Part Of The Problem - It's A Disaster Already

Episode Date: March 3, 2026

Dave Smith brings you the latest in politics! On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave and Robbie "the fire" Bernstein discuss the immediate fallout of the attack on Iran, Trump's comments that more Americans will die, statements from Ted Cruz, and more.Support Our Sponsors:Recover & Regenerate. Click www.twc.health/problem and use code PROBLEM for 10% off on every order + Free Shipping for US residentsBodyBrain - Go to BodyBrainCoffee.com, use code DAVE20 for 20% off your first orderProlon - https://prolonlife.com/potpBrunt Workwear - http://bruntworkwear.com/ Use code PROBLEMPart Of The Problem is available for early pre-release at https://partoftheproblem.com as well as an exclusive episode on Thursday!PORCH TOUR DATES HERE:https://robbernsteincomedy.com/eventsFind Run Your Mouth here:YouTube - http://youtube.com/@RunYourMouthiTunes - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/run-your-mouth-podcast/id1211469807Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/4ka50RAKTxFTxbtyPP8AHmFollow the show on social media:X:http://x.com/ComicDaveSmithhttp://x.com/RobbieTheFireInstagram:http://instagram.com/theproblemdavesmithhttp://instagram.com/robbiethefire#libertarianSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

What's up, what's up everybody. Welcome to a brand new episode of Part of the Problem. I am Dave Smith. He is Robbie the Fire, Bernstein. We will be out in Pittsburgh this weekend. Comicdaversmith.com. Come grab tickets. We haven't, I don't think me and you have done shows together in Pittsburgh ever.

I haven't been there on quite a while. I think I haven't been there since we had like a Mises Caucus event in Pittsburgh a while back. Anyway, really looking forward to going out there. So come on out and see us this weekend. I do apologize. The show is starting a little bit late today. I was on Pierce Morgan panel. And it,

you know, it might have been one of them. Oh, dude, Ben Ferguson, who I used to know from back in, I think we met like when I was doing S.E. Cup show.

If you remember, like back in those days, it's like a Bush, George W. Bush conservative. Dude, it was, I mean,

he just, it was bad. Dude, he literally just had, look, I got to understand because he just knew he couldn't win the argument. He just talked over me the entire time.

The entire show just became us talking over each other. And then I did do it back to him a little bit because it was just like, oh, he ruined my whole last time to speak. So now I'm going to do it to him. So it just turned into a total shit show. But it was kind of interesting because Jack Pesabiac was on too. And, you know, I probably should reach out to him. I'd be interested to talk to him more about it. But he just kind of seemed like, man, I can't even defend this shit.

And then they got like that Jojo chick and Tim, Miller. So it's like two Biden Democrats over here who are just like trash and Trump because it's the opportunity and you're like, shut up. Like I don't really want you on my side. Like I just wanted to talk to Jack the whole time I'm like, Jack, you got to admit to that we have to stop supporting the president now. Because Jack Pasebiak, you know, he was a he had just put out this mini documentary like a few months ago on the war in Iraq that was excellent, dude. Like it was excellent. Like I would stamp my name on that documentary and go, yes, he hit all of it, the clean break and the Israel lobby and the seven countries in five years and he went through the whole thing. And then, you know, I mentioned to him

today, you know, remember, because it's so funny, because we'll get into it. There's a bunch, obviously, more developments and fallout from the war. But it was Dick Cheney. He had in the documentary, Dick Cheney's now infamous meet the press appearance where they ask him at the beginning of the war, how long will the war in Iraq last? And he goes, it'll be weeks, not months. That was his quote. It'll, this is going to be,

it won't take months. Come on, months. That's ridiculous. Meanwhile, you know, we, there was a bloody civil war for eight years and a military occupation for

nearly 20. And, you know, so you, you know, you get into these things. It's easy to say, oh,

this will be quick. And like, maybe this one will be. I mean, maybe Donald Trump will just stop. But man, Seems unlikely. You know, I wanted to, I'm curious, just Rob, like, just where what you're thinking about, you know, 24 hours since our last podcast on this.

But one of the things that I'm thinking about that I think I maybe didn't, I maybe didn't do as good a job as I should have in the last episode of really making this point. But I think the fact that, because now, by the way, this has been verified by a bunch more reporting, this is real, that after. the Ayatollah was killed. Donald Trump, through his Italian negotiators, their conduit there, they offered a ceasefire. Like Donald Trump tried to do the 12-day war thing and take another off-ramp,

but the Iranians said no. And they've been responding for 36 hours since then. And the thing that's so, like I think that's a really important dynamic, that that has shifted. I tried to make this point on yesterday's show, but I think it bears repeating or maybe trying to make it in a better way that, you know, when I said Donald Trump had changed the incentives for the Iranians, it's like, well, look, for all of this time, and really, obviously, this was demonstrated in the 12-day war, Iran has not wanted it. They don't want to get destroyed, obviously, right? But now they've created a situation where the Iranians go, dude, we can't do that now. You know, okay, it's one thing if you say, hey, we're going to bomb Fordo or we're going to take out your nuclear sites and then go, hey, you pretend to respond.

Now let's make a deal. They go, okay, let's make a deal. But we're going to come in and murder your Ayatollah and his family. Now let's call a ceasefire. From the Iranian perspective now, they're like, no, then we need. know you're just going to keep fucking with us forever until you overthrow us. So now their self-preservation calculation is that we got to give you a black eye. We got to make sure, you know, some people die.

Now, already since then, since this war launched, there's, I think, is it four Americans? Their Central Command is admitting have died. I think a dozen or so other have been. injured. I think three people died in Austin, Texas in a blowback terrorist attack. Oh, is that a terrorist attack? Well, he fucking, I mean, look, I guess we don't have the, all the details yet, but he had an Iranian flag and I'm with Allah shirt on when he started shooting people up. So it was like maybe it was motivated by that, like a pretty likely guess.

Like I said yesterday, it's the worst way to be vindicated, but around really seems to not be playing around this time. All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is the wellness company. Every workout, injury, or surgery creates microscopic good and bad damage inside the body. Muscle inflammation and tissue breakdown can peak within 72 hours after physical stress, which is why recovery matters just as much as training. Meat, regenerate from the wellness company, your new recovery resource. The first ever oral triple peptide recovery drop designed for full body healing without injections. It works by supporting the body's natural repair process through a proprietary aquasome peptide delivery system.

At the core is BPC 157, a body protective peptide known for supporting gut lining integrity while helping tendons, ligaments, and soft tissue recover faster. No needles, no mess, just clean liquid drops powered by aquasome delivery for superior absorption. So if you're ready to recover smarter, go to TWC. Dot Health slash Problem and use the promo code problem to get 10% off plus free shipping. That's TWC. com slash problem, promo code problem for 10% off plus free shipping. All right, let's get back into the show. What are your thoughts since last we spoke?

Well, still, yeah, I mean, I was hoping that there would be. the easy off ramp of Donald Trump saying, hey, it's a new regime, even if it's not a new regime. In terms of, you know, taking unnecessary risks, apparently Donald Trump's leading picks for who might take over for Kalmani, they accidentally killed as well in the strike. So he doesn't even currently know who he might want to team up with if they were to forge a new government. I think the thing that's really standing out to me, and it resonates from your comments on the last episode is just that Donald Trump is now the old Republican Party. It's all the people that we voted against and had no interest in as the, you know,

establishment politicians are the people that are taking a victory lap on the news station, speaking for Trump. And you're like, this is what Trump was here to do, is to thwart your guys, because we all hated you guys and we hated this stuff. And now we're back. You guys are in full control. I was listening to the Ted Cruz interview, and he's talking about briefings. Donald Trump the day beforehand.

And I mean, the way he's selling it is almost like Ted Cruz went in there, pulled up his pants and showed him who's boss and said, here's what we got to do. And Trump went, yes. And you know what happened in the elections? We all voted against Ted Cruz because that's not what we wanted. And it's incredible that we thought we were thwarting the Republican Party

or voters did. They thought they were getting a new Republican party that was actually America first. And now, I mean, we've got a better salesman for their bullshit. Yeah, yeah. Although, I mean, I don't know. I don't know how effective of a salesman he's really going to turn out to be. You know, there's, one of the things that's so interesting, right, is that even from, and I kind of pounced on that guy Ben Ferguson on the show for this, but even from the Republican perspective, who's when they're, you know, trying to somehow justify this war on the just, it's like, it feels like a, what's the word I'm looking for? A haj-page. What is that? where you just like randomly take thing like that's kind of the justification for this war is just like i don't know what um they're they're muslim and uh they uh also nuclear weapons and they're like you destroyed the nuclear weapons you're like intercontinental ballistic missiles uh are marines

remember the bayroot bombing you remember that 60 years ago you know like it's just they're like whatever they can grab but he goes at one point like after peers asked him a question he goes he goes well i mean you got to admit because i said Donald Trump just destroyed his presidency. And then he goes, well, you got to admit if this goes bad, Dave's right. And he goes, yeah, yeah, yeah, if this goes bad. And it's like, okay, so he goes, if this goes bad, the Democrats are going to win the midterms. And you're like, okay, so, but if you're admitting that if this goes bad, which seems like a good chance,

like it seems like it's already gone pretty bad, Rob. So if this goes bad, then the Democrats win the midterms and the Democrats win the presidency in 2008. And so if you just think about like the average Republican what they've been saying about the Democrats, you're like, so you're willing to risk our liberty to maybe bring liberty to the Iranian people. And that is America first how. Like it's just I almost like I understand why Ben had to just interrupt me the whole time because what are you going to do? Have that argument. What are you going to make the debate that trying to liberate the Iranian things?

people which may, to your own admission, may not work at all is this? You know, the other point that I wanted to make on yesterday's show that I don't think I did. I don't remember. Maybe I did. I don't think I made this point, but I think it's an important one. You know, when Donald Trump, so I knew this about, and I had made this point previously about the first Iraq war under George H.W. Bush, the Persian Gulf War in 91. And, but I had never made it about Panama.

You know, after, I never really knew that much about Panama. I probably knew like, you know, I don't know, like the broad strokes of the thing. Like, I knew Noriega was the CIA's guy until he wasn't. And I knew he was like in bed with the drug cartels. I knew Nas liked to rap about him a lot. And I knew that, I knew that we went in there and we took him out. But after Venezuela, everybody was like, all the hawks were bringing up Panama. as the example. Look, this is another success. So I kind of like started reading a little bit more

about it. And one of the really interesting things was that Panama was just like with the first what they, the Hawks were saying at the time was what Ben Shapiro is saying now about the Venezuela, that it cured Iraq War syndrome. Okay, they were all saying this cured Vietnam syndrome. That's what they were saying. That like, you know, ever since Vietnam, we have this real problem where Americans don't want to get into stupid bloody wars. But look, we just showed them that it could be a stupid, not that bloody war. So now, you know, whatever we want. And anyway, there's been all types of reporting about,

and you could also see that the Hawks have all been bragging about this. But there's been a lot of reporting that this is Donald Trump's, you know, mindset. And I had this confirmed from people who are very close to him. that essentially he looks at the success of Venezuela, the success, whatever that means, like what did you actually do there? But he looks at the success of Venezuela and goes, and that's a big part of his mentality with this.

Like, no, I'm really smart. This is what all the Hawks are saying. Yeah, that was with dumb leadership. This is with smart leadership. And so you end up realizing that there's like a hidden cost, even when these military adventures are somewhat, what they would call successful, what we might call not catastrophic in their results. But there's a hidden cause to that, too.

And the cost is that that breeds all this hubris. And now they start going, oh, yeah, we can do it. And this is literally, I remember living through this. This is what happened after the first war in Iraq, is that everybody said, hey, this was so successful and easy. We didn't even lose any troops. We can do stuff. And then we were bogged down in that country for the next 30 years.

you know and so it just you know Donald Trump can sit here and say it's going to be weeks not months but we've heard that before and I think if you're really paying attention to the fucking you know the signal not the noise here the big news as of today Rob

is that both Donald Trump and Pete Hegeseth the two most important people who you could hear from on this issue the commander in chief and the secretary of war both said they're not ruling out boots on the ground. Well, yeah, I mean, it's it, listen, I, I'm, yeah, it's hard to believe in when they promised us no wars. And now we're already in a war. And now they're going, well, it's going to be a quick war. And now they're already teasing, well, not only, uh, we haven't done our, our big and major

strike. And listen, if we got to do boots on the ground. I'm not, I don't care about the polls. I don't care about anything. We're getting this done. It doesn't sound like, it might, it might still be a quick operation, but it's starting to sound like you're teasing the American people on, hey, this might be a little bit of a bigger operation and it might be more drawn out. Yeah. And one of the big questions so far has been, can they bring about a regime change through these bombing campaigns, you know, without boots on the ground? And, you know, that's an open question. We really don't know. But, it does seem at least so far, obviously, we're only a few days into this thing, but it seems so far

that, well, they were able to kill the Ayatollah and his family member and evidently a lot of senior people. But in the response since then, in the, what is it going on 24 hours since then, or 48 hours, excuse me, the regime has not been taken out. You know, you look at all of these responses. They've hit almost everywhere, dude. like the UAE, Saudi, Bahrain, like all over the place has been touched by Iran. So the regime is still there and strong.

And so now this becomes an interesting thing here. Like essentially, because we've seen lots of reports of senior generals saying like, hey, we only have a couple months of this in us. And the big thing that I was reading is that they were saying they don't have enough anti-missile missiles, meaning like at a certain point, they're not going to be able to shoot these missiles down. as they're coming. And that makes them that much more deadly. Now, it's a big, unanswered question. How long can around keep this up? You know, like what happens there?

But look, I'll say this, even if, which is possible, you know, everyone always brings up the Marines getting killed in Lebanon. And, you know, what people don't mention is what Ronald Reagan did after that, which is he left. And wrote about this in memoirs and said, I promised I would never turn tail and run. You know? But then, and then his line, which is a great line, as he goes, I underestimated the irrationality of Middle Eastern politics. You know, like basically being like, hey, this is too crazy. We got to get out of here. But like, so look, there is a chance.

And maybe I'm starting to think the best case scenario. Because Donald Trump just realizes that and just stop. And just that's it. We're done. But I got to say, Rob, I think in that case, he's already destroyed his presidency. Like, I really think here Donald Trump's in a position where this has to be a success. And not Venezuela where he pretends it's a success. You know, there's a big difference when you get Americans killed. It's a different thing to go over there, get Americans killed and then go, wait, you said it was regime change. And now there is no regime change. I don't know. Anyway, here let's play this.

Here was Donald Trump in a really extraordinary moment addressing the Americans who have been killed. We pray for the full recovery of the wounded and send our immense love and eternal gratitude to the families of the fallen. And sadly, there will likely be more. Before it ends, that's the way it is. Likely be more. But we'll do everything possible. where that won't be the case. We pray.

Here is Donald Trump. I mean, I thought that was quite a statement, dude. Just straight up saying like, yeah, they're dead and there'll be more, likely be more. You know? And as you pointed out, Rob, you alluded to there that Donald Trump had made a statement earlier that the biggest wave of attacks they haven't seen yet. So I guess that's coming. So his response right now is that we're going to hit them really.

hard. And again, again, there's two options here, right? It is kind of a binary in the sense that either topples the government or it does not. And if it does topple the government, well, then everybody is on record acknowledging we have no one else. We played you yesterday, Lindsay Graham. I don't know. What happens then? It's a tool time, home improvement sound. That's what we got of what happens then and if the regime is still standing then what happens these are major goddam questions that don't seem to have positive answers to them i mean he's really uh hey a couple deaths no big deal we're going to see more i mean talk about priming the american people for uh hey there's going to be boots on the ground and it that's been everything of the conversation is

getting americans killed not having boots on the ground and now he's just very casually playing that down as, hey, these are no big deal. It's no big deal. If a couple people die, no big deal if we got to put boots on the ground, really seems like he's getting the American people ready for more. All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Brunt Workwear. I love telling people about this company.

They make the most comfortable work boot I have ever worn in my entire life. I love them. And they're really cool looking, too. I know Lewis was wearing his at the podcast last week. Yeah, people really love these things. I live in the country now. I got a big house and I got a big property. When it snows, I got to get out there and I got to take care of this whole thing. And so I needed a good pair of work boots. But as most of you know, traditionally speaking, if you want a good pair of work boots that can do the job and last, they're going to be brutally

uncomfortable. Or you could have a comfortable pair of shoes, but they're not going to stand up to the elements when you really need them. Brunt workwear has solved that problem. Brunt was tired of the workwear brands that we're out there cutting corners. You work too hard to be stuck in uncomfortable boots that don't hold up. So they built something better, boots that are insanely comfortable and built for any job site. And for a limited time, our listeners can get $10 off at Brunt when you use the promo code problem.

Just go to bruntworkware.com and use the promo code problem and you're good to go. Bruntworkware.com promo code problem for $10 off. All right. Let's get back into the show. Yeah. Yeah. And I mean, it's just, again, like we said the other day, it's the Lindsay Graham administration now. Well, okay.

Well, Lindsay Graham ran for president alongside Donald Trump in 2016 as a never Trump or Warhawk. He didn't come close to getting 1% of the vote. But that's who we got now. And so I don't know. I think there is, it's, it's, it's, It's never good when any president, no matter who it is, whether it's Obama, whether it's Biden, whether it's George Bush, or whether it's Donald Trump. It's never good when a president destroys their presidency because that's bad for the country. It is particularly terrible when Donald Trump, who had positioned himself as being really the only candidate who had a shot to win, who was against the Bushes, against the Clintons, against CNN, against the deep state.

against us. When he destroys his presidency, that is really tragic for all American patriots. It doesn't bring me any pleasure that this is the case. That being said, we didn't get to make these decisions. We just got to debate about them. We did a pretty good job of that. But now the dust is settled and it's President Lindsey Graham. I got to oppose President Lindsey Graham. I have no choice. All good people. I think that was God's first commandment was you have to oppose President Lindsey Graham. It should have been if it wasn't. And it's amazing how we're just not, I mean, we never get a straight story from Trump, but even Hegset, that's, this is not a regime change war, but it is. We're not looking for a prolonged war and we got clear. We're not the dummies of the

previous ones, but this might go on longer, but don't worry, it's not going to go on forever. It's just a lot of contradictory statements. Well, also just like when they keep the, look, I mean, and I will say this, right, because I don't, just, be clear. I still don't think we're going to see boots on the ground in this. And not just because I think like Trump is wise or something like that. That's clearly gone out the window a long time ago. But just simply because there is nowhere near the popular support to do something like that. And listen, man, this is not Iraq or Afghanistan. I mean, I don't see how you could possibly invade around without like minimum 500,000 troops. And I do think on some level,

like they know that's a bloodbath if they do that. So like there's just no way. I mean, that totally changes the calculation of everything. You know, once you invade the country, you de facto become your government and now the insurgents have a target. You know, whereas right now it's just the Iranian military can hit whatever they can reach. But if another government rises or if America invades now there can be an insurgency and so i just don't see that happening just for logistic reasons but they're keeping the option on the table and you know even that alone is a really bad sign it's a really bad sign that this is not nobody is saying like this is the 12-day war they're they're like no no no no this is like dick cheney said weeks not months and they're telling us months

that's where we're starting at. Not saying that that means it's going to be the same, but it doesn't bode well, for sure. All right. Anything else that we should hit or you want to get into some of these clips here? Let's get into clips.

All right. Why don't we, by the way, here is, let's play the J.D. Vance. This was from back after the 12-day war in 2025, where it's the I-empathize clip here. Let's play that one. I certainly empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East.

I understand the concern, but the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents, and now we have a president who actually knows how to accomplish America's national security objectives. So this is not going to be some long, drawn out thing. We've got in, we've done the job of setting their nuclear program back. We're going to now work to permanently dismantle that nuclear program over. the coming years and that is what the president has set out to do simple principle iran can't have a nuclear weapon that has animated american policy over the past 130 days it's going to continue to be a driving force of our policy in the middle east for the next three and a half years vice i certainly

empathize it's um it's very nice that j d vans empathizes with us i hope j d vans can empathize with people who will never vote for j d vans um but isn't that it that's that's it right right what they've been saying all along no no see the problem isn't like there's these these guys like us rob who think the problem is the military industrial complex or the problem is interventionist foreign policy or the problem is launching wars of aggression and wars of choice but no no no see the real problem is just that they were dumb but donald trump is so smart he said this six months after we had to go attack the country for the exact same reasons that he brags that we had set back And again, it's just the, the incoherence of all of this, Rob.

We did the 12-day war, so we don't have to do what we have to do right now. Oh, and that one was a success. They'll still brag about the 12-day war. Totally obliterated. That's what I remember. Mm-hmm. They learned their lesson. For about till winter.

It's been totally obliterated, at least through the fall. That's what we got out of the, uh, the 12-day war. All right. Let's see. Hold on. I wanted to let's go. Let's go to the last one I sent.

Natalie, which is the Anna Paulina. Did you see this? This is her on MSNBC. You're called MS. Now. I thought she was one of the better ones. Maybe I was just suckered by her good looks,

but she's been good on a couple topics. Most recently, the Epstein stuff. And then I saw this clip in. And I was like, oh, man, I didn't realize how, A, how dumb she was and B, how I guess bought and paid for she is on this issue. Yeah, Rob always falls for, he thinks the stripper really likes him. Doesn't, here, let's play this clip. Where, can you just tell me really quickly, where have they killed thousands of Americans in America? I didn't say they killed thousands of Americans in America.

I said that they have been responsible for thousands of Americans being killed. And I think that that's easily something that you can verify. I don't know, state-sponsored terrorism, for starters. Are you serious right now about that whole thing? I'm not going to list out exact, exact specific locations. Are you talking about it? Are you talking about the Iraq war with the U.S. invaded? You could start up by the three that they just killed.

Okay, the whole point in your network, if you want to actually talk about the facts, but I'm not going to stay here and argue with you about something that's commonly expected in a nice. I mean, you don't have a good understanding of the Congress. I mean, you don't have a good understanding of conflict. Well, I'm the one that's getting the briefing is not you. You're a pundit offering your opinion because you want click-Bee but are actually interested in the substance.

No, no, not at all. I was actually asking you. We can talk about the fact that that millions upon millions of dollars to the Iranian regime, or do you not want to address that because it's not supported by your opinion and your network? No, not at all. Is this really even something that we're going to actually get to substance here? Are you going to continue to do it?

No, it seems like you just want to filibuster. It seems like you don't really want to have a good faith conversation. Or you just don't like what I'm saying. No, no, we would have invited you on the air. This happens every time I'm on with you. Yeah, you keep coming on every time and you keep stating a lot of things that are incorrect. The United States launched an attack on Iran. Except for you.

The United States, the United States launched a war against Iran right now. Iran retaliated in which American members, you can call whatever you want to call it, but at the end of the day, the Iranians responded and killed three American service members. So what we're trying to get at is you make an assertion on this air that it's not an invasion when America sends fighter jets and Israel sent fighter jets into another country. are not going to happen. Congress will not vote on war with Iran because that is not something that we support and that is not something that the administration supports. But if you want to talk about what, if you want to talk about. But I guess you think article two is more important. Article two is when the U.S. citizens and our military are in direct imminent threat, the president reserves the authority. Yeah, well, he hasn't made that case to the American public

for Congress. And that's the problem. And that's why he's not going to give you classified intelligence He's not supposed to give it to me. He's supposed to give it to members of Congress. He's supposed to go give it to members of Congress. That's exactly why members of you're only one. There are 435 members and 100 senators and others have not gone. You're not the only one who gets to speak on behalf of the American people. Prior to the strike. Anyway, unfortunately we're out of time. There was actually a briefing with it. There we go. You don't want to hear the facts. They got a briefing.

Hear the facts. I'm telling you what other members of Congress are saying. All right here, you can turn this off. God, it is obnoxious. It is literally this is essentially what happened, to me on Pierce Morgan today, like where they just try to filibuster. They're just like, I'm just going to keep talking, man. And it's amazing, dude, how pathetic she is where she goes, he goes, oh, she's killed thousands of Americans, wherever they killed thousands of Americans. And she goes, number one state sponsor of terror. Like she just, she just literally hits another Fox News talking point because she doesn't

like, oh shit, I have to back that statement up. You know, like what? I don't know. I'm not going to get into this right now. I know you brought me onto the show and you asked me a question, but I'm not going to get into that right now. Are you seriously going to ask me to support my claim that they've killed thousands of Americans? Terrorism.

All right. What terror attacks? Where are the thousand American deaths? Are you seriously going to ask me that right now? Really? You're going to ask me that? Well, we are on a new show. You did just say it.

Yeah, like, what are we? Like, I don't know. Yeah, like, and then she goes, they just killed three Americans. Like, yeah, because you launched this war. Like, what? You're going to, wait, you're using that. as an example, retaliatory strikes. Like, all right, but that's a little bit different than just coming over and killing

random Americans on U.S. soil. It's like, yeah, if you start a war with a country, they might shoot back at you. That is quite a different statement. It's also just so rich. If there's never going to be boots on the ground because Congress won't approve it. Congress is supposed to approve strikes. This is the first I'm hearing of a claim that they got pre-authorization. or that they notify no no they listen man there's and and it doesn't even matter it's not even

congress is supposed to declare war i mean the the president has the authority as she even says they are right to repel an imminent attack but rob again this most incoherent and i mean this out of all the terror wars the justification for this one is the most incoherent and i'm not saying they weren't all lies i mean this one's based off a lot of lies too and all that stuff you know Gaddafi is about to go genocidal was the argument for Libya. Now, that was a lie, but there's at least a coherent argument there, that we're fighting this as a kind of liberal interventionist, we're trying to save people who are about to get killed.

You could at least, like, wrap your head around what they're claiming here. This one, they're admitting that there was no imminent attack. You know, did you see, Rob, this is another thing that happened since we recorded last, was that a few of the people in the administration were floating out this thing that we had intel that Iran was about to attack. And they were about to launch a preemptive attack. And then the Pentagon came out and goes, now that's not true.

We didn't have any of that. So like, there's not even an argument here that there was an imminent attack that was about to come. And that's the only argument that would give him constitutional authority to launch this at all. Doesn't matter? And look, I mean, to claim it's not a war. Isn't it funny?

Because they're essentially what they're arguing is that Pearl Harbor wasn't an act of war. 9-11 wasn't an act of war. You know, those were strikes. You see how ridiculous that it? Like, we wouldn't, if any other country just started bombing us and then killed President Trump, we wouldn't consider that an act of war? Really? Is that right?

Because also, Rob, they're simultaneously saying, Iran has been at war with us since 1979. Wait, so, chanting mean things is war. But attacking another country and killing their leadership is not war. Again, I mean, if you can tell me that's not incoherent definitions, then I don't know what you mean by that. Are you seriously going to ask me this right now?

It is a good technique. It does put me on the back. foot a little bit. You're like, well, I seriously? I mean, well, yeah, it seemed like a reasonable thing to ask. You made a statement and I asked you how you can back that up. Yeah, that does seem like a very reasonable

thing to ask. Yeah. Yeah, I just don't, you know, there's also been all types of reports that it is, they're very concerned like at the Pentagon about this. They are, they kind of feel like we do. right now. Like they're going like, ah, shit, dude, I don't know where this goes. And I don't know if this

really gets out of hand. A lot of moving parts in this. And this is what they're coming out with. Like, this is what they got. You know, as you, as you said at the beginning of the show, which I thought was a very good way to put it, is that you're like, look, people voted for Donald Trump to be the antidote to all of this stuff. And, you know, when Donald Trump was campaigning, which is, you know, all he's ever been good at. But when he was campaigning to be president, you know, who gave the keynote speech at the Republican National Convention? There's Tucker Carlson. You know, that's who he went with. I mean, look, Tucker Carlson was by far the biggest conservative in America. Tucker Carlson had the number one show in all of cable news at Fox News,

the Fox News 8 p.m. hour. And then he got fired and he leaves and he's bigger than he ever was at Fox News. Tucker Carlson is currently, if you check the charts, he's number one. It's the biggest news podcast in the country. And he had Ted Cruz on and just fucking destroyed Ted Cruz. And the entire country, like the entire audience looks at this thing and goes, oh my God, Tucker just obliterated Ted Cruz, clearly loyal to Israel over the United States of America.

I mean, literally says the reason he ran for Senate was to be Israel's biggest defender in the Senate, right? And then Donald Trump sides with him. Man, does this seem bad? All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is, of course, body, brain coffee. You love it. I love it.

I drink it all the time. I genuinely love it. It tastes great and I feel great when I drink it. this is the company created by my brother, Lewis J. Gomez, but this is genuinely an amazing product. It's not just a delicious cup of coffee. It also naturally helps you boost testosterone, which listen, if you're like me, if you're a guy in your 40s, in your 50s, you notice you start to feel you slow down a little bit. You don't have as much energy. You don't have as quick recovery. This is a great way to naturally boost testosterone. If you don't want to take a bunch of supplements,

you don't want to do injections or something like that, just have a great taste in a cup of coffee every morning. Plus, you're supporting Louis J. Gomez, who really is the guy who convinced me to start podcasting and start doing stand-up and all of that. So I love him like a brother. You should too. We're going to blow this thing up. We're going to make sure he knows that it was our fans who did it. We're going to make Lewis rich, but also have him always know that we're the ones who got them there. We're going to go to bodybrain coffee.com. Use the promo code Dave 20 that will get you 20% off your entire order. Bodybraincoffee.com promo code Dave 20 for 20% off. All right. Let's get back to the show.

Did you see me ratio the shit out of Ted Cruz on Twitter yesterday, by the way? Oh, no. Tell me about this. Oh, yeah. Ted Cruz, fucking, because this is the new world we live in now, Rob. How crazy is this? That when they launch a war, senators have to argue with me on Twitter about why they should launch the war. He picked the fight. He threw the first shot. Yeah, Ted Cruz. Here, I missed this. You got to tell me this. This is great. Okay, so Ted Cruz here, let me, uh. Because I, I did see that.

at least on my Twitter, I never know if it's the, like, my personal algorithm or if that's what it's showing on all of Twitter, but on like the sidebar where it shows news stories, you were trending for arguing with, uh, with some other guy, but I would have thought that if there was a Ted Cruz moment, that, that should have been what registered. Yeah, this is, um, so this is what Ted Cruz said to me. So I, uh, I, I called, uh, Donald Trump a traitor. There's one word tweet. I just said traitor. And, uh, that, that tweet went super viral. So I was, you know, it's got like 75,000 likes on it. So I was trending for that. And so then Ted Cruz, now I missed this for like eight hours. It's like, I don't know.

It was like, I think it was like late at night or whatever. Let me see. Yeah, it was one in the morning. So I missed this. I was asleep. So he's, you know, he texts me this at one in the morning. I wake up at like 6 a.m. I don't check my phone first thing. You know, I get the kids breakfast and do all that. So it's like maybe seven in the morning or something. When I see. this. But so he, this is what Ted Cruz responded to me. He goes, understand this imbecile thinks Trump is a traitor.

And then he said, he's a leftist masquerading as right of center. Which I just thought, that's, that's what I masquerade as right of center. I'm a fucking anarchist, dude. Like, what are you talking about? That's how I always, that's how I always try to present myself, Rob. It's just a little

to the right of the center, you know? I'm just kind of like a centrist, but like a little, maybe one click to the right of the... I'm an abolish it all guy, you know, whatever. Ted Cruz doesn't know anything, but that's what he had to say. It's also right of center, so you mean what a lot of voters would actually want?

Right, right. He's not the extreme right wing that Donald Trump decided that he would actually be once he got into office. So how dare he call Donald Trump a traitor for going... And I don't even know, is war extremely right? Maybe, I don't know. Yeah, I mean, whatever. In his, yes, if you let a bunch of Jewish atheist, Jewish atheist former communists

convince you that that's what right wing is, is to be for war all the time or something, sure. But so I, dude, I responded back to him. And I said, Americans are dead because of the war of choice for Israel that you support. You're both traitors. I did love you as the penguin and Batman returns. And then I said, hey, remember when Trump trashed your wife and you took it like a bitch and still supported him? And then I just said, are we done here?

And dude, I mean, I fucking just ratioed the shit out of him, dude. Like, it was like within minutes. He had, which by the way, if you know I have Twitter word, this is all dumb. But if you know what Twitter works, it's like you're kind of behind the ball if you miss the tweet for like 10 hours. You know what I mean? Before he's, because he's a, I mean, it was like within minutes. Just fucking ratio to. And I don't know, whatever.

It's all dumb. It's all dumb Twitter fights. But it is a weird, it is a weird thing about the new reality we live in where, like, he felt like he had to come take me on. And then also you're like, oh, you come, he calls me an imbecile. It's like, oh, dude, you want to be vicious here? Like, is that what you want to do? Do like vicious insults.

Like, all right, I'm going to come a lot harder than imbecile. I'm going to bring up that Trump called your wife a dog face. Remember that? Remember when Trump said your wife? wife had a dog face and then you just still supported them because he's fighting a war for Israel. Yeah. Jeez, Ted, that's rough. In defense of Ted Cruz, not everyone is wealthy enough to buy women off of Epstein and import them from Eastern Europe. So, you know, it is true. Not everyone had that kind of in. Well, inflation is really hurt. Inflation is really hurt people

who are in the market for that. What I find shocking with Ted Cruz, maybe I know we have all clips. Maybe we can get to some of Ted Cruz clips here in a second, but it's twofold. It's one, I mean, he's claiming to have had heavy influence on Donald Trump here. And it's exactly what we've been talking about was this is what we thought we were rebuking in the Republican Party. But also, he's supposed to be the smarty pants guy in terms of like the Republicans. And I mean, he couldn't have looked dumber with Ted Cruz. They didn't know the size of Iran. I get tripped up. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I get tripped up on trivia questions like that. And I could have told you that in a heartbeat. I don't know exactly 90 million. That's what I have on the top of my head. Maybe it's between

80 or not. I'm just saying I'd have 90 on the top of my head is the number. But to be pitching a war with a group of people, you don't even know the size of the country. You have not done your homework, sir. And in this interview, I noticed a line where he was talking. He said, I've not seen the latest intelligence on whether or not Iran was using their stockpiled uranium to to earn rich uranium to make a bomb. And it's like, how can you be uninformed on that? I can't imagine that there isn't some intelligence on that. And you're not even informed on the latest intelligence.

How's that possible? Well, also, like, I think, you know, it's like when I come on this show or I go on another show to oppose a war, I always feel like I got to know what I'm talking about, you know? Like, I got to really have this information down. And I think it's reasonable to say that there's a much stronger, on you if you're supporting a war, right? Like a positive action is there's much more of an onus on you to really be sure, whereas to just be like, let's not start killing people is kind of a different proposition. But yeah, it's pretty amazing. He went in to argue with Tucker Carlson

about regime change in Iran and didn't have the basic facts. Tucker asked him the ethnic makeup of the country and he had nothing. Like it really is something. Anyway, yeah, let's get into some of the Ted Cruz clips here. I know Rob, I think, I think there were a couple different ones. Oh, that's interesting. Sorry, just getting... I emailed too. I'd go with the one I emailed first.

Well, I... You know, I sent one also. Let's do the one I sent, which I think is one of the ones that you sent. But it's that Ted Cruz claims that there's no intelligence is the start of the tweet. Let's pull that one up. And, yeah, let's watch this.

Can you tell us now, if you believe that there was... an ongoing nuclear weapons program. One of the top arms control experts out there, David Albright, has written, there should be an immediate priority on rapid response operations to secure Iran's nuclear stockpiles right now. Can you assure the public that it will be secured?

And if so, who is doing it if there are no Israeli or U.S. forces on the ground? So there is no doubt that a year ago, Iran had an active and ongoing nuclear We took out the vast majority of that at the end of the 12-day war. That U.S. intelligence assessment was not made public if that is what was brief to you. We took out, we launched targeted bombs at the end of the 12-day war where we dropped the equivalent of about a third of a nuclear weapon on those underground facilities, facilities like Fordo, which is built into the base of a mountain.

The bunker buster bombs we used, Israel doesn't have those bombs, No other country has those bombs. We took them out last year. The Iranians were still hell-bent on rebuilding them. And one of the things we are doing right now is taking out their missiles, in particular, the Southern Missile Belt. Right now, Iran is building roughly 100 missiles a month.

They're actively building missiles to threaten their neighbors. They're firing some of them right now at their neighbors. Yeah, at our allies. They're illustrating powerfully. They're attacking virtually every Arab neighbor that surrounds them. They are firing missiles that it's almost like they want to illustrate to the world just how malign they are. But in terms of containing the risk, who's securing the nuclear material that you say still exists within Iran?

Who's doing that? Look, the quantity of nuclear material, I didn't say anything one way or another on that. What I said is they were building nuclear weapons a year ago and our bombing took that out. they also had an ongoing desire to rebuild them. I don't have present-day intelligence on what progress they had made towards rebuilding nuclear weapons since we bombed their facilities.

I have no indication that they were anywhere close to getting nuclear weapons because our bombing was devastating. And Margaret, that's one of the reasons. I urged President Trump, now is the time. You know, dictatorships survive because they're perceived as invulnerable. And in this instance, Iran decisively lost the 12-day war that weaken the regime and set up what the president is doing now. Dude, if you just think about all of this, Rob, I mean, by the way, you made the most important point there, which is like, you know, dude, you don't know.

You're not up on the intelligence. I mean, by the way, the David Albright, who she referenced there, the report that they're referring to was the group is a, well, rather unfortunately named ISIS.

But I think they call themselves the good, the good ISIS. They're the Institute for Science and International Security. They need a new name. Listen, I think they named themselves before the Islamic Catholic. But I agree with you, Rob. That's kind of when you pick a new name at that time.

Time for a rebate. Anyway, but they put out this report. It's worth reading. It's about 40 pages long. But this was their like intelligence assessment of, you know, like where the nuclear capabilities of Iran were at. And what they essentially were saying is that, so their argument, what they believe, shouldn't say their argument.

What they were saying the evidence leads them to believe is that essentially, that the attacks in the 12-day war really did fuck up around's nuclear capabilities, which, you know, it does not, doesn't seem that hard for me to believe. I mean, it was always kind of like Donald Trump was always bragging about how they'd been obliterated. And then you kind of take that with a grain of salt because you go, yeah, he's going to brag about whatever he does and say it was the biggest, most tremendous thing that's ever been done. But, you know, Bunker Busters really do.

I don't know if you've seen any of those demonstrations, Rob, of how bunker busters work, but they really do blow shit up and destroy them. And so, okay, that seems right. And essentially the rest of the report was saying that like Iran really hasn't been doing it since then. You know, now these are still the guys who are arguing. You got to make sure you get this nuclear like material if you're in there. So anyway, but just for a background, people want to read that report here. The report, if you're interested in looking it up, it's the Institute for Science and International Security.

And the report is called comprehensive updates assessments of Iranian nuclear sites five months after the 12-day war. The idea that I'm going to trust. Ted Cruz hasn't read this. Ted Cruz hasn't read a 40-page paper on the latest assessment of all of this. Like, he just doesn't know. And like it is, dude, it is, like you said, it reminds you of the Tucker Carlson thing. It's really one of the things that was why Tucker Carlson did such a valuable service to Americans by having Ted Cruz on. Is that he did have this reputation as the smarty pants.

This is the guy who's argued cases in front of the Supreme Court or whatever. And he's really the very smart one. And he doesn't know anything. they'll advocate for a war without even just having the fundamental details down or even like bothering again it's 40 pages it's kind of dense but i read it the senator can't be bothered to anyway um rob again the incoherence the painful incoherence of this whole thing is that um so essentially we're arguing that they had a nuclear threat we took the nuclear threat off the table.

We still have to be worried about the nuclear threat. Okay. And then in the other one, if you might notice this one, Rob, this is a big thing that they also say too now, right? Is they go, you know, this thing he said at the end, dictatorships rely on the perception of strength. By the way, a little bit of an aside. Is that only dictatorships?

What's all this piece through strength stuff that all you Republicans keep talking about? I guess we all kind of like to project strength or whatever. By the way, another aside, on the peace through strength part that the Republicans have been saying since Ronald Reagan, when do we get the peace part? I've seen a lot of strength. I've also seen permanent militarism waiting on that peace part of the whole equation. Anyway, but here's the problem they have, right? And this is the reality. Why now? Why right now are we launching this war? when obviously the Israel lobby, Benjamin Netanyahu, the Republican establishment, they've wanted this war for a long time. Well, the reason it's going on right now is because the, well, the perception is that the regime's been weakened. Now, this is why they wanted to do it when the protests were happening, but they couldn't

get the military hardware there in time. And so this is why Voice of America is on radio right now telling. the Iranians to rise up and overthrow their government. This is why Donald Trump, when he announced this war, told the Iranian people to rise up and overthrow their government because they perceive the regime as being weak. That's what Ted Cruz just said to you there, right? They rely on this perception of strength,

but after the 12-day war, they're pretty weak now. Look, they're weakened. Hezbollah has been weakened in the region with Israel's kind of decapitating cell phone or pager strikes or pager bombs. The 12-day war was a real embarrassment for a ram. They really just took it and didn't do anything while we did, evidently destroy some of their nuclear program.

It wasn't a weapons program, but don't let that fuck with you. And the economy is terrible. The sanctions have been crippling, and there's been mass protests in the street. So they're weak, meaning now's the time we could try to overthrow them. But, you know, there's another problem with that. Robert really undercuts the whole necessity for war. Because if they're weak, then they're really not that much of a threat to us.

And if they're weak, then they certainly don't pose an imminent threat, which would be the only legal justification for Donald Trump to do this in the first place. And so here you have, and I've really, honestly, I don't think I've ever seen a war like this. And I've seen a lot of wars, and I've been pretty focused on them for like the last 20 years in my life. I have never seen a war where every goddamn propaganda point contradicts the next propaganda point. You know what I'm saying?

Like you just let them explain it and they contradict themselves with the whole thing. Well, if they're weak, then they're not an existential threat. Well, we have to liberate the Iranian people. Well, what comes next? Well, we don't know what comes next. But we can't let the number one state sponsor of terrorism have a nuclear weapon. But we obliterated their nuclear program. like what the fuck rob which one is it well that's what stood out to me the most uh the last time

was when they said they have all this enriched uranium we don't know where they where they put it they were also two weeks away from getting a bomb and we've totally removed their ability to get a bomb and i was just like not all of this can be true at the same time yeah yeah right and now they seem to be walking the fence once again of going no we were very successful when we hit them uh and they still have the potential and desire for a bomb, but we don't even know what the intelligence is of whether or not they're getting one. And of course, this all just ignores the fact that seemingly they had a religious dictate that they didn't want to get a bomb and have never been interested in it.

Yeah. Well, at least that's what the now deceased Ayatollah always said. I believe that wasn't the position of the previous Ayatollah. And so we'll see what comes next. Who knows? But there is no question, right, that we had the JCPOA, that Barack Obama and Europe and the Iranians negotiated this deal. They were staying between 3 and 5% of enrichment. And, you know, we had a whole new inspections regime that came in.

Now, by the way, just the original JCPOA, which really was the best thing that Obama did in his pathetic disastrous presidency. But the whole thing was always a fake agreement anyway. It was never about Iran's nuclear weapons. We all knew Iran. The CIA had assessed back since like 2007 that the Iranians hadn't even, they weren't even trying to get a nuclear weapon, let alone were they close to it.

And the whole point of the JCPOA was to take away Benjamin Netanyahu's pretext for war. And that's why he hated it so much. And so the whole thing was like we had a whole new inspections regime. We knew exactly what they were doing. And we lost that after the 12-day war. But there's just the idea that they're developing a nuclear weapon is always. Look, Benjamin Netanyahu's been saying this since the fucking 1990s.

So the 1990s he's been saying they're three years away from developing a nuke. He had that cartoon bomb in the in the UN like that this is like 15 years ago or something. I don't remember it, 10 years ago, whenever. But it's like this is all, it's all just complete lies, all complete war propaganda. All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Prolon by El Nutra. Prolon is a plant-based nutrition program. It features soup, snacks, and beverages, all designed to nourish the body while keeping. it in a fasting state, triggering cellular rejuvenation and renewal.

Developed over decades with USC's Longevity Institute and backed by top US medical centers, pro-lone has been shown to support biological age reduction, metabolic health, skin appearance, fat loss with muscle protection, energy, and a healthier relationship with food. Now you guys have probably heard a lot about these fasting diets. Everybody's doing that. This is the first one I've ever heard of that essentially lets you get the benefits of a fasting diet without having to give up food. You trick your body into thinking that it's in a fasting state, but you're still able to eat, which is a pretty big deal for most of us. Well, if you're ready for your own reset,

for a limited time, Prolon is offering our listeners 15% off sitewide, plus a $40 bonus gift when you subscribe to their five-day program. Check them out at prolonlife.com slash P-O-T-P. That's P-R-O-L-L-E. O-N-L-I-E dot com slash P-O-T-P to claim your 15% discount and your bonus gift. Prolonlif.com slash P-O-T-P. All right, let's get back into the show. Here, let's play one more clip of Ted Cruz. It was this one, play one of the clips from the email that Rob sent, because there was another clip in there that was pretty good, too.

I like the one where he's just really talking about. I got to talk to Trump before this attack and basically convinced him this is our best opportunity. Do you remember which? Yeah, that's that's the first one that I emailed. I think it's this. I have to ask about the differing views, let's say, inside your party about whether this is the right thing to do. Starting with the president himself, campaigning on and saying in his inaugural address that there would be no more wars. And there were a fair number of Republicans who voted for him liking that promise. Tucker Carlson is somebody who, like that promise. He told ABC that the president's decision to strike Iran is, quote,

absolutely disgusting and evil. Your response? So I will say your quote of the president was slightly off. He did not say there would be no more wars. He said there would be no more forever wars. Those are very different things. I emphatically agree with him. You are not going to see a major U.S. troop presence in Iran. He and I talked about that on Friday. We talked about Israel leading many of the attacks. We talked about targeted airstrikes taking out the military capacity of the regime to attack the protesters. And I also urged arming the protesters so the people of Iran could fight back because they were- Is that going to happen?

That was one of my questions. Is the U.S. going to help them? I hope so. I do not know for sure. I did not get a clear answer on that. That is what I advocated for. Look, Tucker Carlson, as President Trump has said, Tucker Carlson is a kook. He's an isolationist.

His views are fringe. And Tucker Carlson has spent the entire Trump presidency. Okay. This was a different clip, but it's great. So first is there's a hard pivot from the pitch of no new wars to no forever wars. I don't remember that being the conversation. Oh, no, no. What Donald Trump said was no more regime change wars.

He's lying through his teeth already, but keep going. sorry. I thought there was even just chatter of no new wars. Like, oh, yeah, yeah. He said that too. No, no, no, he absolutely bragged about no new wars. I'll keep you out of wars, all that stuff. Yes. And so now we're getting a hard pivot to, uh, it was no forever wars. I don't remember that being the conversation.

And now this is, what can I just say? I'm sorry. I'm sorry, Rob. Keep your thought, but just keep your thought. But it just, it's important to be said that nobody ever says there for forever wars. Like, what does that mean? No, Dick Cheney said it'll be weeks, not months. None of them ever say we're for forever wars.

And by the way, like, and I mean this, none of them ever really are. Like, no, no one wanted, like, no one who wanted to go to war in Iraq went, oh, dude, I bet we'll get 20 years out of this thing. No one went into, I mean, maybe some weapons companies or something like that. But like, there's just, there's no distinguishing yourself from anyone else by saying that. I'm sorry, anyway, keep going. And now, I mean, this is just straight out of the COVID propaganda book of trying to pretend, hey, you're insane and everyone's getting the vaccine. And now he's trying to pretend that nobody in

the Republican Party has Tucker Carlson's views. Tucker Carlson is the fringe view. And really Americans are not isolationists. And that's not true. Bullshit. That's why Tucker Carlson is as popular as he is. And that's not the mainstream of the Republican Party is not for fighting these foreign wars. They were for America first. Let's deal with our problems over here and quit wasting money over there. Yes. Again, go check the charts in the news podcast. Tucker Carlson is number one. Number one. Okay. And so yeah, the idea. Right. This is on the level of Brian Stelter saying that Joe Rogan is a fringe figure. Like, yeah, okay, if you want to try to play that game, dude, that's the, the, and look, again, this is, and we got to wrap on this, but I will say the idea of labeling, oh, the majority of people, they're not isolated. coax like Tucker Carlson. But like they always go to this isolationist thing. And look, I think to be completely fair, I think Tucker is certainly much more of a

protectionist than I am or you are. We're like really free trade guys. But isolationism, this is a total red herring. Like this isn't on the table right now. The United States of America is. is the biggest empire in the history of the world. We have, you know, bases in, you know, we have thousands of bases in hundreds of countries all around the world.

We still occupy Germany and Japan and South Korea. We have bases as we've found out, right? Everybody paying attention to the news is learning where we have bases. And where do we have bases? Oh, everywhere. All over the goddamn place. This isn't a conversation between isolationism and interventionism or something like that. This is a conversation about whether we should launch another stupid regime change war of choice.

That's the conversation. But of course, Ted Cruz can't frame it as Tucker Carlson is a kook who doesn't want us to get into another regime change war. Because then that kook would sound like super majorities of the, American people. And look, even right now, even, and it's pretty amazing, dude, even right now when, look, there's dead Americans and there's some blown up stuff, but there's only a few dead Americans so far. And even right now, Donald Trump barely has majority support of his own base.

And think about, he's, let's I saw it was saying like 55% of Trump voters said like, okay, we'll support the president so far. And if this thing starts getting bloody and costly, that number's going down and down and down. And if you look at independence or young people or Democrats, this thing is wildly unpopular. So to try to pretend that somehow the guy with the biggest podcast in the political world represents this fringe view by not wanting to fight yet another regime change war in the Middle East when all of them have been catastrophic so far is just, yeah, this is what they got. This is what they got. Ted Cruz, I mean, I guess it's worth saying, not that it's ever going to happen, but it's like, hey, Ted Cruz, you know, call me an imbecile on Twitter.

Come on the show, buddy. I promise, completely good faith. I'll be nice, no insults. You could insult me as much as you want to. I won't insult you one time back. I'm just going to ask you really substantive questions, and we'll see what your answer is. Let's see who the imbecile is. Let's see.

All right. We got a wrap there, but I'm sure there'll be a lot more to talk about. So we'll catch you guys tomorrow. Peace.