Pod Save America - Tucker’s War With Fox

Episode Date: May 9, 2023

Joe Biden gets some rough polling as he prepares for a debt ceiling showdown with Republicans. Donald Trump offers no defense as a jury decides the rape and defamation case against him. Tucker Carlson goes to war with Fox News. Diane Feinstein is still MIA as Clarence Thomas scandals pile up. Then later, Pod Save the UK host Nish Kumar talks to Tommy about King Charles’ coronation and UK politics. For a closed-captioned version of this episode, click here. For a transcript of this episode, please email [e-mail] and include the name of the podcast.

Welcome to Pod Save America. I'm Jon Favreau. I'm Priya Zepic John Lovett. I'm Tommy Vitor. Welcome to Pod Save America. I'm Jon Favreau. I'm Priya Zepic John Lovett. I'm Tommy Vitor. On today's show, Joe Biden gets some rough polling as he prepares for his debt ceiling showdown with Republicans. Donald Trump offers no defense as a jury decides the rape and defamation case against him.

Tucker Carlson goes to war with Fox News. And Dianne Feinstein is still MIA as Clarence Thomas scandals pile up. Then later, the host of Pod Save the UK, Nish Kumar, talks to Tommy about King Charles' coronation and a whole bunch of other stuff. We talked coronation. We talked about politics. They just had a bunch of elections. What does that mean for the Labour Party? There's a lot of shared challenges right now between the Labour Party and the UK.

That's pundit hacking up a bone. It's the Labour Party in the UK and the Democratic Party over here. we uh you know misery left company so we talked about it so tommy talks to nish and all of you should check out the very first episode of pod save the uk it's up now the number one podcast in the uk the number one podcast in the uk it is funny it is insightful It is a joy to listen to. Please go subscribe wherever you get your podcasts and check out the first episode. All right, let's get to the news. Joe Biden got a suboptimal poll from the Washington Post and ABC over the weekend that has him losing to Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis among all adults by seven points, 49 to 42% for Trump and 48 to 41% for DeSantis. That's if you push leaners,

people who are leaning one way or the other. The president's approval is at a record low of 36% in the poll, which is down from 42% in February and 63% say he doesn't have the mental sharpness to serve effectively as president. That's up from 43% in 2020. Not great news in the poll for Trump either. A majority think he's a liar who should face multiple criminal charges. Though about a quarter of all independents who support charging Trump say they would still vote for him over Biden. I'd like to talk to some of those people. Yeah, the people that he should be in jail and president.

Really just dumbfounding. That's your independent swing voter for you you know and we love them god love them god love them god love make the world go around they think they're listening uh anyway great news no uh any evidence this is an outlier i feel like you just recited some does anyone want to unskew the poll yeah first of all we should stipulate that we don't yell at polls here they're inanimate objects they did nothing wrong they did nothing to you they're just data sets, look, here's what I would also say. You know, unskew so you can sleep at night, but spend all day thinking that they're,

they're pretty real. But if we were to yell at some polls, it is weird that 56% say they would, that Trump should face criminal charges, but 49% say they'd vote for him. That doesn't, that seems challenging to make work. Other, other sort of, I don't know, I wouldn't say it unscues the poll, but gives you reason to believe that it's less, it's, it's, you can step a little bit, you can step back off the ledge a tiny bit is that it says he's 26, he has 26% approval among under 30, 42% among non-whites, 41% among urban residents, 46% amongst those with no religious affiliation. These would be people that may not approve of the job Joe Biden is doing right now.

But these are, don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative types. That was my one sign for hope. What do you got? I'm looking for something here. It's a very bad poll. Trump's winning young people. Biden's winning old people. That doesn't make a lot of sense either. It's all just sort something here. It's a very bad poll. Trump's winning young people. Biden's winning old people. That doesn't make a lot of sense either.

It's all just sort of weird. It's confusing. Here's what to do. Throw it in the average. Yeah. Sure. Okay. 538 it.

538 it. Well, yeah. We were going to do that after the conversation, but we still got stuff to do before the mattress ad. So the average has Biden's approval steady around 42, 43 percent. So no sudden upticks or downticks in the approval rating for Biden. So it's a little higher than the 36 percent in this poll, though, you know, the Quinnipiac poll in terms of like high quality polls. First of all, they haven't been many for 2024 yet yet but the Quinnipiac has him at like 37

the Wall Street Journal NBC one had him at 42 so it's in the range the difference is is that Biden's horse race number is higher in those other polls than it is here and Trump's higher now they did push leaners at the regular poll was like I think Trump only got 45 or 46 percent when they didn't push leaners and 45 46% is what Trump has received in the last two elections. Yeah. You said that this doesn't have a lot of good news for Trump either, which is true, but it sort of fits with where Trump always is, which is just he always has very bad polling that kind of fits with where this was at. The one thing that I pulled out that I did think was worth talking about is it said 33% say Trump is honest, 63% say he's not. That's that is where Trump has always been on the honesty mark. But

Biden is only at 41% saying that he's honest and trustworthy, while 54% say he's not. In the lead up to 2020, that was, if not flipped close to it. And that has been dropping pretty steadily. And to me is like a really, like put it put aside the actual kind of horse race numbers, the comparisons, all the rest, the fact that there's been that drop in honesty and trustworthiness, when that is, I think, one of his big selling points. And one of the ways he's sort of ridden sort of waves of disapproval is was alarming to me. I got to check with Obama, because I do think that for a lot of presidents, they're honest and trustworthy numbers tend to go down over the course of the eight. Do you have an AI thing ready?

Oh, no, no. Imagine if I just had a soundboard. You have the face that you have when you're ready to introduce a bit to us, which I was really excited. Yeah, I mean, look, it has been steadily going down. And that is probably just a result of people just being disappointed with the difference between what a candidate sounds like and what a president sounds like, which is of course true. But like you look at Obama over eight years and even when his disapproval dropped, there were certain metrics of his sort of personal likability that kind of stayed buoyant, which was a protection against

people like Mitt Romney, for example. And I don't know, that was just nerve wracking to me. So easily could be a bad sample, bad poll, or could be right, we don't know. The RCP average has Trump leading by one with this poll in it. So either way, it's gonna be a close fucking race. That's a long time. Right?

A lot of undecideds. Trump is once again around 45, 46, right? When you don't push leaners, which is always where he's been. And if it's just Trump and Biden, then, you know, probably a little better for Biden. But again, we get third parties in there

and suddenly it could be 2016 and Trump doesn't have to get much higher than 45, 45%. That RFK Jr. magic. Or fucking no labels and whether they're going to Joe Manchin or Kyrsten Sinema or someone else.

And a lot of the drop in here is not just independents, but Democrats. Yeah, that's and that one that one's probably most easily fixable. I will say it's hard to, you know, the 60 percent saying he's not doesn't have the acuity viewing Trump as having being more kind of up to the job. Yes, you say that. That may be a little more nervous than the honest and trustworthy ones even. I don't like either. Yeah, that's great. I mean, instead of just so instead of just complaining about we don't like either. Like, look over there. They're going to destroy the economy with a debt ceiling. They're going to do nothing to stop guns, gun violence. They're going to take your freedoms away. The key is the choice. It's Joe versus the wackos. And when we don't have a Republican nominee yet, it's very hard to do that.

And I think Trump, it's, you know, I think like the political press and a lot of people that are very engaged are paying attention to the ongoing legal machinations. But there's nothing compared to a campaign. And he really is out of the limelight in a lot of ways. And you see that kind of even in this poll, like just like places where his just approval rating has gone back up. Like he had this sort of immovable approval on the economy that basically stayed pretty high up until the pandemic and then started dropping. And now it's kind of back up to where it was pre-pandemic. And all of this is a really and it's the it's I hate to say it like absence makes the heart grow fonder and it sucks. But oh, you said with Trump, with Trump. Yeah. Yeah, I think I can't tell. I mean, I think that I feel like opinions about Trump are pretty hardened, but that the campaign is going to hinge on reminding people how awful he is. Right. Which is not hard to do. Sometimes he just opens his mouth and does it.

of, like you said, legal issues that he's dealing with that will, again, shine a light on who he is as a person. I think for Biden, Tommy's right that it's all a choice. It's all about why Trump is crazy. It's all about why the Republicans are extreme. But in terms of his own personal style, I think Biden's got to really flood the zone with being in people's faces all the time. I think that stepping back when you're the challenger to Donald Trump and Donald Trump's president and you don't really Biden's just the alternative to what you don't like right now. I think that works. I think it's tougher when you're the incumbent, as Joe Biden is. And if there's a lot of people who they when they only they only hear from Joe Biden when there's some right wing tick tock of him seeming old, then they're going to have a bad opinion of him. Right. And I think the only way to combat that is Joe Biden out there all the time, showing some energy, being loose, being with people. Right. He's he's really good one on one with people, whether it's town halls, whether it's

meeting people on rope lines. Like, I think all of this, if I was running a campaign, this is what I would, I'm sure the Biden people are thinking about all this. Like, this is what I would do. We were just talking about the Correspondence Center speech last week. And his delivery was really good. And he was having fun. And also when he's in fighting mode, too, when he's like talking about Donald Trump, talking about the threats of democracy, he tends to have a lot of energy there, too.

I think that reminds people that he's got a fighting spirit too. I think there's ways to help combat the perception that he is too old. Yeah, I'm sure they're very frustrated because I think the economy has added 13 million jobs or just shy of 13 million jobs since he took office. Unemployment is at record lows, like three and a half percent. You're reading all these announcements about companies literally opening manufacturing plants in Georgia and other places because of tax credits in the IRA, but he doesn't seem to be getting any credit for it. So I agree with you. He's got to be out more. I do think it's good advice, but I think there's limits to how many people are actually going to hear about these stories just because of the way the media

works. So hard. So, you know, that's why it's just a volume. I'd be like big shoes, big shoes. So hard. So, you know. That's why it's just a volume. I'd be like, big shoes. Big shoes. It is quantity at some point, right? Because it is so, getting attention, even when you're president of the United States in this media environment, it's just harder, you know?

Yeah. And doing a typical event where you're just going and touting some manufacturing jobs, like it's just, that won't get you the attention anymore. You got to keep, and I think it's, it's not only what Joe Biden has done, but that he continues to show

this like fighting spirit on behalf of working people. He did this today. On Monday, he announced new regulations with Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg that would require airlines

to compensate customers beyond a ticket refund if there's a delay or canceled flight. Love this. Love this. This is good stuff. They should do some fun stuff with this to, again, really get some attention. I love the fee stuff.

People aren't going to know that. Now, the problem is it's not going to take effect for like months, if years. Sure. Don't harsh my vibe. The rulemaking process. The rulemaking process. I love it. It's a great idea.

Integrated character IP life enhancement via airlines. Creative communities, infinite freedom. Don't just give me a voucher. Fork over some extra cash. I love that. Go to an airport. Why didn't we do more of this? Going after these terrible monopolistic companies

is a great idea. Do it every day, Joe. We did a passenger bill of rights, but it didn't quite go as far as this. We did the if airlines overbook and that you get kicked off a plane because of the overbooking, then they have to pay you like double the money. And we said they couldn't leave you on the tarmac for more than eight hours or something. So, you know, there was that jet flight that went fully kind of Lord of the Flies. But Biden out there fighting against corporations on behalf of working people over and over again.

That's that's good stuff. Yes. That's good stuff. And just, you know, let's get him out there meeting people between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. That's the sweet spot. Get him out there. Sun shining, birds chirping, ice cream in his hand. And joke.

And he should be joking about his age all the time. Yeah. He did it at the correspondence center. He should do it some more. I'm older than the trees. He said something about his 280-year career. That's great.

The other day, which is really funny. Do that. I like it. All right. Donald Trump still has a few bumps on his road back to the White House.

New York Times reports that in the classified documents investigation, Special Counsel Jack Smith has obtained cooperation from a secret witness who worked at Mar-a-Lago, and he's also issued a new wave of subpoenas including for records related to trump's business dealings with saudi arabia his name juan jr with a little mustache

you get it that's funny um also after the leader of the proud boys and three others were convicted of seditious conspiracy congressman uh jamie rask Raskin told Jen Psaki over the weekend that Trump could absolutely face the same charges. And jurors have just heard closing arguments in the rape and defamation case brought by the writer E. Jean Carroll against Trump, who not only turned down a second last minute chance to testify, but presented no defense in the case whatsoever. None. testify but presented no defense in the case whatsoever none well just so people understand so the reason there was the second chance to testify is that when he was opening up a golf course in scotland he did the thing he always does which is i could testify happily testify love to testify and the judge was like okay he said they said i'm coming back home i gotta go back home to testify i have to leave the country early i have to leave ireland earlier wherever i

was going to go testify and the judge was like okay you weren't going to do that and then the judge's like okay tell me by 5 p.m if you're going to want to. And the judge was like, okay. And he was just like, you weren't going to do that. And then the judge was like, okay, tell me by 5 p.m. if you're going to want to testify. No, no, no. And they're like, oh, no, no. Of course not. What are you, crazy? Very strange.

So the jurors did get to watch video of Trump's deposition from October, which we have some clips from. Let's listen. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything. That's what you

said, correct? Well, historically, that's true with stars. It's true with stars that they can grab women by the pussy? Well, that's what, if you look over the last million years, I guess that's been largely true. Not always, but largely true. Unfortunately or fortunately. When you said in that video that Ms. Leeds would not be your first choice, you were referring to her physical looks, correct? Just the overall, not my, I look at her, I see her, I hear what she says, whatever.

You wouldn't be a choice of mine either, to be honest with you. I hope you're not insulted. I would not, under any circumstances, have any interest in you. I'm honest when I say it. It's just such an awful view. So disgusting. Unfortunately or fortunately. I mean, a lot of these are things he's said before, but he just compounds it any way he can by just being the most disgusting human being in these depositions. You know, it's things he's said before, but I will just say I know that we're all inert to this now because we've had a lot of years of Donald Trump.

But I will just say, I know that we're all a nerd to this now because we've had a lot of years of Donald Trump. But let's remember when the Access Hollywood tape comes out and Donald Trump actually gives the, remember the live on air apology he does? That is, you know, this is not what I meant, blah, blah, blah. Now, it's just like January 6th. He's long gone past, oh, I didn't say that or that was just a joke. And now he says, oh, no, what I said was true. What I said was true and it was good. It was good. That's what you do get to do that if you're a joke. And now he says, oh, no, what I said was true. What I said was true and it was good. It was good.

That's what you do. You do get to do that if you're a celebrity. When he makes it worse and he insults the lawyer and she's, yeah, it sounds awful. We'll leave the legal consequences of Trump's actions to juries of his peers. It does seem like the political consequences of all these cases could be a bit more damaging for Trump than the hush money case. But what do you guys think of all these developments that have popped up recently? There's a lot of, I mean, certainly this conversation we're having right now reminds you there's just a ton of legal uncertainty swirling around him as a person around the campaign. And the fact that DeSantis and all the other opponents can't seem to get it together to leverage not just what he actually did, but the

kind of political risk is, you know, another indictment of how bad they are running against him. Yeah. I'd also just say that deposition interview footage always looks bad. Really bad. It always just, it has that just sort of- It has a feel to it. It has a feel to it, as does all kind of hidden camera footage always going to feels bad. I don't know what the impact of this specific case

will be a year and a half from now, but what are his two lowest moments as a candidate and president? I'd say one of them is around the Access Hollywood table. I'd say the three lowest moments. One is Access Hollywood, second is the healthcare vote, and the third is the insurrection.

You'd probably say those are the three. I definitely include trying to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power. i don't even mean obviously but i mean in terms of like the public the public reaction to him where you know like we just talked about how robust and like how stable his polling always is and like what are the things that managed to kind of like pull that clothesline down a little to weigh it down it was access hollywood it was healthcare uh and it was the insurrection And this is as bad as that ever was, even though we are all fucking desensitized to it. I realized that this is incredibly hackish of me. But when I saw that deposition footage, my first thought was ads, Democratic super PAC,

if I was a Democratic super PAC out there, I would throw some of that deposition footage in an ad and test it first, you know, test it for in front of voters, focus groups, see how it goes. But I would bet, particularly after talking to Celinda Lake on this show a couple weeks ago, that this would break through. She said that this case is breaking through. And a lot of her research, especially among women, especially among young women, says something about our society, of course, that it's not getting as much coverage as the Hashwani case. I realize it's a civil lawsuit, not criminal, but it's a pretty big deal if a jury decides that a former president is a rapist for the first time. Yeah. I mean, I think it's getting less coverage

because it's just different phases of the trial. I mean, similarly, in the Mar-a-Lago case, I've always wondered whether people would really care whether or not he took classified documents. But when you start to read about how the FBI is looking, they're talking to his staff to see if they were directed to hide or move things after the subpoenas came through or if they deleted footage of what happened. That feels like a big deal. I mean, like Jack Smith is flinging subpoenas like a blackjack dealer down there. Like the whole staff has now been subpoenaed. Both of the Calamaris, who can forget the Calamaris?

It's a double Calamari. Matthew Calamari Sr. and Jr. I think the plural of Calamari is Calamari. I think you might be right. Here's my favorite. I think one of them is a double calamari. Matthew Calamari Sr. and Jr. I think the plural of calamari is calamari. I think you might be right. Here's my favorite. I think one of them is a calamaro. My favorite anecdote from this New York Times story about the Mar-a-Lago case was, among the information they have gathered in interviews,

concerned his habit of flushing material down toilets, according to a person familiar with the matter. And I just love the idea of some very serious fbi agent like asking questions be like number one so this goes down the shooter as well it's a yellow lead amela okay number two uh tommy can you give us your take on the uh the potential saudi connection here it was just sort of slipped in as weird paragraph 20 of the new york times story it's like oh by the way there's a subpoena for trump's business dealings with the saudis over their their golf venture yeah i don't know what to make of that. And I've never really

believed that. You want to red string it for us? Yep. They never really believed that Trump took a bunch of classified documents to sell them to some other country or anything like that. But if you were looking for a way to trade this information to, let's say, the Saudi government for cash, it does like uh having the live golf tournament host a bunch of uh matches or whatever they're calling them they call something different at his clubs would be a great way yeah to launder that money great way to get his beak wet unbelievable we didn't even also talk about the fact that they've uh given immunity to a bunch of the fake electors oh yeah which uh. Which, like... Yeah, those people...

They all got immunity deals. They got immunity, so what do they know? And why are we giving... And where... Finney Willis hasn't given out immunity for free. And what those people did

was very serious, very illegal, and very wrong. And so, you know, who are the people you're going after? There's not very many above the electors

that aren't named Donald Trump. As Tommy pointed out, one person who's still not taking advantage of any of this is Ron DeSantis, who's busy dealing with more of his own bad press. ABC obtained video of Tiny D's debate prep sessions from his 2018 race for governor,

where an advisor suggested that when he gets to the podium, he should write the word LIKEABLE in all caps at the top of his notepad. You can also see Matt Gaetz telling DeSantis to tone it down during prep and DeSantis struggling with how to avoid pissing off Trump's voters. Let's listen. Has the NRA donated to me? I don't think the NRA is quite the boogeyman the Democrats think it is.

Do we hit him on guns or just everyone who cares about guns is going to vote for me? Is there any issue upon which you disagree with President Trump? Obviously there is because I've voted contrary to him in the caucus. I have to frame it in a way that's not going to piss off all his voters. So what I do is I do what I think is right. I support his agenda in terms of what he's been able to do. If I have a disagreement, I talk to him in private. I think when you walk up there, the other pad, you have to write in all caps at the top of the pad,

like a book. And I do the same thing because I have the same personality. We're both aggressive. walk up there at the other pad you have to write in all caps at the top of the pad likeable and then look i do the same thing because i have the same personality we're both aggressive i see the same thing do the same thing do you guys think it's a good sign for your political prospects when the person advising you on likability is uh matt gates matt gates is dressed like he's gonna go sell nitrous balloons at a dave matthews concert he's wearing like nirvana flip-flops and a too tight t-shirt. Matt Gaetz is telling you to tone it down? Yeah, that's it.

This fucking guy? Matt Gaetz is like, here's how to be likable. Can we just be honest? Take it from me, Matt Gaetz. It's not bad advice. No. It's such pretty good advice

from Matt Gaetz. The whole thing like seems kind of normal and more reasonable and I don't know, even DeSantis kind of seems smarter about politics but he comes off

as very angry about everything. That fucking voice of his. You might say he comes off as a little sanctimonious he comes off like the mars attacks aliens the other it reminded me of something which is um the way which they're trying to corral this fucking humorless stale voiced whiny, whiny, awful personality candidate to being a likable politician. When I was first working on The Hill, I worked for a senator named John Corzine,

much more likable than Ron DeSantis, but he was just, he was like a finance guy. Public speaking was not his forte, and they like, very early on, they wanted him to come up with jokes or have like be funny, and they brought me into speech prep. And I just remember realizing how far we were from jokes because one of the pieces of advice was,

it would be helpful if you stopped rolling up the speech and using that to scratch your beard while you're talking. Write that one at the top of the notepad. That's what that reminded me of. But saying write likable on your notepad is so goddamn funny. It's terrible advice. Well, you can't just be like you can remind yourself to be likable. You are or you are not. When George H.W. Bush was running against Bill Clinton, Bill Clinton was obviously more likable and more compassionate and more able to relate to people. And so there's a famous moment where George H.W. Bush says something about grocery prices and he goes, message, I care. And that was not

the part. That was subtext. He was supposed to show, not tell. It was like saying your name here. Yeah. I think there was something revealing when Gates is telling him, oh, you were too aggressive in what you just said. What he was referring to is during debate prep remember back in the 2018 race uh at one point uh DeSantis says all right Florida don't monkey this up by voting for Andrew Gillum and everyone took it as a racist statement and so in debate prep they hit him with that they hit DeSantis with that and he basically was like yeah I was pretty hot in response to that but what I learned from Kavanaugh is you can never even show a hint of weakness on these things or even seem apologetic at all. You've got to just go hard and seem angry. And that's the only way to do it because otherwise our base

will think that we're weak. And that is the lesson that all of them have learned. Yeah. That is the whole lesson of the Trump era. Never apologize. Act like an asshole. And you can get through it. It's just. But he sounds so whiny. So whiny. He's a big whiner. And he's resting dumb face. And the whole thing.

I mean. Yeah. It's a weird debate staff. I mean, Matt Gaetz is running your debate prep. That's just a strange decision. Yeah. And now he's for Trump. So, yeah.

Well, I mean, that must worry them. I mean, these kinds of tapes leaking, I don't know if I've ever heard of that happening before. That's a pretty big breach. Like debate prep is kind of like an inner circle, kind of sacred space. That shit doesn't leak. So in Gates goes from DeSantis guy to Trump supporter, sycophant.

DeSantis had a big split with Susie Wiles, who was running his campaign at the time. She's now working for Trump. I would be sitting there thinking, oh my God, what else are they sitting on? That's cool. Yeah. Big week in D.C. Joe Biden has his first debt ceiling meeting with the four top leaders in congress at the white house today just in time a couple weeks away from default yeah janet yell it is just it's just uh just white knuckling on a toilet somewhere just fucking anxiety for fucking days she's not what's she on a toilet janllen hasn't had a solid shit in two weeks oh my god just saying she's anxious you can't hear that on any other podcast no other media you're not getting that on msnbc oh my god uh this comes after 43 republican senators signed

a letter over the weekend saying they will not support a debt ceiling increase without substantial cuts of the kind the house passed meanwhile kevin mccarthy and leadership aides are trying to tamp down expectations within their caucus about what would constitute a win for Republicans, since his most extreme members are saying they won't vote for anything less than the House bill. Are we just headed for a either default or a less crazy version of the House bill? Is it still possible at this point for Biden to get a clean increase? Is any kind of deal possible? What do you guys think? I would say, first of all, I think to get 43 Senate Republicans together to say anything close to this, it had to be vague and purposely vague. So what they say is they're united behind

the House Republican Conference in support of spending cuts and structural budget reforms as a starting point for negotiations on the debt ceiling. That leaves a lot of room to maneuver and that they won't vote for cloture on any bill that raises the debt ceiling without substantive spending and budget reforms, which also gives you a lot of space um 50 shades of gray the starting point was fan fiction about twilight you can go very far from your starting point it's just something to think about though it was it was vague but still they didn't get uh they didn't get romney collins or murkowski to sign on to that letter uh they didn't you're right so i don't know they got

40 they wait i feel like they got to they got to they got above 40 and they pat themselves on the back i think what what the republicans have done which is smart here in the senate is they're like we cannot leave at least at this point we can't leave mccarthy out to dry he got this pass through the house we've got to lock arms with mccarthy we can't have any daylight between the senate and the house republicans otherwise we're not going to get anything out of Biden. That's to me, that seems what that letter is about. I would say it's getting getting this off. This says where the the Senate Republicans are. I don't know that this is something that puts any more pressure on Biden than what he already was facing. But I think publicly it answers the mail on what McConnell's been getting asked over

and over again. Yeah. I'm just still caught up on that, you know, previous comment about the Treasury. I mean, I guess good news, bad news, good news. You can't really get much worse than a one point five trillion dollar debt limit extension for less than a year for five trillion in cuts. So baby steps to better. Well, you know, I still don't see a path forward, though. The reason I mentioned on the McCarthy side, what we saw in Playbook today, that he's tamping down expectations, is there were some senior Republican aides in the House who were like, if we just get the unspent COVID funds and permitting reform, that's a win. And I'm like, yeah, oh, no, don't get that. That would be horrible. We can't get that out. It's a reminder that with the House Republicans, some of them play crazy, some of them aren't crazy.

And some of the ones that play crazy are just, like, a little bit nervous with some of the ones that are, hey, like, I'm visiting this asylum. I don't fucking live here with you people. But, yeah. I do think, though, like, I don't see a clean increase happening at this point. Because forget about the 43 Republicans. You also got Joe Manchin and you're dealing with the Senate. Forget about the House at this point? Because forget about the 43 Republicans. You also got Joe Manchin, you're dealing with the Senate. Forget about the House at this point. Getting a clean increase through the Senate seems like it's very difficult at this point. I also think a lot of this is

semantics. Like, I don't know what, like, if, like, for example, we don't know what's going to come out of a conversation with McCarthy and Biden tomorrow. But one thing potentially is some sort of a framework that is a short- term debt ceiling extension with some kind of cap on spending that kicks you to a negotiation over government shutdown. Plus that Biden gets to call that a clean raise to get you to the field, to the to the negotiation to track strategy. It's right. And so but like, did Biden get a clean debt limit increase in that case? Yes. No. I think the semantics fall apart when you tie it to another negotiation. increase in that case? Yes. No. I think the semantics fall apart when you tie it to another negotiation. We need a bipartisan coalition of reporters, TV broadcasters, podcasters to come together and say, we're sick of talking about this. It is so boring. It makes us want to die.

Please just fix it so we don't have to talk about this again. You know who's going to help us with that? Our audiences. People keep saying it's boring. I'm interested. I think the gamesmanship is kind of interesting. I think it's fascinating. It's a lot of game theory stuff. Yeah, it's game theory. It's real negotiations. Who are you to? It's real snakes.

It happened to my friends. I think what's also exciting to me about a two-track strategy is you get to do something that's, I think, classically American, which is you kick the can down the road and raise the stakes, which is a classic American move. Kick the can, raise the stakes. Procrastinate and make it worse we're at season six and everyone's lost the plot it's west world all over again it's west it's west world all over all over again it's all again anyway your mind is the scene of the crime speaking

entertainment different thing axios reports that tucker carlson is about to go to war with fox news in order to get out of his contract which is basically paying him 20 million dollars to not work for any competitor or himself until 2025. Tucker's apparently thinking about starting his own media venture. He's approached Elon Musk about working together. Of course he did. And a friend said that when it comes to Fox, Tucker, quote, knows where a lot of bodies are buried

and is ready to start drawing a map. I don't keep saying this thing that like, what fucking bodies over there what what do we not know about this heinous right-wing fascist organization actual bodies like is it actual corpses because it because it actually what it feels like what fox news feels like right now they bury roger ailes under the uh under the newsroom like how how how it's felt watching this over the last like six months is like uh a graveyard after a hurricane and all the bodies have kind of come fully up already.

Like what bodies are left? I'm crushing it today. I'm crushing it today. Here's what I know. What do you know? Every generation needs a hero. Your Ellsbergs, Daniel. Oh my God.

Your Brockoviches, Aaron. All right. You could be that. Tucker, Serpico and a bow tie. Tell the truth. The way in which Aaron Brockovich, Serpico and Ells tie tell the truth the way in which aaron brockovich serpico and ellsberg are so different and just different analogies tell the truth tell your truth tucker tell me i have i have an i have a different take oh wow i want fox news to win this one you've

always been a fox fan because to love its point what else is tucker really going to do to fox that they haven't already done to themselves through various uh depositions and uh discovery processes over the last several months but if fox can somehow stop tucker from having a platform for the next two years i think that's a win for all of us i think that's great yeah that's where i'm at too i want i want fox to just hold the line on this uh on this um fascist non-compete. We're with you, Murdochs. Keep the faith. Jokes aside, I think what I'm most interested in

in all of this is which mainstream media outlets are willing to uncritically print everything Tucker's lawyer says. Bodies are buried. I got bare knuckle brawlers standing by to fight. Allies, friends, sources close to Tucker. Everyone is offering Tucker money. I mean,

the amount of posturing going on in these news stories that are just going unquestioned is notable. I, one of the, one of the reports was said that Daily Wire

was like, I've been waiting for the fucking Tucker Carlson, Tucker Carlson caravan and the Ben Shapiro caravan. Those places, those people should

meet in the middle. I mean, there is, look, Tucker Carlson will wind up on a Rumble or a Daily Wire type type outlet i think the question really is whether his non-compete prevents him from going to 60 minutes a news washington new york times com

cancel culture run amok this week at the new york times pamela paul and tucker carlson having a conversation doing one of those chats uh i was watching CBS Sunday morning because I'm 75 years old. Of course you were. How do you even get that thing? Do you have rabbit ears? And they had George Will doing a puff piece on Henry Kissinger. And I was like, what era am I living in? You saw that too?

I did not see it, no. I saw Tommy tweet about it though. Sorry to do that to you. Anyway. Yeah, I agree. Anything that keeps Tucker Carlson quiet for a while, I'm for. But you know what? Go at each other.

Burn the whole conservative ecosystem. My point is quiet is going to be a range. Because I do think he's going to have a podcast on Rumble or something like that. He's going to do something. It's a question of whether he's on Newsmax or he's a non-compete. Or he can just tweet a video and Elon will just juice it and promote it. All right. Finally, the list of Clarence Thomas scandals just keeps getting longer.

Harlan Crowe didn't just secretly pay for private jet rides, luxury yacht trips in the home of Clarence Thomas's mother. The latest ProPublica bombshell says that Crowe also paid the private school tuition for Thomas's grandnephew. And the Washington Post reports that Federalist Society goon Leonard Leo paid $25,000 to Ginny Thomas through Kellyanne Conway's polling company and asked that the paperwork have, quote, no mention of Ginny, of course. Can the Senate Judiciary Committee do anything about these scandals or any of the judicial nominations that are stuck in committee? Of course not, because Dianne Feinstein is still absent. Jake Tapper made a point about this to Dick Durbin over the weekend. Let's listen. All due respect, sir, you and your fellow Democrats were very ginger and very polite when it came to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and not pushing her to retire when you had a Democratic majority in the Senate. How'd that work out for you? How'd that work out for Roe v. Wade? Well, I can tell you that you can play these out and try to guess what the Supreme Court

opinions resulting from it will be. The bottom line is, though, we have in the past had members of the Senate, I can think of a handful as I'm sitting here, Democrats and Republicans, who've been absent because of medical conditions for lengthy periods of time. I want to treat Dianne Feinstein fairly. I want to be sensitive to her family situation and her personal situation. And I don't want to say that she's going to be put under more pressure than others have been in the past. What is going on? I will say this. So first of all, Dick Durbin is the person that has set off this. It was Dick Durbin's comments to CNN that set off the calls for Dianne Feinstein to retire. It was him telling a reporter, hey, I'm not going to be able to move judges through this committee. We're deadlocked in a bunch of shit. This is creating a real problem that set off the firestorm of people calling for her to retire. So he's, there's a, I'm sensitive to the fact

that clearly he is reacting to what the Feinstein people have been saying, which is she's not going to be forced out. He's trying to be delicate. But that being said, yikes.

Yeah. I mean, yeah, I agree with all that. Probably people would have noticed. That's why the nominations were holed up. They can count the votes on the committee at some point. Yeah, for sure.

He went out there, but I'm saying he went out there and kicked it up. Well, he did in a very, in a very Dick Durbin way. Look, all of this is in a very Dick Durbin way. The velvety-est of velvet gloves is that he is approaching all of this.

I mean, this went viral because of Jake's question, not because of Durbin's answer. I get that these people are all collegial and they're all friends in the Senate. I get it. I get it. You don't want to be nasty to someone who you've served with for years. But like fucking there's a lot at stake here. There's a lot at stake.

Well, he goes on to say in that interview that when Feinstein put out in her statement that nothing is being held up, that he just doesn't agree with that, that her absence is being felt on the committee. They can't do these subpoenas for Harlan Crowe or for Clarence Thomas. It is slowing down the nomination process. So he is saying that, I mean, look, I don't know why I'm defending Dick Durbin. Nobody's been- Biggest Dick Durbin defender here. I'm surprised by myself. Dianne Feinstein should fucking retire. The reason Durbin's answers, Durbin's sort of letter to the Chief Justice

of the Supreme Court about ethics, inviting him to come to the committee was very frustrating and seemed incredibly feckless because it was. Sadly, the RSVP, no.

Right. Not only the RSVP, no. Will not attend. He sent a scathing response which was basically like, how dare you even ask me? Strict scrutiny did a great episode on all these sort of ethics issues

that you should listen. But the biggest challenge is because Feinstein isn't there, you can't issue a subpoena. They can't do anything. And so listen, setting aside the whole Dianne Feinstein of it all, no one individual lawmaker's hurt feelings should take precedent over the work that we all send in there to do. The suggestion otherwise, this silly forced collegiality, she's 89 years old. Several years ago, there was a round of stories about her asking the same question at a hearing verbatim twice in a row. That's when people really started talking about this stuff. I think the saddest part of this also is now we are now in, we've been in weeks and

weeks of stories about a lot of people calling for her to retire, a lot of people questioning whether she's mentally fit and certainly whether or not she has the sort of physical stamina to ever return to the Senate. Through that entire period of time, she said, I will return but will not give a date. That is really sad because it tells you that her health condition is very serious, that she cannot return to the Senate. So it is all very like, it is obviously human and it is somebody who is afraid to have their final moments in public life be defined by their illness and calls to resign. That is obviously sad. But one person's ego and the staff's desire

to protect that person's ego is not more important than confirming justices getting these subpoenas out the door and having full representation for California in the Senate. It's ridiculous. out the door and having full representation for California in the Senate. It's ridiculous. And this, I hate, this isn't even potentially the worst of it. Like, you know, Dianne Feinstein's making an argument that, oh, look at how many judges they confirmed. And I, you know, this argument is like, we're getting through all the judges that can be confirmed right now. And, but down the road, there's going to be a roadblock. Of course, there's going to be a roadblock of course there's going to be a roadblock with her without her on the committee and then of course there's the supreme court stuff but as amy klobuchar mentioned when she first talked about this we need for the debt ceiling too

potentially right if if if we get if we get either joe manchin or kirsten cinema one of them to not be an asshole and it we required like, you know, 51 Democrats to be there or 50 Democrats to be there plus Kamala Harris. And we don't have Dianne Feinstein. That could be a real fucking problem. Or it just sets one card against us even further of having to need every vote. Ro Khanna tweeted about how

because Senator Feinstein was absent, the Senate overturned a Biden rule that would cut pollution from heavy duty trucks and cause all of us to breathe in worse air. I mean, that's a real, that, that has happened in the past. And, uh, yeah, it's, it's not just about confirming judges. I mean, we can, they can spin this all they want, but that's not the extent of the problem. Yeah. More broadly on these Clarence Thomas revelations, it's now like multiple stories about Clarence Thomas and ethics. There was a story about justice, Neil Gorsuch's selling a law firm to a big, uh, selling real estate to a law firm that a bunch of issues before the court. There's questions about Roberts's

wife placing lawyers at big firms and maybe earning $10 million. I think what we're learning is that maybe decades and decades of really chummy coverage of Supreme Court that ends up in book deals and people being friends has not really served us very well. And maybe we need a little more adversarial work here. Sub-tweeting Nina Totenberg. I'm not sub-tweeting. Take that, Nina Totenberg. I'm with you. Everybody. We got to go a little harder with these folks.

These people got to reform the court. That's the only way out. They're not going to make ethics rules for themselves. They're not going to be, they're clearly not embarrassed by any of the reporting. They don't feel shame on this stuff. They feel like they're above the law because the way that we've set up the system right now,

they really are, unless we have 60 votes in the Senate to pass some reforms or to expand the court or to put into place term limits. Or we have enough senators to get rid of the filibuster. We can do it with a few more. Yeah. Or if we have enough senators to get rid of the filibuster and like, you know, I mean, again, I would love it if Dianne Feinstein could come back and we'd actually could subpoena Justice Roberts or Thomas and then have them be, you know, answer for themselves answer for themselves on national television great um but real change we gotta fucking change the court the uh the clarence thomas story about the tuition is i thought pretty funny because the only defense

that it's not a gift for clarence thomas is that it was actually a gift to the child which is really funny to think about a billionaire giving a suitcase full of cash some kids or go to school like as we all know it's the child who pays tuition at school. Well, I think that was, and Crow's statement in response to the story was like, how could you turn his love of education into something political? And I believe there's some... Oh, his love of education. Yeah.

Education and Nazi memorabilia. And I believe that Thomas did disclose when someone else paid for part of this kid's tuition. So this is just, the most amazing thing about the Thomas revelations is it's even forcing reporters from the New York Times to be like, yeah, I looked at it. No, no, no offense, but it's pretty illegal. They have no way to, they can't spin it into a, they said, he said, they said. Every defense of. He said, they said, they said, they said. Sure. Sure. Every defense of Crow giving all this money to Clarence Thomas in a variety of ways

has fallen apart. For example, Crowe gave an interview with the Dallas Morning News where he recounted how he first met Clarence Thomas, and it was Crowe offering Clarence Thomas a ride home on his private jet. That's how they met, on a private jet. They're PJ buddies. They're PJ buddies. They're PJ buddies. During that flight, we found out we were kind of simpatico.

I bet you did. The billionaire said. I bet you did. That's a direct quote. I bet you did. Simpatico. I bet you did. A billionaire said. I bet you did. That's a direct quote. I bet you did. You know, the other thing too. I saw my copy of Mein Kampf fall out of my bag. Okay.

He's a collector. He's a collector. It was a statue of Hitler. LA dad defiant over there. It was a little like, you know those Statue of Liberty ones they sell at like the airport in New York? It was a Hitler. It was a little like, you know those Statue of Liberty ones they sell at like the airport in New York? It was a Hitler.

It was a little Hitler. Fell out of his pocket. It was a paperweight for history. I just, yeah, I got this at an auction. The funny thing too is it's like, oh, so you caught a ride on a billionaire's private jet and then you had a great discussion with him

paying for the privilege of being on that private jet with your conversation, you know, like earning your keep as an interesting guest on that private jet with your conversation you know like earning your keep as an interesting guest aboard this private jet it's gross i say it's gross rbg should have retired and you know what i'll tell you something else i'll tell you something else i got we got all shit we got shit for that i call them i wasn't one of these ginger people no i'm just saying i'm sexist for calling feinstein to resign i'm sex sexist for calling for RBG to resign. Listen, I have a position here.

Looking for a third to make it a Trent? I'll call on old people to resign all the time. Can you find some old dude? Chuck Grassley. Chuck Grassley. He's got to get out of there. Strom Thurmond. Let me just say, I'm just saying, I remember whenever you even hinted at the idea that

RBG should retire, you were properly, for notorious RBG, you were castigated at the time. I'm just saying, you look back at it. Okay, well, hopefully our producers can find some clips of you calling for the RBG return. You can find it. Olivia, you can find it. Go to the archives. To the archives.

To the archives. When we come back, Pod Save the UK host Nish Kumar talks to Tommy about his new podcast and King Charles' coronation. All right. All right. It's been a wild week in the United Kingdom, which is why I am so excited to welcome the co-host of Pod Save the UK to the show. Nish, it is so great to see you. You are number one in the UK on Apple podcast charts. Are you drunk with power right now? I'm drunk with power and I'm drunk with alcohol, Tommy. I don't know how much you know about British culture, but when things go well, we get incredibly culture, but when things go well,

we get incredibly drunk. And when things go badly, we get incredibly drunk. I love that. Let's all get pissed. Also, I want to clarify to all listeners in the UK that I'm wearing this hat with Pat the Patriot on it, not to be a troll, but because I need a haircut. So just get that on the table. Okay. King Charles had his coronation bash over the weekend. A lot of the stories I saw in the run-up to Saturday basically argued that nobody cared. First coronation since Queen Elizabeth II in 1953, there's a poll that said 64% of adults had no real interest in the ceremony. Did you end up watching and do you think 64% of the country really just tune this thing out? I mean, I think that there is there remains like a section of the public for whom the royal family are an incredibly important part of their of their lives. And I don't know if I can speak to 64%. I mean, I think in terms of who watched it, it would probably be more than that.

Just sort of out of sheer curiosity. in terms of who watched it it would probably be more than that just sort of out of sheer curiosity i i think whether you care or not there are a lot of people that just tuned in i mean literally because they sort of took over all the tv channels you know like a super villain does in a movie when they're images of like bbc broadcasters kicking down your door and shoving a tv in your face to make you watch like i love the bbc but, they love these royal events. I couldn't agree with you more strongly on both of those things. Absolutely love the BBC. But yeah, they go hard. They've got a perma boner for the royal family and for coverage of the royal family. It's relentless. This is why I love your show so much because you guys had this really thoughtful academic on and you were talking about federalism versus the monarchy.

And I want to ask you more about that in a second. But you teed it up, I think, saying, but it's more difficult than just getting rid of these cousin fuckers. Right. Which, you know, that kind of candor is the show for me. But before we get to that, there were a bunch of arrests of peaceful protesters. What happened there? When did London decide to outlaw peaceful protest on the streets? This government has a kind of the sort of larger background to this is the government has passed a bill that specifically makes it more difficult to protest in this country. protest in this country and some of that protest bill was on the back of some of the kind of climate protests that have been happening all over the world but specifically in britain some of the

climate protests that have been happening uh the government have passed a bill um some of the terms of which allow police to set an appropriate level for protest which i i mean i don't think anybody thinks a good idea but some of the new powers given to them in this protest bill seem to have been used on protesters. It's weirdly not actually just protesters that have been arrested. There were three people were arrested in Soho on Saturday on a conspiracy to commit public nuisance. And it transpires that those people were volunteers for a program run by Westminster city council to distribute rape alarms to women who might be vulnerable traveling on their way home. And the reports that come out today suggest that arresting officers claimed

that they were acting on some intelligence, that those people were planning to set rape alarms off and throw them at the horses to make the horses go crazy and the this could not come at a worse time for the met police whose reputation in terms of uh handling particularly female members of public is you know is an absolute all-time low and yeah with huge amounts of justification um so yeah it was a it was a very very it's that's a very specific thing that's worth keeping an eye on as the days develop as to any whether any charges are going to be brought um they've arrested uh yeah some protesters they even arrested a journalist who was filming the protest and who sort of filmed himself being arrested in a kind of weird sort of Blair Witch found footage

horror nightmare of being being arrested simply for that where he's trying to tell you can see all the footage he's sort of saying to people well I'm a journalist to the police are just sort of going no we'll crack on with this. Yeah, we'll arrest you anyway. Yeah, every time we talk, I realize how similar our nation's problems are. Getting that balance right of allowing protesters to do their thing has been a real challenge for us the last couple of years, too. So the monarchy has existed for a very long time. That doesn't mean it's going to be around forever. On last week's Pod Save the UK, you and Coco had this great conversation with a scholar and you talked to this Labour MP about what it would take to get rid of the monarchy.

Now, the only kings we have here in the US are Elvis, LeBron and Burger. So help us understand how do we get rid of this family that just like won't go away. that just won't go away. And let me say, as a representative of the United Kingdom, we would like to thank His Majesty the Burger King. Several of his embassies have opened throughout our country. Oh, nice. And we remain grateful.

The interesting thing about having a conversation with someone like Amelia Hadfield, who's a politics professor that we talk to on the show, is that the mechanism for removing the royal family, moving to a republic is very complicated and would require almost certainly a referendum, which is, I think at this point, if you told the British people that they could either have a referendum or repeatedly be smashed with a cricket bat in the genitals. They would say, well, bring on the bat. Cricket's the most English of games. Let's crack on with this. Just because I think we may be referendumed out. But for people like Clive Lewis, who was the Labour MP that we spoke to,

I think one of the most important things in the short term is actually a reform of the royal family. Because the Guardian has done a lot of really amazing reporting in the last couple of weeks, to show the extent to which the Windsor family has essentially, I mean, they've sort of basically, actively been fighting to prevent scrutiny into their financial affairs. And Prince Charles's net worth is sort of estimated to be in the £1.8 billion region. But the truth is... Billion? Yeah, but the truth is...

Oh, my God. But, Tommy, that's also an estimate because they have fought any attempts to kind of really get full clarity on how much they earn. Just to set this in context context we know every single thing that every one of our mps who like the royal family are public servants earns we have the right to know that we know but for instance that our former health secretary as we discussed uh when we had the chat on the bonus episode of the show our former health secretary was paid 320 000 pounds uh to go

on a reality tv show where he ate bugs uh for a while um we know but we have the right to know that we have the right to know uh how much say gary liniker is being paid who's a kind of presenter of football highlights on the bbc and who found himself kind of mired in a political row um after he criticized the uh borders and migration bill um and we have because he works for the bbc we know how much the bbc pays him because the idea is we pay that money and so the idea that the royal family is able to be opaque about his finances when they take money from the public purse uh is something that i think the short term, I think a lot of people, regardless of how they feel about the ongoing institution, feel should happen pretty urgently.

Yeah, sounds like our Supreme Court seems like there's some transparency needed here. Before we move on, have you seen this Twitter theory that people who believe that Meghan Markle actually did attend the coronation, despite saying she was sticking around in California. There was a 79-year-old man named Sir Carl Jenkins. Apparently, he's a composer. He's got long white hair. He's got a mustache. He's got glasses. Your classic disguise get up. And many people are saying that Meghan Markle just snuck in, dressed like this 79-year-old white dude, care to comment?

Yes, look, I'm afraid to say Sir Carl Jenkins is an extremely talented composer. Unfortunately, he has chosen a moustache and haircut and glasses combination that makes it look like Sacha Baron Cohen is doing some sort of Barat-style prank movie. It is deeply unfortunate and he did, he

was pictured at the coronation and yeah, I understand that there is a theory that Meghan Markle, that people are saying Meghan Markle if anything, it would be fitting that the most high profile member of the royal family

who is a person of colour had to disguise themselves as a white man to get into the coronation if anything there would be something like deeply apt about that but I'm pretty sure even if Meghan Markle tried to get in heavily disguised there'd be some sort of alarm that would have been

set off, I think they might have put a chip in her and if she'd set foot anywhere near the crowd a bunch of alarms would have gone off and the metropolitan police would have been set off i think they might have put a chip in her and if she'd set foot anywhere near the crowd a bunch of alarms would have gone off and the metropolitan police would have thrown her in jail with the other you know criminal elements such as people trying to give women rape alarms i love this because you know the absurdity of this theory did not stop the new york post from writing it up so um that's how i read all about it uh so well i understand the new york post is uh i believe at least philosophically the uh bastard child of the sun newspaper in the united kingdom and i guess both of those newspapers have had a tenuous relationship with the truth of the past

oh oh tenuous at best okay so back to a little more serious stuff so england just had some local elections yes uh in the u.s i think it'd be the equivalent of kind of like a city council or mayoral type position. But they're always looked at as a bellwether ahead of the next national elections. The conservatives did quite poorly. I think they lost around a thousand local council seats. The Labor Party gained about 500. The more centrist Lib Dems and the Greens independ they want to. A lot of analysts are wondering, given how bad a run the Tory party, the Conservatives have had from Theresa May to Boris Johnson's party scandals and

handling of COVID to Liz Truss nearly sinking the economy with a budget, should Labour have done better? What do you think? How are you analysing this kind of what we just saw? Should Labour have done better? What do you think? How are you analysing this kind of what we just saw? Well, the first thing I want to say is just briefly on Liz Truss, and it is good to be brief on her as it befits her time in office. She was at the coronation and it's this weird spectacle that I guess an equivalent is you guys having one-term presidents

at the inauguration. And I guess it's the equivalent of this but she's going to be at all of these events and she was at the fucking coronation for longer than she was prime minister like it was absolutely obscene that she got that she got a ticket but yeah the um the conservative party uh lost uh 1061 seats and uh there have been a lot of reports that they uh have encountered on the doorstep a lot of hostility to the legacies left by boris johnson uh and liz trust and that rishi sunak hasn't uh been able to detoxify uh the immediate legacy of his two predecessors and you're like yeah of course he hasn't because it was like six months ago. Like, amazingly, people in the United Kingdom are able to remember things that happened less than a year ago. And less than a year ago, a lady who, from what I can tell, huffed a bunch of crystal meth, read Margaret Thatcher's Wikipedia page, and then built a policy platform off of it, nearly tanked the

British economy and wiped 30 billion pounds off the public purse. So that still continues to damage the Conservative Party. I mean, as to whether Labour should have done better, I mean, there was some sort of hasty expectation management from the Labour Party in the immediate lead up to the local elections. And they were sort of trying to say, well, you know, if the Conservatives lose sort of 600, 700 seats, that's a good night for us. Obviously, the figure is 1,000, which were some of the harshest predictions

that people were saying would happen. I think for Labour, the mood at the moment coming out of the Labour Party is beyond euphoric. And Keir Starmer has said that these local election results are evidence that the party is ready for power. But people who understand these things more than I do have been warning that the results are not completely clear-cut. They've got a way to go before they can be confident about that.

Yeah, I've seen a lot of comparisons to 1997 when Tony Blair had this massive victory and that was preceded by doing even better in local elections. But boy, my big takeaway from your answer there is, my God, am I jealous that you have an electorate that remembers things that happened six months ago. We're working on 30 days, man.

Like, you know, like a couple of years ago, Trump was like, yo, storm that Capitol and kill some people. And people were like, oh, he seems like a decent guy. But to your broader point of like, okay, what will the Tories do to blunt whatever momentum labor has? It does seem like in the United States, immigration is a big emotional issue for conservatives. As we speak, people in Washington are very concerned about preparing for a potential surge of migrants to our southern border, because Joe Biden has to get rid of the sort of pandemic era rule that would essentially force everyone to be expelled. But for you guys,

I mean, look, the last time I checked, and correct me if this has changed, the UK is an island. You can't just kind of like stroll up to london from another country i genuinely i would love for you to come and explain that to some of the people that live here tommy help me understand this how the tories made this such an issue as far as i can tell there is a section of people in the united kingdom who believe that the country is connected via airport style travelators that just bring a ceaseless stream of job stealing immigrants into the country it's become but the thing the key thing with it is that like the u.s republicans the sort of the tail is kind of wagging the dog here the conservative

party is being led by a small section of its electorate. Conservative voters actually said that the, a poll of Conservative voters found that stopping the vote was actually the kind of second most important issue to Conservative voters ahead of cutting NHS waiting times. And that is- Stop the votes or the migrants who are coming from i

yeah that's right yeah that's right so people are making crossings of the english channel from france and uh they're sort of um it's they've turned stop the boats into our caravan of migrants it's it's the bogeyman and the phrase stop the boats uh you know sort of fits into this kind of um campaigning pattern of the tory party and the brexit campaign you can boil everything down to three words take back control stop the boats get brexit done these are the sort of key slogans and and i think sunak is sort of hoping that stop the boats is his his version of that, that he can sort of animate the conservative vote. But I'm not sure how it's going to play in terms of winning over swing voters, because ultimately, you know, every element of the country is struggling. You know, you can't see a doctor and there's going to be more train strikes over the weekend.

to be more train strikes over the weekend this uh the threat of more strikes from the nurses threat of more strikes from the doctors because public sector pay is still in real terms to recover from 2008 really that's how long standing a lot of these problems are and those problems are kind of as prevalent in the private sector so with the whole country grinding to a hole, I think I just feel like there's a lot of people that are going to think, why the hell are you talking to me about boats when I can't see a doctor? Yeah, that seems right. I mean, it is remarkable how much scar tissue there is in both countries, the US and the UK from 2008 in the financial crisis, and everything that kind of came after. So there's this new book out called Johnson at 10. It's about Boris Johnson's time as prime minister.

Some of the excerpts are unbelievable. It says he referred to himself as the Fuhrer. It's probably not something I'd call myself. He called himself the King. I think you already have one of those. It describes him as having no vision for how to govern, talks about fights with his wife, his top advisor, Dominic Cummings,

this like Karl Rove, Steve Bannon creep. Are these revelations seen as explosive? And do you think there's any chance it will change opinions about Boris Johnson? Because over here, there's a book a minute about Donald Trump with some new revelation, and his approval rating is at 42% in perpetuity. some new revelation. And his approval rating is at 42% in perpetuity. I don't think this is going to change anybody's minds. I think it is a really valuable,

look, I think ultimately all of these things are really valuable historical documents. So the book's written by a guy called Sir Anthony Selden, who's been writing about British prime ministers for 40 years. And he's actually a head teacher as well so the whole thing it plays like this kind of report card you get uh when you leave when you leave office and the thing with Boris Johnson is so much of his kind of incompetence is kind of priced in um i get a lot of stick here from various people including a lot of journalists for drawing parallels between johnson and trump um but there is a huge amount

of common ground between the two men you know not just the like repeated uses of racist language, not just the building of their brands through the media and kind of the use of celebrity cultivated by entertainment television that they've then leveraged into political power. Our countries are both stuck in this weird place where we threw our leaders overboard, you know, Trump and Boris Johnson, but they won't go away. It's like you threw a party. That drunk guy is still there. He keeps turning up the music. He's hitting on your girlfriend.

Like, what do we do here? How do we get them to take the hint? Do you have any ideas that we could borrow? Because I think you guys have done a little bit better job. But but Rishi Sunak, the current Tory prime minister, hasn't, for example, thrown Johnson out of the party itself. No, I mean, he's where possible. He's sort of trying to distance himself from Johnson, which is very difficult to do because he was Boris Johnson's chancellor. So notionally, he was the second most powerful person in that government. So it is extremely difficult for him to distance himself from that but i think the similarities between the two uh projects i mean which doesn't

it doesn't feel like you should even call it a project but between the two shit shows one of the key similarities i think is both of them kind of approached a scorched earth policy to their own parties. So either you got in line or you were bounced out. And what that means is they've created sort of power vacuums in the Republican Party, in the Conservative Party. And so you've got this situation where, you know, potentially dissenting voices were purged. And so you're now left in a situation where everybody involved in the party was very much signed up and part of it. And so it's very difficult to distance themselves

from those leaders. I mean, the only thing that's going to help here, I think, is getting them out of office. But as we've seen in America, you know, you did vote him out. You got rid of him you survived an attempted coup d'etat it is weird how often i think do you remember that time when like some nazis tried to steal america like it's it it comes to me in waves it was a really strange thing

late at night lots of waves yeah it was a terrible thing. And it's just, it's deeply frustrating that a big chunk of the country doesn't look at that memory or think about that history and think, that was really bad. Let's not do that again. That's all I'm asking. Yeah. But if you have the kind of apparatus of a media machine, you know, that regardless of, you know, all of those revelations in the Vanity Fair article about Rupert Murdoch and his contempt for Trump didn't stop him from eventually completely signing up to to it wholesale. And Trump was this kind of careering freight train that Murdoch forgot he was responsible for setting off from the station. You know, it's it's the same thing in this country.

You know, the Daily Mail, the Sun sun newspaper which is a murdoch paper they all have done such an aggressive pr job and even the the day boris actually officially left office the sun and the mail both had headlines to the effect of how could the conservative party do this so they were trying to take root that sort of betrayal narrative as he was leaving office in an absolute cloud of disgrace because it's not just the parties that caused johnson to go uh there was also a conservative called chris pincher who'd been accused of sexually harassing various people who worked for the conservative party and johnson was warned about this and when he was warned about it he he said pincher by name pincher by nature and then gave him a fucking job. So it wasn't even just the parties. It was a total kind of cloud of disgrace. He was removed from office. turfed out for no good reason you end up in a situation that you guys are in as a country where

you have this like lunatic who mismanaged covid caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people then tried to kind of lead a fascist coup and people are still thinking well maybe 2024 yeah exactly exactly well uh nishkumar that is why Pod Save the UK is so critical, because you are the leading edge of the spear that is going to take down the Murdoch empire. We heard it here first. I don't believe he could be killed, Tommy. I don't believe he could be killed. He's very old. The guy in Succession died. Spoiler alert. died spoiler spoiler alert i think that's i think because jesse armstrong is a like not just a great writer but a deeply moral man and i think he's hoping logan royce some sort of voodoo doll that if he gives a heart attack to it might take down murdoch uh i'm just gonna not comment on that because uh

nish uh thank you so much it was great talking with you. And everyone subscribe to Pod Save the UK. It is a fantastic show. We have so many shared problems. I think there are shared solutions. We'll hear about both, but also you're just going to laugh a lot. So I think we all need to laugh so we don't cry. Thanks, Tommy.

You're the best. Thanks to Nish Kumar for joining us today. And we'll talk to you guys later. Thanks to the Calamaris, too. Thanks to the Calamaris as well. Pod Save America is a Crooked Media production. The executive producer is Michael Martinez. Our producers are Andy Gardner-Bernstein and Olivia Martinez.

It's mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick. Jordan Cantor is our sound engineer, with audio support from Kyle Seglin and Charlotte Landis. Thanks to Hallie Kiefer, Madeline Herringer, Ari Schwartz, Andy Taft, and Justine Howe for production support. And to our digital team, Elijah Cohn, Phoebe Bradford, Mia Kelman, Ben Hefko, and David Tolles. Subscribe to Pod Save America on YouTube to catch full episodes, exclusive content, and other community events.

Find us at youtube.com slash at Pod Save America.