Tech Brew Ride Home - Not Great, Bob!

Episode Date: December 3, 2025

We might soon have the first big IPO of the AI era, and it doesn’t look like it will be OpenAI. Amazon takes another few swings at Nvidia’s dominance. Proof positive that self driving cars really are significantly safer. And the disastrous 4k upscaling of Mad Men. Anthropic taps IPO lawyers as it races OpenAI to go public (FT) Amazon’s Custom Chips Pose Another Threat to Nvidia (WSJ) Amazon Has New Frontier AI Models—and a Way for Customers to Build Their Own (Wired) AWS puts Kiro and other AI agents to work on truly autonomous software development (SiliconANGLE) The Data on Self-Driving Cars Is Clear. We Have to Change Course. (NYTimes) Microsoft Lowers AI Software Growth Targets as Customers Resist Newer Products (The Information) The ‘Mad Men’ 4K Stream on HBO Max Had So Many Problems (Not All of Which Involved a Barf Machine) (THR) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It's peak pollination season, and my business is scaling fast. To keep the nectar flowing, I need a phone plan with top priority data speed. That's why I chose GoogleFi Wireless. My connections stay strong even when the hive is buzzing. Plus, unlimited plans start at $35 a month. Now, that's a deal that doesn't stay. Explore GoogleFi Wireless plans today. Plus taxes and government fees.

GoogleFi Wireless is not subject to data traffic deprioritization during times of high network usage. Welcome to the TechBrewrite home for Wednesday, December 3rd, 2025. I'm Brian McCullough. Today, we might soon have the first big IPO of the AI era, and it doesn't look like it will be Open AI. Amazon takes another few swings at Nvidia's dominance, proof positive that self-driving cars really are significantly safer. And the 4K upscaling of Mad Men on HBO, not great, Bob. Here's what you miss today in the world of tech. Conducting business online can feel a little scary these days, especially with AI. creating new opportunities for fraud. In fact, Celent estimates that AI was behind roughly 20% of the fraud perpetrated in 2024. Spotting bad agentic AI while allowing good agents to continue with their tasks isn't easy. Thankfully, Momoto Continuous Captcha can spot malicious agents pretending to be people at the point of account creation or registration. Unlike past CAPTCHA solutions, it runs behind the scenes with no puzzles for users.

Momoto offers TechBrew Ride Home listeners early access with a special price, for Momoto Continuous Captcha because right now, our listeners can purchase a year of Momoto Continuous Captcha for $5,000, a 20% discount on their lowest price plan. To learn more, head to Momoto.a.i slash ride home, that's Momoto.a.i slash ride home. Looks like we could soon have the first big IPO of the AI era, quoting the FT. Anthropic has tapped law firm Wilson Sansini to begin work on one of the largest initial public offerings ever, which could come as soon as 2026 as the artificial intelligence startup races open AI to the public market. The maker of the Claude Chatbot, which is in talks for a

private funding round that would value it at more than $300 billion, chose the U.S. West Coast law firm in recent days, according to two people with knowledge of the discussion. The startup led by chief executive Dario Amo Dai had also discussed a potential IPO with big investment banks, according to multiple people with knowledge of those talks. The people characterized the discussions as preliminary and informal, suggesting that the company was not close to picking its IPO underwriters. Nonetheless, these moves represent a significant step in Anthropics' preparations for an IPO that would test the appetite of public markets to back the massive loss-making research labs at the heart of the AI boom. Wilson Sonsini has advised Anthropics since 2022, including on commercial

aspects of multi-billion dollar investments from Amazon and has worked on high-profile tech IPOs such as Google, LinkedIn, and Lyft. Its investors are enthusiastic about an IPO, arguing that Anthropic can seize the initiative from its larger rival OpenAI by listing first. Anthropic could be prepared to list in 2026, according to one person with knowledge of its plans. Another person close to the company cautioned that an IPO so soon was unlikely. OpenAI was also undertaking preliminary work to ready itself for a public offering according to people with knowledge of its plans, though they cautioned it was too soon to set even an approximate date for a listing. Anthropic received a $15 billion commitment from Microsoft and Nvidia last month, which will form part of a funding round,

expected to value the group between $300 and $350 billion. Anthropic had been working through an internal checklist of changes required to go public, according to one person familiar with the process. The San Francisco headquartered startup hired Krishna Rao, who worked at Airbnb for six years and was instrumental in that company's IPO as chief financial officer last year, end quote. Man, the hits just keep coming for Open AI this week, don't they? And hey, for NVIDIA 2, Amazon yesterday launched Traynium 3, saying this new AI chip is four times faster than Traym 2 and can cut AI training and operating costs by up to 50% compared to equivalent GPUs. Quoting the journal, the main advantage at the end of the day is price performance, said Ron Diamant, an AWS vice president and the chief architect of the Traneum chips. He added that his main goal is giving customers more options for different computing workloads.

I don't see us trying to replace Nvidia, Diamant said, end quote. Yeah, but perhaps more pertinently, Amazon also announced Traymium-3 Ultra Server, a system powered by those three nanometer Traynium-3 AI training chips, and teased Traynium-4, which it says will work with Nvidia's chips. Quoting TechCrunch. AWS says the system is more than 4x faster with 4x more memory, not just for training, but for delivering AI apps at peak demand. Additionally, thousands of ultra-servers can be linked together to provide an app with up to

1 million Trainium 3 chips 10x the previous generation. Each ultra-server can host 144 chips, according to the company. Perhaps more importantly, AWS says the chips and systems are also 40% more energy efficient than the previous generation. While the world races to build bigger data centers powered by astronomical gigawatts of electricity, data center giant AWS is trying to make systems that drink less, not more. It is obviously in AWS's direct interest to do so. But in its classic Amazon cost-conscious way, it promises that these systems save its AI cloud customers money too.

AWS customers like Anthropic, of which Amazon is also an investor, Japan's LLM Kera Curry, splash music, and Descartes have already been using the third-gen chip and system and significantly cut their inference costs, Amazon said. AWS also presented a bit of a roadmap for the next chip, Traneum 4, which is already in development. AWS promised the chip will provide another big step up in performance and support NVIDIA's and VLink fusion high-speed chip interconnect technology. This means the AWS Traneum 4 powered systems will be able to interoperate and extend their performance with NVIDIA's GPUs while still using Amazon's homegrown lower-cost server rack technology.

It's worth noting, too, that NVIDIA's Kuda has become the de facto standard that all the major AI apps are built to support. The Traneum 4-powered systems may make it easier to woo big AI apps built with NVIDIA's GPUs in mind to Amazon's cloud, end quote. Amazon also released its second-gen, Nova AI models including Nova Light, Nova Pro, Nova and fully multimodal reasoning model, Nova Omni, two limited customers, quoting Wired. Amazon detailed two improved large language models Nova Light and Nova Pro, a new real-time voice model called Nova Sonic, and a more experimental model called Nova-Ommy.

Omni that performs a simulated kind of reasoning using images, audio, and video as well as text. The new models are being made available today to a limited number of customers. More significantly, given the importance of its cloud business, Amazon is releasing a tool called Nova Forge that will let customers create specialized frontier models by adding their own training data to unfinished versions of the Nova 2 Lite and Pro models. It is already possible to fine-tune off-the-shelf AI models like Google's Gemini and OpenAI's GPT, but Amazon's approach lets customers add data at various states. of model training, including the process of building the base model, a stage known as custom

pre-training that is normally reserved for large AI labs. Everyone is looking for a frontier model that's an expert in their domain. Rohit Prasad, who leads Amazon's AI efforts, told Wired ahead of today's announcements. Prasad says that Amazon developed the technologies behind Nova Forge to empower internal teams, including those developing Alexa and AI agents to build custom models. This is essentially a new open training paradigm, he says. One customer that has tested the approach is Reddit, which used Nova Forge to create a custom model to identify content that breaks the platform's rules. Fine-tuning a conventional model would not work, says Reddit chief technology officer Chris Slow, because most models are designed to avoid offensive or

violent content entirely, meaning they would refuse to analyze some materials. Slow says that custom pre-training combined with conventional fine-tuning produced a frontier model that is expert at understanding and using Reddit, end quote. Finally, Amazon also has three frontier AI agents. The Kiro Autonomous Agent, the AWS Security Agent, and AWS DevOps agent, each focused on a different aspect of software development. One of the long-time selling points of self-driving cars has always been, look. In aggregate, the robots are probably much better drivers than humans are.

And an analysis of Waymo data covering nearly 100 million driverless miles in four U.S. cities seems to bear that out. Waymo cars have far lower crash rates per million miles than human drivers do. This is quoting from an opinion essay in the New York Times from neurosurgeon Jonathan Slotkin. When compared to human drivers on the same roads, Waymo's self-driving cars were involved in 91% fewer, serious injury or worse crashes, and 80% fewer crashes causing any injury. It showed a 96% lower rate of injury causing crashes at intersections, which are some of the deadliest I encounter in the trauma bay. So far, other autonomous vehicle companies don't report or report incomplete data. Waymo, by contrast, published everything I needed to analyze the data,

crash statistics with miles driven, that allow accurate comparison to human drivers in the same locations. If Waymo's results are indicative of the broader future of autonomous vehicles, we may be on the path to eliminating traffic deaths as a leading cause of mortality in the United States. While many see this as a tech story, I view it as a public health breakthrough. In medical research, there's a practice of ending a study early when the results are too striking to ignore. We stop when there is unexpected harm. We also stop for overwhelming benefit when a treatment is working so well that it would be unethical to continue giving anyone a placebo.

When an intervention works this clearly, you change what you do. There's a public health imperative to quickly expand the adoption of autonomous vehicle. More than 39,000 Americans died in motor vehicle crashes last year, more than homicide, plane crashes, and natural disasters combined. Crashes are the number two cause of death for children and young adults, but death is only part of the story. These crashes are also the leading cause of spinal cord injury. We surgeons see the aftermath of the 10,000 crash victims that come to emergency rooms every day. The combined economic and quality of life toll exceeds $1 trillion annually more than the entire U.S. military or Medicare budget, end quote. Study and play. Come together on a Windows 11 PC. And for a limited time, college students get

the best of both worlds. Get the unreal college deal, everything you need to study and play with select Windows 11 PCs. Eligible students get a year of Microsoft 365 premium and a year of Xbox GamePass Ultimate with a custom color Xbox wireless controller. Learn more at Windows.com slash student offer. While supplies last, ends June 30th, terms at 8. A.k.a.m.m. Ready to soundtrack your summer? With Red Bull Summer All Day Play, you choose a playlist that fits your summer vibe the best.

Are you a festival fanatic? A deep end DJ, a road dog, or a trail mixer. Just add a song to your chosen playlist and put your summer on track. Red Bull Summer All Day Play. Red Bull gives you wings. Visit redbull.com slash bright summer ahead to learn more. See you this summer. Aw. Pay off your home.

Travel for life. drive a Ferrari. In celebration of the world premiere of the Monopoly Big Board Buckslot machine by Aristocrat Gaming, Yamava Resort and Casino and San Manuel is giving one person a $1.6 million dream package. The biggest prize in Yamava's history. Club Serrano members can earn daily instant prizes and secure a spot in the finale May 29th. Don't pass go and own it all. Only at Yamava, celebrating its 40th anniversary. You win? Details at yamava.com must be 21-20. Please gamble responsibly. Monopoly is a trademark of Hasbro. Hasbro is not a sponsor of this promotion. In the great debate about the possibility of an AI bubble, one of the angles to consider is,

are any of these tools compelling enough for people to pay up for? Well, Microsoft especially continues to give us some concerning data points, quoting the information. Executives at Microsoft and other enterprise software firms heralded 2025 as the year artificial intelligence would be capable of automating tasks that involve multiple steps, such as generating dashboards based on company sales data. But as the year comes to a close, Microsoft has lowered expectations for how quickly it can get customers to spend money on these newer products, known as agents. Multiple Microsoft divisions, for instance, have lowered how much salespeople are supposed to grow their sales of certain AI products after many of them

missed sales growth goals in the fiscal year that ended in June. According to two salespeople in Microsoft's Azure Cloud Unit, it's rare for Microsoft to lower such quotas for specific products, the people said. The change shows how Microsoft is adjusting to resistance from companies to pay more for AI. Corporate customers have complained over the past year that it's hard to measure the savings from using the technology for tasks like drafting reports on customer spending and sales leads, and that it can be difficult to get the AI to work perfectly in cases where small mistakes can be costly, such as automating finance and cybersecurity tasks. That said, AI has been a major boon to Microsoft's business. That's largely thanks to new spending by AI firms such

is OpenAI, which has projected it would run about $15 billion worth of cloud service from Microsoft this year, as well as Microsoft's sales of AI software, such as its 365 copilot workplace tools and GitHub co-pilot coding agent. Microsoft itself and other large tech companies also have gotten productivity boosts from using AI tools internally. But getting traditional businesses to boost their spending on advanced forms of AI hasn't been as easy. For instance, private equity fund Carlisle last year started using co-pilot's Studio, a Microsoft product that lets companies develop AI to automate tasks like summarizing meetings or drafting financial models based on Excel spreadsheets without needing to write any code.

But in the months after Carlisle started using the tools, its representatives told Microsoft they were having trouble getting the AI to reliably tap data from other applications, such as Salesforce's customer relationship management app, which was necessary for some of Carlisle's automations, according to someone with direct knowledge of the situation, and a second person briefed on it. This fall, Carlisle reduced the amount it was spending on the tools, the people said. Microsoft isn't the only firm adjusting expectations for revenue from AI agents that automate complex tasks. OpenAI, for instance, recently lowered its projections for AI agent revenue by $26 billion over the next five years compared to earlier numbers. OpenAI expects to make up for

that by growing subscription revenue from chat GPT, which includes some agents, such as deep research for creating research reports, as well as from new products, which could include selling ads on chat GPT, according to the projections. Though CEO Sam Altman said Monday, he was putting off work on ads, as well as agents related to health and shopping, as the company focuses on fixing problems involving chat GPT. The challenge of increasing revenue from AI agents has been particularly acute at enterprise software firms such as Salesforce that, unlike Microsoft, don't have the benefit of owning a large cloud server business. Salesforce and other firms such as Service Now have been offering steep discounts to customers that try new agent products to automate workplace tasks like

closing IT tickets or onboarding new employees. Other firms, including Amazon Web Services, Ananthropic, have been pouring resources into helping customers set up AI applications to run properly, similar to the way consulting firms help their clients. It's not the first time a large cloud and software provider adjusted expectations regarding how much enterprises will spend on AI, even as sales of chatbots and coding models have surged. Last year, for instance, Google and Amazon tamped down expectations for enterprise AI sales after companies didn't start paying for new AI tools as quickly as they had hoped. But there may be sunshine at the end of the AI agent tunnel. Brian Spanswick, chief information officer at cybersecurity firm Cohesity, said his company has been

testing AI agent features from Copilot Studio and Foundry that can write reports about its customers for salespeople based on internal data cohesity has on them as well as publicly available information. While agents have failed to deliver on their promise so far, Cohesity is writing code to better connect them to data sources from other applications with hopes of making them work over the next few months. That's what I'm telling my board, he said. Talk to me in three months and I'll show you the ROI, end quote. Finally today, HBO Max recently released a 4K upscaled re-release of the TV show Mad Men. But, well, not great, Bob, quoting the Hollywood reporter. For starters, the Mad Men episodes in 4K on HBO Max were listed out of order and

mislabeled, which likely made series creator Matthew Weiner an absolute madman. But that's nothing compared to an actual edit oopsie in the seventh episode of season one. In Red in the Face, what the episode is supposed to be titled but was not on 4K HBO Max, a drunk, they were always drunk, Roger Sterling, played by John Slattery, vomits up oysters in the office. in front of prospective clients. In the initial 4K stream that released on HBO Max, a Mad Men crew member was very visibly operating a barf hose behind Sterling in full view of the camera. There was even a second staffer in frame supporting the puke hose tech.

That guy would have been a great friend in college. So what happened here? Lionsgate delivered the wrong 4K file to HBO Max, the Hollywood reporter was told. The non-4K files were fine as delivered. At the time, the story was for, first published, Lionsgate was working on getting HBO Max the correct files, T-HR was told. They were then in the process of being swapped out at around 10 AM PT on Tuesday,

December 2nd. Lionsgate did not immediately comment on the fail. HBO Max referred to H.B.O. Max has been heavily promoting its acquisition of Mad Men reruns and especially touted how Mad Men on HBO Max would be the series's first time ever in 4K. The launch was probably not quite how executives pictured it, literally, end quote. I forget if I mentioned this already, but I've been busy turning out even more rad history episodes. I did one on New Jack Swing. I just researched a three-part episode on hair metal yesterday. And if I get time to edit this afternoon, I'll have an episode out on the U.S. Invasion of Granada in 1983. This is what always excited me about this project,

the ability to have a range of topics as broad as guns and roses,