Piers Morgan Uncensored - ‘S*x Tape? INEVITABLE’ What's Next For Harry & Meghan After ‘Tacky’ Twerking Video?

Episode Date: June 10, 2025

For a couple who are apparently concerned with maintaining their privacy, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have been posting an awful lot of content sharing insight into their Californian life, including pictures of them and their children Archie and Lilibet at Disneyland. But more controversially, Meghan shared on Instagram a bedside twerking video, taken shortly before she gave birth to Lilibet, to silence online trolls who claim she was never pregnant at all. Instead the video has emboldened conspiracy theorists and subjected both of them to merciless ridicule. So, what will be next? A presidential campaign? Or something even more vulgar? Joining Piers Morgan to discuss this is host of ‘Kinsey Schofield Unfiltered’, Kinsey Schofield, commentator Ava Santina and comedian James Barr. Preorder Piers Morgan's new book ‘Woke is Dead’: https://lnk.to/wokeisdead Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Did they think twerking like trailer trash teens would endear them to the public? To me, that is a racist. Oh, do me a favorite. It is. How could they be racist? Trailer trash does not mean anyone's ethnicity or color. So why would you say it does? Megyn is not a white woman.

So we've only had so said it twerking with white women. Why is it racist now when it's Megamark? Because you're saying that she's trailer trash. Most people I saw come on to think of. But it's true, Piz. You can't deny that this is all happened because of unconscious. buyers running through the UK press. Oh, please.

All of this hate, you were just this... No, it's not nonsense. They put little emojis on their faces like, that's supposed to protect them. Either use your kids. I'm not sure. Use your kids or don't use it. Can I just say the bump argument?

If a surrogate had those babies, there is a question as to whether or not they're in the line of succession. Never complain and never explain was the late Queen's motto for royal PR. But Harry and Megan is more a case of never rain and never. abstain, especially when it comes to nauseating self-publicity, which invariably backfires.

After a series of high-profile flops, including Harry's disastrous polo series, and Megan's lifestyle show, they appear to be making a dignified retreat into irrelevance. Well, no such luck, actually. They're currently bombarding a tabloid machine with heartwarming snaps of their perfect California lives. This weekend, they shared tastefully obscured snaps of a family day out to Disneyland, and a week ago, they gave us this. To the T-A, double-a-k, to the east, doing my way. Prego, but I'm still doing moves like B-A. Yeah, I said, I'm pregnant, pregnant, give the child support and pay my rent, pay my rent.

Your opinion is irrelevant, irrelevant, because I'm a baby mama, I can do just what I want. Turn up. If she'll be a baby mama, she's going to get that baby mama. That's work. She's going to put it on you. She's going to get that baby mama drops, drop the time. Sometimes, I don't know, words seem to plove was really, Megan shared that bedside twerking video taken shortly, apparently,

before she gave birth to Lilibet. Remember the child that she named after the queen's private nickname was given to by Duke of Edinburgh, without getting permission and the queen. Anyway, it was to silence online trolls, apparently, who baselessly claimed she was never pregnant at all. Instead, the videos emboldened conspiracy theorists, they're calling it mexpiracy,

and the pair are being subjected to yet more merciless ridicule. So what will be next? A presidential campaign, a elite, sex tape, that can't be far away, or maybe a Freedom Flotilla from Montecito to the Gaza Strip with Greta Thumburg. But joining me to discuss all this, the host of Kinsey Schofield, Consensate Contributor Ava Santina, and comedian in inverted commas, James Barr. Great to see you all. I missed you too. I missed you guys. Love you to see you. Kinsey, I feel like Michael Corleone in Godfather 3, when he gets, he's tried to leave the bad stuff behind and go legitimate.

And then he gets dragged back in by an incident. And he just, every time I try, they just suck me back in. That's how I feel about these two. I don't want to talk about them. I feel like we shouldn't have to. And yet all the papers have been full of it for the last week. So here we are. And we're off again.

And it'll be, well, what do we say about this? Well, I've been dying to ask you, because I know, you spent time with Princess Diana and Megan. I saw Megan trying to recreate Princess Diana moments with the Disney pictures. Do you ever get the sense that she's trying to do that? Or do you see any of the real Diana in Megan? Did you? Oh, God, no. Really?

Fuck, no. Sorry. We are uncensored, but oh my God, the idea there's any comparison between Diana, who was the biggest star in the world, probably arguably, along with Donald Trump, the biggest star there's ever been. I'm sorry, you cannot compare Princess Diana to President Trump. That's outrageous.

You can in fame. I would say those two are the two most famous people I've ever seen. No, but isn't one fame and one, you know, infamy? Famous fame, right? Fam is how well-known are people. Trump, I've read somewhere that Trump gets the publicity oxygen in global media of the next thousand people in the world combined. Right.

So I'm purely basing it on that really. And he lives in the digital age, which massively increases fame. Well, you also see with Harry and Megan, they get, well, Megan specifically, her social media gets a significant amount more views than the Prince and Princess of Wales. But I think that it's all about spectacle. I think it's almost shameless. It's less about substance, which is what we do get from the Prince and Princess of Wales. And it's more about clickbait and generating her own headlines. Well, here's my thing.

James, all right, this is my problem with it. As always with these two, very much, just to remind people, because I did know her a little bit before she met Harry, and then she obviously ghosted everybody. She rejected you, right? Well, of course, she rejected me, yeah. Yeah, whatever. It doesn't matter what it.

Well, it kind of does matter, doesn't it? Well, not really. What do you think I actually tried to, what, do what with her? I have no idea. I wasn't there. So why would you say I was rejected? Well, what happened then? What happened? She asked to have a drink in my local pub.

I met her for an hour and a half. And then went back to my immeasurably better-looking wife. So the idea that somehow I was rejected by Megyn Markel is so utterly ridiculous. And yet people like you promote these scurrilous rumors. But there's got to be a reason that you're so angry. At your heart, no, I'm not angry with it. Here's my thing with them. I'm angry at their hypocrisy.

I'm very angry about the ongoing attacks and diminishing of the reputation of the royal family and the monarchy. And before you play, what about you? yes I was about Prince Andrew who had far more serious things that were going on with him yes I was on about other people who do it I believe in the monarchy and I love the royal family

and anyone that sets out to systematically destroy that brand as they've done and simultaneously make millions from fleecing their royal titles I find that I find that anger making yes you probably think I'm deluded but I think you can hold both of this

here's my question of you is that I was actually very supportive of right to the point they got married Most people were in this country. Their wedding day was a unified day of celebration. The media were unbelievably positive about them. And then after they got married, it all went wrong. And I've written a lot about this where I said,

what happened was they began to do things which appeared to be very hypocritical. And when they got criticized by the media in a way they weren't used to, they reacted very badly. And then the relationship with them and the media got increasingly toxic. And by the end of that first year, it was all held. breaking loose. But it became because they were doing things, if you remember, like they were using Elton John

and George Clooney's private jets like a taxi service when they were also preaching about carbon footprint. They tweeted about poverty and they need to take it more seriously and be aware of Poverty Day on Medea had a half a million dollar baby shower in New York, right?

And so on and so on and so on. You never say this about King Charles. No, no. I will. Don't play what about you. Don't play what about you. It's a fair point though, isn't it? It will be. We'll come to that in a moment. But on the hypocrisy front, I think that as all the royals get, they were criticised to hypocrisy. The difference is they went deafcom one because they couldn't handle it.

And then the relationship with the media broke down and then they left the country and so on. But why did they leave the country? They wanted freedom. They wanted their privacy. They wanted to be left alone. All of these things. Since then, he's carried on, you know, suing everyone that moves,

suing particularly over his personal security in the UK when he's hardly here, but to protect his family. And yet at the same time, here they are at Disneyland putting pictures up of their kids all over social media for millions of people to look at. Again, I simply say, James, it's the hypocrisy. It's nothing else. It's people don't like the double standard.

Firstly, I just want to say anyone at Disneyland taking a picture, they're not having a princess Diana moment. They're just having a moment with their family. So it's ridiculous. Why post it? It's ridiculous to suggest. Why post it if you care about... They are having a Princess Diana.

She also wasn't at Disneyland, and I think she was at Chessington in the UK. So it's a bit different. But she didn't cover their faces with emojis. What, Prince Harry and William? No, but that's to meet the media at their own game, right? Because then the mail can't publish it? Actually, you know, while we're on the mail, can I read you a headline after that twerking video went out?

The mail published, did they think twerking, like, trailer trash teens, would endear them to the public? You know, all of that conversation we had, I've had them with you many times, about there being no racism around Megan Markle. To me, that is a racist. Oh, do me a favor. It is.

How could that be racist? Because she's twerking. No, no, no, but it's the way. She was literally twerking. It's the way that they described it, like trailer trash teens. I mean, you know, twerking is a longstanding. You know, that is, that is emanated out of the atmosphere. What's racist?

Oh, do me a favor. But it is. It's ridiculous. It's ridiculous. It's ridiculous. It's ridiculous. It's ridiculous. Let me tell you.

The trailer chashes is the tiger king. Like, that is the definition of trailer trash in America. But to liken twerking to that, that is inherently, that has racist. No, bollocks. It does. Sorry, I'm sorry. Complete nonsense. It does. And this is a problem with it.

She would love that. She'll send you one of her pots and jamber that. Look, great. She's played the race card. That gets me off the rap. But it's true, Piz. You can't deny that this has all happened because of unconscious buyers running through the UK press. Oh, please.

All of this hate you were just describing painstaking me. No, it's not nonsense. Where was the racism on their wedding day when the British press combined to say how brilliant it was that we finally had a bi-racial royal wedding? So the rest of it doesn't matter. You're rather revisionist with that.

No, I'm not going back to look at the front page. If I remember correctly, in the days leading up to her wedding, her father was all over the tabloids. He'd sent her a letter which was then published in newspapers. And I know brides as they come up to their wedding. And to be honest, she actually handled that very well. Other brides I'd known would have flown off the handle. When you imagine having your life written out in the papers like that coming up to your wedding day?

Actually, only one thing was written out was the father who was banned from the wedding. Publishing. Publishing that. And he was replaced with Oprah Winfrey sitting in his chair. And all her family were banned. And now all his family about, look, you two always defend the infertive with these two. But my point is, it's the hypocrisy. Okay. Hang on, hang on.

I just want to come back. Answer my question. The question is, why put your kids all over social media? Because. If all you're banging on about, all. the time is wanting privacy and protection for those children. You should know this, Peers, as someone that works in journalism, there is a difference between the privacy that you decide to share with people yourself

and the privacy that is stolen from you. And you know for a fact that the British press... How does it protect their privacy by putting their pictures on Instagram? Because they're sharing a video that was taken four years ago online now, because they feel like they're happy to do so. And that's completely within their right. Just because my mom went on Facebook and did the ice fucking challenge. Talk about the kids at Disneyland.

Doesn't mean that you're now in time on time up. But they shared them with that. And their age... Disneyland were last week. Yes, but their faces were covered up. They were censors. Barely. Barely. And by the way, I have a real problem with somebody to do that.

Why? There's a few people that do that. They do endless pictures of their kids to show off their parenting skills. And they put little emojis on their faces like they're supposed to protect them. So either use your kids. I don't use them. To do this is pathetic.

No, so... Who's promoting who here? They are using their children to promote their parenting credentials. They are. Either protect their privacy and keep them out of it or don't. I don't. I also think you...

But you two don't even believe what you're saying. No, I just think that they've got agency here. That's the picture that they decided. And they know by putting those emojis. What does that mean agency to be hypocrites? No, no, no. It means that they know when they put those emojis on, it won't be sold to a tabloid.

A tabloid's not going to print that. And if it does... A tabloids all printed it. Yeah. Why? Because it's... It's so desperate the tabloids, are they? They'll print anything.

I just don't understand why you think that's an issue. But I also think you run the risk of weirdos, now being desperate to know what they look like because you're teasing them with these photos. You're using your kids to promote yourself. It's so dangerous to put a child's face on the internet. It's so dangerous to put a child's face on the internet. Why put them on there at all?

Explain to me. I would agree with that. But I agree with covering up the face. So you agree with me? No, with covering up the face, I think that's absolutely fine. Why put them on Instagram at all? Because they've got a business to promote.

When you're simultaneously campaigning. Because they've got a business to promote. To protect their privacy, why expose their privacy? No, but they're talking about agency in their privacy, right? Does that mean? So, so, so, because they won't. control over what is published. And I think that is totally fair.

They don't want tabloids like rooting through their bins. And that is fair enough. Why would promoting your kids on Instagram deter the paparazzi from coming in wanting to take pictures of your kids? I don't, well, I don't know. Why wouldn't it only encourage them? Why wouldn't it make them think, oh, right.

So you're turning your kids into a commercial opportunity. You want to profit from their exposure all over your Instagram. You want to get more followers, which will make you more money. You don't get the hypocrisy? No, but they've been forced to live a public life. Maybe not her so much, should take that about, but Prince Harry has been forced

to live a public life. Why should he not share pictures of his children and why should they not make a bit of buck off the back of it? He's not. It is Megan who's like simultaneously selling children's clothes through affiliate links on her Instagram page. She's got to make cash. She's allowed to do that. She's got to make

cash. I mean, how do you expect it to make money? She can't go and work in Azda. Like, what's she going to do? Why not? Come on now. She will be safe. She will. Imagine the security implications about that. red carpet that she was looking forward to being behind the scenes producing things like Meet Me at the Lake. But we have seen her step up. She's a podcast host now. She's a TV host. I think that she does like being in the limelight. And I do think she wants the children to

soften her image. You know what? None of it's actually working. That's the reality. The reason she suddenly got all thirsty on social media is that none of it works. But it's nobody cares about her jam. No one cares about her jam. She pretended it all sold out. Really? Maybe what you did was sell about three jars and claim it's a sellout, hoping that would fuel sales. Nobody cares. I imagine it would be sold down. Unless they're trashing the royals, nobody cares. I mean, people even buy those plates with like the king and queen's face on.

I imagine her jam. If they are the senior royals, the jam doesn't sell. She's now saying she's suspended production or something absurd. The whole thing, we know it's all crap. She's going to open a hotel, which I'll be looking forward to. Oh, come on, I am definitely going to be checking in. Really? I can't wait to visit that.

I'm going to go to the twirking classes. I don't see a problem with that at all. The twerk. Let's come back for twerking for a minute, which you say was racist. I mean, honestly, it's exhausting. No, no, it's a pair to trailer trash. That's the problem. Well, okay, what does trailer trash mean?

I don't know. You have to ask the mail a little to review that. When did it apply to black people? Hang on, when did it apply to black people? No, but in that twerking... Trailer trash does not mean anyone's ethnicity or colour. So why would you say it does? Whirking?

White people don't twerk? Only been in the Western consciousness, what, since 2013 when Miley Cyrus did it at the VMAs. So you accept it for the last 12 years at least? least it's being white people doing the twerking. Do you or not? But Megan is not. Do you or not? Megan is not a white woman.

So we've only, as her, said, by her twerking is trailer trash. Since Miley Cyrus in 2013. No, no, I'm saying that's when it entered like the Western consciousness. Why is it racist now when it's Mega Mark? Because you're saying that she's trailer trash for twerking. It was a columnist who thought she was trailer trash

because it was a very... Most people I saw come on to, he thought it was a very tacky thing to be putting out there? Do you think if Kate and William did this? Do you think that... You think they'd ever release it? If they did it? If they did you?

Do you think Kate would release a twerking video? Would people use headlines like that? He'd be pregnant at the bedside? Would people say things like that? The thing is, these two will sell anything about their privacy. And yet they'll fight privacy battle after privacy battle. It's total hypocrisy. I don't agree with that.

We've seen also just like the blatant misogyny about her pregnant. Because she's a woman. No, her pregnancy bump about whether it was real or whether it was fake and all those conspiracies. What's misogynist about that? What questioning someone's bump, whether it's real? You can question everything when somebody puts out of video like that. You can do what hell you like. I don't think that you don't think it was a fake bump. I think she was pregnant and had a baby. I think the tackiness comes from somebody who's a member

of the British royal family putting out a twerking, everly pregnant video with him dancing around like a wooden clown next to her. It's a little bit wooden, wasn't it? I mean, it could have been a bit better than. It's all just embarrassing. It's not embarrassing. It chips away. How anyone can watch that video and not think it is a couple who are in love sharing joy and trying to make their They're not to themselves, these private couples. Because they're public people. They're not, though, are they? They're not anymore.

Also, I think your tweet about a sex tape coming next is quite disgusting. Inevitable. And incredibly. Inevitable. How could you possibly need that? Why? Would you bet your lifetime saving? Yes.

There will be no sex tape accidentally leaked to turn it into the Kim Kardashian of the royal family. I would defend her releasing a sex tape. Remember, it's always accidental, isn't it? Honestly, if she wants to start on only fans, I'll be the first to sign up. Really? You think it would be great for someone who's the job. Duchess of Sussex. I don't think I care.

I don't think I care about the Royal Family. I do, peers. I was just trying to explain. Do you think sex work is beneath some people? Is that what you're arguing? Probably for a member of the Royal Family, yeah. I don't know about that. You probably shouldn't be a hooker.

Yeah. On balance, on balance, a member of the British Royal Family probably ought to steer clear of sex work. Yeah. I don't know about that. You don't know about that? You don't know about that? That sort of implies that, you know.

Eva, do you ever believe anything you actually say on this show? I didn't see. I think you talk about things like, you know, the state of poor people, and I believe you believe it, right? When you talk about stuff like this, I look into the soul of your eyes, and I see somebody who doesn't believe a word. Look, she's a hard defence, I have to say.

Yes, exactly. But I just, I do think the tabloid furor around her is uncalled from. Yeah, but the problem is, on a serious point, my thing about that is, like I said, I don't want to be doing another bloody segment on Mega Markler, Harry, right? except that they compel people to do it because what this show does, it covers the news, it covers what people's talking about.

If all the papers are full of her twerking and them going off to Disneyland and plastering emojis over their kids' faces whilst selling the kids on their social media and so on and bleating about privacy, it makes them newsworthy. So you either then ignore what people are talking about and debating and having all the silly stuff

about the fake bump and so on or you embrace it and we do a debate and it's always the same stuff, right? You two are never going to give any. inch. I'm never going to give an inch the other way. And it's like, I feel like we're losing time from our lives. We're never going to get back with these people. I would love

to see her more political. Oh my God. Really? I can't think of anything I'd rather less hear. Although actually for one reason I would, because she would get completely torched. She would be exposed as a rank hypocrite. If she became a political... Why would you want a woman

to fail like that, though? No, no, I wouldn't want to be fail. I do think they've got a very good... I'd like them both to run for office. My irritation, in a way, in a way, Megat Markle has gone back to live in California and she's living the life she probably wanted all along. A life of unparalleled luxury and riches that she got by marrying her handsome British prince.

She's living back in the state that she came from and she's got her chickens and her dogs and her kids and that's fine. I don't really care about her. He's the one that continues to cause enormous damage to the royal family because he's the king's son and he keeps whacking them away. The king won't even see him, Kinsey, because he doesn't trust him not to immediately go and brief People magazine

about the conversation. That, to me, is on a human level heartbreaking. But on a bigger level, it is damaging to the royal family. He's out there with his renegade royal, wanting his royal cake and eat it. That's my problem with him. She's kind of irrelevant now, right? She's backing LA or wherever she wants to be. It doesn't really matter what she does.

She just does stuff. It's embarrassing. he is the king's son. It is immeasurably more harmful what he gets up to it. Well, and a lot of the Royal Watchers were complaining that they felt like her posts on social media where she barely shows the kids is almost taunting the king who doesn't know these children and how unfair this is because he is the king, but he's also a man with cancer. And I think a lot of times we forget that he's battling cancer because he shows up every day

and works. and it does feel insensitive knowing that he's been struggling and not able to see his grandchildren. But can I just say, can I just say the bump argument, the reason that everybody's frustrated about it is because if Megan Markle did not have those children, and I'm with Pierce, I think she had her babies. But if a surrogate had those babies,

there is a question as to whether or not they're in the line of succession. And that is why everybody's all by. Obviously she gave birth, right? I don't think even these two would be up for creating a fake story like that. I just think, James, the problem is all of it, to me, is just chips away at the magic. We talked about Diana. Diana, for her faults, added to the magic of the royal family because she never actually attacked the monarchy as an institution. She believed in it.

Well, I don't know if they would agree with you at the time. I think they would say that she was attacking the monarchy. I think the things that they felt she was, I think at the time, not that I was really conscious of what was going on, but reading back on it, like, I think they were really unhappy with the way she was conducting herself. It's only now that you look at it and go, what a hero, but at the time, the royal family were really upset with some of the behavior that Princess. Well, they're upset about the divorce battle with Charles. Well, I would say he was equally culpable in that. I'd imagine they were judging her hugging victims of AIDS and HIV

at the time as well. And yet, that's one of the things that has made her such an international. So, Eva, on that point, it's quite interesting. To me, it's a question of how they go about these things. That felt, when Diana went to that hospital and shook the AIDS patient's hand, it was an unbelievably powerful moment. When she walked through the landmines of Angola, it was unbelievable. I remember doing the front page of the mirror.

Incredibly powerful and really did move the needle and stuff. What these two do is like there's a mass shooting in another state. And they get on a plane and they go and put themselves in there, putting their arm around people. No one's asked them to be there. It's not a planned trip. There's nothing official about it. They're just, as people call them, they're like grief tourists now.

They want to be associated with it to be a bit like Diana, but they don't do it in a way that it's anything else than cack-handed and looks grassback. But if they didn't go, then you would have a lot to say about it as well. No, I wouldn't. Who ever sees a mass shooting in America and things? What we really think is Megan and Harry to turn out. Well, when you think about one of the biggest travesties that's ever happened to London, which was the Grenfell Tower fire,

you think about the number of people who went down there, like Adele and Stormsy, and we said we really respect them for going down there. That's just what Megan and Harry are repopating. But they're celebrities. So are Megan and Harry? They're not. They're members of the Royal Family. See, but they're all celebrities too.

There's a difference. I think also, you seem to have a lack of empathy for Harry here. I do, yeah. You're saying that he's trashing the Royal Family. But what he's actually trying to do, I feel, is change the Royal Family and the system behind it. How do you think that's going? Well, it doesn't seem to be going particularly well, is it? But I know that News UK had to pay out 10 million.

recently to him. How happy do you think he is? Remember, he left for happiness. I'd imagine he's pretty unhappy. He left for freedom and happiness. I imagine he misses his family. He doesn't talk to his father. He doesn't talk to his only sibling, his brother.

He doesn't talk to his sister-in-law. He doesn't talk to most of his... But that is their choice. He doesn't talk to most of his other senior members of their family. And yet for some reason, he's the villain. She never sees her father who lives 70 minutes drive away. Her father's never met the kids. This is the father, by the way,

she lived with on her own for seven years. But we shouldn't know that information. Hang on. We know it because they actually had a televised wedding where we could see who was allowed to come. Yeah, but who published all of the letters the days before that? You know, we shouldn't know that. Her argument is you shouldn't be going through my personal information.

Harry has never met the father of his wife. And Harry published a lot of couples. Harry published private text messages in his book too. Harry published a response to the way the press is. handle his entire life. Harry is responding in kind. Just to be clear, he also revealed private conversations he had with Charles and William.

Because they have also revealed private conversations that they have had in his opinion through the press. And the funeral of Prince Philip. I think they're all as bad as each other. I kind of agree with Ava on that. I think it is a bit of tit for tat. You know the answer to this, it seems to me?

They should just do what I've said for a few years now. Just take the titles away. Let them get on with being Megan and Harry celebrities, Adele, whatever, right? Then you can do what you like. You could be judged accordingly, but you can do what you like. It's the problem. It's doing it under the umbrella of being the Duke and Duchess of Sussex,

him remaining in line to the throne. Because he was born into it. He was born. And you lot, you monochists really care about that for some reason. So you can't take it away from him. That's his lineage. I take away from all of them personally. What, you take away the monarchy?

See, that's the problem, isn't it? You don't care. You like the damage they cause because you actually secretly, you want to get rid of the monies. Monarchy? Look, they're a hard, they're a hard defense. He's a very wealthy people who live a very privileged lifestyle. And, you know, even the king, you know, usurping quite a lot of cash out of UK land, taking money away from our NHS, as we found out not so long ago. I don't really care for any of them. So I wouldn't mind if they all disappeared. As the American, I say that I admire

the monarchy because it gives you guys one thing that you can all rally around versus how polarizing our politics. Well, you have been colonized by the UK right now. So that doesn't I was surprised me. It takes it when an American has to fly the flag and you two turn up. And the nails as well. And the nails. Do you check out the nails? All right. Well, look, I wish we hadn't done that segment. But unfortunately, they suck me back in. I find them unbelievably irritating. But you know what? People seem interested in them. And they're going to keep doing what they're doing. We're probably going to keep talking about it. I wish I was stronger and could just ignore them. At the moment, that philosophy is failing. That struggle is real.

But I look forward to the day when that's it. We never mentioned. them again and I'm sure they feel exactly the same way about me. Unlike you three, I'd love to see again. It would love you to have you all back. Thank you. Thank you. Pierce Morgan Unsensit is proudly independent. The only boss around here is me. If you enjoy our show, we ask only one simple thing.

Hit subscribe on YouTube and follow Pierce Morgan Unsensit on Spotify and Apple Podcast. And in return, we will continue our mission to inform, irritate and entertain. And we'll do it all for free. Independent, uncensored media has never been more critical, and we couldn't do it without you.