Piers Morgan Uncensored - Morgan's Mailbag: Crackhead Barney, Hasan Piker & John Mearsheimer

Episode Date: May 5, 2024

It's that time of the week, when Piers Morgan answers YOUR questions. This week he defends bringing American performance artist and ambush interviewer, Crackhead Barney onto the show. And responds to... the viral sensation that was streamer Hasan Piker, defending pro-Palestinian University protestors. Piers Morgan Uncensored is the global arena for fearless debate, bold opinions and major interviews. Subscribe for all-new and exclusive daily content.  YouTube: @PiersMorganUncensored X: @PiersUncensored TikTok: @piersmorganuncensored Insta: @piersmorganuncensored Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Welcome to Morgan's Mailbag, where I give my real-time reactions to your comments and questions about our uncensored content. As always, I've not chosen what I'm about to read and would almost certainly not read out some of what I'm about to read out. But based on the quality of previous correspondence, I'm quietly confident it will, in the main, be witty, witty, wise, intellectually stimulating, perhaps even funny. But we'll see. Okay, let's get started. We start with what has undoubtedly been the number one talking point of the last week, my viral interview with the so-called performance artist, the self-style crackhead Barney,
Starting point is 00:00:42 the woman who harassed Alec Baldwin in a coffee shop in New York, to bring attention to the Free Palestine movement. Free Palestine, Alex, just one time, and I'll leave you alone. I'll leave you alone, I swear. Just say Free Palestine one time. A crackhead's appearance on this show went exactly as I feared. My hand is broken. My neck is broken. No, it's not. My legs. Look at my legs. Don't do this to me, Pierce.
Starting point is 00:01:15 We're literally tens of thousands of comments about this segment, one of our biggest reactions ever. And it must be said, a significant proportion went something along these lines. What the hell is Pierce Morgan thinking putting this woman on the show? Why would you put someone like this on your show, Pierce? Why did Morgan do this? All right, let me explain. this woman was already going viral in America for harassing Alec Baldwin in a coffee shop in New York
Starting point is 00:01:43 and not only calling him a killer, which obviously he was involved in the death of a woman on the set of a movie, but he's yet to face a criminal trial for this. And I always believe people should face a trial before you actually call them a murderer. Secondly, she demanded he, say, free Palestine and then began demanding he abuse Israel.
Starting point is 00:02:06 So this went viral around America and indeed around the world. And we got what was a very competitive booking, the first interview with this woman, Crackhead Barney, to try and explain or defend herself about what she had done because I have no truck with Alec Baldwin. I think he's an incredibly disagreeable guy who throughout the whole process since he did shoot that woman has turned the whole thing into some weird, ghastly publicity tool.
Starting point is 00:02:32 I don't defend him ever for anything. But all I do is criticise him. But here I actually felt some sympathy for it. You know, why should a public figure like him when they're just buying a coffee in their own personal time be abused and harassed in this ugly manner? So I was curious, what was this person like who'd done the harassing?
Starting point is 00:02:51 Did she have a legitimate explanation or defence of what she did? And it was clear from the very first second she appeared on screen with the ridiculous get-up that she had that this was not going to be a serious interview. It was going to be a piece of, she would say, performative art. I would say a performative waste of time and an absurdity.
Starting point is 00:03:13 And that's what it was. But I did try and keep my car. And I did repeatedly try and bring this performative artist back to the real world to say, why did you do what you do and how do you defend it? And when I realized she was just simply not going to answer and was simply doing this interview to get likes and attention or whatever, then we finished it after about seven minutes. It wasn't that long, actually,
Starting point is 00:03:36 relative to some of the big interviews we do. And it got a lot of attention around the world that interview. And I feel actually it was worth doing for this reason. It was illuminating that the whole Israel-Hamas war has been hijacked by people around the world for purely narcissistic reasons, purely me, me, me attention-grabbing. They don't really care about what's going on in Gaza.
Starting point is 00:03:59 They don't really care about the plight of the Palestinians, or indeed what happened to Israelis on October the 7th. They just care about themselves. And Crack-Ebb Barney perfectly epitomizes that kind of nonsense. So, yeah, we got her on. I make no apology for it, but she revealed herself to be the ridiculous creature that she clearly is. Okay.
Starting point is 00:04:25 Do you want to sit down? Did you see the damage? This is one of the most pathetic things I've ever been. had to endure. Pierce Borgon is beating me up on international team. Well, my interview with Crackhead and the subsequent debate has been watched
Starting point is 00:04:42 millions of times across YouTube now, with many streamers reacting to it on their own channels. You're welcome, by the way. So in the interest of closing the loop and providing some definite closure for me, the unscensored team thought I should react to other people's reactions
Starting point is 00:04:55 to my original reaction to Crackhead Barney's reaction to me. If you can follow that, this is how it works. Oh, my guys. Not particularly, no. Oh, Jesus. This can't be what the world is coming to.
Starting point is 00:05:17 That's what I'm saying. Hit the pause, buddy. What, I tell you what? This cannot be what the world is coming to. My pastor said I'd be surprised that we got 50 more years on this earth. We're at the bottom. We're at the bottom. Absolutely.
Starting point is 00:05:33 This is below the bottom. I cannot. I'm a white woman. I identify as a white woman. Sorry. What? I'm a white woman. woman I identify as a white woman. So I assume she's doing a white face here, which is kind of
Starting point is 00:05:47 interesting to me. I don't know how seriously she takes the identity, by the way, but, you know, if a white guy or white woman did blackface for a joke, there's no way that's going to be accepted. There's no way she's getting interviewed. So it's kind of funny how that one works, isn't it? Pierce Borgon is beating me up on international. I have to give credit what credit is due. When I see people that have the courage and boldness to make themselves look insane in order to get things accomplished,
Starting point is 00:06:22 I don't know if she has an agenda. I don't know if she's selling a book. I don't know if she got a course or a social media following. But it is, I have to say, I have to take my head off a little bit for somebody to have enough courage to put their whole body on there and look like a complete fool. For that alone, crackhead Barney deserves credit. I agree. Well, hot on the heels of my one-on-one,
Starting point is 00:06:42 crack-ed, Hassan Piker and Emily Austin locked horns on the student protest sweeping American colleges. Do you not understand the English language? We're delayed. It's delayed. It's delayed. You need a Xanax, first of all. You need a Xanax. At Russell Germainey analyzed the debate like this. I think anything works when you actually hold an open platform to allow people of opposing opinions, political stances to duke it out. Most shows are afraid to do it, but peers as the correct kind of toxic person who feeds off that. So it works sometimes. I'm not trying to be toxic. I actually don't particularly like it
Starting point is 00:07:17 when they all start screaming abuse at each other. It might be entertaining on a low level, but it's not very informative. I like debates to be passionate, to be angry if they like, but to also be respectful of the other person when they're talking and to actually try and be constructive.
Starting point is 00:07:33 And I'm afraid that debate in particular descended into a ridiculous war of words and mutual abuse screaming. I think it's when they screamed at each other You're a terrorist. No, you're a terrorist. I realized I'd lost not just them, because they were just ignoring me. I'd lost the audience.
Starting point is 00:07:49 And that's not a good debate. Well, at John McCauley was less kind than his assessment. He said, I'd like the last 40 minutes in my life back, please. There's a lot of support for Hassan Pico who didn't hold back in his assessment of the rest of the panel. I don't know who the fuck you are,
Starting point is 00:08:01 and you're over here chirping and chirping all the way from, London, about Palestine and doing a both sides of their fucking fine type bullshit. You're talking about how you want a fucking free Palestine, but also simultaneously, you know, both sides got a lot, a lot going on. Shut the f*** up. You don't know anything, okay? At No Cash 47-8 said, I'd like to hear more from the handsome young Turkish chap on the far left,
Starting point is 00:08:24 very informative alluring. Many others left to James Baer's defense, an unusual experience, and cited this montage poking fun at Hassan's outburst. I don't know who the fucking you are, and you're over here chirping and chirping all the way from London about Palestine. Staping time Palestine Staping time Palestine
Starting point is 00:08:43 Stepping time Come on, matey Palestine Stepping time stepping on stepping time Never need a reason Never need a ride and stepping
Starting point is 00:08:52 frog You Palestine Get your knees up Get your knees up stepping on Get your knees up Stepping time Never need a reason
Starting point is 00:08:59 never you run Get your knees up Palestine Palestine Palestine Steping fine stepping time Never need a reason
Starting point is 00:09:06 Never need a ride and stepping Palestine Palestine Get your knees up. Get your knees up. Get your knees up. Get your knees up. Germany.
Starting point is 00:09:14 Readerieger run. Get you. Palestine. Well, we'll leave the final word on all this to at user dash 1S5. Mr. Morgan, you have incredible patience. That is actually one of my virtues. And my God, I need it on this show sometimes. We'll be invited Professor John Meersheimer back to Uncensored, not least because I knew I'd have a civilized, respectful debate.
Starting point is 00:09:38 And it was a fascinating one. as we talked about a potential threat of a nuclear Iran. First of all, it was the Israelis who started this. Israel made a major mistake that increases the likelihood that Iran will get nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons are basically a force for peace. NATO couldn't let a European, sovereign, democratic country come under nuclear attack and not respond to.
Starting point is 00:10:00 Yes, it could. And no American president, in my opinion, is willing to sacrifice New York or Chicago or Los Angeles for Ukraine. Sorry, but Professor, I think you don't fully understand. Let me clarify. Just what we're talking about here. We're talking about nuclear weapons. We're talking about nuclear war.
Starting point is 00:10:18 This is ever justified morally to deploy nuclear weapons? If you use nuclear weapons to effectively murder huge numbers of civilians, you're committing a war crime. At W1ZY didn't hold back in their praise. The most outstanding conversation on television in the 21st century. I mean, that might be slightly a stretch, but it was a really interesting conversation and debate, and what I liked about it was, is that although I disagree with a lot of what John Mishahma is saying,
Starting point is 00:10:48 he clearly knows his stuff, he's done his research, and he's reached conclusions, which may differ to mine. Doesn't mean that he's right or wrong, or I'm right or wrong, but what it does mean is that viewers can hear both sides of a debate and they can work it out for themselves. Well, as is often the case, for some reason, many viewers saw the conversation,
Starting point is 00:11:07 as a contest at Yasser Rakhaldi-6522 had little doubts about the winner. Remember, it's not just peers talking, there's a whole team behind the scenes. Professor Mishama has intellectually defeated the team behind Piers Morgan. It's always gratifying to see intellectual honesty win the day. Well, look, just to be clear,
Starting point is 00:11:26 I defeat my team intellectually all day every day. It's not an unusual occurrence for them, so they won't even have noticed. But look, did John Mishammer beat me? Like I say, It was a debate. I don't think anyone won or lost. You can make rational arguments on both sides as we did,
Starting point is 00:11:43 and some people will agree with me and some with him. It's not actually a UFC fight. Or at Ab-Majuku 8093, chose to interpret my arguments like this. Pierce is British, but he wants American military bases all over the world. No, I don't. That's not what I said. I said it would have been sensible with hindsight
Starting point is 00:12:03 and probably with Fawcite to have kept a small American military presence with other allied forces in Afghanistan. Because without that, the whole thing collapsed, the moment that we left overnight in that ridiculous decision by President Biden. And the result of that catastrophic failure of leadership was that the Taliban swept in and took charge all over again
Starting point is 00:12:25 and have sent women back thousands of years back to the dark ages with their barbaric treatment of women. And if that's a victory for freedom, for freedom and democracy or the world, then I've got a little lesson for you. It ain't. Well, finally, at G. Mack G. Mac Gorgadoli, two, apparently there's a one,
Starting point is 00:12:48 got a tiny bit carried away with this analysis. The professor said, you're welcome, Piers, but didn't go as far as to say thanks for having me. I thought that was significant. I think you're slightly overreeding this. Honestly, they don't have to thank me for the experience. The one thing I'm sure about is that John Meerschimer would be back, because both of the interviews I've done with him
Starting point is 00:13:05 have been two of our highest rated interviews that we've ever had on the show. People like to hear what he has to say and they like me debating him. And finally, here on Uncensored that I'm used to having what I say commented on and criticised, but some people also choose to pass judgment on how I look.
Starting point is 00:13:22 This week, the influential media fashionista, Derek Guy, decided to, well, rip me a new one. He started off by setting out his stall. I thought I'd do a thread, he says, about X, comparing his my style to men'swear icon Kermit the frog. Personally, I've always loved Kermit, a very confident, funny performer who gets all the best pigs. Well, first, Derek analyzed the differences
Starting point is 00:13:48 in how Kermit and myself dress for work. Let's start with the basics, the core of any outfits fit in silhouette. Here's his suit jackets often have lapels and buckle away from his chest and a collar that floats from his neck that suggests his jackets may be too small. No such issues for granted. Kermit the Frog, his clothes, hanged beautifully and smoothly, while still giving a distinctive,
Starting point is 00:14:08 flattering silhouette. Yeah, I mean, you've got a point. This one is a bit tight, but it's been a... I had a long couple of winks in L.A. I'll be eating and drinking too much. Next, Derek moved on to my casual look as compared to the legendary Muppet. Compared with two outfits, he wrote. Piers' black polo with Czech knee-leg shorts and bad sneakers, says nothing.
Starting point is 00:14:28 But Kermit's cargo shorts with a lower shirt, fishing bag and straw hat says, I'm a mid-century sportsman on vacation. I don't really agree with this, you see. This is where you lost me. I'm actually a bit of a fashion icon, globally, in fact. And I think what you'll find, Derek, is for all your pontificating. And by the way, when you do the possessive pises, you didn't get that right. You did P-I-E-R-postrophe S.
Starting point is 00:14:56 That's grammatically a failure. And I know how particularly you are about details. But no, I'm a fashion icon. And the fact that you've now put my fashion onto the global map with your thread, which I just checked has had 4 million views so rising fast, is a matter of great personal pride. And frankly, if you want to compare me to Kermit, who is one of the most iconic figures in entertainment history,
Starting point is 00:15:20 fine, that makes two of us. Well, finally, Derek addressed how Kermit and myself contrasts when it comes to how we dress when we're out in the town, mingling with the stars. Kermit knows that dinner suits, aka Tuxedo, should be warm and black. bow ties made from the same material as the jacket's facing, not like peers long black ties, which should be reserved for business meetings called appearances and funerals.
Starting point is 00:15:45 I actually don't agree. So this is where you reveal your age or just the fact that you're old-fashioned because nobody wears bow ties in it, not even tuck in the carlson. I am a straight tie tuxedo guy because that's where the real action is, where the future is. It's where fashion's going. And you, Derek, my old son, whose grandma needs pulling up, are just not with the times.
Starting point is 00:16:11 Well, that's it for this edition of Morgan's Mailback. Remember, you can watch all of my past interviews, debates and monologues on the uncensored YouTube channel. We've now reached nearly 2.6 million subscribers making us the fastest growing YouTube channel in the world. So like and subscribe to become part of our growing community. Until next time, remember, keep it uncensored.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.