The Charlie Kirk Show - The Democrats' $20 Million Question: Why Do Men Hate Us?
Episode Date: May 27, 2025Democrats are planning a $20 million spending spree to try answering the world's most obvious question: Why has their support with young men imploded? Charlie offers the enemy some free advice that th...ey're unlikely to ever take. Charlie also talks to Sen. Rick Scott about his current "No" on the Big Beautiful Bill unless it gets significant changes. Charlie also reacts to RFK's new change to Covid vaccine guidance and a disastrous new pic to run the University of Florida. Watch every episode ad-free on members.charliekirk.com! Get new merch at charliekirkstore.com!Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey, everybody. Charlie Kirk here live from the Bitcoin.com studio. Today in the Charlie Kirk
Show, Democrats are planning to spend $20 million to win back young men. Good luck.
We dive into that and we are excited to share with you that we are winning young men more so
than ever before. Email us as always, freedom at charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast.
That is the Charlie Kirk Show podcast page. And get involved with Turning Point USA today
at tpusa.com.
That is tpusa.com.
Buckle up, everybody.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this Charlie. He's an incredible guy. His spirit,
his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed
countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here. That's noblegoldinvestments.com. That is noblegoldinvestments.com. It's where I buy all of my gold.
Go to noblegoldinvestments.com.
Happy Tuesday.
We are back in the chair.
I hope you guys had a wonderful Memorial Day weekend.
Major news this weekend.
The Democrat Party is telling us their plans.
You see, the Democrat Party knows that they are losing, specifically losing young
men. We know that in the 2024 exit polls, they showed that Trump won 54% of men ages 18 to 29,
a 29 point shift from 2020s 15 point Biden lead. Let's go to 23 up on screen. Just the
presidential margins among men by race and ethnicity, men are moving to the right dramatically.
Dramatically.
YouGov data shows that even in the United Kingdom, where I just was visiting last week,
32% of UK men ages 18 to 24 voted Reform UK compared to 16% of women, doubling right-wing support. Globally, we are seeing that young men
are scoring at a conservatism scale up nearly 30% versus 2014. So what is going on here?
Well, we've covered this extensively. Where everything masculine is labeled toxic,
young men are starting to search for a place where manhood is still honored, not pathologized.
In a world that preaches weakness as virtue, we are offering challenge,
order, and responsibility. And the men of the West are listening.
The New York Times published a separate piece of data that is equally as interesting,
where the Democrats know that their problem runs deep and everywhere. Show this up on screen. Where almost the entire country is moving to the right,
except the suburbs of Atlanta and the suburbs of Denver and parts of Virginia. Almost everywhere
is moving dramatically to the right. The country is experiencing the course correction or the
right-wing revolution, as I talked about in my book that I published last summer.
That is exactly what we want to see happen.
It is a seismic shift largely led by the men of the West that are rejecting the current composition of the Democrat Party.
And the Democrats know it.
This is cut to 18.
MSNBC reports that the New York Times is saying Democrats want to spend 20 million dollars
to figure out how to speak to young men is there a USAID grant for that there is USAID grant to make
a Sesame Street for Iraqis a USAID grant for every wild thing could they get a USAID grant
to learn how to speak to the civilization that we've never touched before.
You know, I feel as if this is a National Geographic documentary.
And now we venture into the wild to learn to talk to a group of people largely forgotten.
No, they're not the aborigines of Australia.
They're not the island people of Sri Lanka.
They're not the Incans or the former mayans
they are men half of the population of the country we desire to govern play cut to 18
with the midterms fast approaching and the full six months after november's electoral drubbing
the democratic party appears to still be in fact-finding mode. The New York Times reports
that party donors and strategists have been gathering at luxury hotels to discuss how to
win back working-class voters, and they're spending $20 million on an effort to try to figure out how
to speak to young men. Quote, it is codenamed SAM, short for Speaking with American Men,
a strategic plan, and promises investment to study the syntax, language and content that gains attention and virality in these spaces.
The syntax, language and content. So they hire a linguist as if they're trying to decode ancient Sumerian.
How did we go so wrong talking to these people? You are the
problem. Everything you believe is the problem. Instead of meeting at luxury hotels, if you want
to see how men actually think, maybe you should have went to the Indy 500 this last weekend
on Memorial Day, or maybe go on a hunting trip. Maybe show up at a football game and show up to a tailgate and ask the men of the West,
why are you voting Republican? And they will tell you something that is not going to show up in
their data. You see, it's a vibe. And honestly, I got to give our podcast, our campus content,
some credit, not all. The vibe is that if you embrace the Democrats, that is like the weakest femboy, low testosterone thing imaginable.
It's not even that they love Republicans or love conservatism.
It's just that it's such a sad shell and husk of your former self if you are going to become a man voting on the Democrat side.
It's that you're going to be constantly policing people's speech
through the pronoun directives. You're going to be caring about race hostilities and the
mobilizing of resentments. While the left offers therapy and safe spaces, we on the right,
we offer discipline, identity, and meaning, and men are craving meaning.
Men are suffering under Viktor Frankl's existential despair.
But the Democrat strategists and donors meeting at this luxury hotel are seeking a prognosis.
As they're meeting at the swanky hotels they say they're going to buy advertisements
and video games among other things
that's it we're done
no one's ever thought to buy advertisements and video games
before it's just never happened before
above all
we must shift from a moralizing
tone oh maybe you're
starting to gather a little
bit of self-awareness.
MSNBC is fighting over whether this is a good idea.
Play cut 207.
It's great that we're being a little bit more introspective.
That's always helpful. But I think that the Democrats have forgot that maybe we should just talk to people like people.
We don't need to do studies on it.
We don't need to meet at hotels.
How about we just go to community meetings and meet people where they are on social media and there are different forms and platforms that they are. But I think that we just the Democrats have forgot how to
talk to normal people about things that are really important to them, like the economy.
So it's I think a really good lesson to learn. But I also think we just need to get back to basics.
You see, Comedy Central, they dispatched one of their court jesters, one of the clowns that they
have on payroll there, a guy by the name of Jordan Clapper,
to go talk to young men and say,
why do you like Charlie Kirk?
Why? Tell me why.
And I'm going to make fun of him in my very funny way.
You see, he's so funny I forgot to laugh.
But this is 226 of the National Geographic reporter from Comedy Central
with just an elitist and smug and condescending
and just the pomposity just oozes from these guys.
And this is exactly why they're failing is, yes, I'm very smart and funny.
You know that, right?
He's like one of the last comedians that is still on the left
because the left does not believe in freedom of speech.
You cannot be in comedy. And not believe in freedom of speech and therefore not want to be on the right because free speech is not a left wing value.
So he goes and tries to mock one of our fans when they're obviously acting in good faith.
Here's very funny man from Comedy Central play cut to 26.
What makes Charlie Kirk so effective on a campus like this?
I just think it's all the research he's done, all the statistics that he has to back it up.
For some students, he was the only one speaking to their concerns.
A couple years ago, I started finding more people because I got so tired of not being able to speak my mind.
So I needed to find people that actually knew how to say things to a, I'm forgetting
the words. I'm sorry.
You needed somebody to be more articulate for you.
Yes. Because you see me like right now, I can't put words together.
You're looking for somebody to put words in your mouth.
Yes.
Gotcha.
Well, not like that exactly.
Well, that's what I was doing right there.
Yes.
What I'm talking about is what Charlie Kirk cut a dozen times.
Yes, yes.
Yes, he puts the words in your mouth.
Yeah, making enough sense for me so I memorize what he says,
then I can freely say it to that.
Exactly.
So this guy, it's very funny, that's the same people that will say,
Charlie, what are you going to do to talk to college students?
Here he goes and selectively edits people that are trying to find the words
and say, you know, I like him because of this and this.
And he just tries to brutalize them.
Hey, Democrats, you are the problem.
And there's not any amount of advertisements in video games that are going to want people to support you.
America's small businesses rely on TikTok to succeed, helping them attract more customers and drive more growth.
From small batch sellers to fast-growing brands, 74% of businesses on TikTok say it's helped them scale.
We go super viral on TikTok here on this program, reaching billions and billions of views.
You see, by hiring more employees, boosting sales, and expanding new locations,
like AZ Taco King, who grew up from a mom-and-pop taco cart to two thriving restaurants in just a year.
Or Coco Asante, who upgraded to a larger facility and brought on more staff, letting their handcrafted chocolates reach more customers.
Or Dan O's Seasonings, who went from a one-man show to Team of 45, now supporting dozens of hardworking families with TikTok small businesses are
thriving are certainly is again reaching hundreds of millions of people a week on TikTok the one
of the reasons we're able to win the youth vote is thanks to what we can do on TikTok finding
their customers and expanding learn more about TikTok's contribution to the U.S. economy
at TikTok economic impact.com so checkiktokeconomicimpact.com. So check it out, tiktokeconomicimpact.com,
tiktokeconomicimpact.com. Portions of the Charlie Kirk show are brought to you in part
by tiktokeconomicimpact.com. So Democrats are trying to figure out their way out of the
wilderness. And our goal is to keep them in the wilderness. It's project keep Democrats in the
wilderness. But honestly, I don't have to do anything to keep them in the wilderness. It's project keep Democrats in the wilderness. But honestly, I don't have to do anything to keep them in the wilderness. You see, when I think of masculinity,
I don't think of a rock. I don't think of Joe Rogan. I don't think of the great Titans that
built the West. Julius Caesar. No, no, no. I think of David Hogg. When I think of masculinity,
I think of David Hogg. What could be more masculine
than this? Play cut to 25. Jasmine Crockett. Jasmine Crockett. I love her. She is amazing.
I think that people want to see somebody who fights and calls out the ultimately. I think
that's what Jasmine does. And we need a lot more people that are out there that are willing to do
just that and call people out on their BS and not say, oh, my God, Republicans are going to criticize me for saying this.
Screw that. They're going to criticize you no matter what.
I think Jasmine is is frankly the type of leader that we're really looking to support.
Where do I donate? I will actively raise money for Jasmine Crockett running for the presidency. I will be a bundler.
I will be an official bundler for the Jasmine Crockett 2028 campaign. I will call donors.
We'll start a super PAC. If she runs the presidency, I think turning point PAC,
which by the way, we're allowed to do. We could run ads in support of Jasmine Crockett.
I think we will do independent expenditure saying that she is the fighter of the future. I mean, look at this. When I think of masculinity, this is what I think about. I mean, look at this Titan. Look at that menace, that mountain of
muscle. I mean, come on. Those biceps, boom. That fierce look in his eyes outside of the physical characteristics that make David Hogg indistinguishable than a survivor from a concentration camp.
The more important component is that he never stands up for core values.
He's always pandering.
I mean, he's sitting there.
He's talking to the people around him and he's like, oh yeah, you know, Jasmine Crockett, she's the greatest.
She's wonderful. Act like an entire moral coward to appeal to real alpha men. You have to be an
alpha man. And then remember, he instantly got cowed by the accusations from the DNC that he should
have been removed because of racial quotas. So what does he do? He goes on a breakfast club and
essentially endorses a black crazy woman because he's a compliant little beta. It's exactly how
you drive men away. Again, I'm not necessarily an expert in this. All I know is that we have been
able to gain a major audience of millions of people, men and women, but especially men. And what we just did in Cambridge last week
is one of the reasons why our audience just keeps on growing. We go right into the lion's den,
400 people against me. I had three supporters, two of them I paid,
Blake and Mikey, who are my payroll. I think I had one fan out of 400.
And you just got to throw it down.
What are your best ideas?
And even though the audience was completely against me and opposed to me, that's what it's all about.
Throw it down.
Confront the mob.
Stand for truth.
Don't pander.
I went straight into one of the most rotten and corrupt institutions of elitism.
And the Democrats are increasingly the party of whining, censorship, lecturing, and social
ostracizing. They're the people that would send you, by the way, to a detention camp for saying
something true. The Democrats are all about dependence, passivity, conformity, envy, lack of personal responsibility, and lack of initiative.
So the Democrats are going to spend $20 million, that's right, trying to win over young men.
They say here it is the Sam Project speaking with American men.
Because they know that this is a major and glaring issue.
And understand the other good dynamic of this is that their hyper race politics is breaking apart.
The Democrat Party created a race obsession over the last 40 years.
And now that that is breaking, the divide in America is much, much less white versus black.
Praise God, because that means nothing.
And it's more about kind of male-female.
And I don't want that divide, but at least that is a divide that is rooted in characteristics that matter.
Male female distinctions absolutely matter. And you actually want to be the political party that
skews masculine. You know why? Because masculine men will get non-crazy women to follow. Masculine
men will lead their family in that direction. Masculine men will stand up with courage and with strength and with honor against the injustices.
I would much rather be the political party that is masculine and male almost to a fault
than the one that is hyper feminine, the lighter touch.
But deep down, it's not just that feminism is weak.
No, no, no. It's that it's cruel. Feminism is not about helping women. It's about hating men
at its core. It's about scolding you. It's about moralizing to you.
We understand this, which is why we are the ascendant political force in the West.
We're honored to be partnering with the Alan Jackson Ministries, and today I want to point
you to their podcast. It's called Culture and Christianity, the Alan Jackson Podcast.
What makes it unique is Pastor Alan's biblical perspective. He takes the truth from the Bible
and applies it to issues that we're facing today. Gender confusion, abortion, immigration,
Doge, Trump, and the White House, issues in the church.
He doesn't just discuss the problems. In every episode, he gives practical things we can do to
make a difference. His guests have incredible expertise and powerful testimonies. Each episode
will make you recognize the power of your faith and how God can use your life to impact our world
today. The Culture and Christianity podcast is informative and encouraging.
You can find it on YouTube, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Be sure to subscribe so you don't miss any episodes.
Alan Jackson Ministries is working hard to get biblical truth back into our culture.
You can find out more about Pastor Alan and the ministry at alanjackson.com.
That is alanjackson.com.
Again, that is alanjackson.com. Again, that is AlanJackson.com. Joining us now is Senator Rick Scott of the great state of Florida.
Senator, I want to just begin by talking about what's happening at the University of Florida.
They potentially could be hiring this left-wing lunatic as president of UF.
What's going on here?
Well, I think for Florida education, it's pretty scary right now. They're talking about electing somebody that clearly has said very racist things about, you know, original citizen of the country is racism.
He's been a big proponent of DEI.
So what I've been asking is, OK, so let's do a real investigation here.
Let's get all the facts out on the table.
Let's slow down, take our time.
But the University of Florida
trustees are voting today. They're going to make a decision today. Now, after that, it has to go
to the Board of Governors that is responsible for all the university system in Florida. So
I'm hopeful at some point, you know, they'll take this seriously and do a real investigation
because what we don't want, we don't want anti-Semitism on our campuses.
We don't want encampments on our campus.
We don't want somebody to say that we're all racist.
And this guy at the University of Michigan
allowed encampments, allowed our Jewish students to be,
the Jewish students there to be harassed,
has said that this country is a racist country.
So I don't I don't get it. It doesn't make any sense to me.
Well, and it's just we need to get these universities in Florida back into alignment.
It is they need to be places of free speech and elevating the West.
And so that you hear the story, the headline here is that you want the UF board to investigate
the presidential pick. I just who puts these people even in the positions? And does the
governor have the final say? Well, the governor doesn't have a final say. What happens is the
board at the university gets to pick them. And then and then after that has to be confirmed by the board of governors that
looks at all the universities. But see, look, it's a secret search. It's not in the public.
These things need to be in the public. He needs to have conversations with all the students,
with all the faculty, with all the donors, with everybody in Florida, so he can answer questions.
So we need to have an open process. So, I mean, this is our flagship university. I mean,
I was governor for eight years. We put significant resources. I appointed people to these boards to try to make sure we become number one in higher education. We did.
And I just hope this doesn't take us backwards. Let's just play. I mean, there's so much here.
This is Santa Ono, who could become the next president of University of Florida.
Play cut 156.
Racism is one of America's original sins.
And the University of Michigan has not been immune from participating in racism. We have excluded and segregated individuals because of their race or their gender, ethnicity, religious faith, or sexual orientation.
In doing so, if you think about it, we have robbed those individuals and our university and our world of their incredible talent and potential.
And then PlayCut 158, an indigenous strategic plan and climate And then PlayCut 158,
an Indigenous strategic plan and climate action.
PlayCut 158.
We know that the Indigenous strategic plan
is considered to be sort of the standard globally.
The climate action plan and our leadership of UC3,
the University Climate Change Coalition,
is admired globally.
And our recently completed Aerie Task Force report, Anti-Racism Inclusive
Excellence, is also considered to be a standard that is emulated around the world. So I'm really
proud of what the university community has accomplished during our time together.
So Florida is becoming more and more Republican and more common sense,
and this guy might become president. Senator, it's outrageous. It's completely outrageous. So how can, without a thorough
investigation, without completely understanding, maybe, you know, you could give him something
that was taken out of context. But you look at that, you listen to those tapes.
What could be taken out of context? I mean, he thinks we're racist down here. We're not.
We believe in meritocracy. We want you to get a job at the end. You know, so we're not we're
not buying into all this DEI stuff in Florida. But this guy clearly has. All right, Senator,
I now want to shift gears to the big, beautiful bill. Senator Ron Johnson and Senator Rand Paul
are threatening to not vote for it because they say it does not cut enough spending. What is your take on the current status
of the big, beautiful bill? It's passed the House. Will you be voting for it or will you
be advocating for some changes? Well, look, I think all the Ron Johnson, Rand Paul, Mike Lee,
all of us, we want a bill to pass. We want a good bill. We want to build a security order. We want President
Trump's agenda. We want to make sure we plus up the military. We want to make sure all the
doge opportunities to reduce costs are part of this bill, and then this bill to the extent we
can. But guess what? The Democrats have increased the budget by over 50 percent in the last five
years. The House bill cuts the spending by less than 2%
over the next 10 years. It doesn't balance the budget. It doesn't get close to balancing the
budget. So there's a whole bunch of us. We are going to fight like hell to balance this budget.
I mean, we've got to get rid of the Green New Deal money. We've got to say, if you don't want to work, why do you get free health care paid by somebody else?
Why do poor states pay for the health care of citizens of richer states?
I mean, there's so many things that there's no common sense here.
So I think we're all going to fight to make sure we pass a bill that puts us in the process to balance the budget.
And we can balance the budget quickly. You balance your budget. Part of it's going to be
through this reconciliation bill with the mandatory. Part of it will be through the
budget process in September through discretionary spending. But we're going to get this done.
So, Senator, would you say without any changes at its current composition, would you vote no?
Oh, absolutely. I'd vote no.
This bill doesn't have it.
If they brought it to the floor right now, there's not a chance it'll get the 51 votes it needs.
So there's – look, we all know we have to balance the budget.
Look, we know that it's getting harder to sell our treasuries.
We know interest rates are going up. We want to get interest rates down. We get inflation under control. That means balance the budget. Guess what? I did it every year I was governor.
These states supposedly balance their budgets. No, they balance their budget by doing the same
thing the federal government does. They borrow money. I stopped that. I stopped the state
borrowing more money every year, which it had been doing for 40 years, and it paid off a third of the state debt while I was governor. So that's what we
ought to be doing at the federal level. That's how we'll get interest rates down. That's how we'll
get inflation under control. The poorest families in this state, in this country, are getting hurt
by this massive inflation caused by reckless government spending. We're spending, Charlie,
$2 trillion more than we take in.
And we're taking in plenty of money. It's not like we don't have high enough taxes.
We have a high, way higher spending than we need. And so, Senator, that's a big statement,
and we want to see it pass. What can then be done? Because our audience is like, wait a second,
I thought it passed the House. Are you saying that the Senate can change it and then there's a reconciliation between the House and the Senate? Is that correct? mandatory spending to get this budget balanced in a short period of time, which is what we have to
do. It's what we promised. I just went through my election just like President Trump did.
We all promised we were going to balance the budget. We are going to set the process to
quickly balance in this budget. Senator, in closing here, let's talk about the great elements
of the bill, because there's a lot of good stuff that I'm sure that you don't want to gut. Energy
independence, $1,000 Trump account for every new baby boring
drill, baby drill, border security, ice agents, border patrol tax on remittances,
no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, major middle-class tax cut. And I'm just barely
touching the surface. We're starting to get to work requirements for Medicaid, but it needs to
be even more dramatic. We're peeling a little bit back of the inflation reduction act and that
nonsense of Biden. So we don't want to blow up the entire bill. And I'm
sure that is your perspective, because what I just listed, what I just listed are phenomenal wins.
And if we can get serious spending cuts, then we have a historic accomplishment, Senator.
We will get historic spending cuts. I believe in it. We've had great conversations in the
Republican Senate about how we can make
sure. Let's take Medicaid as an example. Should we be spending more money for able-bodied adults
that don't want to work or poor kids, which was the purpose of the original Medicaid program?
I watched my brother not get health care when I was a kid because we didn't have Medicaid back
then. But now guess what? The states have played the system
through provider taxes and other things. So they spend way more money for able-bodied adults.
And these poor kids are left out in the cold just like they were before Medicaid.
So let's get it back to its purpose. Take care of the chronically ill. Take care of the disabled.
Take care of the poor kids that can't afford health care. That's what we should be doing. And that's what I'm going to make sure happens with this.
Senator, in closing here, what would be what is your block?
I mean, Lee, Paul, all you guys together, what would it look like to have a realistic win?
Because you're not going to get everything you want. That's politics.
What would you say is the line of which you say we are willing to compromise?
What is the 80 percent principle?
What does that look like in practice?
So, Charlie, part of it will be through this bill.
The reconciliation part will be the budget.
But it looks like we'll collect $5.5 trillion in revenues this year.
So this year we should not spend more than $6.5 trillion.
And then next year we're actually down some more and hopefully have our revenues come up more as Trump rebuilds the economy. So over about three year period time,
we should be able to balance the budget. So our goal is to get the spending down to about six
and a half trillion dollars, which is reasonable. Senator, thank you for your time. And we'll be
watching very closely. Thank you. See you, Charlie. Bye bye.
Ask 10 people to define the word capitalism.
How many different responses do you think you'll get?
This is a word that comes up all the time, but does anyone know what it really means?
Do you?
Hillsdale College offers more than 40 free online courses.
That's right.
Free online courses on subjects like the Book of Genesis, the rise and fall of the Roman
Empire, the history of the ancient Christian church.
It's hard for me to even say which is my personal favorite.
You guys have got to take these online courses.
They've recently launched a new course, Understanding Capitalism, that I've been watching.
In seven lectures, you'll learn about the role of profit and loss,
how human nature plays a part in our economic system,
why capitalism depends on private property rights, the rule of
law, and above all, freedom, and why capitalism is ultimately a system that encourages morality
rather than undermines it. Right now, go to charlieforhillsdale.com to enroll. There's no
cost and it's easy to get started. That's charlieforhillsdale.com to register, C-H-A-R-L-I-E
forhillsdale.com. Phenomenal news here.
Again, it's we have to praise President Trump and his administration every time we get a win.
And I got to give this show some credit. We had on this program Dr.
Marty McCary and we had Dr. Brett Weinstein.
Well, people were not talking about the story at all.
It was kind of just in the in the background and people weren't really focusing on it.
We put the slight and loving pressure on.
And we said, why is it that the COVID shot is still being recommended to healthy children and to pregnant women?
Now, I don't know if it's actually been removed from the vaccination schedule.
I think those are two technical different things.
I'm going to have to have somebody much smarter than me help understand, help explain to me. But at the very least, it is no longer being recommended.
That means pediatricians no longer have to recommend the COVID shot to a healthy
six-month-old baby. No longer for kids or for pregnant women. Now, I don't quite know the
difference between it on the vaccination schedule and an official
recommendation. Someone can explain that to me another time. But let's play the announcement
here. Let's play cut to 28. I couldn't be more pleased to announce that as of today,
the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC
recommended immunization schedule. Last year, the Biden administration
urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot, despite the lack of any clinical data
to support the repeat booster strategy in children. That ends today.
I'm sorry. I got to take a pause here. I hate the word democracy because it's overused and
people don't understand it, but it actually is an accurate term at times for the will of the people.
We are a republic, not a democracy.
Can I just have a still image of Bobby Kennedy on screen, though?
I want you to stare at that.
That right there is proof that our small d democratic institutions still work.
The only reason why Bobby Kennedy is there is because of the will of the people.
He's not there because of a pharma lobbyist. He's not there because of AstraZeneca or Pfizer
or Moderna, Johnson & Johnson. He's not there because of the Republican conference.
I want you to soak in that for a second. That should give you unbelievable hope.
That should give you optimism. That should give you satisfaction.
President Donald Trump honored his promise to him and President Donald Trump knew the potency
and the power of the Maha movement. You want to talk about a sleeper realignment in American
politics, how Democrats have opposed the Maha realignment and president of all the coalitions
that we brought together. The one that is holding together the strongest is Maha by far. And just so you know, this happened at the turning point
action event when Bobby Kennedy endorsed president Trump a year ago today, Bobby Kennedy was running
for the presidency as an independent a year and a half ago today, Bobby Kennedy was running for
the presidency as a Democrat. And now Bobby Kennedy is saying, nope, the COVID shot is no
longer being recommended. If for that reason and that reason alone, you should say, praise God that
President Trump won back the White House. And I know it's easy to get so into the weeds of
complaining and doomsdaying and blackpilling and dooming, but let's just take a pause and say,
wow, Bobby Kennedy is the head of the HHS,
and he is now going after the COVID shot, flanked by Jay Bhattacharya and Dr. Marty
McCary, and show that screen up one more time. Do you know what those three men all have in common?
All three of them, Jay Bhattacharya, Marty McCary, and Bobby Kennedy, all three were uniquely maligned and uniquely slandered during COVID.
They were uniquely censored. They were uniquely singled out. And now they're running our public
health departments. And they get the last laugh. And maybe now we need to keep on investigating
the efficacy of the COVID shot. Maybe get that jab off the market altogether. I'll let other
people make that case.
This was our ask and we got it. No longer being recommended for healthy kids. Praise the Lord.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody. Email us as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Thanks so much for listening and God bless.
For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to charliekirk.com.