Part Of The Problem - Debate RECAP
Episode Date: September 11, 2024Dave Smith brings you the latest in politics! On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave is joined by co-host Robbie "The Fire" Bernstein to discuss everything about the presidential debate..., where key shots were missed by both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, bias on behalf of the moderators, previous debates and presidential seasons, and so much more!Part Of The Problem is available for early pre-release at https://partoftheproblem.com as well as an exclusive episode on Thursday!Support Our SponsorsMonetary Metals - https://bit.ly/4eoich3YoKratom - Win Skankfest Tickets! - http://yokratom.com/SkankfestGet your tickets to Porch Tour Herehttps://porchtour.comFind Run Your Mouth here:YouTube - http://youtube.com/@RunYourMouthiTunes - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/run-your-mouth-podcast/id1211469807Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/4ka50RAKTxFTxbtyPP8AHmFollow the show on social media:X:http://x.com/ComicDaveSmithhttp://x.com/RobbieTheFireInstagram:http://instagram.com/theproblemdavesmithhttp://instagram.com/robbiethefire#libertarianSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
With Audible, there's more to imagine when you listen.
Whether you listen to stories, motivation, expert advice, any genre you love,
you can be inspired to imagine new worlds, new possibilities, new ways of thinking.
And Audible makes it easy to be inspired and entertained as a part of your everyday routine,
without needing to set aside extra time.
As an Audible member, you choose one title a month to keep from their ever-growing catalog.
Explore themes of friendship, loss, and hope with Remarkably Bright Creatures by Shelby Van Pelt.
Find what piques your imagination. Sign up for a free 30-day Audible trial and your first audiobook
is free. Visit audible.ca to sign up. What's up, what's up everybody? We are live. Welcome to a brand new episode of Part of
the Problem, a very special debate recap episode. Of course, I'm Dave Smith and as always, I
am joined by Robbie the Fire Bernstein. How are you feeling this morning, brother?
I enjoyed watching those debates last night. All right. Very good. Well, let me just real
quickly before we get into it. Uh, we, me and Rob will be out in Oklahoma city, uh,
this weekend. Um, Oklahoma city will be there, um, tomorrow and Friday. And then a Saturday
night we'll be in Tulsa, Oklahoma
Comic Dave Smith comm for those tickets and of course Rob's on the road a whole bunch Where are you at after that Rob go to porch store comm? I've got ten porches left Byron, Michigan Salt Lake City and
A whole bunch of others filming in Denver in October go look at the line of porch tour comm
Hell yeah, okay.com. Hell yeah.
Okay, sorry.
I'm just trying to share this link right now.
I apologize.
We got a little bit of a late start here.
I had a couple of technical issues on my end, but I solved them, which is a first.
We were all very impressed Dave. Listen, again for the average person not that impressive, for me
pretty damn good. Okay sorry and now I'm trying to tweet and while we're stalling I'll read off more
cities that I will be in Providence, Rhode Island that's a pretty town, Miami, Florida, Jacksonville,
Florida, outside Chicago, Mesa, Arizona, we're we're we're por, baby. All right. All right. I'm ready to go. I'm sorry, guys. I'm focused.
I'm locked in. All right. We had a presidential debate last night
that was, I would say, of unique significance.
There's just there's really nothing else that we can compare this election to.
It's just different. It's it's an unprecedented election on every in every way you could think of and
It looks like at least right now the overwhelming odds seem to be that this is well
It certainly is the shortest presidential election in terms of when both of the candidates were in
It was a it was an election that was basically just the
Convention to the election day typically that's the that's the end of the fourth quarter of a presidential election
In this year's election. We didn't even have the candidate until just a few days
Before the Democratic National Convention. So you've got a shorter period and it looks like this is going to be the only debate that
they do.
I guess that's not 100% official yet, but it certainly does look that way.
And the race, at least according to the polls, is in a dead heat.
So in an environment like that, there's probably never been a more important consequential
debate.
I want to give a few thoughts on this. I want to get Rob's thoughts.
I kind of want to give my broad thoughts on it and then I want to hear yours and
then we can kind of go into like specific moments of the debate.
I'm going to say this to open up and I have a feeling this is going to get some
people angry and
some people might disagree with me on this, but just hear me out before you have an immediate
reaction. I'm going to tell you this overall Kamala Harris won the night and here's why
I think Kamala Harris won the night. I'm not saying that she was great. I'm not saying that she was
likable. I'm not saying anything like that. In terms of just like purely scoring this
as a debate, but then maybe Donald Trump won it. He probably landed the stronger blows
on her than she landed on him. However, if you zoom out and you look at it, there was really never a huge chance
that she was going to land substantial damage on Donald Trump. Now, I'm not saying there
was no chance that that could happen. Anything's always possible. But the real question of this debate was could Donald Trump substantially change the nature of
this race ranging from could he land something devastating like like a
devastating performance like his last one against Biden which again wasn't
really Trump it was Biden collapsing but would Kamala Harris have moments where
she collapsed would Donald Trump facilitate that or not, you know,
not get in her way while she's having those.
But would we come out of this debate going the race is now in a different
place than it was going in.
Kamala Harris largely has not been defined to the
American people.
She's a third rate politician who was an inconsequential,
not very visible vice president over the last four years. So the question is, would he be
able to define her and then define her as this? I'm just saying when you come out of
it, I don't think any of that happened.
I think we're leaving this with the presidential race
in the exact same place that it was
before the debate started,
and I don't see how you can look at that
other than an L for Donald Trump.
That's just, that's what the game was.
It's over, and now I think we're right back.
I don't think the polls are going to be moved by that debate performance.
I could be wrong, but that's my feeling, uh, going into it.
I think Donald Trump. Okay.
I'll do Trump and then her Donald Trump had some good moments.
Uh, he had some good moments. The good moments were of course,
what we could predict the good moments were going to be.
The good moments were when he was hitting her on inflation,
on immigration. However,
overall as a debate performance for Donald Trump, he was,
I felt like fairly low energy.
He was rambling and he took the bait
at times when it was really stupid to take the bait.
I mean, the one that stands out to me in particular
was when the topic of immigration comes up
and Kamala Harris, which this was obviously game planned
and it was obviously like this was her strategy
and he fell right into it.
She turns and starts just saying how, uh,
his rallies suck and everyone's bored at his rallies. And if you watch,
they're leaving early cause they're so bored at his rallies and it,
it goes over to him. And of course he cannot help himself.
He immediately has to go, no, my rallies are great.
Your rallies are nowhere near as good as mine. You can't even have a rally to go. No, my rallies are great
Your rallies are nowhere near as good as mine
You can't even have a rally like mine people love my rallies and it's almost like dude
Do you not realize that she just got you to eat 30 seconds of the immigration topic?
With bragging about your own rallies now
He did pivot back to it, but still it was just such a clear tactic and he fell right
into it, fell right into it. So he had some good moments where he was effective. He was much more
aggressive with her than he was with Joe Biden. And I think part of that was because she did,
you know, insult his rallies early on, so he couldn't stand for that.
I don't know overall how that's going to play.
I think that for, for Donald Trump supporters who are like, you know, edgy young men on
Twitter, I think they tend to really like that. I'm not sure that it plays so well
with the broader audience.
As far as Kamala Harris goes,
look, she had some very bad moments.
Right away, her opening was terrible.
But she did not,
she didn't have catastrophic moments. She didn't like hurt herself in them.
And then the other thing I'll say before I turn it over to you,
and I'm curious to get your thoughts rub is, uh,
I gotta say a word about the, uh, the moderating,
um, where it is, look, it's a given.
Anybody who pays attention over the last eight years should, it's a given
Anybody who pays attention over the last eight years should know it's a given that any of the corporate
Media hacks who moderate these debates are obviously going to have an anti-trump bias
That goes without saying that's always the case
last night's debate was by far the most egregious version of that that I've ever
seen. It was,
it really was a three on one debate where not the,
the moderators were not only in the framing of their questions were half of,
I mean, half the questions were like, now, Donald Trump, people tend to feel like you're a piece of shit.
What do you think?
Why are you such a piece of shit?
They'd be like, okay, Kamala Harris,
why do you think Donald Trump's such a piece of shit?
Not only was it questions like this,
but they were doing something
that moderators tend not to do.
Usually there's occasional isolated incidents of this and it was
it's been controversial in the few instances that moderators have ever tried to play fact checker
but they try they were playing fact checker but exclusively with Donald Trump all night
and Kamala Harris, well we could get into this. She threw out some pretty fat lies.
Not a word, not a word from the moderators.
And not only that, I thought the most egregious moment that I actually couldn't
believe was when, uh, when they asked Donald Trump about how he had said that
he did lose the election in 2020.
Rob, you remember this point where they said, well, you recently admitted that you lost the election so which one is it did you lose
and he goes no no I was being sarcastic I said we lost by a by a hair or
something like that he goes I was being sarcastic no we won that election and
then he gives a whole speech about how they won the election and then the
moderate it goes back to the moderators and the moderator goes I didn't sound
like sarcasm to me.
And you're like, yeah, what?
Wait, you're just interjecting your opinion in this.
It didn't sound like sarcasm to you.
I mean, look like you're the moderator of a debate.
That's fine. If Kamala Harris wants to say it didn't sound like sarcasm to me,
but for you to just jump in and like take with not,
not even pretending that it's a fact check, just like,
I want to offer my opinion into this. Like I thought you were pretty lousy.
President myself. I thought that was wild. And I will say this, uh,
and this, I promise with my final thought before I turn it over to you, Rob,
uh, I,
I do think that that helped Donald Trump.
Like I think that's the biggest victory for Donald Trump coming out of this is that it
was all so clearly rigged against him. And I'm really surprised that the it seems like
the corporate media still hasn't figured that out.'t figured out that like you can't be this blatantly bias or it kind of
gives him street cred like look the whole establishment is against you but
anyway so those are my broad takeaways from the debate what do you think Rob?
All right you know I agree with everything you said except that last
part which I think this
debate was, it was Donald, it wasn't Donald Trump against Kamala Harris.
That's what you've been saying the last couple episodes was actually Donald Trump against
the machine.
And we knew that the machine's going to cheat him.
But it was is Kamala Harris such a lousy cond candidate and is Donald Trump so many tears
better at this than he than she is that he's going to have a knockout?
Is he going to figure out how to expose how dumb we've seen her off the cuff?
Maybe she's not that dumb and she's actually been a drunk this whole time, or they gave
her the Biden meds and that's why he failed the last time as he stole them.
She came off fine.
I mean, I might not like her, I might not like what she had to say, but in terms of,
hey, is this person too dumb to get through a debate?
She won that challenge.
She did not come off.
And I think what really gave Donald Trump the L is that he has nothing to say also.
And so eight years ago when he ran the first time, he said, I'll make it great.
I'll do this.
Don't worry.
Best that you've ever seen.
Like no one's ever seen.
That doesn't work eight years later.
You know what I mean?
When you were the new pretty boyfriend or girlfriend
and the new shiny object, all of that worked.
It doesn't work anymore.
And so yeah, Kamala Harris is up there lying,
but guess what?
Donald Trump doesn't have anything to say either.
And by the way,
I'm secretly sitting over here rooting for Donald Trump.
There's nothing I want more than for the Democrats to fail.
But I'm watching Donald Trump
and he kind of has to pick a lane where he either needs
to be more informed on these issues, actually state policy, actually have solutions to highlight
the fact that Kamala Harris doesn't, or he's got to pivot back to when he's just being
funny and charming, where he had a couple of those moments where he's like, go wake
up Joe Biden at four in the afternoon, I started laughing.
Like he had a bunch of good moments where I was laughing
and I was like, well, at least that's fun.
But when he's up there kind of, it doesn't matter.
Yes, they cheated him.
They only got one debate.
They got it on the platform that they wanted.
They got moderators.
She might've had the questions beforehand.
We all knew that that could happen, but he sat there.
He was rattled.
He was angry.
He came off as uncomfortable.
And at the end of that, firstly, he was rattled, he was angry, he came off as uncomfortable, and at the end of the...
Firstly, he had nothing to say when he had opportunities to actually state policy, and
he missed some big shots.
There were some big...
You were talking about the fumbles on getting goaded about the size of his rallies or otherwise,
but then there were also just some wide openings to smash her.
The biggest fumble to me, and then I'll shut up, was the moment when they asked her about
whether or not why he's calling her, why he's saying that she isn't black.
And he just basically decided he didn't want to answer that and say, I don't care.
When what he should have been saying is this is the most important thing to the Democratic
Party.
I'm the person who says, hey, well, let's put up the best person for the job.
That's not your philosophy.
Your philosophy is let's empower people in minority groups.
And that's why you have this job.
That's why Joe Biden picked you is to represent a minority group.
And now it's really important to the Democratic Party that minority groups are being represented.
And I think you are stealing from them and claiming to be a minority that you are not.
And it's on your birth certificate,
it's in statements that you made.
And so to your party and to what's important to them,
I think you're being dishonest,
the same as you're being dishonest
and all these other issues.
I would like to move away from the racial identity politics
and get the best candidate up here and talk about the ideas.
That's not what you're about and you're lying about it.
But instead he just punted and he looked weak.
Yeah, I completely agree with you that there were just massive opportunities and he just
didn't quite connect the dots. You know, like it's almost like, because you know, me and
you are standup comics and you know, sometimes it is kind of inside baseball, but like for people who don't know, you know, like stand up comics will have like, you'll have like a joke and you'll work it over a period of time and kind of it, where you're like, oh, now it's this is crushing. And you could
have a thing where like, the that idea that you had two
months ago was getting chuckles in the room. But then you
figured out the way to say it. And now it's like getting a
standing, you know, ovation in the room. Like it's it you can.
There were so many moments in the debate, where Donald Trump
tried to hit her with a thing. And I went, Yeah, that just
didn't quite land. Like, he didn't, you know,
the moment that I was thinking of that literally just popped into my head as
you were saying like, Oh, there was this moment for a huge smack down. Um,
I thought if you remember,
I think there were actually a couple of different points in the debate where
Kamala Harris looked at him and said, Hey, I'm not Joe Biden. You know, like you're attacking Joe Biden,
but I'm Kamala Harris. So I don't even know who you're talking about.
And it was almost like, I actually thought it was effective the way she used it
because it was like, Hey buddy, have you not adjusted to the last two months?
Like that's not that guy. You're attacking that guy,
but you're running against me. And feel like to which is look all this
All you really judge these things on is how does this come off to normies?
You know and I think to ignore me that sounds kind of right like it's like yeah
Why is he attacking Biden Biden's not here anymore now?
You're just kind of attacking this
Pathetic old senile man who's not even here to defend himself and has already dropped out of the race
Now you just come off kind of like you're a dick in a bully
Where's like we all kind of already agreed and the reason that we all agreed that that guy was too senile to run for president
And the reason why it wasn't landing is he because he didn't connect the dots, which is not that hard to do
I mean, I mean I can't imagine if you were prepping for this debate that you
wouldn't go, you like the response from Donald Trump should have been like,
that's right. You're not Joe Biden, but you're not running on what you ran on
in 2020 and you're not running on the last four years where you were vice
president. So who are you? That's the question. You're right.
I'm criticizing the last four years.
You don't want to stand by those four years because they're a disaster. You don't want to stand by what
you ran on in 2020 because it's a disaster. So what are you running on? Because so far I've got
you're some lady. You know, like there was just a way for him to really nail her there, but he didn't exactly connect it. Instead of pointing out that she's abandoned, um, her positions from 2020,
he just insisted that those are her positions.
That was his line of attack.
He just went, no, she is for the green new deal.
She is for, for decriminalizing, uh, border crossings.
She is for Medicare for all.
She is. Well, she's sitting there saying she's not.
And then after she says she's not, he goes, no, she is.
And he never even connected the dots to go, no,
but she is on record saying she's for these things.
All the normie American person got out of that was that she says she's not for
it. And then Donald Trump insists she is. It just didn't like, the normie American person got out of that was that she says she's not for it and then
Donald Trump insists she is. It just didn't land the way you need it to land. Look, I'll
tell you, I know this just from my little experience, right? Which is nothing like what
Donald Trump is doing. But I know that if I'm talking to, I don't know, like let's say I go on a
podcast that is like, like it's a podcast about Austrian economics and they want to
interview me about why I think Ludwig von Mises is superior as an economist to Frederick
Hayek or something like that. You know? Well,
if I'm doing that show, I can kind of already assume everyone who's listening to this knows what
Austrian economics is. Because the podcast is about Austrian economics. We're having a debate
between two of the most famous Austrian economists to ever live. You know that the audience knows
this already.
But if I go on Joe Rogan and there's something I want to say about Austrian economics, well, the first thing I have to do is explain to the audience what
Austrian economics is because obviously I know I'm not talking to an audience of
600 people who are nerds about this shit.
I'm talking to an audience of 15 million people.
The overwhelming majority of have no idea what I'm talking about.
So you just know going in there, it's like, Oh, okay.
I got to explain this to people.
My point is just that you have to explain that to people.
You have to connect those dots. And he never really did.
He never really explained to people that it's like, no, this is what she did. She was running on this.
Now she's walking back on all these things. You know,
he kind of alluded to at one point that she stole all of my views or something,
but I just felt like he never really landed that blow. Of course,
he never, which is still baffling to me. He made,
like you said, he got in some good digs on Biden.
But again, the problem with it was what I was saying before. Now, like if you don't connect the
dots, now Biden's just this old guy who's not there. You're just picking on an old man who's
not around, who's objectively just really sad. Like what he didn't do was what I've been saying for months now
that he needs to do, which is that connect that to her. Why is she, you know, responsible for this,
which she is largely. And he didn't do that. I also did, you know, to your point, Rob, where you
said he really just doesn't have that much to say either. He was,
he was rambling for so much of the debate.
And you know, I gotta say,
I think this is something that
hardcore Trump supporters are,
they're probably going to disagree with me on this,
but I also think it's something where
They tend to miss this that there was so much of what Donald Trump said
Where he just he sounds like a kook
You know like if you're not following what's going on with the fucking eating animals story that it just sounds kooky
It's like wait. What what are you even talking about? I mean,
there were points in the debate where he was just saying things that you're
like, this, this sounds like to the average person.
I think this is going to come off sounding wild and slightly unhinged.
I just thought there were a lot of moments like that where he had an
opportunity. He could have really done
something. There were these like knockout punches that could
have been landed and I don't think they were. I think the,
you know, I know there were that listen, there were moments
that I enjoyed, you know, the thing where he said, excuse me,
I'm speaking to her. Like, okay, that was a fun zinger.
I just thought that like in terms of like even the zingers he was
labbing, I was like, these are like, these are jabs.
They're not knockout blows. Like he touched her a little bit with that one,
but he didn't like devastate her and there were openings for that. All right,
guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show which is Monetary Metals. If you guys have been
listening to the show for a while you know how much I love this company. They
are revolutionizing the precious metal space by allowing you to get a return on
gold and silver paid in gold and silver and right now you can unlock a 12%
return on silver paid in silver.
Silver, of course, is not just a precious metal.
It's a tangible asset and a great way to diversify any
investment portfolio.
But with monetary metals, you don't just own physical silver.
You own silver that works for you to generate more silver
growing your total ounces over time.
And as I said right now, you can earn 12% annual interest on silver paid in silver
in their latest offering if you're an accredited investor.
If you wanna learn more,
click the link in the episode description
or just head over to monetary-medals.com.
This is the first true silver bond since 1834.
You earn 12% annual interest on silver paid in silver. You must be an accredited
investor to participate. It's a three-year term. The bond is financing a publicly traded mining
company located in the Western United States. Click the link in the episode description or
go to monetary-medals.com for more information on how you can participate. All right, let's get
back into the show.
So I want to discuss some of the policy fumbles.
Sure.
Because I think some of the biggest missed opportunities.
All right, there's a Jay Leno joke.
I once saw him, he did an appearance once he retired
on The Tonight Show and he told this joke about
there was this newspaper article about this guy
who was jerking off in coach on a flight.
And what I'd like to know is how do you have the elbow room?
So what I call that, I call that an X factor joke where it's like not what you'd be thinking
about.
So just apply it to politics.
And I'm going to give a cheat code to all the politicians out there who are seemingly
terrible at this.
It's very easy to lie and pretend like you can fix things.
You just need to have some sort of a reason or some sort of a storyline.
So for example, one of the biggest fumbles that Donald Trump had was, hey, you want to
replace Obamacare, what's your plan?
And he literally fumbled and said, I don't have a plan.
If I'm in control and I can remove Obamacare, I will come up with something better.
And when he was really openly saying, I have nothing at this time,
he was kind of showcasing, I don't have anything.
And every single time I go to you,
don't worry, the best, the best, the best.
I'm just, the bravado doesn't work anymore.
He's gotta pivot the lie, just have a reason.
The reason could be as simple as,
oh, I'm actually gonna return the insurances
to the states, there's more competition,
you can buy it over state lines,
I promise you your insurance is going to be cheaper.
That's it.
And with competition, you'll have better coverage.
That doesn't even need to be true.
The markets might not work that way.
Hey, I'm going to create a new marketplace where everything's going to be, and I've heard
him say this, there's going to be public pricing on everything so you can shop around.
Once these companies have to display their pricing, it's going to be cheaper.
And what Obamacare did was actually increase
the insurance company's profits by limiting competition,
I'm gonna fix the markets.
You just need to come up with something,
it doesn't even need to be true.
The other gigantic fumble was on Ukraine,
where for some reason, you know,
he just starts talking about the money.
And firstly, he really messed up on Nord Stream,
because at the end of the day,
Biden took out Nord Stream. so to pretend like you were the
stronger one. Oh god so stupid that he's gonna brag he's bragging that he killed
Nord Stream. He's bringing which by the way this is a little bit of an aside
but it is because it's so backward it's the stupidest goddamn policy that
Donald Trump insists that God, man, he
is just such a disappointment. This actually gets me angry to even say, but so like Donald
Trump is going to brag that he can for anybody who doesn't know. Okay. So the Nord Stream
pipeline is this natural gas pipeline that was set up between Russia and Germany and that was essentially
going to deeply integrate Russian and German interests and Donald Trump is
sitting there bragging about how he's the one who killed that like hey guys
is that a really great thing that I isolated Russia from Europe, right? Isn't that wonderful that I made them
not have mutual interests and I left Russia more isolated? Like, yeah, that worked out
really great. But then on top of that, you're like, dude, fucking Joe Biden or, you know, the West, somebody under Joe Biden's control, essentially, in the biggest ecological
terrorist attack in human history, took out the Nord Stream pipeline, and then tried to blame it
on the Russians to juice up the war propaganda. And yet you're going to sit here and brag about
how you're the one who really took it out just
insane What he should have said is
We've never looked weaker and people are dying for no reason and you're marching us towards world war three without a plan and
That's why we need to de-escalate and end this war because we are not winning it and people are dying for no reason
And it's because you claim that Putin wants to go take
over all of Russia and you are lying.
That is not true, and you're actually making us look worse to the rest of the world, and
there is death on your hands.
But instead, he didn't want to take on this core idea of, hey, if we don't oppose Putin
now, he's going to go take over all of Russia.
So he just kind of ceded the whole thing to her of, It's okay if he needed to explain it's not that you Ukraine lost
This thing is over and we're marching towards World War three and you are responsible for deaths for no reason
For no strategic advantage and it's because you guys haven't thought this through but instead he pivots to never would have happened
once again a grandiose claim never would have happened which he could have explained why it wouldn't have happened because listen, I wouldn't have provoked them by putting
Military gear over there and saying we're gonna join it
He doesn't explain the problem. The problem is that he did send in the military gear to Ukraine. But yes, you're right
Look Rob, I mean, you're absolutely right, dude
And he could have easily just said he could have even just stuck to like, Hey, Joe Biden told us we were going to win this war with sanctions that we
wouldn't even have to send weapons in. That's what all of you guys,
Joe Biden was bragging about how he was going to crush the RuPaul fast forward
two and a half years and hundreds of thousands of people are dead.
And you're looking over at me, you know, like there were so many ways. And look, I know, I know we're,
um,
we're in like the last few weeks here of a presidential election.
And I know that Trump supporters are not going to like hearing us say this,
but I'm sorry. Like my job is to tell the truth.
That's my commitment to the audience here.
And it was just what was so glaring throughout the entire debate was just
what the problem with Donald Trump is. And it's just always been the problem
with Donald Trump. It's like, it's not what the left projects onto him.
It's not that he's Hitler. It's not what the right projects onto him. It's just
that whatever the equation that is Donald Trump, you know, it's like if you in order
to be a successful politician, if you needed like a certain amount of bravado and brashness
and a certain amount of like edginess and a certain amount of like comfortability in
front of the camera and then a certain amount
of knowledge about what you're talking about. He is a 10 out of
10 in brash, comfortable, whatever, and a zero out of 10
in knowing what he's talking about. The guy's just never read
a book about anything. He doesn't know anything.
Then so he's just left having his instincts, which are largely correct,
but then no real knowledge or substance or understanding underneath it.
And so he's just left rambling.
He's just left rambling about a whole bunch of stuff and just sounding like a
kook and just not, you know, what is he is rambling about how she's a communist and
Israel will be gone in two years if she's president and she basically loves
the Palestinians but she doesn't even love the Palestinians but she does love
the Palestinians but she's she really hates Israel Israel will be gone I'll be
so much better for Israel and then the incoherent thing about how just because I'm in there,
what's your answer to why Putin wouldn't have invaded if you were in there?
Because he wouldn't have, because I would have been in there.
And I guess Hamas never would have attacked either cause he would have been in
there and everything would be great because he would have been in there.
And you know,
the other thing I also got to say is that he, he had,
um, he also really had no answer for the COVID stuff.
He had no way,
isn't it remarkable that after the last four years,
you would have a presidential nominee facing off against Kamala Harris
and can't really nail her on COVID.
Just all he can do is brag about how he did such a great job.
Like as if we're supposed to look back at 2020 and go,
yeah, what a great year that was.
We were all, you know, like the old hacky question
was always, are you better off now than you were four years ago?
And who the hell can say that?
Who the hell can say that four years ago wasn't the worst year that,
you know, and, and like, again, he's just, he was just left,
just rambling. And I, again, I don't want to be like too harsh on him
There were some moments where he landed good shots, but yeah overall
I just I really agree with you
The problem with the rambling is that you know
They almost gave him too much time with the two minutes where he would kind of be done with the best ever
And he would say that and she goes shit
I have to fill another minute and a half
So to me this debate was can he expose how dumb Kamala Harris is and not only did he not do that
she came off fine. I'm not saying I liked her. I'm not saying she didn't lie. I'm not saying I like what she had to say
I'm just saying in terms of is this person too dumb for the job. She was not she came off fine
she came as as competent of a liar as anybody else and every time he had the opportunity to showcase the fact that he actually had policy or a better agenda,
he mostly just rambled and came off a little bit unhinged.
And he had a couple good moments, but for the most part, it kind of highlighted to me,
hey, this guy just, he's just bullshitting too.
It's hard to yell about how Kamala Harris is lying when he's basically doing the same thing and just, I'll fix it, better than anyone, more than anyone's ever
seen, Israel won't exist. What does that do? You know, you're kind of, it brings you to
the same place. The other moment that I just thought was so disappointing was on the border
talk and you know, the Democrats really pulled a successful dirty trick. First
is that Haitian story. So from what I understand it's a it's a comedy where a bunch of Haitians
I ended up in Ohio. I guess they're at the park and they're like oh wow you just have
free ducks in your park and they start eating the ducks in the park and now that's not etiquette
in America. Sure you can go hunting for ducks but you can't just go to the public park and go, oh
look, there's a bunch of ducks in the pond and start eating the ducks.
People don't like, there's a little pond up the street for me.
I like walking up there every once in a while.
There's some turtles in there.
If I showed up one day and all the nice turtles I like looking at were gone because some Asian
people decided to make turtle soup, firstly, where's all the concerns about viruses and
wet markets opening up in the United States of America?
Last I checked, that's how we ended up with a worldwide pandemic. So you know I think
well I don't I don't think that's actually how we ended up with it but
yeah that was the story. I'm just saying that's still the official story from the
NIH so you would think that they'd be going bat shit crazy over people eating
wild animals out of... That was a good one. Bat shit crazy? I appreciate that Rob.
That was good. Alright so the Haitian, I'm just working off the headlines on that.
And then I think people took it a little bit further to go pets.
I think the Democrats managed to get that story in there just before the debate.
So that he'd be up there talking about people eating pets and it would discredit him on the, but it's also like dude. There's just he has no ability to
fucking focus
Focus like two comics with ADD. I know
Literally, I have no ability to focus but you but I could do better than this look
It's like here's the thing you really do like with Donald Trump and again look
like, here's the thing you really do like with Donald Trump. And again, look,
okay. Donald Trump benefits in many ways in our view because the other side is just so
awful. And that is why we do find ourselves kind of rooting for,
for him. You know, I've like,
the analogy to me is almost like a, it's like, I don't know, like Rob,
if you had a girl, like a girlfriend who was terrible to you and she was
like, she was cheating on you. She was just disrespecting you.
She was embarrassing you.
Like this chick is just awful and she's bringing you down.
And then you went to me and you were like, Oh,
I got this new girl I'm talking to. Maybe I'll just dump her and go with this
girl, but I've never met the new girl, but I'm immediately just like, yes,
dump this chick and go with the new chick, dude. And, and okay.
I don't know the new chip, but I'm just like, yeah, but fuck her.
Like she deserves to lose. You know what I mean? Like she,
that's kind of how I feel. That's the extent to which I root for Donald Trump.
These guys deserve to lose. Um,
for a lot of reasons that we've covered for the last four years on this show.
But, but the thing is, man, it's like, if you had Donald Trump,
it's like if I could grab him by both of his fucking dumb ears,
the right one seems to have healed pretty nicely, shockingly by the way. Um,
but if I could grab him by both his ears and just scream at him, he'd be like,
the thing about immigration dude is like, zoom out.
Don't zoom in.
Don't focus on the story of the last 24 hours,
which is this thing which is kind of unverified.
And like, maybe it's true.
I don't know, I don't care.
That's not what you don't know I don't care that's not what
you don't want to zoom into some very specific very crazy sounding story that
probably 95% of the people listening have never heard of and is gonna sound
insane and then when the media just goes well an official person told us that
that's not true and then you're just left going well It is true and they go well the official person told us it's not true and you got that it's true
Like that's that's not good enough. But what you want to do is zoom out and go hey in
2016 I walked down my escalator and said this is the biggest problem in the country and for that
people like you
Demonized me in the most vicious way and at the time you said border crossing should be legal
The illegal border crossing should be decriminalized. Well, look at you now
What are you saying? Hold on. Let's just let's just take a moment moment here let's all admit that I was right about that okay that my that on the most important issue that was
central to my campaign I called it right and you guys all mocked me for calling
it that I mean look dude this is so easy in that he could have created a moment
right there just with that that is the campaign ad for the rest of the
election there's no getting around it you're all trying to sound like Donald right there just with that that is the campaign ad for the rest of the election
there's no getting around it you're all trying to sound like Donald Trump now and
instead he just kind of went on and on about how they've ruined the country
they're eating cats and they've ruined the country wonderful Wonderful. Just if he wanted the focused answer would have been
and people are gonna have to fact-check me on the numbers I didn't look this up
and but if you were Donald Trump you could have spent five minutes and put
this together. Hey guys eight years ago I said there's a problem with the border
for 20 billion dollars I could have built a wall and this could have been
over and solved. At this point New York City has has spent $100 billion catering to these migrants.
You will not be able to afford the social services that you need.
And if this continues, you're not going to feel safe in the streets of your town.
Here's an example.
What just happened with some Venezuelans.
You can just name an example.
They love the stories.
Oh, I know that little kid on a farm.
You could have told one of these immigrant crime stories and then go on and here, let
me tell you what the Democrats did.
I had border crossings at this level and they decided through amnesty and parole to get
as many people over the border as possible.
And here's how many people crossed while they were in charge.
And then they pretended like they wanted to solve it by legalizing the current level of
immigration.
Joe Biden said that he did not have the power
to close the border.
And if we allowed the current level of illegal immigration
to take place legally, then he would close the border.
And then when that failed, they got rid of amnesty.
And guess what?
Border crossings have dropped.
They've done everything they can to bring as many people
over the border as they could.
And the second they're back in power
and not up against an election, they will do the same thing
and you will not feel safe at home.
That's what he should have said.
Instead he meandered into cats
and he let them get away with the storyline.
And it just, I don't know, it was just such a dropped ball
on really what might be his biggest and best talking point. And again, I just, I can't know. It was just such a dropped ball on really what might be his biggest and best talking point.
And again, I just, I can't stress enough. And if people don't, you know, like I understand if people want to say,
oh, you hated Kamala Harris in the debate. I completely get that. I mean, look, her, she has the energy of like,
has the energy of like the fucking like most annoying chick in your seventh grade
class who's like running for school council. You know what I mean? Like she's just got that energy about her. She's incredibly phony. Um,
she's not impressive. She doesn't really have anything.
She doesn't have any real arguments. She also,
much like Donald Trump has never read a book about anything
I mean the it's amazing like how easy it would be to
Stump either of these two with just like very basic questions that like any educated person should know
You know what I'm saying? Like you could just literally like, I mean, I like I don't. If you, you know, if you were like talking about the war in in Gaza or something
like that, and you just went like, okay, here's a question to both candidates. Israel has for a long
time occupied the Palestinian territory. What year did they start occupying them?
Do you think there's a chance either of them know?
Like, honestly, do you like, I mean, but I'm just saying, like,
do you think there's a chance either of them know?
I'm saying like very basic information like this.
Neither of them know.
They just don't know, which is really like a, just a sad statement for the country, but whatever.
But like, look,
I understand that she's terrible and all of this. Uh, and I understand, as I said, that the media was outrageously unfair in this debate.
But the point I think we're really making is like what I said at the beginning,
this was his shot and the shots were right there.
That like the kill shots were right in front of him and he failed.
He failed to deliver. He failed to land that knockout blow.
Like if she was a boxer, she was carrying her hands around her waist.
Her chin was right there in front of you and you landed a few jabs.
It's like that's kind of how I'd look at it.
Like a boxing match where one guy has their hands down and the other guy is able
to land a few jabs. That's not great. And that was your only chance.
That was your shot to knock her out was last night and he didn't do it down to
look, I'll say this. I did think that.
I thought Kamala Harris had a very bad opening and Donald Trump had a strong
opening. I thought that was actually at that point in the debate. I was like, this might be a very, very good night for Donald Trump.
And then everything after that, he pretty much just let it fall through. Look,
down to even details like he actually,
Donald Trump had a good closing.
He won the coin toss and got to close out the night,
which I think we're all shocked.
There was a legitimate coin toss.
I assume they had like a one-sided coin back there.
But then what did he do?
What did he do for the first time in his closing statement?
He hit him with what is one of Donald Trump's most powerful lines.
It's not quite as powerful as it was when he used it against Hillary Clinton,
but it's still somewhat powerful when he says she says she has all these,
you know, solutions. Why didn't she do it already?
Why doesn't she do it now? Right.
But that's not a powerful closing statement.
That's a question you actually ask her. That's something you say three times during the debate
and demonstrate that she can't respond to it. That might make sense in your opening. You know,
that might make sense in your opening to say, know she says she's got all of these solutions
But she's been in the White House at the highest level for the last four years
Why hasn't she done it yet? You know I bet you throughout this whole debate
We won't hear an answer to that simple question and then demonstrate that she can't answer it you don't close on that
It's not it's just not nearly as powerful
You know when you're closing
Especially when you're going last like you're closing and she doesn't get
another closing statement. This is the last statement. Well, this now is,
oh, you could say that in an ad that doesn't matter. You know what I'm saying?
You can always say that the value in saying something like that is to
demonstrate that she has no response. At this point,
your closing statement is almost like the debate's over. You're not really debating her anymore. You just get to give
a little ad at the end. The end is to sum up what happened in this debate and make sure
you drill that narrative into everybody who's listening's head. So they're like, oh yeah,
that was my last thought of the debate. So again, I just think that, you know,
there are a lot of advantages to Donald Trump's style over traditional
politician styles. Um, a lot of the,
a lot of politicians are, let's face it,
they're nerds and Donald Trump is not a nerd.
He's a bully, but he's not a nerd.
And by the way, that dynamic is part of the reason why Donald Trump
infuriates the political class so much because they're all a bunch of nerds
and he's a bully and all of these nerds remember how much they hate a bully,
you know, and Donald Trump's just like Donald Trump's thing is that he's the guy who just like
had a rich dad and gets a hot chick and is kind of a buffoon.
And he has the nerds going like, Oh, it's so unfair. You know,
that this guy is who this guy is. Kamala Harris literally said it at one point.
She literally brought up that his dad had money. Like this is, you know,
we're psychological creatures. This actually does play a role in there,
but so there's advantages because say like when Donald Trump's debating Jeb Bush,
well, what has Jeb Bush been doing for the last six weeks?
He's been at debate camp, you know, cause he's a nerd.
So he's been at debate camp and they're working on all these debate techniques and all this shit.
And Donald Trump isn't doing any of that.
Donald Trump didn't go to debate camp before a debate because that's for nerds.
That's not what, that's not what Donald Trump's of the worlds do.
And so there's an advantage to that because like you would see if,
if you remember these little moments from back in those debates, like there was one moment.
So like Donald Trump would be debating Jeb Bush and Jeb Bush comes out tense and
tight. And then it was like, well, okay.
I've remembered all of my talking points and Donald Trump is just like cracking
his neck and he's like loose and he's like, you're gay, you're lame,
your mom's ugly, you know?
And it's just like, he's just cool and freewheeling and these other guys are uptight and nervous.
Um, and there's something about that style that can be effective,
but you gotta have just like a little bit, a little bit of strategy,
a little bit of focus, a little bit of discipline.
And he has none of it, none of it. So yes, to your point, Rob,
people who know that Kamala Harris is terrible.
They still see that. Uh,
people who know that she's lying and that know that she's walked away from all
the stuff she used to say she believes and stuff like that. That's okay.
But the thing is that the media, the moderators, they are, they're not going to hold Donald Trump's,
they're not going to hold the viewer's hand and walk them through how terrible
she is. They're going to cover for her. And so you got to do that.
You have to hold their hand and explain it to them. And,
and he didn't do that. And she did,
she did pass the lowest of bars,
you know, which is that she's not a complete disaster.
She didn't implode in on herself.
She sounded to know about as much as he knows to have about as much of a plan as
he has. So like that was a real victory for her.
The question coming into this was kind of like, who is this chick?
Is she even a professional? Can she hang on this level?
And she kind of answered that, yeah, I can hang with him.
And that's why I think it's a big win for her. All right, guys,
let's take a moment right now. I gotta tell you about something.
I have your chance to win Skankfest tickets
courtesy of YoCradom.com, home of the $60 Kilo.
That's right, YoCradom, our number one sponsor,
has your chance for a three-day all-access passes
to Skankfest.
Go to YoCradom.com slash Skankfest right now to enter.
Winners will be picked on September 21st
and they've got other prize packs like kilos of kratom.
Where else on earth can you win Skankfest tickets
and kilos of kratom?
Nowhere, which is why you gotta go to YoCradom.com,
longtime sponsors of this show, YoCradom.com slash Skankfest.
That's how you enter to win free tickets to skank fest this year.
Yo kratom.com home of the $60 kilo. All right,
let's get back into the show. And by the way, I mean, I will, okay.
In the, in the remaining time that we have here,
I will say one more note on the, uh, the moderators, which like,
I know everybody look,
I could have just spent this whole episode bitching and moaning about how note on the the moderators, which like I know everybody look,
I could have just spent this whole episode bitching and moaning
about how unfair it is to Donald Trump.
We could have easily done an hour on that.
But at a certain point you're just like, well, that's the game.
Well, that's that's the game here.
This is like grown on that note of it being the game.
He could have refused the debate.
He decided hey, Kamala is so bad anywhere anytime.
Let's do it.
I'm going to demolish her and it's true.
It's not fair that the Democrats got a repeat.
The Democrats blew the first debate so bad.
They had to recall their candidate and then they game plan to figure out.
Well, what where do we want to do the only debate?
How do we have the most favorable terms? Which news organization might give us questions beforehand?
I'm not saying that that for sure happened.
But just an example of, you know, once again,
they didn't call her where their borders are,
but they said you were there exploring root causes.
That's the way they framed the question.
They were, yes, they worked for her all night,
but at the end of the day, you gotta win.
Same as Donald Trump didn't prove
that there was election fraud the last time so he's a loser so in this case
Yeah, the other team might have had the better deck of cards in terms of being able to set a more favorable format
But you lost and you're in and it's part of the game that you agree to go do it there
This is like grown man shit
Okay, if there are if there are three guys with guns who are trying to invade my house and I am
inside watching them on my cameras and I got my gun. Okay.
And I'm, they're trying to invade my house where my wife and kids live.
I don't get to sit there and go,
this is so unfair that there's three of them and only one of me
But this is just not fair. Sorry. You don't get to do that. You don't have that option
This is life and death. There's three of them and there's one of me. Those are the breaks now
How am I gonna win? That's the only answer you don't get to sit like so that's that. Now that it is true that it's pretty
wild the advantage that these three guys have over me just being one guy with a gun and
there are three guys with a gun. That is true. It is pretty wild that they fact checked Donald
Trump so many times and let her get away with some of the shit they let her get away with
saying like look. Yeah. Well I was just to give a few examples of that.
The fact. Listen, man, the Charlottesville, there were fine people on both sides.
Thing is so goddamn wild.
It is so wild that the thing about it is, is that there are there are these scandals
with Donald Trump. And I got to say, most of them sound like complete bullshit, but there'll be these,
these scandals where it's like, well,
the general who used to work for you,
who you fired said that privately you said,
fuck all the troops or something like that. And Donald Trump's like, what?
I never said that. And you're like, well,
a general says that you said that and it's just like, I don't that and you're like well a general says that you said that
And it's just like I don't know he claims he said it use claim
You didn't I don't really buy that Donald Trump is saying that to his generals. That sounds kind of crazy
But the the very fine people on both sides thing is on tape
It's on tape
Literally Donald Trump utters the words
There's very fine people on both sides and then a reporter goes wait
You're saying there were very fine people in the group of like neo-nazis at Charlottesville and he goes no no
I'm not saying that at all
I'm saying there were very fine people on both sides of the debate over whether we should tear down these statues or whether we
Should keep these statues, but no I totally condemn white nationalists and white supremacy and all of that stuff.
That was his it's on tape. You can go look at it,
but they still bring it up. The project 2025 stuff, the, uh, the,
a lot of the stuff about abortion where she was like, Oh, he's again,
he has no exceptions. Donald Trump's always, first of all,
nobody believes that Donald Trump is really pro-life in any deep way
Like Donald Trump's a guy who let's just say I think Donald Trump's taken care of a few pregnancies in his day
That would be my guess but uh
Regardless she got away with a lot of bullshit and they didn't fact-check her over any of that
But you know what? That's the game. It doesn't matter and to your point Rob, which I do think this is a really um,
A point that's really worth considering is that
Look Donald Trump had his
he had options here and and
You know, look I will say that
fundamentally right now in terms of like,
um, like,
like just in terms of the,
like the actual existing fundamentals that are right in front of us,
like where the state of the world is right now,
you could say there is simply no need for this.
So if you could like, like imagine in my house,
I have a fireplace and that's what I've been using for heat.
I start a fire every night and that's what keeps my house warm.
And then I get a like panel heating put in.
Now I have panel heating throughout my entire house or central heating or
whatever. I no longer need the fireplace.
That simply isn't necessary anymore. Now I may keep it because I like it.
I may enjoy, uh, uh, you know,
having a fireplace for whatever reason, cause it looks nice on Christmas or some
shit, but I don't need it to heat my home anymore.
Cause just like the fundamentals of the situation have changed.
I have panel heating now in the same sense
where with where technology is and where the flow of information is,
we don't need to have this debate on ABC anymore.
We don't need that. That's a choice, but you don't need to do that. We could very
easily Elon Musk could host an event that will live stream to Twitter that will get
as much if not far more viewership on it. You could Lex Friedman or Joe Rogan or a number
of other people could be the person who moderates this debate, who hosts this debate and get as many eyeballs on it.
This is something different. We've never lived in a time like that before, truly, in the way that we do today.
And Donald Trump could have made the decision that I am going to accept those. I am not going to go with these hack corporate journalists.
I'm going to push for it.
And now it is true that there is no chance in hell that Kamala Harris would
have done that. Right. Okay. So this is the calculation here.
There's no chance in hell that Joe Biden or Kamala Harris would have,
would have done a debate moderated by Elon Musk, right?
But think about that for a second think about that for a second because that's kind of the point
There's no chance in hell that they would ever go into an adversarial environment
So maybe that ought to lead to the question. Why are you then?
Why are you willing to do what they would never do and?
Just saying it's something worth considering and if you're if you're a Republican and much more important than if you're a Republican if you're a
Dissident so this includes Democrats and leftists and and libertarians and all of it
You should be thinking about that
You should be thinking about that.
Like why the hell should we continue to give this awful,
corrupt, disgusting fireplace,
a monopoly on heating our home when we do not need them anymore.
You know, like let's change the, the analogy a little bit.
And now I'm going to tell you that this fireplace is poison and it's poisoning my family.
Why exactly am I still turning it on?
I don't need to.
I have another source of heat now.
There's no need to do this.
And that's something that like Donald Trump
in this election had a profound opportunity.
I'm not saying he could have lured them into that debate,
but he could have made a real stink about it and gone like,
no, there's no reason why I should be.
Why should I go onto the networks that lied us into the war in Iraq
and lied us through COVID?
Well, he can't say that because he was part of it,
but certainly could say Iraq.
Why should I go into these networks
who have gotten everything wrong?
There's a new form of communication.
It's far more popular.
Far more people are getting their news this way.
Not to mention, by the way, the entire young generation.
The entire young generation gets their news
through social media.
None of them get it through corporate media anymore. And so what does that tell you?
Okay, this is the future. This is the future. There will be,
there is nobody, no, I mean, okay, I'm obviously being slightly hyperbolic,
but not that hyperbolic. Okay.
There is almost nobody who's 25 and you go,
what's your source of news? And they go,
CNN and the wall street journal. It just doesn't exist.
If you find that you've found a unicorn, okay.
They all get their news through tick tock with through, you know,
podcasts through things like that.
And so Donald Trump could have made this case,
especially after doing the one with Joe Biden.
He could have said, no, I already did one of these.
Okay, now it's time for you to have the courage
to come actually come into the lion's den.
I'm just saying there were options there and I don't know.
There's a lot of like, there's a lot of like the theory of gaming all of this out and
figuring out like which outcome would have yielded the best
results. But hindsight being 2020 and having the advantage of
that, I can tell you that that was damn sure better than just
walking into a corporate media debate and doing that.
I agree with everything you just said and you know that's part of the
winning and losing thing is that he agreed to the terms and he wasn't able to flatline her.
I also think he had a golden opportunity to take back the power from the fact checkers,
which is the first time they did it. He could have just said thank you for fact checking. I'd like
to point out to the American people that in the last debate,
I was fact-checked over the Hunter Biden laptop story
that turned out to be 100% true.
And so I would encourage,
we are here for me to debate Kamala Harris,
and I think we should leave the news bias out of this
because in the last election, you guys got it wrong.
And you can continue to fact-check me during this debate,
but I would like for the American people to know that you're just incorporating your bias into what she should
be responding not you. That would have been so good dude. If you had just gone like well here's
the thing about you guys fact checking right if you were fact checking in 2020 as you did at the
debate you would have said that Hunter Biden's laptop is Russian disinformation. If you were fact-checking in 2017, you probably
would have said I was involved in a conspiracy with the Russians, right?
Well, here's the thing about your facts. They're consistently wrong. They
consistently turn out to be lies. So how about we just save your fact-checking
for it? You know, like, yeah. I mean, it was just all right there. All right.
Are you instituting your news bias into what's supposed to be
a debate between me and her on the ideas of what's better to
lead this country and I have better ideas. DT, I'm available
for hire.
Yeah, yeah. Well, I don't let me know. Let me know if he gives
you a call. I listen, I'll say this just in closing.
I do think I'm not saying like, uh, that this,
in fact, I'm not saying that this changed the landscape of the race. My,
my whole point here is that it didn't,
it didn't change the landscape of the race.
And so I think we're essentially left in the place where we started,
which is that I would say Donald Trump is an ever so slight favorite right now. If there were free and fair elections, something we're very confident in, I think Donald Trump is probably going to win.
And I mean, like, if you flipped a coin 10 times, I think maybe he wins six of them,
maybe a little less than maybe five and a half. I think he's got,
he's, I think he's a slight slight favorite, but it is,
I think it's pretty close and I overall just on the metrics that we gave you,
I think Kamala Harris won the night.
Brings me no
pleasure to say that. Not who I'm rooting for, but that's kind of my takeaway from this.
Alright guys, thank you very much for listening. We will be back soon. I'm recording another
episode with, I got Daryl Cooper coming on later today. That episode will be out in the
next day or two. So stick around for that. What were you going to say, Rob?
Yeah, check out the Run Your your mouth podcast. Once again,
I got live dates coming up at porch tour.com and then me and Davy Smith were,
uh, what is it? Oklahoma, Oklahoma this weekend, Oklahoma, Oklahoma,
Tulsa and Tulsa. Yes. And then Skank Fest. So that's right.
And then Skank Fest coming up. Uh, yes, that's right. And then, um,
I will be in, uh, Austin, Texas.
We're doing live Legion of Skank shows at the creek in the cave right before skank fest also plus plus doing some other fun shows
Out there and and and then finally I will say thank you to everybody who's watching live who signed up at part of the problem
Dot-com if you want to watch the shows live ad free uncensored
You got to sign up over at part of the problemroblem.com. If you love the show,
that's where you can go to support us and we very much appreciate it. All right. Thanks
for listening guys. Catch you next time. Peace. you you you you you you you you you you you you you