Pod Save America - The DOGE Who Caught the Car

Episode Date: March 7, 2025

The DOGE wrecking ball keeps swinging, but the Supreme Court, and even Donald Trump himself, might finally be slowing Elon down. Trump backs off his trade war with Canada and Mexico—without extracting a single concession—as economic indicators begin their predictable slide. Jon and Dan break down the latest on government cuts, why Social Security is in danger, and the Democratic infighting over censuring Rep. Al Green for heckling Trump. Then, The Bulwark's Sarah Longwell joins Jon to discuss how voters are reacting to Trump's big speech—and why the economy remains their top concern.

Welcome to Pod Save America, I'm Jon Favreau. I'm Dan Pfeiffer. On today's show, the Doge wrecking ball continues to swing, but it looks like the Supreme Court and maybe even Donald Trump might be clipping Elon's wings. We'll get into all of the latest there. The government runs out of money next week, but Congress is busy scolding one of its members

for interrupting Trump's State of the Union. Speaking of which, I sat down with our pal Sarah Longwell from the bulwark the morning after the big speech to talk about how voters are processing the first month of Trump 2.0, so stick around for that conversation later. But first, we have some important updates to share on how the golden age of America is coming along. Hmm. Few days after launching an economic trade war against our fiercest adversaries in Canada and Mexico, Trump is already backing down. On Wednesday, the White House announced that their new 25% tax on everything we buy that's

made in Canada or Mexico would exempt cars, preventing what analysts say would be up to a $12,000 increase in car prices. Then on Thursday, right before we started recording, obviously, Trump said, just kidding, trade war is basically off until April 2nd on most goods from Canada and Mexico. What changed? You might ask. Well, Canada didn't offer any concessions. Mexico didn't offer any concessions. Mexico didn't offer any concessions.

But here in the United States, the stock market tanked over the last week. The Atlanta Fed's forecast model now predicts that the economy will shrink this quarter. Consumer sentiment is at an eight-month low. Retail sales dropped by the largest amount in two years. And even though the Bureau of Labor Statistics jobs report won't be out until you're listening to this, we learned on Thursday that employers cut more jobs in February than at any time since the last two recessions. I don't know, Dan, do you think any of those economic developments might have factored into Trump's decision to surrender to Canada and Mexico after

just a couple days? I do, I do think it did, because if there's one thing Trump cares about, it's how rich people feel about him. And here are all of his Wall Street buddies, his new found tech friends, all losing tens of millions of dollars in the market over a three day period.

And so I think he reacted to that. And frankly, Trump probably also lost a lot of money himself. I'm sure he has money in the market as well. It's not just in various meme coins. I think he probably to that. And frankly, Trump probably also lost a lot of money himself. I'm sure he has money in the market as well. It's not just in various meme coins. I think he probably has some stocks and bonds too. And so yeah, I think that this is, he reacts to it. He takes the Dow very seriously. He used it as a measure of economic success

in his first term. He did once tweet a long time ago that if the Dow, any president who has the Dow drop a thousand points over two days should be impeached. I'm sure he still stands by that opinion, but so yeah, I think this is, uh, he blinked because the market responded in a way that he did not anticipate, which suggests he really didn't prepare very well for this. Cause it was pretty obvious what was going to happen.

I asked what I was going to say. What did he think was going to happen? Did he think everyone was going to be like, Oh great America's back? He did say in the, he was asked, we're recording this on Thursday afternoon, he was asked in the Oval about this and he said, you know, why do you think the stock market has been so spooked? And he said, well, a lot of these

are globalist companies anyway. It's like, we were trying to figure out like, what does that mean? Companies with business abroad? Like, I don't know, the guy who owns a couple of golf clubs in Scotland. I mean, it's the stock market. It's also an issue that just aside from the stock market

and aside from all his rich friends, just breaks through, I think, in the media in a pretty big way, because you have impacts of tariffs on like every different region of the country. And, you know, we talked about this after different region of the country. And, you know, we talked about this after the state of the union, I think, I can't remember what we talk about when,

but you know, there was like a clip on Fox News of some guy being like, I can't get these cars off the lot now because they're gonna be so much more money. So I'm sort of also wonder if those stories started getting to the White House and made them a little scared. Yeah, I'm not, maybe.

I mean, this was terrible press for him. There's every local paper, local newscasts was like how this is gonna affect prices for X, right? I saw a headline here in the Bay Area about how the terrorists are gonna make Bay Area housing cost even more. And so I'm sure you saw that across the board, but bad news doesn't really make it to this White House.

Right? Yeah. So who knows? But they are responding to the repercussions of this, even if those repercussions were so obviously foreseeable to anyone who paid a lick of attention. All right, I got the toughest question of the day for you. If you had to make the case that Trump's trade war is an actual cogent strategy. How would you do it?

I wouldn't. I have self respect. Fair. It's not like it's not possible. And if you want, if you want me just for the, as an intellectual exercise to try he, the argument would be mad man theory that he seems so crazy that people will do what he wants because anything is on the table, right? It's like, keep him on their toes. It's tough to implement that

when what he wants is unknown. Yeah. Like this latest one, he launched, the first one, there was a few fig leafs that like no one really believed. It was like, you got to help more with fentanyl and you got to do this and trafficking and immigration and all that kind of shit.

This time it was just like, I'm starting to trade war with Canada and Mexico and that's that. And then he does a call with Claudia Schoenbaum, the president of Mexico. And I guess the call goes well. I don't know how the call, maybe she flattered him. Maybe she told him the speech was great on Tuesday night and didn't even, I guess he didn't even have a good call with Trudeau, with Governor Trudeau of our 51st state and that's it. That was it. He didn't ask for anything, he didn't get anything and then he just stopped. So like when April 2nd comes around, do people take his threat seriously? Do they think it's really gonna last? Do they really care that much

other foreign leaders? I just can't tell. Yeah, it's really gonna last? Do they really care that much, other foreign leaders? I just can't tell. Yeah, it's, I mean, the madman theory is that you were pretending to be a madman to keep your opponent on their toes. If you're an actual madman, it really doesn't work quite as well. Because you don't have any defined objectives,

you don't have a strategy, you're just being an imbecile. I also think that just backing off didn't necessarily work, at least, uh, with regard to the stock market, because it still closed down a couple hundred points again, probably because a lot of businesses are now thinking like, how do we plan for the future?

How do we set prices? We don't know if there's going to be more tariffs again, or if he's going to, if he's really going to go through with it with reciprocal tariffs on April 2nd, like he said in the speech, and unpause the trade war with Mexico and Canada, or if he's just going to keep going. So it's just causing chaos.

The one thing- Chaos and corruption, Dan. Right. Chaos and corruption, that's exactly right. I mean, for businesses, they want a good economy, they don't want a bad economy. What they really don't want is a chaotic, uncertain economy because you can't make any decisions. They really have to have some confidence.

Even if the economic outlook is not good, they want to have confidence in that outlook six, 12, 24, 36 months in advance to make decisions about whether you're going to open more stores, hire more people, build a factory, launch a new product. And if you can't have any sense of what's going to happen because there's a guy in the White House who's just capriciously making decisions left and right, for no foreseeable reason, then they're going to hoard cash to try to wait out the uncertainty and the chaos for a better time for investment and that's going to be a self-fulfilling prophecy that's going to hurt the economy because it's going to mean less economic growth. So fairly or unfairly,

presidents are usually blamed when a recession or inflation happens on their watch, even if they inherited the problem. You know, people sometimes give them a little grace period if they've inherited it, but then eventually they get blamed if it persists. But it's not often you can draw such a direct link between a president's actions and an economic downturn.

The Trump regime's already trying to avoid the blame for the economic uncertainty we're facing right now. Elon Musk is saying that the US should stop including government spending in GDP calculations. Some Republicans are claiming that we shouldn't count federal workers who lost their jobs in the jobs numbers. What do you think? How big of a problem is this for Republicans

and do you think they'll be able to lie their way out of this one? No, I don't think they're gonna lie their way out of this one, right? It's just the one thing that people fully understand is the economy. And for all of Trump's messaging skills, the size of his megaphone, all of that,

he cannot bend reality to his whims. Maybe for his like most ardent fans, but not for the middle of the electorate, right? And you're already seeing the softest Trump voters, right? The new Trump voters, the men under 40 who came to him, there's a navigator research uses a measure of people who voted for Trump but don't strongly approve of him.

All of those people are souring on the economy and they're souring on Trump because of what they're seeing. And you're right, this is directly attributable to him. And it is a message that Democrats should latch onto because people are gonna see what's happening. And we do have to tell a story about why it's happening. And the fact that Trump is chaotic and erratic is a story that is quite believable to people because it about why it's happening. And the fact that Trump is chaotic and erratic is a

story that is quite believable to people. Cause it fits with what they see. To anyone with eyes, ears. They know it. And we, this is, I think you see this lesson in the 2020 election too, which is people will put up with a lot of Trump's chaos because they think there are positives to it in a sclerotic broken

system, but when that, when that chaos starts impacting their lives, then they turn on him. And we are at the point where it is in affecting people's lives. And I don't, you know, there's obviously concern that they could fuck with the statistics and the numbers around GDP and the jobs numbers.

The two that I just mentioned wouldn't be, I mean, you'd be able to see the GDP and then they were just subtracting government spending, which by the way, our old colleague, Jason Furman from Obama world, he said that if you stripped out the public sector production out of the Atlanta feds forecast, the GDP would be on pace for a 3.8% contraction this quarter, which is more

than they were. So I don't really know what stripping out the government spending part is going to do that Elon wants there. I don't think that's going to help that much. And you can say, oh, well, the jobs numbers are actually this, because we're not counting federal workers, but everyone's also going to know how many federal workers lost their jobs. And even if you decide to go into the BLS, like Doe decides to go into BLS and, and the commerce

department and fuck with the numbers. This is like, people are still going to feel that the economy is not doing well, right? Like the consumer sentiment, like if you see high prices, if your paycheck isn't going far enough, it's not going to matter what kind of headlines you see. We just went through this for the last four fucking

years. Yeah. Where we had strong growth, low unemployment numbers, and high prices. And guess what happened? People weren't happy about the economy. Jason's right. I mean, the idea of taking government spending out of GDP

as a way to make GDP look better is just, you have to be an idiot to think that. Like, that's just not how it works. You're taking things that drive growth out of a growth measure and think it's going to give you more growth is foolish. But I think there is a downstream consequence to even talking about this, which is, if this speaks to the business uncertainty,

the economic uncertainty that's coming from this administration, is these are the numbers that people make decisions on. And if there are reasons to believe that people are fucking with those numbers, it's gonna cause even more uncertainty. Because if that number comes in and it's better than people thought, but they don't trust it because these people

have been openly talking about playing with the numbers, then businesses are not gonna bank on that number as a reason to be more optimistic and therefore invest more. Yeah. All right, Dan. So the Doge days are not yet over, but we're beginning to get some signs that Trump is finally realizing

that he may be the Doge who caught the car. Man, I did, oh man, that's great, great work. Look, I'm really proud of that, really proud. In just the last week, the CDC asked almost 200 employees back after letting them go, including people who work on the 9-11 Survivors Health Program.

The FDA is trying to reinstate staff involved in checking medical device and food safety. The General Services Administration, GSA, suddenly pulled over 400 listed government properties off the real estate market. An NBC reported that DOGE is reversing course on axing several hundred veterans' health care contracts after a quote, revolt by frontline VA employees. Although even more of the contracts remain on the chopping block, some of which are already paid for. On top of all that, Doge also keeps losing in court. A federal civil service board ordered the Department of Agriculture to temporarily rehire

over 5,000 employees. A court told the Office of Personnel Management it could not directly fire probationary staff at other agencies. And here's the biggie, the Supreme Court narrowly rejected the Trump administration's attempt to withhold billions of dollars in payments that the government owes USAID contractors for foreign aid. Chief Justice John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett sided with the court's liberals in the 5-4 decision, which left it to the lower court to, quote, clarify what obligations the government

must fulfill since the original deadline for payment has passed. And what I can only assume is a response to all of this chaos and dip shittery. Uh, Trump held a cabinet plus Elon meeting on Thursday where he appeared to put the Doge back on the leash. I'm sorry. Sorry. No, it's good. It's great.

I'm going to do something to amuse myself. It's great stuff. Politico reports that the president said in the room that Elon is quote, empowered to make recommendations to the departments, but not to issue unilateral decisions on staffing and policy. Those decisions will be up to the agencies themselves.

Following that report, Trump wrote a long post on truth social saying that they'll now be using quote, the scalpel rather than the hatchet. And when he was asked by reporters about all this afterwards, here's how he described the new policy. I want the cabinet members to keep good people. I don't want to see a big cut where a lot of good people are cut. So I had a meeting and I said, I want the cabinet members go first,

keep all the people you want, everybody that you need. Elon and the group are gonna be watching them and if they can cut, it's better. And if they don't cut, then Elon will do the cutting. Okay then. I like that this whole thing is framed as like, oh yeah, like everything's great. This is awesome.

The cuts are going wonderful. Elon's doing great. Everyone loves each other. It's a golden age. And there's just like a little small change we're making, which is like, we're not going to fire all these people anymore. And you can keep the people that you want. And yeah, by the way, maybe we fucked up a lot.

But if you don't fire them, Elon will fire them. Right. Yeah. So he's got to keep going back and forth. What do you make of all this? You think this is pressure? You think this is, what do you think this is? I wanna know when the deep state got to Trump. You know what he's worried about?

He's worried about a binder two of the Epstein files. He doesn't know what, Pam Bondi apparently, I don't know if we talked about this in the pod, but apparently there's a report that Pam Bondi, she presented that binder at the White House with the Epstein files, but that was all publicly available anyway, as a quote unquote surprise.

You always want your chief law enforcement officer to be the one surprising you. At the White House. At the White House. Those are always good surprises from the AG, but yeah, no. So the deep state got to Trump, I guess. I mean, let's see what really happens here. Like, Elon is not someone who takes no for an answer.

He let's just see what, what actually, like what the, if there was an actual change or this is just sort of window dressing. I wonder if some of these closed door meetings they've been having with Republicans, like some of the Republicans who are obviously too afraid to say anything publicly, or at least most of them are,

are privately sort of pressuring the White House and Elon. I mean, I guess Elon met with the senators and gave them all his cell phone number. That's funny. I saw that Susan Collins has been texting him, which is cool. Yeah. Do I think there's any emojis. Who's using emojis first? Probably Elon, right?

He's just, he's all memes. He's a meme lord. That's true. The, I also think the cabinet has been blowing up Trump and Susie Wiles because just, it's hard to run an apartment when you have a bunch of unaccountable people running through it, just cutting things and like seizing your payment systems and putting your building up for sale. when you have a bunch of unaccountable people running through it, just cutting things and like seizing your payment systems and putting your building up for sale.

It's like, they're trying to sell the headquarters of these departments. Like where are the people gonna work? It's like, this is the one thing I've been struck by. Trump's order that everyone has to go back to the office and also we're gonna sell the office. Like what's gonna happen? We're gonna talk about the social security administration,

but there's like, they're closing offices left and right. And some workers are like working in closets now and sitting on the floor because there's no space to work. Apparently they put one of the, this was on Bloomberg TV, they put a building up for sale in Virginia. And by doing so accidentally revealed a CIA black site. So many questions about this. So many questions.

How did they, like, how do we know they accidentally revealed a CIA black site? So many questions about this. So many questions. How did they, like, how do we know they accidentally revealed a CIA black site? Why is there a CIA black site in Northern Virginia? I mean, that's- I would say I texted that on our group chat with Ben and Tommy and no one responded. Fucking crickets from those guys. No response from Ben and Tommy on that one.

There were a couple of people that made a great joke on Twitter about this, which is that they just assumed it was a DEI initiative. Okay, I guess that's a great joke on Twitter about this, which is that they just assumed it was a DEI initiative. Okay, I guess that's a great joke. It is, it's a great joke. This show is sponsored by BetterHelp. Think about your favorite leaders, mentors and idols. Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, right? These are all Tommies.

Napoleon. Napoleon. Stalin. They don't have all the answers, but they do know when to ask questions or seek support from their community, which they don't do. In a society that glorifies hyper-independence, it's easy to forget that we're all better when we have a support system behind us. Therapy can be a source of support for any area of your life. It's time to shift the focus from doing it all to knowing that we're all better when we have a support system behind us. Therapy can be a source of support for any area of your life.

It's time to shift the focus from doing it all to knowing that we're better when we ask for help. All those people I mentioned, they could have used some therapy. They could use it right now. We'd probably all be in a better position. Everyone can use therapy. It is very helpful if you haven't done it yet. It is someone who you can sit down with.

You talk it out. They listen to your issues and they have to listen because unlike your friends, you pay them to do it. If you haven't tried yet, give it a whirl. BetterHelp is fully online, making therapy affordable and convenient, serving over five million people worldwide. You can access a diverse network

of more than 30,000 credentialed therapists with a wide range of specialties. You can easily switch therapists any time at no extra cost. Build your support system with BetterHelp. Visit specialties. You can easily switch therapists anytime at no extra cost. Build your support system with BetterHelp. Visit betterhelp.com slash PSA to get 10% off your first month. That's BetterHelp, H-E-L-P dot com slash PSA. So Elon's response to all this seems as though he's blaming

the agencies for the cuts they're making. In a closed door gathering of congressional Republicans, Elon reportedly said that while he quote, can't bet a thousand all the time, it's the agency heads who are responsible for the job cuts and sometimes they're doing it wrong. Not so, says Trump's handpicked acting head of the Social Security Administration, who apparently got the job as a reward for sharing sensitive information with Doge. That's how you move on up in the world in the Trump regime. According to the Washington Post, Leland Dudek, that's the new social, the temporary Social

Security Administrator, privately told senior staff and advocates for the elderly and disabled in a meeting that, quote, things are currently operating in a way I have never seen in government before. That quote, Doge people are learning and they will make mistakes. And quote, I am receiving decisions that are made without my input. This is the Trump guy. This is the guy they got from middle management who's been there for years, who decided to like, his hand secret information. So're like this is our this is our loyalist on the inside and he's like I don't fucking know what's happening it's not doesn't seem great.

Other employees at the Social Security Administration tell the Post that some of the staff cuts, spending cuts, and office closures are already leading to long delays in people getting their retirement and disability claims processed. Thought Trump was going to protect social security benefits and make government more efficient. What's going on? Doesn't seem that way. I would say that.

I mean, you were just playing with absolute political fire to be in a situation where people may not get their social security benefits on time, where their disability claims are not being processed, where they can't get anyone on the phone. This is where the rubber hits the road, right? You see the same thing with the VA. You aren't getting veterans benefits, Medicaid checks aren't going out, hospitals are not getting paid for by, for services rendered. All, like this is very real stuff and this is where it affects people's lives and this

is like very, the politics of it are devastating. I mean, again, it's supposed to be the department of government efficiency, right? Like the whole idea is if this is a success, then they save taxpayers money and they make government work better for less money. But they are so far just making it work poorly. They are firing a bunch of people who they shouldn't be firing. They're already having to like hire them back.

People who are counting on benefits and services aren't getting them. And this is why I think that Trump, you know, the whole Elon and Doge thing sort of reining them in a little bit. It does feel like if you just have a bunch of stories about how everything's broken and people are pissed and things aren't working as they should, I don't know what good headlines you get from that. This is probably where there is some divide

between Trump and the Project 2025 architects, including people like Elon Musk, which is Trump, he doesn't care about any of this shit. Like he wants to root out people who are not on his side. He wants to get rid of the quote unquote deep state, at least until they got to him earlier this morning. And so like he's very on board with, let's go through the FBI,

let's get out of all the people who work for Jack Smith. Let's go through the CIA and get all the people who leaked about me and my perfect phone call or about Putin or whatever else. What the other people wanna do is they just wanna break government. They just wanna break it because they don't believe in it. And it's gonna be really, really, really hard to fix.

Like you're gonna have to hire, how are you gonna hire more people? Are you gonna, like just imagine, I'm talking about this last night, imagine you're the next democratic president three years from now and you come in and you wanna fix all the things that Trump broke. How are you gonna get all of that done?

How are you gonna hire a bunch of people? How are you gonna reopen offices, right? It's just the, it will not be a turnkey. Usually when you switch administrations, it is just sort of, there is a sort of a turnkey element of it. You get rid of all the old executive orders, you put new people in, you put new executive orders in, and you can start turning, and the wheels of government

can start moving in your ideological direction. Here, in, and you can start turning the wheels of government, start moving in your ideological direction here. That is not going to be available to the next president because the wheels of government are being smashed by a bunch of people who hate government. Yeah. It's also going to be hard to recruit people to

work in government after the way that thousands and thousands of people have already been treated. And the reason one of the people go to government for many reasons, one is public service. Many of treated. And the reason, one of the people go to government for many reasons. One is public service. Many of them, particularly like the scientists, the doctors, they could work, they could make a lot more money

doing something else, working elsewhere. But they choose this out of public service, but also because a government job is an incredibly stable, up until now, have been an incredibly stable job with very good benefits, right? You had job security and here now that does not exist anymore and so in a world where we're just like flipping

back and forth between a Democrat and a Maggots Republican every four years, you're not gonna go back into government for a long-term career because you know, four years from now Donald Trump Jr. could be there, JD Vance or whoever else and you could lose your job all over again. Yeah, no, that's exactly what, and I think that's their intention, at least some of them. How much do you think this has to do with the legal challenges that they've been facing?

Because, you know, if, if it's, if it's Elan and Doge doing all the damage, then, uh, as, as we're seeing in some of these legal cases, uh, it's not, uh, it's not going well for them, but if it's, you know, an agency head deciding, Hey, we're seeing in some of these legal cases, it's not going well for them. But if it's an agency head deciding, hey, we're just gonna reduce the workforce of my agency, that seems like it's a lot more legally viable. Yeah, that probably is part of it. It's hard to imagine that Trump's giving public comments

based on the advice of a lawyer to try to have a better legal strategy. That seems somewhat unlikely and out of character. And there are- Unless Suzy Wiles is really effective. Have you even heard Suzy Wiles' name since the election was over? No, but maybe that's how she wants it.

That's what they said about her in the campaign. Well, she's not really doing the same, not really the same disciplined operation as the campaign. Yeah, that is true. Yes, technically, they're in a more legally precarious position if Doge is doing it. And that's not always true. These federal workers do have some protections.

You do still need cause and reasons to do it. That's true. So it's not maybe they would slightly improve their chances by switching it. But I think this is more about the cabinet secretaries being like, we just took these jobs. We have no control. Throw these nuts running through a department

doing everything. And they complained to Trump and Trump, they're the last person in Trump's year before this meeting. So he made these comments. He may feel differently after, you know, talking to Elon on the phone tonight, who knows. That's true. We should also note in the department of bad things

that haven't happened yet, but are probably about to, the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump was planning to sign an executive order as soon as Thursday that would abolish the Department of Education, which prompted Press Secretary Caroline Levitt to post on X, more fake news, President Trump is not signing an executive order on the Department of Education today. Who knows? This is a longstanding campaign promise, so it would not be unexpected if it happens.

Polar coaster listeners will remember that this idea is not exactly popular. Honestly, even if you don't listen to the polar coaster, which you should, you probably, if you've paid attention to politics, you probably would guess that eliminating the Department of Education is unpopular. But would you care to elaborate

on how unpopular this is? Yeah, it is one, and when you test, in several polls, if you test Trump's ideas or proposals or executive actions he's taken, the most unpopular is pardoning January 6th rioters. Right around that same neighborhood, abolishing the Department of Education.

This is a Republican idea that has been going back decades. It is so unpopular that it sunk the Republican House majority in the 90s. It was so unpopular in the 96 the Republican House majority in the 90s. It was so unpopular in the 96 presidential election that by the time we got to the year 2000, Republicans were running on expanding the Department of Education. That was the entire no child left behind policy

of George W. Bush. It is a truly, like those are the politics. The politics are terrible. It's an insane thing to lean into. Also not something you can do with executive order. Right. That's what I don't understand. It's just, it's got to take an act of Congress.

I mean, we thought that about a lot of things. And lo and behold, it's the folks at USAID who may have something to say about it. But so far, you know. The courts have been stepping in. Yeah. So I don't know how that's going to work. And look, I think it's something like 90% of education funding is state and local,

but, you know, the Department of Education does provide a lot of funding when it comes to student loans, federal financial assistance for college, also Title I, which helps students with disabilities in school, and so there's a lot of that funding that goes to public schools. So, you know, that's a, you're really playing with fire

if you're going to start. And like, I think I've heard them say, well, if we shut it down, then the funding that goes to Title I and stuff like that, that'll just get devolved to the states. But like, I don't really think there's a plan here. No. There's a good plan.

One other sign of the times here with the deadline for funding the government coming up, pardon me, with the shutdown looming, we like to say shutdown looming. Congressional Republicans are now leaning against including any of Doge's spending cuts in the continuing resolution, opting instead for a so-called clean CR,

which would keep the government open through September 30th at current levels of spending. Chuck Schumer apparently supports this as well, because it would get enough democratic support to avoid a shutdown. Feel like we heard this from some of the senators who joined our live stream before the State of the Union. I've even seen it from-

Joint address. For, oh, nope, nope, State of the Union. I just had to play the role of love in here. And I even seen it from some more progressive democratic politicians. It seems like just no one wants a shutdown partly because what we have been saying, which is like, what do you ask for

and what can you expect to win from a shutdown? What do you think? Yeah, the wind is coming out of the sails on this very quickly and people, democratic activists are gonna be super pissed about this. And I understand that reaction for sure. This is a, as we talked about with Senator Schiff, this is a singular point of leverage we have.

And to let it pass by seems, you can understand why people will be mad about that. Now the question, and I have been very torn about this question, you and I have kind of gone back and forth over the course of the podcast on this. And I think we've each taken both sides of it. Yep. And the question that you would have for people

on the pro shutdown side, and ultimately we're not really shutting it down. It is, it's really gonna be, can the Republicans get 218 votes to pass? Then the ball will be in the Senate score, but they have to do that first. And I'm under the, I imagine that no Democrat is gonna vote for that continuing resolution in the House.

I hope so. And so they'll just make the Republicans get the number on their own and see if they can fall under their own weight. But if you're on the, if you're on the, I don't even wanna say pro shutdown side, but if you're on the side who wants the fight here, my question for you would be,

what would be your public rationale for why you're opposing a clean year long continuing of funding for the government at levels agreed to when President Biden was president? And what do you think you could get out of that fight that would be something more than just, that would be a substantive victory as opposed to just waving the white flag

after some period of time? Right, and probably they would say, well, okay, well, we're going to, we're trying to shut down Elon Musk's sort of some period of time. Right. And probably they would say, well, okay, well, we're going to, we're trying to shut down, you know, Elon Musk's sort of illegal destruction of government, and then you say, okay, well, the White House is not going to agree to that. Also, you know, I think who knows, maybe that's

another reason as they're approaching the shutdown, why Trump tried to say that they're putting some guardrails around Doge and it's going to be agencies, like you do need, you need a clear goal. Um, and you need to believe that with enough pressure, Republicans will agree to that goal. And then you've got to think that a government that is completely shut down will put pressure on Donald Trump and Republicans because they won't want that.

But everything they've done over the last two months suggests that they very much like breaking government. And so it's, you know, and we, you know, when government is shut down, like, people are still getting their Social Security benefits and stuff like that, so all the like, most, you know, it's, look, it's not a great thing when government shuts down,

and it's not usually politically very popular, but right now, all of the bad that is coming from Trump and Elon destroying the government is like, they're getting all the blame for it. And Democrats are getting none of the blame. And if we're shutting it down, then people say, okay, great, it's a fight. What are we fighting for?

The test here is can Mike Johnson get a clean continuing resolution out of the house? And if not, if you were to like, if they were to add in what they call anomalies, which are specific provisions, specific cuts or policy changes within the CR that implemented the Doge cuts, the Democrats would have to fight that.

They could not, you cannot vote to implement the Doge cuts. But absent that, I think the question is much more challenging. And just the one piece of advice I have for Democrats is decide what you're gonna do now and do not raise expectations of something different. Right, and yeah, and if you do decide that you're gonna have the fight,

you gotta stick with the fight. Because if you do, if you pull a Trump trade war thing and you shut the government, because we've been there in 2018, and you shut the government down for a week and then you're like, uh, okay, they're not doing anything. They don't care. Now what do we do? All right, we're going to open the government again. It's just that's the worst of all worlds.

It doesn't mean that Republicans are walking away from the Doge budget cuts though. Mike Johnson says they'll figure out a way to codify those in fiscal year 2026. So not till fall. Meanwhile, though, Congress has to move forward with the budget reconciliation process. This is the big, beautiful bill, whatever you want to call it, Trump's economic plan. As a reminder, the House has passed their budget resolution and the Senate will take it up later this month. And while they can do all this without any democratic support, they need most Republicans, almost all Republicans. And so there will be pressure on vulnerable Republicans. And it might be a bit higher

now that the Congressional Budget Office has confirmed that the savings targets in the bill, we've all assumed this, but now you've got it from the CBO, nonpartisan scorekeeper of Congress, that the targets that they have in the House bill will not be possible without cuts to Medicaid, Medicare, or the Children's Health Insurance Program.

How do you see all this playing out? Do you think the Senate's just gonna look at what the House did and be like, yeah, that's too much, we're gonna go with our own thing? You know, the Senate's obviously not going along with what the house does. They have very different priorities. They feel differently about the Medicaid cuts.

They think a lot of the trillion dollars in cuts is ridiculous. There's several senators have said that, that that's a true impossibility. And so like, how does this end, I guess is the question. One way, and I've been thinking about this, because the budget resolution itself is not a legally binding document.

It's a pretty fake thing. And you can amend it. You can pass a superseding one that just all it is is a, is permission to pass something without a filibuster in the Senate. Like that's what it is. And so it can say almost anything

and they are not bound by this version of it. The easiest things Republicans could do, like they have to pass something, if they don't pass anything, then the debt ceiling will expire and nearly every American will get a tax increase at the end of the year. And so the position of greatest fallback

or maybe of least resistance is just a short term, short three or four year extension of the Trump tax cuts as is, which is what happened to the Bush tax cuts in 2010. I believe 2010. And so you could see that just you, everyone lives to fight another day. And the Republicans could probably do that relatively easily

if they, with Trump's help. And they come up with some, you know, they make these cuts sound like a big deal, but they're really not mathematically that you like include a bunch of Doge cuts and you include some like modest cuts here and there on spending, but you don't touch anything big. And you get your border, your extra immigration

border enforcement funding that they all are gonna want. And then you call it a day. That does seem like- And some energy stuff. And some energy stuff. And some energy stuff, yeah, you drill baby drill. That does seem like the most, the path of least resistance for them. There's a lot of resistance on that path though.

Well, I was gonna say, provided that all the crazies in the House and some in the Senate, like the craziest Republicans, the hardliners, agree to that because they want much, much deeper cuts. Which is the immigration is the bait to get them to go along. Yes. For the crazies. Because they care about cutting the government, but they care a lot about some pretty nasty immigration policy.

Yeah, and at some point you say this is the only train leaving the station. No. Pots A of America is brought to you by ZipRecruiter. If you're doing what you love to do, there's nothing better than being surrounded by people who love it as much as you. And if you own your own business, you want to hire employees who love what they do to boost the overall success of your business, plus make it a pretty great place to work. But how do you find passionate employees who are a good fit for all of your roles?

ZipRecruiter, and right now you can try it for free at ziprecruiter.com slash crooked. How fast does ZipRecruiter's smart technology start showing your job to qualified candidates? Immediately. ZipRecruiter's powerful matching technology works fast to find top talent so you don't waste time or money.

See a candidate who'd be perfect for your job. You can use ZipRecruiter's pre-written invite to apply message to personally reach out to your favorite candidates. We've used ZipRecruiter here at Crooked Media. And it's great, it's hard hiring. It is, it takes a long time. And there's a lot of, ZipRecruiter just cuts right

through it all and gets you qualified candidates fast. It's great. Hire experienced people who are excited about what they do with ZipRecruiter. Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day. See for yourself. Go to this exclusive web address to try ZipRecruiter

for free. ZipRecruiter.com slash crooked. Again, that's ZipRecruiter.com slash crooked. ZipRecruiter is the smartest way to hire. So let's talk about Democrats. Love talking about Democrats. What they're doing so far this week is mostly voting against the Republican-led censure of Congressman Al Green for heckling Trump during the joint address. Ten Democrats joined every Republican in passing the resolution, which a censure is basically just a public scolding. When a member is censured, they then have to present themselves in the well of the

house and, which is the front of the chamber. And while the resolution is read out loud and those words just sting when they hear them. But Al Green, when he was censured, appeared with a gaggle of other Democrats who then sang, we shall overcome, while Mike Johnson banged the gavel and eventually sent the house into recess. Dan, which kind of Democrat are you? Are you the kind who votes to censure

a member of your own caucus for protesting cuts to Medicaid during the State of the Union, or whatever the fuck it's called? Or are you the kind who protests the kind who vote to censure the member? Or is there a third option? God, I fucking hope there's a third option. It's all so stupid. The whole thing is so dumb.

Every part of it. Every part of it. Like we can, you know, we talked about this in the pod we did right after the quote unquote state of the union. And I find it really hard to care about what Al Green did. Like, is it going to win us an election? No. Is it going to lose this election? No. Is it a big victory for Trump?

No. Is anyone going to remember this some years down the road? No. And so I don't really understand why 10 Democrats felt the need to vote for this. Like if they're going to somehow avoid getting anti-Al Green ads in 14 months, like what do they think is going to happen?

Jim Hines from Connecticut, was one of the members who voted for the censure. I saw a statement from him that he was like, 10 years ago, no, not 10 years ago, much longer. I don't know how many years ago, when Joe Wilson, Republican Congressman Joe Wilson, said, yelled, you lie to Barack Obama during not a State of the Union, but the-

No, that was a State of the Union. No, it was not. It was a joint, it was a, it was not even a fake State of the Union, it was just a straight up joint address 15 years ago. This is my stickler thing for everyone. They always say, you know, it was an address to a fake State of the Union. It was just a straight up joint address 15 years ago. This is my stickler thing for everyone. They always say, you know, it was an address to a joint session of Congress

about the healthcare bill, about the Affordable Care Act. And it was in Labor Day 2009. Anyway, and so he was like, I voted for that. And so I want to be consistent. Now that wasn't a censure. That was a resolution of disapproval, which also is like. The world has changed, Jim Hines. The world has changed.

So I don't know. I think it's so, I think the whole thing is so stupid. And also it's like, my view on this is like, if you're Al Green and you feel strongly about this and you want to protest during the speech, then you know that that could come with censure. It's a Republican controlled house. And as far as we can tell, Al Green, he said, okay, fine, censure me. I don't give a shit. Like I did it. I'm proud I did it. And was I trying to like win an election? No. Was I trying

to call attention to Medicaid cuts? Yes. Did that, is that what he did? I think from the coverage, probably not, right? Because that's not what the coverage was about. If you are a casual observer of politics, you'd be like, oh yeah, there was a disturbance at the beginning of the speech. They kicked some guy out. Then everyone got mad that some Democrats

weren't standing up and clapping for the kid with cancer and blah, blah, blah. If it, and that's actually being generous because I think most people who are casual news observers probably don't know any of this, right? So, did it achieve it? No, but like, you know, he wanted to do it, and if you want to protest, you protest. My thing is, if you want to protest

and you want to commit, you know, civil disobedience, and that's a stretch to say this is civil disobedience, because it's not breaking any law, it's just breaking the rules of the House, then you, you know, then you accept the consequences of that, and that's what civil disobedience is. Then for Democrats to be like, Oh, I got a vote to censure him. It's like, you know, censure is for like, if you look through history, you know,

like way back when I think they they've censured some people for like inappropriate language on the house floor in like the early 1900s, usually it's like you committed fraud, you committed bribery. I think Paul Gosar got censured for trying to incite violence against other members or something like that. You know, just interrupting the president during the state of the union. I don't know. It's also fucking stupid to me.

It's what Kevin McCarthy wanted to do to Trump for January 6th. As an example. This is why this, and I'm glad you brought up January 6th, because this is when I get mad thinking about the whole thing. Because it was like the decorum. Why did he do this? And he stood up and this is why did Democrats do this? Or it's like, what are we all talking about?

Do we all like we were all alive in January of 2021 when a bunch of fucking rioters went into the Capitol trying to kill a bunch of members of Congress because the current president United States sent them there. Yeah, the ringleader was speaking at the time. That's what he interrupted. The guy who incited the riot and the people who had tried to give it like, just the only thing I'd say about this is no one is better at turning a five

minute moment to a five day story than Democrats. I know, I know. We had everyone, everyone's like, oh, it happened. What is my reaction to it? Like I'm uncomfortable with it. And that's an okay thing to be, is to be uncomfortable with it. But then their first reaction is to dial up someone from Politico and Axios and complain about it. And then we're going to have the censor vote. And so instead of making what I think would be a fair-minded political argument that the economy is teetering, prices are up, the world's in chaos, and what is the house doing? They're spending their time censoring

the guy with the cane. Like, what are we doing? We just, 10 of us had to vote for it. So now, now everyone's going to be mad at the 10 people. Right. Now it's like, let's primary the 10 people, and what the fuck are Democrats doing? And like, you know, I see some of you,

like, we need to start a third party, but what's like everyone just calm the, like, come on. This is not the most effective use of our time or our energy, none of it. None of it. And I said, and I would definitely not have been one of those 10. Cause I think, I think that's a dumb vote.

But like, again, I just think the whole thing is crazy. Our friends at blueprint, apropos of a great segue, actually, our friends at blueprint released a new poll on Thursday morning that found that regular Americans aren't exactly wowed by Democrats performance in the new Trump term. 40% of respondents chose the statement. The democratic party doesn't have any strategy at all for responding to Trump, as opposed to only 24% who think there is a strategy,

but it isn't working, and a meager 10% who think there is a strategy that is working well. Who the hell are those people? I wanna meet the 10% who think there's a strategy and that it's working well, and I would like to know what the strategy is. I think those people think Democrats are sleeper cells,

like Trump double agents. The strategy, if you think the strategy has helped Trump, you may think it's working. Any takeaways from the poll? I don't think I needed a poll to tell me that people weren't happy with the Democratic Party. Like, that was not, I did not need that. That was, I knew that any conversation with any person

who cares about politics will tell you that. Any moment on social media will tell you that. There are some useful things in the poll beyond that. They do, they poll test Trump's, a lot of his actions and policies, they even more valuable. They tested a bunch of messages that would be most effective

in drawing contrast with Trump. The content of those will not surprise you. Number one, protecting social security, Medicare, Medicaid, number two is about the economic chaos we just talked about. Number three is about veterans benefits and Medicaid. It's like, we know what those messages are, but it's useful to reinforce that even with all

of the insanity and everything that's going on, the most persuasive things are still the most persuasive things we thought they should, we imagine they would be. Yes. So we can be constructive. What should Democrats be doing? Any other, not, if they're not protesting Donald Trump in the speech or singing, we shall overcome

or voting to censure their own members, anything else? I think, like, I just want to stipulate, there are no easy answers here. There is no silver bullet. There is nothing that some Democrat or some group of Democrats can do that's going to stop Elon Musk, right? And expectations are completely out of whack.

And I understand people are scared and frustrated and they're looking to their party to offer a solution. We just don't have the power, Democrats don't have the power to actually stop them. So you hear a lot of people saying, like, where's the message? Why don't we have a message? And the message could be better.

It could be better delivered. It could be delivered more effectively, whatever else. But even if we had the most perfect message, we're not solving the problem that most people want solved. And we do have to play at least some version of the long game here, which is we have one moment, doesn't come for about a year and a half, but when that moment comes, we have a chance

to actually make a huge difference in Trump's ability to destroy this country, and that's to win back the House and maybe the Senate. And the process between now and then is about making Trump more unpopular and informing the country about what he is doing. And I think the real dilemma here is, and we can talk about this for hours,

and we are on a very tight 90 minute time frame, as people will find out very shortly, is that we know what the most persuasive things to say are. We just don't currently know how to make people hear those things. And that there is a real gap between the things that persuade people and the things that generate the engagement and drive the conversation sufficient people to hear it.

And the best advice that I have is we all have to be loud. And so we can talk at all about what congressional Democrats can do. I'm more interested in what everyone, all of us can do, what everyone listening can do, which is go to town halls, go to protests, call your member of Congress, talk to all your family and friends,

use those messages I just talked about, share the news, talk about the chaos, point out the economics of like, just be out there. And because we all have agency here. And if we're just waiting around for Hakeem Jeffries or Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer or Chris Murphy or someone to save the day, they can't do that for us. We're going to have to do it ourselves. And it's not gonna happen overnight, but over the course of time between now and November, 2026, we can put ourselves in a position to win the House, win the Senate, and really dramatically curtail Trump's ability to damage this country.

I agree with all that. And one other idea that a lot of people have been floating, and I think some Democratic members have said they were wanting to do this, but... Undercovered story this week was the head of the NRCC, uh, its job it is to elect a Republican House, to re-elect a Republican House in two years, uh, basically told all of their members, no more town halls.

No more town halls because you don't want people showing up at the town halls to protest you. And so now all these House Republicans are not going to have town halls probably next time they're all on recess. And I think that Democratic politicians, Democratic members, and all of us, like you just said, should be going to those districts where House Republicans or Senate Republicans who are going to be in competitive races in 2026

aren't holding town halls and hold our own town halls or go to their offices and hold protests outside their offices or hold town halls outside their offices or, you know, Democratic members, House members can go to the Republican House members districts that are maybe close to them in their states or the next states and say, I'm going to go and you know what?

And Republicans can show up too. Maybe Republican, you know, we can make it, you publicize it. And if Republican voters show up and want to argue with you, that's great too. Like that's going to get people's attention. Like, you know, like have some, have some verbal exchanges with that, with people who don't agree with you, maybe even the members themselves, if you can find them. Again, like, I just think that like, like you said, getting people to hear it is going to be the tough part. You have to get people's attention. And I do think there's a huge

vulnerability now where there's going to be some, some bad news that's frustrating people from Trump and Elon, but like in 2026, the people that we're going to have to get people to vote against are Republican politicians. And so far, they're doing a great job just kind of hiding. And now they want to hide more. And they probably want Trump and Elon to take all the heat. And it's our job over at least from now until 2026 to make sure that those people are famous. Yeah. Ro Khanna and Timbal also have said they're gonna go to districts. Yes, those are the people I was thinking of. I knew it was two people. There has been a lot of reporting about what some

of the people who are presumed to wanna run for president, like Gavin Newsom, Josh Shapiro, Gretchen Whitmer, and Wes Moore, others might be doing. That this is a great use of their time is to go do it. The one thing I would add in there is it doesn't have to be a competitive district. House elections rise and fall in the national political environment.

So if you don't happen to be near one of those California or New York districts that are competitive, do it in a Republic, any district. The walled garden of local news and politics doesn't exist anymore. And so just if there was a thousand stories about angry town halls from all over across the country, that is going to affect

the people in vulnerable districts too. Yes, that is a point well taken. Uh, okay. When we come back from the break, you're going to hear my conversation with Sarah Longwell, two quick things before we do that. And you know what? It's a Dan double header.

Uh, new polar coasters out now. What'd you and Caroline talk about this week? Well, as I like to say, Pots of America is for the nerds. Polar coasters for the super nerds. So we went deep into the question of why Donald Trump is becoming less popular. Why his approval ratings are down, why people are souring on his economy. We also got into some Bravo Talk for people maybe into that,

but mostly we were keeping it across the house. I hear that made Elijah nervous, the Bravo Talk? It did, he made Caroline record a topper to tell people that Bravo Talk was coming, like a trigger warning for Bravo Talk. Excellent, Bravo Talk is coming. Dan and Caroline are gonna talk about the Page Craig breakup, be prepared. That's good, well talk is coming. Dan and Caroline are gonna talk about the Page Craig breakup.

Be prepared. That's good. Well, if you wanna hear about that or a polling analysis, check out Polar Coaster. You can get access to Polar Coaster and other exclusive subscriber series at crooked.com slash friends. Dan, I understand we've got a deal for Message Box too.

God, that is such a good transition. Thank you so much for bringing that up. I appreciate it. Yes, we do have a deal for Pod Save America listeners and really only Pod Save America listeners for at least the first hundred days of the Trump administration if we make it that far. In this month on Messagebox,

one of the things I'm very focused on is what I think what we just talked about, which is the most important thing Democrats can do was make Donald Trump less popular. So I have a series of posts that go into strategies, tactics, messages about what elected Democrats, the DNC, whatever else can do, but mainly what all of us can do, the right things we can say in our conversations with our friends and family about Donald Trump that could drive down his approval

numbers. And so if that is of interest to you, I would refer you to the world's most cringeworthy website, cricketer.com slash yeswedan. If you go there, you can sign up for Message Box and you will get your first month free. This special offer will be around for either, for a while or until my dignity takes over and I can't take any more, we have to bring down the website. Yeswedan is just my favorite, it's my favorite thing.

I love it. Every morning, I go is just my favorite. Uh, it's my favorite thing. I love it. Every morning I have a mug with yes we Dan. I get a, I go into our cabinet to get a coffee mug and I see that mug and I just wonder where, how did we get here? How did you get here? That's a real question. We, America, really how did America get here? Paws of America is brought to you by Armour Colostrum. Everyone's looking for ways to be healthier and stave off winter illnesses. Give your immunity and gut health their best chance with Armour Colostrum. Discover the transformational health benefits of Armour

Colostrum that have earned tens of thousands of five-star reviews. Probiotics and other supplements are touted as a gut health solution, but most products on the market are dead before they even reach your gut. Armra colostrum naturally fortifies your entire gut wall system and optimizes your whole body microbiome, which helps guard against irritants that can trigger digestive issues and compromise your immune system. Research has shown that colostrum helps to enhance nutrient absorption. Armra colostrum can help stabilize blood sugar levels, modulate hormones, and ignite your metabolism.

This enhanced nutrient absorption has been a long-priced benefit of elite athletes. Let armor colostrum help you reach your goals by promoting lean muscle building and fueling cellular repair regeneration to fuel better performance and faster recovery. Colostrum bioactives have also been shown to reactivate hair follicle stem cells and activate collagen production, promoting hair growth and enhancing skin radiance. We've worked out a special offer for our audience. Receive 15% off your first order. Go to tryamra.com slash crooked or enter crooked to get 15% off your first order.

That's t-r-y-a-r-M-R-A.com slash Crooked. Sarah Longwell, welcome back to Pod Save America. Hey, thanks for having me. I feel, I can't, have we talked since the election? I listen to you every week, so this is what people do to me sometimes. I'm like, I listen to you every week, so I feel like. Yeah, have we talked to either of them?

I guess you talked to Pfeiffer right after the election. Yes, yeah. And so did JVL. So it's hard to know because I also listen to you guys, especially when we're doing crossovers. And so we just have, we have both a parasocial and a real social relationship. That is true. What did you think of the speech last night? You know, I was annoyed by the speech for the positives in it,

because I think that Trump did a pretty effective job on several fronts. Number one was creating heartwarming moments with, and this is, I mean, on right wing Twitter right now, the big takeaway is that Democrats did not clap for the young boy with brain cancer and that they are ghouls. So I actually didn't catch that if they didn't.

Yeah, because the cameras were just on the boys so I didn't see the crowd. Yeah, and I think that it is possible that what the reaction was was a frustration of you are sort of putting the camera on this young guy. And it was a sweet moment, right? His dream was to be a secret service. They made him a secret service thing.

But I think that my guess is Democrats were sitting there being like, this guy is cutting pediatric cancer research right now as we speak. And like, if I had to get in their brains, it would be things like that. But anyway, I thought, I also thought the part where he went through the USAID stuff and like crack jokes about it and got laugh lines out of it.

Like that right now, I've got Tommy on the show on Saturday and we're talking about foreign policy. And one of the things that I think Trump has done, especially on the right is to create a constant sense of scarcity. And when people have a sense of scarcity, they are constantly doing the math of, oh, money goes to Ukraine, it's not going to Americans.

Money's going to this weird country I've never heard of. When Trump does this thing where he's like, pronouncing countries names as though, are these places even real? Was Sotho? Yeah. No one has ever heard of that. Normally, the leader of the free world

might not be keen to admit that they don't know where these different places are on the map, but Trump is happy to do it and frankly that lands right because other people also don't know where these are and so while it was filled with lies and the smug faces of Mike Johnson and JD Vance behind him sort of Fake laughing at everything he said and so it was and it was too long and had all these problems. It did the job for the audience that Trump is trying to reach. And I just, the fact though that he, this is the one thing,

and I read Pfeiffer's message box this morning and it was, we did a live stream right afterwards. And I, it was my initial takeaway was like, the minutes that the economy got, so deeply paled in comparison to what voters would tell you is their absolute priority, which is the cost of living and the inflation. Trump barely talked about it except to blame Biden.

And then he spent the rest of like, if you, I should do this, I should go figure out what is the breakdown of things where Trump was talking about trans stuff versus the economy? Cause I think trans stuff got way more time than I reckon I was. And earlier in the speech, the first, I have the same thought. The first issue that he went into depth on was trans athletes.

And it was like a lot. And then he got to the economy and stuff like that, but it was very, Joe Biden did all the bad things to make inflation bag and eggs. And then I'm to do great stuff. I'm going to drill tax cut. But it really is, the scarcity point is interesting because it's almost like I'm going to get government out of the way with all the bad things that government's doing, all the crazy,

corrupt, woke shit. And then once that happens, I don't need to do anything to the economy. It's just going to be great again. Yeah. You get rid of DEI and everything just, prices go down. Those things exactly work together. Yeah, how do you think it landed with voters? You were talking about audience.

We always know that even the CNN poll and the CBS poll, I think it was like 20% of the sample were Democrats in both. This happens obviously when a Democratic president is up too. Mostly Democrats watch, when a Republican, you know. So the audience that we're probably concerned about is the audience of, you know, maybe first time Trump voters. I know you've been talking to them in your Focus Group podcast, Biden to Trump voters.

What do you, how do you think it landed, the speech landed with them? Well, so here's the thing. I just don't think that many people are going to watch, like the State of the Union, which is not called the State of the Union, this first one, because he's only been there a little bit of time. I'm calling it State of the Union. Right? We're calling it of the Union, this first one, because he's only been there a little bit of time. I'm calling it State of the Union. Right? We're calling it... It's fine.

It's like Gulf of Mexico. Yeah, that's right. These speeches are for two groups, for people like us, right, who have to watch them and like hate watch them really. Yeah. And for fan service. And I thought it was a pretty effective fan service speech and the fact that it like blended kind of rally points. And he was doing doing all the hits for the people and it's why he talked about trans stuff it's why he talked about spending it was you know and and and and you know he did the thing with Again, I don't think people are going to watch it or consume it last night, but I think in terms of what they're going to get out of it.

Here's the main takeaway. Republicans were pumped during this. They looked like they were having fun. The energy was high. They looked like they were winning and Democrats sat there with their arms crossed, waved a cane and didn't really know what to do in the face of like North Korea levels of enthusiasm.

I mean, Republicans cheering at stuff that I'm like, well, if I showed you maniacs cheering like this, because Trump sounds- For invading Greenland. Yeah, right? Like you guys would never have believed me. You tell me how deranged I was if I showed you what's happening right now 10 years ago and said, no, you're going to cheer for all this stuff and he's going to sound just this moronic and you're going to love it. They would have said, no. The only thing I liked about the

whole speech and the only thing that I think unifies us today, because it's supposed to be a country unifying speech and the only unifying piece of it was I think the ritual humiliation of Marco Rubio is something we can all get behind in that speech. I think he's setting up Rubio to be the Patsy. Oh. I mean, he was very, he was almost explicit about it last night, but I haven't been thinking about this for a while. Like, something's going to go wrong in the world,

and he's going to be like, oh, that's Marco Rubio's fault. Yeah. Which is great. It's one thing that we can all be excited about. Yep. I like that. What did you think about the Al Green interruption, the resist, or the resist t-shirts, I guess, there was the false thing.

I came down on the side of like, I don't really think it matters either way. I wouldn't have advised people to do that. But then you have a lot of people online who are like, why did the Democrats go at all? And it just feels like there's a lot of debate about what Democrats should do among Democrats, and then there's a lot of different responses from Democrats that we saw last night, and none of it seems like it's necessarily valuable. I don't know that it's necessarily harmful either. I don't know, what do you think?

I mean, I could go on at length about all the things I think Democrats need to do from a communication standpoint, but I will say for a thing like this, I just think it's the thing where you sit there in stony silence and then clap for the kid with cancer. Like that's basically it. And I don't think, I think creating, I mean, Marjorie Taylor Greene did this with Biden.

I just think when they have, that scene from the wedding singer where he's drunk and he's yelling, cause I have a microphone and you don't. Like Trump's on stage, he's got the room, you're not gonna win this. So just like sit there and be, and this is my overall feeling about Democrats right now is I think Democrats are internalizing the need that they need to be better communicators,

but for some reason they are deciding that that means they should all just like get on TikTok and they should become, they should like- Vertical video is the way to be a better communicator. Put on sunglasses and do a slow-mo walk. And I just, what I want to tell Democrat, if Democratic legislators are listening, you do not need to be influencers.

You do need to be influential, which means govern and give, let the influencers package your stuff for audiences, but you should look like serious legislators. You should look like people who are going to be an opposition party that people can take seriously. And like, if you're good at it, if you're AOC and you like know how to do it, cool. But nobody should be going to Chuck Schumer and be like, you know what, Chuck?

What we really need is you on the TikToks because that is gonna give the Democratic Party the brand that it's looking for. Like, don't do that. I know. Dan Pfeiffer said that this is, there's a lot of like reading stage directions from the Democrats, which has really stuck with me. And there is a lot of that right now.

And I'm trying to like give them some leeway because no one knows what we're doing right now. And it's a new world. And like, did you read JVL's triad this morning? I noticed. This is such a mean question. What was JVL's day? He was talking about how we are not in,

that there's a group of people that think this is- Against normalism. Yeah, that this is like- I haven't read it yet. Well, I'm sure you know, because he's your bestie, I'm sure you're, but it's like, we're not in normal politics anymore. And then some people are like like in a normal politics scenario,

you sit down, you clap, the Democrats have the right message, stuff like that, but we're not in that world anymore, which I agree, where then he didn't get to his like, so then what do we do? Like, what kind of response do you have in a not normal world? Yeah. And that I haven't figured out yet.

I don't know if you have thoughts on that. I mean, generally, I think part of the problem is that Democrats are looking for other people to tell them how to behave in this moment because people do feel at sea. And I guess I would say to them, like, this is going to sound ridiculous, but like, what do you feel authentically? Honestly, I have been saying the same thing. What do you feel authentically is the thing that is the most harmful? And then go talk about that and do it as somebody who, where you express your concern for the

American people and the direction of the country sincerely and say, if I were in charge or what I think that what we should be doing instead is this. And I just, I do think everybody's like, well, what is my talking point on this? Like by the time everybody gets their talking points or by the time everybody's being told what the, everybody's focus, as somebody who does focus groups, I'm like, please don't wait for my guidance. Like just say the thing you've, you know,

that matters to you. No, this is what I like. I have been outraged by some of the specifics around USAID. It's like, I get it. I see the polls. I feel like I don't even have to see recent polls. I know from years ago that like no one likes USAID. Foreign aid is unpopular.

But I also think like, you know, when the government already spends $10 million on like food for starving children, and then they just like let the food spoil because Elon cancels the contract. I kind of think people would think that's fucked up. I kind of think people would think that's fucked up. I kind of think they would think that's wasteful. Or at least a measure of incompetence.

Right, yeah, so it's like, know the political context, but if it makes you mad, I think the passion is more important right now, we're two years out from the election, than figuring out exactly the right message, which we need to do eventually, but like right now, we need the passion. Yeah, and also, I don't know,

the message to me is always a little bit like, what are you mad about? That's Trump's fault. Right. You know, like the reason I do Focus here is a lot, I was listening, so I'm like, what is annoying them? What don't they like? Why is that Trump's fault?

Like this is, that's all the Trump guys did, right? It's like, oh, are you mad about inflation? Are you mad about this? That's Biden's fault. Biden's fault, Biden's fault. And I'm gonna fix it. I'm gonna fix it, yeah. I saw that you said

that Alyssa Slotkin's response was good. What did you like about it? Well, you know, here's the thing though. Just what you and I were just talking about, where we talk about the passion and the authenticity. So I'm an Alyssa Slotkin fan girl. So I'm not good for this because I like, I love a sturdy midwesterner who talks about the,

you know, her mixed marriage parents of Republic that's great that is and I also thought she was doing something really important I talked about this a little bit with Tommy that I think Democrats have been failing to do which is you cannot voters don't care about democracy quad democracy and so to tell a better story about democracy and make people care about it you have to tell a better story about America and she talked about democracy last night through the lens of America and why America is uniquely good. And I was like, yes, this is what I have been waiting for. The problem is that Alyssa is,

this is not a problem that she's a serious person. And so she delivered what I was like a 10 out of 10 technical speech for 2009. And I just, I think that if, I think she can and should be a leader for the Democrats, somebody that they look to, to think about how they're gonna, who their leaders are gonna be in the future. But I also think they're gonna have, it's such a tone shift to go from Trump's just casual way of being up there, the bombacity,

to sort of the very Washington, I bombacity to sort of the like very Washington. I'm going to read a speech now. I'm going to do it very proficiently. The substance is going to be very good. But did I make you, did I light you up? Did I make you feel like I was your champion and I was, no. And like that's kind of what people, I know that's what. I listen to Democrats all day long. If you ask me, what do Democrats want? I'll be like, they want to win.

They want to feel like they are winning something and they want someone to go make them feel that way. This was my almost exact thought. And it's been like what I'm struggling with and thinking about what Democrats need to do, which is I would wager that if you had focus group dials of Alyssa Slotkin speech, that if you conducted a focus group and maybe Alyssa Slotkin's speech, that if

you conducted a focus group, and maybe you will, where you played some clips of the speech, it would resonate really well with the swing voters. And I think it was like, and I also think in fairness, it wasn't just like it hit all the message points. I thought the end where she talked about democracy was it was stirring. And she even, you know, she hinted at, we're really going through something right now as a country.

So I get that people would like it, but then I also struggle with like why in our party are all of the moderates who can win, who are on message, like they don't really, they don't convey the urgency and the passion as much. And then the progressives who are not necessarily on the message, they have the passion, but it's not necessarily landing with the right voters.

And I just, I want Democrats to combine both of those things and it's just really, it's lacking right now. We used to have this joke in conservative circles where like, where we would talk about how conservatives didn't make good protesters because it would be like, what do we want? Slow and gradual change. When do we want it?

In the due course of time. And it's a little bit, and the way that everything is upside down now, it's a little bit where Democrats are like that, where the sober and serious people in the party really who I think appeal to swing voters and can win in a lot of these swingier places, like they're not filled with the passionate bombastic intensity of what I think a lot of people are yearning for out of leaders in this moment, right? They are threading a needle by saying, yeah, like what's happening right now is straight, but they're also like, but I'll work with him and I'll do that. And you know, they feel, and that it's like Obama when he sat there chatting with Trump or Joe

Biden went to the US, there's this real dissonance between the guy is a really bad guy destroying democracy and also, hey bud. Right, right. And it's not a hey bud because what people think when they see that or what I worry that people think is like, oh, it's all fake, right? And what they're thinking, what I'm sure Joe Biden was thinking is like, well, if we're going to be the party that says like, you know, we need to be a big diverse country politically and make sure that everyone gets along and institutions and laws and like,

I have to act like that. But also we're in a media environment now where an attention strategy to get people's attention is the most important thing, but to get people's attention, it feels like you need to be more like a Trump or more like some of the bomb throwers on the left. And I don't know how you get people's attention

in this environment being just a normal person who wants to like, you know, who has the right message and wants to be serious and sober. Like that, that seems to me the challenge. Well, I think, you know, it's funny, normal person is better than normal politician. And so I think here's, here's the voters just say it all day long. They're like, I don't, so and so seems like a regular politician. And I guess that's my unfair, because I liked it knock on the speech

is it seemed like sort of a regular political speech. What voters say that they want actually, let's talk in the Dems right now is a real, is funny because it's just a bunch of, it is like, it's black women and it's older white men, everybody sort of agrees. We need a straight white man who's not a politician. It's like, everyone is really internalized,

this idea that everybody is too racist, because people will be like, you know, I love Pete Buttigieg, but we're never electing a gay guy. Or I love, you know, Jasmine Crockett, but we're never electing a black, like everybody's just like, who is a white straight man We're never electing a gay guy. Or I love Jasmine Crockett, but we're never electing a black. Everybody's just like, who is a white straight man who's also not part of the Democratic

firmament? And then everybody just goes, Mark Cuban. If you raise Mark Cuban to voters, they're all like, yeah, that guy. Or they bring it up. And what they mean is, can we get our own bro-ish billionaire who can go on every podcast and talk normally, but also basically shares our values. Yep, bombastic but not cruel. Yeah, that's right.

That's right, like he's on a TV show and apparently we're doing that now, so. But it's now like you have this very narrow, narrow spot where it's really hard to find that person. Well, and it is, I mean, I just, I kind of keep wanting to say to Democrats, like, don't, I don't want you to believe that we're too racist and sexist in country or too homophobic to, because I'm sorry, but most, like a lot of your best stars, a lot of your bench doesn't meet this criteria.

Also, we would never have elected Barack Obama if we were, and that was, again, people were saying that after 2004, like, oh, well, Barack Hussein Obama? No, we need like a white guy from the South. That's the only way that we're gonna win again. So you've done a bunch of focus groups since Trump's inauguration.

What are people saying? It depends which people. Look, so I actually, maybe I'll try to split it into three buckets. So the Trump fans, right, your MAGA voters, the number one thing, their takeaway, and this last night he leaned into this, which is he's doing stuff and he's doing it fast. He's like, yeah, it's like the action.

And they don't, I don't really know what all these executive orders are about, but I know he's signing a lot of them. And they're saying, you know, I see ice trucks in my neighborhood. So I know they're doing something about immigration. And so there's really that bucket of love and they love what Doge is doing.

What is it doing? They don't know, but like it is doing stuff and they see the action. And I think for what has become a real impatient American way of like, I do not wanna wait for the Congress to pass all of, just do a thing that helps, which I think is not great for our system of government. But there just is this sense of,

I'm not waiting for y'all to get it together and compromise like Trump is doing stuff, that's good. Okay, so that's one bucket. Then I would say there's, I wrote a piece for the Atlantic yesterday, which Jay feels like, why doing stuff, that's good. Okay, so that's one bucket. Then I would say there's, I wrote a piece for the Atlantic yesterday, which JVL's like, why do you, you literally have this other media company. Don't read JVL, because I've been busy writing for the Atlantic.

I am the worst. I am the worst. He, I deserve, I deserve. But like the, they just hound me more than he does. I don't know. They were, I had been doing a series of focus groups They just hound me more than he does. I don't know. I had been doing a series of focus groups with kind of the low, they're not hard partisans, but they voted for Trump.

I've done a lot of Biden to Trump voters. And the thing that you hear from these sort of not super political, the not super mega voters is they're just like, I want something done about the economy. And JVL and I do have this fight all the time about, he's like, the economy's good and this is all just fives and it's BS.

And I get really mad at him because I say, I don't know, man, all I do is listen to people talk about the real trade-offs in their lives. They know exactly how much everything at the grocery store is. And it's not just like a talking point of about groceries or gas, whatever. People's cost of living is the place

where politics meets their lives. And it is an enormous impact on them. And they're not, I don't think that they're brainwashed about this, right? Like they go to the store and see, there has been an affordability crisis, even before inflation, like there's been an affordability crisis,

especially around housing. I mean, I remember even before the inflation really took off, I did a bunch of focus groups for the wilderness and like every demographic group that I talked to in every part of the country, young people, old people, housing, housing was their number one thing. Yeah. And so like, I do think that's real. I am certain that it's real. And I think that it has been tough for Washington to like catch up to and honestly

I don't understand why this is so hard for even like JVL or Democrats To understand because we've been talking about in people Democrats been talking about income inequality for forever So like maybe what's happening is that yes Some people are doing well in this economy and that the macro economy can be well while there's still a group of people who are falling further and further behind and sort of a middle-ish class tier that is finding the level of inflation to be really having a dramatic impact on their life. So those voters are very interesting to me because I think those are the ones who easily

either could swing back in 26 or even if they're low propensity and maybe aren't big midterm voters, they're the kinds of people that like, they're just, they're not like a firm part of the Trump Republican coalition. They're just mad about prices. And they're also, and what they're saying right now is why is he doing this other stuff and not focusing on prices? And so like that to me is a real opportunity for anybody who wants to disrupt sort of the broader Trump coalition is to say, hey, he's not focused enough on this. And you can see it in the polling too. It has been almost, I don't know if axiomatic's

the right word, but it has been a truism that sort of Trump equals good economy. Like people kind of have this vague sense, Trump businessman, good economy, that's why he was elected. And now he is his net positive rating on the economy, people are like, you're not paying enough attention to it. And that's what we hear in the focus groups from this group. And that's what I was listing, is all the people who are like,

I don't know, inflation is still really bad for me, maybe it's even getting worse, so like the tariff stuff scares me, or prices are getting worse, and he seems to be doing all this other stuff, he's not focused on this. So I think that is an opportunity, so that's the other bucket. And then there's a third bucket, which is the Dems who are feeling very depressed and they are, I think,

desperate for a leader. Like the absence of, and I mean, I heard this before too. I think a lot of the frustration with Biden and his age that I heard from, specifically from Democrats, was just around the fact that like, he couldn't fight effectively because of that. And like now they're just kind of like, where is everybody? Where is the fighting? Where are the people who are standing up?

Why isn't this happening? And then, you know, and it's, you get, it is tough because you sort of like beg the Democrats to do something and they're like, okay, well we're gonna go protest outside USAID. And then you're like, and it's, you get, it is tough because you sort of like beg the Democrats to do something and they're like, okay, well we're going to go protest outside USAID. And then you're like, no, no, no, but nobody meant that. Um, and so it's a little, it's hard. Uh, it's not an easy solution, but I just know what that's what they want. How are they feeling about Doge and Elon? I know that when you did some groups, I think before the inauguration, there was some, you know, worry about Elon, but also let's give him a chance. He's smart, whatever. How do they

feel now? And is the, I'm very curious if the incompetence and chaos of what's happening is landing with people. Yeah. So Elon, so I did a good episode about Elon with Kara Swisher, where we listened to, we asked a bunch of Biden to Trump voters about Elon, what they thought, and you could basically split the groups in two. On one side, there are the groups, there was the people in the groups who were like, yes, love this, they're cutting stuff, they're finding abuse, they, you know,

they know about the, they think about the condoms, like the fake condom story, they'd internalize that. And they also, they know Elon. Listening to Kara talk about Elon is funny to me because I often listen to Kara only when she's talking about politics. And when she was talking about Elon, I was like, oh my gosh, you know, all this stuff that I had no idea about, because Elon's just one of these cultural figures

that I haven't paid attention to until he broke the political plane, right? But a lot of these voters have been, just like with Trump, they'd been tracking Elon forever. They hold stock in his companies, they think they wanna go to Mars, like they're invested in the whole Elon thing. Then there's another half of the voters who are like,

why does this billionaire want to be in our government? What is he doing? And I often talk about how persuasion is not teaching, it's like making somebody switch a position that they previously held. It is about unlocking something that they already kind of believe. And so people have deeply embedded in them the archetype of the

sort of evil billionaire trying to get more. And so there's a lot of people who are just like confused about why Elon is doing this. Why is Elon the guy? Why is this billionaire who gave, they know gave Trump a lot of money? Like what is the deal here? So there's this other group that's just deeply skeptical and I thought that was a real vulnerability for Trump and Elon. And I will just say, I know Kara gave you her theory about that. He's just collecting all this data and information to feed into the AI models. I think I think there's something there.

Although all the all the PSA hosts think I think I'm a little crazy, I think. But I know I'm with you guys. I think it's like a real. It's funny, don't say that was her theory and it was just the first time I'd heard it and it made a great deal of sense to me as a thing. Because there's a world out there of people who know Elon really well.

Cause he's been and they'll really bulk at the notion that somehow it's all corrupt. They're like, he's not corrupt, he's just, you know, he's like a- Well, the whole, I mean, this was the case with Trump too, the whole like, he's so rich, why does he need more money? He's already rich enough, he's doing this out of the goodness of his heart.

That has some purchase, I think. That works with some voters, yeah, that he is doing this because he really cares about America and- Maybe. I mean, I don't know. I don't know. I don't know all the rich people and I don't know, but I just, I suspect that people get very rich like that because they like to continue to get very rich.

Um, I don't know about how much of it is like a deep corruption versus. Elon thinking, having like a master of the universe feeling, right? Like, yeah, give me all this and I'm going to do what I want with it. And like the ego on these people, that to me could be enough explanation itself, but I do knowing not a ton about AI, just just enough to be dangerous. It struck me as an interesting idea that the government was the last sort of big pot of information that one could get access to for the language learning models. And I do think, and you would know this better, but I think for no

small number of conservatives, the idea that Elon Musk has poking around in all of our private data and information, And not like the MAGA fans, but like some people have got to be like, and Alyssa Slotkin brought this up in her speech last night. I know she has said previously that she was hearing this in some town halls in some rural parts of Michigan. People were like, what is he doing in our data? Like I do think that has some,

that could be an effective message. I think so too. And look, I don't know what he's doing, but that's also, what's so weird is that all the people who love Elon are like big transparency advocates. Elon himself will tell you he's a big transparency advocate. None of this is transparent.

And I do think that that is something that people should be like, what is happening? You don't even have to say what you think it is. Just put them on defense and say, I demand you tell us what you're doing with Americans information. Last question I'll let you go. How are you guys thinking about fighting back

at the bulwark? Have you had conversations post election like, okay, this is a new world we're in, this is pretty scary and like, what's the best way for us to contribute? Yeah, I mean, I guess I don't necessarily, I obviously have more activisty things that I do that is how I think't necessarily, I obviously have more activist-y things that I do that is how I think about like, how do you fight back exactly.

I think for the bulwark, it's more about, I think that Trump is such a liar, that what he creates is this distortion field that for a big group of Americans suddenly causes them to be like, I'm trying to figure out what the truth is Who can I trust what is going on? And I want to be a place where people feel like I Trust these people because we've earned it not by being right all the time actually, but by having really honest Discussions between us where we admit my favorite thing about like JVL and I do the secret pod and we call it the secret pod in part because we give ourselves permission to be wrong on it a lot.

But we tell everybody, I don't know that this is my opinion. I am trying to figure out what my opinion is and we work through a lot of it together. And so I think for us, we want to put more nutritious information into the world. We want to have a community. We want, I think we do want to model though, and maybe this is more intentional than other than anything else, there's a tremendous amount of fear right now. Like we are watching so many media companies be unwilling to say the true thing or kind of mind their P's and Q's or worry about their parent companies

and the deals that they have to do. And I think we just try to want to maintain and hold our space as we will continue to tell the truth and like we don't, we don't care. We don't have Disney's not our parent company. Right. Though if you want to buy us, go ahead. No, no, no, just kidding. Just kidding. Bob Iger if you're listening. Yeah. We're not here to worry about, you know, their mergers and acquisitions. We're just

going to tell the truth in this moment when I think people are desperate for it and not a lot of people are giving it. I think that's great. I think building trust, I mean, the lack of trust is what got us here. So I think building trust is really important. Sarah, thanks for coming by PodSafe America as always. Oh, thanks for having me.

Everyone check out the Focus Group podcast. Tommy's on this weekend, I guess. Tommy's on this weekend. Check out all of your podcasts. Go to the Bulwark, subscribe. It's fantastic. We're practically doing crossovers now. I know, I love it.

All right, take care. Bye. One last thing before we go, Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Points USA, General Maga Goober. He was the first guest on Gavin Newsom's new podcast this week, titled, This is Gavin Newsom. We have a new pod competitor, our own governor. So Newsom and Charlie Kirk got into it.

I haven't listened to the whole thing yet, though. You know what? It's, it's working. I'm kind of interested. I'm intrigued. It's piqued my interest to see what, to hear what Gavin Newsom and Charlie Kirk are going to talk about. But anyway, what's most important for all of you is that Charlie Kirk offered this

assessment of the podcast industry. It's by no coincidence that out of the long form podcasting genres, the top 10, eight of them are conservative or center right. Rogan, Megan Kelly, Theo Vaughn, the Paul Brothers, our program, Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh. There's a singular one on the left, which is Pod Save America, which is just like a bunch of Obama bros agreeing

with each other for 90 minutes and saying that we're not very smart. And you know, and so anyway. Now, I find that grossly unfair because we have kept this podcast just a hair under 90 minutes. I'm actually worried now that I'm looking at the clock that we didn't, but... It's gonna be close. I think my conversation with Sarah was 30.

We're like at a... We're like at 55. Ad breaks. We probably didn't make it. You know what? We're not counting ad breaks. We're not counting ad breaks. Okay, yeah. Charlie Kirk. You know what, we're not counting ad breaks. We're not counting ad breaks. Okay, yeah.

Charlie Kirk. You know? Spot the lie, spot the lie. I appreciate the recognition. Sometimes we disagree. We just did over where you should hold town halls. There you go, there you go. All right, that's our show for today.

Tommy's gonna be back on the feed on Sunday with an interview with Alistair Campbell, the top labor strategist in the UK about how parties come back from the dead, his advice for Democrats and the mess in Europe. It's gonna be pretty interesting, so check it out. And then we'll be back with another episode in your feed on Tuesday.

Have a great weekend, talk to everyone soon. Bye everyone. If you wanna listen to Pod Save America ad free or get access to our subscriber discord and exclusive podcasts, consider joining our Friends of the pod community at crooked.com slash friends or subscribe on Apple podcasts directly from the pod save America feed. Also be sure to follow pod save America on Tik TOK, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube

for full episodes, bonus content and more. And before you hit that next button, you can help boost this episode by leaving us a review and by sharing it with friends and family. Pods A of America is a crooked media production. Our producers are David Toledo and Saul Rubin. Our associate producer is Farah Safari. Reid Cherlin is our executive editor and Adrian Hill is our executive producer. The show is mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick. Jordan Cantor is our sound engineer with audio support from Kyle Seglin and Charlotte Landis. Madeleine Herringer is our head of news and programming. Matt DeGroote is our head of

production. Naomi Sengel is our executive assistant. Thanks to our digital team, Elijah Cohn, Hayley Jones, Ben Hefcoat, Mia Kelman, Molly Lobel, Kirill Pellavive, and David Tolles. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.