Piers Morgan Uncensored - Morgan's Mailbag: Muting Guests, Swift Better Than Beatles & More

Episode Date: April 29, 2024

Piers Morgan responds to more comments and insights on his latest Piers Morgan Uncensored interviews and debates, telling us why he'll never mute guests (no matter how much they interrupt) - plus he g...ives his scathing opinion on singer Sam Smith''s latest fashion choices. He also stands by his comment saying Taylor Swift is bigger than The Beatles and tells us why he should be King of America... YouTube: @PiersMorganUncensored X: @PiersUncensored TikTok: @piersmorganuncensored Insta: @piersmorganuncensored Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Welcome to another edition of Morgan's Mailbag, where I give my real-time reactions to your comments and questions on the content we've been serving up on uncensored. As always, this is the first time I'd have seen any of these comments, but rest assured, my team knows that the Morgan Brain works at breakneck speed, meaning you'll get my usual, fair-minded responses and rape your wit. Alright, let's get started. We kick things off with my Will I Am interview,
Starting point is 00:00:33 and his plans to make music using artificial intelligence. Where do you see the line here between AI being a force for good and a force for not so good. If you're imaginative, it's your duty to try your hardest, to aim it to be a force for good. It's human nature to be concerned. Where will music be, will you think, in 20 years time, if AI really becomes a formidable part of the industry?
Starting point is 00:00:59 I say thank AI music for coming. I want human made. I thought this conversation with the Black Eye piece front man was fascinating. However, at Doug Doug W, utilize what I think is called, irony in his reaction. He said, finally, I've been waiting to hear while that bloke who used to be in black eyed peace thought about all this. I don't really judge
Starting point is 00:01:16 a person by that. A lot of you also decided to have a bit of fun suggesting who else you might interview and on what subject. Joe O'Leary said, next episode, Kid Rock discusses string theory, particle physics with Pierce Morgan. I'd watch it. And at Dellboy 13, up yant even further, writing next episode
Starting point is 00:01:33 Rumpel-Styliskin discusses how infrastructure in Sao Paulo is affecting women's mental health. Yes. Who wouldn't watch that? We're on to something. This is fascinating. Will I am demonstrated that there's AI tech
Starting point is 00:01:44 during our conversation. Say hello to Pierce. It's an absolute pleasure to be part of this conversation with you on Pierce Morgan uncensored. It's fair to say that at Stephen Francis 504 was mesmerized. It's just something strange and lonely
Starting point is 00:02:02 about a man who sat there having a conversation with a phone app. So were there any serious takes on this segment? Well, thank goodness for At Willow Garrison 8089. He said, I think human intelligence or rather the lack thereof, is much more important than AI. People today are taught what to think rather than how to think. Yes, and that is the point, I think. As for Will I am, it's one of the smartest, most creative and interesting guys that I've probably ever interviewed.
Starting point is 00:02:28 If you didn't get that from that interview, you're part of the problem. Because AI is here. AI will transform our lives. It can either be a force for good or it can be a force for bad. Will I. Am wants to make it a force for good. We should listen to him. And the fact he's talking into an app, that's what we're all going to be doing. We already pretty much do anyway.
Starting point is 00:02:49 So get with the Will I Am program, because he, not for the first time, is way ahead of you. Well, finally, at Brodo Gok suggested a name change. Will A.I. Am. Actually, not bad. Not bad. I'll pass it on to the great man. The pro-Palestinian protest causing chaos at universities in America with a subject of a heated, uncensored, debate this week. Why are they protesting, peers?
Starting point is 00:03:16 Because they're protesting what they consider to be genocide, some do, and the Israel killing 34,000 Palestinians. You're absolutely disattached from reality. Wait, wait, wait, 70,000. I'm almost... You said, I'll come to you in a moment. Just let me finish. This is not what it is.
Starting point is 00:03:34 At HVS spoke for literally thousands of you on this. I just wish they could stop screaming. Can't you just mute them when they keep interrupting? Well, here's the problem. We're called unscensored. If I start censoring everybody when they get angry or interrupt, we're kind of losing the point of a show. So what I try and do is moderate
Starting point is 00:03:52 and get involved if they get completely out of hand as I did in that debate. But passions run high. When a lot of people are dying, people get very angry. And I'm always mindful of that as well. So we don't have a mute button. I don't have anything here that I can mute people with. I just have to try and moderate things as best I can
Starting point is 00:04:12 whilst not wanting to stop people having their say in as passionate a way as they like. But I agree with you, if people interrupt too much or speak over each other too much, it is annoying. Well, that sense of men illustrated the point, cutting this montage, which tallied the total of interruptions by one contributor in particular. Israel killing 34,000 Palestinians.
Starting point is 00:04:34 You're absolutely disattached from reality. I'm sorry. I don't know what you're talking about. I'm almost... You said, I'll come to you in a moment. Just let me finish. This is not what it is. I'm sorry.
Starting point is 00:04:43 Don't lie to the viewers. Okay. You said, let him make his point. Don't let me be honest. No one can hear either of you when you shout over each other. I'm the one who knows exactly what they are doing. Okay, you said, nobody will hear you when you shout over people. With so many interruptions in one debate, apt Prit Pahl Singh felt there's really any one person to blame.
Starting point is 00:05:10 Piers Morgan literally sucks at his job. The most biased program ever. Really? Really? Isn't that interesting? Because I had just as many people telling me I was too pro-Israeli in that debate as I did telling me I was too pro-Palestinian. So who are my bias towards exactly? Well, former bodybuilding bad boy in seven times Mr. Olympia, Phil Heath, came in for a mano-ill-Mano chat. We got on very well, flexing a few biceps.
Starting point is 00:05:39 Would you have to be vain? You have to spend a lot of time adoring your physique. What's for the tiny trunk to me? They all seem to be about three sizes too small. This is true. We wear them pretty high up a little bit. You've had a few tensions with Arnold, he criticized bodybuilders with a belly.
Starting point is 00:05:56 You definitely have to have the biggest calves, the biggest everything. How would you feel about this whole issue of trans athletes? What's your general view of that? They told me that you hired a trainer. At Colonel John Matrix 1000. They're like a testosterone in that name choice, said I prefer Phil Huthier in retirement than when he was competing. He has so much more time to pass on his knowledge.
Starting point is 00:06:16 and experiences in life I find very inspirational. I really liked him. Very chilled out guy, given what he'd done as a career, and very reflective and honest about things like drug abuse and so on. Very, very interesting character, obviously hugely successful, and now has a very rounded view of what happened to. Well worth listening to. At BWalk 34, recounted his own into an experience with the big man.
Starting point is 00:06:40 I met Phil back in 2008 in my last bodybuilding show. We shared dumbbells backstage to pump up. Great guy. Pump up. I didn't pump up with Phil. I didn't tackle him on subject of steroids and his thoughts on the body positive movement. I guess there's some people that just Love what they love, right? But for me, I agree with you. I think if we were to look at obesity and what it means you know, health-wise, looking at those blood markers, I think we would be able to see through blood work that they're not as healthy as they seem,
Starting point is 00:07:13 and although they love themselves, we want them to live a healthier life. At MC-80466 wrote, I love that when asked his opinion on the body-positive movement, he really kept his answer focused on health. He mentioned markers, blood test diseases, how it's good to be essentially healthy. There wasn't shaming or ridiculing.
Starting point is 00:07:32 Phil is great. Yeah, I get it. I actually think shame. is the answer, actually. I know when people say to me, blimey Morgan, you put on a bit of timber, it makes me go to the gym and drink and eat less. And ultimately, if you want to lose weight,
Starting point is 00:07:44 you've got to drink and eat less and go to the gym a bit more. So I'm more for a bit of brutal honesty, I'm afraid, when it comes to body positive. Because one thing about body positive is, it ain't positive. Most of them are morbidly obese, and there's a clue in the word morbid.
Starting point is 00:07:58 It means death. Finally, I couldn't let the ultimate Mr. Olympia go without the invitation to the Morgan Gun Show. First of all, have a little feel. Have a little feel. Not too bad. Huh? Drug test him right now.
Starting point is 00:08:14 Thank you. Thank you, Phil. Hey. I want to say what this is actually going to be like. Okay, one, two, three. I can do this all day. Can you? Yeah.
Starting point is 00:08:31 I can't. At Gojit was impressed. Good to see you're pumping some iron peers. Never stop. When you get to my age, 59 now. It's all about the weights and I do. I go and pump iron a couple of times a week
Starting point is 00:08:46 and I'm getting some big weights up. So I think Phil was genuinely startled and he was surprised to lose. I wasn't. Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Now it's time for me to give my real-time reaction to a viral video which my team believes might provoke a noteworthy response from me this week
Starting point is 00:09:03 or so I'm told. Pop star Sam Smith has finally taken my advice and decided to wear something more modest and the satanic stockings of spenders he's recently taken to wearing. Let's wash this together. Describe it today. This is Rick Owens.
Starting point is 00:09:16 I called it other day with my shoes. Damn, and then proud of Cleo back. We're proud of you. We're proud of you. We're proud of you. Definitely proud of you. If you give anybody a Stalin tip, what would it be? Every day, start again. Do you know what, Sam? Finally, I think you found your fashion range.
Starting point is 00:09:35 A massive, great trash bag. Yeah, it suits you. Yeah, and it kind of sums up your reputation since he started doing all these stupid costumes. Trashy. Woohoo! We're talking about Pop-Stiles. My interview with The Daily Wiles
Starting point is 00:09:52 Matt Walsh this week provoked some passionate responses, mostly because I said this. She's now bigger than the Beatles. I was told by a great record company legend in LA very recently that she now is a bigger cash generator, even pro rata, than the Beattor. than the Beatles that hide of their power, which is quite extraordinary. At suit and tie no pants, blimey, wrote,
Starting point is 00:10:15 I'm an American watching this interview in America as I sit my coffee. When Pierce said Taylor Swift is bigger than the Beatles, I somehow did a spit take of tea and shouted bloody hell in a British accent. That's how offensive that comment was. MK then agreed, saying hearing that quote about Taylor Swift being better than the Beatles is like saying the bluey knockoff chip chiller. It's better than the original show. Well, it wasn't quite what I said.
Starting point is 00:10:37 I didn't say that she's better than the Beatles. I just said she's bigger than the Beatles. And statistically, commercially, she is. You may not like it, but she is now actually commercially bigger than the Beatles. And has had more commercial success than they did. That's all I'm saying. I love the Beatles, greatest band of all time.
Starting point is 00:10:58 But I also love Taylor Swift and can admire what she's achieved. We love you, Tyler! And finally, Stephen Crowder returned to one sense. It was time to give us his thoughts on one social media company. TikTok. TikTok, TikTok, TikTok, TikTok. Crowdig once called me a free speech hypocrite for my stance on Alex Jones being allowed back on X. I question whether he was a real hypocrite of his stance on TikTok operating in the United States. To be clear, I don't want to ban TikTok. That's not my position.
Starting point is 00:11:28 What do you want to do with it? That's never been my position. No, and I certainly don't want a content ban. What we're talking about is a ban on ownership of foreign influence, right? That's what people are talking about. There should be no banning of TikTok. Right, but that's not. No, it's not. Zebra 66 commented, Peers and he's to learn the difference between hypocrisy and nuance. It's not hypocrisy to believe in free speech for Americans, but not to allow foreign
Starting point is 00:11:48 dictators to use our freedoms against us. Ah, got it. So it's not hypocrisy if you're Americans, really what you're saying, right? Yeah, it doesn't work that way, buddy. Hypocrisy is a global thing. Well, at Kit dash KK9CB. Do you want drugs when you came up with that? I think no.
Starting point is 00:12:05 Question my motives for questioning crowd are up on his free speech double standards. Alex Jones is living rent-free in Pierce Morgan's head. Yeah, kind of, actually. Yeah, he is because I don't think he should be allowed social media platform until he's paid the families of the Sandy Hook victims who he's so sickeningly betrayed for vast sums of money.
Starting point is 00:12:24 So I do, yeah, I do think about him a lot. And looking at his behaviour on X since he got loud back on is absolute evidence he shouldn't have been allowed back on. The guy's a whack-job conspiracy theorist. He makes money from spewing lies. I don't think they should be allowed a platform, personally. Finally, I suggested this to Stephen. I think you'd make a good prince, actually.
Starting point is 00:12:49 You wouldn't make a good king. Kings are reserved for people like me. But why? I have to sleep with my relative? No, it's actually your name. It's not very kingly. It'd have to be someone like peers. At Jimmy Inverness, correct of me saying, Stephen of Blois was king of England from 22nd of December 1135 to his death in 1154.
Starting point is 00:13:06 Last an intelligent comment. Naturally, we've got a picture of what King Stephen looked like. I mean, actually, a lot better looking than crowded. although the same kind of weird eyes. Now let's take a look at what a real king might look like. There you are, magnificent. King peers. I could have been king of America.
Starting point is 00:13:24 Imagine that. Imagine I'm much happier that they'd all be in America, right? That's it for this edition of Morgan's Mailback. Remember, you can watch all my past interviews, debates and monologues on the Unscensored YouTube channel. Like and subscribe to join our Common Sense Movement and more than 2.5 million followers. And until next time, remember, keep it uncensored.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.