Tara Brach - Navigating Conflict with a Wise Heart – Part 2 (2019-03-06)
Episode Date: March 9, 2019Navigating Conflict with a Wise Heart – Part 2 (2019-03-06) - This series of talks offers guidance in transforming conflict into a portal for awakening your understanding, flexibility and compassion.... We look at how to heal our own unmet needs and not be dependent on others changing; and how to engage with another person when both are dedicated to mindful communication. We also extend our exploration to societal conflict. The talks are accompanied by reflections and meditations that can directly enhance your capacity to respond to conflict from the most wise and caring part of your being. Your support enables us to continue to offer these talks and meditations freely. If you value them, I hope you will consider offering a donation at this time at www.tarabrach.com/donation/. With gratitude and love, Tara
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Greetings. We offer these podcasts freely and your support really makes a difference.
To make a donation, please visit tarabrock.com.
Namaste and blessings and welcome.
We are exploring tonight, this is our second of a two-part series on navigating conflict
and we're going to continue the exploration starting with one of my favorite little
parables that has to do with porcupines that are going through the coldest winter that have been
known for many, many years and many animals froze to death during this one. So in an effort to
save themselves from this icy fate, they decide to gather together and fend off the chill.
And they huddled very close to each other and covered and protected from the elements that
are worn by their collective body heat. But as you can imagine, what happens is,
happened was their prickly quills proved to be a bit of a problem in that kind of close contact
and they were poking and stabbing each other. There was some wounding going on with their
closest companions in particular. So the warmth was wonderful but the needling became really
uncomfortable and eventually they began to distance themselves one from another and they
scattered in the forest only to when they were alone start freezing up and many of them died.
So it soon became clear they had to choose and they had to choose between solitary deaths
and a kind of frigid environment in the wilderness or the discomfort of being close up but being
needled by their companions and by each other's quills when they banded together.
Wisely they decided to return to the huddle and they learned to live with the little wounds
caused by close relationship with their fellows in order
to benefit from the collective heat they generated as a group and in this way they were
able to survive and flourish.
So that's our parable and you might be thinking for yourself and consider in this last week
or so did you get needled some anywhere along the line by somebody around you or were
you needling somebody?
you invoke or trigger a reaction?
And if we're honest, it might not be this last week but most of us it probably was, you
know, and if we're honest we do hurt each other.
We often aren't aware of each other's needs, we step over, not so carefully, step on
each other and don't really notice how much the other is needing to feel appreciated
in a certain way or attended to or seen or cared about.
So we do prick each other and for the sake of our collective well-being and freedom, evolution
has given us the capacity to find ways to work out the conflicts and the wounding.
It doesn't always happen but we have that capacity.
It's really part of the evolution of consciousness that we can deal with that and wake up
in a way actually that brings a tremendous amount of intimacy and understanding and connection.
The classic symbol is the lotus growing out of mud and the saying is no mud, no lotus.
That it's not whether or not we're going to have conflict because the given is conflict.
We have conflict with our inner life and we have conflict with each other.
The question is how do we respond?
And that's what we're going to continue to explore.
And the given is that it requires a really deep commitment.
It's a training, a willingness and a commitment to be uncomfortable, sometimes to be scared,
to be vulnerable if we're going to work out the conflict in our lives.
And we actually have a lot of strong conditioning to do the opposite of that, to run in
the opposite direction, to avoid facing conflict whenever we can, are to get locked into the
kind of blame that perpetuates hostility.
By way of example, Rita Rudner, she says, I love to shop after a bad relationship.
I don't know, I buy a new outfit and it makes me feel better.
It just does.
Sometimes if I see a really great outfit, I'll break up with someone on purpose.
So it's fun and for each of us, part of waking up to ourselves, being on to ourselves,
is catching onto what is my strategy when there's conflict?
What do I do?
And what we're going to be exploring because the teaching is whatever we practice grows stronger.
So if there's tension with somebody and you regularly practice locking into resentment
and blame, that's just going to cultivate the neuropathways that bring us to more and more
resentment of blame.
If you're one of those conflict-voiding people that's always trying to harmonize and smooth over
but then ends up feeling really, really angry or wronged or really distant from people,
then that's going to be the groove that gets deepened.
So it becomes really important to catch on to what is my mode when there's conflict.
And of course, as we do in these classes, I'll be inviting you to pick an area where
you feel you've been at odds in some way and we'll do some practice with that.
Last class, one of the basic premises is that when we're in conflict,
It's not like the humans are in conflict.
What's really in conflicts is a clash of unmet needs.
You know, my need for being seen and your need for feelings controlled or safe or whatever it is,
there's a clash in needs.
And no matter how right you feel in a conflict,
and this is a hard one but it's really, I keep having to re-experience it.
experience it in my own life, no matter how right you are. When you're in a conflict and
feeling right, you're in a trance. Your world has become very confined and the lens
then is, you know, the right self and a wrong or bad other. And what we see through
that lens, the self becomes tight and judgmental and either aggressive or defensive but
small and the other, all we can see of the other is the sliver of their being that we've
decided is wrong or bad.
We forget about all the other stuff.
The lens is really, really narrow.
And it's interesting because when we're in our rightness, we're operating off of our survival
brain, the limbic brain.
And the thing is that no matter how right we are, we don't like our lightness.
limbic self. If you watch when you're in a conflict and whether you feel like it was your fault
in some way or whether you feel like it's the other person's fault, when you're caught in that
trance, one of the signs of trance is there's something that feels slightly distasteful or
yucky or not good about yourself. We don't like who we are because we're coming from a very
small portion of our being. One of the things that's always interesting,
to me is when we're on conflict, the way we take in information, how we're sorting
for information to prove our rightness and another's wrongness.
And it's always a distortion.
So one of my favorite, this is a historical fiction that I think has a really illustrative
point in it.
And it goes like this.
About a century or two ago the Pope decided that all the Jews had to leave Rome.
there was a big uproar from the Jewish community, so the Pope made a deal.
He would have a religious debate with a member of the Jewish community.
If the Jew won, the Jews could stay. If the Pope won, the Jews would leave.
The Jews realized they had no choice, so they picked a middle-aged man named Moisha to represent them,
and Moishe asked for one addition to the debate. To make it more interesting,
neither side would be able to talk.
The Pope agreed. The day before the great debate came, Moisa and the Pope sat opposite.
other for a full minute before the Pope raised his hand and showed three fingers.
Moisha looked back at him and raised one finger.
The Pope waved his fingers in a circle around his head and Moisha pointed to the ground where he sat.
The Pope pulled out a wafer and a glass of wine. Moisha pulled out an apple.
The Pope stood up and he said, I give up, the man's too good, the Jews can stay.
So an hour later the Cardinals are all surrounding the Pope and they're asking them, well what happened?
What happened? And the Pope said, well, first I put up three fingers to show the Trinity,
and he responded holding up one finger to remind me that the one God, common to all our religions.
Then I waved my fingers around me to show that God was all around us,
and he responded by pointing to the ground showing that God is the very ground of existence.
He, you know, I pulled out wine and wafer to show that God absolves us from our sins.
He pulled in an apple to remind me of original sin.
He had an answer for everything. What could I do?
I do. Meanwhile, the Jewish community is crowded around Moitia. What happened? They asked.
Well, he said first, he said to me the Jews had three days to get out of here. I told him
that not one of us was leaving. He told me this whole city would be cleared of Jews and I let
him know we were staying right here. Yeah, yeah, and then said the crowd, what happened then?
I don't know. He took out his lunch and I took out mine.
So do you see what I mean by a trance, you know, when we're in conflict?
We just interpreted our own way.
So the trouble with communicating when we're in a trance is that it doesn't lead to understanding
and caring.
That's the given.
If you are caught in your limbic brain, if you're feeling defensive, aggressive, I'm right,
wrong, if you speak from that place it creates more distance.
I know for myself I'm always, it's always always like an axiom of truth that when I'm feeling
agitated and have some blame, if I speak I'm not going to get what I want because I'm just
going to push the other person away and they're going to be more defended.
So the key is not to communicate from trance but to remember our intention, to remember
what matters to get in touch with what's going on inside us.
And when we don't, there's always, always repercussions.
I'll give you an example from my own life and this is a story about my husband and I, Jonathan,
we have a, one of our rituals as a couple, is that we meditate and
least twice a week together in the morning and when we do part of our meditation is a kind
of check-in where we speak what we're grateful for and we speak of where challenges are and
then we check out to see you all is there anything between you and me and really feeling
happy and free, connected etc.
So when I often go into or not as much currently but back in the day maybe five years
ago, six years ago, because this is when this event happened, I had a certain tension and
a grudge that I felt like I was always more interested in looking at the what's between
us thing.
You know, it was a little bit of a gender thing but I always wanted to look at, you know,
where is there something we need to pay attention to?
And he was always a little bit real ready to harmonize, not so into looking.
So that's a preface to say that that morning we chatted about everything and but
our relationship and he almost forgot that last piece of, you know, how are we doing?
So I asked, I said, so, how are we doing?
Now I just want you to know I didn't have anything in that particular moment that I thought
was going on but I kind of wanted to put him on the spot a little.
So I said, so anything good we should, anything we should be paying attention to.
And then after I framed it in this positive invitational way I kind of sat back.
So I was on my turf, you know, I was good at this kind of.
part of things and he started squirming, you know, because he figured there was something I had
on my mind and he was, you know, his fear of course, he missed something and I was going to
pounce and he looked at me hopefully like maybe I'd give him a clue. I was totally silent,
you know, so I'm just sitting there, then he gets that deer and the headlights look like
oh my gosh, something's really going on. And then he got this mischievous look and he pulled
out his iPhone and he asked Siri, how do you respond?
when your wife asked, how are we doing?
Within moments he had an answer, and this is absolute truth,
Siri said, you say, I'm okay, you're okay,
and this is the best of all possible worlds.
Honest to God,
Siri's too good.
I mean, what could I do?
So, we kind of, you know, thought that was really funny
and went out and had a walk or whatever,
but the follow-up was,
that I had to own the trance I was in which was, it was kind of a passive-aggressive move
I had done where it wasn't well intended.
I wanted to make them uncomfortable.
But actually by naming that, by naming the trance and the patterning it actually set us
on kind of a new ground of a little more space, a little more trust to actually be able
to look at what was between us when there was something that had come up.
So in our last class, the last exploration of this, the first step when there's conflict
is what I call the U-turn where we go from there's something wrong with you or there's
something going on that's bad here to, okay, what's going on inside me right now?
And this pause rather than going at it with somebody but this pause to take some time
to give some space, to check in is absolutely essential.
I call it the sacred art of pausing,
whether it's for five seconds or for five minutes or until the next day,
is where we have a chance to come out of that limbic trance
and to actually come from a more whole and intelligent and compassionate place.
Pausing is really important in any,
sort of interaction when there's a reactivity and especially with couples. There's been
research one of the most renowned authors and couple therapists John Gottman did a really interesting
study with couples where they'd come in and he'd wire them up so he could watch their brains
as they interacted and all these physiological gauges and then they discussed these difficult
issues and he'd wait until the pulses went up and they got to a certain point in
midst of an argument and then let them know that the camera had broken down and they needed
to just wait while they fixed the cameras.
So he'd put them off in their own rooms for 15 minutes, come back again and then after
they came back found that they could really resolve a whole lot of problems pretty easily.
They were entirely two different people because it takes adrenaline about 15,
minutes to be metabolized.
Now this is a pause without any real intentional kind of meditative process.
So imagine you combine the pause where you just have time to physiologically settle with
making the U-turn and actually becoming more intimate with your own experience and you can sense
that you then can engage from quite a more resourceful place.
which is our practice.
So that's what we covered last time was making that you turn.
And when we do, what we're doing is saying, okay, so what am I feeling?
Okay, I'm feeling hurt.
I'm feeling fear.
What are my unmet needs?
Well, I have an unmet need to feel like I'm special, like I matter to this person,
or I'm respected, or I'm seen.
but we get in touch with that so that when we're communicating rather than saying
you're bad you're wrong we can say this is what came up for me this is the feeling
this is the unmet need.
Does that all make sense thus far because we're about to take the next step?
So the next question is then how do we go about skillfully engaging with another person after
we've made the U-turn. And that's what I'd like to spend the rest of our time now talking about.
And it's really a process of naming to the best of our ability what's true about what's going
on. And there's several guiding inquiries when we're naming things with each other.
The first is to get in touch with our deepest intent. So it might have been with Jonathan that
if I had recognized it, I would recognize, oh, the intention I'm operating off of now is kind of a gotcha intention.
But if I really go deep, I want to be intimate and unless we pay attention to these things,
my fear is that will always be a little bit nice to each other but not really know each other.
So if I had taken the time I could have gotten to that more vulnerable, I want to be close.
So that's the first inquiry.
What's our real intention here?
What's the real intention as we are with another person?
The next few that I'm going to name are adapted from nonviolent communication.
And I'm curious here, how many of you are familiar with Marshall Rosenberg and nonviolent communication?
Can you raise your hands high?
Good number.
Okay.
As you listen to know that there's a lot of good free research,
sources on the web that you can, if this appeals to, these inquiries about kind of naming
what's true and working out conflict, if this appeals you can look up nonviolent communications.
It's a training.
It's a training in how to really pay attention deeply so it's not something you can necessarily
just say, oh here's my list of questions and I'm going to do it right away.
The second inquiry after what's really the intention is, and this is for both people to
say, well what can we objectively say really happened?
So it's that we both, you know, it's not he pulled out his lunch and I pulled out mine,
it's like what really can we both say happened?
The third is what was I feeling.
That's what we do with the U-turn, what was I feeling or what do I feel.
The next one's what do I need?
the unmet need? What am I hoping for? And the last is what do I want to ask for? It might
be I want to ask that we can talk about this more. Or I want to ask and see if you understand
how I was feeling. Or I want to ask that we can pause more when this comes up again,
that kind of thing. So those are the questions. What's my deepest intention? What do we both
agree happen? Feeling? What am I feeling? What's the
unmet need and what's the request. Now, it's ideal if you're talking to somebody and you both
take turns with these to mirror back what you're hearing so that the other person gets a sense
of being heard. But I want to share an example so you get a feeling a little more of a grounded
sense of how this can work out. The story I'd like to share with you, this is from quite a while ago
and I think it's in radical acceptance.
I thought of it, but it was a pretty clear example.
And it happens to a lot of partners where one person becomes ill
and then all sorts of issues come up around how the two are working with one person being L.
So I thought that would be a good one.
For this couple, their relationship was going downhill and they were thinking of separating.
He was a fine carpenter and he, on a camping trip he had contracted
limes. His fingers were swelling, his body ached. He was getting way behind on work, really depressed.
And so she started taking on more hours of work, working overtime and had to do all the
meals and the cleaning and this and that. So what they could both agree on is that he was getting
sicker and they were both getting emotionally reactive. Because basically,
when they came, that's what they could agree on.
And what their intention was was to see if they could reconnect.
Okay, that was their intention.
So when these inquiries, okay, what are you feeling?
For her, she was saying,
I feel completely unappreciated by you.
I'm trying so hard to make up for things
and I feel like I'm never enough that I'm not doing it right
and you actually treat me like I'm not caring, but I'm trying really hard and so I feel
really unappreciated.
And his view was that she begrudged the whole situation, that she was blaming him for being sick
and that she was angry about it and she was angry that he couldn't do his share.
So that's the setup, that that's where they both were.
I had them each do their own U-turn so they could get in touch and then share what the actual
feelings were.
For him under his anger, shame, frustration, impotency, loneliness, fear about the future and his
unmet need was to feel worthy and empowered and secure and what he wanted was please trust
I'm trying, I'm trying to do as well as I can.
And for her underneath the unappreciated was feeling helpless.
She said I love you and I can't make you feel better and I don't know if any if it's going to
work out. I don't know if you're going to get better. And what I need you do is to trust
I'm caring. So I'm giving you an example of them. They responded to these questions in a way
that rather than blame went to vulnerability. And that created a receptivity to each other.
And they stayed together and it was really, really hard.
because she very quickly would go into feeling like I'm doing stuff and I'm not appreciated
and he'd feel a shame but they had a way to talk about it.
Now I want to name here that in order to be able to resolve with another person in this way
there's a few things that have to be in place.
You have to have a person that's willing to meet you and practice this way.
You have to have a person that's actually able to get in touch with themselves
so they can actually report out their feelings and their needs.
Lots of people can't do that.
You might be thinking, yeah, right, well, I'm willing,
but there's no way the person I'm having a conflict is going to be able to do that.
You can still make the U-turn, okay?
You can still get in touch with your own so that you can,
to the degree you can work out conflict,
be speaking from a place that's not going to elicit defensiveness.
So you can do degrees of this.
There's another thing that many of you might be thinking because I know the feeling which
is when I'm in conflict it feels in a very specific way scary and threatening to try to begin
to work out something because once we feel we've been hurt there's a fear we're going
to get hurt again.
So I want to first say that again.
for two people to engage in this more evolved way of processing, they both have to be willing
to practice it.
They have to be willing to do it.
There has to be a safe enough container or it is dangerous.
It will feel like you could be vulnerable and say, here's my feelings, here's my needs and
get completely slammed, right?
So, here's the thing again, we have to practice the full U-turn and then use our intuition
to how much we can communicate.
Tick-Nat-Han has an interesting way of languaging this.
He says when you get triggered and you're angry, pause, breathe, walk, do the U-turn,
embrace your anger, sense what's going into what's inside you, look into its knees,
nature. And then if it's still there, then you have to communicate. But here's what
he advises for communication. Three sentences. I'm suffering and I want you to know it.
In other words, I want these feelings and unmet needs. I want you to know it. I'm doing
my best. That's the intention. And please help. Please join me in paying attention to this.
So he calls us the language of true love.
And he encourages you to write down these three sentences.
I'm suffering and I want you to know it.
I'm doing my best.
Please help.
Can you hear the spirit of the language and sense that it's a hundred percent responsible?
It's not saying it's your fault, it's not saying I'm relinquishing responsibility,
it's just saying, can we look at this together?
So we're going to practice.
We're going to practice making the full U-turn and imagining into being able to process with another person.
So if you will, just to take some moments to find a good way of sitting for this.
To bring to mind a situation with somebody, if you imagine the porcupine, somebody that's close.
somebody that's close but where there is a pattern of reactivity that you'd like to wake up from,
that you'd like to bring more understanding, more connection to work with.
It could be a friend, a sibling, a parent, a child.
Ideally, choosing someone that could potentially have the capacity to meet you in the exploration.
Some situation where you feel some blame or resentment, where there's some prickling going on
with someone close, where you'd like to explore the U-turn, at least easing up things within
yourself, more contact with your own experience, and where potentially you might be able
to process some.
Let the attitude be how honest can you.
can you be right now with yourself?
So you can sense, okay, if you were going to describe the situation, what would be the bare-bones
description that's objective and honest.
And ground this in your intention, what your real intention is, your deepest intention with
this person.
Is it to understand each other better, to have more loving connection, more spontaneity?
And from that intention, begin that U-turn of bringing your full attention inwardly so you can
begin to investigate and sense so what is it that I'm feeling when I'm triggered?
It might be more than one feeling.
If you're feeling angry you might also feel hurt or shamed or rejected.
How does the interaction make you feel disrespected?
seen. So it'll help to kind of bring the situation to mind and sense, well, what really,
what are the feelings that come up inside me?
And feel your body, your throat, your chest, your belly.
Sometimes it helps to even take a posture that expresses the feeling that comes up when
this is being triggered so you can really get in touch with it.
You wouldn't be blaming unless there wasn't some feeling underneath.
some form of vulnerability.
And what's the unmet need?
What is that part of you that is reactive really want or need?
Is it to be cared about?
Is it to be treated with respect?
Is it to be understood?
Be appreciated?
Accepted?
To sense the need.
Do you have a sense of what you'd really want to ask for
that is ecological and wise, like possible?
Do you want to ask that you, that this other person spend more time talking or show you that
they understand in some way?
Take some moments to sense the need that's there and really offer to your own being
what's needed in this moment.
most important, what can you offer yourself? If there's a need to be seen, can you really
let that part know you see it? Like from your highest self, your kindest self? If there's
a need for respect, can you honor your own dignity? If there's a need for love you might
put your hand on your heart and really offer care. In making the U-turn it's key to bring
the resourcefulness inside, you'll be in a much better position to relate to the other person
if you've brought love and respect and understanding to the part of you that's reactive.
So take some moments from your highest self, from your wisest self to offer inwardly what's
most needed, offer the words that could be reassuring.
And if you feel it would help to have some support, imagine others who care about you,
or it could be a spiritual figure, but call on support.
So the part of you that's reactive is getting taken care of.
The more deeply you resource right now internally,
the more possibility of finding connection with the other person.
And from a place of awakeness and open-heartedness,
you might reflect on the other person for a few moments.
You might imagine them going through this process and sensing for them, what is it that
that person's feeling?
Follow on your intuition, again from your high self, your future self, your most evolved
space of beingness.
What's that person feeling?
What might that person be needing that would calm or soothe or heal?
the upset in that person.
And for the last few moments you might imagine yourself together speaking,
imagine hearing each other's feelings, hearing each other's needs,
and sense the possibility of deepening understanding
of a willingness to respond in a way that can be helpful to each other,
knowing that you can continue on your own with this practice
and that it's again a life training to be able to process within ourselves
and then bring it in and communicate with others
that it takes a lot of practice and a mutual commitment
so there really is a safe container but you can take steps you don't have to wait
and the more you make the U-turn and bring the compassion within,
the more you'll find a kind of creativity
and an intuition on how to begin to speak with another
so you can both share where the vulnerability is in a way that's healing,
not creating more distance.
Now, a big question comes up, well, what if I do the U-turn and I'm still angry?
And that actually happens a whole lot
because the more the conflict taps into wounds that are historical,
the more it takes actually many rounds of U-turns to begin to kind of quiet and calm
so that you're actually coming from a place that's not hijacked by your limbic system.
But that's okay. Do it a number of times and resource as well as you can.
Often the resourcing is not just inward. It means getting in touch with other,
people and being able to process with them and sensing that they are holding you in a way
that's helpful.
One trick that's helpful is if you're really agitated and aggravated by a person is to,
in your mind's eye, imagine that trigger person moving away from you and shrinking into the
distance.
Like just imagine that and the more visually you imagine them smaller and more distant actually
the more you can resource yourself.
I'm just giving you a couple of tricks that I've heard and found are actually helpful.
Another is to view from your future self.
Like just imagine your future self.
You're more evolved and awake and loving self imagine through that part of your own eyes.
Now another question is what if the other person's still really angry?
And the best approach I have found when some
else is angry and I've kind of settled some is to ask them, say, help me to understand
what's going on with you.
Help me to understand what you're saying.
Help me to understand what's important to you or what I'm missing.
You're not saying help me to understand what you're feeling right now because that's
going to get them locked back into feeling but what are you saying, what's important
to you actually conveys you care.
you're interested and it allows them to begin to communicate."
Pema Chodrin puts it beautifully.
This is one of my favorite of her quote.
She says, we don't set out to save the world.
We set out to wonder how other people are doing and to reflect on how our actions affect
other people's heart.
We started last class with a frame of what it means to be 100% responsive.
that when there's conflict, when there's blame, when there's wounding, there's a true
empowerment to say, okay, I'm 100% responsible for my experience.
Whatever a person does, now if they're being abusive that doesn't mean you don't set
boundaries or get away.
You're 100% responsible to take care of yourself.
But blame any moment of you're bad and you're wrong.
takes away from your own empowerment. If you want to feel a sense of your own strength
and resourcefulness, 100% responsible. And there are two ways that can take expression
that I want to close with naming that both have felt really, really important in my life.
And the first one is the power of apologizing. Every one of us hurts other people at times.
And apologizing is super powerful both in offering what it does for you to offer it and also
in receiving.
There are three steps to apologizing and these are neatly summed up, I want to give you the author's
name, Beverly Engel.
I like the way she does this, the three R's.
The first is regret.
That's a statement of regret for causing harm.
is responsible, that's 100% responsible, I accept my responsibility for my actions. And then the third
is remedy, some statement of willingness energetically or actively to remedy the situation.
So we do these three. And I'll give you an example for me with Jonathan, a different one,
where apologizing became really important. And this was a couple of years ago, he had a
to meet a small group of working on a project. He agreed to meet with them for a morning.
It didn't have anything to do with his domain. They were a little bit confused and even asking
him and he had a driver really long distance. So I kind of, he felt obliged in some way. I knew
it wasn't on his priority list so I pounced. You know I was really critical. You know you're
always pressed by how much you have to do, how much is, you know, on your plate. And, you know,
you go just agreeing to do this, this, this.
So then he kind of got quiet and didn't say much and then I realized that I was out of line.
So in my mind I rehearsed I was going to apologize and I was rehearsing it and I was saying
okay I'm really sorry and it's not how I want to be with you and I was just concerned that
you weren't staying aligned with your priorities then that's a whoops because.
you can see how quickly an apology goes into self-justification.
Notice how quickly when you're apologizing or something you then say, I just-da-da-da.
Because immediately that just means that you're now showing why you actually were okay
doing it.
And I realized this is so much like when I reflected further this is so much the way I was
with my son.
You know, he wasn't doing it my way.
I assumed he should do it a certain way.
And I was doing the same thing with Jonathan.
So I really apologize.
And I was accountable for laying my way on him.
So regret.
And I was doing it really all right.
I was taking responsibility fully.
And then by way of remedy, I told him I would pay a coach
to teach him how to do it my way.
We goof around a lot.
But he liked that.
That was OK for us.
So I want to just say that I'm apologizing is super hard because we have right come up
rubbing against our pain about feeling imperfect.
And we all feel like a lot of pain around being imperfect.
And yet if you can apologize, what happens is it breaks down that identification of the,
that I've done something wrong and I'm bad.
It actually we're coming from a larger place.
frees up our identity and it's deeply healing to the other person. I want to read you a story
that Beverly Engle tells about this. She says, when I was 35 years old, I divorced my mother.
I felt that under the circumstance it was the only thing I could do. I'd long felt that she
had damaged me with emotional abuse while I was growing up and during my adulthood she
continued to treat me in ways I didn't like.
I became so emotionally and physically stressed when I was with her that it affected my health.
So I made the difficult yet necessary decision to stop seeing her.
That estrangement lasted three years.
She says I wrote a book titled Divorcing a Parent.
I told about the experience of divorcing my mother and encouraged others in similar situations
to consider doing the same.
Then one day the phone rang.
When I picked it up the person on the other end of the line said, I'm sorry.
It was my mother.
Waves of relief washed over me.
Resentment, fear and anger drained out.
Much to my surprise, those two simple words seemed to wipe away years of pain and bitterness.
There were the words I'd been waiting to hear most of my life.
I knew that it had taken all the courage my extremely proud mother could muster to say them,
so I didn't have to belabor the point.
The important thing was that she was saying she was sorry, something that she was
think she had never done before. I could tell by the tone of her voice she truly regretted
the way she had treated me. Of course this was only the beginning of the story although
I believed her apology I didn't know if her behavior toward me would be different. This I
tested over time but by apologizing she had acknowledged I had a reason to be hurt
and angry and that was extremely empowering for me. Apology has indeed changed my life.
My mother lived only three more years but she was able to offer an apology and because
I was able to accept her apology we're closer in those three years than we had ever been.
Our time together was extremely healing for both of us.
So I close with this story because sometimes we know that we've been off and it's ours
to become big enough and by big enough I mean really open.
beyond our small self that wants to be right and doesn't want to be wrong to extend
an apology.
It's really freeing and enlarging and as this story shows it can be incredibly healing for
the person receiving.
We're talking in these classes really about evolving our relational consciousness.
There's no way to do it.
it without coming up to the edge of where we feel really uncomfortable.
And so, and if there's a lot of trauma we have to be really gradual.
But the invitation is each one of us in our lives we're going to be pricked, we're
going to be needled and we're going to feel pricked and feel in some way that somebody's
wrong.
And each one of us has the potential to let that that's
be a place of waking up to really free ourselves from being the victim or the aggressor
to wake up to a bigger space that really wants to connect and understand.
So with this I invite you to a final, taking a final few moments in the deepest sense
when we evolve our consciousness we're letting go of old patterns of defending, old patterns of
It's a surrendering for something fresh and tender and awake and vast to unfold itself.
So you might as we close again bring to mind some place where you feel at odds with someone.
Again one of the close in porcupines is usually useful to reflect on.
You might ask yourself who would you be if you're not meant to be.
If you're not making the other wrong, you're not making yourself wrong.
Surrendering the stories of wrongness, what becomes possible?
The poet Rumi writes, very little grows on jagged rock.
Be ground, be crumbled, so wildflowers will come up where you are.
Be ground, be crumbled, so wildflowers will come up where you are.
where you are. You've been stony for too many years. Try something different. Surrender.
Namaste and thank you for your attention. For more talks and meditations and to learn about my
schedule or join my email list, please visit tarabrock.com.
