The Charlie Kirk Show - How To Build a Permanent Conservative Realignment For Gen Z

Episode Date: July 14, 2025

Gen Z knows what they want: Houses they can afford, jobs that pay well, and a chance to live out the American Dream as it was for their parents and grandparents. Charlie walks through how to best prep the country for Gen Z's mass entrance into the workforce. He then discusses President Trump's resumed weapons shipments to Ukraine, as well as the Biden autopen story that has suddenly blossomed into a full mainstream scandal. Alex Marlow joins, as does Josh Hammer to recap his Israel debate against Dave Smith during the Student Action Summit. Watch every episode ad-free on members.charliekirk.com!    Get new merch at charliekirkstore.com!Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hey everybody, Charlie Kirk here live from the Bitcoin.com studio. We have Josh Hammer, we have Alex Marlowe, we talk about what I learned in Tampa, Florida, around 7,000 young patriots. We talk about the rise of Mamdaniism, a Muslim running for mayor in Minneapolis. We talk about Biden's AutoPen, Israel and Iran and more. Email us as always, freedom at CharlieKirk.com. Subscribe to our podcast and get involved with the most important organization in the country, TPUSA dot com. That is TPUSA dot com. Buckle up everybody.

Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campuses. I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks. I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most

powerful youth organizations ever created turning point. USA. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are gonna fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here. Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of the Charlie Kirk Show, a campuses across the country. That's why we are here. Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of the Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you

could protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at Noble Gold Investments dot com. That is Noble Gold Investments dot com. It's where I buy all of my gold go to noblegoldinvestments.com I had a very relaxing weekend sitting by the pool and getting a good tan Sleeping in till 1 p.m. That haven't been up too much Of course the exact opposite of intro I've never worked so hard at any event in turning point USA history the team will attest to this It's just up at 637 and literally no breaks.

I think I maybe stopped for 10 or 15 minutes to eat something. I was just so excited to be around these young Patriots. The event had an energy, it had a buzz, it had a fatality, it had a life of its own that quite honestly we've experienced very rarely in Turning Point USA history. Part of it was that the grassroots had questions. The grassroots was engaged.

You wouldn't think that an event like we're hosting at the Student Action Summit coming after an election you'd have this kind of spark and this kind of energy. My schedule on Friday was as follows. Woke up very early, did Fox and Friends, awesome with my friend Charlie Hurt, went straight from there and sat with the young students at Turning Point USA privately, a hundred of them, table by table for over an hour listening to them, learning from them, went straight from there and spoke to the chapter leadership summit for an hour and a half and took questions dashed to our program here did two hours live on radio then boom did another fox news hit and then straight from the fox news hit went and did a prove me wrong for an hour and a half where people

were able to ask non-political cultural questions then went backstaged opened the event then I had to go dash and go do interviews at the members only lounge of Charlie the Charlie Kirk show with Tucker Carlson went back to backstage. Oh, yeah, and then I had to go greet Pete Hegseth We did a members only interview with Pete Hegseth, but I went back to the main stage interviewed Megan Kelly After I interviewed Megan Kelly dashed back and did a members only interview with the apostate prophet, which is an incredible interview that you are going to love, finished up that members only interview with the apostate prophet to then only have to go to two donor dinners, couple donor meetings, all in between getting lots of phone calls about the very slow news weekend, without any caffeine, purely on water and patriotism.

That was just Friday. Saturday was even crazier. But we decided to push ourselves harder than ever. We are the hardest working organization in the country. We do more content. We do more events. We do more grassroots engagement than any other organization out there because we believe the nation is at stake.

The nation is at stake. The nation is at in peril. Now plenty was said this last weekend at our event about Epstein. Honestly, I'm done talking about Epstein for the time being. I'm going to trust my friends the administration. I'm going to trust my friends in the government to do what needs to be done. Solve it. I've said plenty this last weekend. So if you guys want to see my commentary on it, that's fine.

We have escalatory action potentially being taken in Ukraine and Russia. We have tons of announcements happening when it comes to NATO. But let me just say this again, everyone knows my opinion about the Epstein thing, the messaging fumble. I would love to see the DOJ move to unseal the grand jury testimony. I think that would be a big win. I would love to see that. And I'm going to trust my friends, Cash Patel, Dan Bongino, my friend Pam Bondi, all these guys. Todd Blanch, I'm going to trust them to solve it. Balls in their court, I think that there

was plenty of, let's say, speeches that were directed towards this topic this last weekend. So we don't need to spend our valuable time on this program relitigating it. And by the way, this last weekend so we don't need to spend our valuable time on this program, relitigating it. And by the way, this last weekend we also had a lively debate on stage that you should check out, which I'm going to talk about later in the hour, about Israel, Josh Hammer versus Dave Smith. It's gone super viral, all about Israel. But taking a step back, I want to remind you the big picture. And the big picture is this. What I love about these events is I'm able to talk to people directly. We did a focus group, by the way, yesterday morning with well over 50 of our top Turning Point USA students.

And whoa, that focus group is going to go viral. Think like Jubilee times 10, hearing straight from students about issues that matter to them. The Student Action Summit was the largest we have ever had. And President Trump was negotiating ends to war and understandably was not able to make time. J.D. Vance was with his family, understandably not able to make time. Even with that, and we would have loved to have them both, we had 7,000 people there. Largest ever Student Action Summit. This is a movement that is durable, that is strong, that is growing. We had Pete Hegseth, we had Tulsi Gabbard,

we had Kristi Noem, so we still had three cabinet secretaries. And we also had Tom Homan. Coming out of this event though, I want to repeat something that I told almost every reporter. To keep this movement together, to keep this movement to be the dominant generational movement and to make this the most permanent generational shift since Woodstock is that we must be honest and serious about the renter economy versus the ownership economy. This kept coming up from students at our event. The repetition from the students, which is, Charlie, I wish our leaders would just talk about how I can't afford homes. Charlie, I wish our leaders would emphasize about how I can't afford anything. And they said,

we love President Trump. We want the one big, beautiful bill to work. And the takeaway is that they want their leaders to dress their immediate concerns. When we win elections, and I think President Trump is doing this, we must govern in a way that fulfills the mandate. So I look at myself almost as, I mean, look, I wear a lot of different hats, but in some ways I'm an advocate. I'm like a special interest group advocate. And I had a great conversation with the president on the phone last night expressing advocate. I'm like a special interest group advocate. And I had a great conversation with the president on the phone last night expressing this. I'm kind of a special interest advocate for three groups, the conservative base, evangelicals,

but most importantly and most well-known for younger people, younger voters. And you could add the muscular class on top of that because we have a really good connection on this program and through all Of our advocacy with the muscular class as a side note What's so awesome is when we do these events the guys taking out the trash the guys that were cleaning up the Conference center and they do such a great job. They work tough tough hours a lot of overtime They all wanted selfies. They were all giving us thumbs up. They're black. They were Hispanic. They were diverse

That's our base. It was so good, but specifically with younger people. I feel as if I am a selfies, they were all giving us thumbs up, they're black, they were Hispanic, they were diverse. That's our base. It was so good. But specifically with younger people, I feel as if I am a special interest group advocate. And I say that kidnally because I mean, are younger voters really a special interest group? No, of course not. But what I'm saying though is that I'm trying to deliver a message as a conduit, as a transmitter, as an interlocutor, if you will, saying the next generation is prime for a permanent conservative realignment. It is temporary so far. We've lived through a temporary conservative realignment. It is not permanent. I know this generation better than any other prominent conservative, not because I'm one

of them. I'm a little bit older than I'm 31. A lot of these kids are 18 to 21, but because I have spent hundreds of hours asking questions and Andrew will attest to it, the way that I ran that focus group yesterday, I'm able to get down to the heart of the matter very quickly. I know their lingo. I know their language. I'm able to extract it because when you do as many campus events as I do, you start

to see patterns and you have pattern recognition and it's a lot more accurate than polling and macro data and here is the kicker. You are going to see more Zoran Mamdani's. You're gonna see more, by the way there's another Muslim running for mayor in Minneapolis. Big surprise and he's arguing for the exact same thing. You're going to see more Mamdani's and AOC's and Ilan Omar's and Rashida Tlaib's. You're going to see a rise of Mamdani-ism in addition to Muhammadism, so you have both kind of together, but Mamdani-ism coupled with Muhammadism, if we do not achieve and fulfill the mandate to get younger

people to own homes, get married, have kids. If we do not fulfill that mandate, if we do not have young people be able to own instead of rent, then you will see an introduction of radicalization of our politics. Hey everybody, Charlie Kirk here. I'm excited to tell you that I'll be speaking at the Culture and Christianity Conference at World Outreach Church just south of Nashville, Tennessee, this September, and I'm inviting you to join me. My friend, Pastor Alan Jackson, organized this conference so we can address the issues we're facing in today's culture, but through the lens of God's truth. We'll talk about what's happening in the church, the media, and with our help. When you'll attend, you'll gain insight and valuable perspectives on what's happening in the world today. Learn

how to recognize truth from deception. Find boldness so you could defend your faith with confidence and compassion. Join me, Pastor Alan, Sage Steele, Dr. Bill Lyle, and many more. September 19th and 20th, registration is now open. There's never been a more important time to seek the truth, embrace the truth, and boldly deliver the truth to the people around us. Come find out what's happening in the world around us and what you can do to make a difference. Learn more and register at alanjaxson.com.

That's alanjaxson.com slash Charlie. That's alanjaxson.com slash Charlie. I'll see you there. If we fail to make renters and owners, if we fail and we fall short, which again, I think President Trump is really onto something with the cutting the rates thing. If we cut interest rates, a lot of this ownership economy becomes more real. The tragedy is this, and I know this because we're here in Phoenix, Arizona, which was once one of the most affordable cities in America, and it's now become one of the most expensive cities in America. Why? Because during COVID, this was a freedom beacon state. So a lot of

people sold their assets in blue states that have much higher asset values because cost of living brought their appreciated capital into the state of Arizona and created a housing rush with a limited supply. And next thing you know, Arizona is now one of the most expensive states in the country. And the tragedy is this, and I know this from so many of my wonderful staff. If you if you were able to get into the housing market, let's just say before, up until early 2022, you are in a rock solid position. Let's just say 2021, right as Trump left office. If you, though, were able, if you have not been able to, and you wanted to get into the housing market in 2023, 2024, 2025, you're on the outside looking in, you're

a renter. I mean, you take me for example, again, we do very well in this program, we're super blessed. God has really been generous to us. But we were able to buy our property and with like a 2.8% interest rate, it's ridiculous, back during COVID, very, very low. And then of course, then since COVID, that asset price has gone up significantly and dramatically. I look at though, my fellow employees or my fellow workers that want to now buy homes, it's now at seven or eight

percent interest rates and the homes are much more expensive. So the down payment is more and then the interest rate itself just makes it impossible for them to even enter the housing market. Not to mention we have BlackRock coming in and buying these homes and are bidding against our own young people. And interest rates are only part of the pie because unfortunately it won't help when like a garbage 500 square foot house cost $600,000. I think that these major $10 trillion wealth management funds and illegal immigrants owning homes are two of the major problems. So we got to figure it out. We have to figure it out because if we don't, the red-green axis, again, it's not always going to be red-green, it just so happens this is multiplying. Again, I'm going to be proven so right on this. People say, Charlie, you can't say this, you can't say that Muslims are taken over the West.

Well, they are, and I'm going to say it again and again and again because I see pattern recognition. Sadiq Khan in London, you have Zoran Mamdani in New York, and now you have a new one, a guy who wants to be mayor of Minneapolis, Omar Fata. If we do not solve the ownership crisis in America, which I believe President Trump will, but it's a race against the clock, it's literally a race against the clock, it's who gets there first. Can we do it before this radicalism crescendos in peaks? Can we keep the radicalism in its corner and into the bowels of American

society where it belongs, or is it going to surface? So apparently this guy is Somali mayor candidate Omar Fata, who says, quote, protecting all of our communities from Donald Trump means not letting the Minneapolis Police Department interact with ICE whether it's an immigration raid or not again so this guy is a Muslim Somalian so we brought them in through mass migration and though he doesn't care about so he's just he's an instrument for the destruction of the West he He wants this particular guy, he wants Islamic socialist control over Minneapolis. And we've seen this happen so many times. Mass immigration without assimilation is invasion.

Commit that to memory. Mass immigration without assimilation is invasion. Especially when you do it in such big numbers. So my takeaway from the Student Action Summit was that these young people have been sending us a distress signal, and praise God for them. They're working their tail off. They're starting Turning Point USA chapters. They are fighting on the front lines, and they're saying, Charlie, can we just please have a national project

on marriage, kids, homes, marriage, kids, homes. Said differently, mortgage, marriage, mating, mortgage, marriage, mating, the three M's. Make it easier to have a mortgage, make it easier to get married, and make it easier to mate. Those three things, the three M's. easier to get married and make it easier to mate.

Those three things, the three M's. And if we don't do that, the warning that I derived from our 7,000 faithful students is Charlie after us, the deluge. So we better stop it. Okay. Breaking news. President Trump did a press conference this morning with the head of NATO to announce that there is a little bit of an arms deal. It's different than what Biden did. President Trump did a press conference this morning with the head of NATO to announce that there is a little bit of an arms deal.

It's different than what Biden did, but let's walk through the basics first. Trump recently paused weapon shipments to Ukraine, also said he'd only send defensive weapons to avoid escalating the war. But President Trump has apparently gotten very frustrated with Russia, believing they're not serious about reaching a peace deal. Let's start to get some tape about this, guys, as I go through some of the facts here, please. So today in a press conference along with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Trump said America will quote, send the best military equipment to other NATO members, including

offensive weapons, which they are free to transfer to Ukraine. Per President Trump, we are just being an arms dealer selling to our allies who can do whatever, who can do whatever. But it's clear this is meant to be up to up to up the ante against Russia. President Trump has also announced a 50-day deadline for Russia to make peace or face 100 percent secondary tariffs, which apparently would be tariffs on nations that buy Russian oil. Let's play cut 284, please. We've made a deal today where we are going to be sending them weapons and they're going to be paying for them. We the United States will not be having any payment made. We are not buying it but we will manufacture it and

they're going to be paying for it. Our last meeting of a month ago is very successful and that they agreed to 5%, which is more than a trillion dollars a year. So they have a lot of money and they have, these are wealthy nations. They have a lot of money and they want to do it. They feel very strongly about it and we feel strongly about it too. Now here, the situation is a little bit different than what Biden did, but I'm going to give you my thoughts, which is it's not a direct just weapon transfer to Ukraine.

At least somebody is purchasing them. Now, we have to make sure this actually ends up happening, and I believe it will. So NATO or Europe is basically going to be an intermediary arms dealer with the United States that will buy the arms from the United States, hopefully generating some revenue, and then bringing them and sending them to Ukraine. Now, I want to see an end to this Ukrainian-Russian war. Personally, I don't want us to send any more arms to Ukraine. But at the same time, I want you, if you agree with me,

in principle, what would you do if you were President Trump? He's in a very difficult position here. So let's walk through this, because I've done a lot of thinking about this. So President Trump started by trying to warm up the relationship between Vladimir Putin and America. Good phone calls, kind of talking like more friendly. Remember, Joe Biden had that relationship dead.

That relationship was dead to rights. We didn't even have a back channel. And right out of the gate, there was a very bullish trend. And he gave Putin a huge leash. And there's no better way to tick off President Trump. And honestly, it would tick me off if I was in the chair. It would tick you off if you were president. Where you have a great conversation with a foreign leader.

Oh yes, everything's great. Let's do a deal. And then boom, Vladimir Putin is bombing churches on Palm Sunday, which did happen. Now Russia will say, well, you know, there's been assassination attempts against us and we're responding in that capacity, that regard. Okay. It's a war. There's always, I guess, a couple of sides to this, but some open advice for Vladimir Putin, don't play Trump as a fool.

This is not Joe Biden. This is not Joe Biden. This is not Barack Obama. And so President Trump has tried outright diplomacy multiple times. Now, if you think about it, President Trump does not want to see the Russian army march all the way to Kiev on his watch. I don't think anyone wants to see that. That would not be good. So it's a very difficult balance. It's a very difficult balance because, of course, Ukraine has not been forthright. This guy is the greatest salesman since P.T. Barnum.

He shows up to America dressed like an uppity foreigner in a black t-shirt, and he ends up with $60 billion. Zelensky is the greatest salesman we've ever seen. President Trump wants to see the war end. He doesn't want to see the war lost. And as someone who honestly, I'm not, I'm kind of like, I don't want to see more arms to Ukraine. I don't. I've said that repeatedly. I said it under Biden. I have a great deal of compassion and understanding for President Trump here. And I'm not just saying that because he's a friend and I know him. And if you disagree with me, then email me what you would do if you were president.

Because this is not an easy one. This one's a toughie. Tired of hearing that fossil fuels are ruining the planet? Well, here's what the headlines won't tell you. We're living in the safest, healthiest, and most prosperous time in human history. Since 1980, global extreme poverty has plummeted from 42 percent to under 10 percent. Meanwhile, life expectancy and incomes have soared. And this transformation didn't happen in spite of fossil fuels. It happened because of them.

From powering clean water systems and food supply chains to driving industrial growth and life-saving infrastructure, fossil fuels have been the quiet force lifting billions out of poverty. So while activists blame fossil fuels for everything under the sun, the data tells a different story. Fossil fuels have made the earth a better, safer place for people to live. I'm Charlie Kirk and I want you to know the facts, so don't be fossil fooled. Get the full picture at oilfacts.com. Brought to you by NASDAQ listed Prairie Operating Company, a high growth, low cost producer

of safe and responsible American energy, oilfacts.com. That's oilfacts.com, oilfacts.com. So President Donald Trump is doing rationally the most important thing of which there is really no downside in the pursuit of diplomacy. If you think about it, Vladimir Putin thinks that he understands domestic American politics. Here's Vladimir Putin's perspective. He's not feeling Russian angst, as we've explained on the prior show, because he's getting all of his troops

in the rural parts of Russia, not from Moscow or St. Petersburg, where the Russian elites or oligarchs live. So it's basically very poor Chechnians that are dying in the war and are just being used as cannon fodder for Vladimir Putin's agenda. So Vladimir Putin is making a bet, and here is the bet that Vladimir Putin is making. He is betting that America does not have the stomach to keep financing or to keep sending American weaponry. Almost all of Vladimir Putin's political calculus is based around the first principle that America domestically is done with this, and he's going to seize on that,

and he's going to take advantage of it. So President Donald Trump is saying no, your first principle is incorrect. Play cut 294. Will these be Patriot missiles specifically or Patriot batteries that you're planning? It's everything. It's Patriots. It's all of them. It's a full compliment with the batteries. And when do you expect them to arrive in the Ukraine, sir? Well, we're going to have some come very soon, within days actually. A couple of the countries that have patriots are going to swap over and we'll replace the patriots with the ones they have. So President Donald Trump, saying this, is now, he now has a leverage point against Vladimir Putin. Oh, really, Mr. Putin,

you're going to tell me that you want to do a deal and you're starting to go bomb children's hospitals or whatever. I mean, again, it's a war. Ukraine's doing stuff they shouldn't be doing. Russia's doing stuff they shouldn't be doing. I'm not getting too into the details. It's so it's, by the way, it's a very confusing war to follow. 7000 people died last week and we act like it's okay. Oh yeah fine seven thousand. Seven thousand people died? And we just kind of shrug our shoulders. We kind of roll our eyes over all that. President Donald Trump continues in cut 293 saying that he'll impose very severe tariffs of the 100 percent on Russia if no deal is reached. Play cut 293.

I'm disappointed in President Putin because I thought we would have had a deal two months ago, but it doesn't seem to get there. So based on that, we're going to be doing secondary tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days. It's very simple. And they'll be at 100%. And that's the way it is.

It can be more simple. It's just the way it is. I hope we don't have to do it. Now, here's the argument that some are making. They're saying this is a problem for NATO or Europe to be buying weapons because they want to bring Donald Trump and America into this conflict. But I actually don't share that view. And I think President Donald Trump has beyond earned our confidence and our trust after what happened with Iran. I think President Donald Trump has shown he does not want a war against Russia. He does not want a hot kinetic war. He doesn't. And he didn't want one against Iran. He doesn't want a quagmire.

So I don't share that view. Do I think that we could potentially be stuck with a funding problem and a relentless kind of armament problem? Yeah, I could see that. Could I see this war going on longer than we would like it? But let me repeat, if you are in my philosophical camp, which I bet a lot of you are, and you're kind of fatigued with the war in Ukraine, you don't want to keep on financing it, you're kind of like, what are you war in Ukraine. You don't want to keep on financing it. You're kind of like, what are you guys even fighting for? Another 100 extra miles, so another 500,000 people can die? What would you do differently? And if your answer is that we're just going to pull out completely, you run a major geopolitical and political risk that Ukraine will no longer exist as a country. Now some people hold that view. That is a firm view.

Some people say that, hey, if Russia wants it, Russia gets it. Now the counter I don't like is, well, then Russia is going to march all the way to Paris. No, they're not. Actually Article 5 will prevent him from even stepping foot into Poland. That's not going to happen. The argument, again, the whole kind of slippery slope argument that, Article 5 will prevent him from even stepping foot into Poland. That's not going to happen. The argument, again, the whole kind of slippery slope argument that, oh, Vladimir Putin is going to march tanks through Warsaw and then next you know he'll be running Brussels.

No, Ukraine is different. So the question is then, the important question is not about Brussels or Paris or Madrid, the more important question is, are you okay with Ukraine being conquered by Russia completely? And that is a very complicated question. Now, are you okay morally or do you want to involve militarily? I'm of the opinion that this is not our fight and this is not our war. But President Donald Trump has to manage a global economy as well. He wants to keep the dollar as the world reserve currency status.

This is not an easy one. We need to aim for a ceasefire. And I think President Donald Trump has that as an ultimate destination. And I also think President Donald Trump dismisses some of the more radical clamoring people. Oh, yeah, he's going to roll tanks all the way into Prague. No, he's not. Just stop it. That's not going to happen.

Will he potentially take over Ukraine? And would it be a gut punch to the European psyche and to continental Europe? Yes. And so he's threading the needle. And so Putin basically is not taking what Trump was saying seriously because Putin was saying, now he didn't say it, but he was acting as if, well Trump you have no cards. Well now Trump does have some cards actually and that's why he's doing the full

compliment. Putin may be misreading the influence of some of the MAGA portion of the country that wants no involvement in Ukraine. That's why I think Putin's first principle is incorrect. And so Donald Trump says, oh, you think you understand where we're at? Well, now I'm doing a full compliment for Ukraine. Do you want to negotiate now, Mr. Putin? So I have all the confidence that President Donald Trump is going to keep us out of any sort of kinetic dragging us into it. I have no concern whatsoever. The reason why Iran I had so much concern, there was a lot of other reasons why Iran, is because we didn't know the rationality of Iran.

Russia, I think doesn't want it either. That's the other thing. Russia does not want a hot war against America. But now President Donald Trump, this is key, has shifted the responsibility to Europe. That is key. Okay. I want to now get to another story here. Actually, let's just play some of the best moments from the Student Action Summit while it's still fresh. We had some amazing speakers. By the way, we have our Student Action Summit straw poll results coming up soon. Let's play, cut 246 from Tom Homan. One of the greatest accomplishments from this administration that needs to be repeated on a daily basis is how now we now have a hermetically

sealed border and the invasion is over. It is a incredible accomplishment. Please cut 246. Tonight, as I'm talking to you, we got the most secure border in the history of this nation. In the history. Illegal immigration is down 96%. That means 96% less people are coming. When 96% less people are coming, how many women aren't being raped by the cartels? How many children aren't dying making that journey?

How many pounds of fat and all is it getting to the country kill Americans? What they've been able to accomplish with President Trump has been able to do at the southern border He can golf for the next couple of years and still call this presidency a success To stop the invasion of foreigners into the United States of America now It's time also for mass deportations, and we are getting mass deportations. We had Kristi Noem, we had Tom Holm, and I spoke to them both publicly and privately, and it's like a commitment, an unspeakable resolve to the mass deportation agenda. It was an honor to have our good friend, Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Defense, SecDef.

Man, I've seen motorcades in my life. That is the closest thing to a presidential motorcade when Pete Hegseth pulled up to our event. He came in with 43 people. It's amazing. But he's still the same person he was, still the same person. Humble, strong, for fortitude, excellent resolve. Here is Pete Hegseth at the Department of Defense.

One of the best rated speeches. Play cut to 48. We're going back to gender neutral color blind merit based performance standards. We do readiness, we do accountability, we do war fighting, we do lethality, we don't do social experiments, we don't do politics. I don't care in my formations, I mean I have my political views and you have yours, but I don't care in my formation if you're a Republican or a Democrat. Do you love the country? Have you sworn to defend the Constitution? And you know, we had dozens of young men, I think some young ladies, but mostly young

men that said they wanted to join the military because of Pete Haegseth's speech. They have hit their recruitment goals so early, they need to go to Congress to ask for more money to satisfy the recruitment goals. And under Biden, the recruitments were record lows. Recruitment, military recruitment, is a poll test of national morale. When you are hitting your national recruitment numbers, when you are hitting your military recruitment numbers, it is a leading indicator for national revival for national revitalization. We also hosted a debate, Josh Hammer versus Dave Smith about Israel. But let's go to this one here, which also went very, very viral. I could tell you that which is Tucker Carlson smashing the push for amnesty,

play cut 249. What do I think about amnesty for farm workers? I think it's the most grotesque thing I've ever heard. Are you joking? Amnesty for farm workers? We have like 60 million illegal aliens in the country. The country bears no resemblance to the country I grew up in, and it's not better, it's worse. So I'm not going to sit for another lecture from anybody telling me we need to import more people to write code, or pick grapes, or any other task.

Period. It hasn't worked. The country hasn't gotten richer. It hasn't become more unified. Those words should burn on the tongue of anyone who utters them. How dare you talk like that? Amnesty. This was the most successful student action summit in history. We made a lot of headlines, we had a lot of spirited debate, a lot of discussion. Was a phenomenal success.

Private student loan debt in America totals about $300 billion. WIREFI refinances private student loan debt and they do not care what your credit score is. Many clients aren't even able to make the minimum monthly payment on their private student loans when they first contact WIREFI. Go to wirefi.com. That is y-r-e-f-y dot com. You don't have to ignore that mountain of student loan statements on your kitchen table anymore. So go to wirefi.com. Do you have a co-borrower? Well, Wirefy can get them released from the loan and you can give mom or dad a break. Go to wirefy.com. Can you imagine being debt-free and not living under this burden anymore?

So go to wirefy.com. That is y-r-e-f-y.com. And let's face it, if you have distressed or defaulted private student loans, there's no better place to go than Wirefy. They provide you with a custom loan payment based on your ability to pay. They're not a debt settlement company, so check it out right now at YRefi.com. May not be available in all 50 states. Go to YRefi.com. That is Y-R-E-F-Y.com. Joining us now is Alex Marlowe, editor-in-chief of Breitbart.com, host of the Alex Marlowe show. Alex, great to see you. We were just with each other a couple days ago in Tampa, Florida.

Remind our audience, walk them through what this event was like for you. It was an amazing event for me, Charlie. Congratulations. You guys are the centerpiece of the political universe right now, and that's the point. We're a free idea, a free speech country.

We should be a movement that is routinely checking in on where we stand on various issues. It's one of the things I admire most about president Trump. And it's why I was so enthusiastic about guys like, you know, Robert Kennedy, not a traditional Republican being a part of Trump's cabinet. Uh, it is the spirit of challenging ourselves to be sharp on all the ideas. And your conference has just become the absolute nucleus for that. So, uh, it's there is, if you go to these things and you just want it to be

Kumbaya on agreement all the time, then you're just being so lazy. And that's some of the vibe I'm getting online is just outrage that you guys would have discussions about certain things. It's just, no, no, thank you. Please stop. Count me out of that. Yeah. So, what would you have to say to people that they saw a speaker they didn't like, and then they try to blame me for having that speaker? Because they didn't like that speaker. And by the way, it goes all across, you know, it's on both every possible garden variety of that. How should we approach that question of platforming and of running an event like this?

You have something to say about this running Breitbart for as long as you have. Please, I'd love to say about this running Breitbart for as long as you have. Please, I'd love your commentary on this. Yeah, I'd like the number one authority on this thing. So let me tell you, I can only speak for myself here, Charlie, but once you tell me I cannot have a person that I've chosen as editor-in-chief of Breitbart

to platform on my platform, I have no other choice but to have them again over and over again. So you're actually hurting your own cause by suggesting that you can't have X, Y, or Z person speak, especially if you do so in a public way. Because then I don't have any other moves. My only move is if we're playing chess here is to platform them again and again and again.

And so if you really want to get through to me, that's just not the way to do it. And yet I did see that a lot online, Charlie telling you, well, we can never do this again. Well, then what's your reaction? Your reaction is probably going to be, well, now they're just going to be the centerpiece of the whole thing, because you can't tell me what to do. Charlie, you didn't do this for 10, 12 years, whatever you've done at Turning Point,

to have people chirping online to say that, to try to control what you're doing and your platforming and which voices you want to feature. That's not why you built this. So I know this is someone who built something similar and was told the same stuff. So I find it to be something, it'll blow over. People will calm down, but overall the vibe of the event was very exciting.

And I think it is, we're a vibrant movement with a lot of super interesting smart people who are constantly challenging each other to bring the heat. I watched the whole debate last night on the plane with Josh Hammer and Dave Smith. They're both so sharp. It's like, debate last night on the plane with Josh Hammer. Yeah, what do you think about that? They're so they're both so sharp. It's like I agree with Josh way more than I agree with Dave, but they both had commanding presences.

There was the right amount. I think of emotion because it's an emotional topic without it being too emotional and they were bringing all this detail and facts that and that I didn't know all of it and I read this stuff 24 7. So I thought it was a total treat and it's not something you're getting anywhere else. So why are we saying? Oh, this is unique. This is original. No one else is doing this. Oh, well, then let's just stop doing it No, that's the exact wrong way to approach media

Yeah, and honestly, I don't want to give too much credence because I think the criticism rises to the surface The audience loved it. I've gotten hundreds of hundreds of message and thousands of comments thanking me because I'm moderated. I think I have very, you know, strong views on this stuff and I'm very much in Josh's view. I think Dave brought up some points on the neoconservatism stuff that I'm fully in alignment, but as anti Trump stuff, obviously, I don't agree with. But what would you say when people say, well, you can't platform that person, even though it's in the in the scope of a debate?

Yeah, I completely disagree with that. And I'll tell you why, because I learned so much about Dave from this, because it's the most I've heard him speak. And to be honest with you, I didn't find his arguments overly persuasive. But I felt like that was actually comforting to me, that I felt like as someone who's mostly pro-Israel, very much a Zionist, looking at this debate, I did not feel overly intimidated, but I got to understand someone who's mostly pro-Israel, very much a Zionist, looking at this debate, I did not feel overly intimidated, but I got to understand where he's coming from. I'm very empathetic and sympathetic to someone

who's coming from the sort of Ron Paul wing, where Ron Paul's been indicated again and again over the years, and if that's sort of your baseline, and you're just gonna assume that basically I'm taking that he's my North star, and then I'm gonna pick and choose from there, it helps me understand where people are coming from. How am I gonna understand where he's my North star and then I'm going to pick and choose from there. It helps me understand where people are coming from. How am I going to understand where he's coming from?

Unless if I'm not one to seek out his content, unless someone like you is moderating a forum like this, it just, it makes perfect sense to me. And the key to media, the key to getting people's attention right now is you have to do something unique, you have to do something original and where else you're getting a debate like this. I haven't seen one in forever. Well, thank you. And by the way, it is one that our students especially are seeking clarity on.

Yeah. They don't really know how they stand on these issues. They don't really, because they're told one thing. And what I was, the biggest takeaway is like, Charlie, thank you. I have more clarity of how now I'm going to think about this. Their mind is not going to be made up in an instant. These things are culminating over periods of time. And again, we have Josh Hammer coming on later in the show.

I encourage everyone to watch it. It's on our YouTube channel. We're posting it on our podcast. It's on our X feed. It already has millions of views. The way I moderate it though, because I watch a lot of debates and I participate in a lot of debates, what ends up happening is debater A and debated be start talking past each other and you end up Discussing a nuanced portion of the rabbit hole that nobody the audience cares about

So they were talking about like something and like a prime minister of Israel in 2002 I'm like guys this is no one knows what you are talking about. Okay, or the barracks bombing in 1983 So it's the moderators job to try to bring it back into a place where the audience can actually follow it. Otherwise they're like, no, the 16th point you made is incorrect. No, my 16th point is right. And you miss number one, two, or three. And so I also, I can't stand when there's interruptions of debate. And it's just, it's very important to try to keep decorum and alex

wouldn't you say though this makes it a lot different than the democrats would you would you ever find a democrat conference where they would have a debate like this on in front so i don't think so right so so if you want to go back into my history in the conservative movement i've been i think i don't think it's overly I know it's self praise but it's I've been I think had some of the most longevity and effectiveness in the conservative movement of the last few decades it all started when I was UC Berkeley and I thought I was a libertarian but UC Berkeley there's only one conservative club the college Republicans and I just showed up because I thought I think I'm a political guy I think I'm a conservative I'm

gonna go and they would do debates amongst themselves. They would have the Ron Paul libertarians who were sort of no, no war, very limited government. And then you would have the George Bush style Republicans who were huge government every war. They agreed on nothing and yet somehow we were in the same club and I found that to be utterly fascinating. And so if that's the moment we're in, it's fine with me. It's I'm a pro-Israel guy. I tend to give Israel the benefit of the doubt on a personal level, but I don't mind being challenged.

And if you do, then grow up, something a baby. Yes. And doesn't it make us stronger? And look, I have a lot of sympathy for the Ron Paul stuff. There's so much stuff that Ron Paul said that what it did is it made me at least reconsider certain foreign policy doctrine and dogma and definitely made me less neoconservative. But I don't agree with everything that Ron Paul said, legalize all drugs and you know, come on.

That stuff is silly. But I want to just kind of get to a point here which is that, here's a question then, Alex, then where do we draw the line? Who then do we not platform? What criteria then would you submit? Again, I'm running the event. the event, you're a great advisor. What would a matrix criteria be for such a thing? Here's where my criteria is.

Either you're a good faith actor or bad faith actor. It's very easy, it's self-evident to use a Jeffersonian phrase. If you're a self-evidently bad faith actor, you're not gonna get a platform from me or our organization. Yeah, here's the thing that I would say to you in private, or I'll try to say it exactly the same in public as I would say in private.

A lot of your power, if not all of your power, is because you've built a lot of credibility within conservative politics, which is legitimate power. And that when you weigh in on something politically, when you're leading your herd somewhere politically, it makes a difference. And you don't want to waste that for just for a few extra clicks. And we're in a media economy where attention seeking behavior is rewarded right now. Whether it's good or bad attention, it is rewarded in the marketplace in this sort of

podcast marketplace that we're in. And you have to pay attention to people who they're tipping a little bit into the, I'm just trying to get attention and clicks at the expense of substantive arguments, at the expense of seeking out truth and what is productive for the movement, not just over the next three weeks but over the next 30 years. Then I feel like it's probably not worth the time. But that said, you can always check yourself by trying something new. And I always remind myself of this at Breitbart News.

If I feel like I'm too set my ways, I'll try to do something different just in order to try to challenge myself and see what it's like and to test waters. So you're free to do that. You should feel emboldened to make mistakes even. But overall, if you feel like you could be eroding some of the trust people have built in you politically, then I feel like you think about. Again, this is for me to decide because I'm in charge. Yeah, yeah, that's your thing. And people can, yeah, they can say whatever they want.

I have to make the decision, are you seeking to be a statesman or a philosopher, or are you a performer or an actor? Which in the ancient virtues were the lowest of all the ancient virtues. So if, again, if we have the appearance over lots of period of time that you're just like trying to basically be a court jester and you're a bad faith person to just try to get clicks and there's not deeply held beliefs or can be explained with prudence or wisdom, or at least have some sort of admission or reconciliation towards wisdom, then you know, you're not going to come on stage. Criticizing is hard, building is hard, coalitions are hard, but the Sudan Action Summit was a major success. Charlie Kirk here, crime is skyrocketing.

You may already own a firearm, but before you face the financial and emotional weight of pulling the trigger, consider Berna. Berna's less lethal launchers fire tear gas and kinetic rounds designed to incapacitate attackers for up to 40 minutes, giving you time to escape and call for help without deadly consequences. I use Berna, my family all has them, and now meet the new compact launcher, an amazing product. Sleek, slim, and hits like a sledgehammer, but the size of a smartphone, it's perfect for concealed carry. Comfortable, discreet, and confidence building, it fires at 400 feet per second with 41 joules per square inch

of stopping power. That's enough force to halt a threat cold that the legal and moral complexities of lethal force. What I love about Berna is they're proudly American. Over 80% of their compact launchers components are sourced in America, and each unit is hand assembled in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Best of all, Berna is legal in all 50 states. No background checks, ships directly to your

door. Trusted by hundreds of police departments and government agencies around the world. Visit BRNA to learn more. That is byrna.com. Alex, you were around the conference in Tampa. What did you learn from the students? What did you open your eyes about how they're feeling, what they're sensing from a political standpoint? Because it was buzzing with youthful energy, that which I wish most of our leaders would take time to seek to understand. Alex Marlowe. Yeah, it's really important to understand this is the so they want to be reached. They want to be talked to. They want to be respected. And one of the reasons why is because they're leaving these online lives and they don't get that physical interaction.

I mean, it just, seeing people, it's such a pleasure for them to see the people who are their favorite characters in the, because this is, Charlie, we know we're witnessing the greatest movie of all time, the Trump era of American politics, we've never seen anything like it. It's the most entertaining thing ever. And these are their characters and they see them show up in person and they're talking to them and tailoring messages to them.

It just really delights them. So it's really important for them to do this. And I'm glad that you keep getting these great rosters of speakers, but they're also so much smarter than I mean, I'm not exactly an old guy, but when I was on the campuses 20 years ago, 18 years ago, whatever it was, I never fractioned the information as the normal person does who's just going around these campuses because of the internet, because of the access to information. So these are incredibly smart people and they're very moldable. And so but they have to be respected too, because they like agency, they like dignity.

So I mean, it really is terrific to get to understand what's important to them and what interests them and what draws them into the political fray. What would you say, because there's like a couple major issues, aid to Ukraine, mass deportation, some, not President Trump whispering, amnesty. What were some of the biggest issues that you were hearing about? I know Epstein got a lot of attention. I don't want to talk much about that, OK? I think we've exhausted it.

I told people in the audience, look, I am trusting my friends in the administration to proceed. The ball is in their court. Cash, you're the man. Bongino, you're the man. Pam, great friend. Ball is in your court.

Take it. Run with it. I have the full faith. I think all that is said is needed to be said this last week. And it's just repeating the same thing over and over again. But what else? What was like the most shocking thing that you wish an average older conservative could learn

from what you saw at the event or the conference? Yeah, but I think the up-seeing thing, what's important about it is not, is that that's worth mentioning is that the transparency thing is a big deal and authenticity and feeling like you can trust the government is a big deal and over promising and under delivering is going to affect newer voters to the coalition. And I'll tell you, Charlie, from my audience, I put a lot of cold water that we were ever going to get great answers on Epstein. I figured they were either too complicated to release and they could really interfere with the lives of innocent people. Or it wasn't as bad as people thought.

I mean, we knew it was bad, obviously, but that stuff was out there. So I was always very skeptical we'd get much, but it's the over-promising from certain members of the administration that things were going to come out. That's the real problem. And that's the point, is the authenticity and the transparency really makes a big deal. They do not want to go and fight useless wars for other countries. That is flat out.

And that's why it is. I think that's a very important pressure because I think the way Trump handled the Iran situation was perfect. But I think a World War Three or ground war is totally, it would be intolerable for the whole nation. So it's good to see that. And I do think there is a deeper concern that the system is rigged to favor a few people, the very, very top. And that is something that the right is not. I don't

think we're grappling with that. And you brought this up as much as anyone, Charlie, that the, if we don't figure out a way to message on this issue, we run the risk of seeing the ma'am Donnie's rise who have terrible ideas, but you say it with a smiley face and maybe you say it persuasively and it could get through to some low information people. And if we do not have more young people be able to own homes and stop renting, political radicalism will rise. Political radicalism will set in to the nation and the country. Final question here, Alex Marlowe,

Biden auto pen, you've covered Biden a lot. I got to let you riff on this. Yeah, this is exactly what we thought we were getting when we had heard that this was the best case scenario in terms of people who think the Biden administration was basically illegitimate. When you see that he did not approve many of the names, pardon with the auto pen,

this is where the legal apparatus, if worked effectively, can start unraveling parts of his administration. Because if we can determine that was in fact illegal, and it should be, the president's supposed to sign this stuff, whoever came with this auto pen, it is for certain things,

for certain things maybe they'll determine it was okay. But for certain things, this is absolutely illegitimate. This could open up some of those investigations to try to get justice for President Trump and for the American people who got railroaded by this guy. So I'm not surprised, but I'm very heartened that we now have attack vectors in terms of trying to unravel some of the horrible stuff Biden did. Alex Marlowe, check it out. Breitbart.com does excellent work. Alex, thank you so much. Thank you, Charlie. Joining us now is Josh Hammer. Josh, great to see you again. We were on stage together yesterday.

I guess to make it fair, we should have Dave Smith also on the show, but we could have Dave back on at another time. But Dave, I do want, Josh, I do want to take this opportunity just to promote the debate for those that haven't seen it, to recap it. So Josh, I want to get your opinion. Then we're going to play some pieces of tape. And then Josh, I want to give you an opportunity to maybe finish some points that you might not have had time to do so.

But first, Josh, your impression, your experience at the Turning Point USA High Profile Israel debate. Well, first of all, Charlie, thank you for the invitation to appear at the debate. And thank you for moderating it. You moderated an outstanding debate. I told you in person afterwards that I thought it was 10 out of 10. You did a fantastic job there. Thank you. Look, it's a very emotional topic and emotions run high there,

but there were a lot of substantive points on both sides. One of the things that I want to do, and now that we've already seen what happened, I think it's very clear in retrospect that it was a deliberate, one of many deliberate tactics on my end to try to make sure that the people there understand and the audience watching at home around the world, that MAGA and America First and the Trump doctrine of foreign policy

simply does not mean what libertarian isolationists like Dave Smith think that it means or what they think it ought to mean. The Trump doctrine of foreign policy is a nationalist realist foreign policy. It is a third way foreign policy between the equally absurd extremes of neoconservatism on the one end and isolationism on the other end. And Charlie, that was a theme that I tried to hit over and over and over again, through the course of this debate.

It was a very lively audience. The audience was super engaged there. All sorts of applause lines, I thought, for both of us, the occasional boo at times as well. But it was an incredibly enriching and rewarding experience, and I'm deeply happy that I did it. Yeah, and so I wanna play some pieces of tape,

but I wanna congratulate both you and Dave. Usually on Sunday, the rule at works, the rule at Turning Point USA events is Sunday, we'll be lucky to have like one third of the room filled. It's just the way it is. People fly home. They're like, okay, they had a long night the night before. But it was packed.

I mean, it was the most packed closing to a summit we've ever had outside of having Trump or something like that, obviously. So let's just play some pieces of tape here that have gone viral. But first, I want to go to a piece of agreement that I think is important. I want to first play cut 257 where I throw it down and I say, look, we can, you can criticize the Netanyahu government. Great Dave, Josh, you know, you can have a view on, you know, Iran intervention, but we're not going to put up with this Jew hate stuff. It's not

going to happen. We're not going to put up with it. Play cut 257. There is a rise of, I just think some disgusting stuff online. I'm not blaming you for this. I'm not one of those people, right? But what do you have to say that there's this like dark Jew hate out there and you see it and I see it. I hate it. It's it's not good. Yeah. And everyone in this audience guys don't get yourself involved in that. I'm telling you will rot your brain. It's bad for your soul. It's bad. It's evil. I think it's demonic. Josh, I think that was an important point. Dave agreed and it really kind of fenced in where this is what I think good faith.

Argumentation versus kind of the slop that we see emerge far too often online. Yeah. And this is the critical distinction. Look, there are so many parts of US Israel relations of US involvement in the Middle East, more generally US involvement in this, in the 12 day war against Iran. I think all of this is totally fair game. What should the level of USA to Israel? What should it be? Should there actually be a Dave and I actually agree that that aid should be phased out? We disagree on the timeframe, but we broadly agree that USA to Israel ends up

being something of a mutual bear hug that in my judgment actually ends up undermining both the United States and Israel in the mid to long term. So there was actually no small amount of agreement when you kind of go between the lines there. But this cut that we just saw, Charlie, is so important. And throughout your entire career, you've just been such a stalwart friend of the Jewish people, defender of the Jewish people. Charlie, you and I are friends. We talk a lot offline. And I told you that what you go through on college campuses, when you have these crazy people that have gone down these rabbit holes on social media that are talking to you, Charlie Kirk,

a young evangelical Christian about what is in the Talmud. First of all, my heart breaks, and this is where we are in the year 2025, that a young conservative Christian is being asked to defend the Talmud. It's just an utterly absurd thing. On its face, it is just totally absurd. But more importantly, you do an amazing job with it,

an absolutely amazing job of defending the dignity of the Jewish people, the dignity of the Jewish state of Israel there. So God bless you and thank you for all you've done throughout your career to defend the Jewish people in the Jewish state. I think the crowd and everyone watching at home saw that yet again yesterday.

Thank you for saying that. And that is such a good point. And look, some people are, you know, how Charlie, how dare you platform? Can you respond saying that and that is such a good point and look some people are you know oh Charlie how dare you platform can you work can you respond to that Josh because they're saying you know why did you platform Dave Smith by the way I think that's ridiculous but you act it was a debate obviously you know that I think that we actually get stronger through debate we should be unafraid to have those kind of discussions. How would you respond to that, Josh? So first of all, this actually was not my first time

debating Dave Smith, Charlie. I actually debated him back in February at Princeton University in New Jersey as part of the Steamboat Institute's Campus Liberty Tour, I think is the exact name for that tour. So this is my second time in just six months debating him. So if people are blaming Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA for throwing Dave Smith into a debate,

then they probably have other organizations to, to, to blame as well. I look Dave Smith for better or for worse, your mileage may vary. I obviously am not a fan to put a mildly of what the guy says. I think, I think, I think a lot of it is egregiously wrong to the point at times of just being utterly offensively wrong, but he has a platform and people, especially a lot of younger people really, really, really tend to do glom on to what he says and to take what he says seriously. And to the extent that we're debating legitimate substantive issues, what is the nature of US Israel relations? What should US Israel relations look like?

I think that is entirely legitimately fair game. Now, Charlie, it would have been very different if we had gone there on that stage and you as the moderate said, okay, you know, Josh and Dave, why don't you debate whether Israel is a Nazi enterprise committing a Nazi-esque Holocaust in Gaza, God forbid, or let's debate whether Israel is an apartheid state. I mean, you know, there are some things that I think definitely should not be subject to a legitimate debate, especially at a high-profile, highly influential conference like TPUSA Student Action Summit, But that's not what we did on stage yesterday. And I'm really just quite pleased with how it went.

You know, one of the biggest lies being sold to American people right now is that you're in control of your money, especially when it comes to crypto. But the truth, most of these so-called crypto platforms are just banks in disguise, fully capable of freezing your assets. The moment some bureaucrat makes a phone call. That is not what Bitcoin was built for. That's why I use Bitcoin.com. I just did a major transaction on it. They offer a self-custodial wallet, which means you hold the keys. You control your assets.

No one can touch your crypto, not the IRS or not a rogue bank, not some three letter agency that thinks it knows better than you do. This is how it was intended by the original creators of Bitcoin, peer-to-peer money, free from centralized control, free from surveillance, and free from arbitrary seizure. So if you're serious about financial sovereignty, go to bitcoin.com, set up your wallet, take back control, because if you don't hold the keys, you don't own your money. Bitcoin.com freedom starts here. If you don't hold the keys, you don't own your money. Bitcoin.com freedom starts here.

I want to play one more piece of tape here, but now I want to get, let's just play this here. This is towards the end and the agreements and let's just go through. You and Dave both agreed on a sun setting of aid to Israel that the United States should decouple and I've, I've said this for a while, but by the way, Bibi Netanyahu has also said this, that if Israel is betting on the domestic support of the American body politic, that is a risky support. I'm a risky bet.

Things can change over time. Let's go through the agreements. Let's go to cut 254. I wanna just summarize. This was time well spent. Both Dave and Josh agree on some plan to wind down US Israel aid. That was an agreement, correct? The timeline you could debate about.

Number two, they both say every human's made an image of God and we should not trivialize when you know, people are killed. Also I think we all agreed October 7th was awful. It was terrible and should be talked about more and it needs to be emphasized. We also agreed this Jew hate stuff has no place in public discourse, period. End of story. And I don't like it, it's disgusting, and we need to call it out when we see it. And finally, I think the fifth is that I hope we demonstrated, and both our participants

got a little lively at times, that this is a debate worth having, that it's better to have this out in the open than silence people and censor them and call them names. Instead, this is how we solve our problems. Give it up for Josh and Dave one last time, everybody. Thank you. So Josh, comment on the agreement. So we talked a little bit about the aid, Charlie, but I'll just kind of reiterate my basic point here, which is that USAID to Israel, I've been criticizing this arrangement for the past decade. In fact, APAC, first of all, APAC is not the boogeyman that a lot of people think that it is.

We had this conversation on stage yesterday. They simply are not anywhere close to as powerful as I think a lot of people think that they are. The easiest way to know that is that APAC failed to stop Barack Obama's nuclear deal back in 2015. It was the number one priority of the entire decade and they failed. But nonetheless, despite that point, I'm not personally a fan of them because they exist effectively in large part to get these large scale and annual aid appropriations, roughly $3.8 billion in the most recent aid package every year from the US to Israel. Now, in my opinion, that aid ends up being harmful to both countries.

From the United States perspective, it does end up being a crony capitalist bit of the military industrial complex that President Dwight Eisenhower famously warned about in his farewell address. You end up essentially subsidizing Boeing, Northrop Grumman, very large fat cat defense contractors, people, you know, the kind of companies that Lindsey Graham lobbies for. You frankly don't need any more money flowing into their coffers. very large fat cat defense contractors, people, you know, the kind of companies that Lindsey Graham lobbies for, you frankly don't need any more money flowing into their coffers. But from Israel's perspective, you know,

they should understand, I think Israel, that the more that they are reliant on foreign aid, the more that you embolden other countries that are not in this case Israel to essentially wag a finger and know you can't do XYZ thing or else we're gonna cut off your aid. We saw that time and time again from the Biden administration in particular after October 7th. Then if you actually believe in Zionism, Charlie Zionism is this word that has been

torn and feathered by the jihadis, the kaffir clad radicals on campuses. Zionism is a very simple and actually beautiful concept. It is the notion rooted, I would argue in the book of Genesis, no less, that the Jewish people have a God-given, ancestral biblical right to their homeland. That's literally all that Zionism is. So if you believe with that very simple rudimentary proposition, it stands to reason that the Jewish people actually should determine that and that they should not be reliant on anyone,

ultimately, other than themselves, to the extent possible there. So I think that this aid arrangement ends up undermining both countries' interests in the mid to long term. Again, I think Dave and I disagree very much on the timeframe. I wouldn't cut that off, God forbid, in the middle of an active seven-front war, the likes of which Israel has been facing since October 7th. But I definitely think that in the mid to long term, it would be a good idea for both countries. And just really briefly on

the Genesis 127 point, Charlie, in my book, Israel and Civilization, I talk about how Genesis chapter one, verse 27, the divine image imperative, but Selma, we would say in the Hebrew, a mago day for our Catholic friends in the Latin. This is the foundational ethical moral imperative of all of Western civilization, literally everything. In fact, I argue that Thomas Jefferson

never would have been able to write the words that he wrote in the Declaration of Independence. We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal. Well, where is he getting that from? The 14th Amendment sweeping claim of equal protection in Section 1, the 14th Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause. Where is that coming from? Martin Luther King's speech in Washington, the Civil Rights Act in 1964. All these sweeping moral assertions of genuine human equality in the American legal and moral order.

It has its roots. That root is the Hebrew Bible and that root is Genesis 1.27. So yes, we obviously all care about the dignity and the humanity of every single human being across the world. And it's very important no matter what conflict we're discussing, whether it's Gaza, whether it's the Yemeni Civil War, anything there. And I do think it's curious, by the way, that a lot of people tend to assert this concern when it comes just to Gaza, but

tend to be a little silence when it comes to Yemen or Syria or Boko Haram in Nigeria and so forth. So I will call it out for some hypocrisy there, but I try to be consistent in trying to believe in Genesis 1 27, what that means for all conflicts all throughout the world. Josh, what points do you wish you would have made or that you would have made more completely had you had more time? Charlie, I would have liked to spend a little more time.

And to be clear, this is not your fault. It's just the nature of how these debates go. But I would have liked to take a little more time to explain the proactive humanitarian measures that the Israeli military takes in Gaza to prevent civilian casualties. There was a lot of exchange, a lot of accusations. Dave Smith and people who agree with Dave Smith tend to oftentimes accuse Israel of doing terrible things, of slaughtering babies, of indiscriminately just opening fire. Now on the debate, which I agree everyone should go ahead and check out the debate, I did talk a little bit about how we actually have some numbers when it comes to civilian to combat in death ratio, one to 1.5 as crunched by john spencer, the head of urban

warfare studies at West Plains, a number that he says is the lowest in the entire history of recorded urban warfare, literally ever. So the most humane, but I would have liked to explain a little bit more about how the IDF going back at least as far as the 2014 war in Gaza, arguably as far back, I think maybe as even the prior conflict 2012, they will literally drop leaflets out of the sky onto buildings, they will individually call up apartment buildings and stores and houses and say there is going to be a military operation here because there is a Hamas facility

headquartered as the case may, in the mosque where you are, in the housing area where you are there. So we're going to have to take care of this. So you have 30, 60 minutes, two hours, four hours, whatever it is, to basically get the heck out of Dodge. They do this all the time there. So look, in many ways, Israel is the IDF, along with the US Army, is the most moral war fighting machine in the modern history of the world.

So these continued allegations of just effectively just trying to turn the old blood libel smear and then turn it on the Jewish military when it comes to Gaza, is really just a frankly despicable line. I would have liked to take a little more time to explain why it simply is not the case there because again, they go above and beyond Charlie.

Sometimes frankly, even some folks in the US military have looked what Israel does. And I've heard some veterans say, wow, I mean, we would never do such a thing there. So, you know, we complain a lot about how Barack Obama put overly restrictive rules of engagement on our own boys here in the US military. Israel goes so far, arguably, one might even argue, but perhaps at times too far to impose ultra, ultra, ultra strict rules of engagement on their own forces, all trying to basically appease these nefarious and scandalous allegations of indiscriminately slaughtering children, none of which is even remotely true.

In closing here, Josh, what would you say is the takeaway of how young people are viewing this issue and what you may be learned throughout the debate on a better way to keep framing it to win over younger people. Charlie, look, you and I are in our 30s. At least I think you're in your 30s. You know, we're basically... Yeah, I'm 36. So we're effectively the same age. And we grew up in the context and in the immediate aftermath of the failed regime change moralist who boondoggles in Iraq and Afghanistan. And for younger millennials and Gen Z who grew up in this context, they

rightfully are skeptical when it comes to U.S. military involvement overseas. I think that Operation Midnight Hammer, Trump's 12-day war, the 37-hour B-2 bomber runs in Iran, could potentially be an inflection point in showing to young people that not every use of American military force, Trump did the same thing with Qassem Soleimani and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the head of ISIS, by the way, back during his first term. I think he has shown yet again with this extraordinarily successful surgical strike in Iran, a strike, by the way,

that would not have been possible were it not for the IDF essentially neutralizing the Iranian air control and missile launchers and all of that there. But with this strike, I think that Donald Trump has highlighted for young people, for maybe the first time in their lives, and missile launchers and all that there. But with this strike, I think that Donald Trump has highlighted for young people, for maybe the first time in their lives, what a truly surgical strike, nationalist realists

bomb the crap out of our enemies who want to kill us and then get the heck out. What that kind of foreign policy can actually look like. Charlie, it is the Trump doctrine in action, as I've been arguing for the past month, and I'm just proud to call this man commander in chief, because again, he fulfilled multiple campaign promises with one strike of the blow. He has set Iran's nuclear ambitions back by many years on the one hand and two he did so without starting a war without a single American casualty. Check out the Josh Hammer show and check out Newsweek.com Josh thank you so much.

Thanks so much for listening everybody email us as always freedom at Charlie Kirk.com. Thanks so much for listening. God bless. so much for listening everybody email us as always freedom at Charlie Kirk com thanks so much for listening god bless for more on many of these stories and news you can trust go to Charlie Kirk com