Realfoodology - Why So Many Women End Up With C-Sections: Birth Interventions Explained | Dr. Stuart Fischbein

Episode Date: May 12, 2026

299: I’m joined by Dr. Stuart Fischbein to have an honest conversation about modern pregnancy, birth culture, and why so many women feel fearful going into labor. We talk about the rise in C-sections, inductions, epidurals, and the cascade of interventions that can happen in hospital births. Dr. Stu also explains the history behind “geriatric pregnancy,” the differences between midwifery and the medical model, and why informed consent and individualized care matter so much for mothers and babies. Whether you’re currently pregnant, planning to have children someday, or simply curious about how birth has changed over time, this episode offers a deeper look at the modern birth system and the importance of trusting women’s bodies.Topics Discussed: → Pregnancy After 35 & “Geriatric Pregnancy” → Home Birth vs Hospital Birth → Fear-Based Birth Culture → C-Sections, Inductions & Medical Interventions → Midwifery Model of Care → Epidurals, Pitocin & Birth Outcomes → Informed Consent & Choosing the Right Birth Provider → Trusting Nature’s Design During Birth Sponsored By: → Function | Check your health the way I do — 160+ lab tests a year for $365, plus the ability to dive deeper into your results with Function's trusted connections to platforms like ChatGPT and Claude. Join at https://functionhealth.com/REALFOODOLOGY and use code REALFOODOLOGY25 for a $25 credit toward your membership. → Qualia | Take control of your cellular health today. Go to https://qualialife.com/realfoodology and save 15% to experience the science of feeling younger.  → PaleoValley | Head to https://paleovalley.com/realfoodology for 15% off your first purchase. → BetterWild | Right now, Betterwild is offering our listeners up to 40% off your order at https://betterwild.com/REALFOODOLOGY → Clearstem | Discover the CLEARSTEM difference — Because CLEAR SKIN CHANGES EVERYTHING. Go to https://clearstem.com/realfoodology and use code REALFOODOLOGY at checkout for 15% off your first order.→ 00:00:00 - Introduction → 00:02:11 - Is Pregnancy After 35 Actually “Geriatric”? → 00:08:35 - How Mammals Naturally Give Birth → 00:13:12 - Why C-Sections & Inductions Keep Rising → 00:20:16 - What Counts as a True Birth Emergency? → 00:33:58 - The Cascade of Interventions During Labor → 00:42:20 - Midwives vs Traditional OB Care → 00:49:38 - Solutions for the Modern Birth System → 00:54:57 - Fear-Based Pregnancy Culture & Epidurals → 01:03:07 - Epidurals, Hormones & Baby Bonding → 01:17:07 - “Your Baby Is Too Big” & Birth Myths → 01:21:17  - Induction at 41/42 Weeks Explained → 01:25:31 - Why Birth Stories Stay With Women Forever → 01:28:37 - Final Thoughts + Trusting Your BodyShow Links: → ⁠realfoodology.com Check Out: Dr. Stu → Instagram - Birthinginstincts → Dr. Stu’s Newsletter Sign Up  Check Out Courtney:  →⁠⁠⁠ ⁠LEAVE US A VOICE MESSAGE⁠⁠⁠⁠ → ⁠⁠⁠ ⁠Check Out My new FREE Grocery Guide!⁠⁠⁠⁠ → ⁠⁠⁠ ⁠@realfoodology⁠⁠⁠⁠ →⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠PEOPLE VS THE POISON - Sign up now!⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ → ⁠⁠⁠ ⁠www.realfoodology.com⁠⁠⁠⁠ → ⁠⁠⁠ ⁠My Immune Supplement by 2x4⁠⁠⁠⁠ → ⁠⁠⁠ ⁠Air Dr Air Purifier⁠⁠⁠⁠ → ⁠⁠⁠ ⁠AquaTru Water Filter⁠⁠⁠⁠ → ⁠⁠⁠ ⁠EWG Tap Water Database⁠⁠⁠⁠  Produced By: Drake Peterson Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

If anybody thinks that health care is about getting you well and it's not about money, they're being naive. If you look back at how a mammal gives birth, whether it's your dog or a deer or a horse, the mammal goes off to a quiet place. They go off by themselves. They want to feel safe, quiet, and undisturbed in their environment. You don't interrupt them. You don't restrict their movement. You don't anesthetize them. You don't bother them. The other dogs or deer don't come around and ask how they're doing. Nobody's doing a vaginal exam on a tiger at seven centimeters.

The system is designed very poorly for good outcomes. It's designed very well, maximize problems. And so we have this whole system where everything that the hospital does to you when you come in, make you go bathroom and pee in a cup, draw your blood, start an IV. They bill for all those things. If anyone's ever been to a homebirth, we don't make women pee in a cup, draw blood or start an IV, and somehow they still have babies. If doctors had the ability and the freedom to treat women as independent people, we probably would improve our outcomes. But then somebody's going to lose control and profit. That's the problem. Dr. Stu, welcome to the Real Foodology podcast. I'm so excited to have you on. I have had so many people in my life tell me that I need to get you on the podcast, including my own midwife.

So she was very excited when she found out that you were coming on my podcast because she's a big fan of yours and listens to your podcast. And then I actually realized yesterday when I was looking you up that you were on my friend Alex Clark's podcast like two years ago, I think. Yeah, it was an honor to be. That's when she was, I think she's still in Phoenix. But it was called the spillover in those days. Now she's got culture apothecary. but yeah it's one of my biggest uh downloads for being on that and again that long format that you and i wanted to have but we couldn't quite arrange the uh scheduling for me to get to austin and time and you

and you have a deadline coming up so i do yeah just for my listeners i because they're going to be like why are you doing this virtual i don't normally do virtual but because my due date is rapidly approaching and I really wanted to get you on before I gave birth to my sweet little baby boy. We did what we had to do. So I'm so honored to have you on to give you a little context because I don't know if you know a lot about me and my story, but I'm 41. We got pregnant on the first try. I unfortunately am just one of those women that it took me a lot longer to find my person. So I'm having my first baby at 41.

And one thing that I was really shocked by going into all of this was hearing everyone, call pregnancy geriatric after 35. Is pregnancy after 35 actually geriatric, or is that label outdated and fear-based? Exactly. Let me explain something. Again, I don't think many of your listeners probably know who I am,

so they probably haven't heard much of what I said because when you go on podcasts like this, you kind of tend to repeat yourself and you think you're telling the same story over and over again, but you've got to realize you're speaking to a different audience. I have something that I call my exact number rule. And this is how medicine in general and other things in life put these things together where they come up with these numbers. And then somehow they become rules or tenants or benchmarks for quality.

And 35 is one of those numbers. You're not old when you're 35. And the risks don't suddenly change when you're 34 years old in 11 months to suddenly now you're 35. There are certain things that, chances of things happening that rise as you get older, but the amount of the rise is very small. So what happens is when doctors and medicalized birth models want to manipulate you, they'll start using things like relative risk or high risk or whatever to convince you that there's something wrong and that when you are convinced there's something wrong, you're easier to manage.

So when you're over 35, you're just at a slightly greater risk of having a baby with a chromosomal abnormality, which is easy to rule out these days. You are not at much significantly greater risk of hypertension or diabetes or stillbirth or anything else, yet they came up with this number. It's very much like other numbers in pregnancy, like 42 weeks or 39 weeks for that matter, or 24 hours of ruptured membranes, or one minute of delayed cord clamping, or six feet apart. These are all made up numbers.

And it's one of those things that really bothers me because the first thing you said to me today was I'm 41. So I know that that's something that's on your mind. And how did it get on your mind? The culture, and I'm pretty sure your midwife didn't dump that on you, but the culture dumps that out of that sort of thing. So what is it about age 35? Well, people need to understand where that number came from.

If you understand the history, you'll understand how ridiculous it is. But my understanding where 35 came from was prior to the era of ultrasounds, so we're talking to the 1940s and 50s. The risk of doing an amniocentesis without ultrasound guidance, the risk of miscarriage was one in 200. Now it's like one in 700, one in 800 because of the ultrasound guidance. But you used to just find a soft spot and take it and take the needle and you used to stick the needle in. And you'd take a one in 200 risk of miscarrying from that procedure.

My mom actually had a miscarriage at 20 weeks from an amnia. How do you say that again? Amniosa. Amnius antisisis. I mean, it does happen. Everything carries benefits and risks. And so you have to count every individual woman needs to weigh those herself because it's one of the tenets of medical ethics is that given the same information it's not reasonable to expect two people to come to the same conclusion.

Yet the medical system would have want all women over 35 to come to the same conclusion. So why that 1 in 200 is significant is because that's the risk at age 35 of a woman having a baby with Down syndrome. So they're apples and oranges, but it's where actuaries that work for insurance companies decided we'll pay for amniosynthesis beyond age 35. So 35 became a number. And then it just, it was like the blot of Cleveland. It just kept growing and growing in importance. It doesn't mean anything significant because everything that can happen when you're over 35 can happen when you're under 35. And if it happens with a slightly greater frequency when you're over 35, slightly greater frequency doesn't mean common.

But because most of my colleagues in obstetrics fearbirth and they use that fearful language when they talk, it's a bit coercive, actually. I'm not sure they even know they're doing it because they're just repeating what they learned. But your body works perfectly well at age 41. You conceived on your own. Your body knew exactly what to do. You're growing this baby on your own. There isn't a cell by date. You don't need to be induced at 38 or 39 weeks because you're over 35.

It's just a number that somebody came up with and it's now sort of become, you know, a benchmark that's used by everybody, but it doesn't really mean anything. Yeah, that was a great explanation. And to your point, this is something I also really wanted to talk to you about Dr. Stu, because I went into this with a completely different mindset than I think a lot of women do, where I came in knowing I've been prepping my body for years. I've been an integrated nutritionist for the last 15 years. I know how to take care of my health.

I know how to eat really well. I focus on eating whole real foods. And so I've really been, I knew that I was going to meet my partner later. As it started creeping up, I was like, okay, like I still want to be able to get pregnant. So I'm going to really dial in my nutrition and take care of my health. So I never approached this from a place of fear. I always felt like, you know what, this is going to work out. My body's really healthy.

And to your point, what you said is that just because you're 35 and over doesn't mean that you're going to have all these issues, you could be 27 and dealing, you know, with health issues and have a really hard pregnancy. And for me, I'm happy to report that I've actually had a really great pregnancy, and I've been completely free of fear. I haven't had a lot of crazy symptoms. It's been pretty easy, honestly, symptom-wise. And one of the reasons that I sought out a midwife and why I'm only going with a midwife and why I didn't do an OB-GYN was because I didn't want somebody telling me my whole pregnancy that I needed to be fearful because of my age. Again, we have to go back to basics, and we have to think about how do mammals give birth?

and what has the medicalized birth model done to that? And if you look back at how a mammal gives birth, whether it's your dog or a deer or horse, the mammal goes off to a quiet place. They go off by themselves. And they want to be undisturbed. They want to feel safe, quiet, and undisturbed in their environment. And when they're hungry or thirsty, they eat and they drink,

which is nobody restricts their food. You would never take your dog's food and water off the floor when they're in labor. you don't interrupt them you don't restrict their movement you don't anesthetize them you don't bother them the other dogs or deer don't come around and ask how they're doing nobody's nobody's doing a vaginal exam on a tiger at seven centimeters and when a mammal is approached by a predator or there's a forest fire or little kids run into the room where the mammal is laboring the mammal stops puts out adrenaline for the most part and other things too and stops contracting gets up and runs away and we'll go back into labor only when it feels safe. This way nature ensures the best chance of survival.

We are no different. We may be a higher intellectual species, but this is not a higher intellectual process. This is a primitive brain function. Women in a coma, they can grow a baby and they can go into labor without thinking about it. Thinking about it actually gets in the way. So when we have a system that treats women differently from the very start of the pregnancy all the way till the time when you go into labor, you get in the car to drive to the hospital until the moment you put your baby in the car seat to drive home, pretty much everything that you can think of, you could rattle off all the things that are done at the hospital, and I'll tell you, they're anti-mammalian design. You would never do that to any mammal. You would never ask them a

bunch of questions when they come to treat. You would never make them change places anyway. move. You would never ask him a bunch of questions. You'd never make him go in the bathroom and pee in a cup, put on a hospital gown, have blood drawn, start an IV, have belts put on you, immobilize you, interrupt you with taking your blood pressure and asking a whole series of questions that don't mean anything. Why do we do that to humans? Why do we treat pregnancy and labor like a medical emergency? Well, you can control people better when you have a fear-based system. there is everything that they do, and this is not cynical, it's true, is there's billing codes for that. And if anybody thinks that health care is about getting you well and it's not about money, they're being naive.

The system is designed very poorly for good outcomes. It's designed very well to maximize profit. And so we have this whole system where everything that the hospital does to you when you come in, make you go in the bathroom and pee in a cup, draw your blood, start an IV. They bill for all those things. If anyone's ever been to a homebirth, we don't make women pee in a cup, draw blood or start an IV, and somehow they still have babies. They say it's for safety.

They say, well, we want to know what your hemoglobin is or we want to have a blood clot and a blood bank just in case. But that's silly. What do you do if a wound comes in from a car accident or a gunshot wound? If they really are bleeding that badly, you give them O negative blood. until you can type and cross them. You don't have to do that. But there's no money in not drawing labs.

If hospitals got paid more for not doing stuff, they do less stuff, but they don't. And then there's the fear built in and the way the system is designed and the way doctors are taught. Doctors are taught mostly in these days, obstetricians are taught by maternal fetal medicine specialists when it comes to obstetrics. They are the high risk specialists. And they obviously as a high risk specialist, you see, see everything as high risk. That's kind of what you do. And so if everything's high risk, then things can go wrong in any minute. And they live in that world. And then, of course,

we have the fear of liability, which is real, because we have people that want to sue and we have trial lawyers. They can't wait to do it. And it's a whole industry. And nobody wants to get sued. and you're more likely to get sued if you do something that's outside of the way the hospital does it, even if it's better for your client, the mother, or it's better even medically. Like, for instance, I mean, I love giving examples because I think it helps a lot,

which is riskier. Being over 35, Courtney, or being induced because you're over 35? I would think being induced. Correct. Because it's not natural. But which one's labeled high risk? Being over 35. Correct.

How about this one? Crazy. Having a breached baby and being told you have to have a C-section, but nobody asking you, do you want a second baby or do you want a third baby? Or having a breached baby and delivering it vaginally? Which one carries more risk? I'll make it easy for you. The C-section carries more risk.

For that mom, not that baby. That baby has a slightly less risk, but that mom has much more risk. And then all you've done is you take a... and will slightly gain risk diminishment in that first pregnancy. And now if she wants a second or third or fourth baby, you've increased the risk to all those babies because you have the scarred uterus. So the C-section for breach will be labeled standard of care.

The vaginal delivery will be labeled high risk, but it's actually the opposite. So it's a way of thinking. It's a way of brainwashing. And ultimately, whether the doctor or the hospital system thinks that this is safer is really not what matters. What matters is what does the woman think? And how can a woman make an honest decision

if she's not been given honest information? They talk about evidence-based medicine and standard of care and stuff like that. Those are all terms that sound good, but they really don't mean anything. Because of the standard of care in your community is to not allow a woman to have a V-back. And I allow you to have a V-back.

I'm outside the standard of care, but what I'm doing is actually better care. And it's supported by the evidence. But they're going to label you as dangerous. They're going to label me. Yeah, they're going to label you as crazy and me as an outsider. And they'll pick on it. And then they tend to go after the outsiders. They tend to go after the people that make waves.

They just do. I mean, midwives across the country right now are getting picked on. And I'll ask anybody this question. We have a system now where about 98 plus percent of babies are born in the hospital. About one and a half percent are born at home. Some states are doing pretty well like Idaho. I think I heard has about an 8 percent home birth rate, which is great. But it's about 98 percent in the hospital.

We have rising rates of cesarean section, rising rates of induction, rising rates of postpartum hemorrhage, rising rates of NICU missions, rising rates of epidurals, all these things. And our outcomes are getting worse or certainly not getting bad. better. So when I see the state's legislature is going after midwifery, we don't have a horrible outcome in pregnancy because 1% of women are giving birth at home. It's the 99% that are giving birth in the hospital that are causing the problem. And yet that's too big a thing to take after and that's where the money is. And so it's kind of like in California, we don't deal with

infrastructure, but we'll ban plastic straws. So that's the kind of thing that that, that's happens and we and you see this in states right now because who has the lobbying power organized medicine does big pharma does the american hospital association does what do they want they don't want any competition they don't want women giving birth at home well they make a lot of money off the c-sections too don't they they make a lot of money off of everything that goes on in the hospital and and and they especially make a lot of money when a woman has a problem like needs a C-section or a baby needs to go to the intensive care unit what i can't understand if the system is so good is over the last 20 years Courtney the rate of niki admissions

newborn intensive care unit admissions has nearly double it's gone from a little over 5 to about 9.8 percent so one out of every 10 babies is going to the nixu now if the system is so good then how come it's not so good it's called it's you know there's a guy that i i listen to on the podcast sometimes and um he calls it the money ball theory and i don't know if you ever saw the movie money ball There's a scene where Brad Pitt plays Billy Bean, the general manager, and he's talking to the scouts. And the scouts are telling him about this great hitter and the minors.

And he just says something real fast. He says, if he's such a great hitter, how come he doesn't hit good? And it just goes on to the next scene. And I think about that sometimes when it comes to our obstetrical world. The people that are running the system are singing the praises of the hospital and they're cursing the idea of homebirth. Yet if your system is so praiseworthy and so good, how come it's not so good? I've been thinking a lot about hormones lately, especially during my pregnancy.

And honestly, what's been frustrating is how little visibility we're given into what's actually going on in our bodies, unless something is really wrong. Here's the thing. Women's hormonal health is one of the most overlooked areas in medicine, but it impacts everything. Your energy, your mood, your strength, even how you show up day to day. And we're usually only testing a tiny fraction of what's actually happening. Things like estrogen, testosterone, fertility markers, even the proteins that control how your hormones are used in your body. Most women have never seen a full set of tests around this. That's why I started using function.

It's 160 plus lab tests a year so I can actually see what's going on and stop guessing. Because if something feels off, I want data, not just assumptions, and when things are working well, I want to understand why so I can support it. Check your health away that I do, 160 plus lab tests a year for 365 plus the ability to take. dive deeper into your results with functions, trust, and connections to platforms like chat, GBT, and cloud. Join at functionhealth.com slash real foodology and use code Real Foodology 25 for a $25 for a $25 credit towards your membership. I've been thinking a lot about how aging really shows up, not just in birthdays, but in

energy, recovery, and how fast your body bounces back. That's why I got so excited about qualia senolitic. One of the most fascinating breakthroughs I've seen in the science of aging. As we age, our bodies accumulate senescent cells, often called zombie cells, which can drain energy and slow recovery. Qualia Cynolytic is a clinically tested formula with nine vegan plant-derived compounds designed to help your body naturally eliminate those zombie cells. And the best part, you only take it two days a month. Yes, a month. Since adding it in, I've noticed better energy, less soreness, and an overall lighter, clearer feeling like I'm aging smarter, not harder. Experience the science of feeling younger. Go to qualia atlife.com slash real foodology for up to 50% off your purchase and use. code real foodology for an additional 15%. That's Qualia, Q-U-A-L-I-A-L-A-L-A-L-A-L-A-L-A-L-A-L-F-EF for an extra 15% off your purchase.

Your older self will thank you, and thanks to Qualia for sponsoring this episode. I've observed something recently, and I hope that if any of my friends listen to this, they're not going to take this as a judgment. But I have had six or seven friends in the last six months give birth that all wanted to give birth vaginally and every single one of them had a quote unquote emergency C-section. And the reason why I put quote unquote in there is because I don't know, I don't know all the details for every single one of them. And I'm not saying that they didn't all need them, but I wonder because the amount of C-sections that I'm seeing happening right now,

and I actually had a conversation with this about this with my Dula recently. And I said, what is going on? Why do I feel like every single one of my friends that's going to the hospital to get birth, trying to give birth vaginally? They're all getting thrown into C-Sections. and they're being told that it's emergencies. And I want to know what is a true emergency where a C-section is needed. Okay, I got so much to say about that. Are all your friends over 35?

Just out of curiosity? You know what, it's a range, actually. A couple of them are in their early 30s. But yes, two of them were over 35. I imagine that some of them were probably induced and they were probably induced for no reason. You're absolutely right that it can't be popular. It would be statistically almost impossible that all seven of them ended up with this emergency C-section because they needed one.

There's a word called diatrogenic, which means, you know, medically induced or whatever else or a medical cause for the problem. And I can tell you that that's the case. And how do I know that's the case? Because it's simple math. It's simple math. Fifty years ago, the C-section rate coordinating the United States was 5%. Oh, my gosh. What is it now?

It's about 35%. I'm using even numbers because it's just easier math. Okay, it's about 35%. Now, what's happened in the last 50 years? Well, we've got more inductions. We've got more high-risk specialists. We've got more, you know, we've got all these things. We've got continuous fetal monitoring.

We've got labor curves. I could go off on tangents on every one of these things and give you 10 minutes on how stupid they are. segment on our podcast every now and then called dumb doctor dogma and most of these things if you really look at them you wonder how do they see things ever get through peer review how do they how do they ever get accepted as normal because they make no sense for instance continuous fetal monitoring is where you wear the belts and they've been using it now for over 50 years and the idea was if we monitor babies in labor we're going to find the babies that would have

ended up maybe having cerebral palsy or an interpartum death and we're going to save them but our after 50 years of use and hundreds of thousands of unnecessary cesarean sections, not only has there been no evidence of benefit from continuous fetal monitoring, there's been evidence of non-benefit. And yet it's still standard of care in almost every hospital because it's a labor saver and they think it's a liability preventer. They don't care that the outcomes end up with cesarean section. Again, the system is set up that the hospital actually makes more money if you have a

cesarean section. So how did all these women end up with cesarean sections? And I'll get to your question about true indications in a second. They ended up because doctors meddled in their pregnancy. They coerced them into doing something that they didn't need to have done or they didn't allow them to labor as nature design. They brought them into the hospital too early. They made them stay in bed, wearing the belts.

They couldn't move. They gave them a popsicle or some ice chips. They didn't let them eat. They got uncomfortable because they couldn't move and deal with labor as any other mammal would do it. They finally got an epidural. An epidural slows down labor. Then they started potosin. An epidural disconnects the mother from the baby hormonally, maybe even psychologically.

Not feeling anything anymore, yet the baby still is feeling things. And it doesn't have mom to rely on anymore because mom stops sending signals that she's contracting. because mom doesn't feel anything. And the baby then doesn't, they don't like the way the baby's heart rate tracing is. And so they do a C-section. They get a baby that comes out most of the time, crying and doing well.

And everybody says, God, we got that baby out just in time. And it's like, yeah, I mean, it's silly. If you look at the C-section rate, what it should be, and I'm not a big fan of the World Health Organization, and I don't think any of your listeners probably are either. but 40 years ago, they said the C-section rate above 10% probably had no benefit and probably had detriment.

And they even went 10 to 15%. So let's just say the C-section rate should be 15%, which, by the way, it was three times higher than it was in 1970. And we don't have better outcomes now than we did in 1970. So let's just say it should be 15%. And let's just give the benefit of the doubt to hospitals and say that the C-section in the United States is 30%, because you can see where I'm going with the math here.

Well, that means that if you believe that, then that means half of all C-sections being done are unnecessary. Oh, my God, that is crazy. And then afterwards, they will tell you, thank God you were here in the hospital, because if you were at home, then, you know, what would you have done? Maybe it could have harmed your baby. And I'm thinking, well, you may have never had to have any of these interventions

if you've been in the hospital in the first place. But here's the scary part. Because there's about 1.2 million cesarean sections being done every year in the United States, a little less than 4 million babies every year. So if we take 30% of that, it's 1.2 million. Now, just assume that half of those are unnecessary. That's 600,000 unnecessary major abdominal surgeries every year. If there were 600,000 unnecessary knee surgeries or gallbladders or mastectomies or something,

not only would people be upset, but insurance companies would be upset because they're paying for that. yet here we have 600,000 unnecessary surgeries every year. No one's upset about it. That's absurd. If half of all C-sections being done are unnecessary, who's doing them? Because no doctor goes home at night and says to their spouse, hey, honey, I did two unnecessary C-sections today. Every C-section a doctor does, he or she thinks is necessary, yet half are unnecessary. So this is where something that...

What's the disconnect happening there? I'm sorry to interrupt you. There's a disconnect. It's cognitive dissonance. It has to be. Because no doctor wants to believe they're doing something wrong. I don't believe that doctors are evil by nature. But the idea that one third of all women in this country, and in some countries it's

two-thirds of all women, can't have their baby as nature design. And that's considered normal now. That's considered standard of care. You can see where I'm going with this. standard of care doesn't mean what people think it means. It's a tool to get you to manipulate you. And I know this is upsetting for a lot of people who are listening. Right now they're probably saying, God, I wish that guy would shut up

because he's making my stomach all upset because I don't want to not trust my doctor. I don't want to not trust my hospital. Well, you need to do your research. You need to look into that. Yeah, and I was going to ask you. So I kind of have a two-part question. Well, first of all, what you were talking about is actually another question I wanted to ask you, which is essentially the cascade of interventions that happens,

which is, you know, you go in, everything you kind of just explained, which is you go in, you get the epidural, and then they put you on the potosin, and then the baby's heart rate goes down, and then they have to rush you into a C-section. It's like, you know, just a cascade of interventions that happens that ultimately leads to the C-section, that if you were at home, none of this would have ever happened

because you would have just been able to labor as nature designed. There's also the aspect that we didn't even mention yet, which is what I'm hearing a lot. And this makes me so mad I see red, is that doctors and nurses are wanting to get out in time because they want to go home for dinner or whatever it is, which I understand, but I'm also like, this is a woman's life and her baby in your hands,

and then they're trying to get the baby out sooner with the C-section. So there's the cascade of interventions. There's also that notion of the hospitals don't want to pay for the mom to be there for multiple days in a row. Whereas, you know, think about me if I'm laboring for two days, It's like, I'm at home, you know, for my home birth if I don't end up in the hospital. And then my other question, I just don't want to forget to ask you is, what is, how does somebody navigate this and find someone that they actually trust and know that they're in good hands? I wrote this all down because there's four questions here that I want to get to.

First, I want to get back to your original question, which is what's a true emergency? I still had that. We didn't, we didn't finish that one. This is what I do, though, Courtney, is that I tend to go off on tangents. So I told you this before we started that I can monologue on something because I'm so passionate about this because we're doing it so wrong. And I've seen both sides. I spent 28 years working in the hospital and 12 1 half years working in the home. So I have a unique perspective on this.

Most doctors who work in a hospital have never been to a home birth. They don't really know what goes on. They only see the home birth transports, most of which by the way are not emergent. They're just a woman that's exhausted. once pain relief or gene, potocin or something, or a vacuum or something to help deliver the baby. Very rare when a home birth goes awry, but those are the ones that make the news. Which is fascinating, by the way, because bad things happen in hospital every day. Those things don't make the news. Yeah, they don't make the news. Okay, true emergencies.

Things like a placenta previa. And what is that? That's where the placenta covers the cervix. So the baby can't get out without tearing through its own placenta. All right, that's a true emergency. Some babies will have a bradycardia where their heart rate goes down and it's not caused by, you know, starving her, immobilizing her, numbing her, hyperstimulating her. It just happens sometimes. Occasionally, rarely, about one in every 500 pregnancies, you'll have something called a prolapse cord where the cord comes out before the head.

It's a little more common in twins and breaches, but it's about one in 500 head down babies. We'll have that happen. You can have something called a placental abruption. where the placenta separates, usually no fault of anybody. Sometimes it can occur after a sudden deceleration injury like a car accident or falling down, but most of the time when you have an abruption, there isn't an obvious cause. That's a reason for, you know, if she's not about to deliver, that's a reason for cesarean section. Certain anomalies in babies that probably would be better off coming out gently through the abdomen,

as opposed to more traumatized. I don't mean that in a bad way because nature designed babies to come out vaginally. There's a lot of benefits to babies having to navigate the birth canal and use their reflexes and be exposed to your microbiome and the stresses of labor and the delayed cord clamping and all that goes with a nice vaginal delivery. But sometimes some babies with spina bifido

or maybe an abdominal wall defect. But we're not talking about a failed induction at 39 weeks because a woman happened to be 36 years old, and they brought her in, and the baby didn't like labor after mom had been laboring for 20 hours with no food, and she took an epidural, and she was on Pitocin. We're not talking about those. We're talking about those true emergencies.

That can happen. But when you are working with women at home, and you don't meddle with Mother Nature, I learned this. I didn't know this. I learned this from my experiences with midwives. They taught me pretty much everything I know about normal birth. I learned a lot about problem birth and residency, but not much about normal birth.

We treated them all the same. Every woman came in and had the same protocols, and that's wrong. But at home, we don't see this rapid deterioration of a maternal or fetal status when you're not meddling with Mother Nature. If something is going wrong, you can generally see it coming from hours away. You start to get a feeling like this labor is not progressing normal. And the longer a midwife has been in practice, the more familiar she is with what's normal. A good example of that, because I like these examples, is if you live in the same house for 30 years and you go out for dinner, and you come home and you open the front door and the chair in the front hall is moved three inches from where it normally is,

you immediately, Courtney, will know something is wrong. I might not know because I'd never been in your house before, but you'll know something is wrong. Now, could it be an earthquake? Could have been a burglar? Could have been the dog hit it? Who knows? Could it, you know, could your partner have pushed it when he picked up your purse or whatever? Who knows? But you know that something is wrong and now you're going to try to figure out what's wrong because you're so familiar with what's normal. And that's where midwives are good because midwives are experts at normal birthing. And really, about 80% of women who are pregnant it should be taken care of by a midwife who practices like a midwife,

not a midwife who's being forced to become what they call medwives, where they basically are many OBs, they're just practicing the policies that the OBs set for them in the hospital setting, which we see a lot of that. So those are the true emergencies. Then you asked about cascades of intervention and why we don't see them at home, and I kind of just sort of did summarize that because we don't mess with nature's design. I know that a race horse is a valuable animal, but how many horses need C-sections?

Probably none. Every now and then, if you have a million-dollar horse, you might, you know, that kind of thing. But I'm just saying, for the most part, none. Dogs, none unless you're French bulldogs, which is kind of silly. They bred French bulldogs would be too big to come out. I mean, talk about silliness, all right? Which is actually something I want to ask you about humans in a second, but yeah. Okay. So, yeah, cascade of interventions is, as I said, you brought into the hospital either you come in in labor, probably too early, or you come in because your bag of water is broke and you're not contracting. And in midwifery world, we would ask you a couple questions like baby moving, yep, fluid clear, yep. Any contractions? Nope. Any blood? Nope. Okay, go back to bed. In the medical world, if you break your bag of water, suddenly they start looking at their watch and they say, you know,

well, we only have 18 hours or 24 hours before all hell breaks loose, so you should come in. So you come into the hospital. You're not really in labor, and so you're not in labor, but you're in the hospital. So what are they going to do for you? They're going to do a vaginal exam, and they're going to probably say your cervix is only two centimeters. We probably should start augmentation with potosin. And then that starts that whole cascade, because now you have to be in bed and be monitored

because your membranes are ruptured, so you can't move, so you're uncomfortable, so you ask for an epidural, and then your contraction space out, then they give you more pituitary, the baby doesn't like it and you know the story and that's that's the way it works whereas at home we don't do those things so you don't see that cascade of interventions except on rare circumstances where it's actually necessary if a woman if a woman is having a home birth with a good midwife and we'll talk about you asked how do you pick that person if she ends up with a C-section for that pregnancy she's going to be one of those five 10 percent of women who probably needed it not one of those 35% of the other balance who didn't.

Inflammation is an important part of the body's natural healing process, but unfortunately our modern lifestyle, diets high in sugar, unhealthy fats, stress, allergies, poor sleep, environmental toxins, can trigger chronic inflammation, which can become the foundation of modern day disease. If you're looking for a delicious drink that will improve energy, focus, and support healthy inflammation levels, you need to try Paleo Valley's superfood golden milk. It combines the profound, well-demonstrated health benefits of turmeric with other nourishing

certified organic superfoods such as Lions Main, Rishi, Cordyceps, Chitaki, Salon, cinnamon, ginger, and more. Plus, they've added organic coconut milk for its brain-supportive MCT's black pepper, Himalayan pink salt, and organic monk fruit for an amazing taste and maximal absorption. To try the superfood golden milk today, go to paleo-valley.com slash real foodology, and you will save 15% off when you use code real foodology. Again, that's paleo valley.com slash real foodology. Okay, let's talk about dogs and allergies. I noticed something with my dog's turkey and butters, it's like poll licking, ear scratching. Those can be signs of allergies. A lot of these

allergy symptoms and dogs can start in the gut. When their gut is out of balance, it can show up in their skin, ears, digestion, energy levels. As someone who's really intentional about my own health. I need to be thinking about my dogs the same way too. They need good bacteria to support their gut and keep their immune system balanced. That's what led me to better wild allergy relieved soft chews. They're designed to support your dog's allergy defenses by strengthening digestion and helping restore balance. They use natural ingredients and include probiotics plus ingredients that support gut immune and skin health. So you're not just covering things up. You're supporting your dog at the source. I've been giving them to turkey and butter's daily and they think

they're treats. I've especially been more consistent now that we're heading into spring because that's when allergies tend to flare up. And it gives me peace of mind knowing that I'm doing something proactive for their health and not reactive. Right now, BetterWild is offering my listeners up to 40% off your order at BetterWild.com slash Real Foodology. Well, that's exactly what my, to your point, when my midwife told me and my husband very early on, because, you know, we're first-time parents. We're admittedly a little bit nervous about a home birth. But what I told you earlier before we started recording, I'm actually more scared of a hospital birth than I am a home birth, which is why I'm doing a home birth. But my midwife told us very early on,

she said, look, I know when there's going to be an issue and we will be headed to the hospital long before there's actually an emergency because I know what to look for. And you got to think about it. I mean, this woman doesn't want to have a liability on her hand. So if she really knows and she sees something serious happening, she's going to get us to the hospital before it's even an issue. Midwives don't do this because they want to get rich. And midwives don't do volume because they can't. Because they have this continuity of care model, which is the best model of care. And sadly, what's happened is that you asked about why doctors want to, you know,

they want to get home for dinner, they want to get to their kids' baseball game or whatever else. They've changed that a little bit because now what's happened is doctors used to be the captains of the ship. They used to own the patients. They used to bring the patients to the hospital, and the hospital then take care of the patients. And if the hospital wasn't nice to the doctor, the doctor could say, you know, I think I'm going to take my practice

and move it over to that other hospital over there. Well, hospital businessmen didn't like that. They didn't like the fact that they didn't have control. So what did they do? In the late 80s and early 90s, they brought in something called managed care, and they began to take over the patients. And then they began to hire the doctors.

And this was one of the biggest downfalls, I think, in why care has gotten worse, because doctors were less invested in the individual patients, since they didn't really know them very well. And there was less continuity of care. They may take care of a patient at almost every prenatal visit, but there's only a one in seven chance that they're going to be on call when they're in labor. So that woman is hoping that her doctor's the one on call, and she's not. So now she's taken care of by a stranger, and a stranger has no connection to you.

doesn't know you. And that's human nature. We care more about people in our direct line of sight like our family than we do about the neighbor down the block. And we care more about the neighbor down the block than we care about somebody living in the town 20 miles away or somebody living in another country or whatever. So that's just the way we are. So they broke that up because they wanted to destroy the doctor-patient relationship. They being people that run health care, that run the obstetrical world. And I mean, this is more than just obstetrics, but that's what we're talking about.

And they even change the word doctor to what? Provider. Practition? Oh, yeah, provider. Provider. It's like, provider of what? And by the way, midwives, unfortunately, midwives are only mid-level providers.

So they've demeaned everybody and they demeaned midwives even more by calling them mid-level providers. No, she went to school. She went to training. She did an apprenticeship. She became a nurse and then a certified nurse midwife. She's not a provider.

And I as a physician am not a provider, but it is another way to demean us. And what they've done by taking doctors who used to be independent and now making them salaried employees working a shift is they divided their loyalty and their fiduciary duty. My fiduciary duty as a solo practitioner was always to my client. Now my fiduciary duty is supposed to be to my client, but if my client wants to go past 41 weeks and my employer says we don't let people go past 41 weeks, now I have to change my language and

stuff and subtly coerce my client into having an induction because otherwise my employer will be pissed off at me. You can see the inherent conflict. So you were just talking about how they're basically demeaning midwives and saying that they're mid-level, did you say mid-level, I think? Mid-level provider, right. So I want to tell you something because I also really want my listeners to hear this. So, you know, I've had a very different experience than a lot of people I know have had throughout this entire pregnancy because I've never stepped foot in an OB-Gen office since I got

pregnant. And that was on purpose. Every single appointment that I have with my midwife is anywhere between an hour to two hours and we go over everything. Perfect example, which is another thing I wanted to ask you about. My husband and I are different blood types. So I'm A negative and my husband's A positive. So there was a concern for the blood, right? We got really lucky. My baby is the same blood type as me. So he's a negative as well. So we didn't even have to explore the idea of doing the Rogam shot. But before we found out what my baby's blood type was, she spent 30 minutes going into four.

full detail with me about the ins and outs of the Rogam shot. And when I shared a little bit about this on my Instagram, I have never been flooded with so many messages in my life from pregnant women that were going, wait, wait, wait, my doctor just basically told me I had to take it. They said nothing about testing the baby's blood. They just said out the gates, you just take the Rogam shot. There were no questions. They gave me no explanations about it. And my point about this tangent is that we have never gotten more, like we got so, we've gotten so much information information every step of the way. Same thing with GBS. Another thing I want to talk about, the vitamin K drops, all of this stuff. Every time we sit down and talk with her for over an hour about the

ins and outs, the pros and cons, why would we do this? Why wouldn't we do this? What would happen if we didn't do it? What would happen if we did? People going to a regular OB-Gen are not getting this type of information explained to them at all. They're just being told you have to do this. That's correct. They may be getting a handout, but they, you can't. Because the way the medicine system is set up, doctors have to do volume. They can't, because of the, first of all, their overhead to run their office or they're run an office setting is extremely high. And even if they're an employee of a large system like Kaiser Permanente in Southern California, I don't know what you have in Texas, but, you know, one of the big health systems,

the overhead is immense, so they have to do volume. And the doctors, again, it's of their own making because they never stood up and said no. but their schedules are not made by them. Their schedules are made by schedulers. And if they're told they get six minutes for a prenatal visit, that's what they get. If they get eight minutes for an annual exam with a woman for her pap and whatever else, that's what they get. And if they don't do their volume every day and they get behind all day long,

eventually one of their managers is going to come to them and saying, you know, you're moving too slowly. You have to speed things up. That's how it works. It's not the same. is when you're cared for by somebody you know. Don't you feel good about going to your visits with your midwife because you know her? And by the way, when you call at night, who's going to answer the phone?

My midwife. That's right. If you're in the doctor's system, who's going to answer the phone? You have no effing idea. You just don't know. And the idea that you said that you feel safer not going to the hospital, that's important because ultimately where a woman feels safest is where she should labor. But how do you make a decision on safety if you're on you,

you're given skewed information. Now, if you're given full information and you think that you feel better in a hospital, that's where you should be. But you have to go in with eyes wide open and understand that the likelihood of you having an unmedicated birth and having a vaginal birth and having delayed cord clamping and skin to skin and not being harassed a little bit about hepatitis vaccine or vitamin K or other things like that is going to be something you're going to have to deal with. You need to know that. And so people should check out. I always say this. When you When you move to a new community, you check out the schools, you check out the parks, you check out, you know, the crime rate in your community. You might check out where's the Costco, where's the grocery store, is there a movie theater.

What people don't ever check out is the hospital. It's a great point. They should check out the hospital. They should ask, you know, what's your V-back rate? What's your C-section rate? Do you do breach delivery? What happens if I break my bag of waters and am not in labor? You know, who's on call?

Is it, you know, how does it work? and check it out so that you can find out that maybe, just maybe, this isn't the hospital for you. Might be the best town for you, but you might decide that you're going to get birth at the hospital in the next town over. But if you don't check it out, you know, you get what you, you don't have any say in it. And it's too late when you find out you're in labor that suddenly they say, no, you can't eat, no, you can't do this. Yes, you have to be augmented. And ultimately, they should never talk to you like that because that's coercive language. and, you know, the funny thing is, Courtney, they say they follow ACOG guidelines.

And ACOG guidelines should not be what midwives, the standards that midwives are held to because midwives aren't obstetricians. But they lie to you when they say they follow ACG guidelines. What they actually mean is we follow the ACOG guidelines that we like and we ignore the ones we don't like because there are very strict ACOG guidelines against the use of coercion and coercive language and threats of child. protective services and all those other things that they will do to you if you refuse to do what they want you to do.

Something really awesome about Clearstem skincare is that you don't have to choose between anti-aging and anti-acony. If you're acne prone and you're also concerned about aging, clearstem is the perfect line for you. I love it just for the anti-aging benefits. And I'll tell you that my favorite products are their gentle gel cleanser. It gets everything off. It doesn't leave your skin feeling stripped and dried. I also love their hydra berry, moisture.

I love the under eye gel and I love the skin spray all day spray. I also really love their serums. Honestly, I love everything that they make. Those are my favorite products. I use the skin spray multiple times a day. I have it in my carry on bag, purse, my car. I keep them everywhere because they're really good at keeping your skin super hydrated. When I think of ClearSim, I think of skincare that protects me from acne and aging at the same time. Discover the ClearSim difference because ClearSkin changes everything. go to clearstem.com slash real foodology and use code real foodology at checkout for 15% off your first order. That's clearstem.com slash real foodology and use code real foodology for 15% off. I've heard horror stories of CPS being called on parents that want to leave the hospital early after they've given birth.

Right. I was like, what? They will call CPS on you if you don't stay in the hospital. And they think they're being virtuous, these people that are calling. They think they're protecting the baby because obviously they care more about that baby than the parents do. And the parents, it's crazy. Yeah, it is, it is, it's crazy, but it's a, it's a paternalistic system that is, and they're fearful about liability.

So they think that they're protecting the baby is going to protect them from being sued. When we really need to redefine, that's not right the word, redesign the, the entire system because the system we have right now is not fixable. It's not going to, it's not going to change. They're not going to suddenly say, you know, we've been doing all these things for decades that they're not working, so we're sorry, we're leaving. and we'll let Dr. Stu and the midwives figure it out. No, they're not going to do that.

Right. I wish they would, but they aren't. I wish they would too. So what's the solution? More people just opt for home births or maybe the middle ground is birthing centers. What are your thoughts on birthing centers? Well, because of time, let's talk about solutions because a lot of times we sit there and complain and complain and we don't have solutions.

I got a lot of them. The first one, I think, starts with how reimbursement and pain. payment is. It's basic economics. Remember basic economics 101? If you want more of something, you subsidize it, if you want less to something, you tax it. So if they pay more for C-sections, what are you going to get? More of them. More of them. You know, if they pay more for babies in the NICU, what are you going to get? More babies in the NICU. If they pay more for ultrasound, then not doing an ultrasound, what are you going to do? You're going to do more ultrasounds. So change the incentives. How about if they pay more for vaginal birth, pay less

for a cesarean. How about if they pay more per birth to a hospital that has a C-section rate under 20% and a little bit more if it's under 30% and a lot less if it's over 30% or whatever number you want, you know, I'm just making up these numbers. But how about changing the way we incentivize people? People will say, well, that's coercion. Well, of course it is. But what's happening right now is coercion? That's how we decide we don't want to go 85 miles an hour in a 45-5 zone. because we're going to get a ticket. We don't want a ticket. There's a consequence to it.

And we might as well be encouraging things that are actually better for baby and mother's outcome. Right. That's one. It's changing the way insurance companies, and insurance companies could lower the C-section rate tomorrow, simply by lowering the amount they pay for C-section and raising the amount they pay for vaginal birth. Suddenly, breach delivery would come back, feedback would come back. And along with that, has to be tort reform. Tor reform is something we talked about a lot in the 80s and 90s because there were a lot of states that were going crazy on malpractice premiums.

And in Florida was one of them, California was another one. We passed laws that helped protect, put a cap on pain and suffering and stuff like that so we could cap the insurance premiums because doctors were just basically being forced out of business because they couldn't afford the malpractice insurance. So have a system of either loser pays like they do in England and Canada where if you're going to sue someone, somebody, you better have a damn good case. Because if you have a damn good case, they're going to settle right away. And if you don't have a damn good case and the defendant wins, then you have to pay the defendant's attorney. You might think twice about a frivolous lawsuit.

So tort reform, you can't have one without the other. Start with youth education. I think it would be really important to get into middle schools and high schools. And there's an organization that, of that Bliss and I, my co-host in my podcast, we support without, we don't take any money from them, but we advertise for them. It's called Girls Who Know. And I encourage your listeners to look them up. And what they're trying to do is educate young women about their bodies, about their menstrual periods, about pregnancy. And eventually we'd need to get our young boys educated as well. But if we can educate these women, these young girls, young in life, then it's going to be hard for them to be gaslit when they're older.

and they go to the doctor and the doctor says this and says, no, actually, that's not true, doctor, you know? You know, I'm not at high risk because I'm 35 or 41 or whatever. You know, if you educate, start early, because once you instill fear into the birthing world, you can't get rid of it. You know, there's a scene in the movie Inception where they're talking about how they're going to implant this idea

into Sillian Murphy's character's brain. And one of the people, they're sitting on the roof, and one of the persons says, why can't we just tell him to break up his company? He says, because then he'll know where it came from. And he goes, what do you mean? And the guy says, don't think about elephants. Okay.

So if you start to plant seeds of fear early on, like your hips are too small, your husband's too large, your mom had C-sections, you know, all these things. And doctors do this kind of stuff. Remember that when you go into see the OB, they have, it's all electronic now, but the electronic records have what's called a problem list. That's how doctors do things. And when you're pregnant, what's the number one thing on the problem list?

That you're pregnant. And the American College of OBGYN has a statement in one of their guidelines that says pregnancy itself is a high risk condition. And I'm not taking that out of context. That's what they say. So if that's the prison by which doctors. and medical students and residents are learning about obstetrics, you can understand why they're all scared.

Because pregnancy itself is a high risk condition. Is pregnancy itself a high risk condition? No. High risk is not a number. High risk is something that makes doctors uncomfortable. I'm seeing this incredibly concerning trend happening online right now. In the comments, in the DMs that I'm getting, and also I see videos about it,

where women have been told, not everybody, But there's a trend happening online where I'm seeing women are making these comments and saying, well, it's incredibly dangerous for a woman to be pregnant. And it's the most dangerous, high-risk thing that a woman can do is to get pregnant and have a baby. And they're being told that it's risky and dangerous to be pregnant. And not only that, but they're also being told, too, to just immediately opt for the epidural because why would a woman ever put herself through unnecessary trauma and pain? And I think all of that is so concerning.

And where are they getting this from? Probably from the doctors and from the medical system. Some of it's from the medical system. There's no doubt. And some of it's propagated through mom's groups where mom has had a bad experience. And therefore, she's finding soulless in a way

or redemption in a way of trying to prevent it from that from happening to other women. They're not doing you a favor. pregnancy is a normal function of a woman's body and most of the time it goes really well occasionally it can go wrong but that's not the norm and the idea of going into it and being fearful the whole time there's it's very short-sighted because what does fear do to the mammal and what is the mammal secreting when the mammal is scared and what is that doing to the developing fetus when a woman is worrying all the time versus a woman that's joyous all the time,

secreting their baby in dopamine and oxytocin as opposed to cortisol and adrenaline. When those little neuron pathways are forming, I mean, they're little, they're mini-meas, these things inside of us, and they carry a lot of it, but a lot of it isn't set. We think that genetics is set, but a lot of it isn't. There's a thing called epigenetics, which can change. how genes are expressed. And when, so this fear is not beneficial, but sometimes it's psychologically a way that people can cope

with something that happened to them that's bad or justifying, rationalizing their decision to have an induction at 39 weeks ending in a C-section by saying that this is really, it's a really scary, see what happened to me and blah, blah, blah, and there's a need to do that. And then the doctors, of course, propagate that. Partly because they themselves fear birth, partly because they profit from that fear.

And partly, I think they just don't know anything else. They learned something 20 years ago in medical school or residency. They've never bothered to look deeper at it anymore. And now, since they're just an employee, a cog in somebody's system, why would they? Why would you do extra homework? Yeah. You know, I could really go off on a tangent here. and the American Board of Medical Specialties

and the American Board of OBGYN, used to be when you were board certified, you were board certified for life. Then it was every 10 years. Then it was every six years, but you had to take every year modules that were put out by the American Board of OBGWAN. Then it became you need to do that every year.

Wow, do they do that every year now? They have to take this certain number of modules every year to keep their board certification. Now, these things are not free. you have to pay for them. So if you need a certain amount of continuing medical education credits are called CMEs as a doctor, for a midwife, they're called CEUs, and you can get them from taking your board modules, then you're going to just take your board modules because you have to take them anyway.

Why would you take something on breach delivery? Why would you take something on midwifery care or whatever? You wouldn't, you just focus on that. But I just want to make it very clear. And I'm not saying this because I'm bitter because I'm not. I was board certified for the first 20 years of my practice. And then I wasn't. And then I decided, it was a kind of a decision that I was kind of forced into

to either do something that I didn't want to do or to keep my board certification or just let it go. And I just let it go. And did I suddenly become a, worst doctor the day after I let my board certification go? No, in matter of fact, I think I became a better doctor. But I certainly didn't become a worse doctor. So doctors just because they have MD, FACOG, which is fellow of the American College of OBG-B-G-B-G-BORD, board certified, does not make them necessarily wise. How do I know that? Because all the stupid things we've been talking about for the last 45 minutes or so have been put into place by board-certified fellows of the American College

of Wobitchewan. We saw this during COVID. It was a great way to get doctors to coerce them to do exactly what they wanted them to do, to have them all get in line and push out this narrative that was not necessarily, oh, it was not better for, it was honestly putting a lot of the public and endangerment. We know that. We knew that then. We know that now.

They suppressed it back then. The American College of WBGWWN is still to this very day that we're talking, what is it, April 30th of 2026, still pushing COVID vaccines, D-TAP vaccines, flu vaccines, and RSV vaccines on all pregnant women. And they tell you to use something called motivational interviewing.

Motivational interviewing is a euphemism for coercion. Basically, you want to, if a woman, if you counsel a woman and you tell her she should have a COVID vaccine and she chooses not to do it, then ACOG actually tells you that you haven't counseled them well, and next time they come in, you should try again,

as opposed to honoring their ethical right to decline the treatment and saying, given the information, you've declined the treatment, I respect that. It's not maybe what I would do, but I respect it, I honor that. I'm not going to keep bothering you. Nope, got to do motivational interviewing. This is, again, they're compromise. by Big Pharma.

They make a lot of their money from Big Pharma. Big Pharma controls the journals. Big Pharma controls the medical schools. Big Pharma controls the organizations. The American Academy of Pediatrics is one of the most corrupt organizations. And, you know, right now, at least they're facing a receteering lawsuit in federal court. So we'll see what happens with that. Well, I don't put a lot of faith in these processes.

They take too long, and I can't wait that long. But, and then you all. also the other thing you mentioned about I think there was something about why would you get an epidural and there's an old thing about I wrote a paper I wrote a not a paper a blog one's called labor is not a toothache because you hear people say well you would never have your teeth drilled without lydicane why would you know or novocaine why would you have a baby without an epidural and that I've I've said this many times that that's just very so short-sighted and again no respect for nature's design in the medical world.

They don't have any, they think that they, they, that they intervene on stuff, they're going to make it better. But they often will intervene without proving that their intervention is safe first. They'll just do it probably because of a profit motive, like continuous fetal monitoring. There was a lot of money in that. People had to buy these devices. They have to buy the paper. They had to buy the software and the hardware.

and when it became introduced in the 1960s, every hospital bought one for every labor room they had. Every doctor's offices started buying them. It's a huge industry. They brought it in place without ever proving that it was going to do what they said it was going to do, which was lower the rate of interpartum death or cerebral palsy, which it didn't do.

So epidurals interfere with nature's design. And I don't know if you've heard this story, you probably have, but I'll just briefly, if I might. When a woman, you know, you ask yourself the question that is universal question, why is labor painful? What's the point of labor being painful? All right. Well, putting the biblical reason aside, you know, eating of the fruit of the tree of knowledge

without their permission, whatever, putting that aside, labor is painful in all mammals. We know that because they've studied that. They actually looked at catacolamine secretion and sheep and they're in labor. It's like, I mean, I could think better things to do with my life, but that's what somebody did. And they found that there's surges every time they have a contraction, they're putting out more catacolamine. So we know it's painful. But painful labor in nature, how does that benefit the mammal? Because if the mammal is crying out or moaning, it's more likely to attract a predator.

So it's not beneficial in that way. So maybe it's beneficial in this way. And this is a theory. but there's a connection between mom and baby. Baby has been living the life of Riley inside your belly for nine months, and now suddenly uterus starts to contract. And every time it contracts, there's more pressure on the baby, and there's diminished blood flow through the placenta for that 30 or 40 seconds.

And that's affecting the baby's sensing something that it's never sensed before. But because mom is uncomfortable, mom is secreting hormones like, endorphins, which are her natural opiates, and adrenaline, which helps to space out contractions, and cortisol, which deals with stress, and of course, oxytocin, which everybody knows is your bonding, love-making hormone. And so baby gets a waft of mom's hormones. Now, there's a question. Some people don't believe that the hormones cross in great enough amount to make a difference, but I don't believe that. I believe that these things cross the placenta. and the baby gets a sense of there's mom.

And this is what I talked about with Alex. If you remember the interview with Alex, I did that. And her real about that where, you know, without mom, was very, very well put together on Alex's podcast. So they're getting a waft of mom and a reassurance that mom, who they've been communicating with for nine months, hormonally, electromagnetically, through sound, through other things, hearing voices.

they've been communicating with their mom. They know their mom. It's very familiar to them. And so suddenly the contractions get so intense that their mom decides to get an epidural. So now mom is numb. But she's still contracting. But the baby's no longer getting any connection from mom.

And sometimes the contractions space out, Courtney. And so they say, well, the contractions is based out. Let's add pitocin. So now potocin is saturating the oxytocin receptors. You're not even getting any oxytocin. from mom. And you're not getting endorphins, adrenaline, cortisol, or other things

that I'm not talking about. You're not getting those things from mom because mom is actually probably snoring because she's taking a nap. She's so exhausted, she got her epidural now she can rest. But the uterus is still contracting. Now the baby's without mom. And so eventually the baby's heart rate

begins to show signs of changing. Like maybe it's accelerating a little bit. Maybe there's a decrease in variability. Maybe there's some deceleration. And now we have the monitor on and, God, that's making the doctors and the nurse is uncomfortable because the baby's showing signs of not tolerating labor. And so they end up deciding to do a C-section for the fake diagnosis of fetal intolerance to labor when it's really fetal intolerance to induce and augmented and intervened upon labor.

It really is. And the baby comes out generally fine. Is this why baby sometimes has a hard time latching first after breastfeeding? I also heard it might be because baby is a little doped up from the fentanyl that's in the epidural. I don't know if that's the case or not. I don't know that the fentanyl does that. I just know that C-section interferes with bonding and breastfeeding, but not always. So again, I don't want to be accused of being hyperbolic.

You know, the relative risks might be slightly higher, but the actual risks are still relatively small. But the baby is deprived of using its reflexes to come down the vaginal canal. And we did a podcast with somebody who talks about fetal reflexes and being integrated into your childhood reflexes and those babies that are missing that may have some other problems like attention deficits, so or in bedwetting and other things like that that you may see. It would be really interesting to look at a study of bedwetters and find out how they were delivered. I know for me, I didn't wet my bed, but my mom has no memory of my birth because my mom got

twilight sleep and I got pulled out with forceps, which is what they did in the 50s. Oh, wow. What's twilight sleep? Or they just put you out? They put you under? Yeah, they gave, it was ether or some general anesthetic in those days. They just put you out with gas and then they pulled the baby out. So we have these babies that aren't getting delayed cord clamping. They're not getting exposed to mom's microbiome. They will have problems chronically labor. There's higher rates of asthma. There's higher rates of autoimmune disorder and babies born by a cesarean section. And is that because they're missing out on the bacteria coming through the canal?

We think so. Okay. Yeah. Nature designed a system over eons. For man to come in in the last hundred years and think that we can do better, just tells you something about mankind. Yes, there are times where nature goes awry. And a baby has a problem that medicine,

can solve. But that doesn't justify meddling in every freaking labor. Yeah, it doesn't justify out the gates acting like pregnancy is just a medical emergency in of itself. And labor is a medical emergency. If there is an actual emergency, it would be different. And that's why those Facebook posts you're talking about where people are doing that. They're doing people, they're doing women a disservice. They think they're not. But they should present both sides. It would be really, what would really, what would really be great is to have debates between people. They used to have something on TV called Point Counterpoint.

I don't know if you remember it. You might be too young. Yeah, where they had a conservative and a liberal and they had a moderator. I forgot his name. William Buckley, I think, was the name. And he did this thing. And it was brilliant because you got to see both sides of an argument.

It was when things weren't so polarized as they are now. But wouldn't it have been great during COVID, the very beginning, whether if President Trump or President Biden had said to Anthony Fauci, you know, Anthony, there's a lot of questions out there about masking and six feet apart and locking down and about ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. So what I've done is I've gotten two hours of primetime television on CNN and we're going to have a moderator and you're going to be on stage with J. Bata Char. Or Peter McCola would be awesome. Or Peter McCullough, yeah. Jay is the author of the Great Barrington Declaration, one of the three authors. And it would have been great to or have Peter and Jay there with Fauci and Deborah Berks or Francis Collins or somebody who are all pro it or Peter Dashek or any of these other

people that are so pro the lockdowns and everything else and have it on national television, but they won't ever do that. And I would love to be on a podcast with a moderator where two, if I was on with a very rigid maternal fetal medicine doctor who thinks that all they're doing is great, I would think we'd probably find a way to agree on 70% of stuff. And the other 30% we could have a conversation about and they could hear my side of the view and I would hear their side of the view and then the listener could. But they just never, you can't ever do that.

I mean, I've tried to get people to come on podcast. They won't come on. I know. I've tried to get people that disagree with me to come on my podcast. Some have, but it's very rare and it's hard to get them because they feel like they're just being trapped. I'm like, I'm a very reasonable person. I just want to hear the other side. And the thing is, a confident person is willing to admit they don't know something. It's the insecure person. It's the insecure person that feels like they're going to be trapped. I mean, you need to be wary when I speak to a reporter.

you know, I'll talk to them for, you know, 30 minutes, and then I'll see that they quoted me one sentence. Same. So you got to be careful about that sort of thing. And I would tell anybody who's being interviewed by somebody to, if you're being videoed, you should video it yourself too and keep a copy. Because they do edit those things. But you can't be afraid if you believe that you're right,

you should be able to come out and defend it. and you shouldn't be afraid to defend it against people who think you're wrong. But dialogue has gotten to be, it's disappeared in this generation. There's too much screaming and everybody can anonymously attack you. You've probably been attacked, Courtney. I know that I have. A lot. I have been attacked a lot.

Yeah. I mean, look at you. Why would anyone want to attack you? Thank you. That's very nice. Well, I've been in the, you know, it sounds like similar to you. I've been in the alternative, holistic, if you will, world for a long time, health world. And people don't love that.

When you swim upstream and you go against the status quo, people do not like it and they attack you for it. I get it from all angles. I get it from just people. I also get it from doctors. I get it from nutritionists. And, you know, it's fine. We don't need to go into it. But yeah, it's just when you go against the status quo, you're going to get a lot of hate for it.

But I think eventually everything that we've been talking about in this episode, hopefully, things are going to change. And I love that you brought up earlier so many of your ideas and solutions that you have because there's so many people that are waking up now going, okay, what we're doing is not working. We need to do something differently because we're having horrible outcomes for baby and mom. And just in general, when you look at the medical system as a whole, we are having terrible outcomes. We're getting unhealthier as a population. What we're doing is not working and we need to fix it. Ideally, getting back to practitioners being independent and not being employees. I don't know that that's ever going to happen, but these, again, this would help. Because then they'd have more stake in the game. They'd have more commitment to the individual client. Instead of legislatures increasing regulation, they need to deregulate. Let women choose. If a woman wants to be delivered by her granny, she can do that.

Let her do it. But if a woman wants to be delivered by her granny, who happens to be a midwife, she can't do that. I mean, just think about how stupid that is. I mean, a taxi driver can deliver your baby, but a certified nurse, a midwife in Nebraska can't. You know, so it's a felony if they, if they do that. Look at the midwifery model of care. Again, it's not a for-profit volume-driven model. So you'd have to get a lot more midwives out there. we don't have anything close to the number of midwives you would need to get 80% of pregnant women being seen by a midwife primarily. We need hospitals. We cannot say we get rid of the hospitals because we need the hospitals.

But the hospitals in turn can't make money if they're only doing with 20% of the pregnant women. So they need the normal pregnant women to bring them in, but then they overtest them and they over intervene upon them. And that causes all the problem. Let families decide who supports them. If family wants a midwife, let them have a midwife. If a family wants to free birth, let them free birth. If a family wants a maternal fetal medicine doctor and OB, fine. That's what they should have.

And we should have paid family leave that's longer. So that, I mean, there's nothing more important than how we raise our children and how our children are born into this world. And we put so little emphasis on that. How we come into this world, really, affects us for the rest of our lives. And maybe part of the reason we have so much chaos in the world right now is because we really, excuse the word, fucked up birth. I worry and I wonder about that a lot too. Because I think about, yeah, just the medical emergency that babies come into

in this world in the hospital. And, you know, we haven't said this at all. And I think it's implied, but I'll just say this anyways. Obviously, thank God for modern medicine. Thank God for these interventions for when there are true emergencies and those babies and maybe mom would have otherwise died. Thank God. But we've just taken it to a place now where we're acting like birth is unnatural and that laboring is unnatural and we're just intervening before we even need to, before there's even an emergency in the first place.

Yeah, Courtney, there's a number that's used in statistics called a number needed to treat. and the number needed to treat to prevent one death in breach delivery runs around one in 500. So in other words, you have to do 500 C-sections to save one baby. Now, some people will say, well, that's great, we saved a baby. Yeah, but you might lose one mother from surgery. And what are you doing downstream to all her future babies? So it isn't just about, I mean, medicine can do miracles. that's true, but they need to be able to, they need to look at the whole picture.

What is this family's values? What are the desires in the future? Individualizing your care. The problem with a big system like that is they don't individualize their care. Everyone gets the same protocol. If you have a certain type of twins, then you get this kind of testing and you get this, and you're induced on this, at this week, and the babies need to go to do, babies have to do this certain thing. And that's not true. For some women, it is true. For some women, it isn't true.

If doctors had the ability and the freedom to treat women as independent people, we probably would improve our outcomes. But then somebody's going to lose control and profit. Okay, so I'm really curious because I saw a post about this the other day, that a woman was told that her baby was too big for her to birth, and so she had to have a C-section. is does this happen where babies are too big for you to bird them naturally? Well, when you ask the question that way, can it happen? Yes.

Does even the American College of OBGN doesn't really support induction or C-section for suspected large baby. Unless it's, you know, unless it's a diabetic and it's over like 10 pounds, that kind of thing. But even then, the prognostic uncertainty of ultrasound makes it not really a reliable. reliable thing to do. Any doctor that tells you your baby is too big for you is a doctor you shouldn't be going to. Simply, unless they give you a really good explanation. Because first of all, the estimating fetal weight is not very accurate. Second of all, the pelvis is a dynamic organ. It's not fixed, so it moves. And by the way, when you deliver in an upright positioning, when you're on all fours and upright, there's 20 to 30 percent more space in your pelvis than when you're laying flat on your back.

And for generations, how have women giving birth flat on their back? Because that's the way we're taught. And there's many doctors who, when a woman says, I want to deliver squatting, they don't know what to do because they've never seen a woman deliver in any position other than lithotomy. Well, then there's the issue, too, if they have an epidural, they can't move. move or they can't stand or sit that way. Right. So again, that's why the C-section rate is higher in women who have epidurals. I mean, that's one of the reasons. And the other thing is, and the baby itself is not fixed.

Baby's head is designed to mold. So the idea that the baby's too big to fit out, and again, they're going to say this to you when you have a nine-pound baby. A nine-pound baby is a normal baby. I mean, these are the kind of things you need to find out about, you know, you're going to to find out about your practitioner long before your 39 or 40 weeks. So this is why you need to interview them. I always tell women, remember I talked about checking out the local hospital, but I also

say, you know, first visit you have with your OB should not be a medical visit. You should not be going in there, letting him take your blood pressure and drawing your blood and doing anything. It should be an interview. You should go in there. Remember, you're the consumer. They're the salesperson. You can decide whether or not you want to buy that car, you want to go to a different

dealer. You can decide that with your OB. And how do they answer the questions? Do they give you the time of day? Do they look you in the eye? Are they busy with typing in their computer? Or do they have one foot out the door? What do they do when you break your bag of waters a term and you're not in labor? What do they do? Do they do breach delivery? Oh, you don't? Why not? Will they let you go to 41 or 42 weeks? Ask these questions. As an interview, just say, you know, I'm not here to have you check on me today, I'm here to interview you. I'm happy to pay you for your time, pay your consult fee, whatever it is, but I'm not here to be your patient yet. I'm here to see if we click. And everybody knows when you feel good about somebody, you walk out of there feeling better,

then if you walk out of that office feeling worse than you walked in, and you're already nervous when you came in anyway, because you're always sort of nervous when you're pregnant going to the doctor. but did you walk out feeling safe and secure or did you walk out feeling more agitated? And if you walk out feeling more agitated, why the hell are you going back? I totally agree. Wait, so I have a question about what are your thoughts on inducing at 41 or 42 weeks versus just letting a woman let her baby come when he comes? I believe in nature's design.

So I would tend to let women go as long as they want. but I do believe in checking on the baby. So if you get to about 41, I wouldn't, there's no reason to be doing antinatal testing on a woman who has no problems, no hypertension, no diabetes, no growth restriction, true growth restriction. We didn't even get into that whole issue

with maternal fetal medicine doctors. But if they don't have any problems, then at about 41, 41 and a half weeks, I'd start testing the baby with what's called a biophysical profile. And that's just looking at the baby on the monitor and also checking the fluid around the baby, because fluid is a good indication of fetal urine output, and urine output's a good indication of placental profusion and blah, blah, blah.

So if those things are fine, then there's nothing magic about going beyond 42 weeks. Does the stillbirth rate rise? Yes. It rises in all pregnancies beyond 36 weeks. So that it rises is not what's important. What's important is how much is it actually rise. And that is a very small number. but you'll be often be told relative risk.

You'll say, well, it's twice as risky if we wait another week. Well, if the risk was, you know, one in 2000 this week, so next week it's one in a thousand. That may be, you know, some people I say, well, I don't want to take that risk. Okay, fine. Other people will say, well, that's a 99.9% chance not going to happen. And I think that there's benefits to my baby going into labor spontaneously, picking its own birthday. I don't know what it is, but I know nature designed it this way, so I'm going to wait.

And you should be able to have that choice. you should never be in a situation where you're feeling coerced, you should always be able to get an explanation from it. And if the explanation seems reasonable to you, then that's fine. But if it's not plausible, then understand that your doctor is just trying to get you down the path that makes them the most comfortable. Yeah, I completely agree. This was one of the many reasons why my husband and I didn't want to have an OB-Gen

because we were told that since I am quote-unquote geriatric, that most OB-GYNs would not allow me to give birth after 40 weeks. They would be forcing me into an induction. And they would have started testing your baby 36 weeks. You had to go in twice weekly. By the way, no concern how Courtney, you're a busy woman, how that affects your schedule, that you have to drop everything twice a week to go

and sit in a waiting room for an hour and then be on the monitors for a long time. And again, no concern about the fact that the monitors are a form of ultrasound, which is a form of EMR, non-ionizing radiation. And no one's ever tested those things for safety. You know, we live in worlds where our... where we're bombarded by everything between microplastics and 5G and glyphosate and geoengineering.

We don't really know all, you know, differentiate, but we do know that ultrasound is a form of radiation. It's not like x-rays, but it can cause, potentially cause problems. And because they've never really done any real good studies on that since the late 1980s, we don't really know what that's doing to our babies. We know that we have children right now who are more chronically ill than any generation ever before. Now, we can blame that on many different things, as I just said, or even the vaccines or whatever else you want to blame it on. That's fine. But maybe it's also what's happening in the womb. And maybe we need to take consideration about that and just go back to trusting nature's design.

And for some women who I'm talking about these things and say, well, listen, I have Medi-Cal. or Medicaid, I can't afford to do some of the things that you're saying, can't afford to go to a different hospital. Make this a priority. Start as a young woman, start saving money, get a health savings account going so that you're not limited in your choices by financial constraint. Because this is the most important thing that you will do in your life. And I always say, like, winning a gold medal is a great thing or graduating law school is a great thing.

But the thing you'll remember when you're very old and nearing, sorry, I get emotional, when you're nearing the end is you remember the birth of your children. And too many women love their children, but do not love the birth story of their children. And what have we done as a medical community to change that, to make that story something that women are upset about, they can never really get over. And I've talked to women my entire professional career. And a lot of them come to me in a second pregnancy or third pregnancy because they had a

bad experience in their first pregnancy. And they may have a nice birth in their second pregnancy, but you talk to them years later, and they're still upset about the fact that they got coerced into doing something and ended up with a C-section for their first pregnancy that they didn't need. And they always wonder if they could have done it differently. And that doubt shouldn't have to be something that hangs over, this most monumental event that you're about to embark upon. So it's really kind of cool.

I love everything that you just said, and I feel like that's a great place to end. And I will say it's very tragic and sad that we've taken that away from so many women. And I want to say one other thing. So my husband and I actually joined a crowd sourcing. It's not technically insurance, but we just call it insurance.

There's a company called Crowd Health, and they pay for the entirety of our homebirth after a little deductible, which is very manageable. They're great. We had the CEO on our podcast, and you should too, if you haven't had a mind. He's great. I did.

Yeah, he's amazing. Yeah, no, he's great. We're huge fans of crowd health. So anyone listening that feels like it's not attainable for them, my husband and I, for both of us, for our plan, I think we pay, like $180 a month or something. I mean, it's wild. So it's a great resource for people, especially if you're wanting to do homebirth. They're paying for the entirety of my home birth after a little deductible, which I think is cheaper than what we'd pay in the hospital. And you could pay a fortune in an insurance premiums.

and they won't pay for a home birth. And insurance companies are, you know, we all need it because the idea was actually designed by farmers. It was a co-op. So if somebody's crops failed, they didn't lose their farm because they all banded together. And then the idea then was morphed into something that was not ever meant to be, which is where insurance companies, they have the nicest buildings, they have the private jets, They sponsor the bowl games. They, you know, have sponsored the golf tournaments.

Clearly, they have enough money to blow on all kinds of things. And then they deny life-saving care. And then they deny life-saving care. They make it hard for you to get, you know, you don't pay your premium on time. You're canceled, but try to get payment for something that, a service that you had, and it may take, you know, nine months of fighting only to get a diminished reimbursement or nothing at all. Right. Again, that them along with pharma, along with big medicine,

have not made our country a healthier country. Well, my next guest is here, so I'm going to have to go. I hate cutting you off because I could talk to you for hours. I'm definitely going to have to have you come back on. In fact, if you would like to come back on, I would love to have you on after I've had my baby, and we can talk more. Maybe we can talk about my birth story.

I would, no matter how it goes, I would love to do that. And I would love to talk to your listeners a little bit about Breach and Twins. Yes, well, and that was on my list of questions. Yeah, we didn't get to it, right. I know. But let's do that. Okay. I'll have you come back.

I'll come to Austin next time. Right. I was going to say this time, come here and we can do it in person and we can share my birth story and maybe I'll even bring my baby with me. We'll see. Yeah, I'm sending you blessings to you and Hector and just hope it goes as smooth as you desire and you desire and you get everything that you desire. It's going to be one of the hardest things you've ever done, but it's going to be one

of the most valuable things that you've ever done. And odds are it's going to go great. It just is. And you have a trusted midwife who knows what she's doing. So you're in really good hands. So at the very beginning you said you're a little nervous about it. Don't be. Just go into it and surrender. Surrender to nature's design and trust that your body knows exactly what to do. That's why I just keep reminding myself over and over again. I'm like so many women have gone before me. My body knows exactly what to do. God designed my body to do this. I was meant to to do this. Just keep reminding myself all of that. Many blessings, Courtney. Thanks for having me on. Thank you. Also, please share with everyone where they can find you. Your podcast, your Instagram,

your Instagram, anything you want to love. Well, everything is birthing instincts, all one word. So it's birthing, well, no, it's Burthing Instincts podcast. At a website is birthinginstincts.com and the Instagram is at Burthing Instincts. And I, my mission in life right now, I've sure to retired from clinical practice simply because I got old and I didn't want to be on call anymore. but I go around the world and I teach breach and twin delivery skills along with the podcast with Bliss which we've been doing now. I've been doing the podcast since 2013, so it's been a long time. But Bliss has been with me for 10 years and we have fun doing it.

And I advocate for women's choices and informed consent and not skewed informed consent, but honest informed consent. So that's my mission in life. It's a good mission. I'm very happy. I moved out of California. Three years ago, I live in a small town in southern Utah. So if anybody's listening who happens to be traveling near Zion or Bryce or whatever

and wants to stop and say hello, I'm more than happy to see you. Thank you so much, Dr. Stu. This was an amazing episode, and I'm so excited to release it. And I'll be in touch after I've given birth. Thanks, Courtney. Thank you so much for listening to The Real Foodology Podcast. This is a Wellness Loud production, produced by Drake Peterson.

The theme song is by Georgie. You can watch the full video version of this podcast inside the Spotify app or on YouTube. As always, you can leave us a voicemail by clicking the link in our bio. And if you like this episode, please rate and review on your podcast app. For more shows by my team,

go to wellnessloud.com. See you next time. The content of this show is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not a substitute for individual, medical, and mental health advice and doesn't constitute

a provider-patient relationship. I am a nutritionist, but I am not your nutritionist. talk to your doctor or your health team first. Are you overwhelmed by the shoulds? Do you want to simplify your life to better align with your values? Do you want to create space in your schedule so you have room for the good stuff? Play, joy, relationships, creativity, and more?

Check out Edit Your Life, a podcast to help you edit the unnecessary from your life so you have more room to enjoy the awesome. Through episodes with me, Christine Coe, and a range of smart, compassionate guests, you will come away with insights and tactics to help you simplify and declutter your home, time, mental space, and more.