
I was doing that kind of oscillation in the first Trump administration, but I'm doing it much more often now.
I'm like, we are all going to go to camps now.
And then I'm like, eh, that's right.
This is fine.
Cory Booker is doing like a weird dance up on stage or whatever.
Like, this is fine.
Business as usual.
And so with the Epstein thing, like, there are some days where I go, like, this is it.
Like, this is, I think, I think he's cooked.
And then there's other days where I'm like, it just doesn't matter that no one will care about this in two weeks.
There'll be some new thing.
Yeah.
And I guess, like.
I was with you until a few weeks.
Yeah.
I thought this could, I thought this could be it for me.
I thought so too.
I can see a world where he can't shake it and he becomes a liability to like the J.D. Vance Project
2025 center of his regime.
And I would have to know more about the sort of inner fighting of the Trump administration,
which I'm sure there's just so much of it.
I just don't know how cutthroat the inner world of Trumpism right now is, but I could see
a possibility where journalists don't let up, the few journalists that are left, don't let up,
they find something damning enough, and he gets jettisoned by his own team.
When I say it out loud, I sort of, I feel a little embarrassed that I think that.
No, you might be right.
I mean, these things do happen in authoritarian regimes.
Well, here's a part of it that I would agree with.
Like, this is unsustainable, right?
Like, the way that Trump runs, 100%.
the country and the government is unsustainable and it might be sustainable for 20 years.
It might be sustainable for 50 years.
I don't know.
But like this kind of like organization around one person, this kind of look over there,
look over there, look over there, always.
This, you know, just total lack of fealty to the truth, I think is unsustainable.
Like I hope when my kids are my age, they're not living under.
Barren.
It'll be barren, right?
Be barren.
I know.
I know.
God.
But I, but I also think.
that the inability to know what's real
does not actually make people
more set on figuring out what's real
that makes them less set on it.
What you decide to do is say that
everything I'm seeing fits into my,
I'm going to make sure that everything I'm seeing
fits into my worldview.
And I think that persistence
is really evident this time around.
The economy is bad.
Everything is bad.
Like this guy is not winning literally at anything.
I am glad he's putting cane sugar back in Coca-Cola.
Yeah, that is one victory.
Blinds for all.
agree on. Yeah, we can all agree on. Yeah. But in general, I'm like, you're walking around on the roof.
Like, if Biden did that, can you even imagine he'd be, like, strung up as we speak? The land of, like,
consequence is non-existent anymore to me. It would require not as much something to happen to him,
but something that happened to us as like an audience as a, as a electorate. Because the other thing
is that, like, Trump, I realize more and more serves as a social function for so many people.
It has created social environments, friends, people like get together.
This is like how you connect with your neighbors.
And so, you know, do you guys have like monthly meetups?
Is there like a monthly list meetup?
You can't tell me.
We can't talk about it.
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
Okay.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That's fair.
You're going to have to say something so you never get invited back to five
in order to get on that list.
I can also confirm that nobody on five four is on the list.
That's right.
I've heard that they're not on the list either.
Yeah.
They're not on the list.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Here's my theory of how people snap out of it and maybe how they turn on Trump.
I think the way that people, like,
conservative see liberals right now is so crazy that when we are like theory at the beginning
of like the first Trump administration where it was like,
you don't have to go to Thanksgiving and talk to your MAGA uncle.
You don't have to talk to your MAGA parents anymore.
You can cut people off.
Like actually you can't.
And like if you can afford to, meaning like you're not trans or like these aren't,
you're not, you know, not like.
undocumented, these people aren't like actually coming for your neck every single minute of every single day.
I'm like, you got to be out there talking to these people so they can just see you normal
because they have gone from thinking that like that Hillary Clinton, et cetera, are lizard people
to thinking we're all lizard people, right?
There's probably not an easy one size fits all like way that this ends.
It's possible that we just like are plagued with Jeffrey Epstein updates throughout
the remainder of Trump's life and power, however long that may be.
Well, it's not going to end any, it's, Gayle and Maxwell is going to come out and point
her finger at some people and get out.
I assume so.
You know, so it's going to, she needs to stay alive past this recording being published.
So we'll see how all that goes.
She's not going to kill herself.
She knows she's going to get a pardon.
Look, she got moved to a minimum security prison in Texas.
The clock is ticking.
So we'll see what happens to her.
Josie, you said, isn't this bad enough?
But there can't be no bad enough because, like, people always want the game.
They don't actually want the game to end.
And the issue became that there was no one in the way of stopping the game to end.
So as long as this keeps being a drip drop thing, they'll wait for forever because it lets them to keep speculating and have their hero.
Yeah.
That's okay.
There's no, there's no like, this is now.
closed because then it unfolds their entire reality that this guy's the Messiah who's
expressing the deep state. They can believe that for forever as long as they don't ever like definitively
say it's closed. Right. That makes sense me. Yeah. The thing I could see,
fan communities turn on the person that got them there. I do think that this is the core of
mega-ism, the idea that like we're going to kill all the elites and the long,
it goes out, they're going to need to believe something more extravagant or believe in somebody else
who's going to kill all the elites of their lives finally become good.
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense to me.
And I think what you're kind of getting to is like meaning to their lives that like
has given them meaning to their lives, right?
And that like without it, they don't really have that.
And therefore, like, they need to keep believing and they need to be something and there needs to be a
bad guy and there needs to be some wins because otherwise, like, what do I?
I have to live for, which sounds dark, but I think is actually not an accurate.
No one's here for the tax plan.
They're here for an idea that tomorrow is going to be better than today and that there's
going to be something exciting.
And it's like the anticipation is better than any actual answers.
Like there's nothing that could be in there that was ever going to be satisfying.
You need the show to continue.
And like the later seasons you get into, the more Daffy it becomes.
Yeah.
I can think of this better as TV.
that I, because I think it's much closer to TV,
than I can think of it as like, uh, uh, politics.
You know, you,
you say something that like, I think gets back to what I would,
like gets back to this idea that they also think all liberals are monsters, right?
Which is like, what would it be like for these people to kind of realize that most people are
monsters?
Like, most people aren't monsters and most people, like, maybe they would even like some of
these people they hate and maybe trans kids aren't out to ruin their kids' lives.
and maybe no one is trying to track them to the bathroom.
And maybe like you, you know,
maybe there isn't someone always waiting to kill or kidnap their children
or murder them or whatever.
To me,
as someone who grew up scared of everything and everybody,
and then finally it was like,
oh, most people are actually pretty good
and there's not as many things to worry about as we may think.
Like, that was relieving.
But I think to some people it would be,
it would almost be disappointing.
It would almost be, like, too boring.
I think it's like definitely an isolation.
and a boredom thing combined with like just being
like baseline racist but I think it's also just
boredom for sure can I ask you guys a question though
if you were upstein wouldn't you have killed yourself
I would have killed myself I'm not suicide like I'm not trying to die
but like you are going to be tried for some serious crimes
you know you are you're used to being very rich and connected
you're in prison it's miserable what's keeping you here
after everything that's been said on this episode I'm not answering
There's still a chance I could write the Great American novel.
And I feel like that would have kept me going, you know?
That's because you have, like, goals and, like, value beyond just being a fucking weird.
We don't know, you know, much about Jeffrey Epstein's inner life.
You know, who knows what.
Yeah, that's true.
Maybe he was, maybe he was getting his MFA playing.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Hitler had his paintings and Epstein had his haikus.
Yeah.
Yeah, exactly.
Exactly, exactly.
And Hitler killed himself too.
So there you go, you know.
Yeah.
That's right.
Or diddy.
Or diddy.
Let's help people who are not part of this world understand why this is the thing that's sticking to Trump.
So my question is, do you think if Epstein, do you think that, like, without Epstein Q would have been a thing that would have proliferated and can, like, as, like, concisely as possible, can we explain?
why this is the thing that is stuck to Trump when nothing else sticks to him.
Do I think, I suspect that without Epstein, Q would still have proliferated some, but not as much,
in part because Epstein is kind of the most solid evidence they have for their theories about,
you know, the world of like sex ring, you know, elite sex rings, et cetera.
Like I think that there is some there there where often there isn't.
And so it has really helped.
And I think part of the reason that Epstein has stuck to Trump is because Trump's deep state,
I'm going to dismantle the state state, I'm going to uncover the deep state.
That is his whole thing.
His whole thing is there are a lot of powerful people that are fucking you over.
They're bad people.
And I'm a good person who's going to come in and make them pay for their mistakes.
Yeah.
I definitely think when you hold yourself out to say, I'm always going to tell you the truth.
I'm going to uncover everything.
I'm going to put the fitness influence or in the FBI.
We're going to whatever.
drain the swamp, you don't really have the luxury of saying, don't pay attention to this.
You don't have it.
Right?
That being said, it has not been the political obstacle for him that it would have been for
anybody else.
Yeah, no.
That's absolutely right.
I think we can all agree that we live in hell.
I want to thank you for coming on the show.
This is great.
If people want to follow you, where could they do that?
I am no longer on Twitter, but I am on Blue Sky and I am on Instagram and my username
is Jay Duffy Rice.
and follow me, you know, thanks.
Thanks so much.
I'm going to be on the internet till I die, probably in prison.
This was a delightful conversation about one of history's greatest monsters.
So thank you.
Yeah.
Yes, thank you.
Thank you guys for having me.
This is great.
Panic World is a production of Courier.
It is written and produced by Grant Irving and hosted by me, Ryan Broderick.
Josh Fielstead is our production coordinator, and our amazing researcher is Adam Bumis.
From Courier is Shane Verkes, who edits our video episodes.
along with our producer, Kevin Maroney, and National Managing Director and Executive Producer Kevin Dreyfus.
R.C. DeMezo is their VP of Brand and Social.
Charlotte Robertson is their Deputy Director of Brand and Social.
Marianne Couga is their Director of Marketing.
And Tracy Kaplan is the Senior Vice President of Sales and Distribution.
If you want to sponsor the show or give us products to sell, she's the one to talk to.
You can email her at Tracy at CourierNewsroom.com.
Lastly, here's my advice for you.
Chill out and touch grass while you still can.
