Piers Morgan Uncensored - Piers Morgan Uncensored: Should we bring back corporal punishment in schools?
Episode Date: September 7, 2022On tonight's episode of Piers Morgan Uncensored, Piers looks at fears for the Queen after she cancels her attendance to another formal engagement. Piers also asks if teachers hitting pupils may be the... answer to rising crime and gang violence after a school in America brings back corporal punishment. Piers also has a heated debate with a Vegan protestor following their latest protests. Watch Piers Morgan Uncensored at 8pm on TalkTV on Sky 526, Virgin Media 627, Freeview 237 and Freesat 217. Listen on DAB+ and app. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Tonight on Pierce Morgan, uncensored.
Fears for the Queen, as she dispones another formal engagement.
Doctors have now ordered the 96-year-old monarch to rest.
Youth crime rising and fears of a gang violence,
could teachers smacking kids again be the answer?
A school in America brings back corporal punishment.
And militant vegans on the warpath, vandalizing Big Ben
and gluing themselves to the road,
demanding we all go meat-free.
We are here outside that House of Parliament,
concerned members of animal rebellions asking the government to transition to a plant-based food system.
I'll be going toe to toe with one of those protesters right here live.
Live from London, this is Piers Morgan Uncensored.
Well, good evening, welcome to Piers Morgan Unsensored.
Prime Minister Liz Truss met with her cabinet for the first time today.
And these were the proud, smiling faces of the people she's charged were sifting through the rubble of a broken nation.
They all look quite cheerful, don't they?
like they don't know what's going to happen to them, or us.
But these are the people we have to trust now in a rebuilding country
where families can pay their bills,
where businesses can hope to survive the next six months,
where the lights actually stay on this winter.
A lot's been said and written about this top team already,
apparently, this trust.
It's now the sole survivor of the David Cameron administration.
We're told it's the most diverse cabinet ever,
not a single one of the four great officers of state,
is now held by a white man, perish the thought.
But there are monas too, of course.
They groaned that some things never change
because two-thirds of them are privately educated.
Others fear she's repeating Boris Johnson's mistakes
by packing her squad with allies
and benching the experienced players.
Some critics have even rather impudently wondered
why a cigar-chomping plus-sized karaoke fan
is our new health secretary.
But here's the point.
I don't care.
I don't care where they went to school.
I don't care if they like a cigar on a pint.
I like a cigar.
and a pint. I don't care if they voted leave or remain. I don't care if they backed Boris or
supported Rishi Sunak. I don't care if they're black, white or screaming violet. This is a wartime
cabinet, quite literally, given what's going on in Ukraine. All the British people care about
is whether they can fix this unholy mess. Liz Trust keeps promising us she can. The word she
keeps using is, I will deliver, deliver, deliver, deliver. In her campaign, to be leaving,
and our Prime Minister, she made a staggering 149 policy pledges.
149.
This new cabinet has a lot to live up to.
If they can step up and deliver, as she says they can,
the country will not only back them every step of the way,
will cheer them when they do it.
But if they break those promises, if they don't deliver,
if the country gets worse, not better,
we'll be watching and we will hold them to brutal account.
Well, joining me now, my peers back,
contributor Esther Cracker, broadcaster and journalist Jenny Clemen.
And this is very exciting.
The BBC's international editor and author, Jeremy Bowen.
Welcome.
Thanks for inviting me, Pierce.
Really, to have you here.
Really is it adds a touch of class.
Not the you lady.
Thanks.
But a touch of class.
I want to start, well, first of all, welcome to all three of you, obviously.
I want to start, first of all, with the Queen.
Because we've just seen her in this unprecedented situation
where Boris Johnson and his trust.
up to Balmoral for the first time
to do the official process of the
handover to be Prime Minister.
And she did look okay, but she looked frail.
I mean, the pictures, she just looked frail.
She's 96 years old. Yeah, exactly, yeah.
Now we hear that she took a term for the worse.
She's got to spend some time now resting.
She couldn't attend a privy council meeting
after doctors intervened.
Ongoing health issues, obviously.
I guess, Jeremy, for me,
as you're the nearest to her age, obviously.
What do you think about all this?
Because we've only known one monarch in our lifetime, any of this.
I just feel like it's going to be such a seismic moment
when she's not here anymore.
I think that the national outpouring world might even dwarf
what happened when Diana was killed.
I think it's going to be absolutely huge
and a national trauma of the greatest extent.
Yeah, you're quite right.
I was born in 1960s.
She's already been on the throne for eight years at that point.
It's amazing, isn't it?
It's absolutely amazing.
And you've travelled the world where they don't have monarchies.
What do you think of the institution of the monarchy in the modern times?
Well, I think it's worked for Britain.
I think the Queen herself is a national figure like no other,
universally respected, even by people who say they don't agree with the monarchy.
What will happen after that, I think people might ask more questions
because of course there are people who say that maybe we've had enough of the royal family.
But I think that while the queen's there, of course, those questions are very much on hold.
One of the problems, Esther, is we have the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and all that drama going on.
A report tonight from Omid Scobie, this, in my opinion, revolting little specimen,
who keeps popping up as the Sussex's Licks Pitdle mouthpiece and keeps trashing the royals on their behalf.
tonight trashing Prince William
saying that he believes until
William admits his accountability
of all the terrible things he's done
to Megan and Harry, they can't be reconciled.
They're literally in Windsor Park tonight.
Half a mile from each other, these two boys,
and they haven't even said hello to each other.
This is damaging. It's not just damaging
to them and their relationship.
It's damaging to Charles,
who also hasn't seen Harry.
And apparently, I was told on good authority
this week, he feels incredibly hurt
of what's going on. He's going to be king,
sooner rather than later, probably.
But this is also damaging to the foundation of the monarchy.
I think this is now the best time
for the monarchy to transition.
And I think, I know no one has made this point,
but I do think the queen should abdicate
because I do think the country should...
She won't do that.
She won't because of her sense of duty.
Well, no, it's actually because they believe
in the natural law of succession.
They believe that once you interfere with that,
I was told this by somebody senior in the royal family,
that if you start interfering
with the natural process, you then let other things come into play.
For example, if the Queen was to abdicate
and Prince Charles gets killed in the car crash the next day, God forbid,
you have a constitutional crisis, which is why they don't abdicate.
I mean, we've had one in the last few hundred years.
But I think that the issue the royal family has is how do you rebrand?
How do you become more tolerable?
Because obviously we're seeing this feud with Harry and William,
and I think it's very unpalatable,
and I think it's actually a disgrace to the Queen's legacy
and what she's worked so hard to build,
and you have these two freeloaders
on the other side of the world
just basically making money off her legacy
and off her years of hard work.
I do think that maybe it's time,
okay, if she won't abdicate,
maybe Prince Charles should step up
and take sort of more.
You're doing more and more.
I don't know.
I think the monarchy was devised
at a time when you could never imagine
someone living 96 years.
And the thing about the queen is
she is all about dignity.
That's why she doesn't want to be seen
in a wheelchair or with mobility aids.
She's a very dignified person.
And I think her having to continue until the very end
kind of goes counter to that.
And again, with the Harry and Megan business,
you do have to think about the question of dignity.
And I don't think there is anybody,
Republican or otherwise,
who would say that the Queen is not...
Look, you cannot have a renegade royal family
running around, hoaring those titles to the highest bidders.
You can't.
It's incredibly damaging.
That's why I've been on about this for quite a while,
because I could see the danger to this.
the actual future of the monarchy.
If it looks like the royals basically
don't do any public service or duty,
they fly around in private jets,
preaching about the environment,
and then they cash in their titles
to Netflix and Spotify,
hundreds of millions of dollars.
And aren't Harry Megan getting more and more unpopular,
so I read, also in America?
They are, they are, but I think the damage,
the drip, drip, drip damage to the integrity of the monarchy,
it should not be underestimated.
There has to be a distinction between monarchy
and celebrity. They're two separate things
and there isn't a... Which the Queen's always understood.
Yes, which the Queen is understood. And I think maybe Megan
didn't understand that when she married into the royal family.
Oh, I think she understood completely what she would do.
Well, she wanted them. I'm very cynical about it
because I think she's... This is all an actress
at the top of her game getting what she wants out of this.
Using our royal family to make herself very rich and famous.
But I think that will only work as long as people want to hear her
and I think I'm getting a sense. I think the thing is we'd find her less
distasteful if she did it for free.
You know, she talks about all the things
that she wants to do.
They have to support themselves now.
They have to support themselves.
They have to pay for security.
Actually, give up the titles.
Just be Megamarkal
and Harry, right, and go and do your thing.
And fine, see how you get on.
What I have a problem is, is they come back here
to boost their royal status,
to remind people that they are royals,
because that's where the money is.
And then they trash the monarchy
and the institution, and they trash the other royals.
I mean, you just can't have it always.
Anyway, enough of them.
What does play a little clip?
This is Nick Kirios.
You a tennis fan?
A little bit, yeah.
So Nick Kieros, who's this obviously super brat, good player, but a super brat,
did very well at Wimbledon, came up a little bit of short,
was doing one in the US Open, loses, and then he does this.
It's coming, I'm told.
We're on baited breath here.
Well, we don't have it, but it's worth waiting for,
because Nick Kiroz has been trying to convince us that he's a better man.
Yeah, he says he's over all that.
He's over all that.
He's come through it.
And he can take him.
He can take defeat.
There's no problem.
It's all okay.
And then he threw one of the most almighty tantrums ever seen.
Look at this.
It's the second one that is so pathetically childish.
Like, get over yourself, your big baby.
He's just trying to show that he cares.
It's good branding.
He's the bad boy of God.
We're talking about him.
I think it's really not okay.
It's not okay to lose your bag like this.
And if Serena Williams had been violent like that,
there would be something.
Well, actually, Serena Williams.
has done stuff like that.
She has been roundly castigated for her.
She said something rude to a line, Judge.
Yeah, but she's, you know, that's really, really aggressive.
It's really not okay.
Jeremy, if you ever smash things in your job?
I've still got a tennis racket I bought about 20 years ago.
I would never smash it.
They cost a bomb.
Because you always strike me, I've done you a long time,
you've always strike me as extraordinarily calm person
when all around is exploding.
I don't smash things.
I mean, I'm often surrounded by people who are smashing things,
often with guns and quite big ones.
But no, I don't see.
I guess maybe that's his way of dealing with his rage and disappointment.
But to be honest, I think that if you explode like that, it shows you failed.
It does, but it also shows this extraordinarily burning passion he has inside of which, like, McEnroe,
I don't think McEnroe could help himself.
This is what some people.
I just don't buy that at all.
It's terrible.
It's like people who beat their spouses.
It's just all this passion that I had for you.
No, get a grip.
We don't do this now.
He's not beating a tennis record. He's not beating a human being.
I know, but you know, you shouldn't display your anger by doing violent acts.
We've evolved past this, I think.
But it's entertaining and by talking about...
And I think, honestly, when it's surprising with Jeremy.
Well, I think it's un-dignified.
I think he's doing it. I think he does it deliberately.
Yeah, I think it's branding.
I think, you know, 20 years...
Should we smash up this table for branding?
Well, I don't want that to do my brand.
The bad girl of the Pierce-Morgan show.
It's the same. It's when he picks up the same.
The second rack is, smashes that one.
I mean, that is, it's pathetic.
If you're watching, Mr. Curis, I think you do watch the show.
Just grow up, your big baby.
Jeremy, I want to talk to you quickly.
I'm not going to labour this, but BBC,
impartiality.
I'm going to talk about the BBC?
Yes. On your programme?
Yes, I do, actually, because I'm very curious.
Where's the line for you with partiality?
Emily Maitliss has raised a lot of questions about it.
Gary Linnaker, there was in the news again this week.
What do you think?
There's a long-time BBC time.
Gary's in a slight different categories.
It doesn't work for news.
That's the argument that he's able to have a bit more freedom
to make these quite opinionated tweets.
Do you accept that?
Or does it make life difficult views?
I accept because it's the rules.
I follow the rules, man.
I mean, I do.
And the director general, my boss said in that committee
the other day at Parliament that I think it was a work in progress.
I don't really mean by that.
Maybe he's going to have a chat with him.
But, I mean, clearly it's controversial for some people.
On the whole business of impartiality,
journalism is about truth.
It's about getting to the truth,
and it's about how you get to it.
Now, this is a very opinionated program.
You see, it's written, you know, it's a wrong-sale title.
You get what you can say on the tin.
You get what you can say on the tin with the BBC as well,
which is not my opinions.
It's not about me.
It's not about, yes, it's my analysis and my observation,
and I use my own eyes and my ears,
and I might even, in the right context,
talk about something that happened to me
if it's, if it illuminates the wider issue.
And in the course of that,
what impartiality means, in my head,
and I think in the BBC's as well,
is that we've all got views.
I mean, my God, as I got older,
my views get stronger.
If I've had lunch with you,
you make me look like a shrinking violent,
but you don't do it on camera.
Well, no, I'm not high.
Maybe if they paid me what you pay you, peers,
I don't know.
But the thing is, is that I think that
At the BBC, it's quite clear.
Whatever your views are, you stick them in a box on the door,
you can pick them up on the way out.
When you saw Emily make this his thing on news night,
which causes the problem about Dominic Cummings,
did you feel it crossed the line?
Yeah, I did, actually.
I think that it wouldn't have taken a great deal
to stay on the right side of the line.
Because, you know, you cannot say this,
we all think that, effectively is what she was saying.
Because actually, probably some people didn't think that.
I think if she'd written it a little bit more clever,
if she'd said, everybody's talking about this.
This is what people are saying.
I mean, some of you out there may disagree.
But, you know, the country's up in arms about Dominic Common.
I think a lot of people were.
But it was the way she said it,
and in the context that she said it,
and in the top of doing a kind of soliloquy
at the top of a big-time BBC news program
was not considered appropriate.
And I think it was appropriate
for the bosses to have a word with her after that.
Interesting. She didn't like it, clearly, and I know she's got another job.
Well, I was going to ask you me, there's been a lot of people leaving the BBC, you know, from Emily to Andrew Neil to Andrew Marr, all these people.
And lots of people you haven't heard of who have taken redundancy in various things.
Is there any check that could tempts you to unleash yourself as an opinionated monster?
I'm a BBC man through and through, you know that.
I think you are. I think you are, I am. I am. And, you know, if someone came in and made me a life-changing offer, who knows, I consider it.
But actually at the moment, it's been nearly 40 years.
So, you know, I only know one way to work.
And do you know the most disgraceful thing I discovered today about you?
What's that?
You don't have any honour.
Nothing.
Not even an MBE.
How can that be?
I don't make these decisions.
One of the greatest correspondence in BBC history.
Not even an MBE.
MB is pretty good.
But you walk around your newsroom and you see all these people with honours.
They don't wear them to the office or anything.
No, but I mean, that would get my...
I went to a state dinner once, and I saw some dip it for...
It was for the King of Jordan at the Guildhall.
Stop name-dropping. You know, I hate name-dropping.
You'd never do it. And suddenly, all of these people who had known diplomats at the Foreign Office,
were just dripping with medals and things on sashes around their necks?
Would you like something, the recognition of your work?
I'm not quite happy as I am.
If I launched a campaign on social media?
Go ahead. You never see what happens.
We'll take a short break. Come back with more from our pack.
We'll talk about militant veganism.
because you don't like Milton, I just discovered,
which is a bizarre revelation.
They're certainly scoffing cheese.
It's like it's gone out of fashion.
So we'll discuss.
They also talk about Donald Trump and democracy,
because I think those are big issues.
And Jeremy's great book,
The Modern Middle East of personal history.
No one knows more about it than he does.
We're talking about that after break.
Welcome back to Pierce Morgan Narsense.
I'm still with me a talk to you contributor,
Esther Krakow, broadcaster and journalist Jenny Clemen,
and BBC veteran.
BBC veteran.
Do you mind me being called a veteran?
It's been nearly 40 years.
You're a veteran.
People are seeing veteran Jeremy Bowen.
Let's talk politics for a moment.
As to the cabinet, I've got to say,
it's been a lot of speculation about, you know,
what color they all are, where they were educated, you know, blah, blah, blah.
I don't care.
All I care is, are they any good?
Can they do their job?
Because I don't think the public are looking at them going,
oh, look, there's no white people in the main...
You cares.
Yeah, what makes a difference?
And I think at this time,
where people are really kind of in the thick of it
and really facing hard choices.
We shouldn't care what they look like.
I think it's nice, you know, they're diverse, whoop, whoop.
But I think it's more about looking at their competence
as opposed to the color of their skin.
Someone like Chrisi Quarteng has a fantastic CV.
I've told people, you know, you couldn't actually find a more qualified man
to be chancellor, but everyone's saying, oh, but he's not real diversity
because he may be black, but he doesn't think the right things.
Right.
We're facing a cost of living crisis.
I'll judge them on what they do.
Exactly.
It's judging what they do.
Jenny, I mean, the big issue is energy.
We're going to hear tomorrow we think from Liz Truss about what this
big 100 billion pound plan is, we think it's going to be a cap of two and a half thousand a person.
The problem is she's also pledged to cut taxes.
I'll be talking about this all week.
Nobody I've read, who I think is smart in the world of economics, thinks you can possibly, in the
current situation, cut taxation when you're going to be borrowing so much and not have
inflation roaring even higher.
Well, she's got this kind of Boris boosterish, it'll all be fine, thing about her.
She is the heir apparent.
learn from three years of borrowers is not the case. She thinks that you can do it
through borrowing. She's found one or two economists who back her up. She's surrounded
herself with people who are loyal and she, you know, she does not picking people necessarily,
I would say, on their talent. She is picking people according to how biddable they are and how
loyal they are to her and how willing they are to sing from the same hymshy and, you know,
we'll see how that gets on. It's quite funny. Jacob Rees-Mogg, who is the new business
Secretary said in January that he believed that any new leader should should go call a general
election in order to have a mandate. He's not saying that now that's business secretary.
You know, these people, they don't really have principles very much. They're just people
who are going to have Liz's back. Well, Jeremy, I mean, look, unprincipled politicians are
nothing new. I think what's new, though, in the modern era, certainly the last few years,
Boris Johnson, Donald Trump, you look around other countries around the world, the sort of rise
of these sort of celebrity leaders.
What's your take on that?
Well, in electoral terms,
it's magnetic for a lot of people.
They've had a lot of success.
It's partly, I think, a function of the way
that the world is now,
the way that the celebrity culture
has morphed into politics as well,
and it feeds off people's big images.
I think politicians,
there were always big figures in politics
who people still talk about
but if you bolt on all the other stuff
that comes with being famous these days
then they become much, much larger.
In America, Trump obviously planning a comeback
will probably run again.
A poll came out, Quinapeak poll this week.
Two-thirds of Americans believe democracy is dying.
I found that a terrifying statistic.
Well, I think it's, you know,
it's the great democracy of the world
and I know it is what's happening in America
in terms of social division, the culture wars,
the way that there are,
while they may, whoever's in the White House
might try and get one message out from the federal government,
there are lots and lots of different messages
come out from different states,
vastly different regulations that they're bringing in.
You know, in some states,
taking action against companies for being too green.
In California, saying that after 2035,
you can't sell petrol cars.
You know, so...
It's a very disunited States of America.
Yes, and the thing about America was
that they managed to meld together all these forces.
It was the great melting pot.
President Biden, a few days ago, said this.
Not every Republican,
not even the majority Republicans are Magi Republicans.
Not every Republican embraces their extreme ideology.
But there's no question
that the Republican Party today is dominated,
driven, and intimidated.
by Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans.
And that is a threat to this country.
Now, Esther, my problem with that is that when he says MAGA Republicans,
70 million people voted for Donald Trump.
Second time round, 10 million more than voted for him first time.
It may have been more, actually.
This is a bit like Hillary Clinton, call them a basket of deplorables.
Is at the moment you start labeling everyone who voted for Donald Trump,
a lunatic or a Mab or whatever, you know, Biden must call them,
you alienate half the country.
But that's the problem.
And I think to say that Maga Republicans
don't make up that much of the Republican Party,
that's a complete lie.
You know, Trump's endorsement hit rate is like 90% now.
If he endorses you, there's a 90% chance
you're going to get elected.
He's an incredibly powerful figure in the party
because there are loads of people
that are still flocking to him.
And this is just deepening the divisions in the party
on the country as a whole.
I mean, Jenny, should he even be allowed to run?
We've now discovered that in this FBI raid,
some of these highly sensitive
of top secret documents included apparently
details of foreign powers
nuclear capability.
And it was just sitting there at Murillago.
It is terrifying. And this is not just an issue
for America's national security, it's potentially an issue
for ours, because we don't know which countries
nuclear codes or nuclear plans
were in there. So it's really serious.
In terms of whether or not he should be allowed to run,
I mean, I don't know what the rules are or what makes you
ineligible. I think people should not
vote for him. Because as much as, you know,
you say, calling Maga Republicans,
you know, labelling them in the same way as baskets of the basket of deplorables.
These are, I think Donald Trump, ever since he lost the election, has become far more extreme.
And his whole...
Well, he's a slur.
I know Trump very well. He's a sore loser.
He's a sore loser.
But the problem is, when you're a sore loser when you've lost an election,
what you're basically saying is, I refuse to accept democracy.
And that's why you see this poll of Americans saying, we think democracy's dying.
Because they see the guy who just lost the presidency still says,
I didn't lose it.
And they see the raid on Mar-a-Lago
as fitting perfectly into this narrative.
And Trump just has to say the whole things
that fit up and so on.
Jeremy, your book, the modern Middle East,
fascinating book.
I mean, everyone who wants to know about the Middle East,
you go and read this.
You've been pretty much everywhere in the Middle East.
You've been shot at, stabbed, chased, harried, everything.
You've been at the sharp end of it.
I want to start with Ukraine,
because Ukraine is an appalling war.
On the face of it,
it's a ruthless dictator invading a...
sovereign democratic country.
When I was in Ukraine,
and I'm not trying to compare our war correspondent credentials,
given I spent three days as one,
but it was fascinating to me that there were some Ukrainians
who said that they felt that Russian-speaking parts of Ukraine,
like the Crimea, perhaps even the Dombas,
actually a lot of people there wanted to go back to being part of Russia.
Does that make it more complicated or not?
It is complicated, and it's not a simple story.
And Zelensky himself was not that popular,
before the invasion.
He had 30% approval ratings back in December.
And then he brought the country together with those extraordinary broadcasts
that he was doing on a nightly basis,
walking around Kiev with his bodyguards and recording things,
and putting them online.
No, I've spent quite a bit of time in the east, in Dombas,
this region where there's been an awful lot of fighting.
And I spoke to people there who had no time for Zelensky,
particularly who wanted it all to be over.
I found others who weren't sad about the Russians coming in.
But then there were plenty of others.
It's a bit of a false distinction to say that just because Ukrainians are native Russian speakers,
they might automatically feel that they are closer to Russia Zelenskyy's first language is Russian.
And so it's like, you know, think about the Irish.
You know, they speak English, but there aren't all that many.
any Irish, you want to be part of Britain.
Do you fear that we are near a nuclear conflict than we've ever been?
Yes.
Well, probably since the Cuba missile crisis, which was when I was a small baby.
Yeah, I think we do.
Ever since the very start of all this, Putin has been using nuclear rhetoric.
He hasn't done anything, but I think his rhetoric almost normalizes the presence of that threat.
I mean, those of us who can remember 1989
and the fall of the Berlin Wall
and the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991
can remember growing up.
I mean, I grew up in the Cold War
and always in the background,
there was this sense that if things did go wrong internationally,
we might all end up as radioactive dust.
And sadly, I feel that's come back.
And that's one of the really dangerous things
about this crisis, the fact that
Russia, which actually has more nuclear warheads than the US,
is talking about using them.
Of course, it could just be threats.
It could just be talk.
But when someone who has an arsenal of what, 6,000 plus warheads
starts talking like that,
well, you've got to take it seriously.
When you talk about the Middle East with such authority,
I want to take you back to the start of the Arab Spring
and ask a difficult question.
Would the world be better off
if we hadn't gone on a domino-removing process
of all the dictators in the Middle East,
would they have kept the lid on things better
than what's happened since?
Well, the dictators pretty much are back,
sometimes different faces,
and of course Assad himself never left.
And actually, the force to remove those people who did go,
and that was the ruler of Tunisia,
and then the president of Egypt,
and that it went on from there.
That came very much from the streets.
It really did,
There's a large population of mostly young people, 60% under the age of 30,
who were just fed up with these countries run by autocrats, corrupt.
The whole process of governance was completely dysfunctional.
Should we, as we did in Iraq, should we be trying to instill our democratic values into Middle Eastern countries?
No. Democracy grows from within a country.
We weren't given it by people here.
in the UK or in Western Europe, we did it for ourselves.
I think we can do things to help.
I think, for example, we can help with the building of institutions.
That's a really important part of it.
To have a democracy, you need courts that are pretty honest, reasonably honest,
so they can enforce contracts.
It's not just about voting.
It's about the legal system.
It's about the respect for the rule of law.
All of those things.
That's what democracy is built on.
And it's wrong to think that just because it's the Middle East,
people don't want democracy.
I think a lot of people would like to have it.
But now quite a lot of people when confronted,
Egypt's a good example, when confronted by this tsunami of what seemed like change,
actually were quite relieved when the military came back in,
the strongman, Cece who's there now,
who's a worst dictator, the Mubarak Ever was.
Yes, exactly.
It's a fantastic book.
the making of the modern Middle East
of personal history really cannot
recommend it highly enough.
Final question for the three of you.
I'm getting into interview a vegan militant
who's been throwing paint all over Big Ben
and Parliament and so on today. Are any of you
vegans? Vegetarians?
No. So we're all meat eaters. Would
someone chucking paint at Big Ben
just so we've repaired a damn thing
make you give up meat?
No. Absolutely not. It's made us talk about it now.
She's on your show. She's on your show.
It's a win, Pearce.
You're dairy intolerant.
No, I'm not dairy intolerant. I just don't like milk.
Right.
Milky stuff.
But do you want to ban people from having it?
No, if they want to eat it.
Exactly. And that's my point.
You want to eat your vegan gruel?
Eat your vegan gruel.
Let me eat my meat.
And you chucking pain of Big Ben,
isn't going to make me eat gruel?
It's not.
We'll have that debate in a moment
with one of the protesters who thought it was a great way
to persuade me.
That'll be coming up later.
And coming up next,
as a Missouri school reintroduces the practice of paddling
seen here in a school in Florida, toughen up discipline.
Should British schools follow suit?
Are our schools, frankly, going too soft?
scoring a generation who just don't respect the rules?
Or is this actually modern-day torture?
We'll debate that after the break.
Thank you to my brilliant pack.
Jeremy, Jenny, Esther.
Touch of class, wasn't it?
Today.
Yeah, I'm definitely.
Good old Bowen.
Great to see.
We'll come back again.
You can be unscensored here, mate.
You can say what you like.
See you're after the break.
Welcome back to Pizmorgon on the Sensor.
Crime Rising, Youth Gang Culture on the Up
is the only way to get back control of our streets
and our schools to get tougher on kids.
A school district in the US state of Missouri
has decided to reinstate corporal punishment
in its classrooms, allowing students
to be punished with a paddle like this
under a new policy.
Well, this video of a 5-year-old, 6-year-old girl,
I'm sorry, at an elementary school in Florida
shows what can happen.
The girl's mother gave permission
for this to happen, according to an official report.
But is bringing back this form of corporal punishment at schools
the best way to root out the problem of rising crime and disrespect?
Well, head teacher, Serge Sefei, and former gang member,
and now government advisor, Gwinton, slowly, join me.
Now, welcome to both of you.
Gwinton, you grew up in Jamaica,
where there was a lot of corporal punishment.
And then you came here where there hasn't been for a long time,
saying not in schools in any authorized way.
What's your view about this?
I think if we look at historical records and see with the rising gang crime
to the point now where we're at 3.4 million for each murder
and track back where a lot of this started is from young people being excluded from school
and teachers feeling as if they've got no control of the school, much less the classroom.
If that could have been prevented, a lot of people would have made it through to college
and then to university
and had higher prospects of actually gaining a job or something.
People will feel looking at this paddle,
you can't possibly use this on kids.
It does look scary.
And as said, if you've not come from somewhere
where you've actually gone through that system,
it actually looks scary.
It looks like a mini cricket bat looking at that.
But one thing that we have to put in there
is that in America,
they've actually asked the parents' permission for this.
So it's not just as if the schools implemented it.
Right. The parents have to give the permission.
Have to give consent.
Sirge, I mean, that's the point of this is quite interesting.
Parents want their kids to be disciplined like this.
Does that change the dial for you?
Well, first and foremost, there's no argument, hopefully, anymore.
We've got to get tougher with kids.
However, this ship has sailed.
Our parents aren't allowed to hit kids anymore here.
So the idea of using an implement, you will not find a teacher
who will carry out that sort of punishment
when parents can be taken to court for it in their own kids.
What we're going to get tougher on is adults that have long since abdicated their responsibility of bringing up kids.
And I've got a whole list there.
Let's start with absent parents.
You know, no one wants to talk about it anymore, but you've just had everyone seen it.
Advert after advert from the media, finding a single parent mom with three or four kids.
And no one wants to ask, okay, well, excuse bereavement.
Well, where's the other parent here?
And, of course, I've been teaching 42 years in inner city areas.
And time and time again, people are struggling with their kids,
but they're struggling on their own.
Why do we accept the fact that people can have children yet not take on board
the responsibility of bringing them up properly?
What do you say to that?
I agree with you in some sense to that,
because for what I do in the day-to-day,
I look after people on witness protection when I'm not running elections.
But there are a lot of parents struggling by themselves.
And when you look at the murder rate,
a lot of these young people are coming from broken.
homes. But to say that, I came from a home where I was a middle class young person and I was
still caught up because of the environment. I had a tutor and everything else. So it's not everyone.
Sometimes the excitement out there or the environment that you have to go to school forces you to
either become a victim or learn to survive. But we know this. But I wouldn't even stop there.
The parents, single parents is one thing. Let's talk about, you've talked about exclusion rates.
I know as a head teacher and teachers. Well, how to account
for everything. You know, exam results, exclusion rates, you name it. Yet, I've excluded kids
in my time, not regretted a single one, tried not to, but I'm telling you now, happy to say
it, any child that walks into my school with a knife is not walking back in my school again.
But have we gone too soft on kids in school? Yes, and let me talk about the fact there's kids
being excluded, okay, I can tell you now, there's very few that haven't had social services
involvement for donkeys years. We've been paying that money that's been invested.
no good. I want to know, and I've
asked this question of my local authority
for donkeys years, you know, the youth
offending team, what are the re-offending
statistics on that?
I know I'm accountable, and
I'm afraid the message that
adults, now go back to adults, us,
abdicating our responsibilities,
we're not bringing up children properly.
We're not telling them they have to take
responsibility for their actions.
See, I do think this is right.
Yeah. I think the disagreement is you think
corporal punishment can solve this.
in a gang? Would it have any impact? If your kids excluded from school, if you bring them back
and you use corporal punishment, do they not to see that as basic extension of being in a gang?
As I said, it's about being tough about giving support. I've just run for the mayor of Hackney,
which is unheard of. And if you look at their stats of that, how many people would have come
from where I've come from to be doing what I'm doing. So we need to show that there is another way.
When you talk to young kids, young black kids in particular, a lot of the knife-crime
is endemic amongst young black kids in London, right?
When you see them and you talk to them,
how do you try and persuade them this is not the way to go?
You have to be an example yourself.
And one thing, you can't be a broken man talking to a young person
that's making $4,000 of a county line.
If a young person's out there making more money than you,
you then are struggling to tell them to go and work in Tesco's or somewhere else.
Yeah, but this is where, I mean, I've run two schools.
2,000 kids, Camberwell and Peckham.
You should see those kids.
Brilliant kids.
They know their place in terms of they're here to teach.
Teachers are in charge.
We have rules and regulations.
And when they break them, there's no fanning around in terms of
we make it damn clear.
You would agree with that.
He's right.
Make it damn clear.
That is wrong.
You're going to get punished.
Take responsibility for it.
And we hope.
But I know, and I've already alluded to it,
we have a whole bunch of professionals,
you name it,
all around the place, a youth justice system,
there's broken Britain for you,
telling these kids who everyone knows,
I've got all sorts of examples.
When I know the kids have admitted,
and I've actually been sorry for doing things wrong,
they've got their lawyers saying,
no comment, the parents are on board with it,
and I'll get you off on a technicality.
And then we're surprised when they reach 18,
we chuck them in prison.
We did a poll actually on social media earlier,
asking about whether we should bring back
physical punishment in schools to try and deal with this.
56% said yes.
44% said no, it's an interesting result.
Final word to you.
Well, you have to look at that piece,
is a lot of parents are also struggling.
So when their children come home from terrorising the teachers,
they then terrorise their parents.
Of course.
So a lot of parents are there crying out for help.
Yeah, well, they get it in a good school.
They get it in a good school if they come and ask for it
because there's no one terrorising teachers in my schools
and in a lot of good schools.
It can be done without the paddle.
Chaps, I've got to leave it there.
Really good debate.
Thank you both very much.
I appreciate it.
Well, coming next, Animal Rebellion paint Parliament White
as vegan activists,
spray the gates to Big Ben with paint
and a protest against milk.
Is this really the best way to make a point to the new Prime Minister?
I'll go toe to toe after the break
with one of these militant vegans
who's demanding, well, people like me
should give up meat and just eat gruel
for the rest of our natural lives.
Welcome back to Pizs, Morgan, our sensitive.
Crime Rising, Youth Gang Culture on the Up
is the only way to get back control of our streets
and our schools to get tougher
on kids, a school district in the US state of Missouri,
has decided to reinstate corporal punishment in its classrooms,
allowing students to be punished with a paddle like this under a new policy.
Well, this video of a five-year-old, six-year-old girl, I'm sorry,
at an elementary school in Florida, shows what can happen.
The girl's mother gave permission for this to happen,
according to an official report.
But it's bringing back this form of corporal punishment at schools
the best way to root out the problem of rising crime and disrespect.
Well, head teacher, Serge, Cephyll.
and former gang member and now government advisor, Gwinton, slowly.
Join me now. Welcome to both of you.
Quentin, you grew up in Jamaica where there was a lot of corporal punishment.
And then you came here where there hasn't been for a long time,
saying not in schools in any authorized way.
What's your view about this?
I think if we look at historical records and see
with the rising gang crime to the point now where we're at 3.4 million for each murder
and track back where a lot of this started
is from young people being excluded from school
and teachers feeling as if they've got no control of the school,
much less the classroom.
If that could be prevented,
a lot of people would have made it through to college
and then to university
and had higher prospects of actually gaining a job or something.
People will feel looking at this paddle,
you can't possibly use this on kids.
It does look scary.
And as said, if you've not come from,
from somewhere where you've actually gone through that system,
it actually looks scary.
It looks like a mini cricket bat looking at that.
But one thing that we have to put in there
is that in America, they've actually asked the parents' permission for this.
So it's not just as if the school's implemented it.
Right. The parents have to give the permission.
Have to give consent.
So, Serge, I mean, that's the point of this is quite interesting.
Parents want their kids to be disciplined like this.
Does that change the dial for you?
Well, first and foremost, there's no.
argument, hopefully anymore. We've got to get tougher with kids. However, this ship has sailed.
Our parents aren't allowed to hit kids anymore here. So the idea of using an implement, you
will not find a teacher who will carry out that sort of punishment when parents can be taken
to court for it in their own kids. What we've got to get tougher on is adults that have long
since abdicated their responsibility of bringing up kids. And I've got a whole list there. Let's
start with absent parents. No one wants to talk about it anymore, but you've just had everyone
seen it, advert after advert from the media,
finding a single parent mum with three or four kids,
and no one wants to ask, okay, well, excuse bereavement,
well, where's the other parent here?
And, of course, I've been teaching 42 years in inner city areas,
and time and time, again, people are struggling with their kids,
but they're struggling on their own.
Why do we accept the fact that people can have children,
yet not take on board the responsibility of bringing them up properly?
What do you say to that?
I agree with you in some sense to that
because for what I do in the day to day,
I look after people on witness protection
when I'm not running elections.
But there are a lot of parents struggling by themselves.
And when you look at the murder rate,
a lot of these young people are coming from broken homes.
But to say that, I came from a home
where I was a middle-class young person
and I was still caught up because of the environment.
I had a tutor and everything else.
So it's not everyone.
Sometimes the excitement out there
or the environment that you have to go to school
forces you to either become a victim
or learn to survive.
But we know this, but I wouldn't even stop there.
Single parents is one thing.
Let's talk about, you've talked about exclusion rates.
I know as a head teacher and teachers,
well, how to account for everything.
You know, exam results, exclusion rates, you name it.
Yet I've excluded kids in my time,
not regretted a single one, tried not to.
But I'm telling you now, happy to say it,
Any child that walks into my school with a knife is not walking back in my school again.
But have we gone too soft on kids in school?
Yes. And let me talk about the fact there's kids being excluded.
I can tell you now there's very few that haven't had social services involvement for donkeys years.
We've been paying that money that's been invested.
No good.
I want to know, and I've asked this question of my local authority for donkey's years,
you know, the youth offending team, what are the re-offending statistics on that?
I know I'm accountable.
And I'm afraid the message that adults,
now go back to adults,
us, abdicating our responsibilities,
we're not bringing up children properly.
We're not telling them they have to take responsibility
for their actions.
See, I do think this is right.
Yeah.
I think the disagreement is you think corporal punishment can solve this.
You were in a gang.
I mean, would it have any impact?
If kids excluded from school,
if you bring them back and use corporal punishment,
do they not to see that as basic extension
of being in a gang?
I've just said it's about being tough about giving support.
I've just run for the mayor of Hackney, which is unheard of.
And if you look at their stats of that,
how many people would have come from where I've come from
to be doing what I'm doing.
So we need to show that there is another way.
When you talk to young kids, young black kids in particular,
a lot of the knife crime is endemic amongst young black kids in London.
When you see them and you talk to them,
how do you try and persuade them this is not,
the way to go. You have to be
an example yourself and one
thing you can't be a broken man talking
to a young person that's making
$4,000 of a county line.
If a young person's out there making
more money than you, you
then are struggling to tell them to go and
work in Tesco's or somewhere else. Yeah, but
this is where, I mean, I've run two schools.
2,000 kids, Camberwell
and Peckham. You should see
those kids, brilliant kids.
They know their place in
terms of they're here to teach. Teachers
are in charge, we have rules and regulations, and when they break them, there's no fannying around
in terms of, we make it damn clear. You would agree with that. Is right. Make it damn clear.
That is wrong. You're going to get punished, take responsibility for it, and we hope. But I know,
and I've already alluded to it, we have a whole bunch of professionals, you name it, all around
the place, youth justice system, there's broken Britain for you, telling these kids who everyone knows,
I've got all sorts of examples. When I know, the kids have admitted, and I've actually been sorry,
for doing things wrong.
They've got their lawyers saying, no comment.
The parents are on board with it.
I'll get you off on a technicality.
And then we're surprised when they reach 18,
we chuck them in prison.
We did a poll actually on social media earlier,
asking about whether we should bring back
physical punishment in schools to try and deal with this.
56% said yes.
44% said no.
It's an interesting result.
Final word to you,
well, you have to look at that, PS,
is a lot of parents are also struggling.
So when their children come home from terror,
the teachers, they then terrorise their parents.
Of course.
So a lot of parents are there crying out for help.
Yeah, well, they get it in a good school.
They get it in a good school if they come and ask for it
because there's no one terrorising teachers in my schools
and in a lot of good schools.
It can be done without the paddle.
Chaps, I've got to leave it there.
Really good debate.
Thank you both very much.
I appreciate it.
Well, coming next, Animal Rebellion Paint Parliament White
as vegan activists spray the gates to Big Ben
with paint in a protest against milk.
Is this really the best way to make a point
to the new Prime Minister, I'll go toe to toe after the break
with one of these militant vegans
who's demanding, well, people like me
should give up meat and just eat gruel
for the rest of our natural lives.
