Tech Brew Ride Home - Mon. 06/13 – (Another?) Crypto Bank Run
Episode Date: June 13, 2022All the crypt is down bad. Is DeFi lending platform Celsius to blame? More importantly, are margin calls coming for big Bitcoin bag holders, including Tesla? Jack Dorsey’s plan to leapfrog to Web5. ...Leaked images of the Galaxy Z Flip 4. Is your smart TV committing ad fraud? And why I’m pretty sure that Google AI bot did NOT become sentient. Sponsors: Dragon Ball Z Kakarot! AltoIRA.com/techmeme Links: Celsius Tanks 70% in 1 Hour After Company Pauses Withdrawals to 'Stabilize Liquidity' (Decrypt) Jack Dorsey's Bitcoin venture TBD unveils proposal for decentralized Web platform (The Block) Jack Dorsey’s TBD Announces Web 3 Competitor: Web 5 (CoinDesk) Galaxy Z Flip 4 leaks in real-life shots with much smaller display crease (9to5Google) Apple Goes Deeper Into Finance With Buy Now, Pay Later Offering (WSJ) Some Ads Play on Streaming Services Even When the TV Is Off, Study Finds (WSJ) The Google engineer who thinks the company’s AI has come to life (Washington Post) Nonsense on Stilts (Gary Marcus) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
On April 4th, 2023, around 2 in the morning, a man was found stabbed multiple times on a sidewalk in downtown San Francisco.
Hey, who did this to you?
What happened next turned the story into a political firestorm.
Reports have identified the victim as Bob Lee, the founder of Cash App.
From Bloomberg Podcasts, this is Foundering, the Killing of Bob Lee, beginning April 16.
Welcome to the tech meme right home for Monday, June 13th, 2020. I'm Brian McCullough today. All the
crypto is down. Bad. Is Defy lending platform Celsius to blame? More importantly, our margin
calls coming for big Bitcoin bagholders, including Tesla. Jack Dorsey's plan to leapfrog all the way
to Web 5 leaked images of the Galaxy Z Flip 4 is your smart TV committing ad fraud.
And why, I'm pretty sure that Google AI bot did not become sentient. Here's what you
today in the world of tech. So at some point I must have made a Bitcoin price alert in Coinbase.
I say at some point because I never knew about it until about a month ago because it had never
triggered. But three or four times recently, I've gotten these emails from Coinbase that,
you know, Bitcoin up 5%, Bitcoin down 5%. I guess it has a 5% in a 24-hour period window.
So this morning, I wake up to a message that Bitcoin was down 9.18%, and I'm like,
What Now?
Well, the what now is, I think, DeFi lending platform Celsius.
The Celsius token sell fell 70% in one hour after the defy lending giant suspended withdraws,
dropping to about 20 cents amid a broader crypto market slump.
Celsius has now paused all withdrawals, swaps,
and transfers between accounts, citing what it calls extreme market conditions.
But here's what I can't figure out because I was offline last night when this was all going down.
Was crypto already falling and Celsius is suffering because of that?
Or is the fall in the broader crypto market causing a bank run on Celsius
because it's forcing margin calls or forced withdrawals that tumble over to tether and other things?
Or what? I don't know, quoting decrypt.
On Sunday night with crypto markets already in freefall, controversial crypto lender, Celsius announced
it was suddenly pausing all customer withdrawals, swaps, and transfers.
We are taking this action today to put Celsius in a better position to honor over time.
It's withdrawal obligations, the company wrote in a blog post on Medium.
We are taking this necessary action for the benefit of our entire community in order to stabilize
liquidity and operations while we take steps to preserve and protect assets.
Furthermore, customers will continue to accrue.
rewards during the pause in line with our commitment to our customers, end quote.
The company's sell token quickly reacted dropping 70% in one hour from a prior high of
49 cents earlier on Sunday down to 15 cents, according to coin market cap.
The rest of the crypto market was not having a good day either on Sunday when Celsius
shared its news, though nothing compared to sales dramatic drop.
Celsius launched in 2017 and offers customers high yield for crypto deposits, which it lends
out to other crypto firms. It shares that business model with BlockFi and NXO among other players, end
quote. So you could see how a project that lends out crypto to earn yield could have an effect on
the broader markets if people are pulling their loaned crypto back, or at least attempting to.
Bitcoin has dropped around 10 to 15% to below $23,000 and a half dollars at the time of this writing.
Bitcoin, by the way, is down 23% just from $3,000.000. Bitcoin, by the way, is down 23% just from $3,000.
Thursday afternoon. Ether, dropped by more than 15% to around $1.2,000 per token. Avalanche dropped more
than 15% and Solana dropped 15% or more. And it's getting worse as I write this. Binance has temporarily
paused BTC withdrawals, citing a stuck transaction and initially giving around a 30-minute time frame
for the fix, but no updates have been given for at least 90 minutes. But Brian, how is this,
any of this new. It's another day, another whatever this sort of mess is. And yes, I agree with you.
But listen to this. It kind of sounds like a bank run is going on, right? Kind of sounds like Celsius
might not be solvent. A real layman situation here. Well, Canada's second largest pension fund
was among the investors in a $400 million equity round of financing for Celsius just back in
October. And remember, Micro Strategy, that company that at the start of the most recent Crypto Bull Run
bought a bunch of Bitcoin, well, Micro Strategy, as of this point, has a $205 million BTC
collateralized loan with Silvergate Bank. If BTC drops below $21,000, the company will be forced
to hand over uncollateralized BTC to answer any potential margin call. That's what I'm hearing on
Twitter. You know who else bought a lot of BTC? Tesla. Twitter tells me that combined,
Tesla and Micro Strategy are currently sitting on an impaired loss of $1.5 billion. So what would
happen if Tesla and or Microstrategy were forced to sell their BTC? Oh, and you know who else's
current paper losses in Bitcoin are at this point totaling 44%. That would be the sovereign nation of El Salvador.
Is this a good time to mention Jack Dorsey's long-gestating Bitcoin project, which we got some more
details on?
You know, why not?
Jack Dorsey's Bitcoin Venture TBD trolled everybody a few days ago by announcing plans to launch
a Web 5 platform using the Ion network focused on decentralized identity and data storage
for applications, quoting the block.
The web democratized the exchange of information, but it's missing a key layer.
identity. We struggle to secure personal data with hundreds of accounts and passwords we can't remember.
On the web today, identity and personal data have become the property of third parties. The project's
website states, Web5 brings decentralized identity and data storage to your applications.
It lets devs focus on creating delightful user experiences while returning ownership of data and
identity to individuals, end quote. A presentation made public along with the announcement
explores the different components of the proposed platform, Web 5 notably Udard.
utilize ion, a second-layer network built on top of the Bitcoin blockchain, as a protocol for
verifiable credentials. This will likely be our most important contribution to the internet,
Dorsey said in a tweet, proud of the team, end quote. Our IP Web 3 VCs, Dorsey added in his
post, end quote. More details from CoinDesk, quote, appearing at a consensus panel clad in a black
and Bitcoin yellow track suit emblazoned with the numeral five, TBD lead Mike Brock explained that
that Web 5, in addition to being too better than Web 3, would beat out incumbent models by
abandoning their blockchain-centric approaches to a censorship-free identity-focused web experience.
This is really a conversation about what technologies are built to purpose, and I don't think
that renting block space in all cases is a really good idea for decentralized applications,
Brock said. He continued, I think what we're pushing forward with Web 5, and I admit it's a
provocative challenge to a lot of the assumptions about what it means to decentralize the
internet really actually is back to basics. We already have technologies that effectively
decentralized. I mean, BitTorrent exists, tour exists, et cetera, and quote. Web5's monetary layer
will be built on the foundation of Bitcoin. This is unsurprising, given Dorsey's outspoken Bitcoin
maximalism. The other technologies underpinning Web5 are borrowed from myriad areas of
cryptography and computer science. Web5, like Web3, will enable users to interact with one another
without intermediaries. This, in theory, means no threat from government
sensors or centralized service outages, among other supposed advantages.
Similar to other attempts to create a decentralized layer on top of the web, Web5 will also aim
to provide users with a decentralized identity, allowing them to seamlessly move from application
to application without needing to explicitly log in. User data, rather than getting stored
with third-party products and services, will be controlled by users and only be exposed with
their permission, end quote. Leaked images and a video seem to show a Samsung
Galaxy Z Flip 4 with a similar design to the Flip 3s, but with a shallower and less noticeable
display crease, quoting 9 to 5 Google. We got our first look at the Galaxy Z Flip 4 design,
ironically exactly a month ago today. CAD-based renders depicted the phone with a virtually
identical look to the Galaxy Z Flip 3 with two-tone outer panels, vertical dual camera layout,
and the small outer display. Tech Talk TV posted to Twitter a gallery of images,
showing the Galaxy Z Flip 4 in the flesh, specifically its black variant. The device has a matte
glass top panel with glossy glass over the display portion. The display appears to be roughly the same
size, but we can't see the borders in any of these shots. Matt glass in particular wouldn't be
new to the series as the Flip 3's black variant was also matte, as were some other colors. Aside from
that, we get a glimpse of the side-mounted fingerprint sensor as well as the hinge. Samsung has been
rumored to be adjusting the hinge design, but there doesn't appear to be any changes looking at
the side of the device. When it's fully open, though, the two halves of the flip four appear considerably
closer. The metal border is also significantly thinner, end quote. I got some answers to my
questions about Apple's new buy now pay later service. Sources are telling the Wall Street Journal that
Apple plans to use Apple ID data for identity verification and fraud prevention alongside credit reports and
FICO scores. Quote, much like a bank, the tech giant will rely on credit reports and FICO scores
to check applicants' financial standing, but it also plans to use its giant store of Apple ID
data for identity, verification, and fraud prevention, the people said. The move marks a big
change for Apple, which until a couple of years ago had little appetite to become a lender itself.
A concern at the company, including for Chief Executive Tim Cook, was the potential reputational
risk, according to people familiar with the matter. When it was ready to launch a new credit card,
few years ago, Apple tapped Goldman Sachs to approve applicants and fund the loans. The company now
feels comfortable becoming a lender in part because of the small dollar amount and short duration of the
payment plans. People familiar with the matter said, payment plans per transaction will max out at $1,000,
and the amount for which consumers are approved will depend on their credit reports and scores.
Apple also will factor its own information on millions of customers for identity verification
and fraud prevention the people said. Applicants whose Apple IDs have been in good standing for a long
period and who have no indication of fraud are more likely to get approved. Apple said it would
require consumers to link their debit card to its Buy Now Pay Later service. Payments will be deducted
from their bank accounts automatically every two weeks unless the consumer opts out. The company said
it designed the service with users' financial health and mind, end quote.
Among other things that never end, digital ad fraud, or at least something that sounds very
much like ad malfeasance, at least. According to a new study, some streaming devices keep playing
content even when TVs are off, leading to around 17% of ads being shown when users can't see
them, thereby costing brands more than a billion dollars a year, quoting the Wall Street
Journal. Some 17% of ads shown on televisions connected through a streaming device, including
streaming boxes, dongles, sticks, and gaming consoles are playing while the TV is off, according to
a study by WPP PLC's ad-buying giant Group M and ad measurement firm, Ispot.tv. That is because when a TV
set is turned off, it doesn't always send a signal to the streaming device connected to the TV through its
HDMI port. Group M said, as a result, the streaming device will continue playing the show and its ads,
unless users had exited or paused the streaming app they were watching before turning off their TV.
Due to the nature of the problem, using a smart TV on which streaming apps are loaded, makes it far
less likely that ads would be shown while the TV is off, since in this instance, the television
and streaming device are just a single piece of hardware. Group M said it found virtually no
incidents of the issue on smart TV apps. The study, which included smart TVs, and some hooked up
with a streaming device, found that on average between 8 and 10 percent of all streaming ads were
shown while the TV was off. The U.S. connected TV ad market has been growing exponentially in recent
years, going from $2.6 billion in 2017 to an expected $18.9 billion this year, according to estimates
from insider intelligence. That means that this year alone between $1.5 and $1.9 billion worth
of ads are expected to be shown to viewers who can't see them, end quote.
Over the weekend, a piece from The Washington Post got picked up basically everywhere about a Google
engineer who was placed on paid leave after he became convinced that it's Lambda chat,
generator had become sentient. So yes, the headlines and basically every venue over the weekend
were that somebody thinks the AI has become sylphil wheel in my attempt at an Arnold Schwarzenegger
impression. I will link to the original post piece in the show notes so you can read it if you
hadn't. But finally, today I'm going to quote for you from a piece by one-time guest on this
podcast, the AI guru Gary Marcus, who says that he thinks that the notion that Google's
Lambda might be sentient is completely ridiculous. Quoting from Gary's substack,
neither Lambda nor any of its cousins, GPT3, are remotely intelligent. All they do is match
patterns draw from massive statistical databases of human language. The patterns might be cool,
but language these systems utter doesn't actually mean anything at all. And it sure as hell
doesn't mean that these systems are sentient. To be sentient is to be aware of yourself in the world.
Lambda simply isn't. It's just an illusion in the grand history of Eliza, a 1965 piece of software that
pretended to be a therapist, managing to fool some humans into thinking it was human, and Eugene Goosman,
a wisecracking 13-year-old boy impersonating a chatbot that won a scaled-down version of the Turing test.
None of the hardware in either of those systems has survived in modern efforts at artificial general intelligence,
and I'm not sure that Lambda and its cousins will play any important role in the future of AI either.
What these systems do, no more and no less, is put together sequences of words,
but without any coherent understanding of the world behind them,
like foreign language Scrabble players who use English words as point-scoring tools
without any clue about what the words mean.
I am not saying that no software could ever connect its digital bits to the world,
a la one reading of John Searle's infamous Chinese room thought experiment,
turn-by-turn navigation systems, for example, connect their bits to the world just fine.
Software like Lambda simply doesn't.
It doesn't even try to connect to the world at large.
It just tries to be the best version of autocomplete.
It can be by predicting what words fit best in a given context.
Roger Moore made this point beautifully a couple weeks ago,
critiquing systems like Lambda that are known as language models
and making the point that they don't understand language in the sense of relating sentences to the world,
but just sequences of words to one another.
the AI community have our differences, but pretty much all of us find the notion that Lambda
might be sentient completely ridiculous. Stanford economist Eric Bern Folson used this great analogy,
quote, foundation models are incredibly effective at stringing together statistically plausible
chunks of text in response to prompts, but to claim they are sentient is the modern equivalent
of the dog who heard a voice from a gramophone and thought his master was inside, end quote.
Hey, everybody. The ride home fun.
is now raising funds for Q4 of our early stage rolling fund.
If you've not invested in the fund before, now's a good time to do so.
This quarter coming up, I have two of our biggest bets in terms of check sizes and conviction
thus far in the fund's life that we're going to make this coming quarter.
And look, I've only told you about a half a dozen of the companies we've invested in
over the past three quarters.
To date, we have actually invested.
invested in 20 total companies. We're looking to do in the neighborhood of 20 more investments over
the next four quarters, so why not jump on board now? Learn how to invest by going to ridehomefund.com.
And if people want more info, email me at Brian at ridehomefund.com, and I'll share our recent
fund memos outlining all the investments we've made and our overall fund strategy so long
as you promise to keep it confidential. Talk to you tomorrow.
