Part Of The Problem - Is the Ukraine War Ending?

Episode Date: August 19, 2025

Dave Smith brings you the latest in politics! On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave is joined by Robbie "The Fire" Bernstein to discuss Trump's meeting with Putin, how their dynamic ties into the Russiagate scandal, and more.Support Our Sponsors:Kalshi - https://kalshi.com/daveMy Patriot Supply - https://www.mypatriotsupply.com/problemQuince - Get free shipping on your Quince order and 365-day returns athttps://www.quince.com/POTPGo to BodyBrainCoffee.com, use code DAVE20 for 20% off your first orderPart Of The Problem is available for early pre-release at https://partoftheproblem.com as well as an exclusive episode on Thursday!ROB LIVE DATES HERE:PORCH Tour: www.porchtour.comFind Run Your Mouth here:YouTube - http://youtube.com/@RunYourMouthiTunes - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/run-your-mouth-podcast/id1211469807Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/4ka50RAKTxFTxbtyPP8AHmFollow the show on social media:X:http://x.com/ComicDaveSmithhttp://x.com/RobbieTheFireInstagram:http://instagram.com/theproblemdavesmithhttp://instagram.com/robbiethefire#libertarianSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Searching for a romantic summer getaway. Escape with Rich Girl Summer, the new audible original from Lily Chew. The exquisitely talented Philippa Sue, returning to narrate her fifth Lily Chew title. This time, Philippa is joined by her real-life husband, Stephen Pasquale, set in Toronto's wealthy cottage country, aka the Hamptons of Canada. Rich Girl Summer follows the story of Valerie, a down-on-her-luck event planner, posing as a socialite's long-lost daughter, while piecing together the secrets surrounding a mysterious family,

and falling deeper and deeper in love with the impossibly hard to read and infuriatingly handsome family assistant, Nico. Caught between pretending to belong and unexpectedly finding where she truly fits in, Valerie learns her summer is about to get far more complicated than she ever planned. She's in over her head and head over heels.

Listen to Rich Girl Summer, now on Audible. Go to audible.com slash rich girl summer. What's up? What's up, everyone. Welcome to a brand new episode of part of the problem. It's Monday. We're ready to get the week started. Of course, I'm always, as always, I'm joined by Robbie the Fire Bernstein. How are you, sir? Oh, man, I had a great run of porches out in Tennessee. And I'm back out. This is, this is, I'm porching hard, my friend. Peck in Indiana. You ever been to Peck in Indiana? No one's been to Peck in Indiana. The four people that live there are in Peck in Indiana. And I'm bringing my porch there. St. Louis. Missouri, Wadsworth, Ohio, and Cincinnati, and then the bugout at a maximum Philly. So we're porching hard. Very nice, very nice. I'm very excited for you. I've heard nothing but great things, as always, but particularly about this run of porch tours.

And I'm getting ready this week. I got a couple more days at home. And then, of course, this weekend is the big one, the comedy mothership. So I'm really looking forward to that. always just always one of my favorite you know uh one of my favorite weekends of the year is always headlining that place so very excited for that um and got a bunch more fun stuff uh coming your guys way over the next uh few days and weeks um but for today it's pretty obvious what the topic of the show is going to be um since let you know we do our show monday through thursday and so since

our last show Thursday of several things, the major events in regard to the war in Ukraine have happened. The first, of course, was on Friday, Vladimir Putin came to the United States of America. Well, Alaska, close enough. Technically, he came to the United States of America. In a much more real sense, he was more in Russia than anything else. But, you know, legally speaking, he was in the United States of America. And him and Donald Trump met for three hours. They met with, I believe, Whitkoff and Marco Rubio and Sergei Lavrov were all in the meeting. They met for three hours. Everyone described it as a good meeting. No deal was reached. Specifics weren't really given. They held a little bit of a joint press conference. Now, today as we speak, Zelensky and other

European leaders have arrived in D.C. evidently, they will be meeting with Donald Trump later today. And so we're at least, at the very least, I don't even know if you can call it progress toward ending the war, but you're at least, we're at least seeing like the prerequisites that would be necessary for progress to end the war. I don't know. I got a bunch of stuff to say on all of this. I'm not exactly sure where to start first. But I will say, and believe me, I'm well aware that this is a simple point that I'm making. It's one that I've made before. But, you know, part of the reason also why, even though I'm a very stupid, non-expert failed comedian, part of the reason why I can still take the soul of your favorite Warhawk is because they really don't have

answers to a lot of these very simple points. But one of the things that's just remarkable to me, is like it's just it's it's crazy to me i cannot overstate the levels of insanity that this wasn't always going on from the very beginning of the war like just that the fact that human beings we can um like the fact that we have irrigation and like structures that are over five stories tall like the fact that you made it to that level forget the internet and I'm just saying like if you made it to the level of civilization that like your your building advanced irrigation you should all it should also just be a standard that like hey before we embark on a mass murder campaign let's just try to talk it out let's let's try our best

to have a like literally something something you would expect of any of your friends to do before they got into a fist fight at least try to talk about like see if there's not possibly a way to de-escalate this maybe it doesn't have to come to this that's the level you would expect from any one of your friends because you'd go hey guys we're not we're not 16 I mean we're adults who have jobs

and kids and families and stuff so like you know at least try to talk it out before this gets violent and the fact that unlike such a macro scale you could have violence on such a level and that this was what we just saw was the first time since the war in Ukraine broke out that the president of the United States

and the president of Russia sat down together. I just find that to be so criminal that it took this long for that to happen. By the way, that's not even like with war in general, I feel that way. But that's not even to add on to it that it's we're talking about D.C. and Moscow

We're talking about essentially the two biggest nuclear threats that have ever existed, something like 90% of the stockpile of nuclear weapons is held by the United States of America and by Russia. So those two nations are in a proxy war and they're not talking. It's just madness. So thank God this happened, but my God, is it just criminally insane that it took this long for it to happen? That's my first thought.

well to speak to that also everyone that's criticizing donald trump for having this meeting and for trying to make progress i think that that's equally just criminally insane i mean what biden did to get us into this war uh was you know with uh we refused to say that ukraine won't be joining nato and that's non-negotiable that was really stupid and then the fact that we then went off with this storyline that uh putin's trying to take over all of russia and so we had i mean all of uh europe and so we got to stop them now. We had to hear that for years. Then we had to hear that we were winning for years. And so this is important for the nation of Ukraine that we continue to back them because they're winning this war. And we can't have dictators that are just encroaching on other people. The whole storyline is stupid. And now finally got Donald Trump, who did not end this on day one. And there's a lot of circular motions going on here, which it seems like we just have to divorce ourselves from Ukraine and Europe and then let them actually say, all right, this isn't working and not continue with the war, which, but all of that aside, I mean, the fact that no

one's tried to sit down and just talk to Putin directly until now is crazy. And then the fact that the Warhawks are giving Donald Trump shit for it or Bolton's even out there, like he's out class, so he shouldn't be sitting down with them or just sitting down with Putin and boldens him. And it's a victory now for Putin because he gets a meeting. It's like, guys, people are just dying for no reason. The easiest way to de-escalate this at this point, is to let them keep what they, what they took, say that Ukraine's not joining NATO, and be done with it. And I guess if Putin decides to be aggressive again,

then you're back at the same place with at least more of a world attitude of, look, that guy's actually just being aggressive. But then you're just back at the same place. You're not in a worst place. So, yeah. Kudos to Trump for doing it. And, you know, shame on everyone in the media that's trying to say that even just sitting down with Putin is a mistake.

That doesn't make any sense. Well, it's unbelievable. I mean, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, like, it's, like, if I said, it's criminally insane that, um, that, um, that, you know, these, these meetings haven't been happened the whole time. But like, and, like, and like, and like, you're telling me, all of these, like, global governance bodies, you know, there is the United Nations and there are, you know what I'm saying, like, there are old. And it's like, you're telling me all of these like global governance organizations, you know, exist and rule number one isn't like hey if a war ever breaks out or if tensions that look like it's leading to a war ever broke out the first rule of international law is you guys got to sit down together and try see if there's any other way that you can resolve your disputes other than just what war it you know mass violence and and innocent people dying you know by definition. I don't think there's ever been a war in history where no innocent person

ended up dying. So like, kind of by definition, that's what that means is going to happen. Yeah, I think that's a, but yes, then the people who demonize it and they do it in the dumbest possible ways. Like the most ridiculous you know, it's your, you're legitimizing

evil or something like that. If you sit down and talk to people, it's, you know, bless you. COVID. Yeah, you go well it's like uh you know it's the idea of even saying like you're legitimizing evil you're like what could be more evil than discouraging peace talks in the middle of a hot war so that you know like maybe maybe you don't get to have a comment on who's too evil to meet with but of course you know this is um i think one of the the major issues you have and this is what i was talking

about uh the other day when i was kind of uh reflecting on my most recent pierce morgan appearance But one of the things that happens is, and it's interesting because it's like, it's kind of right at the center of kind of our, you know, Rothbardian, libertarian, you know, insight on the nature of government, which is essentially that, you know, the nature of government is like it's a criminal organization. That's what governments are. And when you, you know, understand that and you take that into account in your worldview, it just leads to different conclusions than others draw. But particularly, when it comes to war what you see, particularly in the West, I mean, which is what I know the best, but in the West, when they're justifying war, all of the sudden, you notice that, like, people start talking about things like it's a fantasy land, you know, like they're just, hey, we're, we don't, we don't appease dictators or we don't, you know, these were two of the arguments that I was met with my last time that I was on Pierce Morgan. and they're both arguments I've been met with before.

But, like, one of the arguments was about Ukrainian entry into NATO. And they go, hey, since when can a big country bully around a little country and tell them they can't join whatever security alliance they want to? And, like, that's the way it's presented on this show. Like, hey, since when did bigger nations start telling smaller nations what they could do? You're like, I'm pretty sure since there were big nations and small nations. like what world are you even talking about like are you reading out of a storybook right now like what do you and and then i just said to them i said to the panel filled with like one general and about i go are you telling me that mexico can join a military alliance with china if they want to

no they can't it's just not the case it's just not the case that like oh sovereign nations are allowed to do whatever they want to like sorry that's not how it works and america would never accept that anywhere near our own let like some small little let the bahama try to join, like, a military alliance with Vladimir Putin and see what happens, you know? It's just like, that's not actually how the world works. And we have a whole Monroe doctrine, and there are spheres of influence. And yes, no, it's just, it's not the case that, like, the Soviets can just put nuclear weapons on Cuba if they want to. Like, you know, when we already lived out that experiment.

And then the other thing was the thing about appeasing dictators. Like, all of a sudden it becomes, like, Vladimir Putin bad, you know? Oh, what are you talking about? Appeasing dictators. The whole world is dictators that America gives money to. What are you talking about? So it's just like, you know, a lot of that stuff. But really, again, it's not that the people on CNN and MSNBC are so naive

that they don't understand the nature of government, but us with our brilliant Rothbardian insights do understand the nature of government. The reason it's so creepy is that, no, this is just the tactic to keep the war going. this is just what they say i mean like what dude they all these people um when you you remember uh when the build up to the war and around was going on and like official israeli members of the government were posting pictures with the son of the shaw like they were they were pretty explicitly implicitly saying that like hey here's the rightful leader of of around Here it is, the son of the last dictator that we installed.

That's what we believe, hereditary monarchy is now the, because everybody knows, like who in their right mind doesn't think that if, let's just say, they had free and fair elections in Iran, and the political party who won said no normalization of relations with Israel, no trading oil in dollars, no doing business with the West, no but there was a democratic election. Or let's say there was a military coup in Iran and a military dictator took over, but he said, we're going to normalize relations with Israel, we're going to open up our oil markets to American oil companies, we're going to trade only in dollars, yada, yada, yada. who do you think D.C. and Tel Aviv would prefer?

Do you think they would go, no, we have a commitment to democracy and an open society and we can't, we would never, you know, support, we would never appease a dictator. Like, no, obviously, they would choose the latter because that's their policy objectives. And that's, you've got 80 years of U.S. foreign policy to back this up. So it's all just, all that stuff is, is just ridiculous. All right, guys, let's take a moment, a very special. moment and talk about body brain coffee for a moment. Now, a lot of you guys might know about this already. Part of the problem listeners, we're blowing this product up. It's an amazing product,

but also it is the creation of the great Louis J. Gomez, who has always kind of backed this show, hosted it on his podcast network, is my partner on part of the problem.com and a hilarious comedian and great guy. He's just launched this product. We really want to make this a huge success. And also, It's a great product. As many of you know, testosterone levels have plummeted. This is probably you. Testosterone is going down nationwide. It's a very strange dynamic.

But the average man's testosterone has dropped nearly 40% in the last few decades. And it's not slowing down. That means less strength, less drive, less energy, and ultimately less leadership in your own life. This also, I would argue, means a less libertarian society. That's why you need body brain coffee. This isn't some gimmicky mushroom coffee. It's real premium Colombian coffee infused with ingredients designed to support testosterone clarity and focus. Toncat Ali to help boost natural testosterone, Ashkoaganda to help reduce stress and keep you sharp,

Lions mane to enhance brain function and focus, and L-theonine to balance it all out so you feel energized without the crash. whether it's in the gym at work or leading your household. You can't show up halfway. You need to be locked in. You need to be the man who sets the tone for everyone around you. Body Brain Coffee helps you do exactly that. So stop being tired and foggy and unfocused. Take control. Be the man. I will tell you guys, I love this stuff. I've been drinking it for days now. I feel great. It's a delicious coffee. Go support Lewis and support this product by going to bodybraincoffee.com. And make sure to use the promo code Dave 20 that will get you 20% off your order right now. Remember again, guys, we want to blow this up. But we also want Lewis to know that it was all us who did it. It was not his achievement. It was ours. So make sure to use the promo code Dave 20 when you go to bodybrain coffee.com.

All right. Let's get back into the show. The other thing that I got to say really struck me in seeing, because I was thinking about it. As you're watching, you know, they did. So after the three hour meeting. Trump and Putin had like a little press conference thing. Not too much was said, although a few, there were a few things that were interesting. We could get into that a little bit.

But one of the things that just really stood out to me was that I think I could be wrong about this. Someone could double check me, but I think this was the first time they were together since Helsinki, which must have been in 2018. And was 17 or 18? I think it was 2018. And there's just, I don't know, it was kind of interesting to see the two of them together after all these years. Now, for, you know, for people who don't remember, Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump did meet in Helsinki back in what I believe was 2018.

And the huge controversy back then, Rob, right, was that Donald Trump said that he believed Vladimir Putin, because all the questions were about him interfering in the 2016 election. and Vladimir Putin was like, I didn't interfere in the 2016 election. And then they asked Trump, they said, you know, he's saying he didn't interfere in the election. Do you believe him? And he goes, you know, I believe him. He tells me he wasn't involved in that.

I believe him. And this is what the entire corporate media tried to spin as treason by Donald Trump because he dared to say that he trusted Vladimir Putin over his own intelligence agencies. And it is with all of the evidence that's come out since that time, and even the most recent stuff that Tulsi Gabbard's been releasing, it is something to think about the fact that, like, Donald Trump ran in 2016 on d'aunt

with Russia. He explicitly ran on getting along with Russia and not moving in this, you know, more and more hostile direction. And then when he tried to do it in 2018, they all accused of treason for this thing that we've now learned that they completely made up and planted and used just for this purpose. I mean, for a few purposes, but this was one of the major ones to prevent the democratically elected president of the United States of America from enacting the policy that he ran on that the American people supported to enact his policy with regard to getting along with the biggest nuclear power in the history of the world. It's just that that's a that's a crazy story

to then see it all come to at least they're they're in the same room and at least there's talk of trying to end the bloodshed and trying to reach some type of deal. So I don't know. I was just thinking about a lot of those things like all about rushagate and it really does when you see how high the stakes are. It's like it gives you a whole another level of appreciation for how criminal Russiagate was. You know what I mean? Like it's it's it's very easy for us to always like stop at the level of the intelligence agencies tried to frame the duly elected president of the United States of America for treason. Because really do you like when you say that out loud, do you need to go further than that? Like that seems to be enough. That seems to be more than enough for this to be

like one of the greatest outrages in the history of the United States of America. Right. But it's actually quite a bit worse than that, because it was actually intentionally being used to prevent Donald Trump from pursuing his policy agenda, which was to get along with the country with the biggest stockpile of nuclear weapons in the history of the world. And they intentionally thwarted that, and that has already resulted in a war where hundreds of thousands, perhaps well over a million people, have died. So like, it's just like as you think about that, it really is, it gives you a whole new feeling, even though, listen, I know the administration is already a failed administration. I know that they're probably not going to deliver

on 10% of the good things that they promised. But like, and I know that they're pivoting away from the Epstein cover up. But it does, it did just leave me with another thing of like, man, they really those people who did russia gate really need to pay like they really do need to be held to account to that it's just so it's hard to overstate what a profound crime that was yeah i guess i never really uh put that all together that we could have been moving in a direction of getting along with russia which might have made it more difficult for biden to uh you know pull off the natos going into ukraine and then provoking that war if uh we were in a better place so yeah that that is uh i guess an interesting storyline that lurked in the background there of, you know, the Warhawks of

the people that are anti-Russia kind of instigating that as long, as far back as eight years ago. Oh, yeah. And, and I mean, look, it had a huge effect on it because, you know, you so much, I mean, look, there's, there's a lot, like, there's, there's, there were huge levels of escalation in the hostilities between the U.S. and Russia, you know, I mean, there's, we have a long history of, of, of having hostilities with Russia, but saying like post-Soviet Union, like the Clinton had the first round of NATO expansion, and that was a huge, huge deal. George W. Bush had the dual-use rockets put into Poland.

That was a huge, huge provocation. Like they all, he got us out of a couple of different really important treaties. Like there were steps each way, but the, this disaster, like this catastrophic war, the story of that really starts under. Obama in 2014, and backing the Maidon Revolution, recognizing the government that overthrew the democratically elected Yanukovych government. All of that stuff was real. That's when the actual war in Ukraine started, right?

Like, there was a Western-backed coup. Then there was, after, while the money was flowing in, there was fighting on the street. There was this huge clash. The government's overthrown. And then immediately after the new government comes in, there was a civil war between the east and west of the country. And that went on for years after that. I think something like 15,000 people died in that war. The numbers now pale in comparison to since Vladimir Putin invaded.

But at the time, this was a big deal. And Vladimir Putin did send essentially special forces in back then, I think in 2015, maybe he sent them in. And in 2014 after the coup was done, he annexed Crimea. So, like, this is when the whole thing starts happening. And so it's in this context, right? It's in 2014 that the government in Ukraine is overthrown and it's backed by, you know, Obama and Joe Biden. And then Vladimir Putin annexes Crimea. This is in 2014.

In 2015 and 16, the civil war is going on. That's when Donald Trump comes in, right? Donald Trump comes in in the middle of like there's this civil war in Ukraine over U.S. intervention, U.S. European intervention in the region. There's this conflict there, and the guy who gets elected was running on like, let's de-escalate. Let's have detente. Let's be friends. Now, he was more, when they were running, they were talking about what was going on in Syria,

but all this shit was going on too. And so to frame, you know, because Russiagate was like a double frame job, it was they, they framed both Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. They framed Vladimir Putin for overthrowing our elections, and they framed Donald Trump for being involved in the conspiracy to do it. But it was all bullshit. None of that was real. And so, yeah, then you had essentially Donald Trump, and particularly after Helsinki, I mean, the amount of pressure that, they impeached him over Ukraine, right? like this was a it was an enormous pressure campaign and what was the the thing that they impeached him over right now this was later but the thing they impeached him over that was such a big deal is

that he threatened to hold up weapons shipments into ukraine while this civil war was going on now he ultimately gave in and did the and sent the weapons in but that's kind of what russia gate created it created this environment where donald trump because he's trump and he's not like he never had the intelligence or the creativity to be like to actually pull off a 4D chess move you know what I mean so it would never be like because like an actual 40 chess or someone who was actually smart enough and and like clever enough to like rise above the thing and go like oh here like he he could have had you know I don't know he could have made it he could have shouted from the loudest bullhorn during all of that Russiagate stuff,

he could have used Aaron Mate in the Nation magazine completely debunking the whole thing. Like the biggest left-wing publication with this left-wing journalist has completely debunked Russia Gate. But he never even thought to bring that up because he doesn't read and he doesn't know. He had no idea that it had been debunked in the nation. You know what I mean? And so instead, the problem is that Donald Trump isn't actually this like master manipulator, negotiator, who's always playing 4D chess.

And so what Donald Trump did instead, in very Trumpian fashion, was he goes, oh, they say I'm a puppet of Vladimir Putin. I'm going to show him what a Putin puppet. I'm not. I'm going to send weapons into Ukraine and put sanctions on Russia. And then if you remember, Rob, he used to brag about this. You know, they say, they say, I'm a puppet of Vladimir Putin, but no one's been harsher on Vladimir Putin.

That's Donald Trump's 4D chess. That's what he actually gets, is to be like, yeah, MSNBC, well, just to prove you wrong, I'll do exactly what you want. And so that's where the thing escalated. And then, of course, Joe Biden comes back in, Vladimir Putin invades, and the rest is history. With all that said, with moving on from Russiagate and having that completely debunk, they did look like friends, which I mean, I guess that's the better way to engage in diplomacy is to, you know, try and get the guy feel welcoming and that you can be trusted.

It is just kind of, listen, anyone. that's saying that Donald Trump shouldn't have had that meeting, I think, has a bad agenda, which is to try and keep this war going on. And I don't think that this war can be one. I think it can only be escalated and more people can die. I think that's all you have. But it was kind of classic Donald Trump, where he did get his big television spectacle, not a single details released, no real sign of progress aside from the fact that he actually sat down with the guy. And it just seems like we're kind of in the same circle of Zelensky and Europe going, no, we have to continue this war. Donald Trump's saying, no, it needs to be over, but like with no, I guess,

clear path for pulling the trigger on it other than to just throw up our hands and say, we're out of this mess. You guys can go figure it out. Yeah. Yeah. Well, we can get into, you know, while the details, specific details have not exactly been released about what was discussed or what the progress like there's not a progress report um Putin did uh somewhat vaguely say it's something like there's still one major obstacle that has to be worked out um but I think that you know we know we know more or less where we're at um and we'll we'll get into that in one second I did um what was that no just before oh yeah before we move on from Russiagate and go to the meeting with Putin and now the latest with Zelensky

I did want to play this just because, as we were talking about Rushagate and thinking about this, and this is a great little, I got this from, it was Mays, I believe, right? Yeah, Mays. Good Twitter follow, by the way. But it's Mays Moore, M-A-Z-E, at M-A-Z-E-M-O-O-R. Good Twitter follow. But he posted this compilation video of Eric Swalwell, which really was just, it's worth for, again, And, you know, like, sometimes you've got to go back and watch those news clips of, like, how crazy the COVID propaganda was.

And, like, you're like, oh, yeah, fucking forgot. They actually did all that. This was a great little compilation of the way they were talking during Russiagate, like, how goddamn criminal this whole frame job was. And then the, um, how unashamed they are after even the whole thing falls apart. But here, Natalie, let's, let's play this clip. Mueller used a legal term and did not find a chargeable Russia-Trump conspiracy. You talk about collusion, and you've also want to play this for you, talk about it pretty directly as if there was a personal link, a personal activity by Donald Trump established.

Take a look. All of the arrows continue to point to a personal, political, and financial relationship that Donald Trump had with the Russians. Do you believe the president right now has been an agent of the Russians? Yes. I'm not hearing the evidence that he's an agent of Russia. Yeah, I think it's pretty clear. It's almost hiding in plain sight. Do you believe that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians in the 2016 campaign? Yes. Do you believe the president himself colluded with the Russians?

Yes. There was certainly evidence of collusion, not evidence that met the beyond a reasonable doubt standard, but this president in no way is cleared. Do you accept the findings in the Mueller report that do not support some of the, those claims? Well, I accept that I probably should have been out there a little bit earlier because who knew how many links there were 200 pages of links. I accept also, Ari, that prior Congresses did not have an imagination to see a president or a campaign have so many concerning conduct and not right laws to prohibit it. But it didn't meet the standard beyond a reasonable doubt. But here's what we know. The Russians helped Donald Trump. Sure, but to be clear, so you're

no longer maintaining that he is effectively a quote, Russian. asset? No, I think he acts on Russia's behalf, and I challenge him to show me otherwise. Well, I guess that's what I'm saying. You accept the findings or not. I mean, one could argue that Barack Obama at times was, again, what does the language mean? Barack Obama was advocating on behalf of Cuba's interests, if some people are critical of his Cuba policy. You clearly, in those quotes, though, were discussing it at the level of a financial link or a conspiratorial a conspiratorial collaboration, which Mueller's evidence doesn't support. So I want to find out, do you accept that?

No, there's evidence of collusion and coordination there. It doesn't go beyond a reasonable doubt, but that doesn't mean that this is a good guy. I mean, we know the Russians helped him. He asked the Russians to help them. The campaign expected to benefit from it. What we don't know yet is why won't he show us his taxes? Why won't he show us his finances? And look, Ari, if this guy is able to be blackmailed by a porn star,

how do we know he's not going to be blackmailed by Vladimir Putin? And that's what we need to understand. And this is the last question I'll do on this. I'm going to move on. I appreciate you being here to take the colloquy. Some candidates, you know, there's some people in Congress we can't even get on. So I appreciate it. But the last question I'm pressing you on, though, is yes, you can ask all those tough questions.

But are you or are you not maintaining the asset theory, even though a 400-plus page report for Mueller does not document that? I think he acts on Russia's behalf too many times and he puts their interests ahead of our interests he pulled us out of syria he wants to reduce the role of nato he continues to pull back sanctions on russia he won't tell us what he talked about with vladimir putin and he won't tell us anything about his finances with the russians he acts guilty ari yeah i mean so is that not pretty freaking unbelievable to just like if you by the way there's even arey there who's he's doing this thing that i've i've called that a lot over the years rob it's pretend journalism Like he's acting as if he's giving him a tough interview, but he's actually not at all.

And he's kind of carrying his water there because they get into this whole asset, like conversation. But if you hear in the clips that they just played, what Swalwell said point blank was that Donald Trump was an agent. And just to be clear, there's a big difference between calling someone a CIA asset and a CIA agent. There's a big difference between calling someone a Russian asset and a Russian agent. Like agent implies that you are straight up working for them carrying out operations. It's not just like, oh, you're something that they use or you're something that, you know what I mean? You were doing your own thing and they liked that you were doing this. So you guys coordinated in some way.

Calling a Russian agent, the sitting president of the United States of America. And then after there's this huge multimillion dollar investigation, doesn't back. back you up at all. You go, well, I challenge him to prove to me that he's not. What the hell does that mean? And then, of course, Rob, at the end there, they kind of give it away. Now, don't they? They kind of give it away. Well, what really is the proof? Now, of course, he lists off a bunch of things, none of which Donald Trump actually did. He states them as if he did that. He pulled us out of Syria. No, he did. He's, you know, NATO no longer has power. Not true. NATO's only gotten more powerful under Donald Trump. It's gotten bigger. It's expanded. It's gotten more

powerful. But isn't there kind of an admission there that it's like, yeah, that's really what it's all about, isn't it? Like Donald Trump campaigned on pulling us out of Syria. He campaigned on diminishing NATO. In 2016, this is. But if you were to enact those policies, that would be proof that you're a Russian agent. You know, like it's a, it's really something that You're like, that's the democratic process that everybody in DC is screaming about, is that a candidate ran on this, the people supported him, he was duly elected, but he's not allowed to implement those policies. It is something.

All right, guys, let's take a second and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Quince. I love this company. We're talking high quality fabrics, classic fits, and lightweight layers for the summer at prices that won't break the bank. I've gotten, they've sent me a couple of their things that are really nice, got this beautiful cashmere hoodie, another really nice sweater. They've got really good quality stuff at very reasonable prices, which as you know are very rare these days. Casimir and cotton sweaters from just

$50, airy pants and flow knit polos that look and feel amazing. Your wardrobe just got a whole lot better. Keep it classic and cool with long lasting staples from Quince. Go to quince.com slash POTP for free shipping on your orders and 365 day returns. That's quince.com slash P-O-T-P, Q-U-I-N-C-E dot com slash P-O-T-P for free shipping and 365-day returns, Quince.com slash P-O-T-P. All right, let's get back into the show. Well, I mean, we did, what was it, two and a half years of coverage of the ship. God bless you now.

COVID. Thank you. I caught it. Yeah, exactly. through uh through zoom uh we did three years of uh debunk in the russia gate stuff while it was happening and it exact it's so amazing the way that russia gate went right into covid that then went into no biden doesn't have dementia and it's a 12 year track record or yeah about a or an eight year track record of just a completely lying to you on a daily basis on these big stories ongoing

but that talking point of the last one which was you know because it used to be if you were trying to just be pragmatic and be like listen let's not have this war oh so you're a Putin apologist oh you must love Putin it's like any time that you just have a different strategic insight of what benefits the US that might not harm somebody else then instantly oh because you really only like what you really only like that guy's agenda and it's like no I actually don't care about Russia I don't care about what Putin's doing I think that this it costs us money for no reason I think it's a foolish strategy you're putting more risk on the table But it's just, it's such a funny thing that if just you agree with the other side. You could say that like if you didn't think our government should get rid of TikTok. Oh, so you're a Chinese socialist party advocate. You like the Chinese Communist Party running businesses in the United States of America. It's like, no, I don't like our government policing what technology you are aren't allowed to use. And I think they work with all the other social media platforms.

So, you know, whatever they're doing with big data, maybe we need more transparent. across the board because I don't think the other ones are innocent. I just think they're doing it in our government's interest. But it's amazing. Just the second, like, you know what I mean? You do anything that might benefit someone else, even if it's because you think it is for your interest, then it's just that

classic talking point. Well, you're a Putin apologist. Yeah, it is. For Russia. Yeah, it's unbelievable. It's so dumb. And it's, uh, but again, that is, it's a, it's a tactic that's been used

quite a bit. I don't think it's working very well at least uh fortunately but yeah no you're they're absolutely right that is what you hear it's constantly uh over the and it's funny it's funny too when it changes like i'm like wait what am i am i a defender of the mullahs in iran or hamas or putin or you know like which one make up your mind okay none of the yeah it's like oh this is all ridiculous like who even what it's always what was so crazy to me too is that it was like it's like you're like you know i don't want to bomb iran and you're like oh, so you love the Iranian regime? You want the Iranian regime to be stronger

and to continue to overrule their city? No, I don't care that. None of that has anything to do with what I'm talking about, which is I don't think we should be at war with them. Yeah. Yeah, yeah. I mean, we're like, so many. It's funny because when, like,

they never even apply this logic when they just haven't put a war on the table, like when they're not trying to sell one. So like in the same way, like, no one right now is advocating that we bomb North Korea, right? it. But if they started, they started rolling out a campaign for it, there would be some percentage of people who then go, well, yeah, of court, what do you fucking support North Korea by not wanting to bomb? You know what I mean? Like, they would just jump into it. But right now there's no push to do that. And so they're just not even thinking about it. But you're like,

right now, you, Mr. Warhawk guy, who's supporting our current status quo policy of not bombing North Korea, does that make you a Kim Jong-un asset? Because you support the status quo of not launching a war again it's all just like so stupid like or how about you could just feel that way for different reasons like there just there could be other reasons than you care about that regime but I always said I mean I've made this point many times but I always thought it was kind of funny because like I've read a lot about um you know the cold war and which is in itself you know a horrible uh you know terribly misguided policy that did a lot of damage to the United States of America but But, you know, and I'm sure, you know, for people listening or for you, Rob, like, those people probably know, like a little bit about, like, you know, Joseph McCarthy or the, which gets lumped together, which is not the case of separate things.

But there was the House Committee on un-American activities where famously, like, Americans were accused of being communists. This is what's known as, you know, McCarthyism or the Red Scare or any of this stuff where, like, people were being accused left and right of being. communists now the truth is that the i mean it's a long chapter in american history i won't go too deep into it but mccarthy was not completely wrong i mean there were communists who had infiltrated the state department and other kind of like sensitive areas in america um most people still look back at that as like oh this was like a fucked up thing to do where you just start accusing people of of being disloyal and then they could be blackballed or whatever um but i always said you know at least whatever side of that debate you're on, at least back then, there were communists.

Like, I mean, there were people who, like, identified as communist. There was a communist party. There were people who were sympathetic to the communist party. There was, like, that was a belief system that people had. The thing that's so funny about being, like, you know, you're a Putin stooge is you're just like, who does that apply to? Who in the United States of America is actually like, that is, I am sworn loyal to Vladimir Putin?

I just think the Russian model is the model that we need to follow or something like that. It's like, what is he a corrupt Republican, essentially? Like, all right? Like, what is it? It's the worst thing you can say about Vladimir Putin, is that he launched the war in Ukraine. Like, oh, he started a war. Okay. That seems to make him more, that makes him more similar to my leaders who I spend my whole

life hating. Like, what about that would I be, you know, admiring? Yeah, anyway, it's all pretty weird. So I did think, getting back to, let's talk a little bit about the Putin meeting. And then we could talk a little bit about Zelensky today because that's going on right now. I did think one of the things that I thought was interesting is that Vladimir Putin went out of his way to say that if Trump was president, the war wouldn't have happened, which was nothing more than sucking up. to Donald Trump. I mean, that was like, it was a clear way to say, I just validated that, you know, the thing he said was right. And he can kind of in a way, right, like Vladimir Putin

can say that with more credibility than any other person on the planet, right? Because like, how can you even really argue, you know, at least on the surface? Vladimir Putin's the guy who launched the war and he's saying it wouldn't happen. Well, then that just backs up with Donald Trump said. I think that Vladimir Putin's smart enough to know that that. that's how you win favor with Donald Trump, is to say, I'll make you look very good, Mr. President. But so, you know, it did just seem like, oh, he's trying to win over favor with President Trump here.

That being said, it was the tone from both of them was certainly very respectful and complimentary, and not at all what it seemed was being signaled by Donald Trump just like a week and a half earlier where he was giving Vladimir Putin timelines and threatening him with how bad things would be if he didn't follow them. So there was none of that at their summit. It was a much more cordial tone. All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is My Patriot Supply. This summer isn't just hot. It is historic. There's been flash flood warnings at 40-year highs, and it's not slowing down. There's

in towns underwater and roads that have been washed out. And in every crisis zone, the same scene, there's crowds standing in line waiting, waiting for bottled water, waiting for food, waiting for someone to show up and save them. If there's one thing I know, you don't want to be in a position where you're relying on someone else to save you if you don't have to be. That's why I always protect my family with my Patriot Supply. And right now, my Patriot Supply is giving away four weeks of emergency food. Just go to MyPatriotSupply.com slash problem to find out how you can claim your free four-week food supply and join millions of Americans who are preparing with my Patriot Supply, including me. Claim your free four-week kit today at my patriot supply.com

slash problem. That's my patriot supply.com slash problem. All right, let's get back into the show. I don't know. Any other thoughts on... Even just before the summit, you know, at least there a headline saying that Donald Trump was saying there's going to be severe consequences, which is like, you know, it's like double secret probation from Animal House. What severe consequences do you have left? And, you know, I mean, the back and forth with Trump, where he said 30 day deadline, and then he's like, well, we can't do a 30 day deadline. Let's have a 14 day deadline. There's no reason to wait or nine days. He was just like, we can't do 30. He seemed to walk back wanting to tariff any nation that's still buying the natural gas, because I,

I'm going to guess that that would probably create trade problems to tariff India at that level, but I don't know. I'd have to dig into that, but he seemed to walk that one back. And then the other one that it's somewhat interesting is that walking away and going, we're not going to require a ceasefire while we're engaging in the peace process, I would think, is actually better in Putin's interest because they're currently winning the war. And so I think that that's, if anything, that almost sounds to me like quite a concession, because I seem to remember from earlier talks demand for ceasefires

and part of what Trump one of Trump's gripes with Putin was he said he would get on phone calls with Putin and it would sound very good and then Putin would do massive bombing campaigns and Trump kind of saw that as a slap in the face and that Putin was not serious about peace or that they were just dragging it out

and that they were not willing to kind of that was almost the proof to Trump that Putin wasn't willing to engage in the peace process was ongoing attacks after he had friendly phone calls with him. So that's what I'm saying. It's all kind of circular and just comes down to, I think Donald Trump just needs to go, we're done with this.

And then for Europe to try and pick up the bill for a little while until they finally realize, all right, this is a mistake and we can't continue to do it. I think until it gets there, it feels very circular to me. I don't understand why Zelensky thinks he can stay in it. I don't know why the European nations think that they're going to repress Donald Trump, but literally a week before he finally decided to sit down with Putin, and it looked like he was trying to escalate.

Yep. No, it certainly did. And to your point, look, no deal has been reached here. And it is not even, you know, it's quite likely that Donald Trump is back in D.C. now he's talking to Zelensky and the Europeans. Now there's going to be a million warhawks in his ear. And I would not be surprised at all if he paid. Kivots back to that type of posture.

It's also possible. It just walks back away from this. Yes. Yeah, right. I mean, however, I will say, I think that the,

I think there's a likelihood that this war is, um, essentially is going to end sooner rather than later. I think that in a way, I think, you know, not, we'll see how this all goes,

but it, it's kind of what a lot of us have been saying all along is that the deal is going to end on Vladimir Putin's terms here and I don't really I don't think there's a way to insist that it doesn't and I think that the the Russian terms have been pretty clear from the very beginning of this they have now after this time like they're they're taking the Donbass region they're keeping Crimea. That much is a given. Now, it's somewhat up in the air as to whether that's all they're going to keep. In addition to that, I think they've been pretty clear that they're insisting on like a corridor to Crimea through some of those southern provinces that they hold right

now, but that they may be willing to give back. And then the other issue here, right, is that I think it's, what is it? I think like somewhere around a third of Dinesk is still controlled by Ukraine and Russia has the rest of it and they have all of Lujansk and they want that part and so this is what Donald Trump was, you know, indicating with the land swap deal like, oh, you'll get some territory back in the south and you'll give this territory up in the east and, you know, kind of selling it like, see, you each get a little bit of what you want, but really what it is is Vladimir Putin taking what he wants and leaving them the rest. But the, so that, that in itself, I'm not saying there's nothing tricky to working out the details of that.

And I think that the more that Vladimir Putin, the way he sees it is that, which I think is true, is that the more he dominates on the battlefield, the stronger a negotiating position he's coming to. You know, like if he had all of the Donbass region, he wouldn't even need to be talking about that. He wouldn't even need Ukraine. So what's the incentive there to either try to get it through negotiations or just win it on the battlefield? field. But so that's kind of the split. That's how it's going to end up going down. Many of us have been saying this the entire time. I mean, the deal, if you remember the deal that was agreed to in principle, I mean, it was, you know, it was never signed. It was, you know, in pencil, not in pen,

but the deal that famously Boris Johnson went over and broke up very early into the war in 2022 was that the bullet points of it were that Russia keeps Crimea. It's formally recognized their annexation of Crimea. The Donbass region would be like neutral essentially or would at least, I forget the exact language of the deal, but it was something like independence for the Donbass region or something, some more intensified version of the Mink Accords like Mink's Accords that there would be a, you know, like

strong federalism is some degree of independence for the Donbass region, and that Ukraine would agree to never enter NATO. That would be put its right. So now the deal is just moved in Putin's favor a little bit more. In fact, he's going to keep the Donbass region for his own screw independence, a corridor

to Crimea, Crimea and the Donbass officially recognized as Russian territory, and a promise to not join NATO. Like, it's still going to be the same bullet points just with hundreds of thousands of people more dead and Ukraine getting a little bit less like this is how it's going to end whether it ends tomorrow or it ends a year from now this is how the war is going to end something along these lines and um where the it seems at least at

this point that there has the shift that's happened slowly um because there's been shifts all around But the shift that's happened from, say, like, the war party, and by the war party, I mean, the establishment of the Democrats and the Republicans and the intelligence agencies and military industrial complex, NATO, and the Europeans, they do seem to have all walked off of the ledge of we're going to recover all territory. We can't give any territory to Vladimir Putin. What you hear them talking about more and more now, and this is particularly mouthed by Zelensky, is the security assurances. And when they're talking about security assurances, there's a built-in concession there, which is that like, okay, we know we're not getting Crimea. But what's, you know, they want security implied there is for what's left of Ukraine. So we're already kind of at that point where we're accepting that like that's the way the war is going to end.

But the security guarantees, and this is, I think, where Trump has really fucked everything up since he came. in. This is a big part of the reason of why he failed on his promise to end the war on day one or whatever is that the security guarantees are not, they're almost put out there by Zelensky like it's a minor little detail. Like, well, in addition of this, we sure would like, you know, like it's almost like put out there where like, like you're buying a new car and you're like, hey, could you throw the Sirius XM in for free or something? You know what I mean? Like, it's like a little detail, but it's not a little detail. That's what the entire war is over. That's like the central issue of the whole goddamn thing.

Because when you have a security guarantee, what does that mean? It means you're not neutral. Like that's really the essence of it, right? You don't have a security guarantee for your enemies. You don't have a security guarantee for neutral countries. You only give war guarantees to allies. That means you're on one side of this. And that's been Vladimir Putin's entire point the whole time,

is that you can't make Ukraine one of your sock puppets. You can't make Ukraine an extension of the United States of America, which is essentially what the whole thing has been an effort to do, right? And that's where, and so I do think that that there is the poison pill in this whole thing. And what exactly it means? Now, I'm not saying that I can conceive of a possibility where there's some way to end this war, where there's some level of security guarantee given like by the Europeans or something. like that, but there's not going to be an American war guarantee. That'll be enough for Putin to

keep the war on. Because if that's the case, then why the hell leave? Why don't I just take more territory? You know what I'm saying? So that's going to be the thing that's going to be the real hurdle here. I don't think anyone could pull this off. But to me, the security guarantee should basically be wars over. And Putin's agreeing, hey, I just throw Biden under the bus and shove it up Europe's ass put that on a bumper sticker it's sellable all right you sell out Biden by just saying we're never needed to happen and uh this was Biden's mess I would like to get along with the United States of America and I have no interest in taking any more territory and you got to make it Putin's got to make it very clear not looking for anything more but uh this we need for what we've

currently conquered we pull in Israel what we currently conquered we need for security purposes and then what I think you need is essentially if Putin you know gets all that and decides to take aggressive action again. No security guarantees, but I think you probably need a commitment from China and India and all the nations of the world for full sanctions and not to be buying natural gas. And then I actually think that that's your security guarantee. All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Kalshi. I'm really enjoying visiting Kalshi. I just downloaded their app. I like using it to check in on what's going on where the real prediction markets are.

And I've been seeing them pop up more and more on social media. You may have as well. If you don't know, Calci is America's first fully regulated prediction market. CFTC approved in all 50 states. So that means you can bet on just about anything. You can bet on whether the Democrats are going to take back the House of Representatives. You can bet on whether Donald Trump will run for a third term. You can bet on who the Democratic nominee is going to be.

But you can also watch these markets and see. where other people are betting, which I find very interesting. Go sign up today at calshy.com slash Dave. That's k-a-l-s-h-i.com slash Dave. You can sign up and trade right away Kalshi, where your gut meets real money. All right, let's get back into the show. Yeah, that might be the best way to do it. Here, let's play, because there was a clip of Zelensky here today.

I will say, Rob, we couldn't get through this full hour without mentioning he wore the t-shirt again oh really now this isn't this isn't his meeting with this isn't the meeting with Donald Trump yet so I like it's possible someone's holding the blazer for him somewhere

but here is from today in the meeting with some leaders in DC before like ahead of his meeting with Donald Trump I don't know if he's going to change but it's pretty wild but anyway here's Zelensky are you sir are you sir? Oh you're sir

Thank you so much. Mr. President, thank you, Mr. President, thank you very much to remind. Mr. President, thank you very much for your time. I know your time is busy. What I wanted to, would you just briefly was to I've done meeting with President, the Vice President, and the National Supervisor, Secretary of State, this is my area. I think, thank you so much.

So, first of all, we are thankful to the President for this invitation and the four months of what we will have. It's important signals about security guarantees, and that's why it's important that we are together with the United States and Europe, and the President accepted the meeting, common meeting, also after our bilateral, common meeting with Europeans. And so I'm so grateful that such big countries as UK, Finland, and, you know, and the President of Wonderry, the Secretary, Ruth, that they will come. And I think this will be important meeting.

And we will speak about the architecture, I think so, we will have time to speak about architecture of security guarantees. This is what really, I think, the most important. Good. Yes. I hope so. We will speak together. We will begin, of course, bilaterally, but I think mostly we can speak about it.

When we would be together sitting. All right. So really, look, the point of that was just to show you that he's not wearing a suit. that he's wearing the last time i think didn't he have like that uh kind of military sweater thing that was just full new york city comedian it seems like a shittier black t-shirt than i'm used to seeing him in um but really that look i mean this is and i don't know rob i mean maybe maybe this is just me um but it does it like it makes my blood boil but i don't know i just find look i mean he's talking about security guarantees over and over again i mean this is his big thick from his position of no

negotiating leverage whatsoever. There is nothing that he offer. Like, Vladimir Putin obviously has some negotiating leverage, right? Because he's conducting a war that we sure would like him to stop. And we have some negotiating leverage over Vladimir Putin because, like, we were the

ones who were threatening to bring Ukraine into NATO and we could, and he wants us to stop. And we were the ones who were sending weapons in and he'd like us to stop. So, like, there's some negotiation there. Zelensky is offering us nothing. Like, Just absolutely nothing, but yet he's sitting here demanding security guarantees.

And like, what is that? I don't know. Like, what does that mean? Like a security guarantee, it's like, if you think about it in a way, right, nobody is God. So nobody can give you a guarantee, like a real guarantee, right? Like, that doesn't actually mean anything. If I were to say to you, Rob, like, I guarantee your security. then what you would take that to mean is, like, to the best of my ability, I will try to

protect you or something like that, you know what I, but like, that's all I could do is try to fight the guy who's fighting you. And if he's tougher than me, I can't, then my guarantee is meaningless. But like, there is something where like, I would, I think like, um, you know, like, if someone tried to hurt my wife or my kids, I would do everything within my power to protect them but then just like some random other lady in my town goes i also demand a security guarantee you're like wait what you're in a position to demand that i get into a fight over you like that's my choice not yours and so i do just find this to be appalling um i also uh think you know this is and this is where donald trump really messed up with that whole mineral deal and all that talk is that

Donald Trump basically has, this is, it is crazy that we're this far into Donald Trump's presidency, like we're almost at the end of August. He's been president since January, and he still has not, like, extinguished this idea that we're going to give Ukraine a security guarantee, that we're not only going to say, hey, we're going to help you negotiate an end to this war after helping you fight this war for, for you know three years but we're going to say hey if you ever get in a war in the future we're on the hook for it if anyone's if there's ever an act of aggression against you in the future that's our job to protect you where do you get off demanding something like that and and like you know

the real look the real dynamic that's changed here and and i'll tell you i think the the main reason why the Hawks aren't talking about taking back Crimea and all of this stuff now, because they never thought they were going to do that. They just wanted to keep the war going as long as possible. That's always been the goal. It's just to hurt Russia as much as possible. And if you got to sacrifice Ukraine in order to do that, then sure, let's do it. But the real reason why all this talk is changing now is because the Ukrainian people are done.

They don't want to, I just saw another poll today. It's like right around 70 percent, 70 percent of the Ukrainian people want. on an immediate end to this thing a negotiated settlement meaning they're happy to give up some of their land to end this war they don't want to do this anymore they've they've seen what they were able to do with a blank check from the west and they know they don't have that blank check anymore why the hell would they want to keep fighting this war um and they they recognize that like hey if you don't get this deal done with vladimir putin and if vladimir putin decides that um i can't I can't work out a deal with these guys.

Then all of his incentives become to take as much territory as he can because you're not working out a deal anyway. And so if you don't have a guarantee about what's going to happen with the other territory, you don't take. You do have a guarantee if it's yours, you know? And that's essentially what Vladimir Putin's been saying this entire time. Is his not saying this is exactly right, but his argument has always been we try. He basically said, Ukraine can't be a part of the West.

They don't have to be a part of Russia. This is what Vladimir Putin's been saying for over 20 years. Ukraine doesn't have to be a part of Russia, but they can't be a part of the West. They can be independent if they want to be. That's acceptable. We can accept neutrality. But if the choice is there is no neutrality and neutrality means you're a puppet of the West, then I'll just take it and it will be.

mine. Like if it's not going to be neutral, it will be mine. It's not, the options are neutral or mine, not yours. That's been Vladimir Putin's position this entire time. And so it, listen, what we can hope for here is that seeing as how the Ukrainian people want none of this anymore and seeing as how Zelensky is still not in a suit and tie and pissed off Donald Trump last time and looks like he might do it again, that maybe at least, Vladimir Putin puffed up his ego, Zelensky is pissing him off, and at some point Donald Trump wipes his hands, you know, washes his hands of this mess and goes, all right, we're not giving you a security guarantee. Give him the, give him the territory he's taken, and that's it.

I'm not optimistic that we're there yet, but I am cautiously optimistic that that might be sooner than later. Final thoughts to you, Rob, and then we'll wrap up. If you want more porch, visit a local porch. And this weekend. And where did I say I was pecking, Indiana, St. Louis, outside of Cincinnati, and then outside of Cleveland, Ohio, then Philadelphia, and then back at Pub Cousin, Myersville, Maryland, the original porch for a stand-up, a little concert for my shedcast friends and the smokeout bug out. Hell yeah. The world connecting with- There you go. That's the key to the piece. Nice getting drunk at a porch with Rob. And then, yep, see all you guys out in Austin at the comedy mothership this weekend. And then me and Rob will be on the road a bunch for the rest of the year comic dave smith for all those tickets all right catch you guys next time peace