The Blindboy Podcast - Drinking wine with Vincent Browne
Episode Date: September 4, 2018A conversation with legendary journalist Vincent Browne Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information....
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to the Blind Boy podcast number 48.
If you're hearing this,
if you're hearing this, it means that I am currently in Spain
and the room that I have in Spain has got terrible acoustics.
So I've had to post this episode as the emergency backup
because there's no way I would do a podcast from Spain
in a room full of tiles
where there's nothing but reverberation
it would sound like gogs
so
that's what this one is
but first before I continue
I would like to read a piece of short prose
that was sent in to me by Hollywood
actor Barry Pepper.
Quentin's in the kitchen preparing a fool. It's a dessert named after an idiot. His hands
shake as he massages the fool. His mind wanders back to the deserts of Kuwait, 1991.
The orange flames are a thousand children screaming.
The clouds rain down Isle.
He looks at his boots.
He's back in the kitchen, preparing a fool.
That was a piece of prose there called Desert Dessert.
Desert Dessert by Barry Pepper.
Thank you very much, Barry, for sending that in, so here's the crack, I'm over in fucking Spain and can't
record a podcast, so what I'm going to do is I'm going to give you a live podcast and
this is, this was recorded about six months ago and it is myself and the magnificent vincent brown and vincent is
he's a journalist tv presenter but he's most importantly he's just a very aggressive voice
of truth vincent in his uh fearlessness and tenacity in calling out power and
fucking
going head to head with power
he kind of, he's like an old school lad
that reminds
all of us young people
the importance of
understanding that
just because someone is a
politician or just because someone is in a position
of power
that you have every fucking right to ask them why and to hold them to account and that's what
vincent does and that's what he's done his entire career fearlessly holds people to account and he
is a terrifying figure if you're on the wrong side of him. So this interview,
it was in LIT,
Limerick Institute of Technology,
in the theatre there.
It was about six months ago.
And special thanks to Limerick School of Art and Design,
the photography, film and video course,
and also the audio-visual course in LIT for making this happen.
And just a general big shout out to
Limerick School of Art and Design I did my degree there I did my master's there and they've been
nothing but supportive of me uh ever since so yeah this is myself and Vincent Brown and I think we're
bought a little bit pissed and then we sober up because they put a lot of wine into my dressing
room when I was drinking it then Vincent came out and I got a kind of a feeling because they put a lot of wine into my dressing room when I was drinking it
then Vincent came out
and I got a
kind of a feeling
that he had a bit of wine as well
and we needed to find our feet
after a while
but
what I like about this
is that
this was in front of
a fucking packed audience
there must have been
seven, eight hundred people
but it had the intimacy
of
a conversation
between two people
you know
I won't be doing like an ocarina pause.
Will I?
I won't be doing a full ocarina...
My fucking place is falling apart.
I won't be doing a full ocarina pause on this
because I'm going straight into the interview.
I'll play the ocarina for two seconds.
Actually, I might fucking buy a new ocarina in Spain I think that's what I'll do because I got
this last one in Spain as well I'll get a bigger one but so before I go into the interview
like the podcast subscribe to the podcast and if you feel so inclined this podcast is supported by you the listener um via the patreon page so if you if you like the podcast and you would like to donate to it and
give me we'll say the price of a pint once a month for creating content please do patreon.com
forward slash the blind buy podcast so here is an interview with myself and Vincent Brown.
God bless you cats.
Would you ever think of going maybe online, Vincent?
Because if you had, let's say, a YouTube show,
you can go wild with that, you know?
Because I always felt with you,
I felt that there was this spirit inside of you
that was always held back by the bullshit rules of television.
there was this spirit inside of you that was always held back by the
bullshit rules of television.
No.
I have a project now which I've
wanted to do for years and it's
part of a larger project. The larger project is
to
write something about the illusion of Irish
freedom. To make
the point that people fought for freedom
but freedom for what?
How were the mass of people less free after we got independence
than they were prior to then?
They were still enslaved by poverty, by misery,
by unemployment or by employment in so many ways.
And the idea of freedom really was made a nonsense of
certainly some people
from clonkers or munchers
or whatever
or glenstall did well
and got status jobs
but for the massive people
I think that to talk about freedom
was a nonsense
that the social system
which was already there
continued even with greater cruelty
after independence
than before that.
So you're talking about
freedom of economic mobility.
The freedom to escape
what you're born into.
Yeah, all of that.
Because it's interesting,
I was talking to a historian
last week and he was talking about
the ethos of coming the nail
and how they
had set up, how they
wanted to set up the idea of an Irish
ruling class once the British
left.
When you talk about
do you mean that
you feel that the War of Independence 1922
did not give us something more socialistic?
Do you feel it went too capitalistic?
Yeah, I could put it that way.
But the people who...
For instance, W.T. Consgrave,
who was the first Taoiseach President of the Executive Council,
during the War of Independence in 1931, W.T. Consgrave, who was the first Taoiseach President of the Executive Council, he,
during the War of Independence in 1931,
he wrote
to Austin Stack, who was supposedly
Minister for Local Government in this
make-believe government they had at the time,
complaining about people who
came from poor houses
and saying that they were never
going to do anything in their lives,
they were no good, they just wanted to live off the rest of society
and the more of them that emigrated, the better.
That was the mindset that informed much of the first government that came into office.
The second government, the Fianna Fáil government, that came into office in 1932,
was a bit more left-wing than the previous governments had been
and a lot of good things were done in the early 30s was a bit more left-wing than the previous governments had been.
And a lot of good things were done in the early 30s in spite of the fact that there was an economic war
and things were very difficult economically.
But then they too sort of succumbed to the mindset
that had been there previously.
And I suppose you could call it capitalist mindset
where people control the lives of other people
and where a mass of people really live in misery.
And that's what it was.
Like a million people left Ireland from independence onwards.
So what was freedom?
What did freedom mean to them?
It didn't mean anything.
They were escaping the awfulness of Ireland.
Just think of people in mental institutions
and think of what was done to them
during all those times.
There was an act passed in 1945, the Mental
Health Act in 1945
and it required
the government to publish every
year a report by the Inspector
of Mental Hospitals to publish it every
year and it gave a special
authority to the President of the High Court to ensure
that it was published.
The purpose of this was to ensure
that the people would know
the conditions in which people were living in the
mental hospitals.
From 1945
until
1967
no report was published.
The report was done okay
but never published. And nobody
not the President of the High Court
during that time, not any
Minister, not any TD or anybody else
raised the issue of what was going on.
Why weren't these reports published?
And I got to see
some of those reports and they described
really appalling conditions in which people
lived in mental hospitals and indeed
long afterwards people in mental
hospitals lived in truly appalling conditions.
I saw one in St.
Peter's in
Port Rann in Dublin.
It just was appalling.
People
living in dormitories with
maybe a foot between the beds, with a tiny
little knocker, and that was all
people's possessions,
not even a curtain between
the beds, so there's no
privacy, no dignity, no anything.
These were people in mental hospitals.
When you think of people in the Magdalene laundries,
for instance, and all the chimneys,
and the children as well,
the children in well. The children
reformatories.
All of that. The children
or people in prisons, prison
conditions were pretty terrible too.
All of that. This was misery
for so many people. Anyway.
I'm assuming, Vincent, that
it was, like I
know what Magdalene Laundries,
it was targeted at the poor more so than people who came
from good families would say in inverted commas that it was the girls who came from the poor
families that were more likely to end up in the magdalene laundry and i'm guessing this was the
same thing with the mentally ill oh absolutely yes but an industrial schools of course if you
were uh if you were a young lad and you were misbehaving, if you came from the wrong family, you were sent to an industrial school.
If you came from a good family, you were given the freedom.
Yeah.
My mother was born in Glasgow.
Her mother and father had come from Manaheim.
And her mother had four children, or five children.
And when my mother was three or so,
her father was killed in a brawl in a stockyard in Glasgow.
And they were living in a tenement in Glasgow and they had to come back to Valley Bay and Caddy Manor.
And one of the children was deaf and dumb.
Oney was his name.
And because of the culture at the time, he was kept in a back room. And the family was deaf and dumb. Only was his name. And because of the culture at the time,
he was kept in a back room.
And the family was ashamed of him.
And just think of what that
did to his mind.
And then,
he was sent to a mental
hospital in Marlondown.
And a cousin of mine,
also a grandchild, a grand
nephew of, or an actual nephew of,
Oney and I, who's also a nephew of Oney.
And we found out about him from details in Manor Mental Hospital.
And the conditions in which he lived for so many years.
And that family, I'm sure my family is no worse than many other families,
that was the culture of the time.
So you say that it was the conditions of mental hospitals,
that people in mental hospitals came from poor families.
Yes, to a large extent, but they also came from rich families,
people who were ashamed of them
and who wanted them out of the way
and it was
really something pretty horrific
also the Catholic Church did so much
damage
that's what I was going to bring up
this notion of when you're speaking about
we didn't get the freedom post independence
do you feel that's because too much power was handed
to the church and they restricted freedom?
Yes,
that was largely the case.
People go on about partition
and the reason we had
partition essentially was because
a large number, a million Protestants
in Northern Ireland didn't want to be part
of Northern Ireland
believing that home rule
would be Rome rule
and by God
they were right
and that
just think of
how miserable
it would have
been for them
if they had
been coerced
into a
United Ireland
during all this
and what they
did
well it's
possible they
would have
been
incredibly
demonised
but of
course what
they did
to the
Catholics
in other
hand was
pretty appalling
too
and that's inadequately understood as well because that's what gave rise to the conflict later on. A rising anger among the Catholic communities there that was abandoned by the South. The South didn't want to know about them.
writing about that at the moment and representations there was a groups that have campaigned for for social democracy in other land uh started by a gp actually in duncan and he and his wife were very
much involved conrad klauski was his name and others were involved and they uh they published
pamphlets they did studies on the scale of discrimination scale in housing in the
gerrymandering in employment employment, and all that.
And the southern government just didn't want
to know anything about it, and
made it clear to them, just go away,
stop annoying us.
And that
attitude and the sense of
abandonment that the northern community
felt, abandoned by
what they saw as their own people
in the south led to
the frustration and the anger that
eventually exploded in
late 1960s
in the late 1960s into 1970s
caused the horror of the conflict in Northern Ireland
It's mad how some of the stuff you're talking about
how we can still see
that rippling today
like in, we'll say
the mental health crisis in Ireland at the moment,
access to mental health is
atrocious in Ireland at the moment,
treatment is atrocious, but
it affects people
with less money more.
People, like, if you have a mental
health issue in this country,
the best access,
the best
treatment that's available
is either charities or if you can afford it going down the private route um if you can't afford that
then you're essentially the system says fuck off similarly uh the eighth amendment in this country
um the fact that women don't have access to abortion in this country
but if you're poor
you cannot afford to go over to England.
You know, and so we still see
this rippling of
how the
system affects people with less money.
There's a report published in
2002, it was called
Inequalities and Mortalities.
And it showed that for all the
killer diseases,
including cancer,
and the varieties of cancer,
that
people in the lowest income bracket, as compared to
the highest income bracket,
died, and the mortality rate
was far higher, people in the lowest
income bracket. In one case, in one of the
cancers, I can't remember which it was, it was far higher, people in the lowest income bracket. In one case, in one of the councils, I can't remember which it was,
it was 30 times higher
for people in the lowest income bracket.
And so that
inequality persisted even
unto death, and it
was a massive issue.
You talk about the Eighth Amendment,
and thinking about it nowadays,
this reflects
of course a misogyny
and Mary McAleese put it about
that the Catholic Church is
an empire of misogyny
and that's certainly true
and that
infected our minds
very
crucially as well
but other factors, it wasn't just the Catholic
Church that did that to us there were other factors that did misogycially as well. But other factors, it wasn't just the Catholic Church that did that to us,
there were other factors that did it misogynally as well.
And one of the arguments,
sorry, essentially the argument
against the repeal of the Eighth Amendment,
in my view, is misogynistic.
And it is that people just don't think that
women
who are pregnant are in a
unique situation or
babies who are
in the womb of a
pregnant woman are in a unique situation
because they
uniquely are dependent
on a particular person for their sustenance.
And there are
often cases where the
woman, where the
person who
gives substance to this
being, just can't
do it. And just
for various reasons, just can't do it.
For whatever reason, like
say she has five other children,
the husband has left her, she's in
desperate state, and she just
can't go on with it.
And she can't give sustenance
to that other person. No man is ever
in that situation. Ever. It's
impossible. And
the
attitude in our society
is, well, fuck her. Too bad.
She's got to, under pain of criminal
sanction, she's got to give her body
to the substance of that person
irrespective
and that's it
Do you feel that
because I was always of the opinion regarding, we'll say,
I thought Ireland was quite left after independence, and it wasn't until the 50s,
with Ireland voted that China should be allowed to enter the UN in the 50s,
and at that moment, a message was sent to the bishop of uh boston to tell the bishops in
ireland that the ireland and irish are gone to left wing and need to denounce communism from
the catholic church so is is that a myth was that was ireland not left before the 50s
no that was just a just a blip um it's uh It's had no particular significance.
The Catholic Church went berserk about it,
but so what?
And they went berserk about a lot of things.
John Cooney's biography of John Charles McQuaid
was the most powerful bishop there has been in Ireland
since independence.
He's the man who wrote the Constitution?
Not quite, but anyway.
But
this fellow complained to the editor
of the Irish Independent
who had
shown an advertisement of a woman
in a swimsuit.
And he had taken out a magnifying
glass and seen
that under the magnifying glass and seen that
under the magnifying glass
he could see a
sentence of a pubic hair.
And now imagine
the mindset that would take a magnifying glass
to look at this. And
he demanded that no such
advertisement would appear again.
Just think of that bloody idiot.
Without him seeing the absurdity of it.
It's very absurd, yeah.
But anyway,
the...
Well, if you have to take out a magnifying glass if you're looking at
photographs of nudie women, then what does that say?
Well, it wasn't a nudie woman.
It was a woman in full
bathing costume, stuff, and all
her body almost entirely covered
except for this bit of pubic hair.
There's no pubic hair anymore, but...
Were you ever held back from pursuing a guest
on your show by the
producers or editors
no
no one ever said here chill out
Vincent
no
next question
what do you think are the main political
faults of the last decade
ah yes think are the main political faults of the last decade? Ah, yes.
The main
problem,
we have
politics here
is a circus.
And
they're saying that for this reason.
Politics is supposed
to be about competing ideas
about the kind of society we have
and the kind of policies we should have.
But there's no divergence of view at all in it.
Sinn Féin looks as though they might offer a different view,
but now they're so domesticated
and they're so keen to join the establishment
on whatever terms that are on offer for them,
they're the same.
So Sinn Féin, of course, the Labour Party has gone away, one hopes.
Sinn Féin, FÃor Fáil, FÃor na Géal, and if you ask anyone, well can you find any difference
between them? X. Like you need a magnifying glass and an archbishop to find them.
X. Like you need a magnifying glass and an archbishop to find it.
On the subject of that, someone asked me if you think a mainstream left-wing youth movement like they currently have behind Corbyn in the UK is possible in Ireland.
And who would you see as potentially even leading that? Are there any candidates?
Well, I think it's wrong to think in terms of leaders
because if there's leaders, there are followers.
And followers, when you think about followers,
they're sort of gobshites who can't think for themselves.
But basically, we've got to argue for a different mindset.
I've made this point a number of times previously,
and I'm sure some of the people have,
whom I cannot see, none of whom I can see from here,
which I think is deliberate.
But slavery was regarded as the natural order of things
for millennia thousands and thousands of years in fact human beings have been around for 200,000
years certainly for 150,000 years slavery was regarded as the natural order of things
some people were born to be masters some people were born to be slaves
that's the way it is
for
certainly for 10,000 years
and I'll explain why I say only 10,000 years in a moment
people believed that women
were, if not the property
of men, they were under the
control of men or should be under the control
of men and that they were under the control of men or should be under the control of men and that they were
incapable of
being in positions of
power or authority or
whatever and it's
only in the last very short time
when you think about it, the spectrum of 200,000
years, it's only in the
period of say the last
20, 30 years that people have begun to change
their minds about women and women
have got some degree of equality
but it's still far short
of actual equality
and
of course slavery
has ended
and this was
represented a transformation
of mindsets
and suddenly people thought no slavery isn't a representative transformation of mindsets. That suddenly people thought, no, slavery
isn't a natural order of things.
There's something inherently insidious
about slavery. It's wrong.
Similarly, with regard to the treatment of women,
there's something seriously
insidious about it. And the feminist
movement, of course, is hugely important
in
alerting us to that.
Something insidious about the way we
we are equal where we treat women and that we still do and that us men still regard women
and talk about women when you look at the
on april 5th you must be very careful margaret it's a girl witness the birth bad things will
start to happen evil things of. It's all for you.
No, no, don't.
The first O-Men.
I believe the girl is to be the mother.
Mother of what?
Is the most terrifying.
Six, six, six.
It's the mark of the devil.
Hey!
Movie of the year.
It's not real.
It's not real.
It's not real.
Who said that?
The first O-Men.
Only in theaters April 5th.
Rock City, you're the best fans in the league, bar none.
Tickets are on sale now for Fan Appreciation Night on Saturday, April 13th
when the Toronto Rock hosts the Rochester Nighthawks at First Ontario Centre
in Hamilton at 7.30pm.
You can also lock in your playoff pack right now to guarantee the same seats
for every postseason game, and you'll only pay as we play.
Come along for the ride and punch your ticket
to Rock City at torontorock.com.
Travelling in Belfast,
of the fellows who accused the rape in that room,
irrespective of who you think is guilty,
whether you think they're guilty or not,
but the way they talked about it,
the text about her the following day,
that is a mindset which is prevalent
among a lot of us men still,
and particularly in the rugby fraternity,
that women are there almost just as sex toys
for us men.
So anyway, the point I'm making is
that mindset, and you could call
it ideology, is really what it's all about. And that if you don't change people's mindsets,
nothing will change. That's happened with regard to slavery, it's happened with regard
to women, and a lot of other things. And that's what we've got to do with regard to our politics
here. We've got to change mindsets. We've got to open the possibility.
Yes, it's possible to create
an equal society. It's possible
to have people earning more or less
equal incomes,
to have equal access to healthcare, to have equal
access to education, etc., etc.,
etc. But we're millennia
away from it.
But until we started
and still start arguing about it
or whatever, yes it will take 100, 200,
300 years for that
to come about, but unless we start
arguing about it or
arguing for it and talking about it
and talking about the possibilities of it,
it won't happen.
Do you think something such as
something such as the water protest movement got as close as a people to realising that?
I had ambivalent feelings about that.
And I have more than ambivalent feelings about the left.
And I have more than ambivalent feelings about the left.
And the reason for that is the left is afraid to argue the case for equality.
And to argue, for instance, the case for virtually equal incomes.
And the reason they're afraid to argue for that is because they feel they'll lose votes.
And of course they're right. They will lose votes.
Because if you argue for equal incomes,
you talk about very high taxation and people are adverse to that.
But we've got to persuade people
that we need much more equal societies
in the interest of us all.
I've argued this for years,
we're a very, very rich society.
In terms of households,
if you divide the number of the wealth and GDP of our society
by the number of households,
GDP of our society by the number of households.
The average, it comes out
about 100,000
euros per household.
Now, and say
30,000 of that has got to go on
taxation and all that, so
you've 70,000 left. I think
that's more enough. That's okay.
Most households
could live on 70,000
a year.
But of course that isn't what we have here.
Anyway, the point I make is
the left refuses to argue
for accepting
and taking on issues
like the water bills, which are easy to
take on, but they then won't argue
for very significant
increases in taxation, arguing
why this
is necessary to create the kind of society
that they say they want. In other words
the left cop out. So they go for more
of a centrist type of thing so as not to
Well, they don't. They actually
just stay sound.
Another fact about the left is they don't
elaborate their
none of them really have
I'm talking about people before property
the Socialist Party or the Solidarity Party
now and other
left wing groups
they don't spell out
how the changes
in the society that they want is going to be paid for
they won't do that
because they know they'll lose votes
and they'll lose seats
and that's the way it is.
Of course they will.
And the only way they gain seats
is through populist movements
like the water charges or whatever.
And this is a pity
because we won't be able to change people's mindsets
unless we're honest about an upfront.
Unless there's an honest conversation.
Yeah.
What are your opinions on, we'll say,
emerging technologies, right?
And the case for universal basic income if if so many jobs are being replaced by robots therefore universal basic income that gives the
case for us like if you look at just walk into duns or tesco you know we're buying things off
robots now you know the the checkout people don't exist anymore.
So those profits are still going to the top,
but they're not paying the wages for them
because it's a robot.
So should we tax the robots?
I mean, tax some robots, like bankers.
I always thought it was funny but the argument was
you have to pay them huge salaries
if you pay
if you pay
what's the cliche
if you pay peanuts you get monkeys and we pay them fortunes to be still got monkeys
um um sorry what was the question again should we tax the robots vincent i think that
and if we technology technology change is inevitable and is welcome and that a lot of If we... Technology can change
it's inevitable and it's welcome
and that a lot of really
dreary jobs, just think of
if you're working in done stores
at a checkout point and that's what you
do every day for six or seven days a year
a week, maybe if you're lucky
maybe you don't know whether you're going to get
work this week or next week or whatever
but think of what a misery those jobs are.
And think of how, if we had a really equal society,
how people could flourish in doing things that are creative and liberating.
So we shouldn't be afraid of technology.
We should say, yeah, this is an advantage.
And, of course, a start-up point would be a basic income thing but eventually
something close to equal income for everyone yeah and one of the great successes we have in this
society is the ga i think it is really a remarkable institution and it's founded primarily
without without leaving them yeah but also and voluntary work by so many people.
People say, oh, you've
got to incentivise people and give them loads of money.
No, you don't. There are other incentives
in life, such as
people who contribute so much to the GAA.
And we don't sort of think, well,
Jesus, how can that be such an amazingly
successful and great organisation
based on voluntary
work? because they're
incentivized or something to join doing that there's fulfillment in doing that
and we've got to see the incentives in terms of that rather than purely in
financial terms of course financial terms have financial incentives have
some point to play but it's got out of hand. Yeah.
What do you, like,
the argument that the government will make that we'll say about the multinational corporations,
the idea that they will not come to Ireland
unless they have this pretty, pretty fucking easy corporation tax.
What's your opinion on that?
Should we be taxing Apple properly?
Taxing Google? Of course, sir. Because I think that's like a collective sense of low self-esteem. tax what's your opinion on that should we be taxing apple effect properly taxing up google
of course because i think that's like a collective sense of low self-esteem we've got a highly
educated english-speaking workforce i think google should be happy that they're here well why don't
we have an irish what is that that we haven't created the only thing that is what and corporate
level in ireland in the last there's's the two Stripe guys from Limerick.
Ryanair.
What other international company has made such a mark?
Stripe. Do you know the two Stripe lads?
The Collison brothers.
So they're these two lads.
They were about 17 years of age.
They were going to Castletroy College in Limerick.
And they created a company called Stri age that were going to castles right college in Limerick and
They created a company called strike. Yeah, yeah, yeah similar up to PayPal
But I don't know that I mean are there any stripe offices in Ireland?
No, the boys are just fucked off and become San Francisco's. Yeah
They're no Franciscans anymore in every country, there's no Franciscans in them rightimerick, are there? There's no Franciscans in Limerick, no.
What have we got?
There's a cross from where the lobster pot used to be.
What's the... There's no monks.
The Redemptors are still here.
The Redemptors are still here, and there's the two lads,
the monks in my roster are doing great work.
You don't remember the Redemptors, I assume,
when they were in their full flight,
but they scared the bejesus out of most of us when we're growing up.
Really?
Shouting and roaring about the fires of hell and all that.
I had a buddy and he went to the Redemptors Church.
And at the back of the Redemptors Church, they had this giant, like an oil tank.
And this is where all the holy water in Limerick came from.
So my buddy was about 10 years of age and he went into the redemptorist because he had a very inquisitive mind and he asked one of the monks he said look what's the crack with the that giant
drum of water like the blessed every day how is all that water holy and the monk anyway
water holy and the monk anyway showed him that they had an actual ball cock in this giant drum of holy water and apparently there was a level at the bottom was continually blessed water
and they had it figured out the theory was that the blessing of christ would imbue the rest of
the water and then the whole drum became holy so then my little buddy asked he said
all right okay well when that evaporates then does that not just go into the clouds and make
all water holy and he got kicked out of the church
what's your view about all that what's my view about about religion about religion i wouldn't
have a hell of a lot of time for religion i I mean, I respect people's rights to practice it.
I do believe that people should have the freedom to practice it.
Do you believe in God?
I don't know what God is.
I certainly don't subscribe to religion.
I wouldn't be so arrogant as to go straight off and call myself an atheist.
I think our understanding of time is flawed.
We view time as something that starts and finishes,
whereas the likes of quantum physics would tell us that time is most likely circular.
So I think we could be living in a simulation, like a video game.
You know, that's what I think,
is that we're a big giant joke on someone
on someone's computer in another universe so we're not really here at all or we might not be here at
all or or that's um this is that this is a mirage a mirage and consciousness you know reality is
created look at you you're at moments actually i think i think it's probably
but uh regarding me and religion,
sure, I fucking...
I nearly got banned from RTE
because I call communion way for haunted bread.
You know?
But I do...
I enjoy religion as entertainment.
I love to crack open...
No, seriously, I like to crack open. No, seriously.
I like to crack open the Bible as an artifact of mythology.
Like, you know, I was only reading last week about the Tower of Babel.
Do you know the story of the Tower of Babel?
I do.
It's phenomenally interesting.
Do you know about the Tower of Babel?
No.
It's a story from the Old Testament.
The Old Testament is grey crack because it's nuts.
It's how the Bible explains how god invented language and basically there was a town babylon which is now
iraq and the inhabitants of babylon were like fuck it heaven sounds class let's build a building so
high that we can go up there so the residents of babylon built this giant tower and
it got as far as the clouds so then god was upstairs in heaven going fuck me the humans are
fucking the humans are nearly at my door with their tower what am i going to do they can't just
climb to heaven so god invented all the words languages so that the builders of this tower
could no longer communicate and then the building stopped and
when the irish were told that story of the tower of babel by saint patrick we had when the the
irish monks got a hold of it the irish had imbued that story and written the irish language into the
story of the tower of babel because when the irish heard about christianity of course there was no
mention of paddy in it at all so the irish started to write themselves into the bible and one of the things
they did with the tower of babel is that they wrote a little extra bit on the end that said that
when god made all the other languages he got the best bits of all languages and made the irish
language and it was these type of these type of stories that the the Irish monks made were one of the reasons that the Brits used originally for invading us.
It's true.
You should read up about St. Brendan. He gave a fucking communion wafer to a whale.
And the Brit Normans used a fella called Geraldus, who was a historian of Ireland.
He wrote a book called Toperaldus who was a historian a historian of ireland he wrote a book called topographic hibernica and in this book he just basically said look at what the irish are
doing to christianity they're gone stone mad and then he wrote that in latin took it to pope adrian
who was a british pope he wrote a thing called the fucking the papal bull lord billeter which
was the permission for the normans to invade Ireland because of what we'd done to Christianity.
Are there any historians here?
No, good.
That might be a little
bit off.
They said the Bible
was great, the Old Testament was great, crack. No, it
isn't. Oh, it's not.
I mean, if you touch Mount Sinai, you get stoned to
death.
That might be a bit of a crack.
But what it says about women is utterly insidious.
The book of Leviticus, which is the third book,
the fourth book of the Bible is Genesis,
and then Exodus, Numbers, Leviticus,
and something else, Numbers, Leviticus, and something else.
But a part of it says that for a man to touch a woman who is having a period is an abomination.
Now, just think of people believing that and think of what they think of women.
Yeah. Isn't it just so insidious and it's actually poisons um i know paul jerk on the port and um i was talking about the about the
religion of the old testament and he said it's poison in the well of civilization yeah and it is
and he said it is poison in the well of civilization yeah and it is and i mean that's not a popular view but um but i i forgot
but that's the thing you know we're entitled i would like to see a society where we're entitled
to have this view about religion and other people are free to practice it so long as like i'd be a
big fan of secular secularism you know do what
you want with your religion eat your holy bread eat your fucking haunted bread believe that you're
eating the ghost of a 2 000 year old carpenter just get it out of my laws please you know it's
not the ghost what is it and what is the actual it's the actual 2 000 year old carpenter that
you've to eat yeah um you you seem fairly on the ball with your religion there
is that from your school days?
no, I got a
I was interested in religion
because it's such a powerful influence
in society
not just in this society but generally
and you really can't understand
our culture without understanding religion
or understanding Christianity and Judaism.
And I persuaded RTE
to allow me to do a
program every night for some years on the Bible
and it forced me to read the Bible.
In the interest of balance?
No, no, there was no balance at all in the program.
But I found it very interesting, but also scary.
I don't understand how other people who are much more intelligent than me
and who are much finer, more decent people than I am,
can subscribe to religion, but that's it.
How are you about the New Testament?
How do you feel about the word of Christ?
Similarly, I cannot see what
the veneration of Jesus
I do not understand why
he said nothing new
like this thing that
love your neighbor as yourself
this was said
a thousand years previously
by the Egyptians
and nothing of any consequence did he say that was new.
And so what the hell? What is it?
But also, I find it surprising that somebody tomorrow,
maybe somebody tomorrow will tell somebody else about this conversation we're having.
And almost certainly they'll get it wrong.
Yeah.
Tomorrow.
Yeah.
we're having and almost certainly they get it wrong yeah tomorrow yeah now about jesus um the
three of the gospels mark luke and um matthew were written between 30 and 50 years after he died yeah and the gospel john was written about 80 years after he died now how likely is it that
they they're just making a lot of it up did no fucking paper
exact exact quotations it's just ridiculous there's no tape recorders or either in flowerpots
or elsewhere um and so um and and also the the those gospels were written very much to agendas. There were dissensions within early Christendom.
For instance, on the issue of whether you had to become a Jew first in order to become a Christian.
Yeah.
And that was a big issue.
I'm struck by a theory that the reason Christianity got up and running was because the Romans,
Constantine and then later emperors, were very concerned about the factionalism in the
Roman Empire due to different religions.
And they were very keen to get a monotheistic religion because there'd be less
there'd be no more arguments about my god
is better than your god and all that
by the way
there's a
sociological argument that's made
that monotheism developed
at a time when humans started to
live in larger communities
that when you look at when humans were polytheistic
it's when we were
hunter-gatherers when we relied upon the forces of nature the sun the wind the moon that these
things influenced our lives and when we grew into societies that had large amount large populations
over a thousand that monetization creeped in because it echoed the political system that would be necessary to govern that amount of people. I don't know if that's true. I think that
religions got codified about 10,000 years ago at the time of the agricultural
revolution which I think is quite significant, because then private property came into play.
And the notion of surplus.
And private property demanded that men control women's sexuality.
And this was because men wanted to be sure
that their property would go to their offspring,
not somebody else, not some other fellow's offspring.
So they had to control women's sexuality.
And then religion came to the aid of that.
Religion was formed around that idea.
And the early books of the Old Testament are polytheistic.
They acknowledge the beliefs in other religions, etc.
So that would have happened later on.
But anyway, let me just...
We have an interesting point of what you said there about 10,000 years ago
regarding when property became a thing with the agricultural
revolution that's also when dogs and cats right that's when cats became domesticated
like cats nowadays are not fully domestic but dogs are we domesticated dogs when there were
wolves about 30 000 years ago when we were hunter-gatherers it's only when we had uh
agriculture and then the idea of surplus being able to hold on to grain that vermin became a
problem and then we started to domesticate cats and that's why cats today are still kind of pricks
because we've had an extra 30 40 000 years to breed dogs to be friendly but cats are still kind of, I'm only
10,000 years old bud, fuck you.
And half
play with you. I haven't heard that
before. It sounds
plausible.
You're big into your history.
I accept that you know more about
cats than I do.
You're big into your history.
I'm not claiming it. Well, I guess I'm not
claiming it. But anyway,
I was
tempted to get around to saying
that I'm attracted by the
theory, and it could be just a theory,
that the reason that Christianity got
up and going was because
the Roman emperors wanted
an agreement
on one religion, which meant monotheism, really.
And Judaism, obviously, would have been an option for them.
And because of that, Judaism actually was allowed to prosper in many parts of the Roman Empire,
like we know about Paul's journeys in Turkey and Greece and Rome and Cyprus and Malta, etc.
But there was a problem with Judaism in having it accepted as the accepted religion throughout the empire.
One of the problems was the dietary requirements of Judaism.
And people weren't that keen on the diet restrictions and was that just pork or is there other stuff
i don't know but the other was one was circumcision yeah but fathers weren't that keen
on circumcision and uh so uh i in christianity came along and because uh christian christians had come to
accept that you didn't have to become a jew before becoming a christian christianity
fitted the bill it's monotheistic didn't have the disadvantages of judaism and that was it
but as well now that you mentioned that theory i'm not saying that this is true. How they used to circumcise back then,
they didn't use a blade.
The rabbi had to bite the foreskin off the child.
I'm serious.
So the argument could be made.
I don't want to.
Have a rabbi bite off.
A rabbi bite off your foreskin
or someone puts water on your face.
I'm going to put the water on my face.
That's true, by the way i'm not making that up don't blame me if that freaks you out that's fucking that's three thousand year old shit there is something relevant to this that's very very
topical and it's female genital mutilation and and about 200 000 women have been
genetically mutilated uh in the world today and it's prevalent in primarily in africa but many
other asian countries and it happens in britain and probably in ireland a little bit as well there
was a report last year that it was going on in Ireland, yeah. Yeah. And it is just horrific.
I mean, you think of the extent to which...
And, of course, the point of it was
to diminish women's sexual appetites or enjoyment.
Again, to control women's sexuality.
And when you think about the scale to which men went to control women,
it just is almost frightening.
Yeah.
But we still do it um
i in other ways but wasn't it in catalysism where women were not permitted to orgasm
that a man was if a woman orgasmed there was a scene
i hadn't heard that one i hope it's true and it didn't just come to me in a dream
I hadn't heard that one.
I hope it's true and it didn't just come to me in a dream.
Do you think there's elements of Catholicism that are essentially polytheistic because of the veneration of saints and things like that?
I never thought about it.
I think about that a lot.
Do you?
I do.
Do you ever hear about the...
There's illegal Catholic saints.
There's a few of them.
And one of them is a dog saint.
He's an Italian.
I can't think of his fucking name,
but he's...
He's a dog that saved a baby.
And...
This village in Italy started worshipping him
and drawing pictures of this dog
in, like, a bishop's robe.
And the church made him completely illegal, and now now you're secretly worshipping to this day Jesus Christ they had a similar thing out in Kilrush where they worship an eel
I'm joking here what what do you think of the current state of Irish journalism?
Journalism is going through a difficult time now because of social media.
Yeah.
And also because the print media is moving towards extinction.
And it's an issue. is moving towards extinction.
It's an issue. It's a huge problem.
And I don't know how it's going to be resolved.
I assume that people will find, through social media outlets,
ways of doing good journalism again, and people will begin to appreciate it and will get followings and attractions
because of it
that's one reflection
another reflection is that
in many ways journalism
it's possible to do journalism better than
it was ever done before because of the
internet that the
information that's readily available now
is so gigantic as compared
to what it was 20, 30, 40 years ago. And so it's possible to do things journalistically
now that wasn't possible to do before. But another point is that the trivialization of public discussion is really
for instance
look at our media
and look at the obsessions they have about
Leo Vradka's
socks
or whether
Leo Vradka or Michal Martin
will be the next teacher
or Mary Lou will be in government
next time
and it makes no
difference whatsoever, not a tiny little bit of difference. Who's in government next time,
who's not in government next time, whatever. It makes no difference at all, because it
will make no difference to people's livelihood, or to people's welfare, because they all think
the same thing. And you'll never have journalists,
particularly political journalists,
writing about how Fianna Fáil,
for instance, or the present government,
how the policies that they espouse
or the policies they agree to
affects the lives of ordinary people.
And just look at the scale of inequality
we have in our society.
The numbers of people who are living in poverty,
which is very, very high, our risk of poverty is very, very high.
We have very high levels of inequality in our society.
Look at the problem of the housing.
We're a hugely rich society, we can't provide housing,
a basic requirement for people.
Look at the health, the point I was making earlier on
about rich people
or people better off,
people in poor
income groups dying
prematurely by
at least five years. 5,000 people
die prematurely every year in this
society, this is what this report said, because
of inequality. And
nobody bothers about it at all.
Similarly with regard to... But where are the journalists saying this?
Yeah, similarly the sex abuse thing, I go on about the sex abuse, this is a very important thing.
It shows that 200,000 people, women, 200,000 women have been raped in the course of lifetimes
and another 100,000 to 200,000 have been otherwise sexually abused. But 200,000 women raped in our society. It's
just, in our society, 4 million people. It's just shocking.
And the percentage of that that actually go on to successfully convict their rapist in
court is something like 1%.
And one of the big problems about this case in Belfast is, suppose these guys are acquitted and maybe properly
acquitted, I don't know
I don't know about that
but let's
just suppose for a minute they're acquitted
think of what that will do to
women around in all of Ireland
and elsewhere
when they've been raped
and they're thinking of reporting to somebody
of course they won't do it
they'll be terrified of that
look at the audio that woman was put through
for seven days in the witness box
people will be terrified
I have two daughters
and if either of them were raped
I think I would say to them
don't go near the police
I'll get a big iron bar
and break the legs of the people who did it
and that's what
that's
that's what... APPLAUSE
Is your reaction like that, Vincent,
because you have so little faith in the legal system
when it comes to this type of... when it comes to rape?
I'm afraid so, yeah.
But also, it's not treated with anything like the same...
Sex abuse is not treated with anything...
Its prevalence is so great that you think this is a major issue in our society it's a peripheral issue at best my peripheral issue which we get upset about every now and again for instance
tom humphries that journalist fellow yeah uh convicted of of um grooming a woman and raping
her a girl and raping her and the outrage that was about her.
I really was irritated about the outrage,
because I was thinking, how the fuck did you not know
that this is an epidemic in our society?
And we don't treat it as an epidemic.
There's no appreciation it's an epidemic,
and it's a major problem that we need to do something about it.
Anyway, that's my thought.
Thank you. about it. Anyway, that's all. I mean...
The one positive out of that is that that's why the Me Too movement exists. It's an act of digital vigilantism because the system does not work.
Yes, absolutely. And that's really good that that's happened, yeah. Well, it puts... It makes men feel less freedom
to commit crimes that they feel they'd otherwise get away with.
Can I ask you a question?
Do you think that men, that we, us men,
not just Irishmen, but probably generally,
but let's talk about just Irishmen,
that we're fucked up with regard to women and sex generally?
Absolutely, yeah, that's definitely... I mean well what do you mean by fucked up well how did you agree with me if you didn't know what i meant
by fucked up no but no for me when you said fucked up do i think we have uh when you said that to me
i i taught we have a sense of power sexual power and entitlement i would agree
with that but then i have to go what that's my definition of fucked up i wonder what vincent says
but the way we the way that men often talk about women for instance the use of the word fuck
actually is in itself is when you think about it as i could give a fuck just think of that
that's it as though the most it's devaluing the act of sex.
The act of sex is the most useless thing you could have.
It's one of the most beautiful things one can have,
if you look at it properly.
But the word cunt, unless you look at women,
I think that there's something really disturbed about that.
That the word that we use to describe something,
to give the worst description of a human being,
happens to be the same word as it refers to women's genitalia.
There's something really disturbing and fucked up about that.
Jeez, there I go again.
Thank you.
um yeah no i mean i was asking do you think that no i'd agree with you and uh i mean i was raised uh as within the privilege of being a being a man you know i never have to
i don't have to worry about my sexual safety at know i never have to i don't have to worry
about my sexual safety at any point in my life i don't have to worry about i can go into limerick
city tonight and walk around at three o'clock in the morning and at no point am i worrying about
being sexually assaulted and no but no one wants to sexually assault me well barren that i wouldn't but like yeah it's it's um i never had to think about this shit until it was pointed out to me by
women and until it was pointed out to be my women i was blissfully going about my life just going ah
you're overreacting and then someone had to point it out to me and go no this is how it actually is
for me as a woman um i know i can't meet you there tonight
why can't you meet me there tonight you lazy bitch uh because i can't go out at that time
of night because people want to rape me i'd never thought of it you know it needed to be pointed out
to me explicitly but it's in it's having a more ordinary circumstance like for instance a woman
walking along the street late at night
when the street is fairly abandoned,
and there's somebody walking behind her.
That woman is scared.
Terribly, yeah.
Usually scared.
For instance, a woman in a lift, like in Ireland,
there's not many very high-rise buildings,
but, for instance, in America,
there's a woman in a lift on on her own and a man gets in,
she's immediately terrified.
And there's something wrong with the
men's culture.
And I think it's to do with our
sense of
what it means to be a man, the hard
man, the fucking...
What it means to be a man, the tough man.
He's a hard man.
But also, taking it back to some of the text messages
in that rugby trail
it's not
not only us being elevated for being hard men
but being elevated for
how much sex we can have
and
the quality, if the sex that we have
is I don't give a shit about her it was just a
ride that is elevated within male culture as a positive thing yeah when you're younger in
particular like oh absolutely yeah yeah yeah so i mean i mean all you can do is fucking
you talk to the lads coming up the young lads coming up is it enough to talk to them because that's the culture,
it's there.
And there is a problem
with masculinities with us men
and the only way to address it
is through education
but also through the media
and through talking about it
and acknowledging that it's an issue
and pointing out to men that there's something disturbed about it.
And, like, I mean, what I'd wonder too is, like,
in sexual health classes that kids are given,
like, when I was given sexual health classes,
it was delivered to me by a priest, you know, and I'm not that old.
Now at least they have sexual health classes,
but I'd like to know how much of the sexual health classes that are delivered to young male children have to do with
consent and have to do with empathy for the fear that women face by simply existing
do you know what i mean because that for me like i said that was a huge eye-opener for me
yeah to realize like you were saying there about a woman alone and lift that had to be beaten into me that had to be really pointed out to me for me to believe it
because i've never dealt with it my whole life i've never worried about like the worst that's
going to happen to me is someone's going to rob my phone do you know what that's what i have to
worry about but no one wants to take my body like on the the program that I did on TV3 for 10 years,
a feature which I never bothered with the Twitter thing,
partly because I...
With the what thing?
The Twitter thing.
Trigger warning. Content warning.
That I didn't want to do so because I felt that if I tweeted,
I would then do so imp some positively at times and regret it
and I never bothered reading it either
but other people tell me
just tell me that women
on the program
would get the
amount of abuse that was
directed at them on the social
media was really extraordinary and this
happens all the time
with any women going on television on
any programs they get terrible abuse and terrible um denigration and there's something really
strange um i'm disturbed about that i've thought about that and i think what it is is that
when when two men argue there's's the threat of physical confrontation.
And I think when men are arguing with a woman, they're unconsciously aware that there will be no physical confrontation, that the man will always win.
So men unconsciously moderate their behavior with other men.
That's why lads, when they get together, tend to have great banter.
their behaviour with other men.
That's why lads, when they get together,
tend to have great banter.
Because to elevate the conversation into argument could mean two men fighting,
two men boxing heads off each other.
And when they're online, if they have a woman,
they go straight in with a load of violent language
because she can't hit back,
and she's not going to hit back,
and that's what's in their head.
That's just my theory about it.
Yeah.
Yeah.
In your... back and that's what's in their head that's just my theory about it yeah yeah but in your your in your i haven't i i tried to get your book through amazon and no there's not they're out of print
they'll be in print yeah so i got it but um and in your podcast what are the themes what are the
big issues you raise my big theme is uh mental health mental health i used to be a person who
suffered from severe anxiety and depression when i was about 19 um so did i you did as well did
you yeah around that time when you were young that yeah yeah and i overcame it and now i'm
able to sit in front of an entire audience
and be completely relaxed and comfortable,
and so are you.
But you have to wear a mask.
Well, no, that's just so, like,
I can go to Aldi and buy carrots
and people don't say hot or something.
I'm not particularly interested in fame in Ireland.
Sure, you know yourself.
You'd be going to a shop and people go,
how are you getting on, Vincent?
Do you know what I mean?
Or they might go,
I didn't like what you said the other night on TV, Vincent.
For me, I want to avoid all of that shit.
So I get to...
Is that all it is, is it?
That's the bones of it, yeah.
What's the flesh of it?
What?
What's the flesh of it?
How do you mean the flesh of it?
You said that's the bones of why you wear a mask.
What's the flesh of it how do you mean the pleasure that's the bones of fire I just I I started the rubber bandits thing in the year 2001 Big Brother when the first Big
Brother was on television and I got to see how disposable celebrity was and i got to see how we say the
person who won big brother became the most famous person in ireland and england for about two months
and then slowly faded into nothingness and it scared the living shit out of me and i don't
think i ever want to be recognized in the street or Or I don't ever want to... Like, I get to go on television.
I get to have a podcast.
I get to write a book.
But at the same time, I get to live in Limerick and have a normal life.
And I wouldn't trade that for anything, you know?
That's what you said.
And as well, being famous in Ireland.
That's what you said was the bones of it.
Now, I asked you what was the flesh of it.
That is the flesh of it.
No, you said that was...
You had already said that was the bones of it. Now, tell us about the flesh of it. That is the flesh of it. No, you said that was the bones of it.
Now tell us about the flesh of it.
There must be other layers of issues there.
You're kind of picking up.
This is a man who used to have social anxiety
and now he happens to wear a mask in his face
and he feels comfortable doing it with a mask in his face.
I don't know, like...
Anxiety is no longer a part of my life.
Do you know, it hasn't been a part of my life for about ten years
and nor is depression.
So...
I don't know, I just...
I'm blind by now, shall I mean?
If I took the bag off, I'd just be some lad.
What's wrong with being a lad?
I just... I want to go to Aldi.
I want to go to Aldi and not be bothered by people.
That is?
That's about it.
I'd say there's more to it than that.
But the audience think there's more to it than that.
audience think there's more to it than that.
I don't know. I haven't tested it.
What did your mammy say about it?
My ma? Yeah. She said,
don't curse in front of Vincent Brown.
Oh, Vincent.
You bald boy.
Yeah, that was the magnificent Vincent Brown.
Someone who just, he put me on a spot at the end,
he put me on the fucking spot, because that's what he does, that's what he does, he will not,
he's an expert at, like, there's no dodging questions with that man, he will go straight at
it, what did you really say, what did you really say, fucking legend, so that was an
absolute pleasure, absolute pleasure, um, I hope you enjoyed it, and again, apologies, apologies
for not giving you the full shebang this week, but I'm over in fucking Spain, and I don't have
the facilities to give a decent podcast, to give a decent quality recording, so that's why I have
the live podcasts on hand, in case of an emergency you
know um it's better than doing nothing this week which i would never do i'll always put out
something for you all right god bless go in peace uh have a lovely have a lovely week and i'm gonna
back to you next week with a normal regular podcast hug you delicious boys and girls rock city you're the best fans in the league bar none tickets are on sale now for fan appreciation
night on saturday april 13th when the toronto rock hosts the rochester nighthawks at first
ontario center in hamilton at 7 30 p.m You can also lock in your playoff pack right now
to guarantee the same seats for every postseason game
and you'll only pay as we play.
Come along for the ride and punch your ticket to Rock City
at torontorock.com. you