The Charlie Kirk Show - Ukraine: Peace At Last? + Mamdani in the White House

Episode Date: November 24, 2025

President Trump has scuttled multiple wars since taking office, but is he about to get his biggest victory yet? The show breaks down the proposed Ukraine peace plan that Charlie cared so much about achieving. Scott Jennings discusses MTG leaving Congress and Mayor Mamdani's chummy WH meeting. Jack Posobiec talks about his direct challenge to Zohran Mamdani at the White House. Watch every episode ad-free on members.charliekirk.com!    Get new merch at charliekirkstore.com!Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

My name is Charlie Kirk. I run the largest pro-American student organization in the country fighting for the future of our republic. My call is to fight evil and to proclaim truth. If the most important thing for you is just feeling good, you're going to end up miserable. But if the most important thing is doing good, you will end up purposeful. College is a scam, everybody. You've got to stop sending your kids to college.

You should get married as young as possible and have as many. many kids as possible. Go start a turning point USA College Chapter. Go start a turning point to say high school chapter. Go find out how your church can get involved. Sign up and become an activist. I gave my life to the Lord in fifth grade. Most important decision I ever made in my life and I encourage you to do the same. Here I am. Lord used me. Buckle up everybody. Here we go. Kirk Show is proudly sponsored by Preserve Gold, the leading gold and silver experts, and the only precious metals company I recommend to my family, friends, and viewers.

All right, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show. Happy Monday. It's Thanksgiving week. We're excited to be with you in studio. We have Blake Neff here, as always, joined as well by the Zoran Mamdani questioner, the repeated question. Benchpressor, some might say. Jack Basobic, who was just at the White House on Friday during the Zoron-Trump Accords. I want to hear, give us the inside. The piece of course. Yeah, give me the inside.

They did not share Diet Coke, though. I can confirm that no Diet Coke was shared or offered. They didn't even offer it. No. He didn't offer it. I've never seen a thin person drinking diet. All right, hold on. Yeah, I have to.

We have to play the clip. I wasn't planning on just a bit of about face. It just happened off the spur of the moment. This is cut 98. This is Jack repeatedly bench pressing Zohraam, I'm Donnie. You're continuing this idea of race-based property taxes. No, to be very clear. No, the use of the term was a description of neighborhoods,

not a description of intent. So you intend to tax the wider neighborhoods more? No, we intend to create a fair property tax system because we want a New York City that is not only fair and equitable, but also one that every New York. Oh, we missed the first question there. There was like, there was that moment where you go, yes, you did. No, no, you absolutely did.

This clip, it's hard to hear it. He's like, no, yes, you did. Well, no, you said it. It was a good clip. It was a good clip. You said white neighborhood. Well, I have to just say, I have to say Blake sort of was warning about this beforehand. Blake was going.

Yeah, everyone was like, it's going to be this big showdown. I was like, uh, Trump likes New York. He likes meeting people. he's not actually as hostile to his political enemies as like in person yes he's very quite genial yes he's very congenial in person that's the word i was going to use as well and the and i kind of knew it was going to be peaceful and in walks jack poseobic and sort of gives the the people what they want somebody somebody had to somebody had to do something somebody did something some people did something uh ilhan omar no it was no it was it was just this

this situation where I honestly just got it I'm so annoyed that like here's this theater kid who's up there like acting as if he didn't do all the Bollywood stuff on his acceptance speech and demagogue white people

on the campaign and talk about how my campaign is for Blake you remember the list right the Bangladeshi taxi driver I think you mentioned Uzbeks we now have Uzbeks and the Cajeks and the Ecuadorian abuelas and all

the just went full mask off and now he's trying to ratchet it back. He's trying to put the mask back on and oh, no, I'm just a nice guy. All I care about is affordability, et cetera. And like, no, you said all these things. You just don't get to walk away from that because you're in the Oval Office. And you could tell, though, I don't think anyone in media has ever really just, like, held him to account on these things. They usually sort of like, you know, let him just spill his word salad out and then go with that. It was a total non-answer, too, by the way.

He was like, it's a description of intent, not a... So an intent to tax the weight... Tax wider than it was. Yes, exactly. And, you know, listen, we're going to watch and see how that happens. What's the intent? Trump is giving him an Olive Branch, not to be a crazy person. I think a lot of people interpreted that as Trump folding and being charmed by Mom Donnie.

No, this is Trump 101. Olive Branch, hey, we had a nice conversation. We're going to hold off on doing anything crazy. Let's see what he does. And if he crosses me, we're going to go for him. Well, and imagine Mondami now having to go back to the left and be like, why did you sit down with a fascist? Yeah, yeah. Well, and he's got clips on that, by the way, where he's basically saying everything I said about Trump still holds true now, which is a very, very strange thing to do.

And he wouldn't actually just come out and say, yeah, he's a fascist. He said, what I said previously is still true. It would actually be funny if you just said, yes. Just say it. Anyways, we are going to talk about Ukraine. There is a massive movement that's been happening, Blake, on the Ukraine peace front. So there was, you can set this up, but there's essentially two competing deals that are now being floated. There is a U.S.-led effort that apparently happened with Witkoff and some Russian counterparts in Russia.

That's where the negotiations were happening. And then there was, that was leaked. And then the EU rushed to put together their own point-by-point plan. the US one has 28 points and the EU's is a little bit more pro Ukraine. We didn't get to this last week. So there's been it was a leaked 28

point plan as they call it. We're not sure by whom although evidence is it probably actually was leaked by the Russian side, which was capitalized on the press to say it was a Russian authored plan. But what's going on is we actually haven't talked about the war in a while. The war is still going. It is still

grinding. There is evidence it has been getting worse for Ukraine. than it was a few months ago. They're losing ground a little bit faster. Not super rapidly. It's a big meat grinder war, but things aren't looking promising. And so last week,

we had this peace plan come out, 28 points, and some of the key ones, do we have that B-roll of the map that I gave you? I don't have the number in front of me right now. I think I get it. Yeah, throw that one up.

122. 122. So this is the heart of it. It would basically, it would cede to Russia, the areas of Ukraine, basically what the current front line is. There's a tiny amount of adjustment in the north, but it essentially

matches what the current front line is. It would create a demilitarized zone in Donetsk province, which is one that Russia wants, but they haven't taken all of it. So it would essentially demilitarize the part still held by Ukraine. That would be the purple section. Yeah. And what's very important is

this deal, the 28 point deal, would formally acknowledge Russia taking those territories as opposed to what some of insisted on where they might allow Russia to keep occupying them, but continue to leave it as not recognized. That supposedly Ukraine should take it back. That's U.S. recognition. Yeah, U.S. recognition. So that means the President of United States would come out with the whole of government secretary of state saying, and that's something obviously another president

could overturn, but of course the Russians could always point to saying that, look, the U.S. recognized this. And truthfully, I think that is a very important part of what I think a long-term piece would be. Because what has kept this a tumor that has flared up over. and over again is that it's not resolved. It has never resolved. There is no final jurisdiction for 11 years now. For 11 years. And that's almost, that's likely what led to this war is the refusal to acknowledge the seeding of Crimea, or I should say the seizure of Crimea. And, you know, their original offer before the war happened was if you would acknowledge Crimea and then a few military concessions that they would be okay with a long-term peace. That wasn't seated. So instead,

got this war other stuff in it it would the peace deal would require ukraine shrinking the size of its military i think that will be a difficult sticking point that's that's the u.s version not the u.s version the u.s version yeah the u.s version caps the ukraine military at 600 000 which is still huge by the way for your european terms especially uh the eu plan would give no restrictions placed on you yeah it would not allow them into nato though would allow them into the european union which I feel it would be a quite important session because is Russia going to invade a member of the European Union,

especially if the European Union maybe developed some sort of unified armed forces. It seems less likely to me. But the point is, this is, a lot of people have freaked out about this. There's a lot of opposition to it. There has been a counter-European Union plan where the main argument they've made

is basically that it has a smaller number of points in it, and 19 points instead of 28, which means it concedes less to Russia. The neocons are free. leaking out and that's that's the really big thing because they just don't want the war to end they don't well it here's the thing i mean i think they're still playing under an old paradigm here here's one big key difference between the two plans by the way the trump 28 point plan does offer g8 membership to russia if they play by the rules over time so russia could get back into

essentially the league of nations and trump talked about that a lot uh yeah well he mentions it like every time he goes to the g7 that's that's a big a big carrot that is dangling out there for Russia if it plays by it plays by these rules and I think here's here's the deal you have uh to your point Blake this war continues grinding on there is no end in sight massive loss of life and casualties one thing we know about Russia is they are very good at wars of attrition where they just grind them out long long time I mean so I think that if you compare and contrast these two plans you still have the European Union playing over under the an old paradigm if you will And I think just analyzing both of them this morning or over the weekend,

the Trump plan feels much, much more realistic. Legacy Box has been a proud sponsor of this show since 2021. And we here at the Charlie Kirk Show are grateful to continue supporting a community that values family and tradition. You know how we talk about protecting what really matters. That's not just finances or politics. It's your family memories too. We all have those old VHS tapes, film, real. maybe boxes of photos sitting in a closet, but time isn't on our side.

Tapes wear out, films fade, and before long, the stories of your childhood, your parents, and even your grandparents can be lost. That's where Legacy Box comes in. They make it simple, order their kit, fill it with your old media, and send it back. Their team of experts carefully digitizes everything and returns both your originals and a secure digital version you can stream, share, and keep safe forever with confidence. Honor the moments that matter, and now in Charlie's own words. legacy box.com slash kirk to say 50% and take care of it today. You'll be glad you did. That is

legacy box.com slash kirk. Legacybox.com slash kirk. I'm going to play the clip here. Let's play cut 93. All the women are talking about it. 93. You told me this in private, but how many kids did you guys want to have? We wanted to have four. Yeah. And I was praying to God that I was was pregnant when he got murdered. Oh, wow. I thought of that once. Just like whether it was meant to be or whether we'd get news like that. I was like, oh, goodness, that would be the ultimate blessing out of this catastrophe.

I was praying. Both of us were, we were really excited to just expand our family. Thank God you have the two. I know. Thank God. Boy and girl, I know. Yeah, it was a powerful moment. You know, I was.

kind of like side stage and i you know i just never wanted to bring that type of stuff up with erika so it was news to me as well i want to play some clips here from the rush ukraine uh negotiations this is rubio and yermak and the erishing statements after the first round of negotiations play cut 90 so it is in my personal view that we've had probably the most productive and meaningful meetings so far in this entire process that since we've been involved in from the beginning product that was already built on a foundation of input from all the relative parties involved here. And we were able to go through some of those items now point by point. And I think we've made good progress. So he's saying it's the most productive and meaningful meeting so

far. And that was Andrew Yermak, who's the head of the Ukrainian delegation to Geneva. So those meetings were happening in Geneva. You know what's an interesting piece of this, by the way, is that a lot of people are speculating this 28-point peace plan was actually drafted in Russian because it looks to be we mentioned that we mentioned that yeah translated over but that I think that's just because when Axios got it

they got it from the Russians so we're probably in Russian but I my understanding was that and Rubio came out and said this is the US yes he says it right there no he said it was the US version I what what stands out to me about certainly the US plan

is they'll complain that it's too pro Russian although I would just note if you're going to oppose a plan that is pro-Russian I feel you need a plan for, okay, is Ukraine going to win the war? Are we going to go until every Ukrainian is dead so you can feel really morally righteous over their pile of corpses? Are you going to step up to pay for it forever? That should be the question to Europe if they want it to go forever. Or are you going to deploy your own troops?

Yeah, exactly. Like, you have to ask those questions. Otherwise, again, you're just demanding that every Ukrainian die for your sake. Because this has been the issue, right, is that we keep backfilling we, when I say we, the West, EU. U.S., etc., technology, drones, intelligence, etc., but nobody's actually sent troops. And the problem is, is that you can use those drones, you can hit Russia in the backfield, target energy infrastructure, things like this. But you know what you can't do?

Capture and hold terrain. Only men can do that. You need men for that. And that would be the biggest escalation of sending actual troops. And at that point, which nobody wants to do. You're dangerously close to the big escalation that we never wanted. So what it stands out to me in the U.S. plan is it is a serious bid to say we are attempting to normalize relations with Russia after effectively a 20-year new Cold War with them, if you will. Here's the question that I think, and I don't know if we mentioned it, there is this question about, and Bannon's brought it up, the security guarantee for Ukraine, right?

Is that like an Article 5 guarantee or? But I want other stuff. Other stuff, though, it's that Russia gets reintegrated into the global economy, so we stop the endless sanctions. That's also why you, frankly, recognize the territorial change so that there is a set mutually agreed upon border between the two instead of what stands out with the European plan is they don't want to acknowledge this. They want to continue that frozen conflict attitude that we had before this war, where, okay, you occupy this land, but we're not acknowledging it. So it's a potential flashpoint whenever we want it to be. I mean, a couple months ago, people were saying when, you know, I remember I went to Alaska when when Trump had to sit down with Putin and Putin came over and, you know, but then it all kind of unraveled after that and they announced this Budapest thing, but then it never really got off the ground. And a lot of people were saying, hey, and Ukraine really wasn't agreeing to anything at that point.

Zelensky came in and it's like, well, if we had the meeting, but you didn't agree to it. So people were saying that an armistice might be the only thing possible at that point. So the fact that Ukraine is on board with this and we are seeing the Russians be on board with this, I think that actually speaks credibility to or gives credibility to what Rubio is saying, that actually there's a real possibility for a deal here. Well, and it strikes me, Blake, to your point, is that the only way to have this be a lasting peace is if you officially recognize the ground that Russia has gained in this, in this long, bloody war.

At least some portion of it. Maybe there's a counterproposal they can make that cedes some of it back or something, but. Well, but to your point, it's, look, we have to understand that Putin sees this as his legacy, you know, basically, you know, reverting the, the, the errors and the sins of his predecessors in the 90s and when the USSR fell. And so he wants to at least, you have to give him something is my, my read on this. And I think this is a realistic. Kremlin and say, you know, we did all this and this is what we got. Well, you got to also understand that Putin is propped up by oligarchs. That's the reason he's able to hold on to powers because he controls the oligarchs.

You have to come back from a war like this and show something tangible. Otherwise, this is going to just continue on forever. And then the person who comes after Putin is going to be like 10 times worse if he's seen as a failure. Yeah, I mean, in theory that, I mean, the glass have full, I think EU rose-colored glasses vision is that they're going to be able to sort of install somebody better. The fanatics who want this war to go forever, I feel like they're just calculating that Putin will die and then somehow Russia implodes after that. And that strikes me as highly risky.

Yeah, the last time that we got rid of the czar, we got Lenin. Think of the most insane warhawks you've seen in America. They exist in Russia too. They sure do. They're more insane, arguably. Yeah, they're like, let's glass Paris kind of guys. This is Lane Schoenberger, chief investment officer and founding partner of Y Refi.

It has been an honor. and a privilege to partner with Turning Point and for Charlie to endorse us. His endorsement means the world to us, and we look forward to continuing our partnership with Turning Point for years to come. Now, hear Charlie, in his own words, tell you about Y-R-R-R-R-E-F-Y-F-Y. I'm going to tell you guys about Y-R-R-E-F-Y.com. Y-R-R-E-F-Y-FI is incredible. Private Student Loan debt in America total is about $300 billion.

Y-Refi-Fi is refinancing, distress, or defaulted private student loans. You can finally take control of your student loan situation with a plan that works for your monthly budget. Go to Y-ReFi.com. That is Y-ReFi.com. Do you have a co-borrower? Why refi can get them released from the loan. You can even skip a payment up to 12 times without penalty.

It may not be available in all 50 states. Go to Y-ReFi.com. That is Y-R-E-F-Y.com. Let's face it, if you have distress or default to student loans, it can be overwhelming. Because of private student loan debt, so many people feel stuck, go to Y-R-R-R-E-F-Y.com. That is Y-R-E-F-Y-F-Y dot com. private student loan debt relief y refi.com. I'm so excited to welcome Scott Jennings, author of A Revolution of Common Sense, his new book.

He's also the host of the Scott Jennings Show on Salem. And you can find him on X at Scott Jennings, K.Y for Kentucky. Good Kentucky boy. Scott, welcome to the show. Andrew, good to see you, my friend. Greetings from Northern Kentucky today. I'm traveling a little bit and glad to join you on the Charlie Kirk Show, my friend. Yeah, it's great to have you. I mean, the last time I saw you was with Charlie in Colorado, I believe. So it's a lot. But we stay in touch. You're doing great work. Congratulations on the book, A Revolution of Common Sense. Why don't you tell us a little bit about the book and what's about why you wrote it?

well i was listening to the president speak in january in his inaugural address and he used this phrase a revolution of common sense and i thought at the time that would make a great book title because it is the perfect encapsulation or description of how he has rebranded the republican party in a conservative movement and so um i went to the oval office in early february i pitched him on the idea of a book and we worked together on it he gave me access to him to the oval office to air force one to the cabinet to several members of the senior staff. And I told him, I thought that 100 people would come along to write books attacking him for this, that, and the other, but somebody who likes him understands what he's trying to do and wants to give the American people a fair description of

it. I ought to get a chance to write a book. And he agreed. So this was the product. And I'll just give you one more nugget, Andrew. I didn't know what to put on the cover. So I sent the president a message and said, what's your favorite picture of yourself from the first hundred days? And that's the photo that came back. So that's the president's favorite picture. I let him, I let him, I let him picket. Wow. Well, listen, the subhead, by the way, I think is really important. And the reason I want to call attention to it is because it is something that Charlie was obsessed with. It was what he was laser focused on. You said how Donald Trump stored Washington and fought for Western civilization. So you're painting this battle as an existential battle to save the West,

to save Christendom in a sense. I believe that. Charlie believe that. Why do you, believe it? If you could articulate it in the way Scott Jennings would, why do you believe the stakes are that high? Well, first of all, the last time, as you mentioned, that I saw Charlie and you together in Colorado, if you'll remember the conversation that he and I had in front of that audience, we talked a lot about the future of Western civilization. And this theme permeates the book because I think, and I talk about this in some of my public talks, and I think Charlie understood this and articulated it well. We're not just battling about the day-to-day politics anymore. The future of our country, the future of the West, the future of whether we're

going to live in a world that is based on the ideals that have been the foundation of our society for 3,000 years is going to continue. It's that versus really dark ideologies, people who would leave this world and darkness, people who have views that I think are really the enemies of human liberty. That's the battle that's going on right now. And I don't know whether President Trump knew he was signing up for it or not, but he is the leader of the fight for the future of the West. And look, this is, you know, the West isn't a place on a map. It's a set of ideas born in Jerusalem and Rome and Athens. And it's been the foundation of our civilization. It's been the foundation of our freedom. This is the civilization that gave birth to the Bible, the constitution,

the concept of a university. Everything we are is based on this pillars of Western civilization. And it's in danger. I think our financial situation and the mass migration crisis, in the world and the march of these dark ideologies, I think they're all combining to really challenge the future of the West. It's what keeps me up at night. And I think the president's leading us admirably, but I think we all need to understand. If you're within the sound of our voice, you're on the front lines of this battle right now, whether you know it or like it or not. Well, Will said, and I think you talk about front line of the battle. I want to bring Blake Neffin, one of our producers here, Scott, as well for this conversation. So we were

just talking about in segments one and two about Ukraine, talking about front line of the the battle. There's a lot that's been made of this, the EU plan versus the United States plan. Give us your take. Which plan do you see is the more realistic path to peace here? Well, look, I've thought a few things, and Secretary of Rubio, I think, has done a good job trying to manage this. Number one, it has to be a negotiated peace. Neither of these guys is going to go back to their capital and take a knee and wave a white flag. I've never believed that. Number two, it has to be something that guarantees what's good for America. You know, what is good for us here? Security is good from a military perspective, but also economic security. We've spent a lot

of money on this. We've spent a lot of time on this. What are we going to achieve out of this negotiated settlement? And number three, ultimately, you know, are we going to get any guarantees that we're not going to be involved in any conflicts in the near, medium, or long term? I mean, that's the other thing we're looking for here. And so I hear Secretary Rubio sort of landing, out these principles. I think he's on the right track. You have to involve both countries. I've been sort of, you know, flummoxed at people who say, well, we just have to take whatever the Ukrainians want and force Russia to accept. Well, how do you do that? How do you force another country to accept something? It has to be negotiated and it has to be done from a position of

strength, which is what I think Rubio is doing right now. Yeah, I mean, listen, I'm with you. You know, it seems like the basic disposition of the neocon right and the neoliberal left are really into this idea that you can't give Putin anything, Putin bad, we have to be enemies with Russia, this fixation on constantly being at Russia's throat, and never being able to see a future where relations are normalized. Blake, I thought you painted that picture extraordinarily well, and earlier in the show, where the power of this deal is that you would have to essentially, as the U.S., go over and say, those. Those regions are now part of Russia, and there is a powerful, powerful, I think it's symbolically powerful, but it's also pragmatic and realistic because those areas, they speak Russian, they probably want to be a part of Russia. Yeah, Ukraine would have to cede some territory, but they've already ceded the territory in battle. And so you've ultimately got to give Putin something if you want the killing to stop. Yeah, I think the most important thing here about this plan is it strikes me as a bid for a. permanent peace it is not anything that says oh we'll acknowledge you're there but we're not going

to recognize it things like that is treating it as a ceasefire it is treating another war as the eventual outcome of this because if you're not recognizing it your expectation seems to be there will be another fight about it someday yeah and whereas if you're reintegrating russia into the global economy if you're creating a new international border the intent is this is supposed to be a resolution and i just feel there is no long run value for america or for the west generally and just being out in a cold war or hot war with russia forever well and scott so i throw it to you i'm let's play cnn here um let's play a little game here i'm going to be the i'm going to be your counterpart but scott isn't that rewarding bad behavior isn't that if we give russia this

territory and we acknowledge it as the u.s we're we're rewarding bad behavior are we not This is unrealistic for the future. That's a bad precedent. Well, look, we've already punished Russia some of them. And it has to do with sanctions that we recently put on oil companies, A, B, we got NATO members to do 5% on defense spending. No other president's gotten that done. See, Russia's goal was to take over all of Ukraine and to leave Ukraine not sovereign. And this plan would leave Ukraine sovereign.

And so, no, I don't think Russia is getting everything they want out of this, just like Ukraine is unlikely. to get everything they want out of it. That's what we mean by the term negotiated peace. Plus, as I understand it, Ukraine's going to get a security guarantee out of this. That's not something the Russians probably wanted to go into this war thinking that would happen. And so let's not forget on top of all of it, thanks to, I think, our help and thanks to the help of some other countries, Russia has suffered enormously in battle. Casualties are high. Their economy in some ways has been wrecked over this. And so we have punished these guys quite a bit. And if you want the killing to stop, you're going to have to get to a place where both countries decide to stop.

And that's the point of this agreement. But don't mistake that Russia got off Scott Frey here. I don't think they did. And if this agreement were executed, as we've seen it laid out in public by Secretary of Rubio, this is not, I don't think, the outcome that Putin would have wanted when he started this war. Yeah, I think that's spot on Scott here. again author of the i want to make sure i get the title just right the revolution of common sense the revolution of common sense how donald trump uh stormed washington and fought for western civilization uh we've got two minutes left here in this segment scott i don't want to you you

brought it up when we were texting and so i want to get to this story that's she's being called the a oc of tennessee and so it's democrat afton ben and she is taking incoming because she is on the record now saying that she hates the city she wants to represent. Let's play 135. I've been heavily involved with the Nashville mayoral race because I hate the city. I hate the bachelorets. I hate the pedal taverns. I hate country music.

I hate all of the things that make Nashville, apparently. And it's city to the rest of the country. But I hate it. Yeah, I'm that girl at the airport that all these bachelorets are giddy walking out. in their two-toned colored pantone pink shirts and they walk out and I'm like they're like oh my god Nashville is so loud um before before we dunk on her that woman could be elected to Congress next week so again if you live in the 7th district you can vote right now early voting goes through Wednesday

cast your vote now Scott your reaction welcome well welcome to the modern live I mean this is effectively a great hood ornament for what the Democratic Party has become. These sort of vapid liberals who really hate the people they live around. This district, by the way, is partly Nashville, but it also includes a huge swath of rural Tennessee. Does that sound like someone who's got anything in common with rural Tennessee? It doesn't mean. On top of that, you may have seen that she has been a longtime supporter of defunding the police. She went on MSNBC this weekend and refused to denounce those views that she has espoused for years about defunding the police. I mean, this person couldn't be farther from the center politically of that district than she is.

But this is where the energy in the Democratic Party is right now. She's the AOC of Tennessee. I mean, these sort of charismatic, condescending, hateful, socialist-style candidates, that's who they're nominating. That's who they're trying to put forward all over this country. and in a special election, anything could happen. So my advice to Republicans down there is don't sleep on this. Trump won this district by over 20 points, but Democrats are pouring money into it for a reason.

You think that's the kind of person you want in Congress. Think again. Connection, open dialogue. These are the things that build communities. Charlie, Kirk, and TikTok share in that knowledge. That's why TikTok has built a space where that kind of listening actually happens. People don't just post, they respond.

They build on each other's ideas. You'll see a teacher simplifying a tough lesson so it finally clicks, or a gardener sharing a trick that saved their crop. But what matters most is in the video. It's what comes next. Someone asking a question, someone else answering with a story of their own. And suddenly, people who've never met become a community built on curiosity. When people listen and understand, a shift happens.

Walls come down, ideas, travel further, and connection, real connection takes their place. that's what listening does it reminds us that we're not as different as we may think and that's what makes tic talk so powerful it's a place where every post can turn into a conversation and every conversation can make a difference portions of our program are sponsored in part by ticot all right welcome back to the charlie kirk show i'm not we're not done with afton ben here uh there's so much good clip good cuts on her uh let's let's see this uh 19 139 this is her saying that right Rioting is a way for people to express themselves and bragged about harassing ice agents. Yeah, as you do, 139.

Afton Bain says, I'm a very radical person. So radical, Bain thinks, rioting is a way for people to express themselves. Worse, Bain went on a midnight joy ride, harassing ice officers and state troopers. This is great. We've got our girls' plot, and we're bullying the ice vehicles and state troopers.

So this is like... Unhinged. And it's really scary. Stop. in vain so radical it's scary so this is that is a it's in a republican plus 10 district that trump won't by 20 yeah so it is a race we should win but I mean the headline today on the hill is Democrats look to cap off winning streak with Tennessee special election they are paying attention to it they are putting money into it we have to acknowledge they're a little more

fired up right now as you know they were during Trump's first term. That's how we got, you know, started off with John Ossoff running for house. And I think he lost the first time, but it was very close, I think is what it originally was. And then he just gained more and more momentum. So if you are in Tennessee, I know you're out there. Go vote early. Right now, you can do it today. You can do it tomorrow. You can do it Wednesday. Do it now. Get it out of the way. Yeah. Otherwise, vote on Tuesday. And put this to bed. Don't allow us to lose If we lose this one, it will be really embarrassing and really bad for everything. Look, I mean, these Democrats have gone from defunding to dehumanizing and degrading the police.

I can't imagine there's anybody in Nashville or surrounding areas that wants their representative in Congress to view law enforcement in that way. So if you need only one reason, that's it. All right, Scott, so we're talking about this special election in Tennessee, which we should win, but Democrats are more fired up than we are. so we got to keep our eye on the on the on the on the prize here we got to stay focused go out and vote as blake said that's exactly what charlie would have said just get out and vote vote early get it done you don't want a flat tire on the on election day to get in their way but now we have mtg she has announced her resignation obviously there was a huge fallout with president trump our majority is getting slimmer and slimmer and we got to we got to keep our eye on this i think mtg's district has another r plus 10 so we're going to have a special election there it sounds like What do you make of this? Why are we seeing this? A lot of people calling this the fracturing of the right right now. We're kind of at a nadir when it comes to energy. What do you make of it? Well, a couple things. One, I still think Donald Trump is enormously popular among Republicans. I mean, I saw a data segment with Harriet from CNN this morning on this. I mean, he's got an 87% approval rating among Republicans. That's higher than Obama had with Democrats. And at this point, his second. term higher than Bush had with Republicans in his second term. So in terms of his clout and influence at the party, I think that's really high. But you do see people starting, I think,

to break with him for one reason or another on certain issues. And they really should not. I mean, my view is politics as a team sport. And he's the head coach. And he's still calling the plays right now. And we have a united opposition, you know, the media, the Democrats, the federal bureaucracy, the judiciary. I mean, you have these sort of entrenched interests that are united in trying to overwhelm the conservative movement. When we fracture, it makes them, it makes their job a lot easier, frankly. And so I don't like it, I guess, candidly, when my friends, our friends are fighting, and I don't like it when it seems like there's a fracture. But we have a leader. His name is Donald Trump, and I think we ought to respect that. And I know people have differences of opinion

on certain issues. But at the end of the day, we're fighting larger battles here. And internal fractures make it harder to win those larger battles. Yeah, I completely agree. And you've been excellent on staying focused on the left. Scott, I mean, this is your, I would say it's your day job. It's really your night job on CNN. I want to play, because it's just going, the clips are making the rounds. You want to hear a Swisher's podcast. And she claimed that the Hunter Biden coverup of the laptop was just politics as usual. I got to play this clip and get your reaction, 123. The story was true. There wasn't really any dispute of that other than from these 50 people who come from government, who are in and out of government when Democrats are in power. That's politics.

me, Scott, that's, that's, I mean, you're not naive. They were making their case, just like you would say Trump just did with whatever issue he has. Well, I, I don't agree that it's just a simple matter of making your case. It was one of the biggest lies that was told to try to get Joe Biden over the finish line. Do you, do you think it's just politics as usual? Yes, I do, actually. I think it's, I do. You like it. Absolutely. So, so lying Scott is just politics to the Democrats. You You just lie now. And honestly, it's worse than lying because it took 50 people that have intelligence titles. They've been director of the CIA.

They've been this. They've been that. And they put their own credibility out there to say, this was Russian disinformation. And then on top of that, you had news outlets that were being forced to censor information. You had social media companies that were censoring information. They were stopping the American people from getting access to information on the doorstep of an election. it was a big misinformation op for the party that's constantly worried about misinformation that's all it was remember the New York Post had its social media accounts shut down because they're the ones that broke the story so this was not politics as usual but to the left anything goes they will do anything they will coerce anybody they will censor anything in order to get political power and I think that's what we have to realize that we're up against it's not politics as usual it's something much much worse than that and they have a whole media apparatus that will completely completely whitewash it on the back end when they get caught.

Scott Jennings, A Revolution of Common Sets. Check out his new book. Thank you, my friend. It's good to see you. Good to see you, Andrew. Thank you, brother. For more on many of these stories and news you can trust,

go to charliekirk.com.