Piers Morgan Uncensored - Charlamagne tha God: Trump, Diddy & Caitlin Clark
Episode Date: June 4, 2024He’s a media mogul, a bestselling author, and star host of The Breakfast Club - self-styled as The Most Dangerous Morning Show in the world. In a world of spin and nonsense, Charlamagne Tha God deal...s in straight-talking facts. And his new book, Get Honest or Die Lying, is billed as an antidote to small talk from small minds. Now, once again, Charlamagne Tha God is Uncensored. Charlamagne talks Trump conviction, Diddy allegations & has his say on the Caitlin Clark racism debate. Piers Morgan Uncensored is the global arena for fearless debate, bold opinions and major interviews. Subscribe for all-new and exclusive daily content. YouTube: @PiersMorganUncensored X: @PiersUncensored TikTok: @piersmorganuncensored Insta: @piersmorganuncensored Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I get excited to be on with you, man, just because I know we're going to have some lively conversation.
We're seeing right now.
And there is a way that privileged white males who used to be president are treated.
A lot of everyday people aren't going to feel sorry.
You know, for him to be screaming that, you know, he's being treated so unfairly.
And it's like, not necessarily.
To pick you up on that, Shalama, mate.
That's why I asked you, is it good for America?
Have you decided yet who you're going to vote for?
Yeah.
Would you like to share it with me?
I've never been to a Diddy party.
Trump was trying to hide things.
He did he was trying to hide things too.
I think race is a factor in Caitlin Clark.
But, Piz, you have to admit,
whenever you see somebody excelling in a field
that that race doesn't usually excel in,
you know, it is heightened.
He's a media mogul, a best-selling author
and star host of The Breakfast Club.
Self-starred as the most dangerous morning show in the world,
and having been on it, I can confirm it is pretty dangerous.
In a world of spin and nonsense,
Charlemagne the God deals in straight-talking facts,
and his new book, Get Honest or Die Lying,
is billed as an antidote to small talk from small minds.
So once again, Charlamagne the God is uncensored.
Charlaman, great to see it.
Pierce, what's up, man?
Good to see you again, too, man.
I love an early plug.
I love it being bold.
A little shameless self-promotion.
You know, you got to do that on a big black of life.
Well, you know me, I'm all in for shame with self-promotion.
And what I loved about the book, it said it critiques the prevalence of superficial conversations
and advocates for deeper, more meaningful dialogues to address societal divisions and personal unhappiness.
Because I totally agree with you.
I think social media has made everyone talk and think and debate in soundbites.
We've lost that ability to do what I did with you when I came on your brilliant breakfast show in New York.
We just had time.
You know, we had a 90-minute conversation.
We could talk about stuff with nuance, with layers.
And it seems that we've lost that ability.
People have kind of forgotten how to have longer conversation.
Yeah, not only have we lost that ability, we're putting everything on the same scale.
And, you know, when I talk about small talk, I'm saying how we take a lot of these, you know, minor issues and we make them these big macro issues.
We take these small things and make them, you know, big things.
So when the actual big things come across our desk,
the big things are up for discussion.
We don't even know how to talk about them
if we talk about them at all
because everything is literally on the same scale.
So things that are small are held to the same level of, you know,
literally is, you know, things that are big.
One thing I was struck by,
I watched you do an interview with CNN, I think, a few days ago.
And I could see that you were kind of irritated
by constantly being kind of, I guess,
your eyes wheeled out as a spokesman for all black people in America
because of your great influence from the show and so on.
I totally got that.
It's like, why should your skin color dictate
whether you're booked to do an interview to talk about society or issues or whatever?
Tell me a little bit more about how that makes you feel when you feel that way.
Well, you're a good reader of people, you know,
because that's exactly how I felt in that moment.
Because I'm like, you know, black people are not monolithic.
and, you know, when you bring me on a show
and ask me what all black people think,
I could not tell you.
I could only tell you, you know, what I think.
And it's a little frustrating, too,
because, you know, in America, you know,
they keep asking about the black vote,
the black vote in regard to Biden.
When you look at the polls, you know,
he's losing the young vote.
He's losing the Latino vote.
Like, there's a lot of people that are down on Biden right now.
So I don't understand why it keeps coming back to a black thing,
a black thing, a black thing.
I completely agree.
And it must be, I mean,
I was trying to think what it would be like if I get booked only to talk about issues about white people.
How very quickly, how annoying I would find that.
And so I get it.
I mean, that isn't going to happen because it doesn't happen to white people that way.
But it's an interesting thing to actually see that you were kind of bristling.
I watched it.
I thought, yeah, I get that.
I get it.
There's a guy here in America, man.
His name is Tim Ryan.
He's a good dude.
Yeah, I know, Tim.
Yeah.
And, you know, Tim has this phrase called the,
the exhausted majority.
And he said most people in America are the exhausted majority.
So I don't care whether I'm black.
I don't care whether I'm white, Democrat, Republican.
Most people are just exhausted at what's happening in our political system right now.
And I represent one of them.
Well, yeah, and I think you're absolutely not alone.
And let's talk, you know, immediately about what happened in the last week.
It is, listen, I'm in the UK at the moment.
Across the pond, there's a kind of wonderment.
and shock about what is happening to the great superpower of the world
when you have one candidate who can barely string a sentence together
and the other candidate facing all these criminal indictments
and actually being convicted now of being a felon.
I'm putting aside the debate about whether that is fair or not fair,
and I'll come to that with you.
But just the fact that these are the two candidates
that America has to choose from in November
seems staggering to people.
Yeah, and I represent the one in four Americans who have unfavorable views about both of them.
So it's like, you know, when you see me on a show like the view and I say something like,
yo, both of these, you know, both of these candidates are trash.
I truly mean that, you know.
One of them, one of them like, you know, has all of these criminal charges.
One of them led an attempted coup of this country.
One of them said we need to terminate, you know, the Constitution,
to overthrow the results of an election.
You know, that was, you know,
the overturned the results of an election.
That was Donald Trump.
And then, you know, the other one is just uninspiring.
You know, the other one can't even deliver, you know,
the proper messaging about the things, you know,
that him and his administration have done.
And, you know, we spend so much time here in America
talking about how bad Trump is,
especially the left media.
They talk about how bad Trump is,
and they're always on their social media
and on their platforms
was talking about how bad he is, but they're never talking about how,
they're never talking about the things that they say President Biden has done.
And then they wonder why people ask those questions.
They wonder why people say, well, what is Joe Biden done?
You know, what is Kamala Harris doing?
We would know if more of y'all would spend more time telling us about them
as opposed to just talking, you know, telling us how bad Trump is.
I totally agree.
Again, because there's a kind of, this Trump derangement syndrome is a real thing.
I see it in people where they're so fixated.
in hating Trump and everything about him
and doing it 24-7.
They forget that there's a country
currently being run by Democrats
who are making decisions
that are directly impacting on people's lives.
I thought it was interesting with Dynamics.
You mentioned The View.
I want to play a clip.
This is where,
effectively, the host try and bully you
to endorse Biden.
Take a look.
I've seen y'all do this on The View before.
I saw y'all do this to Killer Mike
when he was on the View.
And Killer Mike literally sat here and said,
hey, you know,
I supported Keish and Lance Bottoms.
I supported Ralph Warnock.
I supported John Osoff, right, in Georgia.
He said, you should support the people that I've supported.
You should support the person who the people I've supported are supporting.
Okay.
That's your opportunity to say, well, clearly he's talking about President Biden.
Why do y'all need us to say this if we don't feel comfortable saying?
No, no, it's not that we need you to say it.
But I think other folks need to hear because, you know, one of the things you
I'm sorry, just jumped you, I'm sorry,
but one of the things that we've been talking about
is the fact that getting facts
out through the media
has been very, seems to be very difficult.
I feel like I just spew some facts.
Yeah, I... Yes, but we need you to do it on your show.
Well, I think, well, the reality is I think both candidates are trash.
So, because I, because I'm, but I am going to vote in November
and I'm going to vote my best interest and I'm going to vote
who I think, you know, can preserve democracy.
So if I think both candidates are trash and I don't feel like,
you know, endorsing one, would you rather me endorse an individual or endorse the fact that,
hey, we need to go out here and protect democracy?
What was fascinating, Charlemagne, was their stunned reaction.
They couldn't really deal with this.
It was a kind of presumption by them that you would, obviously, you would vote for Biden.
And when you said, actually, you know, I think both candidates are trash.
They were sort of shocked.
They don't know what to say.
And I've watched the view a few times.
And it's so ridiculously partisan now.
You know, I watched Joy Beha reacting to the Trump conviction and saying she actually got a leak.
she said, and tittered away.
And I was like, wow, what part of you thinks
that that is a smart way to deal
with what is going on right now
to look like you're so partisan,
so overexcited by anything that's damaging to Trump,
that you lose all kind of reasonable ability
to assess and analyze the big picture
about American politics and where the country is?
Yeah, and I don't like the assumption that, you know,
just because I don't want to
endorse, you know, means I'm not voting.
And, you know, it goes back to what I keep saying about the left really does not know how
to push narratives in any way, shape, or form.
Because, you know, I was on CNN this weekend.
And I literally was talking about a chapter in my book called the language of politics
is dead.
And I give credit to Donald Trump for killing the language of politics.
Like, he's made it to wear politicians, they don't have to be perfect.
They don't always have to say the right thing.
And they can actually stay what they truly feel if they change.
choose. Do you know Fox News? I was on CNN. Fox News took that clip and their headline was
Charlamagne de God praises Donald Trump for killing the language of politics. That's just them
pushing the narrative that they want to push. I didn't praise him. I just, you know, but in a way,
I understand why they did that because in a way, you're kind of, you're kind of praising him.
What you're acknowledging is that Trump's appeal, and this, I don't want to speak for you, you can tell me,
But it seems to me what you were saying was Trump's appeal comes from the fact he's a straight talker.
You may not like what he's saying, but he sounds authentic and he doesn't sound like a normal robotic, pre-planned, pre-rehearsed politician.
Oh, I say it all the time.
I said that, you know, somebody like Donald Trump and a lot of conservatives in general, especially the MAGA ones,
they are more sincere about their lies than Democrats are about their truth.
So you can hear a conservative say something that you know is not true, but it'll sound sincere.
and you can hear a Democrat say something that possibly is true,
but they don't sound like, you know,
they don't sound sincere about it in any way, shape, or form.
Did you feel the Donald Trump conviction was a good moment for America?
I mean, listen, man, we say nobody is above the law, right?
So, I mean, if, you know, if charges are bought up against somebody
and, you know, they go through their due process, they go to court,
and they're found guilty, you know, I don't know.
know if that's necessarily a bad thing because nobody is, you know, above the law.
But what I think is going to happen now is you're going to see a lot of tit for tat.
Of course.
Now that, you know, now that you know, they've made it to where I can totally see them doing
political, you know, retaliation in the courts.
If I'm not mistaken, Hunter Biden's, you know, the jury selection begins in his trial
to date.
So how do you know Hunter Biden is going to get a fair trial?
You know, we just had, you know, Governor Josh Shapiro here.
and he told us that he sued Donald Trump 43 times.
And in return, Donald Trump sued the state of Pennsylvania, you know, 43 times.
So, I mean, that's just, I don't want to see that in our political system.
I don't want to see people just, you know, weaponizing the courts and, you know, weaponizing the justice system and just, you know, going after each other.
But I think that's what you're going to see.
Trump is interesting.
Yeah, I mean, my issue with it is I agree no one should be above the law.
But nor should the law be twisted to just go after one person like Trump.
I mean, there's no other businessman in New York who would have had what was a state misdemeanor
offense at worst upgraded to a felony in the way that Alvin Bragg did because he's politically
motivated in most people's estimation.
I think he is.
He's a Democrat.
He makes no bones.
He wanted to take down Donald Trump.
But by escalating a state misdemeanor to a felony in the way that he did, he
wasn't actually treating Trump fairly in the way that the law would normally treat someone.
So I think in a way, it's not that Trump felt he was above the law.
If he was just entitled to the same treatment in US law as every other business guy in New York,
he would not have had to face felony charges.
That's the reality.
It got twisted and morphed up to be something a lot more serious than it actually was.
In the end, he had a fling with a porn star nearly 20 years ago, one night stand, which he denies,
but I think he's pretty clearly did.
And here we are, 20 years later,
and he's running for president in 2016,
and he wants to hide this information
like a lot of famous people do
when people make allegations about them,
and he pays her off.
And then because he shovels a bit of paperwork
in his business,
suddenly he's now facing imprisonment.
And I just felt...
I mean, if it's...
We know he's not going to see no prison,
but I mean, you know, we can't just...
If it's illegal, it's illegal,
and if you get caught,
then you got to, you know,
deal with the consequences of those actions.
You know, I'm not, I don't know.
Yeah, but should an American president.
Yeah, but actually, my point is this, if they were taking an American president to court
over an illegal drone program that killed thousands of innocent people,
if they were doing it over major corruption involving government funds
that were being funneled to a president and his family, you know,
something of that order, then, okay, I get it, right?
But to do it to Trump over a payment, which at $150,000 was about a fact,
fifth or a quarter of the amount that Bill Clinton paid to pay off Paula Jones,
who accused him a sexual harassment. And he was president of a time, unlike Trump. And yet
Bill Clinton never got dragged through criminal courts because he didn't shuffle a bit of
paperwork to pay it. So yeah, technically it was a crime. I don't think anyone disputes that the
jury made the right decision when they had to adjudicate on this. But my question is, should this ever
have come to court. Some of the other cases that Trump's involved with are infinitely more serious.
You know, his involvement in January 6th, you know, the documents that were found at Merillago
and shuffled around, the Georgia phone call and so on. They're all more serious. But to take
a president of the United States through the criminal court in election year depriving him of
his right to campaign, all I thought was whatever happens here, Trump cried stolen election
last time wrongly, without any evidence. But this time he's going to have a very good case.
if he loses this election by a marginal amount,
which is quite likely one of the wins or loses by a marginal amount,
he's just going to say this got stolen or over again
by putting me through the courts for two months,
preventing me from campaigning over a stupid little story
involving a fling 20 years ago,
they have stopped me winning the election.
And he'd ever, actually, I think probably a lot more people agreeing with him
than he did last time.
Yeah, he was going to say that regardless.
I don't know how much sympathy he's going to get, though,
because, you know, when you are a powerful person,
when you've been a person who's been as wealthy as long as Donald Trump,
you know, a lot of everyday people aren't going to feel sorry for you
because there's everyday people who get, you know,
jammed up in the justice system and get, you know, sentenced to jail for, you know,
lesser crimes than what Trump, you know, just got convicted for.
So I don't think nobody's going to feel sorry for him in that case.
And then, you know, and if it was a political move,
hey, it was a brilliant political move because I read this morning,
I read over the weekend that 49% of independents think Trump should drop out,
out, you know, after the convictions.
You know, it's easier to say this is a witch hunt, this is a witch hunt, this is a witch hunt,
you know, when you haven't been convicted.
And that was one of my concerns.
I said that last week, I was like, yo, if Donald Trump, before the verdict came in,
I was like, yo, if he gets found not guilty on this, it makes everything across the board
look like a witch hunt.
It makes what, you know, going on in Florida, what's going on in Georgia with the election
it makes all of that looks, makes the January 6th and direct stuff.
It makes everything look like a witch hunt.
If he was found not guilty on these 34 counts, it wouldn't even matter that it was just some
Thorny Daniels Pornstar stuff,
it would just make his, you know,
declaration that all of this is a witch hunt stronger.
So the fact that he was convicted,
I think it does change the minds of a lot of people.
You know, I think he has his diehard supporters
who are going to, you know, show up for him regardless.
But when you look at those independents,
and they're like 49% of them say they think Trump should drop out after the conviction,
that's, I mean, that was a good political move,
if it was a political move.
Well, I said on the flip side, he's raised nearly $60 million.
since he was convicted, smashing all records.
He's galvanized his base massively.
The independents are very important.
There's no question.
But I'm now going to ask you a question
which will fly completely in the face of what I was talking to you earlier
about only asking you to represent the black community.
I don't mean it like that.
But there'll be a lot of black Americans
who will share Trump's view about the justice system
being particularly unfair to members of the African-American community in America.
So is Trump not entitled to?
to say, look, on this occasion, the justice system was deliberately skewed to nail me and was
therefore used unfairly.
Yeah, I highly disagree about, you know, that narrative that a lot of black people are
gravitating towards Trump because, you know, Trump is being targeted by the justice system
or, you know, now he's, you know, been convicted of crimes.
I push back on that.
Yeah, I just don't agree with that because when you look at it.
at what happened with Trump, like people, there's a two-tier justice system in America.
We know that. We know that there's a way, you know, that black people are treated, and we know
that there's a way, you know, white people are treated. But then there's another third tier
that we're seeing right now. And there is a way that, you know, privileged white males who used
to be president are treated because in the New York case, you never saw a mugshot. You never saw
Donald Trump in any handcuffs. Piers, you tell me where that happens. Who does that happen to?
in America. There's rich.
We have seen a Trump mugshot.
In Georgia, but not in the New York case.
So, for him to be screaming that, you know,
he's being treated so unfairly.
And it's like, not necessarily.
34 counts and you get to walk out of a courtroom, you know.
Well, the 34 counts only were,
I would say that, I'm only playing devil's advocate here,
but I would say 34 counts are all on the same thing, right?
So it sounded a lot worse than it was.
It was all about the same falsifying a business record.
I think the unfairness, the unfairness point really is would any other businessmen have had that misdemeanor upgraded to a felony?
I don't think they would.
So that's where it looks to me like a Democrat motivated Alvin Bragg, who is a Democrat and was on record to say, I want to take down Trump.
Well, he ran on that.
He ran on that.
Right.
So he's made no secret of what he wants to do.
And he's done something with this misdemeanor, which has not been done with other people.
But this is what I tell people, Fis, Alvin Brad Grant on that.
People can't get you if you don't give them nothing to get.
So clearly, you know, Trump has done enough to where they were able to bring charges against him
and now have him convicted in a court of law.
Like I, we can sit here in debate whether that's right or wrong.
But the only reason we would say it's wrong is because he's a president and we think
that he should have a different level of privilege than everybody else.
Well, actually, I do think they should.
I actually do.
Dang.
Yeah, because I don't think any president,
I don't think any president in America,
particularly now,
could possibly get a fair trial.
I don't care what people say about that jury.
There will have been people in there
who were not being entirely honest
about what they really feel about Trump.
I'm sure of it.
Because how could you not have extreme views
about Trump either way?
Oh, I agree with that.
That I agree with you.
I've been saying that from day one,
it's impossible for somebody like Donald Trump
to get judged by a jury of his peers,
a jury that's not biased.
And it would be for Biden, by the way,
if Biden was being prosecuted
in a criminal court in Texas,
it would be exactly the same issue.
I would feel exactly the same way.
It's just, I just don't think any American president
can possibly get a fair trial
of a jury of so-called peers.
They're not peers.
He's the president of the United States.
He's the most powerful person in the country.
He's one of only 46 people to hold that office.
Of course, this jury has nothing
in connection with Trump on that level.
So I just felt like from the start,
the whole principle of dragging him through a courtroom
over something so relatively trivial,
I felt was always destined to make America
a more divided country, which it already is.
What do you think about the other charges?
Do you think the other charges are fair?
Well, I think he certainly has responsibility
for what happened on January 6th,
and I think that was serious,
and people died, and that is a very serious situation.
I think the storing of classified documents
at Marilago was.
wrong and I think is serious for any person to do that. But I also know Joe Biden was found with a lot of
documents at his house in Delaware. And on the Georgia phone call, it comes down to your interpretation
of the phone call. Trump will have a view about what he meant when he said, I need to find these
extra votes. Other people will take another view. And again, it comes down to, you know,
if that's a jury trial, is it really going to be in Georgia a fair trial for Donald Trump?
Are those 12 people are so unimpeachable that they can rise above any personal feelings for Trump?
I very much doubt it.
He's probably the most famous person
and notorious person
in the history of planet Earth.
And the idea he could be in a courtroom
anywhere in America
and get a fair shake
is, I think, for the birds.
I agree, but then, I mean, so what do you do?
Like, how do you hold people like that accountable?
You know, America clearly doesn't have it.
You go through the impeachment process.
They've done that twice.
I know. I know.
And but that's all you.
You're left with it. I mean, look at Bill Clinton.
You know, he was impeached over Monica Lewinsky and lines the American people.
You know, a lot of presidents get impeached for stuff.
I mean, it is normally the mechanic that you use,
but nobody thought of dragging Clinton through a criminal court for any of the stuff
with either Monica Lewinsky or Paula Jones.
Yeah, that's true, too.
I mean, I know it's just so interesting because I think out of all of the cases, right,
you know, the election interference and George.
trying to find the, you know, the extra votes.
And I think the insurrection are the strongest ones.
Because even if you bring up the Mar-a-Lago case to what you just did,
the first thing people to say was, well, hey, President Biden had documents in his house too.
Right.
And then now you're trying to figure out, well, what document is what?
Was it the nuclear code?
Was it something simple?
So people would dismiss that one.
I think the same thing with the New York and with the Stormy Daniels.
People will be like, man, that's what he's getting convicted for?
Right.
So it's like you're damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Because I think you would have the same.
reaction. If he was in court right now in Georgia and they found him guilty of trying to find
extra votes, it would be the same reaction.
Totally agree. You know, from the American people. But that is my problem with,
that's my problem with taking presidents through the regular criminal system. I don't think you
can. I just don't think you can. And it goes back to what I, and it goes back to this, right?
And I'm not trying to plug my book, but it's true. What I said about everybody putting things
on the same scale. Yeah. Right? Like all four of those charges should not be on the same scale.
They should not be weighted to same.
Like, you know, two of those things, you know, to me, are much heavier than the other two.
But should Barack Obama be taken through criminal courts for running drone programs
that killed lots of innocent people?
Oh, man, if you do that, then you're going to have to lock up every single...
Right. So your logic...
Okay, but to pick you up on that, Charlemagne, your argument against doing that
is you then had to do it for everybody else, right?
But Trump wasn't afforded that logic.
with this prosecution?
Well, we're in a new day and age.
And, you know, I guess this is how it's going to be moving forward.
Yeah.
And honestly, I don't know if we want that.
Like, you know, there's been people right now that's calling, you know,
for if the federal cases against Trump happened,
they're calling for Joe Biden to departing Trump, you know.
I don't know, Piss.
Like, you know, we're about to see some things in America
that we've never, ever seen before, you know, moving forward.
And that's why I asked you, is it good for America?
And I think probably you kind of agree with me that ultimately,
I'm not sure any of this is good for America.
Looking at it from outside America at the moment.
I love America.
I don't know.
I love Americans.
But watching what is happening here is really unsettling.
It feels like a kind of banana republic, you know,
like sort of wild corrupt, you know, South American regime.
It's like it doesn't feel like America.
Yeah, but the only reason I say I don't know is because if I say,
if I say, no, this isn't good for America because of what happened in New York.
What about when a president, you know, does things like attempts to lead an insurrection of this country?
Right.
You know, what about your president does things like, you know, tries to overthrow the results of an election, you know, like what?
Those are things that I feel like should be punished because none of that is constitutional.
So, you know, for me to say, hey, this isn't right, I can't, I can't say that.
Because if I say that about this, and that means even the bigger things that he's accused of, I've got to dismiss those too.
And I don't, I don't necessarily agree with dismissing those.
Let's just play your clip.
This is from your last interview with me
when I asked you about Trump.
Let's listen to this.
I need a name, Charlemagne.
Is he winnable?
I really don't know.
You've got to give me a name.
Who's going to win?
Biden v. Trump.
It's not Dean Phillips.
It's not going to be Dean Phillips.
I really truly don't know
if I had to say right now, I would say Donald Trump.
Wow.
There we go, the casting vote.
Charlemagne the God, the man with his finger
on the pulse of America.
Trump.
Maybe.
But I don't know.
That's what's so scary about it.
So I'll ask you the same question, post-conviction.
Do you still think this is not about whether you want him to win,
but do you still think Trump will win?
I truly really don't know now, and I tell you why.
I think, you know, like most elections in America, it comes down to the basis.
And, you know, right now, Donald Trump's base is very energized, you know,
behind, you know, this conviction.
Like, you know, last week in New York City, they have Fifth Avenue blocked off.
Guy was walking around Fifth Avenue with an F. Joe Biden sign.
And then there was all of these a bunch of F. Joe Biden signs, you know, up and down, up and down the block.
And on the flip side, you know, a lot of President Biden's base, you know, doesn't seem too energized, you know, by him right now.
I mean, especially when you look at, you know, you look at, you know, the Muslims in Michigan, you know, who are mad over, you know, what was happening in Gaza.
You know, if they sit out, you know, if they sit out in mass, it could be a real problem.
you know, for President Biden.
But then on the flip side of that,
you're going, like I said earlier,
the 49% of independence who, you know,
think Trump should drop out.
So literally right now,
I think it's going to come down
to who can energize their base the most.
Who can make those die-hard, you know,
constituents come out in droves in November.
And I don't know, I really don't know who that's going to be.
Have you decided yet who you're going to vote for?
have I decided yet who I'm going to vote for?
Yeah.
I believe so.
Would you like to share it with me?
No.
Not at all.
But, you know, I tell everybody, this is what I do with my listeners.
I put all the facts as I know them on the table.
I bring on people who, you know, want to chair for their respective sides.
Like I said, we had Governor Josh Shapiro in here.
He's clearly a surrogate of Joe Biden.
but then, you know, we've had, you know, the people like Candace Owens in here,
and, you know, different conservatives, like Vivek Ram and Swambe.
That's why I love your show.
Yeah, so it's like, I just want everybody to get all the information to make their own decisions.
We've had third-party candidates in here.
We've had RFK Jr. here.
We've had Cornell West, Marianne Williamson.
I want to put everything on the table.
I want all my listeners to get as much information as they can about everything that's available for them to vote for,
and they go make their own decisions.
The latest polls suggest that 17% of black Americans would now vote for Trump, a significant increase on either of the two last elections.
Can you understand that?
I don't believe it.
And the reason I don't believe it a couple of months ago, it was 22%.
You know, I think all of those polls are a little bit overstated.
I think what you're, what happened.
First of all, I would like to know who they're polling because I've never met anybody who's been polled.
Like my good sister, Angela Rod, she has a great podcast.
called the Native Land podcast with Andrew Gillum and Tiffany Cross,
and they just literally had a discussion about that last week.
I don't know any, you know, black person who's ever been polled.
I would like to know who they're polling.
But I think what you're experiencing right now is, like I said earlier,
you have the exhausted majority.
And every presidential election year, we have this.
It's the same exact conversation.
Black people are disappointed.
You know, black people are fed up with the Democratic Party.
So if you're talking to black people, some black people,
in this moment, I think that's what you're getting, you know,
when it comes to a lot of these polls.
Because, you know, and even when you see those poll numbers,
it's not because of anything that, you know, Donald Trump is doing.
I think it has to do more with what black people feel.
And like I said, I can't speak for all black people,
but I'm just speaking based on conversations that I've had,
what a lot of black people feel the Democratic Party hasn't done for them over the years.
Not even just this current Biden administration, just over the years.
years, you know, a lot of hope, a lot of change has been promised that, you know, they just,
we've never, we've never received the way we want to. And I think, um, I think that's what
happens. Whoever they, whoever these people that they're polling, I think that's what you're,
you're getting. You're getting a reaction to just, you know, years and years of disappointment
in Democrats. I don't think it necessarily has to do with anything that Donald Trump is doing
or even, you know, President Biden isn't doing. President Biden is just continuing a tradition
of, you know, not doing enough for black people
and black people feeling like not enough is being done,
you know, for them by Democrats.
And is that feeling enhanced by what is widely accepted
to be the poor performance of Carmelah Harris as vice president?
I think we all at this point realized
that the vice president has been handcuffed in a lot of ways,
you know, she was being attacked, you know, by her own party.
You know, there was, you know, a month ago,
there was like so many stories,
constantly coming out and the stories were about how people in the Democratic Party were basically
telling President Biden to watch out for Vice President Harris because she has aspirations, you know,
past being Vice President. And I think, you know, because of that and because of the position
that she's in, you know, it might make her fall back, you know, in a way. But, you know, she's starting
to come out a little bit more, but I still would like to see, you know, the Vice President Harris,
to Kamala Harris that a lot of us, you know, know from her days in the Senate when she was really holding people's feet to the fire, man.
I'd like to see her come out and really prosecute, you know, the case against Donald Trump to the American people.
Now she has more to even be able to do that with now than he's been, you know, convicted.
And I think the biggest thing that, you know, folks should be saying about somebody like Donald Trump is like regardless of, you know, party, right?
If you call yourself a patriot, you have to say that a lot of things he does are just not constitutional.
Like, you know, if you're calling for the determination of the Constitution, the overthrow the results of an election, if you led an attempted coup of this country, at the least you have to say that's not patriotic.
So when you're out here waving your American flag or, you know, you're mad at athletes for taking a knee, right?
And you're calling that unpatriotic.
Then what is that what he's doing?
It's a very interesting point.
I want to end, Sean, a couple of totally different stories.
One is what's happening with P. Diddy.
His former security guy, Roger Bonds, came on my show last week.
Said he'd seen Diddy violent with multiple women.
A lot more allegations coming out all the time about it.
What do you make of what is happening with Diddy?
The same thing I make of, you know, what's happening with anybody.
You know, you got to deal with the consequences of your action.
Period.
You can't run from yourself.
I tell people that all the time, man.
Like, you know, I'm a big proponent of mental health.
And the reason I'm a big proponent of mental health
and, you know, people doing the work on themselves
is because a lot of people are dealing with a lot of unheeled trauma.
They're dealing with a lot of pain and a lot of hurt.
And they end up projecting that pain and that hurt onto other people.
And, you know, that's what I think has been happening with him over the years.
I don't know him personally.
I know him from interviewing him.
You know, of course, I've had conversations with him,
but I've never hung out with him.
I've never been to a Diddy party.
None of that.
Like, that's just not, you know, things that I'm interested in doing.
But I feel like, you know, he's a person who's been dealing with a lot of pain
and a lot of hurt for a long time.
And, you know, it seems like he's been hurting a lot of people.
And like I said, projecting a lot of pain on folks.
And you cannot run from yourself.
I don't care who you are.
I don't care if you're P. Diddy.
I don't care if you're Donald Trump.
I don't care how rich you are.
I don't care what race you are.
You cannot run from yourself.
Eventually, you know, your BS will catch up with you.
And I mean, I think that's what we're seeing right now.
I think we're seeing a lot of his BS catching up with him.
I mean, you can't even hide.
Like, you're just the same way, you know, Trump was trying to hide things.
Pete Ditty was trying to hide things too by, you know, suppressing that tape.
So, I mean, you know, you can't run from yourself, Piz.
You got to deal with the consequences of your action.
So, you know, whatever happens to him as far as, you know, legal ramifications are concerned or, you know, jail time.
he has to deal with that.
But what I would tell people is don't forget what the issue is.
Because a lot of times we do that here in America,
we get so caught up in the celebrity that we forget what the actual issue is.
And the issue in this situation is domestic violence.
The issue in this situation is the patriarchy,
because as long as you have, you know, men, especially powerful men,
you know, thinking that women are their property, you know,
and they can do whatever to them.
You're going to see situations like, you know, the Diddy Cassie take?
And like I said, you know, men not dealing with their with their unheeled trauma.
You know, men not dealing with their pain, men not dealing with their hurt and projecting it on to, you know, people around them.
Those are the three issues that I think we really should be focused on because long after we're not talking about this P. Diddy and Cassie situation anymore, there's still going to be women all around the world, you know, dealing with men like that.
So how do we get to the root of the issue? I think we only get to the root of the issue by talking about the actual issue and not the individuals.
Big story in the news of the moment is Caitlin Clark, biggest star at the moment in women's basketball.
She was pushed to the ground in this rather notorious incident a few days ago by Cheney Carter off the ball.
And this follows a couple of things.
One was one of your friends from the view, Sunny Host in one of the co-as, arguing that white privilege and pretty privilege played a role in Caitlin Clark's popularity.
ESPN, former host,
Jamil Hill, also said that her popularity
was due to her race and sexuality.
And people are saying,
well, that is why potentially Kennedy Carter
did what she did off the ball.
When you put it all together,
what do you feel about this, Shal?
I mean, are we seeing the race element of this story
coming to the fore inevitably?
I don't think that, you know,
the young woman who pushed her did it
because Caitlin Clark is white,
but I will go back to the points
that Jamel Hill and Sunny made.
I think race is a factor in Caitlin Clark,
but it's not the first factor.
The first factor in Caitlin Clark's success
is that she's phenomenal as a basketball player.
Like she's one of the,
we've never seen anything like her.
You know, she, the leading score
in Division I basketball, period, male, female, whatever.
But, Piz, you have to admit,
whenever you see somebody,
excelling in a field
that that race
doesn't usually excel in,
you know, it is heightened.
You can look at Tiger Woods and golf.
You can look at Eminem in rap music.
You can look at, you know, even President Obama.
Yeah, but here's a difference.
Here's a difference.
But here's a difference.
When Obama and Tiger Woods
dominated their fields of politics and golf,
people didn't use their skin color
in the same way they're using K.
What they're saying there is she's got white privilege, pretty privilege, she's a pretty white girl, and that's the only reason there's all this fuss about them. Whereas I don't think you would argue with Obama and Tiger Woods. Yeah, there was a fuss about them, but that's because they were, one was a brilliant politician. And the other one was one of the great golfers of all time. But that's the point. They're all once in a lifetime generational talents, including Caitlin, including an Eminem. But whenever you see somebody, you know,
excelling in a field that that race usually doesn't excel in,
there's going to be more eyeballs on it.
You're going to be like, damn, you heard this dude, this dude.
That's true.
That's true, yeah.
Same thing with Caitlin.
You seen that white girl can ball.
That white girl can ball.
It's just a thing.
It's not like, you know, but their success isn't just because they're white.
Their success is because they're phenomenally good at what they do,
and there is that element to it.
Just like, we see it all the time.
So it's like, I think when the girl hit her,
I think she's just going through some rookie hazing.
I think there is a lot of rookie hazing involved with that
because she's not the only rookie Angel Reese.
She, damn, she got, you know,
they choke slammed her last week, right?
So I just think there's a level of rookie hazing going on.
And there is a lot of jealousy and envy
because these young ladies that are coming into the league now,
the Angel Reese's, the Caitlin Clarks, you know,
they've made a lot of money.
They've made more money than some of these,
woman that's been in the NBA for years.
So I think there is a level of jealousy and envy.
Like when you saw, I saw the young lady tweet out, the young lady that puts Caitlin Clark,
I can't remember her name, but she tweeted out, um, other than three-pointers,
what does she bring to the table?
That's an envy.
You got to admit that's an envious statement, right?
Yes.
That's a, that's a statement that reeks of jealousy.
It does.
I think, yeah, I don't think, I don't think, I don't think it's, I don't think she's playing
the race card.
I think she's just upset at a lot of the attention, you know, that, that a Caitlin
Clark is getting.
But I'll tell you what, they better be careful how they treat Caitlin Clark.
They better be careful how they treat Angel Reese.
If not, they're going to be back flying JetBlue in a minute.
They're going to be back on Delta.
They're going to be back on Southwest.
It's not going to be no charter planes for those young ladies.
If they end up hurting either one of those women.
But they shouldn't be soft on them either.
No, I totally agree.
And actually, I'm sure, listen, I haven't seen Caitlin Clark complaining.
I think she'll probably dust herself down, score some more three-pointers,
and get a bit tougher physically, which is what she's,
have to do to be in the program. But on that specific point, Sunny Hosten made about
white privilege and pretty privilege playing a role in her popularity. You know, again,
using the Tiger Woods analogy, he was so talented. I don't remember saying that he was
benefiting in a white sport from black privilege or, you know, black, or being a good-looking
young black guy. That wasn't, they weren't used as the sticks to beat him with when he rose
to the top of goal very quickly. And yet here we have Caitlin Clark, who is by
any definition, a brilliantly talented basketball, regardless of her skin color, having somebody
on national television say, actually, she's only really popular because of her white and pretty
privilege. I think that's wrong. Yeah, I disagree with that. I mean, Caitlin is, like I said,
she's a once in a lifetime generational talent. Like, you know, she's literally the leading score
in college basketball history. Like, I started watching, I started watching women's college
in basketball because my wife, she graduated from the University of South Carolina.
She was a cheerleader for the University of South Carolina.
So I used to go to a lot of football games, a lot of basketball games.
I'm a Gamecock fan.
When Don Stanley came to the University of South Carolina, I started watching, you know,
women's basketball a lot.
When we kept Asia Wilson, who was the face of the WNBA, the best talent in the WNBA now,
when she stayed home in South Carolina and played for us, I never, I watched that whole run
and never stopped watching women's college basketball.
So I saw when Angel Reese came.
man. I saw when, you know, Caitlin Clark came in.
And what kept me watching was the fact that they were really good.
Like, all of them were really good.
Like, they are, you know, phenomenal competitors, man.
So it's like, yeah, I think that there is an element that I think there is an element of race.
But like I said, I think it's because whenever you see somebody dominating that race doesn't usually dominate, it just makes it more of a spectacle.
It just does.
That's just how we're all wired.
I don't know.
When you see the first black president, that's more historic than any other president that's ever happened.
When you see Tiger Woods, that's more historic than anything else.
You know, when you see a Caitlin Clark, you're like, wow, I've never seen that, you know.
So, I mean, yeah, to deny race in those situations, it would be foolish of us.
But that's not the sole reason.
I don't even know what the percentage would be.
But I wouldn't even give that half of why, you know, she's successful.
And your message to Chenity Carter is be careful you're not back flying JetBlue.
What's her name? What's her name again?
Chenidy Carter.
Chenity Carter, yes, to Chinity Carter and, you know, all the other women out there that are being super tough on the rookies like the Andrew Reese and the Kaylin Clarks,
you have to be careful because if you hurt one of them, you're all going to all be back, you know, flying Delta or JetBlue,
which is nothing wrong with Delta JetBlue.
I love both of them.
I could have my house on both of them.
But if I could fly private all the time, I probably would.
I could fly charter,
I probably would.
So, you know,
don't cut your nose off
to spite your face.
But don't be soft on them either, though.
No.
I thought Martina Ravato Lover made a good point.
She said, the players in the WMBA
need to realize that Clark is helping all of them now
and in the long run.
Caitlin's the tide that will raise all boats.
And I totally get that.
It's like the more exciting
you can make the sport,
the women's national basketball association sport look.
The more eyeballs you're going to get,
the more money they're all going to get.
And she's absolutely right.
And by the way, the reason everybody is having a reaction to what happened to Caitlin is because it wasn't a basketball play.
Yeah.
Like it was clearly a cheap shot.
My man Matt Barnes, he hosts a very popular podcast called All the Smoke Podcasts that you can hear on my podcast network, the Black Effect Eye Heart Radio Podcast Network, him and Stephen Jackson.
He said that, you know, Indiana needs an enforcer.
Indiana needs somebody that protects, you know, the star.
because he was an enforcer for Kobe Bryant.
God bless the dead.
And just like you've seen other enforcer,
like Charles Oakley wasn't enforcer for Michael Jordan
when he was on the Bulls.
Like every team needs an enforcer.
So when there's a cheap shot like that,
that happens, you know, Caitlin Clark,
somebody can retaliate.
Piz, I was born in 1978,
so, you know, I'm sure you follow American basketball.
You saw there was a time,
I think it was Bill Lambeer had like,
like he just did this disgusting,
dirty foul play on Larry Bird, right?
mind you, Bill Lambitts, white, Larry Bird's white.
So it's just basketball basketball.
He hurt Larry Bird.
I don't know if it was, I think it was the next game.
Robert Parrish, Black Center, two-piece Bill Lambitt.
Like, I mean, it wasn't even a basketball play, just a beat down to the ground
because you need an enforcer.
And I think, you know, that's what this situation is.
The Indiana fever do need an enforcer, you know, to protect Caitlin.
I have an idea for who that could be.
I think if LeBron James just needs to identify as a
woman. And then by Joe Biden, by Joe Biden's yardstick, that will be fine. He can become the
enforcer for Caitlin Clark. And, you know, not right now in America, that could be a possibility.
It could actually happen. Yeah, it could actually happen. That's right.
Charlemagne, brilliant to talk to you. I love the book. Get honest or die lying, why small talk sucks.
I think we've just proved two things. One, you're the best promoter of your own products and why shouldn't
you be there? Great. And secondly, you do what it says on a tin. You like this.
extended chat. I like it. I love going on your show. I love having your mind. I think you're a
breath of fresh air in the global debate. So thank you very much. Thank you, Piz. I get excited to be
on with you, man, just because I know we're going to have some lively conversations, man. So
thank you for having me again. Great to see you. Catch up soon. Take care.
