Test Match Special - Australia embarrassed, Brook opens up and Hundred reflections
Episode Date: August 17, 2026Mark Chapman is alongside former England captain Michael Vaughan, former England spinner Phil Tufnell discussing Bangladesh thrashing Australia, the new 'era' for England as they prepare for their Tes...t Match against Pakistan and reflecting on the winners of The Hundred last weekend...
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The TMS podcast on BBC Sounds.
We've got an hour of Five Live cricket on the way.
England's men have their three-match test series against Pakistan beginning on Wednesday.
So you'll hear from Harry Brooke in the next hour after what's been an eventful year for him.
The hundreds managing director Vikram Banerjee will join us later on after victories for Trent Rockets Women and Manchester Super Giants men at Lords yesterday.
Michael Vaughn and Phil Tufnell.
are with us. And despite all of that going on over here in England,
there really is only one place to start tonight.
And that's, well, let's just put our feet up and bask in Australia,
losing at home to Bangladesh.
Webster around the wicket and he cuts and that's going down towards the boundary.
That could be it. That will be it.
Bangladesh have won the game.
and this is as bigger win as Bangladesh have ever had
and probably one of the more embarrassing defeats
that Australia have ever suffered in test cricket.
They came here with everyone saying,
well, will it last three days?
And here we are on the fourth day
and Bangladesh have beaten Australia in their home patch
by nine wickets.
Now, we'll come on to her,
from an Australian point of view very shortly.
And as I say, revel in it.
It's brilliant for the game, isn't it? Michael?
Yeah, it is.
I mean, I've watched quite a lot of it.
I've got quite an interest in Australia,
having worked there for the last few years,
but more so on the back of what we saw in the winter
where we all felt that England had a glorious chance.
And just a reminder that England played against the second string Australian side.
And this was Australia at their best.
They had everyone to pick from Bolandigmate the 11,
and all of a sudden, Bangladesh arrived in Darwin.
On the back of been bowled out for just over 50 in a warm-up game,
given no chance.
Australia won the toss.
There was a bit of a green tinge,
and Pat Cemy says we'll have a bat very much the Australian way.
And the technical side of the Australian batting was completely exposed.
And I smile in a way because many were saying to England
over the course of the preparation and leading into the ashes
that it wasn't all about airspeed, it wasn't all about pace.
Well, Bangladesh with a couple of nice seamers bowling around 8 yard miles an hour,
hit the top of off stump.
Australia's techniques were flawed.
And then with the batting hand, in the first innings,
they batted for 138 overs, with Tamming a magnificent 100.
So a brilliant performance by Bangladesh,
their best test victory in their history by Country Mile.
And the light of Jim Maxwell, Crash Craddock,
the Aussie journalists, saying that this is Australia's worst ever.
test match defeat.
So Australia have got a lot of questions
to ask themselves of what they're going to do from here,
but a brilliant achievement from the Bangladesh team.
Yeah, and it's just before we pick apart Australia
and Jeff Lemmon's going to join us,
that has to be the biggest thing to take out of this, Phil,
is what this will hopefully do for Bangladesh test cricket.
Well, I mean, it's just amazing,
I mean, as Mike was saying there, is this the biggest ever upset in test history?
I don't know whether it is.
I think Bangladesh are about four or fifth in the world now, you know, so it's not the end of the world.
But just going back to what you were saying there as well, it's almost the fact that that should have been us.
That could have been us.
That's what sort of like has brought it all back to the surface for me a little bit.
As you say, we're taking nothing away from Bangladesh whatsoever.
It was surprising to that.
But Phil, as Michael points out, we England, you know, we England didn't approach it like Bangladesh.
No, precisely, correct.
But I think that, you know, that there is a feeling then amongst, you know, like the English,
that, you know, the time was right for us to go over there and do something.
And they had the opportunity to go and do something very, very special, Bangladesh.
And they pulled it off, you know, so fair play to them.
but then I mean you don't get those obfages too much in test cricket,
especially playing in other people's conditions and what have you,
and it's just a shame that we didn't take the chance that Bangladesh did.
I'm sure there will be some questions fired at Australia, that is for sure,
and perhaps a little bit of selection as well and what have you.
Yeah, I mean, Chappas, it just tells me that the basics of the game work.
So if you arrive and play the basics really well,
so, i.e. you try and hit the top of off stumping,
that's not working, you just bowl.
into channel and you try and ball for a few dots and you try and frustrate a batting unit that's what
Bangladesh did with the bat in hand they saw off the new ball they looked about for a long period of
time 138 overs they did so in that first innings and they caught well so the basics of the game
actually wherever you play around the world I think we scratch our heads far too much about how to
play in Australia you know I've seen teams winning Australia and the teams that win in Australia
They just cover the basics better than the home side.
And that's exactly what Bangladesh did this week.
Jeff, Jeff, Jeff, how are you?
Good evening.
What has been the Australian reaction to this result?
Anger, embarrassment, praise for Bangladesh, all of them?
I think all of them.
I think everybody's rolled up into a big sort of bowl of the combined
parts of all of that.
I've heard a lot of praise for Bangladesh.
I think people,
I think Australian cricket supporters
generally appreciate an underdog
and they appreciate someone who rocks up
and gives it a go.
And the fact that this wasn't a test match
that was won on the back of won mad innings
by somebody that just happened to have a day out.
The fact it was a consistent performance over four days,
they didn't lose a session.
You know, genuinely Bangladesh did not lose a session
over three and a half days of cricket,
which wouldn't have happened many times across their test.
I think people respect that at the same time as being absolutely furious with the Australian team,
that they've managed to drop a game that you would never expect them to drop.
I mean, not in a million years, particularly Asian sides coming to Australia.
Sri Lanka have never won a test match in Australia.
They've been playing test cricket for 20 years more than Bangladesh have.
You know, Pakistan haven't won in Australia for 30 plus years.
And Bangladesh rock up.
They've been given the Darwin game, the, you don't really count.
You're not part of the main summer.
you can go and play in the middle of winter in the top end
and they show up and go, okay, well, if you think that we're that bad,
we're just going to knock you over.
It was an amazing result.
Are the Australian public just furious with the team?
Are they furious with how the team have been allowed to get to this stage?
And that question comes off the back of Ricky Ponting,
who said, look, I'm the last one who wants to make a change.
It has to get to a bad point before I start.
saying you ought to leave somebody out.
But there had been enough evidence to suggest
they weren't going to lose anything by starting that regeneration.
Yeah, that's a big part of it in that you've got an administration
with this Australian team who are very much more stick than twist.
They're very much more.
We're going to back the current group of players we've got to come good.
And so Manus Labashone is the one under the microscope the most at the moment
who's had pretty poor returns for a few years now,
a couple of exceptions aside.
They did drop him last year,
but it was definitely meant to be a give him a kick-up-the-butt sort of drop.
It was like, well, drop you for a little while,
go back to state cricket.
He made a pile of runs quickly.
They brought him back in as quickly as possible.
If he's out of the team, again, this time,
then it'll likely be for a much longer period.
But there's frustration that Labashane's been allowed
to keep occupying a spot for essentially three years
without delivering at the sort of level that he did beforehand.
And then a player like Jake Weatherald, who had a pretty poor ashes really all up.
You end up averaging in the 20s.
That's not a good return for anybody.
And they made excuses as to why they rationalised why it wasn't as bad as they thought.
They gave him a new national contract.
So I don't think they're going to drop him after one test into a new national contract.
But it was an interesting call to say, we're going to back a player for 12 months,
who's just played five test matches without,
with only one half-convincing score in it.
So those two players are the main focus of attention
from the Australian public at the moment
now that Cam Green has got that attention off him
by at least making 100 in the second innings.
Michael?
Yeah, I actually think Australia
had been paping over cracks for quite a while.
I think Travis said,
if you go back to the Ashes series,
that injury towardsman Coadja in Perth,
Travis going to the top of the order.
He was the reason really that England really struggle
I mean, they didn't bat well enough.
And if England had just batted with a little bit more sense,
i.e. like Bangladesh, you've just done in Darwin,
I think England would have won that series.
And it was really down to one or two individuals.
And, you know, I think Jeff will agree with me
that Australia, over the course of the last three or four years,
their batting unit has been very similar.
They've been very reliant on a Travis head scorer,
a Steve Smith score,
Alex Carey getting them out of a tricky position.
Consistently, they haven't batted as a unit.
You go back to the 90s, the early 2000s,
where you just do.
knew if Hayden didn't get your Langer would, if Langer didn't get your Ponting would, there was always
kind of a batting unit batting as a team. I see Australia at the minute batting like a group of
individuals. They don't seem to be able to create those partnerships like they used to in the past.
I'd be surprised if they don't make the change. I'd be surprised if they don't go to someone like
Matt Renshaw who's been around the Australian side for a while. He's been in and out of the side,
he's been back in the one day team. Someone like Nathan McSweene who's doing really well
here in England playing for Northampton.
He's a player that kind of got shoehorned in
to open the batting against Jasbit
Bumra. And given that first
over, Jasbitt Bumra ball into
into right hand, as we know the record that he has.
So there's one or two players
just out of the Australian team
that'll be looking to get their chance.
Younger players like Olly Peak, probably
not quite done enough.
You're looking at Cooper Connolly. Again, he's done really
well in whiteboard cricket. But, you know,
that top of the order, and this is
where I look at the ashes and think,
England missed a golden chance, but in a year's time here in the UK,
the Australian side is not going to get any younger.
And England will have a golden chance as long as England can start playing sensible cricket.
If they can, they can do what they didn't do in Australia.
But in terms of Australia, what they have to try and do from here,
fundamentally they've got to start batting as a unit
because for a while now they've been batting as individuals.
And was it right, Jeff, I heard Mark Waugh saying
that sort of like the batting unit looked like they were batting with a bit,
of fear, you know, they perhaps needed, you know, dare I say it, a bit of basball about it?
I don't think anybody needs to see a bit of that. I think we've seen a lifetime's worth of that.
Phil that died a long time ago.
The biggest bit of fear I had in the last few months was Ben Stoke saying he wants to coach
the England team. I was like, please don't start this again. We've just done all this.
Just give us a couple of years. Give us a couple of years to get a breath. But, you know,
They were a hesitant lineup.
Yeah, no, exactly.
In all seriously, you don't usually say that about an Australian batting line up, do you?
You know.
But fair of what then, Jeff?
Look, it was interesting choosing to bat on day one.
When you start relatively early in the day in Darwin, it's a tropical environment.
It's very different to anywhere else they play.
And whether it was overnight, due to still moisture in the surface, whatever it was,
there was more movement in that first couple of hours than anywhere.
But it wasn't extravagant.
None of this was impossible for a test class team to cope with.
It just looked like they were a team that hadn't played in months and months.
And for all that they talk about the preparation and they've been at training camps in Brisbane
and all the rest of it, it's still not match play.
And whether that was the key, I know that was talked about a lot with England in their lead up,
the lack of match play to that Asher series in Australia as well, you can never quite pin down
what's causation and what's correlation.
But there was very little confidence.
It was tentative stuff.
It was poking outside off stump with an angled bat.
The number of players who chopped back onto their stumps,
you know, Cameron Green made the 100,
but he should have been out.
He chopped onto his leg stump,
and the bail didn't come off much earlier in his inning.
So that mistake was made by so many players on a surface
that was slow where that kind of dismissal comes into play
so much more often.
So they just looked like a team that didn't have,
their idea together about how they wanted to go about this game.
And Bangladesh did.
They got smashed up in a tour game.
They got bowed out for 50 and they went, okay, well, that was embarrassing.
But how do we want to play?
What's our approach?
And they came out and played with clarity.
And I didn't see a lot of clarity from the Australians
except possibly green in the second innings.
And even Smith, who made a couple of scores, looked odd.
He was scratchy and erratic and playing about seven different kind of games in the one innings.
Yeah.
And Jeff, sorry, just quickly then.
And then how comes the boys with the ball?
Didn't drag them out of a hole then?
Yeah.
Which they usually do.
Well, maybe because Nathan Lyon hasn't played for about 40 years.
And he looks flat.
His trajectory was flat.
He didn't have the energy through the crease.
You know, he's approaching 40 years of age.
And Anderson might have been able to do it,
but not everybody can be a test bowler at that age.
But he's had such a long layoff that he had to come back.
Cummins looked flat to me.
He also hasn't played for so long, played one test during the ashes.
and has barely played for almost a year now.
So in terms of those two,
so often it's Cummins, who's the partnership breaker.
When things aren't going well,
he's the one who comes on and makes the difference
when a pair is well set.
And the key thing for Bangladesh is they had partnerships
almost all the way down.
They lost a couple of wickets quickly in the middle,
but even through the tail end,
which normally Bangladesh six out all out is pretty consistent.
They had partnerships with every tail ender with Mehdi Asan,
who was able to inspire those bowlers to stick,
with him as well. They batted 52 overs for the last four wickets. And you went, that's probably
never happened in Bangladesh test history. So they had that idea of partnerships. And Australia,
I think, didn't have Cummins at his best as the partnership breaker. They had Stark and Hazelwood
looking decent with the new ball. But there was nothing in it with the old ball. And the
Bangladesh bowlers were able to be consistent enough to keep the scoring down and be something of
a threat with the old ball. And the Australian bowlers were not. Jeff, thank very much for coming on.
See you soon. Jeff Lemon with us.
We've got commentary
of the second test, which I'm assuming
we had already planned and
we're not just relishing and reveling
in this even more.
Quick, give it all.
Turn our attention to England.
Then their three-match series
against Pakistan starts on Wednesday
with Marcus Drosothic
interim charge. Joe Root,
the new permanent captain, new
head coach of the test team, Stephen
Fleming, still waiting in the wing.
We can hear from Harry Brooke,
whiteboard captain,
test vice captain,
talking to Stefan Schemelt,
the BBC's cricket correspondent.
And in amongst everything else,
he talks about how he deals with the criticism
that comes from being a test cricketer.
I feel like it's actually a little bit of a compliment
that people are giving me scrutiny
and have their opinion about my game
because it means that people care
and I've almost earned that scrutiny.
I know it's not a nice thing to see people.
It's like,
you off but it means that people care and means that people think that I can put in a
better performance and I have done that day and I remember as a kid going to watch
Baz at Headingley play for I can't remember I think it was Warwickshire or someone and Matty
Fisher got him out in the first over and I was absolutely devastated I'd only gone to watch
him and after he got out I was like dad can we just go home so I can kind of understand
it as a fan of cricket and look I'm just trying to be as good
of players I possibly can be for the side and try and win as many games as I possibly can
to make the England cricket team the best team in the world.
Do you get why, because of how talented you are and the amount of runs that you score and your
record and all those things, that maybe you draw more frustration from supporters when you get out
playing a shocking shot in your words?
If supporters get frustrated, then imagine how frustrated I get.
Is that really?
Yeah, of course. It's a frustrating game, isn't it?
And one day you could be blitzing it everywhere,
be 30 off 10 balls and then just get out, and it's annoying.
But that comes back to what I'm trying to say.
I want to try and figure out that in-game,
the little nuances that make a massive difference
in giving you the opportunity of scoring them runs on that day.
Yeah, I've just got to do that slightly better.
We've spoken before, and I've said to you,
do you think there's, I don't know, a perception around you
from fans or from the media that's unfair?
And you said to me, do you know what, I've got absolutely no idea?
I don't know how I'm perceived.
by people.
One thing I always think about is you're very authentic.
You'll say what you think and you'll do what you want to do
and you stay very true to yourself.
And that might be doing a handstand when you walk up.
Is that how you feel that you're still playing the game for fun
and you're being true to yourself
and you're being authentic to yourself.
And if people don't like that, so be it.
I would say that I'm an extremely honest person.
I'm honest with myself.
I'm honest with my game.
And yeah, I just, I love playing cricket.
I love walking out there here in the Barmy Army singing Jerusalem
as we're about to bowl the first ball or the crowd chanting your name
when you've hit a four or you've got a 50 or 100.
It's just little things like that.
When the atmosphere is amazing, you feel like you're on top of the game.
There's all sorts of little bits of playing for England
and just playing professional cricket in general.
It's just amazing.
Can I honestly get you into trouble though?
One time I think when you first started being the one day captain or you were standing in for Joss,
I think there was a comment where you got asked about batters getting caught on the boundary.
He said, who cares?
And as you being honest, can it get you into trouble?
Yeah, I think so.
But a lot of people say honesty is the best policy.
So, yeah, I probably have got in trouble a couple of times being a little bit too honest.
That example, yeah, I was trying to, for me as captain that series,
I was trying to bring a fearless nature to our batting order
and giving them a license to go out there and try and play
in whatever manner they felt like they wanted to try and put us in a position to win the game.
So that's where I was trying to go with that comment, for example.
That was all I was saying there was to try and give our batter's freedom
and make them go out there to be able to perform at their best ability.
What about the off-field stuff?
I know you and I have spoken about Wellington
before and this is not the time to get in deep into that because we've had that conversation.
But months on, what was the impact of that on you?
And how did you deal with that?
Because for other people, they might have been able to go away and think about it and not be in the public eye.
But straight away, you were captain in England and Sri Lanka going into a T20 World Cup,
speaking to the media over and over again.
Now we're months on, how has it affected you, if at all?
But you know, you're only human.
and these things can leave a long impression on people.
Yeah, it was a tough period, especially when I was at home,
getting ready for the media before we went out to Sri Lanka.
Is that in the gap between Australia?
But yeah, that was a tough period.
That was probably the hardest period.
But I actually feel like the character that has shown throughout that period
to go out there and still perform and lead the side fairly well
to go out to Sri Lanka and win that one-day series,
which hadn't been done for four years in Sri Lanka by any side.
I was quite proud of myself in that regard,
and I was very proud of the side in that regard.
Looking at it now, I feel like it's shaped me as a player,
as a person, knowing how bigger responsibility it is
to be the whiteball captain, especially in,
and in England with such a high percentage of people
enjoying and watching cricket and keeping a close eye on it.
So I think it's, I don't want to say it's helped me,
but it's made me realize how big it is to be England captain
and it's not just the leadership on the field.
It makes a massive difference off the field
if you can lead well and lead with responsibility as well.
You talk about character.
Did you know you had that in you?
To respond to...
I think I've always been a person to back myself
and have the belief.
And I think any top class athlete in the world
has that ability to...
to back yourself even when everything's going bad, to be honest.
I think you just have to have that belief to be able to get where you want to go.
Do you think there is a parallel universe where if some of those things haven't happened,
you would be sitting here as test captain?
I don't know. I honestly don't know. I don't really look at it like that.
I think the decision to make Rudy's captain the right one.
I'm actually really excited to see what he can do.
I think he's definitely the right man to take over that job.
He's got a hell of a lot of experience in that department
to have captained the side.
I don't know the numbers, but nearly 70 times.
Most ever test victories as captain.
And the wealth of experience it has had throughout his captaincy reigns already
and watching the way that Stokesy and Baz went about it the last four years.
I think he's definitely the right man for the job.
And I'm really looking forward to working alongside him and being along his side.
You were really honest about how honoured you would have been if you had got the call.
And just now you've spoken about what happened over the winter made you realise what a big deal it is to be an England captain and a leader.
There's a good chance that one day you will become test captain.
So again, is that in the back of your mind and all these experiences that you've gone through, you know, that's a good thing to do and that's a not so good thing to do?
Yeah, and there are little things that you do learn throughout your career.
Obviously, it was on quite a high scale.
But, yeah, having that responsibility now has made a massive difference for me and my leadership.
I think there is a potential that I could be captain, but at this moment in time,
all I'm focusing on is trying to win a few games of cricket.
And I will be 1,000% behind Rudy throughout this series and moving forward.
And I'm really looking forward to what this test I can do.
that kid in nappies, right, who spoke about, you know, when he could first talk,
he just wanted to be a cricketer and going to Burley and Sedder School and Yorkshire and England
and all those things and everything that's happened in between and even some of the bad stuff
like Wellington, is it still the dream?
Definitely. Yeah.
What's not to be happy about? I'm an extremely upbeat person. I'm always happy.
Even when things are bad, I just think there's no point dwelling on things. You've got to be happy.
And that's been throughout my family growing up as well.
My mum's an extremely happy person.
My dad's an extremely happy person.
And I just think life's too short to not be happy.
And I'm in a very privileged position to be able to say that I'm doing something that I extremely love as a job.
And I refuse to call it a job.
But I'm doing something that I extremely love for work, which is just a dream come true.
And every time I step over that white line, whether it be for England,
sunrises in the 100 or Yorkshire
it's always a phenomenal feeling
to be able to go out there and say that
this is my life.
Great interview with Stefan Schemel
and if you want to hear Harry Brooke in full
the whole thing is available
on the TMS podcast feed on BBC Sounds.
When you listen to that Michael,
where do you want to begin?
Because I could take it in all sorts of different
directions but I'm more interested about where you would go having listened to that having been
in very similar situations to him yeah I absolutely adore Harrybrook I wouldn't choose
anyone's about five across the world in any of my teams than Harry Brooke I just think he's
he's a gift that we have here in English cricket my frustration is that he's yet to win a
major trophy you know he's not had an ashes in his hand you know I know he's not the
the skipper of the test team but as a player he's not won her now she's last year against india you go back
to the oval he was strolling that test match played an incredible innings in the second and he's chasing
down over 300 and then made a mistake and england didn't quite get over the line so the frustration
with me as an ex player is the talent that he has and and i don't want to waver from that i don't
want him to sum to start playing in any other way other than every now and again he's got to read the
situation just that little bit better you go to trink bridge that
that fourth afternoon, the Ben Stokes' Retirement Day,
and that innings that he played that evening was,
I don't ever want to see that kind of innings from Harry Brook again
in test match cricket.
In the fact, I don't want to see him play like that in Whiteball cricket
because he's got too much.
He has to realise, and I love the fact that he was saying,
I want to win things.
You know, I'm a player that wants to win,
and he has to understand how good he is
because he really can win test matches for England.
I wouldn't say he can win it on his own
because you need a group of bowlers to get 20 wickets.
But he's got that much ability and that much game,
and he'll put so much fear in all the bowlers around the world
that he can win games for England pretty much on his own
with the bat in hand.
And he has to understand that.
And if he wants to win the ashes in a year's time
and be a part of a group that's on that podium at the Oval,
it's a great feeling.
You know, he can do it.
He really can play innings that can transcending them
from being a very good team to watch
and a very enjoyable team to watch
to a team that can win major series
against the better teams.
And that's the one thing
that this side hasn't done
over the course of the last four years.
They've beaten some good sides,
but they haven't beaten Indian,
they haven't beaten Australia.
And whether people like it or not,
that's pretty much what you get judged on.
By then, we've got nowhere near
a World Test Championship final.
And that's something that I think
this team has to have an eye on
that the World Test Match Championship Final
is played in a...
in our backyard.
You know, England making it to a World Test Championship final
will be huge for the team, huge for the game.
And these are the kind of things
that I hope the team under Joe Root, Stephen Fleming,
are going to be talking about.
At the top of that, I know Joe Root is a wonderful play,
is England's finest,
but, you know, I think you're going to be probably make a strong argument
in a few years' time.
Joe Root, I think, will always be England's finest,
but you could argue that Harry Brook could become
England's finest to watch,
because he's going to play innings that we've never ever seen.
He's already played some innings that I've never seen in England player play.
Kevin Peterson probably close.
He played a couple, one in 2005 at the Oval and one in Mumbai played innings,
which I'd never seen before.
But I've seen some innings from Harry Brook already,
and he's only a young kid that is remarkable.
So we're going to see lots more of that in the future.
But it's just that moment when the game gets hot
and he can get the team over the line.
I just want him to understand that he's got to get the team over the line.
line, not just play a certain way because it's flamboyant and it's great to watch.
Get the team over the line.
And that's how highly irate him.
I have him right up there across all the formats with the best players in the world.
And I think he realizes that.
He's clearly got the confidence.
And it's the right decision for him not to be the captain of the test team.
Just let him do the whiteboard.
Take the team to the World Cup next year.
Stand next to Joe Root for however long it is.
And I'm sure in time, he will become the England Test Max captain.
I think that was the best interview I've heard Harry Brooke give, actually.
You know what I mean?
It seemed a little bit more kind of considered.
And, you know, it's just not, well, I'm this happy chappy.
I agree with everything, Mike there about, you know,
what a special player, one of the best in the world and all of that.
But he said a couple of things there, didn't he?
He said he's still figuring it out, you know,
and I think he's now realised.
And the other thing he said, you know what I mean?
He said, I just want to give people the freedom.
Now, sometimes, you know, I don't want to take that away from him, you know, and away from this sort of like, I'm going to say it again, Basball, kind of like that freedom.
But that sometimes doesn't necessarily get the best out of you.
You know, you've got to have a little bit of ticker in there.
You've got to have a little bit of technique in there.
You've got to have everything in there.
You know, if you just can't go out there and sound as free as a bird, that is going to make me the best player I can be.
It's a combination of everything.
and that takes some time to figuring out.
He's still such a young.
He's 27, which, I mean, is young.
Well, I'm getting there now.
No, but I mean, look, that gives him so much time to develop within the sport, doesn't it?
Yeah.
But it's still figuring it out.
It's still figuring it out.
Yeah, the great players across all sports, you know, you go Messi, you go Ronaldo, you go real great.
sports people, they get their teams to major trophies.
And I honestly put Harry Brooke, I'm not saying he's in
Messies category, Ronaldo's category, but I have him right up there
with the ability in the game that should be able to take England to major
trophies. He's that good. They can get a group of players around him
and they have a huge amount of talent on the England side. And that's been
the frustration for many of us is that, you know, you go across
English cricket for 30, 40 years.
and this England group have got so much talent.
They really have, but talent's only one thing.
You know, the external talent that we see is just the one thing.
It's the internal talent.
That's the most important.
That's the way you think.
It's going against the grain every now and again.
It's doing things that you're necessarily
who don't want to do on a given session or a given day
just to get your team across that line.
And that's what this England side has got to be
a little bit better at doing over the course of the next few years
to you look at who England have got to play.
They've got to go to South Africa in the win.
It's not going to be easy.
You get to Bangladesh for a couple of test matches.
That's not going to be a completely different challenge.
And then obviously the ashes next one.
And then they go to India away.
So the next 18 months for the test side,
it's not an easy challenge that this team has got.
But the only way that they can get over that
is probably understanding the conditions
and understanding the type of play that you require on a given day.
And Harry Brooks, the kind of character to that.
I wouldn't want to take that aggression away from him, you know,
because you'd want him to be your free spirit,
but that free spirit can't just be allowed to be that free spirit all the time.
When that moment comes to getting that over the line,
he just has to do whatever he can to make sure he's out there
when the crunch moments are.
What about that free spirit in the terms of how you carry yourself
when maybe things aren't going well,
or you get out to a poor shot?
because there is something incredibly positive
about someone like Brooke being upbeat, cheerful,
not letting things get to him.
To have that personality, I think, is something that's,
it must be a great gift for a sportsman or woman.
But then sometimes from a fan's point of view, Phil,
that is then seen as not, I mean,
it couldn't be further from the truth with these people,
but as not caring, as oh, you don't look unhappy enough that you've got out that way.
You're not brooding in a certain way.
You don't look angry at yourself.
So how do you balance that?
Well, how will you balance it first, I reckon is, well, I know, actually, for my personal experience,
is that you'd be all right with yourself.
Listen, so long as, you know, I mean, Mike just mentioned it, you know, that shot,
they get against New Zealand, you know.
You know, some people come in and throw the bat, some people.
sit down. Some people say, oh, listen, not to worry, that's just the way I play.
Exactly. So, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So what you've got to do, though, and what fans, fans don't mind that.
I always found it very, very difficult. You know what I mean? You know, once you've lost the test,
of course you're going to be upset and everything. But then, you know, the next day you're going to go
home. You're going to be pictured over the park with your kids, sort of like pushing on the swing
with a great big smile on your face. You can't lock yourself away and be glum and sort of,
there's not a time limit that you've got to be unhappy for to make the fans happy and what have you.
What the fans want is to see that you are learning.
You are learning from that.
You know what I mean?
And sometimes, you know, when the guys come in and they just sort of like throw the bat down and just sort of go,
oh, well, not to worry, it's not the end of the world.
Well, it should be the end of the world.
It's not the end of the world because it's a game of sport and what have you.
But you must then learn from what you've just done.
You mustn't then just blank out that knock or blank out that bowling performance or football match.
and just go to yourself, well, you know, that's just me and I'm going to be happy.
You've got to take all of the, and that's maturing and become, that's what experience is.
You know, you've got to learn.
Phil, Phil, the England Crete fans are very, very fair.
They get behind the England team pretty much 90% of the time.
When they get upset, it's when they see stupid cricket.
Yeah.
No, and I'll go back to the Oval that last morning.
England needed 30 with five wickets in the tank to beat India to win.
that series 3-1. They got it down to 22 and then they played stupid cricket so they ended up losing
that game they drew the series. You go to Perth that second afternoon. They played stupid cricket.
They lost that test match. You know, the fourth afternoon against New Zealand at Trent Bridge,
that was just stupid cricket. And that's the only time the In the Kreet fan will get annoyed with
the team. If you get outplayed or you're trying to do the right thing and sometimes the right thing
is being brave and being aggressive, that's just the team that has to
has to make that judgment.
But what the England side has done a little bit
over the last couple of years,
which has annoyed the England fan,
they've played stupid cricket,
and that's what they've got to get a little bit better at.
At times, they've got to just play within themselves,
play smart and get through that moment.
If they can do that, I think they're gonna be
a very threatening team.
They've got a decent amount of pace in the attack,
and they've got a lot of skill in that batting lineup,
and they continue to kind of,
I think Joe Root is almost like the perfect fall
as a captain because I loved his interview,
just a few days ago
and he didn't want a name
he didn't want a basball name
he just wanted to play the right cricket
and that's why he says he's going to try and do
play the right cricket for that moment
that the test match brings on to you
will Fleming make them
smarter? I mean you
spoke to Brendan McCullum at the 100
yesterday didn't you
Michael who described Fleming as like me
but better which was I mean
very self-deprecating
of him will he make them
smarter? Well I can only
going of what I know of Stephen Fleming when I played against him. He was a very smart captain.
He's been known for 17 years in India, working with the Tenai Super Kings, of being a fantastic man
manager. You look at the squad that's been selected for the first S-Kays Pakistan. There's a bit of
sense in the selection. They've gone for a little bit more experience. And I think that's what
Stephen Fleming will bring. He'll bring a little bit more sense in terms of the way that he wants
his team to play. He won't be scared of his team playing aggressive at the right time.
You go back to when his team, when he was captain of New Zealand, they drew nil-nill-nill in
the early 2000s against Australia away, and they just nullified Australia. They went with a tactic.
They pretty much left every one of Glenn McGraw's opening bursts, just kept on leaving him,
letting him go over the off stump. I'm not saying that England will go completely that way,
but I think under Fleming, they'll certainly bring a little bit more sense.
He'll manage the group very, very well.
He's renowned for that.
I don't think it'll all be about airspeed and pace,
which is pretty much what it's been about.
I think there'll be a bit more in terms of skill.
The Chennai Super Kings over the years have had skillful bowlers,
not just pace.
New Zealand back in the day, Phil, you played against them.
I mean, there was Chris Harris bowl in about 30 miles an hour
when the keeper stood up.
So I do think he'll bring a little.
bit more sense and skill
but fundamentally it's very very difficult
to get your test match team playing to a real high standard
when you haven't got a world class all rounder
and you don't have a world class spin and that's going to be his challenge
I know you want to come in Phil but honestly
that that I just reminded me with Michael talking about
you playing against New Zealand that
sky cricket thing with you with you NASA
and Michael Adelson
watching the final test of the Oval
is one of the other.
the funniest fortuit. It's absolutely
sensational television. I couldn't
stop light tears rolling down my face. It was brilliant.
That was good. I mean, I played
under Flem at Middlesex. He was my captain.
And what he will bring is a little bit of
refinement, if you know what I'm trying to say
though. He was a refined kind of cricketer. He won't, and as
Michael said there, it won't just be all about airspeed and what
have you. It will be sometimes a perhaps like a cook
bowling if he's right for the job.
You know what I mean? It'll be, just look at those New Zealand sides of the past.
And also the way they play their cricket as well.
Lots of sort of like, not necessarily all rounders and bits and pieces, pitted, but, you know,
good, solid citizens in the side.
And also, what he was when he was crapp.
And he didn't mess about.
He was quite tough.
You know, he gives this sort of like, you know, sorry, a kiwi, sort of like a little bit like
Baz and what have you.
But when the nitty gritty came down to it,
and there wasn't, you know, and there was a bit of messing about or something wasn't quite right,
he could put his fat foot down and what he did do was get the instant respect of the team,
you know, when there was a little bit of shenan or, you know, on the field or something,
or a bit of a soul kid and they went, no, not having that.
And he cut it out straight a well.
So I think it might have been a little bit lucky to get him, but I think it'll be a great pick.
The one thing that I'm slightly frustrated is that he's not going to be here for the Pakistan series.
I know that was part of the remit and he couldn't make it.
But even it was just for one game just to be here and see the team,
see the surroundings of the grounds that obviously next year
we'll be playing at Edgebast and in the Ashes Laws just to get the feel of the facilities
and also just to introduce yourselves to the team.
I'd love to have been here for the Pakistan series.
but if you said to me
you wouldn't have got Flaming
if he had to be here
and he'd have said
no I can't be here
I would accept that
that's fine for him
to miss this series
because he's clearly an outstanding coach
and I have a feeling
they probably went for Andy Flower
once Andy Flowerer
he pretty much ruled himself out
I think England have got the next best
in terms of Fleming
in particular the partnership
that he'll create with Bazma Cullen
We're very quick to pile on
when things aren't going right
do you also
I'd be interested in Michael really
if you were captaining this team now in this situation
whether you'd expect an element of understanding here
in the sense of you've already mentioned it,
you know, the balance of the team is going to be very difficult to get right
without Ben Stokes.
It immediately creates issues for however you put this team together now.
And particularly for this first test,
and it's nothing new to say this,
but at least three likely of the starting 11
were in the final at Lords last night in the 100
in Duckett and Atkinson and Tongue.
So it is not an easy situation.
No, it isn't.
And on the back of Pakistan,
playing two tests in the West Indies
and a three-day game against a professional cricket association team.
So Pakistan are well-prepared.
England will just have to kind of just hope
that they find their red ball form straight away.
You know, I look at the team and I look at the talent chap.
I look at Ben Duckett at the top of the order, a wonderful opening batter.
You know, you've got Joe Root, England's finest, Harrybrook,
Jordan Cox is a great talent, Emilio Gage is just starting out.
And then you've got Dan Lawrence coming back in,
who's been in fantastic form for Surrey.
Jamie Smith's had a rough nine months, but we've seen in the past how talented he is.
And then you've got Atkinson Tong, Joffa Archer,
Briding Carton, that's got, Oleg Robinson.
Look, let's not give him an excuse, chap.
There's plenty of talent there.
There really is a good group of England players that should,
should be able to beat Pakistan.
But I will give them a warning sign that Pakistan are just trying to find a little bit of some of that.
That second test performance against the West Indies was excellent.
They've got a group of players that look well-drilled.
Aki Javi, this is the new coach.
And we know with Pakistan, of yes, you can get days where they look hopeless.
But they also give us days where you go, they can look like the best team.
and they're all from nowhere.
So that's going to be the challenge
for the England side over the course,
particularly this week,
because they're ready for Red Bull cricket.
And England, I'll just kind of hope
that they find their footing on Wednesday morning.
But it should be a series that, you know,
without a Ben Stokes, without a world-class spinner,
they should have enough to be able to beat Pakistan.
Let's sort the 100.
Then we're going to talk to the managing director
of the 100 Vikram Banerjee on 5 Live cricket.
Before I bring Vikram in,
how has the 100 been for you, Phil?
How has it felt?
I enjoyed yesterday
Was it yesterday?
Yes, it was yesterday
Yes it was yesterday
Yes it was sorry
I've had a long two or three days
Obviously the women's final
Didn't quite spark into life
But I enjoyed the whole day
It was great entertainment
So for me
I think that the pitches
Might have had something to do
with not quite being the tight
and close games that I was after
You know all the time
Obviously you're going to get a couple of ones
where you're bowled out for 100 and the other team comes flying through.
But I think over the course of the three and a half weeks or whatever it is,
yeah, it's enjoyable.
It's entertainment.
It's entertainment.
I might not necessarily in a couple of years' time,
remember who won the 100 at Lords, 2026,
but that's not necessarily, I think, why I was there.
I was in there for a good day out.
I think the men's game has got better.
Phil, you said two years. Do you remember who won it now?
Yes, I do. Thank you very much. It was yesterday.
But what I will say is that the men's game, I mean, the guys are here now.
I mean, there is some serious cricket going on in the men's game at the moment.
And Vikram, thank you very much for joining us.
The standard of cricket on the men's and women's side has probably gone up a notch this year, would you say,
due to, well, certainly on the men's side,
even more overseas talent.
Is that the biggest positive?
Yeah, evening, everyone.
I think the talent on display at the moment in the 100
this year has been phenomenal.
We've had players, yep, the fourth overseas.
We've also had all the England players available
who are doing really well at Whiteball cricket at the moment.
So the combination of that players enjoying themselves,
giving it everything,
We've had some great games, some great moments of talent.
We saw it yesterday with Siphot, smashing it everywhere.
We've seen it throughout this tournament from a lot of teams.
So the quality, I would say, across men's and women's,
but especially the men's really has taken a step up this year,
which is great to see.
What is the thing that you think you need to work on most
going into the next couple of years?
There's a number of things.
I think we've had a brilliant year.
It's been a brilliant year for the hundreds.
especially given all that's gone on.
But across all the different factors,
you never want to sit on your laurels.
You always want to improve.
So, yes, the quality has been brilliant,
but can you go again?
What's the thing that will improve that even more
across men's and women's?
What's the next thing that can drive women's cricket
further, even further forwards?
What's an even better way to create fan engagement
and more and more families and children
falling in love with our sport through the 100?
What's the way to boost attendance?
and people following and watching online on their iPads or phones or sitting in the stadium.
How can you do that even better?
So across all of it, we want to keep improving, but it's a really good foundation that we've set this year.
Do you want this to be going forward?
Do you want this to be a form of entertainment that people can, a little bit how Phil said,
you know, go out, have a great day, enjoy it, go home.
or do you want these eight teams to be properly ingrained in their cities and their communities?
Because one of the, I suppose one of the issues with franchise cricket,
and particularly with the 100 at the moment,
because this season was reset with some new owners and new kit colours and new players,
it feels like people are just passing through.
So how do you make people, for example, at Manchester, in Manchester,
go, right, for the next three years,
we are wanting to go to Old Trafford
because we know we're going to see
Seifut, Tong, Baker, Atkinson.
It might sound a bit greedy,
but why can't we have the fandom
and that tribalism
and people really being fans of Manchester?
But at the same time, it's a great day out.
For all the people dressed in orange yesterday
coming to see their team
as Sunrises Leeds play.
They didn't play very well.
They didn't perform in that women's final,
which is a shame.
But I would hope they went away
having a great day out.
And you can do both of that.
You can have fandom
and make sure the day is great for families.
And that's what we're trying to do.
The fandom thing will take time.
It doesn't happen overnight.
We know that.
But a lot of the teams are doing some really good stuff.
You go back to yesterday
and the amount of shirts that were there,
that were worn, that were orange,
that we yellow, that were the red and blue of Manchester.
That's a good start.
We've now got players and those players that you named across the men and women that are locked in for at least three years.
So Seifert becomes known as a Manchester Super Giants player, as does Joss Butler.
Phoebe Lichbill gets known as a Sunrises Leeds player and keeps coming back.
You can start to build some heroes with that.
And we know that kids these days, yes, follow teams, but they also follow their heroes.
And so we can build on that now over the next couple of years as well.
Michael?
Yeah, I mean, I think Richard Gould, the CEO of the ECB mentioned it.
I think people, it's like if you praise the 100s, you get criticised.
Oh, you're working in.
That's why you praise it.
I think people get a little bit lost.
The reason why we need a prominent franchise league in the UK is if we don't have it,
our players will go and play elsewhere.
They'll go and play in the Major League cricket, which is coming up the radar.
They'll go and play in the Caribbean Premier League.
And it's so important.
It's not necessarily about the super.
superstars because they get gigs everywhere.
It's about keeping our county players playing here in the UK.
And by playing here in the 100, you know, they'll go back and play for Somerset.
They'll go back and play for Nats.
They'll go back and play for Hampshire after being a part of the 100.
And that's really important because if we don't have a league that pays our players,
the amount of money that they could get elsewhere, we're going to lose them.
So I think over the last four weeks, I've been obviously privileged to go and watch cricket.
I've been to the Metro Bank, which has been a revelation this year.
Because what's happened with an extra overseas player,
the standard of the Metro Bank's gone up.
So the Metro Bank crowd, I don't know it's like great weather.
But the standard of the Metro Bank over the last four weeks
has been outstanding because there's been one or two players
that probably thought they were going to get in the 100,
didn't get in because there was an extra overseas.
So the standard of that tournament has just gone up a ladder.
And that's what cricket and sports all about,
is always trying to push the levels.
And I think the 100, particularly the men this year,
the standard of cricket has been outstanding.
And then you go to the Metro bank
and you look at the standard of the Metro bank,
you go, yeah, it's gone up from last year.
Now, if that goes up next year again
and the 100 goes up again,
you start to see a little bit more growth
in terms of the development of the players.
So I just think it's very important for the fans to understand
that if we don't have the 100
and we can't pay our players,
the amount of money that they're getting,
they'll get on a plane and we won't see them.
And the county game will lose some real talent,
which would be a great share.
And that's why the 100's very important.
Vikram, do you wish that you'd been able to keep control of ticket pricing for this year's event?
No, I think part of what you're looking to do when you bring in some of the very best in the world,
whether it's from America or India from around the world, to come in and add their nuance and their Nouse.
We're working with them.
And part of what they have, if you like, bought as part of the...
that is from a commercial sense is ticket revenue as well as their shirt sponsors and their branding
and all the rest of it. I think there's been a lot of lessons learned through this year and I can see
it really flying next year. But there have also been some brilliant things that have happened.
There have been, you know, for, you know, ticket sales really did pick up as the season went on.
It's only a short window. But by the end, we saw numerous full houses with flags waving everywhere,
with colored shirts and all the rest of it going on. So again, I think,
it's one of the things that we've in this new model.
It was a transition year.
I think from next year now it will fly.
Have owners fed back to you what they've learned already from this year's tournament?
And if so, can you give us a flavour of that?
Yeah, I mean, I've been at all the games myself.
We've been in contact with the investors throughout the year.
They've had a great year.
Some of them, like Sanjeev Gwanker and Jonathan Goulston, have had better years
and are very happy right now.
having won trophies.
But all of us, we're all chatting at the moment now,
and already, kind of midway through the tournament,
people were looking at, okay, well,
here's what we can do better next year,
here's what we can build on going forward.
So things like the fan engagement,
things like the lessons learned on ticketing,
things like some of the digital stuff that we do,
again, where kids these days,
yes, they watch on TV,
but they're also following on their phones
and looking online as well
and how we can build on that,
how we can create heroes
from some of these players
now that they're locked,
all of these things and all these conversations are really doing.
And as Michael talks about earlier,
there is a real investment now of how the 100 can support English cricket
and how it can grow everything from, you know,
how can we help these kids that are coming in watching Birmingham Phoenix play
and Trent Rockets to suddenly go and pick up a bat and ball for themselves
and they can be the next Jacob Bethel or Joe Root themselves in how many years time.
Michael.
Yeah, I mean, I think we've also got to be fair for the game.
It's not been a summer.
You look at what's on with the England team.
With all the controversy, you go back to last summer,
it was an Indian summer.
You're always going to get more supporters when in.
Next year, the Ashes.
You know, the 100 starts the day after the Ashes finished.
I think the Ashes finishing on August the 2nd.
I think the 100 starts on August the 3rd next year.
So you kind of look at that.
We know what happens with an Ashes summer.
Everyone gets into cricket.
So I think there'll be more naturally fans
that will come to the 100.
more next year. But I just think that there's an understanding of new owners, new teams, new kits,
and the fans might just take a year or so to get used to. But I have no question next year
with the Ashes series just happening before it. I think the ticket sales will go through the roof.
That will make a big difference, weren't it, Vickro? Yeah, as Michael said,
we've actually done, in many respects, we're a little bit down, but pretty well for those
even years. So next year, I think there'll be so many lessons that have learned so much
to build on now. I'm already really looking forward to next year
because I do think we'll really will fly.
Thank you very much for coming on. Do you have a rest now?
I do indeed for a few days before we go again.
Vicron Banerjee, thank you very much.
My age your director of the 100th.
Thanks to Phil and Michael, test match special's coverage of England's
test series against Pakistan begins on Wednesday morning at 1025 on Sports.
This is five live sports.
It's all ice for the lights, not to stop around.
Everyone standing around the 18th Green.
Oh, my God!
The home of the world's greatest sporting events.
Listen on BBC Sounds.
