Switched on Pop - The End Of Pop Music As We Know It: Fall Out Boy & Charli XCX

Episode Date: May 4, 2017

Is it true that all pop music sounds the same today? For the past year the “pop-drop” has dominated the airwaves. This new form of EDM infused pop came out of DJ culture and has infused its sound ...with every mainstream act like Lady Gaga and Coldplay. Tiring of this sound, some artists are finding creative ways to parody this pop trope. The rock outfit Fall Out Boy’s “Young And Menace” demonstrates equal parts mastery and mockery of the pop-drop. And PC Music, a rising art-music label out of London, skewers the whole of pop cliché on their mixtape collaboration with Charli XCX. After this episode, we promise you’ll be ready to move on to new sounds. Luckily, listeners have collaborated to create a new favorites playlist to help you cleanse your palette. Featuring:The Chainsmokers - CloserKygo & Selena Gomez - It Ain’t MeLady Gaga - The CureFall Out Boy - Sugar We’re Going DownFall Out Boy - Young And MenaceJay Z - D.O.A. (Death Of Auto-Tune)Ariana Grande - Into YouKaty Perry feat. Skip Marley - Chained To The RhythmDrake - PassionfruitPostmodern Jukebox - Sugar We’re Going Down SwingingBritney Spears - Oops! I Did It AgainSkrillex - BangarangDJ Snake - MiddleBeyoncé - Love On TopIcona Pop - I Love It (feat. Charlie XCX)Iggy Azalea - Fancy ft. Charli XCXSelena Gomez - Same Old LoveCharli XCX - 3AM (Pull Up) (feat. MØ)Hannah Diamond - Every NightBronze - Thy SlaughterDanny L Harle - Super Natural (ft. Carly Rae Jepsen)SOPHIE - JUST LIKE WE NEVER SAID GOODBYEA.G. Cook - SuperstarAriana Grande - Side To SideCoon Sanders Original Nighthawk Orchestra - I'm Gonna Charleston Back To CharlestonSpotify Playlist: https://open.spotify.com/user/switchedonpop/playlist/1LeUhwRJfMGdlPkSMR9Uxu Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:01 Attention Spotify. Has arrived the new Good Girl Jasmine Absolute of Carolina Herrera, a fragrance with character curman and addictive. Imagine a jasmine
Starting point is 00:00:10 emvolvente, tofi caramelized and tonka toasted. A combination that seduce from the first instant and she has aweller. Discovering Auxel
Starting point is 00:00:20 and let mevote and get it involver for their sensia. Convierte your passion in a new business with Shopify and batte records of the
Starting point is 00:00:31 business with the form of the world. You've heard well the best conversion of the world.
Starting point is 00:00:38 The incredible system of the Pago by the website and your social and the internet and in
Starting point is 00:00:44 whatever that's music for your ears. No, you'll make more your
Starting point is 00:00:49 business will be a super-exit with Shopify. Start your period
Starting point is 00:00:53 of a year per one per records. Welcome to Switched on Pop.
Starting point is 00:01:06 I'm songwriter Charlie Harding and I'm musicologist Nate Sloan. So, Nate, this week we've done something a little bit different. We reached out to our listeners on Twitter and asked for a crowdsourced recommendation for an episode.
Starting point is 00:01:19 Wow. Really rolling the dice there. Anything could happen. We got over 40 submissions, and there's some extraordinary stuff in here. Nice. We've got a little playlist. We'll give it to people at the end. So after combing through these suggestions, Charlie, what stood out?
Starting point is 00:01:34 What caught your ear? There were two songs. They really captured me because they... are dealing with this sort of internal frustration that I've been having, which is the cliche argument of everything sounds too recycled, to the same. All pop music sounds the same, right? But these two songs have brought that feeling into a totally new context. Oh, interesting.
Starting point is 00:01:58 You're talking about sort of the assembly line sound of popular music sometimes. Yeah, exactly. So what I want to do today is I want to knock down one of our previous great, episodes and I want to try to declare the death of the pop drop. Whoa. And on top of that, I want to suggest where sounds might be going. Yes, let's topple some false idols. Let's kill our darlings. Let's expose the truth. So Nate, you may remember that last September we named this sound, this thing that had been happening for over a year, this new musical section where vocals get all chopper,
Starting point is 00:02:40 up and after the chorus and this giant moment of hyper dance poppiness called this thing the pop drop. I have a hazy recollection of that, yes. Yeah, we talked a lot about it on the show. And what's wild about a lot of these recommendations and a lot of the things that we're seeing on the charts is a really obvious me-toism, a let's take that sound which has been working and let's recycle it. So we have, for example, Selena Gomez has a tune,
Starting point is 00:03:24 It Ain't Me. Do you know this one? No, I haven't heard it. Let's check it out. Selena Gomez is not the only person borrowing the sound. We can even hear some of it on the new Gaga track called The Cure. I have heard this one. Yeah, I mean, I hear these as sort of variations on a theme of a pop drop, but it is unavoidable.
Starting point is 00:04:02 Oh, yeah. When you turn on the radio, it seems. So I sense that you feel that you've reached peak pop drop. I think we have, and I have found a song, which is the final nail in the coffin of that pop drop sign. Okay. It's Fallout Boy's new single, Young, and Menace. And this song is both a perfect pop drop and I think an absolute parody of the form. Now, for background.
Starting point is 00:04:29 Listeners may know Fall Out Boy as the Chicago rock band who have been producing hits since 2005. They are probably best known for their song, Sugar We're Going Down. Do you know this one? You know that tune. Wow, 12 years. It seems like a long time ago. Well, they're this great rock band.
Starting point is 00:05:02 They've got a really strong pop sensibility, and they have released this new track, Young and Menace, which on one level is a personal, story about the band's leader Pete Wentz, who you could say he's been a bit of a menace in his growing up as a rock star. He hasn't been the best behaved. But I think that this song is also, at least I'm hearing it as almost a parody of modern pop music. So let's drop the needle on Young and Menace. All right, hit me.
Starting point is 00:05:43 Twice like my name was Mickey 6 I woke up in my shoes again But some way you exist I did it again That was great Okay that was great I love that part Wow is that
Starting point is 00:06:20 Is that the same band? That was my first reaction, right? Wild What is the first thing that you hear In this track? The first, like the first sound you hear or the first thing that I noticed. What's the first thing you notice?
Starting point is 00:06:35 The first thing I noticed was the vocal being doubled by another vocal pitched way down, really low. Well, I want to hear that again. Oh, Charlie didn't notice that. I didn't notice that. Advantage Sloan. Well, you know what? The first thing I heard was the moment just before that. The really high voice. The high voice.
Starting point is 00:07:07 Yeah. The hint at the pop drop At the very beginning of the song Just like the Gaga track Just like the chain smoker's track Just like everybody's doing Yeah, you kind of adambrate the pop drop At the very start, yeah, I see that.
Starting point is 00:07:27 Exactly, which is the vocal Thrown up octaves as opposed to down octaves But I think in either way, it's pretty clear that this doesn't really seem like a rock band. No. I think instead it feels like they are imitating an electronic pop, hyper-pop sound. Yeah. I mean, can you even play this? Is this playable live?
Starting point is 00:07:56 That's an interesting question. I want to get back to that in a second. Okay, okay, table that. So in this verse, the first thing that he says is, we've gone too fast for too long, we were never supposed to make it half this far. We've gone way too fast for way too long. Again, two readings here. One could read this as somebody. who's basically saying I'm kind of like a burnt out rock star who has partied too hard
Starting point is 00:08:21 and we shouldn't have made it this far. I also am hearing it as whenever he's, when he's, just when he says that line. The little pop-droppy synthesized vocal comes in. And for me,
Starting point is 00:08:39 it's almost like, hey, this sound has gone far too long and needs to die. This is like the equivalent of Jay-Z's death of autotune moment. Oh, what's that?
Starting point is 00:08:52 That was when he did the death of autotune track was sort of a dig at all the rappers who were autotuning their vote. Is this Paul Outo-Boys equivalent right now? So I'm sort of hearing it that way. Because I think that they are making a self-conscious song that is playing to the expectations of what's happening on the radio, both probably for their own success, but I think there's a little bit of parody in here.
Starting point is 00:09:28 So they're trying to exploit it and kill it at the same time. Peak pop drop. That's what I'm talking about. Peak pop drop. So the other thing I notice in this verse is it has this sort of underwater electronic sound, a sound that you would not expect to hear in rock, where all of the upper frequencies are filtered out. All the music is just in the lower frequencies so that the vocal really stands out. We're never supposed to make it half this far.
Starting point is 00:09:56 We hear this in tracks all over the place from, we heard this certainly on the Ariana Grande, Max Martin track. What was it? Into you, Charlie. The Ariana Grande, Max Martin track, please. What? I don't know how you could forget the experience of listening to that song.
Starting point is 00:10:21 I mean, just a little, just processing that. But go ahead. I'm sorry. So she does the same sort of sound. We've also heard it on another Max Martin track. Recently, we talked about Katie Perry's chain to the rhythm. It has this same quality. And we've also heard this sound on a bunch of Drake's tracks.
Starting point is 00:10:45 We explored that thoroughly on another episode. Yeah. Well, you know Drake actually records in an underwater studio. That underwater sounds. I think this sound is a referential of modern pop music which is really drawing heavily upon
Starting point is 00:11:03 electronic EDM stuff and you catch this as well when the kick drum comes in you get this four to the floor duh duh sound oh yeah
Starting point is 00:11:14 that sort of build up that you would expect in an electronic pop tune and then we go to the chorus and what do you think is going to happen in a chorus? I kind of expect
Starting point is 00:11:24 what happened in that first song we listen to pour me some sugar mama what was that called again it's a pour me some sugar mama sounds like the 1950s version of sugar going down now you know where my head is always at yeah so I would expect something like that
Starting point is 00:11:50 where everything kind of peaks in this massive explosive chorus but no it doesn't do that does it no they do they're doing just what everyone else is doing on the charts right now, they have this as I've called it too many times, a diminutive chorus, nothing pops.
Starting point is 00:12:14 All the sonic characteristics of a chorus are just missing. Instead, we get a very tongue-in-cheek reference to potentially the height of pop music. Britney Spears, oops, I did it again.
Starting point is 00:12:37 The year 2000, yes. What do you think that they're saying? For Charlie, it was all downhill from there. I think it's been uphill. What was the question? What do you think this reference is about? Okay, so, okay, that's a great question. Because it is, like, I hear what you were saying earlier that there is something sort of smirky
Starting point is 00:13:11 or satirical or ironic here. And this is the moment to me where I feel that most acutely. Because it does seem to be a little bit an indictment of the pop music. landscape by by making this reference I think it's I think he kind of gets to have it both ways because at once it's sort of it's sort of vent like a certain veneration
Starting point is 00:13:35 of pop grates and it's also sort of a little bit like pulling back the curtain and look you know look what we're doing it again there's no debate that this is a reference because he uses the exact same rhythm that Britney Spears uses in her tune deep references here
Starting point is 00:14:01 but I think obviously a cynical reference, he says the line, I only wrote this down to make you press rewind. And send a message I was young and a menace. Well, now I'm connecting it to the psych assessment. Is this some kind of like clockwork orange-esque brain laboratory that he's reporting from or something? I think that there, again, is a double meaning and impartially in that clockwork orange direction. So first there's actually a deep reference to the band, which I only found on genius.com, that press for rewind is a lyrical trope that they've used on many of their other songs. So they're
Starting point is 00:14:51 referencing their uvra, if you will. But there's also this oops, I did it again. I only wrote that down to make you press for wine. It's like this is, I wrote this thing down because it's infectious. It's going to be stuck in your ear. It's an earworm. You're going to keep going back to it. And I only wrote it to do so suggests that it's a cryptic and sort of menacing commercialism to the pop
Starting point is 00:15:16 landscape, right? I think that's what's coming across. I'm toying with you is what he's saying, basically. Exactly. Yeah. After his cynical message,
Starting point is 00:15:26 what do we get? We get the complete fragmentation and dissolution of every sound we've heard so far. It's like stepping into a fun house of mirrors.
Starting point is 00:15:49 This is, and this is the peak pop drop. I think this is the most amazing pop drop I've ever heard. Yeah. We obviously get the chopped up vocals that we've heard in so many other tunes. They're pitched all around. And underneath a, what is it? I don't dare to try and suss out what's happening in that section. an immensely controlled rhythm section.
Starting point is 00:16:19 Some of that rock guitar is in there. There are just all these insane gestures and sounds moving and sweeping through and messing with your mind. It's so delicately tied together. It's almost like turning your radio dial really fast and happening to get a bunch of different styles of music that fit in the same rhythm because it's very disjunct. Like it's very, yeah, the seams are showing. It has the dubstep qualities that we've heard from Scrilex.
Starting point is 00:16:57 It has a lot of that pop-trop quality that we have heard from DJ Snake. Totally. It brings these things together in a way that, again, is controlled, intentional, catchy, but I think also a bit of a parody. And I get this feeling of parody. in the composition itself. Ooh, interesting. Okay.
Starting point is 00:17:37 I don't know how to completely describe this collage aesthetic, but there's a moment where you think it's over, but it's not. Right. There's a sense of closure. Yeah, that's...
Starting point is 00:17:57 And no, it's gonna keep on going. There's another entire section waiting for you. Yeah, that's pretty wild. I think Fall Out Boys is taking the form, distilling it down to its essence, playing it back, making you press free while.
Starting point is 00:18:11 And it makes me reflect on, hey, all the other people that are doing this pop drop sound, one, can't do it nearly as well. But two, probably nobody should repeat this again because this is enough. I buy it. I totally buy it. It's like after we covered Beyonce modulating four times and love on top, it's like everyone else was like, nope, now no one else can modulate again. There haven't been a lot of pop modulations. Yeah, especially the multiple modulations in a song. Yeah, this is such a maximalist and very, like, aggressive and intense that it at once makes you feel the sort of desperation of the lyrics expressed in a musicalized form and makes you go, wow, this song has pushed this technique to its limits and is doing so kind of with a wink at the same time.
Starting point is 00:19:10 Yeah, exactly. So I think Fallow Boy have done an extraordinary job here But I don't think that they are the best parodiest out there Oh, okay I'm intrigued So there was once a queen of meta-aware Hyper self-conscious pop art Distilled to its essence
Starting point is 00:19:31 Into parody And that throne for a long time I think was held by Lady Gaga Yeah But I believe that there is a new ascending queen who is... Who we'll talk about right after the ad break. Oh, brutal. Brutal.
Starting point is 00:19:49 Okay. I wait with bated breath. Maria, you have a podcast now and you need to start acting like it. What's the first step as a podcaster? Well, you have to ask lots of questions. I'm Maria Sharpova and I'm hosting a new podcast called Pretty Tough. Every week, I'm sitting down with trailblazing women at the top of their game to discuss ambition, work ethic, and the ups and downs that come on the path to achieving greatness.
Starting point is 00:20:19 I have a few pretty tough questions for you. Okay. Ready? Ready. Do not sugarcoat something for me. No. No. We'll dive into their stories and get valuable insights from top executives,
Starting point is 00:20:31 actors, entrepreneurs, and other individuals who have inspired me so much in my own journey. Pretty tough is your front row seat to the women who have demonstrated the power in being unapologetic in their pursuits. I hope you'll join us. episodes drop Wednesdays on YouTube or in your favorite podcast app. Immigration may be Donald Trump's signature issue. President Trump is now targeting predominantly Democratic cities for ice raids and deportations. Dozens of protesters clashing with immigration and customs enforcement agents in Minneapolis Tuesday.
Starting point is 00:21:07 We will begin the process of returning millions and millions of criminal aliens back to the places from which they came. But what we want to do in this space is talk about America and politics beyond the current president. So what do most Americans think about deportation and border security, period? I think that Americans are definitely against the kind of violent displays that we've seen in the street from ICE. When it comes to the question of deportation, the answer is more complicated. My sense is that people want border at the border. They don't like the idea of having no idea who's coming into the United States at any given time. The view on immigration from the bottom up, instead of the top down. That's this week,
Starting point is 00:21:50 on America Actually. Every Saturday in your audio and video feeds. Nate, at the top of the show, I made a bold statement that too much pop music is sounding too alike and it's getting to me. But we are in luck because there are artists who are turning these pop clichés into brilliant artistic parodies.
Starting point is 00:22:15 And I'm talking about more than just the pop drop. I want to double down on my bold statement by suggesting that there is a new, descendant queen of art pop music who is consciously using these cliches in a way that highlights both the ridiculous elements and the best elements of pop. And I'm very excited to share her with you now. I'm very excited to hear about it. I like your prognosticating here and you're proclaiming. You're like looking at your watch at 10.30 p.m. on April 26, I pronounce the pop drop.
Starting point is 00:22:54 deceased. A bold statement. Well, I will keep you in suspense no longer. The artist who has got my attention is Charlie XX. Oh, we have not heard from her in a while. Charlie XX, also known as Charlotte Acheson. Etchison. I guess I should have known that XCX was not her real last name.
Starting point is 00:23:16 No, no. We first talked about Charlie XXX, I think on our third episode, about her song, BoomClap. and she is known as a great songwriter, but also as a really great co-writer. She has written alongside Icona Pop, Iggy Azalea. She wrote the Selena Gomez song, Same Old Love, which we've covered on the show.
Starting point is 00:23:43 Really? Oh, fascinating. She's been all over the pop charts for a couple of years, but we've been ignoring her. So we've been missing out because I think that Charlie XX is this really aware pop writer who has a almost, war-hawish-like character, like Lady Gaga has had in the past, but for me, almost to a whole another degree in her understanding, celebration, and parading of the form of pop music.
Starting point is 00:24:13 Cool. Yeah. Okay. Let's drop the needle on Charlie XX's new single 3am pull-up featuring the artist Mo. This is off of her latest mixtape called Number One Angel, a co-production with many of the artist on the PC music label. Let's check it out. Take me there.
Starting point is 00:25:13 Wow, that is relentless. I dig it. What do you feel about this song? I think I'm into it. I don't know if I like it or not, but I find it kind of irresistible. I think that is part of its intent. I'm going to do something that is a little a characteristic of our show. Whoa.
Starting point is 00:25:30 Before we go into what is making this song tick. I think we need to know a little bit about the people. people behind it and how it's made and the influences it's drawing from. Cool. I accept this proposition. Thank you. We need to go back a few years. This new label out of London comes out. They're called PC music.
Starting point is 00:25:53 It's a bunch of electronic musicians in their 20s, founded by this producer named A.G. Cook. Huh. It's known for robotic, hyperpop that feels like it's... Cape Hop with Max Martin hits distilled down to their purest form and sped out by an artificial intelligence. Huh. Whoa.
Starting point is 00:26:15 Cool. And when you look at the dozens of think pieces about PC music, people describe them as potentially the next big thing in music. But overwhelmingly, the adjectives that you heard were synonyms for plastic, fake, neon, polyurethane, bubble gum. These were the words that described their sound. Yeah, interesting. There is this great quote from The Guardian.
Starting point is 00:26:44 Sam Wolfson writes that this music is part intellectual response to the prevalence of marketing and pop culture and part antagonistic refreshing of the most critically ridiculed music from the past decade and packaging it as if it's the future. Yeah, that sounds like a pretty interesting. accurate assessment of what I just heard. He further describes some of their music as like a malfunctioning bop it. And what's extraordinary about this label is that it's actually not a real label. So first all, they don't really have like an office. They don't have a formal record label. It's really just a conglomerate of these different electronic producers and singers who have a sort of cult status
Starting point is 00:27:34 pseudo-celebrity. They rarely give interviews. And when they do, they're entirely staged. And they are almost like performance artists in pop star imagery. Fascinating. Like a collective, perhaps. They're a collective. Yeah, exactly. A.G. Cook says that he with this group is trying to make forward-thinking pop music something that pushes the envelope.
Starting point is 00:27:59 And he wants to make things that are upbeat, happy. They're almost juvenile. And I want to go into the sounds of PC music, what they're completely. prized of because I think that they're going to give us context for the Charlie X-CX album, which was produced by artists from across this label. Yeah. Huh. So what I was saying is that this is pop art music.
Starting point is 00:28:26 It's pop music to the nth degree. It's super self-aware. And it's also, it's intentional. It's trying to make, it's not, not pop music. And it's not not making fun of pop music. It's somewhere in the middle. You can't figure out if it's performance art or not. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:28:44 The umbrella quality of their sound is just super pop. And I want to give you some examples. This is Every Night by Hannah Diamond. So robotic. Wow. This is wild, Charlie. Check this out. This is bronze by the slaughter on PC Music's Volume 1.
Starting point is 00:29:32 That is completely blowing my mind. It is. It's like the simulacra. It's like Baudriard meets pop music or something. It's a little too. Usually pop producers find ways to soften the edges of their perfectly quantized computer-made compositions into something that sounds more organic here. It's kind of the opposite.
Starting point is 00:29:55 It's like, let's go further into that metronomic precision and sort of lifeless vocals to make it sound as artificial as possible. But beyond just the robotic quality of the distillation. of pop music. It even has this Europop dance sound like a sort of sports anthem kind of quality. You can hear it in Denny L. Harrell, I think is the producer with Carly Ray Jepson. They did a track called Supernatural
Starting point is 00:30:23 Off of PC Music Volume 2. Nice. So this is what's funny about that. You have this Europop quality that starts really big, but then recesses down into something small and constrained. And this is the other character quality of PC music.
Starting point is 00:30:55 It has this restraint to it. Just as much as it's super pop, it also holds back. Let me show you in another example, what I mean. This is Sophie. He's all over the Charlie XX album. He's also working with Rihanna right now. Big producer. He has a track called Just Like We Never Said Goodbye.
Starting point is 00:31:14 And I think you'll really get the idea of intentional restraint of that hyper-EDM energy. Cool. It's like you never said goodbye When you spoke to me You have the biggest grit on your face Oh my God, yeah And I feel like my eyes are like Why does sausage?
Starting point is 00:31:40 This is so It's again, but my reaction is At once like completely Captivated and also Like slightly disturbed. Yeah, exactly. And so do you hear that sense That there's, it feels like it's going to be
Starting point is 00:31:54 enormous. The song has this obnoxious, loud, trancey Wow, wow, But there's no drums. It just never goes anywhere. It stays at this almost breaking hyper energy. It has that restrained quality. The last thing that we need to discuss about PC music
Starting point is 00:32:15 is their simplicity of melody. Their songs are meant to get stuck in your head. This is A.G. Cook, the label's founder, and this is his track, Superstar. I know the other one. Huh, that is, yeah, again, it's, it's, it's, it's wonderful and familiar and slightly unsettling. It has an almost nursery rhyme-like quality, right? Yeah, but it's so aggressive that it takes away any sort of comfort that you might get from those rhymes.
Starting point is 00:33:04 So for a couple of years, PC music has been making this very strange, super pop, robotic, simplistic, restrain. bubble gum pop sound and across the internet people have been predicting that this is either the next big thing or that this parody is the death of pop music altogether they have struggled to find their audience they haven't ever had a real breakout smash
Starting point is 00:33:32 except for in these sort of underworlds of music criticism until working with Charlie XXX and I think we're going to see more and more their sound with other artists So I want to listen again to 3 a.m. Within the context of PC music. Cool.
Starting point is 00:33:48 So do you hear 3 a.m. in a slightly different context now? Yeah, I do. I hear it as like one of those PC music experiments, except with, instead of that robotic singer, we have a real person. Like Charlie XX is just kind of dropped into the middle of that. Even though they change her vocals too, they all they put some weird gating effect on it or something. where it sounds like, just like swoops in and swoops out really quickly. There's like no decay to her voice at all.
Starting point is 00:34:41 She's definitely embracing the sound and I think bringing it into a slightly more listenable terrain, if you will. Yeah, totally. And the song has a nice arc too, you know? Yep. Well, let's talk about that arc and how it works. We open up with the same method that we are hearing in the Fallout Boy. the same thing that we're hearing throughout the pop drop.
Starting point is 00:35:10 The hint of the chorus from the very beginning with this high, almost obnoxious vocal. In this case, it's not chopped and sampled, but it has that same quality. Yeah, there it is. The foreshadow of the feast to come. Exactly. This is a technique we hear all through pop music. It's called Don't bore us, get to the chorus, put the hook at the start, and give us a hint of what's to come. And as we said, PC music is trying to distill the sound of pop music and regurgitate it back in a hyper pop form.
Starting point is 00:35:48 And so they too use this, don't bore us, get to the chorus. It's a technique we've heard other artists use like Ariana Grande and Max Martin in their song side to side. Right. So this is, again, this is like Uber Pop. Uber Pop. It's using all the right language of pop music and distilling it to its essence. Ah, gotcha, yeah. Aside from just the textural quality, I want to pay attention to the composition of the verse because it's simple nursery rhyme-like melody
Starting point is 00:36:28 that we expect from PC music, it's basically made of this really simple walk-down the major scale, right? Right. That is what we call, yeah, consecutive scalar patterns right there. It's the easiest melody anybody could sing. It will immediately get stuck in your ear because of that. Right, and it has that internal repetition that creates a very hooky effect for a listener. And she starts in a low octave so she can eventually walk up the scale to build energy, a great pop writing trick.
Starting point is 00:37:12 Very effective. Basically so that they are immensely sticky, they stay in your ear. But the melody stays simple all throughout. And as the song builds up the chorus, where you move up into a higher register, the melody gets even simpler. She just walks down three notes of the scale. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:37:48 And the melody culminates at the end of the chorus with doubling down on the home note, playing it over and over again, drilling it into your ear. Doesn't get much more textbook than that. I think that the chorus has this. this PC music-like quality. It's simple, it's a high melody, it's robotic,
Starting point is 00:38:14 and underneath it is this restraint. The whole thing is driven by this underlying rhythm. Yeah, I do hear what you're talking about. And we never get much more than this rhythm. It's this simple, syncopated kick all throughout. Yeah. Incidentally, that's the same rhythm as the Charleston. the dance that was
Starting point is 00:38:49 a pop music craze in the 1920s. I'm not... No, no, no, no, no. I'm not going to let you go down classical master's route. You can't stop it. It's happening. No, no, it's over.
Starting point is 00:39:02 History repeats itself, my friend. So I think this rhythm really matters because it supports the most important element of the song, and we haven't even called it out. It's the tempo. The song is really fast. It's a lot faster
Starting point is 00:39:19 than things that we hear on the charts. It's almost comical. It's really fast. Yeah. And I think that they use a fast BPM in order to bring out the parody quality, to bring attention to the roboticness, the
Starting point is 00:39:40 simplicity of the melody. And the song is over 130 beats per minute, I believe. And that's a lot faster than most radio, which is 120 and lower these days. So I think if you compare to other things you might be listening to, it really stands out.
Starting point is 00:39:56 And this kick drum makes it stand out even more by syncopating the rhythm, so it feels like it's moving even faster. Yeah. And on top of that, you get a vocal singing in really fast 16th notes.
Starting point is 00:40:10 So everything feels frantic. It has this manic-like quality, right? Yeah, that's a good descriptor. It's a little stressful to listen to it. I think that this hyperactive tempo supports the lyric in the meaning of the song, which, although simple, works perfectly with the music. The lyrics are just another cliche.
Starting point is 00:40:31 It's about a broken up relationship that gets back together after a 3 a.m. phone call. But this song captures that 3 a.m. feel really well. You know what it's like when you're staying up all night? It's 3 a.m. You're way over tired, and you're just buzzing from too much. Yeah, yeah, I do. I think that this song has that feeling of that your heartbeat is like going way too fast. You've been cramming. There's an exam.
Starting point is 00:41:15 You can't sleep because of all that caffeine. And it's embedded in this song. It's in the tempo. It's in the lyrical acceleration. But like PC music is want to do, the song also has this restraint. It never really blows up. Probably, I think it supports the lyric because at 3 a.m., you probably don't have enough energy to really let it go. Yeah, no, I totally know what you mean.
Starting point is 00:41:46 And yet, there is kind of a happy ending in a way to this saga. Your dismissal of the lyrics of this song suggests to me that you may not have paid much attention to them. I, in contrast to my usual technique, actually did this time. And if you're not paying attention, as you and I, again, are want to do. You don't notice that. The lyrics shift. Yeah. So at the end, she's talking about pulling up at 3 a.m. for a late night booty call.
Starting point is 00:42:14 Right. But after kind of having this come to Jesus moment when Moe steps in and starts singing with her. Yeah. But by the time we get to the final chorus, she's saying, it's 3 a.m. And you're calling. And then I can't believe I used to want this. Oh. No more.
Starting point is 00:42:29 No pull up, pull up, pull up, pull up, pull up, pull up, pull up, pull up, right to your love. No more pull up, pull up, pull up, pull up. So there is an arc of progression there. And afterwards, the song disperses even further. The frenetic quality falls out and we're left with that washy synth sound, which maybe supports the protagonists letting it all go and preparing to rest. Yeah, I buy that. Well, I made multiple bold claims about this track.
Starting point is 00:43:15 I hope that we can see that in breaking it down that this song is really brilliantly embracing the tropes of pop songwriting, taking them to their logical conclusion, doing so really effectively and doing so in a really singable song that you can't get out of your head. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:43:37 I want to suggest that Charlie XX is a master of her craft. She can take all of the structures of pop music and give it back to us in a way that says that she knows everything that she's doing. And with the support of A.G. Cook, who is the producer on this track and the founder of the PC music label, I think the two of them are really the masters now of pop art music, I think sort of displacing Lady Gaga who wants to help the throne. I also want to say that beyond just her understanding of composition, and pop cliche,
Starting point is 00:44:17 Charlie XX is also playing with the image of pop music. You have to check out this music video of her performing on Kimmel where her and A.G. Cook performed the song, Bounce. The song has zero miracle content other than bounce.
Starting point is 00:44:44 Yeah. That is about it. So what's happening is she's dancing on this stark white stage, which is coated in feathers. And she's also wearing feathers. Everything's in white. She's dancing frantically all by herself, jumping all around the stage, out of breath.
Starting point is 00:45:03 She's dancing like nobody's watching her, like she's at a rave. And hilariously, behind her is A.G. Cook, the label owner and her producer, he's lying face down on the ground as if he's passed out. And she's just dancing all around him, not paying attention. Really? That happened on television? It happened on TV. And I think that it's making fun of this pop cliche. You hear it in a lot of verses. You dance till you drop.
Starting point is 00:45:39 I think it's really mocking that rave culture, the individualistic narcissism where everyone's dancing all around you and you're in your own comfortable bubble by yourself. No, I'm totally convinced. You know, between this song and the Fallout Boy song we listened to earlier, I find it totally persuasive that artists
Starting point is 00:45:58 kind of fed up with the status quo are starting to release their own tracks that sort of poke fun at the assembly line nature of pop today. So is it too much to say that the pop drop is over and that writers need to be conscious of how they use the cliches that Charlie XEX, AG Cook and PC music so intelligently toy with? It's never too much for me.
Starting point is 00:46:22 So let's do it. Let's declare the pop drop dead. And if anybody's sad about that, there's good news. The good news is that in our listener recommendations, there is so much extraordinary good new music that I'm really excited to check out. And we'll make sure to share that playlist of recommendations with everybody on Twitter and Facebook. Yeah, well, I think you've just sketched out some possible new directions. You're never supposed to use the phrase new directions. Whoa, okay. Sorry, Charles.
Starting point is 00:46:52 If you don't get the double entendre, just say it aloud a couple of times. People stupidly use it all the time, especially in marketing, billboards, advertising. Oh my God, that's great. Anyway, Nate, it has been a pleasure. I'm excited to explore new sounds with you real soon. Till then. Switched on Pop is produced by me, Charlie Harding. And me, Nate Sloan.
Starting point is 00:47:23 Editing by Bill Lance and design by Luke Harris. We are a proud member of the Panofly Network. You can catch all of our past episodes. on the Apple Podcast app where it would mean a lot to us if you would leave us a review. I'm still waiting for a review in RIME. We have a playlist of over 40 tracks submitted by listeners. Go check it out. I assure you like me, you'll discover some very cool new stuff on there.
Starting point is 00:47:50 And we are always looking to engage on the Facebook, on the Twitter. Reach out to us at Switched on Pop and let's continue the conversation. We'll be back again in two weeks with a new show. and until then, thanks for listening.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.