Pod Save America - 1116: Epstein Files: Worse Than You Thought

Episode Date: February 3, 2026

The Justice Department releases more than three million more files related to Jeffrey Epstein, and the list of powerful people involved with the notorious pedophile is ... long. Jon, Tommy, and Lovett... react to the most notable revelations from the new batch, including the many mentions of Trump, and then check in on the president’s corrupt dealings, including a half-billion bribe from the United Arab Emirates and an attempt to steal $10 billion in taxpayer money in the form of a lawsuit against his own IRS, the release of 5-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos and his father from ICE custody and the arrest of journalist Don Lemon, and Democrats’ incredible 31-point legislative flip in Texas. Then, Tejano artist and Latin Grammy winner Bobby Pulido stops by the studio to talk to Tommy about his race for Congress and Trump's weakening support among Texas's Latino community.

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Today's presenting sponsor is SimpliSafe Home Security. As a Ponsave America listener, you know as well as us the dark chapter we're stepping into. Oh, we're there. We're in it. It's been a long chapter. Yeah, we're in the chapter. But no matter what's happening outside your four walls, your home should always provide a safe sanctuary for your family. Simply Safe can help provide peace of mind with proactive protection that helps to stop threats before they even have the chance to break in.
Starting point is 00:00:23 What do you love most about having Simply Safe? Simple Save is very easy to set up, and the app really reliable, the customer support, really great. It gives you peace of mind. There you go. Traditional security systems only take action after someone has already broken in. That's too late. SimplySafe's active guard, outdoor protection, can help prevent break-ins before they happen. AI-powered cameras backed by live professional monitoring agents, monitor your property, and detect suspicious activity. If someone's lurking around or acting suspiciously, those agents see and talk to them in real time, activate spotlights, and even contact the police, all before they have the chance to get inside your home.
Starting point is 00:00:53 No long-term contracts or cancellation fees. Monitoring plans start affordably at around a dollar a day. 60-day satisfaction guarantee or your money back, named Best Home Security Systems by U.S. News and World Report five years in a row, ranked number one in customer service among home security providers by both Newsweek and USA Today. And right now, our listeners can get 50% off their new SimplySafe system with professional monitoring and their first month free at Simplysafe.com slash crooked. That's SimplySafe.com slash crooked. There's no safe like SimplySafe.
Starting point is 00:01:45 Welcome to Pod Save America. I'm John Favre. I'm John Lovett. Tommy Gitor. On today's show, Millionthesale. of Epstein files have finally been released, so we're going to talk about why the revelations are just as bad, if not worse than you thought. We also have some stunning new corrupt dates to talk about, the status of Trump's so-called de-escalation in Minnesota, his arrest of
Starting point is 00:02:03 Don Lemon, and other journalists slash protesters, and some good news, a surprise Democratic Special Election win in a deep red part of Texas. And then Tommy talks to musician Bobby Polito about why he decided to jump into politics and run for Congress in Texas. Just a ton of news to talk about as there always is, which is one reason you should consider becoming a subscriber. Good call. Every week on our subscriber-only pods and our growing number of substack newsletters, we're going deeper on all the biggest stories and cover the big stories we didn't get a chance to cover here on Pod Save America. We just added a new bi-weekly subscriber-only episode of Pod Save America called Pod Save America Only Friends. Perfect name. We have a... It's for buys weekly.
Starting point is 00:02:45 That's for buys weekly. Yeah, Only Friends. Weekly by weekly. Only friends. And if you don't like listening to things, if you're still like reading things, we also have a new weekly Pod Save America newsletter called OpenTabs. You also, as a subscriber, would get free, ad-free episodes of all your favorite crooked pods, plus bonus content like Pod Save the World Q&A with Tommy and Ben. Wow. We're still doing that. I'm just kidding. It's very fun to do. I haven't listened. We get super intense questions. I don't think I know how to listen to the Q&A. But mostly just please subscribe because it's the most helpful thing you possibly do for us as a company trying to grow here in the independent progressive media world.
Starting point is 00:03:21 So yeah, if you like supporting independent pro-democracy media, this is a subscription for you. If you don't, we won't, you know, then go somewhere else. Well, keep listening for free. But it would mean a lot to all of us here, Cricket, if you considered subscribing at Cricket.com slash friends. All right. Let's start with the Justice Department's congressionally mandated, though very delayed release of another three million pages of Epstein-related documents, which were dumped online Friday after noon in a fairly haphazard manner, so much so that the documents accidentally included dozens of nude photos of victims and in some cases full names and other information that could be used
Starting point is 00:03:56 to identify them. The biggest takeaway, though, was that a bunch of very rich, famous, and powerful people were close to Epstein, you may even call it a cabal, and seem to know both who they were dealing with and in some cases what he was up to. People like Elon Musk, Richard Branson, Peter Thiel, Sergey Brin, Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, and of course, Donald Trump, whose name appears more than 5,000 times in different contexts. Here's what Trump had to say for himself on Monday in the Oval. The problem is that it's turning out to be the Democrats
Starting point is 00:04:26 that were with and conspired with Epstein. They were working together to try and help me lose the election. And frankly, the DOJ, I think, should just say, we have other things to do because that whole thing has turned out. I mean, other than Bill Clinton and, you know, Bill Gates and lots of people that have, there are a lot of questions about it, but nothing on me. When Epstein was alive, like 10 years ago, nobody cared about it. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:04:54 Busy, too busy. Whoever cared about Epstein before Trump was president anyway. Let's listen. On day one, roll out the blackbook. And not just that. On day one, roll out all of the text messaging communications we were told were deleted. We need to release the EFstein list. That is an important thing.
Starting point is 00:05:11 Just a couple of libs there. Yeah, classic. Obviously, three million pages, a lot to get through. But I know you guys have both gotten through about 95, 97% of them. What jumped out at you in the files? Tommy, you want to go first? Sure. I mean, look, I just want to start by saying I'm completely red-billed on this stuff.
Starting point is 00:05:29 I thought Jeffrey Epstein was a scummy guy who did bad things and then used connections to avoid accountability. I like the web of connections that this man actually has the clear evidence of trafficking that's in these files is stunning. It's like, like, Q&ON was right. They just looked to the wrong direction. You know what I mean? It's like, it's mind-boggling. So Cash Patel, there's another clip for him when he was saying he testifies before Congress that there's no evidence that Epstein trafficked other women to other individuals. Like, he should be held in contempt just for that. Things that jumped out of me, Steve Bannon is all over the Epstein files. They are really good
Starting point is 00:06:06 friends. Bannon is helping him rehab his image. They're working on projects together. Like, it's, he's helping him, Epstein's helping band and fund his stuff. That, that's a lot more we should learn there. You mentioned the Trump piece. I mean, it's, he's in 5,300 files. There's 38,000 references to Trump. Some of those are duplicative. But like, he's everywhere.
Starting point is 00:06:26 And in this clip, it's like, we've finally gotten the files. And now Trump is saying, like, oh, who even cares about this guy? It's been a long time. He's ready to move on. And there's one email where Epstein specifically talks about whether to call Trump about Virginia Joufrey. Yeah. Yeah, that one really stuck out of it.
Starting point is 00:06:41 An Epstein victim, who wrote a book about her experience, who died by suicide recently. We need to learn more about that. Elon Musk is a scumbag. He has a social relationship with Epstein. He clearly knows what's going on. He says, like, I want to go to your island for the wildest party. We don't know if you ever went there. But he is all over these files.
Starting point is 00:06:59 There's multiple NFL owners in these things. Steve Tisch, pretty gross. Giants owner, worst offender. I don't know how he survives this. Jeffrey Epstein got permanently banned from Xbox Live. Did you guys catch this one? Yeah. I've heard about that.
Starting point is 00:07:12 Again, it's one of those things where in our kind of postmodern, post-truth world. Is that unbelievable in true or unbelievable and false? It's true. I think a lot of people thought it was because he was like talking shit
Starting point is 00:07:22 the teenagers on Fortnite and it might be a new thing we learned about him. I think it's because he's registered as a sex offender. I was also just stunned by how truly global the scandal is. Like the crown princess of Norway
Starting point is 00:07:33 was buddies with Epstein. In the UK, they got Peter Mendelsohn who recently was the UK's ambassador to the U.S. gave Jeffrey Epstein a heads up on the government's response to the EU debt crisis before it happened. I guess he resigned, huh?
Starting point is 00:07:49 Market sensitive information, he resigned. Ahud Brock is all over these files. There's audio of Jeffrey Epstein telling Ehud Brock about Palantir for the first time. So it's just... Slovakia's prime minister's national security advisor just resigned as well. Great, great.
Starting point is 00:08:03 You could do a whole episode of Pides Save the World on this. And we're Ben and I are going to do this tomorrow. But like the scope of it is amazing. Just last thing, like you said, love it. Like, it's just the fake news problem is so exacerbated in a situation like this because you have 3 million files dumped onto the internet. There's stuff all over Twitter. You have no idea what's real and what is fake.
Starting point is 00:08:22 It's so easy to slip something fake into, you know, the kind of social media ecosystem right now. It's just really terrible. Yeah, so there's all the kind of who's in it. What does it mean? And we don't know, right? There's a reason traditionally you don't just release millions and millions of files that were kind of part of different aspects of an investigation. Without context. Without context.
Starting point is 00:08:45 And by the way, like, you know, everyone was clamoring for why, you know, for DOJ to release these documents and why they had missed the deadline. And I actually see why it took them this long and probably should have honestly taken them longer because there's tons of mistakes throughout this. If you just search, do a keyword search. You will find an email where the names are redacted every place except one. But if you missed one, well, it didn't matter that you redacted. the other ones. There's all kinds of other names of people unrelated to this that are inside of here with personal information. The other challenges, by the way, in the names, and this is like, you know, why Trump's name is in there so many times, it appears that someone sent Jeffrey Epstein, like, news clips regularly. Exactly. Yeah. So there are so many names. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:09:24 In the OSCE files that are just part of the news clips that he received, which is tough. But then, like, you do see this. And it's too many people for Cabal, John. I think it's fully fledged a ring. this ring of elites. And it's why? Like, why around this man? What was the pull that this man had? And I do genuinely believe, like, a lot of the men connected through this were not necessarily directly involved in sex crimes, though he was a registered sex offender who had a terrible and well-known reputation. So these people are all despicable for getting this close to him. But he had these connections. He could get things done. He could get you to a country club. He could connect people from here. And where did that power came from? And that power came from for some subset of these people. He was a vehicle for access to women, girls, and to a kind of licentiousness that was appealing to
Starting point is 00:10:13 them for them to step out of their lives. In 2010, Peggy Siegel, who is a publicist, was helping Epstein regain entry into society. And she was telling him, I have no idea what the reaction will be to your reentry into society, but take it slow and stay quiet. Your friends are there for you. And at least the house is just, drop dead gorgeous. Every fag decorator with an immediate interest in Israel, charming, will be begging for a look. This was about him bringing together military people, intellectuals, and scientists to have these dinners. And he did it. And you know what? It fucking worked. So Peter Atia, who is a doctor that was recently, like a longevity guy who was recently brought up.
Starting point is 00:10:51 Extremely popular book. Extremely popular book. Actually, like, you know, I didn't know that he was in the fucking Epstein file. I was like, oh, that's interesting. How real is this guy? And then I saw an interviewer He was like proudly referring to the second derivative. It was if it was a scientific term. And I was like, I'm skeptical. I'm skeptical. You're trying to seem smart in a way that I'm not trusting. He had to put out a statement today explaining how he was in these emails with Epstein,
Starting point is 00:11:13 even after he was a registered text offender. And he said, everything about him seemed excessive and exclusive, including the fact that he lived in the largest home in all of Manhattan, owned a Boeing 727, and hosted parties with the most powerful and prominent leaders in business and politics. In retrospect, the presence and credibility of such venerable people in different orbits led me make assumptions about him that clouded my judgment in ways it shouldn't have. I thought the other thing interesting about that statement too is he basically says like, so obviously I knew that he had had a prostitution charge, right? But because it was like he served a year and it was like, you know,
Starting point is 00:11:48 maybe it was a prostitution charge and he didn't know the age of the girl and he was soliciting process, you know, and then it's what you just said, which is no, that knowledge combined with well, he's famous and rich and has. has all these connections and everyone else who's rich and powerful likes him so he can't be that bad it really like shines a light on just how fucking like corrupt and broken and gross the system is that like the entire culture around him can make someone think like I'm not going to do my due diligence on this guy because you know it must have just been a little mishap yeah if people from the fucking aspen ideas visit people I met at the aspen ideas festival would jump off a bridge
Starting point is 00:12:27 why wouldn't I? Exactly. And so, like, he kind of is able to get his reputation back. And by the way, it was a strategy to only have that be what was publicly known about the charges. And now in this release, you find that Acosta, when he was the prosecutor, had a whole bevy of other potential charges involving crimes and abuse and rape of girls. Yeah, the draft indictment that's in here of the 32 counts from the Southern District of Florida that also includes three co-conspirators, the draft that was never. you know, because he got the sweetheart deal from Acosta, so it never went forward.
Starting point is 00:13:00 But that to me is a very fascinating document. That deal remains kind of like the original sin of the second act of Jeffrey Epstein. If that deal is just is about reality, about what he really did, the scope of it. I mean, I think there's no way this guy gets back into the world. But I do think he did exactly what you say, which is like, look, yes, I solicited a prostitute.
Starting point is 00:13:20 One of them was 17 or something like that. And these guys were like just bought it. Yep. I also just, a lot of how we've been looking at the scan, has been around who's involved with it, right? And like, what, what did these big name people do and what didn't they do? I think that's important,
Starting point is 00:13:34 and I think we still don't have all the answers and we should be finding to get more answers. But when you dig into it, you also just find these little, like, artifacts of how he was actually manipulating his situation, including the girls and women that were involved. And you can't, again, at these, we're, there are these little kind of, I don't know, snippets,
Starting point is 00:13:55 these sort of dissent, like, like disentangled little bits of information you can't fully understand. But you see these sort of vicious back and forth with people whose names you don't know where he's saying things like, you had an apartment, you had money, you had an agreement, many agreement promises,
Starting point is 00:14:11 you broke them all. You're acting like a spoiled child, who thinks the world owes them a living, sleeping all day, not helping, not dancing. There are these little bits of the evil at the very core of it. And you see the emails he wrote to himself, little ideas, little things that came to him.
Starting point is 00:14:26 And at the core, of this whole enterprise was this disgusting man. It's like vicious monster that had built all these like kind of layers around him to seem respectable. And the fact that even now we still don't really totally understand a lot of what actually happened because it's now being released in this haphazard and and a confusing way where you don't know what's real and you don't know what's not, we are going to, like I still think there is that whether it's the Democrats in Congress, whether it's a Democratic presidential candidate calling for some kind of hearing and investigation. Like we need to have like public hearings about this, about how this like to just to get the truth about it, including getting the participants in it, force them to speak in front of the country about what happened.
Starting point is 00:15:14 Because I still think we're going to live in this sort of like semi true kind of understanding because of the way they release these documents. to that point, the Epstein law that passed says that the DOJ needs to turn over their internal memos, deliberations, notes on who they charged, why, why didn't they make certain charging decisions? They have not done that yet. So they are just in violation of the law still by not doing that. And usually the Department of Justice would never turn over those notes. But that's what the law that Donald Trump signed into law and Congress just passed said. So I do think that can shine a light on some of this. Because Also, to your point about Cash Patel, like, I can't tell, clearly it was dishonest what he said in front of Congress, but I don't know if you've seen anything in any of the emails. I haven't that show that, like, clearly there were other men who trafficked underage women with Jeffrey Epstein. Like, I don't think any of the emails say that. Cash Patel says there's no evidence, none, if there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he, Epstein, traffic to other individuals. It seems like the Steve Tisch case seems like that's exactly what happened there. Now, maybe they were of age, but did we investigate that? I don't know. He seems like there's a lot. of smoke here, but we'll find out. I mean, it's clear, like, the FBI, like, fell down on the job here. They just didn't do what this is done. It seems like there's three levels of Epstein connections here that you see in these emails.
Starting point is 00:16:31 The first level is new Epstein was friendly with him and was just in the social circles and thought he was a great guy, you know? Then there was New Epstein friendly with him and was discussing, like, girls with him in, like, they were fucking objects in the most grossest sort of manner. And then there were, like, the Tisch stuff, which is like, yes, I have girls for you, basically, which is helping him find. Yeah. And there were, yeah.
Starting point is 00:16:55 And Trump in here, by the way, is through some uncorroborated allegations, but like, including some witness interviews with the FBI and other things, is like somewhere in between the discussing girls in a, in a gross lewd manner and potentially like around him when there were girls being, you know. Trump is saved because he does not use email. Yes. Like if we had audio of Donald Trump's conversation with Jeffrey Epstein, I bet, Jaws will be on the floor. we wouldn't believe it. The other sort of process thing, love it, I'm glad you brought this up,
Starting point is 00:17:24 that I'm seeing a lot out there, is like, Joe Biden could have released all of this. Why didn't he? You fell down on the job. It's like, actually, no, this is not how the Department of Justice is supposed to work. And I think we're seeing that play out. Like, it's awful. Like, I hope there's accountability for the abused. I hope that people who did bad things go to jail. But like, Jesus Christ, like, releasing all these victims' names, the images, like the random people. Like, this is, this is actually not good. And like, no, you don't want Joe Biden to be digging through DOJ files to try to destroy his political opponents, guys.
Starting point is 00:17:58 Like, this is, there should be a bigger principle here. Yeah, I ask, like, the process of the redacting and not redacting, are they being, are they just haphazard and, like, injudicious? Are they being kind of making choices with what names are showing or not showing at times? I have no idea. Also, doing this in these giant, rare, rare, huge dumps of information when in the, inside of it you know is personal and like information about victims of crimes. So some of this is just the incompetence in the way it's being executed.
Starting point is 00:18:30 But I do. I actually, one thing I was just when I was looking through it, I really struck. Like I was over the weekend just the kind of the wash of comments about it, the way we were learning about it, through random people posting things. You didn't know what it was true. And like all of it kind of some of it sort of silly and then all of it relating to monstrous crimes. Some of it was fake on Twitter.
Starting point is 00:18:48 A lot of it was fake. I really did this sort of tear. It really gave them a sick feeling just about where we're at and how like the, the, because we're DOJ, you can't rely on them. You can't trust them. The social media has been kind of taken over by Elon and others in a way that makes it impossible to know what's true or not true. And this all feeds, like, even the fact that we're in this mess is like, of like getting
Starting point is 00:19:13 the information this way as a product of our kind of conspiratorial mindset. And yet I'm glad for the most, like I. do think that this was necessary. I think like what that, that Kana and Massey were able to get this through was like ultimately the right thing to do given what we're learning. Like we would never know any of this. And I'm glad that we do for the most part. Good for them that they that they wrote this law and did it the right way and got every member of Congress but one to vote for it. I just like the people are saying like Joe Biden should have unilaterally taken this step through his DOJ. It's like it's a lot of, um, collateral damage there. I think we don't think true. Yeah, for sure. Potsave America is brought to you by Smalls. Your cat has zero interest in politics, but they absolutely have strong opinions about their food, which is why you need to give them smalls. It's 2026. Do you still feed your cat like it's 1926? For a limited time, get 60% off your first order plus free shipping when you head to Smals.com slash crooked. Smalls cat food is protein pack recipes made with preservative free ingredients you'd find in your fridge and it's delivered right to your door.
Starting point is 00:20:16 That's why cats.com named Smalls. Their best overall cat food, starting with Smalls is easy. Just share info about your cat's diet, health, and food preferences. Then Smalls puts together a personalized sampler for your cat. No more picking between random brands at the store. Smalls says the right food to satisfy any cat's craving. Still not a believer in Smalls. Forbes ranked Smalls the best overall cat food while BuzzFeed said, my cats went absolutely ballistic for this stuff. After switching to Smalls, 88% of cat owners reported overall health improvements. That's a big deal. And the team at Smalls is so confident your cat will love the product. You can try it risk-free. That means they will refund you if your cat won't eat their food. Picky cats, don't even
Starting point is 00:20:50 worry about it. Make 2026 your cat's healthiest year yet. Take advantage. of their new year special and get 60% off your first order plus free shipping when you head to smalls.com slash crooked one last time that 60% off your first order plus free shipping when you go to smalls.com slash crooked. POTS of America is brought to you by ZipRecruiter. Listeners, think back to a first date where you were really interested in someone. You probably ask them important questions like, what are you looking for? Or what are your deal breakers? When do you graduate? So you could get a better idea of whether or not this was the right person for you. Well, the same goes if you're hiring.
Starting point is 00:21:30 You definitely want to address key questions first to see if someone could be right for your role. That's why you need ZipRecruiter. When you post your job, ZipRecruiter suggests screening questions to help you hone in on top candidates faster. And today you can try it for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash crooked. ZipRecruiter's matching technology immediately finds qualified candidates that check all your boxes. ZipRecruiter recommends screening questions you can easily add to get the highest quality applicants. Want to see who's recently active? ZipRecruiter's filters can show you. No wonder ZipRecruiter is the number one rated hiring site based on G2. Ask key questions and hire
Starting point is 00:22:00 faster with ZipRecruiter. Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day. Try it for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash crooked. That's ZipRecruiter. Meet your match on ZipRecruiter. In case the FCREV revelations didn't make you mad enough. We also got more news over the weekend about Trump's mind-blowing, absolutely shameless corruption. The Wall Street Journal reported that just days before Trump was inaugurated, an Abu Dhabi royal known as the Spy Sheik, who's the United Arab Emirates National Security Advisor and runs the country's sovereign wealth fund, bought a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial, the Trump family's crypto venture for $500 million, with an upfront payment of $187 million going right to,
Starting point is 00:22:45 quote, Trump family entities. complete coincidence. The Trump administration then gave the spy chic what the UAE had long wanted but hadn't been able to get access to when Biden was president, half a million of America's most advanced AI chips. I guess the Emirati's just really believed in Eric Trump's business plan and his crypto expertise, huh? Is that what we think? Yeah, for a company that was, I don't think they had a product at the time. And the 49% stake that they purchased actually didn't get you access to the future revenue on the only thing they were selling at that much. moment. So yeah, no, it definitely, that's what happened. First of all, I just want to say,
Starting point is 00:23:20 shout out to the Wall Street Journal for getting this scoop. Like, thank God a liberal billionaire Murdoch is using his power for good, right? While all these other, you know, right-wing assholes like Jeff Bezos, just turtle and buy Melania documentaries. I mean, so by the way, before the story, what we knew about this UAE-AI chip deal was that an Emeraldi-backed investment fund called MGX the last spring made a $2 billion investment into a crypto company called Binance, and they did it using the Trump family's stable coin, their new cryptocurrency, U.S.D.1, which is from World Liberty Financial, the same company. So that came out of nowhere. It instantly made U.S.D.1 one of the most highly circulated stable coins in existence, and then reportedly makes the Trump family
Starting point is 00:24:00 $80 million a year in passive income. Then right after that, the Trump agrees to provide the UAE with these chips. So we already knew that there was like a totally corrupt drug deal. But this report is even crazier. Like they just bought this company outright. There was no disclosure. $187 million goes to the Trump family. Another tranche of the money goes to Steve Whitkoff's son, who, remember, like, as this is all happening, Steve Whitkoff has named the kind of like emissary for everything. He's going around the world. He goes to a crypto conference in the UAE, and then two weeks later, the contracts to make
Starting point is 00:24:36 this purchase just magically appear. And so it just, this confirms what we know, which is that Trump and Steve Whitkoff, they're running around the globe, they're talking to autocrats, and they are steering money into their families pot. And like, Jared Kushner's gotten a bunch of money from the Amarades. We also know the Amaradis were pushing Trump to, uh, pardon the Binance CEO. This guy's CZ. That obviously will help your $2 billion investment if, you know, that company gets right with regulators in the U.S. So it's like, what do you fucking do with this? This is corruption. You mean the general move to the president is what you do. Yeah. It's supposed to do. It's corruption like
Starting point is 00:25:09 nothing we've ever seen in this country. And it's like a one day story. Well, and it is a great example of why impeachment is the only remedy because John Roberts and his court would say that the lifting, yeah, giving them the chips was official business, which it was, right? But obviously, we know that there is a personal stake there. And so what Roberts and the court would say in that opinion is, well, impeachment is the remedy if you think it was if it was a conflict. And the Republicans are just like, no, no, no, it's totally fine for your family to take half a, half a billion dollars and then to literally sell America out by and one of the reasons by the way they didn't want to give the UAE these like very advanced AI chips aside from the fact that it's a foreign
Starting point is 00:25:55 government but weren't they concerned wasn't there a concern that they were doing deals with China they're super tight the the sheikh's company in particular is called g42 was supposed to get one fifth of the 500 thousand of these invidia chips they're super tight with a bunch of Chinese companies including one called Huawei which provides like telecom infrastructure and The United States has spent decades telling other countries to get Huawei the fuck out of their countries, places like the UK, because there's concern that you could do create like backdoor infrastructure to spy on them, which is why there was concern in the Biden administration about selling these chips to the Amaradis. And by the way, these are not, these are like the Blackwell series chips, like the best of the best Nvidia chips that no other countries can really get unless you're like a super close ally and partner of the U.S. And yeah. Or own almost half of World Liberty Financial.
Starting point is 00:26:40 Greece the right guy. Yeah. It's also, there's something struck me that it was right before the inaugural, right? That before he'd even taken office for a second time, he had already decided that he was going to be the most corrupt president in American history. And even saying that is an understatement, really. He was going to be as corrupt as the most corrupt autocrats in the history of the modern world, that he was already going to be a Putin-level corrupt figure.
Starting point is 00:27:07 And like what would happen in a normal? time in a functioning civil society. Yes, of course, there'd be impeachment hearings and his removal, but even maybe before that, there would be Department of Justice investigation. There would be congressional hearings. There would be outrage that would continue, that would be bipartisan. There would be Republicans going up to the White House to say that it's time to step down because the country can't survive having a president this corrupt. Like those are the normal things, right, that you could imagine happening how this would have worked even into previous Republican administrations. We've never had anything this bad. And it's, you know, when I was,
Starting point is 00:27:40 was a kid, I would obviously struggle with deadlines. And if I, I would hit a deadline, but if I missed it, I would never, just simply would never do the work. Right? If I had a paper due on a Monday and I missed the Monday, it was like it never happened, weeks, months, it would be a disaster. I would do that. Because once you're on the other side of the mistake, what's the point? And I do feel like with that's where to wrap with the Republicans, they've sort of, they have their one, impeachment is the mechanism or any kind of accountability. And because that is impossible, we are kind of through that. and now Trump can do anything. There's nothing they can't look past
Starting point is 00:28:12 because they've looked past so much already. And like we talk about this all the time. It's so gobsmacking. It's so crazy. He should be impeached and removed. That is obvious. That's what should happen. But it can't.
Starting point is 00:28:22 And so we sort of live in this world where there's no accountability yet. It's also, it's just like you can't write something this outrageously corrupt. Like you can't make something like this stuff. It's like a Middle Eastern autocrat who also maybe does deal with the Chinese government for like an American asset that has like incredible national security
Starting point is 00:28:46 implications that you're selling out for half a billion dollars for the president like what it's just yeah those chips are how we make pictures of women with six boobs we can't have the Chinese get control of that technology next thing you know it'll be saying things that's the problem with AI right EOka writing. I mean, the thing is the Emirati is like they have a bit of a DC halo because they throw a lot of money around to think tanks. They hire a lot of former generals to come give speeches or consult for their military. They have an ambassador who's been around for a long time, hosts a lot of events at Cafe Milano, you know, a bit of a man about town. But this is also a country that has been funding the other side of a absolutely devastating civil war in Sudan for the better part of the.
Starting point is 00:29:31 two years. They're funding this group called the RSF that is leading to the worst humanitarian catastrophe on the planet right now. So I do think it's just worth thinking about like the foreign policy of the people that Trump did this deal with because it is really gross when you kind of get past the bullshit and the glitterati fucking, you know, appetizer course at Cafe Milano and see what's actually happening. I don't know the foreign policy of any of the governments he's done deals with that he likes that is a good foreign policy. Any good bribes? Yeah, who's he doing deals with? around the world and for governments that they're not either, you know, repressing their own people or others or causing conflict as a type, doesn't he?
Starting point is 00:30:09 The tensions are with the Canada and NATO and the like. The connection to me between the Epstein story and this is, like, these people are buying their credibility with their conferences and their, and their, you know, and comedy festivals in Saudi Arabia, all the people that Trump is doing deals with, they're investing in the kind of appearance of polite society to lend them credibility. And it works. People make the trip. They take the money. And they use their wealth to kind of hide the monstrousness. I don't know if you guys saw that Trump's also looking to steal another $10 billion from us, the American taxpayers. He earned it. President is suing the IRS for $10 billion with a B and damages over the leaking of his tax returns in 2019 and 2020.
Starting point is 00:30:58 You might remember he's also suing the Justice Department for $230 million in damages. Seems like small potatoes now. Over the investigations that led to multiple grand juries, indicting Trump on multiple criminal charges. And since the DOJ now does whatever Trump tells him to do, you can imagine that they may settle this case favorably for the president. Trump basically acknowledged the conflict on Saturday night when he was talking to reporters, though he seemed to just find the whole thing rather amusing. Take a listen. settlement. I'm supposed to work out a settlement with myself. I think what we'll do is do something for charity. You know, we're thinking about doing something for charity or I'll give money to charity.
Starting point is 00:31:38 We can make it a substantial amount. Nobody would care because it's going to go to numerous, very good charities. So he's going to steal $10 billion from the federal government and claim he's going to give it to charity. That's what he's saying right now. But do the press comments on it in black tie? Yeah. Because that's fitting, I think. He was just kind of, yeah, he was at the alfalfa dinner Saturday night, which is a bunch of, you know, elites, just fucking cracking jokes. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:32:02 And croaking jokes. Monopoly. How many people in that room were in the fucking files? It's crazy. I realize that it's, the corruption isn't quite as, maybe it's not as brazen
Starting point is 00:32:11 or as big of a deal, like globally as the UAE thing that we just talked about. But just taking $10 billion from the treasury for yourself. It's just lazy. It's, I mean,
Starting point is 00:32:21 I talk about like things that will, I think that would piss Americans off. Like more, I mean, 10 billion, You know how much a one-year extension of the Affordable Care Act subsidies cost? $30 billion. That is a third of the extension that they said that we apparently cannot afford.
Starting point is 00:32:34 20 million people are seeing their premiums go up. And yet he wants to pay $10 billion out of the Treasury to himself, just so he can promise to give it to many good charities. Could have hired more ice guys with this. Yeah, many other possibilities. The President of the United States is filing frivolous lawsuits against the United States. So he can use his position to settle them. favorably. It's again, you should be impeached and removed from office. We're just watching it
Starting point is 00:33:04 unfold. I was watching all this, the Epstein files and all the involvement of all these people inside the Trump administration. We didn't talk about like Lutnik's in there. A lot of people are in there. And then you look at like the, the UAE case, this lawsuit. There was a CBS got their hands on a memo. if you saw this, of the capital, the insurrection prosecutors wrote a memo to congressional leaders, do you see this? No. Where they recommended what the, what Congress can do because DOJ will obviously not do anything to investigate the immigration abuses, to investigate ICE and detention center abuses
Starting point is 00:33:41 and other things. And they laid out all these things that Congress could do, which would be about preserving records in the case of inevitable prosecutions in the future. And the point they made is there are FBI agents and federal prosecutors who have left because are disgusted with the politicization and the sort of the capture of these bureaus that would be available to do these kinds of investigations. And whether it's as part of the midterms or whether it's a part of a kind of a presidential campaign, I do think talking about how Democrats are going to declare war on corruption and put a real
Starting point is 00:34:12 program of like, I think it should be prime time hearings, a 9-11 commission like law that kind of says, here's how we're going to investigate this, abuses of the power and power, the capture the Department of Justice, the theft by the president, the corrupt acts by the president, and create like a kind of framework for how we're going to be treating this like a really big deal in the future, whether it's in 20, whether it's while Trump is an office or after. And as part of that, bringing on prosecutors, bringing on law enforcement to help kind of lead a true, kind of credible investigation through Congress, I think is one thing. You think Bob Mueller's up too.
Starting point is 00:34:47 Yeah, let's get, let's get that guy out of the fucking mothballs. him and Mueller can, him and Garland can team up. And it'll be a, won't there, won't they? Yeah. Yeah. Like 100 years. I'll have the case. Yeah, you mentioned Howard Letnik. We should just mention he said he'd cut Jeffrey Epstein off in 2005. He told a really detailed story about how he and his wife, walking to the house, saw a massage table, thought it was gross, never spoke to him again. Turns out he went to the island in 2012. So good job, Mr. Lettick. I do enjoy Trump suing the IRS for these documents getting disclosed as he's having his handpicked goon, Bill Pulte. use his authority at the federal housing authority to dig through mortgages and try to prosecute people that Trump doesn't like that as kind of chef's kiss. Like in some sense, in the narrowest sense, Trump has a case in this instance because you can sue the government for breaches of privacy when it comes to IRS data. Of course, he should have released his taxes when he ran for office. Of course, $20 billion is an absurd amount. Apparently he's saying the $10 billion figure is a
Starting point is 00:35:45 $1,000 per disclosure level that's specified in the law. multiplied by an estimate of the number of times that Trump's tax information was published or broadcast. That's how they did the math that got them to the clean $10 billion. But love it, I was trying to think, like, similar to your point about Congress, like, doing this just suggests you've given up on political considerations in any way. Because nothing could be more popular than suing yourself for $10 billion, or suing the taxpayers for $10 billion and being on both sides of the transaction. He just clearly is so greedy that he does not care.
Starting point is 00:36:16 Yes, I think he doesn't care. and I think, you know, this is, like, they feel like they're throwing so much stuff at us every single day. I mean, this was like Bannon, you know, at the beginning. It's like, oh, you do, you do three horrible things a day. And the first two, you know, they can only, people can only pay attention to one and the other two go under the radar, right? And I do think you're right. Like, Leavitt Democrats should make a huge deal of this. I think it should be the challenge with the hearings and the investigations is the country most people want, you know,
Starting point is 00:36:46 what's on their mind most of all is like what are you going to do for me are you going to help me and like you know do i want a bunch of i would just be like we're getting all your money back he stole a bunch of money from uh the country from you he's uh and he tried to sell out a bunch of the country as well and we're getting it all back so we're getting your money back for you i think that's good i think that's good we're going through the couch cushions and uh and all the people who've gotten hurt too you're going to be able to uh that the government is hurt under don't trump because he broke the law um we're going to make you right as well yeah i think that's right i think i think you'd have tie it back to the ways in which this was ultimately about pursuing his own interest at the expense of
Starting point is 00:37:20 the country. I do think any broad investigation into Trump corruption will ultimately lead to tariff decisions and the higher cost people paid. And I do think you'd have to then like really make it clear that it's about not just sort of looking back, but about the reforms you would need, right? Because you would, and you know what? Some of this is not going to be like top polling message. I think there'll be popular programs, but no, not everything we're going to have to do to fix our democracy is going to be able to tie back to affordability. But like, We got to figure out some kind of return to independent counsel. There are reasons that was allowed to expire.
Starting point is 00:37:52 But man, what a different world we'd be living right now if three judges could appoint an independent counsel to investigate crimes by the president. Now, I don't know if the Supreme Court, which is now believed that the president is above the law and the unitary executive. Like, I don't know what happens now. Would it be held up by like the vast majority of judges last time? It was in front of the Supreme Court. Would that happen again?
Starting point is 00:38:15 I don't know, but constitutional amendments around the pardon power, stepping up congressional oversight of the administration, like a lot of steps that we should be talking about that are forward looking about preventing this kind of thing from happening again and attacking the ways in which Trump abused his office. One other just, you know, talking about inherent contempt is too late when the person who you're trying to get is already not reporting. I would like to start hearing congressional leaders start talking about the fact that whatever we do to investigate the Trump administration, that they would.
Starting point is 00:38:45 will use, if necessary, inherent contempt to arrest and detain people who do not participate. We need to, like, Congress needs to start asserting it's Article 1. It's first on the list. They need to start reasserting their authority and make clear that they will, if necessary, enforce subpoenas and hold people in contempt and make them testify. Yeah. And then it'll be the, it'll be Congress's goons versus the federal government's goons facing off. Yeah. And look, I don't know what,
Starting point is 00:39:16 I just, I feel like we can't play chicken with them. And I just, we have to, and by the way, like, do I worry about that power being the hands of Republicans? Of course I do. Of course I do. But we have to assume that we can use the power effectively and make a case the American people if we are able to win the Congress. Tommy, to your point of Trump not caring about the politics, we got a, he talked more
Starting point is 00:39:37 this weekend about the gigantic new commemorative arc, arch. Arch, it would be an arch. right? I think an arc would be a box. I think it of the arc to We've got the gold mark. Oh, that's a French word, yeah. So it's a new arch he's constructing
Starting point is 00:39:50 on the Virginia side of the Potomac. The Washington Post reported over the weekend that the latest plan is for the monument to be 250 feet tall. Of course, that's for America's 250th anniversary. Of course, happy birthday America. That's tall. That's a big arch.
Starting point is 00:40:06 It's a 150 feet taller than the Lincoln Memorial. Only 40 feet smaller than the capital, the U.S. Capitol, the Lincoln Memorial will sit in the shadow of this, of the Trump arch. Fucking,
Starting point is 00:40:21 imagine, imagine what an eyesore. The one in St. Louis is 630 feet tall. That's, this one sounds kind of lame. Is this a good place to say that I also think
Starting point is 00:40:32 they fucked out the World War II Memorial? Okay. No, it's not. It's not the place for this. I just think they didn't, I just think like it's, you know what it is? It's too fucking literal.
Starting point is 00:40:40 Okay. Yeah. You're one of the, yeah, here we are. Just living through this emergency, but let's go back and talk about that. He also announced that he's going to be closing the Kennedy Center, who's boarding now controls for two years for a complete renovation. Who knows? Maybe it has to do with the fact that no one wants to perform there anymore.
Starting point is 00:40:58 So he's like, no one's coming here? You know what? Then it's closed. That's it. It's done. Yeah. My birthday party is canceled. Right, exactly.
Starting point is 00:41:06 One Kennedy Center event that did still take place last week, the world premiere of Melania, the documentary. Great box office numbers. You guys see that? I had fun. I thought it was pretty entertaining. I saw it twice. I'm going to say on the arch.
Starting point is 00:41:20 It doesn't bother me because next Democrat's going to shut this stupid thing down, right? This is not going to get built. We're going to bulldoze a whole arch? I don't think. How fast can you build a fucking giant arch? I have no idea. It's a good point. Maybe it's fast.
Starting point is 00:41:31 It would have to go up, especially one that's, I'm sorry. taller than the Lincoln Memorial. We're making it bigger than Lincoln Memorial. Come on. This is crazy. Matches. go. I care less about Trump building arches that we can perhaps tear down or stop if they don't get finished. Obviously, he says he's going in a snap of, I don't know how the East Wing can see.
Starting point is 00:41:49 East Wing ballroom's going, but it seems to be slower than been originally predicted. I am worried about the Kennedy Center. In the grand scheme of Trump abuses, if he fucks up the Kennedy Center, it's a building, will be okay. But, you know, they have this obsession with like neoclassical architecture, architecture that evokes like the Greeks and the Romans. and the sort of classic forms and it's sort of a vaguely fascist mindset. But Kennedy Center is a beautiful place that I'm sure they don't appreciate.
Starting point is 00:42:17 And then he's talked about wanting to build a bigger entertainment complex. Have you seen this? In one of his posts, he said, not only we're going to renovate the Kennedy Center, we're going to build a bigger and more beautiful entertainment complex.
Starting point is 00:42:26 And like, that's a beautiful building. Like UFC cage match vibe. Yeah. And so I worry about them fucking that up because it's harder to fix it once in a scale. You don't think they're going to nail it. Well, I just think, yeah, I don't think that the architects are there.
Starting point is 00:42:41 When I see that colony, it's a little too roco-co for me. When I see what they did to the east wing colony, I can't imagine. You know, as they said in Beauty and the Beast, it's not Baroque, don't fix it. You know what I'm saying? No, I'm, you know, he's going to fuck up the Kennedy Center for sure. I do prefer him focusing on architecture than on the destruction of democracy. He should be, yeah, if he woke up every day for the next three years and just focused on the arch and the ballroom. Blueprints, hard hats.
Starting point is 00:43:07 And like nothing else. Ribbon cuttings. Anything like that is great. I agree. I agree. Melania, biggest grossing documentary in a decade. Highest for the non-music domestic doc.
Starting point is 00:43:20 They're very like couched. Because Taylor Swift's Aresor Dock opened up at like, you know, 10 times that. But also when you spend $75 million, when you spend $75 million, $40 for the dock, 35 on the marketing, and you make back $8 million in the opening. You don't make that. No, you net $3.5. because half goes to the theaters. I mean, yeah, all it took was $35 million in marketing
Starting point is 00:43:41 and relentless promotion from the most famous person in the world and current president, Donald Trump, to get, you know, it sounds like a bunch of old people in Trump areas went inside this document. Women over 55 were like 70% of the audience. And they also, you know, those people got to say we're sticking it to like liberal Hollywood because people had started making fun of what was expected
Starting point is 00:44:01 to be a low open. So we feel stuck. Trump fans parting with their money to please him no longer a surprise to me. I just, it's a bribe. I found it just so, like, all the, the, there's a, there's a couple people that all, like, they pride themselves in being kind of free speech warriors for like tech bros, finance guys, praising the eight million saying gotcha libs.
Starting point is 00:44:21 And it's like, I get that, like, you didn't like, like, wokeness because you thought it was about the feelings of people that you're not fans of. But your entire operation here seems to be at the feelings of, of Donald Trump, because you seem to be involved in business. Is 75 million for a movie? that makes eight good business? Or is that a bribe in every fucking theater? It is funny because none of them are saying like,
Starting point is 00:44:42 wow, what a great doc. And like our first lady is wonderful. Because they only care about being able to own the libs with the documentary. I'm pretty sure Melania had final cut. I mean, she was like an EP on the project. Yeah, she did. It would all apparently look staged. Of course she did.
Starting point is 00:44:56 The spend coincided with Amazon firing 16,000 people this year, 14,000 more last year. The thing, but for Jeff Bezos, again, like, what is the point of having fuck you? money if you never say fuck you what are you doing man i mean he does say to the amazon workers all the time that's true that's good actually big fuck you to the washington post as well he's saying a lot of fuck you yeah well i guess it's just not to anyone powerful to all society when we all got to see the the brett ratner photos spill out of the epstein files the director of milania was all in the press this weekend for another
Starting point is 00:45:28 reason too another one another one part of the cabal was welcoming was sort of a big kind of welcoming is he's sort of saying just i think he was getting to a visit to, I don't know, wherever he sends up those penis rockets, I think. But I'm not sure. Check the facts on that. But, yeah, there's sort of a despicable lack of kind of moral courage on the part of our wealthiest elites, something that has come up several times during this program.
Starting point is 00:46:05 Pod Save America is brought you by Article. We love Article. Article has great furniture. We have a bunch of great article furniture around the office. They also have a lot of great options if you're looking for something, like fit in your home if you need like a new TV stand, if you need a new dresser, if you need new bedside tables. They have a lot of great options that can fit in with a lot of styles. Article offers a curated range of mid-century modern coastal and Scandy inspired pieces that
Starting point is 00:46:27 not only shine on their own but also pair seamlessly with nearly any other Article product. This thoughtful design approach makes it incredibly easy to mix and match, helping you create a space that feels cohesive and stylish. Article takes great care in curating its collection, focusing solely on high quality, meaningful pieces that will stand the test of time. There's no filler. Every item is chosen for its craftsmanship design and lasting value. Article offers fast, affordable shipping across the U.S. and Canada with options for professional assembly if you prefer a hands-off experience. Articles customer care is available seven days a week, offering knowledgeable support
Starting point is 00:46:54 and even free interior design services to help you get your home just right. With articles 30-day satisfaction guarantee, you can shop with competence knowing that if you're not completely in love with your new furniture, you can easily return an article is offering our listeners, $50 off your first purchase of $100 or more to claim. Visit article.com slash crooked, and the discount will be applied at checkout. That's article.com slash crooked for $50 off your first purchase. purchase of $100 or more. Potsave America is brought you by Hymns. ED is more common than you think, and simpler to treat than ever.
Starting point is 00:47:24 Through HIMS, you can connect online with a licensed provider to access personalized treatment options discreetly and on your terms. Through HIMS, you can access personalized prescription treatment options for ED if prescribed. HIMS offers access to ED treatment options ranging from personalized products to trusted generics that costs 95% less than brand names if prescribed. You shouldn't have to go out of your way to feel like yourself. HIMS brings expert care straight to you with 100%. online access to personalized treatments that put your goals first.
Starting point is 00:47:48 This isn't one-size-fits-all care that forgets you in the waiting room. It's your health and goals put first with real medical providers making sure you get what you need to get results. Thing of Hymns is your digital front door that gets you back to your old self with simple 100% online access to trusted treatments for ED and more. All in one place. To get simple, online access to personalized affordable care for ED, weight loss, and more. Visit Hymns.com slash crooked. That's Hymns.com slash crooked for your free online visit Hymns.com slash crooked. Featured products include compounded drug products, which the FDA does not approve or verify for safety, effect, and Mr. Quality, prescription required.
Starting point is 00:48:21 See website for details, restrictions, and important safety information. Actual price will depend on product and subscription plan. It's been a week since Trump told reporters that his paramilitary squads would, quote, de-escalate a little bit after they killed two American citizens in Minneapolis. Since then, the president has called Alex Prady an insurrectionist whose, quote, stock has gone way down and told reporters that he actually won't be pulling back the operation in Minnesota. a federal judge there also just declined to block Operation Metro Surge, at least for now. ICE, which had issued guidance earlier last week, saying that they'd be returning to targeted enforcement operations, issued a new internal memo on Friday, giving agents the green light to arrest people without a warrant. Then on Saturday, Trump was asked about his announcement that federal agents would only respond to protests in Democratic-led cities if they asked for help.
Starting point is 00:49:14 Here's what he said. Back to your post on ICE protests. Do anything bad to our people? they will be they will have to suffer. I'm sorry. They will get taken care of in at least an equal way. You know, you see it the way they treat our people. And I said, you're allowed. If somebody does that, you can do something back. You're not going to stand there and take it. You know, I think they already know that. That's not how the justice system works. Yeah, they did. They did murder two people in public. So I do, I think they know that they can do whatever they want. I think you think of the original. Yeah, that's the original. That's like, you know, know. That's justice classic. Yeah. Old Testament justice. Another book he has not read, but yes.
Starting point is 00:50:04 How are you guys feeling about the de-escalation? Were you de-escalated? I interpret everything through the prism of Donald Trump, his personal reaction to seeing things on cable TV that he does not like. To the extent there are changes, it is to discourage that from happening again. Hopefully, it creates improvements on the margins for communities. community is affected, but I just, I have no hope for the underlying policy as long as Trump and
Starting point is 00:50:27 Stephen Miller running the show, unfortunately. Yeah, we have, Holman said there will be a reduction in forces. There's an objective way to know if they are pulling back and that's getting some of these people out of Minneapolis. And regardless, like, I do think whatever they were planning to do after Minneapolis, I have to think that what has happened there and then Twin Cities has changed what was going to happen next, right? Because I mean, they did cancel Maine.
Starting point is 00:50:51 They canceled Maine, right? They need that Senate seat, even though they all hate Susan Collins. And so Susan can't, Susan Collins got a got that got that, got that, um, word from Nome that they were going to pull out of, which they called by the way, she was called catch of the day. Yeah. Disgusting. But whether there were rumors about them going to Philly and other places, we don't know.
Starting point is 00:51:06 But, um, it does seem like it has at least, uh, whatever Trump says in the moment, as Tommy said, it's like, they are react. They are at least aware that they need to change the, the images on screen. Uh, also, Christine Nome just announced, uh, body cams, by everyone's going to get body cams. It's a good thing. They're trying to get ahead of this now that they've negotiated an extra two weeks over DHS funding. And one of the, you know, one of the demands was body cams. Look, on the body cams thing, I'm like, great, fine.
Starting point is 00:51:35 But we have a lot of these, we have a lot of this violence, killing and all kinds of other lawlessness by ICE on video. And it doesn't seem to be working all that well since we barely got an investigation into Alex Prattie's death. and the federal government has refused to open investigation into Renee Goods' death. So not great. But yeah, I mean, I think that I think to me this is like keep up the pressure. Yeah. Right? Because they are they are not going to do any of this on their own.
Starting point is 00:52:07 When you do pressure them and you do make a big deal out of this, you do start getting some improvements on the margins. And you can't let up because if you let up, they will just go right back to doing what they do. and, you know, all the pressure in the world is still not going to solve the problem, but at least it's going to make some approval. Yeah, I also would say that body cams are also on when, would be on in places where people no longer have their phones, right? And so, and there was a report out of the Twin Cities
Starting point is 00:52:39 about somebody that was brought to a hospital. He had terrible injuries to his face and injuries to his brain, like multiple fractures. and the federal agents claimed that he had run into a wall. The nurses and health providers denied that. I didn't think that, or at least felt that seemed not credible, including someone else. They had not kept their stories straight.
Starting point is 00:53:04 And so we just have no idea what's going on behind close. There's a lot of reports about what's happening, these detention facilities that are awful. And so, you know, the body cams. Well, in the body cams, you need like mandatory activation. of the body cameras, you need some sort of like clear rules around retention of the footage and access to it. So like there's a lot of ways to kind of just slap a body cam on someone for it to mean nothing. I think that the results are mixed regardless. But at least there's
Starting point is 00:53:32 transparency, hopefully, if done right? Well, to your point, like the no amount of reform, no, no protections will work if law, if the federal agents know that their bosses will protect him even when they break the law, which is why you have them lying and, which is why you have them lying and You can't trust what's coming out of ice. You can't trust Nome. So, yeah, like, the main problem is, well, one major problem, regardless of what we get through law is the fact that their leadership will defend these people, even if they commit terrible crimes against people. One piece of good news out of Minnesota is that five-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos and his father, Adrian, are back home with their mother and brother after a federal judge ordered them to be immediately released from a Texas detention facility in a scathing ruling that accused the government of cruelty, lawlessness, and traumatizing children. Texas Congressman Joaquin Castro, who had visited Liam and Adrian last week, personally accompanied them home.
Starting point is 00:54:25 Unfortunately, Liam's case is in no way isolated. the New York Times reports over the weekend that at least 3,800 children under 18, including 20 infants, were arrested and detained by federal agents last year. Since March of last year, more than 1,700 children have been stuck in detention centers. What did you guys make of the judge's ruling and whether all of this might help other children who are being detained under just horrific conditions right now? I mean, I think all of us felt like this is one of the more sickening stories you've seen in a while. I look locals say ice tried to use this kid as a bait. DHS was like attacking his father repeatedly. These are pending asylum claim.
Starting point is 00:55:04 It sounds like these people are trying to come to the country the right way. Like Liam is out, thank God, because of a massive outcry and because of attention to his case. Like shout out to Congressman Castro. That's incredible what he did. Like exactly how you should be using your power in this moment to draw attention to issues and also like get change at the margins. But we can't replicate that in all these cases. And, you know, there's a horror stories of people in detention of ICE or see. BP detention and places all across the country.
Starting point is 00:55:29 It's so fucked up that, like, they were picked up in Minnesota. They take them to Texas. Then they just, they've been releasing people in Texas. Yeah. Who have no connections there. Like, how the hell are you supposed to get back home? You're just a migrant. You have no money.
Starting point is 00:55:40 You have no connections. You don't know anyone there. Maybe you don't have their phone. So I don't know. Like, I, I, it's glad to see this little kid is out. God knows what, um, trauma, you know, will stick with him for life. I mean, you know, when, uh, Congressman Castro visited last week, his report. after visiting to everyone was that Liam was depressed.
Starting point is 00:56:00 He was sleeping the whole time. He was there. He was sick. And now we find out that the Dilley Immigration Center in Texas, where Liam was being held, there's now a measles outbreak there. So it's real HHS and DHS really working together to fuck up the country on this one. Yeah. When Trump did family separation, like they never successfully reunited with hundreds of kids.
Starting point is 00:56:24 Lots of people, yeah. with their families. A lot of the stories you're hearing are from citizens whose spouses are non-citizens. And they're safely in the country. They can call lawyers. They can get help.
Starting point is 00:56:34 But there are people that have no connections once they're picked up. And they are just in the system, silent. We have no idea what's going on with them. And we know that they're making mistakes, that they're losing track of people, that they're not able to keep the records.
Starting point is 00:56:48 I mean, they're standing up a mass deportation program as quickly as they can with a bunch of incompetent deuce on the ones and two. So it's just an absolutely kind of, it's a mix of kind of cruelty and like the malevolence of it combined with just a gross incompetence across the board knowing that they will net that as long as the Republicans are in power. They will never face accountability for it. I don't know if you guys caught like a Star Tribune story about the conditions inside the federal detention center in Minneapolis. I think it's whippled.
Starting point is 00:57:11 I think you guys visited it, right? But there are reports of one meal a day, overflowing toilets, denial of medical care, sell so crowded that people had to take turns lying down because it wasn't an room for everyone to sleep. And, you know, the Trump administration continues to try to ban lawmakers from surprise visits to detention centers. A judge once again just blocked that policy. Judges keep saying no. The law says that they can go whenever they want. They're members of Congress. And the Trump administration just pretend it's not the law because for what we were saying earlier, right? Like there's no cameras inside there, right?
Starting point is 00:57:44 No one's filming with their phones. There's no body cam. So we don't know what's happening in the detention centers. They're also buying up new warehouses all across the country. because they want to like build more of these detention centers. They're treating people like absolute fucking dog shit in there. I mean, I think 32 people died in ICE custody last year. 17 in Customs and Border Patrol custody.
Starting point is 00:58:05 And in January alone of this year, six people have already died. There was that other case where the administration was claiming it was suicide, but the evidence suggested it might not be a suicide. And the coroner, right? The autopsy. Yeah, that it wasn't a suicide. So like we're just, we're not getting the truth out of these places. They want the notice because, you know, it's like a Jesus has come and look busy situation.
Starting point is 00:58:24 Like they want to have a chance to be ready for any inspections. And I just wonder if, like, to people that would defend the administration on this, what if you, what if Cheesecake Factory announced that they'd only allow health inspections with a weak notice? Do you think that you would want to go eat there? No. And corporations are making a lot of money. I mean, the Financial Times reported that companies, including Palantir and Deloitte, have collectively made more than $22 billion in contracts at the heart of the ice crackdown.
Starting point is 00:58:48 I think like you said Castro going like more more Democrats should visit these detention centers. I think that's a good. It is a good use of your power right now. So we haven't had a chance to talk about Trump's DOJ arresting Don Lemon on Friday, along with another independent journalist named Georgia Fort and several activists, all of whom were charged in connection with the January 18th anti-ice protest in Minnesota church. You'll remember that both a magistrate judge and a federal judge refused to sign off on the government's initial attempt to get an arrest warrant for Lemon and his producer with a federal judge ruling, quote, there is no evidence that those two engaged in any criminal behavior or conspired to do so.
Starting point is 00:59:26 But here we are. How big of a deal is this? When the Department of Justice is arresting people for doing journalism using a specious application of a law, because the attorney general is a tool of the president, and regardless of whether the case is upheld, just trying to get a good news cycle to stay in his good graces. Like, we are in such a dangerous place. Pam Bondi is so, is there such an empty vessel?
Starting point is 00:59:57 What a complete, like, morally vacuous, just an empty, empty shell of a human being. And so you just look at what Pam Bondi's willing to do. Like, I just don't think there's a bottom. I think she's worried about public embarrassment. I think she's worried about what Trump thinks. I think she's worried about what Trump thinks. I think she's worried about bad headlines, but she has no ethical compunctions.
Starting point is 01:00:14 Nothing will stop her from doing something like this. She's like her friend and colleague, Christy Noem. Yeah. Cashelette. All this is Stephen Miller and all. That's why you pick a bunch of middling incompetent fucking mediocrities to run your agencies. I think it's a huge deal. Like John Lemon might get out.
Starting point is 01:00:30 He, uh, a judge might toss this case. It's an obvious First Amendment violation. But the process is the punishment. It's scary. It's expensive. It's intimidating. And it's not happening in a vacuum. the feds raided a Washington Post reporter's house recently. They took her devices. The Pentagon
Starting point is 01:00:45 is forcing its press corps to basically try to get them to sign rules that said they'd run stories by them before reporting. He's suing half the press corps. He's intimidating people to make better coverage. I mean, now the TikTok U.S. operations are owned by a bunch of Trump lackeys. The state of the free press in this country is going in a bad direction. The indictment is ridiculous, too, because it's like, you know, basically what they have to prove, because they're charging the Face Act, which says that you, it was originally for abortion clinics,
Starting point is 01:01:16 for purchasing outside abortion clinics, but it's also for churches as well, right? Like you can't, and it says, it makes it a crime to use force threats or physical obstruction to intentionally interfere with anyone seeking to exercise their right of religious freedom at a house of worship or to intentionally damage the property, right? And so it's not trespassing, right?
Starting point is 01:01:32 Like, you have a trespassing case if you say, okay, this is a private church, people came into the church, we told them to leave, they wouldn't leave, trespassing. That's not what they're charging here. they're charging this the face act right and so to make that stick you have to you can't say that don lemon just came into the church with the protesters you have to say that don't lemon was threatening and obstructing and all this kind of stuff and so they have these the indictment reads like and then he just starts like peppering the pastor with questions threateningly with the questions
Starting point is 01:01:59 he like menacingly puts his hand out and the right you know i saw a fucking scott jennings treated this but he was like oh so democrats position now is that if you are holding your phone up and filming something that you can break any law because then you just call yourself a journalist. It's like, no. Oh, come on, man. That is, that's so stupid. They were like, he shouldn't have just, he shouldn't have charged into the church. And it's like, again, there's like a, there's lesser charges and there's lesser things to do to
Starting point is 01:02:23 someone who walk into a church who is clearly interviewing the pastor, the other people, everyone else. Just covering the protest. He's just a physically obstructing and threatening them. If it's a ridiculous defense because if the, if, if, if, if, if, if, if, if, if, if, if, if, if, he was on the outside being, like, he was on the outside being, like Pam Bond, they should charge him with this. It would never have occurred to anyone a million years. Well, and the other thing is how many...
Starting point is 01:02:43 Ridiculous. How many departments of justice, right? When a magistrate judge refuse to issue the criminal warrant and then it gets kicked up to a federal judge, first of all, what Department of Justice would say, oh, the magistrate judge said no criminal, no arrest warrant, we really want to get this person. So we're going to go up and we're going to appeal it. So then they appeal it to a federal judge and the federal judge is like, no, there's no evidence for this whatsoever.
Starting point is 01:03:04 And then the Department of Justice is like, fuck that federal judge. We're going to a grand jury. where we know we can get an indictment much easier because the defense doesn't have to offer any kind of evidence whatsoever. You're not there for. There's no judge there at all. So we'll go that route. Like that is the authoritarian nature of what they're doing, right?
Starting point is 01:03:22 Like continuing to look for ways to arrest Ton Lemon even after multiple judges and federal prosecutors have quit over this too. There's another eight federal prosecutors, by the way, who just broke before we were in the Minnesota office who are quitting as well. It's the core distinction. You find a crime and then you look for the person who perpetrated it. You don't find a person and then look for the crime that they committed. They're doing that is what they do.
Starting point is 01:03:46 That is Pambodny's main role. I think it might have something to do with why the DOJ is having to recruit on Twitter now. Because every time they try to do one of these things, a bunch of people quit. And they're trying to figure out how to replace career and seasoned professional prosecutors with fucking bozo goons from the fucking law internet. If you're a blue check who's ever posted Pepe the Frog, come join the Department of Justice. We need you. And by the way, explicitly saying, if you support President Trump and our crime agenda, anti-crime agenda, well, really.
Starting point is 01:04:14 Yeah, it's a crime agenda. I had to write the first time. But yeah, like, just absolutely galling. Not to be outdone by Pam Bondi. Tulsi Gabbard is also out there trying to score points with Trump in the MAGA media world. Last week, Dan and I talked about the FBI raid on the Fulton County Elections Office in Georgia, where a photo showed Tulsi talking on the phone in a baseball cap. Like a real ominous.
Starting point is 01:04:34 Yeah. Real ominous seeing the head of the national. National intelligence. It's like you're trying to be kind of, you're trying to hide, but you're not doing a very good job of it. Spy chief, like baseball had to stand of the picture.
Starting point is 01:04:44 It's not that hard. So now we know the New York Times reports on Monday that the day after the raid, Tulsi facilitated a call between some of those same FBI agents and Donald Trump himself. They got a direct line right to the president. The call was short,
Starting point is 01:04:58 according to a U.S. official, who, quote, compared the conversation to a pep rally or a coach giving an encouraging halftime speech to his players. Isn't that wonderful? This is not the only Gabbard story in the news, though. The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday that a U.S. intelligence official has filed a whistleblower complaint,
Starting point is 01:05:15 alleging wrongdoing on Gabbard's part that is supposedly so highly classified that the complaint is kept locked in a safe. And it allegedly implicates another federal agency as well. Who would like to take a stab at what the hell Tulsi Gabbard has been up to? Sure. I'd love to. So I think the key to understanding what Tulsi is doing up to in both these cases is if you think back to last year, March of 2025, Tulsi testifies for Congress and she says, Iran is not decided to get a nuclear weapon. A few months later, Trump decides he wants to bomb anyway. He's asked about her comments and he
Starting point is 01:05:46 says, I don't care what she thinks. A couple days later, she revises her views so that the intelligence case matches Donald Trump's opinion. It's best practices in the retail world. Fast forward to January 1st, 2026, first day of this year, Tulsi posts a photo of herself on the beach in Hawaii doing yoga. And then two days later, the United States invades Venezuela. She was completely cut out of the planning of that operation. I think she's seen that she is like on the house with Trump, doesn't want to get fired. Not much of a warrior pose. Yeah, she's hammered.
Starting point is 01:06:15 You think about it. She's hemorrhaged her policy principle. She was an anti-regime change person, right? That was her big thing. She served in Iraq, didn't want regime change wars, hence supporting Trump. Fine with those now. So now she's like, whatever. I do think there's a deep state.
Starting point is 01:06:27 I'm fine being like the fraud czar. The IG report thing is crazy. I think like my total speculation guess is that there's some intelligence that implicates someone close to Trump. Like a hypothetical one is you could imagine a whistleblower talking about Jared Kushner who doesn't have a clearance, not part of the government, getting access to intelligence information or sharing intelligence information with foreign officials or Steve Whitkoff for flying around the world and negotiating with Vladimir Putin on WhatsApp or whatever the hell he's doing. And like the reason it could be so sensitive is maybe we learned about this through collection on the other countries. And it's so sensitive. I'm making all this up.
Starting point is 01:07:08 Like this is just purely hypothetical. But it's really weird. It's really weird. And she has an obligation when there is a whistleblower complaint like this to brief it to Congress. And I think two weeks after receiving it. And they haven't done that. And that's a huge breach. Yeah, it's not an avocado.
Starting point is 01:07:25 It's not like they're waiting for it to ripen. Yeah, it's a big deal. It's not like the information in that safe is getting less in condescending. convenient for them. And what's strange in the story is you see that they're kind of trying to figure out a way around sharing some of it. They were flirting with talking about executive privilege and other ways of getting out of sharing all of it with Congress. But they, the sort of the lamentation, like, we don't know what to do with this thing. Follow the law. Right. Show it to Congress. You don't have a choice. Also, just not for nothing, but the President of the United States talking through the intelligence director directly to the FBI agents, who participated in a raid on a county elections office in which the president himself has been implicated in a crime way back a couple seasons ago. Right.
Starting point is 01:08:13 That he's now trying to cover up or do whatever. Imagine Evel Haynes, Joe Biden's DNI, being at the Mar-a-Lago raid, tossing her phone on speaker and Joey gives an out-a-boy to the troops there, you know, raiding Melania's underwear drawer or wherever the fuck happened. Not even like not even going through cash Patel, right? They're just going right over the whole chain of command in the FBI. Just right. It's just the agents on the ground.
Starting point is 01:08:36 Trump wants to because he's a, he's like, it's like a coach during half time. Yeah, I think it's wishful thinking. Yeah, it's wishful thinking to think this is part of a cover up. I think there's sort of a drumming up of something new and fake. Yeah. This is about this, I think this is about future election theft, not past election theft. Well, it's both. Because for him, he wants to, we got to set the record straight about 2020 and we got to make some arrests.
Starting point is 01:08:55 So then we go, then we can go to the future too. Yeah, you're right. He said something today to Dan Bongino, who was until recently the deputy director of the FBI, about federalizing elections and 15 of the crooked states or something like that. So, yeah, he's got it on the mind. Yeah, he's been on that beat. He's been on that beat. So, yeah. They will take whatever they found.
Starting point is 01:09:14 They will use it to claim that this is the reason. There's some pretext for some takeover. He said, we should take over the voting in at least 15 places. The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting because we have states that are so crooked. Well. Yeah. The worst the polling gets, I think, the more animated is a project. They have good reason to worry because on Saturday, Democrats flipped a Trump plus 17 state Senate seat in Texas, winning it by roughly 14 points.
Starting point is 01:09:40 That is a 31 point swing. The Democratic candidate, Taylor Remit, a union president and Air Force veteran, defeated the Trump-backed candidate. Lee Wamsgans. I know. Any relation? Tom Momskins. I was like, I saw the name Wamsgams. I was like, how is that even possible?
Starting point is 01:09:54 That was a made-up comedy name. Yeah. It was a runoff for the ninth district around Fort Worth. Again, this is a state Senate district, but about a million people in that district, so big district. The day before and the day of the election, Trump had posted to Truth Social in support of Wamsgans, giving her his cherished endorsement and calling her phenomenal and a quote, true MAGA warrior. But here's how Trump reacted to her loss on Sunday. Democrat won your special election in an area that you had won by 17 points. What is your reaction to that?
Starting point is 01:10:27 I don't know. I didn't hear about it. Somebody ran where? In Texas, special election for legislative. The ninth state Senate. I'm not involved in that. That's a local Texas race. You mean I won by 17 and this person lost? Things like that happen. It's true. They do have a lot. It might happen a lot more.
Starting point is 01:10:47 What do you guys think about the, a lot of hype around this? overhyped, underhyped? What do you think? I think, well, I saw people making a Senate map where if we see, if we have a switch, did they? Yeah, a Senate map where if there's a swing of 31 points or roughly 31 points, it would mean Democrats would be able to get to 59 or more, get to 60 Senate seats. So, I mean, straightforward from here. Fun to think about. Look, whatever the implications of a specific special election at a moment of just absolute kind of Trump doltrums and sort of dissatisfaction in the country. And like, the, the, The question I had about it was, though, like, is there really something happening with, like,
Starting point is 01:11:25 between Alex Preti, the anti-second amendment stuff, the turn against ICE, the lack of focus on affordability, the endless headlines about Trump taking over the Kennedy Center and building arches? Like, is there something deeper happening? Like, is there an actual sort of weakness in his, not base of support, but whatever, the two columns over? Like, is that real and could it be lasting? Like, is this a low watermark or is at the beginning of, like, a real? unraveling. I just don't think we know. Yeah. I was thrilled to see Tom Wamscans in Death by Lightning, which I watched one episode of... Isn't it great? It's about the president
Starting point is 01:11:58 getting called? Quite good, yeah. Garfield. But really was the doctors, the doctors digging around in there? The doctors dug around in there. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I think. I talked to Bobby Polito about this race in the interview today. First of all, everyone check it out. He's really cool. He was in town to go to the Grammys because he was Grammy nominated. That's why the traffic can say that. Careful. That's where they get you. Don Lemon. That's to ask on Lemon about that. Very interesting guy. not your traditional congressional candidate. But like, you know, I was talking to him about his district and, you know, the gerrymander that's happened in Texas and whether he thinks that Republicans may have over-torked it.
Starting point is 01:12:31 And he feels pretty optimistic that they have over-assumed their ongoing support with Latino voters in particular. And, you know, this, you know, state Senate seat is one little indication of that, but there might be a broader set of numbers coming our way. At least three of the five seats that they score. squeezed out of there and their gerrymander, I think, could be at risk now. Listen, I wanted to say that they've over gerrymandered. Then I was told that that was wishful thinking. And now it's back to not being just wishful thinking. Who's your strata?
Starting point is 01:13:02 No, there was a, there was a consensus. There was a Peter Twinklish. Was it NIMBY Twitter? This is weeks ago. Not NIMBY Twitter. Don't get me started on NIMBY Twitter. Unbelievable what's happening with NIMB Twitter here in Los Angeles. But the point I was making is only that I think are we back into saying that they may
Starting point is 01:13:18 have over jerrymandered. then it's back to being possible because it was it was it was seen as um polyanish for a while that's all i'm saying it was you were so right so early i didn't know i'm not saying i knew to your point about something deeper uh happening so this was a runoff this election the first election was in november um so the same district and all the republican candidates combined versus the democratic candidates combined it was um gop plus five so it's that was that was that was good enough for Democrats. That was plus five in a Trump plus 17 district.
Starting point is 01:13:53 And this was then 14 points. So there was another like 20 point swing just between November and what is it? February. And the Republican had way more money. Way out. Way out. And so now turnout was low, right? Turnout was about probably a third of what they're.
Starting point is 01:14:11 Seven people. Yeah, right now. So it's about 100,000 voters. It's about a third of what you'll get maybe people in Texas who know this kind of stuff estimate for the for the midterms about a third of what you'll get and you know lower for a special but it wasn't low and then uh like this highly concentrated democrat it was because about 50 percent plus of the voters were Republican primary voters so that means that the Democrat won by a lot of Republicans or a lot of independence especially and some Republicans uh deciding to change
Starting point is 01:14:42 their votes which is huge well luckily today in the Texas Senate race everything seems copacetic everyone involved in that primary. I'm just getting a little greatest. No one is posting videos. I think it's important to take random TikToks and then decide that they're gospel. For those who don't know, we're talking about, there seems to be some sort of beef between James Taylor Rico,
Starting point is 01:15:01 the former candidate in the race, I don't know. And Colin Allred and... Colin, who we really like, he's been on the show, a cool guy. I don't know what's happening down there. I wish they would just pick up the phone, talk on the phone. Yeah, one thing we should do is win the Texas Senate race, and so that's just something everyone should be thinking about.
Starting point is 01:15:15 I love to. Or at least try. Try, right? We should try to win that race for sure. Maybe not throw the race before it happens. That's one thing that we should think about. I don't know. I don't know. It's just a thought. We do need it. We do need it. We do. We do. We do. We need Texas. We need Texas electoral votes someday, too. Also. One day, one day those Texas electoral votes are going to come along. Yeah. And if they don't, there won't be a Democratic president. Hey, hey, hey, hey. There won't be even either way. So you're saying there's a down. Don't blame Texas. Speaking of Democratic presidents, as we were recording, Bill and Hillary Clinton agreed to testify in the House Oversight Committee's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. I heard that, I heard they rejected them. Now they don't want them. Yeah, I heard they still want to, they want to go forward with contempt.
Starting point is 01:16:00 It's like, hey, guys, can you see you belong together? Yeah, it's like, also, by the way, James Comer, listen, I know it sounds like I'm a partisan Democrat and I am, but like, how would some fucking inherent contempt feel right now, huh? Put a little pep in your step, huh, James Comer? I'm sure. I'm sure that's where they were headed. A couple sergeant arms lying. I'm sure maybe that's why they're rejecting it. Honestly, I don't know. They're going to show up at the hearing at the schedule time and the schedule room and they're still going to arrest them.
Starting point is 01:16:26 I don't like the cut of your jib. Arrest them. And then Trump's going to do a conference call with the whole room. Yeah, and Tulsi's going to be there. Anyway, when we come back, we will have Tommy's interview with congressional candidate Bobby Bolito. This podcast is sponsored by Strawberry.me. Let me ask you something. You think LeBron, Patrick, Michael.
Starting point is 01:16:52 Holmes or Serena got to the goat status by guessing? No. No. Coaching. They had coaching. And some talent. And a lot of talent. There's an interesting paradox.
Starting point is 01:17:04 I don't know if you call it a paradox, but there's a statistical thing that emerges that's confused as people about the interplay between training and talent. When you look at high performance athletes, because when you pull out the high performance athletes and you do the comparison between training and talent, it looks as though the training is not helpful, but it's only a kind of statistical anomaly that naturally emerges from when you look at high talented people in a way that I'm not going to spend any more time on because this is an ad for coaching. Strawberry.combe.
Starting point is 01:17:33 Strawberry.com. Who does Patrick Mahomes play for, quick? Keep it in. I don't know. Chiefs. Chiefs. His teammate dates Taylor Swift. Oh, I know about that.
Starting point is 01:17:45 I know about Travis and the brother. They have a good relationship. But strawberry dot me. My favorite coach is Coach Kerr because he was on Pod Save America. Dan interviewed him once, remember? No, that was Steve Kerr. Wait, who did I say? I thought you meant Coach K.
Starting point is 01:18:00 Oh, no. The Duke guy? He's right. He's right? Coach Kerr. Is it Steve Kerr? He talked to you? Sorry, you, okay, sure.
Starting point is 01:18:07 I thought you meant Coach K. Who's Coach K? Duke guy. That's right, because Coach Ker is a huge lip. He's a huge lib. Sorry, you know what? I wrongly fact checked to you. Strawberry dot me.
Starting point is 01:18:17 This ad's going great. Matches you with a professional career coach. who breaks down your game film. They help you negotiate that raise, navigate the politics, and execute a game plan that actually works. And the cost, think about it. One raise, one promotion, and this coaching pays for itself 10 times over.
Starting point is 01:18:32 That's the best ROI in the game. Stop riding the bench in your own life. Go to strawberry.comme slash crooked today and get 50% off your first coaching session. Strawberry.combe, because pros don't guess they get coach to win. He's a Latin Grammy winner and a Tejano music icon currently running for Congress in Texas' 15th district. Welcome to Potsave America.
Starting point is 01:18:53 Bobby Polito, great to see you. Thank you. In person. Yes, in person. Yes, we were, most people don't know what the Hanno is. So if you're white or black and not Hispanic, you're like, what is that? Well. Yeah, it's kind of like Selena.
Starting point is 01:19:08 So I tell everybody, it's what Selena did. I want to hear a lot more about the music piece of this. Because you're in town because you went to the Grammys last night in person in Los Angeles, right? Correct. I was nominated. How to go? I lost. I'm sorry.
Starting point is 01:19:23 Is that okay? Is it just, is it a thrill to be nominated? I've lost more than I've won. And I think most have. I mean, you saw most of these people, you see, you see like Lady Gaga going against Justin Bieber and other Titans. Only one wins. Right. Right. And so, so it's, it's a very hard award to win. Do the competitive juices flow when you're up there? You know what? I won two Latin Grammys, Latin Grammys, which is a little, not the American Grammy. And it's really more pressure when they're, you know, and it's really more pressure when they're up there. You know what? I won two Latin Grammys. You know what? I won two Latin Grammys, and it's really more pressure when they expect you to win, then when you're not expecting to win. Right. Right. Because if you're not expected to win, like, who cares? Who cares?
Starting point is 01:20:01 I wasn't supposed to win anyway, right? Right, yeah. But if you're supposed to win and you don't. Yeah, that's true. Yeah. Yeah, there's no expectations. Like, you don't write a speech. You have a couple too many drinks.
Starting point is 01:20:10 Then you have a good time when you get up there and, you know, kind of say your piece. It's work. See, okay. It's work. We were chatting on the way in. Yeah. You were telling me that no matter what the event is, it's work. But like, okay.
Starting point is 01:20:21 So I didn't watch. last night because I was dealing with a three-year-old and a one-year-old. I'm like a sporadic award show watcher. The ones where it's lots of long speeches. Yeah. That seems very boring to me. But the Grammys, it's like a really cool, interesting concert every time. It was a good show.
Starting point is 01:20:42 I liked it. I'm an old-school guy, so I like the older artists. I don't really know the younger artists, right? So I really like see Lady Gaga. I thought she was great. You know, Bruno Mars, I thought that was great. You know, Post Malone singing with Slash and like, that's cool. That is cool.
Starting point is 01:21:01 Yeah, that's cool. They do a good job like mixing, matching. Yeah, yeah. I hate that feeling, though, when all of a sudden you don't know what the kids are listening to. I feel like my brain, the older I get is kind of like hardening. It's like getting new music in there until a stick. I guess if you see someone in concert, like that's when you create an experience, I think that creates that, like, memory. But you know, there's so much talent, man.
Starting point is 01:21:23 all talented. There's no slouches there. Everybody's good. Yeah, and they work their asses off. That also, too. Yeah, a lot of bloody fingertips on the guitar over. Yeah, lots of hours of practice and stuff. But people don't realize, like, how hard it is to walk and to be in an award ceremony with your wife. Why is that? Because she's got to wear high heels, because that's what they say that looks good. But she's got to walk like 10,000 miles, right, that day. Yeah. And she's complaining. And she's in pain. I would be. I mean. I would be. I mean. I mean, it's work. Did you wear boots?
Starting point is 01:21:56 I wore boots in a hat and all leather. Okay. Like the S&M version of a cowboy. Which that is exactly what we need, I think, to win a congressional seat in Texas. All right, let's talk some politics. So a Democrat just won a major special election victory in Texas over the weekend. They flipped a Texas Senate district that Trump won by 17 points in 2024. And I think this was against like a much better funded opponent, right, on the Republican.
Starting point is 01:22:23 Yes, correct. What do you think happened in like, is it irresponsible to read T leaves and try to divine what this says about 2026? I think a little bit of both. Okay. There is, it's good news. Yeah. It really is because, I mean, Trump won my district by 17.9 points. Oh, interesting. Wow. Right. So don't think for a minute, I wasn't looking at this and going like, okay, I want to see how this goes. You're like, here's that point nine. I did not expect him to win by 14 points. I thought he may eke it out. this is a big deal. And then if you look in the Hispanic districts, he overperformed Kamala by 40 to 50 points. What? 40 to 50? Yes. Wow.
Starting point is 01:23:05 Yes. So, so in the Fort Worth areas. Oh. So, so this is, um, it was very surprising. I was very shocked and very encouraged. And I'm not surprised to be honest with you from what I'm seeing on the ground, even where I am. Well, so let's talk about that.
Starting point is 01:23:22 So you're running. For the 15th district, for those who, you know, don't have a map ready in their brain, it's like it's as far south as you can get in Texas, right? Right on the border. Yeah. And then it goes, shoots up and then kind of east of San Antonio. Is that the new map? That's correct. Okay.
Starting point is 01:23:37 I gerrymandered it. Yeah, we'll talk about that. Right. So Wikipedia tells me the district is 80% Latino. Is that right? Yep. Okay. It is.
Starting point is 01:23:44 Yeah. You got parts of the Rio Grande Valley where Democrats got crushed in 24. Right? No. No? You're touching. There's the, yeah, there's a caveat. Okay, tell me the caveat. Well, they gerrymandered it to make it seem like South Texas was red, but in our elected
Starting point is 01:24:03 representative right now, Monica Dela Cruz has never won the Valley. Okay. She's never won South Texas. Even with the Trump wave, she lost. Oh, right. Okay. Right. So where she did is she picks up the margins up in the northern and just blows it out like
Starting point is 01:24:16 80, 20, and that gave her the win. Okay. Well, so, but just on the South Texas piece, there was that big. swing right there was to trump there was a there was a huge swing why do you think that was like what happened i think the candidate didn't resonate with him and i think i hate to play into our own stereotypes as Hispanics but i think since i'm a Hispanic i'm a Latino i can i can do it say whatever you want if there's if there's a stereotype that's that fits us is we're very aspirational people right the reason why a lot of Latinos come to the united states is for a chance to work and actually
Starting point is 01:24:50 make it. I think if you think most about his banks are hardworking, very family oriented. And they come from normally from countries that if you work really hard, you get nowhere. Nobody wants to come over here and work really hard and get nowhere. And that's where we are right now.
Starting point is 01:25:08 So a lot of people in the Hispanic community were saying, like, we voted for Trump because we thought I could work hard and actually do something. So it's economic. It's a big thing. And then you tack on this, the cruelty that's going on right now, the fear with the raids and things like that that is also affecting
Starting point is 01:25:25 the economy, then there's a huge, huge backlash against it. Yeah. I think you're making important point, too, which is like, I think for someone who's a political, obsessive like me, I think of Trump the candidate, but a lot of people still think of the businessman, the reality show. Yeah, the millionaire, the billionaire. You want to be rich. You want to be rich. Give me some of that. Yeah. When you're doing town halls, like, what, what are you hearing about? And then Secondarily, like, what's the conversation about border security and immigration policy like today as compared to maybe a year ago? I think it depends. I've already visited all 11 counties.
Starting point is 01:26:00 I'm not even in my primary yet. You're working. You're out there. I've been fussing my butt, man. My wife is the best person in the world because when you retail campaign, it's the most time-consuming type of campaigning. You're actually grassroots on the ground meeting voters. That's what we're doing, taking their questions. And look, it depends because in the Real Grand Valley,
Starting point is 01:26:24 immigration is a big deal. Because we're in a community where 35 or 40% of the people speak Spanish. And when you see that the administration is racial profiling also based on language, that's a problem. In a community with a lot of people who speak Spanish and, you know, so it affects our businesses. We get a lot of, we've always historically dependent, of tourism for Mexico. And right now, tourists don't feel welcome. And so they're not coming
Starting point is 01:26:53 and spending their money like they should. You know, especially the dollar keeps declining. It's bad. The peso should be really good. They should be coming in droves. Right. And so the economy's not doing well. And there's going to be a big backlash about it. Well, the good news is we also pissed off the Canadians. So they're also not visiting. Not just a kidding. We pissed off every ally we've ever had. We're working on pissing off most of NATO. Right. The European Union. I'm not a lot of flights from Greenland these days, I'm guessing. No, I don't think so. Yeah, well, I do want to ask you about, like, the economics of these, this ice crackdown.
Starting point is 01:27:26 Because, I mean, you know, I'm reading articles about kids who haven't gone to school in a month. Correct. That's right. Families who can't go to a job site. I know someone here in L.A. whose husband was picked up and detained for hours when he was trying to work construction job. That's right. And then, you know, he just, like, didn't have his papers on him. But then he didn't go to work that day, right?
Starting point is 01:27:46 flipped out everyone around him. That's right. So it's like, what are you seeing in terms of the economic impact? Oh, that's a huge deal. I mean, look, the builder community right now is struggling, big time. Think about it like this, right? We talked about the aspirational nature who we are. We're always trying to work. So a lot of these construction owners of these construction companies, this is their first generation where they're actually making money. Because before them, right. They were busy trying to do the work. Right, right. And or their parents were, and they wanted them to now get out of that. And so now when they're barely starting to get there, they don't have a workforce. Yeah. And what do you do about that? I mean, that's the problem, right? And
Starting point is 01:28:26 they get really angry because people say, just hire American labor. It's like, I'm putting ads out. Nobody wants to work those jobs or they don't know how to work those jobs. Right. So what do you do? Once business slows and construction slows, construction is houses get more expensive, right? And then realtors get mad because they don't have enough things to sell. And so it's just a domino effect business-wise, which historically the Chamber of Commerce vote tends to lean Republican. And right now they're very angry about this
Starting point is 01:28:57 because it hasn't. And us as Democrats, Tommy, haven't been, we haven't been really good salesmen of ourselves on economics. When you go just look at our economic history, Democrats have always been better on the economy. Historically, I mean, we've always been better and we just don't sell ourselves that way. And people think Republicans, oh, successful businessman and they're better for the economy. And that's just not true. Yeah, I wonder whether it is.
Starting point is 01:29:23 It's just sort of a cut taxes, you know, equals good business in people's minds. I'm wondering like sort of where this disconnect comes from. You know what? That equals deficits. Yeah. That's what we're in debt. Right. Right. Yeah. Our kids, kids will be. That's exactly right. And it's because of Republicans, to be honest with you. Well, look, I agree with you on the, Joe Biden. He handled inflation, I think better than a lot of countries did, but it wasn't good enough for people. Correct. Correct. Well, we printed a lot of money. Yeah. Yeah. We printed a lot of money. But also, you know, I think immigration was also a big driver of votes against Biden's last cycle. And, you know, look, I'm not a fan of Governor Abbott, as you of my guess, Texas governor. We agree. He seems like not the nicest guy. But I think politically speaking, he did have an enormous impact on the national debate about immigration through this sort of sustained busing of individuals.
Starting point is 01:30:14 And so like early on, I think people probably remember Ron DeSantis flies a bunch of people to Martha's Vineyard. It was so obviously a stunt and so obviously shitty that there was a backlash. But the busing was just relentless. And again, like treating someone like a political prop or pawn, I think is like morally wrong. Agreed. But there's another piece of this that's like, well, okay, why do just border communities need to shoulder the economic and kind of social burden of having a bunch of people? people in their communities. I'm just wondering if you could, like, talk about how people you knew felt at the end of the Biden days and that conversation has changed today.
Starting point is 01:30:54 I think what it was is there was a disappointment that for three years he didn't go there and didn't address the problem. In year four, actually James Langford had a deal negotiated, right, that Trump eventually eventually killed because he wanted to win. Right. And so we didn't really do a good enough job educating people on how they themselves also had a hand in this. But, but it took too long. So, you know, you got to understand in South Texas, there's a lot of Border Patrol agents, and they vote.
Starting point is 01:31:27 And so do their families. And they felt, I mean, I have friends and family and Border Patrol. And they felt that they had been, they didn't sign up for necessarily for processing people because that's what it was becoming with the asylum system. with the asylum seekers. They're like, I signed up to patrol the border not to be processing people, right? Because that's all they were doing, was just processing.
Starting point is 01:31:51 And then the people would fly to wherever they wanted to fly. And that created a lot of resentment. It really did. And I don't want to ever sound like inhumane about that because that's people's spirit. They always want to look for a better life. That's natural.
Starting point is 01:32:07 That's a part of what our ancestors would have done for us. So, but it took four years for him to sign an executive order, which in year four, that immigration slowed down considerably because of he addressed it, which just took too long. Yeah, it's like way too long. No, but I think you're making an important point, which is like, I think it's important to hear from people like you who like live in these communities and no friends and just understand how complicated things are, right? Like, you have a bunch of friends in Border Patrol. I do. They're good people. They are. They're not trying to harm anyone.
Starting point is 01:32:38 And also like, look, we're all horrified by what's happening. happening with ICE, the video of the murder of Alex Preddy by two CPP guys, horrifying, right? Horrifying. And then ProPublica just published their names. It seems like the two men are Latino, and they end up killing a white protester, which I think is just the perfect example of like the scrambled racial politics of all of this, right? Because these guys are like at a organization that is recruiting people with white nationalist imagery run by Steve. and Miller, who is an out-and-out racist. And it's just like, nothing is what you'd expect.
Starting point is 01:33:14 And I think we all need to get comfortable with the complexity, you know? I agree, Tommy. But I also don't feel like, I feel like we're putting a lot of emphasis on ICE and not emphasis on this administration. Right? People, like right now, ICE is the boogeyman. Last night at the Grammys, everybody was out, ice out and F-E ice. And it's, ICE was always existed, right?
Starting point is 01:33:39 And whatever you want to call it, we need a force to get rid of bad actors in our country that are criminals and bad people. You need that. You can't not have that. But I think when we just make a focus about ICE, we take off the focus on this administration that's actually using them in that correct, in that manner, right? The political decision's driving how they act. That's the problem, right? It's when they tell them and they go berate them in the White House and say, get me 3,000 people. Right. Now you're forcing them to be overly aggressive to meet quota numbers.
Starting point is 01:34:14 Yeah. That's very different than saying how they campaigned. We're going to go get out the bad people. Right. That's is not what they're doing. That's absolutely right. And so those are two separate things where you say, hey, go get out the bad people. Nobody's going to tell you you can't do that.
Starting point is 01:34:28 But when you're deporting gardeners and grandmas, right? And then you go in and you're violating constitutional rights. You know, Fourth Amendment, just like crazy. This is this is not who we are We can't be that And we have to call the administration out on it Because it's easy They're going to just go, well, it's ICE's fault
Starting point is 01:34:50 Yeah, that's the boogeyman No, it's you. Yeah, right? It's Stephen Miller, it's Donald Trump It's the people that are enabling them That's who has to be called out And we can't give them a pass So it doesn't sound like you're in the kind of
Starting point is 01:35:05 Abolish ICE camp of the solution to this problem Look, it's been branded really poorly now I don't know. It's a bad It's got, you know, you give love a bad name, you give ICE a bad name, well, they did. But you got to have some type of administrative arm to get rid of the bad people. I'm for that, I don't think anybody's going to disagree with that, right?
Starting point is 01:35:28 Because there are bad people in every walk of life. But the way they're doing it, I think that's where it's bad. And I'll tell you, look, last night was a room of, of people in the industry, right? And artists, we're emotional, man. We pour our heart out in the music, right? And so we are probably more emotional than most. But most Americans, especially in I live,
Starting point is 01:35:54 I live in a rural district. People aren't exactly that emotional. They're more, okay, let's reason with this. Let's find some common sense solutions to this. Yeah. And I want to caution, you know, because I kind of, I come from both worlds. I live in a rural area
Starting point is 01:36:10 and I'm in an industry that's very, very much emotional and we kind of have a blend of it and say like, yeah, I don't think abolishing is the right word. I know that's the emotional response to it because of what we're seeing and it's tragic and I hate it. I hate it as much
Starting point is 01:36:29 believe me with every fiber of my soul. But we have to be smart on how to point them out and let people know why we got here. And we got here because we were sold to build a goods and we voted for the wrong person. Not we. I did not vote for that. What I'm saying is as a community. As a country, yeah. As a country. No, I agree with you. Look, obviously Trump and Stephen Miller are the drivers of this. I think where I kind of personally
Starting point is 01:36:52 land is blaming ICE is almost too simplistic. Like I do like CBP obviously. It's been a huge problem here. The needs reforms there. You need reforms of ICE. I also think the Department of Homeland Security is a complete total fucking disaster. It is. We created it after 9-11 in this like climate of fear. And we made securitize. all these functions that maybe would be better in the Department of Justice or other places. So there's a broader rethinking that needs to happen, but it's probably bigger than just ICE, in my view.
Starting point is 01:37:18 I agree. I mean, you see the Secretary of Homeland Defense, it looks like it's Halloween every time she comes out. She's got a different outfit. She loves. Cosplaying is different things. I just don't see, like, that's not, it's ridiculous. Yeah.
Starting point is 01:37:33 It's not serious. It's not a great run organization. Let me ask you about Texas doing this. mid-decade redistricting. The conversation in Washington is often like, how does this impact the balance of power, right? The number of seats are Democrats, Republicans. How do human beings in Texas feel about having this forced on them?
Starting point is 01:37:51 Do they know? Do they care? A lot of people don't even know. It's amazing how many people have no idea. I still to this day, people in the real Grand Valley tell me, hey, am I in your district now? They know there was a change,
Starting point is 01:38:05 but they didn't really know, like, a lot of people didn't know what was going on. I sure as hell did. Yeah. When I was keeping an eye on it when they were doing this. And I'll tell you, Tommy, like, from my perspective, I looked at this and went, they're assuming they're going to win those five seats. And they're also assuming that they're going to keep everything that they have. And from my perspective, I'm like, no, you're not.
Starting point is 01:38:29 Not if I have something to say about it. You think this is a mistake? They kind of, there's like the dummy mander, right? Oh, absolutely. Oh, yeah. Look, I was a political science major in college, and so I, the nerd in me comes out sometimes, right? I try to keep it suppressed. You're in the right place, man.
Starting point is 01:38:47 I try to keep it suppressed, right? But you look at it and you say, okay, everybody went on 2024 Trump numbers, which is what they did. But we went on, we went in research 22 numbers, which is a Biden midterm, which favors Republicans in the opposite party is in power. And there is a candidate named Rochelle Garza from Brownsville, Texas. that ran against Ken Paxton for Attorney General. She lost my district by less than one point. That's not that red. No, no.
Starting point is 01:39:18 That's a little red. Yeah. Right? Now, I looked at that and I went, oh. So on one hand, I was really mad of they were doing, but if I could be honest, like from my personal perspective, I went, well, I don't hate it. Because 65% of the district now is new. Huh.
Starting point is 01:39:37 to her, to the incumbent. So she doesn't have the name ID in that district. If that makes any sense. No, it makes whole sense. So, like, I'm a South Texas musician. Right? Our music is very cultural to our people. You know, in our kinseneras and barbecues,
Starting point is 01:39:56 my music and music of my father, too, has been historically present. We've been there forever. So we've toured those areas. We have friends. We have friends. right we know the people and when I saw this and I went oh you're giving me Beville Texas a Tejano town well you're they're looking at it going well they voted 75% Republican and
Starting point is 01:40:18 I'm going yeah but there are people yeah they see numbers you see human beings that's exactly right that's exactly right okay so your staff how often are they trying to get you to sing at events play music how many events turn into concerts man you know what when we go do a ranch hall we sing them a couple of songs. Okay. I go take their questions, we feed them. You get a guitar and hand?
Starting point is 01:40:45 What do we got? No, I take a band. Okay. The whole band? Not a whole band. It's kind of like an acoustic set, right? It's an acoustic set. So while they're eating food, they're hearing our music.
Starting point is 01:40:53 Yeah. Not my music, but our type of music. And then I go speak, I take their questions, I answer all their questions, which I might add my, the person that we want to take down, and defeat,
Starting point is 01:41:07 Monica de la Cruz has never done a town hall. She's never answered her constituents questions ever. How do that? You hear that sometimes about members of Congress and it's like,
Starting point is 01:41:15 did she just move to D.C. and she never comes back. How is that possible? She goes and they hide her and they protect her because they don't want her to expose herself. So they're trying to play her safe.
Starting point is 01:41:26 They're hiding her. So what I'm saying is I'm going to be the opposite. I'm going to go everywhere. Take some questions. And take questions from you bring them on. Play some bangers.
Starting point is 01:41:34 Yeah, play some. some bangers. We finish. We close with that. And then it went, everybody's happy. Do you do covers ever? Just your stuff? Do my stuff. That's fun. God. Yeah. I like, sometimes we get to do live podcasts. And it's really cool. And we've gone out in front of big audiences. And it's exciting. And I love doing it. And I get to be with my friends. But every single time I walk out on the stage, I think to myself, God, I wish I was doing something cooler for the next hour and a half. Like I had a real talent. And I was playing music or I was funny. I was doing a stand-up set. No. But you know, You know what? It's perspective is everything, right? I always took my approach to music. It's work. It's a job. How, so you mentioned your father was a... Yeah, my father's a legend in the music.
Starting point is 01:42:17 It's like Hank Williams, Hank Williams Jr., but... Yeah, well, so... But not racist. Now, I was just kidding. Like, you know what I mean? Like, in the cultural thing. I get it. There's a lot of legends in Texas. I get some Willie Nelson, THC drinks in the office right now. So when you're growing up, your father's being as big as he was in the business, did that make you want to play music?
Starting point is 01:42:38 Do you know what make you walk away? No, I was a Texas boy stater in high school. I went to boy state. That's like a whole government. Like I was a history buff. I loved government. I loved politics. And that's why I became a political science major.
Starting point is 01:42:52 I got an academic scholarship to go to St. Mary's University in San Antonio. And so I did not want to be a singer. That was not in the plans. My God, so you're walking on that stage thinking, God, I wish I could do a podcast right now. That was always greener. That was my first love.
Starting point is 01:43:07 Like, I was not, like, once I had success in music, I recorded a song with my dad. That's what did it, right? So I got two labels. It really went really high and it hit. And I had two labels in a bidding war. I ended up negotiating my contract and renegotiating my father's contract.
Starting point is 01:43:26 in that same negotiation. I got him 100% raise. Hell yeah. Yeah. And so I ended up trying music. I said, Dad, I'm going to try it out and see what happens. And that ended up turned into a platinum record. And then I've been at it 30 years.
Starting point is 01:43:40 That's incredible. And so my music's kind of gone, my life has gone full circle. And I'm like, you know what? I'm tired of what I'm seeing. Right now I'm just a guy with an opinion. I want to be somebody with my opinion matters. And I want to be a voice for me. my people and yes it would be taking a huge pay cut from what I'm doing right now but it's worth it my
Starting point is 01:44:03 my life has to mean more than just music in my opinion and and I haven't seen I've been really frustrated with the way things have been going with our political discourse and I do think that I have a different perspective of where I come from and and and I got nothing to lose I really want to I really want to represent my people. That's exciting. Well, so where folks want to help out, contribute, where they go? Yeah, they can go from Bobby Polito for Texas. Um, my district is 11 counties and we're not a very, we're very poor actually. My district's very poor. So we kind of have to go fundraise out of the district. Not my, my, I'm not going to say poor. I misspoke. My district is broke. And I say that because our spirit down there is we don't consider ourselves poor.
Starting point is 01:44:55 We consider ourselves broke. It's temporary? Because tomorrow we're going to make it. Yep. Yeah. Right. And so we're very aspirational. But we've been, she has like $2 million in her war chest.
Starting point is 01:45:07 And I have a primary. And so we need to fundraise aggressively. But I feel very, very confident that we're going to win. Wow. And we're going to flip this district. I think it's exciting. I think it's inspiring when people come from nontest, traditional walks of life and run for office.
Starting point is 01:45:22 Like, why do we, not everyone needs to be a lawyer. You know what I mean? Like, it's great when people from, from the entertainment industry run who have a different kind of cultural connection. There's not many entertainers, though. Have you seen this guy Bobby Wine running in Uganda? I have not. He's like incredible massive music star running against an absolute tyrant in the thug. I know.
Starting point is 01:45:40 That's like not normal. No, it's not. It's like completely rare. Well, because I think people are turned off because people are worried that the minute you jump into politics, you're going to polarize half your audience. and maybe they won't listen to you anymore and won't buy records and it scares people.
Starting point is 01:45:53 But I'm not that. Yeah. You don't seem polarizing. I'm not a polarizing guy. But I'll fight. Don't, don't, don't, don't, don't confuse the niceties for a fight. I'm not, I haven't gotten to fighting for 20 years. So don't worry.
Starting point is 01:46:06 Yeah, but I didn't end well for me. I had a giant swollen ear and it sucked. Yeah, I've been, I've had my fair share of bar fights. But I'm a Texas boy, right? I know, of course. You can expect that. But, um, look, I'll fight for, for the people. And that's the bottom line.
Starting point is 01:46:22 Our health care down there is a mess, man. She voted to cut Medicaid, Medicare SNAP. Like all the things that our district that ours really depends on, she voted to cut. And so you have to fight for what's right. Our health care system is in shambles. I go get my health care in Mexico. Really? Yes.
Starting point is 01:46:42 Cheaper, easier, why? Listen, musicians, all the musician community, we don't work for school districts or other things like that. where you can pull it. Right. Health insurance is through the roof. It got more expensive now with this ACA subsidies that expired. So we're on the border, but how many people that are not on the border are struggling right now? It's just ridiculous.
Starting point is 01:47:05 I mean, we really have to get in there. And the biggest problem we're going to face is corruption because they have their claws in these politicians. Yes, not good. And, you know, somebody has to go. over there and just call them out for it. I love it. I love it. Well, the website again is
Starting point is 01:47:23 Bobby Pulito for Texas.com. Great to meet you. Thank you for running. Thanks for coming in. And, you know, next Grammys, you're going to win one and then, but also you're going to be a member elected officials. No new music, no Grammys.
Starting point is 01:47:37 What if you get inspired one day? You're sitting in your office and you're like, you write like a disc track of Mike Johnson. Songwriting is therapy. It is, it is. Yes, it is. Well, thank you for coming in. Thank you, Tommy.
Starting point is 01:47:48 Appreciate it. That's our show for today. Thanks to Bobby Polito for coming on. Also, quick reminder, some tickets left, not many, but some tickets left for our upcoming shows in New Zealand and Australia. Wow. Next week, guys. Next week we're going to be in Australia, New Zealand. We're in Auckland on February 11th, Melbourne on February 13th, Brisbane on February 14th, and Sydney on February 16th.
Starting point is 01:48:13 Grab your tickets at crooked.com slash events. Hope to see some of you out there. And in the meantime, Dan and I will be back with a new show on Friday. If you want to listen to Pod Save America ad-free and get access to exclusive podcast, go to cricket.com slash friends to subscribe on Supercast, substack, YouTube, or Apple Podcasts. Also, please consider leaving us a review
Starting point is 01:48:31 that helps boost this episode and everything we do here at Cricket. Pod Save America is a Cricket Media production. Our producers are David Toledo, Emma Ilich-Frank, and Saul Rubin. Our associate producer is Farah Safari. Austin Fisher is our senior producer. Reed Cherlin is our executive editor. Adrian
Starting point is 01:48:47 Hill is our head of news and politics. The show is mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick. Jordan Cantor is our sound engineer, with audio support from Kyle Seiglin and Charlotte Landis. Matt DeGroote is our head of production. Naomi Sengel is our executive assistant. Thanks to our digital team. Elijah Cone, Haley Jones, Ben Hefcoat, Mia Kelman,
Starting point is 01:49:04 Carol Pellevieve, David Tolls, and Ryan Young. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.