Pod Save America - Trump Targets School JUST Outside Boston

Episode Date: May 27, 2025

Jon, Lovett, Tommy, and Dan talk about the administration's attempt to bar Harvard from enrolling international students and other new Trump threats, including possible sweeping tariffs on the EU and Apple products. The guys answer your questions on everything from the future of Democratic leadership and why some Senate Democrats keep voting with Trump, to whether a future Democratic president should roll back executive power. Plus: who's surprisingly not terrible in Trump 2.0? How would they handle a Trump interview? Finally, some thoughts on Bluesky, how use AI without losing your mind… and whether 100 Crooked staffers could take down a gorilla. For a closed-captioned version of this episode, click here. For a transcript of this episode, please email [e-mail] and include the name of the podcast.

Pod Save America is brought to you by Quince. Father's Day gifting is always the same story. Socks, grill tools, repeat. This year, do better. Head to Quince. Quince makes it easy to find gifts that actually feel thoughtful for the dads in your life. Quince has all the pieces dads actually wanna wear,

like organic cotton silk polos, European linen beach shorts, and comfortable pants that work for everything from weekend hangouts to nice dinners. The best part, everything with Quince is priced 50 to 80 percent less than what you'd find at similar brands. By working directly with top artisans and cutting out the middleman, Quince gives you luxury pieces without the crazy markups. And Quince only works with factories that use safe, ethical, and

responsible manufacturing practices and premium fabrics and finishes. Great stuff at Quince. I just got a zip-up hoodie, because it gets really f***ing cold in this office, like right now. And I also got some t-shirts and a few polos. So, I know I'm supposed to talk about what I got from my father, but I didn't get him anything from Quince. Sorry, Dad.

Huh? When is Father's Day? It's middle of June. We got some time. Got time, okay. For the Dad who deserves better than basic, Quince has you covered. Go to quince.com slash crooked for free better than basic, Quince has you covered. Go to quince.com slash crooked for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. That's q-u-i-n-c-e dot com slash crooked to get free shipping and 365 day returns.

Quince dot com slash crooked. Welcome to Pod Save America, I'm Jon Favreau. I'm Jon Lovett. I'm Tommy Vitor. I'm Dan Pfeiffer. We've got all four of us here today. We are doing a mail bag. We're gonna take some of your questions. Hope everyone had a good Memorial Day weekend.

But we woke up, it's Friday, we're recording this, and we woke up and, you know, Donald Trump made a bunch of news. So we might talk a little bit about that at the top, if you guys want. It's not often I wake up and there's like multiple breaking news New York Times notifications on your phone about Donald Trump.

Really? Not like most days? Well, this one was like a couple right in a row because first he threatens the EU with a- They had to come. Right, yeah, which is one of his favorite punching bags with a 50% tariff because apparently the trade negotiations aren't going well with Europe. So starting on June 1st, he wants to recommend a straight 50% tariff.

So it's going to be tough to drink those French wines, Tommy. No. Zut alors. I need a better one of those. And then right after that, he said, I've long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India or anyplace else.

If that's not the case, a tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the US. I mean, most of the weekend, I'm walking around with an Apple, an iPhone in one hand and a glass of wine in the other hand. That's like both of my modern man. Wow, look at this. Yeah.

What are you doing to me? Just scrolling and sipping, scrolling and sipping. Yeah, flawlessly wove those two nerves. I was thinking about it. I'm like, wine and an iPhone. No, I do think the tariffs are happening to you. No, I think you're right. Also, all of our kids desperately want to work at Foxconn.

That's where this is going. Yeah. And then, of course, Dan and I talked a little bit on Friday's episode about the threat to Harvard and trying to revoke their ability to enroll any international students whatsoever. Harvard sued. There was a temporary injunction granted this morning, Friday

morning. But it's still chaos. I don't know if you guys have read some of the stories there about these students who, students who are already there, who don't know if they're gonna be able to finish school, students who are incoming students to Harvard, international students, who have already like turned down other colleges and were ready to go to Harvard and now don't know if they can. Anyway, Trump versus the world. What do you guys all think? It is very cruel to those students. Could be a good day for somebody who got waitlisted. It is like 6,800 kids. It's 27% of the last year's class, I think, is international.

I just saw a story, I saw a Harvard professor tweeting about how among those at risk of not being able to go to Harvard this year are IDF veterans. So to combat anti-Semitism, we are telling Israeli combat veterans that they can't go to Harvard. That makes total sense to me. Is that what we're doing? We're combating anti-Semitism by kicking

these foreign students, including Israeli students, out of Harvard? That is the ostensible purpose of the- It's hard to keep it straight, but yes, that's why. There's also a DEI element to it. They're saying they also employ DEI policy. So it's anti-Semitism promoting pro-Hamas sympathies on campus and DEI policies. And what the letter from, what's her face?

Kristi Noem said is that they were demanding from Harvard video footage, records of all the international students, potential disciplinary action. So basically like, have they ever participated in a protest? That's sort of what they're looking for. Not just illegal activity, protected speech, protest activity.

They're demanding any footage of protests that might involve international students. Yeah, it's just a, you know, Harvard responded, it's brazenly unconstitutional. They're not any footage of protests that might involve international students. Yeah, it's just a, you know, Harvard responded. It's brazenly unconstitutional. They're not pretending at all that this has anything to do with their international student program or any kind of illicit or illegal conduct by Harvard that would justify shutting down the program.

They are explicitly saying, for this other reason that we care about, which is anti-Semitic protest on campus, we are going to use all the levers of power we have at our disposal to fuck with you. So the judge blocked it because Harvard basically is saying this will do a ton of harm even before we're able to litigate it, but it's also just bracing the unconstitutional. Yeah. And then the markets are taking the tariff threats well.

Well, I think the markets, I think they're shrugging off the EU portion of it because I mean the problem with Trump making these threats now is they've the Europe has already watched him cave like multiple times he caved to them he caved to China like we're what's this like round what two or three of these terror threats the new thing waking up and threatening a foreign country or block of them I think I'm kind of used to right now waking up and threatening one of like the crown jewels of the US tech community or like one of the biggest US companies period is insane.

And the idea that Apple is going to shift manufacturing from China to the United States is nonsensical. They're trying to shift from China to India in part because of like US government pressure that we want all these major companies to diversify supply chains and not be captive to the Chinese Communist Party. Now the Chinese are making it very difficult to shift those supply chains and manufacturing

out of China through a bunch of restrictions that are too boring to get into. But the idea that Apple wouldn't just like eat the 25% tariff and make our iPhones $100, $300 more expensive, as opposed to trying to completely redo the company in the United States is ludicrous. Trump thinks that there's some magic factory in a box button that Tim Cook is not pushing. Even if he were to say tomorrow, yes, we're going to make more, it would be years upon years before you could start making the iPhones in the United States. Yeah. It's basically what happened to the Mattel guy,

the CEO of Mattel, because he said the same thing. He's like, oh, we're moving out of China. We're gonna try to move more production and manufacturing into India. And Trump's like, no, no, no, no, no, no. You don't get to move from China to India. You have to move here. And if not, no more Mattel toys.

That's what we're dealing with this Memorial Day weekend. I was actually more alarmed by the EU tariffs because what's he fucking doing? Is he actually gonna go through with this? It's like more of the same chaos. It could have like far reaching consequences. With Apple, it's like, all right, the most profitable company in the history of planet Earth,

they've made an incredible amount of money making iPhones in China and selling them at tremendous profit in the US. Do I think this is the way the US president should behave? No, but do I care that much? I really don't. But I do think it speaks to how little Tim Cook has gotten for his obsequious bowing before Donald Trump. Is it working?

Is your charm offensive in your donation? Is it working? Doesn't seem like it's working. It's not working, but like the net effect of this is that Apple sells like 75 million iPhones in the US. What's most likely to happen is that they all cost $300 more. So yeah, that would really suck for like a huge chunk of the country.

Well yeah, Apple will- A huge political impact. Of course. They will make us eat the cost. Like it's a pretty big deal. I think they're a Samsung. You can definitely. You can definitely drink in one.

No, I know. It's just annoying. Okay, so let's get pretty big deal. I'm like not a Samsung. You can definitely. You can definitely. Drinking wine. No, I know. It's just annoying. Okay, so let's get to the questions. These are from Discord, from our subscribers. The first one is from CallMeTRL, although I think this one's probably from Elijah. What can Dem Voters do to push the party to elect younger reps to leadership positions?

COF, AOC, Oversight Committee, COF, AOC, oversight committee, COF, to move on from this seniority system they have. That was Connolly's last words. Oh my God. Jesus Christ. Oh, come on. No. What?

What? He had throat cancer. Oh, I didn't realize that. Well, I know he died of cancer. That's very specific, but I'm sorry. That was obviously inappropriate and I think we should leave it in. All right.

Dan, Dan, what's your answer? That's a good joke. I'm still in shock by what just happened there. Sorry. It begins with electing more younger Democrats, right? That is the first thing, there are gonna be primaries. We're gonna have open seats for the Senate coming up in a whole bunch of states.

We should be, if you want the younger Democrats, we should elect those. And there should, pressure should be, if you want the younger Democrats, we should elect those. And there should pressure should be put on leadership to have a different system. Like there is a value in experience for sure. Like the longer, if you've been in Congress a while, you know how these things work, you have developed issue expertise and that matters. But we have to think about other things. Politics is also performance.

And we have to think about people who can communicate, who can speak to the large part of our core base that we're losing, which is young voters. And so we need a system that isn't simply the, the longer you've been in Congress, you automatically get the spot. And so it's put pressure on Hakeem Jeffries, put pressure on Chuck Schumer.

If you think we need a younger leadership in the Senate, put pressure on senators. You can do that by calling their office, you can do that through protests, to look for younger leadership. the Senate, put pressure on senators. You can do that by calling their office, you can do that through protests, to look for younger leadership. That begins with getting someone to challenge these leaders. Right, you actually need that to happen, particularly in the Senate.

You know who's really good at finding young leaders is Matt Gaetz. Oh. Yeah. You know, this used to be worse. I think before the 70s, it was like just de facto, if you were the most senior member on the committee, you got the job.

Then in the 70s, the party granted the caucus the power to vote on these things. In 2020, Dems put in place six-year term limits for chairs. So we could do more of that. There could be rank choice voting for committee chairs. You could reform the steering committee, which is a leadership setup committee that recommends people for these spots.

You could put more emphasis on policy expertise or whatever. There is an open question though, does this really fucking matter? People care what AOC thinks a lot more than name a random committee chair. I can't, even though she was passed over. So it's a fair question. I do agree that the committee chair issue

is less of an issue than the fact that a number of House Democrats have died in office. That seems bad. Over the last year or so. Three have died this year. The last eight members of Congress or senators to die while in office have all been Democrats. Yeah.

But you know, ultimately, like you said, Dan, we gotta run younger candidates and if you don't see younger candidates running, run yourself. Right. You know? All right, this is from Patrick W. As someone who worked in the Senate during the first Trump term, I don't remember the moderate Dems aside from Manchin voting so often with

Republicans for Trump nominees or for bad bills like Lakin Riley, the Genius Act, etc. What is going on with senators like Gallego, Slotkin, Warner, Rosen that they feel like voting with Republicans and Trump so often in this moment. Anyone want to take that? So you guys want to hear some Republicans in the first Trump term that got big, big votes? Mm-hmm. Jim Mattis, you want to guess?

100-nothin'. Unanimous? No, no, no, no. Thanks for yes-anding this. It's a no. Way to be a team player without 98 to one. I meant no, I said. One, who was against Jim Mattis?

I think it was Senator Gillibrand, I believe. There was a question at the time of whether someone who was just in uniform, you're supposed to be statutorily out for five years, I think. Oh. Before you can be sec-def. Elaine Chao got 93 to six for DOT. That's Mitch McConnell, pressing the flesh.

It is. I think immigration to a specific area where Democrats felt like they were off sides politically and a lot of them are these people are in border states. So they voted for terrible bills because they thought that's what their constituents want. The Genius Act is in my view, an indefensible, weird decision.

It's about the regulation of stablecoins. It got 69 votes in the Senate. I think Democrats are scared of crypto money, and also they want to be perceived as pro crypto among crypto fans. But Trump is literally selling access to the highest bidder as we speak. That was last night, sorry. Yeah, I think the argument that they have made because of first the Democrats are a lot of Democrats I think most of them even the pro crypto Democrats in the Senate were against the genius act and then they made some changes

And so the people who are for it are saying well It's some regulation of stable coin is better than no regulation at all and there's all these consumer protections built in and Opponents like Elizabeth Warren are saying not consumer protections built in, and opponents, like Elizabeth Warren, are saying not enough protections built in, and also it's not doing anything about Trump and the Trump problem. I believe the, but the regulations now say that no member of Congress or senior administration official can start a stable coin while in office.

But if you already got one going. Right, exactly. Like, come on, what is this? So, not a great bill, but I would take issue with the premise only in that at the beginning of Trump's term, with some of the cabinet nominees, and things like Lake and Riley Act, we were in a political environment

where I think a lot of Democrats were like, okay, we gotta work with Trump when we can and oppose him when we must. And I think now, with the exception of the Genius Act, I don't think many nominees are getting through the Democratic Senate, except for some reason Cory Booker voted for Jared Kushner.

That's the one I want to bring up, right? Which is, I mean, he is a, Charles Kushner was a long time donor of Cory Booker. Cory Booker put out a statement right before Charles Kushner's conviction, but it's an unbelievable vote. It's just absolutely an insane thing to do. Cory Booker put out some statement about how

the reason he did it is because Charles Kushner helped pass the first step act when Cory Booker was doing that in the first term, which is an absurd premise. And I think it was, I understand that people thought at the time that we should work with Trump when we can and oppose him when we should. That was idiocy then and it's idiocy now.

Yeah. If there are like, I can, I don't know enough about the genius act and the stable coins about, and I can buy an argument that some regulation is better than none. But if you're voting, no one who has to vote for a single Trump nominee has felt good about that vote afterwards.

Yes. How's everyone feel about their 99 fucking votes for Marco Rubio? We had been how I'm basically saying to Rubio's face this week, like I about that vote afterwards. Yes. How's everyone feel about their 99 fucking votes for Marco Rubio? We had Ben Hallen basically saying to Rubio's face this week, like, I regret that vote. And then Rubio's like, that's how I know I'm doing a good job. Which doesn't make any sense because were you mad he voted for you when he got the vote?

You're just coming up with a fucking little retort, fucking Marco Rubio. But it did feel like what they were trying to do was the same reason they were getting behind people like Mattis, because it was this idea like, no, you need responsible people there to hold Trump to his feet to the fire, make sure there are serious adults.

If he's not there, who's gonna be there in his place? But then that was what Marco Rubio's role. That's what Besant's supposed to be doing. Right. But they're just not. Charles Kushner, what are we doing here? Yeah, not a great guy. All right, this is fun.

Who were your rankings of most disappointing and surprisingly not disappointing Trump 2.0 appointees and characters? And then this person said, "'Bergum's kind of wholesome.'" I think we just named a surprisingly disappointing one, which is Marco Rubio. That's the top of my list.

Right, he's throwing people in jail for writing up ads. He's helping. And he's proud of it. Lead deportations to El Salvador. Like he is, he was the most normie cabinet selection out there and he's done more to erode democratic norms than maybe anyone else. I, look, I didn't expect good things from Christine Ohm,

but if you would have told me that within weeks of Donald Trump become president, she would do a fascist photo op in front of prisoners at a Salvadoran mega prison to justify illegal, extrajudicial kidnappings. That would have been, I think, surprising to me. Well, it's also very specific. Yeah.

Yeah. What a polymarket idea. Wow, whoever predicted that was smart. Quite a windup on that prediction. I think Decent too, I would say. See, I don't know, has he been a moderating force? Kind of seems like in the times on the tariffs. I don't think he's helped too much.

Maybe, yeah, maybe. I mean, is there a difference between a pathetic failed moderating force and someone who's going along with what like a Lutnik wants? Well said, well said. Tulsi Gabbard, her entire worldview was defined by Iraq and now she's firing intelligence analysts who disagree with or who disagree with a political judgment they made about immigration. Dan, what about you?

What do you got? I probably put Marco Rubio as most disappointing. I didn't have any real hopes for him. I just thought he would be sort of a shuffled off to the side feckless loser the whole time, as opposed to like really leading into being a giant pro-Trump asshole, but that was surprising. With four jobs. Yeah, I mean, I think Besant, I don't know what hopes I had for him either.

He's mostly failed at what he was doing. He's worse at being Gary Cohn than Gary Cohn, which is saying a lot of the role that he had. You know, I would say Doug Burgum. I haven't really thought about him since the day he was confirmed and this question. So that seems like he's at least not doing something terrible.

So I should feel good about that. Oh, that's on your, yeah, okay. Oh, that's your surprising. That's my surprising, yeah. I think that I did not expect much from her at all, but Pam Bondi to me is like almost as bad as I imagined Matt Gaetz being. Like she, and whenever, if you catch her on TV,

she's just like a White House spokesperson. Yeah. Like she's the attorney general. Empty vessel. But she's just, she's so obsequious in the cabinet meetings and she's just like spitting out talking points and just do, she's just a Donald Trump staffer. That's it.

She calls him president. Yeah. Not mister, not the. Thank you president. That's the way a child would. You know who's getting a lot of love in surprising places these days? Oh, no.

Cash Patel. Roll the clip. Oh, wow. Oh, a surprise clip. Wow, a surprise clip. If it makes you feel better, I mean, Gorka is not taken seriously by anyone who knows him, I think including his wife.

And he's a very nice person for what it's worth. And I think his job literally is just to sit on the internet and like send, you know, fiery replies to people on X. I mean, I don't think he actually has a job. Oh, well, then I guess he's the perfect guy for the job. It really is, I assume. There's someone else working on counterterrorism. Tommy, fuck you for making me like Tucker Carlson there.

I know, that was Tucker talking to a guy named Sean Ryan, who's like kind of a military podcaster guy. Oh, yeah, I always see him. Really shitting on Zeb. So is there some sort of Zeb Tucker beef? There was, um... So apparently, there was a backstory that was too long to include, but Gorka went after Sean Ryan over something and was real dick about it. They also just think he's a clown,

and he's like cosplaying serious counterterrorism. Sean Ryan's a former Navy SEAL turned CIA kind of contractor dude. Any other pleasant surprises? Surprisingly not disappointed. Anyone other, anyone else? I know we kind of talked about Cash Patel a little bit. I know.

I didn't want to jinx anything. I don't either. You know, yeah kinda talked about Cash Patel a little bit. I know. I didn't wanna jinx anything. I don't either. You know, yeah. A bunch of cash holes. Dan Bongino and Cash Patel going out there and basically saying that Epstein kills himself. I mean, it's sort of a strange way to go, fellas.

But there's a kind of an odd moment of them kind of trying to speak the truth to the base. Not clear why they, I mean, clearly they felt so compelled by all the pressure they're under. It tells you something about what their day-to-day priorities are, but those guys could be worse. It's just weird to me, like, after the shoot, the terrible shooting in DC of, um,

those two staffers at the Israeli embassy, like, Dan Bongino's Twitter feed is just given out, like, good, credible information and very calm, and I'm like, what? It's weird to me only because Cash Patel and Dan Bongino seem less crazy than their boss. It's not like they're taking a cue from Pam Bondi. Like she's much more of like just a Trump staffer

than the two of them. And I thought it would have been reversed maybe. It just raises the question about what the deep state has on both of them. Oh, there we saw Dan. Exactly. Dan, you joke, but I listened to two hours of Tucker Carlson talking to that guy, Sean Ryan, last night, and this was a big chunk of it.

Whoa, let's talk about that. Where do you find the time? Two hours? I did on 2X. But it was a- Was it a four-hour podcast you did at 2X? No, two to one, two to one. Okay, but you still did an hour of Tucker Carlson and Sean Ryan at night with two children

who are quite young. I listened to half of it this morning. It was compelling. It was good. I'm gonna step in to save you, Tommy. an hour of Tucker Carlson and Sean Ryan at night with two children who are quite young. I listened to half of it this morning. It was compelling. It was good. It was a good idea. I'm gonna step in to save you, Tommy. At 9.30 last night, I started the conversation

between JD Vance and Ross Doethit. Ugh, that was an annoying conversation. And I listened to that to go to sleep. It was so bad. What is wrong with you? It did not help me go to sleep because it got me extremely angry at JD Vance. No fucking shit.

Like what did you think? Just Ross soothing dulcet tones was gonna rock you to sleep like a lullaby? Supposed to have a guy you're trying to get into a Twitter fight with every three days? I don't know what the last straw was for Martin Luther to kick off the Reformation, but like it kind of has to be a Catholic conversation

more irritating than that, I suppose. Yeah, anyway, we won't break that down. We won't break that down. All right, new question from Kev. When a Democratic president gets back in office, do you think it is their responsibility to strip back some of the presidential powers that have been taken over the past two decades,

or is that not possible with an ever-paralyzed and ineffective legislative branch? I had Tommy and Dan both say they wanted to take this one. Oh, my answer is nope. Use the power you have to do stuff that makes people happy. I'm not saying that President Pete should crush his enemies with DOJ, but we're not going back to normal. Let's do some shit.

I thought that you were gonna say for war powers. What do you mean? Like have Congress actually offer us war? The fact that we're still, that the presidents are still using the authorization for Afghanis in Iraq to just like launch whatever. It would be great if Congress would repeal the AUMF. I'm absolutely for that.

But I think just in terms of the leaning on executive action, not waiting for Congress, no, we're not going to let Republicans obstruct us to death ever again. I have a different take on this. Let's hear it. I'm not, I'm fine with continuing to have a broad-based definition of executive power because Congress is paralyzed. I think in 2020, Democrats should run on an agenda that makes the president more accountable for their actions.

We should support making the Hatch Act apply to the president. We should have a legal solution where it sets out where presidents can be prosecuted to sort of hem in the immunity decision. We should pass laws that say presidents can't have meme coins, stable coins. There's like a whole set of things that we should, Trump has found all these loopholes system, he has exploited them mightily. It is in our interest to be, we're not gonna ever take advantage of those things,

hopefully, so we should run to close all those loopholes. I think it should be a big part of our agenda. And I think a president- Lie about it, not do itopholes. I think it should be a big part of our agenda. And I think a president- Lie about it, not do it. I think you should. I think you should do them. And not do the meme coin. I think it's not gonna be that hard.

Look, we're in this sort of vicious circle where it's like heads we, tails they win, heads we lose, which is, you know, we abide by all these structures that slow down government, restrict the president's ability to operate, then Republicans come in, they can do whatever the fuck they want. We can't prove to people that government can work effectively and serve their interests

if we're so hemmed in when we finally have power. But at the same time, I do think the presidency is now this sort of symbol of total government failure and the only antidote to that is not reforms that make Congress more effective or make the agencies move more quickly But just to accrue more power to the president and it's a kind of it's a tough spot for Democrats to be in But I think Tommy is right Like we first and foremost need to prove to people that government can work within the bounds of the law Within the the structures provided by Congress, but that it can be dynamic and effective and fast-moving

And I think for a long time, Democrats weren't willing to kind of ruffle feathers, break through walls in a way that proved that to people. And I think that's like the first order priority. Yeah, I'm being a little bit glib, but I do think like, and obviously like I would love to, I would do like common sense ethics reforms, but I do think like Trump with like Doge, for example,

it was ineffective and stupid, but it made him look like he was active in doing things and actually cutting spending. And I think we have to figure out our version ineffective and stupid, but it made him look like he was active in doing things and actually cutting spending. And I think we have to figure out our version of something like that that makes us look like we're not just gonna get obstructed. Like there needs to be like a little bit of that kind of like fast moving energy with like,

a moral and like ethical and ideological goal we support. There's somewhere between the lawyers stopping everything from happening and having the judges stop everything you tried to do. And Trump, we Democrats have everything you tried to do and Trump Yeah, we we Democrats have erred on the former and Trump has fallen into the latter Yeah, I would probably pass legislation or try to pass legislation to Trump proof the bureaucracy and independent agencies Just give a little more protection just based on what the courts have ruled so far

You know the courts have sort of stood up to Trump on some of the deportation stuff But they are not standing up to Trump on like firing, except for the Fed, I guess, firing, you know, heads of independent agencies, knowing that some of these independent agencies are going to be, you know, like Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, right? We want to protect that beyond the next Democratic president, next time there's Republicans. So I would put, I would try to push for reforms there. And then I maybe clean up the Insurrection Act, the Alien Enemies Act.

So make sure that if we get another Republican president, those aren't on the table. Let me get rid of that one. You're overlooking our big win on the P-Club. What's the P-Club? On the P-Club? The President's Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. Oh, we won on P-Club?

A federal judge, Trump fired two Dems on that board. Federal judge said, no, no, no, no. Who were the dems? Were they friends of yours? I don't know, man. A couple, a couple of clobs, you know? Big win on the, let's do a rapid response video on our big wins on the P-Cob board. I think Tommy just did.

Travis LeBlanc and Edward Felton. I think that's going to go viral. Oh good, Eddie. All right. From Dan Levy. Suppose you somehow had the opportunity to interview Trump. How would you approach it?

Would you ask tough questions and courtesize his record? Or would you try to butter him up and trick him into saying something harmful, i.e. the quiet part out loud? Oh, can we, all right, you know what? Honestly, we're gonna have a little ceremony and we're gonna bury that phrase in the ground. There's no more, how is anyone hearing any quiet parts?

It's all loud all the time. Didn't have that on my bingo card. I'll bury that one with it. Louder for the people in the back. I would go with some simple questions. I think the Kristi Noem, what is habeas corpus example is some kind of how I would go with Trump. Like, what does the emoluments class say, sir?

And then when he inevitably flips out, I just want one journalist to be like, you're the most powerful man in the world, your party controls the entire government. Do you ever get bored of bitching and whining so much and just see what he says? That's good. Yeah, I would goad him into losing his temper,

but I would also make sure that like the, you know, he couldn't leave the interview. He could try, but the doors were all locked. I think you wanted him to storm off. Beijing Secret Service. No, we're just hanging out. He's just abiding by the rules. Yeah, but I think that goading him into losing his temper,

especially around the jet, the corruption stuff, that's what really gets him. Like he really flipped out at Peter Alexander. That was great. That was a really sort of interesting moment of him just being kind of like, he had just shown his little videos and he wanted questions about the videos

and Peter went right to the plane. He's like, I just, it was like a show and tell kind of thing. Yeah, it was a presentation. Dan, what would you do? I would pick one subject and stick to it. I think one of the problems with this is these reporters go in, they feel like they have to ask him about everything.

Like just in the example with the Terry Moran interview where Donald Trump is seeming like a complete lunatic, lying or being completely misled about a picture with fake tattoos that he tweeted out of the Oval Office. And Terry Moran's like, I hear you, I hear your lies, but I got to get to Ukraine, got to get to Ukraine, I hear the clock tick. So just pick one issue, right? It could be corruption, it could be what's actually in the budget bill, it could be his illegal deportations. Let me just pick one thing to stick to it so that you can actually drill down as opposed to trying to cover the waterfront

and you're all allotted 17 minutes or whatever it is. I also want one just thing I think has been effective with him too is sometimes be like, I never said that, right? And that's not what I said. If you just have the printout of the, you know, just have the post, he fucking hates that. He hates being confronted by his words.

And if you just have, like, it's right here. This is what he said, it's right here. Dan, is the new media section of the press room actually damaging or is it just kind of a weird sideshow? It's a weird sideshow. It's serving the purpose that Trump wants, which is to grant access to his biggest fans so that they will cover him

even more positively, right? It's not changing the world. It's not upending what journalism is or anything like that. It's access for sycophants with large media platforms and it's working the way it's intended. Yeah. It's smart. Yeah, Democrats should do the same thing.

They absolutely, you should. Yeah, I look forward to the next Democratic president having a new media section with a whole bunch of people except us. Yeah. Yeah. Four more years of being hated. Probably the way that goes.

I was like DMing Midas Touchdats so we could borrow their badge. Fuck. We do know Brian Tyler Cohen. Yeah, that's right. Brian Mask. Yeah, I'm all Jon Fass plus one. Please let me in. All right, here's a tough one.

Are there any conservative commentators that you respect and who is your least favorite conservative commentator so far in Trump 2.0 and then this person gives us a leading Scott Jennings? I suppose this means conservative commentators who are still pro-Trump. I think you have, yeah. I don't think we can be like Bill Kristol.

Oh yeah. Honestly, I really don't, I don't. That's not where I'm at. Like I really have a great deal of respect for the conservatives that said no. I think it's just been interesting. I think people's revealed themselves in the last decade about what they really believed.

And I really genuinely admire the conservatives that walked away. But the ones that are inside defending this, I just have no respect for it. There's no, I don't know. Maybe there's some that are better than others, but it's hard for me to judge. I mean, we have Fox on all day long,

and it's just sort of whatever the talking points of the day are, whoever host is on will repeat them like in 2018 the claims that there was a white genocide in South Africa and white farmers were being exterminated was Cabined off to the Tucker Carlson hour of Fox News. Yeah now that Trump is talking about it It's on every single show that doofus sports guy Will Kane like everybody's just repeating that talking point, right? So I have the least respect for those useful idiots. I don't respect them, but I find it interesting that Laura Loomer, Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon

are all willing to be critical of Trump on certain issues and at certain points. Again, I don't like them. I think they're bad people who do and say terrible things and are dishonest, but they speak truth to power more than like the bozos, you know, Laura Ingraham. Yeah. It's the, it is interesting where there's a lot of people who are for whatever Trump

is for because they didn't really have that strong of an ideology. They really want power and money success, whatever it is. So they just go along with what Trump wants. And then there are the people that really did have an ideological agenda they cared about, to whom they view Trump as useful. And it's where that pops up, like you have these House Freedom Caucus members, a lot of them went along with this bill,

but someone like Thomas Massey is willing to go on the floor and say, this is still a bad bill and you can't convince me otherwise. Like there is, that speaks to a genuine belief that that person has, I think it's wrong, but. And then he voted for it. No, didn't Massey vote no? I think, did Thomas Massey vote no?

Yeah. Oh, I thought they got all. No. Who's now? It was two of them, Massey and someone else, anyway, sorry. I think Massey was trying to raise money off of. Oh, that's right. That's right, that's right.

Because he, Trump went after him. Dan, you said that you respect Scott Jennings? That's who you're most familiar with. No, no, I think you misheard me. Yeah, I agree with a lot of it. There's none of them that I respect in any way, shape or form. It is interesting.

The people I respect less are the Fox News people and Brett Baier in particular. Like the fact that we're in a world where Laura Loomer has more journalistic integrity than Brett Baier is something that I would hope would keep Brett Baier up at night in his very, very large mansion in Palm Beach, but I suspect it doesn't. Brett Baier, like he really has become the lead

Pravda guy at Fox News. He is the house organ. And it's not just that he interviews Trump, he interviews a cabinet official every other night for some sort of gauzy one-hour thing. And when Trump went to the UAE in Qatar, he interviewed the prime minister and gave them both softball, hour long,

whatever, like specials. Do you think that the reason the Palm Beach houses of these Fox News anchors keep getting bigger is because they're like the Winchester widow and they need to sleep in a different bed each night to evade the ghosts that haunt them for what they've done and from which they've reaped their great rewards?

I was thinking that. Yes, yes. That was my first thought this morning. Yeah, you were thinking that. Yeah. What's the Winchester widow? The Winchester widow, she inherited the fortune from the Winchester gun company from her husband

and she built this elaborate mansion but never stopped constructing it because she would like to sleep in a different room because she felt she was haunted by the ghosts of the people killed by the weapons. And so it's this maze-like structure. Dark. What's the origin of the story?

The Winchester widow, but that's it. What do you mean? I mean, did someone write it? Oh, I don't know. Okay. Okay. You mean like, where did I hear from it? I don't know.

I don't know what fucking rattles around. I saw it, I read a book or I saw a TikTok. So the latter. Yes. The content people come here for. I'm Googling it for you. Maybe it's just because I listened to the interview last night. I thought Ross Deffett did a good job with JD Vance.

Did he? The daily part he didn't push back. This is the problem, Tommy. It's like, first of all, it's a good lesson. Doing the interview about the interview you just did. Lame. Yeah, we've thought a couple of times about, like, should we talk about the interview? After listening to five minutes of The Daily doing that,

I was like, absolutely not. Why am I listening to this? I should listen to the actual interview between Ross and JD Vance. Ross is famously against masturbation too, so. Well, yeah. Did that come up in the interview, John? I can't agree with him on everything, you know? Yeah.

Yeah. No, I respect him? You're gonna jerk yourself off on the daily. Like you should be consistent as well, I'm saying. But he did, you know, he pushed JD Vance on immigration and some other, like, oh, so you're a Catholic Christian and you believe this. And JD Vance was fucking smug and awful.

I should, I do wanna, I wanna modulate my joke earlier, which was really just about JD Vance being irritating. I actually want to listen to the conversation. I think there's a lot of knee-jerk Ross Douthat hate in the world that I'm not a participant in. I like him. Yeah, and I don't even know if he's like a bit, he's a conservative that's interesting

because I don't think he's anti-Trump, but I don't think he's pro-Trump either. No, I don't put him in, I think he's, yeah, no, I think he's an interesting, I actually don't put him in that category at all. But Scott Jennings is definitely my least favorite or maybe tied with Bacha Ungar Sargon. Oh yeah, tough one. Because she's sort of a new character this time around.

Well, they're all coming off that Abby Phillips evening panel and she's like, Poor Abby. Stop booking him. She's doing a good job trying to deal with it, but what's your take on blue sky? Can it be good or will it discourse itself to death? This seems so far up your alley, John.

Let us know. Oh boy. Are you on there? I check in once a week, once, like a couple times a week, just to see what's going on. Like a wellness check? Like what is happening? Like a PO, what are you talking about?

Yeah, so I... Yeah, otherwise his ankle starts beefing. He's gotta blow into the tube and make sure, and otherwise he gets in trouble. Well, here's the thing, guys. Some of the people that we like and follow a lot on Twitter are now, like, mostly posting on Blue Sky. Chris Hayes, Rachel Maddow, like, they're mostly there.

And so I want to, like, see what's going on. And then every time I go, in my mentions, there's a lot of people being like, you guys got to come over to Blue Sky, tell John and Tommy to come over, there's a lot of people being like, you guys gotta come over to Blue Sky, tell John and Tommy to come over, and Dan, and what's going on? You know, so I go over and I'm like, I'm always trying it out.

I went yesterday and people are very mad, love it, that you and I are hosting a Jake Tapper, Alex Thompson book event. Little do they know that Jake might actually come on the pod, but, uh, like just, so I, I sort of tweeted something or posted or skeeted, skeeted something about it. And then my mentions flooded with just, someone

told me to throw myself down a mineshaft. Uh, Twitter energy, but it is Twitter. Yeah, totally Twitter. Very, and then, and then they're like, fuck, go back to the Nazi site, you know, so there's a lot of that, and there's a lot of nice people that are like, here's what you need to energy. And then they're like, fuck, go back to the Nazi site, so there's a lot of that. And then there's a lot of nice people that are like, here's what you need to do.

And then someone told me that there is a way to filter out all the mentions from people that you don't follow on there, which you can do on Twitter, and it proved my Twitter experience. Deleted from your phone. They didn't have it at first in blue sky, but now I did that and I think,

man, I don't know, maybe I'll give another whirl. Sarah Longwell was talking, they did, I was listening to Sarah and Tim and JVL talking on the bulwark and she was saying how she's been trying to avoid consuming, trying to like not consume as much opinion and more straight facts so that she can know that she's forming her own opinions. And I've just been, I've been feeling just like,

I don't know, just the relentlessness of Trump, the kind of onslaught of it, like I've been feeling my inability to focus getting worse than the last couple of weeks. And so I took Twitter off my phone again because I am trying to just like, let me just read the stories and show up. And you know what, if I'm like, you know, it's like,

I just, I don't want to like run my opinions through the machine as much as I've been doing. So I've like took it off my phone for a while. See how that goes. Okay. And Tommy, you're not skeeting any time soon. Never signed up for it. Everything I hear about it makes me feel like

that was the right decision. Can I defend Blue Sky for a sec? Yeah. I just like, like, I would love it. I'll turn it to Twitter, but I just don't want to deal with like Lib on leftist violence all day long. It sounds like that's what it is. Here, here's where Blue Sky I think can be most useful

is all of our Twitter feeds, everyone we followed over the 10 or so years we've been on Twitter is such a disaster now that you can kind of start fresh in Blue Sky. I don't post there very often, but I do look at it. And I basically just only follow reporters. And it is actually a much better way when something happens to just go to your following tab

on Blue Sky, which is just all reporters that I followed in the last couple of years here. And you just get people telling you what's happening in the news. It is, that is the closest thing to the Twitter 2011, 2012 experience of it as a in real time news site. This is a general rule, whether it is Twitter, Blue Sky, don't read your mentions, John.

It's like, I see your mentions sometimes cause I see your tweets and they're not, they're not, they'll tell you, you're not getting a better experience on X. I'll tell you that right now. Well, that's what I'm saying. That's why, oddly enough, my experience on X has been better for the last several months than Blue Sky.

Cause you have your blinders on. Cause I hid the mentions on X. You need your Blue Sky blinders too. For sure, for sure. But I also, to that point about the news and Sarah's point, I made a list on Twitter that's called Just News, and it's just following reporters. Because I have the same thing.

It's like sometimes you just want the latest news and you don't want people's opinions. Do you have a feed on your, whatever they call Tweet Tech Now site that's just like people you want to fight with? It's like Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Mark Davis. No, I don't have that. Then please don't give me that idea.

But, all right. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Pods of America is brought to you by Fast Growing Trees. We got three fast growing trees in our office right now. They look spectacular. So great.

And you know what? We've had fake trees in the office. There's just no substitute for the real thing. Yesterday they were... And I know that now that I've seen the fast growing trees in the office. Yesterday they were waist high today, through the roof. These things are growing fast. It's crazy. We got a Forever Goldie tree, a Thuha Green Giant tree,

and a Mozzarella Deliciosa Swiss Cheese plant. Lovett's been trying to eat it. Nice, you got me. Did you know Fast-Growing Trees is the biggest online nursery in the US with thousands of different plants and over two million happy customers? They got all the plants your yard needs, like fruit trees, privacy trees, flowering trees,

shrubs, and so much more. Whatever plants you're interested in, Fast-Growing Trees has you covered. Find the perfect fit for your climate and space. Fast Growing Trees makes it easy to get your dream yard, order online, get your plants delivered directly to your door in just a few days without ever leaving home. Their alive and thrive guarantee ensures your plants arrive happy and healthy. Plus, get support from trained plant experts on call to help you plan your landscape, choose

the right plants and learn how to care for them. We love Fast Growingowing trees. Have them in the office. I got some at home too. So it's always nice to have a plant expert telling you which plants to get and where they should go. This spring they have the best deals for your yard up to half off on select plants and other deals and listeners to our show. Get 15% off their first purchase when using the code CROOKED at checkout. That's an additional 15% off at fastgrowingtrees.com using the code CROCKET at checkout, that's an additional 15% off at fastgrowingtrees.com, using the code CROCKET at checkout. Fastgrowingtrees.com, code CROCKET. Now's the perfect time to plant.

Use CROCKET to save today. Offer is valid for a limited time. Terms and conditions may apply. Pod Save America is brought to you by Rocket Money. Tariffs are trending, but what does that actually mean for your wallet? Probably nothing good. With all the tariff headlines lately, you might be wondering, how does this affect my

day to day? Higher tariffs can mean higher prices on goods, from groceries to gadgets. Let Rocket Money help you stay one step ahead and keep more money in your pocket. Uh oh, Rocket Money is going to end up in a truth social post if it keeps talking about how tariffs are going to lead to higher prices. Big problems, big problems. Rocket Money is a personal finance app that helps find and cancel your unwanted subscriptions,

monitors your spending, and helps lower your bills so you can grow your savings. Rocket Money's dashboard gives you a clear view of your expenses across all of your accounts. Easily create a personalized budget with custom categories to help keep your spending on track. See your monthly spending trends in each category to know exactly where your money is going.

Get alerts if bills increase in price, there's unusual spending activity, or if you're close to going over budget. Rocket Money will even try to negotiate lower bills for you. The new goals feature automatically saves money for you so you don't have to think about it. Help pay off bills, put away money for a house, or just build your savings. Rocket Money makes it easy. Rocket Money has over 5 million users and has saved a total of 500 million dollars in cancelled subscriptions, saving members up to $740 a year when they use all of the app's premium features. We've all used Rocket Money here to cancel some subscriptions. Sometimes you got to use it a couple

times just to make sure that you're not letting those subscriptions piled up without knowing it. Cancel your unwanted subscriptions and reach your financial goals faster with Rocket Money. Download the Rocket Money app and enter our show name, Podsave America, in the survey so they know we sent you. Don't wait, download the Rocket Money app today and tell them you heard about them from our show. ["Rocket Money Theme Song"] All right, another question.

I can't figure out how to use AI in my day-to-day. I don't wanna fall behind, but I just can't find a good use for it. Do you guys use it? Any tips on how it's useful or how I can get started? It's just a much better Google search. Google's terrible now. It's been ruined, and I don't know,

whether it's perplexity or chat GBT or whatever, pick your poison, Claude, llama. It's really hard to keep them all straight. Yeah, porcupine, whatever the fuck these things are. They're all just better. Hedgehog. Hedge hard to keep one. It's really hard to keep them all straight. Yeah. Porcupine, like whatever the fuck these things are. Like they're all just better. Hedgehog. Hedgehog. Hogwild.

Yeah, Hogwild is an interesting one. You can draw funny pictures. I tried to make an Only Dans logo. I'll see if I can pull it up here. It wasn't that good, so the visual part is not there yet. Only Dans. I like it. I'll show you.

I do it Google. I use it as Google, as a better Google. Yeah, I'm like really kind of viewing it as more like of a novelty that I'm experimenting with and throwing things in there to see what comes out. I don't use it as a Google that often. What I, I find it useful to me in moments where I'm stuck. Like if you're just stuck, like trying to figure something out, it'll like break out of it. I find it useful to me in moments where I'm stuck. Like if you're just stuck, like trying to figure something out, it'll like break out of it.

Like, wow, that is a... Why is that Dan, like Dan crossed with Scott Jennings? It's really strange. It's AI. Yeah, no, we, yeah. No, no, we got that it was AI for sure. That's the conversation we're having, but the... Well, that's why it doesn't look like him.

Yeah, it doesn't look like him yet. But it will. And so like, there was a couple of days ago, I was like trying to write a description of something and it was a tough thing to hit the tone right. And I was just like struggling. And so I just said like, hey, help me come up with a sentence or two

to help describe this. And it's for an upcoming series we're gonna do. And I didn't use basically any of it, but it gave me like one sentence that was like smarter than what I had come up with myself, to be honest. And I was like, oh, that works. Let me take that and then I can write something to it to figure it out.

It like kind of, I think it's like a, it's a block obliterator, you know, it'll just like throw, it's relentless. So you can just get a bunch of ideas and maybe you grab one and then you can keep working, keep writing, think of something. But other than that, I haven't yet really cracked why it's, I mean, I don't know, maybe it's helping people move faster.

I use it all day, every day. Really? What's your preferred? I use it as, like for Google, I never Google anything anymore. I will ask it like very specific questions to find answers to. I use it, I will use it to synthesize data.

Like I will upload a large poll and ask it for a set of findings to answer certain questions or test the premise. I will use it, I never use it for writing per se, but I will use it the same way you do love it, which is like, I am stuck. I'm trying to write something and it's like, you've used the same descriptive word like three times and you're trying to like, what's another way to say this? I use that. I will upload a full message box and I will ask for 10 title suggestions and almost never do I end up using the ones they actually have, but it always helps me like figure it out. I use it for

a lot of research and to really synthesize large data sets into easily understandable things. And you can use it to make, I'm not very good at this, but to use it to make charts and graphics. The part that I find troubling about it still is like, let's say you ask it a question about the news and most of the time it's giving you a useful synthesis of various articles and that's great, but it's trained on certain data sets

and one of them is that Joe Biden, a lot of what it was trained on was a time when Joe Biden was president. And so you'll ask it a question and you'll be like, wait a second, this answer still thinks Joe Biden is president. And so like, oh wow, it's really, if you were working with someone day to day.

It was McDonald's. Yeah, it was McDonald's. It was, yeah, I'm sorry, I'm using a McDonald's 4.7. But if you were working with somebody and they were really, really smart, but every once in a while thought it was 1997, you'd be like, oh, you, I can't trust you. Yeah.

You know, so that's what makes me nervous. I make it double check it's work. I make it double check it's work all the time. Yeah. Are you sure this is correct? Yeah. It's so obnoxious. And you're like, it's gonna hate me.

Hey, I'm about to say this on a podcast, are you sure? I saw something that really kind of like was, I tried it and it was interesting. Again, this is just like just coming up with questions to ask to kind of learn about it, but it said, you don't just ask it a question, you say, assemble a group of experts to help me answer this question.

Assemble a marketing person, a political person, a strategist, an expert on YouTube, have them meet and discuss this question and decide on an answer together and then show me what they did. And like they have a meeting and then you reply and you say- Do you give them a lunch break?

What you reply and you say, all right, this is a great first draft, but remember this whole team gets fired if it's not perfect. And they're like, all right, back to the drawing board, everybody, here we go. We got to really pull off a great meeting. Wow.

You're really, you're into it. I'm learning. I also use it for recipes all the time. Like I want to make this, cause it's very like, what it allows you to do is like, well, I don't have this. And then I'll give you a new version with the things you have. That's good.

I've read, you can do it, so I've never done it. You can take a picture of your fridge, upload the Chet CPT and it'll offer things based on what's in your fridge, what you can cook. Wow. I've never done it, but I've read that that's something you can do. Cool.

Creepy though. All right, next question. Tommy and John, any comments on the Celtics demise? Dan, any comments on the 76ers? Whatever is going on with them? I only caught, let's see, the first game where we blew a 20 point lead, and then I zoomed in right before Jason Tatum got hurt.

That's it. That's all I had for the Celtics. Yeah, so our best player is out for at least a year. I mean, it's in Achilles, so, like, you wouldn't bring him back at this point. Um, our two best players both got Supermax contracts. We're about... Dan, do you understand the NBA salary cap? I don't. There's something called the second apron. It is. We're apparently above that and there's a

bunch of restrictions. Yes. If it weren't to unravel the team. You have to get, you have to get below the second apron because if you're on the second apron, two years in a row, in addition to having a giant half billion dollar tax payment, you also have real restrictions

about how, what players you can sign, how you can use your various cap slots. And so they have to get below it because they have to trade some of the members on the team. Most likely, True Holiday or Kristaps Rosengas. Who's at the, yeah, he's at the, he also had a weird health thing. So we're fucked.

We're at the end of this little run. I don't think DraftKings or FanDuel, whoever like me make this bet right now, but I would put $100 down right now that the Celtics will win the 2026 NBA Draft lottery. Oh, because you think it's rigged? Yeah, for sure. Okay.

Yeah. Like Dallas. Maybe it's rigged by God. That's possible. It's not, but every time that something like this happens, this is how the Spurs got Tim Duncan. It's how the Mavs got Cooper flag. It's how miraculously the six weeks

after Anthony Davis left New Orleans, they got Zion Williamson. So this is a bet I would be willing to make. It's interesting, because it would make sense to me that the same God rigging a draft for the Celtics would be the one that made Donald Trump president. It's true, it's a good point.

It's a solid point. Tough to fair. Sorry, Boston. From Katzian, Katzian, Katz? Anyway. Katz and Katz. Katz and Katian, Cat-Sian, Cats? Anyway. Cats and Cats. Cats and Cats, Cat-Sian and Cats.

Is there anyone in the cricket office who beats Fabs for screen time? Is there a dark horse we're unaware of? Probably. I got some. It's Elijah, right? It's Elijah, it's Austin. I believe it is two of the other hosts of this podcast.

The only one who gets off here is Love It. Yeah, that's right. Thank you. I got off here in all kinds of places. And I'm guessing Dan because I am on text chains with Dan so often that I know he must be looking at screens and Tommy is just as bad as me. I think that-

Right, just described about his Tucker Carlson interview in the evening, it was dark. That was deep research. That was deep research, yeah, yeah. Yes. Yeah. But- Chachi Pithani.

Do you wanna defend yourself, Dan? Are you- I'm online way too much, there's no question about that. The difference is you're just now become such a poster. Yeah, I'm a poster. It's like we always know when you're online, you're always posting. Always be posting, always be posting.

This is from, lovealwayscracksmeup. Oh my God. What a surprise that loveit chose this question. I like the question, I like the question. What are your favorite RPGs of all time? Thank you loveitcracksmeup, all right. Here's my list, this is the only notes I took for this whole solo record.

You hung back for the rest. Yeah. Yeah. Bloodborne, Bloodborne I did. Demon's Souls, Dark Souls III, Elden Ring. Those are all part of the kind of from software universe. I love Skyrim, I love Fallout, some of those games. Dishonored is not technically an RPG.

I think it's RPG adjacent, but I really liked the world building. Deus Ex, Human Revolution was a great game. Diablo III, Diablo 4 are on the list, but I do think those games are basically a kind of drug and are dangerous. They're dangerous. They grab you.

They don't let you go. They're kind of, they hook you with the serotonin loop. Not an RPG, but Subnautica is a great game that's about building up your abilities. It has some like RPG vibes, even though it's obviously not an RPG. And then I am very excited to play Baldur's Gate 3 and just go Elysium. that's about building up your abilities. It has some like RPG vibes, even though it's obviously not an RPG. And then I am very excited to play Baldur's Gate III

and just go Elysium. Wow. I used to like RPGs when I was a Nintendo kid. And then I liked your Final Fantasies, your Chrono Triggers, old school. Yeah, that was legitimate. And then I stopped, then I stopped in college. I played Skyrim and Fallout

in an earlier period of my life. Oh, that's great, Dan. I like those games. I really got into Skyrim and Fallout in an earlier period of my life. Oh, that's great, Dan. I like those games. I really got into Skyrim. Last question. Based on the internet debate of could 100 men kill a gorilla without weapons, Crooked has about 100 employees. Could the Crooked staff kill a gorilla?

Yeah. Not in a million years. Here's the thing. Nor would they. Look around this fucking place. Here's the thing. Nor were they. Look around this fucking place. Nor were they. Here's the thing. Look, I love our, here's the thing. Crooked, what I'm about to say is gonna, just you don't have to bear with what I'm gonna say.

So this is the one you didn't prepare for. But we're questioning the question. I love how many different parts of the Pride flag are represented at this company. Oh my gosh. But I do think it puts us at a disadvantage against the gorilla. I'm sorry.

I just think that we gotta put a lot of our he-hims at the front and some of our, and a lot of our, just gotta get those he-hims up ahead. Sorry, we're sending in the he-hims, and the she-hers and the they-thems, we're gonna hang back. And then- You know what, I wouldn't put too much stock

in the he-hims. As one of them. I wouldn't either. I don't think I would. My actual view on the defeating of the gorilla is it's actually not about whether the gorilla loses, the gorilla will lose. It's about whether you are one of the first

five to 10 humans to go into that fight. Cause a couple of people are going down and they're going down hard. A gorilla can lift like 2000 pounds. Gorillas are strong, but a hundred of us, we're gonna beat the gorilla, but we're just gonna take some pretty heavy losses early on, that's the problem.

That's what's gonna happen, I'm sorry to say. Arms are gonna be ripped off, faces torn apart. It's gonna be a ugly battle, but we're gonna tire that gorilla out, all right? We're gonna be able to coordinate using what language? If I had 100 Aaron Donalds in the first 50 we're ready to die, maybe. But like-

You think you would need 100 Aaron Donalds to beat one gorilla? I think you'd have to send waves of 10 to gang up on it. Why wouldn't you send all 100 at a time? Because you can't, there's not that much surface area. Yeah. Well, yeah, I think you definitely need

at least 10 to move in at once, but I just think then the grill is going down. It's luck of the draw. Who are we sending first to the gorilla? What? Who are we sending first? Yeah. Kyril's good.

I think Ben Hefko could fuck up that gorilla. Yeah, well he doesn't have an impression. Is he here? Who's not here? We'll send them. I got a follow up from Lovett actually. No, sorry, this is from the Lovettest show on Earth. What if it was 100 gorilla-sized ducks?

100 gorilla-sized ducks? Well, I think it's 100 gorilla-sized. Oh my God, that's a big duck. That's a big one. That's a lot of them too. Yeah. We're fucked in that. I think you's 100. Oh my God, that's a big duck. That's a big, and that's a lot of them too. Yeah, big beak. We're fucked and that's it. Yeah, I think you could beat the ducks.

I don't think you could beat 100 duck-sized gorillas though. 100 ducks? That was interesting. It's like Ant-Man sort of. I think so. Would they have, yeah, would they have, oh yeah, portion strength. Is it one person versus 100 gorilla ducks?

Or is it the whole, is it each staff get a duck-sized gorilla? I don't know. That's actually the Christmas present, 100 gorilla ducks or is that the whole each staff get a duck-sized gorilla That's actually the Christmas present it's the holiday present yeah, I'll tell you either way we're gonna hear about it from the Union It's gonna be a tough one The CBA specifies they are not supposed to go first. There's no animal combat. Senior staff going after the gorilla first. I noticed no one from senior staff was in the first wave going after the gorilla.

No senior producers going in first, all right. Thank you for your questions, everyone. Big thanks to all of our Friends of the Pod subscribers for sending in questions. We'll be back with a regular episode on Friday. Don't forget, you can subscribe at crooked.com slash friends to unlock a ton of great perks, including subscription only shows

like Polar Coaster with Dan Pfeiffer, ad free episodes of Pod Save America, Pod Save the World, Love It or Leave It, and Offline. To get started and learn more, head to crooked.com slash friends. If you wanna listen to Pod Save America ad free or get access to our subscriber discord

and exclusive podcasts, consider joining our Friends of the Pod community at crooked.com slash friends or subscribe on Apple podcasts directly from the Pod Save America feed. Also be sure to follow Pod Save America on TikTok, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube for full episodes, bonus content and more. And before you hit that next button, you can help boost this episode by leaving us a review and by sharing it with friends and family. Pods A of America is a Crooked Media production. Our producers are David Toledo and Saul Rubin.

Our associate producer is Farah Safari. Reid Cherlin is our executive editor, and Adrian Hill is our executive producer. The show is mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick. Jordan Cantor is our sound engineer with audio support from Kyle Seglin and Charlotte Landis. Madeline Herringer is our head of news and programming. Matt DeGroote is our head of production. Naomi Sengel is our executive assistant.

Thanks to our digital team, Elijah Cohn, Hayley Jones, Ben Hefcoat, Mia Kelman, Molly Lobel, Kirill Pellaveve, and David Tolles. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.