Pod Save America - Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Meltdown

Episode Date: August 9, 2024

Trump throws a temper tantrum at Mar-a-Lago, boasting he draws bigger crowds than Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. did for the “I Have a Dream” speech. Is he freaking out because Harris is surging in the polls? Meanwhile, Harris and Walz hit Detroit, where they score a UAW union endorsement and tout her economic record. Brian Tyler Cohen discusses his new book, “Shameless: Republicans’ Deliberate Dysfunction and the Battle to Preserve Democracy,” and then joins Jon and Favs for a game called Take Appreciators. For a closed-captioned version of this episode, click here. For a transcript of this episode, please email [e-mail] and include the name of the podcast.

Welcome to Pod Save America. I'm Jon Favreau. I'm Dan Pfeiffer. On today's show, Kamala Harris takes the lead in the race for the White House just three weeks after announcing her candidacy. But now she's got to reintroduce herself to voters in the lead-up to the convention, while the Trump campaign throws everything they have at her and Tim Walz. And later, our pal Brian Tyler Cohen is here to talk about his brand new book and play a round of Take Appreciators With Me and Love It.

But first, remember Donald Trump? Who? Since the debate on June 27th, he's held only eight campaign rallies and we haven't seen him on the trail all week. The Washington Post reports that he's, quote, upset and, quote, complaining relentlessly about Kamala Harris's surging poll numbers and massive crowds.

He's posting fantasies about Biden crashing the Democratic convention to take back the nomination. And all of this might be why the old man decided to shuffle out of his beach club on Thursday and yell at the cameras for a while. Here's some highlights from Trump's press conference. In history, for any country, nobody's had crowds like I have. And you know that. And when she gets a thousand people and everybody starts jumping, you know that if I had a thousand people would say, people would say, that's the end of his campaign.

I have hundreds of thousands of people. But she has a thousand people or 1,500 people and they say, oh, the enthusiasm's back. No, no. The biggest crowd I've ever spoken before was that day. And I'll tell you, it's very hard to find a picture of that crowd. You see the picture of a small number of people relatively going to the Capitol, but you never see the picture of the crowd. The biggest crowd I've ever spoken, I've spoken to the biggest crowds. Nobody's spoken to crowds bigger than me. If you look at Martin Luther King, when he did his speech, his great speech, and you look at ours, same real estate, same everything, same number of people. If not, we had more. And they said he had a million people, but I had 25,000 people. But when you

look at the exact same picture, we actually had more people. I'm not complaining. I'm saying it's a... Comparing his crowd on January 6th to Martin Luther King's, I have a dream speech during the March on Washington. I was driving, had to go pick up Kyla from basketball camp during that press conference, and I was driving with it, playing in the car, and I almost swerved off the road at Martin Luther King because I did not see that one coming. I should have, but I didn't.

That was a compilation of all the times he talked about crowd size. I actually think there were some more. First of all, the press conference lasted over an hour. He continued to bring it back to crowd size in polls. It was a wild press conference lasted over an hour he continued to bring it back to crowd size and polls it was a wild press conference i feel like we say that every time he does a press conference and we're like this one is really wild this one i'm trying to think of what was different about it he seemed first of all he's very angry he's very frustrated he does seem upset oh he does and so yeah i do

think that washington post story is true about him complaining relentlessly because we all heard him do it uh what do you think what were some of your takes on the press conference i mean i i agree with that he cannot get over the state of the race like he is a lazy entitled human being and he thought he was cruising to the white house and now he's not and he is mad about it because the other thing he kept he was cruising to the White House. And now he's not. And he is mad about it. Because the other thing he kept bringing it back to was how he was definitely not mad about Kamala Harris being the candidate now. He was definitely not mad at all. I'm not complaining.

But the Democrats destroyed the Constitution by Joe Biden stepping down. In his vehement defense of Joe Biden, who he repeatedly said he did not like. He doesn't like his brain. He said, I don't like his brain. But I just think about this. He has not done anything all week. He has a rally in the core battleground state of Montana later tonight. Tonight, right?

Yeah, I think so, yeah. Thursday night, yeah. Whatever. Yeah, Thursday night. The night we were recording this, not the night you were listening to this. It's always tricky for me. And so here he is. He's got the whole press in

front of him and he does nothing to advance his message. No message. No policy. Later today, which you can tell one of the things his advisors told him to do was to talk about his proposals on taxation of tips and no taxation on social security because he's been truthing the hell out of them afterwards to try to clean it up. Did he talk about Kamala Harris's record? Not really. Did he talk about Tim Walz's record? Not up just did he talk about kamala harris's record not really did he talk about tim wallace's record not really did he talk about his any of his plans anything he's gonna do nope not really at all no it's just it did he talk about how the economy was great when he was president did he talk about what the economy is now did he talk about him he just he

did he started out the press conference by saying we are headed toward a depression it's going to be worse than 1929 and also a world war and the country is an awful place and everything everyone's laughing at us and then he just sort of went off on a tangent that lasted for about an hour about himself and how he's angry with kamala harris and himself and his poll numbers and his crowd size and all the rest here's what i'd say get out there more more. More press conferences, more rallies. Every day. Every single day. Let's do it every day. There were some newsy things he was asked. He was asked whether he would restrict access to Mifepristone. And they really caught him because instead of saying the abortion pill, they said Mifepristone. And he clearly has no

idea what Mifepristone is because his response was, you could do things. Absolutely. Those things are pretty open and humane. That's what he said. Would you restrict, would you, would you ask the, would you have the FDA restrict access to Mifepristone? We could do, you could do things. Absolutely. Yeah. He also, someone asked him how he'd be voting on the constitutional amendment in florida to protect abortion access and he said he'd be holding a press conference about that and and he'll have a more liberal answer than you think um sure i guess we're holding our breath for that press conference i'm sure you know when his staff learned about that press conference during this conference yes just then um he said he was off the trail when someone asked him why he wasn't campaigning he said he was off the trail. When someone asked him why he wasn't campaigning,

he said he was off the trail because of the Democratic convention, which is in two weeks. I would just note that for a long time, for decades, there was a tradition where you did not campaign during the other person's convention. Was there? Yeah, there was. We actually broke that. I think Obama was one of the people who tore down that norm. But it is definitely not a tradition do you don't campaign for the month before the convention like that's not that's not how you do this he once again questioned uh kamala harris's race someone asked him a question about why he did that why he said that at the uh nabj and he said whether it's indian or black i think it's very disrespectful to both. And then when he was asked about her surging in the polls, he said, well, she's a woman and she represents certain groups of people.

That was his response. He did some really in-depth poll analysis of the impact she would have in the race, about who would help him with and who to hurt him with. Yeah, he really started going into demographic groups like he was on Polar Coaster. He's not invited. Do not come on Polar Coaster. He's not invited. Do not come on Polar Coaster, Donald Trump. Have we talked about the fact that it's clear now he has confused insane asylums for asylum seekers? Have we talked about that on this podcast? I can't remember.

You and I have not talked about it. Have you talked about it with anyone else on another podcast? I don't know. I don't think so. I don't know what I say in public or what I see. What's a meeting? What's a podcast? At this point, who knows?

It is clear that the reason he's always talking about other countries dumping out their mental institutions around whenever he's bringing up immigration, it's now clear that it's because he thinks insane asylums are like asylum seekers, and he has conflated those two terms. It is much like in 2016 when he tweeted no cuts to Medicaid, when he meant to tweet no cuts to Medicare, and he didn't know the difference. Right. And of course, he did propose very large cuts. He proposed to basically eliminate Medicaid or just completely eliminate the federal guarantee for Medicaid and then also cuts to Medicare. Yes. Yeah.

Also, he's really into, he said this when Tim Walz was first selected. He said it again. Transgender has become such a big thing and he's really into transgender. He's really into everything transgender. So he doesn't really know. He doesn't know much about stuff. And so he can sort of skate on the surface of a lot of these words. Like he knows the words

he hears the buzzwords in the background when he's watching cable he's watching his favorite shows so he can say you know a couple sentences but he really can't go beyond that he has the public affairs knowledge of a regular cable news watcher who does a lot of two screening yeah that's about right so the other newsy thing uh he said he's now agreed to the ABC debate on September 10th. That debate is now on. Kamala Harris afterwards said she's in. So that is happening. We are headed towards a September 10th debate.

Donald Trump, Kamala Harris. Exciting stuff. He said he's also agreed, of course, to the Fox debate on September 4th, which Kamala Harris has not agreed to because he wants it to take place in a MAGA Thunderdome with a bunch of a huge audience that are all his people. And then a new one, he said

he wants a debate with NBC on September 25th. She said she's open to that one. We're going to get by that first September 10th debate first. Why do you think Donald Trump changed his mind? Because she's surging and he's sagging, right? A week ago, I mean, you guys talked about this on Tuesday, but last Friday night, he pulled out of all the debates,

pulled out of the ABC debate, doesn't want to do it. Seemed like the last thing in the world he wanted to do was debate Kamala Harris. But she's on a glide path right now, right? She gained, and then she passed him in the national polling average. All these states are toss-ups. He knows she's heading into her convention in two weeks. That is more momentum for her, and he's got to do something to stop it. He cannot just sit on his ass in Mar-a-Lago and win this election.

Right. And it's finally come to, he's finally come to that conclusion. And so he wants to do many debates and he seems to be trying to, he wants to, he looked weak. I think he recommends he also looked weak and scared this past week from not wanting to debate.

So he's trying to go back on the, on offense here and seem like he's the one pushing for debates. Can't wait. Can't wait. Would you do more debates if you were her if i was her yeah uh depends on how the first one goes right like i mean you know there's a scenario where she absolutely crushes it in that first debate and then it's like why do you do another one then there's almost any other scenario even a scenario where they're where like she wins do you do another one? Then there's almost any other scenario, even a scenario where she wins, but enough people say that maybe he did okay and then he starts pulling even or pulling ahead in September,

then maybe you want to do another debate. Or if she does poorly, then you probably do want to do another debate. I mean, the calculus for Biden to want the debate, something that will- Not to go back, yeah. Yeah, the history we'll wonder about for a long time, but the original calculus was we need the elector to focus on Donald Trump to win. That was Joe Biden's calculus. That's not necessarily, we'll get to this, but that's not necessarily Kamala Harris's calculus.

But I do think she's largely undefined, which we'll also get to. But getting on stage and kicking his ass, I think, has real value. And doing it multiple times, I think, probably also has real value. But I think your approach is probably right. You could theoretically agree to two. And then after you kick his ass on the first one, say, I don't want to put Donald through this again, like he did about Biden. To me, it feels a little bit like the Obama-McCain debates in 08,

which is like, I think that voters, you know, like Obama was ahead. Voters still just needed to know that he could do the job, that he was ready. And all it took was sort of like one or two debates with McCain. And they're like, OK, even though everyone's saying he's this like new, inexperienced young guy, he stood up there on stage. He held his own. He knows what he's talking about. He gave as good as he got. And like, that was it. Yeah. She shouldn't have to do that. Cause she's the vice president of the United States. Like it's basically in her job though. But she, but again, everyone, everyone has the memory of a goldfish now and, uh, people don't, and the media is fractured so people don't know her

as well as they should and like with obama you're asking people to make history in this case uh several in several different ways and so that the burden is unfairly on kamala harrison the way it wouldn't be on a on a on a white man candidate yeah but it is i think for for voters it's probably more of a reassurance and uh who is she and what is she for than can she really kick Donald Trump's ass? Though for the press and the way it's going to be covered, people will want to see that she can kick Donald Trump's ass. Kicking Donald Trump's ass is not about beating Donald Trump. It's demonstrating strength on her behalf in an election where – because you also – that is the emperor has no clothes moment for Trump, right? If you're running as a strong man and you get your ass kicked in a debate, like that is very hard for

you. And that did not happen in either of the two elections, even though just the way it would play out, I think is different than it would be with Biden or Clinton because of just how those politicians were perceived and how unknown Kamala Harris is to people. So I think it's just a very fascinating strategic calculus for them. It's different than it was for Biden in a similar situation. Yeah, for sure. Polling, big source of Trump's anger. Kamala Harris is now leading by two points nationally in the 538 average, as you mentioned. That includes a whopping 53 to 47 lead in the latest Marquette poll, which is one of the highest rated polls out there. She's also got a point lead in their Wisconsin poll, has seemingly tied it up in Georgia,

closing the gap in Arizona. Our friends at Split Ticket also found a one point lead for Harris in the blue wall states of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Their late July poll just a couple of weeks ago found Biden trailing Trump by seven in those states. Quite a swing. Seems like a long honeymoon for Harris, huh? What do you what do you make of all the polling? Care to rain on our parade at all? I know that would be on. That's what I go to you for. Yeah. But you know what? I'm not going to do that today. I'm not going to rain on anyone's parade. Oh, Dan's just guaranteeing a win. I'm not guaranteeing anything.

I'm just saying let's just revel in the positivity right now. Think of where we were three weeks ago. Three weeks ago, Donald Trump was cruising for an electoral landslide that would have brought him to the House and the Senate at the same time. The Georgia, Arizona, Nevada were off the map and no longer competitive for Democrats. Biden was behind in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. The odds of victory were quite long. The states of Minnesota, Virginia, and New Mexico and New Jersey were becoming competitive. Here we are now, three weeks later, new ticket, toss-up race. All six states are within the margin of error in toss-ups. Joe Biden had one path to 270 if you squinted as hard as you possibly could. Kamala Harris has as many paths to 270 as Donald Trump does right now. She has momentum. She is surging. That doesn't mean it's in the bag. So even a two-point lead in the popular vote is about, we probably, a tie, if not a slight deficit in the battleground states.

But we are, the Democrats, Kamala Harris, Tim Walz, we are in this in a way that seemed impossible to imagine three weeks ago. So we should, there's a ton of work to do, a ton of work to do to define her, to win this race, to make sure that the voters turn out. But to get back, even though she's made huge improvements with young voters, Black voters, Latino voters over where we were three weeks ago, there's still work to do to get to the numbers that we had in 2020. And we probably have to exceed them because if you look deep in the poll, you see some bleeding with older white voters.

If you look deep in the poll, you see some bleeding with older white voters. And so we're going to need more young voters, more black voters, more Latino voters to make up that deficit and win. But we can be happy right now. We can be excited and overjoyed at where we are because it's not anywhere where we thought we would be just three weeks ago. I know. And I think if you look under the top lines of these polls, what has happened, what she's been able to do is essentially consolidate the Biden 2020 vote in a way that Biden could not or was not when he left the race. And so his weakness with younger voters, black voters, Latino voters who had not necessarily

said they were voting for Trump, some had, but were flirting with a third party candidates or not voting at all. It seems like she has consolidated that vote. But of course, that still brings you to a 2020 race that was decided by 40,000 votes across three states. So super close. And, you know, you can hear it in some focus groups to the sort of Trump Biden voters, the Trump voters from 16 who switched over to Biden in 20. You know, there's still work to do with them. Like you said, there's still work to do, you know, registering and turning out more Democratic leaning constituencies and voters. And, you know, it's going to be close. And Trump will still get, you know, never one lesson since 2016 has been like never underestimate Republican turnout when Donald Trump is on the ballot. And it always breaks records.

So that's that's something that we have to think about in the next couple months. One quick housekeeping note before we move on. It's summertime. It's a beautiful day out there or it's 120 degrees. It's probably 120 degrees. Either way, this is your sign to step outside. Take Pod Save America on the go and give your eyeballs a break from the screens. Podcasts. You can listen to them anywhere. Why not take us to the beach? Take us to the cookout. If you know anyone with a boat, take us on a boat. Republicans have monopolized boat culture for far too long. At Sea or on Land, our goal at Pod Save America is to break down the news and have open, honest, and hard conversations

to make sure you have the real information you need to vote for the future you want and help others do the same head to Apple Podcasts or your preferred

podcast platform now to make sure you're subscribed and please take 20 seconds to share your favorite episode of Pod Save America with five of your friends and that's it that's all we got.

We are recording this exactly two weeks before the vice president delivers her acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. The next 14 days are a window for the Harris-Walls campaign to frame the race and define the candidates on their terms. A new blueprint poll found that voters are more responsive to informative pro-Harris messaging that focuses on her biography, record as a prosecutor, and commitment to economic populism and immigration reform. They are less persuaded by anti-Trump messages because 71% of all voters say their minds are already made up about Trump and there's nothing you can do to change their mind, whether they're against or for.

Obviously, Harris goes after Trump pretty hard in her stump speech right now, but especially this week, she's been leaning into a more positive message. Here she is accepting the UAW endorsement in Detroit today. We want to recognize the right all people have to freedom and liberty to make choices, especially those that are about heart and home and not have their government telling them what to do. Our campaign is about saying we trust the people.

We are a nation of people who believe in those ideals that were foundational to what made us so special as a nation. And we know we are a work in progress we haven't yet quite reached all of those ideals but we will die trying because we love our country and we believe in who we are and that's what our campaign is about we love our country we believe in our country we believe in our country. We believe in each other. So how would you balance the anti-Trump pro-Kamala message if you were the Harris campaign? There has been a theory all along that if this election is about Donald Trump, Donald Trump will lose. That was certainly the theory when Biden was the Democratic nominee. Do you toss that theory aside and say she needs to define herself, she needs to define her agenda, and she needs to tell people what the Democratic Party is for? Or do you do some kind of a mix? What do you think? It's a little bit of a mix. You do have to throw the previous model aside because we have been analyzing this race in the context of an election that was the present versus the recent past. And now it is the past versus the future. And that's a very different...

And Kamala Harris is the vice president to the incumbent president, but she does not represent the status quo in the way that Biden did. She represents change from Biden, change from Trump, change from these sort of grinding politics we've been in since Trump came down the escalator 10 years ago. It is a different, more hopeful future. And so the way to do it, I think, is to – she has to educate people about herself. All the polling, all the focus groups, the public stuff, the private stuff, all shows the same thing. The single most important thing is to educate people about her biography, her positions, and her values. She has high name ID. People know almost nothing about her. The persuadable voters know less than everyone else.

So you have to do that. That's what the ads that the campaign and the smart people who run the super PACs have on the air right now. It's all bio stuff. Now, in your stump speech, you got a crowd of people who hate Donald Trump there, right? You got to give him some stuff. And so you got to do it contrast, right? I think her best riff is the prosecutor perpetrator one, because it's her bio against him, right? And against what he stands for and who he is and so all of the testing i have seen this cycle shows that the most the best ads are contrast ads now for kamala harris you have this urgency that you need every every second of that 60 second ad to educate people about her because no no nominee has ever been this this seems crazy for the vice president of the United States, but this less known at this

point in the race, right? Everyone else has been through a year primary, right? They've campaigned in 40 or 50 states, or they're the incumbent president. She just, for most people, popped up on their screen two and a half weeks ago, and now she is the nominee with 88 days or 87 days, whatever it is they go. And so you have to do a lot on her bio And now she is the nominee with 88 days or 87 days, whatever it is they go. And so you have to do a lot on her bio and who she is and what she stands for. And there's a way to do that where you're not just reading your Wikipedia page, but you're tying, you take every aspects of your bio. And this is in this great ad they have up targeting Latino voters that talks about her position on immigration as someone who is a children of

immigrants. And so it's that way. Use your bio as the reason why you have certain policy positions and then use Donald Trump's bio to be why he has certain policy positions, right? It's not exactly Scranton versus Mar-a-Lago or whatever that sort of frame was, but it's kind of in that realm. or whatever that sort of frame was, but it's kind of in that realm. Yeah. And I think that the prosecutor versus convicted felon riff was very useful at the beginning of the campaign to show fight, to take on Donald Trump as she was still sort of consolidating the Democratic Party. I would imagine that as she goes forward and she's already doing this, that sort of morphs into using the elements of her bio that show her as a fighter who can take on powerful corporate interests on behalf of people and Trump's only

for himself. And so, you know, an element of her bio that's particularly effective when she talks about it is, you know, she was attorney general for the fifth largest economy in the world in California and took on the big banks on behalf of homeowners. And when she was vice president with Joe Biden, she took on pharmaceutical companies to bring down the cost of insulin. And so I think she'll be introducing herself on those terms. And, you know, we heard her do this in the clip that we just listened to. They are going to try to other her, right? And they're doing it to her and Tim Walz, right? Like she is not like us. She is, whether it's Donald Trump implying

that she's, you know, she's a phony. Is she biracial? Is she just changing who she is, right? Not pronouncing her name correctly, not spelling her name correctly, right? This is what they did to Barack Obama too. So they are going to try to other her and say that she's not like us. She's not like your typical American. And she can get up there as she just did in that clip and talk about how much she loves this country. And she and Tim Walz said this at the event where she introduced him and announced him, a couple of middle-class kids. She's from Oakland. He's from Nebraska. And she's the middle-class kids she's from oakland he's from nebraska and she's the middle class daughter of immigrants who has lived the american dream and now she's going to fight to make sure every single person in this country can live the american dream too and you contrast that

with donald trump who's had everything fucking handed to him and only cares about himself it's a great contrast the republican magGA version of the American story is like you fell off the Mayflower and you just arrived in Plymouth Rock. But the true American story that everyone knows, because that's everyone's family, is at some point, your parents, your grandparents, your great-grandparents are immigrants from somewhere. And telling that story is like, I mean, that's, Republicans look to scans at Obama's version of his story, right, with a single mom and a father who wasn't from this country. And they're like, that's not the American story. But that rings true to everyone. And her story is

truly a quintessential American story. And so there's a way of telling it that that informs your values, that inform your policies going forward. Yeah, for sure. How would you spend these two weeks leading up to her convention speech? And what do you think the goals of the convention itself should be? So for the next, at least the next week, right, the week of the convention, it makes sense to sort of do some stuff a little bit lower key so that your convention is getting the attention, right? Because Tim Wallace is going to speak one night. President Tim Walz is going to speak one night. President Obama, I assume, will speak one night. President Biden will speak one night.

Like you want that to drive your message. But next week, normally you would sort of just like glide into the convention just doing your stump speech. And I think going with Tim Walz and introducing herself and giving us the same version of her stump in each of these battleground states is the right choice. This is our first time in most of these states and certainly our first time with Tim Walz also do that. But you got to continue to be on offense. So you're going to have to start. We're now at the point in the race starting next

week where you got to mix in a new hit on Trump every day. And I would think about doing some policy rollouts next week. I know that sounds crazy, but because her convention speech needs to be so much about introducing her, I worry about a convention speech that's introducing her, but also laying out her vision for the future. We're going to get into like some sort of, you know, horrendous version of a state of the union, right? That's not what you want. You want it to be tight.

You want it to be good. You want to be powerful. Honestly, that was our 08 convention speech right up until like two days before. And we just kept cutting and cutting and cutting. And it just kept getting bigger and bigger and bigger with policy. There's a lot of business to get done in any convention speech and her specifically. No one cares about the policy part of it.

Right. They care about it in terms of who you're going to fight for. People want to know who she's going to fight for and what she's going to do for them. And I think if she has a real tight section on lowering costs, affordability, what she plans to do, that's going to take care of it.

Right. But what you give yourself, she's in the position where by the time Barack Obama gave the speech, he'd given 700 economic policy speeches on the campaign trail. So you could reference it here. She has given no economic policy speeches as a presidential candidate. So I'm not saying, I know the speechwriters, I like the speechwriters personally too much to suggest a major economic policy speech weeks before the convention So I'm not saying, I know the speechwriters, I like the speechwriters personally too much, it suggests a major economic policy speech two weeks before the convention. I'm not saying that. But just do, but just, I would do that to you. I would

not do that to them. Just like, you can just, you can put it in, you can just insert it into a speech in Michigan next week, right? Just like one proposal here, one proposal there. Even just like, I think she even said this at one point, like on day one, I'm going to appoint someone to go after price gouging, right? There are some things you can do like that. They're just easy that you can then reference in the speech. The main thing here is she has succeeded by being on offense the whole time. And you can already see the press, not that the press matters that much, but it still matters some, is going to get bored with this quickly and they're going to start putting pressure on her. I'd also – she did this today.

She took questions. The press is already freaking out. She hasn't talked to them enough. And so she took a few questions today before leaving Detroit, I think. Do that all week. Just a couple here, a couple there. Of course, one of the questions was, why aren't you taking more questions from us? Why aren't you doing an interview?

Yes. She did say – I knew that would get you. Of course. One of the questions was, why aren't you taking more questions from us? Why aren't you doing an interview? She did say, I know that would get you. But she said, I talked to my team. We're going to schedule an interview by the end of this month, like a sit down thing.

So she, which was good. But I would even, I just like, just the thing we'll always hear is, let the air out of the balloon slowly. Right? So that when you do,

like I do some local TV interviews next week. Right? Yeah. I know, I know do some local TV interviews next week, right? I know, I know the Washington press won't count those, but they kind of, they have to pretend like they count. And just, so what you don't want.

You can't shit all over the local media. I would just take that. You want that out of the way before the convention speech. So you can roll out of the convention speech. And I don't know what they have planned, whether it's like a bus tour or a boat tour, just like a barnstorming tour, where you can just really build on that momentum for a few days without the press screaming at you every time you turn around why won't you talk to

us so just like take care of that business now so that you can maximize the convention moment going forward i hope it's a boat tour and just go through great lakes just yeah who did the boat do i did not do a boat tour did john kerry do a boat tour either john kerry did a boat tour or brock obama did a boat tour i think it was John Kerry. Yeah, John Kerry did like a sea to shining sea tour after the convention because it was in Boston. So he went right across the country. He went all the way to Oregon, I think. Like he was talking to Lewis and Clark.

Didn't work. Nobody didn't get dysentery on the Oregon Trail. Harris' new running mate, Tim Walls, is also in a race to define himself before the Trump campaign can do it for him. Their senior advisor, Chris LaCivita, was the person who led the Swift Boat attack against John Kerry's military service way back in 2004. God, 20 years ago.

And now he's doing the same thing to Walls. J.D. Vance kicked off the attack this week by accusing Walls of lying about his rank in the military, his service, and leaving the National Guard before his unit was deployed to Iraq. One other Trump campaign line of attack on Walls has blown up in their face after ABC unearthed a recording of Trump praising Walls for his response to the George Floyd protests. Let's listen. I know Governor Walls is on the phone and we spoke, and I fully agree with the way he handled it the last couple of days. Let's listen. These dummies. They're like, from the moment Walls gets picked, they're telegraphing like oh his handling of the george floyd protests in minneapolis this is going to be the main line of attack we're going to get him because he didn't send the national guard out uh you know

with they wanted it one afternoon and he sent it out the next morning and that was going to be the whole thing and then they got donald trump being like great job we love you excellent guy i'm sure he just loves tim walsh because his last name is walsh i never real did you i never really thought that that line of attack was going to be that salient only because i feel like as as again we all have the memory of goldfish now and that's gotten worse over the years i feel like talking about something that happened in 2020 in one city in the country feels like it has limited effectiveness. The only thing it does is that it gives MAGA Republicans who go on TV something to say, because there's really nothing else to say about Tim Walz.

Right. He is incredibly successful, incredibly likable. No, no, no. He had the audacity to have uh have tampons in in school bathrooms that's that that one rocket rocket around the uh magosphere pretty quickly they're very upset they think they want to call him tampon tim and they think that that's going to be that's it he's done i mean i would stipulate one that almost any time spent focusing on tim walls is probably a win for us because i was gonna say this whole thing of like what why are you going this hard at the,

I mean, I, I, you know, we're, we've done our share of JD Vance attacking, but, um,

I do think that there's, again, there's limited value in that as well. Well, I mean, we, I think we've been pretty open and that's mostly catharsis. Like it's a,

it's a music, like we deserve that, right? Like, like you don't see the Harris campaign spending all their time on JD Vance. You're right. Right. I mean,

you have to, the JD Vance part that was useful was his connections to Project 2025. Like that was a helpful that drove a larger narrative. The things about Tim Walz's handling of something in Minnesota four years ago is not does not drive any sort of message about Kamala Harris. And once again, the guy is a veteran gun-owning football coach from rural Minnesota. You're not going to make him into some sort of radical. That is not feasible. Well, what are your thoughts on the attempt to swift boat him, attacking his military

record? I mean, it's disgusting and despicable and totally unsurprising from Trump and the people running his campaign. And it's complete and total bullshit. He filed paperwork for Congress a month before there were even rumors that his unit could be deployed. He announced for Congress a month before his unit got orders. There's no evidence that he ran for Congress to avoid going to Iraq. It's complete bullshit. He served 24 years in the Guard. You only had to serve 20 to get

retirement. He served 24 years. He was also deployed during the war in Afghanistan, Operation Enduring Freedom. He was stationed in Italy at the time. In an ad, he was talking about assault weapons bans, and he was saying, I've carried weapons of war innumerable times and he was stationed in italy doing security missions during operation during freedom which was the war in afghanistan so it's like what what are we talking about yeah this is it is just absolutely ridiculous like it's it's totally absurd i think the stuff like people are going to hear this because these are the kind of things that will rocket around the internet like in your text exchange with your uncle you're going to get the tampon thing and you're going to get this the veteran thing and so the things that we just laid out here are the talking points to respond to that once again attacking Tim Walls's service record and attacking his uh gubernatorial record for one period of time that Donald Trump praised

four years ago it's not a particularly constructive use of time for the Trump's campaign, but if you want to win the argument with your mag uncle, these are the points you need. Yeah. And also there's a guy who served with them in his unit who's a Republican and said, doesn't like his politics, not going to vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. But he's like, he was a fantastic soldier, loved serving with them. And of course, he did not leave the Guard to avoid Iraq. He left the Guard so he could run for Congress. The other argument here is that he has inflated his rank because he rose to the rank of Command Sergeant Major, but he did not retire with that rank because you have to serve for three years of that rank to retire with it. So he retired at a

lower rank. And there have been a couple of times in pieces of paper, including one from the Harris campaign that said retired ass as opposed to rose to, but like we are, that's it. That's the whole, that's the whole controversy. It is a semantic argument that is absolutely absurd.

And just the fact that we're having this conversation speaks to how, what an amazing pick Tim Walls is. Cause this is the best they have. Right. And it's also, well, it's also a sign that they are flailing right now and they are desperate. Like you said, speaks to what an amazing pick Tim Walls is because this is the best they have, right? Well, it's also a sign that they are flailing right now and they are desperate. Like you said, they think that the press might be a little bored.

The honeymoon has gone on too long. She's gotten a lot of good press. So they see an opening to just latch onto something, which I think, by the way, they might've had some traction had Donald Trump not gone out today and for an hour just fucking had a a breakdown on national television yes because now once again he made himself the story so we're going to deal with that for another another new cycle and then we got

next week and then we got the convention so yeah it's um they are uh they are running out of time but obviously lots of work to do uh for kamala Harris and Tim Walz and the whole campaign and all of us. When we come back, we will talk to our friend Brian Tyler Cohen about his new book, Shameless Republicans, Deliberate Dysfunction and the Battle to Preserve Democracy. joining me now our good pal brian tyler cohen youtuber podcaster and now author his book shameless republicans deliberate dysfunction in the battle to preserve democracy comes out on august 13th you can pre-order it now wherever books are sold. Brian, welcome. Thank you so much. Look at this. Look at this book.

I love it. I love the cover. We got Abe Lincoln here. We got the Lincoln Memorial, but he's got his hand on his face. Cowering in shame. He is embarrassed. Cowering in shame.

Well, let me just say, first off, it's awesome to be here and a big part of why I do what I do is because of what you guys do. You are a huge part of my media diet and a huge part of my my media diet and a huge inspiration for me so um to be here is really exciting and i appreciate it

too nice of you that's how you get good questions in the interview let's go yeah you know me it's uh it's gonna be some hard-hitting shit here so as someone who uh just wrote a book with the help of three other people and still complained the whole time, why'd you do it? Why'd you do this to yourself? I guess I just have like, I just wanted my life to be as miserable as humanly possible. Here's the thing. This was written between the hours of 10 p.m. and 3 a.m. every night in the aftermath of all of the work. When do you sleep?

What are you doing? There's very little sleep. And thank God I don't have kids. I just have a chihuahua who's fine with me sitting there and writing all day. But yeah, a lot of it happened. It's an impossible news cycle to find free time in. It's not like we're done at 6 p.m. Yeah. What made you want to write the book? You obviously have this huge platform where you can say whatever you'd like all the time. What made you want to put a book together? Yeah, I think it's important to reach different people where they are. I mean, so much of what you guys do at Crooked in terms of your strategy is not just podcasting, but branching out into books yourself and YouTube as well.

So it's important to reach people where they are. It's also just personally, it has been a dream of mine for my entire life to actually publish a book. I was an English major in college. So the book is like the top of the mountain here. So a big theme of your book is the lessons the Democrats can learn from operating in this sort of unbalanced political landscape where Republicans are constantly lying, spreading misinformation, tough field for Democrats to play on.

What's your take on how Democrats can sort of balance the field? I think the most important thing is not to confer all of our, all the legitimacy onto the mainstream media as if they're advocating for us. I mean, they are so not on our team that they bend over backwards to show deference to Republicans. I mean, there were, I think, something like 69 Hillary's email stories in the lead up to the 2016 election. And so like, these are, these are people who are not only not on our team, but they're, they're broadcasting that they're not on our team. And yet we have, we have independent progressive media, like Crooked Media, like what I do, and like so many others in this space who are showing that, that we are willing and able to, to pick up the mantle

for where the media is dropping the ball. And we have to be able to be able to pick up the mantle for where the media is dropping the ball. And we have to be able to combat what the right has done. I mean, from the days of Rush Limbaugh all the way to today with Fox News and OAN and Newsmax and Daily Wire and just the vast ecosystem of the right, we have to be able to push back. And by relying solely

or only legitimizing mainstream media sources, we to be able to push back. And by relying solely or only legitimizing mainstream media sources, we're not going to get there. Yeah. I don't even think that they should be on our team because they're like, look, it's their their job is to report the news. Their job is not to help Democrats win elections. And I mean, one of the reasons we started Crooked Media was not even like a frustration with the mainstream media, but just like, you know, people are getting their information from different sources. People have like strong opinions about politics. And if you have strong opinions about politics, like, you know, decades ago, you would like join your local Democratic committee, right? But now people get their information on their phones, and it's good to have sort of a community to go to. Is that how you think of your YouTube? Yeah, absolutely. I mean, we're so lucky right now to be able to reach people instantly, to get instant feedback and to have an actual connection with people.

And I can see what resonates. By the way, as a content creator, I can see what resonates with people, what messages are working, what messengers are working. I can see who my audience wants to hear from. I can see who my audience is deathly bored from hearing from, and I won't name any names, but there are people out there in the Democratic Party. And we have that advantage, especially from a persuasion perspective, that we need to know what works and what doesn't work. And having like the internet at our fingertips and having those analytics at our fingertips helps us do exactly that. What messages have been working lately?

Well, right now, I think it's been great to watch the whole weirdness narrative set in because for so long, it's kind of been bizarre that we haven't been able to land on that. And it is so weird. And it seems so obvious in retrospect now that these people are so obsessed with everybody else's lives that they're trying to insert themselves between a woman and her doctor, insert themselves between where Americans can travel, insert themselves between what

Americans can read and what they get. I mean, the whole thing is just so weird. And like now that we finally landed on it and because we have a growing progressive media ecosystem and these campaigns are strong, that message is able to actually resonate. Whereas before the left wing media ecosystem kind of just felt like scattershot attempts at trying to make something stick and it never really did. And it always felt like Republicans went into the morning meeting every day and they came out with their talking points and they were always so organized. And to finally see the tables be turned and it's actually the left that's better organized

while the Republicans are dissembling and figuring out whether they're going to hammer away at Trump's message of killer windmills or hammer away at Trump's message of imaginary cannibals or hammer away at sharks or whatever it is, has been great to see. We've all been coconut pilled here. We've all been walls pilled. We've taken all the pills. How are you feeling about the election now? Now that we are in this just crazy, crazy moment where three weeks ago we had an entirely different Democratic nominee, entirely different Democratic ticket. It feels so weird to feel hope. Like as a Democrat in the last like decade,

hope has been so fleeting. And, you know, you find what moments you can, few and far in between. But look, obviously we have to be vigilant as we head toward November. But I think at the same time, we can kind of enjoy the moment that we're in. But I think at the same time, we can kind of enjoy the moment that we're in. And I think that it couldn't be going better right now, which as a Democrat is a very foreign concept. Knock on all the wood. Knock on all the wood,

a very foreign concept to me. But it could not be going better than it is right now. And the fact that Trump is falling apart to the extent that he is right now has been a testament to that, I think. And even with this debate stuff has put it especially into particular focus because Donald Trump's whole shtick thus far has been that he's a strong man, right? That he's tough. And he's not particularly adept at policy or foreign, like domestic policy, foreign policy. He's not a good speaker. He's not good at governing. He's not good at managing people. But what he had was the toughness, the strongman vibes. And when he refused to debate Kamala Harris on September 10th for ABC News,

and the Harris campaign leaned in on this, and that kind of enveloped the narrative for days and days and days. It showed that she took away the last thing that he had left and what he was left looking like was just deflated and defeated and weak. And I know that you guys talk about this a lot and this is especially Dan Pfeiffer's focus here

with message box and whatnot, but our job is not to always point out that Trump is trying to be a strong man, because that actually plays into his hands. It's that in fact, he's weak. And this was the first time that was really, really put on full display to the extent that the entire country was able to see it. Yeah, he doesn't love being mocked either, as most strong men do not. Before we go, one of my favorite anecdotes comes near the end of the book. It's about how you convinced your mother, who never had any interest in politics and believed the entire system was corrupt, to vote for the first time in 60 years during the 2020 election.

Not only that, she voted for Joe Biden and Democrats down ballot. What advice would you give listeners who want to encourage someone in their life who might be cynical about politics or skeptical about politics to go out there and vote? So the story I like to tell is actually about Wisconsin. And Wisconsin is oftentimes the tipping point state. In 2020, the difference between a Biden win and a Trump win was two votes per precinct. That's it. And so if you're looking for a proof point that we have

agency here, it's that all it would have taken for Donald Trump to win Wisconsin in 2020, the tipping point state would be flipping two people per precinct. And everybody has somebody in their lives who doesn't vote. When I asked my sister, I think it was in 2018, when there was the gubernatorial race, if she was voting for governor, her response was, what's a governor? And if somebody in my family can be at that position, then I know that there are people listening and watching who have those people in their lives too. So look, I'm not asking everybody to do everything,

but we are asking everybody to do something. And in that case, it's just a matter of finding one or two people in your lives who wouldn't otherwise be able to, wouldn't think that it was worth it, that it would have any impact to participate in this election and make those people your responsibility. You want to stick around for a game of Take Appreciator? Let's do it. I think we're doing the blind ranking test.

Let's do it. We're going to be right back with Lovett to play a game. And we're back. Hi. Hi. I'm John Lovett. I'm here because we're going to play a game. Yeah, we are.

So welcome. So welcome to Blind Take Rankings. Here's how it works. I'm going to read you five takes. Pretty shameless takes if you ask me. Oh. See what you did there. Brian and John, you must rank these takes from least egregious to most egregious.

So five is the least egregious. One is the most egregious. Here's the catch. You must rank the takes as they come and you don't know what's coming next. So try not to use that number one spot too early. All right. Are you ready? Let's do it. So ready. Take number one. And here it is.

Tim Walz is an MSNBC anchor's idea of a folksy politician who can appeal to middle America. Quite a take about a man who tricked us into believing he wasn't a coastal elite by being born in Nebraska and grazing a family, coaching a team, and serving the country in Minnesota. Just playing that long game, you know? Yeah. grazing a family, coaching a team, and serving the country in Minnesota. Just playing that long game, you know? Yeah. What makes this even more egregious is I think it was written by a writer for the National Review. Oh, yeah.

Yeah, Rich Lowry is just a real... They both know the take. They know the take. I mean, come on. Elijah's like, oh, that's an easy one. It's not about guess the take. It's about ranking the take. I know.

Sometimes we just like to show off our knowledge. I know, and it's impressive. It's impressive. I'm take. It's about ranking the take. I know. Sometimes we just like to show off our knowledge. I know. And it's impressive. I'm going to give it a four. I think we're in agreement here. It's kind of a lazy... It's kind of a reach. It's kind of a lazy... Also, and I'm stealing this from someone else, but you know who's MSNBC's

idea of... What was it again? An MSNBC anchor's idea of a folksy politician who can appeal to middle America. He's a J.D. Vance. Yeah. Someone put a picture of J.D. Vance. All right. Take number two. The best thing that can happen for long term supporters of the Democratic Party is for this election to be a massive loss for the party. That's the only way the party will reform itself. Consider how the party shut down competition in the primary, misled the public about the health of the president, That is such poor concern trolling.

Yeah. It's just not, I'm like giving that a... I would say three for that one. I'm giving it a five because I feel like they did such a poor job of trying to have a really, like to piss you off with a take. It doesn't even piss me off. It's just stupid. I would agree with that.

I think this is something that Trump is trying to shoehorn into the narrative, that Republicans are trying to shoehorn into the narrative. First of all, to like undermine the whole coup narrative. It's like, well, you think we did a coup? That's a coup. But it's also like, we're good. We're fine. It's them who are mad about it. That's why they're so mad.

They're mad that we're so happy. They hate to see us happy. They hate to see us happy. They don't want to see us in a ray. They don't want to see us in a ray. I needed an agreement here. Three or five? I'd say five. We're saying five. We're saying five.

That was Bill Ackman. I remember he spoke at the, he spoke at the Republican National Convention. I know that I might've bumped it up to a three. Next up. This is a headline. Here it is. Democrats could regret calling Trump and his supporters weird.

Could regret it. Could come to regret it. I'll read you a passage from the op-ed. I don't know what is sufficient for Harris to win, but I sure know what is necessary. A message that is dignity affirming for working class Americans, not dignity destroying.

If this is a campaign that descends into name calling, no one beats Trump in that arena. Two, two, two. I agree with that. That is getting a two. These are one of these takes that comes in a vacuum. They haven't been around or awake for the last eight years, and all of a sudden it's the Hillary Clinton,

or it's the Michelle Obama when they go low. Yes. Well, dignity affirming, much like J.D. Vance and go low. Yeah. Yes. Well, dignity affirming, much like JD Vance and Donald Trump. Right. The whole tack was that they are there. They're out there using their voice for workers. Was it,

was that what it was? I think it was more that, you know, it's sort of, I think of more of a, they go low situation. And that comes from Thomas Friedman. Thomas Friedman.

That's right. Oh, of course it does. Tough take. Of course it does. Tough take. Heard that one in an Uber. It's also like... In Jakarta.

It's also just like the kind of thing where it's like, you know that thing that seems to be making Republicans insane while delighting every Democrat from Joe Manchin AOC? I don't think it's working. All right. Also, they're going to regret calling them weird. What skeletons are in our closet that haven't come out yet that would make all of a sudden Kamala Harris and Tim Walz seem weird

relative to someone like J.D. Vance and Donald Trump? Also, we may lose this election. If we do, I'm not going to go back and be like, it was weird that we shouldn't have done that. No. No. It was not picking Josh Shapiro. Just kidding, everybody.

You know where my head's at. You know where my head's at. Next up, this is a short one again, just a take, not a headline. It's in response to the Wall's pick. The quote is, no Jews allowed at the top of the Democratic Party. Quite a take.

What do we have left? We have one and three, I think. One and three? I think it's one and three. We have one and three. I feel like it's got to be three. Yeah, I would agree with that. Also, no Jews at the top of the Democratic Party.

I think Chuck Schumer even quote tweeted that. When Chuck Schumer is dunking on you. It's a good dunk. Chuck Schumer saw that, bagel fell right out of his mouth. I quote tweeted that. When Chuck Schumer is dunking on you. It's a good dunk. Yeah. Chuck Schumer saw that. Bagel fell right out of his mouth. I can say that. That's allowed.

Also, he saw that. He saw that and was like, we got to get tweeting before Doug Emhoff does it first. Yeah. There's a little friendly rivalry there. Who's the. And if it wasn't Saturday. Who's really at the top of the party. And if it wasn't Saturday, Josh at the top and it wasn't saturday

josh shapiro could have been out of two because he's i guess no and not top he's not top of the party you know it's remember when there was a second gentleman versus senate majority leaders to your dismay yeah chuck probably wins that one but yeah no for sure for sure well there was that there was that article it was a profile there was a profile that called dog that although you know what doug's moving up i was well if Doug's first gentleman... First gentleman versus Senate Majority Leader. Yeah. It's got the president's ear. You know?

It's a powerful job. Edith Wilson around the country. Much like Jill is doing today. Jesus Christ. What? It's over. You and Christy Jackson still fighting the wars. If Walls... Just kidding, everybody kidding everybody if walls is running against obama he'd totally do a birth certificate joke at no time in living memory has there been any such thing as going lower

than democrats are willing to go it's not possible wait Wait, wait. Oh my, what? This is about the couch. Is it about the couch joke? Can't go lower than that. That is the lowest. That is the bottom. I'm so glad we saved one. I'm so glad. I feel so good about this. But you said the birth certificate thing, right?

That was part of it? Yes. So the example that they use is literally example that they use. And is worse. And is worse. That's a good point. That's a good point. Philosophically, he's saying Democrats could not go lower than this it is equivalent of the things republicans do

that's such a good point here's what's driving me i have not talked about this yet like the the the couch joke complaints if tim walls had got up there and and was given a riff and said something about a couch and be like you heard about the couch right you heard about jd vance and the jd bounce fucked a couch oh yeah or even like insinuated that he did that would be one thing i'd still think it was a funny but like we could at least have that debate he just he just he he said a word that was like a signal to a certain group of very online people us uh with the couch and like that's it the fact that they got so mad is also telling on themselves. But he didn't spread the disinformation. He just nodded to a joke that's out there.

And it was smart because if you didn't know the joke, it would still work. It just sounds like he's lazy. If you didn't know that he was not spreading any kind of misinformation or disinformation because if you hadn't heard it, you would have had no fucking idea what he was talking about. And it still makes sense. You're just saying, oh, the guy must be on his couch hanging out and i think the reason it drove them so crazy is because if somebody doesn't understand it and hasn't heard it to explain it you sound unhinged and you have to like someone made up someone made up a story about the jd vance fucking a couch so he said he talked about him getting up

off a couch i think the reason that that it hurts so much. Are you upset yet? That get you angry? The reason it hurts so much too is, yes, it's not true. But like the fact that so many people believed it could be is a pretty poor reflection on J.D. Vance. But it's like, yeah, of course, Democrats shouldn't also spread disinformation, right? Like everyone's like, whoa, now you think you, no, we shouldn't. That's not what he did. That's not what he did. Yeah, I mean, look, the fact

that J.D. Vance was born in Canada is not even something we've been bringing up. No, no. We've been very... We'll let them fight that out. Yeah, that's their... We're not gonna... That's their business. I don't know that for a fact. Maybe Trump will drop him from the ticket when he finds out. Don't say that too much. I don't actually want it to happen. Well, let's do a...

Let's... So that's it. Did anybody... happened well let's let's do a let's uh so that's it uh did anybody did any of the many people in this room keep track of the rankings anybody did a single person in here i got i see four laptops did anybody type out the order i think i remember i think i remember um okay number one no we start with five okay well i'm just trying to go with my fucking memory the fifth the fifth was your first you said uh folksy no no no that was no you didn't know okay in fifth you said uh the concern trolling was fifth uh tim walsh being a folksy politician in the minds of an msnbc anchor was fourth uh democrats could regret calling trump in his support was weird that's two that was two no jews allowed at the top of the Democratic Party. Three.

Three. And number one. Nice job. Number one, Democrats can never sink lower than this couch illusion. It's the Democratic equivalent of a joke Republicans constantly make. And that's going to be number one. I'm totally fine with that list. That's exactly what I would have done.

That's a good list. Hey, everyone. Go buy Shameless, would have done. That's a good list. Hey, everyone. Go buy Shameless, Brian's book. Please go buy the book. You can get it anywhere books are sold. Anywhere you get your books online. That's right. Or in real life.

August 13th. August 13th is out, but it's available for pre-order now. All right. Help our buddy Brian out. Thanks for coming by. Love it. Thanks for that fantastic game. What a delight.

Thanks to Elijah on the ones and twos. Everyone have a great weekend. We'll see you next week. Thanks, everybody. If you want to get ad-free episodes, exclusive content, and more, consider joining our Friends of the Pod subscription community at cricket.com. And if you're already doom-scrolling, don't forget to follow us at Pod Save America on Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube for access to full episodes, bonus content, and more. Plus, if you're as opinionated as we are, consider dropping us a review to help boost this episode or spice up the group chat by sharing it with friends, family, or randos you want in on this conversation.

Pod Save America is a Crooked Media production. Our producer is David Toledo. Our associate producers are Saul Rubin and Farrah Safari. Reid Cherlin is our executive editor, and Adrian Hill is our executive producer. The show is mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick. Jordan Cantor is our sound engineer, with audio support from Kyle Seglin and Charlotte Landis. Writing support by Hallie Kiefer. Madeline Herringer is our head of news and programming.

Matt DeGroat is our head of production. Andy Taft is our executive assistant. Thanks to our digital team, Elijah Cohn, Haley Jones, Phoebe Bradford, Joseph Dutra, Ben Hefcote, Mia Kelman, Molly Lobel, Kiril Pallaviv, and David Toles.