Piers Morgan Uncensored - Piers Morgan Uncensored: Trump Criminal Charges? Marianne Williamson, Eurovision
Episode Date: May 10, 2023On tonight's episode of Piers Morgan Uncensored, Piers debates about whether Trump should be in running for president after being accused of sexual abuse. Also Piers chats to the candidate running to ...be the first female President, Marianne Williamson and Piers lookd into what all the fuss is about with Eurovision. Watch Piers Morgan Uncensored at 8 pm on TalkTV on Sky 522, Virgin Media 606, Freeview 237 and Freesat 217. Listen on DAB+ and the app. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
And should anyone with a charge sheet like this be allowed to run for president anyway?
We'll debate that with a super pack of our sense and starts.
Plus, as ailing President Biden plunges in the polls again,
or talk to the Maverick Democrat presidential candidate who says she can beat him
and become the first female president of the United States.
Marianne Williamson joins me live.
And Britain prepares to host Eurovision for the first time in 25 years.
I think it's a load of old Euro trash.
Sharon Osborne and Louis Walsh disagree.
We'll argue about it.
Live from the news building in London, this is Piers Morgan Uncensored.
Good evening from London.
Welcome to Piers Morgan Uncensored.
Seven long years ago, the upstart Republican candidate for president,
a thrusting young buck named Donald J. Trump, said this.
My people are so smart.
And you know what else they say about my people?
The polls.
They say, I have the most loyal people.
Did you ever see that?
where I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue
and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose any voters, okay?
It's like incredible.
It is incredible, and it's starting to look like he was right, isn't it?
The charge sheet against Donald Trump is unprecedented.
Never in history is such a powerful politician,
never mind a former president,
face such a maelstrom of legal misery.
He's been indicted by a grand jury
for hush money payments to the Porn Star Stormy Daniels.
He's accused of pressing the Secretary of State in Georgia
to find 11,000,
votes to overturn his election defeat.
He could yet face charges over his inspiring role, or the opposite of inspiring, really,
but the fact he encouraged this attack on the Capitol on January 6th, and over the hoarding
of classified documents at his home, Murillago, in Florida.
Well, now in a civil case, a jury says he sexually abused the magazine writer E. Jean Carroll
in the dressing room of the department store in the 1980s, and then defamed her by calling it a hoax.
He's been ordered to pay $5 million in damages, although he almost certainly would appeal.
This was her response on U.S. television this morning.
He said after the verdict and he was still posting after midnight that he has absolutely no idea who you are
and called the verdict a continuation of the greatest witch hunt of all time
and that you were funded by Democratic donors.
What is your response to that?
Here's the thing. Here is the astonishing thing about this win yesterday.
of all the cases that this man faces, all the legal quagmires, it was one, well, let's think of all the
prosecutors, all the special counsel, all the investigators, and what happened yesterday
is one five-foot-two little blonde, wily female attorney, and one 79-year-old advice
year-old.
Yeah.
Five-foot-nine.
Five-foot-nine.
79-year-old advice columnist beat Donald Trump in court.
Well, she's right. She won and did beat Donald Trump.
The jury decided that the man who became president
and may well be the next president, sexually abused and innocent woman
that lied about it. Trump did not testify in the civil case,
but in deposition videos seen by the jury,
he pretty much nailed himself.
I don't even know who the woman. Let's say, I don't know who.
It's Marla.
You say Marla's in this photo?
That's Marla.
Yeah.
That's my wife.
She's accusing me of rape.
A woman that I have no idea who she is.
It came out of the blue.
She's accusing me of rape, of raping her.
The worst thing you can do, the worst charge.
And you know it's not true, too.
You're a political operative also.
You're a disgrace.
But she's accusing me, and so are you, of rape.
And it never took place.
And I will tell you, I've made that statement, and I said, well, it's politically incorrect.
She's not my type.
She's all my type, he says, having mistook the woman he abused for his ex-wife,
who presumably at that point was still very much his type.
But so far, Teflon dons, again, showing astonishing resistance under fire.
He remained streets ahead in the polls to become the Republican nominee for president,
continues to discry conspiracy.
His supporters continue to lap it up.
My simple question is this.
the best America can do.
A fading unpopular President Biden
who can barely string a sentence together
pitted against a former president
who could well be campaigning in an ankle bracelet.
This is America's choice
and America's fight to have, of course.
But I care a lot about the country.
I've lived and worked there for more than 20 years
and its politics have massive implications
for the rest of the world.
Surely it can do better than this.
Well, joining me as a political analyst,
probably the best analyst of American politics.
There is.
Frank Lutz, who I'm glad to say,
with me here in London, and across the pond, Fox News contributor and Outkick host Tommy Leran
and by Michael Wolfe, author of the phenomenally bestselling, fire and fury, inside the Trump White House.
Okay, well, look, great to see you all. Michael Wolf, let me start with you. You know Trump,
as well as anybody. You wrote the devastating series of books about him. Can he wriggle off all
these hooks, I guess is the obvious question. Could you see a pathway now for Donald Trump
to just barrel his way once again to the White House?
Well, yeah, I mean, I think that the answer is, of course.
I mean, he has done it so many times before
that it would be actually more surprising
if this finally trips him up.
I mean, I got a note from one of the Trump inner circle this morning
that said we're in uncharted territory,
which I think,
I think is true. To be found liable for sexual abuse in the middle of a presidential campaign
is, well, unprecedented. But will this have an effect on the campaign? It will certainly
have an effect on the people who hate Trump. But the question is, will it have an effect on the
people who love Trump? As so many things in the past that
We thought would have an effect, have not.
So it is uncharted.
We wait and see.
Yeah, it is.
Tommy Leran, I want to play a clip from Chris Christie,
who may well end up running against Trump to be president.
He was on Fox News Radio and said this.
You know, his response yesterday to me was ridiculous,
that he didn't even know the woman.
I mean, you know, how many coincidences are we going to have here with Donald Trump, Brian?
I mean, he must be the unluckiest SOB in the world.
He just has, you know, random people he's never met before who are able to convince the jury that he sexually abused them.
I mean, this guy is one person after another, one woman after another.
The stories just continue to pile up.
And I think we all know he's not unlucky that he can engage in this kind of conduct.
All right, Tommy.
Give me some defense for Donald Trump here.
It's not a matter of being unlucky.
It's a matter of the world wants to take this man down.
I mean, every time I hear a charge against Donald Trump, some drummed up charge, I swear my head is going
to explode.
They go after this man over and over and over and over again, over some BS ridiculous charges.
And let's also keep in mind that this jury did not find him liable for rape.
They said that they did not believe this woman that he raped her.
But then again, they're going after him for defamation.
I don't know about you, peers, but if someone falsely accuses me of rape, I think that it's
and popping. You can say whatever you want about somebody who falsely accuses you of something
as atrocious as rape. Hang on. Yeah, they didn't just find against him for defamation.
They found against him for sexual assault, right? So he was not found guilty of the higher charge
of rape, but he was certainly found guilty by this jury in a civil case. It must be said,
the different bar, of course, to a criminal case, but he was found guilty by a jury of sexually
assaulting this woman. Yeah, and again, the same woman that went on CNN and said that
rape was sexy. Okay, I'm sorry if I have a little bit of suspicion here. And this, honestly,
as a woman, really bothers me because there are people with legitimate sexual abuse and assault
and rape claims that don't come forward for this exact reason. People that make a mockery of
it like this woman, E. Jean Carroll, who wants her moment in the sun and her moment in the spotlight.
They go after this man relentlessly. And then meanwhile, you've got the Biden crime family over there.
Amazing that we're focusing on this and not the fact that we know now that that the Bidens were
involved in a massive bribery pay-to-play scheme, the fact that the media continually focuses on
Donald Trump and not what's actually going on with our current sitting president, to me, is an
abomination. All right, Frank Lance, let's get to the polling on all this, because it's really
interesting, because after the indictment over the Stormy Daniels case, which I thought was
overreach, frankly, it looked to me like if he made those payments, he was doing it probably
to keep this quiet from his wife. And is that really the correct way to go after a
a president of the United States to take him down for that?
I don't think so.
I think there are more important legal issues to come.
But what was extraordinary was after that indictment.
His poll numbers surged, and so did his fundraising.
It was almost like, you give us a reason to get behind this martyr, and we're going to do it.
Will that happen again now after this, do you think?
And you've got the exact word, martyr.
I like to call it.
It's not even victimization.
It's now persecuted.
And Donald Trump is the perfect political person who understands communication and is united all these Republicans against those who are attacking them.
And the Fox News host, she did it right there.
But I want to bring it down a little bit because I know what you think about America.
As do I.
There's a reason why I'm here.
We're destroying our democracy.
We actually are.
More Americans think our institutions have failed.
More Americans believe our elections are fraudulent.
More Americans believe democracy does not work.
More Americans have lost faith and confidence in the future.
And most importantly, more Americans today than ever before
think their kids are going to be worse off than they are.
Pierce, we're destroying this gift that we were given.
It's not entertainment for me.
It's not being a pundit for me.
I'm watching my country while I'm alive.
I'm watching my country tear itself apart.
And the problem is that Donald Trump is leading that effort.
It's not about the truth to him.
And by the way, elections are less important than the future of our democracy.
Obviously, we have trouble here in Great Britain.
But America's become the laughing stock.
I mean, Michael Wolf, I have to say, a lot of the world is shaking their head going,
you've got 320 million people in America.
And you have two potentially,
runoff again between two people, one of whom will be 82 if he wins the election, 86 by the end,
who is already showing visible signs of senility.
And the other one is already under criminal indictment,
has just been found guilty by a civil jury of sexual assault,
has a number of other legal threats coming down the line.
A lot of people away from America scratching their heads going,
how is it that it's going to be these two,
facing off to become the most powerful person in the world?
Well, I hope you're not asking me to answer that question
because I have no idea.
I mean, it is kind of astounding.
I, you know, I mean, somebody was saying to me the other day,
well, you know, we always love a rematch.
So is that part of this that we are seeing
and we now regard all of this as an incredible show,
that these are all characters engaged in some kind of, I don't know, media event.
And who is responsible for that?
Well, Fox certainly has responsibility in that.
And, you know, all other cable channels have responsibility for that.
But right now we have a debt ceiling that we cannot solve.
Right.
We have a budgetary crisis.
We have a crisis in terms of our relationship with China.
All of this is having a negative impact on actually getting things done.
I think you have a paralyzed Washington in the sense that the first thought now for any side that loses an election is how to spend the next four years preventing whoever wins from doing anything.
And this has been going on now for a long time.
And I look at it and think, I'm not sure how you solve that problem.
So you're correct. You're so correct.
But then the question is, what does the media do in this process?
Or are they playing, as Michael Wolf says,
are they playing characters in this Broadway play?
Well, take CNN tonight, are going to be doing this big town hall.
Caitlin Collins, one of their correspondents,
will be interviewing Donald Trump in front of a lot of Republican voters, apparently.
Big departure for CNN who were full-on Trump bashing for a number of years.
But, you know, again, you can already see a huge,
furority erupts about them even doing this.
But Trump is a bona fide candidate to be president.
Why shouldn't CNN do it?
But already I can say this is going to play out
in a horrendously toxic way, whatever happens.
But some of this is our fault as voters,
our fault as citizens.
We seek news that affirms us
rather than informs us.
We just want to be confirmed.
We surround ourselves of people who agree with us.
You can't even have a political conversation
at Thanksgiving or Christmas
without interrupting.
So the problem is, and by the way,
actually, I'm going to blame social media more than any other factor.
No question.
It's a poison.
And it's time for Facebook and Google and all those companies
to set down and acknowledge the damage that's already happened and address it.
Let me bring Tommy in.
Tommy, the big question for me for the Republicans is I felt for a while
the only way Joe Biden might be able to win in 2024
is if Donald Trump is his opponent again.
because he's beaten him once.
He knows he'll get the anti-Trump vote out.
Trump has probably got the power
to win the nomination for the party,
but I'm not sure he can win enough of independence,
for example, to become president.
Why would the Republicans willfully engage
in an act of self-harm
when you've got, for example,
a candidate like Ron DeSantis,
the Florida governor,
who's been very successful,
he's nearly half Trump's age,
he hasn't got any of the baggage.
I don't really get this strategy here.
Well, you know,
I'm not sure that that's true.
Michael, that was for Tommy.
I'll come on to you for a response to Tommy.
But Tommy, that one was for you. Can you hear me?
Tommy, can you hear me?
I don't think she can.
That's the who song.
We're going to fix Tommy's ear, because I don't think she can hear me.
Michael, you answer them.
Yeah, you know, I mean, I think what you point out
is the weakness of the situation
to suddenly posit Ron DeSantis.
And that's the only person
that the Republicans and the media establishment have been able to posit,
oh, Ron DeSantis can run against him and do well.
But everything that we've seen, except in the local Florida election,
Ron DeSantis is an incredibly untried and weak candidate.
He's actually a bad retail politician, which is, and against Donald Trump,
one of the greatest retail politicians of all time.
That is true.
The only caveat I would put in that is that if you looked at the recent midterms,
most of Trump's endorsements lost or did badly,
and DeSantis was the standout Republican winner,
taking a majority of 30 or thousand to one and a half million.
I mean, he has got the scores on the board.
Well, in Florida, but we've seen again and again and again
in the history of presidential races,
governors who can't step out of their own state.
It's an entirely different skill set
to deal with national media
over local media and local media
and local political organizations.
Yeah, that is true.
Let me bring in Tommy.
I was going to ask you about DeSantis on me,
but your ear fell out.
So we've got your ear back.
I'm going to ask you about somebody else.
George Santos strikes me as the only person
where Donald Trump looks at him and goes,
wow, now that guy, that is shameless.
I interviewed him in New York recently, and we had this exchange.
I've been a terrible liar.
I mean, would you be prepared to say that?
Sure.
Like I said, well, I've been a terrible liar on those subjects.
I've been a terrible liar, as the George Sanders.
Well, he's now been arrested for being a terrible liar,
and he's got, I think, 13 charges for his lies.
But he says tonight, I'm not going to resign.
He intends to return to Congress to vote tomorrow
and intends to run for re-election.
How is America, again, I ask you as a nation, you're speaking of your country here,
how can someone like George Santos, who literally lies about whether the sky is blue,
how can he still be operating in Congress?
Well, again, because I am a conservative and a Republican,
I don't stand up for people just because they are a conservative or Republican.
So I'm not going to stand up for George Santos.
I'm not going to defend him, right?
I think we can do much better as a Republican Party as conservatives.
But I do find it incredibly interesting, peers.
that the rest of the mainstream media chose to run with the George Santos story today,
which impacts very few people when you really look at it,
instead of running with James Comer and House Oversight over the Biden crime family,
which I've been trying to address because we could have potentially the then-vice president,
current president, taking money from foreign entities like China in the millions of dollars
over a span of several years.
But yet we're talking about George Santos?
I'm not defending the man, but my God, you've got a man sitting in the White House
has not been held accountable for what his family has done, what his son has done.
I really wish someone would talk about that.
That has implications for our entirety of our national security.
Right.
And certainly, Franklin, I was just finally, I mean, that there is a double standard about the way
Biden is treated by the media, because all of the media do skewed to the left.
And I do think if it was the Trump family that had this kind of murky stuff going on
with all these payments coming into the family, from all these foreign adversaries in many cases,
they'll be all hell would be breaking loose.
So I go back to your original point.
Is this the best we can do?
And that the ad that's going to kill Donald Trump in the end
is going to be a middle-aged woman looking at her daughter
who's turning 18 and asking her,
is this the person you're proud of?
Is this the person you find as a role model?
Is this the best person we can put up for president of the United States?
It's going to be asked as a question.
This is not about entertainment.
Am I concerned in this whole conversation?
is that we're trying to score political points.
And I mean this. You know me.
This is not about political points.
At some point, you break your democracy.
At some point, the public loses.
Well, I do think your point about social media,
I do think it's got so tribal on social media.
Facts no longer matter.
All that matters is getting on your tribe's side
and agreeing with whatever the tribe has decided
is the agreed line.
And facts are getting disintegrated.
I've got to leave it there.
I can talk about this all day long.
and it's great to have you here, Frank.
Please come back soon.
Michael, thank you very much over there across the pond.
And thank you, Tommy.
It's going to be fascinating to watch how this all plays out.
But again, I asked the question I asked up the start.
Really, America?
This is the best you can do.
Come on.
Unsess to the next.
She's Oprah Winfrey's former spiritual advisor
who's making a bid to unseat Joe Biden as president.
I'll talk live to Marianne Williamson,
presidential candidate.
Is she a better option to be president of the United States?
Well, we'll find out.
Welcome back to Pierceville and Unsentist.
She's the self-help author and Democratic presidential candidate
who once said she would harness love to defeat Donald Trump.
She believes the power of the mind may have prevented a hurricane
hitting the United States in 2019.
She once wrote,
The sickness doesn't exist,
and diseases like cancer and AIDS and other physical illnesses
are physical manifestations of a psychic scream.
Now, some of that she's walked back
with a history of saying things that many may deem quirky at best.
Does Marianne Williamson really believe
she has a shot of becoming the first female?
email president of the United States. Well, let's find out. She joins me now.
Marianne, well, listen, great to have you on the program.
Thank you so much. So I want to start with some of those things that you've said in the past.
I know you've walked some of them back, but when you run...
No, I haven't walked any of them.
Well, I think you did when you talked about... You don't take any of it back.
It's not about walking them back. It's about pointing out how disconnected they are from the
context in which any of those things were said. I never said that the power of the mind,
these are all misrepresentations and mischaracterizations of what I've said.
If you say I have to walk them back, it's as though I'm supposed to admit that I said something completely ridiculous.
Nothing that I said within the context that I said it was ridiculous at all.
That's all.
Would you say you regret any of those things that we referenced?
Not if you look at the context in which they were spoken, no.
You know, no.
I shouldn't apologize for the fact that there is now an understanding of a mind-body connection.
Anybody in any kind of a psychotherapeutic situation might say,
ooh, I'm in such pain.
It feels like my body is screaming.
Listen, I have osteoporosis.
My mother died of diabetes.
My sister died of breast cancer.
My father died of colon cancer.
I have spent most of my career being of service to people with AIDS and other critical illnesses.
No one needs to school me on the reality of illnesses and its ravages.
I am not a woman who doesn't understand those things.
You are a woman, and if you were to win, you would become the first female president of United States.
And that does beg the question, the burning question, one that has tripped up so many famous people in the world of politics around the world has cost people their jobs.
So let me ask you straightforwardly.
What is a woman?
What is a woman?
Well, a woman, if you look at it only biologically, you know, I wrote a book called a woman's worth.
I am a woman who is born into a woman's body.
I think of myself as a woman.
But it's a different world today.
people can define their sex, their sexuality, binary, non-binary, however they want.
I just know what I am as a woman, so I'm not going to get trapped into any of that.
You know, we live in a free society.
And in a free society, people can identify however they wish to identify, do whatever they do,
as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.
And I have no problem with that.
What about when it does hurt, for example, female sports people who are suddenly seeing themselves
come up against trans women who might be six foot four inches?
tall and a powering parsum in swimming pools.
That does do genuine harm.
What's your view about that issue?
That is a complicated subject, absolutely.
But there are ways through muscle mass, through hormones, through chemical testing.
There are ways to determine whether or not a particular race is.
You can't think, though, as a female candidate to be president,
you cannot surely think it is remotely fair for trans athletes.
And I've got nothing against trans people.
I've always supported their rights to fairness and equality.
I just feel that this is completely unfair,
and trans athletes should simply not be allowed to compete
against biological females.
End.
Those situations, once again, they're complicated.
They're not all the same.
It's not that complicated.
It is, actually, because there are some situations
where it may be what you just said,
other situations where it may not be.
You know, it's important that we protect the rights of the minority.
It's also important that we protect the rights of the majority.
So those things should be determined.
according to factors that are agreed upon by the sports officials
and all of the people seeking to be part of those races should be protected.
Their rights should be protected and honored.
What would be the first thing you'd do as president if you won?
One of the first things I would do is determine that there would be an audit for the Pentagon
every cent that we spend there.
I would cancel all contracts where the United States government has contracts with union busting companies.
I would deschedule marijuana from a Schedule 1 drug.
I would bring together a group to have a very serious conversation about how we were going to get to universal health care.
And I would also use the marching rights that are part of the BIDOL Act of 1980, by which pharmaceutical companies are told that if you develop a drug with even $1 taxpayer money, which means most drugs in the United States, that the government has the right to lower those prices.
I would bring together a group of leaders
who were the experts on childhood,
everything having to do with the neurophysiology of children,
neuropsychology, the needs of children in terms of health,
in terms of education, everything that it would take
to have the greatest experts on childhood
because I want to develop a department of children and youth.
I want a massive transfer of resources
into the lives of children, 10 years and younger.
Okay.
I want you to have a...
Listen, I don't want to stop me.
but I've done want to run out of all time.
But okay, that all sounds very laudable.
And you rattled them off.
You've obviously thought about it a lot, which is good.
What would you do, for example, as commander-in-chief,
if China invaded Taiwan?
That's a very, very difficult one.
That's a very, very difficult one.
And hopefully, hopefully, if I'm the day I'm president,
China will not have invaded Taiwan.
I will certainly not poke the bear.
I would certainly try to walk back,
any of this almost Cold War type of conversation
that is happening too much in this country
between the United States?
What if you were commander-in-chief
and they literally, as many people think,
is highly likely in whoever is the next president
in that term of office, if they did invade Taiwan?
Joe Biden has said he would be there to help.
Would you?
What did you say that Joe Biden has said?
He said that he would help the Taiwanese if that happened.
Well, there are different ways to help the Taiwanese,
and I believe that we're trying to help them right now.
And one of the ways that we're also trying to help the Taiwanese is to build better relationships with China
so that we can be more on a road towards healthy collaboration, which we will need not only economically,
but in order to deal with the climate crisis in the years ahead.
So let's right now work on where we are.
Let's not poke the bear.
Let's take the temperature down.
Let's think in terms of China, not as an enemy, but as a collaborator, hopefully someone that we can compete with in a healthy way.
That's what my attention is on.
Well, I say it's a great respect, but people will say that's very naive, that we've just, you know, if you did that attitude with, say, Vladimir Putin, that's not going to stop him invading countries.
And people look to America, for better or worse, as the global policeman.
And if you want to run the country, you want to be the boss, you're going to face some very tough decisions about what you do when the bears actually go and do bad stuff.
Thank you, Paris.
I understand what the role of the commander-in-chief of the United States is.
But there was nothing naive at all about what I just said about China.
And the last thing I'm not naive about is Vladimir Putin.
Joe Biden has said he won't debate other Democrat candidates in the primary season.
Many people think that's just cowardly.
What's your view?
Of course he should debate us.
There are three candidates for this nomination.
There is not an enthusiasm in this country, as you were mentioning earlier.
There is not an enthusiasm for a Trump-Biden rematch.
The majority of people,
have said that they wish the president would not run again.
If the American people hear his agenda for the next four years,
and they hear my agenda for the next four years,
and the agenda of anyone else who is running,
and they say, through their votes in a Democratic primary,
yes, I think Joe Biden is the best candidate to win in 2024
and the best leader for the next four years,
then God bless him. He should be the one.
But the idea that the DNC and the Democratic elite establishment
can just shoehorn him into the nomination is undemoration.
Democratic. If you have a party, which we do, that likes to think of itself as a champion of democracy, we should not be so wary of democracy in our own house. So it is important that the president debate me.
I completely agree. I suspect he's quite afraid of debating you, actually. What do you make of this issue of the Biden family and all this foreign money from adversaries, which appears to have been pouring into their coffers?
Well, you know, it appears to be, we don't know yet.
The facts aren't all out.
We have rules of due process in this country.
And no one, whether it's Donald Trump or President Biden, should be above the law.
We'll see what happens.
But no matter what happens, this is certainly a shadow on his candidacy.
And one more factor for people to think about in terms of a president whose approval
ratings are already very low.
So Hunter Biden is not his father.
We don't know anything yet.
But yeah, I mean, this is not great going into a presidential race.
All the more reason why the president should be debating me and to anyone else who is running
so that we can present to the American people who get lost in all this.
This is what is so wrong.
You know, as you were speaking about earlier, it's like a circus of smut and racehorse and gossip.
We need to think about the American people who are lost in all this.
The American people, one in four of whom have medical debt,
18 million of whom cannot afford to pay the...
pay in order to fulfill the prescriptions that their doctors give them.
Half of our seniors live on less than $25,000 a year.
We have a third of our workers who live on less than $15 an hour
and cannot even pay for a place to live.
These are the people who are looking at all of these institutions
and saying you're failing us.
You're not doing anything for me.
And that's what I want to talk about.
And final question.
And final question.
And final question, Marian,
should somebody who's just been found guilty
by a jury of sexually abusing a woman,
should that person be allowed to run for president?
Everybody needs to vote for, well, right now they can legally.
So every voter has to choose for themselves.
But I'll tell you something.
This is not about, listen, people who are total Trump supporters,
like the person that you had on earlier, she doesn't care.
They're not going to care.
That's not what's going to lose for the Democrats in 2024.
The power of Trump is not what's going to lose for the Democrats in 2024.
What could lose for us, however, is droves of people staying home, particularly young people,
particularly young people who are not going to go to war for a president who approved the Willow Project
and has given more oil drilling permits than even Trump did, and who do not see in any way regarding their health care,
regarding their capacity to go to college, regarding these college loan debts that are trackling them.
They don't look at the Democratic Party and feel they have my back either.
No, I think you're right.
That's what is dangerous for the Democratic Party in 2024,
all the people who might be staying home
unless we present them a genuine opportunity,
a genuine alternative of economic reform,
and a whole new face.
And obviously, I think that face should be.
Obviously, you think that face should be you
and you put your case very compellingly.
And it's great to have you on Pierce Morgan on the Senate.
So thank you very much.
Thank you.
Getting very interesting that race in America.
Just on the Democrat side with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
and now Marianne Williamson,
both polling surprisingly strongly.
against Joe Biden may not be a given
that he ends up being the Democrat candidate
that would be a bombshell.
My interview with Cristiano Rinalda's been nominated
for another award. You can vote for the interview
of the year. I've also been nominated for
presenter of the year at the Trick Award.
So go to www.trik.org.
And cast a million votes
so we can expand our trophy cabinet.
And remember, with every vote,
another snowflake somewhere melts.
Unscensored next. A global audience of more than 160
million were tuning to Eurovision this weekend.
I will not be one of them because I think it's a load of old
Balderdash. But Louis Walsh and Sharon Osborne are going to try and persuade me why
I'm wrong. This is not going to go well this segment.
We'll take a good long look at our gallery there because you won't be seeing any of them
again. Welcome back to Piers Morgan Unsensored. I remain the only voice of
common sense here because Eurovision returns to the UK this week after 25
your absence. It's supposed to be of course in Ukraine.
Who won it last time but obviously Ukraine can't host it.
So Liverpool has the dubious.
honor of being host city.
And that's fine. And everyone I know seems to be wildly excited about this, apart from me.
Because I think Eurovision is a stain on humanity.
Oh, ridiculous.
Now, the first of two semifinals was effected on audiences last night, head of the grand final on Saturday.
Fans say Eurovision is a world-class festival of the arts, an exhibition of the best of pop music and offer.
Recallections may vary.
Take a look at this.
That's right now we need to mix
Cream and butter
sweet so good
Woods at my back
my got those on my hair
My pants are sharp
And my eyes are
That last act we're called
We Are the Winners from Lithuania
The one thing Lithuania's never won
Is anything
Unbelievable
I'm going to bring in now
Sharon Osborne and Louis Wool
Sharon's with me
Louis's wherever Louis is
The pair of them are going to try and
He's in Ireland of course he is
They're going to try and persuade me
that this ludicrous farce
is actually a credible tournament.
Louis, you go first.
Come on.
I say it's awful.
Listen, I watched the semi-final last night.
I know you do, but I think it's brilliant fun.
I watch it every single year.
There are some really good songs.
You played all the bad ones.
But there's some Abba came from it.
Celine Dion, Johnny Logan,
so many great people.
It's light entertainment at its best peers,
and you may not like it, but I love it.
I think it's honestly, Sharon.
I bet Sharon.
Well, the thing is, it doesn't surprise me you like it.
It's a canvas.
Because when we did America's Got Talent Together,
you always put the nutty acts like that through.
And it was down to me on behalf of the grateful American people
to buzz them off.
You love this crap.
I do.
I do.
It's not crap.
It's cultural.
It's not cultural.
It is.
It's very interesting to see all these different cultures
and what they consider to be entertainment.
And it's very interesting.
Look, a little.
the worst thing about it. I'm going to say this is somebody
who went to Ukraine to interview President
Zelensky and his wife
and I've obviously done a lot of stuff
about the Ukraine war. I really didn't
like Ukraine winning it last year
simply because the country's at war
and I don't, and I'm sure they're going to
probably win it again this year for the same reason.
The moment any competition to me
goes into what I call just
transparent virtue signaling, they weren't the best
act. We all know that.
Oh, behave, of course they go. Then it's not a competition.
It's something else. It's like
It's people just ticking boxes.
No, it's people that like other people peers.
No, it's not.
And try and understand that.
You know the worst thing, Louie.
When I went to Ukraine,
I came through the train station to go back to Poland,
and the train station manager gave me the hat
that the winner of the Ukraine,
that hat, he gave it to the train station guy in Kiev
and signed it, and the guy gave it to me.
And obviously, it was the last thing.
I had to pretend to be happy.
You should have put it on for a picture.
But let's not pretend that Ukraine act, look, I love Ukraine, I love Ukrainians, I want them to win this war.
I don't want to see them keep winning competitions simply because they're at war. It's ridiculous.
They only won last year. I mean, I voted for them maybe ten times last year. I wanted them to win.
Of course you do, because you like people.
All right, so should they win the Football World Cup as well then?
Yes.
They should win everything, should they?
Yes. Yes. Okay.
Pears, it was a good song.
We listened to the songs.
Sharon and I are in the music business.
It wasn't a good song.
It wasn't a good song. It wasn't a good song.
It was.
I haven't heard a good song on Eurovision.
I would say in...
Since Adba.
Since Adla.
When was Adler?
1970, something, right?
Celine Dion, Johnny Logan,
Bucs Fizz, loads of people.
Bucks Fizz?
I watched last night.
I'm amazing...
Bucks Fizz? You're citing Bucks Fizz?
I thought...
I thought that Switzerland was good.
Did you like Switzerland, Louis?
I did, but I love Finland.
I know he's a bit crazy, but I loved it.
I also loved Israel.
I thought it was absolutely crazy.
She's good.
She's very...
My other problem with it is,
it's a complete carve-up
where all the countries
basically look after their mates.
None of the voting is genuine.
They'll often take the best song
and obliterate it
because it's not from a country
that's part of their little pact.
Pierce, you are wrong.
the best song always wins.
Always.
Yeah, but the bar is unbelievably low.
A, the bar is unbelievably low for that title.
And B, the best song never wins.
But it's about entertainment, peers.
It's about personality, presentation, all of that.
Well, let's hear, this is the UK entry this year.
Have it listened to some of this.
Yeah, I know.
Just get you, please, stop that.
Look, this is my point.
This is my point about that.
That is, you hear that in every Euro-Trash disco at 3 in the morning
when they want people to leave.
They turn on that kind of stuff when they want to kick people out.
No, no, she represents youth of today.
Use them today.
There's not a person under 50 who would listen to that and not think it's horrifying.
You're wrong. You're wrong.
It's for 80-year-old guys.
No, it's not.
And their bimbo mistresses to go and dance at in some nightclub in Lithuanian.
Lithuania at 3 in the morning.
That's what that's for.
No.
And the idea that you two do actually know your music,
this is what offends me.
You do. Married to one of the great rock stars in history.
Weaned on rock music,
your father, one of the great rock managers.
And you, Louis Walsh, produced some of the great pop bands of all time.
The fact that you have straight faces.
Because it's an achievement.
As you try and persuade me that this garbage is serious music.
I love it.
You don't love it.
Sam Ryder won.
He does.
So do I.
It's entertainment.
I do.
Are you both going to watch the whole thing on Zambard?
Absolutely.
You're going to watch it? Are you proud?
Absolutely.
Louis, what about Ireland not getting through?
No, it wasn't great.
It wasn't great.
It wasn't great.
Oh, really?
There was a song that you're a vision that wasn't great.
Yeah.
Cairns, there are some great songs.
Neither of you believe a word you're saying.
Absolute rubbish.
You do this kind of thing to annoy people like me.
No, do.
really gifted musical ear.
No, no, it's not.
It's about, it makes people have to be.
This is why I had to be the lead judge on America's Got Talent.
Oh, boo.
Because Sharon would go nuts and put these sort of acts through,
and I would have to then save a nation.
Pears, there's a massive market.
150 million people can't be wrong.
They can, and they are.
The whole thing is a complete travesty.
It's a travesty.
The production is sensational.
BBC have done a vote.
It's amazing. Amazing.
The thing is unwatchable builds.
It's not just the songs.
We watch for the clothes, the dancing, all the outrageous that goes with it.
You don't know what's going to happen.
All right.
Just play me a little bit of a matchup that will be played at the start, please.
This is the clothes, it's the music, it's the whole ensemble.
Yes.
Let's remind ourselves of that.
It's everything.
Here we go.
I mean, honestly, in a court of law, this is the moment that Rumpold of the Bailey goes,
I rest my case.
Literally, I rest my case.
I've got to leave you there, thank God.
Two years ago.
No, no, no, there's no more than you.
You've had a chance to this way.
That's ridiculous.
It is utter nonsense.
I will not be anywhere near a TV on Saturday night.
Yes, you will.
You'll love it.
No, I won't.
Yes, you will.
Louis, love me to see you though
and Sharon, love me to see you.
Always a pleasure, never at your
looking well, Sharon.
And I know that off camera, you'll both say to me,
you know what, you're right, but that's what normally happens.
No.
No, no, not this time.
I keep it real.
Not this time.
Unsensored next tonight.
Should straight actors be allowed to play gay roles?
Well, apparently not.
One LGBTQ bus, whatever the other bitches are,
star thinks, no, you can't have that.
You can only be gay now to play gay roles,
to which I say, great.
In that case, you can only.
and he'd be straight to play straight roles.
Guess what? That debate's going to disappear
very quickly if the rules work both
ways. We'll debate this after the break.
Back with my pact, talk to
your contributor, Esther Cracker and the Associate in Mirror.
Kevin McGuire, welcome to both of you. All right, Eurovision
fans, Adderavio? No, I knew it. I knew it was a lot.
I knew you were a cut of... I kid you. I thought it was
a lottery. Yes. I was like, where is
the Eurovision in my bank account? And they're like, no,
I said it's a song contest. Well, it's shown the world.
You watch, of course, you watch it.
It's voting, isn't it?
It's the voting to see if Britain can get in North Carp.
It's the most corrupt voting in the world,
possibly outside the Politburo.
Literally.
Let's talk about gay actors.
Forget this bubbles around this story.
People say,
wokeery doesn't exist.
Listen to this.
Netflix's Heartland star,
Aidan Marino,
thinks he's not authentic
for a straight actor
to play a gay character.
He happens to be gay.
He plays the first major LGBTQ plus character
in the Canadian series.
Okay, fine.
A gay guy should play a gay guy.
He says it.
tweeted back when I saw this story,
all right, then straight people should play straight
roles. I mean, I have to work both ways.
Doesn't it? Or we just assume
actors can play any role.
It is. Now, I
understand where actors come from
if they feel discriminated and they're not getting
lots of parts. Why are the parts
like me, I'm not getting.
You sometimes get it from working class actors
too. Why do you have some of my class?
It would make zero difference. But it's your ability
to be on this panel today. No, I agree.
It's acting.
When actors
performing sort of sex scenes, right?
Are they taking jobs from prostitutes?
I mean, that's the point of acting. Who's going to play Adolf Hitler
in a movie? Who's going to play a
mafioso boss? What happens
with the Sopranos? What happens with
the West Wing? Have you got to be a president of United States
to play a president? I mean, the whole thing. Once you
go down this avenue of woke thinking,
as always, insanity lurks. Yeah, I mean,
Scarlett-Johans got in trouble for saying this, actually. She had to
backtrack and apologize. They all apologize.
We had, you know, Eddie Redmond,
wasn't it, who apologized for playing a transgender person in the Danish...
Even though he won a loss for it.
But why is he apologised? He was great, and shot on light on transgender issues.
He was, but I don't think we always end up in a lunatic position.
It's just a discussion to make us more aware and think about it.
That, I think, is not a bad thing.
I think that's bizarre when you talk about acting,
because surely that's the whole, your entire profession is played on being something that you're not.
So why do we have to talk about this?
This person must be hired because of the country.
skin or whatever. And also you turn on Netflix and they have a whole period, you know,
series about England back in, you know, the 19th century and half the cast of black.
And you're like, you think that was what the aristocracy was like in England?
Right, that's Bridget and you're quite right.
And by the way, I don't care.
It's a better.
I don't care, but if you're going to be true to yourself.
Yeah.
But I'm not sure it's meant to be a dot you draw.
I've got to leave it there.
Keep it on sense.
Thank you, Pat.
We'll do more time tomorrow.
Thank you.
Think you're ready for Sky's next generation full fiber broadband.
Think again.
You want it bigger.
It's not just fast.
It's full fiber.
