The Daily Stoic - If They Control Your Attention, They Control YOU | Chris Hayes (PT. 1)

Episode Date: June 4, 2025

What if the real problem isn’t politics, the economy, or technology, but where you’re directing your attention? Emmy-winning journalist Chris Hayes joins Ryan to reveal the sinister mechanics of modern media, explore how the digital age fractures our sense of self, and explain why misinformation is most dangerous when it tells us exactly what we want to hear.Chris Hayes is the Emmy Award–winning host of All In with Chris Hayes on MSNBC and the New York Times bestselling author of A Colony in a Nation and Twilight of the Elites.  Chris’ latest book is The Sirens' Call: How Attention Became the World's Most Endangered Resource. Follow Chris on Instagram and X @ChrisLHayes and watch Chris’ show ALL IN on MSNBC📚 Books Mentioned: The Sirens' Call: How Attention Became the World's Most Endangered Resource by Chris Hayes Trust Me, I’m Lying by Ryan Holiday The Odyssey by Homer (Emily Wilson Translation)The Brass Check by Upton Sinclair🎙️ Follow The Daily Stoic Podcast on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dailystoicpodcast🎥 Watch top moments from The Daily Stoic Podcast on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@dailystoicpodcast✉️ Want Stoic wisdom delivered to your inbox daily? Sign up for the FREE Daily Stoic email at https://dailystoic.com/dailyemail🏛 Get Stoic inspired books, medallions, and prints to remember these lessons at the Daily Stoic Store: https://store.dailystoic.com/📱 Follow us:  Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok, and FacebookSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Wondery Plus subscribers can listen to the daily stoic early and ad free right now. Just join Wondery Plus in the Wondery app or on Apple Podcasts. The Shaw Festival in Niagara-on-the-Lake presents The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. Filled with breathtaking battles, mythical creatures, and unforgettable characters. This new adaptation of C.S. Lewis's classic will mesmerize the whole family. Don't miss this epic adventure, The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe, this season at the Shaw Festival. For tickets, go to shawfest.com.

Have you ever wondered who created that bottle of Sriracha that's living in your fridge? Or why nearly every house in America has at least one game of Monopoly. Introducing the Best Idea Yet, a brand new podcast about the surprising origin stories of the products you're obsessed with. Listen to the Best Idea Yet on the W each weekday we bring you a meditation inspired by the ancient stoics, a short passage of ancient wisdom designed to help you find strength and insight here in everyday life. And on Wednesdays, we talk to some of our fellow students of ancient philosophy,

well known and obscure, fascinating and powerful. With them, we discuss the strategies and habits that have helped them become who they are, and also to find peace and wisdom in their lives. Hey, it's Ryan. Welcome to another episode of The Daily Stoic Podcast. About a month or so ago, I was in New York City. I was in 30 Rockefeller Center. That's where Saturday Night Live is filmed. It's where The Tonight Show is filmed.

It's where most of the big NBC shows are filmed. I was there to shoot Stephanie Ruhl's show. She was nice enough to have me on. She was interviewing me about stoicism and that sort of everything that's happening in the world. Some of those clips, you might have seen them. They went viral. I was in the green room before the show and I'm watching Chris Hayes' show, All In with Chris Hayes. And he starts talking about something that's very near and dear to my heart, History Day. The very first thing I ever did that got any attention,

that showed me maybe that history wasn't just this thing that you read about, it was something that you could participate in, it was a conversation you could have. They were doing a segment on how Doge and everything, what it was cutting. And one of the things it was cutting was the grants to the History Day Foundation.

And I was just extremely frustrated by this because History Day, as I said, it changed my life. You wouldn't be listening to this podcast had History Day not shaped me the way that it did. I did a 10 minute documentary about World War II and about the landing of Normandy and it was an excuse. I got to interview my grandfather, someone I loved very dearly, who supported me and believed in me and was just someone I looked up to a great deal. And I got to interview him for this. My mom actually sent me a DVD of the video not that long ago. I have it

now on my Dropbox, so I'll never lose it. But that was, you know, frustrating, to say the least, disappointing. But History Day shaped me, and so I was watching that. And I think that's what great news broadcasts do, is they tell us about things that people in power would rather us not know about, that they were trying to sweep under the rug,

that they were trying to get away with. How is the richest man in the world at this time, Elon Musk, how is he totally unelected, deciding that money that Congress apportioned is going to be eliminated? I don't know. It's just absolutely crazy. I don't want to get into that. I do want to get into today's guest, someone I was really excited to talk to, someone who, as I watched this, I'ming, I go, you know what, I need to walk this off a little bit. I start walking up and down the halls, I go to the bathroom, I come back, the show is finished and Chris Hayes is standing there.

And I could see he just finished his show, I know that feeling. He did not want anyone to come up to him. He was debriefing with his staff. I said, you know what, I'm gonna talk to him soon enough anyway. And that's actually what we're gonna do in today's episode. But before we get into today's episode, I want to read know what? I'm gonna talk to him soon enough anyway. And that's actually what we're gonna do in today's episode.

But before we get into today's episode, I want to read you something. Let us begin with a story from Odysseus' journey. In book 12 of the Odyssey, our hero is about to depart from the island of the goddess Circe, which gives him some crucial advice about how to navigate the perils

of the next leg of his voyage. "'Pay attention,' she instructs him sternly. "'First you will come to the sirens "'who enchant all who come near them. "'If anyone unwarely draws in too close "'and hears the singing of the sirens, "'his wife and children will never welcome him home again. For they sit in a green field and warble him to death

with the sweetness of their song. There is a great heap of dead man's bones lying all around with the flesh still rotting off them. Odysseus listens to Circe as she provides him with a plan. Stuff wax in your ears of your crew, she says, so they cannot hear the sirens, and have them bind you to the mast of the ship

till you've sailed safely past. Odysseus follows the plan to a T. Sure enough, when the siren's song hits his ears, he motions to his men to loosen him so that he can follow it, but as instructed, his crew ignores him until the ship is out of earshot. This image is one of the most potent in the Western canon, Odysseus lashed to the mast, struggling against the bonds that he himself submitted to, knowing this was all in store.

It has come down to us through the centuries as a metaphor for many things, sin and virtue, the temptations of the flesh and the willpower to resist them, the addict who throws his pills down the toilet in preparation for the cravings to come, then begs for more drugs. It is an image that illustrates the Freudian struggle between the ego and the id, what we want and what we know we should not cannot have. This is not from the Greaking Out podcast, which I have listened to hundreds and hundreds of times

with my youngest, there are actually a new season of it. We had Kenny Curtis, the host of Greaking Out on the podcast not too recently, and there's a new season, season 11, we're in the middle of it. This is also not from the Emily Wilson translation of the Odyssey, which of course I loved and have raved about.

This is from today's guest's book. And it's actually not about Greek history at all. It's about attention. Chris Hayes is an Emmy award winning host of All In with Chris Hayes on MSNBC. He's written a number of great books. You've probably heard of him. Well, his new book is called The Siren's Call,

how attention becomes the world's most endangered resource. It's obviously something I think a lot about and used to think a lot more about, having written quite a bit about media and how the way that the incentives of the media system inform what we consume and how marketers, people like me in my old life, spent a lot of time trying to manipulate

and wield those levers for the benefits of their client. Chris's new book is great. It's about something, obviously, I've talked about in my books that I think is more essential than ever. We are in a street fight for attention. People are fighting for our attention. People are trying to manipulate our attention.

And if you don't understand those forces, if you can't be in command of yourself, if you don't know how to focus, if you don't know how to tie yourself to the mast as Odysseus did, you're gonna be in a lot of trouble. That's what we talk about in today's episode, sirens, history, misinformation, media responsibility, and of course, self-discipline.

As I said, Chris Hayes is the Emmy award-winning host of All In with Chris Hayes on MSNBC, the New York Times bestselling author of A Colony in a Nation and Twilight of the Elites. His new book, The Sirens Call, How Attention Became the World's Most Endangered Resource, is fantastic. You can follow him on Instagram and on Twitter,

although maybe don't go on those sites, but he's Chris L. Hayes, that's Hayes with an E, and you can watch his show all in on MSNBC. Thanks to Chris for having him on and thanks for giving me a little bit of your attention in today's episode. Enjoy. We were like 10 feet from each other like last week.

I was in the MSNBC studios. I did Stephanie's show and we walked by each other as you were exiting your show. I didn't realize that, but I did see afterwards that you posted about the National History Day thing. I know, I was quite upset watching that in the green room. Pretty upset. It's insane.

The funniest part of it, I mean, funny, it's darkly comedic is that the amount of money, it's like $266,000 total. Yes. Oh, what are we doing here? Yeah, of a multi-trillion dollar budget. Yeah, congratulations. And of all the things that you would,

it seems pretty non-controversial to me, but somehow that gets on the chopping block. I don't understand it at all. Yeah, it must be hard as a news host to watch things and be able to put them in perspective, not to just be continually outraged. I mean, I'm pretty much right now continually outraged, but yes, modulation is key.

It's sort of a key part of the job. Yeah, that would be tough. I was thinking about this with the title of your book, The Idea of the Sirens. It's fascinating to me because my eight year old is obsessed with the Odyssey. Just how timeless that metaphor is, right? And that what I was fascinated to learn about the Sirens,

I don't know, I guess I just, I knew they said seductive things, but like when you actually read the Odyssey, they would often just tell people what they wanted to hear. They told stories about when you were gonna go home or how you were gonna go home. It wasn't just that they were these beautiful, seductive or talented singers, it's actually what they were saying

that drew people to the rocks. Yeah, and that you, that it's different for everyone what pulls you in. Yes. And what compels you to your, speeds you to your death. You know? Well, yeah, because, you know, we often think of misinformation as this thing

that sort of plants ideas in people's head or propaganda is planting ideas in people's head. But actually it's much more insidious in that it usually tells you something that you want on some level to be true. Yeah, and it's the part of what's so crazy about the landscape that we occupy now is how individuated it all is, right?

That your specific predilections, the things you want to be true, can be found pretty quickly with the algorithm. And through this sort of sorting mechanism to lull you to get you to compel your attention. Yes, and that it really can create in the way that the sirens could individualize the message to be as seductive as possible,

that is technologically feasible in a way that never was before in a sort of previous mass media environment. Exactly, and that part of it, like that part of the weirdness of it, which is that there is a kind of God-like power. You know, for years you had, even me, right? So I decide every day like what to put in the show.

Yeah. And that's, we're exercising a set of judgments, editorial judgments, attentional judgments, right? Like what we think is important, what we think people will pay attention to, et cetera. And that's like every studio executive, everyone is making work. Sure.

But like the platforms don't do that. They, like the thing, this, the judgment is gone. It's just the machine learning, you just put stuff up and the machine learning is doing it. And that ability to sort of zero in without that sort of judgment beforehand, both create sort of cool stuff. Like there's all kinds of things that people, it turns out people wanna watch, you wouldn't have guessed, but also is a kind of power that does feel unnerving. Yeah, even the shift from the social graph, social networks to the purely algorithmic social networks,

it doesn't seem like a big leap, but there is an editorial assumption based in the early sort of version of Facebook and these other networks that you like things that- Who your friends are. Yeah, you like what your friends like. Yeah, exactly. And also that you like what you told us you liked, right?

Right. Like, my Facebook account is partly still driven by things that I uploaded in college that I said, music I like, bands I like. It was a whole thing. You would type in and be, oh, I'm the first person to ever say I like this band or, you know, I just bought this album.

And so part of it is still built around the assumption that you know what you like and it knows what you like. And now it's like, actually you only like what other people like and here it is. And that sense of alienation from ourself and the sense of different selves. I mean, this to me is sort of a core part of the book and a core part of the weirdness of the life we live in,

which is we do have different selves. And those selves that we contain, the multitudes we contain, do have different desires, likes and predilections. And different parts of ourselves are activated by different forms of exposure and different forms of technology. There's some sense in which I think the operative idea, if you're an engineer, the algorithm is like, we've found the true self.

The true self wants to look at like whatever, bikini videos or whatever, whatever is sort of lowest common denominator. But one of the points that I'm trying to make, particularly with the Odysseus metaphor at the top, right? Is that like, we are divided against ourselves always. And we're always coming up with ways to fortify one part of the self

and try to contain another part of the self. Yeah, there's a battle between sort of the higher self and the lower self in all people at all times. And I think typically the job of an artist or someone with some sort of editorial judgment, even when you're giving people what you want, there's some aspirational element in trying to reach the higher self.

Like people need this, people will like this, this is good, this will stir something in them. And then when you remove that, what do you get? Yeah, I think that's exactly right. And that sort of human aspiration that I think people making stuff, and even people making stuff, we should be clear for the algorithm.

Like, I don't wanna be one of these sort of fuddy duddies, like, oh, everything that people are, like, there's tons of great stuff. People are making really cool stuff. I learn things. Every day I learn things from history. I first encountered your work, basically algorithmically, and really learned and enjoyed stuff from you.

So the individuals who are making this stuff, I think still have that aspiration, because they're humans. Yes. But the sort of aggregate emergent product of the technology, which is inhuman, is blind to those aspirations. Every big moment starts with a big dream. But what happens when that big dream turns out to be a big flop?

From Wondery and Atwill Media, I'm Misha Brown and this is The Big Flop. Every week, comedians join me to chronicle the biggest flubs, fails, and blunders of all time like Quibi. It's kind of like when you give yourself your own nickname and you try to get other people to do it. And the 2019 movie adaptation of Cats. Like, if I'm watching the dancing and I'm noticing the feet aren't touching the ground, there's something wrong with the movie.

Find out what happens when massive hype turns into major fiasco. Enjoy the Big Flop on the Wondery app or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to the big flop early and ad free on Wondery Plus. Get started with your free trial at Wondery.com slash plus. Every successful business starts with an idea and on the best idea yet,

we're obsessed with those light bulb moments. Like how a bored barista invented the Frappuccino during his downtime, and then it got acquired by Starbucks. Or how Patagonia's iconic fleece was inspired by a toilet seat cover. On the best idea yet, we dive into the untold origin stories

behind the products you're obsessed with, and the bold risk takakers made them go viral. These are the wild ideas and insights that made Birkenstock the best-selling sandals since Jesus. And made Super Mario the most played video game in the history of attention span. Nintendo almost became a ramen company until Super Mario saved it. New episodes drop every Tuesday. Follow the best idea yet on the Wondry app or wherever you get your podcasts.

You can listen early and ad-free right now on the Wondery app or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen early and ad free right now by joining Wondery Plus. And if this podcast lasts longer than 45 minutes, call your doctor. I do find it so fascinating though. So we're talking about obviously something that's brought on by very modern technology. And then the discussion is rooted in the sirens. And then you open the book with Socrates and Plato,

just sort of how, not just how timeless the debate is, but there's also something interesting I think, where in order to be able to understand modern things, you do have to be rooted in a sense of the historical precedent. And if you don't get that, I think you very much are at the mercy of the inventions and all of the downsides. And because you're not aware that, hey, people have been having this debate for a long time. That's one of the things you talk about.

It's like, oh, hey, people talked about this with comic books. And I know near pretty well we were talking about. It's comic books. It was radio. It was newspapers, it was every medium has brought this debate but also just that human beings, I think to go to our point, human beings have been wrestling with the lower self and the higher self for a long time and you there's something about having that familiarity that I do think protects you a little bit. So yeah, I think both protects you in your life

and your practice of your life. I think also intellectually is really important too, because it's very easy to sort of ahistoricize all this stuff. And if you're not aware of sort of the notion of moral panic or the fact that people freaked out about comic books, like I do think there's a little inoculation that's necessary and try to be really sort of rigorous

about what's new, what's not, what's new, what's not. And the sort of what's not part of it, and part of the thing that I enjoyed the most about writing the book was just, you know, I was a philosophy major in college. I got a chance, you know, it's like reading Pascal or Kierkegaard or the Stoics or Buddha, right, about these fundamental problems, right?

Like I sit alone in my mind, I can't escape it. Sometimes it's hell. Sometimes there's nothing to think about. I feel desire for things that I don't want to feel desire for all these things that are just core to the human condition. It's sort of beautiful in that way because you're connected to something so deep there,

you know, when you're having those experiences. Yeah, because I think it's easy to go, hey, if the technology went away, if the algorithm was changed, we'd be fine. And then you go, wait, wait, in the 1500s, Blaise Pascal was lamenting our inability to sit quietly in a room alone.

And so it's like, oh yeah, actually, it just helps you realize, okay, yeah, the technology is exacerbating the problem, but ultimately the common variable in every one of these problems has been human beings and our endless desire to be stimulated, to hear what we wanna hear, to be distracted and whatever.

And so ultimately you have to win that battle yourself, whatever media or technological environment you happen to be in battle yourself, whatever media or technological environment you happen to be in. Totally, and I think that's true personally. I also think the flip side though is, on the flip side of this sort of moral panic critique is like the printing press like really did completely alter you in life and plunged Europe into hundreds of years

of sectarian bloodshed. I mean, so like there's certain stuff that does, you know, really alter particularly, I think on our sociality. I mean, I think that's the place where the way we live inside our own heads, there's something profoundly consistent about that struggle that reaches so far back. The way we socialize with each other, the institutions that mediate it

and the forms in which we encounter each other do change profoundly in all kinds of ways. Because the medium changes or the economics change, and then what kinds or types of information flows through that changes, how we see each other, how we see ourselves, makes it easier to be more divided as opposed to more united, adds rocket fuel to other timeless human problems.

Yeah. And one of the things I think about, which is adjacent to the things I discussed in the book, something I think about a lot is it's also useful to remember how contingent those divisions can be. So to go back to the point I just made about the printing press, there was a time not that long ago, I heard my grandmother tell stories about like the scandal when so and so married an Episcopalian. Yes.

Or like someone got ran off with a Baptist, right? And like the idea that sectarian divisions within Christianity, within Protestantism would be like enormously consequential to your social life, to like, is just preposterous to us now. That is so far, you know, removed. And which isn't to say like there aren't still corners of American society, that might be the truth. But this was a huge deal for a very long time.

And now it's like, so those divisions, it's so funny because they could be so present, they could draw blood and then they can also go away, which that part of it to me is kind of the hopeful part of that story about that contingency. Yeah, I mean, I write a lot about Montaigne in the book that I'm doing now, and this guy is basically driven to retreat from the world

because the Reformation is raging all around him from things like the printing press. And there's this kind of, what the printing press does is take these divisions that I'm sure were already there, but allows people's certainty about them to explode and then attack and antagonize and it just sort of goes back and forth and escalates and escalates into ultimately violence. Yeah.

And I think that one of the things that we see now and one of the things that I think is precious to kind of contemplate is when you're sort of thinking in these two modes of sort of these sort of enduring parts of human struggle and the pitfalls of human sociality and violence and cruelty and then the contingency of historical and technological social developments that change the way people relate to each other is not to Is sort of to remember the thing on the other side of doom Yeah, which is like people do find ways out which sometimes in moments Frankly within for me for the last little bit has been a little tough to remind myself

When people talk to me about their information diet I always say something like you should probably consume a lot less news and read a lot more books yeah, right because and I think that goes to your point about doom because Journalism and news by definition is what's happening now or happened recently So it's almost never about the way out or never about the solution because it's about the problem by definition right, whereas a book is is is a because it's about the problem by definition, right? Whereas a book is a bad medium to talk about what's happening in the moment

because it takes so long to produce. And you expect someone to consume it at a later date. And so in reading history, you can often learn the way out in analog situations that then helps you understand the news. So I'm not saying don't watch the news, don't consume any of it, but if you haven't rooted yourself in history,

you're gonna feel like, or philosophy or whatever, you're gonna feel like this is unprecedented, it's never happened before, it's incredibly dangerous, and there's no way out. And it could be a version of all those things, but there's probably been very similar things to this before. And that can help see it in perspective.

Yeah, and I think there's a tendency to kind of overdose on despair. And from the attentional standpoint, like, you know, negative, this sort of, if it bleeds, it leads, you know, the same thing we say in newsrooms, we don't cover the planes that land, right? Like, yeah, human flight is like one

of the most incredible marvels ever created. And they just go up and then they come down and it happens like millions of times and wow, you know. But the other part of it for me in balancing that, which again, the book was really good for is, even in the darkest moments, there's something to learn. Like I've been, you know, even if you go back and you read sort of run up to Nazi Germany, World War II, the darkest, darkest stuff, which sometimes really will freak you out. Yeah, of course.

Some of the, you know. History doesn't always make you feel better. I said it puts it in perspective, but it doesn't, like, it also gives you a sense of how fucking bad it can get. Yes, exactly. But even just like, you know, there's that great, you know, the Anne Frank line where she says, I think people really just like, you know, there's that great, you know, the Anne Frank line where she says,

I think people really are good, you know, that this very, very sort of wistful and touching sentiment from someone about to be murdered. There's a Sartre quote that I keep coming back to where he says, we were never more free than under German occupation. And what he means by it, and then he says basically, because even just to read the truth, to say the truth, under German occupation. And what he means by it, and then he says basically,

because even just to read the truth, to say the truth, to be true to yourself in every moment was an act of liberation. Because the forces against us were so profound that we truly had to choose to be liberated in every moment we did, in everything we think, that when your whole life is being controlled

and you can't say what you think, you can't read what you want, that you had to choose a kind of liberation every morning. I think about that quote all the time, how profound it is. Yeah, I mean, there's this interesting dichotomy in Stoicism, because you have Marcus Aurelius on the one end, then you have Seneca on the other, and then you have Epictetus.

So you have this kind of spectrum of like absolute power, then you have sort of fame and wealth, and then you have literal slavery. And it's interesting when you read their writings, you kind of get the sense that Epictetus was the freest of them, because he was the most self-contained. And because everything had been taken from him,

he sort of had this sense of like, what truly did constitute freedom, that it wasn't, hey, I can send an army over here or there, or hey, I can buy whatever I want. It's like, I know who I am. I know what this moment represents. I know what I'm not gonna allow them to take from me. And yeah, there is something profound

about what sort of actual freedom is and not these sort of license that we often mistake it for being. Yes, and I find that that kind of mode of thinking for me, almost at a therapeutic level, when things are bad is a real comfort. Yeah. Like just almost like emotionally bad is, is a real comfort. Yeah. Like just almost like emotionally, therapeutically, it's like self-soothing

almost to just emanate out a little bit and look back and try to get a little bit of that philosophical distance. If I'm really in that kind of deep somatic place, fight or flight, anxiety, doom, that is, that is really the thing for me as a both emotional, intellectually, almost spiritual project is the thing that kind of gives me sucker. Yeah, there's a, I've quoted this before, but there's a letter that Churchill writes to his editor or something, right? As sort of before he, before he comes back to power, but as the sort of the, all his

predictions about Germany are coming true. And he's working on this book. I think it's a history of the English speaking peoples or something. And he says, you know, I'm putting a thousand years between me and the present moment for a little bit. And I think there's something about what's happening now that can feel very overwhelming and hopeless and confusing. And you go, hey, I'm gonna study human beings

in similar situations. And you go, okay, it can get really fucking bad. So I'm not gonna be a blasé about this, but at the same time, when all this sort of the R and the D next to people's name gets stripped away, when even being familiar with the people falls away, you're just sort of left, it cancels out all the extraneous variables

and you kind of see what philosophically and morally and what matters on a more profound level. And then you bring that back to how you're gonna act in the present. It's not like, oh, I'm gonna escape into my books and pretend this isn't happening, but it's I'm gonna understand what's really happening by familiarizing myself with things

that have already happened. Yeah, I found that in a really important through line recently. You talk a lot about the different media critics in the book, and that's the other thing that sort of calms you down and also makes maybe you a little hopeless, I guess, which is like, how timeless media criticism is,

even though all the mediums change and so much time has passed. I don't know if you read for, did you read Upton Sinclair's book, The Brass Check? No, I've never read The Brass Check. So after he writes The Jungle, he writes basically, because he becomes this famous guy. It was controversial because he's a socialist, but he writes this book called The Brass Check, which is basically an expose of the media system, the same way that he did the meat packing industry.

And you're like, you could just change newspapers and wire services to like blogs and social media. And this book is reads like it was published this week. Yes. Well, and part of that has to do, I think, with some of the attentional incentives that don't change about people, right? So part of that has, you know, so much of, you know,

if you go back to Benjamin Day and the Penny Press and the New York Sun, like, you know, Lurid, Purient, they had the first reporter that went to the courthouse and talked about, you know, murder and sexual assault and like these, and also made stuff up. Like, you know, he's got a week of exposes on like life on the moon, you know, because it sells, because, you know,

things that sort of stimulate our faculty for involuntary attention, which is like the part of us, the deepest part of our attentional faculties, you're about to get hit by a car, a predator's gonna get you, you're in danger. Like all that stuff endures age to age to age, and those incentives endure age to age to age, and they're chased in different ways,

but are tend to be the recurring source of the critiques that also endure. Yeah, or they were beginning an economic set of incentives that we have turned up to a thousand now, but yeah, I remember when I was writing, trust me, I'm lying. It's like this breakthrough of like, no, no, you're buying the newspaper on the way to work

and you're listening to competing newsboys shout the headlines. You're only gonna pick one, but that is exactly the same dynamic as you pull up Google News and there's 50 links, which one are you gonna click? And you pull up your Twitter feed or your TikTok and which one are you gonna stop on?

It's the same thing, just they're wearing a newsboy cap and they're an orphan. One of the things that you write about in that book and the era that you're sort of capturing in that book, which I think is actually a really interesting and somewhat counterintuitive point is that maximally competitive environments tend to bring out the worst.

Yes. Like, so there's, so if you think about like, what's a place where there's the most competition for your attention and it's a casino, Times Square, the supermarket checkout counter. Grand Central Station for employees. Grand Central Station, that period of time of the internet, the sort of digital publishing Wild West,

the competing newspapers when there's 15 newspapers. And so what happens in those environments, right? What happens in really competitive attention environments is the newsboy drive to the lowest common denominator. How can you best get people's attention? Yeah, and it's a finite game versus an infinite game. When you're just like,

when you're buying what's most interesting or you're clicking what's most provocative and there's not recourse when you are misled or when they get you. That is the same part of it too. Like when you're not paying, you're much more susceptible. And yeah, I think sometimes we lament like the elitism and the out of touchness and the sort of multi generational ness of like, the New York Times and these

sort of family owners. But that's actually kind of an important governor on that extreme. Absolutely. Yes, then wanting to fit in polite society is actually acting as a curb against some of the worst impulses on the medium. And broadly, I think subscription models is one way to think about it, right? Like, if you have an iterative relationship with someone. Now, again, there's stuff on the other side of that, which is like you can get sort of audience capture in those circumstances,

and there's a whole set of incentives in ways that can go wrong. But if you're just doing these one, these hit and runs, right? You like, you swoop in, you give someone content, you swoop away, right? Now, if you were lied to in that one moment, like they're gone, there's no records. If you're playing an iterative game here where you've got to come back tomorrow and be like,

wait a second, you lied to me yesterday. Like that changes things. One of the things that's so wild about talk about turning us into a thousand is the sort of algorithmic universe, right? Is some piece of content just, it comes out of nowhere. It's totally identified its origin, the reputation of the person that posted it,

and then you see it and then it goes back out. It's like the ultimate version of this. You talk about this in the book. It's like, by the time you realize you've been had, or that there's more to this story or whatever, they've already monetized that attention in a real-time auction and moved on. Like they got, before you even read the rest

of the headline, they got paid and moved on. Dude, I had the craziest example of this happen the other day. I was scrolling on TikTok and there was a news story that looked, it looked like a local news story, okay? And it looked like a clip from local news. And it was a local news story about how in Chicago, the homeless are now putting tents on top of city buses.

And it was images of tents pitched on city buses. And it had the detail that there were little bricks and heavy things weighing down the tents. It was obviously to my mind, it was obviously AI generated. It was total AI fabrication, but it looked unnervingly like a real story. And I just thought, well, I see this for what it is, but like who made this and why?

And where is this gonna go? And I was just like, I was looking into a very dark future. Totally. When I saw it, I was like, whoa. I think what the competition does to the consumer is one thing, what it does to the creator is also interesting. Like I wrote this book about Gawker a few years ago

and I was fascinated by like, what happens to people when you put them in a room and then you put up a big screen and you say, hey, the person who is at the top of this leaderboard gets the most money, right? It turns the reporting of the news into a video game and then naturally desensitizes them to the idea that they're writing about real people in the

real world that have real feelings. And I think even Nick Denton has started to talk about, you know, some of his regrets about that. And we saw where that ended. But what I thought was so interesting, because the book was largely about Peter Thiel sort of lashing back against that, is how it's fascinating to me that is what happens to sort of right-wing media culture, particularly on Twitter and X. Like it's become about engagement. And you see them post the graphs of how much their engagement goes up or down.

They're not like, hey, am I providing a service? Hey, am I saying things that are true? They've really taken, and the way that Gawker took gossip and turned it into this video game, they've kind of took the American political narrative and our shared sort of values and turned that into a game. And it's obviously made many of them quite monstrous. Yeah, and I write in the book about Willie Lowman

and Death of a Salesman and why he's this sort of enduring figure, right? And he can't get people to pay attention to him and his wife, you know, sternly tells his sons like, attention must be paid, he's a human being. Yeah. And that, you know, in some ways, and I, you know,

I say this, you make content, I make content, you know, like it makes Willie Lohman's of us all. And you see up, I mean, you know, not just at the lowest level of the kind of churn of like trolls on Twitter,. I mean, and you see up, I mean, you know, not just at the lowest level of the kind of churn of like trolls on Twitter, but I mean, up to literally the most powerful people in the world, no exaggeration, Elon Musk and the president of the United States are both people who are clearly deeply in the grips

of the incentive structure of going through life, seeking attention. Like that is- Yeah, they have billions of dollars in nuclear weapons and just like a regular person, they're like, hey, how did that tweet do? Exactly right. I mean, it's truly, I mean,

there's something so wild about it, but yes, that, and that point you make like, yes, it does something to the audience and the consumer. It does something to the creator. And that's why, you make like, yes, it does something to the audience and the consumer. It does something to the creator. And that's why, you know, all incentives, like the opposite of that world, right, which is like tenured professor, where your sort of compensation is guaranteed basically for the rest of your life and relies not at all on attention. If five people, you know, read it, that's fine.

And they have their own attention markets, obviously in academia, but it's like, one of the things I think about a lot is like any institutional setting is gonna have some set of incentives that can become perverse. And kind of what you need is you don't want monoculture. You want ecosystems, right? For intellectual life, for creative life,

you want different forms of these institutions and incentives producing different kinds of creation. Some of which might be like, it might be good to have some people who are like chasing those short-term clicks and some people who like don't care. You know, that's really the key to me to like something that seems remotely healthy. Well, I think about this as a creator, right?

Like I primarily identify as a writer of books, so an author. So I sit down and I think about something for many creator, right? Like I primarily identify as a writer of books, so an author. So I sit down and I think about something for many years. I work on it, it's long form and it comes out all at once. And it has to be good enough that people would pay for it. Then at the same time, you make content and you go, okay, we've got to make this video about this thing. And by the way, if they're not hooked

in the first one second, they're not gonna watch it. And in some way, those are mutually exclusive ways of creating and thinking. On the other, they can make you better at both, right? Yes, because a lot of authors are fucking boring and entitled and they just assume they have unlimited time and space and then they're hurt that no one's interested.

And it's like, you didn't do the work. Like you're competing with not just television and other forms of entertainment, but you're just competing with the fact that people are busy and they don't think that they're interested in ancient philosophy. And if you want them to be, you have to make them interesting. And then also like, hey, how do you use these algorithms

and not let it melt your brain and make terrible stuff? How do you use it to put good things through it? So I do think it can't, you're right. If there's a diversity of it, it can make everything better. But if a set of incentives or a set of norms takes over, then you're kind of captured and all you get is whatever that set of incentives optimizes for. Yeah, you get this kind of invasive species,

strangling of the ecosystem, which I think we all feel in different ways. And I completely agree with that. I say in the book, I have a daily cable news show. It's one set of incentives. I have a weekly podcast, I write books. They're all different and I do, there are different faculties that are engaged

and different skills I've learned and and I agree with you that like yeah the the opposite end of caring about attention too much is not caring at all and and making stuff that's precious and self-contained and doesn't grab people and doesn't try to reach out to them you know like yeah none of this stuff in any extreme version as the sole incentive structure for making stuff is the best. What you want is a healthy balance and it does feel like we're constantly dealing with the fact that things get very quickly out of balance in the discourse that we inhabit.

Thanks so much for listening. If you could rate this podcast and leave a review on iTunes, that would mean so much to us and would really help the show. We appreciate it. I'll see you next episode. If you like The Daily Stoic and thanks for listening, you can listen early and ad free right now by joining Wondery Plus in the Wondery app or on Apple podcasts. Prime members can listen ad free on Amazon Music. And before you go, would you tell us about yourself by filling out a short survey on Wondery.com slash survey. Shopping local might seem like a tough cookie, but truthfully finding Ontario made products is a piece of cake.

That's why support Ontario made dot CA exists. With over 17,000 products listed, everything from cars to cosmetics, it's never been easier to shop local and support Ontario manufacturers of all sizes. When you choose Ontario made, you're supporting your neighbors, strengthening our economy, and celebrating the incredible products Ontario sells with pride. Discover what's made right here. Visit supportontariomade.ca