TAKE ONE Presents... - The Xenopod 9: Outro
Episode Date: December 27, 2023Final report of the podcast, The Xenopod. We've watched all the Alien franchise films and offer this final report on our findings, the various themes that have emerged as we went through, and some tho...ughts on the future of the franchise. With a little luck, the network will pick this up. This is The Xenopod, signing off. Our theme song is Alien Remix by Leslie Wai available on SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/lesliewai/alien-remixThis podcast was recorded during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. Without the labour of the actors currently on strike, the film being covered here wouldn’t exist.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Get away from her, you bitch away from her, you bitch!
Hello and welcome back to the Xenapod, a podcast where we watched all the alien franchise films in order,
contextualize them and critique them.
I'm Simon Bowie, and joining me for this final episode of the Xenapod,
where we're going to wrap things up, is, as always, my co-host, Jim Ross.
Hello.
Hi, Jim.
Merry Christmas
Yeah, I know
It sounds a bit funny
Because we're recording these air at a time
But yes, indeed,
Merry Christmas
But yeah, this is coming out
In that lull between Christmas and New Year
As a special treat for listeners
It's not
We're not reviewing the official aliens' Christmas film
Which is Prometheus
Or the unofficial alien Christmas film
Which is Alien vs Predator Requiem
Although actually, looking at the release state of this
When this comes out
Happy Birthday to Me
the day after us comes out.
Oh, wonderful.
Merry Christmas.
Happy birthday.
That lull.
The lull between Christmas and New Year,
otherwise known as Jim's birthday.
The gym period.
Yeah, today we're going to wrap up.
We're going to offer some thoughts on the franchise as a whole,
look at some of the themes that we've discussed over this podcast,
share our rankings of the franchise,
and sort of look towards future alien friends.
franchise projects or projects that never got off the ground for one reason or another.
Before we get started, I'll say that this podcast was recorded during the 2023
saga after a strike, and without the labour of the actors currently on strike,
the film being covered here, covered here, wouldn't exist.
And I really, really hope by the time that this comes out that strike is done with.
Hopefully it'll be resolved.
I can't help us if it's still going on when this is actually published.
I can't see the studios.
wanting to extend this into Oscar season. I think that'll be the big, you know,
breaking point for the studios.
Finally, Oscar season is good for something.
Good for labor relations, unexpectedly.
Yeah, exactly.
So I went back to listen to our first episode where we did a little intro episode and what
we wanted to do with this podcast, setting out our stall, as it were.
I wanted to ensure that we met our aims and objectives.
for this project.
So we talked a lot about treating the alien franchise as a continuous text and looking at it as
one media text, which I think we tried to do, but we had trouble because the franchise itself
is so discontinuous.
Different directors, different historical periods of production.
A couple of recurrent themes came up over the podcast, like what you termed the identity
crisis, a term that really stuck for us as we went through these films, where they do have
a crisis about what they want to be. I think that really starts in aliens, right?
Like right almost at the beginning of the franchise, because it's so different from alien.
Yeah, because the funny thing is, I mean, you're right, it does start right from the off,
and I think it's one of the things that's praised, and I think we've even said in the episode,
one of the most praised things about aliens is the fact that it takes this blueprint
the alien set down
and it basically takes it in a related
but very different direction, right?
And that's how it kind of makes itself its own
beast and I think probably what made that film
so successful. I think the funny thing is
other films in this series
then tried to do it to varying degrees
of success.
So, like, it really does start
from the off. I think one of the other difficulties
in taking it as a continuous text
is what direction you actually take
that from, right? Because you can do it as
you can do it
based on characters, right?
In which case you've kind of got the four films
that centre around
Ellen Ripley, you've got Prometheus
and Covenant together, because they're basically kind of
like, you know, one's a direct sequel to the other,
and then they offshoot kind of alien
versus predator affair.
So you could do it that way. You could do it chronologically, right?
So you could start off with
you know, Prometheus, well, I mean, suppose technically
you'd have to start off with Alien versus Predator
and Requiem, which you might have to.
just give up after that but then
you know that and then you'd have
Prometheus and Covenant and then you'd have
you know the series based on
Ripley or you know
I think that's also part of the issue
here is a very convoluted
is a very convoluted set of
films in terms of what angle you want to take
it from I think the angle we've gotten with the release
order I think that is the way to do it because I think
that kind of best reflects the times in which
each of these were made as well
but you know you could argue it for other
other ways to do it
So that's another thing we've discussed, this kind of multimedia versus transmedia franchise
and how that has developed with kind of blockbuster paradigms.
So there's different routes into the franchise as we've discussed through this podcast
and kind of subjective roots.
Like we talked about Rudiger Heinz's articles on the alien universe
and these meta-cinematic universes.
And yeah, these different routes in which you've just talked about.
but they also reflect these kind of shifting paradigms of Hollywood blockbuster entertainment.
So we mentioned in one podcast that Alien comes out during a period where Kramer versus Kramer is at the top of the box office charts,
which is just feels inconceivable today.
Yeah, yeah.
You know, it really takes us from the kind of dying days, I suppose, of New Hollywood,
through this kind of 80s blockbuster era,
a kind of 90s cheaper blockbuster era,
and then to the kind of huge productions,
your MCUs and your Star Warses that we have today.
Yeah, and it's hard to separate that out, right?
Because, I mean, several of the films,
particularly the first two alien aliens that we've spoken about,
they're quite, you know, I mean, it's a big well-known franchise
and those two films in particular.
They're quite influential films, right?
So there's a little bit of a chicken and egg scenario here.
But, like, Alien feels like a film from the 1970s, right?
It has the pacing and the kind of just feel of a 70s film.
Same for aliens, right?
It sits quite nicely alongside kind of this 80s action film template that kind of developed,
albeit it's got its own ideas and, you know, I think it's a bit more intelligent than some of those.
But it's very but comfortably at home in that.
And then on the less kind of, you know, film.
that didn't fare quite so well from a kind of critical perspective when we were talking about them.
Even the likes of Alien Resurrection, it feels like a very late 90s film, right?
You know, it's...
It feels very late 90s.
We talked about the kind of casual teenage boy misogyny of that film and the kind of teenage aspect of a lot of the script decisions.
Yeah.
You know, so, like, and as I say, there's a bit of a chicken and egg thing here.
Like, you know, are the films reflecting the time which they've made, or are they,
influential in what falls and I think for the first couple I think there's you know I mean aliens a tough
one because it came right at the end of the 70s right but I think still around that time it probably
had an influence I think aliens despite you know it's a little bit of both I think for something
like resurrection it's more it's reflecting the time it's made in I don't think alien resurrection is a
particularly influential film in that respect but um no but yeah it's it's just interesting to look at
and I think like another thing about taking these things as a continual text is the sheer length
of time that this spans, I mean, if you think about the original Star Wars films, that's
still, like, you know, what, less than a decade, you know, I mean, from, like, you know,
the, you know, from Star Wars, as it was called, before it was retitled, the New Hope, through
to the Return of the Jedi, it's not a particularly long period of time, whereas if you look
at even just alien through to alien resurrection, we're talking about, so that was 97, 79,
you know, we're talking about, like, what, 28 years, you know, like, it's, it's, it's,
You know, it's an enormous period of time, and we're talking about maintaining the lead character also in that case across that time, long before, you know, legacy sequels were even really kind of a thing that we spoke about.
There is a kind of interesting consistency in the films. I mean, you've just spoken about how they have different tones, and I agree. But there is a kind of consistency that you get in going from Alien to Alien Covenant that you'd,
don't see in, say, Mission Impossible,
which you go back to the first one,
and it feels so 1996.
Oh, yeah.
It almost feels entirely different
from where it's ended up.
There's been a massive shift.
And, of course, you see shifts
in the Alien franchise,
like the Alien versus Predator films
feel very different.
And maybe what I'm talking about here
is simply because Ridley Scott came back
and did the last two.
So there's this kind of bookending
of tone and,
production design and vision.
I mean, to do the Mission Possible comparison, like, it's funny.
I mean, I think Mission Possible is another series of films where you could actually do
something like this, but I don't think it would be as interesting to look at, right,
because of the focus of those films.
But in terms of the kind of consistency of tone, I think Mission Possible has its own phases,
right?
And I think basically, once you hit, let's say, Mission Possible five onwards, right?
I think they're pretty, you know, they're pretty consistent after that point.
But I think prior to that, the way it kind of feels a little bit similar to the Eileen series is in bringing different directors to it, right?
I mean, like, the shift from De Palma to John Wu, right, from one to two.
It feels very stark.
That feels very stark, almost in the way that the shift from Ridley Scott's horror film to James Cameron's action film feels with the first two, right?
So I think you're right in the sense
that it's Ridley Scott came back to it, right?
I think that's what I'm thinking of.
Because Mission Impossible vacillates
until it finds a groove.
Alien almost immediately finds a groove
and then goes off it
to get back into that groove
30 years later or whatever, 40 years later.
But even then, even then it's not 100% consistent
because I think Ridley Scott comes back to it
and that brings a certain tone and approach
that is what makes it feel similar.
But he comes back to it with much kind of grander scale ideas, right?
I mean, like, at least he does with Prometheus,
and then they immediately get rained back in to an extent with Covenant.
But it's interesting, even within that,
it kind of, it kind of makes you think about where he would have gone with it
if he'd actually stuck with the immediate sequels.
I would have been interested to see where...
I feel like almost if you didn't have that disconnect,
maybe you would have ended up with something a bit more coherent, but, you know, yeah.
We've watched all the alien franchise films, and we've both done rankings for the alien franchise films.
Now, I was aware when we were doing this, that more than likely, alien and aliens are going to be top.
We're not, you know, we're not so out there that we're saying anything is better than alien or aliens.
But there is some interesting variation, perhaps, in our ranking.
rankings so do you want to go first yeah sure I'll fire away as anybody who knows me I'm I'm not
big on rankings so this is done under mild duress but I think you know I think um you ask me on
a different day you might get a slightly different ranking here but I think this I think this
kind of broadly reflects like especially having watched everything another time and like
reflecting on what they were trying to do um I think you know I think I'll probably go with
So, number one, it's not really any surprise at Alien, right?
I think we both agreed that, like, especially for what that film's trying to do,
it's essentially perfect, right?
So that's right up there.
I did actually deliberate a little bit about position, too,
because I did end up with slightly mixed feelings about aliens when we then spoke about it,
but I think that's more to do with the influence of the film itself
and, like, what effect it had, rather than the actual text of the film.
So, aliens, unsurprisingly, is in second place.
I think when push comes to shove, that's where it goes.
I think you could make a case for other films going above it,
but I think that would be more, you know, slight cynicism about what people learnt from aliens
rather than the film itself.
I had the same kind of vacillation.
Like, we discussed it in the episode.
I don't like what aliens does to the franchise and where it takes it,
but it is a well-structured and well-made film.
Yeah.
And it's, you know, above many of the others that will go on to rank.
Yeah, within the confines of the film itself, it's excellent, right?
It's when it goes beyond that, it starts to maybe fall apart.
In third position, I have actually put Alien 3.
There's a lot about that film I like.
I like the grimy murkiness of it,
and I think it also shows how you can do that and make it look good, right?
Because I think anybody who watches that film and complains about, like,
a very flat, samey palette should then go on to watch Alien versus Predator
requiem and realize that
there's a lot worse
out there and this is actually pretty well
done right you know and I keep thinking about the image
of one of the prisoners against
the rotating fan and the lighting
I think this isn't
a great looking film it has a lot of problems
but I think it
kind of holds itself together
well enough and it has a lot
going for it I think I also
quite like the fact that if you wanted
to you could take those three films
and make them a nice little self-
Contained Trilogy and just leave it at that, right?
The vagaries of, like, Hollywood and making money and all the rest of it
mean that we've got the other five films on this list, but I quite like the fact that you
could make that little sort of self-contained thing.
So for me, for what Alien 3 was trying to do, I like it a lot, and I think it's amazing
it pulls off as well as it does, given, like, some of the problems with it.
But, yeah, I'm going to put Alien 3 in the third, I think.
That's fair, yeah, I think there's a really nice little self-contained.
contained trilogy in Alien Aliens and Alien 3 with a nice symmetry to it that we don't stick
with because they want to make money. No, no. Now, after this, this is when it starts to get
so quite difficult in my view to rank them, right? So as I say, I think there's a few
that aren't hills I'll die on, but fourth I've put, so I'll do four and five together
because they essentially come to like, you know, they send it. Yeah, they come as a pair
essentially. I have put Covenant above Prometheus. For a few reasons, I think Covenant works
better as a film on its own terms and in and of itself. I don't know if it really works as a sequel
to Prometheus, but it does enough interesting stuff. And we spoke about this on the last episode. A lot
of it comes through kind of Fastbender's character and David and, you know, what it's trying to say through
him and I found the actual kind of scenes and action and horror of that effective enough
that I got a lot out of that and I thought it was a really interesting film ultimately what
it comes down to is I was kind of less annoyed by it than Prometheus like I mean even
rewatching Prometheus the both films suffer from the supposedly smart characters
doing dumb things trope I think Covenant suffers from it a lot less than Prometheus
I didn't find myself in Covenant
actively going
What in God's name are you doing
at the screen in the way that I did in Prometheus?
The reason both sit so high is because I think they look great
and, you know, Ridley Scott is a fantastic director
He's an excellent builder of worlds
We've seen that with Blade Runner, we've seen that with Alien
And I think he really does good work here
These films have a lot of problems that we discuss on the episodes
but they are entertaining films
I think they have interesting ideas
and what it comes down to
is I think Covenant executes them
a little bit better than Prometheus
Yeah
After that we've got
I've got Alien Resurrection
Now this is where
Alien Resurrection is not a film I enjoyed
I think I found it quite silly
albeit I heard it's good moments
that we discussed on the episode
It has because I think it has
some more interesting imagery
That's why it sneaks in
ahead of Alien versus Predator. What I will say about Alien versus Predator, which is what I've
got in number seven, I think Alien versus Predator does what Alien versus Predator wants to do
a little bit better than what Alien Resurrection wants to do. But I think it's ultimately just
a less interesting film, right? I don't think Resurrection necessarily executes its ideas
amazingly well, but it does have some nice imagery. Like we spoke about kind of like some of the
scenes are kind of like, you know, Ripley, kind of like
in the alien nest. I think it
does some interesting
things with
the hybrid alien
human creature, which...
The newborn. Yeah, the newborn asset, that's what they
called it. You know, which is
it, like, it gets a
visceral reaction from you. This thing is
like, it looks horrible, right?
And I think that's a sign of, like, really quite good
production work. So I think that's what
sneaks it above it for me. I think alien versus
predator as an alien versus predator film,
you know, with all the logical holes
that it potentially introduces.
I still think it achieves what it wants to
better in resurrection, but I think
ultimately resurrection is just a more interesting film.
I think anybody who listened to the episode
will not be particularly surprised
that Alien versus Predator Requiem find itself
at the bottom here. Like, we spoke
about its potential in the first 10 minutes
which then just go, you know,
go out the window into the blackness
of that film. Immediately. It falls off a clip.
Yeah, right. And, you know,
And I've thought about even more
since we record that I really do stand by what we said
in an episode about that film having a
really nasty, regressive edge to it.
Oh, absolutely.
Which is not in the other, which is not in any of the other films.
And I think for that reason, beyond the fact
that I don't think it's a particularly great film,
I think it just stands so at odds
with everything else that has been kind of
thematically dealt with in this,
that it's a really odd film.
It's a really odd film.
on its own terms and within its own boundaries, I don't think it's that good, but within the wider
discussion of this franchise, it's also a really odd film to sit in this. It's really, it's a strange
one. Yeah, it almost doesn't sit with the other films at all. I mean, we talk about these
films as a continuous text, and this is a major discontinuity. Yeah. Because it doesn't even get the
themes of the other films, which, you know, Alien starts with this kind of anti-capitalism. The monster is
the corporation. The monster represents
the rapacious greed of capitalism.
And the franchise continues to develop that
in as much as it can
as a franchise itself, as a product of
a capitalist studio system.
But it does, you know, continue to pay lip service
to this theme at least. But Requiem just doesn't.
Yeah. I mean, I think the main thing for me with that
is if you look at basically any other film on this
list, with the exception of Alien vs. Predator, but, you know, I think you could, you could make
a case there, but if you look at any of the other films on this list, anything that shows up that
is, like, a xenomorph or xenomorph-like, right? So I include kind of, you know, protomorphs and zeomorphs
and, you know, the various other things that aren't technically the same creature, right? But, you know,
are clearly from the same kind of strand. They're always kind of, like, in some way, I mean,
there is the creature horror and body horror stuff kicking around, but they are in all,
in all senses, they are metaphorical for something else, right? They are representing something
else. I think Alien vs. Breastor Requiem is the first one where they're really not, right? They are
just, you know, it's just monsters. Yeah, exactly, right? And like, you know, it's a fantastic
creature design, so can you do that with it? Yeah, of course you can. Is it a less interesting
film? Absolutely. And then when you put it in a film which is as badly made as Alien versus Predator
Requiem, that's how you end up at the bottom of this list. Yeah, there's some slight but
maybe significant differences in our rankings. First, I have Alien. Like you said,
I think it's a masterpiece. I think it's perfect for what it does. And it tackles some of the
weightier anti-capitalist themes better than any of the other films. Next is Aliens, which
I just discussed
I have a problem with
in the direction it takes the franchise
but is a well-crafted
and entertaining film that works
on its own merits.
So next, I have
Alien Covenant, just re-watching it
as I discussed in the episode
I was so surprised to find
how well it worked for me
and how effective I found it.
Read that review you wrote the time of it.
This is the major revelation
of this podcast, to be honest.
Absolutely wild.
Yeah.
I didn't expect it at all.
but I really liked how it developed its themes and characters and you know I may not
appreciate what it does in terms of explaining the xenomorph but I think as a film it
works better than a lot of the other films we've discussed next I have alien three
because I just I think the studio interference really hobbles it maybe if we'd been
watching the assembly cut maybe that would be third for me because I see
to recall that holding up a little better, having a little more time to breathe, but the theatrical
release, it's too fragmented for me to really work. I like the darkness of it, I like the nihilism,
but I also like how Alien Covenant gets nihilistic, particularly at the end, you know, with the
entire colony, under threat from David and his proto-Zenomorphs. So yeah, much of a muchness, I think Alien
Covenant edges it for me.
I think the funny thing is, I mean, I have the, I mean, obviously my ranking these two
or the other way around.
I could live with, like, Alien Covenant being above Alien.
I think, this is where it starts to get kind of like tough, because I don't think
Alien, Alien Covenant has its issues, right, and we discuss them.
Alien 3, I find, sits a little bit better within my conception anyway of what the Alien series
is but at the same time just from
filmmaking standpoint
Alien Covenant doesn't have anything as
in elegant as that kind of
ridiculous maze chase scene that you have in Alien 3
right? That's what stuck with me
that the incoherence of that scene
which is kind of the main action scene
of the film and it's just
filmed so incoherently
it really doesn't work
the compositing on the Xenemoth
puppet doesn't look convincing
doesn't hold up
So, yeah, I mean, I can, I can, you know, I'm not looking at this going, my God, Simon, are you high?
You know, like, I can, I can definitely see it.
I think for me, there's something about Alien 3, and it's, it's look, and it's sort of, like, slight griminess, and, you know, also, I mean, the grand irony is, actually, if you ever talk about Alien Francis, I actually argue Alien 3 is the film that has the most iconic image from this series in it, and it's when the xenomorph kind of, like, really goes up to.
Ripley's face and she's like grimacing and like squinting her eyes and turn away from it
it's just like I find quite funny like generally one of the most maligned film in the series
is the one which has actually given it as one of its most iconic images but um yeah I can I can
live it I can love it covenant being above Alien 3 I think um I would do that's say I've put
aliens 3 above it but yeah I can I can see why I think it's um alien covenant
again and this is going to sound inconsistent right because this is kind of why
I put resurrection above Alien versus Predator, but I didn't do it here.
I think within the confines of its own film, it's slightly better made.
I think within the context of the series, I prefer where Alien 3 sits.
But yeah, I can see that.
I thought for a second about Alien Covenant above aliens,
but then I thought I really would get AI reactions,
and I would have been disowned by at least a couple of friends.
the thing is though right
I mean
this so I mean
not that I want to digress us too much
but this is where I start to get into my rant
about kind of ranking things and lists
right because it depends what
your criteria is
criteria are rather
for ranking
right because if we're talking about kind of like
you know
the wider influence of the film
and what effect
it has on other films both within
and out with this franchise
I think you could argue
I think you could make that argument.
I think you could look at putting the Alien Covenant above aliens, right?
You know, it's like the Shrek argument, like Shrek's a good film.
Like, it made every film, maybe it made every animated film for about the pad 15 years after
into this arch kind of Shrek copy, you know.
So, like, is Shrek good or is it bad?
You know, it's a kind of a, to me, anyway, it's a similar sort of argument here.
So, I mean, I would see it.
I'd still think you'd be mocked and jeered in the street.
but, you know, I could see why that you can make that argument.
But I'm not making that argument.
Not today, at least.
Under Alien 3, I have Prometheus.
And again, on the kind of subjectivity of rankings,
I was thinking just this weekend,
maybe I should move Prometheus above Alien 3.
Because I think the, I was specifically thinking about this in the context of the creator,
the Gariff Edwards film, which I went to see this weekend.
where the ambition of it and the visual spectacle of it carries a lot of weight for me.
I appreciate an ambitious sci-fi, and I appreciate these lofty ideas,
even if they don't quite work or have a script, so that's a bit shunky.
So I feel like whereas the script shunkiness stands out for me in Prometheus,
a lot more on every subsequent viewing after the first one,
I think I'd feel the same way about the creator,
where just viewing it this once
I can appreciate the scale and the ambition
and the script shunkiness
annoys me a little
I think if I went back to the creator
I'd be more and more annoyed by it every time
but it's that ambition
that I think Prometheus has
that kind of could
on a good day for me
elevate it above Alien 3
I think for me it was pretty much
it was pretty much firmly ensconced
number 5 right it wasn't going to go any lower
than that, it wasn't going to go any higher than that.
I think, because of the reason you've said, right, I have a lot of problems with Prometheus.
We spoke about them and I think, I think the thing for me is the script shankiness to me undermines
how grand everything else is, right?
Because it has these grand ideas, but it has these characters doing incredibly stupid things.
But what I will say is, I think that ambition, combined with the visuals that you get
kind of Ridley Scott delivering in that film and, you know, performances like,
you know, fast-benders in the film and things like that,
it kind of, it gives it a,
it gives it a floor on its quality
that means it's never going to dip down to the final three films on this list, right?
Yeah.
That's the thing.
It's a well-enough made film
with good enough performances and interesting enough ideas
that there's something for you to glom on to, right?
You know, I mean, like for somebody, it might be the ideas,
for somebody it might be the visuals,
for somebody it might be fast-bender's performance.
For other people, it might be two or three of those things.
things, right? But all of those things does give it a little bit of a flack jacket against
actually being as bad as the, in my view, the final three films on this list, which we have
different orders for, but it's the same three films, right? It was never going to go
lower than that on this list, basically. That's it. It's carried along by that ambition and
that scope in a way that the other three that I'll get onto aren't similar to the creator.
you seen the creator?
Not yet, no.
I plan to, because I quite like
I quite like him as a filmmaker
actually, but...
I think the direction is great,
you know, not to go off
on the creator too much, but I think his direction
is great, he is entirely
hamstrung by the script, which
didn't work, and it is
deeply flawed.
So next in my list is
Alien vs. Predator.
So you had Alien
Resurrection after Pomepheus.
I've got Alien versus Predator
followed by Alien Resurrection.
I think for me, the imagery in Alien v. Predator,
I take your point about there being interesting imagery in Alien Resurrection,
but for me, the interesting imagery in the kind of Lovecraftian imagery of Alien v. Predator
elevates it above Alien Resurrection,
in particular because of the flaws of Alien Resurrection,
which we discussed, this kind of teenage boy misogynate,
The very Josh Whedonie script really irritated me this time round.
We discussed it in the episode, but it's got a purient sensibility that I really disliked.
Yeah, I think that's fair.
I think what I'm sitting doing this, right?
I think part of what plays into this, of course, right, is what you remember about the film after, right?
And I think the thing for me is I remember some of the things in Alien Resurrection that I thought were decent, right?
Alien versus Predator, I will be perfectly honest, I remember very little of it, right?
And it's one of the films that we actually watched most recently, right?
It's just, it's a bit of a there and gone film, right?
I don't really remember.
Actually, honestly, the thing that I remember about Alien versus Predator the most upon rewatching it for this podcast is its plot similar.
with Prometheus.
Similar to Prometheus. Right,
that's actually didn't, because that's something
that I didn't, obviously I hadn't noticed before,
because when I first watched Alien vs Predator, Prometheus
didn't exist, right?
That was honestly the thing that stuck out to me.
And, you know, it has its moments, but it's just,
to me, it's ultimately a less interesting film.
Now, Alien Resurrection,
it has a lot of issues, and I think
you've highlighted them, right, and we spoke about
that, and I think that, you know, the, you know,
the puerile,
the puerile humor and
kind of locker room,
misogyny to it is
unfortunate, right? And that drags it down
quite far. I think
ultimately, for me, the reason I end up
putting above it, above Ealing versus
Predidae, is just because there was more memorable
imagery.
Sure. You know, and I think that's
the thing that I've remembered from it
rather that, you know, now that you've
mentioned it, yes, I'm remembering all the
all the things like, you know,
like who, you know, say
who have I got to blow around
here or something? Anyway, all these ridiculous
sort of like lines of script. I'm like, this is, what, what are you talking about?
Yeah. So, yeah, this is another one where I can live with, like, you know, the switch that we've
made here if I was to do it the other way around. But I think ultimately it's just a, you know,
visual imagery. It's just a bit more interesting to me in the end.
I think interestingly, and, you know, arguably this is something we should have done.
If I had done my franchise before we start, if I'd done my franchise ranking before we started this
podcast, I think Alien Resurrection would have been a lot higher purely because of how I remember
it, and I guess I remember it as, I remembered it as quite entertaining, like, fun, schlocky, blockbuster.
Maybe we're talking, like, top three, if I'd been doing this at the start of, before we started
watching them, but it's, it's the subjectivity of that last experience of watching it, where I just
really didn't like it and it really
irritated me
for not even fitting with the correct
tone like it didn't even have
the right tone as the rest of the films
and that's something that
we talked about the script extensively
I think Weiden's script massively
misunderstands and
Jean-Pierre as you know's
direction doesn't help either
I mean looking back at it actually like
I mean we didn't mention this shoot
the episode but I think about kind of the tone of
alien resurrection and you say
so like it misunderstands
the tone
I'd actually argue it makes no attempt to do so
you know
it's not even a misunderstands it
I think it like honestly
like you look at it and it's kind of
like you know we discuss kind of
like Joss Whedon's reaction to the film
and him indicating that the issues were not
with his script well we said
and said well sorry Joss
that's a little old horses shit
because what I would argue is
that
that's written as a Joss Whedon film
it's not written as an alien film
you know it's
it's Joss Whedon's concept
of what a Joss Whedon alien film would be
and so I would argue
it makes no attempt to understand
so yeah I mean
the more we talk about this the more I want to put Alien
versus Predator above Alien Resurrection now
but I think I'll stick with
the ranking I think
yeah I think even Alien versus Predator
is more alien franchisee
than Alien Resurrection.
Yeah, I could see that.
And last, Alien vs. Predator Requiem,
it's a nasty film, it's a horrible film,
it's too dark, the action scenes are boring,
it doesn't work.
Yep.
So not too dissimilar.
No, not really, and I think you could make it.
Certainly, the Alien Resurrection, Alien versus Predator order,
that really, I think that is a bit of a coin flip for me.
I'll stick with it
But yeah
Yeah like I say
There's only so many films
There's only eight films that we're ranking here
So there's not a great deal of variation
That can be had
Especially when
We essentially agree that alien is a masterpiece
Yeah no and I think
You've got work pretty hard to not have alien second
Really
I mean
You know I think there's a subset of people out there
Who probably think we're mad for putting
Alien second right
Because I know it has its folk
You're kind of like oh well you know
because this is the old thing
right people keep talking about like
you know those sequoids that are better than the original
like oh they're so rare here are examples
right the ones that always get trotted out
or Terminator 2
which I disagree with aliens which I
disagree with you know and various
the godfather part two which
maybe maybe I agree with
you know and all the rest
of it but to me alien is
is the better film it's not to say
that aliens is a bad film we discuss this
but to me it is clearly the better film
I also, just tangent alert, I don't think this sequels are generally worse than the original's idea actually holds anymore.
I think there's too many examples disproving it now in this day and age to actually have that as one of these unwritten sort of rules of cinema, but that's a different discussion.
Yeah, I vastly prefer Blade Runner 2049 to Blade Runner, like massively.
It's not just that.
You look at it kind of like the, you know, things like, you know, the DC universe and the Marvel Cinematic Universe and blah, blah, blah, that.
I mean, there are so many films now are sequels, right?
And a lot of them are pretty decent, slash, some of the originals that they have spun off from, aren't that good, that I don't think this rule fits anymore, you know.
Like, you know, if you want to take something as disposable, and yes, I will say disposable, it's the Thor films, right? Yep.
I mean, who at their right mind is going to say the original Thor is the best Thor? It's madness. You know, so, like, there's that, and then you've got, like, the Cat in America films. Like, I don't think anybody would pick the first Cat in America films, the best Cat in America films. Like, you know, I realize it's kind of, it's reflective of this paradigm that we're now in with Hollywood movie making, but, like, I don't think this.
it's rare for sequels to be better
and the original thing is actually true anymore.
And I don't think it's been true for the best part
of a couple of decades at this point.
Anyway, digression over.
Yes.
So before we talk about the future
of the alien franchise,
some proposed projects that are coming out
or have been proposed but never made,
I want to focus on the present
and talk a little bit about where franchise directors are now.
Because all these directors have gone on
to do interesting things,
maybe in different directions from the alien franchise, but we can talk briefly about where they are now.
So Ridley Scott obviously came back to the franchise from the first alien,
and we'll discuss some of his proposed projects for the alien franchise in a bit.
But right now, he has Napoleon coming out soon, which is a biopic of Napoleon Bonaparte with Joaquin Phoenix,
and also Gladiator 2 is coming out soon.
And I'd tell you, I'm not sure I've seen Gladiator one.
Really?
No, I don't think so.
I can't remember it anyway.
It's a good one.
I have this theory, which I nearly wrote something about, but I never did in the end,
about the fact that Ridley Scott, who makes a lot of films, right?
And he's made a lot of extremely good films, you know, some of which we've spoken about during this podcast.
He also makes a lot of very bad films as well, right?
I think purely because he makes a lot of films, right?
and I have this theory
that basically once a decade
he makes a masterpiece
right
so you've got alien in the 70s
you've got
what are his masterpieces
yeah so you've got alien in the 70s
you've got Blade Runner in the 80s
right
I don't like Blade Runner
I disagree no
what do you do a second podcast
so I'm going to stick with Blade Runner
and then you've got
let's say Thelman Louise in the 90s
you've got gladiator in the naughties
and then
then it starts to get
a little bit more difficult right
I think the 2010s
I think you could make a case
for his best film
from the 2010s I'm not going to call it a masterpiece
because it has issues but
I actually think it's the Martian
right good I was going to say the Martian
glad you said that you know so there's that
and then we're now into the 2020s
and the question is what is it going to be for this right
because I haven't seen the last jewel, so I can't speak to that.
It's certainly not House of Gucci.
So will it be Napoleon, will it be Gladdy or two?
I don't know.
But this is my theory.
He makes a genuinely brilliant film once a decade.
And he'll make kind of like some other bad films, some fairly decent films, you know, at other points.
But once a decade, he makes a really good film.
And I think we're still waiting for that one in the 2020s.
house of Gucci
Mamma Mia I'd forgotten about that one
but yeah
I think it's interesting that
like Alien he's going back to an
old film
Gladiator 2 is going to be
a kind of long
you know
a long awaited sequel
to a film that he made
in what did you say it was the 90s
no that was
gladiator was 2000
so right at the stars
so I suppose technically
all his production was probably in the 90s
but it was released in 2000
Yeah, so, you know, a good 20-year gap between those films, so it's, you know, is this going to be the Prometheus of his gladiator?
James Cameron is stuck in a loop of making endless Avatar films for the rest of time.
He's been cursed by a water demon to make Avatar films forever, and he's in production on, what, Avatar Free Fallen?
Surprise twist, the water demon is him and his submarine.
Yeah.
he went down to the Titanic and he found a cursed necklace or whatever that makes him make these films
I'm actually just looking at this right now right by the time Avatar 4 comes out right so
one two three four five six seven eight nine ten eleven by the time Avatar four comes out
nearly like basically over a third of his filmography will be Avatar films
which for a filmmaker who as we discussed your daily's episode sounds like
like an utter arsewall, right?
But is a very...
Yes, he does.
But is a very talented filmmaker.
I find that a little bit depressing, to be honest.
I'm going to go so far as to say
was a very talented film maker.
I don't know.
I don't want to digress into the Avatar films here.
I think the Avatar films are very well made.
I just don't think they're very interesting.
It has some of the problems we spoke about these other films.
I think their scripts are fundamentally uninteresting.
I think they're incredibly made.
films, but, like, I'm sorry, that only gets you so far.
Yeah, I think there's incredible production and incredible visual effect.
I don't think that makes for a well-made film, but I think that's just a distinction in
kind of the definition of well-made, that we're not going to cover here, and we're not
going to do a podcast about the Avatar films.
Well, there's not a lot to do.
There's not a lot to do yet.
Or, frankly, to speak to your point about, like, what's done well about them and what's not,
Unless we were visual effects experts, there's not really a lot to talk about.
Yeah.
David Fincher, who directed Alien Free, has had a hugely successful career after Alien Free, after his debut.
He's had some genuinely great films, you know, Fight Club, 7.
I feel like there's a David Fincher I am thinking of, but can't get to.
Genuine, I would say David Fincher is one of my favourite filmmakers.
And I don't...
And the funny thing is, I think I watched Alien 3.
Zodiac. Zodiac is what I was thinking of.
Zodiac's, maybe his masterpiece for me.
I think, I watched Alien 3, I think, really, before I really knew who David Fincher was, right?
And I don't think I really knew it was a David Fincher film.
I think it was only a few years later once I'd kind of got into David Fincher as a filmmaker.
I saw you made Alien 3, I was like, wait, what?
and like going back and watching it again
since and then
once more for this podcast
you can see it in there right
I think you know it does have his
stamp on it all be a heavily
yeah heavily interfered with but
you can see it there but genuinely like I think
7 is a brilliant film
I thought it really I'm just looking through his film
the only film I've not seen
from his films is actually the game
now that I think about it
but everything at like seven
I think is fantastic
Fight Club
I
Fight Club's an odd one right
because I think it's a brilliant
I think it's an absolutely superb film
I think it has a sort of like
place in popular culture
and the way people think of it
that's actually completely odds with the film itself
it's a strange one like that
Panic Room I think's a great film
Zodiac I think is fantastic
you know I think
I think for me
I would maybe put
seven above it perhaps, which is maybe a slightly controversial thing, but I mean, basically
they're both superb. The social network, I think, is a brilliant film. I think we'd like, so
you and I have both been contributors to the Synotopia show on EHFM, and then 2020 we did best
films of the decade, and pick three, and I pick the social network as one of them.
Oh, cool. And I think, what I find funny about the social network also is it came out in 2010,
right and really it's portrayal of the founding of facebook and Zuckerberg and the motivations and
everything behind it has aged beautifully you know which i think it's kind of unusual for
that sort of it really has aged beautifully um the girl with the dragon tattoo i liked uh but i couldn't
say i necessarily consider it a remarkable film gone girl i thought was excellent i'm one of the
i'm one of the few apologists for mank actually i thought for what it was trying to do it was
actually quite interesting. I quite liked
it. I would say it's maybe
one of his least interesting films
but, you know, I appreciated
it for what it was. Since I'm an
amateur film critic, I'm not a professional film
critic, I didn't have to sit through Mank,
so I turned it off after half an hour.
I'll get into it.
And then
even his television work actually, I found
very interesting. I mean, like, House of
Cards, without wanting to get into the
Kevin Spacey of all of it, right?
The initial seasons of that
where he was very heavily involved
I thought that was
superb and Mind Hunter I think is
brilliant
so some of the work
yeah some of the work he's gone on
to produce
since Alien 3 is incredible
and then of course at the time
we're recording this
going around the festival circuit
is the killer which I've not seen yet
but I'm very interested to see
for all the reasons that we've just said
so yeah his next film is
the killer which is at BFI London Film Festival
and stars
alien franchise
alumnus, Michael Fastmender, as a hitman, an assassin.
And that's a Netflix film, so it's coming out on Netflix before this podcast comes out.
The next director is Jean-Pierre Giney, who directed Alien Resurrection.
He went back to smaller, largely French language films.
He did Amalie after Alien Resurrection, which is kind of his most successful film.
He's subsequently found it hard to get funding for his quirkier films.
But he did Big Bug for Netflix, which I believe is about robots and AI and stuff.
Alien versus Predator was directed by Paul W.S. Anderson, who I mentioned at the time did a load of video game movies, did like Resident Evil and Monster Hunter and stuff like that.
His next film is an adaptation of a George R.R.R. Martin story.
And the brother Strauss, the forgotten directors of Aliens versus Predator Requiem, they made the film Skyline and were produced.
on a load of Skyline sequels.
I haven't seen Skyline, I'm not sure what's about.
But they were sued by Sony Pictures Entertainment
over alleged theft of time and resources
because they had worked on a similar film for Sony,
and Sony is alleging that they, you know,
took the visual effects and stuff that they developed
for that film to the film Skyline.
Nowadays, they mostly manage their company, Hydrox,
which is a special effects company,
and they seem to be mostly out of the film.
be mostly out of the directing game. So interesting career paths for these different directors.
But I want to look forward to the future of the Alien franchise and look at some of the
proposed films that will be coming out or that won't be coming out because they never got made.
So there's been a number of projects, some of which we've talked about on the podcast, that were
going to be made in the Alien franchise almost immediately after Alien.
20th Century Fox wanted to make an alien TV series.
Now, this is only mentioned once in an article in Fangoria in June 1980,
where the author of the article talks about 20th Century Fox wanting to make an alien series,
and NBC wanted to make a Salem's Lot series,
based on the film adaptation of the Stephen King novel.
So there's no information about it because it really didn't get anywhere past the idea stage.
But interestingly, there is another television series in production that we're going to discuss further down this list.
Aliens War Games was a cartoon series which was proposed in 2007
and was kind of supposed to be a continuation of aliens.
Like following the Colonial Marines on their cartoon adventures,
There's some concept art that looks very like Gendit Tatovsky's art for Star Wars
Clone Wars, and it's obviously meant to be a kind of series of short cartoons like Star Wars
Alien's Wargames never got made. It sounds like a god-awful idea to me.
It doesn't, I mean, it doesn't sound great to me. I read about it. I mean, I don't know,
it's one of these things where, like, the desire to monetize this franchise runs into,
kind of what it actually is because I mean I suppose potentially this could have been interesting
in a sort of like Saturday morning cartoon type way but like the idea of making a Saturday
morning cartoon type thing the alien franchise just sounds bizarre to me I remember that the kind
of Saturday morning cartoon series for Ghostbusters like the real Ghostbusters makes more sense
because I can imagine kids watching Ghostbusters and getting a lot out of it whereas I can't
really imagine them watching aliens and getting the same thing out of it.
No. Alien Earthbound is a script by Stuart Hazeldine, which was a sequel to Alien 3.
This was going to be Alien 4. So he wrote this script called Alien Earthbound and he was shopping it about.
Ripley gets cloned and teams up with some pirates. There's stuff about getting to Earth, stopping the aliens from getting to Earth, stopping the aliens from getting to Earth.
which is similar to the last bit of Alien Resurrection.
So there's a station above Antarctica,
interestingly linking with Alien vs. Predator.
And it's this kind of ticking clock thing
where they invade the Antarctica Station
and it's going to crash into the Earth
if they don't stop it.
Never got made, never got past the script stage.
After Alien Resurrection,
they wanted to make a fifth alien film.
Sigourney Weaver was kind of the sticking point on that,
sticking point on that as she didn't want to be involved.
Josh Whedon, who wrote Alien Resurrection, as we were discussed, developed a script set on Earth
for Alien 5 called Alien Revolution, so Groni Weaver didn't like it, and she was moving away
from the whole franchise because they were moving ahead with Alien vs. Predator at the time.
Similarly, James Cameron had discussions with Ridley Scott about where they could take it, but didn't
want to be involved because of Alien Predator, Alien vs. Predator coming out.
then a period of director Neil Blomkamp being involved in Alien 5.
So Neil Blomkamp directed District 9,
which was kind of a sci-fi allegory of South African apartheid.
And he's good, from what I recall.
Yeah, I mean, District 9, I think, is a superb film.
I haven't seen Elysium, which didn't seem to get particularly good reception.
Oh, yeah, I mean either.
I'm a bit of a chappie, Paul, just I don't really see what people's massive issue.
were with that film, to be perfectly honest.
And then other than that, I've not
kind of paid that much attention
to his films, really. I mean, like, the film you made most
recently was the
Grand Tourismal film, which is a film
whose concept, like, confuses
me slightly. It's not a film I've seen, so I can't really
speak to the quality of it. But
there was a while, I think, really,
where this Neil Blomkamp
Alien 5,
and I'll come to why,
it's an odd thing that we keep talking about it,
is Alien 5.
where that seemed to be kind of like
the alien film that the internet wanted made
because he put out concept art on social media
and people kind of like latched onto it
and basically I think
from what I remember
right at the time when it was still an idea
that was kind of like kicking around
the thing that everybody seemed to glom on to
which I find quite amusing
given the franchise rankings that we've just gone through
its main USP
seemed to be the idea that it would ignore
anything that had happened after aliens.
Well, this, yeah,
there was a time when Neil Blumcambe was
a very trendy director.
So he directed, he became well known
for directing some short films
adapting Halo,
the Halo video games,
which have a very similar look to
aliens and kind of
deal with space marines battling aliens.
And so,
there was this idea that he could do
a Halo film
and that people sort of glommed onto this
idea of him doing an alien film and making it look like these halo films that he did and it was
yeah very trendy to want Neil Blomkamp and his idea which he called alien zeno would of what's the
word retconned alien free and had Ripley and Hicks from aliens doing something so there was a great
deal of concept art made xenomorph queens and Ripley and Hicks
looking older, there was even stuff around the engineers and the space jockeys and whatnot
that were in these concept images. But obviously that never came to fruition. The project
was apparently never picked up by 20th Century Fox either, even though Neil Blomkamp was
pushing for it to be involved. Nowadays, you mentioned Grand Turismo. There was an interview
with him in Uprocks
by Mike Ryan
where Mike Ryan asked him about
Alien and
he said it's hard to define
how little I care about what happens with Alien
I kind of shuts down the interview after that
Yeah you linked me to this and I heard of read of it
and it's an absolutely fascinating little
snippet you're right he gets
so I mean
peek behind the curtain we have show notes that we refer
to in recording these and Simon's just got
Blon Camp gets real pissy when you ask
about this and I would encourage somebody to go find
that interview because he really does
it's just that brutality like
I don't care what happens to it. It's like you know
and it's been a very kind of like
you know perfectly pleasant interview
up to that point
but yeah it's
yeah it's been perfectly pleasant
he asks the interviewer asks about alien and he says
I don't care he says I just want to talk
about grand tourism or we shouldn't talk
he says let's focus on grandurismo and then he's down to
like monosyllobic answers
before eventually the publicist
says it's time to end this.
Which to be honest for you, I find extremely
churlish because it's him that put out
concept art on social media and everything.
It's not like, kind of like, you know,
word got out, he was working on something
and he doesn't want to talk about it.
Like, dude, you're the one who
you're the one who put all this out here.
That's it. He put it out
on Instagram on his own account,
but at some point was not involved anymore
and now does not want to talk
about it. The alien versus predator
sub-franchise has its own proposed films.
So there were proposed films for Aliens versus Predator 3.
The brother Strauss had ideas for this.
They had an idea for an aliens versus predator film
that would take place in the future, in the time frame of the original alien films.
And it would follow, you know, this idea of battling a xenomorph queen on a planet.
There was this idea of going to the Xenomorph's home planet.
and covering that ground,
following the kind of development of Eutani
after the end of Wecriem, where she gets the gun,
and he's like, this will take us to the stars, or whatever.
Sorry, I just had this vision of her picking up
and then just saying to infinity and beyond.
The latest weird crossover, Alien versus Predator versus Toy Story.
I don't think Buzz Lighty here would stand up well.
I mean, it is hollowed by D.
all owned by Disney now.
But yeah, neither Buzz Lightyear,
the character from Lightyear or Buzz Lightyear
the toy would fare well against
a xenomorph, I don't think.
So yeah, Alien vs. Predator films,
they wanted to be a third, but it never happened.
Shane Black, who directed
The Predator, wanted to make an Alien versus Predator
film, but as of yet, hasn't.
Shane Black doing one of those things would be interesting.
I quite like Shane Black as a filmmaker
I mean I think it would still sit completely
at odds with the alien series
but within this alien versus predator
sort of shoot off world
I'd be interested to see what he'd do with that to be
I think it could be a bit more
arch and knowing and winky
it could work but
you know
like who knows I quite like some of Shane Black
so I personally think Iron Man 3 is the best Iron Man film
yes I said it
and
Kiss Kiss, Kiss, Bang, Bang, I think is excellent,
but at the same time, the Predator was fucking dreadful, so, you know.
And then there's Ridley Scott's ideas.
So Ridley Scott has talked about a third part in the Prometheus Covenant trilogy
that would kind of bridge the gap between Covenant and Alien.
In 2017, it was reported that that film had already been written
and would be ready to film in 2018,
dependent on how successful Covenant was, hasn't happened.
Scott has also talked to Fandango
about a film that he called Alien Awakening
which he suggests would be set between Prometheus and Covenant
I'm not sure what ground there is to cover there
like David developing the little xenomorphs
Yeah I don't really know what there is to do there
Certainly if you're focusing within
If you're focusing with the on upon the characters
that we know from Prometheus
I don't see what there is there
even accounting for the fact
that that period is fairly
glibly glossed over
in Covenant
given where Covenant goes
I don't really see what there is to fill in there
or I don't really see what there is to fill in
in any interesting manner there
I think this is maybe just one of Ridley Scott's musings
that he throws out in interviews
to be honest.
Speaking of Ridley Scott's musings
that he throws out in interviews,
he has also stated
that there will be
at least three more
prequel films
covering whatever period
he has an idea about
and he's talked about
replacing the xenomorphs
with AI-based antagonists
saying that the xenomorphs
aren't scary anymore
and so he wanted to explore
what a world created by AI's
would look like.
They're not scary,
what's fault is that, Ridley?
So he now talks about these ideas of an AI antagonist and the engineers,
which I guess you follow David creating this colony or whatever after Covenant.
I can see how you can do that.
Catherine Waterston, who was in Alien Covenant, hasn't heard anything in ages about a sequel.
In 2019, 20th Century Fox were acquired by Disney,
but confirmed that future alien films were still in development
and whatever those films are, it's not clear
because the next thing we hear about is
Fidei Alvarez's upcoming film Alien Romulus.
Now this was supposed to be a Hulu release,
like Prey, the latest Predator film,
but I think they've turned it into a theatrical release
and the idea is that this is a standalone film
based on
alien
follows a group of young people
on a distant world
who find themselves
in confrontation
with a xenomorph
I don't know a great deal
about this
but it's supposed to come out
next year right
yeah as far as I'm aware
at the time of recording
well let me be clever
because this will get confusing
quickly
at the time of our recording this
the film is being recorded
and I think it was being recorded
in Budapest I want to say
so it's coming
it's coming soon enough
that we might even end up
dusting off this podcast feed to talk about it
when it comes out
but I mean
I think what interests me about this one
right
out of all the ones that we've
spoken about right
is the fact that it says it's
standalone now this does raise
questions about how
exactly it does link
right and what makes it
an alien film beyond
the title alien
and presumably a xenomorph, right?
I mean, I don't think it says that explicitly, right?
So, you know, who knows?
But I think the fact that it does
potentially have room to do
its own thing is interesting here.
Who knows? Who knows? It could end up
terrible. I've no idea.
I mean, nobody does at this point. But I think the fact
that it is standalone and it maybe
is as a result slightly
less beholden to
you know, this vast sprawling
franchise that we've spoken.
about makes it interesting. Like, could it go somewhere a little bit, a little bit different?
Or at least do its own thing within kind of the context of a, you know, a horror film.
And certainly Ferry Alvarez's background, I haven't actually seen any of his films, but, you know, he was a
producer on the Texas Chainsaw Masker remake. He's directorial credits and could the Evil Dead reboot
in 2030. You know, like, I mean, that's kind of, seems to be the world in which he's operating, right?
So, yeah, I think a standalone thing might be the best thing for the franchise at this point, you know, prove that you can tell other stories that don't link into this kind of continuity that, however fractured, has been set up and have more of an episodic kind of thing would, would work for me.
So it has a release date of 16th of August, 24.
If it comes out on that date, I guess we'll review it on this, on this podcast maybe.
But yeah, unless Disney slash 20th Century Studios pull a Batgirl on it and can it for tax reasons, presumably we'll see it at some point.
You know, they filmed Back Girl in Glasgow, which is where I live.
And they especially did night scenes at the park right next to my flat.
So they directed these huge lights, which were super bright and kind of shone into my window.
So we could see them from here.
and they put down this gross artificial snow
that the council were told would just disappear
without any harm to plant life and wildlife
but I go running through that park fairly regularly
and it took months to disappear
and it looked very damaging to the local floor
and it was all for nothing because the film never even came out
there we go
that's a tangent
the next thing is a Noah Hawley TV series
So Noah Hawley is the showrunner of Fargo, the Fargo TV series, which does a different thing every season, and I think has a good first season, a me, second season, a great third season, I don't think I watched the fourth season.
I didn't bet so I, so this I find interesting, right, because certainly Noah Hawley's track record seems to be a little bit mixed, shall we say.
Fargo is an interesting one in that
I'm trying to do it because I keep getting my seasons of this show mixed up
But the main thing I want to be is
When we talk about kind of like prestige TV in the 21st century
Right
The first season of that Fargo series is right up there for me
I really think that first season of it is absolutely
It's very good
It's absolutely superb
And then the second season
I recall being fairly
I recall being fairly decent
but maybe not quite as bulldover.
Season 3 I enjoyed a lot.
I think that's the one that's got David Thuleus in it,
and I think that was kind of...
That's David Fulis and you and McGregor playing two characters.
Yeah, that's too doubt for me.
And I just love David Fulis in that season.
He's so good.
I mean, David Thuris is excellent.
He's one of those actors where, like,
if he's involved,
I automatically become more interested in whatever it is.
And then season four,
I started watching it, and I thought it was fairly decent,
but I didn't actually make it all the way through it.
I think I've watched like four episodes from it
and I've just kind of never bothered
to watch the rest of it.
You know, so
make of that what you will.
Legion is supposedly quite good. I've not watched it.
I haven't seen it. So I don't really
know what to make of this and I
don't really know
you know, so the thing
is it's meant to be a prequel
before the events of alien,
right?
Yes. So I don't... Not too far
in our future. This is
a summary from the production company
set not too far in our future
it's the first alien story set on Earth
that's not really true
and by branding both the timeless
horror of the first alien film with the
non-stop action of the second
it's going to be a scary thrill ride that will blow people
back in their seats
this is the point where I put up the Ron Burgundy
meme and go I don't believe you
I don't know
it sounds
it sounds odd
I don't really I don't really understand how
this concept works, but
you know, like whatever, I'll check it out when it
pops up, but I don't know,
I don't see, I don't see
this working, like, you know, I'll
judge it once it's actually out there
to judge, but I do kind of
look at it and go, eh,
really? I think
it's funny that throughout
this podcast, we have talked about the identity
crisis of the alien franchise,
which I attribute to this
immediate clash between alien
and aliens, and it's so
funny that they are just leaning into that as the premise of their show. Like, we're going to blend
alien and aliens. Like, no, that's the whole problem with this franchise. Don't do, Noah Hawley,
listen to this podcast. Yeah, it's funny. It kind of, it goes even to the production of what
they're doing right now, because even the fact that there are these two things, right? One is a film,
one is a TV series. One is a standalone thing. The other one's a prequel. I, you know,
like, like, what are you doing? It's even,
all fractured.
Yeah.
Like right now,
it feels as fractured as it has ever been.
Despite these efforts by Ridley Scott
to kind of tame it and pull it in one direction,
it just feels like it's,
since being acquired by Disney,
it's spread out and fractured into a million little bits
that may or may not even get made.
But then again, I mean, that's, you know,
I mean,
the era in which we are regarding this,
that's the Disney playbook, right?
I mean, that's what they've done with Star Wars.
Spread themselves too faint.
Yeah, you know, I mean, the whole thing, I mean...
And Marvel.
Yeah, and, you know, the Marvel stuff as well, right?
Because Star Wars, I think, it stands out more for me
because it kind of comes from a similar place to the alien films, really, right?
And, you know, it was a...
You know, obviously, Star Wars is more of a sci-fi fantasy bent than, you know, sci-fi.
But, like, you know, late 70s thing, very...
successful popular films, spun out some very successful sequels, they come back to it decades later to varying levels of success, and now, acquired by Disney, and it's getting spun in all sorts of directions, and you know what the hell's happening, we've had a sequel trilogy, there's supposedly another trilogy, there was another trilogy that was canned, we've had standalone films, one of which was good, one of which was bad, we've got TV series, some of which are good, some of which are bad, and, you know, it just becomes
very hard to fall, and you've got the same thing with the Marvel films, right? It started
off as a, you know, franchise of franchises, and now it's kind of just spun out into
the book, where even I, and I kept up with it pretty well, I've kind of lost track of what
I've watched and what I haven't, and the indications are, you know, we haven't got many
data points to work with here, is that this is going to go the same way, and I think it's
interesting with this one, because this one at the point Disney acquired it already had
its own identity crisis and confusion
about what the hell they were doing with it
that doesn't look
to be improving. No, so this
series is
allegedly
in pre-production
and they were supposed to start filming it
FX is running
this and FX
said it would start filming in
2023. I haven't heard anything
about it this year
so who knows if that filming
is going on or
If it was being filmed in the States, I think you have to assume it probably hasn't at this point.
Yes.
Like if it was being produced elsewhere, then, you know, maybe it wouldn't be under the auspices of that union,
so maybe then it would have gone ahead.
But otherwise, I can't see it having happened,
because this doesn't strike me as a sort of thing that would get an interim agreement or something like that.
So those are what we can look forward to.
Potentially, Alien Romulus next year, and otherwise this Alien TV series,
coming out on FX, and if Ridley Scott focuses on his prequel films, another one, or potentially
three of those, I had some thoughts about what a worst-case scenario for an alien film would be,
because I just had a vision of deep-faked actors from the original alien, you know?
Another thing out of the Disney playbook.
Exactly, a de-aged Sigourney Weaver.
you know,
boarding the Nostromo
for the first time
and seeing how they get to the point
where they get to
in the first alien film,
which I just imagine
would be utterly terrible.
No, it would be...
The funny thing,
I'll be interested to see
what happened on that front, right?
And the strike that we've kind of highlighted
as going on during our recordings
in the past few episodes is what some of the stuff
like centres around, right?
but I'm actually
I was a bit of an apologist
to draw a parallel between aliens
and de-aging technology
right and deep faking
I was a bit I'm a bit of an apologist
for the
the grandmoth Tark and
deep fake and rogue one right
I actually thought it was pretty well done
I like it I think it works well
yeah and like I and I'm okay with it as a concept
because there is actually an actor
performing that role
and you can make the argument that's essentially
digital makeup, right? I think there's, you know...
An actor who's not Peter Cushing. Yeah, exactly, right. A guy who's doing the
model. Yeah, right, and he's doing, critically, and this is the critical part to me, he's doing
the voice, right? So, like, it is his vocal performance as well, right? So, you can make
a much better case for that being kind of like digital makeup or a blend of live action
anime and, like, very photorealistic animation, however you want to put it, right? But the
key thing is, there's a performance there. The thing that, the direction that things have
gone in more recently, and we only say within Star Wars to do it, which I find a lot more insidious
is the use of AI voices, right, to mimic young Mark Hamill as Luke Skywalker or James Earl
Jones as the voice of Darth Vader. That, to me, starts to get into what are we even
watching here, territory, you know? I think there was some, there was some rumors around
Obi-Wan Kenobi that
James Earl Jones wasn't even
involved. They just
got the voice
you know all entirely computer generated
I don't know how much creeds there is
to those. I don't
know but I mean what I will
say is I'm pretty sure that some of that
was done for
the young Luke Skywalker in the book of
Boba Fett right
and that's where this technology is going
right so
looking back to you know
this series of
films. I'll be interested to see whether any of that actually shows up, right? Because I think
if it did, that really truly is the death knell of this franchise, right? That's when it is
obviously completely devoid of ideas, right? Anyway, to go to, yes, that is the worst case
scenario. Yeah, that would be very bad, capital B. Yeah, and I mean, for all the critique that
we have done on this podcast, the whole thing is critique and criticism. I think we did Alien. We chose
Alien for this because we love the Alien films fundamentally. I love Alien. I would say it's
one of, if not my favorite film, one of my favorite films. And I think the best thing, it's
hard to say what will happen to the franchise, given that it is now owned by Disney, who, you know,
we have focused on Marvel and Star Wars a little bit in discussing this because it's owned by Disney,
and because it's now a Disney property, we can see the same things that could be happening to this franchise.
I think the worst thing that could happen is as much content as they're now churning out for Marvel and Star Wars,
which for me entirely dilute those two things.
You know, as much as I love Alien and this universe, I just don't want to see all that low-quality pap applied to
to alien.
Yeah, and I think if you look at the other
like big Disney juggernauts
right that we've spoken about there,
the thing is the quality of any
individual project notwithstanding
they lend themselves
to that I, this kind of approach
right? Because like obviously the Marvel
Cinematic Universe is based upon the
Marvel comic books and there are
dozens of characters and that and
scores of different storylines
and things like the point is
there's the source material
there is so vast, right, that it lends itself to kind of like spinning up different things
that are connected to it, right? Now, albeit, they've maybe done too many of them, and it started
to look a bit cheap and rushed, and it's not particularly well thought out, you know, whatever,
I'm not going to relitigate kind of our opinions on the Marvel Cinematic Universe here.
And then on the Star Wars side of things, and Star Wars is the more interesting comparison here
because they've got this sci-fi space bent to it, right?
To an extent it also lends itself to that because it implies, it is implied in the way that those films were constructed in the world building that there's a vast kind of galaxy out there and characters to link in with and their own little stories that you can jump on to, right?
So you can kind of create that off and then before Disney acquired that there was that vast, kind of expanded universe of like tie in comic books and novels and stuff, right?
So you've already seen that happen in a different medium even.
here, and the way it differs
with Star Wars, I think if they were
to take this approach with Alien films
it would be absolutely ruinous
and a terrible idea is because
the entire thing
with Alien, and we discussed this as kind of
like a point that kind of worked
against a little bit, Covenant
and Prometheus, that
fundamentally the original text of this
franchise, Alien,
is predicated on the idea that, yes,
the universe is vast, it's
uncaring, and there are
horrors out there that we cannot ever
know, and we might just bump into
randomly, right? It's basically
it's predicated the idea that it's so
vast, we cannot know it, right?
And whilst that opens up
limitless possibilities, it does
also kind of actually restrict it, right?
Because it's not as easily
expanded whilst
keeping it familiar, right? And that's why
I'm, of the two things that we've spoken about
that are supposedly
in production, the alien
Romulus film, which is meant to be a stand-alone thing,
I find that the more interesting
because I think that's got more scope
to do something which
is its own idea
and how it links into the alien films
whatever we'll see right
but it sounds like the more potentially interesting project
the TV series based on the way it's been described
it sounds like a Disney
you know and I've realised maybe I'm doing
a bit confirmation bias here but it sounds like a Disney thing
the whole kind of like you know
blend both the timeless horror of the first alien film
with the non-stop action of the second
it's going to be a scary thrill, right, that will blow people back in their seats.
It's just like, oh, Christ, just shut up.
You know, like, is that really what we want?
You know, it's just, so I find it interesting, and I think what direction it probably goes in,
probably depends on which of these ends up being more successful, frankly.
But, you know, we'll see.
That's a good point.
It's almost like a crossroads with these two directions.
They're leading in different areas for the franchise,
which is interesting given everything we've discussed around the different routes through this franchise.
So I think that brings us to the end of the xenopod and the end of our discussions of the alien franchise.
We've watched them all, we've critiqued them all, we've contextualized them all,
and against Jim's better judgment, we've also ranked them all.
For the future, if Alien Romulus comes out in 2024, we might review that and throw that in this feature.
otherwise we've had some discussions about other film series that we might want to cover
in this same kind of way and if we do that kind of project we'll put something out on
the feed to advertise it or we'll put it on Twitter at the xenopod or blue sky at
the xenopod.b sky. social but apart from that I think we're at the end of our alien
journey. I think the only thing the last thing to add I think is just I found it an
interesting thing to look at because I've
come to a kind of conclusion
about this series
and what it kind of reflects and means
and I've got a kind of an optimistic
interpretation of it and I've got a very cynical
interpretation of it right
and the optimistic interpretation is
if you have a kind of a good
central idea or a good
central sort of like
you know design for a creature
in this case maybe it is then
if you bring kind of creatives to it who are talented and in good faith you can end up with
a whole bunch of really good stuff right you know you get alien you get aliens you get alien covenant
you get prometheus uh alien three to a certain extent right and you know maybe less so the
other ones we've spoken about that's kind of the optimistic thing if you have a good idea and you bring
talented creative people to that good idea and they approach it in good faith and they're given
space to work on it you can come up
with some really great stuff right
the cynical interpretation of it
is if you come up with a good idea
and it does well
Hollywood will throw any
old shit at that idea to make it
stick right
you'll come up with alien
and then before you know it 40 odd years down
the line you're making alien
resurrection and alien versus
preter requiem
and all the rest of it so it's
kind of two sides of the same
coin there, right? If you have a good idea and you get backing and you get good creative
people on board, you can come up with like some really interesting things that have so many
different layers to them and depth and you can take on any level you want, right? You can watch
alien and just be terrified by this alien creature and leave it at that, or you can do what
we've done and kind of look at it like what represents and how, you know, the particular design
and who interacts with what it says about certain things and then how that spins out to other
films and all the rest. You can do that or you can take it surface on. Those are both
perfectly okay things to do because it's an effective piece of work. That's the optimistic
one. And the cynical one is, if you have a good idea, Hollywood will try and milk it to death.
In some cases, actually to death. So that would be my ending, my ending thought here. And I think
this has been such a good example of it because of how long it spans and the different
types and the levels of quality, like going from genuinely one of the worst kind of like
big-ish budget films I've seen in Requiem through to kind of like, you know, one of the best
films I've seen really in Alien. And I think it's an interesting way to look at it.
But that's kind of my takeaway from it. It's like there's an optimistic one and there's also
a cynical one and basically the modern filmmaking world seems to be trying to balance those two
things, right? Yeah, an opposition between these opposing conflicts.
of, I mean, this is the essence of Hollywood, right?
This balance between creativity and commerce and alien franchise
has proved to be a great look at how those two forces interact, fail to interact, fail to
interlock, and how these competing forces produce different things.
So I'm very glad we looked at it, and I hope you've enjoyed listening to our assessment
of this franchise and where it's gone.
I have been Simon Bowie.
I'm an amateur film critic who can be found for now on Twitter at SimonXIX.
I also write this year I've been doing reviews per minute or I write film reviews
with a word count that matches how many minutes long the film is and that's at
reviewsper minute.simonx.com.
This podcast has been hosted by Take One at Take One Cinema.net, which is a film review
site focusing on Art House and Festival
Films, but which has a broad enough remit
to cover a whole selection of films
with loads of good reviewers
on that site. Jim Ross
is on Twitter at
Jim GR. And pretty much
that one also.
As the implosion
of Twitter is ongoing, or
X as it's now known, I
have profiles of various places, but generally
it's always Jim GR.
The only exception is Instagram
slash threads, where it's JimGR underscore.
film because that predates my
part-time film reviewing days
but yeah you can find me on that
or any of the
take one social accounts
which are generally at take one cinema
on pretty much every platform you can think of
so thank you for listening
do come find us
track us down see what we're doing
but for now this is the
last broadcast of the Xenapod
signing off
game over man
it's game over
You know,
I'm going to