Piers Morgan Uncensored - Trump Cuts, Musk Baby Drama + Boris Johnson Interview Ends Abruptly!
Episode Date: February 24, 2025With the prospect of a ceasefire in Ukraine and the runaway train that is Donald Trump’s cuts to the American budget, there is an electricity in the air of the western world. Could the fighting and ...dying in Eastern Europe be coming to an end? And is America finally going to get a handle on its trillions of dollars of debt? Piers Morgan speaks to former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Boris Johnson from Kyiv, who reiterates Europe’s support for Ukraine and responds to the accusations made against him by Tucker Carlson. Then, Piers speaks to Canadian businessman Kevin O’Leary, liberal influencer Joanne ‘Jojo from Jerz’ Carducci, tech and online culture content creator Taylor Lorenz, co-host of 'Verdict with Ted Cruz' Ben Ferguson and right wing commentator Jeremy Hambly AKA The Quartering for their takes on Trump’s aggressive budget cuts. American Hartford Gold: Protect your wealth with precious metals! Call American Hartford Gold today & get up to $15,000 in free silver on your 1st order! Call 866-692-2474 or Text PIERS to 65532, or Click the link below: https://offers.americanhartfordgold.com/piers-morgan/ Home Title Lock: Go to http://www.hometitlelock.com/piersmorgan and use promo code PIERS to get a FREE title history report so you can find out if you’re already a victim AND access to your Personal Title Expert —a $250 value— when you sign up! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Certains say, I've
thought to you.
The more
the more
us help to
and discover
more.
For the
Fet of
the Mere
the gift of
the first
personal with
Ancestry DNA.
Now,
just at
$75 dollars
of rabbe.
Explore
these origins
and the
parkour
that they
do they're
what they're
doing it
today today.
The offer
the offer
is the termine
the day
the time
for the
details
the conditions
can't
It's applied.
I say that I had some role in persuading the Ukrainians to fight for their country.
Great Beats, steaming life.
There is method in Donald Trump's madness.
The chainsaw for bureaucracy.
Chainsaw!
Big, huge cuts.
That's how you do it.
He's not cutting enough, frankly.
They're dripping with fat.
Elon Musk has now got 13 kids by four different women.
I don't love Elon creating infinite beings.
creating infinite babies with zero intention on being a father.
This shouldn't be litigated in public.
Elon is a dick boss, okay?
Five years ago, you ran into a fridge to avoid being interviewed by me.
I'm making amends by giving you the longest interview I've ever given you.
Anyway, take care.
Boris Johnson was British Prime Minister between 2019 and 2022,
placing him at the very hard of the global response
to two historic disasters, the COVID pandemic,
and Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Well, President Putin says that Johnson personally talks
Zelensky out of a peace deal in the very early months of the war,
something that Johnson has emphatically denied.
That deal reportedly involved Russia withdrawing to his position
before the full-scale invasion in exchange for Ukraine,
giving up NATO membership and receiving security guarantees from its allies instead.
Many influential US conservatives led by Tucker Carson
have accused Boris Johnson of therefore being culpable
in the subsequent loss of tens of thousands of lives.
Well, to answer for himself, Boris Johnson joins me from Kiev in Ukraine.
Boris, good to talk to you.
Hello, Pearce. How are you doing?
Yes, I think I caught your introduction just about.
And first of all, let me say how absolutely tragic it is to be here in Kiev
with this war still going on and how heroic the Ukrainians are.
They are going to win.
They will be successful.
But, you know, how ugly and unpleasant it is to hear some of the misrepresentations
that have come out of Washington in the last 10 days or so,
really peddling the Kremlin lines.
such as the one actually that you've just repeated.
Not that I'm suggesting you're endorsing it,
but saying that Ukraine was responsible, started this war,
saying that Zelensky is a dictator,
saying the Ukrainians could have done some deal
early on in this war, got the Russians out,
that wouldn't have involved a complete humiliation for Ukrainians.
It's just lies, it's just rubbish.
And it's very painful for people who care about Ukraine
actually know the fact.
to listen to this stuff. But, but, Pierce, you know, and I've seen some of your commentary on this,
I remain optimistic nonetheless that there is method in Donald Trump's madness and actually
that by shaking things up in the way that he is, he can continue to drive the process of peace
in Ukraine. And I'll just give you one example.
example, peers, look at what's happening with this deal now on resources.
Actually, it contains some great stuff for Ukraine. It's not yet agreed. It's the one that
the Americans proposed to the Ukrainians a few days ago. But the Ukrainians have done
very well in negotiating. It now has stuff in it, important stuff about American commitment
to a free, sovereign and secure Ukraine. American commitment to keep investing in the security
of Ukraine from the fund they set up. American commitment to financial support for the long-term
stability and development of Ukraine. Now, that is good, good language. And that is a great
commitment. Ukraine needs to be economically bound into the West, bound in to America, and this
agreement, this resources agreement, would help to do it. I think what's preventing the signing
of this deal, sadly, is some of the polemic, some of the rhetoric that we've done.
heard in the last 10 days. But I'm sure that it will get done. It will get done, I think, very,
very soon. When it happens, what we in the UK need to do is come in with strong support for what
Trump is trying to do to deliver peace and show how we are going to fulfill our obligations to Ukraine
by setting up with the French that European deterrent force in Ukraine boots on the ground,
And as Keir Starma has rightly said, not in a fighting capacity, but there to provide logistics
and training support, probably about 30,000 people. And that will show, not from the UK, but 30,000 all in,
that will show the Americans that we are actually serious in our concern, in our determination
to ensure peace and security in Ukraine. And that is actually what will, I think, encourage the Americans to remain committed.
So I, it's a grim situation.
It's terrible that the Ukrainians are still fighting.
But after three years of war, Vladimir Putin has not and will not conquer this country.
I continue, in the last year, all this nods and other lies that Putin is making inexorable process to progress towards victory.
It's a great big, big, fat, steaming, stinking lie appears.
In the last year, he's, I think, taken 0.5% of Ukrainian territory at a cost of about 4%.
120,000 troops. It is not going his way. He is not going to win. What we need is to, for Europeans,
and to dial down some of their anxiety, some of the rhetoric, everybody to dial down the rhetoric,
look at what Trump is actually proposing and do a deal that will guarantee Ukraine's security
for the long term and reflect the reality, which is, I think for Putin this war is basically
unwinnable.
OK, look, I concur with much of what you said there.
I said on ex earlier, I think you've been steadfast in your support for Ukraine from the
very start, and that's very laudable.
I felt exactly the same way that you have about this.
But there is this weird disconnect by many in America, particularly on the conservative
right, who do not share our view, who seem to think that Zelensky is the real villain
here, and that Putin was provoked into doing this to safeguard his own security.
because of NATO encroachment and so on.
No.
What do you say to that specific argument?
It's totally mad.
It's totally mad.
It's through the looking glass.
It's the complete opposite.
Putin was not provoked into this act of aggression.
His 115 battalion tactical groups that attacked from the north,
from the east, from the south.
They didn't have some fault in their sat-navs.
And the Ukrainians, frankly,
were completely innocent and did nothing to provoke him.
Nor did NATO provoke him, by the way.
You know very well, peers,
that the reality of Ukrainian membership of NATO then
was a cat's chance in hell.
There were going to be so many blackballs
who would have looked like sheep droppings, frankly.
The French would have vetoed it.
The Germans were going to veto it.
The Hungarians and the Americans certainly weren't going to pay.
It was never going to happen.
And now I think there's an overwhelming argument
for it. But before February 2022, it was absolutely never going to happen, not in a, not in, not in,
not in, not in a month of Sunday. So that is complete nonsense. And by the way, to say that I had some
role in persuading the Ukrainians to fight for their country is a great, it's obviously
totally implausible, but it's also a great big fat steaming lie. It's true I went to Ukraine early on in
in the conflict after they'd kicked them out of the Kiev area.
And all I said then was we're lost in admiration for what you have done, for the heroism
of the Ukrainian people.
But we can't be more Ukrainian than the Ukrainians.
If you have to do a deal in Istanbul or whatever, then obviously that's a matter for you.
What I said was if, on the other hand, you fight on, I just want you to know.
that we in the UK are going to do our absolute level best
to support you in any way that we can.
That's all I said.
And I think any UK Prime Minister, frankly,
would have said the same in my position.
Pierce Morgan Unsensored is now proudly independent.
If you like the show, we ask for only one thing.
Subscribe on YouTube and follow Pierce Morgan Unsensored
on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.
Now let's get straight to the point.
Support for today's show comes from a business focused on a critical issue.
Prosperity.
US national debt is at critical.
crisis levels, inflation has made life more expensive for everybody, and a stock market is precarious.
It's enough to make anyone's financial future feel grim.
So what is the solution?
Well, a simple one is to opt out of the chaos and invest in something solid and reliable, physical, gold and silver.
And there's only one name you need to remember, American Heart for Gold.
This company has earned a trust of thousands of customers with an A-plus rating from the Better Business Bureau
and glowing reviews you can see for yourself.
They offer an incredible range of gold and silver bars and coins that can be delivered directly to your door
or they'll help you set them up in a tax advantage gold IRA.
First-class customer service makes the whole process simple, secure and straightforward.
American heart for gold is committed to getting the truth out there and giving you peace of mind in uncertain times.
And if that wasn't enough, you've got up to $15,000 worth of free silver when you make your first purchase and mention my name, Peers.
So make the smart move.
Call 866-692-2474 or text peers.
That's P-I-E-R-S-2655-32.
That's 866-692-2474 or text peers to 655-3-2.
All the details are in the description.
Now on with the show.
Why do you think, Boris, I've been really confused
that if you went about 30 years,
the idea that anybody on the conservative right in America
would not be all in favor,
of supporting a sovereign, democratic, European country
in defending itself against a Russian dictator
would be unthinkable.
And yet now there is a significant number of people,
conservatives, Republicans in America,
who for some reason think that it's fine
that Putin has done this, and he was provoked,
and he should be able to take the land he's taken,
and that's it.
I don't really understand what has changed here in their thinking.
No, I think it's creepy.
It's creepy and...
It's bizarre, but I think there's always been a strain in America of isolationism.
And I think it's partly just a lack of enthusiasm for embroiling America in any European
theater of conflict.
And, you know, we saw that in the Second World War, two years before the Americans came in.
And as I pointed out many times before, one of the reasons why people are anxious in,
about this deal, the resources deal,
because they think the Americans are being too rapacious.
But remember what they screwed out of us, peers, in 1941.
1940, 94.
We were on our knees.
Britain was fighting alone against Nazism,
and the Americans still demanded,
as a price for Len Lease,
they demanded there was the bases for destroyers deal, you remember.
We had to give up a lot of our bases in the Caribbean.
We had to give them a base in Newfoundland.
They gave us a sort of a rust bucket destroyers.
It didn't really work.
And then we had to pay billions of dollars to America during the Second World War
when a billion dollars was really a lot of money.
In fact, we paid so much money to America that we stopped paying checks.
The UK taxpayer last wrote out a check to the United States
for the support we had in the Second World War under lend lease in 2000.
2006 when Ed Balls was economic secretary to the Treasury and Tony Blair was prime minister.
So what I'm trying to tell you is America, in my opinion, will continue to be the arsenal of democracy.
I'm no doubt that America is going to continue to support Ukraine.
But today, as always, American politicians, whether are on the right or wherever in Congress, they're setting a price on their support.
And just as they did with Franklin D. Roosevelt, they're constraining, as you rightly say,
they're constraining what I think Donald Trump wants to do.
I think, like you, I think his fundamental instincts are in favor of standing up to Putin
and in favor of a sovereign Ukraine.
I hope that is the case.
I think that is the case.
I think a lot of this is Trump being the dealmaker, which he's very skillful at,
and in putting America first.
Just spell out for me two messages.
One, for Donald Trump, what is your message to him?
You know him well.
You worked alongside him when you were British Prime Minister.
And secondly, Keir Stama, who's now your successor as Prime Minister in this country,
is going to the White House on Thursday.
What's your message for Stama when he's standing there next to Trump?
Yeah, so my message to Donald Trump would be what I've said to him repeatedly.
Look, his commitment,
Pete Higgs' commitment to a sovereign, free, secure Ukraine.
That is the key thing.
Everything flows from that.
That's great.
Keep focusing on that.
Putin can't live with that.
Putin's eventually going to lose this thing.
Donald Trump is doing the right thing to focus on a sovereign Ukraine.
Stama needs to go out and show how we, the UK, with the French, are going to provide that
deterrent force to help the valiant, valiant, heroic Ukrainians to turn their country into a
steel-quilled porcupine that is basically indigestible to any future attack by Vladimir Putin.
That's what we need to do.
And when it comes to deal...
One last question, Boris.
When it comes to dealing...
Thank you.
No, I've got to go.
I'm so sorry.
Thank you.
Take care.
One last thing.
One last thing before you go, Boris.
Which is just...
Five years ago, you ran into a fridge to avoid being interviewed by me.
It's a long time to spend in a fridge.
I'm now in a glorified fridge.
Did you get hyperthermia...
Did you get hyperthermia?
I'm not making amends by you being, I'm making amends by giving you the longest interview I've ever given you in a place that is substantially colder than the most domestic fridges.
Anyway, take care.
All the best, Boris.
American homeowners are at risk of a growing real estate scam, which the FBI calls house stealing.
This is how it works.
Criminals forge your signature on just one document, use a fake notary stamp, pay a small fee, and then file it with your local recorder's office.
Like that, your home title is transferred out of your name.
Scammers can then take out loans, using your equity as collateral, or even sell the property
behind your back.
You won't even know it's happening until you start getting collection or foreclosure notices.
When was the last time you check your home title?
I own a home in the United States, and the answer for me is never until now.
That's why I trust home title lock.
The million dollar triple lock protection helps keep your home and equity safe.
Here's what you get.
immediate 24-7 monitoring of your property, urgent alerts if there are any changes,
and if fraud does happen, their US-based restoration team will spend up to a million
dollars to fix the fraud and restore your title at no additional cost. I've teamed up with
Home Title Lock to give you a free Title History Report so you can find out if you're already
a victim and get access to your personal title expert, a $250 value just for signing up.
Go to Home Titlelock.com and use the promo code Peers or just click on the link in the description.
Make sure you check out the million-dollar triple-lock protection details when you get there.
That's Hometitlelock.com, promo code Peers, P-I-E-R-S, to get the protection and peace of mind that you deserve.
US government employees have until midnight tonight to reply to email asked him to list their achievements in the last week.
Elon Musk says that failing to reply will be considered a resignation.
Democrats are outraged.
The union called it cruel and disrespectful.
But his part, Maska said,
it should take no longer than five minutes
and that it's a basic test
of whether millions of federal employees
have a pulse
and are even reading their emails at all.
Well, Doge continues to phase
legal and political challenges
to its aim of stripping billions
from the federal budget.
Elsewhere, President Trump
has fired six top military officers
and what has been dubbed a purge of the Pentagon.
At MSNBC has canceled Joy and Reid
and what I'm dubbing a
purge of the, well, let's just say, I thought she was utterly useless.
Plenty to debate with my panel.
Canadian businessman, investor and Shark Tank star Kevin O'Leary,
Joanna Carducci, also known as Jojo from Jurs,
publisher of the UserMag Newsletter on Substack, Taylor Lorenz,
and the co-host of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Ben Ferguson.
Well, welcome to all of you.
Good to see it.
Ben, let me start with you.
I must to kick things off.
I mean, I've got to say, there's so much stuff coming out of the White House.
It's almost impossible to keep up with it.
There's a kind of electric dynamic energy to it,
which is very infectious, which I wish we had over in Britain, I have to say.
But at the same time, it's alarming people.
It's unsettling people.
We've never seen this kind of thing before.
And some of it I really agree with, and some of it I don't.
We'll come to it later, but I really hate the way that both Trump and Elon
have been going after Zelensky in such a personal manner will come to that.
But I love what they're doing with Doge.
So let's start with Doge.
You know, I think that the whole principle of someone like Elon Musk,
the most successful business guy in the world right now,
taking his expert sway right through federal spending
and unearthing so many obviously egregious wastes of money,
I can't imagine most Americans, and by most, I mean a significant majority,
are not cheering from the rooftops.
Yeah, they are.
And part of this comes down to the account.
in the private sector.
And like the email is a great example of this.
The fact that there's so many on the left
and the Democrats and Union that are triggered saying
this is like an abusive email and that it's mean
spirit and evil is going to trigger people,
then clearly you need to leave your job.
Welcome to what Americans deal with
in the private sector every day.
This wasn't a mean email.
If you've read it and I've read the email,
talked with Elon at CPAC and look, he's saying,
It is time for accountability.
What the hell did you do in your job in the last five days?
Tell me what you're doing so that we know if you even read your emails or you even exist in this fear of no one coming to work in the federal government into office buildings.
And they come out and they say the left comes down and they're like, well, this is somehow just evil.
I mean spirit.
Act like an adult.
Grow up.
You don't wear a diaper anymore.
You're an adult.
And the private sector I have to answer every day.
You do too with ratings for this show.
If your ratings go down, there's accountability for that.
You and I are judged in the harshest way.
I've never gotten the corner and cried.
I've never called a lawyer or a union representative to protect me.
It's the real world.
And when you are a taxpayer, it is time for you demand accountability for your tax dollars.
That's all the Imam Musk is doing.
And anyone that's afraid of this, please don't respond the email.
Do not show up for work.
We don't need you.
Yeah, I mean, Taylor, I mean, what's wrong with anything Ben just said?
Yeah, I mean, listen, I am all for more accountability and more limited government.
you know, in many ways. I just don't know that creating more red tape and this email system is the
most efficient way to restrict the government. I mean, it just doesn't make any sense. Who's
going to read these emails? Like you're just creating more work and also what if people are out?
What work is not a problem? This is not red tape. It's a simple question. If you're in POS, I'm assuming
you have one of them. Who's going to read them and evaluate all of these emails? If he's going to interrupt her,
Can I interrupt him?
Because I mean, I would like to make a point because this, I mean, if we're going to interrupt each other, let's just go there.
Because what you said was hectic and frenetic peers.
And by the way, I just want to take a moment and acknowledge that you and I agree on what's going on with Donald Trump and Elon Musk painting Zelensky as a dictator.
And I cannot believe it.
It's a cold day in hell that we agree.
But I just wanted to acknowledge that because I appreciate you saying something that is factual in that regard.
This is not hectic or frenetic.
This is chaotic.
And that email came through on a Saturday night, and as Senator Tina Smith said,
Elon is a dick boss, okay?
Half of the people that it was sent to were not even checking email on a Saturday night.
Some of them are park workers who don't check their email on a regular basis.
Some of those people had information that was sensitive that they shouldn't be sharing over,
you know, an open server like that.
And Elon sent that email out without the agency heads even knowing it was going out,
didn't consult with them at all.
And now most of them have said to those employees,
not respond to this email. That's actually not true. Red tape. It's not true. It's not true.
Even Tulsi Gabbard said to be even Tulsi Gabbard said not to say I can explain to you the email.
Cash Mattel and Tulsi Gabbur made it very clear. Literally. Take your words. Again, again,
I was just at CPAC. I actually know these people. I know cash well. And what they said in the
email was to their staff was hey, yes, okay, good. Do not respond. Let me finish. Do not respond back to this
email you're going to go to your direct superior and respond to them so there's a chain of command here
because some of these people deal with national security but the idea that you're you're you're
treating adults like coddled little children saying they don't check their email everybody's got a damn
phone i check my email all the time if you're such a little wuss that you can't check a phone
i i'm sorry do you work in the national parks you don't are you don't deserve to have the job like you can hire
them. If this is who you guys want to hire,
people, they're like, oh, I can't check my email
till Monday, then you hire them, and you'll
have a failure of a business.
But in the real world, you check your
damn email by... I'm going to say, I'll
stop shouting a minute. In the real
world, we have chains of command. Oh, hang on.
I'll come to Kevin now. We do in the government.
Okay, here's my point, I would make.
I've got a, you know, not a massive
team of people here, but if one of
them complained about getting
an email over a weekend, for example,
I would know instinctively, and they're all probably listening to me, but I would know instinctively they're not right to work on this show.
You know, we're not a five, we're not a nine to five Monday to Friday show where you clock off and that's it.
We're an all-consuming organic YouTube channel, which has no real-
union and their lawyers.
Yeah, but I understand this idea that you were being a tap.
This idea you'd be traumatized by an email on Saturday.
Because there was no chain of command.
Well, let me bring in Kevin.
Let me bring in Kevin.
But, if one of your producers were to do that without consult.
with you. If they were to send your employees an email on a Saturday night without consulting with you.
And if your employees then said to you, I don't know what I'm supposed to do here.
I probably promote them.
That sounds kind of chaotic to me.
Who's going to even read these emails?
I mean, a chain of command seems like a big way of conducting.
If one of my employees was working on a Saturday night, as many of them do, by the way, we met.
We often worked through weekends.
If one of them did that off for an initiative, great.
Kevin, you've employed a lot of people.
What do you make of this of this whole debate around Elon's email, first of all?
For the average American voter, and we know that they, on a majority basis, put Donald Trump in power, they don't give a damn about this.
They actually don't care about anything other than making sure that a lot of these claims are verified.
And so if Elon runs around and says, look, there's 500 million wasted here and 200 million wasted here, that's very disconcerning.
Trump has a 24-month mandate now before midterms.
he's doing all this very quickly because he knows, come the midterms, he may not hold a majority anymore.
But frankly, nine out of ten Americans think this is a very good idea.
And there's something to be considered here from the real world, as we've been talking about the real world.
When you are in a turnaround situation, and I invest in these and have for 30 years, you go into a bankrupt organization and you cut as much as you have on the spreadsheet at the beginning plus 20 percent.
And why do you do that?
Because you don't know what you don't know.
And you want to do the cut all at once.
Big, huge cuts so that you don't have a situation where every two weeks you're letting more people go.
You want the impact to occur all at once.
Then you hire back to fill in the holes of one of the mistakes you made.
That's how you do it.
And that's what I wish Elon was doing because he's not.
He's not cutting enough, frankly.
These organizations have been growing for a long time.
decades without ever being trimmed they're dripping with that and i think there's a lot more work to be
done here but this email chain thing nobody cares it doesn't matter and if these employees actually
aren't reading their emails whether it's saturday night or monday morning they should be fired
because maybe they haven't been reading them for months or years nobody knows and do they really
not going to an office nobody knows well there's even a theory that some of them might not be
alive but are still receiving paychecks um and kevin you said this you said keep slashing keep slashing keep
hacking while you have this 24-month mandate you just alluded to, cut, cut, cut, cut,
more more cutting. Believe me, it's going to work out great. What's interesting about what he said
about Elon Musk, when he bought X for 40-odd billion dollars, the very first thing he did on day
one was I think he fired half the workforce, 7,000 or so people. And guess what? X carried on
coming out and was fine. And now it looks like, according to the reports.
The company's worth half of what it was when he bought it. I was about to come to that, Taylor.
Substack has more downloads now than Twitter.
I was about to finish my sentence to say that reports in the last few days are that the valuation of X is now believed to be as big as what you pay for it, if not more, because Sony blue chip companies are coming back to advertise.
X is the example.
Hang on, I'll come to you guys.
Kevin responded, I'll come to you.
I promise.
Listen, the measure of what X is worth is what the debt, that's the proprietary stack on the balance sheet.
It's trading at parity again.
It was down as low as 40 cents after he slashed 7,200 employees.
Now it's back.
That's an example of how it works.
And it's back in less than three years.
And so at the end of the day, the same thing should happen in the government.
And the big agencies, he hasn't even started with yet, the military, the Pentagon.
Now, what they get to say in past decades is always, well, you can't touch our budgets.
We're defending the country.
We are opaque.
We're not transparent.
They're pushing all that aside.
They want to see where the billions go, how they're used, and how it's measured in terms of success.
I think there's a lot of money wasted there, and we're going to find that out, too.
But remember, it's all going to happen in two years.
So you talk about breakneck speed, there's a reason.
And everybody should just chill out.
Don't worry about it.
Because this is the only way to do it.
Cut deep, cut hard, and then hire back to fill the holes.
That's what he's doing.
And by the way, they were compassionate when they sent out of email.
On FBI agents that need years of training.
Peers, they were compassionate on the front end of this
by sending an email out offering a massive severance
if you wanted to leave the government
and not come back to work in an office.
Something that the private sector would never offer
to millions of employees.
So for all of these people that are crying in the corner,
you should have taken the bailout.
You should have taken the payout.
You should have walked away
when you had a stupid good deal
in front of you knew you were a lazy person and you didn't want to check an email.
All right.
Well, most of our money is the military.
So let's see if you're getting those.
Don't talk over each other.
Let's go to Taylor first, then Joja.
I was just going to say most of our money goes to the military and defense contract.
And I totally agree.
Actually, the debt.
Well, okay.
But I'm saying like, it goes to debt.
We have more debt servicing than we do military.
Let her talk.
Could you say.
Stop being so rude.
I don't think anyone.
It's bad information to say that the military is going to go.
Time out, please.
It goes to what Kevin was talking about.
If you all talk at the same time, nobody can hear you.
Why do you need to be hurt?
If you all talk at the same time, no one can hear you.
Taylor, finish what you wanted to say.
Taylor's turn.
Jojo, I'll come to you and then I'll let them respond.
Taylor first.
I don't think, look, I don't think anyone here would dispute that we spend quite a bit of money on the military, okay, no matter what you think of that.
Now, I would love to see Elon must come in with his chainsaw and do some.
similar cuts on that float. I think we all have parts of the federal government that we would like to see cut
quite indiscriminately. I just think this is an inefficient way to go about it. I don't know who's reading these emails. It seems inefficient. I think Park Rangers are not going to be checking their email. Like sure, how would you do? No.
But in a more strategic way. I think performance reviews are great. I generally want to know. I think I really do. Okay. I think performance reviews are great. I think allowing people who are managing some of these people that actually have
knowledge of what they're doing saying, hey, look, you have to cut X amount and doing it more
strategically. I think this is kind of messy and honestly inefficient. But look, I would love to
see similar cuts. It should also go through the chain of command. Okay, Jojo.
The way you're describing, it's what we've been doing, and it's a disaster. I want to.
Let Jojo go. We do have systems in place. I'm sorry, Taylor, that you did not get to finish
most of your answers. I guess the guy who's on the podcast with Ted Cruz doesn't get enough
time to talk. But I just wanted to say, back to the idea of nine out of ten Americans being
in support of these doge cuts, I don't know where Kevin got those numbers, but maybe somebody
on Shark Tank manufactured them in front of you. They're not real. Because actually, polling has
revealed that Donald Trump is underwater. And if you've seen the news lately, you've also noticed
that in red districts all over the country at town hall meetings, Americans in very ruby red
districts are voicing their displeasure and dissatisfaction with the state of things.
as they are right now, and they're wondering why Elon Musk has been given this sort of tyrannical
rain that they didn't vote for. This is not wildly popular. I'm still waiting for anybody on this
panel to tell me when the winning starts, because I'm thus far looking around going, we don't,
we don't seem to have any winning. You're just looking at cuts. It's okay. I mean, I would say,
I don't have a, hang on, Jojo, I don't have a horse in the race, but only this morning.
Apple have apparently guaranteed Trump, and it's all been announced,
that they're going to put half a trillion dollars, I think it was, into the...
Is that right? I can't remember the exact figure.
Was it a half?
Kevin, you probably know.
How much is Apple putting in?
Just under half a trillion.
Right.
But it's a staggering...
Into what?
It's a staggering investment in America, which wouldn't have happened,
probably, if Trump hadn't had the meeting with Tim Cook from Apple.
So you say there's no winning going on.
There is a lot of...
Hang on, Judge.
Hang on, there's a lot of money pouring into America,
which was being outsourced,
which is coming as a result of all these Murrilo-Lago meetings
that Trump was having with all the tech guys,
and they're all doing what he wanted.
They're bringing jobs back to America.
The opening factories in America.
That's a big win, isn't it?
Are they?
Yes, literally.
Yes, they are.
Yes, they are.
You should enjoy that.
You should accelerate.
That's Americans that are going to get jobs.
This gentleman just doesn't stop.
In the meantime, if I may answer,
to respond to what Pierce said. No, you just like to hear your voice. Can you just sit down and just wait a second like a good boy? And they say that jobs aren't coming back. That's a lot.
Who raised you? Rude is lying to the American people and people watching.
All right, don't talk over each other.
Jojo, just answer my question, Jojo.
I would just like to say.
Jojo, you asked what winning, Jojo, you asked what winning, Jojo, you said what you're waiting for the winning, I would say that Apple committing half a trillion dollars to American investment is a big win, right?
And that happened today.
I was going to respond.
I was going to respond to you.
In the meantime, peers, eggs are 53% more expensive than they were a year ago.
consumer confidence is down.
Inflation is higher than it was in the last six months of Joe Biden's term.
Who do you blame for that? You're going to blame Biden for that?
Yes.
I'm going to blame Donald Trump.
I mean, this is what, where's the buck's up, sir?
You're going to blame the guy who's been in charge for one month?
You're not going to blame the guy who's at the helm?
Hang on, you're going to blame the guy who's been in charge for one.
Hang on.
Hang on.
The guy's been in charge for one month is responsible for the last year.
Is that your position?
This is, what is remarkable to me is that every,
Every time Donald Trump gets into office, your steadfast inability to hold him accountable for anything when he is at the helm is remarkable to me.
He wasn't responsible for COVID.
Let me ask.
All right.
Let me ask.
Oh, so at what point does the buck stop with the president of the United States?
You know what?
No, I'm a realist.
If you understood inflation in prices, you would understand that it's not his fault in 30 days.
Joe Biden didn't inherit Donald Trump's economy.
Why don't we go to the financial?
Somehow Donald Trump inherited Joe Biden.
All right.
And then go to the financial expert on the panel, which is Kevin.
Kevin, just explain to Jojo the reality, perhaps, of an economy
and how long it takes to do stuff which actually kicks in.
Yeah, the facts about eggs and protein inflation, gas, and rental housing inflation,
have nothing to do with Trump.
He's only been there for six weeks.
The reason we still have inflation over 3%, which is 33% higher.
than the Fed's target of 2% and why they won't be cutting rates again this year is because
we did four massive multi-trillion dollar packages during Biden's administration, including the
Inflation Act, the Chips Act, the Infrastructure Act, and much of that money is still sloshing
around the economy. This was printing money and pouring it out of a helicopter onto the economy.
We probably spent two trillion...
Kevin, impression was lowering. It was lowering at the end of...
of Biden's term. It was not increasing. It is going up now. You're telling me that those things
that were in place before. Inflation was going down, Kevin. I don't need to be an economic expert.
For somebody who hates interrupting, you interrupt a lot. Why don't you let Kevin finish?
I do apologize. I just want to correct some things as he said. Let Kevin finish.
Look, Jojo, let me think of this. But you didn't stop the other guy.
Okay, I'm stopping you, Kevin. You can't reduce inflation in six weeks.
Maybe two years from now, eggs will be where they were at the beginning of whenever you want to count the pricing.
It's a long haul.
The economy is flush with cash, free money, including billions to student loan forgiveness.
All of that stuff is inflationary.
And look, I'm not blaming or saying good or bad.
That's what Biden did.
He is responsible for the inflation.
It's his.
He owns it.
Now, six weeks in, we're seeing a lot of programs.
And the best way to reduce inflation, frankly, and help the country
would be to take all of these savings, not send them out to checks.
If these dozen savings are true, don't send out $5,000 checks.
We don't need that.
We need to pay down debt.
That's the number one issue right now.
And that's the pressure Congress is going to put on Trump.
Use these savings to pay down debt.
Okay. JoJo, your response.
Pierce, could I ask this question?
Yeah, I just don't understand why Kevin is not.
not dealing in the reality of the fact that inflation was going down. At the end of Joe Biden's
term, it was lower and consistently lowering than it is now. It has gone up to, I think, June of
2024 levels. So how is it that you're going to attribute this inflation to Joe Biden while
Donald Trump is in office and discount tariffs, etc., discount, all of those inflationary
programs? I don't understand how you're associating this increase in inflation.
to Joe Biden when it was going down at the end of his...
All right. Let me just don't understand.
Let me say this.
Okay, number one, if you look at the numbers that they changed,
the employment numbers in November, December,
they have changes to them.
That's number one.
Whose fault is that?
That would be Joe Biden's economy then.
If you go and look at it, I don't know why that's confusing
or you have that weird face right now.
They change numbers all the time,
and they say, hey, we thought we added X number of jobs,
and we actually didn't.
They also change inflationary numbers as well.
I don't understand how that's so hard for you understand.
But again, this goes back to what Doge is doing.
And if you look at Doge, we have more spending per month on servicing the debt of the money we borrowed in this country than DOD spending.
And so I'm not sure what you're fighting against.
If we have a bankrupt company, and that is the United States of America right now, there's no one that would invest in.
If it was a private company, it would have gone under.
We're trillions of dollars in debt.
There should be slashes and cuts everywhere.
The president inherited a terrible economy with insane inflation because of all the free money.
Let me ask you, Ben. Ben, let me ask you.
Let me ask you a board.
Hang on, Ben.
Let me ask you a question then.
When should we be judging Trump on the status of the American economy?
When should we judge him on the inflation rate, for example?
In other words, at what point does the Biden effect come sweeping through and actually it's all on Trump?
When you talk to economists, most of them say it's 12 to 16 months before you get a real window of what is taking place now and how it's affecting the economy.
But there's many out there that they just want to win.
So they go to the egg prices, for example, which was a problem with flu and everything else that we know about.
The killing of many of the chickens and the hens, that's part of the problem.
We saw prices go up.
Now, was the president done?
He said we got to lower the price of grain.
We got to lower the price of gas.
We got to lower the price of production.
And we've got to do what we can to help the prices come to.
down. But you got to understand, there are some people, it's not really about helping Americans.
It's about scoring political points. And you've seen that today. They want there to be bad news
in American sufferings. They can point and say it's Donald Trump's fault in six weeks,
which is insane. And I think they know it, but it's pushing a political agenda over what's
okay, but all I would say, hang on, all I would say is that they're actually doing exactly what you guys
would do if it was the other way around, just for the record. No, I wouldn't do that in six weeks.
It's not true.
I would.
I would have been quick question.
Ben Ferguson, I've known you.
God, how long have I known you?
I've known you 15 years.
I know you.
We're both getting old, my friend.
Let me bring in Taylor.
Taylor, I want to show you a clip.
This is from the seat back.
This is where Elon Musk goes mad with a chainsaw.
This is the chainsaw for bureaucracy.
Change saw.
Game likes game, right?
Game knows game, right?
Game knows game, right?
I'll tell you, it's game.
The gentleman sitting in the White House, Donald J. Trump,
it's a glorious day.
Days of thunder.
Days of thunder and years of lightning.
Every day is Christmas Day.
Every day you get more executive voice, more executive actions.
It's not going to stop, and we're not going to retreat.
We're not going to surrender.
We're not going to quit.
Fight, fight, fight.
So there were two things there, Taylor,
which might have concerned people.
One is Elon Musk going berserk with a chainsaw,
which is given to him by President Miele of Argentina.
And obviously, we all got the point.
He's taking a chainsaw to federal overspend.
But it was a weird scenario on stage there.
Someone loved flying around with that chainsaw,
looking slightly bonkers.
And I would argue that Elon may not even realize this,
but he may be sucking up a little too much attention
for Donald Trump's liking.
But we'll come to that particular ego issue later.
The second point was the arm signal which Steve Bannon made at the end,
which he would argue is a deliberate attempt to wind up the libs.
Many people think was a fascist salute and wasn't even an accident.
And that following on from what Elon did,
which I do not believe was a Nazi salute for a moment,
that actually there's a fine line between winding up the libs
and actually embracing or encouraging genuine fascists.
So what are your thoughts on these two things?
First of all, chainsaw Elon.
I think it's bizarre.
I mean, I think Elon just wants,
he's dressed in like the Doge father outfit.
I feel like he just, I mean,
he just wants to perform for the cameras and drive headlines.
I don't even think he knows how to turn on the chainsaw.
I think he's kind of an apt and just seeking attention,
and I think ultimately that might be his downfall.
And anept billionaire.
Got it.
Yeah, I mean, he is.
Richest man in the world, totally enough.
Good point.
Inept, in terms of, in terms of his ability to communicate.
He's just out, like, what is he even saying?
I'd actually prefer to hear him talk about Doge in any sort of coherent way
rather than waving a chainsaw.
I think he's seeking headlines.
I don't think whatever.
Anyway, I don't really care about that or have a, you know,
he goes off and performs and wants headlines.
That's what he's doing.
And by the way, that's what Bannon's doing too with his, like, you know,
salute gesture or whatever you want to call it.
It's just an attempt to garner attention.
And like you said, troll lives.
I think it's quite concerning because actual neo-Nazis interpret those hand gestures
in a certain way.
And you're seeing those people celebrating
this hand gesture becoming normalized.
I think that whatever, it is a Nazi,
like it is reminiscent of a Nazi salute.
If you don't consider it a Nazi salute,
we all know what a Nazi salute looks like.
I think normalizing that hand gesture right now
in this climate is incredibly irresponsible and stupid.
Yeah, I mean, Ben, you know,
I think that when Musk did it,
he probably was done innocently,
is my honest view about that.
He meant it from the heart to them.
I got that.
But when people start doing it afterwards very deliberately, you know that that's not an accident.
They're making a deliberate point.
Now, they might be being funny, as they would put it.
But you can.
If there are too many people on the MAGA right who start doing this, it will encourage people who are attracted to political groups who may be genuine fascists to say, hey, these guys are my guys.
That's not a good thing, is it?
Look, I had dinner Friday night sitting next to Bannon.
And if you're a guy like Bannon who was attacked by the government and found in contempt and dragged off to prison the way he was,
and then you see a media which goes after Elon Musk because he waves at a crowd and says it's a Nazi salute,
which everyone, including you, Pierce knew was not.
Would I want to troll them because I have a different perspective because of what happened to me?
Yeah.
Is he mad?
Sure he is.
Is he ready to fight back?
Yes. Was he willing to go to jail over it?
Absolutely.
Should he be doing it?
Was he persecuted by the government?
Yes, I wouldn't do it.
I can say that.
But Bannon has a different perspective, which is it is absurd that they attacked Elon Musk because they're so afraid of the guy actually saving money.
They say, oh, he did a Nazi salute.
So is he trolling them?
I'm sure he is.
And I don't blame him for being that angry, honestly.
No, but it's interesting.
It's interesting.
All right.
Hang on.
Hang on.
Interesting that you admitted you wouldn't do it yourself.
itself, though, and I'm good, it's glad to hear.
Jojo, I mean, I think there is
an issue. If they keep, if people keep doing this
from stages, representing
Trump and the MAGA movement, I think
it is going to backfire. I think you're going to start
seeing some ugly stuff go on with genuine
fascists coming out saying
these are our people.
I agree, and Taylor's
exactly right. You know,
the neo-Nazis and the fascists,
they're perceiving it as a message
to them. So it is worth
noting that. But also, think about
trolling. Like, you're trolling somebody by making a reference to Nazis who, you know,
these are the people responsible for the Holocaust. The media made the first reference to Nazis
or the UN Musk and you know he didn't do it. Once again, I was in the middle of a sentence.
Thank you. I think your argument about interrupting Jojo, with respect, your argument about,
yeah, it's gone. Hang on, your argument about interrupting Jojo was slightly diminished by the way
you interrupted Kevin, just for the record. Oh, peers, are we going to move past that now and continue
you to let this? We are if you don't start interrupting. You've now corrected me in the midst of being
interrupted instead of correcting the men we're interrupting. I'm kind of bored of people who I kind of
bored of people to make a big deal of being interrupted then interrupting people then playing
the victim then playing the victim about being interrupted.
You moved on from the interrupting. You corrected me instead of here. All right, Kevin, let's
let's just let's call a spade. Let's bring Kevin. I want to finish, I want to finish and
referencing Nazis because as you know, peers, what
we're looking at with Putin on the march right now in what is happening in potentially happening
in Europe to then that, the correlation between that and trolling people by using that symbol,
make no mistake.
We know what's happening right now.
And it cannot be normalized.
You yourself would know that and agree.
You said you wouldn't do it.
And I forget the gentleman's name on the right.
He said he wouldn't do it, but he never said why.
He never said why he wouldn't do it.
And we all know why he wouldn't do it, why nobody on this.
It's self-explanatory.
I wanted to say that.
It's self-explanatory because I don't want to be connected with Nazis.
But no, like, it's saying I wouldn't do it.
And the fact that you need some sort of explanation.
And I'm happy.
But Steve Bannon is mad enough?
He should be able to do it?
You asked a question.
I'll answer it.
I already explained why I think Steve Bannon did what he did.
And for everyone else watching, I apologize.
You guys are going to have to tune out for 30 seconds.
So I explain this very simply to one human being.
And I apologize because you guys understand.
Well, no, Ben, Ben, it's a legitimate question.
just explain very quickly why you wouldn't do it.
Because I don't ever want to be connected to anything that would look like,
aiding abetting people that are Nazis that want to take out Jews who I stand with
and the people of Israel who are under attack right now.
That's just not my style.
But I agree with you.
I agree with you.
I agree with you.
I agree with you.
That's just not my style.
I agree.
But that is something that I think that memo is not getting received.
Let me bring in Kevin on this.
I mean, Kevin, from a leadership point of view,
If you were Donald Trump, how comfortable are you about the constant attention-seeking stuff by Elon Musk?
Does it matter? Would you care? Is he stealing oxygen that maybe you would want to limit to the president?
I mean, how do you feel about that, first of all?
They've already addressed that. Elon Musk does not have any executional mandate.
He can only make recommendations as a special government employee. That's the designation he has.
There's others in the White House that have that designation.
It gets around the lobby laws that exist.
They don't have to abide by them because they're doing direct work for the government through the executive.
That's technically what's going on.
But he's addressed it in multiple interviews as recent as last week.
There's a lot of criticism about this, and I understand it.
When you look at social media combined with traditional linear and cable media,
You've always got to assume 2.5% lunatic fringe, and we have that here for sure.
Now, the issue is more or less, you've got someone with an incredible track record.
Elon Musk has an incredible track record.
He's probably the most successful entrepreneur in modern times.
And he has 24 months to do what he's doing.
You either think it's a good idea or you don't.
You're not going to change your mind.
I submit that the majority of the population is intrigued to get the information about
about how much waste there potentially is.
How it gets implemented and how you execute on it
is that the purview, that only can be done by Congress.
So while everybody's going crazy talking about this,
the actual processing of these cuts,
including the big prize, which would be the Pentagon,
has to be implemented with surgical precision
through Congress.
And that's what will happen.
Having said that, the big stick that Elon has,
and he said this too,
and this too is extraordinary.
If you're in Congress and you vote against these cuts
when the majority wants them done,
I will invest in making sure you lose your next election contest.
That's a serious threat, and it's completely legal.
He can invest in any writing he wants,
any jurisdiction, any county, in any state
against an incumbent who is not supporting the Doge mandate.
An incredible situation.
Frankly, I see no problem with it.
Okay.
You see no problem with a billionaire?
Hang on, Taylor.
I'm actually going to switch gears.
You're a problem with Soros?
Well, I'm going to bring, Taylor, actually, on something else,
which is to do with the Elon Musk baby mama drama
because you actually have been responsible
for the latest development on this
because a friend of the show, Ashley Sinclair,
who came on only a week ago, actually,
but didn't reveal the little secret she was keeping.
This had Elon Musk baby, or says she had,
And you revealed a series of new revelations about this.
For those who haven't been following as assiduously as me,
but to summarize exactly what you were doing with Ashley.
Yeah, so why didn't do anything with Ashley?
I broke the news, which was available in public report documents,
that Ashley Sinclair, who had Musk's latest child,
has filed a paternity suit and custody suit for the youngest child, her new son.
So she's seeking sole custody of the child,
and also seeking to establish legal paternity.
This comes right after, you know, more drama
with Elon Musk's previous baby mother Grimes,
who tweeted just last week that the son,
another child of them, was in the midst of a medical emergency.
There's been a huge custody bottle, et cetera, et cetera.
So I think Ashley's hoping to avoid some of that
and, yeah, seeks sole custody.
Okay, well, the Ashley Sinclair story
has led to some traditional conservatives
questioning the morals of a new Republican establishment.
Jeremy Hamley from the quartering
channel is one such voice and he joins the panel.
Now, Jeremy, great to have you on Uncensored, the first time we've had you.
Thank you for joining us.
You think there's, I mean, I've got to say, when I saw what you were saying here,
that nearly every single conservative influencer is congratulating a twice single mom on another
outer wedlock child with a man who has zero intention on marrying her, Elon's a degenerate
and shares criticism for his actions too.
When I saw that, I was surprised actually that more people were not pointing out there's
a sort of weird double standard going on here, which is the kind of embracing and celebration
of all this when actually a conservative Christian right, perhaps perspective, would normally be
pretty censorious. Yeah, I think it was pretty disappointing to see how a lot of these people
call themselves Christians or Catholics or religious and preach a lot of different morals about
family, the core family, traditional values. And it was pretty appalling to see everyone race into
the replies. And I do want to be clear.
I think both parties here are, you know, I think in many of these cases, the women take a lot of
extra heat.
I think, as she's St. Clair, that there's plenty to criticize.
But I also think I don't love Elon creating infinite babies with zero intention on being a father.
And I don't think that these women who are agreeing to do IVF, knowing that he's not going to be in
their life, is a traditional conservative value.
And it's something that the conservatives aren't calling out because they don't want to wreck their
connection to Elon Musk, at least in my opinion, even if it's tangentially.
You actually criticized Taylor directly. He said Ashley Sinclair literally ran to Elon deranged
leftist, Taylor Lorenz, to smear Elon. That's your based-based trans-conservative queen,
Con, Inc. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. So you weren't impressed by Ashley running to Taylor.
Well, I love, I've got a lot of love for Taylor. Happy birthday, Taylor. But, you know, I think she's
patient zero for Elon derangement syndrome. So I thought it was pretty funny that she was,
you know, breaking the news. Now, if Ashley didn't go to her directly, as she is now clarified,
it's a little less interesting. But I do think it was funny for somebody who was begging for
privacy, was happy to be taking pictures of private signal conversations on a secondary phone
for further lawsuits, run to a spread with the New York Post, and all this stuff set up weeks
before the Valentine's Day meltdown.
This woman was never a conservative.
She has tweets going back to 2020, for example.
Here's one of my all-time favorites.
If you'll allow me to share it, it says,
if women get the right to abortion,
men should have the option to not pay child support.
I think that's pretty rich for somebody
who's currently suing for full custody,
and I think we all know why she's suing for full custody.
Okay. I mean, Taylor, you've also criticized Elon
for using his son of the Oval Office.
as you said, Elon Musk, the dad fluencer,
the billionaires leveraging his son to rebrand himself as a father figure.
Just to bring Taylor back in a moment.
Taylor, first of all, what do you say to Jeremy
about the criticism about Ashley Sinclair running to you,
given how you're such an unlikely bedfellow for this particular debate?
Again, these are public court documents on a website
that every reporter in the country has been checking relentlessly.
And being on California Time was,
up and got the scoop. I don't really know what to tell people that. I don't know what Elon derangement
syndrome is. I am a very nonpartisan critic of both sides of the aisle. I think Elon has done some
good things. I think he's lost the plot on a lot of other things. In this instance, look, I'm not one
that subscribes to these conservative values of, you know, you can't have IVF or whatever, whatever.
So I think that, look, has Ashley made some contradictory statements in the past? Sure. But at the end of the day, this is a mother. Elon Musk is the father of the child. I think Elon Musk, if you are a conservative, right, you should support fathers being, you know, supporting their children. So I hope that he supports his children. I hope he takes care of his children. I think it's concerning how he's, you know, trying to leverage his children to boost his public profile. I've written a lot about the danger of parent influencers.
If he's involved with the kids, you don't want him to be involved with the kids.
That might be the dumbest statement I've ever heard.
He brings his kid around the White House, which is what everybody does if they go to the White House.
They want to show their kids amazing things.
If I can bring my son to the Oval Office.
You don't have to do that on camera.
He didn't choose for the cameras and you don't do it on camera.
You can go to be in office.
This is so much crap.
The Pierce, let me just say this.
Well, Ben, let me ask you, Ben.
Elon Musk has now got 13 kids by 15 kids by
four different women, right? And the latest mother is a single mom who's been married and divorced
and so on. I mean, how does that sit, does that sit comfortably? Any of that, those series of
facts with your conservative Christian right beliefs? Would it be a life that I would lead? No,
but all I care about is the kids and do they have a mom and a dad who are able to grow them
and mature them and spend quality time with them without clickbait and people to.
throwing stones and trying to tear down the mother or the father.
Like, this shouldn't be litigated in public, number one.
Number two, the idea that Elon Musk needs to spend time with his kids, but not in public,
is just unrealistic.
When you are as famous as he is, any other celebrity out there, and you have kids that
around you, they're going to be in the public eye.
You can try to protect them.
But being able to go to the White House, being able to go to the Oval Office, spending
quality time with your son there getting to do that? I have three sons. I absolutely would take
them the Oval Office if I had the opportunity in that meeting. That's being a good dad.
Yeah, yeah. Let me bring in, hang on. Can we talk about conservative values though? Okay, Jojo, quickly.
Let me ask Jojo for a reaction. Well, I want to talk about the degradation of conservative values
between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. They have 17 children between six women. Donald Trump,
I was talking. Donald Trump is a thrott. Donald Trump is a thrott.
vice married serial philanderer who is also by the way and adjudicated rapist you don't
care about the business fraud and a convicted felon I was talking so I want to talk about
the degradation of conservative values peers to your original question which is
this is the slippery slope where we see we were they were once you know
beholden to Christian values more than they are now now they have someone who
worships that our lady of the perpetual mulligan every Sunday and doesn't so much
as go go to church other than to go shake a Bible upside down
after tear gassing peaceful protesters.
This is not the party of family values like they hold themselves up to be or the profess themselves to be.
This is not the back the blue party.
They do not stand with our troops because if they did, they wouldn't be gutting the VA.
And they wouldn't be pardoning those who attacked our police officers on January 6th.
So this is just yet another slide down the slope from that.
All right.
All right.
Let me ask.
Let me ask.
Let me ask.
Let me ask.
Kevin.
Let me ask Kevin.
Let me ask Kevin. Kevin, does any of this matter? Or has the Donald Trump double success winning the presidency twice, despite everybody knowing all about his private life, which just has been generous, has been lively. But does any of it now matter? I mean, if I think about Democrat presidents, there was probably no greater philandra in the history of world leaders than John F. Kennedy, for example. Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton has sex with an intern in the Oval Office while he was Democrat president.
of the United States. So I don't think the Democrats are in any position to lecture anybody about
family values or fidelity. However, does it matter now? I mean, I get the sense people think about
Musk, well, he wants to increase the population, and he's leading by his own example. I don't think
people really care anymore. Now, does it matter? Is my question. No, it doesn't. This isn't really
what people worry about, you know, when they're trying to figure out how to make ends meet at their
kitchen table for millions of Americans making $68,000 on average.
They couldn't care less.
The one thing I would say, though, that is occurring now
because of the, I would say, the mastery of social media
that Trump has pulled off in this latest election
is a lot of soul-searching with the Democrats.
You know, one of the things I have to do,
I don't have a choice, is I'm an investor,
so I really have to be bipartisan
because I also invest in states that are blue.
And I know the governor's there,
and I speak at their conventions
as much as I do at Republican ones
because I have no choice.
Entrepreneurship's bipartisan.
So I've met a lot of the fundraisers
in the last few weeks with Democratic Party,
and they are doing a complete reset
in terms of their messaging to their base.
What they can't understand is how Trump,
and he used social media to do this,
more than linear television,
He was very masterful at doing interviews with people like you, Pierce, and then taking 15, 38, 49 second, 59 seconds snippets of it, and reposting it on every single social media program enhanced.
And what he did, and the one that they're most concerned about during that last four months of the election, was steal the working man from the Democratic Party.
How is it possible that Donald Trump
became the champion of the working man
and unions across the East Coast and West Coast?
How did he do that?
How did he reach them?
What about Michigan?
The Michigan example is being studied
by the Democrats right now.
How did he do that?
Every swing state.
Well, I have a theory.
I have a theory.
I'm going to bring in two final stories
and put them together, actually.
The tax cut is going to pay two clips
because I think that,
Yes, it was about the economy.
Yes, it was about immigration.
But I do think this war that Trump and Elon Musk waged,
using social media, like you say,
on wokeism in all its guises, the woke-mind virus.
I think that played a massive part in this.
I think Trump was, to many people,
common sense against insanity with this woke stuff.
And interestingly, two things happened yesterday.
One was that MSNBC's Joy Reid,
who loves to say that she's, you know, woke,
the woke queen of cable news.
Actually, in my estimation,
one of the most vicious, unpleasant,
race-baiting racists I've ever seen on cable news, frankly.
She got fired because actually, you know what?
People woke up and realized she's not woke in the way
that the nice people like it to be.
She's woke in that awful, vicious, shaming, cancelling sense.
And the second time, we had,
second thing last night was Jane Fonda then saying this,
at an award show.
Make no mistake.
Empathy is not weak or woke.
And by the way, woke just means you give a damn about other people.
Yeah, I mean, Ben Ferguson, on that, the two things are not disconnected.
You have one, Joy Reid, finally getting her come up, it's thoroughly deserved.
But also, you have the complete delusion.
And I believe deliberate delusion of Jane Fonda.
I've interviewed her.
She's a tough lady, brilliant actress, a lot of admiration for her.
But the idea that wokeism is this wonderfully warm, empathetic movement that shows you care is for the birds.
Yeah. Look, I think the American people have realized that this is basically irrelevant to their lives.
We tried it. We tried this. Everything. Go woke. Cancel culture. Fight back and try to destroy everyone's life.
Just like you've heard in these smut stories trying to attack Elon Musk and the women that have a
relationship with him. The American people care about, is it safe to go outside and play? Is it safe
to send your kids to school? Are my kids in a failing school? Can I give my kids a better life than
I had? And if you want to know why Donald Trump did so well in the closing argument with the
American people is because while they were pushing, you know, dudes and sports with women and demanding
that parents can't show up and have a voice at their conferences at their schools and
referring to them as domestic terrorists, the Republican Party listened and said, we understand what
you're going through. We want to give change to that. We want to help you succeed. And we want you
to have a better country for your kids than what you have right now. And so as long as they go up
there and they try to talk down to America and say, well, what means you give a damn? No, what means
you're out there probably trying to ruin someone's life and get them fired for their job and try to ruin
them or put them in jail.
That's what work is.
It's ruining someone's life.
Taylor, I'm not of the conservative right at all.
I'm pretty centrist.
I'm just a journalist.
I fell out with the liberal world completely over this woke stuff
because it's just completely nuts.
I'm like Bill Maher in all this, right?
I just think it's beyond my comprehension
that you could have people on the left
who genuinely think it's fine
that biological men wreck women's sport.
It's madness.
Anyway.
But okay, but the idea that the Democratic
party, Kamala Harris, who, like, doesn't, with all due respect, like, all she said about trans
people is like, I'll leave it up to the states. As if Kamala Harris was some champion of trans people
people. That's not true. That's not true. That's not true. Kamala Harris and Joe Biden endorsed
the right of trans athletes to compete in women's sport. But again, but again,
brought them to the White House. You know what? We, you know what? This is not something,
this is just simply not something that the majority of Americans voted on. The idea that the
I don't agree. No, I think it is.
statistically she's right.
All right, let me bring in
Jeremy. Hang on, don't all talk. Jeremy, you're nodding away
there. I think it played a big part and I would cite the New York Times
report about the they, Carmelis to they then, Trump is for
you, that they say moved the needle by maybe three points. I think it was
massively significant underbelly of debate was about
this woke crap and that Trump
they saw, along with Musk, as basically the common sense
antidote to all this stuff.
Look, nobody did more to get Donald Trump elected than Hollywood elites and the Democrat Party.
There is a reason that once the Trump started running the ads, Kamala's for the, you know, Trump's for you, Kamala's for them.
There's a reason he ran that ad.
I live in a swing state.
That was basically the only ad he ran for the last three weeks running up to the election.
And that tells me that based on their data, it was resonating with people.
Regular people, you know, this all, you know, California liberalism, I get it.
It's funny to make fun of, but people when they go and vote, they don't want anything to do with it.
Let me tell you, woke is dead, which coincident, hang on, hang on.
That we can agree on.
Hang on.
That we can agree on.
Woke is dead, which is coincidentally the title of my forthcoming book, which will be released by HarperCollins worldwide in the fall.
Well, put on the fall.
In the fools.
I'll expect enthusiastic support from all of you.
I've got to leave it there. It's been a great debate. You've all been terrific. Thank you all very much.
Peers Morgan Unscensored is proudly independent. The only boss around here is me.
If you enjoy our show, we ask only one simple thing.
Hit subscribe on YouTube and follow Pierce Morgan Uncensored on Spotify and Apple Podcast.
And in return, we will continue our mission to inform, irritate and entertain.
And we'll do it all for free.
Independent Unsensored Media has never been more critical, and we couldn't do it.
without you.
