Part Of The Problem - The Legacy of Lindsey Graham
Episode Date: July 29, 2026Dave Smith brings you the latest in politics! On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave and Robbie "the Fire" Bernstein discuss the videos of Lindsey Graham released since his d eath in wh...ich he celebrates Netanyahu and the war with Iran, Zoran Mamdani's unveiling of his new government funded grocery stores in NYC, and more.Support Our Sponsors:CrowdHealth - https://www.joincrowdhealth.com/promos/potpBodyBrain - Go to BodyBrainCoffee.com, use code DAVE20 for 20% off your first orderRidge - https://ridge.com/potp10Quince - Get free shipping on your Quince order and 365-day returns athttps://www.quince.com/POTPPart Of The Problem is available for early pre-release at https://partoftheproblem.com as well as an exclusive episode on Thursday!PORCH TOUR DATES HERE:https://robbernsteincomedy.com/eventsFind Run Your Mouth here:YouTube - http://youtube.com/@RunYourMouthiTunes - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/run-your-mouth-podcast/id1211469807Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/4ka50RAKTxFTxbtyPP8AHmFollow the show on social media:X:http://x.com/ComicDaveSmithhttp://x.com/RobbieTheFireInstagram:http://instagram.com/theproblemdavesmithhttp://instagram.com/robbiethefire#libertarian See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
What's up, everybody? Welcome to a brand new episode of Part of the Problem.
I am Dave Smith, and he, of course, is the beautiful Robbie the Fire, Bernstein.
How are you feeling today, sir?
I'm doing well. How are you, Mr. Smith?
I'm doing well. I'm okay. I'm a little bit bummed out today.
I have not. I'm going to have to tweet, I guess, about this at some point.
So we weren't supposed to have a show today. I announced on the site.
I was supposed to go out and speak at the Young Americans for Liberty YAL-Con event in
Cincinnati, Ohio.
But I,
my flight got canceled and there's just like
terrible weather coming in.
Tried a lot of different things.
We were down to trying an option to go to
different cities, to fly me
into different cities, to have someone pick me up
and meet me, but we weren't able to make it
work. There were no flights available
in all of the New York City airports.
And I really did try.
Anyway, not able to make it,
not able to make it there.
I guess we're talking right now. I think I'm going to
like do my speech by Zoom from here. So I will address the kids. But of course, it's not nearly as
fun as being there in person. And I really do, I've done, I can't remember how many of the
Young Americans for Liberty events I've done, but they're always like among my favorite things to do.
I just love it. It's, it's really cool, Rob to go see like, you know, 20 year olds who are, you know,
really hardcore into the same stuff that we're into. And they're really.
excited about it. I always really, I don't know, I always, I always, I appreciate kind of like the
honor of like being like, oh, okay, I'm here to like talk to the younger generation of, you know,
Liberty loving people who look up to me or whatever. So anyway, I really, really enjoy doing it.
I will absolutely do everything I can to be at next year's big Young Americans for Liberty
event. I love the organization. I've met a lot of cool people there.
over the years. So it sucks. It's one of those things. It's, you know, Rob, I mean, we,
people who listen to this show are probably, I mean, we mostly rant about the news, but we do
bitch about flying on airplanes quite a bit because it's just inevitable. If you got two people
who got to fly on airplanes all the time that these type of things happen, it sucks. We're,
we're busy. We travel the whole year. We try our absolute best to never miss any of our,
any of our live performances, or whether that be speeches or comedy shows.
So anyway, that sucks, but I will address the young Americans for Liberty on behalf of the
middle-aged Americans for Liberty. Rob, don't you worry. I'll be representing us.
It's inspiring to see that some younglings are finding this. I find there's a little bit of an
uptick in like the college-age kids that are coming out to porches and even what I see
at our live shows. And I just love to see it. You're like, oh, like I would have thought,
you know, my audience was more 20-year-olds. It just isn't.
which is cool you know i'll porch with 50s and 60 year olds they they make for a fine porch tour
crowd but it's nice uh if the younger kids are you know finding honest information this early in
their lives yeah and i do think that there's something um i don't know i guess there's there's
something to be said for particularly i'm thinking about like libertarians have always felt this way but
i guess it's true in general if you're like it i don't know just for if you don't like a lot of things
about your current system of government and culture and you're kind of advocating that things be
different. On some level, you recognize that like this is a long project. This is going to take a
long time. And that kind of means that like this is this is going to be for, you know, to be
carried out. There's going to be work to be done here. And I personally, and I really don't want
this to come off the wrong way. Because I do want to think about the weight of my words when I say this.
I'm not implying anything like you should be blackpilled or like there's not a lot of important work to be done in the meantime or that like this all just isn't really interesting to keep talking about and and trying to understand.
But it does kind of seem, Rob, like the boomers are going to have to die off.
You know what I mean?
Like that's like like not just much as that they have to die off because I don't know, Rob.
I mean, maybe our, this current system collapses before the boomers die off.
It's quite possible if you ask me.
But like, maybe it's more accurate to say the boomers are going to die off.
And that's almost like the big thing for Americans to think about, about the future, you know, that like, you know, you take the boomers out of the equation, an American public opinion, an American culture, an American, I don't know, finances, just everything is so much different.
And so anyway, it's very, it's very interesting to talk to young people who are aware of this stuff.
And just speaking of being careful about your words, the audience is more 30 and 40.
A porch store, I don't mean to despairs them that a bunch of people are like, wait, I wasn't
50 and 60. What are you talking about?
You do. If you saw, if you stood next to these young Americans for Liberty, you'd look 60.
That's all I guess. No, I mean, there's, you know, older people there too.
There's speakers and organizers and stuff. But.
And on that note, I do got porches coming up, Cocoa, St. August in Florida, St.
August in Florida, Walpole Mass, Newton, Mass, and Rhode Island.
And then, of course, you and I are going to be at the improv, I think, of Fort Lauderdale this Friday and Saturday or Thursday Friday.
Thursday and Friday. That's right. So that'll be the day after tomorrow, July, what do we got here?
Excuse me. I believe it's the 30th, right? Yeah, it's July 30th and 31st down there in Fort Lauderdale.
And then we'll be in Appleton, Wisconsin. I'll be back at the Comedy Mothership in Austin, Texas.
Louisville, Kentucky, Fort Worth, Texas, Dallas, Texas, Salt Lake City, and then Los Vegas.
So we got a bunch of stuff coming up.
Comic Dave Smith, me and Rob will be out there on the road.
All right.
So I wanted to talk a bit about Lindsay Graham today because it was that what was it, his funeral today?
I don't know.
They had some type of service today.
J.D. Vance was speaking.
and we didn't get to this in yesterday's show.
But there's, anyway, a bunch of people are giving speeches about Lindsay Graham's legacy.
And there's also just a couple days ago, there was evidently Rob.
Lindsay Graham had a documentary crew following him for the last few months.
And a bunch of footage was released of his immediate reaction to the launch of.
of the war in Iran, which I found to be fascinating.
And, well, I don't know.
I mean, I guess before we even get into any of this, I guess it's, isn't it,
Rob, it's a little bit of an interesting situation.
Like, I'm listening to J.D. Vance give, you know, like a speech about how great a person
and how charming Lindsey Graham was.
And I don't know. Listen, you guys know, like, look, I'm a little bit harsh on J.D. Vance.
I've been, I've been harsh on J.D. Vance for the last year.
And at some points, perhaps unfairly, you know, Rob, what is J.D. Vance, after all, he's the vice president.
He's not in charge of anything. And he's kind of, what would you say?
At least rhetorically, what is he the most, the closest sounding to us in the administration?
So in a way, you're like, oh, we're beating up on the guy who's most not worse or whatever.
But you know, the thing with J.D. Vance Robb is that he's kind of like, you know, like when you were like a kid and like a bunch of you would like jump someone's fence and then vandalize their property and spray paint something on.
And then the guy woke up and he came out running like, I'm going to kill you kids.
and then everyone ran away,
but one fat kid couldn't get over the fence.
And, you know,
he wasn't even really the one who was leading
or who's doing the worst,
but that guy gets the crap beat out of him
because you know what?
You're all that's here.
The rest of them all got away.
And like, J.D. Vance, there's just this,
I don't know, Rob, there's this feeling where, like,
he's the one who's still kind of hanging on
and asking for something from us.
He wants our vote.
Marco Rubio doesn't even want our vote.
Marco Rubio already knows he's not carrying us.
but J.D. Vance wants to.
J.D. Vanswant. He's the only one left who wants something.
And so what am I to do when I see him praising Lindsey Graham?
Now, don't get me wrong, Rob. I know. I understand in the world of,
not just the world of politics, but in the world, sometimes you've got to say nice things.
It's the nice thing to do at a funeral. But from my perspective,
well, I've watched this administration just trash the country, trash our movement.
Nah, I don't feel like, like, I don't think I do have to.
to put up with this.
I got to say, Rob, I do, I very much, as I expressed the last time we talked about it,
I very much have the sensibilities as a person of being like, you should not speak ill
of the dead, you know?
At the same time, I'm disgusted hearing J.D. Vance just praise a man whose whole career
was advocating death and destruction and human despair.
All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor.
for today's show, which is crowd health, a long-time sponsor of this show. I've been telling you guys about this company for years because I really believe in what they do. And of course, summer is in full swing. And if you want to enjoy your beach days and barbecues without the constant stress of broken health care, go check out what real medical freedom looks like for under $100 a month. Crowd Health is now offering the Black Swan membership, the no-b-b-saltative for people who want control over their care, their costs, and their lives.
For just $85 a month, you get a dedicated team of expert bill negotiators who are fighting for you,
access to low-cost prescriptions and lab testing, plus a hand-cureated network of high-quality,
affordable doctors vetted by crowd health.
So there's no insurance company.
There's no restrictive doctors networks that tell you who you can and can't see, and there's
no bureaucrats dictating your care, just you in charge.
And if a real Black Swan event hits, you handle the first $15,000, and the cost you handle the first $15,000,
crowd steps up to help cover the rest. It's health care the way it should be, closer to the
freedom we had before Obamacare turned it into a bureaucratic nightmare. So this summer, stop renting
your health from the system, take your power back, and enjoy the season with real peace of mind.
If you're ready to make the switch or just to learn more, head over to join crowdhealth.com
and use the promo code POTP. Once again, that's join crowdhealth.com, promo code POTP for your first
three months for less than $85. That's right.
ring in the summer with health care that puts you first.
All right, let's get back into the show.
And with thinking that that was noble, I mean, that's one of the things that's really apparent
in the documentary is that if you got our worldview, he can't believe that someone could be
such a villain and how disgusting it is.
But to him, that he's not afraid that there are cameras recording him saying these things.
Well, that's one of the things that's so interesting about this.
And it's one of the reasons why I did want to talk about it on the show.
You know, we kind of, we kind of got into this on the last episode a little bit.
But I was, I was trying to make, and maybe it was a bit of a clumsy connection between the, like, the Messessian idea of human action with economics and then the idea of, you know, human action in politics.
And I don't know, I guess there's just something where it's like, we can talk about things in collective.
all the time and sometimes that's important and sometimes it's very useful to understanding things.
Like, no matter what you talk, like, if you were talking about like the scandal in the Catholic
church, you're like, there's the Catholic church is a thing in your mind. And like what that means
essentially is like, well, I don't know, like the organization and everybody who works there and all.
And that is a thing. So you have to be able to. But if you really wanted to understand, say,
what was going on, there were individual players who had, you know, they were,
human beings. It's human, it's human beings acting, human beings doing stuff. So each individual
human being had his own childhood and his own stories and his own ambitions and his own heartbreak
and his own. And so in other words, in order to really understand what's really going on here,
you kind of got to understand the individual players. Now, that's harder to do. And so at times,
you just focus on what they're doing, what actions these humans are taking. But it is always
interesting when you get a little bit of an insight into who the person is. And much like, you know,
this has been, I don't know, I mean, this has been something I've been talking about publicly for 20
years, but I guess between with the two examples of both Fauci's Diaries and Lindsay Graham and this
documentary, it's just been interesting lately to think about that, to get a little window into
these people because, look, Rob, it obviously does. It just changes the dynamics a little bit when you
find out that Fauci is like real excited that he's having a Zoom meeting with an NBA player
and like, oh, isn't that knee? And that he's like drunk in the moment on how famous he is all
a sudden. I don't know. That's very interesting. That's very useful information into just,
you know, like putting this whole story together. And likewise, yeah, it's, it's interesting to,
to, I don't know, to see how Lindsay Graham actually was, at least in his limo with his camera crew.
I mean, who knows, you know, what broke once he got away from them.
But yeah, it's worlds apart from the morality that me and you believe in.
That's for sure.
All right.
Do you want to, should we, yeah, you know, let's just go right to the Lindsay Graham.
Let's go to the first Lindsey Graham clip.
Let's play that.
able to deliver.
I'll be honest with you, I think about three to four weeks,
we should have them in a spot where they start losing control of some cities.
And what we're trying to do is just get a few cities to fall in the next one.
Get the Arabs more openly involved tomorrow or by the end of the week
and just have almost irreversible momentum.
So that was the clip.
Okay, so this one is the more getting into like his just, not a psychology, but just, I don't know, the certainty.
You know, there's other clips.
We're going to play a couple other ones where you'll see more of his exuberance, but I got to tell you.
And because for nothing else, I think it's important to just tell the truth about these things.
You know, people are going to talk about Lindsey Graham's legacy.
I really did find this, this clip to be very fascinating to that whole conversation.
Because here you have not just, you know, not just like, hey, remember 20 years ago when you said there were weapons of mass destruction, but there weren't.
But you have just from, you know, just in the last few months here, as this war is breaking out, Lindsay Graham is like he, and I've seen this a lot from Warhawks over the years.
First off, he can't contain his excitement.
There's something truly sick about this.
He can't contain his excitement.
And then they just kind of get drunk with this certainty of what's going to come next.
And here you see, I mean, very clear, about as objective as you could get.
You know, Rob, like I always say with the Austrian versus, you know, other classical or, you know, derivative, you know, economic.
schools of thought. I always go like, well, look, the Austrians are the ones making the argument,
but you can't just empirically test everything against everything. You've got to think these things
through. But if ever you could empirically test something, I mean, he sits here and explains
how the Iranian regime is going to lose control of the cities and how their country is going to
follow. And Rob, those cities, like this was only, this has been in the last, you know, four months
or whatever, I guess going on five months now, those cities in the next days after he said this had
million man marches in support of the regime.
He just got this all completely wrong.
And I guess they're almost look like even if you want to, I don't know, Rob, if you
want to say, hey, look, Lindsay Graham is an evil.
From our worldview, he's evil.
But from his worldview, it's a different thing.
It's like, yeah, but dude, if you're this wrong all the time over and over and
your wrongness involves a policy of killing people.
Jesus Christ, at a certain point, where's the distinction?
And, you know, I think that's, Rob, and I'm really curious to just get your thoughts on this
because this is, you know, this is something, it's like a through line through all of my
Israel debates and all of this shit.
And it's like, look, I understand that, like, I understand that Lindsey Graham was a U.S.
Senator who wore a suit and a tie and had some Southern charm and would crack a dirty Southern
joke when none of the ladies were looking or whatever.
And I understand he wasn't like a head chopping member of ISIS or like a barbarian,
you know, Hamas, you know, angry, you know, 20 year old throwing a rock or whatever you picture.
But like, dude, when you're this wrong all the time and you're probably, it's like what I always say in
the debates with Israel, at a certain point, if you're killing this many people, I mean, in effect,
you're still the killer.
Like eventually it doesn't matter how sophisticated a way you do this in.
You are so wrong.
All you advocate, in effect, is death and destruction forever.
Why am I not supposed to look at you like a monster in your death?
I don't know.
You can touch on any of that that you want, Bob.
I had a similar takeaway watching this clip where, you know, you might say Lindsey Graham has
no interest in the success of the United States people,
and it's just that he's so tied in with the military industrial complex and jobs in his state
that he's just pitching war all the time only for basically war profiteering.
If you're watching this clip, you get, oh, this guy actually thought there was a pathway to victory.
But if you're out pitching, firstly, I'm not sure that a victory, and let's just go with the idea,
America needs to be an empire and kicking people's ass for American interest actually benefits our country.
And so in this case, he thinks that within a couple weeks, I ran, there's going to be revolts and people are going to actually start overtaking their government.
And so there's a pathway to victory here.
Well, that clearly did not happen.
And so you got a guy who spent his entire life advocating for a war thinking that there would be a successful conclusion and what he thought was going to happen clearly did not take place.
So he was wrong, which means that when he went out there and he initiated, hey, we need to be having this war and this war is really important.
He was just wrong.
And so you can't celebrate that guy.
And if anything, you got to you got to punish these individuals because you made the biggest blunder probably the United States of America might have.
ever made. Find me a bigger, I mean, if you have their worldview of empire, find me a bigger
blunder that we've made in terms of foreign wars and entanglements in terms of weakening the U.S.
Empire. If you believe in the need of the U.S. Empire. And I mean, this is such a massive mistake
and you have it on full display that what he thought was going to happen clearly is not taking
place. Dude, I mean, when you're, I mean, dude, when you're, you're on record now supporting
Iraq, Afghanistan,
you know, Libya,
and this.
Jeez, man.
It's just like, I don't know.
Why am I,
I don't think it's unreasonable to go,
you know, one of my favorite things ever,
if you remember Tucker Carlson one time
had Max Boot on CNN.
People don't know Max Boots, another like Arch Neocon guy,
you know, like always supported every one of these wars.
Lindsey Graham, indistinguishable on foreign policy.
And Tucker at one point,
point goes, he goes, Max, I'm not trying to be cruel to you, but like, why don't you try
like painting houses?
He just goes like, why don't you just pick another job?
You're so bad at this.
You get everyone wrong or at least, and I got to say, look, I mean, so if you were to even
argue at a certain point, if I go like, hey, okay, so Lindsay Graham supported the war in Iraq,
the war in Afghanistan, the war in Libya, the war in Syria, the war in Somalia, the war in Yemen,
and supported the destruction of Gaza.
he supported the war in Iran,
was one of the biggest cheerleaders
in the Senate for the war in Ukraine.
All of these policies, Rob,
there's not a single one of those that you could point to
and even pretend was a win.
No, I mean, look, you could,
the closest you could spin to any of this
would be that Ukraine wasn't completely taken over by Russia,
which, you know, I mean, that's, that,
there's a strong argument, but like,
but for U.S. support, you know, that like Russia maybe would have just totally destroyed.
Okay.
But like you, every last one is a loss.
Millions and millions of people are, you know, dead.
Innocent people are dead as a result of this policy.
Now, one might ask themselves, why are you any different than Stalin or Hitler or any other person in political power who we label is like,
oh, you killed all these innocent people.
And what people would respond with that?
Well, first off, people don't like,
they don't like hearing things like that
because it sounds like something a left-winger would say quite often.
So they have a kind of like repulse, like, well, what do you mean?
Oh, yeah, Dave.
America's always the bad guys.
Or, oh, yeah, we're all just as bad as them.
But actually, what I'm arguing for is the opposite of relativism.
I'm arguing for moral objectivism.
I'm arguing for like an objective standard.
Now, if you're going to say like these things are different, well, what's the objective standard?
And whenever you get into that, Rob, what they, and this is the same thing that Israel defenders will do.
Whatever you do when you, when they get into this is they go to motives.
And so they'll say something like, well, look, you could kind of understand that like, however misguided the war in Iraq may have been, that's not the same thing as giving orders to execute everything.
last Jew in a town because, you know, maybe someone was misguided and they thought that like,
oh, he did have weapons of mass destruction or this war would help the Iraqi people or something
like that. But you got to say, I think there's a real problem with that defense.
And I've been working on this for years now, kind of like how to tackle that.
But I just think there's a real problem with your defense being like, no, but we didn't really mean
it.
You know, like, we didn't really do it because we're bad.
we did it for these noble reasons because well first of all like Hitler had his abstract noble reasons too
Stalin had his abstract noble reasons too they all claim now you could certainly say that like hey if
you're putting like a woman or a child into a gas chamber there's no like possible you got this wrong or
like okay fair enough but then on the other side of it rob hey look I really wanted to do this nice thing
that involved murdering a bunch of people, but it just didn't work out, but my heart was in the
right place. Like if you were actually bringing that defense to any reasonable like court of law,
okay, let's say that defense holds. Rob, how about the second time you do it and the third time
you do it and the fourth time? Like by the time you're like a 12th time repeat offender,
do you still get to go? Oh, no, but it's not like sociopathic murderous behavior.
It's just like, oh darn it.
Lindsay Graham was wrong about how the cities would fall once again.
All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Body Brain Coffee.
Love this stuff.
And of course, as I've told you before, the Body Brain Creamer is here.
This creamer was specifically designed to stack perfectly with Body Brain Coffee.
If you guys aren't familiar with Body Brain Coffee, it's a delicious cup of coffee that naturally enhances your testosterone.
So if you're a guy around my age in your 40s and your 50s, if you're looking to naturally boost your
testosterone, but you don't want to take supplements or injections or anything like that, but you will
drink a cup of coffee every day. That's why I take it. Makes me feel much better. Now they have the
creamer that stacks perfectly with that. It's filled with good stuff. It's packed with MCT oil for
clean energy, collagen, peptides, port-a-set mushrooms for endurance and stamina, and a lot of other
good stuff for you. It's going to make you feel better. And it's just drinking a
delicious cup of coffee, something we all do already. Of course, this was created by the great Louis
Jay Gomez, hilarious comedian and brilliant entrepreneur, and the reason why the part of the problem
podcast exists. So go to bodybraincoffee.com, support Louis J. Gomez, get a delicious cup of coffee
that's going to naturally enhance your testosterone, one cup in the morning and you're locked in.
Bodybraincoffee.com. Make sure to use the promo code Dave 20 for 20% off. That's bodybraincoffee.com.
of 20 for 20% off.
How about being an arrogant dumbass making highly consequential decisions on a repeated basis is evil?
And so if you can't take stock on the fact that you're making horrible blunders that are
leading to death because you're just wrong in your analysis, you should not be making
that analysis.
And if you're continuing to make the analysis because you like the power that comes with
it, then you're engaging in evil.
And you can't hide behind the fact of, oh, I was just a dumbass with a.
what I thought were good ideas.
Yeah, yeah.
No, that's right.
That's right.
And also, like, you just, I don't know.
I guess also, and this is particularly true.
Like, I completely agree with everything you said, 100%.
But then just like in addition to that, I feel the need to add that with people like
Lindsey Graham or many people involved in the U.S. war machine or many people involved in the
Israeli war machine and the Israeli government, they really push.
it to the level of me believing that they're just this stupid.
Because, you know, then you go listen to Smotrich, literally just today I saw a clip of
him, openly bragging about the full amount of apartment buildings that they've destroyed
in southern Lebanon and the amount of apartment buildings that they've destroyed in Gaza,
literally bragging that we didn't just drive Hamas out.
We destroyed the homes.
And with like the heavy implication that, look, they're never coming back.
Like, that's ours now.
And so like, okay, well, that guy sure as fuck isn't just.
misguided, right?
Like, that's real Hitler-esque shit right there.
He knows what he's doing, has incorporated that into his worldview, kind of likes that
aspect of it and certainly isn't slown down by it.
But then also it's like with Lindsey Graham, it's like, I don't know, when the thing about
you is that you always love war, like you're always for war.
It does just start to make you wonder like, come on, dude.
Are you really just this wrong?
Are you just this stupid?
Or are you in whatever way, compromised, sick in the head, or just aware that this is a price tag with your policy?
It's like, yeah, a whole bunch of innocent people are going to die.
But you know what?
It's not me and mine.
It's over there.
Either way, I just, I don't really, if I'm being honest here, and again, this is not from a left-wing
perspective where I'm saying, like, there's nothing, there's no relativism in this.
like objective standards here, I just don't really see a sound coherent argument as to why this is
worlds apart from like someone praising Hitler immediately after he died.
You know, aside from the difference that he wasn't the furor, he was just one member of the
phony Senate.
But, you know, like, okay, that difference understood.
But like, aside from that, I don't know, Rob Marley, I don't really see much of a difference.
Well, let's watch the other clips where we can see Lindsey Graham being even more gleeful.
about this. Here, you know what? Let's
yeah, okay, let's do that. Let's go
to the other Lindsay Graham. I'm sorry. You're absolutely right.
Let's go to those.
There's been knocked out now.
The mental count is going way down.
No.
Amazingly, sorry.
I almost cried. I mean, like,
how long have we been pushing this?
You've been pushing this for years.
Right. It's here. I'm talking to Trump this morning.
Well, he's Jack.
It's the best thing I've ever done.
Mike Fox.
He loves blowing stuff up.
So, you know, there are a lot of people inside didn't want to do it.
So I've had my challenges.
But President Trump, when he gets into the zone, he listens, ask good questions, you know, no tweeting.
He hasn't tweeted much at all.
No drama.
He's been a great wartime president.
I said last night that Trump and B.B. are like Roosevelt and Churchill.
I mean, they're the right two guys to confront this evil.
I don't entirely disagree with them on that one.
They are a lot like FDR and Churchill.
Now, that means very different things to me and Lindsey Graham,
but I would agree with them on that.
Rob, what can you say, man?
I mean, again, this is like, what I'm saying?
like when I'm making comparisons to like Hitler and Stalin again in his words Trump likes blowing stuff up
you know um people die when you blow stuff up everybody knows that um Iranians have been dying by
the thousands during this thing people in Lebanon have been died you know like people and
anyway Rob I mean what can you say about the glee that this guy feels like even I'll just say
this and then you, but even if you're pro war, even if me and you, Rob, are wrong about everything and
the pro war hawks are right about all of this, shouldn't they still be kind of like somber as they
launched the thing? If they know innocent people are going to die, this is, this is,
Lindsay Graham is doing this like hours before 168 little girls get killed, you know?
dude this shit is fucking dark man yep it certainly doesn't have the uh flavor of morality or adult in the room
of uh this is going to have terrible consequences but it needs to be done and i wish we weren't here uh this
is a guy who's gleeful about the fact that he's finally able to get a war that we never needed
and he finally found a president that he could pitch on it and hilarious he pretends like
he's the adult in the room of uh well donald trump i could finally get that child to focus and
stay off Twitter. And he was zoned in asking all the right questions. I guess all the right
questions are how is this going to go, Mr. Lindsay Graham. Oh, perfect. The people themselves
are going to revolt. And within a couple months, we'll have multiple cities and momentum on our
side. So great that Lindsey Graham is the adult in the room, was able to get Donald Trump's focus
for Donald Trump to ask good questions, which also just showcases, you know, Donald Trump's
bad at his job that he's looking to Lindsey Graham for advice. And the advice boils down to
a completely flawed policy or idea of how this might go.
But, yeah, I mean, just to your point, the fact that he's giddy about this
because this is life's work is this accomplishment without any sense of,
it sucks that this is what we have to do, but we have to do it.
It's pretty disgusting to see that he would even record that and put it out on film
or allow for it that he's so locked in on that what he's doing is right.
Yeah, no, that's well said.
all spot on.
And the other thing I was thinking about with this.
I talked about this a little bit.
I did a Tom Wood show yesterday.
I think that's out tomorrow.
Go check that out, as always.
Tom Woods, the goat, the best ever.
Love that guy.
His show is so good, by the way.
People don't have to go through the archives of the Tom Wood show.
One of the best shows out there.
But we were talking about how like there's this weird dynamic where they'll do this thing where.
So like Thomas Massey gets unseated in Congress.
And then you'll see someone on social media will be like the Jewish money came in and took out Thomas Massey.
And then someone else will be like, that's really anti-Semitic to say it like that.
But then you see John Podharic go and the Jewish money came in and took out Thomas Massey.
And you're like, oh, hey, but you just said the same thing that he's like it's not anti-Semitic.
If you're for it, it's only anti-Semitic if you're against it.
Like it's just such a bizarre standard that I don't know, just can't.
possibly. So anyway, the thing I'm thinking, like, and this is that, I've been saying, like,
since the 12-day war last year, Rob, as you know, I've been on all the highest profile debates around
the country saying, this is the war the neocons have wanted the whole time. They've spent 20 years
trying to get this war. This is a continuation of the seven countries in five years and the
clean breaks. Like, this has been the whole central argument. And then as if I need, it's like the
Fauci Diaries, as if we need another piece of evidence, like we don't. We've already got our case
sealed, but then, oh, God, well, here he is admitting that they were funding gain of function
research, and here he is admitting what the death rate was and where the origin of the virus came
from.
Okay, well, here is Lindsay Graham.
What is the first thing he says?
The same as Benjamin Netanyahu, the first thing he says when they launched the war is,
this was my life's work.
Like, they acknowledge we've been pushing this war the whole time.
This is what the whole global war on terrorism has been leading up to.
And what is this? I mean, like, who's even arguing anymore that this isn't a strategy for Israel?
Who else was the strategy for, Rob? What? The strategy, your life's work was what?
Toppling Saddam Hussein and Omar Gaddafi and the Ayatollah in Iran. For who? You get 50 guesses, Rob.
Which country is it that Lindsay Graham wants to do that for? Like, I don't know. That's the other thing that
I saw about this too, like while he's so giddy about, and this is one of the interesting things
about, it's kind of like the way people, you know what, like when people talk shit in a fight,
like UFC fighters or boxers will talk shit, even a very high level sometimes.
And it's like, because if you get a guy emotional, they give away a little bit.
They get, they get out of their game.
And this is why it's kind of interesting seeing Lindsay Graham when he gets emotional and he gets
excited because the first thing he says is there's always something Freudian in people when they
get real emotional. The first thing he says is this is what we've been trying to do the whole time.
And that's right. And what was Lindsey Graham? By the way, keep in mind, everybody, the original
never-trumper. If you remember, the first guy he started feuding with when he was running for
president, the original never-trumper, well, Donald Trump carried out their life's work.
And as you know, it's working out really wonderfully. We all get to inherit the spoils.
Uh, yep, let's, uh, I think there's one more clip.
Yeah, yeah, let's go to the next one.
Do you have it on speaker, Ryan?
Yep, okay.
Okay, all right, connecting you now.
Hello.
Hey, baby, Lindsay.
Hey, Lindsay.
How are you?
I couldn't, I'm just so impressed.
Glad to be your friend.
I'm glad you are, my friend.
I'm going to meet with the president this weekend.
I'm going down to Doral.
I'm going to try to get him to join with y'all in Lebanon,
to maybe fly some with you. Would you like that?
Yeah, but I've been thinking about the other side of it for a second.
We're concentrating right now on your phone.
If we tell Czbollah that we're going all the way, we threaten them,
but if we actually do it, then they have no reason not to go all the way against us.
Okay. That's not our interest.
Okay.
We can do it right there.
Well, I'll, okay.
Okay, well, that's actually good counsel.
I'll put it out there as an idea.
We can always...
So here is a real fascinating exchange where you have,
you know, what can only be described as like a childlike gleeful Lindsay Graham
calling Netanyahu,
essentially just praising him,
saying he's so glad to be his friend, he's so excited,
and actually getting out ahead of Netanyahu
in what he's going to be advocating the U.S. military do on behalf of Israel.
And, you know, he is actually saying, I'm going to go to Trump right now to try to get him to join the war in Lebanon.
And Bibi is going, well, wait, hold on one second.
Not quite yet.
We want him bombing Iran still because we want Lebanon, essentially, we don't want them to go for broke right now.
So if they see Americans coming, they know that it's time to go for broke.
So we don't want that.
So maybe in a little bit.
and this is like i don't know man it's truly truly remarkable uh what are your thoughts i i get that
they're filming for a doc here and so that maybe this is somewhat staged even though this doesn't make
lindsay look great so i can't imagine that this was overly staged but the casualness by which
you would think these were more planned out decisions of it sounds like two teenagers just
calling each other like hey i'm i'm going to see trump so i'm going to ask him if i know some extra
stuff while I'm there. And Netanyi, I was like, by the way, he goes, oh yeah, dude, I mean,
typically speaking, we love bombing. And so I get where you're coming from. In this case,
I don't think it's the right time because we're Jews and we try and be sneaking. We don't want
them to realize that we're actually trying to destroy them. And so if you guys stay out of this,
we can pull more of our sneaky, sneaky moves. And we can do that later, but you listen,
you definitely have the right idea, but we already have enough beers at this party. And I don't
want people getting too drunk. So don't actually bring the hard liquor from your parents' cabinet.
it's a wildly not sophisticated call from Lindsay Graham where it's not like he's done a ton of
analysis he's just calling him up like hey as long as I'm seeing President Trump I'm going to get
I'm going to try and get some more bombs for you guys no it's just it's just more bombs for Israel
that's it that's the extent of Lindsay Graham's analysis Benjamin Netanyahu is at least thinking
he's at least got a little bit of a strategy yeah I mean look I don't I don't know you know how
much more there is that you can say, but there's, yeah, look, I mean, here's, here's Lindsey Graham,
just a merchant of death. And I, and I'm sorry, I don't, look, I'm, I understand anybody being turned
off by what they see as like cruelty in the face of death or being turned off by people who are
like mocking him or making jokes or trashing or saying they're glad he's dead or things like
that. Completely understand not partaking in any.
of that, not really particularly my style either.
But honestly, like, if we're just analyzing that, I don't know.
I don't want to hear my, I don't want to hear politicians praising Lindsey Graham.
I just, I find something, I think there'd be something kind of sickening about all of it,
to be honest.
All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Quince.
I've been telling you guys about Quince for a little while.
I love this company.
I own several articles of clothing from them.
If you're looking to level up your summer wardrobe without breaking the bank,
definitely check out Quince.
Everything at Quince is priced 50 to 80% less than similar brands.
I'm telling you guys,
they have stuff that looks really, really nice.
That's both casual and formal and is very reasonably priced.
Quince European linen pants and shirts are the perfect warm weather upgrade
to add to your rotation starting at just $34.
Their teas are soft and easy to weigh.
and their lightweight cotton sweaters are perfect for cooler summer nights.
They work directly with ethical factories and cut out the middleman,
so you're paying for quality, not brand markup.
Also, Quince goes way beyond clothing.
They have custom upholstered sofas, ceramic cookware, premium bedding.
It's the kind of brand you end up recommending to everyone for everything.
So elevate your summer wardrobe today by going to quince.com slash POTP for free shipping
on your orders and 365-day returns now available in Canada as well. That's Q-U-I-N-C-E.com slash P-O-T-P.
Quince.com slash P-O-T-P for free shipping and 365-day returns. All right, let's get back into the show.
All right. Speaking of sickening, you know, it's the second worst government program, Rob.
First is war. Second is grocery stores. We've always said that. It's always first war. But, you know,
commies to the left of us and war hawks to the right so we got to deal with all of them but i'm i'm
sure uh you saw rob uh mom donnie has opened at least one of i don't think he actually
opened it i think the uh the developing i i think i'm sorry i'm getting fake news here it's being
developed yes i think it's like six months out and he was just and he was just show and he was showcasing
uh was that real food behind him or was it north korea stop
fake food. Well, I'm guessing it was a fake display of what might exist in the future and a description
of what the pricing mechanism is, but I believe I had it wrong because I thought that it was the
grand opening and I think it was more the press conference of the way that the stores are
planning on operating. Okay, interesting. Well, let's go to the clip here. I was so good at it as well.
I thought that it was an opening. Oh, there you go. Well, here. Let's go to Mom Donnie's
announcement of developing a grocery store.
We know that for many New Yorkers, 30% at the grocery store means something very different.
Since 2019, food prices have soared at grocery stores around the country by roughly 30%, in fact.
Talk to shoppers around the city, and you'll often hear the same frustration.
Wages have not kept up.
Making matters even worse, some corporations have built out technology that allows for something
called surveillance pricing, collecting personal data to charge some people more than others
for the same carton of eggs, for the same gallon of milk.
All of this leaves too many New Yorkers feeling like groceries are out of...
I have to comment on that.
I agree with them that I hate the concept of discriminatory pricing that a company could
see that you're a person who will pay more for something, so they'll charge you more.
I don't think anyone likes paying more than the next person.
with that said, if you are looking to help poor people,
the poor people are not the ones being charged more for eggs.
What that means is that a grocery store that has like,
if they're using this technology,
if you had a grocery store theoretically with one store in Harlem
and one on the Upper East Side,
the Upper East Side might be paying more for eggs,
which would actually supplement the cost of eggs for the people in Harlem
that you're trying to also sell eggs to.
It's actually what you are for.
We don't like it, but you should like it.
It's literally, yeah, right.
Okay, yeah, anyway.
It's the opposite of what he thinks it is.
Unless is it theory, but this wouldn't be, like, from surveillance of customers,
you could say that there's a company that's actually charging more in the poor areas
because they have more security risks or other costs that they have to offset,
but that's not actually what he's, that's not what he's described.
He's describing tracking individuals and charging wealthier individuals more for food because
they can pay more.
And what a dumb pitch.
Yeah.
Yes.
Agreed.
Here, let's keep lying.
breach. And that is frankly unacceptable, which is why city government is stepping in to make people's
lives more affordable. Today, I am proud to announce a collection of essential staples that will be
predictably 30% cheaper at all five of our city-run grocery stores. This core set of goods will
include all fresh produce, meat, and seafood along with 20 other essential items like cheese, milk,
and bread. Here's how it will work. Once a month, our five city run grocery stores will set prices
for this core set of goods at 30% below typical retail prices. No exceptions, no gimmicks.
The savings will last for the entire month. That means no weekly fluctuations nor sticker shock
at the checkout line. Not for our seniors living on fixed incomes, nor for the parents who rely on a
regular supply of apple slices to keep toddler tantrums at bay. Now, can we all see?
this incredible example of produce in my hand.
Now you will see these plantains here.
So for anyone wondering how much these beautiful plantains might cost,
you can use this QR code or head to grocery.N.YC to access our policy report.
I'm going to demonstrate exactly what that means.
Ladies and gentlemen, the QR code does work.
You can see this here.
All right.
I pay 30% more to not have to QR code a piece of produce to find out what it costs.
So, well, I just want to, let's just get into this a little bit because look, man, I mean,
as is with all of these things, well, first of up, who knows exactly what's going to happen,
but when all of them do happen, everyone will have their story about why it didn't work or what
was this or what the cost was.
But all I would just challenge people to do here is just think this through for a minute
and try to think about how silly the idea of all of this.
this is. Here he's saying, okay, so he's going to, he's developing five grocery stores.
They're going to pick a basket of goods and decide that they're pegging it to 70% of whatever
that costs on the market, right? You just got to point out that's convenient for a socialist
because now you've got a market pricing mechanism to work off of.
Yeah, well, that's right.
Well, that's one thing immediately, right?
So you're just basing it off just what they charge minus 30%.
Seems a little bit arbitrary.
Seems a little bit arbitrary what goods you pick in there and what aren't.
He goes, it'll last for the full month wide for, you know, like, look,
immediately it starts raising some questions.
Like there is a, there almost is a recognition of scarcity, Rob.
if you get what I'm saying, because why make it for a month?
Why only these items?
Why not, you know, all of the items in the store?
Why only five stores?
Why not 10 stores?
Why a supermarket?
Why not a shoe store?
You know, there's a lot of questions here, and these are the things that capitalists
have to deal with asking these questions all the time.
And like, it's funny when people, politicians want to get into it, they think somehow
that like none of these questions are relevant.
But they're very important questions.
And what happens with capitalists is if they do.
don't get the questions right, they lose a shit ton of money. And that's the way that, you know,
that's what they have to deal with and why they work these things out. But you might, so look,
as of right now, I mean, according to this is the answer I got from AI, but also keep in mind
these budgets with city budgets never stick to exactly what they are. But it says,
the plan right now has initial capital funding public allocation of $70 million.
$70 million.
That's been put aside.
Now, almost certainly they'll run over that.
Almost every government project runs.
It was initially $60 million.
And, yeah, it was initially $60 million.
And so they've already spent $70 million, so whatever is, 15% up or something like that.
I'm usually pretty good at predictions, but it's rare that they actually have already
come true the second I make them.
No, but anyway, you know, so that's an easy prediction to make.
Government budgets will usually run over what they are.
But so right away, like, if anybody's being.
honest here. It's like already the conversation is this is a math question now, number one,
in the immediate, in the scene, not in the unseen, just in the scene, there's a math question,
meaning, oh, okay, $70 million, or I'm sorry, what do we say? You said it went from 60 to 70, right?
So $70 million. So now it's not, did New Yorkers like paying 30% less on these 20 issues?
It's a math equation of, is that savings more than the 70 million?
that you're costing the taxpayer.
But then, of course, the other question is, Rob,
is that you're taking $70 million from the taxpayer
and investing it in this with, like, is there any sense?
You know, you'll hear Democratic Socialists, Rob.
Keith Knight, I think, made this point.
I don't know if he said it exactly like this,
but you'll hear Democratic Socialists.
They often talk about wage theft or profit sharing, right?
So they'll talk about the fact that if you are being paid a wage, right?
So if I work a job for a wage, well, then my boss is stealing what they'll call the excess value of my labor, right?
And if he's making a profit, I should take part in profit sharing.
Now, for some reason, you never hear him mention loss sharing.
This never comes up.
That actually, go look up the numbers.
I don't remember exactly what they are, but I think.
50% of businesses fail in the first few years, the overwhelming majority fail in the first
decade.
Most businesses fail.
Most businesses don't work.
Are the workers on the hook for that?
Okay, so that's one question, right, that kind of exposes something in the socialist
worldview.
But that same question applies to government investing money.
You know, most people, even when they're investing their own money, and so they're very
concerned about the risk, end up losing when they go into business.
Oh, by the way, Rob, I don't know, you want to run those numbers through New York City brick and mortar businesses?
Because, oh, you're going to come up with a whole bunch of different numbers there.
But so the idea that just on behalf of the taxpayer, it's a good idea that we invest in this riskiest of investments because it's good for people to pay 30% lower in groceries.
Even from the socialist perspective, you'd understand that, well, there's a calculation there to be.
made to say maybe it would have been better to just give the taxpayers the money to go grocery
shopping right like if you're opening a store that's going to be bleeding money that's going to be
losing its own like this may so it doesn't it this is the infantile thing that democratic socialist
insist on that's really infuriating is it's like no it's good because it's free and it's less
what are you against it fresh produce free less like none of these other considerations need be thought
about, but if you want to be an adult, you actually have to think about this shit.
Well, I'll tell you why this policy is going to fail is because the exact communities
that it's looking to support are going to show up and go, hey, we're the individually
wrapped gushers.
And so you got a guy here who's going, listen, I'm going to help you guys out with fresh
produce.
And firstly, I don't know how concerned those communities are with their availability for
fresh produce.
But if also, I didn't hear him mention the word eggs in his list.
of goods. I think he did.
No? Did he not? I thought he did.
And maybe you're right.
And meat.
But I mean, all right, firstly,
it's the $70 million, I don't believe, is the total number because you also have
the allocation of the real estate, which would be one of your biggest expenses in New York.
I think $70 million is just the buildout number.
The next issue that you have is that one of the locations that they built, which is the
one in Harlem, was four times the cost of what
private grocers would spend on a build-out, and that includes even like a Whole Foods,
which is a more high-end market, which leads you with the question of, can the government do
better than the private market? And you've got a history of these government grocery stores failing.
And now you're in the next stage of, I guess, the operators getting the contracts and whether
or not it turns out to be worthwhile for them. But the biggest flaw that I'm just hearing is,
Firstly, there's no guarantee on the items that are going to be there.
And the best you're going to get is a 30% discount on a monthly basis from what's happening at the grocery stores.
So if you continue to have inflation, you don't have it for, I mean, if you were looking for government groceries, you're not getting free guaranteed food.
You're getting as there's inflation and food costs are going up on any given month.
You can purchase what you're looking or select goods for 30% less.
So I'm just saying like the socialist dream of a free market, that's not even what they're offering you.
They're offering you 30% less if you're willing to shop at the government store for the select goods that will be available.
Dude, it's all and again, as we always say with these things.
Well, look, if I sign, maybe I should make one other point that I just, I wonder about.
But there might, they may have come up with some answers to this.
But there's lots of logistical questions like around the stuff too, Rob.
like so can anybody shop there?
I believe so.
So anybody from outside the city can come in there and get 30% cheaper groceries to.
Yeah, because I guess the assumption is who's traveling.
The point is this is not that good that you have to worry about non-city residents who are willing to pay a toll on both sides for 30% discount.
Yes, probably not.
But then in a sense you could also go, which happens a lot with this kind of like socialist nonsense, is that also.
like, look, okay, so me and you maybe don't like the idea of paying a different price than
everyone else or someone with more money having to pay more of a price, right?
But there is something where like, if the government's going to come in and reduce prices by
30%, should a guy making $5 million a year be able to come in there and get his groceries
for that much cheaper and now get subsidized by the taxpayers to pay less for his stuff?
So you're not even like targeting the people who need the help.
You're kind of just, it's like a spray shot out at everyone.
But look, let me say this, right?
Because I've been trying to make this point quite a bit on economics lately, but I'll try to make it here too.
Because I think honestly, I think the Messessian Austrian, I think we're the only ones who really see things this way.
Even other free market types aren't going to make this point.
But the thing is that, like, again, you have a problem here.
The problem is high prices, right?
Like that's the issue of what's going on with groceries.
You have high prices.
Why do you have high prices?
You have high prices?
because you have to base your currency.
Okay, like the thing about prices is that if you feel like prices are too high
or you feel like prices are too low, for lots of different reasons,
people always want prices to be different.
Everybody wants, I want the price that I pay for everything to be very, very low,
and I want the price that I get paid for everything to be very, very high.
But for an economy to prosper, what you want is accurate information in your prices,
not the prices that you want.
Like if your currency has been destroyed,
the prices are going to reflect that.
And trying to, through the force of government,
change those prices,
you're changing the signal.
You're not changing.
Now, I understand with groceries,
you could say,
yeah, yeah, but that's putting real groceries in people's pockets.
But I think there's a deeper point than that.
You know, I remember one time Ron Paul was asked,
this is like an 08 or 09,
why the Federal Reserve shouldn't be buying,
up all these toxic assets. And he goes, well, the assets should be left to be sold on the,
on the market. And then the CNBC host goes, yeah, but they're worth zero on the market.
And then Ron Paul goes, okay, well, that's good information. Why put that on the taxpayer?
Like, if they're worth zero, then they're worth zero. So why would the Fed buy them? You know what I mean?
Now we all own something that's worth zero. Like there's, it's like you're messing with these prices.
But so in other words, right?
Why is it, think about it like this, right?
Why is it that no democratic policymaker is advocating that neuroscientists get a higher minimum wage?
Why will you never hear a socialist talking about how neuroscientists need a higher minimum wage?
Because they don't get the minimum wage.
They don't get the minimum wage.
They don't have that problem.
They have skills, right?
They have knowledge. They are educated. They have marketable skills. You don't need to worry about
that. So in other words, if you have a whole community of people and you go, they're all making
$4 an hour, that is information. The information is that your workforce does not have marketable
skills. Just raising the price, didn't give them marketable skills. It didn't make them neurosurgeons.
And so in a similar sense, the idea that you would say, hey,
we have this problem, which is the prices of, you know, the price of groceries is going up.
It's like, okay, but what caused that?
And if you won't even ask yourself, what caused that problem, then obviously you're not going
to really be able to solve it.
And then you're just doing silly little things like this.
Like, is it?
Who says it's a good investment to spend way more than, you know, than private company.
spend to open supermarkets and that we're investing the taxpayer's money.
You know, say whatever you will, Rob, about those private businessmen who open
supermarkets, they raise their money from people who voluntarily give it to them.
They don't just force those same people who they're claiming to want to help to invest
in something that may or may not be profitable, that may completely tank.
So, you know, again, we'll see how this goes.
As always, yes, I'm sure if the first person who gets,
in there and gets a piece of produce for a little bit cheaper, we'll probably like that.
But overall as a model, it makes no sense.
And if it did make sense, then at least socialist just be consistent.
Advocate for this with everything.
Like, if this does make sense, then like, why should it just answer this question?
Then why only for a month?
Why only 20 items?
Why only five stores?
We've got big problems.
There's millions of people in New York City who need groceries.
open 50 stores.
Spend the entire budget, right?
Like, I don't know.
Is there a limiting principle here, Rob?
I never seem to hear one.
All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Ridge.
You got to check them out.
I've had a Ridge wallet for many years now.
I switched from the traditional leather brick in my back pocket, which I did for far too long.
But you got to go check out a Ridge wallet.
They're unique, slim, modern design.
They hold up to 12 cards plus cash.
So it's like a minimalist wallet.
It's just everything you need.
But I'm telling you, you pull one out, it's a conversation starter.
They all look really cool.
They have 50 plus colors and styles to choose from.
They're all made from premium materials like aluminum, titanium, and carbon fiber.
All Ridge products have a lifetime warranty.
So this is literally the last wallet you'll ever have to buy.
There's a reason they have over 100,000 five-star reviews online.
And losing your wallet is the worst.
We've all been there.
But with the Ridge Air Tag attachment, you'll always know exactly where your wallet is before panic mode kicks in.
And Ridge isn't just about wallets.
They create premium everyday carry essentials like keycases, suitcases, rings, all built
with the same sleek, durable design.
And no matter what you pick, Ridge has free shipping, a 99-day risk-free trial, and a lifetime warranty on all of their products.
So for a limited time, our listeners can get 10% off at Ridge by using the promo code P-O-T-P-10 at checkout.
Just head to ridge.com and use the promo code P-O-T-P-10.
you're all set. Once again, ridge.com promo code POTP 10 for 10% off. All right, let's get back
into the show. I guess the best the government can do is 30% off on select goods on a rotating
basis and then up to the store owners to actually be able to source them and then not
log the highest available price for those goods to give you the least actual discount.
It's going to be fun to see what kind of games actually come into play. Also, I think I was wrong.
I think it does include eggs, but, you know, I'm excited to see how this plays out.
As I said, to the extent that Momdani tries to actually run with socialist policies,
we get to watch them fail in real time.
And so, you know, let the rest of the country learn what happens when you vote in Democratic Socialists.
Yeah.
Or just start buying up some of those items.
Is there any rule prohibiting you from buying up the 30% cheaper and then selling them at retail?
Oh, that's an interesting one.
some some people come in and just buy out the whole store and then uh set up shop on the uh on the street
and you got to make sure you go you got to go to the projects you got to sell it back to poor people
you got to make sure that you're you're gouging them i'm just kidding don't do that we're not the
greedy libertarians people think we are um yeah anyway it's like uh there is isn't there something
though it's interesting like at least the the old socialist would just go all the way and say yeah
collectivize all the farms right like at least like you know say it with your whole chest i mean
I mean, so don't, please, don't, because it does result in tens of millions of people starving to death.
We're not trying to do that.
But like, that's, it's like, oh, we're going to apply that same logic, but just in a drop.
Just one little drop of that.
Okay.
But why?
Why stop there?
You know, I was watching this video that this guy made the, like, why I'm a liberal and not a democratic socialist video.
And, well, just to save you to the end of it, they have no reason.
Not to, they don't know. Well, sometimes the market should work for some things, but other things the government should come in for. Okay. Well, that's not much of a theory now, is it? Why? Based on what criteria? What? Like, I don't know. I mean, I just think to me, this is like a, this is a basic consistency test. You know, there are goods and services. Okay. Some of them are very, very important. As we talk about a lot on the show, actually, like, there's a bunch that are very, very important that none of us even really think about. Like, but I mean, even, even
Even like things like toothbrushes or something like that are very, very important.
You need it.
You use it multiple times a day, or at least I hope you do.
And clothes and shoes and, you know, all these things.
But, okay, healthcare and supermarkets and all these things.
It's all part of.
So if you're saying that it is a more efficient model for the government to tax you
and then the government to provide goods and services back to people.
If that gets better goods and services to people, then do that with everything.
And if price controls work, if the government can just write a law that says,
hey, these prices are cheaper.
Hey, we got a problem here, man.
Look, everybody acknowledges it's a problem that groceries have gotten so expensive.
Well, if it's a solution, that government can just say, well, I just wrote a law,
it says they're cheaper, or I just opened a supermarket where we sell them for cheaper,
then okay, fine.
But it would really help people
if the price of wheat and grain and flour
and housing and everything was a lot cheaper.
That would really help poor people.
So I'm saying the government should open a store
for all of those things.
The government should sell your TVs.
The government should sell your laptops.
The government should sell you your grain.
The government should set the price of wheat.
The government should set the price of rice.
you know, whatever. Why shouldn't they do it with everything if they should do it with these things?
And if not, if not, why not? Why does it only make sense for grocery stores, but not for shoe stores?
Because I've never heard a socialist explain that ever. Well, Mom Doni might actually be a better
politician than we gave him credit for. And that, oh, he is. Oh, he for sure is. But what you might
actually find is that your fake socialist wealthy kids that are living in New York City,
who are for Mum Donnie, but don't actually understand what socialism is and don't really want it,
suddenly have a store that they're using for the kind of goods and services that they like,
which is lettuce, fruits, and vegetables, and they can get it for 30% off.
And they go, oh, my God, look at how well this democratic socialism is working.
And the poor people who this is supposedly supposed to support don't really actually make use of these stores,
nor is it helpful to them.
Dude, and I'll tell you, that dynamic happens with government programs all the time, all the time.
You know, like when you have what ends up happening, right?
You got a buyer voters somehow.
Well, but I just mean that to your exact.
So like, for example, so like Martin Luther King in the civil rights movement, he would point to like black kids living in the slums of Mississippi and be like, look how poor these guys are, you know?
And then like in the 70s, you get this like affirmative action push that gets.
So then you'll have like Ivy League colleges that are like, hey, we're going to up the number of black students that we have at Harvard or whatever.
And so what happens when Harvard has to up the number of black students?
Okay.
Well, typically speaking, the black students that would go to like Wesleyan, you know, now can get into Harvard.
Right.
So the upper middle class black kid with a dentist father and a lawyer mother who was going to go to Wesleyan, you know,
I was going to go to Wesley and now can go to Harvard.
Oh, the black kid in the slum in Mississippi?
Did he get into Harvard?
Because they, no.
It's like, it didn't actually help.
And so it's a very good point you make that like,
this isn't going to help the people who Mom Donnie puts on the front of the brochure.
Let's just say that.
It'll be like scenesters who are getting this stuff.
Anyway, that's our episode for today.
I will be addressing the Young Americans for Liberty crowd later on tonight,
unfortunately.
remotely. But I don't know if they put that online or not, but I'll think of some stuff to say
and then I'll say it and hopefully it comes out real good tonight when I say it. Okay, thanks for listening.
Portjore.com, commentatysmith.com. Catch you guys tomorrow. Peace.
