Pod Save America - Trump's Pump and Dump (feat. Sen. Raphael Warnock)

Episode Date: March 26, 2024

Donald Trump prepares to pay a $175 million bond, Truth Social goes public and a date is set for the first ever criminal trial of a former president. Mike Johnson faces a motion to vacate his speakership while his House majority seems to be disappearing. Bibi Netanyahu beefs with Joe Biden over the UN ceasefire resolution and NBC faces an internal revolt over the network’s decision to hire former RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel. And later, Senator Raphael Warnock stops by the studio to talk to Lovett about Georgia, the 2024 campaign, and more.  For a closed-captioned version of this episode, click here. For a transcript of this episode, please email [e-mail] and include the name of the podcast.

Welcome to Pod Save America, I'm Jon Favreau. I'm Jon Lovett. I'm Tommy Vitor. On today's show, we're going to talk about Mike Johnson's disappearing House majority that also might get rid of him, Bibi Netanyahu's beef with Joe Biden over the UN ceasefire resolution, the internal NBC revolt over the network's decision to hire former RNC chair Ronna McDaniel, and later, Georgia Senator Raphael Warnock stops by the studio to talk to Lovett about 2024 Gaza, TikTok, and more. But first, jury selection for the first ever criminal trial of a former president and current nominee will begin on April 15th.

In this case, Trump is charged with falsifying business records to cover up a hush money payment to Stormy Daniels, the porn star he had an affair with. If you're a Pod Save America listener in line at voir dire, stay in line. Don't wear your shirt. Don't wear your shirt. Don't wear the shirt. So Trump's lawyers tried to use the release of new documents from federal prosecutors as an excuse to delay the trial. But Judge Juan Merchan argued that the defense has had plenty of time.

So we're getting at least one Trump trial before the election. At least one. At least one. At least one. Trump got some slightly better news from a New York appeals court on Monday, which lowered the amount of the bond he needs to post for his civil fraud verdict from $454 million to $175 million within the next 10 days. He seems to think he'll be able to come up with that amount.

Here he is at a press conference after the hearing. Well, as I say, I have a lot of cash. You know I do because you looked at my statements. I mean, you've been examining my statements for a long time, and I have much more than that in cash. But I would also like to be able to use some of my cash to get elected. They don't want me to use my cash to get elected. They don't want that. they don't want me taking cash out to use it for the campaign i didn't even include like brand value and the brand values i became president because of the brand let's say but the brand values it's one of the most valuable brand values so i think it's i wouldn't swap it for any other brand in the world trump Trump. He's got a lot of cash, plus all that Nazi gold in Ivana's coffin.

I just love it at the end where he goes, Trump. Trump. I wouldn't trade that brand for any other brand in the world. Trump. Very funny if he just walked into the courtroom and was like, an IOU, 20% of my brand. Yeah. Leverage that. Can't buy bread with brand.

So, huge bummer that we won't get to see Tish James seize Trump Tower It sucks We don't get anything We don't get anything No fun I wanted that building Yep That was going to be our building

Now Tish James, who doesn't have a political bone in her body Was going to get that building for us Trump was fundraising off the fact that she was going to take the building And now today he's fundraising off the fact that There's a big fundraising email that just says Trump Tower still mine. That sucks. What is what is that fundraising for? You already got the tower back and you seemingly have plenty of cash. But we will get to see Trump spend most of his spring in a Manhattan courtroom. What's your

take on the political implications of Monday's legal news. I mean, you heard it in the clip there. He keeps talking about putting his own money into the campaign. I couldn't tell if he was trying to suggest that he was going to put some of his personal funds behind his election effort, which I doubt he will actually do given history, or if he just now talks about campaign donations like it's his own personal cash.

I took it to mean the first part, which is he hasn't done that since 2016, but he did do that in 2016. And then obviously he did it in 2020. And I wonder if he's considering it. Here's what I took it to mean. I took it to mean he knows he's about to write a massive check. And he's going to say, I need your donations because these political hacks are taking my money, not to hurt me for anything I did wrong or to punish me but to stop me from

being able to support my campaign will you step in to make up for what these these jew prosecutors have done to me it's always a little bit in there yeah okay okay the other thing i thought was i you sort of referenced it i mean it's, it's got to be the most distracting way to possibly run a presidential campaign. You got to remember all these judges' names. You got to read all these documents. You got to spend months and months in court. You got to wage your little PR wars against Tish James and Goran. I mean, we should get into the schedule here.

So if it starts April 15th, that's jury selection. That'll take about two weeks. And then the case will probably last estimates range now from like late May into June. So he has to appear in court from 9.30 AM to 4.30 PM, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday, gets Wednesday off though. You know, you're not traveling too far if you have to get back there for Thursday so that's a lot of the campaign and that's just the first trial now I realize he'll like use it to raise money and he'll do his little press conference outside the courtroom but I don't know does that wear well it's not the primary right I mean that's when we had the big rally around Trump effect within the Republican Party I just I don't know that you can assume that will happen again, at least not with swing voters. with people's imaginations and knowledge

of how the criminal justice system works and that will make him look very bad to normal people who will just be tuning into the campaign. Trump, like the rest of us, is just adjusting to a post-pandemic hybrid work schedule. That's true. Oh, that's right. Three days in, a couple days out.

It's going to limit his truthing at Fox. Yeah, I wonder if he's going to say that to the judge. can i do some remote remote court why not give it a whirl it's gonna be a hard case to proof hard case to proof proving falsified business records actually is the easy part for uh elvin bragg though that's just a misdemeanor in new york unless you falsify business records to cover up another crime and And in this case, that other crime is not reporting his hush money payment to the Federal Election Commission, which would be a federal crime, not a state crime, if it's judged a crime at all, and it's a crime that DOJ declined to charge him with, right? So there's a lot of moving pieces here. Like, I think he should be

able to prove the falsified business records fairly easily, but it's sort of taking the next leap to covering up the other crime, which clearly it was. There's, there's some complications there. Yeah, for sure. And I'm sure the open-minded Manhattan jury will approach this and try to try to be as fair as they possibly can to Donald Trump. It is interesting, Brett. We get nothing that we get nothing. The one thing that's kind of cool is all the juries are coming from D.C. and Manhattan. Like that's like we get one perk. Oh, I know. Meanwhile, Aileen Cannon down in Florida is like, how can I spike this thing as fast as humanly possible?

So Trump also said at the end of that sort of press avail after courtroom today that he's going to pay cash for the bond. That's what he says. He's also a little richer on paper this week, thanks to his shitty Twitter knockoff, Truth Social. The company lost $49 million last year, but it just started trading on the Nasdaq Monday under the stock ticker DJT, with Trump's stake currently worth about $3 billion, though he's not allowed to sell his shares for six months. Is this real? Is this a Ponzi scheme? And how many shares have you guys bought?

I reject the characterization of this as a Ponzi scheme because in a Ponzi scheme, you have to pay out some money to your early investors with funds from the later ones. And I don't see that happening. Right, right. A Ponzi scheme involves like a couple, there's a couple rungs of the pyramid that do okay.

You can't just have the top. That's just stealing from people. I just keep thinking about that scene from The Sopranos where the two henchmen are like beating the shit out of some stockbroker saying, we're pushing Webistics. That's what I picture. Just some boiler room somewhere. Just being like, we're pushing Trump stocks today.

It's Trump stocks. Yeah, I mean, this is like just a way to siphon cash from Trump fans, right? I think, or anyone who wants to really buy influence. It's like, if you hate Trump, if Yeah. I mean, this is like just a way to siphon cash from Trump fans. Right. I think or anyone who wants to really buy influence. It's like if you hate Trump, if you hate big tech, if you hate the elites, buy some shares of DJT. It's a it's a meme stock. It's a cult initiation fee. It's a securitized Trump stake.

It's an oligarch. I mean, you know, it's all in one. It's fun. But like this, the stock price here is basically just rising or falling based on Trump's popularity, betting on Donald Trump. It's like a bunch of his supporters sort of did this. And then some other people who just want to do like a pump and dump kind of thing here. Yeah. Right.

That's what this is. I mean, some people, some people will make money. Some people lose money. My question is, like, can Trump get money out of this before it collapses if it collapses like can he start selling bits of it just to get some of the money out before the reality of the company not making any money well yeah and by the way face to face with the stock price i should have said it's a six-month lock-up so he can sell his shares but the board can vote for to change that and the board is made up of his son don jr and linda mcmahon and all of his linda mcmahon yeah all of his goons are on the board

so you know right truth social is not uh trading on multiple on its revenues that is that is absolutely true the revenue was three million dollars last, this is not Berkshire Hathaway. This is 5 billion active users on Truth Social selling scammy ads to people for like toenail fungus. What I liked, I went a little trip down memory lane. The initial pitch for Truth Media and Technology Group, which is a company that's merging with the other company, the SPAC to form DJT, was Truth Social.

And then they had a Netflix-like streaming service, a Trump streaming service. And then they had some longer term play to create competitors to Google, Amazon, and Stripe. So I guess e-commerce search and payments. So close. So if you're hoping to make a return, I would not hold your breath until those businesses come to fruition. Did you guys see, we also learned uh that the biggest institutional shareholder of the shell company that merged with uh truth social's parent company is uh

jeff yass the uh you might have heard that name recently because he's also major investor in tiktok he owns a bunch of bite dance the parent company for tiktok and uh he also happens to be a major donor to club for growth club for growth is paying kelly ann conway to lobby against the tiktok ban and lo and behold donald trump flip-flopped on the tiktok ban uh but it's all just a coincidence nothing is nothing is connected here it's just um we just it's the it's his ability to sort of dance between the raindrops for years and years and years. Just the man doesn't get wet. Maybe he'll finally get wet.

Yeah, it's 91 raindrops. Yeah. Let's get this guy wet. What the fuck? What the fuck? Let's get this guy wet. Let's get this guy wet. I don't want to yell quit that, but I don't want to.

I don't either. You know what I mean. Sure. You know what I'm talking about. Okay. Yeah. No. Yeah.

Sure. True social. He's got $3 billion in his valuation. Yeah. Well, he's got a bunch of idiots who are just like, sure. I mean, you said like buy influence. I don't even know if they're buying influence. They're just like Donald Trump's fucking Jesus Christ.

No, I think it's both. I think mostly it's Trump fans who like want to own a share of djt to stick it to all the elites who don't like him but then if you want to siphon money to trump this is a very efficient way to do it you buy a ton of shares of his little company now i mean you could wild previously if you were a saudi delegation you just stayed at the trump hotel for a month longer than you needed to and you just let the room sit vacant but you're gonna deal with Jared. Yeah, this is a new, more efficient way, potentially. Unreal. One more fun Trump thing. Did you guys see that he congratulated himself on Truth Social, the multi-billion dollar company, for winning two trophies at his own golf club? He said,

it's my great honor to be at my golf club to receive the club championship trophy and the senior club championship trophy. I won both. If you believe Trump is a scratch golfer, I've got a stock on the NASDAQ to sell you. Are you guys surprised that he would take credit

for winning a senior open? I thought about that. Yeah, it's very... I think that, yeah. I'm also just sort of like, so you're at your own golf club and you get in the tournament for all the customers

and you're like I'm going to wipe the floor with these people then you win and then you congratulate yourself about winning at your golf club at your own listen you guys are making me realize this is very Kim Jong Il he shot a 38 under par including 11 holes in one the first time he ever played.

So setting him aside, I do think Trump has won something like 20 club championships, but only at clubs he owns. Yeah. Again. But in some cases, he didn't actually play in the tournament. One time he ran into a dude who had just won the tournament. He challenged him to a nine-hole match, and then he beat him. Then he declared himself the co-champion.

Like how each side could send their best champion to fight in the middle instead of having a big battle i mean he's facing multiple criminal charges for uh cheating in an election so no i can't imagine yeah there's that there's that old joke there's that old joke about the golfer you know you're golfing with somebody and they lose their ball in the woods and they're looking and they're looking and they can't find it. And you go over to hit your golf ball. And then all of a sudden you hear from the woods, I found it, I found it. And he hits his ball, gets it right next to the tee. And the question you face is, do you call the man a cheater or do you keep his ball in your pocket? Rick Riley from Sports Illust Wrote a whole book about Trump cheating at golf.

It's a funny thing because it's very polarizing. I think his fans find it hilarious. Like they know he's lying. This is nonsense, right? But they find it hilarious. Some haters despise him. I mostly just have always found it confusing that people like this about him. Like cheating at sports is annoying.

Constantly whining and being a victim is annoying. How does this not wear worse over time? Yeah, I think it's a good point. I don't know if it does. I mean, Joe Biden, our boy Joe Biden, had a really funny tweet. Great tweet. He quote tweeted the truth,

and he just said, congratulations, Donald, quite the accomplishment. That's the tone. That's the tone. That's the humor. I love it. More of it. I enjoyed it too.

Do it. It's great. Yeah, no, but I know. But Tommy, I know you mean, because it's like, I feel like, but wait, weren't we all taught growing up that like that's not strength that that's weakness right like that that's not it's whiny it's an embarrassing way to behave that like being that much of a braggart is not like cool or how a real kind of person right who has really has faith in themselves would behave remember he was gonna he was gonna award himself the congressional

medal of freedom when he was president? Yeah. Instead he just gave it to Rush Limbaugh. Yeah. R.I.P. All right, moving on. The House of Representatives is taking a well-earned two-week recess that Republicans may not want to come back from.

Axios says they're leaving with, quote, their base enraged, their majority in tatters, and their speaker facing the prospect of a humiliating ouster at the hands of his own MAGA allies. I hate to see it. This is mostly because Mike Johnson worked with Democrats to avoid a government shutdown by passing a bill with the same spending levels that cost Kevin McCarthy his job 10 months ago when he made a deal with Joe Biden about the budget. Turns out that same deal is what we just got over the weekend. This led Marjorie Taylor Greene to introduce a motion to vacate, though that doesn't appear to be going anywhere just yet. Then Representative Mike

Gallagher announced that he'll be vacating his seat next month, which will leave Republicans with a one seat majority. Also, James Comer said they won't be impeaching Joe Biden after all. Kooks aren't too happy about any of this. Here's Stop the Steal enthusiast Andy Biggs answering some questions on Newsmax. Let's just, I mean, if you want to talk performance of Speaker Johnson, I'm as dismayed and disappointed as anybody. In the House, Congressman, you think things are good for the Republican Party? I think that we get along better than most people would think. I think that, look, I try to... You understand why I'm asking, right?

Kevin McCarthy abandoned you. Ken Buck abandoned you. And Mike Gallagher just announced on Friday that he's going to resign on April the 13th. You got a one vote majority. What's going on in the House? Well, I don't know why Kevin left. and i'm not sure i know why ken or mike are uh mike left mike's leaving ken left well when you put it that way mike johnson welcome to the resistance if you had what you had read just sort of walking through what what johnson is facing you could

have just until you referenced mccarthy you could have just replaced the walking through what, what Johnson is facing. You could have just, until you referenced McCarthy, you could have just replaced the word Johnson with McCarthy. And it is the exact, exact same situation, exact same politics, same bills, still the Ukraine funding. It's exact same.

We've been in the same place for 10 months, 10 years. No one is happy with Republicans controlling the house, not even house Republicans. It's just like, they can't keep a speaker. They can't agree on anything as a caucus let alone a house like we it's like people want another two years of this they just keep replacing speaker after speaker with more extreme versions who still aren't extreme enough for like the lunatic fringe of their party

investigations based on nothing that don't go anywhere. Impeachment's going great. Impeachment's done. It's going to be the least productive Congress in history by a lot. Basically, all they've done is barely kept the government open, renamed a few post offices. They got all these younger members retiring

and not just retiring, but then leaving early. Quitting immediately. They can't even wait to the end of their term. I think there's a real game theory problem here because once the majority got this low, you have to leave quick because if you want to leave and take a job before your term is up and if you wait too long, suddenly leaving to get your whatever high paid consulting job or something turns the house over to the democrats right gallagher is the last person who can leave without causing them to go to what an even split fucking clusterfuck you know there's seven other people that are like ah fuck yeah they don't want to be lobbyists yeah they want to make the money ken bucks out he he already left and he signed on to the uh democrats ukraine uh discharge petition

right before he walked out the door So these people aren't just leaving they're like leaving with like a couple fuck yous to leadership Yeah, like they didn't even get neither of them Gallagher or Buck Neither of them gave Johnson a heads up that they were leaving or a gift or a no gift or nothing even by the way George Santos announced he's leaving the leaving the republican party's running as an independent i would say their party left him john um so mtg she basically said this is like a warning shot this it's like a resolution to

introduce the motion to vacate but she hasn't triggered it yet i don't know who cares but anyway the question is some democrats have said well you know, if she files this, we might keep Mike Johnson. We might vote to keep him. Do you guys see any good reasons for House Democrats to save Mike Johnson from being McCarthy? The argument for it is that America is our accountability partner and that we need a speaker and a Congress in place to do serious things because we're serious, responsible people and we run the government. We're watching too much polls and that too. Yeah, that's the argument for it. I don't know that I believe that.

So if you go back and look at what this conversation, which we've had before around McCarthy look like, Democrats were eager for McCarthy to keep his job to get funding for Ukraine, award more federal projects in Democratic districts. And some went so far as to demand that right wing Republicans be removed from the rules committee. Some wanted a promise that GOP campaign committees will not spend money to defeat politically vulnerable Democrats. I think that's probably a stretch. It's a lot. Up to including.

You start from it's just a negotiating position. Demanding co-chairs for committees. We're now at the point where people just want the Ukraine aid. And fine, fair enough. But I feel like what's sort of twisted about all this is because the media treats Democrats as protagonists and Republicans as antagonists. And Republicans are just feral creatures wandering the earth. And Democrats are human beings with agency. It's incumbent upon us to figure out how to help them out of this jam.

How about Mike Johnson? Throw together a couple options. What does Mike Johnson want for these Democratic votes? Never, never, never get a proposal from the Republicans for this. And I have another idea. I agree that we should have a functioning House of Representatives. If a few Republicans want to join and make Hakeem Jeffries the Speaker of the House, there's lots of interesting ways that they can be accommodated and made to feel welcome in

the big, beautiful Democratic coalition that would surely be happy to have them. That's another option. I don't know if any of them have enough money for the private security they'll need to hire if they may, if they take that vote. I think it's just, the only thing they have left to do before the election because of course you can't you can't be legislating nothing else is gonna happen because they all have senioritis because it's an election year so they need to get ukraine done yep and uh the funding bill that they just passed uh goes to uh september 30th so you don't want another shutdown in october right before the election i would just say to mike Johnson like put the Ukraine bill on the floor and let's agree on spending levels for through December yeah

through December whatever and you fine take the job it's a who the house isn't doing anything anyway take the job I guess but like so we're just a little twerp just yeah like what else are we doing well here's the alternative something well the alternative is that's what we're getting by the way we're getting a version of that now the alternative. Well, the alternative is. That's what we're getting. By the way, we're getting a version of that now. The alternative is we lose Mike Johnson. Then we get, you know, Andy Biggs or someone even crazier. Ukraine doesn't get done. There's no Ukraine funding.

And then we get another shutdown. But maybe you also get another three weeks of disastrous infighting and votes and embarrassment and humiliation from House Republicans. And there's some political benefit from that. I don't know. You get content for us and fun. That would be the argument. But I will say like what we would be, look, I think the reason people want

to figure out a way to do this for Ukraine is because they genuinely believe that we have a moral obligation to fund Ukraine. But it is also a situation in which the reason Republicans would be desperate for Democrats to help them is because it would once again point out that they are a group of people

that cannot govern the country and shouldn't be trusted with this responsibility. And for the long-term health of the country, we want to win the house. So I think it's a little bit, it's a little tough to just be like, yeah, well, that's the best we could get. They're sitting at 11% approval ratings. So I feel like that, I feel like the country's got the message, but you think, yeah, maybe, maybe. Yeah. No, I just, look, I think that i i get if you're a legislator if you're a democratic legislator and you believe that it's not just a moral obligation to fund ukraine but it is in our national security interest to fund ukraine then a a couple days

of republicans looking like fucking clowns is not as worthwhile as getting this done and actually funding you if you're a serious person get the ukraine funding and then just fucking fuck them just like let's get the ukraine funding then we do our own motion to vacate i think let's trick these bastards i'm sure there's a lot of very serious people in congress mostly our party who care deeply about this issue i do there is an open question though if if johnson is saved with a bunch of Democratic votes, how does Trump react to that? He might have a meltdown. Be like, oh, little Mikey, he's weak. Can't do this with the Democrats.

You can see this going badly in a couple of different ways. Yeah, it'll be. Trump has different ways of sort of breaking off relationships. There's the like, I'm going to blast you on Truth Social, right? I'm going to bury you at my golf course. I'm going to bury you at my golf course. This one's just going to be like, he's going to forget that he ever knew Mike Johnson kind of thing.

That guy, who was that guy? It was like a quick five-month thing. Dennis the Menace from the stage of the speech. He was sort of weird. What was with that Covenant Eyes thing? That was weird. That's what you'll be hearing Trump say. I like that. so there were some big developments with uh israel's war in gaza on monday the u.n security

council was able to pass a resolution calling for a ceasefire after the u.s abstained for the first time this allegedly pissed off bb netahu, who then canceled a planned visit by his senior advisors to the White House. The Biden administration said the abstention isn't a change in policy and reportedly told Israel in advance that they don't see the resolution as binding. Tommy, what did you make of all this? And has there been any movement in Washington on the effort to condition U.S. military aid to Israel or even the other diplomatic efforts that the U.S. and Israel have been engaged in with Hamas? So this resolution basically just reflects the longstanding Biden

policy that they've been working towards for a while, which gets, it's a ceasefire and a release to the hostages. It calls for both. They abstained rather than vote for the resolution because some issues with the wording and also because it didn't condemn Hamas for the October 7th attack. So, I mean, I think some others, it's interesting that the administration says it's not legally binding. I think others would argue it is, but in practice, there's no enforcement mechanism without another vote by the Security Council for like to sanction Israel, for example, and the US could veto that. All that said, it's a pretty big break from the norm where the US has vetoed a lot of UN resolutionsN. resolutions over the years that

criticize Israel, including several similar resolutions about Gaza that called for a ceasefire without demanding the release of hostages or condemning Hamas. More broadly, though, this is another step in what seems like a pretty big divide between the U.S. and Israel. I think that Netanyahu seems to want this fight. And I think he's probably setting up an effort to just start running against Biden, but we'll see. The question of suspending aid is happening on a different track. In February, the Biden team put out this memorandum saying that any country that gets US weapons has to use them in accordance with the US and international law. So the countries that receive these weapons, I think there's six of them, including Israel,

submitted assurances in some written form last week. They're now being reviewed. And we will hear at some point what that review says. And it could result in the Biden administration deciding to withhold additional arms transfers. So there are 17 Democrats in the U.S. Senate who are saying these assurances are bogus. Do not give them more weapons, including like Durbin and Ben Holland, like some centrist Dems. Human rights groups are saying these assurances are not true. They're violating international law, the Israeli military is in Gaza. And so we shall see. And this is just a determination the Biden administration can make itself and Congress doesn't necessarily have a role here. Yeah, I think there's a determination that'll be made by the State Department

and the Defense Department in something like 45 days from receiving these assurances, and then I think Biden makes a call. Because I noticed that Bernie Sanders released a statement because there was $4 billion in military aid for Israel as part of the spending agreement, though I would imagine that's authorized by Congress or appropriated by Congress, and then the administration, if it decides to make this determination, it could probably just not send that. Yeah. I mean, I think they could probably just find ways to slow down or cut off future weapons transfers. But yeah, I mean, the big spending bill not only included 3.8 billion

in military support for Israel, but it banned funding for the UN Relief and Works Agency or UNRWA, which is the biggest employer in Gaza. They employ about 13,000 people in Gaza and provide relief. So some pretty big steps were taken in that bill. Finally, fun times at NBC News right now. After the network's executives decided to hire former RNC chair and election denier Ronna McDaniel as a contributor for a reported $300,000 a year. Journalists who work at NBC revolted, including an on-air rebuke from the network's chief political analyst, Chuck Todd.

Chuck's Meet the Press successor, Kristen Welker, had just interviewed McDaniel, though Welker didn't know when she booked her that NBC had already hired her. That's awkward. Here's a clip of that interview and then what Chuck said to Welker afterwards. Do you disagree with Trump saying he's going to free those who've been charged?

I do not think people who committed violent acts on January 6th should be freed. So you disagree with that? He's been saying that for months. Ronna, why not speak out earlier? Why just speak out about that now? When you're the RNC chair, you kind of take one for the whole team, right? Now I get to be a little bit more myself, right? This is get to be a little bit more myself, right? This is what I believe. Look, let me deal with the elephant in the room. Yeah. I think our bosses owe you an apology for putting you in this situation because I don't know what to believe. She is now a paid contributor by NBC News. I have no idea whether any answer she gave to you

was because she didn't want to mess up her contract. She wants us to believe that she was speaking for the RNC when the RNC was paying for it. And look, there's a reason why there's a lot of journalists at NBC News uncomfortable with this because many of our professional dealings with the RNC over the last six years have been met with gaslighting. When NBC made the decision to give her NBC News' credibility, you've got to ask yourself, what does she bring NBC News? And when we make deals like this, and I've been at this company a long time, you're doing it for access.

Good for Chuck. Way to go, Chuck. Kristen Welker did a great job in the interview, too. Yes, I know. It was a 20-minute grilling. I know. I watched it to prep for this because I hadn't actually seen the whole thing on Sunday and I was like, wow, she did a really great job. That was a really good job. What did you guys think of the uproar? And what do you think compelled NBC to hire her in the first place? So I think it was at one point in that interview

with Walker, she says Biden won fair and square, right? So she's finally saying Biden won fair and square. But all along, she was just saying she was doing what she had to do as RNC chair. Well, Welker played a clip of her talking to Chris Wallace just last year where she said, quote, I don't think Biden won it fair. I don't. I'm not going to say that. Yeah. It's interesting how much this has sort of shifted over the last six, eight years, which is I actually think reflects something good, which is I think a lot of journalists, especially like big mainstream outlets that were sort of kind of much more comfortable in being in the role of kind of referee and sort of viewing it as a match between two sides that they were sort of in the middle of, I think have kind of learned that their role changes when the losing team tries to burn the stadium to the ground. And I also think that that has been helped by the fact that they have been kind of dealt with personal attacks for years. They have seen the dark side of this. They have seen the anti-democratic authoritarian viciousness come for them personally, affect them

personally, affect their colleagues, affect the way they cover the news. And it seems as though that attitude, that understanding that, yes, a lot of the times we are between two sides. But then there are times where we as journalists are on the side of democracy versus the people on the outside of it, I think, has been internalized by people who are covering the news much more than the people who are maybe further away from it. Yeah, I just found it to be a baffling decision. I mean, she just got tossed out of Trump world. She does not seem well dialed into like normie Republican world. I'm sure the Nikki Haley team probably does not like Ronna very much. I don't know that she's dialed into the hill. So per Chuck's point, you pay contributors to get access. I'm not sure what access she gets you. There's obviously also the far more serious credibility problem. And I think for people like Chuck, it wasn't just that you, they were lying to him.

They were, they were brutally attacking him like week after week after week in most personal terms. And so I guess the reason you, you pay her to as a contributor is to keep, have a consistent pro Trump voice on through the election and to keep her from going to competitors. But like, who's spun up to watch the, the Rana exclusive, at least after this one. It does illustrate the larger problem with having, oh, we just need a pro-Trump voice because pro-Trump voices, again, they tell you that the election was stolen. And you just have to draw a line somewhere. Like it is,

like if NBC wants waste waste its money on someone who's not even a skilled propagandist like it's their right to make a dumb business decision and i i do think like political diversity on the network news is important and have people hash it out argue it out and stuff like that but you just have to draw a line somewhere and the line has to be burning the stadium down like you said the line has to be like if stadium down. Like you said, the line has to be like, if you've been telling lies about an attempted coup, we're going to draw the line there. And even if that represents the views of millions of Americans,

that doesn't necessarily mean that it has to be on fucking network news and you have to fact check the person every time they're on. It's just like a hard thing to do. Yeah, I also, it does sound like just from some of the kind of coverage that Ronna Romney McDaniel got sorted Romney kind of interpersonally.

Right. Like that. She's oh, she's from that tradition. So she's one of the normal Republicans that we're still allowed to have on. And sure, she kind of had to defend Trump. But but once she's on our air, she'll be a much more reasonable person. But people don't get there's no there's no it's a golf day. There's no mulligan on calling for the overthrow of the government. Four more years? No, I take that back.

Yeah, to your point, NBC reportedly got close with her because they were negotiating to host a debate with the RNC. So that's how she greased this deal. But you are insulting your audience by putting a known liar on TV all the time and paying that person. And also, I think like this is what everyone hates about Washington. It's this chummy nonsense is that everyone knows that everyone's doing a kayfabe and it's a bit and we know she's a liar, but now she's mopping up afterwards. And that's somehow okay. And again, like, you know,

Alyssa Farrah Griffin, she was in Trump world, she was in the Trump White House to the very end. And when she left, and she became a contributor, you know, I think I probably criticized it myself, right? Like we did. But she also sort of did a mea culpa, right? Like this was wrong. And I've seen the, you know, like there was none of that from Rana. By the way.

NBC. I was just like, no, no, no, no, no. I was taking one for the team and I was sort of lying when I was there. And now I'm here and you kind of got to take one for the team. I mean, it's just it was take one for the team over the defending a coup. The other there was a report, I think it was a Maggie Haberman story in The Times about about Trump trying to get the primaries to be over early to kind of push Nikki Haley aside.

And it was midway through the story. It mentions almost in passing that Trump called Ronna McDaniel and said, hey, can we not only cancel the debates, but can we cancel the elections altogether? And she put out a statement. And so the idea that like, oh, you know, you know, she was just being a team player. She was complicit in this for years. By the way, that doesn't mean like have her on Meet the Press. Kristen Welker's interview with her was fantastic. Just if she's a paid contributor, that, and again, for NBC,

that means every time she's on the air, you have to make sure she's not lying and you have to like fact check her. I mean, it's just ridiculous. There's also just a lot of former Trump officials at this point that you could go to that are more compelling and have more credibility and are better dialed into this world.

Yeah, that is also true. It's a real head scratcher. It's a real just. I don't think she'll be on Maddow tonight. What do you guys

think? And the CBC is going to burn her at the stake. It's going to be a live town hall. Yeah. Like Nicole Walls is

like nailing her demands to the door of 30 Rock. Yeah, they're going to drown her like a witch. Does Rana float? I guess we'll just leave it there, huh?

Yeah, it's a great place to end. Let's go to the interview with the pastor. Yeah, I was going to say, we're going to do a couple of housekeeping items before we're going to give that to Senator Warnock to make sure we hook her right to him. We had a new episode of Inside 2024 out on Thursday. Cal Penn joins

Dan and Alyssa to talk about their time in the White House together and they're going to get into just how accurate political shows like Veep and The West Wing really are. To get access to this Friends of the Pod subscription series and others, head to crooked.com slash friends now. Also, this week the

Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case that will decide the right to access the abortion pill. If you want to help support nationwide abortion freedom, you can pick up any item from Crooked's No Trespassing collection. And a portion of the proceeds will go to Vote Save America's Fuck Bans, the Fight Back Fund, which currently supports abortion rights organizations across Arizona, Nevada and Florida. When we come back, Lovett talks to Georgia Senator Raphael Warnock. Joining us in studio, a man who's won elections in the critical state of Georgia

four times in the last four years, five, if you count the primary. Five times, but who's counting? United States Senator and Pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church, Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock. Welcome back to the pod. Great to be back. It's good to see you. Last time I saw you, I was in Atlanta. Now you're in LA. That's right. Our turf. I was on your turf the last time I was on your show. I guess that's true. I was on your turf the last time I was on your show. I guess that's true. How does it feel to finally not be running in an election in Georgia?

Do you have nightmares where you wake up and you're on the ballot and you forgot and you're in your underwear and your teacher's there? Something like that. You do actually. You do wake up in the night thinking you've forgotten you're up for reelection look i i ran uh uh three years straight my name was on the ballot five times if you count the jungle primary which nobody remembers that when i entered the my first race i had 20 opponents 20 opponents i think it's easy to forget now democrats and republicans and uh here we are i I am glad that I am not running this year, but I'm very committed to making sure that we maintain our majority and the Senate hopefully expand it, flip the House,

and send Joe Biden and Kamala Harris back to the White House. Well, so one problem of you not being on the ballot is we don't have your coattails. All right, Senator, President Biden carried Georgia by under 12,000 votes, became the first Democrat to win the state in three decades. The latest polls have trumped up a couple points. What has to change for Biden to win Georgia in 2024? Well, listen, in this business, you pay attention to the polls, but I think it's a strategic error to be obsessed with the polls. I call it the polar coaster. And look, it's still relatively early in the election season. I think we'll see these polls go up and down.

And here's what we know at the end of the day. It's going to be close. Yeah. And since it's going to be close, we've got to turn our people out. We've got to help people to understand what's at stake. turn our people out. We've got to help people to understand what's at stake. And I do think that as we get closer to the election and people recognize that at the end of the day, this is a binary choice, nothing else, binary choice. And the contrast could not be more stark. The consequences and the stakes, in my view, could not be higher.

And I think that as we make that case, both about what the president has done, and it's impressive, and about the scary alternative, I believe the people of Georgia are going to do for Joe Biden what they did for me and sent him back to the White House. You see these polls and people often believe Joe Biden is ineffective in part because of age, but they also have no idea how much has gotten done. Do you find that when you're out there campaigning? How do we get the word out about some of the achievements that make Joe Biden worthy of a second term? Well, you know, Democrats aren't always that good at

talking about what we've gotten done. I think we stay really, really focused on getting things done. But here are the facts. You know, I think about this as a senator. I think about this as we consider our base. Black unemployment is at a record low. We've seen a 60% increase in Black wealth since before the pandemic. We've seen a 30-year high in the opening up of Black businesses. We've invested some $7 billion in historically Black colleges and universities. As they say, you know, in some of the neighborhoods that I move around in Atlanta, Joe Biden's got receipts. And I think the job is ours to continue to make that case. One of the things that I've been doing is that as I go and talk to rooms all across our state, lately I've been asking people if you or somebody you know has had their student debt canceled or relieved.

And believe it or not, in all the rooms I've been going to, hands go up. And in some places, as much as 60, 70% of the room. And we've done $144 billion of student debt cancellation and counting that's impacted some 4 million Americans. What does that do? It closes the racial wealth gap. What does that do? It closes the racial wealth the question is, who's working for me? Who's thinking about ordinary, hardworking people? And again, Joe Biden has receipts

and will continue to make the case. After the State of the Union, you compare Joe Biden to the boxer Joe Louis. Is that because he was feisty or because you also hope he beats the ever-loving shit out of a Nazi? Listen, he came out fighting. As I said that night, he came out fighting and he never let up. And I think he'll continue to do that through November. You know, I chastise you

for your language, except that when the Affordable Care Act passed, Joe Biden famously said that it was a big deal. A big deal of some kind. I won't say it the way he said it. I thought you were going to chastise me for calling Max Schleming a Nazi when he was simply a German who was forced to be a part of Nazi propaganda. But we don't have to get into the history. We don't have to get into the history. I said I wouldn't get it. All right. You brought up Joe Louis. I didn't bring it up. I think I said that night what my point was. Okay. The man came out fighting. He never let up. Two of the biggest black congregations in your state are working together to get out the vote.

You are pastor at Ebenezer Baptist Church, as we discussed. What do you think the role of the faith community can be, what should it be in this election? Oh, it's huge. And I think that's the case for all of our elections. I have often said that I believe that democracy is the political enactment of a spiritual idea. I really believe that, that it is born of this notion that we were created in what theologians call the imago Dei or the image of God. And if you're not given to that kind of religious language, this idea that we all have value, that we all have worth as human beings. And if I have value, then I ought to have a voice. And democracy enables that by to have a voice. And democracy enables that by giving me a vote. And so I think the faith community has an important role to play

in all times, but especially in a moment like this. It's really the soul of our country, the soul of the nation that is at stake. And we are once again at a critical inflection point, a place where two ways meet. We're somewhere between the hopes of January 5th and the peril of January 6th. We're somewhere between a nation that can send an African-American man who grew up in public housing, the first in his family to graduate from college to the United States Senate alongside a young Jewish man, the son of an immigrant, both inspired by John Lewis or that nation that says this is only for some of us. And if this diverse American electorate decides who the

president is, we're not going to let that happen. We'll shut it down even to the point of violence. And so I choose the America of January 5th. I'm aware of the reality of January 6th. And I think we can't be in denial about that. And there's a sense in which we are both of those days. We're both of them. We can't say that January 6th is not who we are. There's a sense in which we are both of those days. We're both of them. We can't say that January 6th is not who we are. There's a sense in which that's who we've always been, but we've also been January 5th. We're the latest generation of Americans who get to choose which direction we're going to go in. And I hope that the young people who are listening to this podcast and others will lean in. So you talked about people valuing themselves,

whether it's through faith or just simply finding a sense of purpose, sense of meaning. Church attendance is declining. In 2020, Gallup found that for the first time, a majority of the country no longer said they are members of a church, a mosque, or a synagogue. Do you see that in your own church? Do you see declining membership, especially among young people? And how do you explain it if you can't explain it? My church is actually growing and not declining, and it's generationally diverse.

and it's generationally diverse. And to my joy, it is increasingly racially diverse. Dr. King used to say that the most segregated hour in America was 11 o'clock Sunday morning. And I've said to my church for years that if we can't figure out a way to defy that in the church where Martin Luther King Jr. preached, I don't know where else we can do it. So we've been very intentional about that. This might come as a little bit of a surprise to you, but I don't know. I'm not as concerned about church attendance, even though I think it's

important. I think that something happens when you're part of a faith community. I think it's important. I think that something happens when you're part of a faith community. But I think if church leaders become obsessed with putting people in the seats, that's the wrong way to think about it. And in my view, it's actually the opposite of the gospel. Jesus said that if you seek to save yourself, you'll lose yourself. But if you give yourself over for my sake, if you give yourself over to something larger than you, you'll save yourself in the process. And so I think that there's a way in which this focus on institutionalism is a good way to kill an institution.

The church has to give itself over to what Jesus and all of the great faith traditions fought for, justice, mercy, compassion. Otherwise, you find yourself aligned with the powers in such a way that you actually lose your prophetic voice. And so I have spent my time at Ebenezer long before I ran for the Senate fighting for health care because I believed in it. I wasn't running for anything. I was running to get people health care. Fighting for criminal justice reform because I think it is a deep moral contradiction that the United States of America is 5% of the world's

population. We warehouse nearly 25% of the prison population in the world. The land of the world's population. We warehouse nearly 25 percent of the prison population in the world. The land of the free is the incarceration capital of the world. I think that the church has to give itself over to fighting for creation, fighting for the planet. And I think to the degree that we do that and young people see a genuine commitment to that. They may not join the church, but they'll join the movement. And I think that's what we had

long before we had a church anyway. It was actually a movement that became a church. And I invite folks every week on Sunday when I preach and through the work that I do to join the movement. talks about the fact that for the one explanation she has is that there there are a lot of people who feel like there's like churches and synagogues and temples that that do a lot of ritual that doesn't that feels disconnected and then there's people trying to appeal to people that are extreme that are more kind of radical and that that pushes young people away too but that there has to be

something in the middle i don't think anyone is saying, you know, treat church like YouTube and try to get the numbers up. You know, mentioned Marjorie Taylor Greene a couple of times, see if you can get the view count up. But we do lose something when we lose these places where people gather once a week and participate together. And there is a cost to that. And we see that all over. I agree. There is a, you know, there's an epidemic of loneliness in our country. And connected to that, people are feeling less happy and more depressed. And I think human connection is healing. There is something that happens. And so what I do say to young folks in my church on Sunday morning and in other places, and not just, you know, all kinds of people, is, you know, I often hear folks say, I'm not religious, I'm spiritual.

And I understand what they're getting at, right? Are they spiritual, though? Are they spiritual? Or did they watch a video? Well, see, I mean, I think that spirituality is tested in community. It's easy to stand up, you know, in some silo and say I'm spiritual. And I think the way to see the depth of your spirituality is to be in community with other folks who are on the spiritual journey. Because, you know, if you really want to see how deep your spirituality is,

you need to be with folks who are there and they're going to get on your nerves, with whom you're going to disagree, whom you're going to find irksome. And that's where spirituality is tested. It's tested in community. And that's part of what church or the synagogue or the temple provides for us. And and as a community of accountability. Yeah, but that's sort of what's interesting to me about it too, because, you know, people, it's a joke, right? Oh, we got to get up. We got to go to church on Sunday, or I don't want to go to temple today. It's boring. I don't want to go to this service, but there's something that happens when you do these rituals, even when you don't want to do them and part of it is just that that we are in a

society now where we are we are constantly stimulated in ways that don't require us to do the work that would normally have to be done the rituals signify that not only are you part of this living community but a community that that was there you, a great cloud of witnesses who passed on that this work of truth-telling and justice-making in the world was going on before you showed up, that someone passed that it encourages you to take the long view. I think that there is a way in which it's easy to become cynical in this moment because we've seen so much hypocrisy in politics, in religious institutions. I think the problems are so enormous that you can easily become hardened and cynical, give in to despair. But participating in these traditions, at least for me, is the recognition that long before I was fighting for health care and Medicaid expansion in Georgia, long before I was fighting for voting rights, which for me is at root about humanity, long before I was fighting for an inclusive community, a beloved community that

embraces folks, red, yellow, brown, black, and white members of the LGBTQ community. That's intentional about making sure that we celebrate the gifts and diversity that people who are differently able bring to the table, that there were folks who were having conversations about this and fighting for it long before me. And that helps me to take the long view so that when we have these moments, when there are these contractions, like what we saw between 2016 and 2020, these contractions, these steps backwards, I take the long view that says says even if we lose or have a setback in this moment, as Dr. King used to say, the arc of the moral universe is long,

but it bends toward justice. It is what gives me hope to keep bending that arc. So last week, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called for Benjamin Netanyahu to be removed from office. He opened the door to conditioning military aid to Israel, at least opened the door to doing that in the future. On Monday, the U.S. abstained from a vote at the U.N. Security Council, which allowed for passage of a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and for the release of hostages. You said Israel has a right to defend itself. You've called for a negotiated ceasefire in Gaza and for the release of hostages. You said Israel has a right to defend itself. You've called for a negotiated ceasefire and spoken out against the unfolding humanitarian catastrophe. Half of Gaza is on the brink of starvation. Aid cannot reach people, including children who need it. Israel is threatening to invade Rafah, where over a million Palestinians

have taken refuge. You've called that morally unjustifiable. You signed on to an amendment to require that any country receiving weapons to use them in accordance with U.S. and international law. What will it take for Congress to use what leverage it has by conditioning aid to Israel? And I know the politics are complex, but how does it make sense morally that we make demands with our statements, that we beseech with our words, but we don't make demands with the resources we provide. Well, I think with the letter that you saw that I and several others signed on to, you see us doing just that, exploring all the ways in which

we use the tools we have to get our ally to do what is necessary to honor the humanity of Palestinian children and to recognize that Palestinian children are every bit as precious as Israeli children. And so that's the work that I've been trying to do as a moral leader, that somehow we've got to center humanity in this. You got me on this faith part of the conversation, which always informs the work that I do. But since we're on this path, there's a scripture where Isaiah says that the lion shall lie down next to the lamb and a little child shall lead them.

I must say to you that that's always felt and sounded a little idyllic to me. What does that mean? Gaza, I've thought about the fact that adversaries and people who are on different sides of a conflict, here's the thing they have in common. They all love their children. And if somehow we can look into the eyes of other people's children and see our own, of other people's children and see our own. If we actually believed that the ability of other people's children to thrive is inextricably connected to the future of our own, what set of choices would we make? I think that's what the prophet meant when he said that a little child shall lead them. And so we've seen just devastation that is unspeakable. First with,

not first, but in recent months with October 7th, we can't turn our eyes away from what happened and the death that happened, the sheer human cruelty, sexual violence used as a weapon of war, elderly people, little babies and children taking the kind of gratuitous violence and brutality of it all. We can't turn away from that, but we also cannot turn away from the devastation that we've seen in the wake of that. of that. There's an acronym they use in Gaza that basically says, wounded child with no surviving family. I can't think of a worse place to be in the world, a worse hand to be dealt coming into the world than to be a wounded child with no surviving family. And so I'm doing the things that I can, and I'm actively looking for ways in which we can continue to use all the tools that we have to get us on a path that leads to peace.

Here's what I know. Increasing death and devastation will not end death and devastation. And so we've got to get on another road. And I hope that somehow people on both sides of that conflict, that all of us can tap into the best of our faith and moral traditions. that we can tap into these traditions, center the children, and find our way to a two-state solution that honors the humanity of Palestinian children and Israeli children. You're talking about empathy and the need to show empathy. And one thing I actually talked about this with Rabbi Bross as well, is that people who do not feel safe

are not in a position to show as much empathy. That empathy is something that is easier to display when you are safe. It is all well and good to say, oh, we hope that these two sides show empathy to one another. But right now, Israel's planning this invasion of Rafah. And afterwards, there may be time for peace. But right now, we believe it is not only a moral horror, but not in Israel's long-term interest to pursue that path,

that it pushes peace, it pushes a two-state solution, it pushes resolution, it pushes safety further away. How do we use our leverage right now to prevent that from happening so that we're not talking about the importance of empathy after we have even more death, after another 10, 20, 30,000 people, innocent people have died? There's no question that there's a moral urgency to all of this, which is why when I gave the floor speech on the floor of the United States Senate calling for a ceasefire, I said in no uncertain terms that I think it's a mistake, that it would be a grave moral error for Netanyahu to escalate this conflict and to go into Rafah. to escalate this conflict and to go into Rafah. Palestinian people, in a sense, did what they were told to do. And you've got 1.5 million Palestinians sheltering in Rafah.

Now to bomb the very area where they were told to go is unimaginable to me. And the relief agencies that are on the ground are saying this. These are folks who don't have a political bone in this fight. They're predicting that this could mean that we'd lose some 85,000 Palestinians on top of the 30,000 that have already been killed. We're talking not only about empathy, but enlightened self-interest. It would be devastating for the people of Gaza. And yes, it would push us further away from peace.

I know there are those who say, well, what are we going to do about Hamas, which is a terrorist organization bent on the destruction of Israel? I take that seriously. But if the legacy of the attack on October 7th becomes continuing escalating violence in turn, then Hamas will have already won. Hamas is not just an organization. In fact, I think the ideology is much more dangerous, much more lethal, especially now than the organization. It is an ideology that lies in a place deeper than any of the tunnels beneath Gaza. And somehow we've got to disrupt that mindset.

that we will use all the diplomatic tools that we have, that we will use the pressure that we have. Israel is a sovereign state. We respect its sovereignty. But as you point out, as we provide the resources for Israel, we have a right and I think a moral obligation to ensure that what happens with the resources, with the weapons, is consistent with American values and that we have an ability to speak with moral authority and credibility in the world. That's important for the long-term national security of our country and for the prospects of peace,

not only in this conflict, but in conflicts in the future. Switching gears, one thing I wanted to ask you about, there's this bill to ban TikTok, well, to force TikTok to be sold, to pass the house. It does seem as though there's these behind closed doors briefings about how terrifying the invasion of privacy is by this Chinese-owned company. And that's why the house passed this bill to force a sale or the app would be banned. We, as the free American people using apps on our phone as we choose, don't have the classified briefing.

Have you been in these briefings? Where are you on TikTok? Do you want ByteDance to sell it? Do you want to support something that forces them to sell it? You know, I thought you would be kind to me. This is the most controversial thing

you've asked me about all day. We've got to talk about TikTok, really? Yeah, do we? My thing about it is that just if it's really dangerous, tell us. Listen, so... You don't want to get blamed on TikTok. You don't want to get ripped to pieces.

You're a man of God. And you're afraid of these teens. You're a teen-fearing man. For the first time, I am hearing from a 13-year-old constituent in Georgia. All right. Well, they can't vote. And they're reminding me that the next time I'm up, they will be able to vote. Oh, that's true.

That's interesting. That's interesting. That's interesting. That's interesting. Well, but but but but just here. Have you been in these closed door classified briefings? If the American people got to see what members of Congress had seen, would they be more alarmed? Would they be would they throw their phones away? What would happen? I have. And what I have seen is concerning. It gives me pause. And there's a way in which we have been getting this information now over the last few years. And so I do think it's important for Congress to act, but I also think it's important for us to act in a thoughtful way. And so this is not a politician's answer. My 13-year-old constituents and my seven-year-old daughter at home notwithstanding, I do think that we need to act in a thoughtful way. So, you know, I'm looking at the various proposals. There's more than one way to think

about how to respond to this. But there's a way in which, as you point out, it's that classic balance between national security, on the other hand, and the values that we have around freedom and expression and all of that on the other hand. And both of those things have to be protected. and all of that on the other hand. And both of those things have to be protected. So we'll see where we land. All right, last question. You show up to church and there sitting in the front row,

hands folded in his lap, Donald Trump. You have your sermon. Are you just giving your sermon as prepared? Are you throwing it out? Are you talking to him directly? What do you think he would say? You don't know why he's there.

You don't know if he's had some big change of heart or something. We're Ebenezer Baptist Church and the Church of Dr. King, and we're a church. So any and everybody is welcome to the church. And I think that in my case, I wouldn't have to change the sermon, because if you heard me on Sunday morning and the things that I tend to talk about, I'm sure there'll be plenty for him and others to consider. Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock, a God-fearing, a teen-fearing man. Thank you so much for your time today. I really appreciate it.

Great to be here with you. All right. Thanks to Senator Warnock for joining us, and we'll have another episode for you guys on Wednesday. Take care. If you want to get ad-free episodes, exclusive content, and more, consider joining our Friends of the Pod subscription community

at crooked.com slash friends. And if you're already ad-free episodes, exclusive content, and more, consider joining our Friends of the Pod subscription community at crooked.com slash friends. And if you're already doom-scrolling, don't forget to follow us at Pod Save America on Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube for access to full episodes, bonus content, and more. Plus, if you're as opinionated as we are, consider dropping us a review. Pod Save America is a Crooked Media production. Our show is produced by Olivia Martinez and David Toledo. Our associate producers are Saul Rubin and Farah Safari. Kira Wakeem is our senior producer. Thank you.