Part Of The Problem - Trump the Gangster
Episode Date: February 20, 2025Dave Smith brings you the latest in politics! On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave discusses Trump attempting to end the war in Ukraine, designating drug cartels as terrorist groups, ...and more.Support Our Sponsors:My Patriot Supply - https://www.preparewithsmith.com/Sheath - https://sheathunderwear.com use promo code PROBLEM20Lucy - Lucy.co/problemPart Of The Problem is available for early pre-release at https://partoftheproblem.com as well as an exclusive episode on Thursday!Get your tickets to Porch Tour here:https://porchtour.comFind Run Your Mouth here:YouTube - http://youtube.com/@RunYourMouthiTunes - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/run-your-mouth-podcast/id1211469807Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/4ka50RAKTxFTxbtyPP8AHmFollow the show on social media:X:http://x.com/ComicDaveSmithhttp://x.com/RobbieTheFireInstagram:http://instagram.com/theproblemdavesmithhttp://instagram.com/robbiethefire#libertarianSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
What's up? What's up everybody? Welcome to a brand new episode of Part of the Problem.
I am Dave Smith. I am writing solo for this episode. Thank you to all of you guys for
joining. Before we get into it, I got a lot I want to talk to you guys about today. Before we, before we get into that, uh, tomorrow,
I am heading out to Houston, Texas,
comicdavesmith.com for the ticket links there.
We got shows Thursday, Friday and Saturday night. Uh,
I believe five total shows. Um,
and there's still a few tickets for some of them remaining.
So if you want to come see me and Robbie the fire Bernstein out in Houston,
comicdavesmith.com is the place to go.
And then our next stop after that will be Buffalo, New York. And, uh, then I,
I, we got a whole bunch of dates for the rest of the year.
So if you want to come see us live, go to comic davesmith.com.
The other piece of exciting news, which I cannot give you all the details on,
but I did have a, uh,
a great phone call with, um,
Jean Epstein this morning, who is many of you hardcore listeners to the show
will, will know is just one of my favorite people in the world. Um,
and so it was great. It was great catching up with him.
I will be returning to the SOHO forum, uh,
which is an amazing debate series to do another Oxford style debate.
We're still locking down the date.
The opponent has been selected, but I'm not at Liberty to announce that yet.
Although my understanding is that he's agreed to it too.
So it's going to be a debate on immigration.
And I think it'll be one that, that people will really enjoy.
So I'm looking forward to that.
We should be able to announce all the details of it.
I'm hoping within the next week or two, well,
we'll have all of those details,
but the soho forum.org is the website you should,
regardless of me debating there, you should go check them out.
They're a monthly debate series in New York city and they get like, just really, they get like great people, a lot of really, uh,
like great thinkers and very relevant, um,
smart people have a have debated there before and they've got all their debates
are online. If you can check out their entire catalog and it's really fun, uh,
to go to them live. It's always a great time. So I used to,
for years ago,
when I was less busy than I am now and had less children than I have now and,
um, lived in New York city, there were several factors involved, but I used to,
um, I I've debated at the SOHO forum before and I used to regularly do stand up,
uh, like at the, the debate series before the debates. And, um, I love all of the,
the people involved with it. Um, and so anyways, I'm, I'm excited to,
to go back. So it's probably long overdue, but we did, um, I,
I did firmly agree to return to the Soho forum.
So I very much looking forward to that. And I think,
I think you guys are going to enjoy it. Hopefully you enjoy it. Okay.
So let's get into the topic of today's show.
And I will, um, I've,
I've got a little an idea of some stuff that I want to talk about and then I
will do my best to get to some questions in the live chat,
uh, as well as possible. So the, um, but as I always mentioned, sign up at part of the problem.com. If you want to be a part of the live chat as well if possible. So the, um, but as I always mentioned,
sign up at part of the problem.com if you want to be a part of the live chat,
if you want to get the members only episode and a bunch of other goodies,
that's how you can help support the show.
Go sign up over at part of the problem.com. All right.
So Donald Trump is a,
he's president of the United States of America.
I don't know if you guys heard one, a second term, pretty impressive victory.
He's in a very interesting situation.
Um, and I think as we've already kind of,
everybody knows at this point that Donald Trump 2.0 is quite a bit different than
the first Donald Trump who came in.
And part of this might be the people he has around him.
Part of this might be that he has learned some lessons and has a little bit of
wisdom from having been in there for four years already.
Part of it might be that he had a near depth experience and maybe it's changed
them in some ways. I don't exactly know. Um,
maybe a little bit of all of those, but Donald Trump in his
first four years, uh,
really made enemies in Washington DC with a lot of his rhetoric.
And I think the fact that he was so uncontrollable, um,
there's something inherent about Donald Trump that is uncontrollable. Uh,
it is not at all clear to me that even Donald Trump can control what Donald
Trump might blurt out. And certainly the more you kind of examine the American system of government,
you realize that, um, most of the, let's say the most powerful people in our
society, uh, certainly in terms of political power were quite fine with
Joe Biden being president
Think about that and it wasn't even it was all the talking heads in the corporate media all the big donors all of them
They were fine with joe biden up until that debate performance and why were they why did they have a problem with joe biden?
after that debate performance
Well, it was because it it was too obvious that he couldn't win if he was this senile. And so they had to get someone who could
beat Donald Trump in there. That's ultimately what got Joe Biden out. But as
we all know, Joe Biden was senile for four years of his presidency.
Look, this is obvious. Everybody knows this. Anyone who is being honest with
themselves or paying attention knew this at the time.
But what's the really interesting insight from that is that, Oh, all of these
powerful people are actually quite fine with not having a president.
Why would that be?
Why would they be okay with that?
And it's because they, they know that they won't get any resistance
from the man in the chair.
You know, like they're, you didn't have to worry about Joe Biden changing his mind
and, you know, like taking some drastic new course of action.
Whereas with Donald Trump, he's just much more difficult to control.
You know, Donald Trump, even from 2016, 2017, Donald Trump, he always, you know,
they may get their man in the position that they want, but Donald Trump might
fire that guy and bring in a different guy who's not
their guy. You just don't know what he might do, you know? And, and,
and part of that is like to Donald Trump's credit.
Part of that is that he actually has some things that he believes in.
He actually thinks of himself as a boss because that's what he's been for his
entire life.
And part of it is maybe not as much to Donald Trump's credit that
Someone might just rub his ego the wrong way and he might just fire that guy because that's how Donald Trump operates
Either way, that's kind of what spooked him the first time
You know if you're talking about ending wars and draining the swamp you're gonna make some enemies in Washington DC Especially if they think you might actually mean it
some enemies in Washington DC, especially if they think you might actually mean it.
But this time around, Donald Trump is doing a little bit more than just saying that. And so obviously we've been covering for a few weeks on the show, the reaction to Doge.
If you want to make some enemies in Washington DC, you should talk about forcing government
agencies to open their books and floating out the idea of trillions in spending cuts,
that'll make you some enemies in DC. But this time,
Donald Trump has really done it and he has really, uh,
he appears to be gearing up to commit what is the Cardinal sin
in Washington, DC.
And what Donald Trump seems to be about to do is end a war.
And that is not something that you're supposed to do in Washington,
DC. Let me tell you, they do not like that much. Look,
think about it like this. What was undeniably the thing that got,
okay, aside from, aside from his debate performance where he you know was a vegetable
What got joe biden the most heat?
in the the legacy media
In the dinosaur media perhaps we should call it. What what is the thing that he got the most heat for?
What was the biggest controversy of his right? It's the afghanistan pullout
Right now don't get me wrong jo. Joe Biden certainly botched that withdrawal, but you know,
the level, well, just put it like this. Okay.
Think about how big a scandal Biden's botched withdrawal from
Afghanistan was. And again, he clearly botched it. Um,
there's, but if you really think about it,
think about how big a scandal his mismanagement of the pullout of Afghanistan
was, and then compare that to how big a scandal it was,
say when Obama launched the war in Libya or in Syria,
or when he backed the Saudis in the war in Yemen, this gets,
this is like not considered a scandal at all. In fact,
the entire corporate media and I still see people make this claim to this day claim that Obama's
administration was quote scandal free.
So they don't even consider this a potential scandal that a president just
launches a war without congressional approval in aggressive
war, right? Like nobody,
nobody's even making the claim that anyone in Libya ever attacked America
No one's making the claim that Bashar al-assad attacked America. No one's making the claim that the Houthis attacked America and
Nobody's making the claim that Congress gave approval for these wars. So Obama's literally launching illegal aggressive wars
And it's not even considered a scandal but
Biden ends a war which everybody acknowledges was a disaster a 20-year
catastrophe that's the huge scandal and by the way I mean if you look up the
numbers I think there was I think 17 US soldiers died in the pullout of, uh,
of Afghanistan.
And then between like some of the, with the drone strikes and a few,
like if you take it in totality,
I think it's like between 150 and 200 people died, um,
in Joe Biden's pullout of Afghanistan. Now don't get me wrong.
That's really bad. I'm not saying that's good. And it is a scandal. Um,
and there's, you know, we've gotten into this past.
We could get into the details of why that withdrawal was so poorly managed,
but just to keep is we're talking about less than 200 people dying.
I mean, you're talking about the war in Yemen.
It's in the hundreds of thousands of people died.
The war in Syria is somewhere in the ballpark of 500,000 people died. Um,
then in Libya, I don't think we have any good numbers on it, but I mean,
it's been a failed state since then and there were like open air slave
trade markets going on and I believe still are. So it's
at the lowest in the tens of thousands, probably in the hundreds of thousands.
So just think about that, right?
Like it's pretty crazy that you could start a war in illegal
aggressive war and,
and kill hundreds of thousands of people.
And somehow this isn't as big a scandal as ending the war. Well,
uh, Donald Trump now seems to be serious about ending the war in Ukraine.
And some of the statements that he's made and that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have made,
have made it pretty clear that they're on the path
to doing this.
And look, all it really took was America deciding
it was time to end the war.
And it seems like you got the commander in chief
and the defense secretary saying,
oh, we've decided to end it.
Well, if that's true, then the war is going to end.
Um, as anybody paying attention knows, this is, this is a war that could have been negotiated away before it started and at many different points during the war.
So it is it what the, the obstacle to peace was Joe Biden.
And that's, that's just the reality of the situation.
So keeping all of that in mind, I want to go through,
there's, there's a clip here that I saw yesterday, um,
that really it's rare that this happens,
but every now and then I'll see a clip where I'm just like, Oh,
there's so much here. There's so much here to unpack.
We're going to have to go through all of this. And it's a clip from, um, uh,
Senator, uh, what's his freaking name? Sorry. My apologies. I, uh,
constantly forget van Holland, Senator van Holland. Um,
so we're going to play the clip in a minute. Let me just say, by the way,
first of all, before we even get to, uh, um, uh,
Senator van Holland's remarks.
Because, you know, this is a senator talking about the current situation.
And it did just kind of, I don't know, I mean, it kind of like made me think about
Congress in a way.
Now, Van Halen, I think, is a Democrat.
But regardless of that,
isn't it kind of interesting in this moment in this really almost miraculous seeming moment.
And when I say miraculous, I don't mean that everything's perfect.
I just mean that we're, we're living in a political reality that would have seemed
impossible just a couple of years ago.
Sure would have still seemed very
unlikely a year ago.
Um, even if you thought Donald Trump was going to win, it would have seemed
unlikely that so many of the things that are happening would be happening.
And the, um, kind of the cultural shift has been really, uh, um, quite amazing
in this moment, isn't it starting almost to become apparent how just irrelevant and incompetent
Congress is in general?
I mean, it's like Donald Trump, you have this huge cultural shift.
Donald Trump, who, you know, just a couple years ago, Donald Trump was the guy who was you know an
insurrectionist
trader to his country
he was you know a
Convicted felon or he was about to be a convicted felon and he was gonna go to jail and he had all these charges
He was gonna be removed from ballots and now you're in a moment where
somehow he like got hold of like the
cool kid energy and he's all over like podcasts and he's you got NFL players
and UFC fighters doing the Trump dance.
And they're just the, the cultural shift has been phenomenal that
ultimately culminates in this guy winning every single swing state and
the popular vote for the first time in his three tries.
Okay.
You would think in this moment where he's signing executive orders like crazy and where um, you know the uh,
You know the you have doge going through all these different, you know
departments and government
Quietly what happened here is that the Republicans
also have the house and the Senate and the Supreme court,
but just focusing on the Congress, you have all these Republicans,
right? Who for years have claimed,
you know,
to believe in the constitution and to oppose big government. If you go back through all the old, you know, to believe in the constitution and to oppose big government.
If you go back through all the old, you know, Republican, all the old Republicans in Congress,
they have all said things about Obama's reckless spending, about how Barack Obama and Joe Biden
were gutting the constitution and they're, you know, they want to balance the budget,
they want to repeal Obamacare, they want want like all these things that they claim they want to do
How many of these bills have been put on Donald Trump's desk so far?
What are you waiting for? You got the numbers?
So do it send him something. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Oh, that's right. Find out maybe maybe they were always full of shit
So this is the the big problem that America has. It's like, you got these Democrats,
we're about to hear from one in the Senate and in the house,
you got these goddamn Democrats, these Democrats who are ruining America.
And then you have the Republicans.
And the major problem with Republicans is that they're all a bunch of Democrats
too.
So that kind of sums up the problem with politics. Anyway, let's
hear from one of them. Let's play this clip and we'll try our best to break this down.
Right now. But what they did in Munich with President Zelensky was primarily to bully
them, right? The Secretary of Treasury handed him a piece of paper that essentially required Ukraine to hand over about 50 percent of its mineral reserves to the United States, simply in payment of the support that we've already given, which we've given because they were a democratic country attacked by Putin and the Russian forces.
by Putin and the Russian forces. I mean, can you imagine FDR in the middle of World War II
saying to Churchill, you know,
we're not gonna continue to help you
until you turn over half of your coal and mineral reserves.
That's not how you behave when you wanna support
a friend who's under attack
by an authoritarian like Putin right now.
But what they did-
All right, so this was, okay, just a short little clip,
but there's so much in there that I find so fascinating.
And so almost to begin to break some of this down there,
cause there's a few different layers, right? So he's going, look, um,
Donald Trump's treasury secretary, like basically is,
is trying to shake down the Ukrainians.
You know, like they owe us their like resources because of all the money we've given them and
okay, this isn't how it works.
I mean, we were supporting them because they're a democracy against this invasion by Russia.
That's why we were doing this. You don't go and try to shake down your friends.
I mean, just imagine if FDR was trying to shake down the,
the British during world war two, you know, this is,
this is essentially the point that he's making. So there's a few things that,
number one, it's just like, I swear to God there's,
and I guess this is really kind of the definition of the red pill,
but there are some things in life.
It's like these lessons about the nature of reality where once you learn them,
you just can't unsee them. You know, like you, you just can't,
it's like, that's why the red pill is such a good analogy.
It's like that you already made your choice to take that pill.
You don't get, you know, it's like when Morpheus offers Neo the choice because you could take this red
pill or you can take this blue pill. You take the blue pill,
you go back to sleep,
you'll never remember any of this and you'll go live your life.
You take this red pill, you're going to see how shit really works. It's like,
that's your point of choice. After that, you don't have a choice anymore.
Like once you've taken the red pill, you can't unsee it.
You don't get to go back to sleep now. But one of the things is like,
Oh my God, it's this fixation on world war II. It's like, once you see it,
you can't unsee it.
This example has to be brought up over and over and every single war has to be
viewed through the lens of world war II. You know, uh, but my friend,
Darrell Cooper, uh, who who's been on the show, I'm going to,
he's going to come up again in a second. Um,
if you guys remember he stirred up this huge controversy, um,
last year and oh my God, I've just,
it's almost like I've never seen anything like it before. Um,
in a few different ways. But one of the things that was great is like,
the controversy proved his point correct
Like it's just as everybody is getting outraged. They're proving him right
In what his central claim is which is that this is like world war II has become this as he called it this
Load-bearing myth and he doesn't say that meaning myth like it didn't happen
Just the fact that like it's taken on that,
like a life of its own where now it is like it's the
entire justification for the entire regime.
And that's why if you ever go at that, because it's a load bearing myth,
if you ever go with that,
everyone freaks out because they know you take that one out and everything else
crumbles with it. All right guys,
let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Lucy.
Everybody loves a nice tobacco free nicotine pouch and
Lucy is the place to get them.
But Lucy isn't like every other nicotine pouch company that's owned by big
tobacco. They are the mom and pop shop of pouches.
Their pouches come in a variety of strength from 4 milligrams all the way
up to 12 milligrams. Lucy offers a unique variety of flavors including
apple ice, wintergreen, mango, and espresso. And if you're not a pouch guy
or gal, Lucy gum is available in 2 milligram, 4 milligram, and 6 milligrams. I
love the Lucy's.
I love the pouches and the gums. Check them out. Level up your nicotine routine with Lucy.
Go to Lucy.co slash problem and use the promo code problem to get 20% off your
first order. Lucy offers free shipping and has a 30 day refund policy.
If you change your mind, that's L UU-C-Y dot C-O slash problem,
promo code problem for 20% off and always free shipping.
Lucy products are only for adults of legal age
and every order is age verified.
This product contains nicotine
and nicotine is an addictive chemical.
Once again, L-U-C-Y dot C dot C O slash problem promo code problem for 20% off.
All right, let's get back into the show. And so no matter what,
like even if let's just say hypothetically speaking that even if the,
let's say that the correct lesson from world war II,
like I don't agree with this,
but let's just say for that that the standard lesson is the correct lesson from World War II, like I don't agree with this, but let's just say that the standard lesson is the correct lesson to learn.
That like we, the problem was that, you know, we shouldn't have appeased Hitler.
And this was, this was the Neville Chamberlain appeased Hitler when he gave him Yugoslavia.
And that was the problem. the issue wasn't the war guarantee
with Poland the issue was that we should have gone to war with Nazi Germany sooner like
Appeasement didn't work and only aggression would work. Let's just say like hypothetically that was true
It doesn't follow from that that therefore
Aggression is always the answer
Therefore appeasement is always wrong
because like you could pick a million different examples from history where aggression ended up being wrong and and
Perhaps appeasement would have been much better or at least some type of like
De-escalation, you know call it whatever you want to appeasement is kind of a loaded term
But but it's constantly like always they have to go back to this So you have Darrell Cooper goes on Tucker Carlson's podcast and he says that he goes he goes
And you know, my my buddy Jaco is like, you know, he's got anglo-saxon, you know family members or whatever
So I like to kind of tease him and and kind of like provoke him a little bit and I'm probably being a little
Hyperbolic when I say this, but I say that,
you know, Winston Churchill was the true villain.
And it's not that Winston Churchill killed the most people or committed the most
atrocities, but I see him as like the real villain of this war.
So he makes that statement and everybody loses their fucking shit.
I mean, every goddamn notable historian and cable news host and every
everybody's talking about Darrell Cooper.
They're flipping out on him. They all pretend he didn't say, hey, I'm being
hyperbolic here. They all pretend he didn't say, obviously he didn't commit
the most atrocities, but the idea that some guy would even say this out loud
gets this giant freak out. Like don't get me wrong, Darrell Cooper is phenomenal.
He's an incredible historian. His, his,
his series are like some of the best work out there.
I've been recommending him forever and I love him and I,
I wish he was like 10 times bigger than he is, you know,
and hopefully he will be. Um, but the re the,
the actual set for a guy who's got like a few hundred thousand, you know,
like, like Twitter followers, the,
how outsized the response was to that.
He could be talking about any other historical event and like, like again,
I don't think he got it wrong. I think he's right. But let's say he got it wrong.
If he had talked about any other historical event and got it slightly wrong,
just never would have generated that type of response because this is what world War II is. It's not just the story of, you know, a war that happened in the
1930s and 40s, America's part in the 40s, but it's not just like a war that we fought in the 40s.
It is the justification for the continuation and the beginning of every single war since then, every one of them. And there's, there is not one war in the world,
but believe me, as someone who argues about Israel,
Palestine all the time,
every single defender of Israel will bring up world war two at some point.
Just always has to happen because that's just got to be thought of as that was
just good. And therefore why can't we do good again? It's just like it just,
it's this myth that gets people to turn their brains off and that's why it's so
valuable to them. That's why it's been so effective for so long. Um, anyway,
speaking of Darrell Cooper, so Darrell Cooper did respond to this and I did just,
you know, I kind of had like a, um, a somewhat similar, uh,
thought in my mind, but uh, um, you know, so I of had like a, um, a somewhat similar, uh, thought in my mind,
but, uh, um, you know, so I'll say what my,
the thought that I had in my mind was just that, um, you know, like, yeah,
we did kind of shake down the British in world war two. And, and I didn't even,
you know, like Darrell knows more details about this. I mean,
he's a real historian. I'm just a comedian who's talking shit, but, um,
but I was kind of like, in my mind's talking shit. But, um, it's,
but I was kind of like in my mind, my first thought was, uh, was like, well, you know, we did take over the British empire.
I mean, they were the most powerful empire in the world at the beginning of the
war. And at the end of the war,
their empire collapsed and America became the most powerful empire in the world.
So yeah, in a sense we did shake them down. I mean,
even if you don't want to say like directly or literally we tip it anyways. Terrell Cooper
responds to this this clip we just played and he says FDR took US bases in the West hemisphere
in exchange for decrepit World War I destroyers demanded full payment in gold and cash for supplies until the UK was dead broke. Then mockingly, uh,
designated lend lease as HR 1776 just to twist the knife.
UK didn't finish paying us back until 2006.
So it's funny when you get a good historian who's a not part of the regime.
It does help for these things too. So that like, first of all, the guy's completely wrong,
like by his own logic of this,
but that was only kind of one of my major takeaways from this.
There's something that's actually much deeper and more fascinating to me.
And I swear that I just, I don't believe a U S senator doesn't get this.
So I think this is just like, this is the propaganda.
This is what they say when they're on a news show about it.
But it does certainly,
I think this hits, it strikes a chord with the blue pilt.
Now, luckily for us,
I think there's a lot more red pill people than they're used to be, um,
to one degree or another, you know, there's,
there's layers of being red pill. Like you could understand this,
but then you kind of understand the next level and the next level,
but unlike the movie, right? It's not just one red pill or one blue pill.
The analogy is not perfect, but I think between, um,
analogy is not perfect, but I think between, um,
Russia gate and, um, really COVID COVID probably being the biggest one.
Um, I think Biden's them covering up Biden's senility. I think there,
there's just been a mass awakening of people recognizing some basic truths,
like everything in the corporate media is lies like that that you're when you turn on CNN you're watching
Propaganda, this is state propaganda period
The fact that the kind of scientific institutions can't be trusted the foreign policy institutions can't be trusted I just think there's a lot more people who have woken up to this
And and so we're kind of in a different spot, but generally speaking,
I think with blue pill people, I think when you say things like, you know,
you don't go and shake down your allies.
We are funding this war because we love democracy, you know,
because we love the good guys and we're the good guys and they're the bad guys.
And we're like, that's how this really works.
I just don't believe that in the U S senator really believes that,
you know, realize, uh, one of the,
the greatest movie lines of all time. Um, in fact,
I might rank it as my favorite, uh,
maybe the best movie line ever and the best, um, like,
there's a real libertarian, you know, comment to it. But of course this is,
I'm talking about in the Godfather when, um, Michael Corleone. So if you don't,
I assume most of you know the Godfather,
but the story starts out with Michael Corleone is like the,
he's the straight edge son and he goes to the military and his role is he's going to be legit.
He's not going to be like in the crime family.
And then when he comes back, ultimately his father gets shot
and his brother ends up getting killed.
I can't remember exactly, but ultimately he decides that he's going to take over the family business
and he becomes the heir to the godfather.
So he's talking to his wife at one point when he's decided to take over the business
and his wife is a K,
right after I haven't seen the movie in a few years, but if you guys remember,
it's more or less she goes, uh, she's like, what are you doing?
You can't be working for your father. And he goes, listen,
my father's a powerful man, like a Senator or a president,
and this is how powerful men are. And she goes, listen to yourself, Michael,
do you have any idea how naive you sound?
Senators and presidents don't have people killed.
And his retort is now who's being naive K.
And it's just like the perfect line. It's the perfect line.
Because it's the perfect like red pill, blue pill distinction.
Like that is the normie blue pill attitude.
What do you mean he's like a politician? He kills people.
Of course the red build attitude is like, yeah, that's what makes
him like a politician.
Duh.
And so anyway, there is just this, there's a feeling that you get here
where it's like, why, you know, why is our government doing gangster shit?
And make no mistake about it.
What Trump's doing is gangster shit. You know, why is our government doing gangster shit and and make no mistake about it? What Trump's doing is gangster shit, you know, and look I'll tell you I
Just to be very clear here. I don't support this. This is not something that I think is a good idea
I mean, I think we should end the war and the the war never should have been started
It should be negotiated away, but I got to be honest as somebody who has
It should be negotiated away, but I got to be honest as somebody who has
Okay, like there there are certainly experts who have studied this issue more than me
But compared to like a regular person I have studied this issue
pretty you know
pretty deeply This is the war in Ukraine has been one of my major focuses for many years now
The the new Cold War between the US and Russia was one of my major focuses for many years before this war
so just from all the years of interviewing Scott Horton and reading all his books and all the years of
Covering Russiagate and all the you know, this is just something I've been focusing on for a very long time
and For anybody who has been focusing on it, you know, as I said in the
last episode, uh, Ukraine,
the Ukrainian people really are are true victims in all of this.
Uh, this, this was a war that America led Ukraine into,
as John Mearsheimer said, ukraine down the primrose path
And he said this back in 2014
um, and so
it is
you know as essentially we convinced
the ukrainians against the will of the ukrainian people and against the will of the ukrainian elected officials convinced. And when I say convinced, I mean,
we backed a coup against the democratically elected leader of Ukraine who
had decided to make a deal with Vladimir Putin. I mean, he,
he ultimately decided that that was in, I mean,
say his people's interest or his interest or whatever,
but he ultimately decided to calm things down with Russia and make an economic deal. I mean, to say his people's interest or his interest or whatever, but he ultimately decided to calm things down with Russia and make an economic
deal. I mean, think about this.
This is what kicked off the made on protests was that Yanukovych,
the democratically elected, give me this,
we're all in the business of democracy promotion. Well,
the democratically elected president of Ukraine with elections verified by the
EU. So this was as legit as elections get,
even the West claims this was a legit election.
So their democratically elected president,
he decided when he was,
and I think he was conflicted himself,
but when he was deciding between signing this partnership
with the European Union or signing an economic deal
with Vladimir Putin, he ultimately decided
he was gonna go with Putin. That was the course that this country was on
Was to have decent enough relations with Russia
And then the west comes in and pours tens maybe even over a hundred million dollars into this protest effort
Against Yanukovych which ultimately leads to ousting him and him fleeing for his life
Okay, and then under the new government, they pushed him into the civil war. Um,
I think something like 15,000 people died in the fighting in those years between
Maidan and when Vladimir Putin, uh, uh, invaded.
And so I'm just saying that Ukraine,
look, Ukraine is a, is a pawn on the chessboard and there is, you know,
I do think that it's kind of fucked up.
Even though we spent all this money,
it's kind of fucked up for us to then go extort resources away from Ukraine when
really the rightful owners are the Ukrainian people. Um, and by the way,
when I say this, I do not, when I say rightful owners,
I don't mean in any commie sense of the word. I'm not, that is not my conception of property rights.
I'm not saying that like all of the people or the workers own, I'm saying like from a real
hardcore Lockean libertarian perspective, like, I don't know, the people who homesteaded it or
something like that, like they have a better claim on their resources than we do.
And so I, you know, look, I am
because I recognize that governments are gangs and
our
governments are essentially
just the most successful gang.
Like the most, this is basic Rothbard anatomy of the state shit,
but a government is basically the most successful gang who took over the entire area and decided that they were just gonna set up shop
There they didn't have to leave we just rule these people well because I recognize that I believe in
Very limited government very limited like picture the most limited government much more limited than that
So limit the entire thing. So, okay.
I want there to be less gangstership.
I'm not on board with government doing gangster shit.
I also do recognize to the extent that government exists, that's what they do.
That's what they're in the business of doing. Every inch of it is gangstership.
And so when people come out here and they go, Oh my God,
Donald Trump's doing gangster shit
Why that's not why we're supported that we're supporting, you know
Ukraine because they're a democracy. Okay. Yeah, that's right. We're supporting Ukraine because they're a democ the country who's democratic
First of all, they the US back to coup in 2004 in Ukraine and then in 2014
so their democracy is less than 10 years old. If you could even call it a democracy or 11 years old now,
but you can't really call it that anymore because they're not holding
elections and Vladimir Putin has a, excuse me, uh,
Zelensky is a very low approval rating. So yeah, anyway, I'm,
it's a pure fantasy to act like we weren't always doing gangster shit.
We, it was always gangster shit The difference is that and and I think this is essentially why so many people support donald trump
The difference is that he's proposing doing gangster shit. That's at least conceivably in the nation's interest
He's he's at least going like hey, we're gangsters here. We do gangster shit
Why don't we get something for all this money we've put out? Now again,
I don't agree with that because I think I'm not saying like the American people
are responsible for everything their government does, but you know, I,
I don't know.
We have to some degree allowed our government to do this and I don't think that
the Ukrainian people who have had their country destroyed and are going to lose
part of it, they should have to pay us back. I'm a little uneasy with that. I don't agree with that.
But to hear a Senator sit there and try to like have this like, Oh my God,
he's going over and shaking them down. Like he's a gangster,
but that's such bullshit because that's not what America is all about.
America is just about supporting democracy. I mean, it's just, it's,
it's all so laughable.
There's no way a sitting Senator actually sees things this way. All right,
guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show,
which is my Patriot supply. How well do you sleep at night?
Real peace of mind comes from knowing your family is prepared for anything.
My Patriot supply,
America's most trusted name in emergency preparedness, is offering a limited time discount on their best-selling three-month emergency food kit.
This isn't your typical survival food. Each kit provides over 2,000 calories and 100% of the recommended value of 12 essential vitamins and minerals daily for 90 days with delicious meals and extras including chicken, beef, fruits,
vegetables. We're talking quality meals that last up to 25 years in storage and still taste like
home cooked. The pandemic taught us how quickly store shelves can empty. Don't wait for the next
crisis. Your three-month emergency food kit includes free shipping, a disaster replacement
warranty, and 24-7 US-based support.
This special discount is available for a limited time only.
Visit preparewithsmith.com now to secure your family's future with a $100 discount.
If you order by 3 p.m., they'll ship your order within the same day, so you have peace
of mind right away.
Go check them out at my website, prepare with smith.com. All right, let's get back into the show.
We just had,
we had to fight a war against Russia because of the threat to democracy.
I mean, like if we, if we have to fight a war,
if a democracy is threatened,
yet we can prop up the government of Saudi Arabia.
We can prop up the government of Israel. Israel has had control of 5 million
people since 1967 who have no rights whatsoever. That includes voting rights.
So ever that includes voting rights.
But we can prop them up and yet we have to, we have to go to war to defend democracy here,
but it's also okay to prop up all of these countries that are antithetical to
democracy. It's like, it doesn't even make any sense.
It doesn't pass the basic smell test. Like they're,
that's just not what's going on here.
What's going on is that the government's always doing gangster shit
Finally Donald Trump comes out and it is just like I'm gonna do gangster shit on behalf of the country
Then all these people are outraged and they pretend that this is the first time gangster shit has ever happened
Go go listen if you want to see on the topic of Ukraine, go listen to the tape of Joe Biden. In fact, uh,
Natalie, why don't you pull that up? Joe Biden, ukrainian prosecutor
Just put that into uh into youtube and it should spit out the video pretty quickly here
But it's like it's just so funny to be to be like, oh all we were ever doing over there was protecting democracy
And then donald trump wants to do all this gangster shit with the government
Yeah, okay. Did you find it?
Cause this is where you could see how, like what I'm talking about.
When I say gangster shit is all that they do, all that they do.
We'll have that up in a second and then I will, I will go through.
Natalie's got some questions pulled up here and then I will go through the chat
and maybe we'll answer a few more questions in the second half of the show
All right, you could pull that video up whenever we have it Natalie
All right, here we go. Yeah. Yeah, here we go. This is 2006
Oh, sorry, this is Biden's comments later, but you could just skip right to the comments.
I remember going over convincing our team or others to convincing us that we should
be providing for loan guarantees.
I went over, I guess, the 12th, 13th time to Keefe, and I was supposed to announce that there was
another billion-dollar loan guarantee.
And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsenyuk that they would take action
against the state prosecutor, and they didn't.
So they said they had a – they were walking out to the press conference and I said, no,
I said, I'm not going to – or I'm not going to give you the billion dollars.
They said, you have no authority.
You're not the president.
The president said, I said, call him.
I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting the billion dollars.
I said, you're not getting the billion.
I'm going to be leaving here.
I think it was, what, six hours?
I looked at it, I said, we're leaving in six hours.
If the prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money.
Oh, son of a bitch.
You're not getting the money. Oh, son of a bitch. You got fired.
And they put in place someone who was solid.
There you go.
By the way, he's talking to Matt.
Matt Taibbi's done great reporting on this.
The prosecutor he's talking about
was investigating Burisma,
the company that his son was making 100 grand a month
on the board of.
So that's it
You take out you fire a prosecutor and put in a guy who we say he says is solid in other words our guy
Or you won't get this money
Now tell me that's not gangster shit
This is what governments do. Okay. This is the nature of governments. They do gangster shit. What do you think?
You know like for all these people who love to bring up World War two. What do you think World War two was?
You think that was a love fest was all about democracy promotion. Yeah
That's why we partnered with Joseph Stalin for his love of democracy
You know the whole thing is just so but it's just so it's it's interesting
To see people try to kind of spin this when I think so many people are waking up to what is I think like in
Many ways the most important red pill. It's just that governments are
Gangs that's what they are
gangs with a monopoly on aggressive violence
Anyway, I just thought that was was too great., uh, let, let's dive into some questions here. Um, and I'll,
we'll go through a few of these and then I got to pack and get on a plane
tomorrow morning. All right. Uh, Dave,
the state department just declared eight drug cartels as foreign terrorist
organizations. These cartels are not only smuggling drugs,
but people as well.
What are your thoughts?
Um, not good, not good.
And really so much of that is just because of all of the, um,
in the post-9-11 world, like all of the legal, you know,
factors that come in with declaring a group terrorists. And, you know,
it's unclear exactly what the Trump administration is going to do now that
they've branded these cartels as terrorists,
but certainly the possibilities are very close to some type of war.
And I mean, that's, that's the last thing we want to do. Look,
it's already, if you, the bottom line, right, with immigration,
if you're kind of zooming out from the truth is that,
the immigration crisis,
there's a few different things that are going on, right? So number one,
you had like the insane flow of migrants coming in, asylum seekers, some
of them will claim to be, but you have a huge flow of migrants coming in during Joe Biden.
This has already been drastically cracked down.
What's his name?
The Borders Our Guy was just posting about these numbers the other day But already the sick look when Joe Biden came in the signal was sent that it's wide open
So they came in record high numbers Donald Trump's in the signal has been sent
It's not wide open. The numbers have greatly been reduced. So that's number one. Okay
You don't in terms of that problem
What we had was the worst of both worlds under Joe Biden,
which is that you have de facto open borders and the war on drugs going on.
Okay. So you have drugs are heavily criminalized in America and yet there's a
market for them. There's demand. There's a lot of people who want drugs.
And so then you have these cartels that will bring the drugs over the market
and they make a ton of money off doing this. To me, legalizing drugs is the best solution
to all of this. I know there's some right-wingers who don't like that, but the truth is that
it's the exact same logic as prohibition of alcohol. When you had prohibition of alcohol,
you had a huge rise in the homicide rate because the,
it was a black market now and the only people are in the black market are by
definition criminals, right?
And so criminals end up thriving in these black markets.
And also you have a big problem for anybody who's just like, um,
if you've ever like known anyone who sold drugs, like on any level,
maybe I'm more of a,
maybe I was more of a fucked up kid than some of you guys are,
but I knew a lot of people who sold drugs. And, um,
one of the things that happens when you're in an illegal market
is that you have no security. You know, when you're,
when you're in a legal market, uh, if someone steals from you,
you can call the cops or you can hire your own security or whatever you have options.
Like you have legal recourse.
And so if someone like what I'm doing right now, being a podcaster,
this is a legal market, at least for now, maybe not in Germany, according to our,
uh, our most recent episode, but at least in the United States of America
for right now, this is legal.
Now, if someone were to break into my house and steal a bunch of
equipment, I can have, I can have it insured. I can call the cops.
I have other, you know, I have other paths,
but like if you know anyone who ever sold drugs, you know, if you have,
if you have a bunch of drugs,
you can't get insurance on it and you can't call the cops
if someone steals it from you.
You gotta be prepared to defend it yourself.
This is where the guns come in and this is where the gang culture, right?
So there's like when you have a black market, you create all of these problems.
And if you were to legalize drugs, just in the same way when prohibition ended, the homicide
rate drastically fell. And, and same thing would happen
in the same, the same way that Al Capone took over the cities during prohibition. Well, now you got
these Mexican gangs and, uh, then some other South American gangs, um, who are, who are dominating in
the prohibition of drugs. And so that would be the best, you know this would be the best solution that would lead to less bloodshed not more and
I just I see nothing but very dangerous red flags
By designating the cartels as terrorists. I do not think that is a a good plan. Okay next question
Dave if Trump ends up cutting a ton of spending and cuts taxes
How would we be able to combat the inflation to follow with more Americans having disposable income?
I know it will balance out in the future because the cost of production would go down as well
But I'm worried about the short-term effects
Well, you're gonna you're gonna be looking at deflation
If you have big cuts in government spending if there's less money printing and yeah, I think you kind of answered your own question there
There's that this is gonna make the cost of things go down
So this is ultimately I mean this is what has to be done
And so I get your point if you're saying like in the tax cuts
are like stimulative, if you're like directly giving Americans tax cuts, but you got to
keep in mind too, that it's not the government spending all that money too. It's not as if
the government is taxing people and just holding that money. So I don't think that you're going
to see any increase in inflation from the tax cuts and the spending cuts are going to
be deflationary in nature
So this is it's it's gonna be cutting the size of government is gonna be an overwhelming positive
Believe me. We're we're still a long way away from seeing a ton of spending cuts and tax cuts, but hopefully you're right
Okay, Dave, are you nervous about doge auditing our gold reserves at Fort Knox?
What should we expect when it comes out, uh, that the gold reserve is significantly less
than reported or completely depleted?
Um, it's a really good question.
My guess is yes.
I mean like I'd say like closer to completely depleted if I had to guess.
But I mean, I don't know. I don't know any better than you do, you know, but it's like,
why the hell have, why have they been so secretive about what's at Fort Knox? Why have we never
had an audit on this? My guess is yeah, that it's been completely depleted. Now what would, um,
what should we expect? I mean, look,
it's, it's like one of these things. It's, it's, you know,
the short term might be a little bit ugly,
but I think that's necessary for a positive result in the long term.
And it's kind of like, you know,
if you're,
if you're married to someone who's treating you really badly and is lying to
you and cheating on you, looking through their phone, you know,
this might be upsetting and it might not be good for the marriage in the short
term. But if you want to know what's really going on, I just,
I always err on the side that we're better to know than to all be being fooled.
So I would, I would still err. Yeah, there'll be, people would be upset.
It would probably have a negative effect on markets, but at the same time,
it's like this whole thing is built on a house of cards. And so it's,
it's kind of the only way to ever move to a better, more sane place.
All right guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show,
which is sheath underwear. As you guys know by now,
I've been telling you about this company for a long time.
Sheath uses moisture wicking technology to create underwear that keeps everything
breathable and incredibly comfortable for you downstairs.
Sheath's underwear comes in a number of different styles including a brief with a dual pouch that
just kind of keeps everything separated. I'll tell you I was a little skeptical
about the dual pouch but it's a game changer. I absolutely love it. Sheath
underwear is an amazing company and they've been a longtime sponsor of this
podcast so make sure you go check them out at sheath underwear.com and use the promo code problem for 20% off your order. That sheath underwear.com
promo code problem for 20% off your order. They ship anywhere in the world.
Sheath underwear.com. All right, let's get back into the show. Okay.
Uh, okay, Dave, what would your response, uh, to someone who holds the opinion, excuse me,
to someone who holds the opinion that the quote gangster shit is a good thing
when somebody like Trump is doing it,
that it's only a problem when it's not the intro,
when it's not in the interest of the people of the country.
Um, okay. Well, I mean,
I guess there's, there's a couple responses that I would have to that.
So number one, um,
it's wrong, you know, and, and maybe that won't move you at all,
but I still, I'll lead with what I, you know, uh, think. I mean, like the gangster shit essentially means
stealing from people, killing people,
injuring people or threatening to do all of that.
And I do just reject that as morally wrong in the same way we,
we would think it was morally wrong if individuals were doing that. Um,
but even if you forget about that to just totally table the,
the morality discussion,
cause I understand that that doesn't always move people and it's easy,
even though I don't think it's fair,
it's easy for people to dismiss that and be like, Oh, you know,
and anytime you're especially right wingers,
like anytime you're talking about morality,
it's kind of just like dismissed as naive.
Ah, that's not really the way the world works or something.
I don't agree with any of that. It's like, yeah, I actually, I think,
you know, this, when I was debating Josh hammer,
he asked me at one point during the debate,
if morality is a consideration for me, um,
when it comes to us foreign policy. And I was like, uh, yeah, that is.
And I, and you know, and, that is. And I, and you know,
and I would also just say that, um, you know,
two kind of more right-winger types that I think,
I don't know, I'm not claiming, I hate when people who are like,
like make appeals to Christianity or religion when they're not religious.
And so I'm not trying to be that guy.
I'm not exactly religious.
I have a personal relationship with God,
but I don't really like subscribe to a religion
or a particular holy book or something like that.
But I would just say,
I say this as somebody who's not an expert on theology, but I do think it's just,
it seems to me it's completely incompatible with Christianity to
separate morality from government policy.
Like I w I don't know. I must've missed that lesson from Jesus.
Like at some point there's like these,
these rules of morality don't apply if they're good for your country or something
like that. But look, more importantly than any of that,
the flaw in this is like, look,
gangster shit is good for the gangs,
but it's never going to be, you know,
like I'm not saying like in any isolated incident,
it couldn't be good for the country as well.
But the idea that you're going to have like an empowered gangster class that
rules you and that's going to end up being good for you is just, again,
it's like, it was the wisdom of all of the founders,
that that's exactly what you don't want to do. And they were right.
And this is part of the reason why America has been such a successful country
because it was at least started on this premise.
But the idea that like you're going to have this gangster class and you're
going to continue to empower them and that's going to be good for you.
Like I don't,
I'm not saying like in an isolated incident or in
crazy extenuating circumstances,
perhaps there could be for a short timeframe, a benefit to that.
But the idea of like,
do you think any neighborhood is going to be better because they're ruled by
gangs? Is that good for you in your household,
in your personal life and your, like, I don't really think so.
And even in the business world, I don't think it's like the gangster shit that I'm talking about.
And we're not talking about like threats of violence.
That's not really how most businessmen succeed in, in free market or
civilized Western societies.
Um, it's actually from providing value.
It's actually from providing value. And so, you know, I just, I, I think it's very, um, it's,
it's a very dangerous and short-sighted game to get to play.
Uh, okay. Hold on one second. All right. Uh,
here's the last one I have up here and then we'll wrap on this. Uh,
do you see Trump throwing any Republicans under the bus in
2026 running for reelection?
It's an interesting question. Um,
you know, because I'm thinking about it now, right? Is McConnell,
I think is the only one who really didn't vote for his appointees and McConnell. I don't think is is running again
So there's no opportunity there a
Lot of this I think probably depends on what happens between now and 2026
I
Sure, hope so, you know, I sure hope he does it to some of the ones who deserve it
But again, this is the problem with Donald Trump is it's just you know, again, I'm trying to be cautiously optimistic
I mean, this is a different Trump than we saw in his first term
But the problem with Trump in his first term is that what some he ended up throwing the best congressman in the country under the bus
Thomas Massey because Thomas Massey objected to the giant spending bills in 2020
Donald Trump didn't want to hear that in 2020 because he was trying to get
reelected and that, you know,
so he was trying to brag about the spending bills. And I understand, you know,
there, it was COVID, it was a crazy year. He was trying to get reelected,
but at the same time, Thomas Massie was 100% right about that.
Thomas Massie accurately predicted that this would result in
terrible price inflation for the
American people.
And so, you know, Donald Trump is the type of guy who is petty enough that if you cross
him in some way, he might really try to get back at you, even if it doesn't matter to
him because he's only got two more years in there and it doesn't even matter whether you
get reelected or not. So that's an interesting question. I really don't know as of right now
I don't know. Is there any like Republican in Congress who's actually like
You know, it's not as if we have like what Mitt Romney was doing in the first term or like
Liz Cheney or there's not like a Republican
who's out there like being the opposition right now. Uh, if there was,
I think probably he would do that in 2026,
but at the same time I look at it like if I had to guess, yeah,
there'll be some Republicans who stab them in the back between now and 2026.
And I would not be surprised at all if that results in Donald Trump,
uh, trying to throw them under the bus and get them primaried or something like
that. And you know, Donald Trump doesn't have, um,
you know, none of these endorsements and all of this stuff. It's never,
it's never like you have,
you can just give 100% of your energy to someone else.
But in the world of Republicanism right now, Donald Trump's the last
guy you want to have as an enemy.
And so I do think he should be using that.
You know, I do think he should be, he, you know, my advice to Donald
Trump during the campaign, which he ended up somewhat following, I'm not
saying he followed it from me, but he ended up ultimately kind of following.
My, my advice to him was like, you should be threatening the shit out what following I'm not saying he followed it from me, but he ended up ultimately kind of following my,
my advice to him was like,
you should be threatening the shit out of these social media companies,
you know, and that, and ultimately look what he did with Zuckerberg.
Now, if you want to call me out, I guess that is some gangster shit I support.
So there you go. There are some, there are some limited, uh,
examples where I will, I will support some gangster shit being done,
but only in the goal of rolling back gangsters.
So there you go. All right, listen, we're going to wrap up on that one.
I will catch you guys out in Houston, Texas tomorrow night, Friday night,
Saturday night. Uh, see you there. Thank you guys for listening.
Catch you next time. Peace.