Piers Morgan Uncensored - Morgan's Mailbag: Sunday Edition

Episode Date: March 24, 2024

It's another edition of Morgan's Mailbag and this time Piers Morgan responds to your comments about his reaction to Rabbi Shmuley's recent feud with Candace Owens, and how one viewer thanked Piers for the unexpected joy of for once agreeing with Cenk Uygur. Piers also read out viewers responses to debates about Israel-Hamas, Vladimir Putin's re-election with Jeffrey Sachs, and the epic debate of the ages between Destiny, Benny Johnson and Dave Smith about the State of the Union. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome to another edition of Morgan's Mailbag, where I give my real-time reactions to your comments, questions, and constructive criticism about the content we've been serving up on uncensored. As usual, they've all been chosen without my prior knowledge or approval or, in fact, any involvement at all, by the people who professed to be my dearly beloved colleagues but would knife me in the back as soon as look at me. The truly wonderful Piers Morgan Unsensor producers. So let's get started. Vladimir Putin's re-election as a president of Russia. What a surprise that was.

I invited Professor Jeffrey Sachs, who's been accused to being a cheerleader for the Russian dictator to give me his perspective. It's very Russian. This is Russian tradition. I think he's quite popular, in fact. But this is a Russian tradition. It's part of Russian culture.

He's a strong leader, and the Russian people expect a strong leader, and we have to deal with a strong leader. and we have to deal with a strong leader in Russia. Or at LA Thurma, welcome this meeting of minds, my words, not his. Well done sacks, but not luring yourself to Piers Morgan's mental level that is spading dirt rather than considering context and gaining understanding. Hmm.

Doug Cain was less mean, and by less mean, I mean, I mean, still very, very mean indeed. He wrote, Piers Morgan's become a tool for the degenerate, warmongering psychopaths who have sacrificed a half million Ukrainians for profit, and now want to start a nuclear war with Russia, a despicable tool of vicious colonialism. Really? Really. Because there I was thinking that maybe Putin's the bad guy here, that maybe a Russian dictator illegally invading a sovereign democratic country

and murdering hundreds of thousands of people for no crime other than being in a sovereign democratic country that he wants to get his rapacious little hands on. Yeah, Putin actually is the bad guy here. There's no moral dilemma. He wants to grab land from other countries and he'll kill anyone that gets in his way. I think it's incumbent on the rest of the world,

the rest of the world that actually has a conscience about this kind of thing, to stand up and stop him and to help Ukraine defeat him and repel him and get their land back. So sorry if that makes me the despicable tool in this narrative. Well, not everyone was a superfan of Professor Sacks at Hill Secret,

Is this professor a specialist in Russia? If he is the problems in the US education system are more severe than I thought, would very carefully check who was funding this professor and verify whether he's simply a useful idiot or possibly a spy. Interesting theory. He's certainly a very bright guy.

And the thing I like about uncensored is that we get people on where maybe my natural instinct is to completely disagree with everything they have to say. I just ask you what your view of Putin is, and so far you've just said he's smart and tough. I just said he's smart and tough. I just said,

He warned us very clearly. Any negatives, Professor? I believe that the big mistake of both sides is we should talk this out. But you know what? They've got a right to say it. They've got a right to explain themselves. I have a right to challenge them. And sometimes, as we used to do in the good old days, we can simply agree to disagree.

Remember that? My conversation with Slovenia philosopher Slavoy Zhijek was, I think, the fair, fair to say, unique. At the most elementary level, you are not bullshitting. You are an open mind. What is your view about where we are with this war? There is no opposition. I agree with you. The West has to stop this ambiguous game, trying to support Ukraine, but not too much.

Johnny Evil Vids, my name but raises uncomfortable eyebrows, said even if even 10% of leftists spoke the way the Slovoi Zijek speaks, more people on the right would listen. I want to hear opinions that are different from my own. Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Yes! Yes, yes, yes.

That's exactly what we should all strive to do. Listen to other people's opinions. They may change your mind. Nearly happened to me once. Well, Aunt Joe's Abad disagreed. Gijek's philosophical work is mostly unintelligible rambling with seldom points of insight or clarity. His take on current events is similar.

I don't think so. He's known as the maddest, most dangerous guy in the West, apparently. I didn't get that feeling at all. I thought he was a pretty smart guy, not least when he said that he agreed with most of what I say. We'll leave the final word on Slavoi's appearance to messed up lad. Conclusion, the whole video is about Pierce finding his exact doppelganger copy of himself

with 39 minutes of him licking his own. own balls clean about how his worldview is the most righteous, correct, and most balance. Absolutely. And their balls have never been more sparkling. Well, moving on, we invited three titans of YouTube onto the show for a special debate on the state of the United States. Destiny, Benny Johnson and Dave Smith proved incredibly popular. How dare you. The virtue signaling is off the charts. I'm not, I didn't kill anybody. And even in the state of the union, which as you said, and I'll agree, he did better than if the standard is, he was able to walk and get.

head up there and read words off a teleprompter. We're born like Starr's 7706, wrote, I appreciate having a Democrat, Republican, and a Libertarian, all sharing their views on one program. Yeah, I did. And I like the response. Got a big audience. People stayed watching a long time.

And I enjoyed the fact that they did it in a reasonably respectful way. That's how we should debate. Get people around a table. And who knows? We may even find peace in our time. Well, Hootershell said, my boy, Pierce, spelled B-O-I. I think that's something to do with street lingo. My boy peers is really loving these debates, just should let them go on for longer.

I kind of agree, actually. And the beauty of us now being on YouTube all the time and fully digital is that we can do what we like. So expect some longer panels and longer debates and a few longer interviews. Not all, but where I feel is right and we want to keep going, we're just going to keep going. Hang on brother. Well, those kind of guys, dangerous. Well, given the amount of testosterone on this panel, things obviously got a little confrontational at times.

So too much macho energy? At moral government thought not. We need this to be a regular daily show like The View, but with men who actually have different opinions that aren't stupid. That's a good idea, actually. Why are all those panels full of women? And they all hate men.

So why don't we do, we could call it the Ken panel. We have a bunch of guys. We all call ourselves Ken. and we have the last laugh on the Barbies. I like it. Professor of medicine, Martin Koldolf, who feels he was sacked from his job at Harvard for speaking out on COVID,

appeared on Michelle to explain his position. I think they are ignoring basic scientific truths. For example, we have known since 4.30 BC during the Athenian plague that if you have recovered from an infection, you have immunity. The infection acquired immunity. And despite that, they are mandated vaccinations. There was only last week that they ended the vaccine mandate for the students.

It's a difficult subject for many of this, but Shugnet Jones thinks worth discussing. Real science starts with asking questions. Science cannot push forward without debate. There will always be a next question to be asked and an answer to be sought. That is science. That is science. And the idea that we're canceling Harvard scientists for daring to have opinions that fly in the face of the generally accepted opinions,

much of which turned out to be a load of baloney in the case of COVID, is completely baffling to me. Universities are losing their minds. There's supposed to be places that people go to, have very heated debates, and then go and get drunk and do it all again the next day, until eventually they have rounded minds that allow them to listen to all views

without throwing their toys out of the stroller and to go and get drunk. It's utopia. Well, during the same segment, my panel also tackled another contentious topic, banning puberty bogers for kids who identify as trans. To be changed for sexual matters as a child is ridiculous. Like, we don't, in America, you can't buy a pack of cigarettes.

You can convince children that Santa Claus is real, that a tooth fairy takes their tooth from under a pillow. So grooming them or talking them about where they are, there's a whole reason why you call growing up. At Addiv 7-628 spoke for many of this by saying, pediatrician here, no puberty blockers for children. When they reach adulthood, they can make that a decision. with their healthcare providers.

Yes. I have four children. Nothing before puberty. They don't know what they're doing. You had any kids? You people don't want this madness to be happening to kids before puberty? No, you haven't, have you?

In most cases? You just think you know what's best for them. Try having them. Try seeing how kids change and evolve in that crucial period of their transformative lives. From 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14. It is fascinating to observe

and will cement my opinion and should cement yours that this kind of thing happening before puberty is madness. And finally, Rabbi Shmuley Botech and Jenk Yuga from the Young Turks were back for round two of the infamous feud and despite my best intentions, things blew up again. Are you prepared to watch the IDF kill in Rafa to avenge what happened on October the 7th? You're a rabbi.

Rabbi. Hamas are not. Nazis with go-pros, young Turks, is essentially the Hitler youth. I don't like Hamas. I don't want Hamas to win. Hamas made us murder your children, made us murder your women. No, they didn't. You did that. Anti-Semite. You don't know any history whatsoever.

Cheink doesn't know basic facts. Well, over half a million of you have watched the encounter, including At DaFunk 108. He said this rabbi makes Chek look like the wisest human ever to walk the earth. I kind of thought that, actually. and Act ACHPEL-2277 went even further. Rabbi Shmooley is like your crazy ex-girlfriend who burns your stuff and keys your car. I think that would be the least of it

if you fell out with Rabbi Shmooley. For a rabbi is pretty lively. Hamas are Nazis with go-pros. When militarism is destroyed completely, then the Palestinians will come. How many people? How many are right? Real peace offer, knowing that arms do not work. Okay, but one question.

Chech Eiger who... No, one question. His name is Cheong Ugaard, for starters. All right, so get his name right. There was also, though, some criticism for Checks' position on the issues. Rabbi's questioning of the young Turkish position on the war. Antonio Pozo wrote, Why don't you call for the unconditional surrender of Hamas?

It's a very good question. Cheink should answer it. Pierre should have pressed Schenck on that question. That's the easiest solution. I'm not sure it is. So a few Hamas terrorists throw the towel in. What about the ideology? Why does anyone who supports what Israel is doing now, why don't they think about that ideology issue,

is killing so many innocent children likely to make their parents want to do peace? Just think about that one question, because I'm not convinced. I think it may just fuel even more of the kind of vengeful ideology which has fueled Hamas. As well as the topic of the war, we also touched on the rabbi's recent feud with Candice Owens, where she described it as being unholy for running a kosher sex shop with his daughter. Candice Owens, I don't take anything she says seriously. She'll say anything for attention.

She knows nothing about Judaism and she knows nothing about sex, clearly. In Judaism, sex is the holiest act that two people can engage in, especially within the confines of marriage. And that's what we set out to do with kosher sex. This was a book that my dad wrote 25 years ago and he wrote it to enhance marriage

and to make it exciting and to use Jewish wisdom to keep couples connected. And I took those ideas 25 years later because sex had only taken more of a hit. Like my dad said, endless porn addiction, infidelity. People have lost the ability to connect. Metal Max 1 wrote completely unfair to allow both Shmooley and his daughter to come on and attack Candace Owens

without having Candice on to defend herself. Schmullin and his daughter have been attacking Owens for every year. And the moment she replies, she's called an anti-Semi. It is crazy and poor form. this show. Well, to be fair, we have repeatedly asked Candice on unscensored. She's indicated she may come on soon. I hope that's the case and she can say what the hell she likes in response. But I think it's also fair to say she's been doing that anyway when it comes to Rabbi Shmooley. As for a kosher sex shop, why not? Why shouldn't Jewish people be allowed to have sex?

If they don't want to use stuff from a sex shop, why should they be precluded from doing so? Why should we feel that's anything bad? Sex is wholesome, people. You should try it more. At HV. Bart reached his conclusion. Regarding the last five minutes, I never thought I'd been in a situation, which I sympathised with Jink Yuga. He'll like that. I think he was a bit shell-shot by the end. Well, that's it for this edition of Morgan's Mailbag.

Remember, you can watch all of my past interviews, debates, and monologues on the Unsensored YouTube channel. Fast approaching 2.5 million subscribers, making it's one of the fastest-growing YouTube channels of any kind in the world. So there's all the cool kids like to say. Like and subscribe to become part of. of our growing community. Until next time though, keep it uncensored.