The Daily Stoic - The Stoic Code General Mattis Lives By
Episode Date: May 13, 2026General Jim Mattis has spent his life proving that philosophy is not just for the classroom. In today’s episode, Margaret Hoover interviews General Mattis, former U.S. Secretary of Defense,... and Ryan about why philosophy matters most when things are difficult. They discuss how leaders fall back on their first principles in a crisis, and what Marcus Aurelius, George Washington, and Abraham Lincoln can still teach us about courage, citizenship, and character today.👉 Watch the full conversation on Firing Line with Margaret Hoover here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33Rzi-jQYS4📚 Book recommendation: Call Sign Chaos by General Jim Mattis🎟️ DAILY STOIC LIVE | Ryan Holiday is coming to a city near you! Grab tickets here | https://www.dailystoiclive.com/🎙️ AD-FREE | Support the podcast and go deeper into Stoicism by subscribing to The Daily Stoic Premium - unlock ad-free listening, early access, and bonus content: https://dailystoic.supercast.com/🎥 VIDEO EPISODES| Watch the video episodes on The Daily Stoic YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@DailyStoic/videos✉️ FREE STOIC WISDOM | Want Stoic wisdom delivered to your inbox daily? Sign up for the FREE Daily Stoic email at https://dailystoic.com/dailyemailSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to the Daily Stoic podcast, designed to help bring those four key Stoic virtues, courage, discipline, justice, and wisdom into the real world.
Make Stoicism translatable for us right now.
Deal with it.
Just deal with it.
No victimhood, no cynicism.
Deal with reality and keep confidence in yourself and each other.
We'll get through this.
Stoicism is the idea you don't control what happens.
you control how you respond to what happens.
And the idea was you can, not just that you can respond to anything with virtue, but
the worst the situation is, the more important that response becomes.
Find how we handle the toughest things in life.
How we respond.
All right.
Okay, so that was me and the great General Mattis talking about stoic philosophy.
How did that all come to be?
It's kind of a crazy convergence of events bringing this all together.
Let me walk you through that.
Okay, so back in March, a bunch of things converged pertaining to the ideas that we talk about here, to stoicism.
So first was just the application.
I had a brutal, brutal travel day.
I was down in Florida.
I had a 7 a.m. flight out of Panama City, which had to get there super early because all the airport, TSA stuff was going on.
Get on the flight, fly from ECP to Atlanta, Atlanta to San Francisco, drove down to Palo Alto, got a,
a decent run-in, and then I had to show up at the Hoover Institute, where I've been doing a bunch
of research for the book that I'm writing about Stockdale. Stockdale studied at Stanford. This is
where he was introduced to Stoke Philosophy. So I'm walking around the campus. I'm seeing the exact
building where Professor Philip Rhinelander handed future Admiral James Stockdale copy of Epictetus,
the book that he would rely on in the Hanoi Hilton. So that was incredible. And then
I walked down to the Hoover Institute, and I did a television interview where I sat on stage
with one of the few modern Stoics of our time, the great General James Mattis,
four-star general in the Marines, 40 years of deployments.
He carries Marxian's meditations with him, and then was the former Secretary of Defense
before he resigned on principle midway through the first trial.
term, just a shiro of mine, a lifelong student of the Stoics. We've been trying to meet for many
years now since Stephen Presfield connected us, but he was doing this thing for PBS's firing
line where they were going to talk about the 250th anniversary of the founding. He wanted to bring in
some of the sort of stoic ideas, which Tom Ricks talks about in his lovely book, First
Principles, a mutual friend of ours. And he suggested that they also interview me. So that was
just an incredible honor and incredible opportunity.
That's what I was flying out there to do.
And we got to talk about stoicism quite a bit on stage.
We had a call before hand where we got to really nerd out about the stoics.
Obviously, with the events happening in the world, they wanted to talk about some more
political stuff with him.
So if you want to watch the whole episode on Firing Line with Margaret Hoover, you can
listen to the whole podcast.
I think they split it up into two episodes on TV.
But if you want to hear me and General Mattis briefly talking,
about stoic philosophy. Well, this episode is for you. You can grab General Mattis's wonderful
book Call Sign Chaos at the Painted Porch, which we carry. There's a lot to learn from him I feel
when it comes to honor and leadership. And in the meantime, here is me and General Mattis,
Margaret Hoover, talking about stoic philosophy. Being an effective leader is difficult, right?
You've got to keep your ego in check. You've got to know how your business works, how the team
operates for peak effectiveness.
But most leaders are making decisions about their teams based on assumptions and not reality.
And that's exactly the problem that today's sponsor, Scribe, was built to fix.
Scribe optimized passively captures how your team works across approved business apps.
And it uses AI to automatically surface workflows, inefficiencies, and improvement opportunities.
No interviews, no manual discovery, no extra work for your team.
Scribe is trusted by 80,000 plus.
enterprises, including nearly half of the Fortune 500. Scribe Optimize follows work across every
tool involved. If someone starts something that Salesforce and finishes it in a completely different
tool, it tracks it the whole way. And Optimize shows you where your biggest inefficiencies are
with AI-powered recommendations on how to fix them, so you're not just identifying problems. You're
getting clear directions on how to improve. The kind of visibility that used to take months now is
always on. And Optimize only works on applications your admin improves, so no personal
activity is captured and no one's privacy is at risk. If you want to see what optimized could look like
for your organization, visit scribe.com. S-C-R-I-B-E-S-C-R-I-B-E. Maybe you've been hearing the buzz about
live shopping lately I know I have, and it makes sense. People are already on their phones.
They're hanging out. They're looking for stuff to do. So why wouldn't business want to meet people
where they're at? If you're hoping for people to find your listing or waiting for them to walk
into your store, I know a little bit about that. You're setting herself up for disappointment.
On What Not, you can go live and sell directly to people in real time.
They see what you've got.
They ask questions and they buy and they keep coming back.
What Not is the largest dedicated live shopping platform, whether it's beauty, collectibles, electronics, luxury fashion, even cookies.
Sellers are building real thriving businesses on What Not.
What Not buyers spend more than an hour a day on the app and they're not just browsing,
they're bidding and buying and coming back.
So you can go live, show off your projects and turn that into real income.
People selling on Whatnot sell 10 times more than on Whatnot.
other major marketplaces, and that's because you're not just listing products. You're building
real connections with buyers. For a limited time, WhatNot will match your first $150 sold in the first
month. You just got to visit whatnot.com slash sell to start selling. W-H-A-T-N-O-T-com
slash sell, whatnot.com slash sell. The two of you to the uninitiated may seem like an odd
couple in terms of your pairing, but the truth is that you have found
one another in a shared passion for stoicism, the ancient philosophy that emphasizes key virtues,
courage, discipline, justice, wisdom, in pursuit of the better life. Ryan, you are a best-selling
author, an expert on stoicism, and in your public appearances you often cite General Mattis.
You have referred to him as one of your heroes. Why? I think we tend to think of philosophy
is something that might happen on a university campus,
as opposed to something that you use in the world,
what you actually do, which is what the Stoic philosophers were.
We have Stoics who were emperors.
We have Stoics who were generals.
We have Stoics who were politicians,
Stoics who were merchants, people who did things
in the real world.
And so I'm less interested in people like me
who write and talk about Stoic philosophy,
and much more interested in people who
are applying it in the real world, which
General Mattis is an example of.
You famously carried Marks Ruelas' meditations
with you on your deployments over the years, did you know?
Many times.
Ryan, one of your recent books, Courage's Calling,
has a curious blurb on the top,
a superb handbook for cultivating a purposeful life
by none other than General Jim Mattis.
General Mattis, you cite Ryan often in your interviews.
You mention that you're reading his latest books.
You're not only just reading the Stokes and
but you're reading how Ryan has repurposed them.
What is it?
I will say also, we know you to be, as you were called,
sort of popularly, the warrior monk, a man and a general who has
library of thousands of books.
So what is it about Ryan's work that speaks to you?
Well, first of all, Margaret, thank you,
because while Ryan and I have been back and forth communicating
many times over the years, this is actually the first time
we've ever met in public or met at all.
So thank you for this opportunity.
But the problem that you face, I think, in the military on a personal basis, is you're often careening from one crisis to another.
It's just the norm of military life.
It's military generally are not used unless there's a crisis of some kind.
And a crisis is often defined by what?
The people who are affected are not in control.
You've got to deal with it.
You're not going to control it.
And so what you do in a crisis is a human being, and you fall back.
on something. And in my case, I found that by falling back on certain values, I was able to keep myself at least calm enough to take purposeful action because a lot of people are looking to their officers to say, what are we going to do about this?
And it was in finding a purpose that I stumbled into the study of philosophy. It wasn't something I picked up in school, frankly. It was something almost forced on.
me by my circumstance. With Ryan, what I saw in his writing and wherever I followed him,
it seemed like everywhere I went, I'd show up at the Naval. Okay, I'd go to Notre Dame, and
guess what? Ryan Holiday was here last week. I think, well, I'm not going to look too good
this week then because he's a lot better at this stuff than I am, because he's really done his
homework. He's studied the applicability, and he understands it in almost classical terms.
And so that was what drew me to Ryan's writings.
Yeah, there was a stoic about a century before Christ named Scipio Amelianus,
who's one of the great Roman generals.
And he was famous and ancient historian said for training as much in philosophy as he did at arms.
And I think of General Mattis as maybe a modern reincarnation of that very timeless idea.
The warrior monk as an archetype is not a new thing or even a particularly rare thing.
You have to study what you're doing.
And as you talk about in your book, the idea of learning by trial and error is both arrogant and reckless.
And so we turn to the past because the people in the past lived through situations like we're in right now,
like whatever, the one that you're in as an individual right now.
And this goes back to the origin of stoicism.
Zeno is this merchant in the Mediterranean, and he stops at the...
Temple of Apollo, and he asked the oracle there for the secret to the good life.
And she tells him that it is having conversations with the dead.
And that's what he takes this only later to mean that reading the study of philosophy
is a conversation with the dead.
And how do we access this wisdom, bring it into our own lives?
Because, again, to the general's point, to learn by trial and error is largely an expense paid
by people other than you.
We're approaching the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence assigning.
This is a time in our country of division, uncertainty, and now war.
General Mattis, what guidance can Americans glean from the founding generation?
Well, Tom Ricks has written a book about this sort of thing called first principles,
and what you do, when you're in a crisis, you fall back on your first principles.
Well, what are our first principles?
Declaration of Independence you just mentioned, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights.
And you fall back on those things, and you look at our founding fathers who, drawing from the Enlightenment,
which is all based on the ancient Greek and Roman philosophers, they had guidelines for themselves.
And based on those guidelines, they drew up those documents with a lot of skepticism about human nature,
yet a belief in, quote, the people, unquote. And so what you do is you look for something to
kind of ground yourself on. I mean, think of the Simon and Garfunkel song about Mrs. Robinson.
And where have you gone? Joe DiMaggio, our nation turned its lonely eyes to you. In the midst of this time,
we can be turning back to our first principles and the Joe DiMaggio kind of leadership, which is
mature, humble, competent, and all these things that really are summed up in a code that you live by.
Again, a song, you, when you're on your road, have got to have a code to live by.
Crosby Still's Nash and Young, for us gray-haired guys, right?
Sir?
And so the code you live by is probably found somewhere in those principles because there's nothing new under the sun, as Ryan said.
and people have been through it before.
I mean, the people who think this is so bad
what's going on right now in the country.
And yet the founding fathers were mostly still alive
when we nearly made Aaron Burr our president, okay?
So get over it.
This is nothing.
These aren't dark times.
These are stern times.
These are testing times.
Welcome to democracy.
The worst form of government
except for all the rest we've tried.
And it's worth pointing out
that ancient philosophy was what the ancients
turn to also. When Marks-Raelice comes to Stoic philosophy, it is roughly 500 years old. So he is looking
backwards and going, how did people live through moments like this before? What do my predecessors
have to teach me about a moment like this? As we are doing today, it's this, it's both reassuring
and then, of course, a little disappointing that we're still doing the same things that we've
always done. And when the people point out that the Stokes can be a little depressing,
That's one of the things they're meditating on,
is just how little has changed over the last 20 centuries.
But it is true that the ancients were looking backwards to Cato,
and Cato was looking backwards to Zeno and Cianthes
and Chrysippus and the founding Stokes.
And so it is this ancient thing.
It probably says something about the moment of time
that you're in when Stoicism is popular again.
The founders were turning to it,
because the founding wasn't a walk in the park either.
It was a dark time.
And just remembering that there have always been moments like this
and that people have lived through it,
and then we're lucky enough that they distilled
some of those lessons into these classical works
that we can benefit from now.
That's the journey.
You both point to George Washington
as sort of the seminal founder who drew on the Stoics,
but particularly, I mean, he,
Cato, and the fact that he even arranged for Joseph Addison's performance of Cato's play in Valley Forge during the Revolution at a time when Congress had banned theater.
General Mattis, what is it about stoicism that is so beneficial to the military?
You know, if you look at what he went through, I can give you 100 quantifiable reasons why we failed in our Revolutionary War.
and each time you find where Washington is able to stand the strain.
And he was not a perfect human being, not by a long stretch of the imagination,
but he also knew his own weaknesses.
He knew he had a volcanic temper.
And one of the principles that you draw from stoicism is self-control.
And so he learned how do you actually lead an army of free men,
and in some cases slaves, how do you lead that army to surrender some of their personal freedom
so that they can survive and thrive and have victory on a battlefield eventually?
And you see him actually turning to the examples.
You think of Cincinnati, a wonderful example that obviously Washington was very, very aware of,
and others too, actually.
So what he's gaining is the ability when he's in a fight.
up against the finest small army in the world,
remember the redcoats a few years later
are going to humble Napoleon.
That's the army that he defeated by keeping his army alive
all those years, and he's doing it largely set
on a foundation, I think, of the ancients,
of the philosophers.
Furthermore, he has learned how to actually
apply what they said and what they wrote about.
And he is the most boring leader.
can ever find. I guarantee you, as a colonial officer in the British Army, as a revolutionary
general, learning how to fight from French generals half his age, but with more combat experience,
to the father of our country as the first president, he does the same thing time after time. He
listens with a willingness to be persuaded. He quiets himself down, tones down his temper,
and he learns. He listens and he learns. And then, a matter of fact, one of his age
He said he listened so well he could even hear what's not being said.
That is a man in control of himself.
And then after listening and learning, he helps them, and then he leads.
That's the way he melds this army into a warfighting instrument that can actually survive these bloody battles.
And so you see almost a direct line from the examples that he reads about straight into his conduct on a daily and hourly basis.
listening to even what's not being said.
He can even read body language, in other words,
in the midst of all the crises he's going through.
And remember, in crises, we fall back on first principles.
He had them in him.
He didn't just read it and then pass the course in college.
He never went to college, you know?
He actually lived them.
We do these men and women a disservice when we make them superhuman,
when we forget that this was hard work.
You know, one of the sculptors of Washington spends, you know, hours with him sitting there.
He notes that that actually right beneath the surface there were these fiery passions,
that he was, in fact, an incredibly passionate and man with quite a temper, as you said.
And he notes that Washington's first victory then is over that, over himself,
which is the basis of stoicism, that no one who has not first mastered themselves is fit to govern
or to lead.
And so it was work for Washington.
He's not naturally this way.
There are people who are naturally lowercase stoic,
but I don't think that would describe Washington.
Wouldn't describe John Adams.
It wouldn't describe many of the founders.
It was work.
They learned about these ideas as young men
as part of the educational process,
and then it was a lifetime of trying to apply them
and falling short and trying to get a little bit better,
falling short and trying to get a little bit better.
And that is what makes Washington so impressive and why we were so lucky.
I think Thomas Payne wrote that how uniquely suited Washington was for the moment.
He said there are some men who, you know, adversity makes them with or makes them fall apart.
And then there's others in which I think he says unlocks a cabinet of fortitude.
And Washington is this embodiment of the stoic idea of getting better.
because of obstacles and difficulties.
The revolution is not the kind of war that he wants.
It does not go the way that he wants,
but he makes it work.
And that is, I think, his genius.
You have said, Ryan, that Abraham Lincoln
is perhaps the only president
to simultaneously embody all four of the Stoic virtues,
courage, discipline, justice, and wisdom.
How?
And why?
Was that so unique?
What's so impressive about Lincoln, unlike many of the other great men of history,
you know, your Napoleons or your Caesars or your great conquerors,
he uses his ambition, his power to bind a nation together, to heal, to put it back together.
You know, he said every man has their peculiar ambition.
But his ambition, unlike so many of those towering figures,
doesn't come at the expense of anyone else.
He's great in that way.
He was actually writing about those figures in a letter,
and he talked about how you can become great
by making slaves of men or by freeing slaves.
And there is something, I think, uniquely wonderful
about Lincoln in the ends to which he directs this ambition.
And he's a towering figure in that.
regard. You know, you could look at him as this self-made man who educates himself, who
conquers great heights, but there is this moral purpose to it that I think isn't shared
necessarily by all the people who hold that office. You know, that brings to mind, Ryan, something
that Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote, and ladies, he wrote in the masculine tone of his time, so bear with it.
But he said, great men, great nations have not been boasters and buffoons. Rather, they have
perceived the terror of life and manned themselves to face it.
By manning themselves, they're disciplining themselves.
They've got to have the inner character to actually deal with the reality.
And any leader's number one responsibility, whether it be of a corporation here in Silicon Valley
or a football team or anything else, is they have to define reality.
It is very hard to define an external reality if your internal reality.
if your internal geography is churning with no real anchor point.
You'll pick up very quickly if you have a leader who does not have a quiet mind if you're in a crisis.
You'll read it loud and clear.
And Lincoln was somehow able to take the worst crisis of our young nation,
still young nation, even at 250.
And I think that this is why is what Ryan's pointing out.
It's easier to be successful.
And so I think stoicism has been misinterpreted.
You know, it is not a recipe for being a better sociopath, right?
It is easier to succeed if you don't care about anyone else, right?
If you're not held up by pesky moral principles or ideas or ideals.
And I think what you see in Lincoln is this unique combination of an incredibly crafty and pragmatic politician
who also had some, what do you call them, flat-ass rules, some things he would not
Do, yes, some lines that were more important to him than anything else.
And that kind of moral leadership is ultimately what stoicism is supposed to.
That's why the virtue of justice is so essential.
It informs the others.
Looking back, General Mattis, with the 250 years of this country,
or since our signing of the Declaration of Independence,
what are the stoic virtues that have most defined American leadership?
I think that, first of all, the idea that we are all
custodians of our democracy. We are all protectors of our Constitution. All of us have that obligation.
I think we've gotten big as a country. We're spread out. We're diverse. At times, it can seem like
these things are kind of out there and we're more spectators. But democracy is not a spectator
sport. And I think what it really is brought home is that we're going to have to get together.
Really what we have is one great big dispute resolution process is what a democracy is
You think one thing Ryan you've got another I've got another and somehow in the interest of our children and
generations to come we've got to figure out how to deal with it right now and
I think that that is a fundamental
requirement that we then meet the the demands with all of us pitching in and working on and that is the fundamental
idea of a democracy. We're going, no one's going to get everything they want their way.
At times we're going to be compromising and we're going to be working
and making certain that we can deal with those fundamental problems so what we
turn over to the next generation is something just a little bit better on our
goal for a more perfect union. There's a word I never say if I've had two glasses
of wine. It's usufruct and you understand why. It was first used in presidential
I found it in Thomas Jefferson's, but basically it means that he was an agrarian guy and
he said, you know, when you take over your parents' farm, you, a guy or gal, you can change
the water course, chop the trees down, plant things, move the rocks, do whatever you want,
but you are obligated to turn it over to your son or daughter in as good a condition or
better than you got it.
Well, we hold this nation in usufruct.
and we are obligated to do this.
You cannot, as the Congress, surrender your constitutional duties.
You do not have the right to do that.
The Constitution is our guide.
It is our protector, but it also must be protected by all of us.
In 1979, General Westmoreland, who commanded U.S. forces in Vietnam,
appeared on the original firing line with William Fuckley, Jr.
And he discussed sort of what you're getting at.
He discussed the duties and the rights of citizenship.
Take a look at what he said.
I don't believe our democracy long range is going to work
unless there's an attitude in our society,
and particularly among our young,
that they have an obligation of service.
Now, a principle of democracy is, for every right, there is a duty.
For every right of citizenship, there's a duty of citizenship.
Now, we inherited this principle from the British,
and the British, I believe, inherited it from Roman law.
Now, it seems to me that in the last decade,
we have put inordinate attention on rights of citizenship.
Rights, rights, rights.
And in the process, we have neglected duties of citizenship.
Of course, General Westmoreland was speaking in the context of the military draft.
But to what extent 250 years into our nation's founding
does our democracy's long-term survival depend on this greater recognition of civic duty?
Well, certainly, if we don't all protect it, this idea that we're going to just pass on these freedoms,
and there's not going to be any kind of interruption of them is something that history would refute.
We may be a very, very young country in the history of the world.
We are the oldest democracy.
How many people in the world's history have had the freedom.
we have and it shows why we have got a duty equal to every right that we get to pass those
those rights on undamaged I think I don't have a good answer for you other than to say
in my case I was having a wail of a good time in college lost my draft deferment
and as raised by the greatest generation that felt the country didn't have to be perfect to be
fighting for and if Uncle Sam said you're going we all went. A few didn't but 99% of us carried out our patriotic chore
and as my army buddies put it you were the dumbest draft dodger we ever met you joined the marine infantry to get out of the army.
I say well yeah but it worked out but my point is that you each of us has a responsibility and it's not based on a perfect country there's never been a perfect country
But you'd have to go a long ways to find a country more willing to point out where we have fallen short,
where we have such documents as our founding fathers gave us because they were guided by the ancients.
They gave us that one man locked up in a Birmingham jail without any access to any of those documents,
but they're so in all of our minds that he could write a letter from a Birmingham jail and say,
America, you are falling short. We've got to do better. And so you see it actually in action
right there from a Birmingham jail cell. Ryan, General S. Morland actually cited that we got this
sense from the British who got it from the Romans, right? I mean, there's a clear sense that this
does come from the ancients and there's a connection to the Stoics. But there was a tension
even in the ancient world. Seneca talked about how the distinction between the Epicureans and the
Stoics was that the Epicureans were more interested in their sort of self-discovery and
enlightenment. They retreat to the garden, and the Stoics got involved. He said the difference was
that the Epicureans got involved in politics only if they had to, and the Stoics got involved
unless something prevented them. And today when we think politics, we think, of course,
running or holding office. But there are so many ways to contribute to public life, the public sphere.
right down to the fact that, you know, 50% of adults don't vote.
So we have to participate in this system.
And if the people who are philosophically inclined are not participating,
who are you seeding the fields to?
I think that's ultimately what the Stoics realize
on a very sort of practical level,
that if you retreat off with your books and your ideas
and you just debate these things in theory,
but you're not involved, you're not contributing,
you're not making these things accessible and practical
to real people in a real way, somebody else is going to step in and fill that void.
And so I think, yeah, the question of if you're not going to participate, who is participating,
who is speaking on your behalf? I think that sort of explains the situation that we're in right now.
