Piers Morgan Uncensored - Morgan's Mailbag: Crackhead Barney, Hasan Piker & John Mearsheimer
Episode Date: May 5, 2024It's that time of the week, when Piers Morgan answers YOUR questions. This week he defends bringing American performance artist and ambush interviewer, Crackhead Barney onto the show. And responds to... the viral sensation that was streamer Hasan Piker, defending pro-Palestinian University protestors. Piers Morgan Uncensored is the global arena for fearless debate, bold opinions and major interviews. Subscribe for all-new and exclusive daily content. YouTube: @PiersMorganUncensored X: @PiersUncensored TikTok: @piersmorganuncensored Insta: @piersmorganuncensored Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to Morgan's Mailbag, where I give my real-time reactions to your comments and questions about our uncensored content.
As always, I've not chosen what I'm about to read and would almost certainly not read out some of what I'm about to read out.
But based on the quality of previous correspondence, I'm quietly confident it will, in the main, be witty, witty, wise, intellectually stimulating, perhaps even funny.
But we'll see.
Okay, let's get started.
We start with what has undoubtedly been the number one talking point of the last week,
my viral interview with the so-called performance artist,
the self-style crackhead Barney,
the woman who harassed Alec Baldwin in a coffee shop in New York,
to bring attention to the Free Palestine movement.
Free Palestine, Alex, just one time, and I'll leave you alone.
I'll leave you alone, I swear.
Just say Free Palestine one time.
A crackhead's appearance on this show went exactly as I feared.
My hand is broken. My neck is broken.
No, it's not. My legs. Look at my legs. Don't do this to me, Pierce.
We're literally tens of thousands of comments about this segment, one of our biggest reactions ever.
And it must be said, a significant proportion went something along these lines.
What the hell is Pierce Morgan thinking putting this woman on the show?
Why would you put someone like this on your show, Pierce?
Why did Morgan do this?
All right, let me explain.
this woman was already going viral in America
for harassing Alec Baldwin in a coffee shop in New York
and not only calling him a killer,
which obviously he was involved in the death of a woman
on the set of a movie,
but he's yet to face a criminal trial for this.
And I always believe people should face a trial
before you actually call them a murderer.
Secondly, she demanded he, say, free Palestine
and then began demanding he abuse Israel.
So this went viral around America and indeed around the world.
And we got what was a very competitive booking,
the first interview with this woman, Crackhead Barney,
to try and explain or defend herself about what she had done
because I have no truck with Alec Baldwin.
I think he's an incredibly disagreeable guy
who throughout the whole process since he did shoot that woman
has turned the whole thing into some weird, ghastly publicity tool.
I don't defend him ever for anything.
But all I do is criticise him.
But here I actually felt some sympathy for it.
You know, why should a public figure like him
when they're just buying a coffee in their own personal time
be abused and harassed in this ugly manner?
So I was curious, what was this person like
who'd done the harassing?
Did she have a legitimate explanation
or defence of what she did?
And it was clear from the very first second
she appeared on screen
with the ridiculous get-up that she had
that this was not going to be a serious interview.
It was going to be a piece of, she would say, performative art.
I would say a performative waste of time and an absurdity.
And that's what it was.
But I did try and keep my car.
And I did repeatedly try and bring this performative artist back to the real world
to say, why did you do what you do and how do you defend it?
And when I realized she was just simply not going to answer
and was simply doing this interview to get likes and attention or whatever,
then we finished it after about seven minutes.
It wasn't that long, actually,
relative to some of the big interviews we do.
And it got a lot of attention around the world that interview.
And I feel actually it was worth doing for this reason.
It was illuminating that the whole Israel-Hamas war
has been hijacked by people around the world
for purely narcissistic reasons,
purely me, me, me attention-grabbing.
They don't really care about what's going on in Gaza.
They don't really care about the plight of the Palestinians,
or indeed what happened to Israelis on October the 7th.
They just care about themselves.
And Crack-Ebb Barney perfectly epitomizes that kind of nonsense.
So, yeah, we got her on.
I make no apology for it,
but she revealed herself to be the ridiculous creature that she clearly is.
Okay.
Do you want to sit down?
Did you see the damage?
This is one of the most pathetic things I've ever been.
had to endure.
Pierce Borgon is beating me up
on international team.
Well, my interview with Crackhead
and the subsequent debate has been watched
millions of times across YouTube now,
with many streamers reacting to it
on their own channels.
You're welcome, by the way.
So in the interest of closing the loop
and providing some definite closure for me,
the unscensored team thought I should react
to other people's reactions
to my original reaction to Crackhead
Barney's reaction to me.
If you can follow that,
this is how it works.
Oh, my guys.
Not particularly, no.
Oh, Jesus.
This can't be what the world is coming to.
That's what I'm saying.
Hit the pause, buddy.
What, I tell you what?
This cannot be what the world is coming to.
My pastor said I'd be surprised that we got 50 more years on this earth.
We're at the bottom.
We're at the bottom.
Absolutely.
This is below the bottom.
I cannot.
I'm a white woman.
I identify as a white woman.
Sorry.
What?
I'm a white woman.
woman I identify as a white woman. So I assume she's doing a white face here, which is kind of
interesting to me. I don't know how seriously she takes the identity, by the way, but, you know,
if a white guy or white woman did blackface for a joke, there's no way that's going to be
accepted. There's no way she's getting interviewed. So it's kind of funny how that one works,
isn't it? Pierce Borgon is beating me up on international. I have to give credit what credit
is due. When I see people
that have the courage and boldness
to make themselves look insane
in order to get things accomplished,
I don't know if she has an agenda. I don't know if she's selling
a book. I don't know if she got a course or a social media
following. But it is, I have to say, I have to take my head
off a little bit for somebody to have enough courage to put their whole
body on there and look like a complete fool.
For that alone, crackhead Barney
deserves credit. I agree.
Well, hot on the heels of my one-on-one,
crack-ed, Hassan Piker and Emily Austin locked horns on the student protest sweeping American colleges.
Do you not understand the English language?
We're delayed. It's delayed. It's delayed. You need a Xanax, first of all. You need a Xanax.
At Russell Germainey analyzed the debate like this. I think anything works when you actually hold an open platform to allow people of opposing opinions, political stances to duke it out.
Most shows are afraid to do it, but peers as the correct kind of toxic person who feeds off that.
So it works sometimes.
I'm not trying to be toxic.
I actually don't particularly like it
when they all start screaming abuse at each other.
It might be entertaining on a low level,
but it's not very informative.
I like debates to be passionate,
to be angry if they like,
but to also be respectful of the other person
when they're talking
and to actually try and be constructive.
And I'm afraid that debate in particular
descended into a ridiculous war of words
and mutual abuse screaming.
I think it's when they screamed at each other
You're a terrorist. No, you're a terrorist.
I realized I'd lost not just them,
because they were just ignoring me.
I'd lost the audience.
And that's not a good debate.
Well, at John McCauley was less kind
than his assessment. He said,
I'd like the last 40 minutes in my life back, please.
There's a lot of support for Hassan Pico
who didn't hold back in his assessment
of the rest of the panel.
I don't know who the fuck you are,
and you're over here chirping and chirping
all the way from,
London, about Palestine
and doing a both sides of their fucking fine type bullshit.
You're talking about how you want
a fucking free Palestine, but also simultaneously, you know, both sides got a lot, a lot going on.
Shut the f*** up. You don't know anything, okay?
At No Cash 47-8 said, I'd like to hear more from the handsome young Turkish chap on the far left,
very informative alluring. Many others left to James Baer's defense, an unusual experience,
and cited this montage poking fun at Hassan's outburst.
I don't know who the fucking you are, and you're over here chirping and chirping all the way from
London about Palestine.
Staping time
Palestine
Staping time
Palestine
Stepping time
Come on, matey
Palestine
Stepping time
stepping on
stepping time
Never need a reason
Never need a ride and stepping
frog
You Palestine
Get your knees up
Get your knees up
stepping on
Get your knees up
Stepping time
Never need a reason
never you run
Get your knees up
Palestine
Palestine
Palestine
Steping fine
stepping time
Never need a reason
Never need a ride and stepping
Palestine
Palestine
Get your knees up.
Get your knees up.
Get your knees up.
Get your knees up.
Germany.
Readerieger run.
Get you.
Palestine.
Well, we'll leave the final word on all this to at user dash 1S5.
Mr. Morgan, you have incredible patience.
That is actually one of my virtues.
And my God, I need it on this show sometimes.
We'll be invited Professor John Meersheimer back to Uncensored, not least because I knew I'd have a civilized, respectful debate.
And it was a fascinating one.
as we talked about a potential threat of a nuclear Iran.
First of all, it was the Israelis who started this.
Israel made a major mistake that increases the likelihood
that Iran will get nuclear weapons.
Nuclear weapons are basically a force for peace.
NATO couldn't let a European, sovereign, democratic country
come under nuclear attack and not respond to.
Yes, it could.
And no American president, in my opinion,
is willing to sacrifice New York or Chicago or Los Angeles for Ukraine.
Sorry, but Professor, I think you don't fully understand.
Let me clarify.
Just what we're talking about here.
We're talking about nuclear weapons.
We're talking about nuclear war.
This is ever justified morally to deploy nuclear weapons?
If you use nuclear weapons to effectively murder huge numbers of civilians, you're committing a war crime.
At W1ZY didn't hold back in their praise.
The most outstanding conversation on television in the 21st century.
I mean, that might be slightly a stretch,
but it was a really interesting conversation and debate,
and what I liked about it was,
is that although I disagree with a lot of what John Mishahma is saying,
he clearly knows his stuff,
he's done his research, and he's reached conclusions,
which may differ to mine.
Doesn't mean that he's right or wrong, or I'm right or wrong,
but what it does mean is that viewers can hear both sides of a debate
and they can work it out for themselves.
Well, as is often the case, for some reason,
many viewers saw the conversation,
as a contest at Yasser Rakhaldi-6522
had little doubts about the winner.
Remember, it's not just peers talking,
there's a whole team behind the scenes.
Professor Mishama has intellectually defeated
the team behind Piers Morgan.
It's always gratifying to see intellectual honesty win the day.
Well, look, just to be clear,
I defeat my team intellectually all day every day.
It's not an unusual occurrence for them,
so they won't even have noticed.
But look, did John Mishammer beat me?
Like I say,
It was a debate.
I don't think anyone won or lost.
You can make rational arguments on both sides as we did,
and some people will agree with me and some with him.
It's not actually a UFC fight.
Or at Ab-Majuku 8093,
chose to interpret my arguments like this.
Pierce is British, but he wants American military bases all over the world.
No, I don't.
That's not what I said.
I said it would have been sensible with hindsight
and probably with Fawcite
to have kept a small American military presence
with other allied forces in Afghanistan.
Because without that, the whole thing collapsed,
the moment that we left overnight
in that ridiculous decision by President Biden.
And the result of that catastrophic failure of leadership
was that the Taliban swept in and took charge all over again
and have sent women back thousands of years
back to the dark ages with their barbaric treatment of women.
And if that's a victory for freedom,
for freedom and democracy or the world,
then I've got a little lesson for you.
It ain't.
Well, finally, at G. Mack G. Mac Gorgadoli,
two, apparently there's a one,
got a tiny bit carried away with this analysis.
The professor said, you're welcome, Piers,
but didn't go as far as to say thanks for having me.
I thought that was significant.
I think you're slightly overreeding this.
Honestly, they don't have to thank me for the experience.
The one thing I'm sure about is that John Meerschimer would be back,
because both of the interviews I've done with him
have been two of our highest rated interviews
that we've ever had on the show.
People like to hear what he has to say
and they like me debating him.
And finally, here on Uncensored
that I'm used to having what I say commented on and criticised,
but some people also choose to pass judgment
on how I look.
This week, the influential media fashionista, Derek Guy,
decided to, well, rip me a new one.
He started off by setting out his stall.
I thought I'd do a thread, he says, about X,
comparing his my style to men'swear icon Kermit the frog.
Personally, I've always loved Kermit, a very confident, funny performer
who gets all the best pigs.
Well, first, Derek analyzed the differences
in how Kermit and myself dress for work.
Let's start with the basics, the core of any outfits fit in silhouette.
Here's his suit jackets often have lapels
and buckle away from his chest
and a collar that floats from his neck
that suggests his jackets may be too small.
No such issues for granted.
Kermit the Frog, his clothes, hanged beautifully and smoothly, while still giving a distinctive,
flattering silhouette.
Yeah, I mean, you've got a point.
This one is a bit tight, but it's been a...
I had a long couple of winks in L.A.
I'll be eating and drinking too much.
Next, Derek moved on to my casual look as compared to the legendary Muppet.
Compared with two outfits, he wrote.
Piers' black polo with Czech knee-leg shorts and bad sneakers, says nothing.
But Kermit's cargo shorts with a lower shirt, fishing bag and straw hat says,
I'm a mid-century sportsman on vacation.
I don't really agree with this, you see.
This is where you lost me.
I'm actually a bit of a fashion icon, globally, in fact.
And I think what you'll find, Derek, is for all your pontificating.
And by the way, when you do the possessive pises, you didn't get that right.
You did P-I-E-R-postrophe S.
That's grammatically a failure.
And I know how particularly you are about details.
But no, I'm a fashion icon.
And the fact that you've now put my fashion onto the global map with your thread,
which I just checked has had 4 million views so rising fast,
is a matter of great personal pride.
And frankly, if you want to compare me to Kermit,
who is one of the most iconic figures in entertainment history,
fine, that makes two of us.
Well, finally, Derek addressed how Kermit and myself contrasts
when it comes to how we dress when we're out in the town,
mingling with the stars.
Kermit knows that dinner suits, aka Tuxedo,
should be warm and black.
bow ties made from the same material as the jacket's facing, not like peers long black ties,
which should be reserved for business meetings called appearances and funerals.
I actually don't agree.
So this is where you reveal your age or just the fact that you're old-fashioned because
nobody wears bow ties in it, not even tuck in the carlson.
I am a straight tie tuxedo guy because that's where the real action is, where the future is.
It's where fashion's going.
And you, Derek, my old son,
whose grandma needs pulling up,
are just not with the times.
Well, that's it for this edition of Morgan's Mailback.
Remember, you can watch all of my past interviews,
debates and monologues on the uncensored YouTube channel.
We've now reached nearly 2.6 million subscribers
making us the fastest growing YouTube channel in the world.
So like and subscribe to become part of our growing community.
Until next time, remember, keep it uncensored.
